1 DEFENCE RESPONSE TO DEFENCE MANAGEMENT REVIEW OVERVIEW Defence exists to provide military capability to the Government for the conduct of operations. Every part of Defence must contribute to this objective. As we implement the recommendations of the Defence Management Review (DMR) our goal will be to ensure that our workforce is able to support current military operations while positioning Defence for the successful conduct of future operations. The DMR report makes 53 recommendations. Defence agrees to 50 in whole, two in part and does not agree with one. Four key principles underpin Defence s approach to the implementation of the DMR recommendations. ACCOUNTABILITY AND GOVERNANCE We will ensure accountabilities are clearly defined and devolved in every case to the lowest appropriate level. Our governance arrangements will specify Service Chief and Group Head responsibilities and mutual obligations under an agreed Defence business model. We will reform our top level committees to make them more effective and efficient. SUPPORTING OUR MINISTER We will improve the ability of our workforce to support our Minister and his portfolio colleagues, and whole of government decision making, with high quality, timely and accurate advice. We will strengthen relationships with our Ministers and Parliamentary Secretary and their personal staff by better understanding their role and expectations of us. PEOPLE MANAGEMENT We will continue to build a skilled, adaptable and responsive workforce, civilian and military, able to meet current and future challenges. We will provide leaders at every level with the policies and tools they need to lead, manage and develop their workforce. We will reinforce the central role of the Service Chiefs and Group Heads in leading, managing and developing their people. BUSINESS SYSTEM REFORM We will review our business processes and systems to ensure they are focussed on the efficient and effective delivery of Defence outcomes.
2 We will drive a substantial information technology reform agenda. Our strategy will focus on customer support and improving and rationalising our information management systems. We will keep working to understand and manage the costs of all we do and strengthen our commitment to sound financial management. We will establish benchmarks against which we can measure and improve our performance.
3 DEFENCE RESPONSES TO THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE DMR CHAPTER 3 RECOMMENDATION 1 Defence continue to give focus to Defence strategic policy and planning capability. [3.13] An effective strategic policy and planning capability is fundamental to the success of the Defence mission. During the past eighteen months in particular, Defence has strengthened links between strategic policy and planning, capability development and organisational strategy. Defence will continue to maintain a strong planning emphasis on long term strategic capabilities. RECOMMENDATION 2 Defence undertake more extensive induction for incoming Ministers and advisers and senior departmental staff, to educate new staff about the role of Defence. This might include workshops for new ministerial teams and their departmental counterparts, focusing on their respective roles and responsibilities. [3.21 and 3.22] In consultation with the offices of the Minister and his portfolio colleagues, Defence will develop workshops and induction plans for incoming Ministers and their staff. There will be a requirement for senior departmental officers to seek briefs from Ministerial staff about the new Minister s requirements and expectations. RECOMMENDATION 3 Defence review the tasking and clearance process for rapid response Ministerial inputs like Question Time Briefs, and delegate responsibility to the most appropriate level. [3.23] In late 2006 Defence began implementing a series of initiatives designed to improve the quality and timeliness of advice to the Minister including rapid response inputs such as Question Time Briefs (QTBs). In February 2007 further measures were implemented to ensure more rigorous assessment of Defence performance in this area. Defence will continue to work closely with the Minister and his staff to ensure that feedback is acted on quickly and effectively. The level of delegation for authorisation of advice to ministers will always vary according to factors such as sensitivity, complexity and urgency. As a general principle, accountability will be delegated to the lowest appropriate level. RECOMMENDATION 4 Defence increase training for Defence staff to improve the understanding of how to best support Ministers. This might include building on existing training tools
4 like the Senior Leadership Group (SLG) attendance at the Senate s half-day seminar Parliament, Privilege and Accountability; existing ministerial writing courses; and the courses under development in the newly formed Ministerial Awareness and Training Section. [3.24] The report of the DMR recognises that Defence has done considerable work in this area (see paragraph 3.24). A small team headed by a new SES Band 2 officer has been established with specific responsibility for assisting subject matter experts as they develop advice to the Minister on complex and sensitive policy issues. A key objective of the team will be on-the-job transfer of policy development skills and capacity building throughout Defence. The Ministerial Awareness and Training team (MAT) was established in January 2007 to build skills in supporting Ministers. A range of courses will be developed including: Government Awareness, Developing Complex Submissions and Working with Ministers. Pilot courses are scheduled to start