RECOVERING FROM THE EMPLOYER
|
|
- Melissa Powell
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Recovery for Work-Related Injuries Outside of Pennsylvania s Workers Compensation System Jeremy K. O Steen I. INTRODUCTION In Pennsylvania, an employee s work-related injuries and death are compensable almost exclusively through the Pennsylvania Workers Compensation Act (hereinafter PWCA ), 77 Pa. Cons. Stat. 411(1), 481(a). Unless an exception applies, an employee may not bring a lawsuit against her employer (or co-worker). In return, employees are guaranteed some compensation for injuries without the burdensome requirement of establishing an employer s fault. Thus, the PWCA therefore deprived workers of some rights in exchange for surer benefits, and immunized employers from common law actions in order to make benefits available to workers who were therefore without practical remedies. Uon v. Tanabe Int l Co., No , 2010 WL , at *3 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 30, 2010) (quoting Kuney v. PMA Ins. Co., 525 Pa. 171, 174, 578 A.2d 1285 (1990)). As for the exceptions, they are narrow and few. An employee may seek tort recovery, and will not be precluded by the exclusivity of the PWCA, for the following: (1) An aggravation of a work-related injury as a result of an employer s fraudulent misrepresentation; (2) An injury caused by the tortious conduct of an employer if the worker is not in the course of employment at the time of injury; (3) An injury caused by an act of a third person intended to injure the employee because of reasons personal to him, and not directed against him as an employee or because of his employment; and (4) An injury caused by a co-employee as a result of intentional wrong. The purpose of this article is to examine and clarify the circumstances wherein an employee may recover outside of the PWCA for work-related injuries. II. RECOVERING FROM THE EMPLOYER It is important to emphasize at the outset that although other states permit such an action, the PWCA is the injured employee s exclusive remedy even [] where an employer intentionally or through willful and wanton conduct causes an employee harm. Uon v. Tanabe Int l Co., No , 2010 WL , at *3 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 30, 2010) (quoting
2 Poyser v. Newman & Co., Inc., 514 Pa. 32, 36, 522 A.2d 548 (1987)). See Wendler v. Design Decorators, Inc., 768 A.2d 1172 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2001) (holding that exclusivity provision of PWCA prohibited tort recovery against employer for reckless/willful disregard of OSHA standards); Alston v. St. Paul Ins. Cos., 531 Pa. 261, 612 A.2d 421 (1992) (holding that exclusivity provision of PWCA prohibited tort recovery for fraudulent handling of compensation benefits); Snyder v. Specialty Glass Products, Inc., 441 Pa.Super. 612, 658 A.2d 366 (1995) (holding that exclusivity provision of PWCA prohibited tort recovery against employer for intentional infliction of emotional distress because no exception for intentional tort exists); Blouse v. Superior Mold Builders, Inc., 363 Pa.Super. 516, 526 A.2d 798 (1987) (holding that exclusivity provision of PWCA prohibited tort recovery for workers against employer where employer intentionally caused them injuries by failing to warn of known dangers inherent in chemicals, by removing warning labels from chemical containers, and by assuring them that the chemicals were safe for use). There is only a single exception to employer s immunity with respect to intentional conduct, set forth below, for fraudulent representation that results in aggravation of work-related injury. 1. The exception for fraudulent misrepresentation resulting in aggravation of workrelated injury has been construed as narrowly as possible. In the seminal case, Martin v. Lancaster Battery Co., an employee suffered a workplace injury as a result of lead exposure. 530 Pa. 11, 13-14, 606 A.2d 444. While federal regulations required the employer to regularly test its employees for lead levels in blood, the employer in this case intentionally concealed the blood test results by altering those results. Id. at 14, 606 A.2d 444. Because of the employer s intentional misrepresentation of the test results, the employee s continued exposure to lead caused greater injury than would have occurred had the employer accurately represented the blood test results. Id. The employee sought compensation for the aggravation of the injury alone. Id. at 20, 606 A.2d 444. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that the PWCA s exclusivity provision did not apply to immunize the employer. Id. at 19, 606 A.2d 444. To fit within the Martin exception, the employee must show that his employer aggravated an existing injury through fraudulent misrepresentation or concealment of facts
3 pertaining to that injury. Uon v. Tanabe Int l Co., No , 2010 WL , at *4 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 30, 2010) (citing Ranalli v. Rohm & Haas Co., 983 A.2d 732, (Pa. Super. Ct. 2009); Santiago v. Penn. Nat. Mut. Cas. Ins. Co., 418 Pa.Super. 178, 613 A.2d 1235, (Pa. Super. Ct. 1992)). The law in Pennsylvania is so thoroughly settled that no possibility exists outside of this narrow framework. Id. 2. The dual capacity doctrine is absolutely inapplicable when the injury occurs during the performance of the employee s job. There is one further exception when it comes to recovering against an employer, called the dual capacity doctrine. Under this doctrine, Pennsylvania courts have found an exception to the PWCA when there was a separate duty owed by the employer to the public, and the employee could not be distinguished from a member of the public to whom that duty was owed. Callender v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co., 387 Pa.Super. 