1 ERA seminar September 2013 EU Gender Equality Law: The Burden of Proof in sex discrimination cases Else Leona McClimans Lawyer, Law firm Frøland & Co, Lillestrøm,
2 Introduction Content Legislative history gender equality Community legislation Test for shifting the burden of proof Stage 1: Where a prima facie case is made out Establishing facts Stage 2: respondent to prove non-discrimination Other means of establishing disparate impact ECJ case law
3 Legislative history The shifted burden of proof is about access to justice in discrimination cases Directive 97/80, (2003/73 recital ) and now 2006/54 recital 30 See also directives 2000/78/EC recital 31 and 32, and 2000/43/EC recital 21 and 22 Based on the principle of effectiveness: on the practical fact that it is normally impossible for the claimant to prove the actual factual basis or criteria applied in reaching the contested decision in discrimination cases
4 The shifting of the burden of proof Normally: the task of proving the facts upon which a claim is based rests upon the claimant. The defendant does not need to prove anything C-109/88 Danfoss and C-127/92 Enderby: developing a shifting of the burden of proof from the claimant to the defendant (employer) once the complainant established the facts that there was a disproportionate impact on one sex. The employer must prove that the reason was unrelated to sex.
5 C-109/88 Danfoss Female workers earned on average 7% less than male co-workers ECJ: if the system of pay is totally lacking in transparency and statistical evidence reveals a difference in pay between male and female workers the burden of proof shifts to the employer to account for the pay difference by factors unrelated to sex.
6 C-127/92 Enderby..if the pay of speech therapists is significantly lower than that of pharmacists and if the former are exclusively women while the latter are predominantly men, there is a prima facie case of sex discrimination, at least where the two jobs in question are of equal value and the statistics describing that situation are valid. (para 16) Where there is a prima facie case of discrimination, it is for the employer to show that there are objective and non-discriminatory reasons for the difference in pay (para 18)
7 Community legislation - Gender Equality Council Directive 97/80/EC on the burden of proof: intended to make the enforcement of the principle of equal treatment more effective. Covered not only equal pay cases, but any case of discrimination. Does not cover criminal cases. Art 1: The aim of this Directive shall be to ensure that the measures taken by the Member States to implement the principle of equal treatment are made more effective, in order to enable all persons who consider themselves wronged because the principle of equal treatment has not been applied to them to have their rights asserted by judicial process after possible recourse to other competent bodies
8 Community legislation - Gender Equality Council Directive 97/80/EC on the burden of proof: Art 4(1). Member States shall take such measures as are necessary, in accordance with their national judicial systems, to ensure that, when persons who consider themselves wronged because the principle of equal treatment has not been applied to them establish, before a court or other competent authority, facts from which it may be presumed that there has been direct or indirect discrimination, it shall be for the respondent to prove that there has been no breach of the principle of equal treatment. - Case C-196/02 Vasiliki Nikoloudi
9 Community legislation: Anti-discrimination Directive 2006/54/EC of 5 July 2006 on the implementation of the principle of equal opportunities and equal treatment of men and women in matters of employment and occupation (the Recast Directive) article 19(1) Directive 2000/43/EC article 8 Directive 2000/78/EC article 10 identically worded
10 Note: not inquisitorial processes The shifting of the burden of proof need not apply to proceedings in which it is for the court or competent body to investigate the facts to the case itself, that is, to proceedings that are inquisitorial rather than adversarial, as well as criminal cases Directive 2006/54 art 19(3) and (5)
11 Test for shifting the burden of proof 1. The complainant must prove the primary facts to establish a prima facie case. 2. The court must evaluate the fact and be satisfied that they are of sufficient significance to raise a presumption of discrimination. 3. If the complainant succeeds at 1 and 2, the burden of proof shifts to the respondent. 4. The respondent must provide an adequate explanation to discharge the burden of proving that a prohibited ground was not any part of the reason(s) for the treatment in question. 5. If the respondent fails to discharge the burden of proof, the court must make a finding of unlawful discrimination.
12 The two-stage test : 1) The claimant must show facts from which it may be presumed that there has been direct or indirect discrimination 2) If no 1 is fulfilled, then the respondent must prove on a balance of probabilities and despite the prima facie case made out by the claimant, that the reason for the treatment complained of is NOT caused by any discrimination whatsoever.