in June Defence will also review the Australian Defence College course content (Centre for Defence and Strategic Studies, Australian Command and Staff College and the Australian Defence Force Academy) to ensure it imparts a sound understanding of and skills development in support to the Minister and Government. RECOMMENDATION 5 In order to improve external communication skills, Defence introduce a 360 degree appraisal process for SLG members, which includes an external stakeholder perspective. [3.25] Defence will introduce a rolling program of 360 degree appraisal for SLG members, to include a mechanism for external stakeholder perspective. The 360 degree appraisal will be designed to support achievement of Secretary and CDF s joint vision and key priorities. CHAPTER 4 RECOMMENDATION 6 The Secretary and CDF set a joint vision and strategic direction for Defence and ensure adherence to the strategic direction and corporate governance and confront the consequences when adherence does not occur. [4.17] Defence has a well understood mission - to defend Australia and its national interests - and publishes annually a set of key priorities. The CDF has communicated
5 a clear vision for the ADF which is reflected in a range of policy and planning documents. The Secretary and CDF will develop a joint vision for Defence and ensure it is communicated throughout the organisation. Defence will review both SES and Star Rank performance frameworks to further improve individual accountability and ensure key expected results align with and support the joint vision and Defence priorities (see response to Recommendations 7, 43, 51 and 53). RECOMMENDATION 7 Defence governance structures, including Charters, be designed so as to facilitate real accountability by senior executives. Charters should provide more explicit guidance on the executives responsibilities within the Defence service delivery model and be specific about the ownership of resources, service delivery obligations and the development of service level agreements. [4.27] Defence will review and streamline the existing governance framework, including documents such as Charters and Organisational Performance Agreements. Key accountabilities will be articulated for all Senior Executives and include specific references to mutual obligations in terms of service delivery, clarify resource ownership matters and reinforce personal accountability. RECOMMENDATION 8 The Defence leadership commit to a high-level business model which clearly defines roles and responsibilities, and distinguishes policy and core business from service delivery. [4.31] The Secretary and CDF recently initiated a staged review of Defence business processes and systems. The initial stage of that review will include development of an agreed Defence Business Model which clearly defines roles and responsibilities and distinguishes policy and other outputs from service delivery. RECOMMENDATION 9 Defence senior leadership provide the DSG a mandate on a par with that of the DMO in order to reform and improve the operation of the Group. [4.33] Defence agrees that Deputy Secretary Defence Support (DEPSEC DS) should have a clear mandate from the Secretary and CDF to operate Defence Support Group (DSG) with a business and management approach similar to the Defence Materiel Organisation. This mandate should clarify accountabilities and authorities in relation to DSG-led service delivery. A Secretary/CDF directive outlining DSG s mandate will be promulgated and reflected in the review of governance arrangements referred to in the response to Recommendation 7.
6 RECOMMENDATION 10 Service delivery agreements include relevant performance metrics including time, quality, cost and demand. Agreements should also be specific in terms of mutual obligations and dispute resolution at the appropriate level. [4.35] Defence will review the current service delivery model to ensure all service delivery agreements include relevant performance metrics that specifically address time, quality, cost and demand. RECOMMENDATION 11 All Groups commit to active participation in business partnering forums and commit to the use of consistent regular reporting mechanisms and regular reports. [4.37] Defence will reinforce the requirement for Group Heads and Service Chiefs to actively participate in relationship management mechanisms such as business partnering forums. Central to the revised accountability framework will be the need for customers to provide regular feedback to service delivery groups on performance against service delivery agreements. RECOMMENDATION 12 Defence continue to move to achieve cost visibility through robust costing models and management information systems, and the proposed product-level budgets being developed by the CFO. [4.45] Defence will continue to make this a priority task. As the DMR report notes (paragraph 4.44), CFO has introduced product-level budgets in DMO and is actively working to develop them for all service delivery groups, starting with DSG. The review of business processes and systems referred to in the response to Recommendation 8 will analyse the capacity of our management information systems to support improved cost visibility. RECOMMENDATION 13 Defence undertake business process mapping with a view to seeking process efficiencies, increasing cost visibility and where appropriate more informed outsourcing; simultaneously reviewing business process ownership and policy responsibilities to ensure managers have the authority and interest to optimise business processes. [4.53] As outlined in the response to Recommendation 8, a review has been initiated to address these issues.
