Oligopoly. Chapter Overview

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Oligopoly. Chapter 10. 10.1 Overview"

Transcription

1 Chapter 10 Oligopoly 10.1 Overview Oligopoly is the study of interactions between multiple rms. Because the actions of any one rm may depend on the actions of others, oligopoly is the rst topic which requires us to consider interactive decision making. In our study of supply and demand, we assumed that rms and consumers took market conditions to be given and did not realize their decisions a ected the other side of the market. In our study of monopoly pricing, we allowed the monopolist to account for the interdependence of quantity and price, but still assumed that consumers took market prices as given. That is, monopoly amounted to a single person strategic decision problem where the rm had complete control of the market outcome. But oligopoly requires a serious assumption of some sort about the interactions between the decisions of the rms because each rm has partial e ect on the market price. The standard models of oligopoly fall partway between the models of monopoly and perfect competition. Each rm accounts for its own e ect on prices, and maximizes pro ts, while taking the actions of other rms to be xed according to some prevailing conjecture about what those rms will do. An equilibrium requires that the prevailing conjectures about the actions of all rms actually correspond to their pro t-maximizing decisions given these conjectures. This de nition of equilibrium matches the de nition of Nash equilibrium in game theory. 261

2 10.2 Classical Cournot Outcomes The most prominent model of competition among a small number of rms is Cournot competition, as studied originally by Auguste Cournot in Each rm decides on a quantity to produce and the total quantity of production sets the market price. The formal model of Cournot competition is based on rms 1; :::; m. Each rm is de ned by a cost function c j (q j ) which gives its cost for production a give quantity of goods. The market demand function p(q) gives the market-clearing price as a function of total quantity, Q. assume that production costs are strictly increasing and convex (c 0 j > 0,. c00 j We 0) and that the market price is decreasing in quantity sold (p 0 (Q) 0). Each rm faces the same type of problem: (F P j ) max q j q j p(q 1 ; q 2 ; :::; q m ) c j (q j ): De nition 1 A Cournot equilibrium consists of quantities (q 1 ; q 2 ; :::; q m ) such that each rm maximizes pro ts given the production of other rms. The assumption that each rm takes the quantities of the others as given may seem unrealistic, for a rm may have many competitors and is unlikely to know about the speci c production plans of each and every one of them. In fact, since we assume that the market price depends only on the total quantity Q and not on the quantities chosen by individual rms, the informational requirements for a Cournot equilibrium can be somewhat relaxed any rm needs only to know the aggregate production of others to determine its pro t-maximizing quantity in equilibrium. One way to proceed with equilibrium analysis is very mechanical. Crank out the rst order conditions for each rm, check that the combination of cost function c j (q j ) and price function p(q) satisfy the second-order conditions so that the FOC s for each rm. Assuming that all second-order conditions are satis ed, then the combination of rst-order conditions for all the rms produce a system of m equations with m unknowns (the quantities of the rms) and should generally produce an interior solution which is a Cournot equilibrium. 1 But a more 1 It is also possible that there could be a boundary solution. For example, if one or more rms had very 262

3 intuitive approach is to analyze the reaction curves of each rm, which describe each rm s optimal quantity as a function of the total quantity produced by others. We begin by studying reaction curves in the case of duopoly (two rms) and then extend our analysis to the case of many rms. Reaction Curves De ne q1 (q 2) as the optimal production for rm 1 as a function of rms 2 s production, q 2. De ne q2 (q 1) similarly. An equilibrium consists of quantities ^q 1 ; ^q 2 such that q1 (q 2) = ^q 1 ; q2 (q 1) = ^q 2. For xed and known q 2, the rst-order conditions for rm 1 s maximization problem are p(q 1 + q 2 ) + q 1 p 0 (q 1 + q 2 ) c 0 1(q 1 ) = 0: The second-order conditions for a maximum are given by 2p 0 (q 1 + q 2 ) + q 1 p 00 (q 1 + q 2 ) c 00 1(q 1 ) 0: The rst and second-order conditions for rm 2 are exactly parallel to the conditions identi ed above for rm 1. We have assumed that p 0 0, c 00 0, so the second-order conditions always hold if p 00 is non-positive, and will also hold in some cases where p 00 > 0, but is not su ciently positive to o set the two other negative terms in the sum. In the simplest example, which we discuss at length below, both p and c are linear functions, so that p 00 = c 00 j = 0 and the second-order conditions are guaranteed to hold. Proposition 2 Suppose that the rst-order conditions characterize the reaction functions for each rm 2 and that p 00 (q) 0. Then q 1 (q 2) is decreasing in q 2 and q 2 (q 1) is decreasing in q 1. We illustrate this result by totally di erentiating the rst-order conditions for q 1. analysis for q 2 is similar.) (The high costs of production that they would only lose money by setting q j > 0, then these rms should not produce anything in equilibrium. 2 This is equivalent to assuming that there is a unique solution to (FOC) and that the second-order conditions hold as well. 263

4 p 00 (q 1 +q 2 )dq 1 +p 00 (q 1 +q 2 )dq 2 +p 0 (q 1 +q 2 )dq 1 +q 1 p 00 (q 1 +q 2 )dq 1 +q 1 p 00 (q 1 +q 2 )dq 2 c 00 1(q 1 )dq 1 = 0: Rearranging terms to isolate the ratio dq 1 dq 2 ; dq 1 dq 2 = q 1 p 00 (q 1 + q 2 ) + p 0 (q 1 + q 2 ) q 1 p 00 (q 1 + q 2 ) + p 00 (q 1 + q 2 ) + p 0 (q 1 + q 2 ) c 00 (q 1 ) : By assumption, each term in the numerator is (weakly) negative and each term in the denominator is (weakly) negative, implying dq 1 dq 2 0. Example 3 Consider a simple linear example with linear demand and constant marginal cost for the rms: p(q) = A Q = A q 1 q 2, MC 1 = c 1, MC 2 = c 2 :Then the rms are distinguished only by their marginal costs, with 1 (q 1 ; q 2 ) = q 1 (A q 1 q 2 ) c 1 q 1 ; 2 (q 1 ; q 2 ) = q 1 (A q 1 q 2 ) c 2 q 2 The derivative of rm 1 s pro t with respect to its quantity is 1 1 = A c 1 q 2 2q 1. Given the parameters A, Q, and a conjectured value q 2, rm 1 s marginal pro ts are decreasing in its quantity q 1, and thus its second-order conditions for a maximum are satis ed. This is analogous to a monopoly problem with rm 1 as monopolist facing demand function D 1 (q 1 ) = A 0 q 1, where A 0 = A q2 0 and q0 2 represents the conjectured value of rm 2 s production, which rm 1 takes as given. In this respect, we can view each rm in a Cournot duopoly as a residual monopolist for customers who are not served by the other rm. As in the monopoly case, each rm recognizes that as it increases its quantity, it cuts the price to its existing customers, thereby producing decreasing marginal pro ts and a unique solution to its maximization problem for a given quantity produced by the other rm. Thus, rm 1 s rst-order conditions are su cient to identify its optimal quantity (assuming that they identify a positive value for q 1 ), yielding the solution q 1(q 2 ) = (A q 2 c 1 )=2: 264

