2011 Judicial Evaluation Tarrant County Bar Association. Poll Summary - Generated by BallotBox ( Name
|
|
|
- Gabriel Jefferson
- 7 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Poll Summary - Generated by BallotBox () Name 2011 Judicial Evaluation Description What is this? In accordance with the by-laws of the, we are Online Voting 03/07/11 02:15pm CST to 03/28/11 05:00pm CDT Voter Information Eligible Voters 2541 Cast Online Ballots 315 Blank Online Ballots 19 % of eligible voters 12.40% 0.75% Report Information 1: Federal Courts Federal Courts Question Type MULTIPLE Hon. John McBryde (Judge, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas) % 39.46% No. of Respondents 315 Hon. Terry R. Means (Judge, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas) % 39.16% Hon. Dennis Lynn (Bankruptcy Judge, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas) % 10.54% Hon. Russell Nelms (Bankruptcy Judge, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas) % 10.84% % 2: State Appellate Courts State Appellate Courts Question Type MULTIPLE Hon. Terrie Livingston (Chief Justice, Second Court of Appeals) % 18.41% No. of Respondents 315 Hon. Lee Ann Dauphinot (Justice, Second Court of Appeals) % 15.13% Hon. Anne Gardner (Justice, Second Court of Appeals) % 16.65% Hon. Sue Walker (Justice, Second Court of Appeals) % 17.78% Hon. Bob McCoy (Justice, Second Court of Appeals) % 19.55% Hon. Bill Meier (Justice, Second Court of Appeals) % 12.48% % 3: State District Courts Civil State District Courts - Civil Question Type MULTIPLE Hon. Melody Wilkinson (Judge, 17th District Court) % 12.85% No. of Respondents 315 Hon. David Evans (Judge, 48th District Court) % 12.77% Hon. Don Cosby (Judge, 67th District Court) % 12.85% Hon. John Chupp (Judge, 141st District Court) % 10.12% Hon. Ken Curry (Judge, 153rd District Court) % 12.29% Hon. Tom Lowe (Judge, 236th District Court) % 12.29% Hon. Dana Womack (Judge, 348th District Court) % 13.41% Hon. Bonnie Sudderth (Judge, 352nd District Court) % 13.41% % 4: State District Courts - FamState District Courts - Family Page 1 of 70
2 Question Type MULTIPLE Hon. Randy Catterton (Judge, 231st District Court) % 9.87% No. of Respondents 315 Hon. Lisa Beebe (Associate Judge, 231st District Court) % 7.75% Hon. William Harris (Judge, 233rd District Court) % 9.09% Hon. Diane Haddock (Associate Judge, 233rd District Court) % 7.26% Hon. Nancy Berger (Judge, 322nd District Court) % 9.02% Hon. James Munford (Associate Judge, 322nd District Court) % 6.84% Hon. Jerome Hennigan (Judge, 324th District Court) % 8.81% Hon. Beth Poulos (Associate Judge, 324th District Court) % 6.84% Hon. Judith Wells (Judge, 325th District Court) % 8.60% Hon. Terri White (Associate Judge, 325th District Court) % 6.48% Hon. Michael Sinha (Associate Judge, 360th District Court) % 8.17% Hon. Steve Owen (Associate Judge, IV-D Court) % 6.13% Hon. Clifford Bronson (Associate Judge, IV-D Court) % 5.14% % 5: State District Courts - JuvState District Courts - Juvenile Question Type MULTIPLE Hon. Jean Boyd (Judge, 323rd District Court) % 40.53% No. of Respondents 315 Hon. Ellen Smith (Associate Judge, 323rd District Court) % 20.70% Hon. Tim Menikos (Associate Judge, 323rd District Court) % 18.94% Hon. Kim Brown (Associate Judge, 323rd District Court) % 19.82% % 6: State District Courts - CrimState District COURTS - Criminal Question Type MULTIPLE Hon. Sharen Wilson (Judge, Criminal District #1) % 10.50% No. of Respondents 315 Hon. Wayne Salvant (Judge, Criminal District #2) % 9.28% Hon. Michael Thomas (Judge, Criminal District #4) % 8.32% Hon. Louis Sturns (Judge, 213th District Court) % 9.69% Hon. Everett Young (Judge, 297th District Court) % 9.55% Hon. Molly Westfall (Judge 371st District Court) % 6.82% Hon. Scott Wisch (Judge, 372nd District Court) % 8.59% Hon. George Gallagher (Judge, 396th District Court) % 9.41% Hon. Ruben Gonzalez (Judge 432nd District Court) % 7.91% Hon. Gene Grant (Judge, Magistrate Court) % 5.46% Hon. Cheyenne Minick (Judge, Magistrate Court) % 5.32% Hon. Timmie White (Judge, Magistrate Court) % 4.77% Hon. Matt King (Judge, Magistrate Court) % 4.37% % 7: County Courts - Civil County Courts - Civil Question Type MULTIPLE Hon. Jennifer Rymell (Judge, Court at Law #2) % % No. of Respondents % Page 2 of 70
3 8: County Courts - Criminal County Courts - Criminal Question Type MULTIPLE Hon. Sherry Hill (Judge, Criminal Court #1) % 10.46% No. of Respondents 315 Hon. Michael Mitchell (Judge, Criminal Court #2) % 11.03% Hon. Billy Mills (Judge, Criminal Court #3) % 12.17% Hon. Deborah Nekhom (Judge, Criminal Court #4) % 8.75% Hon. Jamie Cummings (Judge, Criminal Court #5) % 8.56% Hon. Molly Jones (Judge, Criminal Court #6) % 7.60% Hon. Cheril Hardy (Judge, Criminal Court #7) % 11.03% Hon. Daryl Coffey (Judge, Criminal Court #8) % 9.89% Hon. Brent Carr (Judge, Criminal Court #9) % 11.22% Hon. Phil Sorrells (Judge, Criminal Court #10) % 9.32% % 9: County Courts - Probate County Courts - Probate Question Type MULTIPLE Hon. Steve King (Judge, Probate Court #1) % 31.82% No. of Respondents 315 Hon. Quentin McGown (Associate Judge, Probate Court #1) % 15.15% Hon. Patrick Ferchill (Judge, Probate Court #2) % 34.20% Hon. Lin Morrisett (Associate Judge, Probate Court #2) % 18.83% % 10: McBryde- all 10.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes % 48.85% No. of Respondents 131 No % 47.33% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. John McNo Opinion % 3.82% % of Ballots 41.59% % % 10.2: attentiveness Does the Judge interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys and litigants? Question Type SINGLE Yes % 28.24% No. of Respondents 131 No % 68.70% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. John McNo Opinion % 3.05% % of Ballots 41.59% % % 10.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes % 52.67% No. of Respondents 131 No % 41.22% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. John McNo Opinion % 6.11% % of Ballots 41.59% % % 10.4: timeliness Page 3 of 70
4 Question Type SINGLE Yes % 95.42% No. of Respondents 131 No % 1.53% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. John McNo Opinion % 3.05% % of Ballots 41.59% % % 10.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes % 78.63% No. of Respondents 131 No % 11.45% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. John McNo Opinion % 9.92% % of Ballots 41.59% % % 10.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes % 29.01% No. of Respondents 131 No % 67.94% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. John McNo Opinion % 3.05% % of Ballots 41.59% % % 10.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent % 16.79% No. of Respondents 131 Good % 15.27% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. John McFair % 19.85% % of Ballots 41.59% Poor % 48.09% % 11: Means - all 11.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes % 96.15% No. of Respondents 130 No % 1.54% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. Terry R No Opinion % 2.31% % of Ballots 41.27% % % 11.2: attentiveness Does the Judge interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys and litigants? Question Type SINGLE Yes % 96.15% No. of Respondents 130 No % 0.77% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. Terry R No Opinion % 3.08% % of Ballots 41.27% % % 11.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes % 90.77% No. of Respondents 130 No % 3.85% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. Terry R No Opinion % 5.38% Page 4 of 70
5 % of Ballots 41.27% % % 11.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes % 78.46% No. of Respondents 130 No % 16.15% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. Terry R No Opinion % 5.38% % of Ballots 41.27% % % 11.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes % 81.54% No. of Respondents 130 No % 11.54% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. Terry R No Opinion % 6.92% % of Ballots 41.27% % % 11.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes % 92.31% No. of Respondents 130 No % 3.85% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. Terry R No Opinion % 3.85% % of Ballots 41.27% % % 11.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent % 71.54% No. of Respondents 130 Good % 23.08% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. Terry R Fair % 4.62% % of Ballots 41.27% Poor % 0.77% % 12: Lynn- all 12.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes % 82.86% No. of Respondents 35 No % 11.43% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. Dennis No Opinion % 5.71% % of Ballots 11.11% % % 12.2: attentiveness Does the Judge interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys and litigants? Question Type SINGLE Yes % 82.86% No. of Respondents 35 No % 11.43% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. Dennis No Opinion % 5.71% % of Ballots 11.11% % % 12.3: apply Page 5 of 70
6 Question Type SINGLE Yes % 71.43% No. of Respondents 35 No % 17.14% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. Dennis No Opinion % 11.43% % of Ballots 11.11% % % 12.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes % 85.71% No. of Respondents 35 No % 8.57% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. Dennis No Opinion % 5.71% % of Ballots 11.11% % % 12.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes % 77.14% No. of Respondents 35 No % 8.57% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. Dennis No Opinion % 14.29% % of Ballots 11.11% % % 12.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes % 80.00% No. of Respondents 35 No % 17.14% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. Dennis No Opinion % 2.86% % of Ballots 11.11% % % 12.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent % 42.86% No. of Respondents 35 Good % 40.00% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. Dennis Fair % 8.57% % of Ballots 11.11% Poor % 8.57% % 13: Nelms- all 13.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes % 91.67% No. of Respondents 36 No % 2.78% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. Russell No Opinion % 5.56% % of Ballots 11.43% % % 13.2: attentiveness Does the Judge interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys and litigants? Question Type SINGLE Yes % 94.44% No. of Respondents 36 No % 0.00% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. Russell No Opinion % 5.56% Page 6 of 70
