Chapter 9: Water, Hydrology and Drainage Land West of Uttoxeter
|
|
- Cameron Patterson
- 7 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Chapter 9: Water, Hydrology and Drainage Land West of Uttoxeter ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT: VOLUME 1
2 9.1 INTRODUCTION This Chapter considers the effects of the Project on surface water and groundwater resources, flood risk and local drainage infrastructure. The assessment also considers the potential for flood risk associated with alterations in the surface water regime and from adjacent watercourses. Potential effects during the construction period are also identified and assessed The Chapter describes the policy context and methods used to assess the impacts of the Project. It reviews the Site s hydrology, hydrogeology, flood risk and drainage prior to development of the Project and the baseline conditions currently existing at the Site. The potential effects of the Project are assessed, taking into account the measures which have been adopted to prevent, reduce, mitigate or offset the impacts. The significance of the residual effects is also presented Potential impacts to ground and surface water quality are assessed in Chapter 8: Ground Conditions, whilst potential effects on aquatic flora, fauna and protected sites are addressed in Chapter 6: Ecological Resources (including Arboriculture). This Chapter has been written by Waterman Transport and Development Ltd and draws on the findings of a Flood Risk Assessment and Drainage Strategy prepared by Waterman Transport and Development (WTD) (presented in Volume 4 of this Environmental Statement). 9.2 METHODOLOGY Baseline conditions relating to hydrology, hydrogeology, flood risk and drainage at the Site have been established using a combination of published information and site surveys. A full list of information sources is presented within the Flood Risk Assessment and Drainage Strategy in Volume 4, however, main sources of information include: Site visits and walkover surveys; Consultation with the Environment Agency (EA); Consultation with Severn Trent Water Consultation with East Staffordshire Borough Council Consultation with Staffordshire County Council Consultation with the Highways Agency Consultation with Connect Roads (A50 maintenance contractor) British Geological Survey (BGS) Information; The Flood Risk Assessment and Drainage Strategy in Volume 4, which forms the basis of this Chapter, followed the approach set out in National Planning Policy Framework, the Technical Guidance to the National Planning Policy Framework, EA Flood Risk Assessment Guidance Note 1 and the East Staffordshire Borough Council Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment and examined: Site hydrology, hydrogeology and drainage; Potential sources of flooding; 1
3 Impact of the Development on flood risk; Mitigation measures required to reduce flood risk to the Development and elsewhere and; The management of surface and foul water so as not to increase and if possible decrease flood risk elsewhere This assessment determines the relative significance of water, hydrology and drainage issues and impacts. The assessment of potential and residual impacts / risks has therefore used the following seven-point scale of significance, which has been based upon professional judgement and experience: Substantial Beneficial: Significant local-scale / moderate to significant regional scale improvement to the quantity of potable groundwater, surface water resources, drainage infrastructure or reduction in flood risk. Moderate Beneficial: Moderate local-scale / minor regional improvement to the quantity of potable groundwater, surface water resources, drainage infrastructure or reduction in flood risk. Minor Beneficial: Minor local-scale improvement to the quantity of potable groundwater, surface water resources, drainage infrastructure or reduction in flood risk. Negligible: No appreciable impact on groundwater, surface water resources, drainage infrastructure or flood risk. Minor Adverse: Minor local-scale reduction in the quantity of potable groundwater, or surface water resources, reversible with time, minor reduction in the capacity of drainage infrastructure or minor local-scale increase in flood risk. Moderate Adverse: Moderate local-scale / minor regional increase in flood risk, severe temporary or permanent reduction in the quantity of a potable groundwater or surface water resources or severe temporary or permanent reduction in capacity of drainage infrastructure. Substantial Adverse: Significant local-scale / moderate to significant regional scale increase in flood risk, permanent reduction in the quantity of a potable groundwater or surface water resources or permanent reduction in capacity of drainage infrastructure. 9.3 PLANNING POLICY CONTEXT National National Planning Policy Framework (March 2012) 10. Meeting the challenge of climate change, flooding and coastal change The National Planning Policy Framework sets out Government policy on development and flood risk. It aims are to ensure that flood risk is taken into account at all stages of the planning process, to avoid inappropriate development in areas at risk of flooding by directing development 2
4 away from areas at highest risk, but where development is necessary, making it safe without increasing flood risk elsewhere. The National Planning Policy Framework advocates the use of the risk-based Sequential Test, to steer new development to areas with the lowest probability of flooding. The National Planning Policy Framework states that Development should not be allocated or permitted if there are reasonably available sites appropriate for the proposed development in areas with a lower probability of flooding. The National Planning Policy Framework also recommends that within any Development, the most vulnerable development is located in areas of lowest flood risk unless there are overriding reasons to prefer a different location, the development is appropriately flood resilient and resistant, including safe access and escape routes where required, any residual risk can be safely managed, including by emergency planning and it gives priority to the use of sustainable drainage systems. Local East Staffordshire Borough Council Green Infrastructure Study (March 2008) The overall purpose of this study is to provide a long term vision for green infrastructure within East Staffordshire to ensure that the current strategic growth of the Borough is fully integrated with and informed by its green infrastructure and to ensure that no net loss of green infrastructure value or provision occurs This study recommends that all developments should be served by Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDs) where feasible and that the component features of these systems should be designed and managed to deliver additional green infrastructure benefits, such as wildlife habitat improvement and provision, landscape enhancement and informal recreation. East Staffordshire Borough Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (Feb 2008) The East