5 This equation identi es rm 1 s reaction function to rm 2 s production since it identi es an optimal quantity as a function of rm 2 s production. rm 1 s reaction function is given by the equation Similarly, rm 2 s reaction function to q 2(q 1 ) = (A q 1 c 2 )=2: Given the assumption of linear costs and prices, these reaction functions are linear as well. Figure 1 graphs both reaction functions simultaneously; note that rm 1 s production is represented as a function from the vertical axis ( rm 2 s quantity) to the horizontal axis ( rm 1 s quantity).for the speci c parameter values A = 10, c 1 = 3; c 2 = 2. A Cournot equilibrium is an intersection of the two reaction functions, for this is the only way that the conjectured quantities for the rms could match the solutions to their maximization problems. As seen in Figure 1, there is a unique intersection of the reaction curves in the linear example and thus a unique Cournot equilibrium with q 1 = A 2c 1 + c 2 3 ; q2 = A 2c 2 + c 1 : 3 In Figure 1, rm 2 has lower marginal costs of production than does rm 1, so naturally rm 2 produces a greater quantity in the resulting equilibrium at (2, 3). Note in addition that if the two reaction curves are linear, they can intersect at most once, so there is a unique Cournot equilibrium. As depicted in the gure below, Firm 1 s reaction curve q1 (q 2) is more steeply sloping than rm 2 s reaction curve q2 (q 1). This is a general property of a linear duopoly model 3 that guarantees a unique equilibrium, either at an intersection of the reaction curves or (if there is no intersection of the reaction curves) at a boundary with only one rm producing a positive quantity. 4 3 In a linear duopoly model, rm 1 s reaction function is given by q1(q 2) = A c 1 q 2, which can be represented 2 as the inverse function q 1 2 (q 1) = A c 1 2q1, which has a slope of -2. By comparison, rm 2 s reaction function has a slope of -1/2 (q2(q 1) = A c 2 q 1 ), so in graphical representation, rm 2 s reaction function is always atter 2 than rm 1 s reaction function. 4 A boundary equilibrium occurs, if for example q2(0) = q 2m is on rm 2 s reaction curve, but q1(q 2m) < 0. In this case, rm 2 simply produces its monopoly quantity and rm 1 produces nothing in equilibrium. The negative value for rm 1 s reaction function indicates that rm 1 s production costs are so high that it cannot compete pro tably with rm 2 in equilibrium. 265

6 Duopoly Reaction Curves Firm 2 quantity q1(q2) q2(q1) Firm 1 quantity 266

7 In a symmetric case with c 1 = c 2 = k, the equilibrium values for the two rms converge to the same value (A k)=3. Tatonnement One challenge is that the equilibrium analysis above does not provide a description of why rms would produce the equilibrium quantities in a Cournot duopoly. If each rm makes the right conjecture about what the other will produce, then they would certainly produce their equilibrium quantities, but this leaves the question of how they might come to these conjectures. One extreme answer, suggested by Cournot, is that sophisticated rms should come to expect equilibrium actions from each other. The basis for this answer in Cournot competition is based on what is known as a tatonnement (slight adjustment) process. Suppose that the rms compete over time in many consecutive periods, where rm i produces q i;t in period t. Further, the rms use last period s output as the best prediction of this period s output for its rival. That gives a dynamic process for the outputs over time based on the equations q 1;t+1 = q 1(q 2;t ); q 2;t+1 = q 2(q 1;t ): As shown in Figure 2 for a linear duopoly example, the tatonnement process leads to "cobweb" dynamics that converge towards the equilibrium point. For example, if we start at an arbitrary point B, where both rms are producing more than their equilibrium quanities, then they will move to point C in the second period, where both rms are producing less than their equilibrium quantities, to point D in the third period, and so on. Each period, the rms switch their production from one side of the equilibrium point to the other (alternating between producing relatively more and relatively less than the equilibrium quantities), while moving ever closer to equilibrium. If we allow this dynamic process to continue for many periods, the rms will move asymptotically closer and closer to the Cournot equilibrium over time for any nite number of periods t, they will not actually reach equilibrium, but for any distance from the equilibrium point, there is some t () so that after t or more periods, the rms are always within of their equilibrium quantities. 267

8 . The Cournot equilibrium is nice because it has this interpretation as the long-run dynamic outcome of some version of strategic interactions. At the same time, though, the tatonnement description is dubious. First, it only applies in repeated competition. But more worrying is the fact that the assumption of each rm that their competitor is acting as in the previous period is clearly false, yet they cling to that assumption over many periods of play. Furthermore, rms may wish to try to develop a reputation over time in order to in uence their rivals. Thus, we cannot really rely on the tatonnement story provided by Cournot and are left without a justi cation of the Cournot equilibrium as the result of a dynamic convergence process Comparison of Cournot and Monopoly Outcomes A monopolist in a simple linear demand economy p(q) = A Q would set p = Q = (A k)=2, where k is the constant marginal cost of production. By contrast, two Cournot competitors would each produce (A k)=3 for total production of 2(A k)=3 and price of (A k)=3. Since the monopoly output maximizes total pro ts for the industry, the Cournot rms would do better to reduce their production. They do not do so because their relationship to the product market mixes competition and monopoly. Taking the production of the other competitor as xed (competition), each acts as a monopolist in what it perceives as the residual market, where 2(A k)=3 consumers remain and the demand curve appears to be p(q i ) = 2A=3 k=3 q i : 268

9 As a result, each rm incorporates the e ect of its production on the prices of its own goods, but it ignores the e ect on the sales of the other rm. With more rms, the pattern continues as each has less and less of a residual market to monopolize. Then, q i = (A k)=(n 1); Q = (A k) n=(n + 1); p = A=(n + 1) + nk=(n + 1): As n increases, total quantity Q increases and p decreases. Ultimately, as n! 1, p! k and we reach the state of perfect competition. This example demonstrates the earlier statement that as the number of rms increases (from 1), the behavior of the rms moves further away from monopoly and towards perfect competition Incentives and the Market The reaction curves illustrate a simple point. As rm 1 produces more, rm 2 s optimal reaction is to produce less. If the rms recognize that point (and they will), they may try to in uence their rival s action. Note that the strategic interaction between the actions of the rms is dismissed in the de nition of Cournot equilibrium. If rm 1 can somehow commit to a more aggressive production policy, it could improve its lot from the original equilibrium because rm 2 would produce correspondingly less than before. Firm 1 can attempt to commit to more production in several ways Stackleberg Competition In the Stackelberg version of competition, one rm moves rst. This rm must be at least as well o as its rival because it can always choose the earlier level of production (e.g. (A k)=3 with two rms). Instead, it will produce more, based on the logic above, giving it a rstmover advantage. Formally, rm 1 can anticipate rm 2 s production as a function of its own decision. 5 q2(q 1 ) = A q 1 k : 2 5 Note that rm 1 s decision precedes rm 2 s decision in time, so only rm 1 can view the problem in this manner. 269