283, 295, 564 A.2d 180 (1989) (citing Tatrai v. Presbyterian Univ. Hosp., 497 Pa. 247, 439 A.2d 1162 (1982); Budzichowski v. Bell Tel. Co. of Pennsylvania, 503 Pa. 160, 469 A.2d 111 (1983)). The seminal case here is Tatrai v. Presbyterian University Hospital, where a hospital employee became ill on the job and was sent to the emergency room. 497 Pa. at 249, 439 A.2d Because the emergency room was open to the public and the hospital employee was being treated just as any other member of the public would have been, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court determined that the hospital employee could recover for the injuries she sustained in the emergency room that resulted from her employer s negligence. Id. at 255, 439 A.2d However, the most significant fact is what the employee was doing when the injury occurred, and accordingly no such exception can exist where [] the employee s compensable injury occurred while he was actually engaged in the performance of his job. Heath v. Church s Fried Chicken, Inc., 519 Pa. 274, 277, 546 A.2d 1120 (1988) (quoting Lewis v. Sch. Dist. Of Phila., 517 Pa. 461, 538 A.2d 862 (1988)). There is also a dual persona doctrine that has been applied in narrow circumstances, and applies only where the employer has a second identity, so completely unrelated to its status as an employer, that the law would recognize the employer in its second capacity as a separate legal person. Soto v. Nabisco, Inc., 32 A.3d 787, 792 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2011) (citing
4 Callender, 564 A.2d at 185). The duties under the second persona must be totally separate from and unrelated to those of the employment. Id. (quoting Van Doren v. Coe Press Equip. Corp., 592 F.Supp.2d 776, 797 (E.D. Pa. 2008)). The purpose of this doctrine is to preserve a plaintiff s right to sue when a corporate merger transforms a liable third party into an employer. Id. III. RECOVERING FROM A CO-WORKER There may be times when recovery against a co-worker or supervisor may be feasible; however, these situations are rare and most often are unworkable simply because any potential recovery may be outweighed by the cost of pursing the claim. Situations where pursuing a cause of action would be appropriate may arise where a co-worker has a personal insurance policy. It should be noted that the mere fact that [two] parties [hold a] position of employment with the same employer at the time of [an] accident is not sufficient to show that they [are] in the same employ at the time of the accident. Bell v. Kater, 943 A.2d 293, 297 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2008) (citing Fern v. Ussler, 428 Pa.Super. 210, 630 A.2d 896, (1993)). When an employee is injured by a co-worker who is off the clock, or performing work outside of his or her duties when the injury occurs, then the PWCA may not act to prevent tort recovery. The crucial question is whether the act or omission that caused the injury occurred while the coemployee was in the performance of his or her duties as an employee. When the PWCA does apply, the following two exceptions described below exist. 1. The co-worker s intentional tort exception requires that the injury-causing conduct be of the type that is not normally expected to be present in the workplace. wrongdoing. The PWCA creates an exception for injury caused by a co-employee s intentional If disability or death is compensable under this act, a personal shall not be liable to anyone at common law or otherwise on account of such disability or death for any act or omission occurring while such person was in the same employ as the person disabled or killed, except for intentional wrong.
5 Sec. 205, 771 P.S. 441 (emphasis added). Pennsylvania courts have determined that the key factor in applying this exception is whether the intentional wrong is one that is not normally expected to be present in the workplace. Snyder v. Speciality Glass Products, Inc., 441 Pa.Super. 613, 629, 658 A.2d 366 (1995) (quoting McGinn v. Valloti, 363 Pa.Super. 88, 94, 525 A.2d 737 (1987)); Baum v. NGK Metals Corp., 155 F.Supp.2d 376, 380 (E.D. Pa. 2001). Intentional wrongs that have been held actionable include a physical assault that arose as a result of a work-place dispute, Readinger v. Gottschall, 201 Pa.Super. 134, 191 A.2d 694 (1963); intentional infliction of emotional distress arising from statements made during a workers compensation hearing that amounted to an affront of a co-worker s dignity and reputation as an attorney, Jones v. PMA Insurance Company, 343 Pa.Super. 411, 495 A.2d 203 (1985); misrepresentation of occupational health risks with the intent to mislead a coworker, resulting in exposure to unsafe chemicals, Baum, 155 F.Supper.2d 376; misrepresentation of information in reports sent to State Farm that resulted in State Farm s refusal to pay a co-worker s bills, Batoff v. State Farm Ins. Co., 977 F.2d 848 (3d Cir. 1992); misrepresentation that prevented a co-worker from seeking proper medical treatment for a workplace injury, McGinn, 363 Pa.Super. 88 ( Fraudulent misrepresentation is not a hazard normally expected to occur in the workplace and is therefore actionable. ); and misrepresentation of medical test data that resulted in aggravation of workplace injuries, Martin v. Lancaster Battery Co., Inc., 530 Pa. 11, 606 A.2d 444 (1992); On the other hand, alleged IIED by supervisors in severely reprimanding a worker for tardiness, threatening to discharge him, and demoting him to an entry-level position, has been found to be clearly acts which an employee would normally expect to occur at the workplace. Snyder, 441 Pa.Super. at Additionally, the court in McGinn v. Valloti stated that an employee might expect the condition of the workplace itself to be unsafe; for example, where there has been a knowing neglect of safety regulations. 363 Pa.Super. at 95 (citing Evans v. Allentown Portland Cement Co., 433 Pa. 595, 252 A.2d 646 (1969); Higgins v. Clearing Mach. Corp., 344 Pa.Super. 325, 496 A.2d 818 (1985)). 2. The personal animus exception requires specific intent and proof of a non-work related motive.
