HOW TO WRITE A MEDICAL LEGAL REPORT AND PRESENT IN COURT
|
|
- Victor Walsh
- 7 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 HOW TO WRITE A MEDICAL LEGAL REPORT AND PRESENT IN COURT William T. Morley bmorley@fasken.com
2 HOW TO WRITE A MEDICAL LEGAL REPORT AND PRESENT IN COURT Background In many, if not most, personal injury cases the outcome depends upon the opinion of an expert as opposed to a witness testifying to a fact. For instance, a witness who sees or feels muscles tightness can testify as a fact to what he saw or felt; to go further and say such muscle tightness is a spasm consistent with an injury caused by an accident is an opinion. In order to prove their case, a Plaintiff in a personal injury action is required to prove causation: that an accident caused a particular set of symptoms. Opinion evidence linking symptoms to an accident is crucial for proving a personal injury case. Such opinion evidence will not be admitted in court unless the provisions of Rule 40A of the Rules of Court which governs the admissibility of opinion evidence are met. Rule 40A Rule 40A states: Application (1) This rule does not apply to summary trials under Rule 18A, except as provided in that rule. Admissibility of written statements of expert opinion (2) A written statement setting out the opinion of an expert is admissible at trial, without proof of the expert's signature, if a copy of the statement is furnished to every party of record at least 60 days before the statement is tendered in evidence. Admissibility of oral testimony of expert opinion How to Write a Medical Legal Report and Present in Court Page 1 of 14
3 (3) An expert may give oral opinion evidence if a written statement of the opinion has been delivered to every party of record at least 60 days before the expert testifies. Idem (4) The statement also may be tendered in evidence. Form of statement (5) The statement shall set out or be accompanied by a supplementary statement setting out the following: (a) the qualifications of the expert; (b) the facts and assumptions on which the opinion is based; (c) the name of the person primarily responsible for the content of the statement. Proof of qualifications (6) The assertion of qualifications of an expert is prima facie proof of them. Admissibility of evidence (7) If a statement that does not conform to subrule (5) has been delivered (a) it is inadmissible under subrules (2) and (4), and (b) the testimony of the witness under subrule (3) is inadmissible unless the court otherwise orders. Notice of trial date to expert How to Write a Medical Legal Report and Present in Court Page 2 of 14
4 (8) A party who delivers a statement shall, on delivery or when a trial date has been obtained, whichever is later, inform the expert of the trial date and that the expert may be required to attend at trial for cross-examination. Demand to cross-examine (9) A party to whom a statement has been delivered under subrule (2) and who is adverse in interest to the party delivering the statement may, by demand to that party, require the attendance of the expert at trial for cross-examination. Idem (10) The expert need not attend at trial unless the demand is made within a reasonable time after delivery of the statement. Idem (11) The convenience and other commitments of the expert shall be taken into account in determining whether the demand has been made within a reasonable time. Costs of cross-examination (12) If an expert has been required to attend for cross-examination and the court is of the opinion that the cross examination was not of assistance, the court may order the party who required the attendance of the expert to pay, as costs, a sum the court considers appropriate. Notice of objection to expert evidence How to Write a Medical Legal Report and Present in Court Page 3 of 14
5 (13) A party who receives a written statement under subrule (2) or (3) shall notify the party delivering the statement of any objection to the admissibility of the evidence that the party receiving the statement intends to raise at trial. Idem (14) No objection under subrule (13) of which reasonable notice could have been given, but was not, shall be permitted at trial unless the court otherwise orders. Dispensing with statement (15) At trial, the court may dispense with the requirement of delivery of a statement. Idem (16) Without limiting the generality of subrule (15), the court may dispense with the requirement of delivery of a statement on one or more of the following grounds: (a) where facts have come to the knowledge of the party tendering the witness after the delivery of the statement of that witness's evidence, that could not, with due diligence, have been learned in time to be reduced to a further statement and delivered within the time required by this rule; (b) where the non-delivery is unlikely to cause prejudice (i) by reason of an inability to prepare for cross-examination, or (ii) by depriving the party against whom the evidence is tendered of a reasonable opportunity to present evidence in response; How to Write a Medical Legal Report and Present in Court Page 4 of 14
6 (c) where the interests of justice require it. Time (17) Before or at trial, the court may extend or abridge the time limits set out in this rule. The purpose of the Rule is to give the opposing party notice by providing them with a written version of the expert opinion and time to address it before the opinion is tendered in court. The Rule speaks in terms of a statement of an expert. For the purposes of this paper we will treat the statement as synonymous with a report prepared by an expert. The Rule attempts to correct a number of problems with expert reports which include: -late notice of expert evidence; -expert reports signed by one author but really a product of several peoples work and opinions; -authors who set out opinions without clarifying how those opinions connect to the case. A potential benefit of the Rule for a busy g.p. is that it creates an exception from the usual rules of evidence which require a witness to give evidence in person before the court. The witness evidence is usually lead by the lawyer for the party calling the witness, and the witness is cross examined by the lawyer for the opposing party. Rule 40A (9) allows a medical legal report which otherwise complies with the Rule to be admitted into evidence at trial without the witness attending court unless the opposing party demands the witness attend for cross-examination. How to Write a Medical Legal Report and Present in Court Page 5 of 14