10 (F P 1 ) max q 1 q 1 p(q) = q 1 (A q 1 q 2(q 1 )): Substituting and taking the derivative gives q 1 = (A k)=2; q 2 = (A k)=4: Total output has increased from the Cournot equilibrium, but rm 1 is better o. Although we have only solved for a special case here, it is easy to demonstrate that both of these properties carry over when the demand function is more general (not necessarily so simple and linear) and marginal costs are increasing rather than constant: rm 1 increases output if it can move rst, increases pro ts from the symmetric equilibrium because rm 2 reduces its output in response. The Stackelberg equilibrium is not an equilibrium of the original Cournot simultaneousmoves game. Firm 2 is responding optimally to rm 1, but rm 1 s is producing too much to be optimal. Firm 1 increased its production to constrain rm 2, but it cannot do that and choose the best response to rm 2 simultaneously. What rm 1 would really like to do is 1) pretend to commit to (A k)=2, 2) induce rm 2 to produce (A k)=4, 3) actually respond optimally to q 2 = (A k)=4 by producing 3(A k)=8. Of course, then rm 2 would wish to increase its production a bit from (A k)=4 and so on. What happens if we allow this process to of thought to continue? We will inevitably end up back at the symmetric Cournot equilibrium because this is exactly the tatonnement process Fixed and Marginal Costs: Another way to become more aggressive is to shift costs from marginal costs to xed costs. With lower marginal costs of production, a rm hits the point MC = MR at higher production level than before (in its monopoly calculations for its residual market). Again, because of production in uence on rivals, it is possible to improve pro ts by shifting towards a xed cost production technology, e.g. building new, faster (but expensive) machinery. The natural extension of this result is that it might be desirable to choose a more costly technology which is weighted towards xed costs over a cheaper one weighted towards marginal costs. Example: Suppose that p(q) = 9 Q; k 1 = k 2 = 3: The rms are identical, each with marginal costs of 3 and no xed costs. The Cournot equilibrium is for each to produce (A k)=3 or 2 each, with a market price of 5. Each rm produces 3 units of the good at a total cost of 6, while incurring a cost of 3*2 =

11 How much would rm 1 pay to reduce its marginal cost to 0? You would not think that it would ever pay more than its current production costs of 6. But let s see what happens. With c 1 = 0, rm 1 s optimal reaction to rm 2 is to produce (9 9q 2 )=2, which is an increase from the earlier value of 3 (q 2 =2). Note that xed costs play no role in the market competition because they are taken to be sunk costs at that point. Then the Cournot equilibrium is q 1 = 4; q 2 = 1; p = 4. By shifting to a lower marginal cost technology, rm 1 in uences rm 2 to cut production by 50%! Now rm 1 s production costs are given by the xed cost, F C and its pro t is 16 F C. It is pro table to spend up to 12 to change technologies, even though that shift could increase the production costs in the relevant range of possibilities Managerial Contracts A nal method to become more aggressive is to pay your managers a bonus based on marketshare rather than total pro ts. That is quite unusual because most contracting issues involve attempts to align the incentives of employees with those of the rm. Paradoxically, oligopoly competition is one instance where it can improve pro ts of the rm to have its managers value something else. If the managers value market share, then they will always choose to produce more output than suggested by the reaction curve. That in turn causes other rms to be more conservative. It is the e ect on other rms that is paramount here. Once again, the commitment to aggressiveness can increase pro ts. Kreps problem 16.2 develops this idea further Price Competition It may seem that price rather than quantity competition is a more natural model. After all, rms cannot choose their market shares, which is at the core of Cournot competition. In fact, it is said that Cournot wished to study a situation in which the strategic choice of rms was the price rather than the quantities, but that he felt that it was too di cult that way. Price competition is known as Bertrand competition. In its extreme form, the rms have unlimited capacity of production, constant and identical marginal costs k, and undi erentiated goods. The rms choose prices simultaneously and the rm which charges a lower price will 271

12 capture the whole market. They split the market at equal prices. Unfortunately, this model produces an astonishing and somewhat unbelievable result: the only equilibrium is for both rms to choose a price equal to their marginal cost, yielding no pro ts whatsoever. The proof of this result is really quite simple: the best response for rm 1 to any price p 2 > MC = k is a price just less than p 2. Similarly, the best response for rm 2 to any price p 1 > k is a price just less than p 1. Price equals marginal cost equals k is the only way both can be simultaneously playing best responses to the other s action. In this case, tatonnement takes the form of continual undercutting of prices. If the initial price is above marginal cost, the rms will reduce those prices ruthlessly to attempt to take the whole market, and they will continue cutting prices until price reaches marginal cost. Comment: This actual story of price competition is an explanation of why it might be that rms o er minimum price guarantees. If you have to o er rebates to previous customers whenever you cut the price, then this reduces your incentives to cut the price, even if it allows you to capture the whole market. If all the rms o er minimum price guarantees, then they may be able to maintain a pro table price and escape from the cutthroat competition that drove the price down to marginal cost Linking Bertrand and Cournot Results Since Bertrand and Cournot each o er such di erent conclusions about the results of market pricing, we would like to resolve their seeming clash. With slightly more realistic assumptions, the Bertrand model adjusts to produce results close to Cournot outcomes. 1. Let the rms choose capacities in period 1 (building expenses are increasing in capacity) and then choose prices in period 2. If the capacity of the rms are not large enough to meet the full market demand individually, then they could charge di erent prices and yet each still have some market share. 2. Allow for a cost of congestion. As one rm gains more customers, it cannot o er such good service to them, either because of long lines or because it is straining its production limits. 3. The rms o er slightly di erentiated products. Even if Coke is considerably cheaper than Pepsi, some customers will still buy Pepsi. Any of these adjustments produces an equilibrium which resembles pure Cournot competi- 272

13 tion more than it resembles pure Bertrand outcomes. 273

Oligopoly: How do firms behave when there are only a few competitors? These firms produce all or most of their industry s output.

Oligopoly: How do firms behave when there are only a few competitors? These firms produce all or most of their industry s output. Topic 8 Chapter 13 Oligopoly and Monopolistic Competition Econ 203 Topic 8 page 1 Oligopoly: How do firms behave when there are only a few competitors? These firms produce all or most of their industry

More information

Economics II: Micro Fall 2009 Exercise session 5. Market with a sole supplier is Monopolistic.