13 The first stage: What kind of facts? The burden of proof does not shift simply on proof that there has been a difference in treatment and a difference in sex (or race or age or disability etc). There must be additional facts not proving that discrimination has occurred, but supporting the likeliness of a direct or indirect discrimination occurring the probability A slightly higher probability (50,1%) is sufficient to shift the burden of proof regarding 1. the less favorable treatment of the claimant 2. the reason why the claimant is less favorably treated (on the grounds of being part of a protected group)
14 Prima facie evidence of discrimination Did the alleged treatment occur? If so, when, by whom? Who was affected? It there an actual or hypothetical comparator who was/ could have been treated differently? Were proper procedures followed? Is there evidence of prejudice, segregation or past discrimination? Was the treatment on the alleged grounds? The court needs to consider all the evidence relevant to the complaint of discrimination, including evidence adduced by the respondent disputing the claimant s evidence.
15 Establishing facts Not always easy because a prima facie case must be built on whatever resources are available to the worker (is a worker entitled to request information from the employer fex on the qualifications of other candidates?). In many countries making voice recordings or taking pictures/ filming is not allowed, even a punishable offence Impertinent comments are difficult to prove. An oral statement is not accepted as evidence if not witnessed or admitted to. (Are you pregnant? Given your religion, will you be able to perform this task?)
16 Primary facts include The facts to the complaint being made: What happened, who was where, when, why and how.. Background evidence: how many women/ minorities/ disabled does this company employ, how many of these has got a promotion etc? Were the claimant and the successful candidate equally well qualified and had similar experience? What is the reason given for the non-selection of the claimant? Relevant statistical evidence and rules: Infringements of company agreements/ voluntary commitments/ equal opportunities policy etc From these primary facts, a court may draw inferences
17 Establishing facts The evidence accepted by national courts are key to the prospects of the claimants case CJEU Case C-104/10 Kelly: Member states may not apply rules which are liable to jeopardise the achievement of the objectives pursued by a directive and therefore deprive it of its effectiveness
18 Case C-54/07 Firma Feryn The facts: an employer had in 2005 publicly stated a policy of not employing certain ethnic minorities. Was this policy capable of being a fact which would place the burden upon the employer to disprove the discriminatory nature of its recruitment policy at a later time? How strict must the national court be in assessing evidence in rebuttal of the presumption?
19 Case C-54/07 Firma Feryn - para The statement may constitute facts of such a nature as to give rise to a presumption of a (still existing) discriminatory recruitment policy. It is for the employer to adduce evidence that it has not breached the principle of equal treatment. The national court must verify that the facts alleged against the employer are established and to assess the sufficiency of the evidence which the employer adduces in support of its contentions that it has not breached the principle of equal treatment.
20 The second stage the respondent The burden of proof shifts to the respondent (employer) once a prima facie case is established, to prove no breach of the principle of equal treatment. The court must uphold the complaint unless the respondent provides a cogent explanation which is sufficient to prove, on a balance of probabilities, that there has been no discrimination whatsoever. The court may go directly to the second stage focusing on the respondent s reason for the treatment.
21 The second stage the respondent The weight of the burden of proof imposed at the second stage will depend on the strength of the prima facie at the first stage The respondent must prove that there is a reason for the decision which is not discriminatory, and that the nondiscriminatory reason is the only reason for the decision. The employer must either provide an explanation that in no sense at all is connected to the protected status of the employee, or provide an explanation in which it is accepted that what occurred is related to the protected status of the employee, but that the exceptions to direct/ indirect discrimination are invoked
22 What evidence may be considered at each stage? Situation testing? Depending on national legislation if admitted as evidence Statistics increasingly used, such as the ECHR case D.H and other vs Czech Republic of 13. November 2007 (app 57325/00 Grand Chamber % Roma pupils in special schools
23 ECJ: Case C-81/12 ACCEPT 58. In the overall assessment carried out by the national body or court hearing the matter, a prima facie case of discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation may be refuted with a body of consistent evidence. As Accept has, in essence, submitted, such a body of evidence might include, for example, a reaction by the defendant concerned clearly distancing itself from public statements on which the appearance of discrimination is based, and the existence of express provisions concerning its recruitment policy aimed at ensuring compliance with the principle of equal treatment within the meaning of Directive 2000/78.
