an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
|
|
- Jayson Harrell
- 7 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Appeal Decision Site visit made on 3 April 2013 by Simon Warder MA BSc(Hons) DipUD(Dist) MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government Decision date: 15 April 2013 Appeal Ref: APP/Y3615/A/12/ Dagden Road, Shalford, Surrey, GU4 8DD The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 against a refusal to grant planning permission. The appeal is made by Berkeley Homes (Southern) Ltd against the decision of Guildford Borough Council. The application Ref 12/P/00634, dated 6 April 2012, was refused by notice dated 7 September The development proposed is the erection of 5 residential dwellings (2 x 4 bed houses and 3 x 5 bed houses) with garaging and associated landscape works following demolition of existing buildings on site. Decision 1. The appeal is allowed and planning permission is granted for the erection of 5 residential dwellings (2 x 4 bed houses and 3 x 5 bed houses) with garaging and associated landscape works following demolition of existing buildings on site at 4-8 Dagden Road, Shalford, Surrey, GU4 8DD in accordance with the terms of the application, Ref 12/P/00634, dated 6 April 2012, subject to the conditions set out in the attached schedule. Preliminary Matter 2. The appellant submitted revised plans 1 with its ground of appeal. These plans show the floor levels of plots 3 and 4 reduced by 75mm and 450mm respectively compared with the plans submitted with the application. The changes are primarily intended to address the effect of plots 3 and 4 on the living conditions of the occupiers of 2 Dagden Road. The submissions made by those occupiers include reference to the changes in the revised plans. The Council had the opportunity to comment on the revised plans in its statement. 3. I am satisfied that the revisions do not alter the substance of the proposal and that those directly affected have had the opportunity to comment. Therefore the revised plans have been taken into account in the determination of this appeal. 1 Plan numbers 1155 C201B, 1155 C202B, 1155 P201E and 1155 P202E.
2 Main Issues 4. The main issues in this case are: whether the proposal complies with local plan policy on infill development within the defined settlement boundary; the effect of the proposal on the character of the area; the effect of the house on plot 4 on the living conditions of the occupiers of 2 Dagden Road. Reasons Infill Development 5. The site falls within the Metropolitan Green Belt as defined in the Guildford Borough Local Plan (LP). However, policy RE2 allows for infilling in villages to the extent specified in policy RE3. That policy defines the settlement boundary for Shalford and allows infilling on land substantially surrounded by existing development for purposes including small scale housing developments appropriate to the scale of the settlement. 6. The appellants argue that LP policy RE3 has been overtaken by paragraph 89 of the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework) which allows for limited infilling in villages without reference to what surrounds the site. However, I note that the national policy in operation at the time that the policy was adopted 2 also referred to limited infilling without further qualification. It is to be expected that local plan policies provide more detail than national policy. Therefore, I consider the additional requirement in policy RE3 for infill sites to be substantially surrounded by existing development does not amount to inconsistency with the Framework, notwithstanding that the LP was adopted in The occupiers of 2 Dagden Road (the objectors) contend that the site is not surrounded by existing development and, therefore, that the proposal does not accord with LP policy RE3. The objectors and the appellants have supplied barristers Opinions in support of their positions on the interpretation of this policy and the Council s solicitor has provided a legal of opinion 3. The key issue in dispute is the definition of existing development. The objectors consider that this means built development. The wording of this policy was clearly carefully considered at the Local Plan Inquiry. Nevertheless the Inspector took no view as to what might constitute adjoining development, seeing it as a matter to be determined on individual circumstances. 4 With this in mind, I consider it significant that the word built is not used in the policy to define surrounding existing development. Nor does it appear in that context in the supporting text for the policy at paragraphs to of the LP. 8. Moreover, based on what I saw travelling around the area, the character of the villages in the Green Belt to which the policy applies is such that potential sites are unlikely to be substantially surrounded built development in the sense of 2 Planning Policy Guidance 2: Green Belts, paragraph 3.4, fourth bullet point. 3 Robert Walton (1 May 2012 and 21 June 2012) and Sasha White (28 November 2012) for the appellants. Hereward Phillpot (8 November 2012) for the objectors. Jacqui Hughes (30 August 2012) for the Council. 4 Paragraphs of the LP Inspector s Report. Page 2 of 9
3 having buildings abutting the majority of their boundaries. The built form of the villages is generally too loose knit with many houses sitting within large plots. The policy is clearly intended to allow some residential development of an appropriate scale (LP paragraph 10.17) and, therefore, it would frustrate the aims of the policy if the meaning of existing development was so tightly defined that otherwise suitable sites, which happened to be located in an area of dwellings with large gardens, were excluded from consideration. 9. The objectors argue that policy RE3 is a Green Belt policy and, consequently, that the reference to existing development can only sensibly refer to built development since this is what impacts upon openness. However, both PPG2 and the Framework allow limited infilling villages without reference to the nature of the surrounding development and LP paragraph is clear that the settlement boundaries were defined to limit development to areas which would not impinge on the openness of the Green Belt. As such, rather than openness, it seems to me that this element of the policy is mainly concerned with the scale of infill development and its relationship with the character of the surrounding area. This approach is supported by LP paragraph The objectors have drawn my attention to an officer s report 5 and earlier appeal decision 6 for a site at Gomshall Lane, Shere. I have not been provided with the officer s report and therefore it is difficult to comment on it. Nevertheless, I recognise that the Inspector took existing development to be built development. It is not clear from the appeal decision letter what evidence was presented on this point, although the comment at the end of paragraph 5 of the decision letter suggests that the Inspector recognised that another interpretation of policy RE3 may be possible. Moreover, the appellant has referred to a number of other appeal decisions for proposals in locations where policy RE3 was applicable. The Inspectors in those cases did not consider it necessary to define existing development in the way suggested by the objectors. Therefore, whilst I recognise the need for consistency in decision making, for the reasons outlined above, I consider that the Gomshall Lane appeal decision should not be treated as the only source for the interpretation of existing development for the purposes of policy RE The objectors have also made submissions on the meaning of substantially surrounded. However, all the parties accept that the words should be given their everyday meaning. 12. Turning to the appeal proposal itself, the site is essentially five sided and accommodates two detached houses which front onto the north side of Dagden Road. The east and south sides of the site abut 2 and 10 Dagden Road respectively, whilst the north side shares a boundary with 72 The Street. The gardens of these properties are well defined by fencing or hedges, are laid out and maintained as domestic gardens and accommodate the expected paraphernalia in the form of sheds and the like. As such, both functionally and visually, they clearly form an established and developed part of the settlement. Together with the Dagden Road frontage, they make up significantly more than half of the perimeter of the appeal site. Consequently, I consider that the site is substantially surrounded by existing development. 5 Application reference 11/P/ Appeal reference APP/Y3615/A/04/ Page 3 of 9