7 Unfortunately for the busy g.p., in part because the Rule is an exception to a party attending in person to give evidence, the court takes its gate keeping role very seriously, and looks for the provisions of Rule 40A to be closely adhered to as stated by Mr. Justice Hood in Hayes v Brown 2001 BCSC 1046 at paragraph 26: The Court of Appeal has noted the importance of the requirements of Rule 40A(5)(b), describing it as one of the safeguards enacted in 1976 when written reports of experts were first permitted into evidence without the expert being examined and cross-examined in open court. See F.(K.E.). v Daoust (1995), 34 C.P.C. (3d) 393 at p In that case the Court found that the Trial Judge ought not to have admitted the delinquent report on the vital question before the Court, that of causation. And see also Goerzen v. Sjolie, [1997] B.C.J. No. 44, wherein the Court of Appeal observed that the provisions of Subrule (5) are mandatory, whether read alone or in conjunction with Subrule (7). It is certainly not simply a technical matter. The principle requirements imposed on the author of an expert report by Rule 40A are set out in Rule 40A(5) which states the report must contain or be accompanied by a supplementary statement containing: -the qualifications of an expert; -the facts and assumptions upon which the opinion is based; -the name of the person primarily responsible for the content of the report. Let us deal with qualifications and name of the person responsible first as these criteria are relatively uncontentious. How to Write a Medical Legal Report and Present in Court Page 6 of 14
8 Qualifications The listing of qualifications would seem simple, but compliance with the Rule can more complicated. The court has held where the only statement of qualification was on the letterhead that simply stating M.D., F.R.C.P. and neurologist was not enough. In Reid v. Belcaen 2003 BCSC 1450 para 11 the court said: The purpose of the rule, among other things, is to give the opposite side the information necessary to determine how to respond to the proposed evidence. In the case of Dr. Biro, it is obvious that he is a physician. It is not apparent what the nature of his experience is, nor is it apparent, for example, whether he is a specialist. The information provided in relation to his qualifications is at least arguably insufficient to comply with the requirements of Rule 40A(5). In the case of the reports of Dr. Falconer, more information as to his qualifications has been provided, but there was no information as to the nature of his practice, the length of his experience, or whether he has any particular expertise, such as an expertise in electrical diagnostic medicine, which is a recognized subspecialty of neurology and which is relevant to some of the opinions contained in his report. I will assume, for the purposes of what follows, that the information provided in these reports is insufficient to meet the requirements of the rule. A preamble or C.V. attached to your report should set out your education, training, and experience particularly in relation to the issues on which your opinion is offered. Sometimes the defence will object to a g.p. s expertise with respect to the diagnosis of particular injuries, for example, head injury, depression, post traumatic stress disorder. It is helpful in such cases to How to Write a Medical Legal Report and Present in Court Page 7 of 14
9 reference in a discussion of your qualifications training in the areas you will make a diagnosis or familiarity in these areas through experience in clinical practise. Name of the Person Responsible for the Report This requirement is not aimed particularly at g.p. s. Engineers in particular, and some accounting firms, were preparing reports signed by the senior engineer or accountant which were really a group effort with different parts of the report the product of various people. The court wants to know the expertise, and allow the opposing party to cross-examine, the individual responsible for each opinion in a report. Group reports are not allowed, and must be broken into components. In the medical field this criteria has been a problem when group reports are written by clinics, such as a pain clinic, or sometimes neuropsychology when reports are scored or interpreted by someone other than the author. This criteria can be met by prefacing your report with a statement confirming you are the author of the report and responsible for its contents. If someone else is responsible for a component of the report they should identify themselves, and prepare a supplementary report. Facts and Assumptions on which the Opinion is Based This requirement is without doubt the area most difficult to comply with and most subject to challenge. The court requires that the factors relating to your opinion be clearly set out in the report so it can assess whether those factors have been (a) proved and (b) carry weight in supporting your opinion. Statements in expert reports which state simply I have reviewed x records, are not sufficient to comply with the Rule: Reid v. Balcaen 2003 BCSC 1450, Narayan v Djurickovic 2003 BCSC How to Write a Medical Legal Report and Present in Court Page 8 of 14
10 Nor is it permissible to simply dictate the findings of other consultants, for instance the court in Lindholm v Vankouehnett [1998] B.C.J. No at para. 17 stated: A report which does no more than marshal and summarize the expert opinion of other experts giving evidence in the case is not admissible. That is the job of counsel. A report which having marshalled and summarized those opinions, does no more than express the opinion of the author that the views of one group of experts are to be preferred over those of another group is also inadmissible. That is an impermissible trespass upon the province of the trial judge. Normally a g.p. s report will be a mixture of true fact, hearsay (the patient told me x and y hurt), and history with reference to the advice of others (an x-rayed dated showed degeneration or a disc protrusion). Some reports particularly a medical legal consultant retained by counsel often set out facts and assumptions under a separate heading, and then set out their opinion under a heading such as analysis or opinion. This format meshes with Rule 40A nicely, but is more difficult for a g.p. in that the g.p. s report will normally proceed chronologically from the patient s first attendance after an accident, discuss the patient s verbal complaints (hearsay); physical findings of the physician (fact or a mixture of fact and hearsay); and the diagnosis will follow perhaps evolving over time depending upon how the symptoms progress. It seems artificial to set out the patient s history and your physical findings, and then restate those findings as you discuss diagnosis under a separate heading. The body of your report should in a chronological fashion set out: -what you have been told or learn through various sources; How to Write a Medical Legal Report and Present in Court Page 9 of 14