24 ECJ: Case C-81/12 ACCEPT 59 Having regard to the foregoing, the answer to the third question is that Article 10(1) of Directive 2000/78 must be interpreted as meaning that, if facts such as those from which the dispute in the main proceedings arises were considered to be facts from which it may be presumed that there has been discrimination based on sexual orientation in the recruitment of players by a professional football club, the modified burden of proof laid down in Article 10(1) of Directive 2000/78 would not require evidence impossible to adduce without interfering with the right to privacy.
25 Indirect discrimination - justification If the claimant establishes a prima facie case that a provision, criterion or practice of the respondent puts/ would put old/disabled etc at a particular disadvantage compared with others without that particular characteristic If the respondent is not able to provide an adequate explanation to rebut the claimant s facts and to prove that any disadvantage is unrelated to the protected ground, the court must make a finding of indirect discrimination UNLESS the respondent can justify that the provision, criterion or practice as appropriate and necessary means of achieving a legitimate aim and thus not discriminatory
26 The importance of inferences : presuming that discrimination might have happened Trying to establish a causative link between the primary facts/ treatment and the alleged discrimination An inference is a link between the discriminatory ground and a fact in the case; the process of inference drawing is a consideration of what conclusions might be drawn from evidence not specifically or indirectly tainted with discrimination Adverse inferences: when an employer does not provide fex witnesses involved in the event etc Where there is a difference in treatment an a difference in characteristic and no acceptable explanation is given by the employer, an inference of discrimination may follow
27 ECJ Case C-415/10 Meister Facts of the case: Speech Design advertised for an experienced software developer twice. Ms Meister claimed to be qualified for the job, responded both times, and was rejected twice. Speech Design did not invite her to an interview and did not tell her on what ground her application was unsuccessful. Ms Meister alleged discrimination based on sex, age and ethnic origin and claimed a right to information. The referring court questions whether Ms Meister can claim a right to information on the basis of Directives 2000/43, 2000/78 and 2006/54 and, if so, what are the consequences of a refusal of disclosure by Speech Design.
28 ECJ: Case C-415/10 Meister 46. The answer to the first question is that Article 8(1) of Directive 2000/43, Article 10(1) of Directive 2000/78 and Article 19(1) of Directive 2006/54 must be interpreted as not entitling a worker who claims plausibly that he meets the requirements listed in a job advertisement and whose application was rejected to have access to information indicating whether the employer engaged another applicant at the end of the recruitment process. 47. Nevertheless, it cannot be ruled out that a defendant s refusal to grant any access to information may be one of the factors to take into account in the context of establishing facts from which it may be presumed that there has been direct or indirect discrimination. It is for the referring court to determine whether that is the case in the main proceedings, taking into account all the circumstances of the case before it.
29 Conclusion community legislation Material from the ECJ to guide the interpretation of the burden of proof is still sparse National courts decide on the cases before them. Equal practice in all member states? What is the standard of proof? More probable than not? Other discrimination grounds than sex: Different standards for different grounds and cases?