7 % of Ballots 11.43% % % 13.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes % 83.33% No. of Respondents 36 No % 5.56% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. Russell No Opinion % 11.11% % of Ballots 11.43% % % 13.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes % 88.89% No. of Respondents 36 No % 0.00% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. Russell No Opinion % 11.11% % of Ballots 11.43% % % 13.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes % 94.44% No. of Respondents 36 No % 0.00% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. Russell No Opinion % 5.56% % of Ballots 11.43% % % 13.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes % 91.67% No. of Respondents 36 No % 2.78% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. Russell No Opinion % 5.56% % of Ballots 11.43% % % 13.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent % 63.89% No. of Respondents 36 Good % 27.78% Condition: Q1 has 'Hon. Russell Fair % 5.56% % of Ballots 11.43% Poor % 2.78% % 14: Livingston- app 14.1: integrity Does the Justice uphold the integrity of the judiciary? Question Type SINGLE Yes % 93.15% No. of Respondents 146 No % 4.79% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Terrie LNo Opinion % 2.05% % of Ballots 46.35% % % 14.2: attentiveness Does the Justice interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys during oral argument? Page 7 of 70
8 Question Type SINGLE Yes % 91.10% No. of Respondents 146 No % 2.05% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Terrie LNo Opinion % 6.85% % of Ballots 46.35% % % 14.3: opinions Does the Justice issue opinions that are well-reasoned and clearly dispose of the cases based onproper application of the law to the record? Question Type SINGLE Yes % 82.88% No. of Respondents 146 No % 14.38% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Terrie LNo Opinion % 2.74% % of Ballots 46.35% % % 14.4: timeliness Does the Justice issue opinions timely? Question Type SINGLE Yes % 73.97% No. of Respondents 146 No % 13.01% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Terrie LNo Opinion % 13.01% % of Ballots 46.35% % % 14.5: impartiality Does the Justice demonstrate fairness and impartiality? Question Type SINGLE Yes % 85.62% No. of Respondents 146 No % 10.27% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Terrie LNo Opinion % 4.11% % of Ballots 46.35% % % 14.6: overall Please select one overall rating for this Justice. Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent % 56.16% No. of Respondents 146 Good % 28.08% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Terrie L Fair % 10.27% % of Ballots 46.35% Poor % 5.48% % 15: Dauphinot- app 15.1: integrity Does the Justice uphold the integrity of the judiciary? Question Type SINGLE Yes % 80.00% No. of Respondents 120 No % 14.17% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Lee AnnNo Opinion % 5.83% % of Ballots 38.10% % % 15.2: attentiveness Does the Justice interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys during oral argument? Question Type SINGLE Yes % 75.00% No. of Respondents 120 No % 14.17% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Lee AnnNo Opinion % 10.83% Page 8 of 70
9 % of Ballots 38.10% % % 15.3: opinions Does the Justice issue opinions that are well-reasoned and clearly dispose of the cases based onproper application of the law to the record? Question Type SINGLE Yes % 56.67% No. of Respondents 120 No % 30.00% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Lee AnnNo Opinion % 13.33% % of Ballots 38.10% % % 15.4: timeliness Does the Justice issue opinions timely? Question Type SINGLE Yes % 64.17% No. of Respondents 120 No % 13.33% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Lee AnnNo Opinion % 22.50% % of Ballots 38.10% % % 15.5: impartiality Does the Justice demonstrate fairness and impartiality? Question Type SINGLE Yes % 70.83% No. of Respondents 120 No % 18.33% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Lee AnnNo Opinion % 10.83% % of Ballots 38.10% % % 15.6: overall Please select one overall rating for this Justice. Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent % 25.83% No. of Respondents 120 Good % 36.67% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Lee AnnFair % 25.83% % of Ballots 38.10% Poor % 11.67% % 16: Gardner - app 16.1: integrity Does the Justice uphold the integrity of the judiciary? Question Type SINGLE Yes % 94.70% No. of Respondents 132 No % 3.79% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Anne GaNo Opinion % 1.52% % of Ballots 41.90% % % 16.2: attentiveness Does the Justice interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys during oral argument? Question Type SINGLE Yes % 89.39% No. of Respondents 132 No % 3.03% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Anne GaNo Opinion % 7.58% % of Ballots 41.90% % % 16.3: opinions Does the Justice issue opinions that are well-reasoned and clearly dispose of the cases based onproper application of the law to the record? Page 9 of 70
10 Question Type SINGLE Yes % 79.55% No. of Respondents 132 No % 12.88% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Anne GaNo Opinion % 7.58% % of Ballots 41.90% % % 16.4: timeliness Does the Justice issue opinions timely? Question Type SINGLE Yes % 67.42% No. of Respondents 132 No % 15.91% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Anne GaNo Opinion % 16.67% % of Ballots 41.90% % % 16.5: impartiality Does the Justice demonstrate fairness and impartiality? Question Type SINGLE Yes % 85.61% No. of Respondents 132 No % 6.82% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Anne GaNo Opinion % 7.58% % of Ballots 41.90% % % 16.6: overall Please select one overall rating for this Justice. Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent % 54.55% No. of Respondents 132 Good % 28.03% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Anne GaFair % 13.64% % of Ballots 41.90% Poor % 3.79% % 17: Walker- app 17.1: integrity Does the Justice uphold the integrity of the judiciary? Question Type SINGLE Yes % 92.91% No. of Respondents 141 No % 4.26% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Sue Wa No Opinion % 2.84% % of Ballots 44.76% % % 17.2: attentiveness Does the Justice interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys during oral argument? Question Type SINGLE Yes % 87.94% No. of Respondents 141 No % 2.84% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Sue Wa No Opinion % 9.22% % of Ballots 44.76% % % 17.3: opinions Does the Justice issue opinions that are well-reasoned and clearly dispose of the cases based onproper application of the law to the record? Question Type SINGLE Yes % 83.69% No. of Respondents 141 No % 9.22% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Sue Wa No Opinion % 7.09% Page 10 of 70
11 % of Ballots 44.76% % % 17.4: timeliness Does the Justice issue opinions timely? Question Type SINGLE Yes % 80.85% No. of Respondents 141 No % 6.38% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Sue Wa No Opinion % 12.77% % of Ballots 44.76% % % 17.5: impartiality Does the Justice demonstrate fairness and impartiality? Question Type SINGLE Yes % 89.36% No. of Respondents 141 No % 5.67% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Sue Wa No Opinion % 4.96% % of Ballots 44.76% % % 17.6: overall Please select one overall rating for this Justice. Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent % 71.63% No. of Respondents 141 Good % 18.44% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Sue Wa Fair % 4.96% % of Ballots 44.76% Poor % 4.96% % 18: McCoy- app 18.1: integrity Does the Justice uphold the integrity of the judiciary? Question Type SINGLE Yes % 93.55% No. of Respondents 155 No % 4.52% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Bob McCNo Opinion % 1.94% % of Ballots 49.21% % % 18.2: attentiveness Does the Justice interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys during oral argument? Question Type SINGLE Yes % 84.52% No. of Respondents 155 No % 7.10% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Bob McCNo Opinion % 8.39% % of Ballots 49.21% % % 18.3: opinions Does the Justice issue opinions that are well-reasoned and clearly dispose of the cases based onproper application of the law to the record? Question Type SINGLE Yes % 81.94% No. of Respondents 155 No % 12.26% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Bob McCNo Opinion % 5.81% % of Ballots 49.21% % % 18.4: timeliness Does the Justice issue opinions timely? Page 11 of 70
12 Question Type SINGLE Yes % 78.71% No. of Respondents 155 No % 6.45% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Bob McCNo Opinion % 14.84% % of Ballots 49.21% % % 18.5: impartiality Does the Justice demonstrate fairness and impartiality? Question Type SINGLE Yes % 89.03% No. of Respondents 155 No % 7.10% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Bob McCNo Opinion % 3.87% % of Ballots 49.21% % % 18.6: overall Please select one overall rating for this Justice. Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent % 61.29% No. of Respondents 155 Good % 27.10% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Bob McCFair % 6.45% % of Ballots 49.21% Poor % 5.16% % 19: Meier - app 19.1: integrity Does the Justice uphold the integrity of the judiciary? Question Type SINGLE Yes % 81.82% No. of Respondents 99 No % 7.07% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Bill MeieNo Opinion % 11.11% % of Ballots 31.43% % % 19.2: attentiveness Does the Justice interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys during oral argument? Question Type SINGLE Yes % 75.76% No. of Respondents 99 No % 6.06% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Bill MeieNo Opinion % 18.18% % of Ballots 31.43% % % 19.3: opinions Does the Justice issue opinions that are well-reasoned and clearly dispose of the cases based onproper application of the law to the record? Question Type SINGLE Yes % 59.60% No. of Respondents 99 No % 16.16% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Bill MeieNo Opinion % 24.24% % of Ballots 31.43% % % 19.4: timeliness Does the Justice issue opinions timely? Question Type SINGLE Yes % 63.64% No. of Respondents 99 No % 8.08% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Bill MeieNo Opinion % 28.28% Page 12 of 70
13 % of Ballots 31.43% % % 19.5: impartiality Does the Justice demonstrate fairness and impartiality? Question Type SINGLE Yes % 74.75% No. of Respondents 99 No % 9.09% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Bill MeieNo Opinion % 16.16% % of Ballots 31.43% % % 19.6: overall Please select one overall rating for this Justice. Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent % 35.35% No. of Respondents 99 Good % 36.36% Condition: Q2 has 'Hon. Bill MeieFair % 19.19% % of Ballots 31.43% Poor % 9.09% % 20: Wilkinson- all 20.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes % 88.13% No. of Respondents 160 No % 6.25% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Melody No Opinion % 5.63% % of Ballots 50.79% % % 20.2: attentiveness Does the Judge interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys and litigants? Question Type SINGLE Yes % 88.13% No. of Respondents 160 No % 6.88% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Melody No Opinion % 5.00% % of Ballots 50.79% % % 20.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes % 71.25% No. of Respondents 160 No % 14.38% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Melody No Opinion % 14.38% % of Ballots 50.79% % % 20.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes % 73.13% No. of Respondents 160 No % 10.00% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Melody No Opinion % 16.88% % of Ballots 50.79% % % 20.5: efficient Page 13 of 70