4 13. In initial correspondence the objectors also contended that the proposal would not constitute infill development since the houses behind the Dagden Road frontage would not fill a gap between existing buildings. However, the purposes set out in policy RE3 allow for small scale housing developments of an appropriate scale as well as development which fills a gap in an otherwise continuous frontage. It is evident from the Local Plan Inquiry Inspector s report that the former purpose could extend to modest redevelopments in depth and developments of backland 7. I consider that the appeal proposal falls within this definition of infill. Overall therefore, I conclude that the appeal proposal complies with LP policy RE3, subject to consideration of its effect on the character of the area. Character of the Area 14. The vicinity of the appeal site is typified by large, but fairly closely spaced, detached houses which give the area a suburban character. Whilst most houses have generous rear gardens, few, if any, are as extensive as the plots which make up the appeal site. The houses generally front directly onto the straight sections of Dagden Road. However, I noted that, at the bend close to the end of the road, numbers 21 and 23 depart from this pattern and are accessed off private drives. 15. With regard to the scale of development proposed, I saw that Shalford is a fairly substantial settlement with Dagden Road alone accommodating more than 30 houses. The village has a reasonable range of local facilities and good accessibility to public transport. In this context, I consider that a net increase of three houses would be in keeping with the scale of the locality. The resultant development density of dwellings per hectare is typical of the range found locally The analysis in the Design and Access Statement shows that the scheme s plot ratio would be some 20%. Whilst this is slightly greater than the average for the surrounding area as a whole (16%), it is similar to a number of the other properties in the immediate vicinity. Moreover, the footprints of the proposed houses are comparable in size with others in the area. Whilst the proposed gardens may be smaller than others in the area, there is no substantive evidence to suggest that the proposal is deficient in indicators of overdevelopment such as the amount of external amenity space, parking and manoeuvring areas or that it would not provide adequate living conditions for future residents. The objectors concerns over the effect of potential extensions to the proposed houses can be dealt with by a condition withdrawing certain permitted development rights. Consequently, I consider that the scale of the proposal is appropriate to its surroundings. 17. I note the objectors concerns regarding potential overshadowing to plots 2 and 3 from the trees on the site s western boundary. However, the rear elevation of plot 2 is some 13m from the adjoining tree canopy line and plot 3 has west and north facing garden areas which separate the house from the tree line by distances of 5m and 8m respectively. I consider that these distances are sufficient to safeguard the living conditions of future occupiers and would not 7 Paragraph of the LP Inspector s Report. 8 Appellant s statement Appendix 6: For example Sites B and C which are closest to the appeal site. Page 4 of 9
5 lead to undue pressure for the removal or reduction in height of the existing trees. 18. The closely spaced buildings along Dagden Road effectively screen views to most existing rear gardens including at the appeal site. Therefore, the fact that the garden areas of the proposed houses would, inevitably, be smaller than the existing gardens which make up the site would not significantly alter the character of the area. 19. The siting of the houses on plots 1 and 5 would follow the established building lines and spacing of buildings along Dagden Road and would be the proposal s most significant contribution to the street scene. The houses on plots 2, 3 and 4 would not front onto the road. However, they would be far less prominent in the street scene, being glimpsed between plots 1 and 5. Moreover, the existing houses at numbers 21 and 23 illustrate that there is some variation in the layout of buildings in the area. As such, I consider that the proposed layout would not be out of accord with the prevailing pattern of development in the area. 20. Dagley Lane and the boundary of the Area of Great Landscape Value (AGLV) runs along the site s western boundary. The lane has a semi-rural character influenced by both the open countryside to the west and the presence of houses and rear gardens to the east. The proposal would bring two storey development closer to the lane. However, the scheme allows for significant existing planting, including the protected trees on the western boundary to be retained and supplemented. Therefore, whilst plots 2 and 3 in particular would be visible from the lane, views would be restricted to the roofs by the retained boundary embankment and would be filtered by planting. Consequently the proposal would leave the semi-rural character of the lane intact and would not materially affect the setting of the AGLV. Nor is there any substantive evidence to suggest that it would affect the setting the Area of Outstanding Natural beauty 21. Although part of the northern boundary of the site adjoins the Shalford Conservation Area, there is nothing to suggest that the proposal would materially affect the setting of the Area. 22. Taken as a whole therefore, I consider that the proposal would not have an adverse effect on the character of the area. As such, it would accord with LP policy G5(2) which requires new buildings to respect the scale, proportion and form of the surrounding environment and policy RE3 which, among other things, presumes against proposals which harm the character or appearance of the area. Living Conditions of the Occupiers of 2 Dagden Road 23. The house on plot 4 would be located, at its closest point, some 10m off the boundary with 2 Dagden Road and there would be no windows in elevation facing the neighbouring property. Plot 4 would be oriented slightly away from 2 Dagden Road and, at their closest, the two buildings would be separated by a distance of some 25m. Whilst I have not been made aware of any privacy standards applicable to the area, the separation distances set out above comfortably exceed those used in many comparable localities and I am Page 5 of 9