11 -your findings on examination (muscles spasm, tingling on certain tests, limited range of motion); -clearly link how the above information leads to your diagnosis. Normal Content in a Medical Legal Report In addition to the mandatory content required to comply with Rule 40A a medical legal report would normally include: -diagnosis; -discussion of treatment, medication, therapy, and patient s progress; -prognosis; -opinion as to causation (did the accident cause the symptoms); -discussion of the extent of the injury and degree of impairment; Other areas which are often commented upon include: -effect on a person s ability to work; -effect on their recreational and social life; -effect on their ability to work around the home and care for children; -care requirements they might have; -risk of re-injury or susceptibility to degeneration. As a rule of thumb probably ninety percent of cases settle. A well laid out, thoughtful medical legal report certainly assists the settlement process thus making trial less likely. How to Write a Medical Legal Report and Present in Court Page 10 of 14
12 How to Present in Court Sometimes, however, even with thorough medical legal reports settlement is not possible. It may be that fault for the accident is in issue. It may be that the parties disagree about any one of a number of damages issues, (cause of an injury, magnitude of an injury, effect of pre-existing injuries). If you have to attend court for cross examination on your report, bear in mind that the court appreciates your effort as stated in Dieter v Briggs 2009 BCSC 914 at para 28-31: [28] The defendants suggested in argument that Dr. Shuckett was an advocate but I do not accept that characterization. I found her to be very clear and objective in her evidence which she was well qualified to give. I pause here to note that the defendants appeared to me to show a lack of objectivity when assessing the role of physicians in litigation of this nature. The defendants stated in written and oral argument: In contrast to Dr. Shuckett, Dr. Cordoni presented as a [sic] impartial and unbiased physician which is highly unusual for a general practitioner. [29] This submission is what is known as a back-handed compliment. It is a gratuitous attack on Dr. Shuckett to suggest that she was not impartial, a proposition which is entirely unfair on the evidence. It is a suggestion that appears to praise Dr. Cordoni while it insults general physicians as a group, as if to say they are typically not able to provide independent medical evidence in soft tissue injury cases. This cynical submission is outrageous and unduly partisan. [30] This court hears many cases involving plaintiffs with claims that someone else s negligent action caused them personal injuries. These are persons who are entitled to damages under the common law of this country if their claims are proven. These are persons who may be suffering greatly from their injuries. This How to Write a Medical Legal Report and Present in Court Page 11 of 14
13 court could not perform its function of determining these important claims without the help of treating medical physicians including general practitioners. [31] Thus, physicians who do testify despite the inconvenience are performing a very important professional and public duty. Coming to court to testify and to face cross-examination may be the last thing a busy physician wants to do, faced with the burdens of practice. Often a general physician is the one physician who knows the patient best and who will have the longest history of treating the plaintiff before and after the incident giving rise to the claim. This court is extremely appreciative of the role physicians play in giving evidence. I sincerely hope that counsel for the defendants in this case reflected only his views, and not a general culture amongst legal counsel who represent defendants or defendant s insurers, when he decided to advance his submission which was so disrespectful of the important role of family doctors in personal injury cases. It is true that in some cases a medical practitioner may be impartial [sic] but it reflects poorly on the defendants to simply advance this as a general proposition. As this passage makes clear, the court is looking for an expert to give unbiased thoughtful opinion evidence, and values such advice. You should: -be prepared: review your report and records; -if you have questions or concerns speak to the lawyer who is calling you as a witness; -translate medical terms so a layman will understand; -answer truthfully; -avoid being an advocate arguing for one side; -not go outside your area of expertise; How to Write a Medical Legal Report and Present in Court Page 12 of 14
14 -take your time in responding to questions. Most lawyers calling you as a witness will be prepared to: -discuss the timing of your evidence -discuss your fee for preparation and attending trial -review your report, questions they will have for you, and likely questions to be posed by the defence Conclusion In preparing a good quality medical legal report, you are performing a valuable service for your patient and the court. It is worthwhile taking the time to do it well. Doing so makes it less likely you will end up in court, and if you do end up in court make the process a better one for you. How to Write a Medical Legal Report and Present in Court Page 13 of 14
How To Use The New Expert Witness Rule To Negotiate A Good Deal By Cary N. Schneider
April, 2011 VOL. 5, ISSUE 2 How To Use The New Expert Witness Rule To Negotiate A Good Deal By Cary N. Schneider Cary N. Schneider is a partner at Beard Winter LLP who specializes in accident benefit and
More informationWriting an Effective Expert Report: The Nuts and Bolts of Complying with Rule 53.03
Writing an Effective Expert Report: The Nuts and Bolts of Complying with Rule 53.03 Adam R. Little Partner Oatley Vigmond 2 Introduction Most lawsuits settle. It is therefore quite infrequent that an expert
More informationRULE 42 EVIDENCE AND PROCEDURE AT TRIAL
RULE 42 EVIDENCE AND PROCEDURE AT TRIAL Application (1) This rule does not apply to summary trials under Rule 19, except as provided in that rule. Witness to testify orally (2) Subject to any Act, statute
More informationCase Name: Sousa v. Akulu. Between Sousa, and Akulu et al. [2006] O.J. No. 3061. 36 C.P.C. (6th) 158. 150 A.C.W.S. (3d) 320. 2006 CarswellOnt 4640
Page 1 of 5 Case Name: Sousa v. Akulu Between Sousa, and Akulu et al [2006] O.J. No. 3061 36 C.P.C. (6th) 158 150 A.C.W.S. (3d) 320 2006 CarswellOnt 4640 Court File No. 05-CV-282383PD 3 Ontario Superior
More informationTHE MAJOR IMPACT OF THE NEW MINOR INJURIES CATEGORY
THE MAJOR IMPACT OF THE NEW MINOR INJURIES CATEGORY By Cary N. Schneider September, 2010 VOL. 4, ISSUE 4 Cary N. Schneider is a partner at Beard Winter LLP who specializes in accident benefit and tort
More informationSequence of Evidence and Witnesses in a Traumatic Brain Injury Case
Sequence of Evidence and Witnesses in a Traumatic Brain Injury Case Sequence of Evidence and Witnesses in a Traumatic Brain Injury Case Who's on First? Princeton, New Jersey Trial Diplomacy Journal, Vol.
