EXISTENCE RESULT FOR STRONGLY NONLINEAR ELLIPTIC EQUATIONS IN ORLICZ SOBOLEV SPACES


 Archibald Hall
 1 years ago
 Views:
Transcription
1 Proyecciones Vol. 26, N o 2, pp , August Universidad Católica del Norte Antofagasta  Chile EXISTENCE RESULT FOR STRONGLY NONLINEAR ELLIPTIC EQUATIONS IN ORLIC SOBOLEV SPACES A. YOUSSFI UNIVERSITÉ SIDI MOHAMMED BEN ABDALLAH, MAROC Received : July Accepted : May 2007 Abstract In this paper, we prove the existence of solutions for some strongly nonlinear Dirichlet problems whose model is the following div(m 1 M( u ) u u )+um( u ) =f divf in D0 (), where is an open bounded subset of IR N,N 2. We emphasize that no 2 condition is required for the Nfunction M. Mathematics Subject Classification : (2000): 46E30, 35J60, 35J65. Key words: OrliczSobolev spaces, strongly nonlinear problems.
2 158 A. Youssfi 1. Introduction Let be a bounded open set of IR N, N 2, and let M be an Nfunction. Consider the following Dirichlet problem (1.1) A(u)+H(x, u, u) =f, where A(u) := div a(x, u, u) is a LerayLions type operator definedonitsdomaind(a) W 1 0 L M() and H is a nonlinearity assumed to satisfy the natural growth condition (1.2) H(x, s, ξ) b( s )(h(x)+m( ξ )) Recently, a large number of papers was devoted to the existence of solutions of (1.1). In the variational framework, that is f W 1 E M (), an existence result was proved in [8] when H depends only on x and u and satisfy the following sign condition H(x, s)s 0, andin[2]whenm satisfies the 2 condition and H depends also on u and satisfies (1.3) H(x, s, ξ)s 0. The result in [2] was generalized in [7] to Nfunctions without 2  condition. In the case where f L 1 (), problem (1.1) was solved in [3] under the socalled coercivity condition (1.4) H(x, s, ξ) βm( ξ ) for s some τ and in [5] assuming the sign condition (1.3) but the result was restricted to Nfunctions satisfying the 2 condition (see bellow). The result contained in [5] was then extended in [6] to Nfunctions without assuming the 2  condition. The solution u given in this case is such that its truncated
3 Existence result for strongly nonlinear elliptic equations in function T k (u) belongs to the energy space W 1 0 L M() for all k>0, but not the function u it self. Our main goal in this paper, is to prove the existence of a solution in W 1 0 L M() for problems of the kind of (1.1) when the source term has the form f divf with f L 1 () and F E M (), without any restriction on the Nfunction M. The paper is organized as follows, after giving a background in section 2, in section 3 we list the basic assumptions and our main result which will be proved in six steeps in section Prerequisites 2.1 Let M : IR + IR + be an Nfunction, ie. M is continuous, convex, with M(t) > 0fort>0, M(t) t 0ast 0and M(t) t as t.the Nfunction conjugate to M is defined as M(t) = sup{st M(t),s 0}. We recall the Young s inequality: for all s, t 0, If for some k>0, st M(s)+M(t). (2.1) M(2t) km(t) for all t 0, we said that M satisfies the 2 condition, and if (2.1) holds only for t some t 0, then M is said to satisfy the 2 condition near infinity. We will extend these Nfunctions into even functions on all IR. Let P and Q be two Nfunctions. the notation P Q means that P grows essentially less rapidly than Q, i.e. for all >0, that is the case if and only if P (t) Q( t) 0 as t, Q 1 (t) P 1 (t) 0 as t. 2.2 Let be an open subset of IR N. The Orlicz class K M () (resp. the Orlicz space L M ()) is defined as the set of (equivalence class of) realvalued measurable functions u on such that:
4 160 A. Youssfi µ u(x) M(u(x))dx < (resp. M dx < for some λ>0). λ Endowed with the Luxemburg norm kuk M =inf{λ >0: µ u(x) M dx < }, λ L M () is a Banach space and K M () is a convex subset of L M (). The Orlicz norm is defined on L M () by kuk (M) =sup u(x)v(x)dx, where the supremum is taken over all functions v L M () such that kvk M 1. The two norms k.k M and k.k (M) are equivalent (see [13]). The closure in L M () of the set of bounded measurable functions with compact support in is denoted by E M (). 2.3 The OrliczSobolev space W 1 L M () (resp.w 1 E M ()) is the space of functions u such that u and its distributional derivatives up to order 1 lie in L M () (resp.e M ()). It is a Banach space under the norm kuk 1,M = X kd α uk M. α 1 Thus, W 1 L M () andw 1 E M () canbeidentified with subspaces of the product of (N +1) copiesof L M (). Denoting this product by ΠL M,we will use the weak topologies σ(πl M, ΠE M )andσ(πl M, ΠL M ). The space W 1 0 E M() isdefined as the norm closure of the Schwartz space D() inw 1 E M () and the space W 1 0 L M() astheσ(πl M, ΠE M )closure of D() inw 1 L M (). We say that a sequence {u n } converges to u for the modular convergence in W 1 L M () if,forsomeλ>0, µ D α u n D α u M dx 0 for all α 1, λ this implies convergence for σ(πl M, ΠL M )(see[9,lemma6]). If M satisfies the 2 condition on IR + (near infinity only if has finite measure), then the modular convergence coincides with norm convergence (see [13, Theorem 9.4]).
5 Existence result for strongly nonlinear elliptic equations in Recall that the norm kduk M defined on W 1 0 L M() isequivalenttokuk 1,M (see [10]). Let W 1 L M () (resp. W 1 E M ()) denotes the space of distributions on which can be written as sums of derivatives of order 1 of functions in L M ()(resp. E M ()). It is a Banach space under the usual quotient norm. If the open has the segment property then the space D() isdense in W 1 0 L M() for the topology σ(πl M, ΠL M ) (see [10]). Consequently, the action of a distribution in W 1 L M () onanelementofw 1 0 L M() iswell defined. For an exhaustive treatments one can see for example [1, 13]. 2.4 We will use the following lemma, (see [6]), which concerns operators of Nemytskii Type in Orlicz spaces. It is slightly different from the analogous one given in [13]. Lemma 2.1. Let be an open subset of IR N with finite measure. let M, P and Q be Nfunctions such that Q P,andletf : IR IR be a Carathéodory function such that, for a.e.x and for all s IR, f(x, s) c(x)+k 1 P 1 M(k 2 s ), where k 1,k 2 are real constants and c(x) E Q (). Then the Nemytskii operator N f,defined by N f (u)(x) =f(x, u(x)), is strongly continuous from P(E M, k 1 2 )={u L M () :d(u, E M ()) < k 1 2 } into E Q (). We will use the following lemma which can be found in [12], Lemma 2.2. If {f n } L 1 () with f n f L 1 () a.e. in, f n,f 0 a.e. in and f n (x)dx f(x)dx, then f n f strongly in L 1 (). We also use the technical lemma: Lemma 2.3. Let x and y be two nonnegative real numbers and let with θ = y2 4x 2.Then φ(s) =se θs2, xφ 0 (s) y φ(s) x 2, s IR.
6 162 A. Youssfi 3. Assumptions and main result Let be an open bounded subset of IR N, N 2, with the segment property and let M and P be two Nfunctions such that P M. Let A : D(A) W0 1L M() W 1 L M () be a mapping (non everywhere defined) given by A(u) := div a(x, u, u) where a : IR IR N IR N is a Carathéodory function (i.e., a(x,, ) is continuous on IR IR N for almost every x in and a(,s,ξ)ismeasurable on for every (s, ξ) inir IR N ) satisfying for a.e. x, andforalls IR and all ξ, η IR N, ξ 6= η, (3.1) a(x, s, ξ) a 0 (x)+k 1 P 1 M(k 2 s )+k 1 M 1 M(k 2 ξ ) where a 0 (x) belongs to E M () andk 1,k 2 to IR +, (3.2) (a(x, s, ξ) a(x, s, η)) (ξ η) > 0 (3.3) a(x, s, ξ) ξ M( ξ ) Furthermore, let H : IR IR N IR be a Carathéodory function such that (3.4) H(x, s, ξ) b( s )(M( ξ )+h(x)) for almost x and for all s IR, ξ IR N,withb a real valued positive increasing continuous function and h a nonnegative function in L 1 (), and (3.5) H(x, s, ξ)sgn(s) M( ξ ) for a.e. x, foreveryξ IR N and for every s IR such that s σ, where σ is a positive real number. Consider the following Dirichlet problem: (3.6) A(u)+H(x, u, u) =f div(f ) in, u =0 on, We shall prove the following existence result:
7 Existence result for strongly nonlinear elliptic equations in Theorem 3.1. Assume that f L 1 (), F E M () and (3.1)(3.5) hold true, then there exists at least a function u solution of (3.6) in the sense that u W0 1L M(), H(x, u, u) L 1 () and a(x, u, u) T k (u v)dx + H(x, u, u)t k (u v)dx = ft k (u v)dx + F T k (u v)dx for every v W 1 0 L M() L () and every k σ. Remark We can replace assumptions (3.3), (3.4) and (3.5) by the following ones: (3.3) 0 a(x, s, ξ) ξ αm with α, λ > 0 and µ (3.4) 0 H(x, s, ξ) b( s ) M with 0 <λ μ and (3.5) 0 H(x, s, ξ)sgn(s) βm with 0 <τ λ and β>0. µ ξ λ µ ξ + h(x) μ µ ξ τ 2. A consequence of (3.3) and the continuity of a with respect to ξ, isthat, for almost every x in and s in IR, a(x, s, 0) = Note that assumption (3.5) gives a sign condition on H only near infinity. 4. In (3.4) we can assume only that b is positive and continuous. Remark 3.2. The solution of (3.6) given by theorem 3.1 belongs to W 1 0 L M() even if F =0, this regularity is due to assumption (3.5).
