This is the Pre-Published Version. 1. Willingness to Pay Entrance Fees to Natural Attractions: An Icelandic Case Study
|
|
- Susan Ryan
- 7 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 This is the Pre-Published Version. 1 Willingness to Pay Entrance Fees to Natural Attractions: An Icelandic Case Study
2 2 Willingness to Pay Entrance Fees to Natural Attractions: An Icelandic Case Study Abstract Introducing entrance fees to natural attractions may help counteract the threat of inadequate public funds for site maintenance and management. The primary objective of this study is to measure visitors willingness to pay such fees in Iceland, where no such measurement has previously been undertaken. A questionnaire survey based on the contingent valuation method was carried out at two major natural attractions in Iceland: Gullfoss waterfall and Skaftafell National Park. Over 92% of the 252 respondents were willing to pay an entrance fee. Mean amounts and population consumer surplus estimates per season were Isk * 333 and Isk 41 million at Gullfoss and Isk 508 and Isk 34 million at Skaftafell, respectively. Modest fees would not significantly decrease the demand for these attractions. Slight differences were found in willingness to pay according to income, attitude towards environmental protection, number of previous visits, history of fee paying, country of residence, age and education. Implications of the empirical study for policy makers and site managers are provided. Keywords: Willingness to pay; contingent valuation; nature-based tourism; Iceland * Exchange rates at the time of the survey: 1 = 87 Isk, $1= 72 Isk, 1= 131 Isk
3 3 1. Introduction Many tourism destinations are experiencing limited or decreasing public funds for the maintenance and management of natural attractions (Eagles, McCool and Haynes, 2002). In the long run, this trend, coupled with rising tourist numbers and increasing environmental impacts such as trampling, littering and disturbance to wildlife, may threaten the very foundation of nature-based tourism. How to aquaire additional funds to protect and enhance natrual attractions has always been a concern in managing sustainable tourism in some destinations where nature-based tourism is a key product. Charging visitors for entering the natural site is one of the possible options. Some countries, such as the United States and Canada, have a long tradition of fee-paying in national parks and other protected areas (Sharpley and Sharpley, 1997). On the other hand, this practice is not common in the Nordic countries. Bearing in mind the above mentioned trends, however, this may change. Iceland is a volcanic island in the North-Atlantic Ocean with a population of 290,000. Although fishery is by far its largest export, tourism is one of the fastest growing sectors of the Icelandic economy. International arrivals have grown on average by approximately 9% per year over the past decade, from 142,600 in 1992 to the record 320,000 in 2003 and this trend is expected to continue into the future (Icelandic Tourist Board, 2003, 2004). Nature-based tourism is an extremely important element in Iceland s overall tourism product portfolio. Protecting and enhancing these resources is vital, especially as Iceland s sub-artic nature can be very vulnerable to environmental impacts. In Iceland, the maintenance, management and development of natural attractions are currently financed by tax-payers. However, the financial need for natural attractions is much greater than that currently supplied by the government tax revenues. Costs are expected to rise if tourist numbers continue to increase as many areas will receive more visitors. Many attraction managers and related government
4 4 agencies have proposed to acquire additional resources through charging entrance fees to visitors with an objective to collect revenue to cover, at least partially, the running costs of the natural attractions, and to improve visitor experience at the natural sites. The idea of introducing entrance fees to natural attractions has been controversial and much debated. It is not the purpose of this study to explore this debate in detail, but to answer some fundamental questions - whether should the tourists who visit the natural attractions in Iceland be charged; whether are the visitors themselves actually willing to pay for access; and what are the factors that influence visitors willingness to pay (WTP)? These questions must be answered before embarking upon any fee-paying policy for Iceland s natural attractions. A review of the literature resulted in no previous studies on WTP to natural attractions has been carried out in Iceland. The results of this study can help policy makers and site managers in Iceland to determine whether a fee policy for natural attractions is a viable option from the visitor s point of view. The results can also help decision-makers in other countries reliant on nature-based tourism, to tackle the financial issue of natural attractions. In a wider sense, the findings of this study should make a good contribution to the tourism literature related to WTP for natural attractions. The rest of the paper is organised as follows. Section 2 discusses the controversies related to the public finance of natural attractions. Section 3 presents the concept of WTP followed by section 4 in which the research methodology on estimating WTP is introduced. Section 5 presents the empirical results of WTP analysis and section 6 concludes the paper. 2. Who Should Pay for Natural Attractions? This section aims to present different views on fee options for natural attractions. Understanding the different views on fee options and the problems associated with them is of critical importance, as entrance fees to natural attractions have significant equity, economic, administrative and political implications (Clawson
5 5 and Knetsch, 1966). Many opposing and supporting arguments have been presented in the literature. These arguments come under two opposing views; the public good view and the user pays view. Both views have their merits. The arguments of these two views are mainly centered around such issues as use value vs. non-use value, and efficiency vs equity. In particular, the public good view considers the tax revenue to be the sole valid source of funding for natural attractions. The main argument of the public good view is that areas of natural beauty are part of the national heritage that belongs to the public and should therefore be free for all. Furthermore, outdoor recreation benefits, directly or indirectly, all members of society. This view also believes that a well-balanced life for citizens in the society is essential. Crandall and Driver (1984) stated that the pride for being able to use the public goods freely is another benefit to the users of these public goods. The argument is that these benefits enhance the welfare of the whole nation and therefore all citizens should share in the costs of running the natural attractions through their contributions to the government tax revenue. The main argument of the user pays view, however, is that of equity. Benefits accrue to those who use the recreation services (and incurring the costs) and therefore it is only fair and appropriate for them to bear the costs. Participation in outdoor recreation varies widely across the population. A substantial proportion of the population actually never visits natural attractions and only a very few visit these recreation areas frequently. In fact, it can be argued that, without charging entrance fees to the natural attractions, non-users are actually subsidising the users who use these attractions. Furthermore, charging entrance fees is also a good way of requiring those users who live and pay taxes elsewhere (international tourists) to contribute to the maintaining and management costs of the recreation areas in the destination where they visit. Interestingly, occupational groups with lower income participate less in passive activities and more in performance activities, where admission fees are usually much higher. This restricts the participation of lower social groups in outdoor recreation activities (Curry, 1985, cited in Curry 1994). In any case, potential discriminatory effects on socio-economically disadvantaged visitors could be minimised through differential pricing.