Staffordshire Borough Council Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA) provides a robust assessment of the extent and nature of the risk of flooding and its implications for land use planning. In addition, the SFRA sets the criteria for the submission of planning applications in the future and for guiding subsequent development control decisions The SFRA recommends that no development should take place in the Functional Floodplain (Flood Zone 3b), all proposals in Flood Zones 2 and 3 should be subjected to the Sequential Test and the Exception Test (if required), the surface water drainage arrangements for any development site should be such that the volumes and peak flow rates of surface water leaving a developed site are no greater than the rates prior to the proposed development, unless specific off-site arrangements are made and result in the same net effect, Developers are encouraged to promote the use of SUDS for the management of run-off, Developments which include areas likely to flood will need to provide appropriate flood warning and formulate appropriate emergency plans to ensure their safe occupancy in the future and Developers should always consider residual flood risk issues relating to a development. 3
5 9.4 BASELINE CONDITIONS Topography A topographical survey shows that the Site generally falls to the northeast from a high point of approximately 112 meters Above Ordnance Datum (m AOD) in the southwest of the Site to approximately 90m AOD in the north of the Site. Hydrology A number of unnamed ordinary watercourse s are present across the Site which drain the surrounding fields. All of these unnamed ordinary watercourse s drain via a number of culverts beneath the A50 to the River Tean located approximately 250m north of the Site There are four licensed discharges to surface water within the 2km of the Site which are summarised in the table below. Operator Discharge Type Receiving watercourse Distance from the Site Trust Inns Limited Sewage Tributary of the River Tean 51m NE Severn Trent Water Sewage Local ditch 102m E Severn Trent Water Sewage Park Brook (River Tean) 122m E J A Hemingway Sewage Not defined 556m N There is one licensed surface water abstraction within the 2km of the Site which is summarised in the table below. Operator Abstraction Purpose Water Feature Distance from the Site East Staffordshire Municipal Grounds: Bramshall Recreation 927m S Borough Council Lake And Pond Ground - Picknall Brook Throughflow Geology Ground conditions beneath the Site are summarised below and have been established from the British Geological Survey Map 140 Burton Upon Trent Solid & Drift Edition 1:50,000 scale and exploratory holes from the British Geological Survey website. 4
6 Stratum Area Covered Thickness of stratum Typical Description Surfacing Whole Site Up to 0.6m Topsoil Buried structures Park Farm Up to 1.2m Foundations, services and former basements Made Ground Park Farm Unknown Maybe present around current buildings and former gravel pits Glacial Till Whole Site 2m to 3m Brown sandy CLAY with gravel Glaciofluvial Deposits North west of the Site 2m to 3m Loose to very dense fine to coarse sub rounded to sub angular GRAVEL with silty sand layers Groundwater Groundwater is not anticipated in the low permeability Glacial Till. Groundwater is likely to be present in the Glaciofluvial Deposits and the more permeable horizons in the Mercia Mudstone Group. Groundwater is recorded in the majority of the exploratory hole records obtained from the British Geological Survey, within the Glaciofluvial Deposits, at between 0.5mbgl and 2.7mbgl There are two licensed discharges to groundwater within the 2km of the Site which are summarised in the table below. Operator Discharge Type Distance from the Site Giltan Homes Limited Sewage 186m N Steven Russell Sewage 290m E There are six licensed groundwater abstractions within the 2km of the Site which are summarised in the table below. Operator Abstraction Purpose Distance from the Site Mr T Tideswell General Farming and Domestic 673m NW Mr T R Statham General Agriculture 714m S Mr T R Statham General Farming and Domestic 714m S Mr R C Meakin General Farming and Domestic 1572m S Mr A C Ede General Farming and Domestic 1695m N JW Brandwick & Son General Farming and Domestic 1781m W 5
7 Drainage Surface water at the Site is currently drained via a number of unnamed ordinary watercourses which are tributaries of the River Tean approximately 250m north of the Site. No positive foul water drainage features are present at the Site Severn Trent Water maps in Appendix E of the Flood Risk Assessment and Drainage Strategy in Volume 4, show a network of 150mm to 225mm diameter public sewers draining to a pumping station off Torrance Grove, approximately 160m east of the Site, which serves the residential area to the east of the Site A private pumping station associated with the JCB World Parts Centre is located approximately 125m north of the Site. A private rising main from this pumping station flows east along the A522 until it becomes a public rising main approximately 550m east of the Site. Flood Risk The information below is based upon the findings of the Flood Risk Assessment and Drainage Strategy in Volume 4, which should be referred to for further information The Site is considered to be at low risk of flooding from tidal, groundwater, reservoir, canal and artificial sources The risk of fluvial flooding from the River Tean is considered to be low. Proposed hydraulic modelling of the unnamed ordinary watercourses at the Site is required to assess the risk of fluvial flooding from these watercourses at the Site. It was agreed at a meeting with the Environment Agency on 21 st May 2013 that this modelling will be undertaken during the planning application determination period. On completion of this modelling the Flood Risk Assessment and Drainage Strategy in Volume 4 and this Chapter will be updated Environment Agency Areas Susceptible to Surface Water Flooding Map and Surface Water Flood Maps in Appendix D of the Flood Risk Assessment and Drainage Strategy in Volume 4 suggest that there are areas of the Site that are more susceptible to surface water flooding. These areas are either unnamed ordinary watercourses or low spots at the Site A topographical survey and OS mapping show that any pluvial flows originating to the west of the Site would be routed towards the Site. Hence, there is considered to be a risk of pluvial flooding occurring at the Site. 9.5 POTENTIAL EFFECTS Parts of the Project are shown crossing the unnamed ordinary watercourses at the Site. If no consideration is given to peak flows, proposed crossings of the unnamed ordinary watercourses at the Site could have a long term moderate adverse effect on flood risk at the Site. Temporary crossings may also be required during construction. If no consideration is given to peak flows, such crossings could have a potential short term moderate effect on the risk of flooding at the Site Depending on groundwater levels present in the Glaciofluvial deposits in the northwest of the Site dewatering activities may be required during construction. Any dewatering could temporally affect 6