8 164 A. Youssfi 4. Proofoftheorem3.1 Let {f n } be a sequence of L () functions that converges strongly to f in L 1 (). Let n in IN and let H n (x, s, ξ) = H(x, s, ξ) 1+ 1 n H(x, s, ξ). It s easy to see that H n (x, s, ξ) n, H n (x, s, ξ) H(x, s, ξ) and H n (x, s, ξ)sgn(s) 0for s σ. Since H n is bounded for fixed n, there exists, (see [11, Propositions 1 and 5]), a function u n in W0 1L M() solution of A(u n )+H n (x, u n, u n )=f n divf in, u n =0 on, in the sense (3.7) a(x, u n, u n ) vdx + H n (x, u n, u n )vdx = f n vdx + F vdx for every v W 1 0 L M(). Step1: Estimation in W0 1L M(). For k>0, we denote by T k the usual truncation at level k defined by T k (s) =max( k, min(k, s)) for all s IR. Let us choose v = φ(t σ (u n )) as test function in (3.7), where σ is given by (3.5), φ is the function in lemma 2.3 and b is the function in (3.4). Using (3.3) and the Young s inequality, we obtain
9 Existence result for strongly nonlinear elliptic equations in M( T σ (u n ) )φ 0 (T σ (u n ))dx + H n (x, u n, u n )φ(t σ (u n ))dx φ(σ)kf n k L 1 () + φ 0 (σ) M(2 F )dx + 1 M( T σ (u n ) )φ 0 (T σ (u n ))dx. 2 Since {f n } is bounded in L 1 (), there exists a constant c not depending on n such that 1 M( T σ (u n ) )φ 0 (T σ (u n ))dx + H n (x, u n, u n )φ(t σ (u n ))dx 2 c(φ(σ)+φ 0 (σ)), which we can write, since H n enjoys the same properties of H, 1 M( T σ (u n ) )φ 0 (T σ (u n ))dx + H n (x, u n, u n )φ(t σ (u n ))dx 2 { u n <σ} + H n (x, u n, u n )φ(t σ (u n ))dx { u n σ} c(φ(σ)+φ 0 (σ)). By (3.4) we have H n (x, u n, u n )φ(t σ (u n ))dx { u n <σ} µ b(σ) M( T σ (u n ) )φ(t σ (u n ))dx + φ(σ)khk L 1 (), while using(3.5), we get { u n σ} H n (x, u n, u n )φ(t σ (u n ))dx φ(σ) M( u n )dx. { u n σ} Hence, we obtain R ³ M( T σ(u n ) ) 1 2 φ0 (T σ (u n )) b(σ) φ(t σ (u n )) dx +,φ(σ) M( u n )dx c(φ(σ)+φ 0 (σ)) + b(σ)φ(σ)khk L 1 (). { u n σ}
10 166 A. Youssfi Then, lemma 2.3 with the choice x = 1 2 and y = b(σ), yields 1 M( T σ (u n ) )dx + φ(σ) M( u n )dx 4 { u n σ} c(φ(σ)+φ 0 (σ)) + b(σ)φ(σ)khk L 1 (), which implies that (3.8) M( u n )dx c 0, where c 0 is a constant not depending on n. Thus {u n } is bounded in W0 1L M(), and consequently there exist a function u in W0 1L M() anda subsequence still denoted by {u n } such that (3.9) u n u in W 1 0 L M () for σ(πl M, ΠE M ) and (3.10) u n u in E M () strongly and a.e. in. Step2: {a(x, T k (u n ), T k (u n ))} is bounded in (L M ()) N for all k σ. We will use the Orlicz norm. For that, let ψ (L M ()) N with kψk M 1. For all k σ, we write using (3.2) so that µ a(x, T k (u n ), T k (u n )) a(x, T k (u n ), ψ ) µ T k (u n ) ψ dx 0, k 2 k2 (3.11) 1 a(x, T k (u n ), T k (u n )) ψdx k 2 a(x, T k (u n ), T k (u n )) T k (u n )dx + 1 k 2 a(x, T k (u n ), ψ k 2 ) T k (u n )dx a(x, T k (u n ), ψ k 2 ) ψdx.
11 Existence result for strongly nonlinear elliptic equations in To estimate the first term in the right, we take v = T k (u n )astest function in (3.7) and then use the Young s inequality, the fact that H n (x, u n, u n )T k (u n ) 0ontheset{ u n k} and (3.3), to obtain 1 a(x, T k (u n ), T k (u n )) T k (u n )dx + H n (x, u n, u n )T k (u n )dx 2 { u n k} kkf n k L 1 () + M(2 F )dx. Assumption (3.4) yields H n (x, u n, u n )T k (u n )dx { u n k} µ kb(k) M( u n )dx + khk L 1 () kb(k)(c 0 + khk L 1 ()), where c 0 is the constant in (3.8). Hence, since {f n } is bounded in L 1 (), we deduce that a(x, T k (u n ), T k (u n )) T k (u n )dx λ k, with λ k a constant depending on k. By the Young s inequality, (3.11) becomes 1 k 2 a(x, T k (u n ), T k (u n )) ψdx λ k +(1+2k 1 ) M( T k (u n ) )dx +(1+ 1 )(1 + 2k 1 ) M k k 1 k 2 M( ψ )dx. a(x, T k (u n ), ψ ) k 2 1+2k dx 1
12 168 A. Youssfi By virtue of (3.1) and the convexity of M, weget a(x, T k (u n ), ψ ) M k 2 1+2k dx 1 µ 1 ( a 0 (x) )dx + k 1 M 1 M(kk 2 ) 1+2k 1 We conclude that + k 1 M( ψ )dx. 1+2k 1 a(x, T k (u n ), T k (u n )) ψdx c k for all ψ (L M ()) N with kψk M 1, this means that (3.12) ka(x, T k (u n ), T k (u n ))k (M) c k, for every k σ. Step3: Almost everywhere convergence of the gradients. Since the function u belongs to W0 1L M(), there exists a sequence {v j } D(), (see [9]), which converges to u for the modular convergence in W0 1L M() anda.e.in. For m k σ, wedefine the function ρ m by 1 if s m ρ m (s) = m +1 s if m s m +1 0 if s m +1. Let θ j n = T k (u n ) T k (vj), θ j = T k (u) T k (v j )andz j n,m = φ(θ j n)ρ m (u n ) where φ is the function in lemma 2.3. In what follows, we denote by i (n, j), (i IN), various sequences of real numbers which tend to 0 when n and j respectively, i.e. lim j lim n i(n, j) =0.