The Burden of Proof Trier May 2013 Declan O Dempsey email@example.com What is it? Common Law country- judge = neutral; parties display evidence before the judge. They are responsible for the points they
EQUAL TREATMENT IN EMPLOYMENT [S.L.452.95 1 SUBSIDIARY LEGISLATION 452.95 EQUAL TREATMENT IN EMPLOYMENT REGULATIONS 5th November, 2004 LEGAL NOTICE 461 of 2004, as amended by Legal Notices 53 and 338 of
Direct and indirect discrimination and harassment: key concepts of EU anti-discrimination law Prof. Dr. Christa Tobler, LL.M. Europa Institutes of the Universities of Basel (Switzerland) and Leiden (Netherlands)
Code of practice for employers Avoiding unlawful discrimination while preventing illegal working [xx] April 2014 Presented to Parliament pursuant to section 23(1) of the Immigration, Asylum and Nationality
1. General dh Recruitment Hereford & Worcester embraces diversity and will seek to promote the benefits of diversity in all of our business activities. We will seek to develop a business culture that reflects
Introduction: Access to justice, burden of proof, remedies Oddný Mjöll Arnardóttir, professor Access to justice Where to bring a complaint? EU Directives 2000/42, 200/78 (and 54/2006): Member States shall
EU Gender Equality Law Workshop II: case study on equal pay Michael Newman Solicitor, England & Wales 1 Play a data game! Spot the jobs where women are paid more than men. International legal framework
EQUAL OPPORTUNITIES AND DIVERSITY POLICY 1. GENERAL 1.1 Juice Resource Solutions Limited embraces diversity and will seek to promote the benefits of diversity in all of our business activities. We will
EU law issues Welfare law is governed by EU in terms of free movement of EU migrant workers, the scope of the Race Directive 2000 and Directive 79/7/EEC of 19 December 1978 on the progressive implementation
The Equality Act Guide for HR Professionals The employment implications of the Equality Act 2010 Background In February 2005 the Government launched a review of UK discrimination law. The main objective
Unofficial translation The Law of Georgia On the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Article 1. The Objective of the Law The present law aims to eliminate any form of discrimination and to ensure
Flexible Worker Guidance Equality and Diversity This document and the attached key points have been created to provide guidance for all NHS Professionals Flexible Workers regarding Equality and Diversity
Summary of the law on SEXUAL ORIENTATION DISCRIMINATION This booklet sets out the basic employment rights to which workers are entitled under the sexual orientation discrimination provisions of the Equality
Equality Act 2010 What does it mean for LSE? Table of contents Introduction...- 2 - Overview of the Equality Act 2010...- 2 - The Protected Characteristics: Key areas to consider...- 2 - Age...- 4 - Disability
Summary of the law on AGE DISCRIMINATION This booklet sets out the basic employment rights to which workers are entitled under the age discrimination provisions of the Equality Act 2010. These apply in
OVERVIEW OF THE EQUALITY ACT 2010 1. Context A new Equality Act came into force on 1 October 2010. The Equality Act brings together over 116 separate pieces of legislation into one single Act. Combined,
Summary of the law on DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION This booklet sets out the basic employment rights to which workers are entitled under the age discrimination provisions of the Equality Act 2010. These apply
This case study is adapted from the original and was used in December 2008 when NIJAC was recruiting a Chairman of the Industrial Tribunals and Fair Employment Tribunal. Applicants had 40 minutes to complete
What Supervisors Need to Know about Discrimination Reference Guide Office of Human Resources Consulting Services 433 Archer House 292-2800 Workshop Objectives Workshop participants will be able to: Define
The Equality Act: Guidance for small businesses Understanding legal definitions of discrimination and unlawful behaviour in the Equality Act Understanding legal definitions of discrimination and unlawful
Kristina Koldinská Faculty of Law, Charles University Directive 2004/113 Scope Definitions Actuarial factors Art. 5 Defence of rights Short evaluation of the Directive Test-Achats case A.G. Kokott opinion
EQUALITY RIGHTS IN NORTHERN IRELAND INTRODUCTION The CWU Equal Opportunities Department are pleased to put this Northern Ireland Equality Laws Toolkit together for the benefit of our representatives in
TEMPLATE FOR VIDCAST: EQUALITY STRANDS OBLIGATIONS OF THE EMPLOYER INTRODUCTION I m Rena Magdani, Employment Partner from Freeth Cartwright LLP. The topic I am considering today is equality and discrimination
Employment law solicitors At Millbank solicitors we are dedicated to providing prompt and practical employment advice to both employers and employees. Our expert lawyers appreciate and understand the ever
Diversity Issues for Recruitment and Selection of Staff This document provides a summary of the main equality and diversity related issues relevant to the University s procedures. It includes some definitions,
Sharpe Pritchard Non-discrimination, Equality and Diversity Policy with Regard to Services and Personnel 1. The firm s general commitment 1.1. The firm is committed to avoiding discrimination, harassment
GUIDANCE NOTE Discrimination Law March 2013 Equality Act 2010 In October 2010 the separate threads of UK Discrimination Law were consolidated in the Equality Act 2010 (except for equal pay which is still
Equality, Diversity and Inclusivity Policy 1 Policy Statement Cripps is committed in all its activities as an employer, supplier of legal services and user of other businesses and individuals to: the elimination
EQUAL OPPORTUNITIES POLICY STATEMENT AND CODE OF PRACTICE GELDER GROUP EQUAL OPPORTUNITIES POLICY AND CODE OF PRACTICE 1. INTRODUCTION The Gelder Group is committed to a comprehensive policy of equal opportunities
Equality and Diversity Policy Responsible SMT person Assistant Principal Adult, HE & Community Effective from (this version) Review date Main points of policy List of procedures for implementation Related
1 of 18 Contents What is this guidance about? 3 How has this guidance changed? 3 A. About the Equality Act 2010 (the Act) 3 A1. What is the overall effect of the Act? 3 A2. What are protected characteristics?