14 Question Type SINGLE Yes % 79.38% No. of Respondents 160 No % 11.88% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Melody No Opinion % 8.75% % of Ballots 50.79% % % 20.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes % 83.75% No. of Respondents 160 No % 8.13% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Melody No Opinion % 8.13% % of Ballots 50.79% % % 20.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent % 51.25% No. of Respondents 160 Good % 28.75% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Melody Fair % 14.38% % of Ballots 50.79% Poor % 5.63% % 21: Evans- all 21.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes % 85.53% No. of Respondents 159 No % 10.69% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. David E No Opinion % 3.77% % of Ballots 50.48% % % 21.2: attentiveness Does the Judge interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys and litigants? Question Type SINGLE Yes % 74.84% No. of Respondents 159 No % 19.50% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. David E No Opinion % 5.66% % of Ballots 50.48% % % 21.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes % 78.62% No. of Respondents 159 No % 15.72% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. David E No Opinion % 5.66% % of Ballots 50.48% % % 21.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes % 84.28% No. of Respondents 159 No % 11.32% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. David E No Opinion % 4.40% Page 14 of 70
15 % of Ballots 50.48% % % 21.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes % 84.28% No. of Respondents 159 No % 12.58% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. David E No Opinion % 3.14% % of Ballots 50.48% % % 21.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes % 74.21% No. of Respondents 159 No % 20.75% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. David E No Opinion % 5.03% % of Ballots 50.48% % % 21.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent % 50.31% No. of Respondents 159 Good % 30.19% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. David E Fair % 10.06% % of Ballots 50.48% Poor % 9.43% % 22: Cosby- all 22.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes % 89.38% No. of Respondents 160 No % 6.25% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Don CosNo Opinion % 4.38% % of Ballots 50.79% % % 22.2: attentiveness Does the Judge interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys and litigants? Question Type SINGLE Yes % 90.63% No. of Respondents 160 No % 6.88% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Don CosNo Opinion % 2.50% % of Ballots 50.79% % % 22.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes % 77.50% No. of Respondents 160 No % 16.88% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Don CosNo Opinion % 5.63% % of Ballots 50.79% % % 22.4: timeliness Page 15 of 70
16 Question Type SINGLE Yes % 87.50% No. of Respondents 160 No % 8.75% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Don CosNo Opinion % 3.75% % of Ballots 50.79% % % 22.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes % 87.50% No. of Respondents 160 No % 9.38% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Don CosNo Opinion % 3.13% % of Ballots 50.79% % % 22.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes % 80.00% No. of Respondents 160 No % 14.38% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Don CosNo Opinion % 5.63% % of Ballots 50.79% % % 22.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent % 60.63% No. of Respondents 160 Good % 20.63% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Don CosFair % 10.00% % of Ballots 50.79% Poor % 8.75% % 23: Chupp- all 23.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes % 84.13% No. of Respondents 126 No % 8.73% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. John ChNo Opinion % 7.14% % of Ballots 40.00% % % 23.2: attentiveness Does the Judge interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys and litigants? Question Type SINGLE Yes % 83.33% No. of Respondents 126 No % 10.32% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. John ChNo Opinion % 6.35% % of Ballots 40.00% % % 23.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes % 64.29% No. of Respondents 126 No % 19.84% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. John ChNo Opinion % 15.87% Page 16 of 70
17 % of Ballots 40.00% % % 23.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes % 71.43% No. of Respondents 126 No % 15.08% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. John ChNo Opinion % 13.49% % of Ballots 40.00% % % 23.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes % 78.57% No. of Respondents 126 No % 10.32% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. John ChNo Opinion % 11.11% % of Ballots 40.00% % % 23.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes % 84.13% No. of Respondents 126 No % 10.32% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. John ChNo Opinion % 5.56% % of Ballots 40.00% % % 23.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent % 47.62% No. of Respondents 126 Good % 30.95% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. John ChFair % 11.11% % of Ballots 40.00% Poor % 10.32% % 24: Curry- all 24.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes % 91.50% No. of Respondents 153 No % 7.19% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Ken CurNo Opinion % 1.31% % of Ballots 48.57% % % 24.2: attentiveness Does the Judge interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys and litigants? Question Type SINGLE Yes % 92.81% No. of Respondents 153 No % 5.23% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Ken CurNo Opinion % 1.96% % of Ballots 48.57% % % 24.3: apply Page 17 of 70
18 Question Type SINGLE Yes % 84.31% No. of Respondents 153 No % 11.76% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Ken CurNo Opinion % 3.92% % of Ballots 48.57% % % 24.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes % 87.58% No. of Respondents 153 No % 8.50% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Ken CurNo Opinion % 3.92% % of Ballots 48.57% % % 24.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes % 86.93% No. of Respondents 153 No % 10.46% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Ken CurNo Opinion % 2.61% % of Ballots 48.57% % % 24.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes % 88.24% No. of Respondents 153 No % 9.80% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Ken CurNo Opinion % 1.96% % of Ballots 48.57% % % 24.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent % 60.78% No. of Respondents 153 Good % 25.49% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Ken CurFair % 7.19% % of Ballots 48.57% Poor % 6.54% % 25: Lowe- all 25.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes % 68.63% No. of Respondents 153 No % 27.45% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Tom LowNo Opinion % 3.92% % of Ballots 48.57% % % 25.2: attentiveness Does the Judge interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys and litigants? Question Type SINGLE Yes % 69.93% No. of Respondents 153 No % 26.14% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Tom LowNo Opinion % 3.92% Page 18 of 70
19 % of Ballots 48.57% % % 25.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes % 56.86% No. of Respondents 153 No % 34.64% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Tom LowNo Opinion % 8.50% % of Ballots 48.57% % % 25.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes % 63.40% No. of Respondents 153 No % 26.80% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Tom LowNo Opinion % 9.80% % of Ballots 48.57% % % 25.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes % 60.78% No. of Respondents 153 No % 30.72% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Tom LowNo Opinion % 8.50% % of Ballots 48.57% % % 25.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes % 60.78% No. of Respondents 153 No % 31.37% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Tom LowNo Opinion % 7.84% % of Ballots 48.57% % % 25.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent % 30.72% No. of Respondents 153 Good % 24.84% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Tom LowFair % 18.30% % of Ballots 48.57% Poor % 26.14% % 26: Womack- all 26.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes % 95.81% No. of Respondents 167 No % 3.59% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Dana WNo Opinion % 0.60% % of Ballots 53.02% % % 26.2: attentiveness Does the Judge interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys and litigants? Page 19 of 70
20 Question Type SINGLE Yes % 94.61% No. of Respondents 167 No % 4.19% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Dana WNo Opinion % 1.20% % of Ballots 53.02% % % 26.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes % 88.62% No. of Respondents 167 No % 7.78% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Dana WNo Opinion % 3.59% % of Ballots 53.02% % % 26.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes % 89.22% No. of Respondents 167 No % 5.99% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Dana WNo Opinion % 4.79% % of Ballots 53.02% % % 26.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes % 88.62% No. of Respondents 167 No % 5.99% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Dana WNo Opinion % 5.39% % of Ballots 53.02% % % 26.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes % 89.22% No. of Respondents 167 No % 5.39% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Dana WNo Opinion % 5.39% % of Ballots 53.02% % % 26.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent % 76.05% No. of Respondents 167 Good % 17.37% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Dana WFair % 3.59% % of Ballots 53.02% Poor % 2.99% % 27: Sudderth- all 27.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes % 92.22% No. of Respondents 167 No % 5.99% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Bonnie No Opinion % 1.80% Page 20 of 70
21 % of Ballots 53.02% % % 27.2: attentiveness Does the Judge interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys and litigants? Question Type SINGLE Yes % 89.82% No. of Respondents 167 No % 7.19% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Bonnie No Opinion % 2.99% % of Ballots 53.02% % % 27.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes % 85.03% No. of Respondents 167 No % 8.98% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Bonnie No Opinion % 5.99% % of Ballots 53.02% % % 27.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes % 79.64% No. of Respondents 167 No % 13.17% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Bonnie No Opinion % 7.19% % of Ballots 53.02% % % 27.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes % 82.04% No. of Respondents 167 No % 11.38% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Bonnie No Opinion % 6.59% % of Ballots 53.02% % % 27.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes % 88.62% No. of Respondents 167 No % 7.78% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Bonnie No Opinion % 3.59% % of Ballots 53.02% % % 27.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent % 55.09% No. of Respondents 167 Good % 35.33% Condition: Q3 has 'Hon. Bonnie Fair % 5.39% % of Ballots 53.02% Poor % 4.19% % 28: Catterton- all 28.1: integrity Page 21 of 70