6 6 People who hold the public goods view believe that charging for access would ration the demand for natural attractions by ability to pay, which is seen as unethical and unfair. More and Stevens (2000) stressed that low-income groups may become excluded from recreational opportunities if user fees are applied, and this defeats the purpose of public recreation areas. Free provision can even be a form of income redistribution, with those with higher incomes paying more through the tax system and in that way contributing more towards the protection of these areas. Another argument held by the public goods view relates non-use values of natural attractions (More, 1999). Citizens of a destination may still value the existence of a site for the protection of heritage, or as an option for future use (this value being expressed through their willingness to be taxed). These values represent benefits to non-users and may constitute a substantial portion of the total economic value of an area, although probably small relative to the value of an area to actual users. The public good view also argues that the level of visitation to a natural area would be reduced if the user charges were implemented, and this would further reduce the positive economic benefits that tourism brings to the area. However, the opposite view is that the reduction in the number of visitors as a result of introducing the entrance fees will reduce congestion in natural attractions hence enhance the experience for visitors, who would be willing to pay more for this enhanced benefit. In terms of practicality, the public goods view suggests that the administration of entrance fees can be expensive and impractical. Many areas have no gate with many entrance points. If the level of visiting natural attraction is low, the costs of collecting fees would likely exceed the amount collected, hence making feepaying option unjustified. Furthermore, visitor experiences would become more structured and commercialised as a result of the introduction of fees (Lindberg, 1998). Going back to the issue of equity, the public goods view believes that charging the resident user an entrance fee, would result in double charging those residents who have already paid through their taxes by way of a national taxation system. However, the users pay view argues that charging entrance fees to natural attractions are implemented precisely because tax revenue is insufficient to achieve
7 7 recreation and conservation management objectives (Lindberg 1998). In the long run, without user fees, taxes would most probably have to be increased. In light of the increased demand for public outdoor recreation areas in the future, user fees may be the only way to raise sufficient revenue to provide adequate services. The issue of user fees is a controversial one without any definite conclusions. Indeed, it is not the purpose of this study to solve this policy issue or advocate a line of policy on outdoor recreation. In any case, it is important to note that there need not be an either-or solution. Introducing entrance fees is but one possible option and all the costs of providing, maintaining and operating public recreation areas need not be met from only one source. A combination of public funds and user fees may be more equitable, more effective and more realistic than the use of a single funding source for natural attractions. Hitherto, decisions regarding the funding for natural attractions in Iceland have been based more upon popular appeals, ideological reasoning and political pressures than on rational economic analysis. The latter is what this study aims to provide, in the hope that it may contribute to sounder policy decisions. 3. Willingness to Pay There exists a considerable body of literature on WTP for various types of outdoor recreation facilities. Most research on and experience of entrance fees comes from the United States, where federal recreation fees have been applied since the early twentieth century (Sharpley and Sharpley, 1997). It should be noted that studies on WTP vary greatly in their context and the comparability is therefore limited in many cases. Many studies on outdoor recreation mentioned user fees in a general sense, (i.e., they may include fees for facilities as well as services). In addition, some studies explored the implementation of new fees and others increased levels of existing fees; these may evoke different responses. However, for the sake of simplicity, the economical mechanisms behind these different types of fee programmes are regarded as being roughly the same.
8 Non-Market Valuation A natural attraction with free access is a non-market good. However, it is possible to assess the value of it to consumers in monetary terms (Bull 1995). One way of doing this is to measure the consumers WTP for the good, should a market exist for that good. In the same context as in a market situation, WTP for a nonmarket good is based on the assumptions of rational choice and utility maximisation. If a change occurs in a non-market good (for example environmental improvement) by which the person believes he or she is better off in some way, that person may wish to pay some money in order to secure this change, the WTP reflects a person s economic valuation of the good in question (Hanley, Shogren and White, 1997). According to Tisdell (2006), WTP for a particular natural attraction has been the most frequently used indicator for the economic value of the attraction. The estimation of the WTP for the attraction has been the basis of social cost and benefit analysis (SCBA), which relies on the Kaldor-Hick criterion that is if the total net value (social benefit less social costs) of the natural attraction increases, the total welfare will also rise because gainers could in principle compensate the losers for any losses involved in the society The Effect of Fees on Visitation Traditional economic theory predicts that the higher the price of a good, the fewer the number of people who would be willing to pay it. If fewer people visit an attraction after an entrance fee being introduced, this contravenes the purpose of most national parks and protected areas to promote public access and, ironically, this may reduce potential revenue as fewer people will pay the entrance fees. It is, therefore, of prime importance to consider the likely effect of an entrance fee on visitor numbers. Some studies have found that demand is relatively responsive to price (Stevens, More and Allen, 1989; Richer and Christensen, 1999). However, the most common finding when it comes to outdoor recreation is that the introduction of modest fees or modest increases in user fees does not cause a dramatic reduction in demand (Fedler and Miles, 1989; Krannich et al., 1999; Schroeder and Louviere, 1999; Eagles, McCool and Haynes, 2002).
9 Factors Affecting WTP Differences in people s WTP may be influenced by certain demographic and psychographic factors. Therefore, it is important to consider these factors when implementing a potential fee policy, as entrance fees may have significant equity consequences. The most prominent equity argument lies around whether fees discriminate against low-income visitors. It is logical to assume that WTP is, at least to some extent, affected by visitors ability to pay. A problem arises when those with low ability to pay may still value a visit highly. Although the effect of income on WTP has been widely debated, the answer to this issue is still unclear. A number of studies on outdoor recreation activities have found that low-income users are more sensitive to price changes than high-income users (Reiling, Cheng and Trott, 1992; More and Stevens, 2000). Williams, Vogt and Vittersø (1999) found charging entrance fees has little distributional impact on different income groups in the natural resource context, as the income levels tend to be high among those who visit the natural sites. According to the Fishbein and Ajzen model (1975, cited in Mitchell and Carson, 1989), behavioural intentions like WTP are a function of attitudes, which are again influenced by behavioural experiences. Membership of environmental organisations and attitude towards environment protection have been found to be closely related to WTP (Carlsson and Johansson-Stenman, 2000; Clinch and Murphy 2001). Laarman and Gregersen (1996) state that what consumers expect to pay is related to what they have paid before. The findings of Kerr and Manfredo (1991) from a study of backcountry hut users in New Zealand s parks suggest that previous fee paying behaviour affects paying intentions. Studies on the effects of previous visitation to a particular site or to a number of sites on WTP have, however, shown a mixed result (Adams et al. 1989; Williams, Vogt and Vittersø, 1999). It is reasonable to assume that people from different countries may be willing to pay different amounts as a result of different attitudes towards and experiences of paying entrance fees to natural attractions and having travelled different distances to an area. Few studies have explored differences in WTP between nationalities. However, nationality was found to have a significant effect on WTP for the whale -