More informationFACT PATTERN ONE. The following facts are based on the case of Bedard v. Martyn [2009] A.J. No. 308
FACT PATTERN ONE The following facts are based on the case of Bedard v. Martyn [2009] A.J. No. 308 The infant plaintiff developed a large blood clot in his brain at some time either before or during the
More informationWorking with an Expert
EXPERT EVIDENCE PAPER 2.1 Working with an Expert These materials were prepared by Leslie J. Mackoff of Mackoff & Company, Vancouver, BC for the Continuing Legal Education Society of British Columbia, October
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF WYANDOTTE COUNTY, KANSAS PLAINTIFF S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF WYANDOTTE COUNTY, KANSAS KC Plaintiff ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No.: 06 CV 1383 ) Defendant Doctor ) ) Defendant. ) PLAINTIFF S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS Plaintiff submits
More informationA Practical Summary of the New Supreme Court Civil Rules for Clark Wilson LLP Insurance Clients
A Practical Summary of the New Supreme Court Civil Rules for Clark Wilson LLP Insurance Clients by: Jennifer Loeb Clark Wilson LLP tel. 604.891.7766 jrl@cwilson.com Edited by: Larry Munn Clark Wilson LLP
More informationHOUSE BILL NO. HB0106. Medical malpractice-use of expert witnesses. A BILL. for. AN ACT relating to medical malpractice actions; providing
00 STATE OF WYOMING 0LSO-0 HOUSE BILL NO. HB0 Medical malpractice-use of expert witnesses. Sponsored by: Representative(s) Gingery A BILL for AN ACT relating to medical malpractice actions; providing for
More informationCOURT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE FOR EXPERTS
COURT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE FOR EXPERTS Justice Peter Biscoe 1. It is a pleasure to present this paper to the Environmental Institute of Australia and New Zealand s Professional Environmental Practice
More informationEffective Use of Experts. Litigating the Medical Malpractice Claim Ontario Bar Association
Introduction Effective Use of Experts By: Peter Kryworuk & Tyler Kaczmarczyk Lerners LLP Litigating the Medical Malpractice Claim Ontario Bar Association April 29, 2013 The importance of expert opinion
More informationProving Causation and Damages in Spinal Fusion Cases
Page 1 of 7 Ben Brodhead on proving causation and damages in spinal fusion cases. Friend on Facebook Follow on Twitter Forward to a Friend Proving Causation and Damages in Spinal Fusion Cases By: Ben C.
More informationPRACTICE DIRECTIONS IMMIGRATION AND ASYLUM CHAMBERS OF THE FIRST- TIER TRIBUNAL AND THE UPPER TRIBUNAL
Tribunals b Judiciary PRACTICE DIRECTIONS IMMIGRATION AND ASYLUM CHAMBERS OF THE FIRST- TIER TRIBUNAL AND THE UPPER TRIBUNAL Contents PART 1 PRELIMINARY 1 Interpretation, etc. PART 2 PRACTICE DIRECTIONS
More informationLegal Action / Claiming Compensation in Scotland
Legal Action / Claiming Compensation in Scotland This help sheet explains your legal rights if you have been injured as a result of medical treatment and the steps involved in seeking compensation through
More informationExpert Witnesses in the Federal Courts A Discussion Paper of the Federal Courts Rules Committee on Expert Witnesses
Expert Witnesses in the Federal Courts A Discussion Paper of the Federal Courts Rules Committee on Expert Witnesses Background The role of the expert witness is to assist the court through the provision
More informationSelecting Your Expert: Criteria to Determine the Right Expert for Your Case
MEDICAL EXPERTS 2009 PAPER 2.1 Selecting Your Expert: Criteria to Determine the Right Expert for Your Case These materials were prepared by Robin J. Harper of Dives, Grauer & Harper, Vancouver, BC, for
More informationGENERAL CIVIL JURY CHARGES IN GENERAL NEGLIGENCE CASES. Although you, as jurors, are the sole judges of the facts, you are duty-bound to follow
GENERAL CIVIL JURY CHARGES IN GENERAL NEGLIGENCE CASES General Introduction Ladies and Gentlemen, now that you have heard the evidence and the argument of the attorneys, it is now time for me to instruct
More information-----------------.----------------------------------------a-ax
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF BRONX: PART IA-3 -----------------.----------------------------------------a-ax ~YSOroANO. : Plaintiff, ALDOINOA, LSB LECTRIC CORP., and THE CITY OF NEW
More information1.1 Explain the general obligations of a claimant and defendant under the Practice Direction on Pre-Action Conduct ( PD-PAC )
Title Preparations for Personal Injury Trials Level 4 Credit value 10 Learning outcomes The learner will: 1 Understand the procedures which a litigant should follow before court proceedings are issued
More informationPROFESSIONAL GUIDE FOR ATTORNEYS AND PHYSICIANS of The Mississippi Bar and the Mississippi State Medical Association
PROFESSIONAL GUIDE FOR ATTORNEYS AND PHYSICIANS of The Mississippi Bar and the Mississippi State Medical Association PREAMBLE Realizing that a substantial part of the practice of law and medicine is concerned
More informationGADSBY WICKS SOLICITORS EXPLANATION OF LEGAL TERMS
EXPLANATION OF LEGAL TERMS Affidavit: After the event litigation insurance: Application notice: Bar Council: Barrister: Basic Charges: Before the Event Legal Expenses Insurance: Bill of costs: Bolam test:
More informationAdvice Note. An overview of civil proceedings in England. Introduction
Advice Note An overview of civil proceedings in England Introduction There is no civil code in England; English civil law comprises of essentially legislation by Parliament and decisions by the courts.
More informationCLAIMS AGAINST TELEPHONE ANSWERING SERVICES: THE TRILOGY OF PREVENTION, HANDLING AND RESOLUTION PART TWO: WHAT TO DO WHEN A CLAIM HAPPENS
CLAIMS AGAINST TELEPHONE ANSWERING SERVICES: THE TRILOGY OF PREVENTION, HANDLING AND RESOLUTION PART TWO: WHAT TO DO WHEN A CLAIM HAPPENS Martin M. Ween, Esq. Partner Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman
More informationA CLIENT GUIDE TO CLAIMING DAMAGES FOR CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE
A CLIENT GUIDE TO CLAIMING DAMAGES FOR CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE 1. INTRODUCTION Making a claim for damages (compensation) for clinical negligence can be a worrying and stressful experience. We recognise that
More informationInformation. Considering a clinical negligence claim. What gives rise to a clinical negligence claim? What about the issue of causation?