22 Question Type SINGLE Yes % 90.71% No. of Respondents 140 No % 9.29% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Randy CNo Opinion % 0.00% % of Ballots 44.44% % % 28.2: attentiveness Does the Judge interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys and litigants? Question Type SINGLE Yes % 93.57% No. of Respondents 140 No % 5.00% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Randy CNo Opinion % 1.43% % of Ballots 44.44% % % 28.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes % 87.86% No. of Respondents 140 No % 10.00% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Randy CNo Opinion % 2.14% % of Ballots 44.44% % % 28.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes % 87.86% No. of Respondents 140 No % 9.29% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Randy CNo Opinion % 2.86% % of Ballots 44.44% % % 28.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes % 80.71% No. of Respondents 140 No % 13.57% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Randy CNo Opinion % 5.71% % of Ballots 44.44% % % 28.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes % 87.14% No. of Respondents 140 No % 10.71% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Randy CNo Opinion % 2.14% % of Ballots 44.44% % % 28.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent % 75.71% No. of Respondents 140 Good % 12.86% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Randy CFair % 7.14% % of Ballots 44.44% Poor % 4.29% % Page 22 of 70
23 29: Beebe- all 29.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes % 73.64% No. of Respondents 110 No % 19.09% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Lisa BeeNo Opinion % 7.27% % of Ballots 34.92% % % 29.2: attentiveness Does the Judge interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys and litigants? Question Type SINGLE Yes % 60.00% No. of Respondents 110 No % 35.45% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Lisa BeeNo Opinion % 4.55% % of Ballots 34.92% % % 29.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes % 65.45% No. of Respondents 110 No % 27.27% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Lisa BeeNo Opinion % 7.27% % of Ballots 34.92% % % 29.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes % 84.55% No. of Respondents 110 No % 11.82% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Lisa BeeNo Opinion % 3.64% % of Ballots 34.92% % % 29.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes % 71.82% No. of Respondents 110 No % 23.64% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Lisa BeeNo Opinion % 4.55% % of Ballots 34.92% % % 29.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes % 71.82% No. of Respondents 110 No % 21.82% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Lisa BeeNo Opinion % 6.36% % of Ballots 34.92% % % 29.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent % 40.91% No. of Respondents 110 Good % 23.64% Page 23 of 70
24 Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Lisa BeeFair % 20.91% % of Ballots 34.92% Poor % 14.55% % 30: Harris - all 30.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes % 60.47% No. of Respondents 129 No % 37.21% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. William No Opinion % 2.33% % of Ballots 40.95% % % 30.2: attentiveness Does the Judge interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys and litigants? Question Type SINGLE Yes % 47.29% No. of Respondents 129 No % 49.61% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. William No Opinion % 3.10% % of Ballots 40.95% % % 30.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes % 62.02% No. of Respondents 129 No % 29.46% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. William No Opinion % 8.53% % of Ballots 40.95% % % 30.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes % 82.17% No. of Respondents 129 No % 11.63% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. William No Opinion % 6.20% % of Ballots 40.95% % % 30.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes % 79.07% No. of Respondents 129 No % 13.95% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. William No Opinion % 6.98% % of Ballots 40.95% % % 30.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes % 52.71% No. of Respondents 129 No % 40.31% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. William No Opinion % 6.98% % of Ballots 40.95% % % Page 24 of 70
25 30.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent % 33.33% No. of Respondents 129 Good % 21.71% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. William Fair % 19.38% % of Ballots 40.95% Poor % 25.58% % 31: Haddock - all 31.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes % 77.67% No. of Respondents 103 No % 18.45% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Diane HNo Opinion % 3.88% % of Ballots 32.70% % % 31.2: attentiveness Does the Judge interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys and litigants? Question Type SINGLE Yes % 65.05% No. of Respondents 103 No % 30.10% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Diane HNo Opinion % 4.85% % of Ballots 32.70% % % 31.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes % 52.43% No. of Respondents 103 No % 39.81% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Diane HNo Opinion % 7.77% % of Ballots 32.70% % % 31.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes % 79.61% No. of Respondents 103 No % 13.59% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Diane HNo Opinion % 6.80% % of Ballots 32.70% % % 31.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes % 66.02% No. of Respondents 103 No % 23.30% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Diane HNo Opinion % 10.68% % of Ballots 32.70% % % 31.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes % 55.34% No. of Respondents 103 No % 36.89% Page 25 of 70
26 Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Diane HNo Opinion % 7.77% % of Ballots 32.70% % % 31.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent % 24.27% No. of Respondents 103 Good % 29.13% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Diane HFair % 21.36% % of Ballots 32.70% Poor % 25.24% % 32: Berger- all 32.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes % 64.84% No. of Respondents 128 No % 32.03% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Nancy BNo Opinion % 3.13% % of Ballots 40.63% % % 32.2: attentiveness Does the Judge interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys and litigants? Question Type SINGLE Yes % 70.31% No. of Respondents 128 No % 27.34% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Nancy BNo Opinion % 2.34% % of Ballots 40.63% % % 32.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes % 46.88% No. of Respondents 128 No % 43.75% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Nancy BNo Opinion % 9.38% % of Ballots 40.63% % % 32.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes % 68.75% No. of Respondents 128 No % 23.44% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Nancy BNo Opinion % 7.81% % of Ballots 40.63% % % 32.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes % 62.50% No. of Respondents 128 No % 29.69% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Nancy BNo Opinion % 7.81% % of Ballots 40.63% % % Page 26 of 70
27 32.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes % 59.38% No. of Respondents 128 No % 34.38% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Nancy BNo Opinion % 6.25% % of Ballots 40.63% % % 32.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent % 29.69% No. of Respondents 128 Good % 21.09% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Nancy BFair % 25.00% % of Ballots 40.63% Poor % 24.22% % 33: Munford- all 33.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes % 88.66% No. of Respondents 97 No % 8.25% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. James MNo Opinion % 3.09% % of Ballots 30.79% % % 33.2: attentiveness Does the Judge interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys and litigants? Question Type SINGLE Yes % 87.63% No. of Respondents 97 No % 9.28% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. James MNo Opinion % 3.09% % of Ballots 30.79% % % 33.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes % 84.54% No. of Respondents 97 No % 10.31% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. James MNo Opinion % 5.15% % of Ballots 30.79% % % 33.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes % 89.69% No. of Respondents 97 No % 5.15% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. James MNo Opinion % 5.15% % of Ballots 30.79% % % 33.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes % 85.57% No. of Respondents 97 No % 7.22% Page 27 of 70
28 Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. James MNo Opinion % 7.22% % of Ballots 30.79% % % 33.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes % 86.60% No. of Respondents 97 No % 8.25% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. James MNo Opinion % 5.15% % of Ballots 30.79% % % 33.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent % 61.86% No. of Respondents 97 Good % 26.80% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. James MFair % 4.12% % of Ballots 30.79% Poor % 7.22% % 34: Hennigan - all 34.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes % 91.20% No. of Respondents 125 No % 7.20% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Jerome No Opinion % 1.60% % of Ballots 39.68% % % 34.2: attentiveness Does the Judge interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys and litigants? Question Type SINGLE Yes % 93.60% No. of Respondents 125 No % 3.20% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Jerome No Opinion % 3.20% % of Ballots 39.68% % % 34.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes % 84.80% No. of Respondents 125 No % 10.40% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Jerome No Opinion % 4.80% % of Ballots 39.68% % % 34.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes % 88.00% No. of Respondents 125 No % 4.80% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Jerome No Opinion % 7.20% % of Ballots 39.68% % % Page 28 of 70