10 10 watching experience in an Australian marine park (Davis and Tisdell, 1998). It has also been found that people are likely to be willing to pay more for entering a site if they have travelled a long distance to the site (Schroeder and Louviere 1999). Visitors from Nordic countries might thus be expected to be less willing to pay for access to attractions than visitors from North America. However, since a few nationalities are included in the sample, it is difficult to test for this difference given the small sample sizes. As for other socioeconomic variables, differences in WTP according to gender have been reported by a few studies, but the results have been inconclusive (Carlsson and Johansson-Stenman 2000; More and Stevens 2000). Evidence also shows that highly educated individuals and younger people have been found to be more likely to support the fee-paying policy for natural attractions whilst age seems to be negatively related to WTP (Bowker, Cordell and Johnson, 1999). As for attraction attributes, in their classic writings on the economics of outdoor recreation, Clawson and Knetsch (1966) stated that demand for unique areas with long travel distance and outstanding scenic or recreational opportunities tend to be price inelastic. A more elastic demand curve can be expected for smaller or modest types of attractions which are closer to the population centres. Based on the above discussion, the hypothesis that visitors to natural attractions in Iceland are willing to pay for access is formulated. The demand curves for natural attractions are assumed to be negatively sloped yet rather inelastic at least up to a certain point. The variables, such as income, attitude towards environmental protection, history of fee paying and education are predicted to have a positive effect on WTP, while age is assumed to have a negative effect on WTP. The directions of the effect in relation to gender, country of residence and previous visits to the sites and to natural attractions in general, could either be positive or negative, which need to be tested. WTP for access to Skaftafell is predicted to be higher than that of Gullfoss. 4. Methodology
11 The Contingent Valuation Method One of the most widely used techniques for environmental valuation has been the contingent valuation method (CVM). As described by Mitchell and Carson (1989), it involves asking people directly what value they would place on an amenity if a market existed for it. The elicited WTP values are contingent upon a hypothetical market situation, or scenario, which is described to the respondent prior to asking for the amount he or she is willing to pay. The scenario is intended to influence the WTP values by describing the conditions of the market and what is to be valued, in this case retaining an environmental asset for recreational use. There is ample evidence that informing visitors of why money is needed and where it will go to is likely to affect their support for the fee-paying option and their WTP positively (Clawson and Knetsch, 1966; Leuschner et al., 1987; Reiling, Criner and Oltmanns, 1988; Laarman and Gregersen, 1996; Vogt and Williams, 1999; Williams, Vogt and Vittersø, 1999; Eagles, McCool and Haynes 2002). According to Ajzen and Driver (1992), the ability to assign a monetary value to a public good depends crucially on the available information relevant for that judgement. The objective information-based contingency is vital in order to obtain informed and realistic estimates. The values elicited can then be aggregated to form a demand curve and develop an estimate of consumer surplus (CS), which is measured by the area under the demand curve but above the entrance fee charged (see Figure 1). (Insert Figure 1 about here) The CVM gives rise to challenges and is not without its critics. The main criticisms of the CVM are the danger of hypothetical bias and strategic behaviour. Hypothetical bias refers to whether respondents answers can be taken as an accurate representation of how they would behave if confronted with an actual market for the good. Strategic behaviour refers to when people deliberately attempt to influence either the future payment or provision of the good, by under- or overstating their WTP (Mitchell and Carson 1989) Sample and Sample Setting
12 12 Two popular natural attractions were chosen as sample settings. Gullfoss is an impressive two-tiered waterfall in South-Central Iceland, a two hours drive from the capital. The site has a car park, souvenir shop, restaurant, visitor centre and toilets where visitors can view the waterfall either from a viewing plateau or by following a trail down to the edge. The site is not very large. The estimated number of visitors per year is approximately 350,000. Skaftafell National Park is situated in South-East Iceland, a five hours drive from the capital. It presents an impressive contrast between a glacier, green mountains and black sandy plains. Popular activities include walking onto the glacier or to the unusual Svartifoss waterfall. The park has a car park, camping area, toilets and shower facilities, visitor centre, shop, paths and signage. Visitor numbers are an estimated 150,000 per year. There are plans to extend the park and apply for World Heritage Site status, following which the Skaftafell National Park can expect its visitor numbers to increase significantly. The population for the study was defined as international and domestic summer visitors to the sites, over 18 years of age. The majority of visitors to Iceland s countryside fall within the summer period. Therefore annual visitor number estimates were considered to be roughly the same as summer visitor estimates The Survey After pre-testing the survey on 30 visitors at Þingvellir National Park, the survey in the form of a structured questionnaire was carried out on-site at Skaftafell National Park on June 2004 and at Gullfoss waterfall on June 2004 (one weekday and one weekend day at each site) at various times between 10am and 5pm. Respondents were approached outside the visitor centres by the researcher and a research assistant. Approximately every fifth visitor encountered was chosen as a subject. The questionnaires were made available in English, Icelandic and German and contained ten questions. Respondents were asked about the maximum amount they were willing to pay for a day s visit to the site, after being presented with the following scenario: The full cost of managing Gullfoss/Skaftafell National Park is currently not covered by government funds. More money is needed to maintain and
13 13 improve the quality of the environment, e.g. repair paths, remove litter, care for plants, improve signage etc. There is no entrance fee for visitors to access Gullfoss/Skaftafell National Park. An entrance fee would help to fund management and maintenance and therefore prevent environmental damage. If there were an entrance fee to Gullfoss/Skaftafell and the money would go directly back to the maintenance of the area, what would be the maximum amount you as an individual would be willing to pay for a day s access, in Icelandic Kronur, before you would feel you are paying more than the visit is really worth to you? The chosen format for the WTP question was the payment card, which provides respondents with an array of potential WTP amounts ranging from zero to some large amount, from which respondents choose a single amount. Using this format, starting point bias is avoided yet a context is provided for the valuation (Mitchell and Carson, 1989). A don t know option and spaces to write any reasons for not being willing to pay were also provided. Respondents were also asked to state their gender, age, country of residence, level of education, household income before taxes, the number of previous visits they had made to the site, the number of visits they make on average per year to natural attractions, their attitude towards environmental protection and how often they had paid entrance fees to natural attractions in the past. 5. Empirical Results 5.1. Sample Characteristics Sample non-response rate was near-zero and item non-response was minimal. In total, 132 responses were obtained from Skaftafell and 123 from Gullfoss. Two responses at Skaftafell and one at Gullfoss were excluded from the analysis on the basis of being protesters and who did not wish to participate in the study. These
14 14 were defined as respondents who clearly did not report their genuine individual WTP based on their open comments. A larger percentage of the respondents at Skaftafell than at Gullfoss were domestic visitors (45% vs. 16%) and a slightly larger percentage of the respondents at Gullfoss than at Skaftafell were male (59% vs. 50%). Apart from these differences, the characteristics of the sample respondents at the two sites were strikingly similar. In general, the respondents were in their early forties (mean age was around 43 years at both sites), highly educated (over 50% had University degrees) and earning a high income (mean annual income was around 35,500, yet the income range was quite wide). Most visitors were visiting the site for the first time, over 50% claimed they visit natural attractions 1-4 times a year on average, over 80% said they were rather or very concerned about environmental protection and around 70% had paid entrance fees to natural attractions before WTP Tables 1 and 2 show the summary statistics of the WTP responses at Gullfoss and Skaftafell. Ninety four percent of the Gullfoss sample and 93% of the Skaftafell sample were willing to pay entrance fees at different levels. The data in both cases were close to being normally distributed. The mean WTP for a visit to Gullfoss was Isk 333 and to Skaftafell Isk 508. The difference between the mean amounts was shown to be significant through an independent-samples t-test (p =.000). Considering the similarity of the sample characteristics, this indicates that the difference is due to site attributes. (Insert Tables 1-2 here) 5.3. Consumer Surplus and Total Economic Welfare Consumer surplus and the effect of the entrance fees on the demand for the sites were analysed through simple regression analyses. Figure 2 shows the demand curve and regression line for Gullfoss (n = 113). The demand curve was produced by plotting the aggregate number of respondents WTP each amount. As was expected, the demand curve slopes downwards. The adjusted R 2 of the regression line is The curve is inelastic when the price increases up to Isk 350. This implies that if an