13 Existence result for strongly nonlinear elliptic equations in We use z j n,m W 1 0 L M() as test function in (3.7) to get (3.13) <A(u n ),zn,m j > + H n (x, u n, u n )zn,mdx j = f n zn,mdx+ j F zn,mdx. j In view of (3.10), we have zn,m j φ(θ j )ρ m (u) weaklyinl () for σ (L,L 1 )asn,then lim f n z j n n,mdx = fφ(θ j )ρ m (u)dx, and since φ(θ j ) 0weaklyinL () forσ(l,l 1 )asj, we have lim fφ(θ j )ρ m (u)dx =0, j hence, we obtain f n zn,mdx j = 0 (n, j). Thanks to (3.8) and (3.10), we have as n z j n,m φ(θ j )ρ m (u) in W 1 0 L M () for σ(πl M, ΠE M ), which implies that lim F z j n n,mdx = F θ j φ 0 (θ j )ρ m (u)dx + F uφ(θ j )ρ 0 m(u)dx. On the one hand, by Lebesgue s theorem we get lim F uφ(θ j )ρ 0 m(u)dx =0, j on the other hand, we write F θ j φ 0 (θ j )ρ m (u)dx = F T k (u)φ 0 (θ j )ρ m (u)dx F T k (v j )φ 0 (θ j )ρ m (u)dx,
14 170 A. Youssfi so that, by Lebesgue s theorem one has lim F T k (u)φ 0 (θ j )ρ m (u)dx = F T k (u)ρ m (u)dx, j M ³ vj u Let λ>0 such that M λ 0 strongly in L 1 () asj and L 1 (), the convexity of the Nfunction M allows us to have ³ u λ M Ã Tk (v j )φ 0 (θ j! )ρ m (u) T k (u)ρ m (u) 4λφ 0 (2k) 1 µ 4 M vj u + 1 µ 1+ 1 λ 4 φ 0 M (2k) µ u λ. Then, by using the modular convergence of { v j } in (L M ()) N and Vitali s theorem, we obtain T k (v j )φ 0 (θ j )ρ m (u) T k (u)ρ m (u) in (L M ()) N for the modular convergence, and then lim F T k (v j )φ 0 (θ j )ρ m (u)dx = F T k (u)ρ m (u)dx. j We have proved that F z j n,mdx = 1 (n, j). Since H n (x, u n, u n )z j n,m 0ontheset{ u n >k} and ρ m (u n )=1on the set { u n k}, we have (3.14) <A(u n ),zn,m j > + H n (x, u n, u n )φ(θn)dx j 2 (n, j) { u n k} Now, we will evaluate the first term of the lefthand side of (3.14) by writing
15 Existence result for strongly nonlinear elliptic equations in <A(u n ),zn,m j > = a(x, u n, u n ) ( T k (u n ) T k (v j ))φ 0 (θn)ρ j m (u n )dx + = + and then a(x, u n, u n ) u n φ(θ j n)ρ 0 m(u n )dx a(x, T k (u n ), T k (u n )) ( T k (u n ) T k (v j ))φ 0 (θ j n)dx { u n >k} a(x, u n, u n ) T k (v j )φ 0 (θ j n)ρ m (u n )dx a(x, u n, u n ) u n φ(θ j n)ρ 0 m(u n )dx, (3.15) <A(u n ),zn,m j > = (a(x, T k (u n ), T k (u n )) a(x, T k (u n ), T k (v j )χ s j)) ( T k (u n ) T k (v j )χ s j )φ0 (θn)dx j + a(x, T k (u n ), T k (v j )χ s j)) ( T k (u n ) T k (v j )χ s j)φ 0 (θn)dx j a(x, T k (u n ), T k (u n )) T k (v j )φ 0 (θn)dx j \ s j a(x, u n, u n ) T k (v j )φ 0 (θn)ρ j m (u n )dx { u n >k} + a(x, u n, u n ) u n φ(θn)ρ j 0 m(u n )dx, where by χ s j, s>0, we denote the characteristic function of the subset s j = {x : T k (v j ) s}. For fixed m and s, we will pass to the limit in n andtheninj in the second, third, fourth and five terms in the right side of (3.15). Starting with the second term, we have
16 172 A. Youssfi a(x, T k (u n ), T k (v j )χ s j)) ( T k (u n ) T k (v j )χ s j)φ 0 (θ j n)dx a(x, T k (u), T k (v j )χ s j)) ( T k (u) T k (v j )χ s j)φ 0 (θ j )dx as n, since by lemma 2.1 one has a(x, T k (u n ), T k (v j )χ s j))φ 0 (θ j n) a(x, T k (u), T k (v j )χ s j))φ 0 (θ j ) strongly in (E M ()) N as n,while T k (u n ) T k (u) weakly in (L M ()) N by (3.8). Let χ s denote the characteristic function of the subset s = {x : T k (u) s}. As T k (v j )χ s j T k(u)χ s strongly in (E M ()) N as j, one has as j. Then a(x, T k (u), T k (v j )χ s j)) ( T k (u) T k (v j )χ s j)φ 0 (θ j )dx 0 (3.16) a(x, T k (u n ), T k (v j )χ s j)) ( T k (u n ) T k (v j )χ s j)φ 0 (θn)dx j = 3 (n, j). For the third term of (3.15), by virtue of (3.12) there exist a subsequence still indexed again by n and a function l k in (L M ()) N with k σ such that a(x, T k (u n ), T k (u n )) l k weakly in (L M ()) N for σ(πl M, ΠE M ). Then, since T k (v j )χ \ s j (E M ()) N,weobtain a(x, T k (u n ), T k (u n )) T k (v j )φ 0 (θn)dx j l k T k (v j )φ 0 (θ j )dx \ s j \ s j
17 Existence result for strongly nonlinear elliptic equations in as n. The modular convergence of {v j } allows us to have l k T k (v j )φ 0 (θ j )dx l k T k (u)dx \ s \ s j as j. This, proves that a(x, T k (u n ), T k (u n )) T k (v j )φ 0 (θn)dx j = l k T k (u)dx+ 4 (n, j). \ s j \ s (3.17) As regards the fourth term, observe that ρ m (u n ) = 0 on the subset { u n m +1}, sowehave a(x, u n, u n ) T k (v j )φ 0 (θn)ρ j m (u n )dx = { u n >k} { u n >k} a(x, T m+1 (u n ), T m+1 (u n )) T k (v j )φ 0 (θ j n)ρ m (u n )dx. As above, we obtain a(x, T m+1 (u n ), T m+1 (u n )) T k (v j )φ 0 (θn)ρ j m (u n )dx = { u n >k} { u >k} l m+1 T k (u)ρ m (u)dx + 5 (n, j). Observing that T k (u) = 0 on the subset { u >k}, one has (3.18) a(x, u n, u n ) T k (v j )φ 0 (θn)ρ j m (u n )dx = 5 (n, j) { u n >k} For the last term of (3.15), we have a(x, u n, u n ) u n φ(θn)ρ j 0 m(u n )dx = {m u n m+1} φ(2k) {m u n m+1} a(x, u n, u n ) u n φ(θn)ρ j 0 m(u n )dx a(x, u n, u n ) u n dx.
18 174 A. Youssfi To estimate the last term of the previous inequality, we test by T 1 (u n T m (u n )) W0 1L M() in (3.7), to get a(x, u n, u n ) u n dx {m u n m+1} + H n (x, u n, u n )T 1 (u n T m (u n ))dx { u n m} = f n T 1 (u n T m (u n ))dx + F u n dx. {m u n m+1} Using the fact that H n (x, u n, u n )T 1 (u n T m (u n )) 0 on the subset { u n m} and the Young s inequality, we get 1 a(x, u n, u n ) u n dx 2 {m u n m+1} f n dx + M( F )dx. { u n m} {m u n m+1} It follows that a(x, u n, u n ) u n φ(θn)ρ j 0 m(u n )dx (3.19) Ã! 2φ(2k) f n dx + M( F )dx. { u n m} {m u n m+1} From (3.16), (3.17), (3.18) and (3.19) we obtain (3.20) <A(u n ),zn,m j > (a(x, T k (u n ), T k (u n )) a(x, T k (u n ), T k (v j )χ s j)) ( T k (u n ) T k (v j )χ s j )φ0 (θ j n)dx Ã! 2φ(2k) f n dx + M( F )dx { u n m} {m u n m+1} \ s l k T k (u)dx + 6 (n, j).
19 Existence result for strongly nonlinear elliptic equations in Now, we turn to second term of the left hand side of (3.14). We have H n (x, u n, u n )φ(θ j n)dx { u n k} = H n (x, T k (u n ), T k (u n ))φ(θ j n)dx { u n k} b(k) M( T k (u n ) ) φ(θn) dx j + b(k) h(x) φ(θn) dx j b(k) a(x, T k (u n ), T k (u n )) T k (u n ) φ(θn) dx j + 7 (n, j). Then, (3.21) { u n k} b(k) H n (x, u n, u n )φ(θn)dx j ³ a(x, T k (u n ), T k (u n )) a(x, T k (u n ), T k (v j )χ s j) ³ T k (u n ) T k (v j )χ s j φ(θn) dx j + b(k) a(x, T k (u n ), T k (v j )χ s j) ( T k (u n ) T k (v j )χ s j) φ(θn) dx j + b(k) a(x, T k (u n ), T k (u n )) T k (v j )χ s j φ(θn) dx j + 7 (n, j). We proceed as above to get b(k) a(x, T k (u n ), T k (v j )χ s j)) ( T k (u n ) T k (v j )χ s j) φ(θn) dx j = 8 (n, j) and b(k) a(x, T k (u n ), T k (u n )) T k (v j )χ s j φ(θn) dx j = 9 (n, j).