Economics II: Micro Fall 2009 Exercise session 5. Market with a sole supplier is Monopolistic. Economics II: Micro Fall 009 Exercise session 5 VŠE 1 Review Optimal production: Independent of the level of market concentration, optimal level of production is where MR = MC. Monopoly: Market with a

More information

Managerial Economics & Business Strategy Chapter 9. Basic Oligopoly Models

Managerial Economics & Business Strategy Chapter 9. Basic Oligopoly Models Managerial Economics & Business Strategy Chapter 9 Basic Oligopoly Models Overview I. Conditions for Oligopoly? II. Role of Strategic Interdependence III. Profit Maximization in Four Oligopoly Settings

More information

ECON 312: Oligopolisitic Competition 1. Industrial Organization Oligopolistic Competition

ECON 312: Oligopolisitic Competition 1. Industrial Organization Oligopolistic Competition ECON 312: Oligopolisitic Competition 1 Industrial Organization Oligopolistic Competition Both the monopoly and the perfectly competitive market structure has in common is that neither has to concern itself

More information

Chapter 9 Basic Oligopoly Models

Chapter 9 Basic Oligopoly Models Managerial Economics & Business Strategy Chapter 9 Basic Oligopoly Models McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Overview I. Conditions for Oligopoly?

More information

Chapter 7 Monopoly, Oligopoly and Strategy

Chapter 7 Monopoly, Oligopoly and Strategy Chapter 7 Monopoly, Oligopoly and Strategy After reading Chapter 7, MONOPOLY, OLIGOPOLY AND STRATEGY, you should be able to: Define the characteristics of Monopoly and Oligopoly, and explain why the are

More information

INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS COMPONENT: THE INTERACTIVE TEXTBOOK

INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS COMPONENT: THE INTERACTIVE TEXTBOOK UNIT EC407, LEVEL 2 INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS COMPONENT: THE INTERACTIVE TEXTBOOK Semester 1 1998/99 Lecturer: K. Hinde Room: 427 Northumberland Building Tel: 0191 2273936 email: kevin.hinde@unn.ac.uk Web Page:

More information

A Detailed Price Discrimination Example

A Detailed Price Discrimination Example A Detailed Price Discrimination Example Suppose that there are two different types of customers for a monopolist s product. Customers of type 1 have demand curves as follows. These demand curves include

More information

Price competition with homogenous products: The Bertrand duopoly model [Simultaneous move price setting duopoly]

Price competition with homogenous products: The Bertrand duopoly model [Simultaneous move price setting duopoly] ECON9 (Spring 0) & 350 (Tutorial ) Chapter Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly (Part ) Price competition with homogenous products: The Bertrand duopoly model [Simultaneous move price setting duopoly]

More information

Oligopoly and Strategic Pricing

Oligopoly and Strategic Pricing R.E.Marks 1998 Oligopoly 1 R.E.Marks 1998 Oligopoly Oligopoly and Strategic Pricing In this section we consider how firms compete when there are few sellers an oligopolistic market (from the Greek). Small

More information

Week 7 - Game Theory and Industrial Organisation

Week 7 - Game Theory and Industrial Organisation Week 7 - Game Theory and Industrial Organisation The Cournot and Bertrand models are the two basic templates for models of oligopoly; industry structures with a small number of firms. There are a number

More information

Common sense, and the model that we have used, suggest that an increase in p means a decrease in demand, but this is not the only possibility.

Common sense, and the model that we have used, suggest that an increase in p means a decrease in demand, but this is not the only possibility. Lecture 6: Income and Substitution E ects c 2009 Je rey A. Miron Outline 1. Introduction 2. The Substitution E ect 3. The Income E ect 4. The Sign of the Substitution E ect 5. The Total Change in Demand

More information

c. Given your answer in part (b), what do you anticipate will happen in this market in the long-run?

c. Given your answer in part (b), what do you anticipate will happen in this market in the long-run? Perfect Competition Questions Question 1 Suppose there is a perfectly competitive industry where all the firms are identical with identical cost curves. Furthermore, suppose that a representative firm

More information

Market Structure: Duopoly and Oligopoly

Market Structure: Duopoly and Oligopoly WSG10 7/7/03 4:24 PM Page 145 10 Market Structure: Duopoly and Oligopoly OVERVIEW An oligopoly is an industry comprising a few firms. A duopoly, which is a special case of oligopoly, is an industry consisting

More information

The Basics of Game Theory

The Basics of Game Theory Sloan School of Management 15.010/15.011 Massachusetts Institute of Technology RECITATION NOTES #7 The Basics of Game Theory Friday - November 5, 2004 OUTLINE OF TODAY S RECITATION 1. Game theory definitions:

More information

Competition and Regulation. Lecture 2: Background on imperfect competition

Competition and Regulation. Lecture 2: Background on imperfect competition Competition and Regulation Lecture 2: Background on imperfect competition Monopoly A monopolist maximizes its profits, choosing simultaneously quantity and prices, taking the Demand as a contraint; The

More information

Economics 203: Intermediate Microeconomics I Lab Exercise #11. Buy Building Lease F1 = 500 F1 = 750 Firm 2 F2 = 500 F2 = 400

Economics 203: Intermediate Microeconomics I Lab Exercise #11. Buy Building Lease F1 = 500 F1 = 750 Firm 2 F2 = 500 F2 = 400 Page 1 March 19, 2012 Section 1: Test Your Understanding Economics 203: Intermediate Microeconomics I Lab Exercise #11 The following payoff matrix represents the long-run payoffs for two duopolists faced

More information

CHAPTER 10 MARKET POWER: MONOPOLY AND MONOPSONY

CHAPTER 10 MARKET POWER: MONOPOLY AND MONOPSONY CHAPTER 10 MARKET POWER: MONOPOLY AND MONOPSONY EXERCISES 3. A monopolist firm faces a demand with constant elasticity of -.0. It has a constant marginal cost of $0 per unit and sets a price to maximize

More information

Microeconomics. Lecture Outline. Claudia Vogel. Winter Term 2009/2010. Part III Market Structure and Competitive Strategy

Microeconomics. Lecture Outline. Claudia Vogel. Winter Term 2009/2010. Part III Market Structure and Competitive Strategy Microeconomics Claudia Vogel EUV Winter Term 2009/2010 Claudia Vogel (EUV) Microeconomics Winter Term 2009/2010 1 / 25 Lecture Outline Part III Market Structure and Competitive Strategy 12 Monopolistic

More information

Oligopoly and Trade. Notes for Oxford M.Phil. International Trade. J. Peter Neary. University of Oxford. November 26, 2009

Oligopoly and Trade. Notes for Oxford M.Phil. International Trade. J. Peter Neary. University of Oxford. November 26, 2009 Oligopoly and Trade Notes for Oxford M.Phil. International Trade J. Peter Neary University of Oxford November 26, 2009 J.P. Neary (University of Oxford) Oligopoly and Trade November 26, 2009 1 / 11 Oligopoly

More information

All these models were characterized by constant returns to scale technologies and perfectly competitive markets.