29 34.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes % 88.00% No. of Respondents 125 No % 5.60% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Jerome No Opinion % 6.40% % of Ballots 39.68% % % 34.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes % 88.00% No. of Respondents 125 No % 8.80% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Jerome No Opinion % 3.20% % of Ballots 39.68% % % 34.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent % 66.40% No. of Respondents 125 Good % 23.20% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Jerome Fair % 6.40% % of Ballots 39.68% Poor % 4.00% % 35: Poulos- all 35.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes % 75.26% No. of Respondents 97 No % 17.53% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Beth PoNo Opinion % 7.22% % of Ballots 30.79% % % 35.2: attentiveness Does the Judge interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys and litigants? Question Type SINGLE Yes % 63.92% No. of Respondents 97 No % 29.90% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Beth PoNo Opinion % 6.19% % of Ballots 30.79% % % 35.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes % 57.73% No. of Respondents 97 No % 30.93% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Beth PoNo Opinion % 11.34% % of Ballots 30.79% % % 35.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes % 80.41% No. of Respondents 97 No % 13.40% Page 29 of 70
30 Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Beth PoNo Opinion % 6.19% % of Ballots 30.79% % % 35.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes % 73.20% No. of Respondents 97 No % 17.53% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Beth PoNo Opinion % 9.28% % of Ballots 30.79% % % 35.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes % 61.86% No. of Respondents 97 No % 27.84% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Beth PoNo Opinion % 10.31% % of Ballots 30.79% % % 35.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent % 32.99% No. of Respondents 97 Good % 29.90% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Beth Po Fair % 26.80% % of Ballots 30.79% Poor % 10.31% % 36: Wells - all 36.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes % 88.52% No. of Respondents 122 No % 10.66% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Judith WNo Opinion % 0.82% % of Ballots 38.73% % % 36.2: attentiveness Does the Judge interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys and litigants? Question Type SINGLE Yes % 82.79% No. of Respondents 122 No % 12.30% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Judith WNo Opinion % 4.92% % of Ballots 38.73% % % 36.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes % 82.79% No. of Respondents 122 No % 13.93% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Judith WNo Opinion % 3.28% % of Ballots 38.73% % % Page 30 of 70
31 36.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes % 88.52% No. of Respondents 122 No % 7.38% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Judith WNo Opinion % 4.10% % of Ballots 38.73% % % 36.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes % 85.25% No. of Respondents 122 No % 7.38% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Judith WNo Opinion % 7.38% % of Ballots 38.73% % % 36.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes % 76.23% No. of Respondents 122 No % 20.49% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Judith WNo Opinion % 3.28% % of Ballots 38.73% % % 36.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent % 58.20% No. of Respondents 122 Good % 23.77% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Judith WFair % 8.20% % of Ballots 38.73% Poor % 9.84% % 37: White - all 37.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes % 72.83% No. of Respondents 92 No % 17.39% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Terri WhNo Opinion % 9.78% % of Ballots 29.21% % % 37.2: attentiveness Does the Judge interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys and litigants? Question Type SINGLE Yes % 82.61% No. of Respondents 92 No % 10.87% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Terri WhNo Opinion % 6.52% % of Ballots 29.21% % % 37.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes % 73.91% No. of Respondents 92 No % 14.13% Page 31 of 70
32 Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Terri WhNo Opinion % 11.96% % of Ballots 29.21% % % 37.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes % 83.70% No. of Respondents 92 No % 8.70% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Terri WhNo Opinion % 7.61% % of Ballots 29.21% % % 37.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes % 73.91% No. of Respondents 92 No % 14.13% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Terri WhNo Opinion % 11.96% % of Ballots 29.21% % % 37.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes % 72.83% No. of Respondents 92 No % 16.30% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Terri WhNo Opinion % 10.87% % of Ballots 29.21% % % 37.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent % 35.87% No. of Respondents 92 Good % 41.30% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Terri WhFair % 16.30% % of Ballots 29.21% Poor % 6.52% % 38: Sinha all 38.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes % 93.97% No. of Respondents 116 No % 3.45% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Michael No Opinion % 2.59% % of Ballots 36.83% % % 38.2: attentiveness Does the Judge interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys and litigants? Question Type SINGLE Yes % 94.83% No. of Respondents 116 No % 3.45% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Michael No Opinion % 1.72% % of Ballots 36.83% % % Page 32 of 70
33 38.3: apply Question Type SINGLE Yes % 81.03% No. of Respondents 116 No % 13.79% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Michael No Opinion % 5.17% % of Ballots 36.83% % % 38.4: timeliness Question Type SINGLE Yes % 79.31% No. of Respondents 116 No % 14.66% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Michael No Opinion % 6.03% % of Ballots 36.83% % % 38.5: efficient Question Type SINGLE Yes % 75.86% No. of Respondents 116 No % 17.24% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Michael No Opinion % 6.90% % of Ballots 36.83% % % 38.6: impartial Question Type SINGLE Yes % 91.38% No. of Respondents 116 No % 6.03% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Michael No Opinion % 2.59% % of Ballots 36.83% % % 38.7: overall Question Type MULTIPLE Excellent % 58.62% No. of Respondents 116 Good % 30.17% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Michael Fair % 5.17% % of Ballots 36.83% Poor % 6.03% % 39: Owen all 39.1: integrity Question Type SINGLE Yes % 90.80% No. of Respondents 87 No % 3.45% Condition: Q4 has 'Hon. Steve ONo Opinion % 5.75% % of Ballots 27.62% % % 39.2: attentiveness Does the Judge interact attentively and professionally toward attorneys and litigants? Question Type SINGLE Yes % 91.95% No. of Respondents 87 No % 3.45% Page 33 of 70
2013 Judicial Evaluation Description What is this? In accordance with the by-laws of the Tarrant County Bar Association, we are
Poll Summary - Generated by BallotBox () Name 2013 Judicial Evaluation Description What is this? In accordance with the by-laws of the, we are Online Voting 09/18/13 12:15am CDT to 10/11/13 05:00pm CDT
Chief Judge of the State of New York. Chief Administrative Judge. Deputy Chief Administrative Judge (Management Support)
Court of Appeals Chief Judge of the State of New York Administrative Board Chief Administrative Judge Presiding Justices Deputy Chief Administrative Judge (NYC Courts) Deputy Chief Administrative Judge
2016 GENERAL. Election Date: 11/08/2016
Official Election Notice County of CABARRUS 2016 GENERAL Election Date: 11/08/2016 This is an official notice of an election to be conducted in CABARRUS County on 11/08/2016. This notice contains a list
THE SAN ANTONIO DEFENDER THE SAN ANTONIO DEFENDER. 2011-2012 Judicial Survey Results
THE SAN ANTONIO DEFENDER THE SAN ANTONIO DEFENDER A Publication of The San Antonio Criminal Defense Lawyers Association MAY 2012 Special Edition 2011-2012 Judicial Survey Results Robert H. Featherston
2014 SUMMER SCHOOL FOR LAWYERS June 23-25, 2014 Sandestin, Florida Linkside Conference Center MONDAY, JUNE 23 RD
2014 SUMMER SCHOOL FOR LAWYERS June 23-25, 2014 Sandestin, Florida Linkside Conference Center MONDAY, JUNE 23 RD 8:00-9:00 A.M. Update on the 2014 Legislative Session and Its Impact on the Bench & Bar
NOTICE OF ANNUAL SECRET BALLOT ELECTIONS TO ELECT THE FOLLOWING MEMBERS OF THE ELLIS COUNTY BAIL BOND BOARD FOR THE 2016 TERM PURSUANT TO SECTION 1704
NOTICE OF ANNUAL SECRET BALLOT ELECTIONS TO ELECT THE FOLLOWING MEMBERS OF THE ELLIS COUNTY BAIL BOND BOARD FOR THE 2016 TERM PURSUANT TO SECTION 1704.0535 OF THE TEXAS OCCUPATIONS CODE Pursuant to Section
A JOINT RESOLUTION. proposing a constitutional amendment relating to requiring board
By:AAGattis H.J.R.ANo.A A JOINT RESOLUTION 0 proposing a constitutional amendment relating to requiring board certification for appellate judges and justices and to increasing the age and experience requirements
Guide for Florida Voters
Judges rule on the basis of law, not public opinion, and they should be totally indifferent to pressures of the times. Warren E. Burger, chief justice, U.S. Supreme Court, 1969-1986 Guide for Florida Voters
2016 SUMMER EXTERNSHIPS THE LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT
2016 SUMMER EXTERNSHIPS THE LOS ANGELES SUPERIOR COURT The Los Angeles Superior Court is now accepting applications for 2016 summer externships. The Court offers full-time externships in the following
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA In the Matter of: ) ) ESTABLISHING THE ARIZONA ) Administrative Order COMMISSION ON ACCESS ) No. 2014-83 TO JUSTICE ) ) ) The Judiciary s Strategic Agenda,
Distinguished Professor of Judicial Studies, Washington and Lee University School of Law, 2007 present)
DONALD W. LEMONS CHIEF JUSTICE Supreme Court of Virginia 100 North Ninth Street Richmond, Virginia 23219 EMPLOYMENT: Currently: Chief Justice, Supreme Court of Virginia Formerly: Justice, Supreme Court
Fifth District Court of Appeals (Dallas)
Fifth District Court of Appeals (Dallas) The Basics 1. Court's Address: Court of Appeals, Fifth District, 600 Commerce Street, Suite 200, Dallas, Texas, 75202-4658 2. Telephone number: 214-712-3400 (main)
Election Summary Report Wayne County, Ohio General Election November 4, 2008 Summary For Jurisdiction Wide, All Counters, All Races OFFICIAL RESULTS
Election Summary Report Wayne County, Ohio General Election November 4, 2008 Summary For Jurisdiction Wide, All Counters, All Races OFFICIAL RESULTS 11/25/08 11:13:00 Registered Voters 73217 President
Law In Colorado Colorado Bar Association Public Legal Education Committee 2004
Law In Colorado Colorado Bar Association Public Legal Education Committee 2004 PREFACE These materials were written to supplement Street Law: A Course in Practical Law, 7 th Ed. (McGraw Hill Glencoe, 2005).