6 satisfied that the proposal would not lead to an unacceptable loss of privacy for the occupiers of number The floor level of plot 4 would be set at 41.35m compared with a ground level at the boundary with number 2 of around 40.68m. I accept that the slightly elevated position of the new house would increase its presence when viewed from the rear windows or garden of the neighbouring property. The house on plot 4 would be a substantial building which would, inevitably, change the westerly outlook for the occupiers of number 2. However, I consider that the separation distances outlined above, together with the filtering effect of the proposed boundary planting, would ensure that the proposal would not have an overbearing impact. 25. The proposed planting on the boundary with number 2 would give rise to some shadowing of part of the adjoining garden in late afternoon. However, it would affect a relatively small area and the use of deciduous species would reduce shading in the winter months when the sun is at its lowest. As such, I consider that the effect would be very limited. 26. Overall therefore, I find that the proposal would not harm the living conditions of the occupiers of 2 Dagden Road. Consequently, it would comply with LP policy G1(3) which seeks to protect the amenities of neighbouring occupiers. Other Matters 27. There is no substantive evidence to suggest that the proposal would lead to highway safety or convenience problems or that, with appropriate mitigation measures which can be secured by condition, it would adversely affect nature conservation interests. The site specific sustainability measures which were a concern of the objectors can also be addressed by condition. 28. Concern has been expressed locally regarding garden grabbing. The Framework excludes residential gardens from the definition of previously developed land and advises that Councils may wish to set out policies to resist the inappropriate development of gardens. However, it does not preclude development in gardens. I have not been made aware of any development plan policies on development in gardens and so the proposal would comply with this aspect of the Framework. 29. I note the misgivings regarding the local consultation exercise undertaken by the appellants. However there is nothing to indicate that the statutory consultation procedures were not followed. I have had regard to the objections lodged at the application and appeal stages and have determined the appeal on its planning merits. 30. I have already dealt with the relationship between LP policy RE3 and the Framework. There is nothing to indicate that the other local plan policies referred to above are in conflict with the Framework. Conditions 31. The Council has suggested a list of 18 conditions. The appellants argue that proposed condition 3 is unnecessary and unreasonable since the additional information it requires has already been provided. I agree to the extent that the survey information and slab levels have been provided. However more Page 6 of 9
7 detailed information on the proposed site levels is necessary in order to safeguard the character of the area. I will impose an accordingly amended condition. With amendments for clarity, I find that the other suggested conditions meet the tests set out in Circular 11/ A condition specifying the approved plans is necessary for the avoidance of doubt and in the interests of proper planning. Conditions requiring samples of external materials and details of boundary treatments are required to safeguard the character and appearance of the area. A condition withdrawing permitted development rights for extensions or alterations to the houses and outbuildings within their curtilages is required for the same reason. In view of the site s setting, a condition withdrawing permitted development rights for the insertion of upper floor windows is required to protect the privacy of neighbouring occupiers. 33. A condition to secure a scheme of tree protection works is necessary to safeguard the character of the area and a condition requiring mitigation measures to protect bats is required in the interests of nature conservation. A condition to secure and implement a construction method statement is necessary in the interests of highway safety and convenience. A condition to secure a scheme of noise control for construction plant, including any piling, is required to protect the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers. This condition combines the Council s suggested conditions 16 and 17. A condition specifying construction working times is necessary for the same reason. 34. Conditions to secure the implementation of the proposed access, parking and manoeuvring areas and the removal of the existing access points are necessary in the interests of highway safety. Conditions to secure and implement a scheme of sustainable energy use and the achievement of at least Code for Sustainable Homes level 3 are required in the interest of local and national policy objectives on sustainability. Conclusion 35. For the reasons outlined above, the appeal should be allowed. Simon Warder INSPECTOR Schedule of Conditions attached to Appeal Ref: APP/Y3615/A/12/ Dagden Road, Shalford, Surrey, GU4 8DD 1) The development hereby permitted shall begin not later than three years from the date of this decision. 2) The development hereby permitted shall be carried out in accordance with the following approved plans: 1155 S201, 1155 S202, 1155 C201B, 1155 C202B, 1155 P201E, 1155 P202E, 1155 P203B, 1155 P210B, 1155 P211B, 1155 P212B, 1155 P213B, 1155 P214D, 1155 V202, 1155 V203, 1155 V204, 1155 V205 and L296/LA/01B. Page 7 of 9
8 3) Prior to the commencement of development, a drawing showing details of the proposed ground levels shall be submitted to, and approved in writing by, the local planning authority. 4) Prior to the commencement of development, details and samples of the proposed external materials shall be submitted to, and approved in writing by, the local planning authority. Development shall be carried out in accordance with the approved details and samples. 5) Prior to the commencement of development, details of all boundary treatments shall be submitted to, and approved in writing by, the local planning authority. The approved details shall be implemented prior to first occupation of the development and thereafter retained. 6) Notwithstanding the provisions of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 1995 (as amended on 1st October 2008) (or any Order revoking and re-enacting that Order with or without modification) no buildings, extensions or alterations permitted by Classes A, B, C, D or E of Part 1 of the Second Schedule of the 1995 Order (as amended on 1 st October 2008) shall be carried out. 7) Notwithstanding the provisions of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 1995 (as amended on 1st October 2008) (or any Order revoking and re-enacting that Order with or without modification) no additional windows or openings other than those shown on the approved plans shall be constructed at upper floor level in the side elevations of any of the houses hereby permitted. 8) Prior to the commencement of development or demolition, an arboricultural method statement shall be submitted to, and approved in writing by, the local planning authority. Development shall be carried out in accordance with the approved statement. The erection of fencing for the protection of all trees on the site shall be undertaken in accordance with BS5837:2012 Trees in Relation to Design, Demolition and Construction before any equipment, machinery or materials are brought on to the site for the purposes of the development, and shall be maintained until all equipment, machinery and surplus materials have been removed from the site. Nothing shall be stored or placed in any area fenced in accordance with this condition and the ground levels within those areas shall not be altered, nor shall any excavation be made, without the written approval of the local planning authority. 9) The development shall incorporate the mitigation measures set out in section 5 of the Bat Assessment Report dated July 2012 by the Ash Partnership. 10) Prior to the commencement of development or demolition, a construction method statement shall be submitted to, and approved in writing by, the local planning authority. The statement shall include details of parking for vehicles of site personnel, operatives and visitors; loading and unloading of plant and materials; and storage of plant and materials. All works shall be carried out in accordance with the approved statement. 11) Prior to the commencement of development, a scheme for the control of noise and exhaust emissions shall be submitted to, and approved in writing Page 8 of 9