Information You are asking advice from Thomson Snell & Passmore about a possible clinical negligence claim. Such claims are complex and it would greatly assist your understanding of the issues if you read
More informationThe Indiana Coalition Against Domestic Violence
Evidentiary Issues in Domestic Cases: An Overview Introduction A. Importance of legal representation in cases that involve domestic violence. B. History of protection order laws and implications for evidence.
More informationGriffis, Carol v. Five Star Food Service
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims and Workers' Compensation Appeals Board Law Winter 2-6-2015 Griffis, Carol
More informationRepresenting Yourself. Your Family Law Trial
Representing Yourself at Your Family Law Trial - A Guide - June 2013 REPRESENTING YOURSELF AT YOUR FAMILY LAW TRIAL IN THE ONTARIO COURT OF JUSTICE This is intended to help you represent yourself in a
More informationClinical Negligence. Investigating Your Claim
www.lees.co.uk Clinical Negligence Investigating Your Claim Lees Solicitors LLP 44/45 Hamilton Square Birkenhead Wirral CH41 5AR Tel: 0151 647 9381 Fax: 0151 649 0124 e-mail: newclaim@lees.co.uk 1 The
More information1.1 Explain the general obligations of a claimant and defendant under the Practice Direction on Pre- Action Conduct ( PD-PDC )
Title Preparations for Personal Injury trials Level 4 Credit value 10 Learning outcomes The learner will: 1 Understand the procedures which a litigant should follow before court proceedings are issued
More informationPRACTICE DIRECTION NO. 1 OF 2015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE IN NORTHERN IRELAND QUEENS BENCH DIVISION (COMMERCIAL) EXPERT EVIDENCE
PRACTICE DIRECTION NO. 1 OF 2015 Introduction IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE IN NORTHERN IRELAND QUEENS BENCH DIVISION (COMMERCIAL) EXPERT EVIDENCE 1. This Practice Direction applies to all proceedings in
More informationPROFESSIONAL NEGLIGENCE ACTIONS EFFECTIVE EXPERT OPINION EVIDENCE
PROFESSIONAL NEGLIGENCE ACTIONS EFFECTIVE EXPERT OPINION EVIDENCE ) - \ These materials were prepared by Jeffrey Scott of.jeffreyd. Scott Legal Professional Corporation,. Regina, Saskatch13wan for the
More informationGLOSSARY OF SELECTED LEGAL TERMS
GLOSSARY OF SELECTED LEGAL TERMS Sources: US Courts : http://www.uscourts.gov/library/glossary.html New York State Unified Court System: http://www.nycourts.gov/lawlibraries/glossary.shtml Acquittal A
More informationA Guide for Childhood Sexual Abuse Survivors
You are not alone. It was not your fault. You have courage. You have choices. You have power. We re here to help. A Guide for Childhood Sexual Abuse Survivors Breaking the silence. Raising Awareness. Fighting
More informationTHE DEFENSE LAWYER S TOOL KIT FOR WORKING WITH MEDICAL EXPERTS
THE DEFENSE LAWYER S TOOL KIT FOR WORKING WITH MEDICAL EXPERTS ABA Tort Trial & Insurance Practice Section Medicine and Law Committee Annual Meeting August 1, 2009 Jessie L. Harris Williams Kastner 601
More informationCase 3:09-cv-00432-HEH Document 77 Filed 02/19/2010 Page 1 of 7
Case 3:09-cv-00432-HEH Document 77 Filed 02/19/2010 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division MINNESOTA LAWYERS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff,
More informationMemorandum. Trial Counsel in Medical Malpractice Cases. John E. Wetsel, Jr., Judge. From: Date: December 11, 2012. Sample Instructions.
Memorandum To: From: Trial Counsel in Medical Malpractice Cases John E. Wetsel, Jr., Judge Date: December 11, 2012 Subject: Sample Instructions ============================== Here is a complete set of
More informationCOURT OF QUEEN S BENCH OF ALBERTA Q.B. FAMILY LAW PRACTICE NOTE 3 FAMILY LAW CONFERENCES. (For matters under Part 12 of the Alberta Rules of Court)
COURT OF QUEEN S BENCH OF ALBERTA Q.B. FAMILY LAW PRACTICE NOTE 3 FAMILY LAW CONFERENCES (For matters under Part 12 of the Alberta Rules of Court) EFFECTIVE MARCH 1, 2011 Pursuant to Rule 4.11, a Court-directed
More informationWHAT LAWYERS LOOK FOR IN A MEDICAL LEGAL REPORT
Seminar written and presented by Angela Price-Stephens at the Trial Lawyers Association of B.C. Medical Malpractice Conference, Maui, HI January 2014 WHAT LAWYERS LOOK FOR IN A MEDICAL LEGAL REPORT Angela
More informationAddressing Abusive Lawyer Conduct in Relation to Litigation Proceedings
Author: Attorney Dan A. Riegleman N63 W23965 Main Street Sussex, Wisconsin 53089 Prepared: 06/01/10 WHITE PAPER: DR2504 Addressing Abusive Lawyer Conduct in Relation to Litigation Proceedings There are
More informationIn the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION TWO
In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION TWO KATHY WACKER and BRYAN No. ED99789 WACKER, Appeal from the Circuit Court Appellants, of Cape Girardeau County vs. Hon. William L. Syler ST.