20 176 A. Youssfi Hence, we have (3.22) H n (x, u n, u n )φ(θ j n)dx { u n k} ³ b(k) a(x, T k (u n ), T k (u n )) a(x, T k (u n ), T k (v j )χ s j) ³ T k (u n ) T k (v j )χ s j φ(θn) dx j + 10 (n, j). Combining (3.14), (3.20) and (3.22), we get ³ a(x, T k (u n ), T k (u n )) a(x, T k (u n ), T k (v j )χ s j) ³ φ T k (u n ) T k (v j )χj s 0 (θn) j b(k) φ(θn) j dx l k T k (u)dx \ s Ã! +2φ(2k) f n dx + M( F )dx + 11 (n, j). { u n m} {m u n m+1} (3.23) Then, lemma 2.3 with x =1andy = b(k), yields ³ a(x, T k (u n ), T k (u n )) a(x, T k (u n ), T k (v j )χ s j) ³ T k (u n ) T k (v j )χ s j dx 2 l k T k (u)dx \ s Ã! +4φ(2k) f n dx + M( F )dx + 11 (n, j). { u n m} {m u n m+1}
21 Existence result for strongly nonlinear elliptic equations in On the other hand (a(x, T k (u n ), T k (u n )) a(x, T k (u n ), T k (u)χ s )) ( T k (u n ) T k (u)χ s ) dx = ³ a(x, T k (u n ), T k (u n )) a(x, T k (u n ), T k (v j )χ s j) ³ T k (u n ) T k (v j )χ s j dx + a(x, T k (u n ), T k (u n )) ( T k (v j )χ s j T k (u)χ s )dx a(x, T k (u n ), T k (u)χ s ) ( T k (u n ) T k (u)χ s )dx + a(x, T k (u n ), T k (v j )χ s j) ( T k (u n ) T k (v j )χ s j)dx. We shall pass to the limit in n andtheninj in the last three terms of the right hand side of the above equality. By similar arguments as in (3.15) and (3.21), we obtain a(x, T k (u n ), T k (u n )) ( T k (v j )χ s j T k (u)χ s )dx = 12 (n, j) and and a(x, T k (u n ), T k (u)χ s ) ( T k (u n ) T k (u)χ s )dx = 13 (n, j) (3.24) so that a(x, T k (u n ), T k (v j )χ s j) ( T k (u n ) T k (v j )χ s j)dx = 14 (n, j),
22 178 A. Youssfi (a(x, T k (u n ), T k (u n )) a(x, T k (u n ), T k (u)χ s )) ( T k (u n ) T k (u)χ s )dx (3.25) = (a(x, T k (u n ), T k (u n )) a(x, T k (u n ), T k (v j )χ s j)) ( T k (u n ) T k (v j )χ s j )dx + 15 (n, j). Let r s, we use (3.2), (3.25) and (3.23) to get 0 (a(x, T k (u n ), T k (u n )) a(x, T k (u n ), T k (u))) r ( T k (u n ) T k (u))dx (a(x, T k (u n ), T k (u n )) a(x, T k (u n ), T k (u))) s ( T k (u n ) T k (u))dx = (a(x, T k (u n ), T k (u n )) a(x, T k (u n ), T k (u)χ s )) s ( T k (u n ) T k (u)χ s )dx (a(x, T k (u n ), T k (u n )) a(x, T k (u n ), T k (u)χ s )) ( T k (u n ) T k (u)χ s )dx
23 Existence result for strongly nonlinear elliptic equations in = (a(x, T k (u n ), T k (u n )) a(x, T k (u n ), T k (v j )χ s j)) ( T k (u n ) T k (v j )χ s j)dx + 15 (n, j) 2 l k T k (u)dx \ s Ã! +4φ(2k) f n dx + M( F )dx { u n m} {m u n m+1} + 16 (n, j), Which gives by passing to the limit sup over n and then over j 0 lim sup (a(x, T k (u n ), T k (u n )) a(x, T k (u n ), T k (u))) n r ( T k (u n ) T k (u))dx Ã! 2 l k T k (u)dx +4φ(2k) f dx + M( F )dx. \ s { u m} {m u m+1} Letting s and then m, taking into account that l k T k (u) L 1 (), f L 1 (), M( F ) L 1 (), \ s 0, { u m} 0, and {m u m +1} 0, one has (a(x, T k (u n ), T k (u n )) a(x, T k (u n ), T k (u))) ( T k (u n ) T k (u))dx 0 r as n. As in [4], we deduce that there exists a subsequence of {u n } still indexed again by n such that (3.26) u n u a.e. in. Thus, by (3.12) and (3.26) we have (3.27) a(x, T k (u n ), T k (u n )) a(x, T k (u), T k (u)) weakly in (L M ()) N for σ(πl M, ΠE M )andforallk σ.
24 180 A. Youssfi Step4: Modular convergence of the truncations. Going back to (3.23), we write a(x, T k (u n ), T k (u n )) T k (u n )dx a(x, T k (u n ), T k (u n )) T k (v j )χ s jdx + a(x, T k (u n ), T k (v j )χ s j) ( T k (u n ) T k (v j )χ s j)dx Ã! +4φ(2k) f n dx + M( F )dx { u n m} {m u n m+1} +2 a(x, T k (u), T k (u)) T k (u)dx + 11 (n, j). \ s and by (3.24) we get a(x, T k (u n ), T k (u n )) T k (u n )dx a(x, T k (u n ), T k (u n )) T k (v j )χ s jdx Ã! +4φ(2k) f n dx + M( F )dx { u n m} {m u n m+1} +2 a(x, T k (u), T k (u)) T k (u)dx + 17 (n, j). \ s We pass now to the limit sup over n in both sides of this inequality, to obtain lim sup a(x, T k (u n ), T k (u n )) T k (u n )dx n a(x, T k (u), T k (u)) T k (v j )χ s jdx Ã! +4φ(2k) f dx + M( F )dx { u m} {m u m+1} +2 a(x, T k (u), T k (u)) T k (u)dx + lim 17(n, j), \ s n
25 Existence result for strongly nonlinear elliptic equations in in which, we pass to the limit in j to get lim sup a(x, T k (u n ), T k (u n )) T k (u n )dx n a(x, T k (u), T k (u)) T k (u)χ s dx Ã! +4φ(2k) f dx + M( F )dx { u m} {m u m+1} +2 a(x, T k (u), T k (u)) T k (u)dx, \ s letting s and then m, one has lim sup a(x, T k (u n ), T k (u n )) T k (u n )dx a(x, T k (u), T k (u)) T k (u)dx n On the other hand, by Fatou s lemma, we have a(x, T k (u), T k (u)) T k (u)dx lim inf a(x, T k (u n ), T k (u n )) T k (u n )dx. n It follows that a(x, T k (u n ), T k (u n )) T k (u n )dx = lim n By lemma 2.2 we conclude that a(x, T k (u), T k (u)) T k (u)dx. (3.28) a(x, T k (u n ), T k (u n )) T k (u n ) a(x, T k (u), T k (u)) T k (u) strongly in L 1 (), k σ. The convexity of the Nfunction M and (3.3) allow us to have µ Tk (u n ) T k (u) M a(x, T k(u n ), T k (u n )) T k (u n )+ 1 2 a(x, T k(u), T k (u)) T k (u). Then, by (3.28) we get µ lim sup Tk (u n ) T k (u) M dx =0. E 0 n E 2
26 182 A. Youssfi So that, by Vitali s theorem one has T k (u n ) T k (u) in W 1 0 L M () for the modular convergence, for all k σ. Step5: Equiintegrability of the nonlinearities. As a consequence of (3.10) and (3.26), one has H n (x, u n, u n ) H(x, u, u) a.e. in. We shall prove that the sequence {H n (x, u n, u n )} is uniformly equiintegrable in. Let E be a measurable subset of, for all m σ, wehave H n (x, u n, u n ) dx = H n (x, u n, u n ) dx E + H n (x, u n, u n ) dx. E { u n >m} E { u n m} On the one hand, the use of T 1 (u n T m 1 (u n )) as test function in (3.7), the Young s inequality and (3.3) led to H n (x, u n, u n )T 1 (u n T m 1 (u n ))dx f n dx + M(2 F )dx. {m 1 u n m} { u n m 1} { u n m} Then, assumption (3.5) gives H n (x, u n, u n ) dx { u n m 1} f n dx+ M(2 F )dx. {m 1 u n m} For all >0, one can find an m = m( ) > 1 such that sup H n (x, u n, u n ) dx n { u n m} 2.