APPROVED for 8.0 CLE Credits 3.0 Ethics. Clarion Hotel & Conference Center 701 8th Street Greeley, CO 80631
APPROVED for 8.0 CLE Credits 3.0 Ethics Clarion Hotel & Conference Center 701 8th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Seminar Schedule 7:30 a.m. Registration Opens / Continental Breakfast 8:15 a.m. State of the Courts
New Directions new challenges
New Directions new challenges 2011 Workers Compensation Court Educational Conference September 15-16, 2011 Meridian Technology Center Stillwater, Oklahoma details/registration available at meridiantech.edu
Date: 2/25/2014 2:40 pm Rutherford County Chancery Court - 20 N. Public Square Room 302Judicial Building Murfreesboro, TN 37130 User: Raechelle
Date: 2/25/2014 2:40 pm Rutherford County Chancery Court - 20 N. Public Square Room 302Judicial Building Murfreesboro, TN 37130 Page 1 of 7 User: Raechelle Civil Court Docket Sorted By: Hearing Date/Time-Case
FOR COUNCIL MEETING OF: February 28, 2011 AGENDA ITEM NO.: 4.3 (a) REAPPOINTMENT OF MUNICIPAL JUDGE PRO TEMPORE AND APPOINT NEW JUDGES PRO TEMPORE
FOR COUNCIL MEETING OF: February 28, 2011 AGENDA ITEM NO.: 4.3 (a) TO: FROM: SUBJECT: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL JANE AIKEN, MUNICPAL COURT JUDG@ REAPPOINTMENT OF MUNICIPAL JUDGE PRO TEMPORE AND APPOINT NEW
L. CLIFFORD DAVIS LEGAL ASSOCIATION NEWSLETTER VOL I - ISSUE 1 - DECEMBER 2014 L.C.D.LA. 2014-2015 Board
L.C.D.LA L. CLIFFORD DAVIS LEGAL ASSOCIATION NEWSLETTER VOL I - ISSUE 1 - DECEMBER 2014 2014-2015 Board Mary M. Panzu PRESIDENT Crystal Gayden PRESIDENT-ELECT Bobbie Edmonds 1 st VICE-PRESIDENT Albert
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS Misc. Docket No. 12-9 2 0 t ORDER REQUIRING ELECTRONIC FILING IN CERTAIN COURTS This order mandates electronic filing ("e-filing") in civil cases, including family and probate
2nd Circuit Drug Court Est. August 1, 2003. 4th Circuit Drug Court
2nd Circuit Drug Court Est. August 1, 2003 Acting Coordinator: Harrison, Hancock, and Stone Hon. Stephen S. Simpson P.O. Box 1570 Gulfport, MS 39502 (228) 865-4880 Phone (228) 865-4376 Fax Hon. Roger T.
PETERSON, JOHNSON & MURRAY, S.C. 788 North Jefferson Street Suite 500 Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202 P: 414.278.8800 F: 414.278.0920 www.pjmlaw.
The Harmonie Group Firm Honor Recognition Summary Wisconsin Harmonie Firm Liaison Clayton L. Riddle Peterson, Johnson & Murray, S.C. 788 N. Jefferson Street, Suite 500 Milwaukee, WI 53202 414-278-8800
Elkins Family Law Task Force
Page 1 of 6 ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE COURTS 455 Golden Gate Avenue San Francisco, CA 94102-3688 Tel 415-865-4200 TDD 415-865-4272 Fax 415-865-4205 www.courtinfo.ca.gov FACT SHEET October 2008 Elkins
Criminal Justice, New Technologies, and the Constitution. May 1988. NTIS order #PB88-213921
Criminal Justice, New Technologies, and the Constitution May 1988 NTIS order #PB88-213921 Recommended Citation: U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, Criminal Justice, New Technologies, and the
TEXAS ETHICS COMMISSION
TEXAS ETHICS COMMISSION CHAPTER 159, LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE BY COUNTY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES Effective September 1, 2013 (Revised 09/01/2015) Texas Ethics Commission, P.O. Box 12070,
ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS. MiSC DOCket NO. 98m 9133
ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS MiSC DOCket NO. 98m 9133 Appointment of a District Judge to Preside in a State Bar Disciplinary Action The Supreme Court of Texas hereby appoints the Honorable Phillip
1 of 2 DOCUMENTS. No. A--2000-1 REVIEW TRIBUNAL OF TEXAS. 55 S.W.3d 243; 2000 Tex. LEXIS 83
Page 1 1 of 2 DOCUMENTS In re Honorable Thomas G. JONES, Justice of the Peace, Precinct 7, Place 1, Dallas, Dallas County, Texas, Judicial Disciplinary Proceeding No. A--2000-1 REVIEW TRIBUNAL OF TEXAS
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JOHN R. MALONEY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 11-50311 D.C. No. 3:10-cr-02803-DMS-1 ORDER
2014 Judicial Performance Survey Report 20th Judicial District
State of Colorado Logo COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE The Honorable Judith L. LaBuda 2014 Judicial Performance Survey Report 20th Judicial District March 26, 2014 The Honorable Judith L. LaBuda Boulder
BEST LAWYERS RECOGNIZES 77 MVA ATTORNEYS. August 2013
August 2013 Moore & Van Allen PLLC is pleased to announce that 77 attorneys representing 19 of the Firm s primary practice areas were selected by their peers for inclusion in The Best Lawyers in America
MISC Docket Nov 99m 90,25
ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS MISC Docket Nov 99m 90,25 Appointment of a District Judge to Preside in a State Bar Disciplinary Action The Supreme Court of Texas hereby appoints the Honorable Bob
HARRIS COUNTY CRIMINAL LAWYER PDF
HARRIS COUNTY CRIMINAL LAWYER PDF ==> Download: HARRIS COUNTY CRIMINAL LAWYER PDF HARRIS COUNTY CRIMINAL LAWYER PDF - Are you searching for Harris County Criminal Lawyer Books? Now, you will be happy that
Turning the Tide: Strategies For Defending Domestic Violence
THE ELEVENTH ANNUAL DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CONFERENCE Turning the Tide: Strategies For Defending Domestic Violence March 5 6, 2007 Fordham Law School Victims CO-SPONSORS: Appellate Division, First Department
MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE WISCONSIN JUDICIAL COUNCIL MADISON, WISCONSIN April 16, 2010
MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE WISCONSIN JUDICIAL COUNCIL MADISON, WISCONSIN April 16, 2010 The Judicial Council met at 9:30 a.m. in Room 328NW, State Capitol, Madison, Wisconsin. MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair
How To Make An Animal Cruelty Case In The United States
WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 27, 2010 8:00-8:30 a.m. REGISTRATION AND CONTINENTAL BREAKFAST 8:30 9:30 a.m. OPENING REMARKS/CONFERENCE INTRODUCTIONS 9:30 9:45 a.m. BREAK Danica Szarvas-Kidd Senior Policy Advisor
Lawrence D. Finder. Practice description. Practice focus
Practice description Larry Finder has extensive experience in government investigations, corporate compliance counseling, federal grand jury, trial practice, internal investigations and business crimes.
Consolidated Case Nos. 04SA396 and 05SA22, State of Colorado v. City and County of Denver and Sternberg v. City and County of Denver.