15 15 entrance fee were introduced (and subsequently increased up to Isk 350), this would not result in a less than proportional decrease in visitor numbers. Hence, the total revenue would increase. The CS for the sample at Gullfoss amounts to Isk 129 million per year when there is no entrance fee while this value decreases with the increase in entrance fees. Figure 3 shows the demand curve and regression line for Skaftafell (n = 127). It is also downward sloping with the adjusted R 2 to be The curve is inelastic up to Isk 600. The CS for Skaftafell decreases from Isk 89 million per year when there is no entrance fee to zero when the entrance fee increases to Isk (Insert Figures 3 and 4 about here) (Insert Tables 3 and 4 about here) Currently, the total CSs for Gullfoss and Skaftafell are Isk 129 million and Isk 89 million, respectively. If the entrance fees are introduced, say, at Isk 333 for Gullfoss and Isk 508 for Skaftafell, a total of Isk million (Isk 62.9 million + Isk 42.4million) could be generated. This income could be further invested in improving or maintaining the infrastructures of the two sites. One potential use of the CS calculation is to assess the total economic welfare as a result of the introduction of entrance fees if the total social costs including both use and non-use costs could be estimated. This suggests a possible area for further studies WTP and Its Influencing Factors The directions of the relationships between WTP and some of the influencing factors were found to statistically significant with expected signs. Best-fit multiple regression models for both sites are shown in Tables 5 and 6. In summary, WTP was positively affected by income, attitude towards environmental protection, history of paying an entrance fee and education, while being negatively affected by age and number of previous visits to the site. Differences were also found between certain countries of residence. Gender and number of previous visits to natural attractions in general did not affect WTP at either site. (Insert Tables 5-6 about here)
16 16 6. Conclusions 6.1. Discussions and Implications The results of this study provide some evidence that a successful entrance fee programme can be designed to provide additional revenue to alleviate financial shortage faced by natural attractions in Iceland. The majority of the respondents in this study were willing to pay an entrance fee, provided that the money would go towards protecting and improving the sites. Modest fees would not have a large impact on demand for the two sites under investigation. This may be explained by these attractions being quite unique and the fee being only a small part of the total trip cost. However, given the change in elasticity on either side of the critical point, the trade-off between funds acquired through entrance fees and the reduced number of visitors has to be taken into serious consideration when deciding on a fee-paying policy in order not to undermine the objective of promoting access. If tourist numbers in Iceland continue to grow, the size of these potential additional funds is likely to increase. This also has implications for other countries that rely on nature-based tourism, as demand for such tourism is likely to grow following increased affluence and urbanisation in these countries. Visitors are willing to pay a higher price for access to Skaftafell than to Gullfoss. Attraction attributes therefore seem to influence how much visitors are prepared to pay. The difference probably lies in that Skaftafell covers a larger area, is further away from the capital and offers greater recreational opportunities than Gullfoss. Therefore, it is important to appropriately assess the levels of entrance fees for all natural site based on their attributes. According to the regression analysis of WTP it appears that visitors with lower incomes may be deterred from visiting an attraction if a fee is implemented. There is also an indication that the attitude towards environmental protection may positively affect WTP, perhaps, because the visitors who are care about the environment are more understanding of the rationale for fee-paying policy or are simply willing to pay more for something they regard highly. The number of previous visits made by visitors to the site has a negative impact on WTP and this may imply that experienced
17 17 users feel a sense of ownership towards the site which is not compatible with fees. In addition, frequent users would bear higher financials cost as a result of a fee-paying policy. This may also imply that the sites that people visit more frequently may have to charge less than other sites that people tend to visit less frequently. The results also show that WTP is affected positively by visitors fee-paying history. Those who are accustom to paying an entrance fee at other sites, are more willing to pay a fee at a new site. This may be especially true for more developed sites such as those in this study. Also, this may suggest that, if a fee-paying programme were implemented for a natural site, people would gradually grow accustomed to entrance fees and at later stages they may even be willing to pay more for gaining access to the site. The reason why WTP is negatively affected by age may be that younger people are more accustom to the idea of having to pay entrance fees to natural sites. As the contingency suggested in the survey, it is important that the sites keep at least part of the funds generated. It is equally important to communicate to potential visitors the reason why entrance fees are charged and what purposes the funds will be used for, in order to gain optimal acceptance for a fee-paying policy. People should then be more likely to connect the two - fees and conservation, and understand more about the contribution they are making. Their attitudes towards environmental protection may also be strengthened as a result. The findings of this study provided some evidence that attitudes towards environmental protection affect WTP; consequently, a fee programme may become more successful by taking the aforementioned measures. It is also of crucial importance to actively discuss the fee policy with the tourism industry and other stakeholders. They need to understand the necessity for fee-paying policy. It is in the tourism industry s self-interest to offer tourists a healthy environment. Without sufficient funding, nature-based tourism may be harmed. An optimal fee level must be estimated by taking the cost of running and maintaining the natural attraction into consideration. There may be considerable costs linked to establishing and operating a fee collection system (e.g. staff and gates) and if these costs are high, a fee programme may not be administratively feasible, especially
18 18 at sites where visitation is low. The collection of the fees may also be technically difficult if the areas are large and have open to access from many directions. There are also aesthetic considerations. However, potential administrative costs can be minimised, e.g. by having coin-operated gates, spot checks of tickets from self-service machines, and indirect fee collection through tour operators. In any case, if an obligatory entrance fee is deemed impractical, the results from this study suggest that there is nonetheless a basis for a donations programme. Based on these findings, a fee-paying programme could be developed which is acceptable to visitors and helps to ensure continued high-quality recreational opportunities. It seems reasonable for policy makers and site managers to at least consider entrance fee as one of the funding alternatives. There are several reasons for viewing fees as a supplement rather than a replacement to budget allocations. Tourism demand is fickle and revenues from entrance fees might become unstable over time. A combination of public funds and user fees (and even other methods of financing) may therefore be reasonable and more effective. The aim in any case is to achieve increased sustainability in the use of recreational resources. Tourists bring often-cited benefits to a country s economy. It would be ideal if part of these benefits were contributed to the maintenance and management of the often under-funded natural attractions Limitations and Further Research The results from this study should be treated with some caution. The main limitation of this study is that the sample size is quite small and the sampling period is short. It would be beneficial to replicate this survey with larger samples and run the survey over a longer period of time in order to improve its generalisation and remove small sample bias. Relationships between WTP and a number of influencing factors were found to be statistically insignificant, and this could be attributed to the mixture of domestic and international visitors in the samples. It would be desirable in the future that these two categories of visitors are investigated separately. As for the multiple regression analysis, a relatively large proportion of the variance in WTP was unexplained by the independent variables. This indicates that some of the important explanatory variables