9 by, the local planning authority. The scheme shall comply with BS5228 (parts 1 and 4) and include all fixed plant, including generators and any piling equipment, used during demolition and construction operations. All works shall be carried out in accordance with the approved scheme. 12) Works related to the construction of the development hereby permitted, including demolition or preparation works prior to building operations, shall not take place outside of the hours of 0800 to 1800 Monday to Friday or 0800 to 1330 on Saturdays and at no time on Sundays or public holidays. 13) Before first occupation of the development hereby permitted, the proposed vehicular access to Dagden Road shall be constructed in accordance with the approved plans. 14) Before first occupation of the development hereby permitted, the parking and manoeuvring areas shall be constructed in accordance with the approved plans. The areas shall be retained and used exclusively for parking and manoeuvring. 15) Before first occupation of the development hereby permitted, the existing redundant accesses from the site to Dagden Road shall be permanently closed and any kerbs, verge and footway reinstated in a manner to be agreed in writing by the local planning authority. 16) Prior to the commencement of development, details of (i) the predicted energy use of the development and (ii) the types of low or zero carbon technologies to be used shall be submitted to, and approved in writing by, the local planning authority. The approved details shall demonstrate how the development will achieve at least a ten per cent reduction in carbon emissions. The approved details shall be implemented prior to the first occupation of the development and retained thereafter. 17) Before first occupation of the development hereby permitted, a final certificate of compliance and assessment report from an assessor accredited by the Building Research Establishment Limited demonstrating that the development has achieved, as a minimum, Code for Sustainable Homes level 3 (November 2011) shall be submitted to the local planning authority. Page 9 of 9
Reference: 05/00928/FUL Officer: Mr David Jeanes
DEVELOPMENT CONTROL BOARD 5 January 2006 Reference: 05/00928/FUL Officer: Mr David Jeanes Location: Proposal: Applicant: Whiffens Farm Clement Street Sutton-At-Hone Kent BR8 7PQ Retrospective application
More informationWard: Purley DELEGATED BUSINESS MEETING Lead Officer: Head of Planning Control week of 23/03/2009
Ward: Purley DELEGATED BUSINESS MEETING Lead Officer: Head of Planning Control week of 23/03/2009 Application No. 09/00389/LP - 51-61 Whytecliffe Road South, Purley, CR8 1. SUMMARY 1.1 This report concerns
More informationDESIGN AND ACCESS STATEMENT
CHANGE OF USE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL ANNEXE TO A SEPARATE DWELLING AND CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW WALL FENCE AND GATES AT LITTLE NOOKE CHAPEL LANE WYRE PIDDLE PERSHORE WORCESTERSHIRE WR10 2JA 1.0 INTRODUCTION
More information143 RUMBUSH LANE SHIRLEY SOLIHULL
2014/514 143 RUMBUSH LANE SHIRLEY Application No: Ward/Area: Location: 2014/514/S BLYTHE 143 RUMBUSH LANE SHIRLEY SOLIHULL Date Registered: 14/03/2014 Applicant: Proposal: MR JAMIE LONG DEMOLITION OF GARAGE
More informationThe land is allocated within the Westbury on Trym Conservation Area and the land is protected by a blanket TPO 340.
SITE DESCRIPTION The site is occupied by a large single dwelling house which was built in 2007. The building is surrounded by large trees and has a substantial rear garden. The land is allocated within
More informationIntroduction. Two storey & first floor rear extensions. two storey rear 1
Introduction This advice leaflet has been produced to help in the planning of your house extension, by identifying the main points to consider, in order to achieve an acceptable proposal. This leaflet
More informationGeneral Advice. 2 front extensions
Introduction This advice leaflet has been produced to help in the planning of your house extension, by identifying the main points to consider, in order to achieve an acceptable proposal. This leaflet
More informationOrchard Barn, Newcastle Road, Blakelow, Cheshire, CW5 7ET. New Detached Double Garage Block with Integrated Garden Store and Loft Storage Area.
Application No: 13/2596N Location: Proposal: Applicant: Expiry Date: Orchard Barn, Newcastle Road, Blakelow, Cheshire, CW5 7ET New Detached Double Garage Block with Integrated Garden Store and Loft Storage
More informationTHE TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 Grant of Planning Permission
Civic Offices Havant Hampshire PO9 2AX Tel (023)9247 4174 Fax(023)9244 6588 DX50005 Havant www.havant.gov.uk To: ADP Architects Ltd Richmond Court 94 Botley Road Park Gate Southampton, Hants SO311BA For:
More informationDevelopment Control Committee 14 April, 2016 WD/D/15/002369 ITEM NUMBER 04
Development Control Committee 14 April, 2016 WD/D/15/002369 ITEM NUMBER 04 Application Number: WD/D/15/002369 Full Registration Date: 23 September, 2015 Application Site: SHUTTERS, CLAPPENTAIL LANE, LYME
More informationName of meeting: PLANNING SUB-COMMITTEE (HEAVY WOOLLEN AREA) Date: 2 OCTOBER 2014
Name of meeting: PLANNING SUB-COMMITTEE (HEAVY WOOLLEN AREA) Date: 2 OCTOBER 2014 Title of report: LOCAL PLANNING AUTHORITY APPEALS Is it likely to result in spending or saving 250k or more, or to have
More information1.1 The application property is an extended two-storey semi-detached house fronting Bedale Road. The side garden adjoins a link road to Wydale Road.
COMMITTEE REPORT Date: 13 October 2011 Ward: Osbaldwick Team: Major and Parish: Osbaldwick Parish Commercial Team Council Reference: 11/02264/FUL Application at: 27 Bedale Avenue Osbaldwick York YO10 3NG
More informationThe Green Belt A Guide for Householders
The Green Belt A Guide for Householders Introduction Much of Mole Valley lies within the Metropolitan Green Belt. This leaflet outlines the purpose, importance and characteristics of the Green Belt and
More informationK M D Hire Services, LONDON ROAD, NANTWICH, CW5 6LU
Application No: 11/2196N Location: Proposal: Applicant: Expiry Date: K M D Hire Services, LONDON ROAD, NANTWICH, CW5 6LU Extension and New Store Mr Dan Mellor 17-Aug-2011 SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION Approve
More informationGeneral Advice. 2 rear single storey
Introduction This advice leaflet has been produced to help in the planning of your house extension, by identifying the main points to consider, in order to achieve an acceptable proposal. This leaflet
More informationName of meeting: PLANNING SUB-COMMITTEE (HEAVY WOOLLEN AREA) Date: 5 FEBRUARY 2015
Name of meeting: PLANNING SUB-COMMITTEE (HEAVY WOOLLEN AREA) Date: 5 FEBRUARY 2015 Title of report: LOCAL PLANNING AUTHORITY APPEALS Is it likely to result in spending or saving 250k or more, or to have
More informationManchester City Council Item 6 Planning and Highways Committee 8 May 2014
Application Number 104843/FO/2014/N1 Date of Appln 28th Feb 2014 Committee Date 8th May 2014 Ward Moston Ward Proposal Location Applicant Agent Change of use of ground floor to a hot food takeaway (Fish
More informationDESIGN GUIDANCE NOTE: 11 PORCHES
DESIGN GUIDANCE NOTE: 11 PORCHES 1. INTRODUCTION This guidance note is one of a series giving advice on various types of development within Barnet. It advises on designing porch extensions including canopies.
