Pricing Fundamentals in Europe. ABA Pricing Conduct Committee and International Committee 30 May 2013
|
|
- June Underwood
- 7 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Pricing Fundamentals in Europe ABA Pricing Conduct Committee and International Committee 30 May 2013
2 Panel Members -Pedro Callol, Partner, Roca Junyent, Madrid/Barcelona -Magdalena Brenning Louko, Senior Policy Analyst, DG Comp, Brussels -John Ratliff, Partner, WilmerHale, Brussels -Frédéric Puel, Partner, Fidal, Brussels/Paris
3 Session Outline 1. The System of Competition Enforcement in Europe. The regulation of vertical restraints (Pedro Callol) 2. Detailed discussion on the regulation of supply and distribution agreements. RPM. Pricing on the Internet (Magdalena Brenning) 3. Focus of NCAs on RPM. Hub-and-spoke cartels (John Ratliff) 4. Price variations accross customers, including price discrimination. The issue of parallel trade (Frederic Puel) 5. Pricing tied to competitors. MFNs and MFCs (Magdalena Brenning) 6. Further discussion on price discrimination (Frederic Puel) 7. Overview of the law applicable to pricing under Art. 102 (Pedro Callol) 8. Discussion of the recent Post Danmark case (John Ratliff)
4 1. The System of Competition Enforcement in Europe. The regulation of vertical restraints Pedro Callol
5 The main provisions in the Treaty of Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) Article 101 TFEU Rough equivalent to Sec. 1 Sherman Act General prohibition on agreements which have as their object or effect the restriction of competition and which affect trade between MS Agreements under the first parag. are void Forbidden agreements may be allowed in block or in individual cases if they achieve positive effects for the economy and allow consumers a fair share Article 102 TFEU Rough equivalent to Sec. 2 Sherman Act Does not forbid monopoly or acquisition of market power as such, but the abuse of a dominant position
6 EU and National Competition Law Key concept for the application of Articles 101 and 102 TFEU: may affect trade between Member States EU Member States have their own national competition provisions largely mirroring Articles 101 and 102 TFEU Anticompetitive conduct often caught by both national and EU law If no inter-state trade affection: national law alone (which must not pose an obstacle to uniform application of competition law throughout EU)
7 Competition Law Enforcement (ii) European Commission. Has power to enforce Articles 101 and 102 by investigating and fining infringements Pre-emption rule: if the European Commission initiates antitrust proceedings, National Competition Authorities (NCAs) must abstain from acting NCAs are competent to apply EU competition law and national competition law Together they form the European Competition Network (ECN) active cooperation and information on matters
8 Competition Law Enforcement (iii) System of allocation of cases between European Commission and NCAs System of work-sharing, case allocation based on sharing information on new files and determining who is best positioned (NCA for a matter affecting a single State; European Commission for matters affecting three or more Member States) National courts also have power to apply Articles 101 and 102 in legal controversies between companies Direct effect of Articles 101 and 102 TFEU Courts can also award damages
9 Regulation of Vertical Restraints in Europe Agreements between principal and distributor are agreements between undertakings as pointed out under Article TFEU Article provides for the possibility of block exemptions Legislation currently in force is Regulation 330/2010, of 20 April, on application of Article to categories of vertical agreements Guidelines on Vertical Restraints Regulation and Guidelines available: /vertical.html
10 2. Detailed discussion on the regulation of supply and distribution agreements. RPM. Pricing on the Internet Magdalena Brenning 10
11 EU Competition rules for supply and distribution agreements Effects-based approach with Vertical Restraints Block Exemption Regulation (VRBER) and Vertical Restraints Guidelines (VRGL) Apply to agreements between non-competitors concerning the sale and purchase of goods and services for all sectors, both on- and offline VRBER creates a wide safe harbour by presuming that vertical agreements are not leading to net negative effects for consumers and are thus exempted under Article 101(3) if: Market share of supplier and buyer does not exceed 30% Agreement does not contain any of the so-called hardcore restrictions Above 30% individual assessment under Article