8 groundwater levels at the Site and elsewhere and could potentially affect flows in the unnamed ordinary watercourses at the Site. Dewatering during construction could have a short term minor adverse effect on the quantity of potable groundwater at the Site and elsewhere and on surface water resources at the Site The increase in impermeable area with the Project could reduce the rate of groundwater recharge to the underlying Glaciofluvial Deposits which could affect groundwater flows and consequently groundwater available for extraction from nearby licensed boreholes Construction earthworks, dewatering and temporary site drainage associated with construction traffic routes and temporary car parks could increase surface water runoff into the unnamed ordinary watercourses at the Site which could have a short term substantial adverse affect on flood risk at the Site and downstream The Project would result in an increase in impermeable area and could increase surface water runoff into the unnamed ordinary watercourses at the Site which could have a long term moderate adverse effect on the quantity of potable groundwater elsewhere and a long term substantial effect impact on flood risk at the Site and elsewhere Discharging foul water from the Project to the existing public sewer network is likely to cause surcharging and/or flooding of the existing public sewer network, which could have a long term substantial adverse impact on flood risk and the capacity of drainage infrastructure elsewhere. 9.6 PROJECT DESIGN Any existing culverts on the Site should be abandoned as part of the Project. To reduce the number and length of crossings it is proposed to divert the unnamed ordinary watercourses in accordance the Manual for River Restoration Techniques Where crossing are required to allow essential access over the Ordinary Watercourses, these could be spanning bridges or culverts. Any culverts would need to be designed in accordance with CIRIA Report C689 Culvert Design and Operation Guide Appropriate water discharges rates and volumes will be agreed with the EA prior to any dewatering taking place SuDs such as infiltration devices, pervious surfaces, swales, filter drains, infiltration basins or ponds would to be incorporated into the Project. Where applicable these features would be unlined to allow infiltration in the northwest of the Site and partial infiltration in the rest of the Site to allow the recharge of groundwater During construction a temporary drainage system would be provided to ensure surface water runoff to unnamed ordinary watercourses at the Site is restricted to a greenfield rate The Project would have a sustainable drainage system which restricts surface water runoff from the Site to unnamed ordinary watercourses to a greenfield rate of 5l/s/ha The Project would not connect to the existing public sewer network until any required upgrading works have been undertaken. 7
9 9.6.8 To reduce the risk of surface water flooding, surface water attenuation will be provided at the Site for up to the 1 in 100 year (+30% for climate change) storm event Land drainage from the land to the west of the Site would be catered for in the proposed sustainable drainage system Although hydraulic modelling is required to assess the risk of fluvial flooding from unnamed ordinary watercourses at the Site. If required, to manage the risk of fluvial flooding at the Site and ensure flood risk is not increased at the Site or elsewhere, the following mitigation measures could be utilised: setting building finished floor levels 600mm above the 1 in 100 year (+20% for climate change) flood level flood compensation works if the Project encroached into the floodplain establishment of a safe dry access/egress route from the Site during a 1 in 100 year (+20% for climate change) flood event. 9.7 ASSESSMENT OF EFFECTS Demolition and Construction Effects Temporary crossing over the unnamed ordinary watercourses at the Site would be designed in accordance with CIRIA Report C689 Culvert Design and Operation Guide. The temporary crossings over the unnamed ordinary watercourses at the Site could have a short term minor beneficial effect on flood risk at the Site As appropriate water discharges rates and volumes will be agreed with the EA prior to any dewatering taking place, dewatering at the Site during construction could have a short term negligible effect on the quantity of potable groundwater at the Site and elsewhere and surface water resources at the Site By restricting runoff surface water runoff to unnamed ordinary watercourses at the Site to a greenfield rate during construction there should be a short term negligible effect on flood risk at the Site and elsewhere. 9.8 RESIDUAL EFFECTS Operational Effects As existing culverts on the Site should be abandoned as part of the Project, the length and number of crossings would be reduced by diversion of unnamed ordinary watercourses and any proposed diversions of ordinary watercourse or culverting should be designed in accordance with the Manual for River Restoration Techniques and CIRIA Report C689 Culvert Design and Operation Guide. The proposed crossings over the unnamed ordinary watercourses at the Site could have a long term minor beneficial effect on flood risk at the Site. 8
10 9.8.2 Unlined SuDs such as infiltration devices, pervious surfaces, swales, filter drains, infiltration basins or ponds could mean that the Development has a long term negligible effect on the quantity of potable groundwater at the Site and elsewhere As the Project should have a sustainable drainage system which restricts surface water runoff from the Site to unnamed ordinary watercourses to a greenfield rate of 5l/s/ha there should be a long term negligible effect on flood risk at the Site and elsewhere As the Project should not connect to the existing public sewer network until any required upgrading works have been undertaken there should be a long term negligible effect on flood risk and the capacity of drainage infrastructure elsewhere As surface water attenuation should be provided at the Site for up to the 1 in 100 year (+30% for climate change) storm event there should be a long term moderate beneficial effect on the risk of surface water flooding at the Site As land drainage from the land to the west of the Site would be catered for in the proposed sustainable drainage system there should be a long term moderate beneficial effect on the risk of pluvial flooding at the Site Although hydraulic modelling is required to assess the risk of fluvial flooding from unnamed ordinary watercourses at the Site. If required, to manage the risk of fluvial flooding at the Site and ensure flood risk is not increased at the Site or elsewhere, the following mitigation measures could be utilised: setting building finished floor levels 600mm above the 1 in 100 year (+20% for climate change) flood level flood compensation works if the Development encroached into the floodplain establishing a safe dry access/egress route from the Site during a 1 in 100 year (+20% for climate change) flood event would be established As a minimum this would ensure there was a long term negligible effect on fluvial flooding at the Site and elsewhere. 