6 Another exception is more so an exclusion. The PWCA defines the term injury in Sec. 301(c)(1), 771 P.S. 411, to specifically exclude an injury caused by an act of a third person intended to injure the employee because of reasons personal to him, and not directed against him as an employee or because of his employment. Accordingly, the party asserting this exception must prove (1) intention to injure, and (2) a non-work related motive. Additionally, when the injury-causing act occurs on the employer s premises, a strong presumption exists that the injured employee is covered by the PWCA. Wills Eye Hosp. v. W.C.A.B. (Dewaele), 135 Pa.Cmwlth. 6, 9, 582 A.2d 39 (1988) (cited by Edwards v. W.C.A.B. (Valve-Plus, Inc.), 894 A.2d 856, 859 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2006)). IV. CONCLUSION Unfortunately, the Pennsylvania legislature and courts have been unwilling to remedy the injustices that so many employees have suffered under the current Workers Compensation system, and so the circumstances that would permit recovery outside of the PWCA are limited. Nevertheless, there are opportunities that should be explored when the PWCA system has failed to make an injured employee whole. If you have suffered a workplace injury and would like to learn more about your legal rights and options outside of the Workers Compensation system, please contact Atlee Hall, LLP today for a free consultation. We have offices in Lancaster, Pennsylvania, but help victims across the state.
WORKERS' COMPENSATION IMMUNITY AND THE EXCEPTIONS THERETO. By: Barry Kronthal
WORKERS' COMPENSATION IMMUNITY AND THE EXCEPTIONS THERETO By: Barry Kronthal PHILADELPHIA OFFICE The Curtis Center 170 S. Independence Mall W. Suite 400E Philadelphia, PA 19106-3337 215-922-1100 PITTSBURGH
More informationFORC QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF INSURANCE LAW AND REGULATION
The plaintiff in Schmidt filed suit against her employer, Personalized Audio Visual, Inc. ("PAV") and PAV s president, Dennis Smith ("Smith"). 684 A.2d at 68. Her Complaint alleged several causes of action
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Karen Davis, No. 216 C.D. 2015 Petitioner Argued November 16, 2015 v. Workers Compensation Appeal Board (PA Social Services Union and Netherlands Insurance Company),
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case 2:14-cv-01072-ABC-JC Document 31 Filed 05/30/14 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:819 Present: The Honorable Audrey B. Collins Angela Bridges None Present N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No. Attorneys
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MEMORANDUM. Bartle, J. December, 2012
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ZENITH INSURANCE COMPANY : CIVIL ACTION : v. : : WELLS FARGO INSURANCE SERVICES : OF PENNSYLVANIA, INC., et al. : NO. 10-5433
More information2016 PA Super 138. Appeal from the Order Entered June 11, 2015 In the Court of Common Pleas of Lehigh County Civil Division at No(s): 2014-C-2423
2016 PA Super 138 ZACHARY NEIDERT Appellant IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. ALBERT CHARLIE, III Appellee No. 1903 EDA 2015 Appeal from the Order Entered June 11, 2015 In the Court of Common Pleas
More informationIDENTIFYING AND PURSUING SUBROGATION RIGHTS
IDENTIFYING AND PURSUING SUBROGATION RIGHTS By: Susan McLaughlin, Esquire Erika L. Austin, Esquire All benefits paid under the Pennsylvania Workers Compensation Act constitute a lien against any third-party
More informationCase 2:09-cv-00532-JPH Document 23 Filed 02/02/10 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 2:09-cv-00532-JPH Document 23 Filed 02/02/10 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MICHAEL WALKER : CIVIL ACTION : v. : : NO. 09-532 BIG BURGER RESTAURANTS,
More informationHow Much Protection Does the Oregon Tort Claims Act Really Provide?