Opinions of the Colorado Supreme Court are available to the public and can be accessed through the Court s homepage at http://www.courts.state.co.us/supct/supct.htm Opinions are also posted on the Colorado
CRAVEN BOARD OF ELECTIONS CANDIDATE DETAIL LIST
CRAVEN BOARD OF ELECTIONS CANDIDATE DETAIL LIST CRITERIA: Election: 03/15/2016, Show Contest w/o Candidate: Y US PRESIDENT US PRESIDENT US PRESIDENT US SENATE WRIGHT, PAUL MICHAEL 12/01/2015 147 SWINSON
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS Misc. Docket No. 93- ADOPTION OF AMENDED RULES FOR HARRIS COUNTY FOR RECEIVING AND FILING ELECTRONICALLY TRANSMITTED COURT DOCUMENTS ORDERED: At the request of the District
USCA Case #13-5247 Document #1456073 Filed: 09/11/2013 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
USCA Case #13-5247 Document #1456073 Filed: 09/11/2013 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v.
U.S. District Court Middle District of Florida (Tampa) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 8:12-cv-01389-VMC-TGW
US District Court Civil Docket as of December 27, 2012 Retrieved from the court on December 31, 2012 U.S. District Court Middle District of Florida (Tampa) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 8:12-cv-01389-VMC-TGW
Effective January 1, 2013. An attorney appointed as lead trial counsel in the trial of a death penalty case must:
STANDARDS FOR QUALIFICATION OF ATTORNEYS FOR APPOINTMENT TO DEATH PENALTY CASES PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 26.052, TEXAS CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, FOR THE THIRD ADMINISTRATIVE JUDICIAL REGION LEAD TRIAL COUNSEL
Misc Docket No. 98-9020
ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS Misc Docket No. 98-9020 Appointment of a District Judge to Preside in a State Bar Disciplinary Action The Supreme Court of Texas hereby appoints the Honorable Horace
WEBB COUNTY APPLICATION/AFFIDAVIT Criminal Felony, Misdemeanor or Juvenile Courts Attorney Appointment Rotation List
WEBB COUNTY APPLICATION/AFFIDAVIT Criminal Felony, Misdemeanor or Juvenile Courts Attorney Appointment Rotation List PLEASE COMPLETE THIS ENTIRE PAGE Date: Name: Birth Date: Business Address: Day Phone:
WITNESS LIST. Criminal Justice March 10, 2015 1:30 PM - or upon adjournment
SB 135 Baker, Janet (Her son), Houston, Cole, Cynthia (Greater Houston Coalition for Justice), Houston, Douglas, Durrel (Self), Houston, Hill, Belinda First Assistant District Attorney (Harris County District
U.S. DISTRICT COURT - DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. Applicable General Orders Index - 4/1/98
U.S. DISTRICT COURT - DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Applicable General Orders Index - 4/1/98 Former 98-1 3/1/98 Identifying those General Orders which are 1 now obsolete 98-2 (92) 1/22/82 Jurisdiction of U.S. Magistrate
CUMBERLAND BOARD OF ELECTIONS CANDIDATE DETAIL LIST
CUMBERLAND BOARD OF ELECTIONS CANDIDATE DETAIL LIST CRITERIA: Election: 05/08/2012, Show Contest w/o Candidate: Y NC COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE NC COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE NC COMMISSIONER OF INSURANCE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, FLORIDA RULES OF JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION, FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL CASE NO. SC11-399 PROCEDURE, FLORIDA PROBATE
2011 Interim Judicial Performance Survey 20th Judicial District
State of Colorado Logo COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE The Honorable Thomas F. Mulvahill 2011 Interim Judicial Performance Survey 20th Judicial District May 6, 2011 The Honorable Thomas F. Mulvahill
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2012-CA-02038-COA
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2012-CA-02038-COA VIOLET MEEKINS AND ALEX GATES, CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEE FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI FOR AND ON BEHALF OF VIOLET MEEKINS APPELLANTS
EVOLUTION OF THE HARRIS COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER OFFICE
EVOLUTION OF THE HARRIS COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER OFFICE ABA 10 th Annual Summit on Indigent Defense Improvement February 7, 2015 Houston, Texas Senator Rodney Ellis, Texas Senate Alex Bunin, Harris County
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2002-KA-01124-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2002-KA-01124-COA JIMMY FORD APPELLANT v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE DATE OF TRIAL COURT JUDGMENT: 5/10/2002 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. MARCUS D. GORDON
SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA MARICOPA COUNTY CV 2013-002769 04/02/2013 HONORABLE LISA DANIEL FLORES
Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court *** Filed *** SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA HONORABLE LISA DANIEL FLORES CLERK OF THE COURT D. Glab Deputy GERALD C FREEMAN TIMOTHY A LASOTA v. RICHARD ESSER, et al. JEFFREY
STATE'S RESPONSE BRIEF
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT RANDY ERIC WORSHAM, APPELLANT NO. 05-10-01017-CR V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE APPEALED FROM CAUSE NUMBER F07-55075 IN THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT
Misc Docket No. 99-9027
ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS Misc Docket No. 99-9027 Appointment of a District Judge to Preside in a State Bar Disciplinary Action The Supreme Court of Texas hereby appoints the Honorable Wayne
Misc. Docket No. Il--------- Appointment of a District Judge to Preside in a State Bar Disciplinary Action
ER OF T H E SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS Misc. Docket No. Il---------.91. 88 Appointment of a District Judge to Preside in a State Bar Disciplinary Action The Supreme Court of Texas hereby appoints the Honorable
Case 12-32065 Document 73 Filed in TXSB on 04/19/12 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
Case 12-32065 Document 73 Filed in TXSB on 04/19/12 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRUSTEE JUDY A. ROBBINS UNITED STATES TRUSTEE HECTOR DURAN TRIAL ATTORNEY
The NH Court System excerpts taken from http://www.courts.state.nh.us/press/030608guide.pdf
The NH Court System excerpts taken from http://www.courts.state.nh.us/press/030608guide.pdf NH court system: The modern trial and appellate court system in New Hampshire took shape in 1901, when the legislature
HOW TO LODGE AN APPEAL AGAINST A CRIMINAL INJURIES COMPENSATION AWARD IN THE DISTRICT COURT
HOW TO LODGE AN APPEAL AGAINST A CRIMINAL INJURIES COMPENSATION AWARD IN THE DISTRICT COURT 1. Lodge two copies of the Notice of Appeal (attachment 1) and two copies of Payment Into Court (attachment 2)
Medina County Domestic Relations Court Detail Schedule Jackie Owen:
Monday, March 19, 2012 1:00 pm 11PA0289 Event / Filing: Objection to CSEA Administrative Findings Case Name: Carter, Jeremy D vs. Carter, Margaret S Medina County Child Support Enforceme Monday, March
ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS. Misc Docket No. 95-
ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS Misc Docket No. 95- Appointment of a District Judge to Preside in a State Bar Disciplinary Action The Supreme Court of Texas hereby appoints the Honorable Jesse A. Holloway,
The Texas Judicial System. Criminal Appeals, in Courts of Appeals, in District Courts, in County Courts, in
The Texas Judicial System The judicial power of the State of Texas is derived from Article 5, Section 1 of the Texas Constitution, which provides: The judicial power of this State shall be vested in one
Conference Mission Statement
Conference Mission Statement Profound racial and ethnic disparities exist in the American criminal justice system and concrete reform is needed to address them. The New York County Lawyers Association,
Written Testimony to Texas House of Representatives Committee on Judiciary and Civil Jurisprudence - Subcommittee on Asbestos
Written Testimony to Texas House of Representatives Committee on Judiciary and Civil Jurisprudence - Subcommittee on Asbestos Interim Charge 4: Study the degree of transparency in asbestos bankruptcy trusts
Misc Docket No. 98-9033
ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS Misc Docket No. 98-9033 Appointment of a District Judge to Preside in a State Bar Disciplinary Action The Supreme Court of Texas hereby appoints the Honorable Faith
UNPUBLISHED IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ABINGDON DIVISION
UNPUBLISHED IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ABINGDON DIVISION WILLIAM ELLIS VANCE ET AL., Plaintiffs, v. BOB KEARY WILLIAMS, ET AL., Defendants. Case No. 1:03CV00136
PROGRAM AGENDA. 6:00 PM 7:00 PM Welcome Reception (for conference registrants, spouses/guests and children)
THE VIRGINIA BAR ASSOCIATION 41st Annual Conference on Labor Relations and Employment Law September 15-17, 2011 Williamsburg Lodge and Conference Center PROGRAM AGENDA Thursday, September 15, 2011 5:00
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Plaintiff,
23 CASE 0:12-cr-00026-JRT-JSM Document 597 Filed 04/30/12 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Criminal No. 12-26 (JRT/JSM) Plaintiff, v. (1) WAKINYON
The Weld County Bar Association, Inc. and the 19th Judicial District Bench-Bar Committee are pleased to present the 8th Annual Nuts & Bolts CLE.