7 RECOMMENDATION 14 Defence move to outsourcing arrangements where benefits in performance improvement can be shared between Defence and its suppliers based on an open book evaluation. [4.53] Defence will ensure outsourcing focuses on delivering efficient, cost-effective services in accordance with the Commonwealth Procurement Guidelines. Defence will use a variety of contracting styles based on value for money and continuous productivity improvement. In implementing this recommendation Defence will draw on DMO s experience of open book evaluation including the need to carefully investigate costs and overheads. RECOMMENDATION 15 Product standardisation be maintained and implemented for any services not yet covered, and serve as a basis for negotiating basic and additional service with a clear understanding of costs involved. [4.55] Service delivery Group Heads will progressively standardise all remaining products and services. CHAPTER 5 RECOMMENDATION 16 Apply the following guiding principles for the organisational design: a. The organisation must be able to maintain a high operational tempo while providing sufficient capacity for longer-term issues, including the development of long-range strategy and policy. b. The structure must facilitate the considered strategic leadership of the organisation. c. The design must make sense to the organisation be understood and easily communicated. [5.4] Any organisational changes flowing from this review will be informed by these guiding principles. The policy and coordination function referred to in the response to Recommendation 18 will be responsible for ensuring the organisation can better respond to the demands of high operational tempo while maintaining a strategic focus. RECOMMENDATION 17 Give greater definition to the individual and shared roles of the CDF and Secretary in the diarchy, in accordance with the suggestion at paragraph 5.14, and reflect these roles in the Ministerial Directive. [5.14] NOT
8 The Secretary and CDF are of the strong view that the diarchy works at its best when the two principals work jointly across Defence responsibilities. Very few Defence issues relate solely to the individual legal responsibilities of the Secretary or the CDF. The vast majority require a blend of judgements on a range of matters such as the development of military capability, international policy and financial management. The best possible advice on such issues can only be developed by combining the unique skill sets required of the head of a major department of state and the commander of a modern professional military force. The Secretary and CDF are particularly concerned to ensure that members of the Defence SLG understand they have important obligations to both the military and civilian heads of the organisation. These obligations should not be diluted in any way with an organisational structure that seeks to align a Group or Service with one of the two Organisation heads. RECOMMENDATION 18 Redefine the higher Defence organisational structure to: a. align direct reports to Secretary/CDF based on their suggested individual and shared roles; [5.18] and b. establish an Office of the CDF and Secretary that comprises those functions that directly support the CDF and Secretary in their responsibility for the management of the Defence organisation including Coordination, the new Policy Development unit, and establish an Organisational Development Unit. [5.21] a. NOT The proposed division of responsibilities outlined at Appendix B of the DMR report is not agreed. See the response to Recommendation 17. b. In line with the guiding principles outlined in Recommendation 16, Defence will develop a policy and coordination function (based on elements of the existing Coordination and Public Affairs Division) to be led by a new SES Band 3 officer. This organisation will support the Secretary and CDF so that they can better respond to the demands of high operational tempo while also delivering high quality policy advice, driving organisational reform and exercising strategic leadership. The new organisation will incorporate the functions outlined at Appendix C of the DMR report. RECOMMENDATION 19 Establish a new top executive committee (the Defence Strategic Management Advisory Council ) to replace the DC and COSC: [5.33] a. with a more streamlined membership and strategic focus; [5.39] b. and supported by subcommittees including audit, personnel, OH&S, risk and possibly other committees. [5.40] a. IN PART The Secretary and the CDF agree that the top executive committee should have a more strategic focus aligned to supporting them in their exercise of strategic
9 leadership. Defence does not agree with streamlining the membership of the top executive committee. Given the size, complexity and diversity of Defence, the top executive committee must remain inclusive of its most senior leaders. b. The roles and responsibilities of all sub committees will be reviewed as part of the response to Recommendation 20 (see below). RECOMMENDATION 20 Review the need for all other committees, adopting a team-based approach to issues where possible. [5.43] Defence will review all Defence committee (and committee-like) roles, structures and processes. There will be a focus on strengthening individual accountability for decision-making, promoting more focussed, team-based approaches to problemsolving and reducing the level of resources currently devoted to servicing committees. CHAPTER 6 RECOMMENDATION 21 Develop a strategic HR function aligned with Defence decision-making, and recast the PE as a strategic central policy owner led by an HR expert at the SES Band 3 level. [6.18] Defence will develop a strategic HR function aligned with its strategic priorities and decision making. The new organisation will focus on policy, planning and evaluation in relation to the essential drivers of Defence HR: recruiting, retention, remuneration and reward, people development, leadership, and working environment. Defence will recruit a suitable HR expert to become the strategic central policy owner for personnel matters. There will be an extensive search of the private and public sectors for suitable candidates. RECOMMENDATION 22 Formally recognise within Defence the roles of: a the Service Chiefs for the leadership, management and development of military personnel of their Service; and b group heads for the leadership, management and development of people of their group. [6.25] In the planned revision of existing accountability documents (see response to
10 Recommendation 7) the critical role of the Service Chiefs to raise, train and sustain members of the ADF will be emphasised. Similarly, the responsibility of civilian Group Heads for the leadership, management and professional development of their people will be clearly articulated. The integrated nature of the Defence workforce is such that there are members of the ADF working in non-service Groups and civilians working in the Service Groups. Accordingly, the revised accountability documents will also reflect the importance of job-specific professional development. RECOMMENDATION 23 Revisit the basis for the split of functions between the PE and DSG. [6.28] Defence will review the division of functions between the Personnel Executive and Defence Support Group with a view to retaining a strategic HR policy centre and further devolving HR processing to DSG and other Groups. RECOMMENDATION 24 Review HR staffing levels in the context of the move to strategic HR and a more logical break-up of HR functions. [6.29] Defence will review the existing HR workforce and align it with any new division of responsibilities between the strategic HR and service delivery functions. RECOMMENDATION 25 Build greater flexibility into the process for filling particular SLG roles and apply a general principle of looking inside and outside Defence to select the best person for the job. [ ] Defence agrees that the primary consideration in executive recruitment should be selecting the most suitable person for the job. In the case of civilian SLG members Defence already recruits from the private as well as the public sector and will continue to do so. Noting the critical need to sustain appropriate career structures within the ADF, Defence will look for opportunities to extend the range of military SLG roles open to competition as is already happening in DMO. RECOMMENDATION 26 Consider a process similar to the Star Plot to manage SES staff. [6.40] Defence accepts the need for more structured career management for its SES workforce. Having regard to the current APS legislative and policy framework, Defence will develop more innovative career management approaches.