12 Hardcore Restrictions Serious restrictions of competition (Art 4 VRBER): prohibited in most cases because of their harm to consumers Resale Price Maintenance (RPM): agreeing fixed or minimum resale price (not maximum and recommended resale prices) Sale restrictions on the buyer: in principle a buyer/distributor should be free to resell where and to whom it wants Hardcore restrictions apply to off- and online sales VRGL clarify and provide examples of hardcore restrictions 12
13 Hardcore Restrictions: RPM VRGL describe the numerous possible negative effects of RPM, but also some potential positive effects (section VI.2.10) Hardcore approach motivated not only by seriousness of possible negative effects, but also by doubts about effectiveness and indispensability of RPM to obtain efficiencies Hardcore approach supported by case experience of Commission and NCAs and by (scarce) other empirical data 13
14 Restrictions: RPM Effects basedhardcore approach with reversed order of bringing forward evidence and showing effects RPM: general questions under Article 101(3) Likelihood that RPM will induce the retailers to provide extra services/promotion? Incentive for retailers to spend the extra money on extra services if still free riding? Indispensability: not directly contract the extra services? Benefit to consumers: to most or only new/marginal consumers? RPM: general questions under Article 101(1) Buyer or supplier driven? Competing vertical structures or sales through same distributors? Market shares and cumulative market coverage? Mature or dynamic markets? 14
15 Pricing on the Internet General rules on resale restrictions apply to offand online sales Restrictions on the distributor s use of the internet are generally considered as hardcore restrictions of passive sales, e.g. dual pricing (VRGL 52(d)) Possible for the supplier to offer a fixed fee to support the distributor s offline efforts (VRGL 52(d)) Efficiency defence under Article 101(3) possible but unlikely (VRGL 64) 15
16 3. Focus of NCAs on RPM. Hub-and-spoke cartels John Ratliff
17 Recommended prices Rpm generally unlawful (with frequent enforcement at national competition authority ( NCA ) level) Recommended prices usually considered lawful due to their unilateral and non-binding nature But participation in a price monitoring system which aims to ensure adherence to recommended prices on retail level may be unlawful E.g. The Bundeskartellamt recently imposed a 20 million fine on a company that was de facto fixing prices through economic pressure on retailers who were not following recommendations, e.g. through oral threats to reduce rebates (see, B5-20/10 BKartA decision of 20 August 2012).
18 Hub and spoke information Concept: exchange Retailer A discloses to supplier B its future pricing intentions in circumstances where A may be taken to intend that B will make use of that information to influence market conditions by passing that information to other retailers B does in fact pass that information to C, another retailer, who is aware of the background of the information transfer from A to B C does in fact act upon the information in determining future pricing intentions (see, JJB Sports, UK Court of Appeal, 2006 EWCA Civ 1318, para. 141) Could be other way around also (i.e. A and C suppliers; B the retailer coordinator)
19 Hub and spoke (2) Enforcement focus of National Competition Authorities ( NCAs ) so far (e.g. UK, Germany). For example, in April 2010 the Bundeskartellamt issued an preliminary and informal guidance letter during its investigation concerning price maintenance in the food sector in Germany, where it explicitly addressed the issue ( Handreichung, WuW 2010, p ). e.g. prohibition of coordination on range of goods, sales strategy or advertising between the retailer and the supplier, provided that the intention or effect is the indirect coordination on prices or other competitive parameters between the retailers (para. 4(d)).
20 Hub and spoke (3) Note that in EU law, actual effect may not be required for an infringement, if the unlawful information exchange occurs Many retail suppliers have active compliance procedures in this area, emphasising: that information supplied to retailers is confidential; and may not be passed on. Particularly in the context of category management.