More informationK M D Hire Services, LONDON ROAD, NANTWICH, CW5 6LU
Application No: 11/2196N Location: Proposal: Applicant: Expiry Date: K M D Hire Services, LONDON ROAD, NANTWICH, CW5 6LU Extension and New Store Mr Dan Mellor 17-Aug-2011 SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION Approve
More informationPERMISSION A GUIDE FOR EXTENDING A DETACHED OR SEMI-DETACHED HOUSE
PLANNING PERMISSION A GUIDE FOR EXTENDING A DETACHED OR SEMI-DETACHED HOUSE Introduction Foreword by Councilor Dave Smith - Chair of the Planning & Highways Committee. Planning Permissions B Owners of
More informationBASILDON BOROUGH COUNCIL
BASILDON BOROUGH COUNCIL Report to: Planning Committee December 05 PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 5/00699/FULL DEMOLITION OF ALL EXISTING OUTBUILDINGS AND REMOVAL OF ASSOCIATED LAWFUL USES AND TWO NO. RESIDENTIAL
More informationDevelopment Management Report
Committee and Date Central Planning Committee 5 th April 2012 Item 13 Public Development Management Report Responsible Officer: Stuart Thomas email: stuart.thomas@shropshire.gov.uk Tel: 01743 252665 Fax:
More informations p planning Date: 26 April 2012 10 CHRISTCHURCH STREET, LONDON SW3 4AR (LPA APP REF: PP/12/00249/Q21) GROUNDS OF APPEAL
Date: 26 April 2012 Ref: R12229 10 CHRISTCHURCH STREET, LONDON SW3 4AR (LPA APP REF: PP/12/00249/Q21) GROUNDS OF APPEAL 1.1 Based on the Council's reason for refusal we believe the main issue in this case
More informationGuidance on Householder permitted development rights
FORWARD CONTENTS CLOSE Guidance on Householder permitted development rights Circular 1/2012 CONTENTS BACK FORWARD CLOSE 1. INTRODUCTION 04 2. BEFORE STARTING 05 3. MAIN CONCEPTS 07 Principal elevation
More information13 Oakleigh Gardens London N20 9AB
Location 13 Oakleigh Gardens London N20 9AB Reference: 15/00608/HSE Received: 2nd February 2015 Accepted: 2nd February 2015 Ward: Oakleigh Expiry 30th March 2015 Applicant: Mr A Peqini Proposal: Single
More informationPLANNING POLICY 3.3.5
PLANNING POLICY 3.3.5 CHILD CARE PREMISES 1. Introduction A Child Care Premises is used to provide a child care service within the meaning of the Child Care Services Act 2007, but does not include a Family
More informationPOLICY P350.5 Trees on Development Sites and Street Verges. Relevant Management Practice Nil Relevant Delegation Delegations DC 342 and DM 342
POLICY P350.5 Trees on Development Sites and Street Verges Strategic Plan Goal 3 Environmental Management Relevant Management Practice Nil Relevant Delegation Delegations DC 342 and DM 342 Rationale Trees
More informationChange of use of an existing vacant office building to a Bed & Breakfast Guest House (Use Class C1) with proprietor's accommodation.
Item 4a Case Officer Ward Proposal Location Applicant 13/00168/FUL Caron Taylor Adlington And Anderton Change of use of an existing vacant office building to a Bed & Breakfast Guest House (Use Class C1)
More informationAGENT(S) / APPLICANT(S): AGENT Dave Dickerson, DK Architects. APPLICANT Halton Housing Trust. DEVELOPMENT PLAN ALLOCATION: Greenspace.
APPLICATION NO: 14/00168/FUL LOCATION: Land to the west of 19 Crow Wood Lane, Widnes. PROPOSAL: Proposed erection of 10 no. 1 bedroom apartments with individual access doors arranged in 2no. 2 storey height
More informationPage 19. Report of the Executive Head of Planning and Transportation. Ref: A2010/62734/FUL WARD: A03 / STONECOT Time Taken: 7 weeks, 0 days
Page 19 Agenda Item 3 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE - Date: 23 June 2010 Report of the Executive Head of Planning and Transportation. Ref: A2010/62734/FUL WARD: A03 / STONECOT Time Taken: 7 weeks, 0 days
More information10.1 WILL HEY FARM WATFORD LANE NEW MILLS RETENSION OF NEW STABLE BLOCK, SAND PADDOCK AND ASSOCIATED EARTHWORKS AND LANDSCAPING (FULL - MINOR)
HPK/2012/0207 03/04/2012 WILL HEY FARM WATFORD LANE NEW MILLS MR & MRS M WILSON KIRSTY WILSON EQUINE AND WILL HEY FARM BED & BREAKFAST RETENSION OF NEW STABLE BLOCK, SAND PADDOCK AND ASSOCIATED EARTHWORKS
More informationGloucester City Council
Gloucester City Council Interim Adoption Supplementary Planning Document August 2008 CONTENTS page 1-2 page 3-6 page 7-19 page 18-26 page 27 1. Introduction 2. Before you design your extension Good Neighbourliness
More informationRotherham Metropolitan Borough Council
Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council Town and Country Planning Act 1990 Self Architects The White House 24A St Andrews Road Sheffield S11 9AL Reference RB2014/1110 Decision Date 20 October 2014 Description
More informationCITY OF SUBIACO. PLANNING POLICY 1.4 (September 2013) PUBLIC NOTIFICATION OF PLANNING PROPOSALS
CITY OF SUBIACO PLANNING POLICY 1.4 (September 2013) PUBLIC NOTIFICATION OF PLANNING PROPOSALS ADOPTION DATE: to be inserted AUTHORITY: TOWN PLANNING SCHEME NO. 4 STATE PLANNING POLICY 3.1 RESIDENTIAL
More information3. The consent hereby granted does not include any external alterations.