11 RECOMMENDATION 27 Identify those management positions that would suffer unduly from churn and commit to leaving SLG members APS or ADF in those roles for an appropriate length of time. [6.45] Defence has applied this approach to a number of critical SLG positions in recent years including CEO DMO, Chief Capability Development and Head New Air Combat Capability. We will now review all SLG positions to identify those that would suffer unduly from churn, noting that the period of occupancy will vary according both to the nature of the position and the occupant s professional development needs. RECOMMENDATION 28 Review its senior leadership development program to ensure coverage of those issues outlined in paragraph [6.47] Defence agrees that effective senior leadership development programs are essential to the sustainment of a professional and innovative integrated workforce. Defence will review all its senior leadership development activities to increase the focus on developing high level business and policy skills and improving the quality and timeliness of advice to government. RECOMMENDATION 29 Recommit to the business skilling program, with responsibility vested in Group Heads for the professional development of their workforce. [6.56] Defence agrees that the business skilling program is essential to the professional development of its integrated workforce. Defence will reinvigorate the program including through clarifying the responsibilities and accountabilities of Service Chiefs and Group Heads in this regard (see also response to Recommendation 22). CHAPTER 7 RECOMMENDATION 30 Maintain the focus on financial management and financial systems reform. [7.6] Financial management and system reform has been a top priority for the organisation and must remain so. RECOMMENDATION 31 Ensure that Defence develops and maintains the skill-sets and capabilities to enable a robust resource management system in an environment where resource certainty is reduced. [7.16]
12 As part of reinvigorating the business skilling program, Defence will ensure an appropriate focus on resource management-related skills sets and responsibilities. RECOMMENDATION 32 Maintain a focus on the real long-term cost of Defence. [7.16] Given the long term nature of Defence major capital investment and the operating life of military equipment, Defence has long recognised the need to focus on future costs and maintains an eleven year forward estimate in the Defence Management and Finance Plan. A key focus of the staged review of Defence business processes and systems referred to in the response to Recommendation 8 will be further improving Defence s capacity to identify, understand, monitor, predict and model its costs. RECOMMENDATION 33 Use the proposed Audit and Risk subcommittees to keep the senior leadership focused on financial reform and risk management. [7.17] The need for a sustained focus on financial reform and risk management will be a key focus of the review of the roles and responsibilities of all sub committees referred to in the response to Recommendation 20. RECOMMENDATION 34 Encourage the ANAO, in reviewing Defence, to adopt a performance-oriented approach and contribute its expertise and skills to the resolution of issues it identifies. [7.21]. Defence will continue to engage with the ANAO to encourage it to apply its expertise and skills to resolving the issues identified in audits. CHAPTER 8 RECOMMENDATION 35 CIOG seek Defence-wide agreement to a customer prioritisation model, enhance its customer communications and measure customer satisfaction to facilitate continuous improvement. [8.13] The Secretary and CDF will ask the new CIO to give the highest priority to developing a better model of customer engagement that includes agreed priorities, mutual obligations, performance measures and a robust feedback mechanism.
13 RECOMMENDATION 36 Defence establish high-level quantitative and qualitative benchmarking of the IT service levels for the administrative information systems. The benchmarking should include comparisons along functional lines as well as overall costefficiency metrics. The purpose of this benchmarking is to establish the performance measures, determine where Defence stands against these measures and use that information to inform future ICT planning priorities. [8.15] Defence will benchmark appropriate elements of its ICT services against industry best practice. The results of the benchmarking study will inform current service delivery and future ICT strategies. RECOMMENDATION 37 Defence move towards establishing single responsibility for technical control over deployed networks and systems that interface with current CIOGcontrolled networks. [8.16] As a general principle, it is agreed that the CIO should be responsible for technical control of Defence networks and systems that interface with CIOG-controlled networks. CIO will set standards and monitor compliance to ensure that ICT systems in Defence operate seamlessly. RECOMMENDATION 38 CIOG provide basic administrative services on a standardised product basis with specific service levels and cost transparency. [8.20] In line with the response to Recommendation 15, the CIOG will launch a standardised product and service catalogue in the near future. RECOMMENDATION 39 Defence develop an ICT strategy that better informs a new business plan which encompasses: a. alignment of ICT with corporate strategy; b. desired outcomes of Defence ICT infrastructure; c. role of CIOG and associates in delivering Defence ICT; d. customer role and requirements; e. high-level assessment of current status of ICT delivery; f. identification of gaps; and g. key directions and performance measures to close the gap. [8.22] a-g. The development of a Defence ICT strategy will be a priority for the new CIO (see also response to recommendation 35).