9.9 CUMULATIVE EFFECTS This section assesses the likely significant effects of this Project when considered in the context of other future projects During construction, following implementation of the mitigation measures outlined above there would be a short term minor beneficial impact on flood risk at the Site and a short term negligible impact on flood risk elsewhere, the quantity of potable groundwater at the Site and elsewhere and surface water resources at the Site During operation of the Project, following implementation of the mitigation measures outlined above there would be a long term moderate beneficial impact on the risk of surface water and pluvial flooding at the Site, a long term minor beneficial impact on flood risk at the Site and a long term negligible impact on flood risk elsewhere, the quantity of potable groundwater at the Site and elsewhere and drainage infrastructure elsewhere. 9
11 9.9.4 No future projects allocated within development plans (current adopted or emerging), having planning permission or awaiting consent have been identified during the preparation of this ES that would increase the likely significant effects of this Project 9.10 STATEMENT OF EFFECTS During construction by ensuring temporary crossings are designed and constructed correctly, agreeing dewatering rates with the Environment Agency and restricting surface water runoff to unnamed ordinary watercourses at the Site to a greenfield rate, there would be a short term minor beneficial effect on flood risk at the Site and a short term negligible effect on flood risk elsewhere, the quantity of potable groundwater at the Site and elsewhere and surface water resources at the Site During operation of the Project the following design and mitigation measures would be implemented: Abandoning existing culverts; Limiting the number of crossing required over the unnamed ordinary watercourses at the Site; Ensuring crossings and watercourse diversions are designed and constructed correctly, Utilising unlined SuDs; Restricting surface water runoff from the Site to unnamed ordinary watercourses to a greenfield rate of 5l/s/ha; Not connecting the Development to the existing public sewer network until any required upgrading works have been undertaken; Providing surface water attenuation for up to the 1 in 100 year (+30% for climate change) storm event at the Site; Catering for land drainage from the land to the west of the Site in the proposed sustainable drainage system; Ensuring building finished floor levels are set 600mm above the 1 in 100 year (+20% for climate change) flood level; Utilising flood compensation works if the Development encroaches into the floodplain and; Establishing a safe dry access/egress route is available from the Site during a 1 in 100 year (+20% for climate change) storm Hence, there would be a long term moderate beneficial effect on the risk of surface water and pluvial flooding at the Site, a long term minor beneficial effect on flood risk at the Site and a long term negligible effect on flood risk elsewhere, the quantity of potable groundwater at the Site and elsewhere and drainage infrastructure elsewhere. 10
Vital Earth Composting Facility Flood Risk and Drainage Statement
Vital Earth Flood Risk and Drainage Statement Final December 2011 Prepared for Vital Earth Ltd Revision Schedule Flood Risk and Drainage Statement December 2011 Rev Date Details Prepared by Reviewed by
More informationFLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT AND DRAINAGE STRATEGY
FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT AND DRAINAGE STRATEGY London Rd. WATERLOOVILE FOR McCarthy & Stone Ltd. July 2010 Such Salinger Peters Ltd 30558-1- Flood Risk Assessment & Drainage Strategy Contents Paragraph Page
More informationRecommendations for future developments
C Recommendations for future developments C.1 Reducing flood risk through site layout and design C.1.1 C.1.2 Flood risk should be considered at an early stage in deciding the layout and design of a site
More informationFLOOD RISK AND SURFACE WATER DRAINAGE ASSESSMENT HILLHOUSE RESTORATION SITE, OFF JAMESON ROAD, THORNTON CLEVELEYS ON BEHALF OF NPL ESTATES
FLOOD RISK AND SURFACE WATER DRAINAGE ASSESSMENT HILLHOUSE RESTORATION SITE, OFF JAMESON ROAD, THORNTON CLEVELEYS ON BEHALF OF NPL ESTATES Integra Consulting Engineers Limited NS / 2543 Fountain House
More informationWEST LONDON PIPELINE AND STORAGE LIMITED AND UNITED KINGDOM OIL PIPELINES LIMITED
WEST LONDON PIPELINE AND STORAGE LIMITED AND UNITED KINGDOM OIL PIPELINES LIMITED WLPS BUNCEFIELD REBUILD Flood Risk Assessment Green Lane Hemel Hempstead Hertfordshire HP2 7HZ September 2009 Prepared
More informationLittleport Co-located Schools
Littleport Co-located Schools February 2015 Morgan Sindall Littleport Co-located Schools 330763 BNI BSE 003 C P:\Cambridge\Murdoch\EST\PROJECTS\330763 Littleport Co-located Schools\12.0 Documents\12.2
More informationIntroduction. The vision of the West Yorkshire Combined Authority (WYCA) Flood Risk Partnership
WYCA SuDS Guidance Introduction As part of the government s continuing commitment to protect people and property from flood risk, the Department for Communities and Local Government and the Department
More information1.2 This technical note provides a preliminary investigation into the Flood Risk and provides outline drainage strategies.
ODYSSEY MARKIDES TECHNICAL NOTE PROJECT : CHAILEY HOUSE, BLEWBURY JOB NO. : 14-216 NOTE TITLE : PRELIMINARY FLOODING AND DRAIANGE AUTHOR : STEVEN ROOTH APPROVED : ANDREAS MARKIDES DATE : 02/09/2014 1.0
More informationProposed Construction of Basement Flood Risk Assessment. 35 Edwardes Square London W8 6HH
Proposed Construction of Basement Flood Risk Assessment 35 Edwardes Square London W8 6HH 1 Introduction This FRA has been carried out in accordance with the National Planning Policy Statement (NPPF), the
More informationFlood Risk Assessment and Drainage Impact Assessment: Planning Guidance for Developers
Flood Risk Assessment and Drainage Impact Assessment: Planning Guidance for Developers Development and Regeneration Services Glasgow City Council 229 George Street Glasgow G1 1QU May 2011 1. Introduction...-
More informationENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT: VOLUME 2 APPENDICES 11.1 TO 11.3
NORTH LONDON WASTE AUTHORITY NORTH LONDON HEAT AND POWER PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT: VOLUME 2 APPENDICES 11.1 TO 11.3 AD06.02 NORTH LONDON WASTE AUTHORITY NORTH LONDON HEAT AND POWER PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL
More informationLondon Borough of Waltham Forest LOCAL FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGY. Summary Document
LOCAL FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT STRATEGY Summary Document October 2013 Local Flood Risk Management Strategy Summary 1 Introduction 2 Partner responsibilities 3 What do we know about flooding in the borough?