8th Annual Nuts & Bolts CLE The Weld County Bar Association, Inc. and the 19th Judicial District Bench-Bar Committee are pleased to present the 8th Annual Nuts & Bolts CLE. Friday, December 9, 2011 at
Case 12-80802 Doc 352 Filed 05/31/12 Entered 05/31/12 12:23:01 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 5
Document Page 1 of 5 Texas State Bar No. 24046903 Texas Attorney General's Office P. O. Box 12548 Tele.: (512) 463-2173 Fax: (512) 482-8341 Attorneys for Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts IN THE UNITED
CAUSE NO. D-1-GN-16-000360. THE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff, v. TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS
CAUSE NO. D-1-GN-16-000360 THE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF Plaintiff, v. TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS MILLENNIUM CLOSING SERVICES, LLC, d/b/a MILLENNIUM TITLE, Defendant. 53 rd JUDICIAL DISTRICT 4/5/2016
ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS. MiSc Docket No. 99m 9047
ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS MiSc Docket No. 99m 9047 Appointment of a District Judge to Preside in a State Bar Disciplinary Action The Supreme Court of Texas hereby appoints the Honorable John
Date: 10/15/2015 12:36 pm Rutherford County Chancery Court - 20 N. Public Square Room 302Judicial Building Murfreesboro, TN 37130 User: Raechelle
Date: 10/15/2015 12:36 pm Rutherford County Chancery Court - 20 N. Public Square Room 302Judicial Building Murfreesboro, TN 37130 Page 1 of 8 User: Raechelle Civil Court Docket Sorted By: Hearing Date/Time-Case
The Civil Litigator. Proposed Magistrate Rules: Crucial to Civil Litigators. Richard P. Holme
Originally published in The Colorado Lawyer, Vol. 28, No. 8, August 1999. The Civil Litigator Proposed Magistrate Rules: Crucial to Civil Litigators Richard P. Holme Under newly proposed rules for state
Justice Information Management Systems (JIMS)
Justice Information Management Systems (JIMS) Tim Mulcahy timothy.mulcahy@jocogov.org Johnson County Kansas 10 th Judicial District Court General Jurisdiction: Population 540,000 19 Judges, 4 Magistrate
2014 Sixth Circuit Appellate Practice Institute
May 6, 2014 Cincinnati, 2014 Sixth Circuit Appellate Practice Institute The Cincinnati-Northern Kentucky and Dayton Chapters of the Federal Bar Association and the Litigation Section of the Federal Bar
ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS. MiSC Docket N m J^- A 1
ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS MiSC Docket N m J^- A 1 Appointment of a District Judge to Preside in a State Bar Disciplinary Action The Supreme Court of Texas hereby appoints the Honorable Mary Lou
RICHARD A. BROWN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY
QDA QUEENS COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY 2 ND ANNUAL MOCK TRIAL COMPETITION The Queens County District Attorney s Office is sponsoring its 2 nd annual mock trial competition to be held on October 24 - October
James W. McElhaney, McElhaney s Trial Notebook. R. Lawrence Dessem, Pretrial Litigation in a Nutshell
ABOTA TRIAL PRACTICE LECTURE SERIES Spring 2013 Mondays 8-9:50 a.m. 2 credit hours January 14 to April 22 Classroom #339, University of School of Law Course Textbooks: James W. McElhaney, McElhaney s Trial
CIRCUIT COURT FOR HOWARD COUNTY PAGE 1 10/02/15 14:45
CIRCUIT COURT FOR HOWARD COUNTY PAGE 1 JUDGE WILLIAM V TUCKER COURTROOM 1 Lee vs Darnell 13-C-14-098399 8:30AM Status Conference To be heard by Judge Tucker Time estimate: 30 minutes *Amended to include
EVELYN V. KEYES 3655 PIPING ROCK HOUSTON, TEXAS 77027 (TEL.) (713) 256-4180 (CELL) (FAX) (713) 552-9845 email: evkeyes@gmail.com
EVELYN V. KEYES 3655 PIPING ROCK HOUSTON, TEXAS 77027 (TEL.) (713) 256-4180 (CELL) (FAX) (713) 552-9845 email: evkeyes@gmail.com COURT OF APPEALS, FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS 301 FANNIN, STE. 214, HOUSTON,
SARASOTA COUNTY CRIMINAL JUSTICE COMMISSION
Present: Meeting Summary June 27, 2011 Ed Brodsky for Earl Moreland David Bullock Larry Eger Lee Haworth George Scott for Tom Knight Bill Little Daryl Promey Karen Rushing Walt Smith Jon Thaxton State
Keldon K. Scott Curriculum Vitae
Education Thomas M. Cooley Law School Juris Doctorate Degree in Law - Cum Laude University of Wisconsin Bachelor of Science Major: Computer Science Minor: Computer Information Systems Keldon K. Scott Curriculum
PETER J. ECKERSTROM 400 West Congress Street Tucson, Arizona 85701-1374 eckerstrom@appeals2.az.gov Office phone: (520) 628-6950
PETER J. ECKERSTROM 400 West Congress Street Tucson, Arizona 85701-1374 eckerstrom@appeals2.az.gov Office phone: (520) 628-6950 PROFESSIONAL BACKGROUND & EXPERIENCE Judge, Arizona Court of Appeals Appointed
ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS Misc Docket No. 96-9196 Appointment of a District Judge to Preside in a State Bar Disciplinary Action The Supreme Court of Texas hereby appoints the Honorable Mark Davidson,
Registering, but not testifying: For:
Criminal Jurisprudence Committee March 25, 2015-10:30 AM or upon final adjourn./recess HB 207 HB 265 Bragiel, Justin (Texas Hotel and Lodging Association) Chandler, Gary (Texas DPS Officers Association)
APPROVED MEDIATORS LIST
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION APPROVED MEDIATORS LIST Listed in Alphabetical Order June 2015-1- The Honorable Bob Shannon Baker Botts L.L.P. 98 San Jacinto Blvd.,
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON AUGUST SESSION, 1997. September 09, 1997 No. 02C01-9610-CR-00320 Appellant )
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON AUGUST SESSION, 1997 FILED JOHNNY LEE MUKES, ) ) September 09, 1997 No. 02C01-9610-CR-00320 Appellant ) Cecil Crowson, Jr. ) SHELBY COUNTY Appellate
MAYOR DE BLASIO APPOINTS 26 JUDGES TO FAMILY, CRIMINAL AND CIVIL COURT
THE CITY OF NEW YORK OFFICE OF THE MAYOR NEW YORK, NY 10007 MAYOR DE BLASIO APPOINTS 26 JUDGES TO FAMILY, CRIMINAL AND CIVIL COURT NEW YORK Mayor de Blasio has made 26 judicial appointments for the New
Official Ballot Presidential Preference Vote and Nonpartisan Office April 5, 2016
11 and Nonpartisan Office 21 40 47 48 49 53 Notice to voters: If you are voting on Election Day, your ballot must be initialed by two election inspectors. If you are voting absentee, your ballot must be
CALIFORNIA COURTS AND THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM
CALIFORNIA COURTS AND THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM California Courts and the Judicial System Unlike the federal system, in which judges are appointed by the president, confirmed by the Senate, and serve for life
FEDERALISM THE SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT IN THE UNITED STATES
FEDERALISM THE SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT IN THE UNITED STATES In the United States, we are governed by both national and state governments and our rights are protected by state and federal Constitutions. Basically,
2015 SUMMER PLACEMENT & WORK EXPERIENCE OPPORTUNITIES
2015 SUMMER PLACEMENT & WORK EXPERIENCE OPPORTUNITIES Batch 4 You may wish to apply for one of the following competitive placement and work experience opportunities run by legal and other organisations.
Minutes. Pretrial Justice Working Group Criminal Justice System Subcommittee March 20, 2012
Minutes Pretrial Justice Working Group Criminal Justice System Subcommittee March 20, 2012 Meeting Participants: Sarah Joy Albrecht, Public Welfare Foundation Kim Ball, Bureau of Justice Assistance Shima
How To Become A Court Appointed Attorney
Court Appointed Attorney Application Ninth Judicial Circuit (Orange and Osceola Counties) Florida law requires that the Chief Judge of the Circuit compile a list of attorneys in private practice, by county
Appendix E. Access to Justice Hearing October 25, 2007 Colorado Springs, Colorado
Appendix E Access to Justice Hearing October 25, 2007 Colorado Springs, Colorado Co-Sponsored by The Colorado Access to Justice Commission and The Fourth Judicial District Access to Justice Committee Colorado
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT JUVENILE JUSTICE COORDINATING COUNCIL January 27, 2015
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT JUVENILE JUSTICE COORDINATING COUNCIL January 27, 2015 PRESENT: Attendees Roster on file NEXT MEETING: April 28, 2015 at 2:00 pm CHAIR: Chief Michelle Scray Brown
ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS. Misc Docket No. 96-9i72
ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS Misc Docket No. 96-9i72 Appointment of a District Judge to Preside in a State Bar Disciplinary Action The Supreme Court of Texas hereby appoints the Honorable Terry
DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION HEADQUARTERS
Acting administrative director Destie Overpeck Chief judge Richard Newman Special advisor Susan Hamilton Chief, legal counsel Destie Overpeck Executive medical director Rupali Das MD. Chief, programmatic
The North Carolina DA List
Ben David 5th Prosecutorial District P.O. Box 352 Wilmington, NC 28402 Phone (910) 341-1401 Fax (910) 341-4515 Bill Graham 6-A Prosecutorial District P.O. Box 126 Halifax, NC 27839 Phone (252) 583-4801