14 RECOMMENDATION 40 CIOG remain an independent Group, reporting to the Secretary, and an expert CIO be recruited at the Band 3/3 Star level. [8.26] Defence will retain CIOG as an independent group. Recruitment action for an expert CIO will start immediately. Defence will engage in an extensive search of the private and public sectors for suitable candidates. RECOMMENDATION 41 CIOG be responsible for all ICT service delivery in Defence, including regional ICT. [8.27] Defence will identify all current ICT service delivery elements and, where appropriate, consolidate them into CIOG. The new CIO will lead the definition and possible re-engineering of the end-to-end processes associated with this endeavour. RECOMMENDATION 42 CIOG develop further the skills to contribute to cross-functional business process reengineering efforts or assessment that Defence undertakes. [8.28] In line with the response to Recommendation 29, the CIO will ensure that people in the Group have the skills necessary to undertake professional ICT work. These skills include customer engagement and expectation management, business requirements definition, business process mapping and technical and business architecture. RECOMMENDATION 43 Defence review the status of performance measurement and reporting within Defence with a view to transitioning and consolidating the disparate approaches into an integrated Defence-wide system. [8.30] As part the review and streamlining of the existing governance framework referred to in the response to Recommendation 7, Defence will consolidate performance management and reporting. RECOMMENDATION 44 Defence plan to develop and implement Defence-wide management information systems. [8.32] As part of the new ICT strategy referred to in the response to Recommendation 39,
15 Defence will continue to rationalise existing management information systems and plan for enterprise-wide business management information systems. RECOMMENDATION 45 Defence clarify its approach to purchasing policies and acquisition strategies for Defence ICT products and services in line with the roles and accountabilities of the groups involved. [8.36] Defence will review purchasing policy and acquisition strategies for Defence ICT products and services. This review will be informed by the acquisition principles Defence has adopted in response to the Kinnaird Review. RECOMMENDATION 46 Until Defence understands its business processes and associated benchmarks and costs, it is not appropriate to consider outsourcing additional ICT services. [8.39] Until Defence completes the activities referred to in the responses to Recommendations 8, 36 and 41, no further outsourcing of in-house ICT functions will occur. RECOMMENDATION 47 Defence transition to a single ERP system in the medium term (10 years) and necessary upgrades to existing systems should be directed towards facilitating this goal. CIOG should lead in this endeavour. [8.42] The development of the Defence ICT Strategy referred to in the response to Recommendation 39, including any upgrades, rationalisations or future business requirements, will take account of the goal to move to a single ERP system within the next 10 years. CHAPTER 9 RECOMMENDATION 48 Defence establish a small dedicated implementation team led by a 2 Star or SES Band 2 officer (reporting directly to the Secretary and CDF) to work with Defence s leaders in implementing the report recommendations within their areas of responsibility. [9.7] Strong, focussed implementation is key to the success of any reform initiative. Defence will establish a new SES Band 2 position to lead implementation of the review recommendations. The new position will form part of the policy and coordination function outlined in the response to Recommendation 18.
16 RECOMMENDATION 49 The implementation team as a matter of priority develop an implementation plan including a communications strategy and timeframes for implementation. [9.8] This response, including the introductory statement, gives a broad outline of the approach Defence will take to implementation. The first priority of the new SES Band 2 officer responsible for leading implementation will be to develop a comprehensive implementation plan that identifies key deliverables, milestones and accountable officers. In parallel, a communication strategy will be developed in close consultation with Group Heads and Service Heads. Defence notes the initial view of the short, medium and long term sequencing of implementation outlined in paragraph 9.18 of the DMR report. Defence also notes the broad costing information provided at paragraph 9.19 of the report. Development of the Defence implementation plan will be informed by these views, recognising that the timeframes and costs associated with some of the more significant reforms in particular, ICT will require more detailed analysis. RECOMMENDATION 50 The Defence Business Improvement Board concentrate on specific improvement initiatives that emerge from this Review, specifically: a. Defence governance structures, including Charters [Recommendation R7]; b. improvements to CSAs and SLAs [Recommendation R10]; c. improvements to costing [Recommendation R12]; d. the level of staffing of the HR function [Recommendation R24]; e. the impact of churn on senior positions, and identification of those that need longer tenure [Recommendation R27]; and f. business skilling [Recommendation R29]. [9.12] a-f. The DBIB will provide a valuable element of external scrutiny of Defence s progress in implementing the review recommendations. RECOMMENDATION 51 Key review recommendations be built into the Defence performance management systems, including the annual report and portfolio budget statements, Organisational Performance Agreements, the statement of Defence Priorities and business plans. [9.13] Defence will ensure individual accountability for the delivery of key recommendations is appropriately reflected in the organisation s performance management framework (see responses to Recommendations 8 and 43).
17 RECOMMENDATION 52 Defence take a structured approach to business planning and improvement, including identifying organisational weaknesses, options for improvement, assigning resources and assigning analytical and review tools. [9.15] A priority for the SES Band 3 officer leading the new policy and coordination function (see response to Recommendation 18) will be to review, streamline and consolidate existing business planning and improvement processes to ensure they are aligned with Defence s strategic priorities. RECOMMENDATION 53 Defence more consciously engage staff in a process of continuous improvement. [9.16] As part of the responses to Recommendations 18 and 52, Defence will ensure that continuous improvement is embedded in its business planning and performance framework.