How Much Protection Does the Oregon Tort Claims Act Really Provide? Session Materials by Jens Schmidt Harrang Long Gary Rudnick P.C. Oregon Public Risk Manager s Fall Conference October 3, 2013 Salishan
More informationChapter 7 Tort Law and Product Liability
Chapter 7 Tort Law and Product Liability Chapter Outline 1. Introduction 2. The Basis of Tort Law 3. Intentional Torts 4. Negligence 5. Cyber Torts: Defamation Online 6. Strict Liability 7. Product Liability
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Clyde Kennedy, : Petitioner : : v. : No. 1649 C.D. 2012 : Submitted: May 17, 2013 Workers Compensation Appeal : Board (Henry Modell & Co., Inc.), : Respondent
More informationConstruction Accident
Do You Have a Case? Construction Accident ebooklet Mark Fryman 201 South 3rd Street Logansport, IN 46947 P: (574) 722-6676 www.starrausten.com Disclaimer No attempt is made to establish an attorney-client
More informationCO-EMPLOYEE LIABILITY 2013 DEVELOPMENTS
CO-EMPLOYEE LIABILITY 2013 DEVELOPMENTS Established in 1945, Evans & Dixon, L.L.C. is one of the most experienced and respected insurance defense firms in the Midwest. Steeped in tradition and committed
More informationThe Exclusive Remedy Provision State-by-State Survey By James A. Reiter and James J. Ranta
The Exclusive Remedy Provision State-by-State Survey By James A. Reiter and James J. Ranta The following survey is provided in summary fashion and was compiled by the author in cooperation with the member
More informationSUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA BRIEF OF FLORIDA WORKERS ADVOCATES AS AMICUS CURIAE
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA S. Ct. Case No.: SC03-368 RODRIGO AGUILERA and PATRICIA AGUILERA, his wife, vs. Petitioners, INSERVICES, INC. f/k/a MANAGED CARE USA SERVICES, INC., a North Carolina Corporation,
More informationInjured on the Job. Your Rights under FELA. Quick Facts: What To Do If Injured
Injured on the Job Your Rights under FELA Quick Facts: What To Do If Injured 1. Consult your own doctor for treatment. Give your doctor a complete history of how your injury happened. Make sure that the
More informationCooper Hurley Injury Lawyers
Cooper Hurley Injury Lawyers 2014 Granby Street, Suite 200 Norfolk, VA, 23517 (757) 455-0077 (866) 455-6657 (Toll Free) YOUR RIGHTS WHEN YOU ARE INJURED ON THE RAILROAD Cooper Hurley Injury Lawyers 2014
More informationPURSUANT TO INTERNAL REVENUE CODE SECTION 7463(b),THIS OPINION MAY NOT BE TREATED AS PRECEDENT FOR ANY OTHER CASE.
PURSUANT TO INTERNAL REVENUE CODE SECTION 7463(b),THIS OPINION MAY NOT BE TREATED AS PRECEDENT FOR ANY OTHER CASE. T.C. Summary Opinion 2001-156 UNITED STATES TAX COURT RONALD W. RAMEY AND JONI J. RAMEY,
More informationA Guide to Employer Liability in Maryland: Principles of Agency and Negligent Hiring
A Guide to Employer Liability in Maryland: Principles of Agency and Negligent Hiring Prepared by the Job Opportunities Task Force and the Homeless Person s Representation Project For more information,
More informationEmployer Liability for Workplace Violence
Employer Liability for Workplace Violence I. Employer Liability under OSHA/MOSHA a. Employers must maintain a place of employment which is free from recognized hazards that are causing or are likely to
More informationBut For Causation in Defective Drug and Toxic Exposure Cases: California s Form Jury Instruction CACI 430
But For Causation in Defective Drug and Toxic Exposure Cases: California s Form Jury Instruction CACI 430 By Matt Powers and Charles Lifland Since the California Supreme Court s 1991 decision in Mitchell
More informationCUNDIFF V. STATE FARM: ALLOWING DOUBLE RECOVERY UNDER UIM COVERAGE
CUNDIFF V. STATE FARM: ALLOWING DOUBLE RECOVERY UNDER UIM COVERAGE AND WORKERS COMPENSATION Melissa Healy INTRODUCTION In Cundiff v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., the Arizona Supreme Court
More informationNON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37
NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 HOWARD A. SCOTT, EXECUTOR OF IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE ESTATE OF ALBERT L. SCOTT, PENNSYLVANIA DECEASED AND LAVERNE SCOTT, IN HER OWN RIGHT,
More informationCardelli Lanfear P.C.
Michigan Prepared by Cardelli Lanfear P.C. 322 West Lincoln Royal Oak, MI 48067 Tel: 248.850.2179 Fax: 248.544.1191 1. Introduction History of Tort Reform in Michigan Michigan was one of the first states
More informationTHE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE ROCKINGHAM COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT Docket No.: 08-C-794 Caroline McMullen v. Donald L. Lamoureux ORDER In this motor vehicle personal injury case, the plaintiff, Caroline McMullen
More informationSAFETY IN THE WORKPLACE By Sharon A. Stewart. January 28, 2005. The Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA) includes a General Duty Clause
SAFETY IN THE WORKPLACE By Sharon A. Stewart January 28, 2005 The Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA) includes a General Duty Clause requiring employers to "furnish a place of employment which is
More informationChapter 11 Torts in the Business Environment
Chapter 11 Torts in the Business Environment Tort a civil wrong not arising from a breach of contract. A breach of a legal duty that proximately causes harm or injury to another. Two notions serve as the
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 11-10294 Non-Argument Calendar. D.C. Docket No. 8:09-cv-02628-JDW-TBM.