19 19 may have been missed out from the regression model. Other independent variables, such as travel costs or distance, and party size, could be included in future research with a view to improve the goodness of fit of the models. If a fee-paying policy were considered, more areas and types of attractions need be examined for the purpose of generalisation. In addition, the costs of running natural attractions should also be evaluated in order to decide the optimal entrance fees to be charged. References Adams, R. M., Bergland, O., Musser, W. N., Johnson, S. L. and Musser, L. M. (1989). User fees and equity issues in public hunting expenditures: the case of ring-necked pheasant in Oregon. Land Economics, 65(4), Ajzen, I. and Driver, B. L. (1992). Contingent value measurement: on the nature and meaning of willingness to pay. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 1(4), Bowker, J. M., Cordell, H. K. and Johnson, C. Y. (1999). User fees for recreation service on public lands: a national assessment. Journal of Park and Recreation Administation, 17(3), Bull, A. (1995). The Economics of Travel and Tourism, 2 nd ed. Melbourne: Longman. Carlsson, F. and Johansson-Stenman, O. (2000). Willingness to pay for improved air quality in Sweden. Applied Economics, 32(6), Clawson, M. and Knetsch, J. L. (1966). Economics of Outdoor Recreation. London: John Hopkins Press. Clinch, J. P. and Murphy, A. (2001). Modelling winners and losers in contingent valuation of public goods: appropriate welfare measures and econometric analysis. The Economic Journal, 111(470), Crandall, D. A. and Driver, B. L. (1984). Recreation on public lands: should the user pay? American Forests, 90(3), 10-11, Curry, N., Countryside Recreation, Access and Land Use Planning. London: E & FN Spon. Davis, D. and Tisdell, C. (1998). Tourist levies and willingness-to-pay for a whale shark experience. Tourism Economics, 5(2), Eagles, P. F. J., McCool, S. F. and Haynes, C. D. (2002). Sustainable Tourism in
20 20 Protected Areas: Guidelines for Planning and Management. Cambridge: IUCN. Fedler, A. J. and Miles, A. F. (1989). Paying for backcountry recreation: understanding the acceptability of use fees. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 7(2), Hanley, N., Shogren, J. F. and White, B. (1997). Environmental Economics in Theory and Practice. London: Macmillan. Icelandic Tourist Board (2003). Tourism in Iceland in figures. Reykjavik: Icelandic Tourist Board. Icelandic Tourist Board (2004). Metfjöldi ferðamanna á liðnu ári [online news report 27/01/04]. Available from: accessed 01/03/04. Kerr, G. N. and Manfredo, M. J. (1991). An attitudinal based model of pricing for recreational services. Journal of Leisure Research, 23(1), Krannich, R. S., Eisenhauer, B. W., Field, D. R., Pratt, C. and Luloff, A. E. (1999). Implications of the National Park Service recreation fee demonstration program for park operations and management: perceptions of NPS managers. Journal of Park Recreation and Administration, 17(3), Laarman, J. G. and Gregersen, H. M. (1996). Pricing policy in nature-based tourism. Tourism Management, 17(4), Leuschner, W. A., Cook, P.S., Roggenbuck, J. W. and Oderwald, R. G. (1987). A comparative analysis for wilderness user fee policy. Journal of Leisure Research, 19(2), Lindberg, K. (1998). Economic aspects of tourism. In: Lindberg, K., Wood, M. E. and Engeldrum, D. (eds.) Ecotourism: A Guide for Planners and Managers, vol. 2. North Bennington: The Ecotourism Society, Mitchell, R. C. and Carson, R. T. (1989). Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. Washington: Resources for the Future. More, T. (1999). A functionalistic approach to user fees. Journal of Leisure Research, 31(3), More, T. and Stevens, T. (2000). Do user fees exclude low-income people from resource-based recreation? Journal of Leisure Research, 32(3), Reiling, S. D., Criner, G. K. and Oltmanns, S. E. (1988). The influence of information on users attitudes toward campground user fees. Journal of Leisure Research, 20(3),
21 21 Reiling, S. D., Cheng, H. and Trott, C. (1992). Measuring the discriminatory impact associated with higher recreational fees. Leisure Sciences, 14(2), Richer, J. R. and Christensen, N. A. (1999). Appropriate fees for wilderness day use: pricing decisions for recreation on public land. Journal of Leisure Research, 31(3), Schroeder, H. W. and Louviere, J. (1999). Stated choice models for predicting the impact of user fees at public recreation sites. Journal of Leisure Research, 31(3), Sharpley, J. and Sharpley, R. (1997). Rural Tourism: An Introduction. London: International Thomson Business Press. Stevens, T., More, T. and Allen, P.G. (1989). Pricing policies for public day-use outdoor recreation facilities. Journal of Environmental Management, 28, Tisdell, C., (2001). Tourism Economics, the Environment and Development: Analysis and Policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Tisdel, C. (2006). Valuation of tourism s natural resources in L. Dwyer and P. Forsyth (eds) International Handbook on the Economics of Tourism. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc.. Vogt, C. A. and Williams, D. R. (1999). Support for wilderness recreation fees: the influence of fee purpose and day versus overnight use. Journal of Park Recreation and Administration, 17(3), Williams, D. R., Vogt, C. A. and Vittersø, J. (1999). Structural equation modelling of users response to wilderness recreation fees. Journal of Leisure Research, 31(3),
22 22
23 23 FIGURE 1 Demand for visiting a park as a function of an entry fee, and the value of a park $ Price charged per visit 2 1 Demand curve No. of visits per year
24 24 TABLE 1 Willingness to pay statistics at Gullfoss n = 113 Mean (ISK) 333 Median (ISK) 300 Standard deviation (ISK) 192 Skewness.55 (st. error.23) Kurtosis.38 (st. error.45) TABLE 2 Willingness to pay statistics at Skaftafell n = 127 Mean (ISK) 508 Median (ISK) 500 Standard deviation (ISK) 318 Skewness.84 (st. error.22) Kurtosis.98 (st. error.43)
25 25 FIGURE 2 Demand curve and regression line with equation for Gullfoss Price Willing to Pay in Isk V=-0.15*P R 2 = Number of Visitors in Thousands
26 26 Price willing to pay (Isk) TABLE 3 Total revenue, consumer surplus and price elasticity for different price levels at Gullfoss Number of respondents Percentage of respondents Number of population Total revenue (Isk) Consumer surplus (Isk) Price elasticity % 350, ,139,950 n.a % 328,319 16,191, ,365, % 325,221 30,049,475 96,757, % 303,540 41,574,592 82,315, % 281,858 50,766,630 69,041, % 244,690 57,625,588 56,932, % 219,912 62,151,466 45,990, % 151,770 64,344,264 36,215, % 136,283 64,203,982 27,606, % 96,018 61,730,620 20,164, % 96,018 56,924,179 13,888, % 30,973 49,784,657 8,779, % 30,973 40,312,056 4,837, % 21,681 28,506,375 2,060, % 21,681 14,367, , % 18,584 0 n.a. n.a % 12,389 0 n.a. n.a % 9,292 0 n.a. n.a.
27 27 FIGURE 3 Demand curve and regression line with equation for Skaftafell Price Willing to Pay in Isk V=-0.09P R 2 = Number of Visitors in Thousands
28 28 Price willing to pay (Isk) TABLE 4 Total revenue, consumer surplus and price elasticity for different price levels at Skaftafell Number of respondents Percentage of respondents Number of population Total revenue (Isk) Consumer surplus (Isk) Price elasticity % 150, ,946,300 n.a % 139,370 12,616,087 76,812, % 135,827 23,160,032 64,714, % 118,110 31,631,837 53,652, % 102,756 38,031,502 43,626, % 93,307 42,359,026 34,636, % 43,701 44,614,409 26,682, % 35,433 44,797,651 19,764, % 28,346 42,908,753 13,883, % 21,260 38,947,714 9,037, % 21,260 32,914,534 5,228, % 5,906 24,809,214 2,454, % 5,906 14,631, , % 4,724 2,382,151 16, % 3,543 0 n.a. n.a % 1,181 0 n.a. n.a % 1,181 0 n.a. n.a.
29 29 TABLE 5 Best-fit linear multiple regression model for the Gullfoss data Variable Beta coefficient Significance level (p) Constant Household income Attitude towards environmental protection Previous visits to the site History of fee paying Age TABLE 6 Best-fit linear multiple regression model for the Skaftafell data Variable Beta coefficient Significance level (p) Constant Previous visits to the site History of fee paying
Chapter #9: Valuation of Environmental Benefits
Chapter #9: Valuation of Environmental Benefits Contents: General Overview Types of Benefits Concepts in Benefits Measurement Uncertainty, Expected Benefits, and Risk Aversion Methodologies for Benefits
The importance of using marketing information systems in five stars hotels working in Jordan: An empirical study
International Journal of Business Management and Administration Vol. 4(3), pp. 044-053, May 2015 Available online at http://academeresearchjournals.org/journal/ijbma ISSN 2327-3100 2015 Academe Research
Premaster Statistics Tutorial 4 Full solutions
Premaster Statistics Tutorial 4 Full solutions Regression analysis Q1 (based on Doane & Seward, 4/E, 12.7) a. Interpret the slope of the fitted regression = 125,000 + 150. b. What is the prediction for
The Elasticity of Taxable Income: A Non-Technical Summary
The Elasticity of Taxable Income: A Non-Technical Summary John Creedy The University of Melbourne Abstract This paper provides a non-technical summary of the concept of the elasticity of taxable income,
Chapter 27: Taxation. 27.1: Introduction. 27.2: The Two Prices with a Tax. 27.2: The Pre-Tax Position
Chapter 27: Taxation 27.1: Introduction We consider the effect of taxation on some good on the market for that good. We ask the questions: who pays the tax? what effect does it have on the equilibrium
Turtle Watching at Rekawa sanctuary in Sri Lanka: How much is the Sri Lankans WTP for saving turtles?
Turtle Watching at Rekawa sanctuary in Sri Lanka: How much is the Sri Lankans WTP for saving turtles? Abstract Turtles at Rekawa are under threat due to ongoing illegal activities. This study examined
What is driving Australians' travel choices?