Australian National Audit Office IT Audit Capability and Resourcing Report by the Independent Auditor June 2012 Commonwealth of Australia 2012 ISSN 1036 7632 ISBN 0 642 81248 9 COPYRIGHT INFORMATION This
the Defence Leadership framework Growing Leaders at all Levels Professionalism Loyalty Integrity Courage Innovation Teamwork Foreword One of the founding elements of Building Force 2030, as outlined in
First Principles Review Creating One Defence Framework for First Principles Review What is the strategy and mission of Defence? Deter, deny and defeat attacks or threats to Australia, its national interests,
Executive Summary Land Systems Division (LSD) is a Division within the (DMO) that is responsible for acquisition and sustainment of designated land systems for the Australian Defence Force (ADF). LSD provides
UoD IT Job Description Role: Projects Portfolio Manager HERA Grade: 8 Responsible to: Director of IT Accountable for: Day to day leadership of team members and assigned workload Key Relationships: Management
QinetiQ SUBMISSION TO THE FIRST PRINCIPLES REVIEW OF DEFENCE QinetiQ is one of Australia s largest independent providers of specialist technical advisory services to Defence. We are a trusted partner to
The Human Capital Management Systems Business Case A Checklist to assist agencies developing a business case Final version for release Human Capital Management See more at psc.nsw.gov.au/hcm Index - Business
PEOPLE AND ORGANISATION DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT IN NORTHERN IRELAND DRAFT JULY 2011 PEOPLE AND ORGANISATION DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT IN NORTHERN
Organisational and Leadership Development at UWS Context The University of Western Sydney s (UWS) leadership development framework is underpinned by the recognition that its managers and leaders have a
DRAFT London Borough of Merton Procurement Strategy 2013-2016 3 Foreword Welcome to Merton s procurement strategy, which outlines our aims for the period 2013 2016 and shows how procurement will contribute
NSW SENIOR EXECUTIVE SERVICE NSW DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AND TRAINING Position Description POSITION DETAILS Position Title: Reports to: Location: Director, Service Delivery and Support General Manager,
BUILDING A HIGH PERFORMING SYSTEM A business improvement plan for the Department for Education and Child Development BUILDING A HIGH PERFORMING SYSTEM 1 Contents Executive summary 3 Increasing local decision-making
Corporate Plan 2015-16 Statement of preparation I Nick Ryan, as the accountable authority of the Australian Aged Care Quality Agency present the 2015-16 Corporate Plan (the Plan), as required under paragraph
Australian Government Security Vetting Agency Quality Manual Quality Management System Description Commonwealth of Australia 2013 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright
Policy Profession Skills and Knowledge framework Find out more now by going to www.civilservice.gov.uk/learning Introduction to the Policy Profession Skills and Knowledge framework The policy profession
the role of the head of internal audit in public service organisations 2010 CIPFA Statement on the role of the Head of Internal Audit in public service organisations The Head of Internal Audit in a public
Position Description POSITION TITLE Manager Organisational Development POSITION NO 500328 DIRECTORATE DEPARTMENT REPORTS TO CLASSIFICATION LOCATION Corporate Services Organisational Development Director
POSITION INFORMATION DOCUMENT Position Title: Senior Manager, ICT Contracts Classification Code: ASO8 Division: ICT Services Directorate: ICT Contracts & Performance Management Type of Appointment: Branch:
NSW SENIOR EXECUTIVE SERVICE NSW DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AND TRAINING Position Description POSITION DETAILS Position Title: Reports to: Location: Directorate: Chief Financial Officer Deputy Director-General,
Chief Finance Officer: Role and responsibilities GOOD PRACTICE GUIDE 2004 : 1 FOREWORD In a public sector environment characterised by continuing change and increasing demands on organisations to deliver
HPF Tool Template for the Performance and Accountability Statement Second round reviews Amended December 2012 The High Performance Framework was developed by the Public Sector Performance Commission. This
BUILDING CAPABILITY A framework for managing learning in the APS APRIL 2003 A Guide for Senior Managers Line Managers Human Resource Practitioners Contents Foreword 3 Introduction and overview 4 Purpose
NES Item 8d December 2011 NES/11/111 (Enclosure) NHS Education for Scotland Board Paper Summary 1. Title of Paper People & Organisational Development Strategy 2. Author(s) of Paper Dorothy Wright Director
Role Description Enterprise Architect and Solutions Delivery Manager Cluster Agency Division Location Classification/Grade/Band Kind of Employment NSW Health Cancer Institute NSW Information Technology