Keith WARD 23 02/00425/FUL 19th March 2002 Change of use of retail shop to form pool room at 150 Mid Street Keith Banffshire AB55 3BJ for Mr Gordon Maver Comments: This application is being referred to
More informationDevelopment in the Green Belt
PLANNING, TRANSPORTATION & STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENT Development in the Green Belt June 2007 This Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) outlines the purpose, importance and characteristics of the Green Belt
More informationSOUTH CAMBRIDGESHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL
SOUTH CAMBRIDGESHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL REPORT TO: Planning Committee 6 October 2010 AUTHOR/S: Executive Director (Operational Services)/Corporate Manager (Planning and New Communities) S/0790/10/F GREAT
More informationR&S. August 2014 Prepared by RandS Associated Srl. 1. Introduction
Building Engineer UK Registration Board n.075077h Design and Access Statement for Application for Planning Permission for demolition of a garage and construction of an extension to an existing Victorian
More informationPLANNING SERVICES UNIT
SUPPLEMENTARY PLANNING GUIDANCE DEVELOPMENT INVOLVING HORSES PLANNING SERVICES UNIT 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 This document provides supplementary planning guidance on development involving horses, which is
More informationRotherham Metropolitan Borough Council
Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council Town and Country Planning Act 1990 Eton Construction Ltd Mr P Harris 79a Wellgate Rotherham S60 2LZ Reference RB2014/1538 Decision Date 08 January 2015 Description
More informationDepartment for Communities and Local Government
Department for Communities and Local Government Permitted development for householders Technical Guidance April 2014 Department for Communities and Local Government Please note: This technical guidance
More informationGuidance Note on the Need for Planning Permission for the Development of Existing Houses and Flats (effective from 6 February 2012)
de Guidance Note on the Need for Planning Permission for the Development of Existing Houses and Flats (effective from 6 February 2012) Introduction The rules governing permitted development (that is, whether
More informationDEVELOPMENT BRIEF FOR LAND AT ALLOA ROAD, TULLIBODY
DEVELOPMENT BRIEF FOR LAND AT ALLOA ROAD, TULLIBODY 1.0 Introduction and Purpose 1.1 Clackmannanshire Council is seeking to dispose of a site at Alloa Road, Tullibody for redevelopment. The site extends
More information1 Welcome. The exhibition comprises a series of boards which provide some background information to show you our initial ideas for the site.
1 Welcome Thank you for taking the time to attend this public exhibition of our proposals for residential development on Land at Daws Farm, Back Road, Writtle (site shown opposite). The exhibition comprises
More informationDevelopment Control Committee 14 April, 2016 WD/D/15/002323 ITEM NUMBER 03. Proposal: Erection of 2no. dwellings in grounds of existing house
Development Control Committee 14 April, 2016 WD/D/15/002323 ITEM NUMBER 03 Application Number: WD/D/15/002323 Outline Registration Date: 19 October, 2015 Application Site: 10 WINTERS LANE, PORTESHAM, WEYMOUTH,
More informationLong Ditton Ward: Alex King Expiry Date: 24/03/2010 Location:
Application No: 2009/2315 Application Type: FULL Case Officer: Long Ditton Ward: Alex King Expiry Date: 24/03/2010 Location: Kingston House Portsmouth Road Thames Ditton Surrey Proposal: Variation of Condition
More informationHome Office, Home Occupation and Home Business
, Home Occupation and Home Business Introduction This fact sheet provides summary information on requirements for, Home Occupation and Home Business proposals. It is not a definitive document but provides
More informationPlanning, Design & Access Statement
Planning, Design & Access Statement Hazell House, Burnthurst Lane, Princethorpe Client: Warwickshire & Northamptonshire Air Ambulance IG Land & Planning 1 Thornton Close, Crick, Northants, NN6 7GE Tel/Fax
More informationGuidance on Non-Material Amendments and Minor Material Amendments
Minerals and Waste Forum Implementation Planning Advisory Group Guidance on Non-Material Amendments and Minor Material Amendments April 2012 1 Non-Material Amendments and Minor Material Amendments 1) Non-material
More informationBUILDING AND DEVELOPMENT TRIBUNAL - DECISION
APPEAL File No. Insert No. 3-06-004 Integrated Planning Act 1997 BUILDING AND DEVELOPMENT TRIBUNAL - DECISION Assessment Manager: Site Address: Gold Coast City Council withheld- the subject site Applicant:
More informationRelevant Planning History P/2006/1070: Demolition of building and construction of supermarket and 14 2 bed flats. Withdrawn.
P/2010/1404/MPA St Marychurch Ward Former G A Insurance Buildng, Greenway Road/St Marychurch Road, St Marychurch Torquay Demolition of former G A building; formation of up to 7 retail units for purposes
More informationSEVENOAKS DISTRICT COUNCIL RESIDENTIAL EXTENSIONS SUPPLEMENTARY PLANNING DOCUMENT
SEVENOAKS DISTRICT COUNCIL RESIDENTIAL EXTENSIONS SUPPLEMENTARY PLANNING DOCUMENT Adopted by the Council On 7 May 2009 1 CONTENT AND STRUCTURE 1 Introduction What is the Supplementary Planning Document?
More informationHouseholder Design Guide
Householder Design Guide A guide for householders to help with the planning and design of house extensions June 2012 www.scambs.gov.uk 03450 450 500 SCDC/HDG/v2/01.06.2012 Content 1.0 1.1 1.2 Introduction
More informationReport to Planning applications committee Item Date 6 March 2014 Head of planning services
Report to Planning applications committee Item Date 6 March 2014 Report of Head of planning services 4(7) Subject 13/02051/F Former Wellesley First School Wellesley Avenue North Norwich NR1 4NT Description:
More informationItem Date Received 11th February 2015 Officer Mr Sav Patel Target Date 8th April 2015 Ward Abbey
PLANNING COMMITTEE Date: 5 TH AUGUST 2015 Application Number 15/0068/FUL Agenda Item Date Received 11th February 2015 Officer Mr Sav Patel Target Date 8th April 2015 Ward Abbey Site 10 Coldhams Lane Cambridge
More informationTHE GRANGE, SOUTH PARK DRIVE, POYNTON, CHESHIRE, SK12 1BS
Application No: 15/4137M Location: Proposal: Applicant: Expiry Date: THE GRANGE, SOUTH PARK DRIVE, POYNTON, CHESHIRE, SK12 1BS Demolition of detached dwelling house and associated buildings, and erection
More information4 Alternatives and Design Evolution
4 Introduction 4.1 This Chapter describes the considerations and constraints influencing the siting, layout and massing of the Development. It also describes the main alternatives to the Development that
More informationFULL APPLICATION FOR ERECTION OF GARAGE MAINTENANCE UNIT AND PORTABLE OFFICE CABIN
6 February 2015 Delivered by post and planning portal Planning and Building Control Nuneaton and Bedworth Borough Council Town Hall Coton Road Nuneaton Warwickshire CV11 5AA Dear Sirs, FULL APPLICATION
More informationErection of replacement warehouse building and erection of two buildings in connection with builder s merchants
Plan: O 02/00708/FUL Thames Ward (A) Address: Development: Applicant: London Works, Ripple Road, Barking Erection of replacement warehouse building and erection of two buildings in connection with builder
More informationDevelopment proposals will require to demonstrate, according to scale, type and location, that they:-
Appendix 2 : Relevant Development Plan Policies Angus Local Plan Review 2009 Policy S1 : Development Boundaries (a) Within development boundaries proposals for new development on sites not allocated on
More informationHouse Code. House Code
1 Application This Code will apply in assessing material change of use and/or building work for a house. 2 Using this Code In using this Code reference should also be made to Section 1.1 How to use the
More informationState Planning Policy 3.1 Residential Design Codes
State Planning Policy 3.1 Residential Design Codes Prepared under section 26 of the Planning and Development Act 2005 by the Western Australian Planning Commission. Replaces State Planning Policy 3.1 as
More informationAPPLICATION NO. 15/P/00168 RECEIVED: 27-Mar-2015. Change of use of shop to residential flat (first floor) and shop alterations
DATE OF COMMITTEE: 12-May-2015 APPLICATION NO. 15/P/00168 RECEIVED: 27-Mar-2015 PROPOSAL: Change of use of shop to residential flat (first floor) and shop alterations LOCATION: APPLICATION TYPE: APPLICANT:
More informationDevelopment Variance Permit Application Package
When do I need a Development Variance Permit? Development Variance Permit Application Package If my proposed development does not meet the standards set out in the Zoning Regulation Bylaw on matters that
More informationPlease describe the proposal accurately and concisely. State the number of storeys proposed and the position of any extensions.