Case: 11-10294 Date Filed: 03/01/2012 Page: 1 of 6 EMMANUEL EBEH, IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 11-10294 Non-Argument Calendar D.C. Docket No. 8:09-cv-02628-JDW-TBM
More informationConflicts of Interest Issues in Simultaneous Representation of Employers and Employees in Employment Law. Janet Savage 1
Conflicts of Interest Issues in Simultaneous Representation of Employers and Employees in Employment Law Janet Savage 1 Plaintiffs suing their former employers for wrongful discharge or employment discrimination
More informationHARVEY KRUSE, P.C. BAD FAITH
HARVEY KRUSE, P.C. BAD FAITH Prepared By: Michael F. Schmidt P25213 HARVEY KRUSE, P.C. 1050 Wilshire Drive, Suite 320 Troy, MI 48084 (248) 649-7800 Fax (248) 649-2316 A. INTRODUCTION Subject to specific
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MEMORANDUM
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA STELLA LIE, et al. : CIVIL ACTION : v. : : CHAN DARA, et al. : : No. 01-3167 MEMORANDUM Ludwig, J. May 15, 2002 This is an action
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA : : : : : : : : MEMORANDUM OPINION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ROSELLE SUCHARSKI, Plaintiff, v. RANJANJUM PATEL, M.D., Defendant. CIVIL ACTION No. 12-3298 MEMORANDUM OPINION Defendant Rajanjum
More informationHow To Defend Yourself In A Lawsuit Against A Car Insurance Policy In Illinois
Case: 1:10-cv-08146 Document #: 27 Filed: 06/29/11 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:342 TKK USA INC., f/k/a The Thermos Company, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION Plaintiff,
More informationUpdate on Insurance in Ohio for Employer Intentional Torts. Kevin M. Young Tucker Ellis LLP
Update on Insurance in Ohio for Employer Intentional Torts Kevin M. Young Tucker Ellis LLP Introduction Brief History of Employer Intentional Torts in Ohio Brief History of Insurance Coverage for Intentional
More informationNational Trends and Developments in Workers Compensation
Over the last 25 years, injured and ill workers rights have been rolled back in many states. At the same time, employers are emboldened by today's economy to pressure workers not to exercise the few rights
More informationWORKERS' COMPENSATION SUBROGATION AND THIRD-PARTY CLAIMS
WORKERS' COMPENSATION SUBROGATION AND THIRD-PARTY CLAIMS I. INTRODUCTION BY RICHARD M. JUREWICZ, ESQUIRE GALFAND BERGER, LLP 1835 Market Street, Suite 2710 Philadelphia, PA 19103 1-800-222-8792 (ext. 829)
More information(1) It was something fairly and naturally incidental to the employer's business assigned to the employee; and
Employer Liability for Employee Conduct by Lisa Mann 05-01-2000 EMPLOYER LIABILITY FOR EMPLOYEE CONDUCT: When Does An Employer Have to Pay? by Lisa Mann Modrall, Sperling, Roehl, Harris & Sisk, P.A. Employers
More informationThe tort of bad faith failure to pay or investigate is still an often plead claim by
BAD FAITH VERDICTS The tort of bad faith failure to pay or investigate is still an often plead claim by the insured. Recent case law relies primarily on court precedent when determining whether the insured
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 08-1412. In re: GEORGE W. COLE, Debtor. CITY OF WILKES-BARRE, Appellant v.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT NOT PRECEDENTIAL No. 08-1412 In re: GEORGE W. COLE, Debtor CITY OF WILKES-BARRE, Appellant v. ROBERT P. SHEILS, Jr., Trustee On Appeal from the United
More informationJENNIFER (COLMAN) JACOBI MMG INSURANCE COMPANY. in the Superior Court (Hancock County, Cuddy, J.) in favor of Jennifer (Colman)
MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT Decision: 2011 ME 56 Docket: Han-10-526 Argued: April 12, 2011 Decided: May 10, 2011 Reporter of Decisions Panel: SAUFLEY, C.J., and ALEXANDER, SILVER, MEAD, GORMAN, and JABAR,
More informationMONTANA SELF INSURERS ASSOCIATION
MONTANA SELF INSURERS ASSOCIATION Executive Director Bob Worthington Board of Directors Rick Clark Plum Creek Timber Co Tim Fitzpatrick MT Schools Group Donna Haeder NorthWestern Corp Marv Jordan MT Contractors
More informationUnited States Workers Compensation/Indemnification Overview
United States Workers Compensation/Indemnification Overview January 18, 2012 Jill Kirila jill.kirila@squiresanders.com Kevin Hess kevin.hess@squiresanders.com 36 Offices in 17 Countries Workers Compensation
More informationHow To Get A Summary Judgment In A Well Service Case In Texas
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION JASON LONG, Plaintiff, v. NO. 0:00-CV-000 ABC THE CHABON GROUP, INC., Defendant. DEFENDANT S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
More informationToxic and Hazardous Substances Litigation. Louisiana Supreme Court Restricts Recovery for Asbestos Exposure Claimants
April, 2003 No. 3 Toxic and Hazardous Substances Litigation In This Issue Quentin F. Urquhart, Jr. is a founding partner of Irwin Fritchie Urquhart & Moore a New Orleans, Louisiana firm that is focused
More informationProfessional Negligence
1239272 - BCIT 1 Professional Negligence Jeremy T. Lovell Bull, Housser & Tupper LLP 1239272 - BCIT 2 Overview Professional negligence law in context Negligence law in general Duty of care Standard of
More informationGUIDE FOR TAX REPORTING AND WITHHOLDING OF SETTLEMENT AWARDS
GUIDE FOR TAX REPORTING AND WITHHOLDING OF SETTLEMENT AWARDS Office of the State Controller State of Colorado Revised January, 1997 I. Purpose The purpose of this guide is to provide information necessary
More informationHow To Sue Allstate Insurance Company
Case 0:07-cv-60771-JIC Document 30 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/07/07 09:36:18 Page 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MRI SCAN CENTER, INC., on itself and all others similarly situated,
More informationBAD FAITH INSTRUCTIONS Introduction
BAD FAITH INSTRUCTIONS Introduction These instructions are not materially changed from RAJI (CIVIL) 4th. The duty of good faith and fair dealing is implied in every contract. Rawlings v. Apodaca, 151 Ariz.