27 Existence result for strongly nonlinear elliptic equations in E { u n m} On the other hand, we use (3.3) and (3.4) to get H n (x, u n, u n ) dx H n (x, T m (u n ), T m (u n )) dx E µ b(m) E M( T m (u n ) )dx + h(x)dx E b(m) a(x, T m (u n ), T m (u n )) T m (u n )dx E +b(m) h(x)dx. We use the fact that from (3.28) the sequence {a(x, T m (u n ), T m (u n )) T m (u n )} is equiintegrable and that h L 1 () toobtain lim sup H n (x, u n, u n ) dx =0, E 0 n E { u n m} where E denotes the Lebesgue measure of the subset E. Consequently lim sup H n (x, u n, u n ) dx =0. E 0 n E This proves that the sequence {H n (x, u n, u n )} is uniformly equiintegrable in. By Vitali s theorem, we conclude that H(x, u, u) L 1 () and (3.29) H n (x, u n, u n ) H(x, u, u) strongly in L 1 (). E Step6: Passage to the limit. Let v W 1 0 L M() L (). By [9, Lemma 4], there exists a sequence {v j } D() such that kv j k (N +1)kvk and v j v in W 1 0 L M () for the modular convergence and a.e. in. Let k σ. We go back to approximate equations (3.7) and use T k (u n v j ) as test function to obtain (3.30) a(x, T t (u n ), T t (u n )) T k (u n v j )dx + H n (x, u n, u n )T k (u n v j )dx = f n T k (u n v j )dx + F T k (u n v j )dx,
28 184 A. Youssfi where t = k +(N +1)kvk. The first term in the lefthand side of (7.3.23) is written as a(x, T t (u n ), T t (u n )) T k (u n v j )dx = { u n v j <k} { u n v j <k} Thus, by (3.27) and (3.28) we obtain a(x, T t (u n ), T t (u n )) T k (u n v j )dx as n. Since a(x, T t (u n ), T t (u n )) T t (u n )dx a(x, T t (u n ), T t (u n )) v j dx a(x, T t (u), T t (u)) T k (u v j )dx T k (u n v j ) T k (u v j ) in L () forσ (L,L 1 ), we use (3.29) and the fact that f n f strongly in L 1 () asn, to obtain H n (x, u n, u n )T k (u n v j )dx H(x, u, u)t k (u v j )dx, f n T k (u n v j )dx ft k (u v j )dx, as n. For the last term in the righthand side of (3.30) we write F T k (u n v j )dx = F u n dx F v j dx. { u n v j <k} { u n v j <k} Hence, by (3.9) we obtain F T k (u n v j )dx F T k (u v j )dx. Therefore, passing to the limit as n in (3.30), we get a(x, u, u) T k (u v j )dx + H(x, u, u)t k (u v j )dx = ft k (u v j )dx + F T k (u v j )dx,
29 Existence result for strongly nonlinear elliptic equations in in which we pass to the limit as j to obtain a(x, u, u) T k (u v)dx + H(x, u, u)t k (u v)dx = ft k (u v)dx + F T k (u v)dx. Which completes the proof of theorem 3.1. Remark 4.1. If the Nfunction M satisfies the 2 condition, the sequence {a(x, u n, u n )} will be bounded in (L M ()) N. Then, the function u solution of the problem (3.6) is such that: u W0 1L M(), H(x, u, u) L 1 () and a(x, u, u) vdx + H(x, u, u)vdx = fvdx + F vdx, for every v W 1 0 L M() L (). Remark 4.2. We can interpret theorem 3.1 in the following sense: the problem ( u W 1 0 L M (), H(x, u, u) L 1 () div a(x, u, u)+h(x, u, u) =μ admits a solution if and only if μ belongs to L 1 ()+W 1 L M (). Remark 4.3. If we replace (3.1) by the more general growth condition a(x, s, ξ) b 0 ( s )(a 0 (x)+m 1 M(τ ξ )) where a 0 (x) belongs to E M (), τ > 0 and b 0 is a positive continuous increasing function, we can adapt the same ideas to prove the existence of solutions for the problem u W0 1L M(), H(x, u, u) L 1 () and a(x, u, u) T k (u v)dx + H(x, u, u)t k (u v)dx = ft k (u v)dx + F T k (u v)dx for v W0 1L M() L (), by considering the following approximation problems ( un W0 1L M() div a(x, T n (u n ), u n )+H n (x, u n, u n )=f n divf in.
30 186 A. Youssfi As an application of this result, we give div((1 + u ) q exp( u p ) 1 u 2 u)+u(exp( u p ) 1) = f divf in. with p>1 and q>0. References [1] Adams, R.: Sobolev spaces, Academic Press Inc, New York, (1975) [2] Benkirane, A., Elmahi, A.: An existence theorem for a strongly nonlinear problems in Orlicz spaces, Nonlinear Anal. T.M.A. 36, pp (1999). [3] Benkirane, A., Elmahi, A.: strongly nonlinear elliptic equations having natural growth terms and L 1 data, Nonlinear Anal. T.M.A. 39, pp (2000). [4] Benkirane, A., Elmahi, A.: Almost everywhere convergence of the gradients of solutions to elliptic equations in Orlicz spaces and application, Nonlinear Anal. T.M.A. 28, pp (1997). [5] Benkirane, A., Elmahi, A., Meskine, D.: An existence theorem for a class of elliptic problems in L 1, Applicationes Mathematicae 29, 4, pp (2002). [6] Elmahi, A., Meskine, D.: Nonlinear elliptic problems having natural growth and L 1 data in Orlicz spaces, Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. 184, 2, pp (2004). [7] Elmahi, A., Meskine, D.: Existence of solutions for elliptic equations having natural growth terms in Orlicz spaces, Abst. Appl. Anal. 2004, 12, pp (2004). [8] Gossez, J.P.: A strongly nonlinear elliptic problem in OrliczSobolev spaces, Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., 45, Part 1, (1986). [9] Gossez, J.P.: Some approximation properties in OrliczSobolev spaces, Stud. Math. 74, pp (1982).
ON COMPLETELY CONTINUOUS INTEGRATION OPERATORS OF A VECTOR MEASURE. 1. Introduction
ON COMPLETELY CONTINUOUS INTEGRATION OPERATORS OF A VECTOR MEASURE J.M. CALABUIG, J. RODRÍGUEZ, AND E.A. SÁNCHEZPÉREZ Abstract. Let m be a vector measure taking values in a Banach space X. We prove that
More informationA PRIORI ESTIMATES FOR SEMISTABLE SOLUTIONS OF SEMILINEAR ELLIPTIC EQUATIONS. In memory of RouHuai Wang
A PRIORI ESTIMATES FOR SEMISTABLE SOLUTIONS OF SEMILINEAR ELLIPTIC EQUATIONS XAVIER CABRÉ, MANEL SANCHÓN, AND JOEL SPRUCK In memory of RouHuai Wang 1. Introduction In this note we consider semistable
More informationProperties of BMO functions whose reciprocals are also BMO
Properties of BMO functions whose reciprocals are also BMO R. L. Johnson and C. J. Neugebauer The main result says that a nonnegative BMOfunction w, whose reciprocal is also in BMO, belongs to p> A p,and
More informationExistence and multiplicity of solutions for a Neumanntype p(x)laplacian equation with nonsmooth potential. 1 Introduction
Electronic Journal of Qualitative Theory of Differential Equations 20, No. 7, 0; http://www.math.uszeged.hu/ejqtde/ Existence and multiplicity of solutions for a Neumanntype p(x)laplacian equation
More informationCONSTANTSIGN SOLUTIONS FOR A NONLINEAR NEUMANN PROBLEM INVOLVING THE DISCRETE plaplacian. Pasquale Candito and Giuseppina D Aguí
Opuscula Math. 34 no. 4 2014 683 690 http://dx.doi.org/10.7494/opmath.2014.34.4.683 Opuscula Mathematica CONSTANTSIGN SOLUTIONS FOR A NONLINEAR NEUMANN PROBLEM INVOLVING THE DISCRETE plaplacian Pasquale
More informationExtremal equilibria for reaction diffusion equations in bounded domains and applications.
Extremal equilibria for reaction diffusion equations in bounded domains and applications. Aníbal RodríguezBernal Alejandro VidalLópez Departamento de Matemática Aplicada Universidad Complutense de Madrid,
More informationON A GLOBALIZATION PROPERTY
APPLICATIONES MATHEMATICAE 22,1 (1993), pp. 69 73 S. ROLEWICZ (Warszawa) ON A GLOBALIZATION PROPERTY Abstract. Let (X, τ) be a topological space. Let Φ be a class of realvalued functions defined on X.