More informationTaylor Wimpey UK Ltd. December 2007
Taylor Wimpey UK Ltd December 2007 QM Issue/revision Issue 1 Revision 1 Revision 2 Revision 3 Remarks Draft For Planning Date 3 August 2007 20 December 2007 Prepared by D Gooding P Barton Signature Checked
More informationFlood Risk Assessment and Drainage Statement
Trinity College, Cambridge Proposed Relocation of Felixstowe Rifle Range, Land north of Nicholas Road, Trimley St Mary, Felixstowe Quality Assurance Site name: Client name: Proposed Relocation of Felixstowe
More informationCreating the environment for business
1. Introduction 1.1 Introduction to Water Cycle Strategies (WCS) 1.1.1 Background The water cycle describes the pathways and processes through which water moves through the natural and built environment,
More informationFlood Risk Assessment. For Application at: Brick House Farm Brick House Lane Hambleton Lancashire FY6 9BG
Flood Risk Assessment For Application at: Brick House Farm Brick House Lane Hambleton Lancashire FY6 9BG Contents 1. Introduction 2. The Site 3. Flood Risk 4. Existing drainage 5. Proposed Development
More informationEast Riding of Yorkshire Council
East Riding of Yorkshire Council Lead Local Flood Authority Interim Standing Advice Revision A - April 2015 1. Introduction From April 2015 the Lead Local Flood Authority (LLFA) became a statutory consultee
More informationDRAINAGE MANAGEMENT PLAN. HERTFORDSHIRE RESIDUAL WASTE TREATMENT PLANT Hertfordshire County Council
DRAINAGE MANAGEMENT PLAN HERTFORDSHIRE RESIDUAL WASTE TREATMENT PLANT Hertfordshire County Council EMPLOYER: Veolia Environmental Services (UK) Plc Veolia House 154A Pentonville Road London N1 9PE Copy
More informationFlood Risk & Surface Water Management. Page 1 of 20
Page 1 of 20 Flood Risk & Surface Water Management Flood Risk & Surface Water Management and the Planning Process Introduction The purpose of this document is to increase awareness of the potential of
More informationBolton s Flood Risk Management Strategy
Bolton s Flood Risk Management Strategy www.bolton.gov.uk Public Summary Bolton s Flood Risk Management Strategy Public Summary Introduction Over 5.5 million properties in England and Wales are at risk
More informationProposed Residential Development Land off Cody Road Waterbeach Cambridgeshire. Flood Risk Assessment
Land off Cody Road Waterbeach Cambridgeshire Cedar Barn, White Lodge, Walgrave, Northampton, NN6 9PY T: F: E: W: 01604 781811 01604 781999 mail@jppuk.net jppuk.net Proposed Residential Development Land
More informationLondon Road, Rayleigh Essex Flood Risk Assessment Addendum
FINAL Countryside Properties (UK) Limited Submitted by AECOM 6-8 Greencoat Place London SW1P 1PL London Road, Rayleigh Essex Flood Risk Assessment May 2015 i Limitations AECOM Infrastructure & Environment
More informationWater and Flooding Position Statement
Derby City Local Plan, Part 1: Core Strategy Water and Flooding Position Statement August 2015 1. Introduction 1.1 This position statement provides an update to the Derby HMA Joint Water Issues Paper which
More informationDECEMBER 2008 [ISSUE 2]
PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WEST SUSSEX FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT CLIENT: ARORA MANAGEMENT SERVICES LIMITED [ISSUE 2] Warrington Office Cinnamon House Cinnamon Park Crab Lane Fearnhead Warrington Cheshire WA2 0XP
More informationLondon Borough of Merton Local Flood Risk Management Strategy
Local Flood Risk Management Strategy Summary 2014-2020 Introduction In response to the severe flooding across large parts of England and Wales in summer 2007, the Government has recently enacted the Flood
More informationAction plans for hotspot locations - Ash Study
Appendix 9 Action plans for hotspot locations - Ash Study Ash Vale North 1. Local evidence indicates the culvert could not discharge during December 2013 because the outlet was blocked on the western side
More informationDevelopment at 2 St Albans Road, Kingston, London, KT25HQ
Development at SuDS Report. Prepared for: Report prepared by: Dave Alonso Divine Ideas (UK) ltd Date: August 2015 Project/Issue number: Appendices Attached: 1510/01/SuDS A, B & C Divine Ideas (UK) Ltd
More informationDesigned and produced by geo-graphicsdesign.com DP 300 3/02
Designed and produced by geo-graphicsdesign.com DP 300 3/02 Guidance for Developers and Regulators Purpose This booklet is produced on behalf of the North East Scotland Flooding Advisory Group and is intended
More informationNewbiggin House Farm,
Newbiggin House Farm, Near Waberthwaite Flood Investigation Report 32 Flood Event 30/8/2012 Cumbria County Council Version Undertaken by Reviewed by Approved by Date Preliminary Colin Parkes Anthony Lane
More informationFLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT
SEVERN ROAD RESOURCE RECOVERY CENTRE FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT REF 402.0036.00374 September 2009 Severn Road Resource Recovery Centre Ref: 402-0036-00374 Viridor Waste Management i PPS25 Flood Risk Assessment
More informationChapter 2 Spatial Portrait
15 November 2013 Dear Julie Fylde Local Plan to 2030 Part 1 Preferred Options Thank you for the opportunity to meet with you on 9 October in respect of the above mentioned document. As discussed at the
More informationStrategic Flood Risk Assessment Update 2015
Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Update 2015 On behalf of Contents Glossary... iv Executive Summary... 1 1 Introduction... 4 1.1 Overview... 4 1.2 Future Development in Lewisham Borough... 5 2 SFRA Approach...