21 4. Price variations accross customers, including price discrimination. The issue of parallel trade Frederic Puel 21
22 Price variations across customers, including price discrimination Legal context Price discrimination prohibited before 2008 (until the Economy Modernization Act) in France as a restrictive competition practice. Current situation: Under both EU and French Law, Price discrimination expressly considered as an anti-competitive practice sanctioned - Articles L of the French Commercial Code and/or Article 101 TFEU Prohibition of anticompetitive agreements) Exemption is possible - Articles L of the French Commercial Code and/or Article 102 of the TFEU (prohibition of abuses of a dominant position). 22
23 The particular case of pharmaceuticals Specific situation of the pharmaceutical industry when Competition rules to be applied Laboratories negotiate reimbursement prices with national social security administrations - Prices vary from one country to the other - To make a margin, wholesalers organize the orders to reexport towards the country where the price is higher To minimize this loss, Laboratories - Impede parallel imports (see Bayer v Commission, T- 41/96, 26 October 2000) - Organize price discrimination to reduce the benefit of parallel imports (GSK v Commission, T-168/01, 27 September 2006 and C-501/06, 6 October 2009) 23
24 The particular case of pharmaceuticals (EU level) In the GSK case, Commission has fined GSK for having concluded with Spanish wholesalers an agreement containing different prices depending on whether the products are to be sold in Spain or in another Member State. In the GSK case, the Court (C-501/06) considered - that the system put in place could provide an economic advantage by contributing to innovation. - that the specificities of the pharmaceutical sector have to be taken into consideration if they might have an impact on the results of the analysis 24
25 The particular case of pharmaceuticals (EU level) In the Lélos Kai Sia case (C-468/06 16 September 2008), the ECJ considered that the fact for a laboratory to refuse to meet orders introduced by some wholesalers known to be active in the export of medicine, is prohibited under art 102 TFUE The specificity of the pharmaceutical sector was not taken into account But dominant pharmaceutical companies can protect their commercial interests by restricting parallel trade (reasonably and proportionally) 25
26 The particular case of pharmaceuticals (French level) The specificity of the pharmaceutical sector is also taken into account by the French Authority (ADLC) ADLC 20 December 2005 GSK laboratories may protect their commercial interests by refusing to deliver a product at an administered price to an exporter if it s only aimed at making profits by selling it on a foreign market ADLC recently launched an inquiry in the pharmaceutical sector (Decision 13-SOA-01): - Issue of laboratories pricing policy - Relationships between laboratories, wholesalers and dispensing chemists in the price fixing 26
27 5. Pricing tied to competitors. MFNs and MFCs Magdalena Brenning
28 Pricing Tied to Competitors: MFCs Two types of price commitment agreements: across-sellers (e.g. price-match guarantees) and across-buyers (e.g. most favoured customer clauses, MFCs). MFCs: contractual arrangement that guarantees the distributor the best wholesale price the supplier gives to any distributor. Distributors are free in setting the retail price. Normally a restriction by effect. Risk: possible reduced incentive for the supplier to compete on prices. Block exempted if market share (supplier s and buyer s) does not exceed 30%. 28
29 Pricing Tied to Competitors: MFCs Recent cases where the MFC clause concerns the retail price (price parity clause), e.g. e-books, online hotel booking cases Supplier upstream. Platforms as distributors downstream. Supplier guarantees the best retail price of goods/services offered on a certain platform. Risk: possible foreclosure of platforms and reduced incentive for the supplier to compete on prices. In addition, only possible if supplier imposes RPM on distributors or if genuine agency agreement (supplier sets the retail price). RPM if non-genuine agency is not allowed to effectively share its commission with final customers. 29
30 Pricing Tied to Competitors: MFCs Third scenario. Platform does not operate as a distributor or agent but rents out space on its platform for the supplier to distribute its goods/services, e.g. ebay. Platform upstream. Supplier downstream. Supplier guarantees the best retail price of goods/services offered on a certain platform. Possible to consider it as a sort of exclusive dealing cf platform with a shopping mall. Normally restriction by effect. Risk: possible foreclosure of other platforms and reduced competition between incumbent platforms. 30