Householder Application for Planning Permission for Works or Extension to a Dwelling and for Relevant Demolition in a Conservation Area Town and Country Planning Act 1990 1. Applicant Name and Address
More informationVEHICLE CROSSOVER INFORMATION PACK
VEHICLE CROSSOVER INFORMATION PACK CONTENTS Introduction Section A Section B Section C Section D Section E Criteria for approving a vehicle crossover application (Diagrams to demonstrate measurement criteria)
More informationLONDON ROAD SEVENOAKS
WELCOME TO THE BERKELEY HOMES EXHIBITION Train Station Gr anv i ll e Dar tford Road Lo ad Ro nd on ad Ro Eard SITE Th ed riv e ley R oad on R oad A 224 Gord Pem b rok e Roa d Site Location Since the submission
More informationWalsall Council Validation Guide for submitting a Householder Planning Application
Walsall Council Validation Guide for submitting a Householder Planning Application Householder Planning Application Guide Introduction This guide offers help to people who are submitting a Householder
More informationDemolition & Construction Management Plan
Demolition & Construction Management Plan 72 76 Cadogan lane SW1 Demolition & Construction Management Plan Issue Date: March 2013 Contents: 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Objectives of the Plan 1.2 Project Overview
More informationHARROGATE BOROUGH COUNCIL
HARROGATE BOROUGH COUNCIL PLANNING COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM 6: LIST OF PLANS. DATE: 31 July 2007 PLAN: 02 CASE NUMBER: 07/02712/RG3 GRID REF: EAST 430361NORTH 454848 APPLICATION NO. 6.79.1519.B.RG3 DATE MADE
More informationDesign and Access Statement. 141-145 Earls Court Road London SW5 9RH
J U L I A N A R E N D T A S S O C I A T E S 1 7 a P i n d o c k M e w s L i t t l e V e n i c e L o n d o n W 9 2 P Y F + 4 4 2 0 7 2 8 6 9 9 0 1 Design and Access Statement T + 4 4 2 0 7 2 8 6 9 9 9 1
More information5. Specific Use Regulations
5. Specific Use Regulations 5.1 Application 5.1.1 The specific use regulations shall apply to all development unless otherwise exempted in this section. 5.1.2 Where these regulations may be in conflict
More informationSite No 17 Former Weston Vinyls Site, Frome Location
Location Former Weston Vinyls site is situated on the A362 Vallis Road in the Western Part of Frome. The surrounding uses are primarily residential with residential to the North East and West. The Vallis
More informationextending your home home extensions design guide draft
extending your home home extensions design guide draft september2004 extending your home home extensions design guide draft september2004 foreword Welcome to Birmingham City Council s guide to help you
More informationCouncillor R. Hollingworth has requested that this application be considered by the Committee, rather than being determined under delegated powers.
Name of Applicant Type of Certificate Proposal Map/Plan Policy Plan Date Mr Timothy D. Hosking A Proposed extension to form bespoke living accommodation for disabled family member (As augmented by information
More informationMount Browne (Surrey Police Head Quarters), Sandy Lane, Guildford Vision Statement. November 2013. with
Mount Browne (Surrey Police Head Quarters), Sandy Lane, Guildford Vision Statement November 2013 with Tibbalds Planning & Urban Design 19 Maltings Place 169 Tower Bridge Road London SE1 3JB Telephone 020
More informationapproval of matters specified in conditions; and The Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (Scotland) Regulations 2013
Application for: planning permission; planning permission in principle; further applications; approval of matters specified in conditions; and mineral workings (if the planning authority do not have a
More informationAdvice can also be sought from specific specialist officers in the Council.
Canterbury City Council Validation of Planning Applications Guidance note 2010: Introduction Up to date advice on the validation of planning applications is contained in the CLG Guidance on information
More informationApplication No : 14/00957/FULL3 Ward: Penge And Cator. Applicant : Travis Perkins (Properties) Limited Objections : NO
SECTION 2 Applications meriting special consideration Application No : 14/00957/FULL3 Ward: Penge And Cator Address : 14 Anerley Station Road Penge London SE20 8PY OS Grid Ref: E: 534681 N: 169887 Applicant
More information2015/0332 Reg Date 13/04/2015 Bagshot
2015/0332 Reg Date 13/04/2015 Bagshot LOCATION: PROPOSAL: TYPE: APPLICANT: OFFICER: NOTCUTTS GARDEN CENTRE, 150-152 LONDON ROAD, BAGSHOT, GU19 5DG Variation of Condition 3 and 10 of planning permission
More informationPrior Notification of Proposed Demolition Validation Checklist
Prior Notification of Proposed Demolition Validation Checklist Introduction Submitting your application can be made easier by ensuring you have submitted all of the necessary information. Should important
More informationDivision 51-4.400. Yard, Lot, and Space Regulations.