More information1 in 30 year 1 in 75 year 1 in 100 year 1 in 100 year plus climate change (+30%) 1 in 200 year
Appendix C1 Surface Water Modelling 1 Overview 1.1 The Drain London modelling was designed to analyse the impact of heavy rainfall events across each London borough by assessing flow paths, velocities
More informationGranville Road Estate, London Borough of Barnet. Flood Risk Assessment and Drainage Strategy August 2014. New Granville LLP
Granville Road Estate, London Borough of Barnet Flood Risk Assessment and Drainage Strategy August 2014 New Granville LLP Document History JOB NUMBER: 237 DOCUMENT REF: Granville Road FRA REVISIONS: Final
More informationSUSTAINABLE DRAINAGE IN LEEDS Supplementary Guidance No. 22 JULY 2004
SUSTAINABLE DRAINAGE IN LEEDS Supplementary Guidance No. 22 JULY 2004 BACKGROUND This guidance provides information for developers on the use of sustainable drainage techniques in new developments. It
More informationChippenham Surface Water Management Plan Intermediate Assessment of Groundwater Flooding Susceptibility
Chippenham Surface Water Management Plan Intermediate Assessment of Groundwater Flooding Susceptibility Phase 1 & 2 November 2011 Prepared for Revision Schedule Surface Water Management Plan Intermediate
More informationSustainable Drainage Systems (SUDS) A guide for developers
Sustainable Drainage Systems (SUDS) A guide for developers We are the Environment Agency. It s our job to look after your environment and make it a better place for you, and for future generations. Your
More informationPlanning, Health and Environment Division
18 Planning, Health and Environment Division A Planning Guide to Sustainable Drainage Systems Introduction Working in co-operation with the Environment Agency, Severn Trent Water Ltd., the Highway Authority
More informationLondon Borough of Croydon Local Flood Risk Management Strategy
London Borough of Croydon Local Flood Risk Management Strategy Summary 2014-2020 Introduction In response to the severe flooding across large parts of England and Wales in summer 2007, the Government has
More information4. Environmental Impacts Assessment and Remediation Targets
4. Environmental Impacts Assessment and Remediation Targets 4.1 Environmental Impacts Significant additional development in the Alder Creek watershed is not anticipated at this time; however, there are
More informationEssex County Council Flood Investigation Report
Essex County Council Stock City of Chelmsford Rev Date Details Author Checked and Approved By 01 February 2015 Draft report for stakeholder consultation Ed Clarke Flood Investigation Engineer Lucy Shepherd
More informationSUSTAINABLE URBAN DRAINAGE SYSTEMS
overflow can lead into a permeable conveyance system to increase further the benefit and reduce the need for pipe systems. Pollutant removal rates have been shown to be high, with some pollutants being
More informationIssue: 2 Adopted by Council: 20/02/07. Directorate of Environment and Regeneration Planning Services
Issue: 2 Adopted by Council: 20/02/07 Directorate of Environment and Regeneration Planning Services LOCAL PLANNIING GUIIDANCE NOTE NO..19:: SUSTAIINABLE DRAIINAGE SYSTEMS Background The provision of adequate
More informationAnglian Water Services Limited. Sustainable drainage systems (SUDS) adoption manual
Anglian Water Services Limited i towards sustainable water stewardship Sustainable drainage systems (SUDS) adoption manual Anglian Water Services Limited 1 Tomorrow s forecast is more frequent, more violent
More information2 ND SEPTEMBER 2014. Report of the Bi-Borough Executive Director for Transport and Technical Services
London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham COMMUNITY SAFETY, ENVIRONMENT & RESIDENTS SERVICES POLICY & ACCOUNTABILITY COMMITTEE 2 ND SEPTEMBER 2014 SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN (SWMP) Report of the Bi-Borough
More informationManaging Surface Water Flooding in Paddock Wood Briefing note - June 2011
Managing Surface Water Flooding in Paddock Wood Briefing note - June 2011 Information for Editors What is the reason for this initiative? 1. Legal Requirements The main drivers are the Flood Risk Regulations
More informationINFRASTRUCTURE, FLOOD PROTECTION AND REMEDIATION. Infrastructure Flood Protection Remediation Policies
INFRASTRUCTURE, FLOOD PROTECTION AND REMEDIATION Infrastructure Flood Protection Remediation Policies DRAFT POOLBEG PLANNING SCHEME 196 FIGURE 9.1: UTILITIES WAYLEAVES Electricity Cables 8m Wayleave for
More informationStrategic Flood Risk Assessment
local development framework Strategic Flood Risk Assessment LOCAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK ROYAL BOROUGH OF KINGSTON UPON THAMES Level 1 and 2 April 2011 Contents Executive Summary 5 Part 1 - Aiding Planning
More informationGroundwater Flooding: a UK Perspective
Groundwater Flooding: a UK Perspective David Macdonald British Geological Survey Maclean Building Crowmarsh Gifford Wallingford OX10 8BB Tel 01491 838800 NERC All rights reserved Talk outline Definition
More informationNOVEMBER 2009 [ISSUE 5]
375 401 BRIGHTON ROAD CROYDON FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT CLIENT: TRITHING LTD [ISSUE 5] Head Office: Unit 2 York House Edison Park Dorcan Way Swindon Wiltshire SN3 3RB Tel. 01793 619965 Fax. 01793 619967 Email:
More informationAppendix C - Risk Assessment: Technical Details. Appendix C - Risk Assessment: Technical Details
Appendix C - Risk Assessment: Technical Details Page C1 C1 Surface Water Modelling 1. Introduction 1.1 BACKGROUND URS Scott Wilson has constructed 13 TUFLOW hydraulic models across the London Boroughs
More informationPROPERTY RISK MANAGEMENT BUSINESS EMERGENCY, FLOOD PLANNING AND MITIGATION GUIDANCE
PROPERTY RISK MANAGEMENT BUSINESS EMERGENCY, FLOOD PLANNING AND MITIGATION GUIDANCE 1 The most common cause of flooding is when the river catchment area receives far greater amounts of water than normal,
More informationWILLOCHRA BASIN GROUNDWATER STATUS REPORT 2009-10
WILLOCHRA BASIN GROUNDWATER STATUS REPORT 2009-10 SUMMARY 2009-10 The Willochra Basin is situated in the southern Flinders Ranges in the Mid-North of South Australia, approximately 50 km east of Port Augusta
More informationInformation Request 14
Information Request 14 Information Request 14 14-1 Responses to Information Request 14 Response to Information Request 14a Response to Information Request 14b Response to Information Request 14c Response
More informationENVIRONMENT ACT PROPOSED TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR PUBLIC REVIEW AND COMMENT NOVA SCOTIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC WORKS
ENVIRONMENT ACT PROPOSED TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR PUBLIC REVIEW AND COMMENT NOVA SCOTIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC WORKS Beaver Bank Bypass Highway 101 to the Beaver Bank Road Halifax County,
More informationFloodplain Development Land Use Review
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division P.O. Box 490 333 Broadalbin Street SW Albany, OR 97321 Phone 541-917-7550 Fax 541-791-0150 www.cityofalbany.net Floodplain Development Land Use Review
More information5.14 Floodplains and Drainage/Hydrology
I-70 East Final EIS 5.14 Floodplains and Drainage/Hydrology 5.14 Floodplains and Drainage/Hydrology This section discusses floodplain and drainage/hydrology resources and explains why they are important
More informationHomes and Environment Scrutiny Committee. (Environment & Transport)
REPORT TO: REPORT NO: Homes and Environment Scrutiny Committee HHPPE/89/15S DATE: 9 September 2015 LEAD MEMBER: Councillor David A Bithell (Environment & Transport) CONTACT OFFICER: Neil Taunt (Tel: 729734)
More informationSurface Water Management: Interim Guidance for Developers
Surface Water Management: Interim Guidance for Developers www.shropshire.gov.uk Contents Executive Summary 1. Introduction...1 2. National Policy Context...2 Making Space for Water...2 Future Water...2
More informationPollution Control NEW! NEW! Stormwater Attenuation Systems Sustainable Urban Drainage Solutions for Domestic & Commercial Applications. klargester.