More information1 Norms and Vector Spaces
008.10.07.01 1 Norms and Vector Spaces Suppose we have a complex vector space V. A norm is a function f : V R which satisfies (i) f(x) 0 for all x V (ii) f(x + y) f(x) + f(y) for all x,y V (iii) f(λx)
More informationA new continuous dependence result for impulsive retarded functional differential equations
CADERNOS DE MATEMÁTICA 11, 37 47 May (2010) ARTIGO NÚMERO SMA#324 A new continuous dependence result for impulsive retarded functional differential equations M. Federson * Instituto de Ciências Matemáticas
More informationExistence de solutions à support compact pour un problème elliptique quasilinéaire
Existence de solutions à support compact pour un problème elliptique quasilinéaire Jacques Giacomoni, Habib Mâagli, Paul Sauvy Université de Pau et des Pays de l Adour, L.M.A.P. Faculté de sciences de
More informationIRREDUCIBLE OPERATOR SEMIGROUPS SUCH THAT AB AND BA ARE PROPORTIONAL. 1. Introduction
IRREDUCIBLE OPERATOR SEMIGROUPS SUCH THAT AB AND BA ARE PROPORTIONAL R. DRNOVŠEK, T. KOŠIR Dedicated to Prof. Heydar Radjavi on the occasion of his seventieth birthday. Abstract. Let S be an irreducible
More informationFurther Study on Strong Lagrangian Duality Property for Invex Programs via Penalty Functions 1
Further Study on Strong Lagrangian Duality Property for Invex Programs via Penalty Functions 1 J. Zhang Institute of Applied Mathematics, Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Chongqing
More informationAn optimal transportation problem with import/export taxes on the boundary
An optimal transportation problem with import/export taxes on the boundary Julián Toledo Workshop International sur les Mathématiques et l Environnement Essaouira, November 2012..................... Joint
More informationF. ABTAHI and M. ZARRIN. (Communicated by J. Goldstein)
Journal of Algerian Mathematical Society Vol. 1, pp. 1 6 1 CONCERNING THE l p CONJECTURE FOR DISCRETE SEMIGROUPS F. ABTAHI and M. ZARRIN (Communicated by J. Goldstein) Abstract. For 2 < p
More informationResearch Article Stability Analysis for HigherOrder Adjacent Derivative in Parametrized Vector Optimization
Hindawi Publishing Corporation Journal of Inequalities and Applications Volume 2010, Article ID 510838, 15 pages doi:10.1155/2010/510838 Research Article Stability Analysis for HigherOrder Adjacent Derivative
More informationDuality of linear conic problems
Duality of linear conic problems Alexander Shapiro and Arkadi Nemirovski Abstract It is well known that the optimal values of a linear programming problem and its dual are equal to each other if at least
More informationMath212a1010 Lebesgue measure.
Math212a1010 Lebesgue measure. October 19, 2010 Today s lecture will be devoted to Lebesgue measure, a creation of Henri Lebesgue, in his thesis, one of the most famous theses in the history of mathematics.
More informationAn example of a computable
An example of a computable absolutely normal number Verónica Becher Santiago Figueira Abstract The first example of an absolutely normal number was given by Sierpinski in 96, twenty years before the concept
More informationGeometrical Characterization of RNoperators between Locally Convex Vector Spaces
Geometrical Characterization of RNoperators between Locally Convex Vector Spaces OLEG REINOV St. Petersburg State University Dept. of Mathematics and Mechanics Universitetskii pr. 28, 198504 St, Petersburg
More informationMetric Spaces. Chapter 1
Chapter 1 Metric Spaces Many of the arguments you have seen in several variable calculus are almost identical to the corresponding arguments in one variable calculus, especially arguments concerning convergence
More informationBANACH AND HILBERT SPACE REVIEW
BANACH AND HILBET SPACE EVIEW CHISTOPHE HEIL These notes will briefly review some basic concepts related to the theory of Banach and Hilbert spaces. We are not trying to give a complete development, but
More informationNotes on metric spaces
Notes on metric spaces 1 Introduction The purpose of these notes is to quickly review some of the basic concepts from Real Analysis, Metric Spaces and some related results that will be used in this course.
More informationPROPERTIES OF SOME NEW SEMINORMED SEQUENCE SPACES DEFINED BY A MODULUS FUNCTION
STUDIA UNIV. BABEŞ BOLYAI, MATHEMATICA, Volume L, Number 3, September 2005 PROPERTIES OF SOME NEW SEMINORMED SEQUENCE SPACES DEFINED BY A MODULUS FUNCTION YAVUZ ALTIN AYŞEGÜL GÖKHAN HIFSI ALTINOK Abstract.
More informationRi and. i=1. S i N. and. R R i
The subset R of R n is a closed rectangle if there are n nonempty closed intervals {[a 1, b 1 ], [a 2, b 2 ],..., [a n, b n ]} so that R = [a 1, b 1 ] [a 2, b 2 ] [a n, b n ]. The subset R of R n is an
More information0 <β 1 let u(x) u(y) kuk u := sup u(x) and [u] β := sup
456 BRUCE K. DRIVER 24. Hölder Spaces Notation 24.1. Let Ω be an open subset of R d,bc(ω) and BC( Ω) be the bounded continuous functions on Ω and Ω respectively. By identifying f BC( Ω) with f Ω BC(Ω),
More informationShape Optimization Problems over Classes of Convex Domains
Shape Optimization Problems over Classes of Convex Domains Giuseppe BUTTAZZO Dipartimento di Matematica Via Buonarroti, 2 56127 PISA ITALY email: buttazzo@sab.sns.it Paolo GUASONI Scuola Normale Superiore
More informationON LIMIT LAWS FOR CENTRAL ORDER STATISTICS UNDER POWER NORMALIZATION. E. I. Pancheva, A. GacovskaBarandovska
Pliska Stud. Math. Bulgar. 22 (2015), STUDIA MATHEMATICA BULGARICA ON LIMIT LAWS FOR CENTRAL ORDER STATISTICS UNDER POWER NORMALIZATION E. I. Pancheva, A. GacovskaBarandovska Smirnov (1949) derived four
More informationMetric Spaces. Chapter 7. 7.1. Metrics
Chapter 7 Metric Spaces A metric space is a set X that has a notion of the distance d(x, y) between every pair of points x, y X. The purpose of this chapter is to introduce metric spaces and give some
More information1 Fixed Point Iteration and Contraction Mapping Theorem
1 Fixed Point Iteration and Contraction Mapping Theorem Notation: For two sets A,B we write A B iff x A = x B. So A A is true. Some people use the notation instead. 1.1 Introduction Consider a function
More informationTRIPLE POSITIVE SOLUTIONS FOR BOUNDARY VALUE PROBLEM OF A NONLINEAR FRACTIONAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATION. Communicated by Mohammad Asadzadeh
Bulletin of the Iranian Mathematical Society Vol. 33 No. 2 (27), pp . TRIPLE POSITIVE SOLUTIONS FOR BOUNDARY VALUE PROBLEM OF A NONLINEAR FRACTIONAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATION R. DEHGHANI AND K. GHANBARI*
More informationMultiple Solutions to a Boundary Value Problem for an nth Order Nonlinear Difference Equation
Differential Equations and Computational Simulations III J. Graef, R. Shivaji, B. Soni, & J. Zhu (Editors) Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Conference 01, 1997, pp 129 136. ISSN: 10726691.
More informationSome remarks on PhragménLindelöf theorems for weak solutions of the stationary Schrödinger operator
Wan Boundary Value Problems (2015) 2015:239 DOI 10.1186/s1366101505080 R E S E A R C H Open Access Some remarks on PhragménLindelöf theorems for weak solutions of the stationary Schrödinger operator
More informationx if x 0, x if x < 0.
Chapter 3 Sequences In this chapter, we discuss sequences. We say what it means for a sequence to converge, and define the limit of a convergent sequence. We begin with some preliminary results about the
More informationConvex analysis and profit/cost/support functions
CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences Convex analysis and profit/cost/support functions KC Border October 2004 Revised January 2009 Let A be a subset of R m
More informationEXISTENCE AND NONEXISTENCE RESULTS FOR A NONLINEAR HEAT EQUATION
Sixth Mississippi State Conference on Differential Equations and Computational Simulations, Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, Conference 5 (7), pp. 5 65. ISSN: 7669. UL: http://ejde.math.txstate.edu
More informationThe idea to study a boundary value problem associated to the scalar equation
Topological Methods in Nonlinear Analysis Journal of the Juliusz Schauder Center Volume 23, 2004, 73 88 DEGREE COMPUTATIONS FOR POSITIVELY HOMOGENEOUS DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS Christian Fabry Patrick Habets
More informationFACTORING POLYNOMIALS IN THE RING OF FORMAL POWER SERIES OVER Z
FACTORING POLYNOMIALS IN THE RING OF FORMAL POWER SERIES OVER Z DANIEL BIRMAJER, JUAN B GIL, AND MICHAEL WEINER Abstract We consider polynomials with integer coefficients and discuss their factorization
More informationNonArbitrage and the Fundamental Theorem of Asset Pricing: Summary of Main Results
Proceedings of Symposia in Applied Mathematics Volume 00, 1997 NonArbitrage and the Fundamental Theorem of Asset Pricing: Summary of Main Results Freddy Delbaen and Walter Schachermayer Abstract. The
More informationSeparation Properties for Locally Convex Cones
Journal of Convex Analysis Volume 9 (2002), No. 1, 301 307 Separation Properties for Locally Convex Cones Walter Roth Department of Mathematics, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Gadong BE1410, Brunei Darussalam
More informationBOUNDED, ASYMPTOTICALLY STABLE, AND L 1 SOLUTIONS OF CAPUTO FRACTIONAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS. Muhammad N. Islam
Opuscula Math. 35, no. 2 (215), 181 19 http://dx.doi.org/1.7494/opmath.215.35.2.181 Opuscula Mathematica BOUNDED, ASYMPTOTICALLY STABLE, AND L 1 SOLUTIONS OF CAPUTO FRACTIONAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS Muhammad
More informationSinguläre Phänomene und Skalierung in mathematischen Modellen
RHEINISCHE FRIDRICHWILHELMUNIVERSITÄT BONN Diffusion Problem With Boundary Conditions of Hysteresis Type N.D.Botkin, K.H.Hoffmann, A.M.Meirmanov, V.N.Starovoitov no. Sonderforschungsbereich 6 Singuläre
More informationLipschitz classes of Aharmonic functions in Carnot groups
Lipschitz classes of Aharmonic functions in Carnot groups Craig A. Nolder Department of Mathematics Florida State University Tallahassee, FL 323064510, USA nolder@math.fsu.edu 30 October 2005 Abstract
More informationChapter 5. Banach Spaces
9 Chapter 5 Banach Spaces Many linear equations may be formulated in terms of a suitable linear operator acting on a Banach space. In this chapter, we study Banach spaces and linear operators acting on
More informationSystems with Persistent Memory: the Observation Inequality Problems and Solutions
Chapter 6 Systems with Persistent Memory: the Observation Inequality Problems and Solutions Facts that are recalled in the problems wt) = ut) + 1 c A 1 s ] R c t s)) hws) + Ks r)wr)dr ds. 6.1) w = w +
More informationThin Layers in Micromagnetism
Thin Layers in Micromagnetism Gilles Carbou Mathématiques Appliquées de Bordeaux, CNRS ERS 23 et Université Bordeaux, 35 cours de la libération, 33405 Talence cedex, France. Abstract  In this paper we
More informationA Simple Proof of Duality Theorem for MongeKantorovich Problem
A Simple Proof of Duality Theorem for MongeKantorovich Problem Toshio Mikami Hokkaido University December 14, 2004 Abstract We give a simple proof of the duality theorem for the Monge Kantorovich problem
More informationRandom graphs with a given degree sequence
Sourav Chatterjee (NYU) Persi Diaconis (Stanford) Allan Sly (Microsoft) Let G be an undirected simple graph on n vertices. Let d 1,..., d n be the degrees of the vertices of G arranged in descending order.