North Carolina Procurement Transformation Governance Model March 11, 2011 Executive Summary Design Approach Process Governance Model Overview Recommended Governance Structure Recommended Governance Processes
John A Manzoni Chief Executive of the Civil Service Email email@example.com 70 Whitehall London SW1A 2AS Telephone +44 (0) 20 7271 8822 Web www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk Paul Chinn Cabinet
POSITION INFORMATION DOCUMENT Position Title: ICT Service Desk Manager Classification Code: AS07 Division: ICT Services Directorate: ICT Customer Services Type of Appointment: Branch: ICT Central Ongoing
Human resource management strategy Executive summary Since 2007, the Department for International Development (DFID) has been supporting the implementation of the International Federation human resource
Department of Homeland SecUl ity Management Directives System MD Number: 0005 Issue Date: 10/28/2004 FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT LINE OF BUSINESS INTEGRATION AND MANAGEMENT I. Purpose This Management Directive
Chapter 1 Secretary s Review PAGE 2 DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND ADMINISTRATION ANNUAL REPORT 2004 2005 Secretary s Review The activities of the Department of Finance and Administration (Finance) have a broad
CENTRE FOR DEFENCE AND STRATEGIC STUDIES Strategic Management Papers A Total and Integrated Defence Workforce Colonel Shane Caughey September 2008 The Centre for Defence and Strategic Studies (CDSS) is
Government of Western Australia Department of Local Government INTEGRATED PLANNING AND REPORTING Framework and Guidelines Integrated Planning and Reporting Framework and Guidelines p1. Contents Foreword
Departm 2007 10 C o r p o r at e p l a n adding value to public sector performance and accountability Commonwealth of Australia 2007 ISBN 0 642 80955 0 This work is copyright. Apart from any use permitted
Internal Audit Foundations Standards 1000, 1010, 1100, 1110, 1111, 1120, 1130, 1300, 1310, 1320, 1321, 1322, 2000, 2040 There is an Internal Audit Charter in place Internal Audit Charter is in place The
DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL CORPORATE PROCUREMENT PLAN 2015 2017 1 CORPORATE PROCUREMENT PLAN 2015-2017 CONTENTS 1. Introduction 3 2. Objectives 4-5 3. The Procurement Plan 6 4. Implementation 7-8 5. Procurement
Standard 1 Governance for Safety and Quality in Health Service Organisations Safety and Quality Improvement Guide 1 1 1October 1 2012 ISBN: Print: 978-1-921983-27-6 Electronic: 978-1-921983-28-3 Suggested
Position Description General Manager, Corporate Strategy and Operations Unit: Classification: Status: Contact: Location: Corporate Strategy and Operations SES 2 Low (remuneration determined by QRAA Remuneration
The Auditor-General Audit Report No.19 2001 2002 Assurance and Control Assessment Audit Payroll Management Australian National Audit Office Commonwealth of Australia 2001 ISSN 1036-7632 ISBN 0 642 44313
Australian National Audit Office Human Resource Management Performance Audit December 2008 Australian National Audit Office Human Resource Management Performance Audit December 2008 Commonwealth of Australia
Planning for the Workforce of the Future a better practice guide for managers WORKFORCE PLANNING IN THE AUSTRALIAN PUBLIC SERVICE Planning for the Workforce of the Future a better practice guide for managers
Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Committee Financial Review FY2013/14 for Vote: Foreign Affairs and Trade Additional Questions Page 2 of 8 291. The Committee notes the auditor's advice that, at the time
Information Management & Technology (IM&T) Strategic Plan 2013-2016 DSTO: Science and Technology for Safeguarding Australia Introduction This document sets out a four-year strategy for information management
2013 INS OPERATIONAL PLAN Planning Context and Key Priorities Our Mission Information Services enables the creation, synthesis and dissemination of knowledge within a global information environment. Our
Position Description Position Title: Employment Type: Section: Division: Salary Band: Agreement: Reporting To: Enterprise Architect Full Time fixed term ICT Project Services Information and Communication
Helping our clients win in the changing world of work: Recruitment Process: Why Outsource? A Manpower Insights Paper The future of RPO looks strong despite or perhaps aided by the current global recession.
Developing a consumer and community engagement strategy: a toolkit for Hospital and Health Services Health Consumers Queensland...your voice in health Developing a consumer and community engagement strategy:
DEPARTMENT OF INNOVATION, INDUSTRY, SCIENCE AND RESEARCH ARCHITECTURE PRINCIPLES Version: 2.2 Status: ICTSC endorsed Page 1 of 17 Table of Contents What are Architecture Principles?...3 Further Information...