More informationTransport Accident Act Common Law Protocols 1 April 2005 (amended as from March 2010)
Transport Accident Act Common Law Protocols 1 April 2005 (amended as from March 2010) 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Consistent with its mission and vision statement, Client Service Charter and public commitment
More informationASSEMBLY BILL No. 597
AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY APRIL 14, 2015 california legislature 2015 16 regular session ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597 Introduced by Assembly Member Cooley February 24, 2015 An act to amend Sections 36 and 877 of, and
More informationMedical Litigation in 2012
Medical Litigation in 2012 Jacob Tse Partner Mayer Brown JSM 8 May 2012 Medical Litigation All kinds of litigation relating to medico-legal matters Legal action for medical negligence 23989412 2 Time limit
More informationAny civil action exempt from arbitration by action of a presiding judge under ORS 36.405.
CHAPTER 13 Arbitration 13.010 APPLICATION OF CHAPTER (1) This UTCR chapter applies to arbitration under ORS 36.400 to 36.425 and Acts amendatory thereof but, except as therein provided, does not apply
More informationOpening Statements Handout 1
Opening Statements Handout 1 Once the jury has been chosen, the attorneys for both sides deliver an opening statement about the case to the jury. Opening statements outline the facts that the attorneys
More informationMODEL DIRECTIONS FOR CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE CASES (2012) - before Master Roberts and Master Cook
MODEL DIRECTIONS FOR CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE CASES (2012) - before Master Roberts and Master Cook Introductory note. These are the Model Directions for use in the first Case Management Conference in clinical
More informationWHAT NEEDS TO KNOW EVERY PROSPECTIVE EXPERT WITNESS THE LAW OF EXPERT EVIDENCE: Expert Witness Academy. April 28 April 30, 2011.
at The Advocates' Society Presented Expert Witness Academy National C. Murray Andrew LLP Lerners & Solicitors Barristers Box 2335 PO ON N6A 4G4 London 519.640.6313 Phone: LAW OF EXPERT EVIDENCE: THE EVERY
More informationThe Foundation of the International Association of Defense Counsel SURVEY OF INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION PROCEDURES: A REFERENCE GUIDE
Responses submitted by: Name: Roddy Bourke Law Firm/Company: McCann FitzGerald Location: Dublin, Ireland 1. Would your jurisdiction be described as a common law or civil code jurisdiction? The Republic
More informationToday I will discuss medical negligence following a number of recent high profile cases and inquests.
Tipp FM Legal Slot 29 th May 2012 Medical Negligence John M. Lynch, Principal Today I will discuss medical negligence following a number of recent high profile cases and inquests. Firstly, what is Medical
More informationPhysician s Guide to Billing Noninsured Services
NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR MEDICAL ASSOCIATION Physician s Guide to Billing revised 2009 GENERAL Definition of Noninsured medical services are not covered by the Newfoundland Medical Care Plan (MCP) and
More informationClinical Negligence: A guide to making a claim
: A guide to making a claim 2 Our guide to making a clinical negligence claim At Kingsley Napley, our guiding principle is to provide you with a dedicated client service and we aim to make the claims process
More informationTrials in Supreme Court
Trials in Supreme Court The final stage in an action (a proceeding started with a notice of civil claim) is the trial. The trial is your opportunity to go before a judge and possibly a jury, and tell your
More informationNew York Law Journal. Friday, January 6, 2006
New York Law Journal Friday, January 6, 2006 HEADLINE: BYLINE: Trial Advocacy, Impeachment With a Prior Inconsistent Statement Ben B. Rubinowitz and Evan Torgan BODY: One of the most exhilarating parts
More informationTHE EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE AND
THE EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE SAINT LUCIA CLAIM NUMBER SLUHCV 2002/0329 BETWEEN: AUDLYN FADLIEN Claimant AND ATTORNEY GENERAL Defendant Appearances: Mr. Hilford Deterville
More informationGeneral Information on Representing Yourself in a Workers Compensation Case
General Information on Representing Yourself in a Workers Compensation Case Idaho Industrial Commission PO Box 83720 Boise, ID 83720-0041 Telephone: (208) 334-6000 Fax: (208) 332-7558 www.iic.idaho.gov
More informationPRACTICE NOTE No. 2 of 2003 PERSONAL INJURIES ACTIONS
PRACTICE NOTE No. 2 of 2003 PERSONAL INJURIES ACTIONS The following notes are designed to explain how the Courts will approach the application and interpretation of the new rules for personal injuries
More informationA successful law career that spans nearly 40 years has to start somewhere.
February 11, 2002 News Story By Kelly A. McCauley Lawrence Gursten Education: Wayne State University Law School (1965) Experience: Gursten, Koltonow, Gursten, Christensen & Raitt, Southfield Professional
More informationQueensland PERSONAL INJURIES PROCEEDINGS ACT 2002
Queensland PERSONAL INJURIES PROCEEDINGS ACT 2002 Act No. 24 of 2002 Queensland PERSONAL INJURIES PROCEEDINGS ACT 2002 TABLE OF PROVISIONS Section Page CHAPTER 1 PRELIMINARY PART 1 INTRODUCTION 1 Short
More informationMedical Malpractice Reform
Medical Malpractice Reform 49 This Act to contains a clause wherein the state legislature asks the state Supreme Court to require a plaintiff filing a medical liability claim to include a certificate of
More informationGUIDE TO PERSONAL INJURY/ACCIDENT CLAIMS
GUIDE TO PERSONAL INJURY/ACCIDENT CLAIMS At Richard Grogan & Associates we have Solicitors with significant experience and expertise who will advise and guide you through all matters relating to bringing
More informationMinistry of Justice Whiplash Reform Programme: consultation on independence in medical reporting and expert accreditation
Ministry of Justice Whiplash Reform Programme: consultation on independence in medical reporting and expert accreditation Question 1: Do you agree that the proposed amendments to paragraphs 7.1A(1) and
More informationCHAPTER 2011-233. Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for House Bill No.