What is driving Australians' travel choices? What is driving Australians' travel choices? ISBN 978-1-921812-45-3 Tourism Research Australia Department of Resources, Energy and Tourism GPO Box 1564 Canberra
Digital Communications
National Assembly for Wales Election Manifesto 2016 Digital Communications Digital growth is key to driving the Welsh economy forward, which is why innovative policies are needed to meet the increasing
Assessing public preferences for managing cultural heritage: tools and methodologies
Assessing public preferences for managing cultural heritage: tools and methodologies Patrizia RIGANTI Summary It is crucial to increase citizens and stakeholders participation in all decision-makings,
WELFARE REFORM COMMITTEE WELFARE FUNDS (SCOTLAND) BILL SUBMISSION FROM COMMUNITY RESOURCES NETWORK SCOTLAND
WELFARE REFORM COMMITTEE WELFARE FUNDS (SCOTLAND) BILL SUBMISSION FROM COMMUNITY RESOURCES NETWORK SCOTLAND A. Background to CRNS 1. Community Resources Network Scotland (CRNS) represents re-use, recycling
Module 5: Multiple Regression Analysis
Using Statistical Data Using to Make Statistical Decisions: Data Multiple to Make Regression Decisions Analysis Page 1 Module 5: Multiple Regression Analysis Tom Ilvento, University of Delaware, College
Coca-Cola Zero dublinbikes
Coca-Cola Zero dublinbikes Report on Revenue Generation Options to Facilitate Expansion April 2016 Dublin City Council Planning and Property Development Department 0 CONTENTS Page 1.0 EXPANSION FRAMEWORK
AN APPLICATION OF THE INDIVIDUAL TRAVEL COST METHOD TO NYANGA NATIONAL PARK, ZIMBABWE. Researchjournali s Journal of Economics
1 AN APPLICATION OF THE INDIVIDUAL TRAVEL COST METHOD TO NYANGA NATIONAL PARK, ZIMBABWE Manzote Emiriya Lecturers at Midlands State University, Faculty of Commerce, Department of Economics, Private Bag
Resources for Implementing the WWF Project & Programme Standards. Step 2.3 Design Operational Plan
Resources for Implementing the WWF Project & Programme Standards Step 2.3 Design Operational Plan June 2007 Step 2.3 Design Operational Plan Contents What Is An Operational Plan?... 1 Why Is An Operational
Site Assessment for Neighbourhood Plans: A toolkit for neighbourhood planners
Site Assessment for Neighbourhood Plans: A toolkit for neighbourhood planners Action the COI Table Of Contents Introduction... 3 Benefit of carrying out a site assessment... 4 How to carry out a site assessment
Fédération des Experts Comptables Européens ACCRUAL ACCOUNTING IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR. January 2007. A Paper from the FEE Public Sector Committee
Fédération des Experts Comptables Européens ACCRUAL ACCOUNTING IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR A Paper from the FEE Public Sector Committee CONTENTS Executive Summary...4 Introduction...4 Nature of this paper...4
2013 Cape Breton Celtic Classic Sydney, Nova Scotia
2013 Cape Breton Celtic Classic Sydney, Nova Scotia Economic Impact Assessment December 2013 The following analysis details the economic impact of the PGA Tour of Canada 2013 Cape Breton Celtic Classic
BIG MISCONCEPTIONS ABOUT SMALL BUSINESS AND TAXES
820 First Street NE, Suite 510 Washington, DC 20002 Tel: 202-408-1080 Fax: 202-408-1056 center@cbpp.org www.cbpp.org August 29, 2008 BIG MISCONCEPTIONS ABOUT SMALL BUSINESS AND TAXES By Chye-Ching Huang
CUSTOMER SERVICE SATISFACTION WAVE 4
04/12/2012 GFK CUSTOMER SERVICE SATISFACTION WAVE 4 GfK NOP Amanda Peet 2 Customer Service Satisfaction Table of Contents: Executive Summary... 3 Objectives and Methodology... 5 Overview of all sectors...
Relationship Manager (Banking) Assessment Plan
Relationship Manager (Banking) Assessment Plan ST0184/AP03 1. Introduction and Overview The Relationship Manager (Banking) is an apprenticeship that takes 3-4 years to complete and is at a Level 6. It
1 Annex 11: Market failure in broadcasting
1 Annex 11: Market failure in broadcasting 1.1 This annex builds on work done by Ofcom regarding market failure in a number of previous projects. In particular, we discussed the types of market failure
The Principles of Volunteering: why have them?
The Principles of Volunteering: why have them? The Definition and Principles of Volunteering are the result of a national consultation undertaken in 1996 with a wide range of stakeholders including volunteers,
How To Be Sustainable With Tourism
QUÉBEC DECLARATION ON ECOTOURISM In the framework of the UN International Year of Ecotourism, 2002, under the aegis of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and the World Tourism Organization
The Benefits and Costs of Establishing a National Park in Madagascar 1 COSTS TO LOCAL VILLAGERS
The Benefits and Costs of Establishing a National Park in Madagascar 1 This case study presents the application of the opportunity cost, contingent valuation, and travel cost methods to estimate some of
INTERNATIONAL COMPARISONS OF PART-TIME WORK
OECD Economic Studies No. 29, 1997/II INTERNATIONAL COMPARISONS OF PART-TIME WORK Georges Lemaitre, Pascal Marianna and Alois van Bastelaer TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction... 140 International definitions
Statistics 2014 Scoring Guidelines
AP Statistics 2014 Scoring Guidelines College Board, Advanced Placement Program, AP, AP Central, and the acorn logo are registered trademarks of the College Board. AP Central is the official online home
9395 TRAVEL AND TOURISM
CAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL EXAMINATIONS GCE Advanced Subsidiary Level and GCE Advanced Level MARK SCHEME for the May/June 2013 series 9395 TRAVEL AND TOURISM 9395/32 Paper 3 (International Business & Leisure
Economic Impact of a Regional Casino in Scotland
Enterprise and Lifelong Learning Potential Economic Impact of Regional Casino in Scotland Overview/Summary POTENTIAL ECONOMIC IMPACT OF A REGIONAL CASINO IN SCOTLAND Overview/Summary 1. This paper outlines
The Distortionary Costs of Taxation
The Distortionary Costs of Taxation John Creedy The University of Melbourne Abstract This paper provides a non-technical review of concepts, measurement problems and estimates of the efficiency costs of
Capacity and Turnover in Public Accommodation Establishments in Hungary
Capacity and Turnover in Public Accommodation Establishments in Hungary According to Act I of 1978 on domestic trade, in Hungary all establishments operated as a business for overnight accommodation and
Positioning and potentials of Greenland, Iceland and the Faroe Islands on the German holiday travel market
Positioning and potentials of Greenland, Iceland and the Faroe Islands on the German holiday travel market Management Summary At one glance:» Preface: This report on Positioning and potentials for Greenland,
Elasticity. I. What is Elasticity?
Elasticity I. What is Elasticity? The purpose of this section is to develop some general rules about elasticity, which may them be applied to the four different specific types of elasticity discussed in
Managerial Economics Prof. Trupti Mishra S.J.M. School of Management Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay. Lecture - 13 Consumer Behaviour (Contd )
(Refer Slide Time: 00:28) Managerial Economics Prof. Trupti Mishra S.J.M. School of Management Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay Lecture - 13 Consumer Behaviour (Contd ) We will continue our discussion
Consumer needs not being met by UK grocery market A British Brands Group research publication
Consumer needs not being met by UK grocery market A British Brands Group research publication INTRODUCTION The British Brands Group provides the voice for brand manufacturers in the UK. It is a membership
Equality Impact Assessment Support for Mortgage Interest
Welfare and Wellbeing Group Equality Impact Assessment Support for Mortgage Interest Planned change to the standard interest rate at which Support for Mortgage Interest is paid August 2010 Equality Impact
MANAGEMENT OPTIONS AND VALUE PER SHARE
1 MANAGEMENT OPTIONS AND VALUE PER SHARE Once you have valued the equity in a firm, it may appear to be a relatively simple exercise to estimate the value per share. All it seems you need to do is divide
Chapter Seven. Multiple regression An introduction to multiple regression Performing a multiple regression on SPSS
Chapter Seven Multiple regression An introduction to multiple regression Performing a multiple regression on SPSS Section : An introduction to multiple regression WHAT IS MULTIPLE REGRESSION? Multiple
Sarah Dickson Otago University Degree: Law and BA majoring in Economics
Sarah Dickson Otago University Degree: Law and BA majoring in Economics The health sector faces a dual problem. The first is essentially an economic question; the issue of how to keep public health spending
Tourism in figures 2012
Tourism in figures 2012 the Belgian market in Flanders July 2013 toerisme vlaanderen TABLE OF CONTENT A. THE BELGIAN MARKET IN FLANDERS 5 1. Key figures 5 2. Distribution within Flanders 5 3. Trends 8
Quantity of trips supplied (millions)
Taxes chapter: 7 1. The United tates imposes an excise tax on the sale of domestic airline tickets. Let s assume that in 2010 the total excise tax was $6.10 per airline ticket (consisting of the $3.60
LOGIT AND PROBIT ANALYSIS
LOGIT AND PROBIT ANALYSIS A.K. Vasisht I.A.S.R.I., Library Avenue, New Delhi 110 012 amitvasisht@iasri.res.in In dummy regression variable models, it is assumed implicitly that the dependent variable Y
Econ 101: Principles of Microeconomics
Econ 101: Principles of Microeconomics Chapter 14 - Monopoly Fall 2010 Herriges (ISU) Ch. 14 Monopoly Fall 2010 1 / 35 Outline 1 Monopolies What Monopolies Do 2 Profit Maximization for the Monopolist 3
Chapter 10. Key Ideas Correlation, Correlation Coefficient (r),
Chapter 0 Key Ideas Correlation, Correlation Coefficient (r), Section 0-: Overview We have already explored the basics of describing single variable data sets. However, when two quantitative variables
. Key perceptions of internally displaced people in Ukraine.