All these models were characterized by constant returns to scale technologies and perfectly competitive markets. Economies of scale and international trade In the models discussed so far, differences in prices across countries (the source of gains from trade) were attributed to differences in resources/technology.

More information

Examples on Monopoly and Third Degree Price Discrimination

Examples on Monopoly and Third Degree Price Discrimination 1 Examples on Monopoly and Third Degree Price Discrimination This hand out contains two different parts. In the first, there are examples concerning the profit maximizing strategy for a firm with market

More information

ECON 103, 2008-2 ANSWERS TO HOME WORK ASSIGNMENTS

ECON 103, 2008-2 ANSWERS TO HOME WORK ASSIGNMENTS ECON 103, 2008-2 ANSWERS TO HOME WORK ASSIGNMENTS Due the Week of June 23 Chapter 8 WRITE [4] Use the demand schedule that follows to calculate total revenue and marginal revenue at each quantity. Plot

More information

Mikroekonomia B by Mikolaj Czajkowski. MULTIPLE CHOICE. Choose the one alternative that best completes the statement or answers the question.

Mikroekonomia B by Mikolaj Czajkowski. MULTIPLE CHOICE. Choose the one alternative that best completes the statement or answers the question. Mikroekonomia B by Mikolaj Czajkowski Test 12 - Oligopoly Name Group MULTIPLE CHOICE. Choose the one alternative that best completes the statement or answers the question. 1) The market structure in which

More information

CHAPTER 6 MARKET STRUCTURE

CHAPTER 6 MARKET STRUCTURE CHAPTER 6 MARKET STRUCTURE CHAPTER SUMMARY This chapter presents an economic analysis of market structure. It starts with perfect competition as a benchmark. Potential barriers to entry, that might limit

More information

c 2008 Je rey A. Miron We have described the constraints that a consumer faces, i.e., discussed the budget constraint.

c 2008 Je rey A. Miron We have described the constraints that a consumer faces, i.e., discussed the budget constraint. Lecture 2b: Utility c 2008 Je rey A. Miron Outline: 1. Introduction 2. Utility: A De nition 3. Monotonic Transformations 4. Cardinal Utility 5. Constructing a Utility Function 6. Examples of Utility Functions

More information

CAPM, Arbitrage, and Linear Factor Models

CAPM, Arbitrage, and Linear Factor Models CAPM, Arbitrage, and Linear Factor Models CAPM, Arbitrage, Linear Factor Models 1/ 41 Introduction We now assume all investors actually choose mean-variance e cient portfolios. By equating these investors

More information

1 Maximizing pro ts when marginal costs are increasing

1 Maximizing pro ts when marginal costs are increasing BEE12 Basic Mathematical Economics Week 1, Lecture Tuesda 12.1. Pro t maimization 1 Maimizing pro ts when marginal costs are increasing We consider in this section a rm in a perfectl competitive market

More information

Table 10.1: Elimination and equilibrium. 1. Is there a dominant strategy for either of the two agents?

Table 10.1: Elimination and equilibrium. 1. Is there a dominant strategy for either of the two agents? Chapter 0 Strategic Behaviour Exercise 0. Table 0. is the strategic form representation of a simultaneous move game in which strategies are actions. s b s b s b 3 s a 0; 3; 4; 3 s a ; 4 0; 3 3; s a 3 ;

More information

Market Power, Forward Trading and Supply Function. Competition

Market Power, Forward Trading and Supply Function. Competition Market Power, Forward Trading and Supply Function Competition Matías Herrera Dappe University of Maryland May, 2008 Abstract When rms can produce any level of output, strategic forward trading can enhance

More information

Learning Objectives. Chapter 6. Market Structures. Market Structures (cont.) The Two Extremes: Perfect Competition and Pure Monopoly

Learning Objectives. Chapter 6. Market Structures. Market Structures (cont.) The Two Extremes: Perfect Competition and Pure Monopoly Chapter 6 The Two Extremes: Perfect Competition and Pure Monopoly Learning Objectives List the four characteristics of a perfectly competitive market. Describe how a perfect competitor makes the decision

More information

Adverse Selection. Chapter 3

Adverse Selection. Chapter 3 Chapter 3 Adverse Selection Adverse selection, sometimes known as The Winner s Curse or Buyer s Remorse, is based on the observation that it can be bad news when an o er is accepted. Suppose that a buyer

More information

or, put slightly differently, the profit maximizing condition is for marginal revenue to equal marginal cost:

or, put slightly differently, the profit maximizing condition is for marginal revenue to equal marginal cost: Chapter 9 Lecture Notes 1 Economics 35: Intermediate Microeconomics Notes and Sample Questions Chapter 9: Profit Maximization Profit Maximization The basic assumption here is that firms are profit maximizing.

More information

Table of Contents MICRO ECONOMICS

Table of Contents MICRO ECONOMICS economicsentrance.weebly.com Basic Exercises Micro Economics AKG 09 Table of Contents MICRO ECONOMICS Budget Constraint... 4 Practice problems... 4 Answers... 4 Supply and Demand... 7 Practice Problems...

More information

Partial Derivatives. @x f (x; y) = @ x f (x; y) @x x2 y + @ @x y2 and then we evaluate the derivative as if y is a constant.

Partial Derivatives. @x f (x; y) = @ x f (x; y) @x x2 y + @ @x y2 and then we evaluate the derivative as if y is a constant. Partial Derivatives Partial Derivatives Just as derivatives can be used to eplore the properties of functions of 1 variable, so also derivatives can be used to eplore functions of 2 variables. In this

More information

How To Understand The Theory Of Economic Theory

How To Understand The Theory Of Economic Theory MICROECONOMICS II. ELTE Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Economics Microeconomics II. MARKET THEORY AND MARKETING, PART 3 Author: Supervised by February 2011 Prepared by:, using Jack Hirshleifer,

More information

Chapter 12 Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly

Chapter 12 Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly Chapter Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly Review Questions. What are the characteristics of a monopolistically competitive market? What happens to the equilibrium price and quantity in such a market

More information

Equilibrium of a firm under perfect competition in the short-run. A firm is under equilibrium at that point where it maximizes its profits.