Asset Management Accountability Framework February 2016 The Secretary Department of Treasury and Finance 1 Treasury Place Melbourne Victoria 3002 Australia Telephone: +61 3 9651 5111 Facsimile: +61 3 9651
City and County of Swansea Human Resources & Workforce Strategy 2013-2017 Ambition is Critical 1 Delivering quality services for a safer, greener, smarter, fairer, healthier, richer Swansea Executive Summary
JOB DESCRIPTION Director of Workforce and Organisational Development Post: Director of HR and Organisational Development Band: VSM Division: Trust HQ Department: Human Resources and Organisational Development
Standard Operations Business Operations process forms the core of all our business activities SMS-GS-O1 Operations December 2014 v1.1 Serco Public Document Details Document Details erence SMS GS-O1: Operations
AIPM PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCY STANDARDS FOR PROJECT MANAGEMENT PART F CERTIFIED PRACTICING PORTFOLIO EXECUTIVE (CPPE) JUNE 2014 Version 2.1 DOCUMENT CONTROL Document Information Document Title Release Authority
Strategic Plan 2011 2012 to 2014 2015 Working Together for Australian Sport Strategic Plan 2011 2012 to 2014 2015 Working Together for Australian Sport Australian Sports Commission 2011 Ownership of intellectual
Job Description Job Title: Reports to: Assistant Director Customer Services Director of Corporate Services Staff: Head of Customer Services, Head of Libraries plus staff group of c. 200+ Budget: 11 million
Governance Victorian Government Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Governance Framework A framework to describe ICT governance in the Victorian Government Keywords: ICT Strategy; governance;
Office of the Minister of State Services Chair Cabinet Committee on State Sector Reform and Expenditure Control REPORT OF THE GOVERNMENT CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER ON THE REVIEW OF PUBLICLY ACCESSIBLE INFORMATION
Office of the Auditor General AUDIT OF IT GOVERNANCE Tabled at Audit Committee March 12, 2015 This page has intentionally been left blank Table of Contents Executive Summary... 1 Introduction... 1 Background...
CIPS takes the view that the outsourcing of services to specialist providers can often lead to better quality of services and increased value for money. Purchasing and supply management professionals should
Defence Submission to the Joint Committee of Public Accounts and Audit Inquiry into financial reporting and equipment acquisition at the Department of Defence and Defence Materiel Organisation The Inquiry
INVESTORS IN PEOPLE ASSESSMENT REPORT Birmingham City University Human Resources Department Page: 1 of 19 Key Information Assessment Type Review Investors in People Specialist Name Bob Morrison Visit Date
CHCO FEDERAL CHIEF HUMAN CAPITAL OFFICERs FEDeRAL Roadmap CHCO This Federal Roadmap was developed as a cooperative effort by the Partnership for Public Service, Federal Management Partners, Inc., and members
CAPABILITY AUDIT FOR HEIs Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) should organically develop their own to successfully manage the process of strategic sourcing. The capability audit provides an assessment
U.S. Department of Justice Mission First...Linking Strategy to Success Department of Justice Human Capital Strategic Plan 2007-2012 Table of Contents Foreword.......................................................................1
THE SERVICE MATTERS FRAMEWORK A STRATEGY FOR SERVICE DELIVERY AT ACU 1 1 SERVICE EXCELLENCE Excellent service delivery is critical to the success of any organisation universities included. Students, staff,
Nomination, Remuneration and Human Resources Committee Class Limited (ACN 116 802 054) As approved by the Board on 6 October 2015 1. Purpose of this The purpose of this is to specify the authority delegated
Position Description Position Title Divisional Manager, Asset Management Division Reports To Services Group Manager Group Services Location Wellington Date Created/Updated January 2016 About the Ministry
1.0 Introduction Mary Immaculate College Human Resources Strategy 2014-2016 1.1 Mary Immaculate College Strategic Plan 2012-2016 rests on 7 foundational pillars, each pillar representing a thematic imperative
TGA key indicators and reporting measures Regulator Performance Framework Version 1.0, May 2015 About the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) is part of the
Creating HR Service Delivery Success HRO Today Forum Europe 2012 By Brad McCaw, Senior Consultant, London 2012 Towers Watson. All rights reserved. Setting the context Businesses are going through significant
A New Model for Development: USAID Management & Process Reform June 2014 Four years ago, President Obama elevated development alongside diplomacy and defense as a core pillar of America s national security
White Paper Organizational Model and Key Roles for an ITIL Implementation Program Overview Introduction This paper describes a recommended approach for how to organize an ITIL Implementation Program. It
Job description Designation: Tri-borough Chief Information Officer Post Number: Department: Finance and Corporate Services Responsible to: H&F SRO, Exec director of Finance and Corporate Governance Employees
Management and Leadership Level 5 NVQ Diploma in Management and Leadership (QCF) 2014 Skills CFA Level 5 NVQ Diploma in Management and Leadership (QCF) Page 1 Level 5 NVQ Diploma in Management and Leadership
Town of Port Hedland ICT Strategic Plan 2012-2017 Town of Port Hedland December2012 Table of Content Executive summary... 3 Town of Port Hedland Strategic Community Plan... 3 Business Context... 5 Activities
DEFENCE FORCE REMUNERATION TRIBUNAL MATTER 8 OF 2008 ADF STAR RANKS REMUNERATION DECISION The ADF has sought a change to the structure of 07 and 08 officers salary bands. Background In the Tribunal s reasons
POSITION INFORMATION DOCUMENT Position Title: Manager, ICT Continuity Planning Classification Code: ASO7 Division: ICT Services Directorate: ICT Operations Type of Appointment: Branch: ICT Security Ongoing
DEFENCE INSTRUCTIONS (GENERAL) New instruction 0 LOG 4 5 012 Regulation of technical integrity of Australian Defence Force materiel Department of Defence CANBERRA ACT 2600 10 September 2010 Issued with