. Key perceptions of internally displaced people in Ukraine. Net promoter analysis of second round of data collection March 2015 Analysis of data collection: round 2. 1. Summary of findings... 2 2. Question
Executive Summary. What are distributive effects and why do they matter?
Executive Summary What are distributive effects and why do they matter? Policies to maintain and improve biologically diverse habitats and ecosystems aim to benefit society as a whole by realising all
Cost Benefit Analysis and Heritage Regulation
Cost Benefit Analysis and Heritage Regulation Rod Bogaards Office of Best Practice Regulation Abstract Cost-benefit analysis can play a useful role in historic heritage conservation. Even when it is difficult
Second English National Memory Clinics Audit Report
Second English National Memory Clinics Audit Report December 2015 Funded by: Department of Health Conducted by: Royal College of Psychiatrists Authors: Sophie Hodge & Emma Hailey Correspondence: Sophie
Unit 20: UK visitor attractions (LEVEL 3)
Unit 20: UK visitor attractions (LEVEL 3) Learning outcomes This unit will develop candidates knowledge and understanding of UK visitor attractions. They will gain knowledge of the range, location and
Spain Facts and Insights
Spain Facts and Insights Key Facts Economic Market population Outbound Travel Market Size UK s share of Spanish outbound market Scotland s visitors from Spain GDP growth forecast 2012 +0.3% (OECD) The
SKYE & LOCHALSH ECONOMIC UPDATE OCTOBER 2003
NETWORK ECONOMIC INFORMATION SKYE & LOCHALSH ECONOMIC UPDATE OCTOBER 2003 HIGHLIGHTS The population of Skye & Lochalsh in 2001 was 12,136, an increase of 3.2% from 1991 and higher than the growth of 0.8%
Asymmetric Information
Chapter 12 Asymmetric Information CHAPTER SUMMARY In situations of asymmetric information, the allocation of resources will not be economically efficient. The asymmetry can be resolved directly through
Learner Guide. Cambridge IGCSE Economics
Learner Guide Cambridge IGCSE Economics 0455 Cambridge International Examinations retains the copyright on all its publications. Registered Centres are permitted to copy material from this booklet for
Summary value willingness to pay
1 Summary Second-generation mobile coverage in the UK is high. Figures from the Ofcom 2013 Infrastructure Report 1 show that 99.6 per cent of UK premises and 87 per cent of the UK land mass have 2G coverage
I. Introduction to Taxation
University of Pacific-Economics 53 Lecture Notes #17 I. Introduction to Taxation Government plays an important role in most modern economies. In the United States, the role of the government extends from
WHY STUDY PUBLIC FINANCE?
Solutions and Activities to CHAPTER 1 WHY STUDY PUBLIC FINANCE? Questions and Problems 1. Many states have language in their constitutions that requires the state to provide for an adequate level of education
Executive summary. Global Wage Report 2014 / 15 Wages and income inequality
Executive summary Global Wage Report 2014 / 15 Wages and income inequality Global Wage Report 2014/15 Wages and income inequality Executive summary INTERNATIONAL LABOUR OFFICE GENEVA Copyright International
British Steel Pension Scheme: Public Consultation Response from the Pension Protection Fund
British Steel Pension Scheme: Public Consultation Response from the Pension Protection Fund Summary The PPF recognises the Government s commitment to securing a sustainable future for the UK steel industry
LONDON S CULTURAL TOURISTS
LONDON S CULTURAL TOURISTS CONTENTS Overview 4. SECTION 01 About this research 6. SECTION 02 Visits to London 9. SECTION 03 Factors of influence 13. SECTION 04 Cultural itineraries 16. SECTION 05 Popular
Constructing a TpB Questionnaire: Conceptual and Methodological Considerations
Constructing a TpB Questionnaire: Conceptual and Methodological Considerations September, 2002 (Revised January, 2006) Icek Ajzen Brief Description of the Theory of Planned Behavior According to the theory
THE JOINT HARMONISED EU PROGRAMME OF BUSINESS AND CONSUMER SURVEYS
THE JOINT HARMONISED EU PROGRAMME OF BUSINESS AND CONSUMER SURVEYS List of best practice for the conduct of business and consumer surveys 21 March 2014 Economic and Financial Affairs This document is written
Prospect Theory Ayelet Gneezy & Nicholas Epley
Prospect Theory Ayelet Gneezy & Nicholas Epley Word Count: 2,486 Definition Prospect Theory is a psychological account that describes how people make decisions under conditions of uncertainty. These may
Chapter 4: Key Conclusions from the Evaluation of the Current Washington Tax Structure
Chapter 4: Key Conclusions from the Evaluation of the Current Washington Tax Structure Introduction This chapter presents the key conclusions and the Committee s view based on the evaluation of the current
FSC Guidance Note No. 31 Provisioning for Deferred Tax Assets. 19 December 2012
FSC Guidance Note No. 31 Provisioning for Deferred Tax Assets 19 December 2012 Purpose of this Guidance Note: To provide industry participants with guidance in the provisioning for deferred tax assets
interpretation and implication of Keogh, Barnes, Joiner, and Littleton s paper Gender,
This essay critiques the theoretical perspectives, research design and analysis, and interpretation and implication of Keogh, Barnes, Joiner, and Littleton s paper Gender, Pair Composition and Computer
Ipsos / Europ Assistance barometer Europeans Plans and Concerns for the Holidays Summary Ipsos for the Europ Assistance Group May 24th 2012
Ipsos / Europ Assistance barometer Europeans Plans and Concerns for the Holidays Summary Ipsos for the Europ Assistance Group May 24th 2012 Contacts Ipsos Public Affairs: Fabienne SIMON 01 41 98 92 15
PENSION COMMUNICATION RESOURCES
PENSION COMMUNICATION RESOURCES Contents Two Sets of Pension Measures Separating Accounting and Funding for Pensions Has the ARC Disappeared? Two Sets of Numbers Financial Statement Impact of New Standards
CALCULATIONS & STATISTICS
CALCULATIONS & STATISTICS CALCULATION OF SCORES Conversion of 1-5 scale to 0-100 scores When you look at your report, you will notice that the scores are reported on a 0-100 scale, even though respondents
2. THE ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF EDUCATION
2. THE ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF EDUCATION How much more do tertiary graduates earn? How does education affect employment rates? What are the incentives for people to invest in education? What are the incentives
Estimating the Market Risk Premium for Australia using a Benchmark Approach
Appendix B Estimating the Market Risk Premium for Australia using a Benchmark Approach 1 The market risk premium ( MRP ) for Australia in 2005 and going forward is set in an international market. Investment
What are the key current issues shaping equity release by older home owners?