Pollution Control NEW! NEW! Stormwater Attenuation Systems Sustainable Urban Drainage Solutions for Domestic & Commercial Applications klargester.com Stormwater Attenuation Systems Sustainable Urban Drainage
More information13 Water Resources and Flood Risk
13 Water Resources and Flood Risk 13.1 Introduction 13.1.1 This chapter provides an assessment of the potential construction and operational impacts on water resources and flood risk associated with the
More informationrescue and relief efforts in the aftermath of flooding, (iii) repair of flood damaged public facilities and utilities, and
1. Purpose (1) It is the purpose of this Ordinance to protect human life, health, and property from flood conditions, to preserve the ability of floodplains to carry and discharge a base flood, and to
More informationProposed General Plan Update Goals, Policies, and Implementation Actions
Proposed General Plan Update Goals, Policies, and Implementation Actions The construction and maintenance of infrastructure is necessary to support existing and planned land uses and to achieve Environmental
More informationThe Basics of Chapter 105 Waterways and Wetlands Permitting in PA
The Basics of Chapter 105 Waterways and Wetlands Permitting in PA April 17, 2013 Goal To develop a basic understanding of PA Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) and US Army Corps of Engineers
More informationFlood Risk Assessment Breakspear House, Hemel Hempstead. Kier Property. October 08
Flood Risk Assessment Breakspear House, Hemel Hempstead. Kier Property October 08 Prepared by:... Approved by:... Simon Marcos Keith Searle Principal Engineer Associate Director Flood Risk Assessment Rev
More informationA Developer s Guide: Watershed-Wise Development
A Developer s Guide: Watershed-Wise Development Environmental Protection What is a watershed? It does not matter how far away you build from a creek, lake, or the ocean, you are in a watershed. Another
More informationRenfrewshire Strategic Flood Risk Assessment
Background Report Renfrewshire Strategic Flood Risk Assessment 16 Renfrewshire Local Development Plan Main Issues Report December 2011 Renfrewshire Local Development Plan Background Report X Renfrewshire
More informationStrategic Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA) Level 1
Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA) December 2007 (Final Issue) London Borough of Brent Brent House 349 High Road, Wembley Middlesex HA9 6BZ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction 1. The London Borough of Brent
More informationPresentation on Flood Risk Management To Engineers Ireland 12 th February 2014. David Keane Cork County Council
Presentation on Flood Risk Management To Engineers Ireland 12 th February 2014 David Keane Cork County Council 1 Contents 1. The Power of Water 2. Defenses 3. Flooding & Flood Types 4. Flood Mitigation
More informationFlood Risk Assessment
Flood Risk Assessment Suffolk Agricultural Association Trinity Park, Ipswich July 212 Suffolk Agricultural Association Trinity Park, Ipswich July 212 Quality Assurance Site name: Client name: Trinity Park,
More informationProposed Re-development, At 321 London Road, Wyberton. Flood Risk Assessment - Revised
Proposed Re-development, At 321 London Road, Wyberton Flood Risk Assessment - Revised Prepared By: C Mason C.Eng M.I.C.E May 2015 Contents Page No. 1. Introduction 2 2. Site Description 2 3. Flood Hazard
More informationINFORMATION SHEET ORDER NO. R5-2011-XXXX TRIANGLE ROCK PRODUCTS, INC. FLORIN ROAD AGGREGATE PLANT SACRAMENTO COUNTY
ORDER NO. R5-2011-XXXX INFORMATION SHEET Background Triangle Rock, Inc. (Discharger) submitted a Report of Waste Discharge (RWD) on 23 August 2010. The Discharger is expanding the mining operations at
More informationR enfrewshire Local Plan. Safe Environment. Page. Flooding & Sustainable Urban Drainage 163 Contaminated Land 175 Noise 177 Major-Accident Hazards 179
R enfrewshire Local Plan Safe Environment Page Flooding & Sustainable Urban Drainage 163 Contaminated Land 175 Noise 177 Major-Accident Hazards 179 16 Flooding and Sustainable Urban Drainage OVERVIEW Flooding
More information11.2 The proposals to deal with the leachate within the closed Lodmoor North Landfill site are assessed in Chapter 10 Geology and Soils.
Chapter Eleven Water Quality, Drainage and Hydrogeology Introduction 11.1 This Chapter considers the impact of the Relief Road on the hydrology of the area and considers both surface and groundwater. Runoff
More informationLand to the rear of the Black Bull Public House Flood Risk Assessment March 10, 2014 Version 1.0 Ref: RAB 148
Land to the rear of the Black Bull Public House Flood Risk Assessment March 10, 2014 Ref: RAB 148 Lindsey Phillips Turnbull Tweedale Ltd 61 Oaken Lanes Codsall South Staffordshire WV8 2AW R A B C O N S
More informationNorfolk House Hotel Development Gatwick Airport. Flood Risk Statement. May 2012. Bloc Hotels. Vantage Planning Ltd. www.vantageplanning.co.
Development Gatwick Airport May 2012 Bloc Hotels Vantage Planning Ltd www.vantageplanning.co.uk Vantage Planning Ltd Contents 1. Introduction... 2 2. The Proposed Development... 2 3. The Development Site...
More informationThe tools will also help to predict the impacts of the options on groundwater within the many ecologically sensitive sites in the floodplain.
INVESTIGATING THE INTERDEPENDENCIES BETWEEN SURFACE AND GROUNDWATER IN THE OXFORD AREA TO HELP PREDICT THE TIMING AND LOCATION OF GROUNDWATER FLOODING AND TO OPTIMISE FLOOD MITIGATION MEASURES David Macdonald,
More informationBLACK/HARMONY/FAREWELL CREEK WATERSHED EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT CHAPTER 12 - STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
Harmony Creek subwatershed Harmony Creek subwatershed BLACK/HARMONY/FAREWELL CREEK WATERSHED EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT CHAPTER 12 - STORMWATER MANAGEMENT April 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION...