Equality and Diversity Policy Responsible SMT person Effective from (this version) Review date Vice Principal December 2011 December 2012 Main points of policy The College is committed to advancing equality
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (First Chamber) 28 July 2016(*) (Reference for a preliminary ruling Social policy Directive 2000/78/EC Equal treatment in employment and occupation Article 3(1)(a) Directive 2006/54/EC
Equality and Diversity Policy July 2015 Policy Group: Equality and Diversity Procedure Number: 3.1 Procedure Title: Equality and Diversity Policy Author: Gail Crossman Date and current version: July 2015
p. 1 1. Introduction The promotion of equality has grown as a focus of public policy in Ireland in recent years. This has been reinforced and given statutory effect in recent equality legislation the Employment
Equality Act 2010 The impact on sporting clubs, organisations, and individuals Brief overview Over the last 30 years many laws (acts) have been introduced to help drive towards a more equal society. The
WELCOME TO NEW YORK! The NEW YORK HUMAN RIGHTS LAW ( NYHRL ) (http://www.nysdhr.com/hrlaw.html) prohibits discrimination in employment on the basis of sex. Women can bring the following claims under the
Document FXU-BOT-101 Equality & Diversity Policy Version Version b Subject to Approval By FXU Board Approved 26 th June 2014 Subject to review No more than 2 years Last review Date June 2016 Signed 1 1
Equality and Diversity Policy Summary This document outlines: Our policy and commitment to equality and diversity for students, employees and others; Information about how we put this policy into practice
Laws Related to Employment Testing and Practices Background Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Civil Rights Act of 1991, the Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures, the Americans
Equality, Diversity and Inclusion Policy What is the purpose of this policy? We are striving to encourage equality of opportunity everyone in employment and are committed to ensuring that unlawful discrimination
NHS Grampian Equality, Diversity and Human Rights Policy for Staff Co-ordinator: Equality and Diversity Manager Reviewer: GAPF Policies Subgroup Approver: Grampian Area Partnership Forum (GAPF) Date approved
Summary of the law on EQUAL PAY This booklet deals with equal pay claims under the Equality Act 2010. THE LAW COMPARATORS CLAIMS DEFENCES TIME LIMITS What does the law say? The right to equal pay for equal
WELCOME TO TEXAS! The Texas Commission on Human Rights Act (TCHRA) (http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/statutes/docs/la/content/htm/la.002.00.000021.00.htm) prohibits discrimination in employment on the basis
A Manager s Guide to Reasonable Accommodation This guide is the responsibility of the Public Service Agency Province of British Columbia TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION...2 KEY CONCEPTS...3 A. The Concept
Employment Law Guide Settlement Agreements (Formally known as Compromise Agreements) See the separate guide. Unfair Dismissal Length of employment Employees can only bring a claim for ordinary unfair dismissal
The Minimum Wage In AZ, the minimum wage is $8.05/hr. Almost all workers in Arizona have the right to receive the minimum wage. Your immigration status doesn t matter at all. When should you receive more
Labour Law in Denmark 2 Labour Law in Denmark Labour Law in Denmark The Danish labour market is in many ways significantly different from what you may have experienced in other jurisdictions. If you have
Germany Germany Introduction The labor law of the Federal Republic of Germany covers all legal rules concerning the relationship between employers and employees and their respective organizations. Traditionally,
What is Evidence, and What It Takes to Prove Discrimination There are many things that happen on the job that are unkind, unpleasant, unfair, or downright insulting! Sometimes these things happen because
Policy National Examining Board for Dental Nurses Effective Date October 2014 Date Last Reviewed Scheduled Review Date October 2016 Supersedes Original Author Owned by Monitored by Equality and Diversity
Elite Employment practices liability insurance The last few years have been extraordinarily active in shaping workplace law and this looks set to continue with employee rights strengthening. In addition,