More informationDifferentiating under an integral sign
CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Ma 2b KC Border Introduction to Probability and Statistics February 213 Differentiating under an integral sign In the derivation of Maximum Likelihood Estimators, or
More informationP (A) = lim P (A) = N(A)/N,
1.1 Probability, Relative Frequency and Classical Definition. Probability is the study of random or nondeterministic experiments. Suppose an experiment can be repeated any number of times, so that we
More information{f 1 (U), U F} is an open cover of A. Since A is compact there is a finite subcover of A, {f 1 (U 1 ),...,f 1 (U n )}, {U 1,...
44 CHAPTER 4. CONTINUOUS FUNCTIONS In Calculus we often use arithmetic operations to generate new continuous functions from old ones. In a general metric space we don t have arithmetic, but much of it
More informationDate: April 12, 2001. Contents
2 Lagrange Multipliers Date: April 12, 2001 Contents 2.1. Introduction to Lagrange Multipliers......... p. 2 2.2. Enhanced Fritz John Optimality Conditions...... p. 12 2.3. Informative Lagrange Multipliers...........
More informationCONVERGENCE OF SEQUENCES OF ITERATES OF RANDOMVALUED VECTOR FUNCTIONS
C O L L O Q U I U M M A T H E M A T I C U M VOL. 97 2003 NO. 1 CONVERGENCE OF SEQUENCES OF ITERATES OF RANDOMVALUED VECTOR FUNCTIONS BY RAFAŁ KAPICA (Katowice) Abstract. Given a probability space (Ω,
More informationFIRST YEAR CALCULUS. Chapter 7 CONTINUITY. It is a parabola, and we can draw this parabola without lifting our pencil from the paper.
FIRST YEAR CALCULUS WWLCHENW L c WWWL W L Chen, 1982, 2008. 2006. This chapter originates from material used by the author at Imperial College, University of London, between 1981 and 1990. It It is is
More information1 if 1 x 0 1 if 0 x 1
Chapter 3 Continuity In this chapter we begin by defining the fundamental notion of continuity for real valued functions of a single real variable. When trying to decide whether a given function is or
More informationTHE FUNDAMENTAL THEOREM OF ALGEBRA VIA PROPER MAPS
THE FUNDAMENTAL THEOREM OF ALGEBRA VIA PROPER MAPS KEITH CONRAD 1. Introduction The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra says every nonconstant polynomial with complex coefficients can be factored into linear
More informationINDISTINGUISHABILITY OF ABSOLUTELY CONTINUOUS AND SINGULAR DISTRIBUTIONS
INDISTINGUISHABILITY OF ABSOLUTELY CONTINUOUS AND SINGULAR DISTRIBUTIONS STEVEN P. LALLEY AND ANDREW NOBEL Abstract. It is shown that there are no consistent decision rules for the hypothesis testing problem
More informationMathematics for Econometrics, Fourth Edition
Mathematics for Econometrics, Fourth Edition Phoebus J. Dhrymes 1 July 2012 1 c Phoebus J. Dhrymes, 2012. Preliminary material; not to be cited or disseminated without the author s permission. 2 Contents
More informationFuzzy Differential Systems and the New Concept of Stability
Nonlinear Dynamics and Systems Theory, 1(2) (2001) 111 119 Fuzzy Differential Systems and the New Concept of Stability V. Lakshmikantham 1 and S. Leela 2 1 Department of Mathematical Sciences, Florida
More informationNo: 10 04. Bilkent University. Monotonic Extension. Farhad Husseinov. Discussion Papers. Department of Economics
No: 10 04 Bilkent University Monotonic Extension Farhad Husseinov Discussion Papers Department of Economics The Discussion Papers of the Department of Economics are intended to make the initial results
More informationChapter 1. Metric Spaces. Metric Spaces. Examples. Normed linear spaces
Chapter 1. Metric Spaces Metric Spaces MA222 David Preiss d.preiss@warwick.ac.uk Warwick University, Spring 2008/2009 Definitions. A metric on a set M is a function d : M M R such that for all x, y, z
More informationn k=1 k=0 1/k! = e. Example 6.4. The series 1/k 2 converges in R. Indeed, if s n = n then k=1 1/k, then s 2n s n = 1 n + 1 +...
6 Series We call a normed space (X, ) a Banach space provided that every Cauchy sequence (x n ) in X converges. For example, R with the norm = is an example of Banach space. Now let (x n ) be a sequence
More informationUNIVERSITETET I OSLO
NIVERSITETET I OSLO Det matematisknaturvitenskapelige fakultet Examination in: Trial exam Partial differential equations and Sobolev spaces I. Day of examination: November 18. 2009. Examination hours:
More informationOne side James Compactness Theorem
One side James Compactness Theorem 1 1 Department of Mathematics University of Murcia Topological Methods in Analysis and Optimization. On the occasion of the 70th birthday of Prof. Petar Kenderov A birthday
More informationSeries Convergence Tests Math 122 Calculus III D Joyce, Fall 2012
Some series converge, some diverge. Series Convergence Tests Math 22 Calculus III D Joyce, Fall 202 Geometric series. We ve already looked at these. We know when a geometric series converges and what it
More informationMath 5311 Gateaux differentials and Frechet derivatives
Math 5311 Gateaux differentials and Frechet derivatives Kevin Long January 26, 2009 1 Differentiation in vector spaces Thus far, we ve developed the theory of minimization without reference to derivatives.
More informationOptimal boundary control of quasilinear elliptic partial differential equations: theory and numerical analysis
Optimal boundary control of quasilinear elliptic partial differential equations: theory and numerical analysis vorgelegt von Dipl.Math. Vili Dhamo von der Fakultät II  Mathematik und Naturwissenschaften
More informationThe Heat Equation. Lectures INF2320 p. 1/88
The Heat Equation Lectures INF232 p. 1/88 Lectures INF232 p. 2/88 The Heat Equation We study the heat equation: u t = u xx for x (,1), t >, (1) u(,t) = u(1,t) = for t >, (2) u(x,) = f(x) for x (,1), (3)
More informationMATH 425, PRACTICE FINAL EXAM SOLUTIONS.
MATH 45, PRACTICE FINAL EXAM SOLUTIONS. Exercise. a Is the operator L defined on smooth functions of x, y by L u := u xx + cosu linear? b Does the answer change if we replace the operator L by the operator
More informationMathematical Methods of Engineering Analysis
Mathematical Methods of Engineering Analysis Erhan Çinlar Robert J. Vanderbei February 2, 2000 Contents Sets and Functions 1 1 Sets................................... 1 Subsets.............................
More informationResearch Article On the Rank of Elliptic Curves in Elementary Cubic Extensions
Numbers Volume 2015, Article ID 501629, 4 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/501629 Research Article On the Rank of Elliptic Curves in Elementary Cubic Extensions Rintaro Kozuma College of International
More information9 More on differentiation
Tel Aviv University, 2013 Measure and category 75 9 More on differentiation 9a Finite Taylor expansion............... 75 9b Continuous and nowhere differentiable..... 78 9c Differentiable and nowhere monotone......