More information(http://www.molevalley.gov.uk/media/pdf/c/r/srfa_-_updated_jnauary_2012.pdf
Possible Submission about Water and Flooding (See maps 3a and 3b) From Mole Valley Local Development Framework: Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Update 2012 (http://www.molevalley.gov.uk/media/pdf/c/r/srfa_-_updated_jnauary_2012.pdf
More informationPE21 7JE LEVEL 2 FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT
IE14/014/ymc Proposed Marstons Public House Swineshead Road Wyberton Fen Boston Lincolnshire PE21 7JE LEVEL 2 FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT SUFFOLK: Registered Office: 7 Museum Street Ipswich Suffolk IP1 1HQ T
More informationGuidance Notes: GARDEN FLOODING
Page 1 of 7 Guidance Notes: GARDEN FLOODING If you are unsure about anything within these notes then please contact the Flood Risk Management (FRM) team using the details at the end of this document. Water
More informationConveyance means a mechanism for transporting water from one point to another, including pipes, ditches, and channels.
Glossary of Common Stormwater Terms Baffle means a device to check, deflect, or regulate flow. Beneficial Uses means uses of waters of the states which include but are not limited to - use for domestic,
More informationFlash Flood Science. Chapter 2. What Is in This Chapter? Flash Flood Processes
Chapter 2 Flash Flood Science A flash flood is generally defined as a rapid onset flood of short duration with a relatively high peak discharge (World Meteorological Organization). The American Meteorological
More informationPlaces Directorate Environment Infrastructure PO Box 100 Wigan Council WN1 3DS. Culvert Advice Note
Places Directorate Environment Infrastructure PO Box 100 Wigan Council WN1 3DS Culvert Advice Note Culverts Advice Note Revisions Rev Date Details Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by 1 19/07/2013 AC MAJ
More informationHenry Van Offelen Natural Resource Scientist MN Center for Environmental Advocacy hvanoffelen@mncenter.org
Henry Van Offelen Natural Resource Scientist MN Center for Environmental Advocacy hvanoffelen@mncenter.org Wetland study slide Water Quality NRE goals in watershed plans Protect habitat that remains.
More informationFlooding in London. Figure 1 New commercial and residential developments on the Thames floodplain
Flooding in London Abstract London faces a major risk of flooding. London s floods are caused by a mixture of river processes, tidal flooding and drains/sewers unable to cope with the volume of water.
More information1. Purpose and scope. 2. SEPA's role in hydropower and planning
Page no: 1 of 10 1. Purpose and scope 1.1 The purpose of this note is to provide guidance on the approach that we will take when dealing with hydropower development management consultations. We welcome
More informationMINERALS AND ASSOCIATED WASTE APPLICATIONS APPLICATION FORM
MINERALS AND ASSOCIATED WASTE APPLICATIONS APPLICATION FORM 1. Applicant Details (See guidance note 1) 2. Agent Details Please complete if the applicant has an agent (See guidance note 2) * Title: * Forename:
More informationBUILDING SURVEYING 313021
BUILDING SURVEYING 313021 Session topic SUDS - Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems Session objectives To examine various Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems (SUDS) for managing rainwater run-off and discuss
More informationReport Relating to Incidents of Flooding within the Dollar Catchment
Joint Position Statement Report Relating to Incidents of Flooding within the Dollar Catchment October 2012 Eric McQuarrie, Scottish Water Stuart Cullen, Clackmannanshire Council TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION...
More informationwww.gov.uk/defra Delivering Sustainable Drainage Systems
www.gov.uk/defra Delivering Sustainable Drainage Systems September 2014 Crown copyright 2014 You may re-use this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms
More informationFlood Risk Management
Flood Risk Management Value of Flood Risk Management Every year floods sweep through communities across the United States taking lives, destroying property, shutting down businesses, harming the environment
More informationFlood Risk Management
Flood Risk Management Value of Flood Risk Management Value to Individuals and Communities Every year floods sweep through communities across the United States taking lives, destroying property, shutting
More informationSutton Harbour Holdings PLC. March 2007
Sutton Harbour Holdings PLC March 2007 Contents!! " # # $ % % &'(&'' ) ) ( * + ', *!$ -,!'! #. / $$ #% 00& ' 00&1 $ Executive Summary!! " WSP Development and Transportation has been engaged by Sutton
More informationThe application site is on the edge of flood zones 1 and 2 with flood zone boundary cutting across part of the southern boundary of the site.
Flood Risk Assessment Erection of Masjid/ Place of Worship, extended car parking following demolition of 11a Grafton Street & boundary treatment Land adjacent 11/ 11a Grafton Street, Preston, PR1 8JB 0723/
More informationHERE COMES THE RAIN AGAIN Stormwater Management in a Changing Climate at the City of Toronto
HERE COMES THE RAIN AGAIN Stormwater Management in a Changing Climate at the City of Toronto Evergreen s Urban Watershed Forum 20 March 2015 Presented by Kurtis Elton Policy & Program Advisor, Toronto
More informationDrainage Analysis for the McKownville Area
Drainage Analysis for the McKownville Area Town of Guilderland Albany County, New York Prepared by: DELAWARE ENGINEERING, P.C. 28 Madison Avenue Extension Albany, New York 12203 June 2010 Town of Guilderland
More informationLow Impact Development Checklist
New Jersey Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual February 2004 A P P E N D I X A Low Impact Development Checklist A checklist for identifying nonstructural stormwater management strategies incorporated
More informationGuidance on the use of sustainable drainage systems (SUDS) and an overview of the adoption policy introduced by
Guidance on the use of sustainable drainage systems (SUDS) and an overview of the adoption policy introduced by Easy guide to Sustainable drainage systems 02 Contents Page Introduction 05 Purpose of this
More informationChapter 12: Impacts, Mitigation, Cumulative Impacts and Residual Effects
Chapter 12: Impacts, Mitigation, Cumulative Impacts and Residual Effects REnescience Northwich Quality Management Prepared by: Tom Dearing Senior Environmental Consultant 02/10/15 Reviewed & checked by:
More information