What are the key current issues shaping equity release by older home owners? Round table discussion November 7th 2012 About this project Focus today on equity release but a bigger picture. Initial proposal
NHS Staff Management and Health Service Quality
NHS Staff Management and Health Service Quality Michael West 1 and Jeremy Dawson 2 1 Lancaster University Management School and The Work Foundation 2 Aston Business School Foreword This report draws on
Cost-Benefit Analysis. 131 Undergraduate Public Economics Emmanuel Saez UC Berkeley
Cost-Benefit Analysis 131 Undergraduate Public Economics Emmanuel Saez UC Berkeley 1 OUTLINE Chapter 8 8.1 Measuring the Costs of Public Projects 8.2 Measuring the Benefits of Public Projects 8.3 Putting
Renminbi Depreciation and the Hong Kong Economy
Thomas Shik Acting Chief Economist thomasshik@hangseng.com Renminbi Depreciation and the Hong Kong Economy If the recent weakness of the renminbi persists, it is likely to have a positive direct impact
The Economic Impact of Long Distance Cycle Routes North Sea Cycle Route (NSCR)
The Economic Impact of Long Distance Cycle Routes North Sea Cycle Route (NSCR) Les Lumsdon and Paul Downward CAST, Staffordshire University Stoke-on-Trent SK10 1LT, UK p.m.downward@staffs.ac.uk Summary
2015 ASSESSMENT RATES
2015 ASSESSMENT RATES FOREWORD WorkSafeNB determines employers assessment rates annually. Several factors influence rates, such as WorkSafeNB s current financial obligations, the prevailing economic environment,
Executive Summary. Viability of the Return of a Major League Baseball Franchise to Montreal (the Expos )
Executive Summary Viability of the Return of a Major League Baseball Franchise to Montreal (the Expos ) November 2013 Table of Contents 1. CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVES... 3 2. RESEARCH METHODS... 5 3. KEY RESULTS...
A layperson s guide to monetary policy
1999/8 17 December 1999 A layperson s guide to Executive Summary Monetary policy refers to those actions by the Reserve Bank which affect interest rates, the exchange rate and the money supply. The objective
USES OF CONSUMER PRICE INDICES
USES OF CONSUMER PRICE INDICES 2 2.1 The consumer price index (CPI) is treated as a key indicator of economic performance in most countries. The purpose of this chapter is to explain why CPIs are compiled
Ayrshire and Arran Tourism Partnership Plan Reviewed April 2007
Ayrshire and Arran Tourism Partnership Plan Reviewed April 2007 1 AYRSHIRE & ARRAN TOURISM PARTNERSHIP PLAN AND THE TOURISM FRAMEWORK FOR CHANGE 2006-2009 Introduction In March 2004 the Minister for Culture,
Inflation Risk and the Private Investor: Saving is often not the best decision
Inflation Risk and the Private Investor: Saving is often not the best decision February 2013 Inflation Risk and the Private Investor: Saving is often not the best decision Authors: Ronald A.M. Janssen,
Association Between Variables
Contents 11 Association Between Variables 767 11.1 Introduction............................ 767 11.1.1 Measure of Association................. 768 11.1.2 Chapter Summary.................... 769 11.2 Chi
Summary. Accessibility and utilisation of health services in Ghana 245
Summary The thesis examines the factors that impact on access and utilisation of health services in Ghana. The utilisation behaviour of residents of a typical urban and a typical rural district are used
II. DISTRIBUTIONS distribution normal distribution. standard scores
Appendix D Basic Measurement And Statistics The following information was developed by Steven Rothke, PhD, Department of Psychology, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago (RIC) and expanded by Mary F. Schmidt,
Bulletin. Anticipating skills needs in Europe: issues and implications. Number 94 2010. Background
Number 94 2010 B Bulletin Anticipating skills needs in Europe: issues and implications This Bulletin draws on results from a major new programme of research undertaken by Warwick Institute for Employment
Update: Comparative Car and Home Insurance Costs in NI
Research and Library Service Briefing Paper Paper 37/11 25 February 2011 NIAR 508-10 Dr. Jodie Carson Update: Comparative Car and Home Insurance Costs in NI 1 Overview A previous Research and Library Service
Solution: The optimal position for an investor with a coefficient of risk aversion A = 5 in the risky asset is y*:
Problem 1. Consider a risky asset. Suppose the expected rate of return on the risky asset is 15%, the standard deviation of the asset return is 22%, and the risk-free rate is 6%. What is your optimal position
National Disability Authority Resource Allocation Feasibility Study Final Report January 2013
National Disability Authority Resource Allocation Feasibility Study January 2013 The National Disability Authority (NDA) has commissioned and funded this evaluation. Responsibility for the evaluation (including
ASSIGNMENT 1 ST SEMESTER : MACROECONOMICS (MAC) ECONOMICS 1 (ECO101) STUDY UNITS COVERED : STUDY UNITS 1 AND 2. DUE DATE : 3:00 p.m.
Page 1 of 13 ASSIGNMENT 1 ST SEMESTER : MACROECONOMICS (MAC) ECONOMICS 1 (ECO101) STUDY UNITS COVERED : STUDY UNITS 1 AND 2 DUE DATE : 3:00 p.m. 19 MARCH 2013 TOTAL MARKS : 100 INSTRUCTIONS TO CANDIDATES
GOLD COAST VISITOR PROFILE AND SATISFACTION REPORT. Summary of results NOVEMBER 2013
GOLD COAST VISITOR PROFILE AND SATISFACTION REPORT Summary of results NOVEMBER 2013 3 GOLD COAST VISITOR PROFILE AND SATISFACTION REPORT: SUMMARY OF RESULTS Visitors to the Gold Coast that participated
Residential Property Investors in Australia 1
Reserve Residential Bank Property of Australia Investors in Bulletin Australia May 24 Residential Property Investors in Australia 1 Over the past decade, there has been a substantial increase in investor
Writing a degree project at Lund University student perspectives
1 Writing a degree project at Lund University student perspectives Summary This report summarises the results of a survey that focused on the students experiences of writing a degree project at Lund University.
The Study on the Value of New & Renewable Energy as a Future Alternative Energy Source in Korea
, pp.26-31 http://dx.doi.org/10.14257/astl.2015.86.06 The Study on the Value of New & Renewable Energy as a Future Alternative Energy Source in Korea Woo-Jin Jung 1, Tae-Hwan Kim 2, and Sang-Ying Tom Lee
How To Compare Social Preferences Of The General Public With The National Health Service
Social Science & Medicine 64 (2007) 2499 2503 www.elsevier.com/locate/socscimed Do NHS clinicians and members of the public share the same views about reducing inequalities in health? Aki Tsuchiya a,,
Conducting Formative Research
Conducting Formative Research 1 The foundation of any sound sanitation marketing program is formative research. Formative research follows a process and includes a set of tools that can be used to help
Guidelines for Gender Sensitive Programming Prepared by Brigitte Leduc and Farid Ahmad
Guidelines for Gender Sensitive Programming Prepared by Brigitte Leduc and Farid Ahmad November 2009 What is a Gender-Sensitive Programming Process? Gender is a critical factor that determines an individual
The Circular Flow of Income and Expenditure
The Circular Flow of Income and Expenditure Imports HOUSEHOLDS Savings Taxation Govt Exp OTHER ECONOMIES GOVERNMENT FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS Factor Incomes Taxation Govt Exp Consumer Exp Exports FIRMS Capital
Non-consumptive use of wildlife. Non-consumptive Use. Non-consumptive Use
Non-consumptive use of wildlife Non-consumptive Use Any non-hunting or non-extractive use Examples: wildlife feeding & photography, bird watching, whale watching Non-consumptive Use Sources of information
LONDON BOROUGH OF BROMLEY TEMPORARY ACCOMMODATION PROCUREMENT STRATEGY 2015
LONDON BOROUGH OF BROMLEY TEMPORARY ACCOMMODATION PROCUREMENT STRATEGY 2015 1. Overview 1.1 This strategy provides a framework for the procurement of suitable temporary accommodation within and outside
The impact of direct-indirect taxation on consumer
IOSR Journal of Engineering (IOSRJEN) e-issn: 2250-3021, p-issn: 2278-8719 Vol. 3, Issue 6 (June. 2013), V2 PP 08-13 The impact of direct-indirect taxation on consumer Ezat Sabir Esmaeel University of