Equilibrium of a firm under perfect competition in the short-run. A firm is under equilibrium at that point where it maximizes its profits. Equilibrium of a firm under perfect competition in the short-run. A firm is under equilibrium at that point where it maximizes its profits. Profit depends upon two factors Revenue Structure Cost Structure

More information

Chapter 11. T he economy that we. The World of Oligopoly: Preliminaries to Successful Entry. 11.1 Production in a Nonnatural Monopoly Situation

Chapter 11. T he economy that we. The World of Oligopoly: Preliminaries to Successful Entry. 11.1 Production in a Nonnatural Monopoly Situation Chapter T he economy that we are studying in this book is still extremely primitive. At the present time, it has only a few productive enterprises, all of which are monopolies. This economy is certainly

More information

Exact Nonparametric Tests for Comparing Means - A Personal Summary

Exact Nonparametric Tests for Comparing Means - A Personal Summary Exact Nonparametric Tests for Comparing Means - A Personal Summary Karl H. Schlag European University Institute 1 December 14, 2006 1 Economics Department, European University Institute. Via della Piazzuola

More information

Chapter 27: Taxation. 27.1: Introduction. 27.2: The Two Prices with a Tax. 27.2: The Pre-Tax Position

Chapter 27: Taxation. 27.1: Introduction. 27.2: The Two Prices with a Tax. 27.2: The Pre-Tax Position Chapter 27: Taxation 27.1: Introduction We consider the effect of taxation on some good on the market for that good. We ask the questions: who pays the tax? what effect does it have on the equilibrium

More information

Chapter 6 Competitive Markets

Chapter 6 Competitive Markets Chapter 6 Competitive Markets After reading Chapter 6, COMPETITIVE MARKETS, you should be able to: List and explain the characteristics of Perfect Competition and Monopolistic Competition Explain why a

More information

ANSWERS TO END-OF-CHAPTER QUESTIONS

ANSWERS TO END-OF-CHAPTER QUESTIONS ANSWERS TO END-OF-CHAPTER QUESTIONS 23-1 Briefly indicate the basic characteristics of pure competition, pure monopoly, monopolistic competition, and oligopoly. Under which of these market classifications

More information

Practice Questions Week 8 Day 1

Practice Questions Week 8 Day 1 Practice Questions Week 8 Day 1 Multiple Choice Identify the choice that best completes the statement or answers the question. 1. The characteristics of a market that influence the behavior of market participants

More information

Lecture 28 Economics 181 International Trade

Lecture 28 Economics 181 International Trade Lecture 28 Economics 181 International Trade I. Introduction to Strategic Trade Policy If much of world trade is in differentiated products (ie manufactures) characterized by increasing returns to scale,

More information

9.1 Cournot and Bertrand Models with Homogeneous Products

9.1 Cournot and Bertrand Models with Homogeneous Products 1 Chapter 9 Quantity vs. Price Competition in Static Oligopoly Models We have seen how price and output are determined in perfectly competitive and monopoly markets. Most markets are oligopolistic, however,

More information

Market Structure: Perfect Competition and Monopoly

Market Structure: Perfect Competition and Monopoly WSG8 7/7/03 4:34 PM Page 113 8 Market Structure: Perfect Competition and Monopoly OVERVIEW One of the most important decisions made by a manager is how to price the firm s product. If the firm is a profit

More information

Figure: Computing Monopoly Profit

Figure: Computing Monopoly Profit Name: Date: 1. Most electric, gas, and water companies are examples of: A) unregulated monopolies. B) natural monopolies. C) restricted-input monopolies. D) sunk-cost monopolies. Use the following to answer

More information

Representation of functions as power series

Representation of functions as power series Representation of functions as power series Dr. Philippe B. Laval Kennesaw State University November 9, 008 Abstract This document is a summary of the theory and techniques used to represent functions

More information

MULTIPLE CHOICE. Choose the one alternative that best completes the statement or answers the question.

MULTIPLE CHOICE. Choose the one alternative that best completes the statement or answers the question. MBA 640 Survey of Microeconomics Fall 2006, Quiz 6 Name MULTIPLE CHOICE. Choose the one alternative that best completes the statement or answers the question. 1) A monopoly is best defined as a firm that

More information

Oligopoly: Cournot/Bertrand/Stackelberg

Oligopoly: Cournot/Bertrand/Stackelberg Outline Alternative Market Models Wirtschaftswissenschaften Humboldt Universität zu Berlin March 5, 2006 Outline 1 Introduction Introduction Alternative Market Models 2 Game, Reaction Functions, Solution

More information

12 Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly

12 Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly 12 Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly Read Pindyck and Rubinfeld (2012), Chapter 12 09/04/2015 CHAPTER 12 OUTLINE 12.1 Monopolistic Competition 12.2 Oligopoly 12.3 Price Competition 12.4 Competition

More information

MULTIPLE CHOICE. Choose the one alternative that best completes the statement or answers the question.

MULTIPLE CHOICE. Choose the one alternative that best completes the statement or answers the question. Chapter 11 Perfect Competition - Sample Questions MULTIPLE CHOICE. Choose the one alternative that best completes the statement or answers the question. 1) Perfect competition is an industry with A) a

More information

Revenue Structure, Objectives of a Firm and. Break-Even Analysis.

Revenue Structure, Objectives of a Firm and. Break-Even Analysis. Revenue :The income receipt by way of sale proceeds is the revenue of the firm. As with costs, we need to study concepts of total, average and marginal revenues. Each unit of output sold in the market

More information

Midterm Exam #1 - Answers

Midterm Exam #1 - Answers Page 1 of 9 Midterm Exam #1 Answers Instructions: Answer all questions directly on these sheets. Points for each part of each question are indicated, and there are 1 points total. Budget your time. 1.

More information

The Binomial Distribution

The Binomial Distribution The Binomial Distribution James H. Steiger November 10, 00 1 Topics for this Module 1. The Binomial Process. The Binomial Random Variable. The Binomial Distribution (a) Computing the Binomial pdf (b) Computing

More information

Real Wage and Nominal Price Stickiness in Keynesian Models

Real Wage and Nominal Price Stickiness in Keynesian Models Real Wage and Nominal Price Stickiness in Keynesian Models 1. Real wage stickiness and involuntary unemployment 2. Price stickiness 3. Keynesian IS-LM-FE and demand shocks 4. Keynesian SRAS, LRAS, FE and

More information

Monopoly. E. Glen Weyl. Lecture 8 Price Theory and Market Design Fall 2013. University of Chicago

Monopoly. E. Glen Weyl. Lecture 8 Price Theory and Market Design Fall 2013. University of Chicago and Pricing Basics E. Glen Weyl University of Chicago Lecture 8 Price Theory and Market Design Fall 2013 Introduction and Pricing Basics Definition and sources of monopoly power Basic monopolistic incentive

More information

1 Economic Application of Derivatives

1 Economic Application of Derivatives 1 Economic Application of Derivatives deriv-applic.te and.pdf April 5, 2007 In earlier notes, we have already considered marginal cost as the derivative of the cost function. That is mc() = c 0 () How