More informationTransportation and Logistics Counsel Annual Conference March 18, 2014. Carmack Amendment And Preemption Of Personal Injury Claims
Transportation and Logistics Counsel Annual Conference March 18, 2014 Carmack Amendment And Preemption Of Personal Injury Claims By: Beata Shapiro, Esq. Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP 1010
More informationNew Hampshire Association for Justice Focus on Workers Compensation Law
New Hampshire Association for Justice Focus on Workers Compensation Law Bedford, NH March 18, 2011 By: Andrew J. Reinhardt Reinhardt & Harper, PLC 1809 Staples Mill Road, Suite 300 Richmond, VA 23230 Phone:
More informationPENNSYLVANIA NATIONAL MUTUAL CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. JOHN D. ST. JOHN, et al., Defendants NO. 09-06388
Page 1 PENNSYLVANIA NATIONAL MUTUAL CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. JOHN D. ST. JOHN, et al., Defendants NO. 09-06388 COMMON PLEAS COURT OF CHESTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA 2011 Pa. Dist. & Cnty.
More informationAutomobile Negligence Lawsuits
SOG/DGL, CH, JB Page 1 of 6 Automobile Negligence Lawsuits Who Is Sued? Driver the driver is the person whose negligence gives rise to the liability. The person suing must prove that the driver negligently
More informationSTATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A13-1110. Faron L. Clark, Respondent, vs. Sheri Connor, et al., Defendants, Vydell Jones, Appellant.
STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A13-1110 Faron L. Clark, Respondent, vs. Sheri Connor, et al., Defendants, Vydell Jones, Appellant. Filed January 21, 2014 Affirmed Hooten, Judge Cass County District
More informationHow To Defend Yourself In A Workers Compensation Case In Daware
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR KENT COUNTY KAREN E. HETTINGER, : : Plaintiff, : (RBY) : v. : : BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE : DELAWARE TECHNICAL AND : COMMUNITY COLLEGE and : RICHARD
More informationProfessional Practice 544
February 15, 2016 Professional Practice 544 Tort Law and Insurance Michael J. Hanahan Schiff Hardin LLP 233 S. Wacker, Ste. 6600 Chicago, IL 60606 312-258-5701 mhanahan@schiffhardin.com Schiff Hardin LLP.
More informationBenefits. Mary S. Kohnke Wagner, Esq. Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin. The following sections explain each element.
5 Mary S. Kohnke Wagner, Esq. Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin General Purpose of the Pennsylvania Workers Compensation Act The Pennsylvania Legislature enacted the Pennsylvania Workers Compensation
More informationWHEN IT COMES TO. Personal Injury Law, LEARN. UNDERSTAND. ACT.
WHEN IT COMES TO Personal Injury Law, LEARN. UNDERSTAND. ACT. When It Comes to Personal Injury Law, Learn. Understand. Act. Although individuals may have heard the term personal injury before, many do
More informationASSEMBLY BILL No. 597
AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY APRIL 14, 2015 california legislature 2015 16 regular session ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597 Introduced by Assembly Member Cooley February 24, 2015 An act to amend Sections 36 and 877 of, and
More informationNURSING HOME CARE ACT INTRODUCTION. The Nursing Home Care Act, 210 ILCS 45/1, et seq., was adopted amid concern over
NURSING HOME CARE ACT INTRODUCTION The Nursing Home Care Act, 210 ILCS 45/1, et seq., was adopted amid concern over reports of inadequate, improper and degrading treatment of patients in nursing homes.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS 444444444444 NO. 13-0776 444444444444 CHAPMAN CUSTOM HOMES, INC., AND MICHAEL B. DUNCAN, TRUSTEE OF THE M. B. DUNCAN SEPARATE PROPERTY TRUST, PETITIONERS, v. DALLAS PLUMBING
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL TRIAL DIVISION : : : : : : : : ORDER
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL TRIAL DIVISION COLLINS COLLISION CENTER, INC., ET AL v. REPUBLIC FIRST BANK ORDER AUGUST TERM, 2012 NO.