More informationON FIBER DIAMETERS OF CONTINUOUS MAPS
ON FIBER DIAMETERS OF CONTINUOUS MAPS PETER S. LANDWEBER, EMANUEL A. LAZAR, AND NEEL PATEL Abstract. We present a surprisingly short proof that for any continuous map f : R n R m, if n > m, then there
More informationReference: Introduction to Partial Differential Equations by G. Folland, 1995, Chap. 3.
5 Potential Theory Reference: Introduction to Partial Differential Equations by G. Folland, 995, Chap. 3. 5. Problems of Interest. In what follows, we consider Ω an open, bounded subset of R n with C 2
More informationGambling Systems and MultiplicationInvariant Measures
Gambling Systems and MultiplicationInvariant Measures by Jeffrey S. Rosenthal* and Peter O. Schwartz** (May 28, 997.. Introduction. This short paper describes a surprising connection between two previously
More informationb i (x) u x i + F (x, u),
Topological Methods in Nonlinear Analysis Journal of the Juliusz Schauder Center Volume 14, 1999, 275 293 TOPOLOGICAL DEGREE FOR A CLASS OF ELLIPTIC OPERATORS IN R n Cristelle Barillon Vitaly A. Volpert
More informationContinued Fractions and the Euclidean Algorithm
Continued Fractions and the Euclidean Algorithm Lecture notes prepared for MATH 326, Spring 997 Department of Mathematics and Statistics University at Albany William F Hammond Table of Contents Introduction
More informationAdvanced Microeconomics
Advanced Microeconomics Ordinal preference theory Harald Wiese University of Leipzig Harald Wiese (University of Leipzig) Advanced Microeconomics 1 / 68 Part A. Basic decision and preference theory 1 Decisions
More informationA CHARACTERIZATION OF C k (X) FOR X NORMAL AND REALCOMPACT
Bol. Soc. Mat. Mexicana (3) Vol. 12, 2006 A CHARACTERIZATION OF C k (X) FOR X NORMAL AND REALCOMPACT F. MONTALVO, A. A. PULGARÍN AND B. REQUEJO Abstract. We present some internal conditions on a locally
More informationClass Meeting # 1: Introduction to PDEs
MATH 18.152 COURSE NOTES  CLASS MEETING # 1 18.152 Introduction to PDEs, Fall 2011 Professor: Jared Speck Class Meeting # 1: Introduction to PDEs 1. What is a PDE? We will be studying functions u = u(x
More information2.3 Convex Constrained Optimization Problems
42 CHAPTER 2. FUNDAMENTAL CONCEPTS IN CONVEX OPTIMIZATION Theorem 15 Let f : R n R and h : R R. Consider g(x) = h(f(x)) for all x R n. The function g is convex if either of the following two conditions
More information1. INTRODUCTION. u yy. u yx
Rend. Mat. Acc. Lincei s. 9, v. 16:159169 005) Analisi funzionale. Ð On weak Hessian determinants. Nota di LUIGI D'ONOFRIO, FLAIA GIANNETTI eluigi GRECO, presentata *) dal Socio C. Sbordone. ABSTRACT.
More information16.3 Fredholm Operators
Lectures 16 and 17 16.3 Fredholm Operators A nice way to think about compact operators is to show that set of compact operators is the closure of the set of finite rank operator in operator norm. In this
More informationON A MIXED SUMDIFFERENCE EQUATION OF VOLTERRAFREDHOLM TYPE. 1. Introduction
SARAJEVO JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS Vol.5 (17) (2009), 55 62 ON A MIXED SUMDIFFERENCE EQUATION OF VOLTERRAFREDHOLM TYPE B.. PACHPATTE Abstract. The main objective of this paper is to study some basic properties
More informationFixed Point Theorems
Fixed Point Theorems Definition: Let X be a set and let T : X X be a function that maps X into itself. (Such a function is often called an operator, a transformation, or a transform on X, and the notation
More informationExistence for some vectorial elliptic problems with measure data **)
Riv. Mat. Univ. Parma 7) 5 006), 46 F RANCESCO L EONETTI and P IER INCENZO P ETRICCA *) Existence for some vectorial elliptic problems with measure data **)  Introduction The study of elliptic boundary
More informationCharacterizing the Sum of Two Cubes
1 3 47 6 3 11 Journal of Integer Sequences, Vol. 6 (003), Article 03.4.6 Characterizing the Sum of Two Cubes Kevin A. Broughan University of Waikato Hamilton 001 New Zealand kab@waikato.ac.nz Abstract
More informationLINEAR DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS IN DISTRIBUTIONS
LINEAR DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS IN DISTRIBUTIONS LESLIE D. GATES, JR.1 1. Introduction. The main result of this paper is an extension of the analysis of Laurent Schwartz [l ] concerning the primitive of
More informationMaxMin Representation of Piecewise Linear Functions
Beiträge zur Algebra und Geometrie Contributions to Algebra and Geometry Volume 43 (2002), No. 1, 297302. MaxMin Representation of Piecewise Linear Functions Sergei Ovchinnikov Mathematics Department,
More informationSensitivity analysis of utility based prices and risktolerance wealth processes
Sensitivity analysis of utility based prices and risktolerance wealth processes Dmitry Kramkov, Carnegie Mellon University Based on a paper with Mihai Sirbu from Columbia University Math Finance Seminar,
More informationLecture 10. Finite difference and finite element methods. Option pricing Sensitivity analysis Numerical examples
Finite difference and finite element methods Lecture 10 Sensitivities and Greeks Key task in financial engineering: fast and accurate calculation of sensitivities of market models with respect to model
More informationEXISTENCE OF SOLUTIONS TO NONLINEAR, SUBCRITICAL HIGHERORDER ELLIPTIC DIRICHLET PROBLEMS WOLFGANG REICHEL AND TOBIAS WETH
EXISTENCE OF SOLUTIONS TO NONLINEAR, SUBCRITICAL HIGHERORDER ELLIPTIC DIRICHLET PROBLEMS WOLFGANG REICHEL AND TOBIAS WETH Abstract. We consider the th order elliptic boundary value problem Lu = f(x,
More informationAdaptive Online Gradient Descent
Adaptive Online Gradient Descent Peter L Bartlett Division of Computer Science Department of Statistics UC Berkeley Berkeley, CA 94709 bartlett@csberkeleyedu Elad Hazan IBM Almaden Research Center 650
More informationSumit Chandok and T. D. Narang INVARIANT POINTS OF BEST APPROXIMATION AND BEST SIMULTANEOUS APPROXIMATION
F A S C I C U L I M A T H E M A T I C I Nr 51 2013 Sumit Chandok and T. D. Narang INVARIANT POINTS OF BEST APPROXIMATION AND BEST SIMULTANEOUS APPROXIMATION Abstract. In this paper we generalize and extend
More information1. Let X and Y be normed spaces and let T B(X, Y ).
Uppsala Universitet Matematiska Institutionen Andreas Strömbergsson Prov i matematik Funktionalanalys Kurs: NVP, Frist. 20050314 Skrivtid: 9 11.30 Tillåtna hjälpmedel: Manuella skrivdon, Kreyszigs bok
More information6.4 The Infinitely Many Alleles Model
6.4. THE INFINITELY MANY ALLELES MODEL 93 NE µ [F (X N 1 ) F (µ)] = + 1 i
More informationMA651 Topology. Lecture 6. Separation Axioms.
MA651 Topology. Lecture 6. Separation Axioms. This text is based on the following books: Fundamental concepts of topology by Peter O Neil Elements of Mathematics: General Topology by Nicolas Bourbaki Counterexamples
More informationTHE BANACH CONTRACTION PRINCIPLE. Contents
THE BANACH CONTRACTION PRINCIPLE ALEX PONIECKI Abstract. This paper will study contractions of metric spaces. To do this, we will mainly use tools from topology. We will give some examples of contractions,
More informationThe HenstockKurzweilStieltjes type integral for real functions on a fractal subset of the real line
The HenstockKurzweilStieltjes type integral for real functions on a fractal subset of the real line D. Bongiorno, G. Corrao Dipartimento di Ingegneria lettrica, lettronica e delle Telecomunicazioni,
More informationInner Product Spaces
Math 571 Inner Product Spaces 1. Preliminaries An inner product space is a vector space V along with a function, called an inner product which associates each pair of vectors u, v with a scalar u, v, and
More informationA survey on multivalued integration 1
Atti Sem. Mat. Fis. Univ. Modena Vol. L (2002) 5363 A survey on multivalued integration 1 Anna Rita SAMBUCINI Dipartimento di Matematica e Informatica 1, Via Vanvitelli  06123 Perugia (ITALY) Abstract
More information