Division 51-4.400. Yard, Lot, and Space Regulations. SEC. 51-4.401. MINIMUM FRONT YARD. (a) General provisions. (1) Required front yards must be open and unobstructed except for fences. Except as otherwise
More informationTHE ROYAL BOROUGH OF KENSINGTON AND CHELSEA PLANNING APPLICATIONS COMMITTEE 16/06/2015
THE ROYAL BOROUGH OF KENSINGTON AND CHELSEA PLANNING APPLICATIONS COMMITTEE 16/06/2015 REPORT BY THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, PLANNING AND BOROUGH DEVELOPMENT Application: /PP/15/02000 Agenda Item: N34 Address:
More informationPerth and Kinross Council Development Control Committee 18 March 2009 Recommendation by Development Quality Manager
Perth and Kinross Council Development Control Committee 18 March 2009 Recommendation by Development Quality Manager 4(9) 09/161 Alteration and Extension to Existing Public House to Provide a New Bookmakers
More informationBY THE DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENT AND NEIGHBOURHOOD SERVICES READING BOROUGH COUNCIL ITEM NO. 13 PLANNING APPLICATIONS COMMITTEE: 11 February 2015
COMMITTEE REPORT BY THE DIRECTOR OF ENVIRONMENT AND NEIGHBOURHOOD SERVICES READING BOROUGH COUNCIL ITEM NO. 13 PLANNING APPLICATIONS COMMITTEE: 11 February 2015 Ward: Mapledurham App No.: 141257 Address:
More informationTEMPORARY ACCOMMODATION
INTRODUCTION The City of Vincent is situated within close proximity to the Perth Central Business District, public transport networks, tourist attractions and education facilities. As such, it is well
More informationAGRICULTURAL BUILDING WITH PHOTOVOLTARIC SOLAR PANELS TO SOUTH FACING ROOF
DC/2015/00494 AGRICULTURAL BUILDING WITH PHOTOVOLTARIC SOLAR PANELS TO SOUTH FACING ROOF LAND AT ONEN, ADJACENT TO B4233, NP25 5EN. RECOMMENDATION: APPROVE Case Officer: Elizabeth Bennett Date Registered:
More informationDevelopment Management Officer Report Committee Application. Summary
Development Management Officer Report Committee Application Summary Committee Meeting Date: 15 Dec 2015 Item Number: Application ID: Z/2014/0978/F Target Date: 31 st October 2014 Proposal: Single storey
More informationNo. 132. Land Use and Building Act (132/1999, amendment 222/2003 included) Chapter 1. General provisions. Section 1 General objective of the Act
NB: UNOFFICIAL TRANSLATION FINLAND No. 132 Land Use and Building Act (132/1999, amendment 222/2003 included) In accordance with the decision of Parliament the following is enacted: Chapter 1 General provisions
More information1 & 2 Brooklyn Cottages, Portsmouth Road, Bursledon, Southampton, SO31 8EP
BURSLEDON, HAMBLE-LE-RICE & HOUND Thursday 02 February 2006 Case Officer Rachel Illsley SITE: & 2 Brooklyn Cottages, Portsmouth Road, Bursledon, Southampton, SO3 8EP Ref. F/05/55659 Received: 24//2005
More informationSite Deliverability Statement Development at: Beech Lane, Kislingbury. Persimmon Homes Midlands March 2015
Site Deliverability Statement Development at: Beech Lane, Kislingbury Persimmon Homes Midlands March 2015 Contents Site Deliverability Statement Development at: Beech Lane, Kislingbury 1.INTRODUCTION 1.1
More informationApplication No. 12/00349/FUL Ward: Longbridge. 33 Faircross Parade, Longbridge Road, Barking
Application No. 12/00349/FUL Ward: Longbridge Reason for Referral to DCB as set out in Section I of the Council Constitution Address: Development: Applicant: The application has attracted two petitions
More informationRelating to Supplementary Guidance Rural Development (RD) 1 and Special Types of Rural Land (STRL) type 2.
PLANNING ADVICE 13/2012 HOUSING AND BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT IN THE COUNTRYSIDE AND GREENBELT Relating to Supplementary Guidance Rural Development (RD) 1 and Special Types of Rural Land (STRL) type 2. CONTENTS
More informationCONTROL OF POLLUTION ACT 1974, SECTION 61 PRIOR CONSENT APPLICATION CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION SITE NOISE
CONTROL OF POLLUTION ACT 1974, SECTION 61 PRIOR CONSENT APPLICATION CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION SITE NOISE I/WE HEREBY MAKE APPLICATION to the London Borough of Merton Council for Prior Consent under Section
More informationWELCOME TO OUR EXHIBITION
WELCOME TO OUR EXHIBITION The purpose of the exhibition is to provide you with the opportunity to view our proposals and give feedback prior to the submission of a planning application to the London Borough
More informationHouseholder Applications: Supplementary Planning Guidance GENERAL POINTS
Householder Applications: Supplementary Planning Guidance Environment Committee: 28 January 2004 Chief Planning Officer Town Hall The Parade Epsom Surrey KT18 5BY tel 01372 732000 web www.epsom-ewell.gov.uk
More informationKINGSTON TOWN PLANNING SUB-COMMITTEE 23 MARCH 2005. YELLOW BOX STORAGE 163-165, LONDON ROAD AND 50, GORDON ROAD, Application Number: 05/12156
APPENDIX C KINGSTON TOWN PLANNING SUB-COMMITTEE 23 MARCH 2005 YELLOW BOX STORAGE 163-165, LONDON ROAD AND 50, GORDON ROAD, Application Number: 05/12156 REPORT BY HEAD OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY
More informationHouseholder Development
Supplementary Planning Guidance LDP7 Householder Development (Revision Number 2) Adopted November 2010 Planning Officers Society for Wales Mr Pat Mears, Chief Planning Officer Planning Division Is-Adran
More informationSECTION 5 RESIDENTIAL R1 ZONE
SECTION 5 RESIDENTIAL R1 ZONE 5.1 GENERAL PURPOSE OF THE R1 ZONE The R1 Zone is the most restrictive residential zone, and provides for and regulates single detached dwellings. The zone variations are
More informationApplication Decision
Application Decision By Gina Warman Appointed by the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs The Planning Inspectorate Common Land Casework Team 4/05 Kite Wing Temple Quay House 2 The
More information