Equality and Diversity Policy February 2015 Contents Page no. Kier Group Plc 3 Statement of Intent 3 Core Policy 4 Forms of discrimination principles 4 Equality and diversity in recruitment, selection,
Attorney-General s Department Discussion paper The Consolidation of Commonwealth Anti-Discrimination Laws Submission of the Physical Disability Council of NSW January 2012 Physical Disability Council of
Liverpool Hope University Equality and Diversity Policy Approved by: University Council Date approved: 14.04.2011 Revised (statutory 18.02.2012 changes) Consistent with its Mission, Liverpool Hope strives
EQUALITY, DIVERSITY AND INCLUSION POLICY AND PROCEDURE HR01 Applies to: EQUALITY, DIVERSITY AND INCLUSION POLICY AND PROCEDURE Original Date of Board Approval: January 2012 Review Date: November 2014 Updated:
INTEGRATING EQUALITY AND DIVERSITY INTO PROCUREMENT GUIDANCE FOR CONTRACTORS & SUPPLIERS Produced by: David Gomersall Procurement and Print Manager JANUARY 2010 CONTENTS Page s 1. Overview 1 2. Why include
RESEARCH COUNCIL EQUALITY AND DIVERSITY POLICY Content Policy statement 1. Principles 2. Definitions 3. Research Council commitment 4. Employee accountabilities and responsibilities 5. Recruitment 6. Training
Recruitment and Selection Policy Recruitment and Selection Policy 1. Purpose The purpose of this recruitment and selection policy is to ensure: a professional and consistent approach to recruitment and
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 30 October 2007 (Widow s and widower s pension rights Equal treatment of women and men Article 69 EEA Directive 79/7/EEC Directive 86/378/EEC) In Case E-2/07, EFTA Surveillance Authority,
Equal Opportunity Policy PURPOSE Anahita Residences & Villas Ltd is committed to becoming an equal opportunity employer and to ensuring that all employees, job applicants, customers and other people with
Employer Guide to the Equality Act 2010 2 The Equality Act 2010 brings together and harmonises lots of previous equality law which had been enacted over a long period, so that the law will become simpler
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Brussels, 11 February 2010 6092/10 Interinstitutional File: 2008/0140 (CNS) SOC 75 JAI 108 MI 39 NOTE from : The Presidency to : The Working Party on Social Questions on :
RECENT U.S. DEVELOPMENTS RESPECTING TELEWORK Alvin Goldman, University of Kentucky Jurisdiction with Authority to Regulate or Decide 1. Which governmental body has authority to regulate various aspects
The Equality Act 2010: Opportunities and responsibilities Gary Loke Equality Challenge Unit University of Exeter: October 2012 Our work = Established in 2001 to promote equality for staff in higher education
A summary of the law on: Unfair Dismissal and Redundancy Employees are protected under the Employment Rights (Northern Ireland) Order 1996 from being unfairly dismissed or chosen unfairly for redundancy.
PHRC Pre-Employment Inquiries The Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission (PHRC) is a state agency which enforces the laws prohibiting discrimination because of race, color, religion, ancestry, age, sex,
Equality and Diversity Policy V1.2 Final 2015 33 30 EQUALITY AND DIVERSITY POLICY Author: Date of Release: 08 September 2015 Version No. & Status: V1.2 Final 2015 11 30 Approved By: Executive Management
EQUALITY AND DIVERSITY POLICY POLICY STATEMENT 1. PHSO aims to be an exemplar organisation, demonstrating excellence in equality and diversity. We strive to be inclusive through respecting one another,
Equality Act 2010 The Equality Act 2010 brings together, harmonises and in some respects extends the current equality law, by making it more consistent, clearer and easier to follow in order to make society
Fair Access, Diversity & Inclusion This is the 7th briefing paper to be issued on the Monitoring and Review of Supporting People. INTRODUCTION Throughout the Supporting People programme there is a strong
WHO'S ON THE FIRING LINE? TIPS FOR AVOIDING WRONGFUL/RETALIATORY DISCHARGE CLAIMS by William R. Hanna I. INTRODUCTION A. Union members were only 7.2% of the private sector work force in 2009, down from
What you need to know about Massachusetts Transgender Rights Law October 2013 On November 23, 2011, Governor Deval Patrick signed into law H3810, An Act Relative to Gender Identity. This law adds gender