More information

Cooleconomics.com Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly. Contents:

Cooleconomics.com Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly. Contents: Cooleconomics.com Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly Contents: Monopolistic Competition Attributes Short Run performance Long run performance Excess capacity Importance of Advertising Socialist Critique

More information

Profit Maximization. 2. product homogeneity

Profit Maximization. 2. product homogeneity Perfectly Competitive Markets It is essentially a market in which there is enough competition that it doesn t make sense to identify your rivals. There are so many competitors that you cannot single out

More information

Nash Equilibrium and Duopoly Theory

Nash Equilibrium and Duopoly Theory ash Equilibrium Economics A ection otes GI: David Albouy ash Equilibrium and Duopoly Theory Considerthecasewherethecasewith =firms, indexed by i =,. Most of what we consider here is generalizable for larger

More information

Econ 101: Principles of Microeconomics

Econ 101: Principles of Microeconomics Econ 101: Principles of Microeconomics Chapter 14 - Monopoly Fall 2010 Herriges (ISU) Ch. 14 Monopoly Fall 2010 1 / 35 Outline 1 Monopolies What Monopolies Do 2 Profit Maximization for the Monopolist 3

More information

Pricing and Output Decisions: i Perfect. Managerial Economics: Economic Tools for Today s Decision Makers, 4/e By Paul Keat and Philip Young

Pricing and Output Decisions: i Perfect. Managerial Economics: Economic Tools for Today s Decision Makers, 4/e By Paul Keat and Philip Young Chapter 9 Pricing and Output Decisions: i Perfect Competition and Monopoly M i l E i E i Managerial Economics: Economic Tools for Today s Decision Makers, 4/e By Paul Keat and Philip Young Pricing and

More information

MICROECONOMICS II. "B"

MICROECONOMICS II. B MICROECONOMICS II. "B" Sponsored by a Grant TÁMOP-4.1.2-08/2/A/KMR-2009-0041 Course Material Developed by Department of Economics, Faculty of Social Sciences, Eötvös Loránd University Budapest (ELTE) Department

More information

Technology Licensing by Advertising Supported Media Platforms: An Application to Internet Search Engines

Technology Licensing by Advertising Supported Media Platforms: An Application to Internet Search Engines No 23 Technology Licensing by Advertising Supported Media Platforms: An Application to Internet Search Engines Geza Sapi, Irina Suleymanova June 2011 IMPRINT DICE DISCUSSION PAPER Published by Heinrich

More information

The Cobb-Douglas Production Function

The Cobb-Douglas Production Function 171 10 The Cobb-Douglas Production Function This chapter describes in detail the most famous of all production functions used to represent production processes both in and out of agriculture. First used

More information

Econ 101: Principles of Microeconomics

Econ 101: Principles of Microeconomics Econ 101: Principles of Microeconomics Chapter 16 - Monopolistic Competition and Product Differentiation Fall 2010 Herriges (ISU) Ch. 16 Monopolistic Competition Fall 2010 1 / 18 Outline 1 What is Monopolistic

More information

Managerial Economics Prof. Trupti Mishra S.J.M. School of Management Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay. Lecture - 13 Consumer Behaviour (Contd )

Managerial Economics Prof. Trupti Mishra S.J.M. School of Management Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay. Lecture - 13 Consumer Behaviour (Contd ) (Refer Slide Time: 00:28) Managerial Economics Prof. Trupti Mishra S.J.M. School of Management Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay Lecture - 13 Consumer Behaviour (Contd ) We will continue our discussion

More information

PART A: For each worker, determine that worker's marginal product of labor.

PART A: For each worker, determine that worker's marginal product of labor. ECON 3310 Homework #4 - Solutions 1: Suppose the following indicates how many units of output y you can produce per hour with different levels of labor input (given your current factory capacity): PART

More information

CHAPTER 12 MARKETS WITH MARKET POWER Microeconomics in Context (Goodwin, et al.), 2 nd Edition

CHAPTER 12 MARKETS WITH MARKET POWER Microeconomics in Context (Goodwin, et al.), 2 nd Edition CHAPTER 12 MARKETS WITH MARKET POWER Microeconomics in Context (Goodwin, et al.), 2 nd Edition Chapter Summary Now that you understand the model of a perfectly competitive market, this chapter complicates

More information

Elasticity. I. What is Elasticity?

Elasticity. I. What is Elasticity? Elasticity I. What is Elasticity? The purpose of this section is to develop some general rules about elasticity, which may them be applied to the four different specific types of elasticity discussed in

More information

COST THEORY. I What costs matter? A Opportunity Costs

COST THEORY. I What costs matter? A Opportunity Costs COST THEORY Cost theory is related to production theory, they are often used together. However, the question is how much to produce, as opposed to which inputs to use. That is, assume that we use production

More information

The Cost of Production

The Cost of Production The Cost of Production 1. Opportunity Costs 2. Economic Costs versus Accounting Costs 3. All Sorts of Different Kinds of Costs 4. Cost in the Short Run 5. Cost in the Long Run 6. Cost Minimization 7. The

More information

UCLA. Department of Economics Ph. D. Preliminary Exam Micro-Economic Theory

UCLA. Department of Economics Ph. D. Preliminary Exam Micro-Economic Theory UCLA Department of Economics Ph. D. Preliminary Exam Micro-Economic Theory (SPRING 2011) Instructions: You have 4 hours for the exam Answer any 5 out of the 6 questions. All questions are weighted equally.

More information

Employment and Pricing of Inputs

Employment and Pricing of Inputs Employment and Pricing of Inputs Previously we studied the factors that determine the output and price of goods. In chapters 16 and 17, we will focus on the factors that determine the employment level

More information

The Prison S Dilemma and Its Connections

The Prison S Dilemma and Its Connections Games Played in a Contracting Environment V. Bhaskar Department of Economics University College London Gower Street London WC1 6BT February 2008 Abstract We analyze normal form games where a player has

More information

Quality differentiation and entry choice between online and offline markets

Quality differentiation and entry choice between online and offline markets Quality differentiation and entry choice between online and offline markets Yijuan Chen Australian National University Xiangting u Renmin University of China Sanxi Li Renmin University of China ANU Working

More information

MULTIPLE CHOICE. Choose the one alternative that best completes the statement or answers the question.

MULTIPLE CHOICE. Choose the one alternative that best completes the statement or answers the question. Chap 13 Monopolistic Competition and Oligopoly These questions may include topics that were not covered in class and may not be on the exam. MULTIPLE CHOICE. Choose the one alternative that best completes

More information

Demand, Supply, and Market Equilibrium

Demand, Supply, and Market Equilibrium 3 Demand, Supply, and Market Equilibrium The price of vanilla is bouncing. A kilogram (2.2 pounds) of vanilla beans sold for $50 in 2000, but by 2003 the price had risen to $500 per kilogram. The price

More information

Online Supplementary Material

Online Supplementary Material Online Supplementary Material The Supplementary Material includes 1. An alternative investment goal for fiscal capacity. 2. The relaxation of the monopoly assumption in favor of an oligopoly market. 3.