CHAPTER 2011-233 Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 479 An act relating to medical malpractice; creating ss. 458.3175, 459.0066,
More informationMOJ STAGE DEFAULTS AND PREPARATION FOR STAGE 3 HEARINGS. By Andrew Mckie (Barrister at Law) Clerksroom March 2012
MOJ STAGE DEFAULTS AND PREPARATION FOR STAGE 3 HEARINGS Introduction By Andrew Mckie (Barrister at Law) Clerksroom March 2012 Telephone 0845 083 3000 or go to www.clerksroom.com The protocol for Low Value
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT, FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR DUVAL COUNTY, FLORIDA.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT, FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR DUVAL COUNTY, FLORIDA. CASE NO.: 16- DIVISION: CV- vs. Plaintiff, Defendant. ORDER SETTING CASE FOR JURY TRIAL AND PRETRIAL CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING
More informationHow To Pass A Bill In The United States
S.B. SENATE BILL NO. SENATOR ROBERSON MARCH, Referred to Committee on Judiciary SUMMARY Revises provisions relating to certain civil actions involving negligence. (BDR -) FISCAL NOTE: Effect on Local Government:
More informationExpert Medical Evidence: The Australian Medical Association s Position
Expert Medical Evidence: The Australian Medical Association s Position The Australian Medical Association and its members have had an increasing interest in this field for many years, with the level of
More informationFridman v. Safeco Insurance Co., 41 Fla. Law Weekly S62 (Fla. February 25, 2016):
Clark Fountain welcomes referrals of personal injury, products liability, medical malpractice and other cases that require extensive time and resources. We handle cases throughout the state and across
More informationRules for Bankruptcy Cases, B.E. 2542 (1999) Translation
Rules for Bankruptcy Cases, B.E. 2542 (1999) Translation By virtue of Section 19 of the Act for the Establishment of and Procedure for Bankruptcy Court B.E. 2542 (1999) the Chief Justice of the Central
More informationThe Effect of Product Safety Regulatory Compliance
PRODUCT LIABILITY Product Liability Litigation The Effect of Product Safety Regulatory Compliance By Kenneth Ross Product liability litigation and product safety regulatory activities in the U.S. and elsewhere
More informationTHE IMPORTANCE OF COMPREHENSIVE NOTES AND RECORDS by: Ryan A. Murray, Oatley Vigmond Personal Injury Lawyers LLP
THE IMPORTANCE OF COMPREHENSIVE NOTES AND RECORDS by: Ryan A. Murray, Oatley Vigmond Personal Injury Lawyers LLP Introduction Comprehensive clinical notes and records are an important part of patient care.
More informationNew York Law Journal. Tuesday, November 28, 2000
New York Law Journal Tuesday, November 28, 2000 HEADLINE: BYLINE: Trial Advocacy, Direct Examination Of A Medical Expert Ben B. Rubinowitz and Evan Torgan BODY: The direct examination of your medical expert
More informationS u m m a ry Judgment and S u m m a ry Trials in Supreme Court
S u m m a ry Judgment and S u m m a ry Trials in Supreme Court This guidebook provides general information about civil, non-family claims in the Supreme Court of B.C. It does not explain the law. Court
More informationClinical Negligence. Issue of proceedings through to Trial
Clinical Negligence Issue of proceedings through to Trial Lees Solicitors LLP 44/45 Hamilton Square Birkenhead Wirral CH41 5AR Tel: 0151 647 9381 Fax: 0151 649 0124 e-mail: newclaim@lees.co.uk 1 1 April
More informationFEEDBACK ON REPORTS BY DR. K.J.B. RIX IN CIVIL CASES
FEEDBACK ON REPORTS BY DR. K.J.B. RIX IN CIVIL CASES I would be grateful if you would accept instructions to see xxxx and to prepare your report. I have no doubt that this will be with the same degree
More informationCase 4:04-cv-03221 Document 50 Filed in TXSD on 08/03/05 Page 1 of 10
Case 4:04-cv-03221 Document 50 Filed in TXSD on 08/03/05 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION EDGAR COELLO, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CIVIL
More informationGUARDIANSHIP / CONSERVATORSHIP: What Do I Need to Know?
GUARDIANSHIP / CONSERVATORSHIP: What Do I Need to Know? What is a Guardian? A guardian is a person who is responsible for your personal affairs. A guardian is appointed by a judge after he or she determines
More informationInformation for Worker s Compensation Clients
Information for Worker s Compensation Clients Overview of the Worker s Compensation Act Indiana Worker s Compensation cases are governed by a State law known as the Worker s Compensation Act. The legislature
More informationORDER. DISTRICT COURT, JEFFERSON COUNTY, COLORADO 100 Jefferson County Parkway Golden, Colorado 80401-6002. MARION WHILDEN AND MARY WHLDEN Plaintiff,
DISTRICT COURT, JEFFERSON COUNTY, COLORADO 100 Jefferson County Parkway Golden, Colorado 80401-6002 MARION WHILDEN AND MARY WHLDEN Plaintiff, v. KIMBERLY CLINE, ELMER DUDDEN and COLORADO CAB COMPANY, L.L.C.