31 6. Further discussion on price discrimination Frédéric Puel
32 Price discrimination: recent developments at the EU level EUROPEAN DECISION Post Danmark case (ECJ 27 March 2012): focus on the price discrimination part A Danish company offered selectively low prices to the three main clients of its own main competitor. The prices where below average total costs, but above average variable costs. ECJ: such prices may constitute an abuse only if - It results in having an exclusionary effect on competitors considered to be as efficient as it is itself (effects-based approach) - and that such pricing policy cannot be objectively justified 32
33 Price discrimination: recent developments at the EU level EUROPEAN DECISION Clearstream case (General Court - 9 September 2009) Clearstream, which is in a dominant position, applied higher prices to its competitor for equivalent services (primary cleaning and settlement services related to them) than the prices applied to similar clients ECJ discussed about 3 points: - Existence of a discrimination (price difference for equivalent services) - Which is not objectively justified - And places the competitor at a competitive disadvantage no need to prove an effective deterioration of the competitive position of the competitor 33
34 FRENCH DECISIONS: Price discrimination: recent developments at the French level ADLC 3 September 2007: application to CIPHA or its subcontractors of prices two times lower for the use of its public loading/unloading equipment than those applied to CIPHA s competitors such as the plaintiff fine of 2.8 million ADLC 9 December 2009, 24 January 2012 and 13 December 2012: mobile phone companies were sanctioned for having offered to their clients different prices depending on whether the calls were made on net or off net. This practice raised barriers to entry for new operators! 34
35 7. Overview of the law applicable to pricing under Art. 102 TFEU Pedro Callol
36 Intro to Article 102 TFEU Article 102 TFEU requires Dominant position (market power) Abusive conduct Abuses related to price Predatory pricing Targetting and price discrimination Fidelity rebates Excessive pricing Margin squeezing
37 Predatory, discriminatory pricing Predatory pricing: Areeda-Turner test Akzo case (case C-62/86): (i) prices below AVC are abusive; (ii) prices above AVC but below ATC are abusive if part of plan to eliminate competitor Measure of cost is varying. Must be regarded case by case (Akzo); in network industries LRAIC is basic measure of costs Evidence of recoupment not required (Tetra Pak II, case T- 83/91; Wanadoo v. Commission, case T-340/03) Selective price cutting: Compagnie Maritime Belge (cases C-395, 396/96): dominant firm reduces prices only to customers approached by new entrant Discrimination, e.g., vertically integrated company charging more to client who at the same is competitor downstream Discrimination is in principle fine if economically justified
38 Exclusionary rebates Fidelity rebates by dominant company may amount to exclusive dealing/monopolization Michelin case (C-322/81): rebates granted only if sales targets of great majority of purchasing needs yearly purchased from Michelin. Also British Airways c. Commission (case C-95/04) Intel (Decision 13/6/2009) and Tomra (case C- 549/10)
39 Excessive pricing Measure of excessive pricing based on costs (Port of Helsinborg, Decision of 23/6/2004); United Brands (case C-27/76). Comparison with other equally efficiently managed companies Comparison with prices charged in other Member States (SACEM, case C-110/88) Prices charged by the same dominant enterprise overtime (British Leyland, case 226/84) Counterfactual exercise of fair price in competition (Commission Communication on Access in the Telecoms sector)
40 Margin squeeze British Sugar (Commission Decision 19/10/88) Deutsche Telekom (C-280/08) Telia Sonera (case C-52/09) Telefonica (case T-336/07)
41 8. Discussion of the recent Post Danmark case John Ratliff
42 Background of Post Danmark case Reference from Danish Court to European Court of Justice ( ECJ ), asking for clarification of EU law Post Danmark ( PD ) had been found to abuse its dominant position in the distribution of non-addressed mail in Denmark through selective prices which were discriminatory because not in its general tariff; and not applied to its existing clients (para.8) although no proof of a strategy to drive out competitors PD had made offers to three customers of its main rival Forbruger-Kontakt a-s ( FK ) and won them, but this did not cause an actual exclusionary effect. FK won back two customers later. One offer was above average incremental cost (aic), but below average total cost (atc); the other two were above atc.