More information

Final Exam 15 December 2006

Final Exam 15 December 2006 Eco 301 Name Final Exam 15 December 2006 120 points. Please write all answers in ink. You may use pencil and a straight edge to draw graphs. Allocate your time efficiently. Part 1 (10 points each) 1. As

More information

NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES WHEN DOES LABOR SCARCITY ENCOURAGE INNOVATION? Daron Acemoglu. Working Paper 14809 http://www.nber.

NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES WHEN DOES LABOR SCARCITY ENCOURAGE INNOVATION? Daron Acemoglu. Working Paper 14809 http://www.nber. NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES WHEN DOES LABOR SCARCITY ENCOURAGE INNOVATION? Daron Acemoglu Working Paper 14809 http://www.nber.org/papers/w14809 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue

More information

Corporate Income Taxation

Corporate Income Taxation Corporate Income Taxation We have stressed that tax incidence must be traced to people, since corporations cannot bear the burden of a tax. Why then tax corporations at all? There are several possible

More information

6.254 : Game Theory with Engineering Applications Lecture 2: Strategic Form Games

6.254 : Game Theory with Engineering Applications Lecture 2: Strategic Form Games 6.254 : Game Theory with Engineering Applications Lecture 2: Strategic Form Games Asu Ozdaglar MIT February 4, 2009 1 Introduction Outline Decisions, utility maximization Strategic form games Best responses

More information

Oligopoly. Chapter 25

Oligopoly. Chapter 25 Chapter 25 Oligopoly We have thus far covered two extreme market structures perfect competition where a large number of small firms produce identical products, and monopoly where a single firm is isolated

More information

11 PERFECT COMPETITION. Chapter. Competition

11 PERFECT COMPETITION. Chapter. Competition Chapter 11 PERFECT COMPETITION Competition Topic: Perfect Competition 1) Perfect competition is an industry with A) a few firms producing identical goods B) a few firms producing goods that differ somewhat

More information

Monopoly and Monopsony Labor Market Behavior

Monopoly and Monopsony Labor Market Behavior Monopoly and Monopsony abor Market Behavior 1 Introduction For the purposes of this handout, let s assume that firms operate in just two markets: the market for their product where they are a seller) and

More information

ECON 459 Game Theory. Lecture Notes Auctions. Luca Anderlini Spring 2015

ECON 459 Game Theory. Lecture Notes Auctions. Luca Anderlini Spring 2015 ECON 459 Game Theory Lecture Notes Auctions Luca Anderlini Spring 2015 These notes have been used before. If you can still spot any errors or have any suggestions for improvement, please let me know. 1

More information

Profit and Revenue Maximization

Profit and Revenue Maximization WSG7 7/7/03 4:36 PM Page 95 7 Profit and Revenue Maximization OVERVIEW The purpose of this chapter is to develop a general framework for finding optimal solutions to managerial decision-making problems.

More information

Online services and the analysis of competitive merger e ects in privacy protections and other quality dimensions

Online services and the analysis of competitive merger e ects in privacy protections and other quality dimensions Draft-Comments welcome Online services and the analysis of competitive merger e ects in privacy protections and other quality dimensions Keith Waehrer Bates White, LLC April 25, 2016 Abstract This paper

More information

Lecture 2. Marginal Functions, Average Functions, Elasticity, the Marginal Principle, and Constrained Optimization

Lecture 2. Marginal Functions, Average Functions, Elasticity, the Marginal Principle, and Constrained Optimization Lecture 2. Marginal Functions, Average Functions, Elasticity, the Marginal Principle, and Constrained Optimization 2.1. Introduction Suppose that an economic relationship can be described by a real-valued

More information

WELFARE ENHANCING COORDINATION IN CONSUMER COOPERATIVES UNDER MIXED OLIGOPOLY. WP-EMS Working Papers Series in Economics, Mathematics and Statistics

WELFARE ENHANCING COORDINATION IN CONSUMER COOPERATIVES UNDER MIXED OLIGOPOLY. WP-EMS Working Papers Series in Economics, Mathematics and Statistics ISSN 1974-4110 (on line edition) ISSN 1594-7645 (print edition) WP-EMS Working Papers Series in Economics, Mathematics and Statistics WELFARE ENHANCING COORDINATION IN CONSUMER COOPERATIVES UNDER MIXED

More information

Basic Monopoly Theory

Basic Monopoly Theory Basic Theory E. Glen Weyl University of Chicago Lecture 9 Regular Section Elements of Economic Analysis II Fall 2011 Introduction Competitive model so far assumes price-taking: 1 If firm charged even little

More information

Pure Competition urely competitive markets are used as the benchmark to evaluate market

Pure Competition urely competitive markets are used as the benchmark to evaluate market R. Larry Reynolds Pure Competition urely competitive markets are used as the benchmark to evaluate market P performance. It is generally believed that market structure influences the behavior and performance

More information

Chapter 13 Market Structure and Competition

Chapter 13 Market Structure and Competition Chapter 13 Market Structure and Competition Solutions to Review Questions 1. Explain why, at a Cournot equilibrium with two firms, neither firm would have any regret about its output choice after it observes

More information

Profit maximization in different market structures

Profit maximization in different market structures Profit maximization in different market structures In the cappuccino problem as well in your team project, demand is clearly downward sloping if the store wants to sell more drink, it has to lower the

More information

Selling to Socially Responsible Consumers: Competition and the Private Provision of Public Goods

Selling to Socially Responsible Consumers: Competition and the Private Provision of Public Goods Selling to Socially Responsible Consumers: Competition and the Private Provision of Public Goods Mark Bagnoli and Susan G. Watts Krannert Graduate School of Management Purdue University West Lafayette,

More information

Practice Multiple Choice Questions Answers are bolded. Explanations to come soon!!

Practice Multiple Choice Questions Answers are bolded. Explanations to come soon!! Practice Multiple Choice Questions Answers are bolded. Explanations to come soon!! For more, please visit: http://courses.missouristate.edu/reedolsen/courses/eco165/qeq.htm Market Equilibrium and Applications

More information

Exploiting Externalities: Facebook versus Users, Advertisers and Application Developers

Exploiting Externalities: Facebook versus Users, Advertisers and Application Developers Exploiting Externalities: Facebook versus Users, Advertisers and Application Developers Ernie G.S. Teo and Hongyu Chen y Division of Economics, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore March 9, 202

More information