More informationHOW MUCH MONEY IS WORTH? MY SLIP AND FALL CASE
HOW MUCH MONEY IS MY SLIP AND FALL CASE WORTH? Knowledge of the Value of Your Claim Can Help You to Determine If a Settlement Offer Is Reasonable and Appropriate Given the Circumstances of the Fall and
More informationArthur J. Siegel, for third-party appellant. Glenn A. Kaminska, for third-party respondents. In this case arising from an automobile accident, the
================================================================= This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. -----------------------------------------------------------------
More informationMost of us understand that, with few exceptions, you can t directly sue a client s
EMPLOYMENT LAW Surviving the Special Employment Doctrine by Ian Fusselman Most of us understand that, with few exceptions, you can t directly sue a client s employer for a work-related injury because Workers
More informationLOUISIANA PERSONAL INJURY ACCIDENT BASICS
LOUISIANA PERSONAL INJURY ACCIDENT BASICS The Concept of Negligence If you have been injured, only an experienced Louisiana personal injury accident attorney can evaluate the unique facts and circumstances
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL TRIAL DIVISION
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL TRIAL DIVISION COPLEY ASSOCIATES, LTD., DECEMBER TERM, 2005 Plaintiff, NO. 01332 v. COMMERCE PROGRAM ERIE
More informationNavigating the Statute of Limitations in Texas
Navigating the Statute of Limitations in Texas Wesley G. Johnson Cooper & Scully, P.C. 900 Jackson Street, Suite 100 Dallas, TX 75202 Telephone: 214-712 712-9500 Telecopy: 214-712 712-9540 Email: Wes.Johnson@CooperScully.com
More informationACCIDENT INVESTIGATION GUIDELINES WITH LITIGATION IN MIND
ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION GUIDELINES WITH LITIGATION IN MIND Introduction The purpose of this paper is to alert the reader to concepts used in the defense of construction related lawsuits and to suggest how
More informationCourt of Common Pleas of Ohio, Montgomery County. Jeffrey A. TIREY, Plaintiff, v. FIRESTONE TIRE & RUBBER CO., et al., [FN*] Defendants.
Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Montgomery County. Jeffrey A. TIREY, Plaintiff, v. FIRESTONE TIRE & RUBBER CO., et al., [FN*] Defendants. FN* No appeal has been taken from the decision of the court. No.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOHN and DENISE McELHINEY : CIVIL ACTION : v. : : ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY : NO. 98-2529 MEMORANDUM Bartle, J. January, 1999
More informationBAD FAITH LAW IN INDIANA
BAD FAITH LAW IN INDIANA CINCINNATI, OH COLUMBUS, OH DETROIT, MI FT. MITCHELL, KY ORLANDO, FL SARASOTA, FL www.smithrolfes.com 2012 I. OVERVIEW OF INDIANA BAD FAITH LAW Indiana recognizes a common-law
More informationWisconsin Hospital Liens: Do s and Don ts for Collecting from Third-Party Liability Insurers
Wisconsin Hospital Liens: Do s and Don ts for Collecting from Third-Party Liability Insurers Timothy W. Feeley, Esq. Hall, Render, Killian, Heath & Lyman, P.C. 111 East Kilbourn Avenue, Suite 1300 Milwaukee,
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY CHARLES R. LITCHFORD and ) PATRICIA LITCHFORD, ) ) Plaintiffs ) v. ) C.A. No. 06C-02-243MJB ) MICHAEL JOHNSON; DP, INC.; ) DP
More informationHow To Defend An Employee Against An Employee In A Construction Accident
Risk-Shifting Agreements In Construction Contracts: Why Insurance May Not Work The Way It Used To David S. White The newer additional-insured clause might leave the owner and subcontractor without the
More informationBy Bruce C. Hamlin John R. Barhoum Lane Powell PC Portland, Oregon
PRODUCTS LIABILITY LAW: COMPARING THE APPROACH IN OREGON AND WASHINGTON By Bruce C. Hamlin John R. Barhoum Lane Powell PC Portland, This article appeared in the Spring 2005 issue of the State Bar's Products
More informationINVESTIGATIONS GONE WILD: Potential Claims By Employees
INTRODUCTION INVESTIGATIONS GONE WILD: Potential Claims By Employees By: Maureen S. Binetti, Esq. Christopher R. Binetti, Paralegal Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, P.A. When can the investigation which may
More informationThis opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2008).
This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2008). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A08-1108 Kimberly Russell, Appellant, vs. George
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 08 1635 Filed February 4, 2011 TIMOTHY L. MERRIAM, An Individual; JUSTINE MERRIAM, Both Individually and as Next Friend of CHRISTOPHER MERRIAM, A Minor, KAYLA MERRIAM,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS 444444444444 NO. 11-0425 444444444444 PETROLEUM SOLUTIONS, INC., PETITIONER, v. BILL HEAD D/B/A BILL HEAD ENTERPRISES AND TITEFLEX CORPORATION, RESPONDENTS 4444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL TRIAL DIVISION
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL TRIAL DIVISION KVAERNER US INC., : APRIL TERM, 2003 KVAERNER HOLDINGS, INC. : No. 0940 v. : Commerce Program
More informationEnergy-Related Litigation: Personal Injury
Energy-Related Litigation: Personal Injury FOLLOW STEPTOE & JOHNSON ON TWITTER: Follow @Steptoe_Johnson ALSO FIND US ON http://www.linkedin.com/companies/216795 http://www.facebook.com/steptoe.johnson
More informationST. MARY S REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER BATH IRON WORKS. treatment costs pursuant to the Maine Workers Compensation Act, 39-A M.R.S.
MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT Decision: 2009 ME 92 Docket: WCB-08-663 Argued: May 20, 2009 Decided: August 18, 2009 Reporter of Decisions Panel: SAUFLEY, C.J., and CLIFFORD, ALEXANDER, LEVY, SILVER, MEAD,
More informationInsurers Not Obligated to Defend in ZIP Code Coverage Suits
Insurers Not Obligated to Defend in ZIP Code Coverage Suits By Bryana Blessinger Hill & Lamb LLP Portland, Oregon Insurers are increasingly faced with privacy and data-breach related claims. One of the
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE ORDER ON AMENDMENT TO WRONGFUL DEATH STATUTE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE DAVID FITZPATRICK, as Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF RYAN R. FITZPATRICK, Plaintiff, v. Docket No. 2:10-CV-54-GZS KENNETH P. COHEN, Defendant. ORDER
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA : : : : ORDER AND MEMORANDUM O R D E R
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SETH ROBBINS, VERN COOLEY Plaintiffs, v. PHILADELPHIA SPORTS CLUB Defendant. CIVIL ACTION NO. 05-2676 ORDER AND MEMORANDUM O
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Safe Auto Insurance Company, : Appellant : : v. : No. 2247 C.D. 2004 : Argued: February 28, 2005 School District of Philadelphia, : Pride Coleman and Helena Coleman
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ROGER HAUTH, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 00-166-JJF ROBERT P. LOBUE, ESQUIRE, Defendant. Kevin William Gibson, Esquire of Gibson & Perkins,
More informationConnecticut Statute of Limitations Checklist
James E. Nealon and Elizabeth W. Swedock, Kelley Drye & Warren LLP A Checklist of the statutes of limitations in Connecticut for several commercial claims. This is just one example of the many online resources
More informationworkers' compensation benefits under the Washington Industrial Insurance Act (WIIA). Long
LED COWIJ QP APPEALS 2013 MAR 19 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHIN AN 8: 39 DIVISION II B ROBERT LONG, deceased, and AILEEN LONG, Petitioner /Beneficiary, No. 43187-4 II - Appellant, V. WASHINGTON
More informationNo. 3 10 0439. Order filed April 25, 2011 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS THIRD DISTRICT A.D., 2011
NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances allowed under Rule 23(e)(1). No. 3 10 0439 Order filed April
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION
2008 WI App 53 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2007AP306 Complete Title of Case: ALEX ROGERS, A MINOR BY HIS PARENTS, JULIE ROGERS AND DENNIS ROGERS, JULIE ROGERS, DENNIS ROGERS,
More informationBUSINESS LAW GUIDEBOOK
BUSINESS LAW GUIDEBOOK SECOND EDITION CHARLES YC CHEW CHAPTER 8: THE LAW OF NEGLIGENCE IN THE BUSINESS WORLD TEST YOUR KNOWLEDGE 1. Outline the elements of the tort of negligence. The elements of the tort
More informationDefense of State Employees: LIABILITY AND LAWSUITS. UNCW Office of General Counsel January 2010
Defense of State Employees: LIABILITY AND LAWSUITS UNCW Office of General Counsel January 2010 COMMON CAUSES OF ACTION (or what could we be sued for) Tort claims Contract claims Discrimination/Harassment
More informationThis case comes before the Court on Defendant Cooper Tire & Rubber. Co.'s Motion to Dismiss, and in the alternative, Motion for Joinder of a Party.
STATE OF WIAINE CUMBERLAND, ss. SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO. CV-05-336 / * CHARLES S. HILL, * - - Plaintiff --. v. * - 'ORDER COOPER TIRE & RUBBER CO., This case comes before the Court on Defendant
More informationCase 5:04-cv-04099-RDR Document 112 Filed 01/03/08 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
Case 5:04-cv-04099-RDR Document 112 Filed 01/03/08 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS ERIKA MEYER, vs. Plaintiff, Case No. 04-4099-RDR CHRISTOPHER NAVA, et al.,
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY IN RE: ASBESTOS LITIGATION : : Limited to: : Olson, Arland : C.A. No. 09C-12-287 ASB UPON DEFENDANT CBS CORPORATION S MOTION
More informationDeclarations. INSU 2500 Chapter 9 CHAPTER 9. Common Elements of Insurance Contracts. Insuring Agreement Example
Declarations INSU 2500 Chapter 9 October 10, 2006 Facts of Policy Usually first page of an insurance contract contains such things as: Identifies the insurance company Identifies the named insured Policy
More informationTable of Contents. A Message From Attorney Edgar Snyder 1. Eligibility for Workers Compensation 3. Types of Workers Compensation Claims 5
Table of Contents A Message From Attorney Edgar Snyder 1 Eligibility for Workers Compensation 3 Types of Workers Compensation Claims 5 Workers Compensation Benefits Payments 9 The Hearing Process 13 The
More informationASSEMBLY BILL No. 597
california legislature 2015 16 regular session ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597 Introduced by Assembly Member Cooley February 24, 2015 An act to amend Sections 36 and 877 of, and to add Chapter 6 (commencing with
More information