More informationExecutive summary and overview of the national report for Denmark
Executive summary and overview of the national report for Denmark Section I Summary of findings There is no special legislation concerning damages for breach of EC or national competition law in Denmark,
More informationWORKERS COMPENSATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL. EMPLOYER CASE ID #[personal information] WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND WORKER DECISION #114
WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL BETWEEN: EMPLOYER CASE ID #[personal information] AND: APPELLANT WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND RESPONDENT AND: WORKER EMPLOYEE DECISION #114 Appellant
More informationSPECIAL CIVIL A GUIDE TO THE COURT
NEW JERSEY JUDICIARY SPECIAL CIVIL A GUIDE TO THE COURT Superior Court of New Jersey Law Division Special Civil Part Special Civil A Guide to the Court page 1 Special Civil is a court of limited jurisdiction
More information16 Steps to Getting a Fair Settlement for Your Injuries
The Petrylaw Personal Injury Reports 16 Steps to Getting a Fair Settlement for Your Injuries 1. Do not talk to anyone except your doctor, attorney or the police officer at the scene. Do not speak with
More informationDistrict Court Amendment (Expert Code and Appointment) Rule 2000
New South Wales District Court Amendment (Expert Code and Appointment) Rule 2000 under the District Court Act 1973 The District Court Rule Committee made the following rule of court under the District
More informationATTORNEY HELP CENTER: MEDICAL MALPRACTICE
ATTORNEY HELP CENTER: MEDICAL MALPRACTICE The healthcare industry has exploded over the last thirty years. Combined with an increasing elderly population, thanks to the Baby Boomer generation, the general
More informationHow To Settle A Car Accident In The Uk
PERSONAL INJURY COMPENSATION CLAIM GUIDE PERSONAL INJURY COMPENSATION CLAIM GUIDE This booklet has been produced by D.J. Synnott Solicitors to give our clients an understanding of the personal injury compensation
More informationWORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD APPEAL TRIBUNAL. [Personal information] CASE I.D. #[personal information]
WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD APPEAL TRIBUNAL BETWEEN: [personal information] CASE I.D. #[personal information] PLAINTIFF AND: WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND DEFENDANT DECISION #41 [Personal
More informationSTANDARDS FOR CERTIFICATION OF LAWYERS SPECIALIZING IN PERSONAL INJURY & WRONGFUL DEATH Revised January 1, 2013
STANDARDS FOR CERTIFICATION OF LAWYERS SPECIALIZING IN PERSONAL INJURY & WRONGFUL DEATH Revised January 1, 2013 Pursuant to the authority vested in the Arizona Board of Legal Specialization ( BLS ) by
More informationWhether considering the damages suffered from an ATTACKING EXPERT TESTIMONY EFFECTIVELY. by Hon. Eddward P. Ballinger, Jr.
ATTACKING EXPERT TESTIMONY EFFECTIVELY by Hon. Eddward P. Ballinger, Jr. Whether considering the damages suffered from an alleged contractual breach, the cause of plaintiff s injuries, or a professional
More informationPRE-ACTION PROTOCOL FOR LOW VALUE PERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS IN ROAD TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS FROM 31 JULY 2013
PRE-ACTION PROTOCOL FOR LOW VALUE PERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS IN ROAD TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS FROM 31 JULY 2013 Title Number I INTRODUCTION Definitions Para 1.1 Preamble Para 2.1 Aims Para 3.1 Scope Para 4.1 II GENERAL
More informationMOTOR VEHICLE COMPENSATION CLAIM SUCCESS
MOTOR VEHICLE COMPENSATION CLAIM SUCCESS 6 WAYS TO RUIN YOUR MOTOR VEHICLE COMPENSATION CLAIM 6 WAYS TO RUIN YOUR MOTOR VEHICLE COMPENSATION CLAIM In this guide, we have outlined the 6 most common ways
More informationImpeaching the Spine Injury Medical Expert. Ernest P. Chiodo, M.D., J.D., M.P.H., M.S., M.B.A., C.I.H. Physician-Attorney-Biomedical Engineer
Impeaching the Spine Injury Medical Expert By Ernest P. Chiodo, M.D., J.D., M.P.H., M.S., M.B.A., C.I.H. Physician-Attorney-Biomedical Engineer It is a common error that an attorney retains the wrong type
More informationIn force as of 15 March 2005 based on decision by the President of NIB ARBITRATION REGULATIONS
In force as of 15 March 2005 based on decision by the President of NIB ARBITRATION REGULATIONS Contents I. SCOPE OF APPLICATION... 4 1 Purpose of these Regulations... 4 2 Applicability to different staff
More informationBEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. G204754. JENNIFER WILLIAMS, Employee. MERCY HOSPITAL FORT SMITH, Employer
BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. G204754 JENNIFER WILLIAMS, Employee MERCY HOSPITAL FORT SMITH, Employer SISTERS OF MERCY HEALTH SYSTEM, Carrier CLAIMANT RESPONDENT RESPONDENT
More information--- Magistrate B R Wright. Melbourne REASONS FOR DECISION ---
!Undefined Bookmark, I IN THE MAGISTRATES COURT OF VICTORIA AT MELBOURNE Case No. D11970768 JOHN SAUNDERS Plaintiff v VICTORIAN WORKCOVER AUTHORITY Defendant --- MAGISTRATE: Magistrate B R Wright WHERE
More informationBEFORE THE ALASKA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS. In the Matter of ) ) K L. V ) OAH No. 11-0204-PER ) Div. R&B No. 2011-011
BEFORE THE ALASKA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS In the Matter of ) ) K L. V ) OAH No. 11-0204-PER ) Div. R&B No. 2011-011 DECISION I. Introduction K L. V appealed the Public Employees Retirement System
More informationBy: Brett D. Baber, Esq. and Steven Blackwell, Esq. Lanham Blackwell & Baber Attorneys. 207.942.2898 www.lanhamblackwell.com
By: Brett D. Baber, Esq. and Steven Blackwell, Esq. Lanham Blackwell & Baber Attorneys I m part of the professional and dedicated team of civil litigation attorneys and mediators at Lanham Blackwell &
More informationCHALLENGING A WILL ON THE GROUNDS OF TESTAMENTAR INCAPACITY PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE INTRODUCTION
CHALLENGING A WILL ON THE GROUNDS OF TESTAMENTAR INCAPACITY PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE INTRODUCTION My paper will focus on the practical and procedural aspects of challenging a will on the grounds of a testator
More information