43 ECJ Ruling Case C-209/10, Judgment of 27 March 2012 No violation of Art. 102 if a dominant company simply lowers a price selectively, but the price is > aic, < atc and it is not shown that the price was set with the aim of eliminating a competitor (para. 44) Danish Competition Authority ( DCA ) wrong to conclude that a practice is an exclusionary abuse just because it involves price discrimination (e.g. different prices to different customers or single price to all) (para. 30) Referring court has to decide if an as efficient competitor can compete with these prices without losses which would be impossible to support in the long term (paras 38,39)
44 ECJ Ruling (2) If referring court finds anti-competitive effects, the Court also has to consider any justifications, e.g. Whether objective necessity Whether exclusionary effect may be counterbalanced or outweighed by efficiencies which (equally) benefit consumers. (Up to PD to show). Simple fact that an efficiency criterion is not included in PD s price tariffs is not a reason to exclude such gains If they can be shown to exist, or are likely to exist because of the behaviour concerned, if the behaviour is indispensable for the gains, and the behaviour will not eliminate effective competition. (paras 43 and 42)
45 Query future impact? Danish Supreme Court follow-up ruling: In February 2013, the Court quashed the challenged (national) decision on grounds of incorrect substantive test Other cases? Note stricter line in ECJ rulings on exclusionary conduct, see, e.g. Tomra, Case C-549/10 P, Judgment of 19 April 2012
EU Competition Law Abuse of Dominance (Article 102 TFEU) Eirik Østerud eirik.osterud@jus.uio.no
EU Competition Law Abuse of Dominance (Article 102 TFEU) Eirik Østerud eirik.osterud@jus.uio.no The notion of «abuse» of dominance 1. The general concept of abuse 2. Forms of abusive conduct 3. Objective
More informationEU Competition Law. Article 101 and Article 102. January 2010. Contents
EU Competition Law January 2010 Contents Article 101 The requirements of Article 101(1) Exemptions under Article 101(3) Article 102 Dominant position Abuse of a dominant position Procedural issues Competition
More informationTelekomunikacja Polska Decision: competition law enforcement in regulated markets
Telekomunikacja Polska Decision: competition law enforcement in regulated markets by Damian Kamiński, Anna Rogozińska, Beata Sasinowska ( 1 ) 1. Introduction On 22 June 2011 the Commission imposed on telecoms
More informationPrice relationship agreements in the UK and EU: a retail-mfn enforcement gap?
MFN Clauses and Antitrust Enforcement and Policy U.S. Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission 10 September 2012 Price relationship agreements in the UK and EU: a retail-mfn enforcement gap?
More informationDraft Guidelines under the Competition Ordinance. Comments by Hong Kong Cable Television Limited
Draft Guidelines under the Competition Ordinance Comments by Hong Kong Cable Television Limited Two overarching points The Hong Kong Competition Commission ( Commission ) s draft guidelines ( Guidelines
More informationFREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (FAQS) ON THE APPLICATION OF EU ANTITRUST RULES IN THE MOTOR VEHICLE SECTOR
EUROPEAN COMMISSION FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (FAQS) ON THE APPLICATION OF EU ANTITRUST RULES IN THE MOTOR VEHICLE SECTOR 27 August 2012 Since the adoption of the new motor vehicle Block Exemption Regulation
More informationInternational Competition Network Unilateral Conduct Working Group Questionnaire. Refusal to Deal
International Competition Network Unilateral Conduct Working Group Questionnaire Agency Name: Danish Competition Authority Date: December 4 th 2009. Refusal to Deal This questionnaire seeks information
More informationBehaviour in Competition. A Guide to Competition Law
Behaviour in Competition A Guide to Competition Law Behaviour in Competition 1 Contents I Introduction 2 1. Statement 2 2. Purpose. Application of Competition Law.1 EC Competition Law 4.2 US Antitrust
More informationModernisation of Article 102 TFEU: Use of Economic Analysis for Conditional Rebates
Competition Competence Report 1/ 2005 Competition Competence Report Modernisation of Article 102 TFEU: Use of Economic Analysis for Conditional Rebates The process of modernisation has reached Article
More informationCOMMENTARY. European Commission Launches E-Commerce Sector Inquiry. What are Sector Inquiries?
MAY 2015 COMMENTARY European Commission Launches E-Commerce Sector Inquiry The European Commission (the Commission ) has launched a sector inquiry of the e-commerce sector in Europe. 1 This is a far-reaching
More informationETSI Guidelines for Antitrust Compliance Version adopted by Board #81 on 27 January 2011
Page 71 ETSI Guidelines for Antitrust Compliance Version adopted by Board #81 on 27 January 2011 A Introduction ETSI, with over 700 member companies from more than 60 countries, is the leading body for
More informationTHE EUROPEAN UNION AND FRANCHISING
THE EUROPEAN UNION AND FRANCHISING (A) HISTORY The European Union has to date limited its activities in relation to franchising to the field of competition law. (i) Pronuptia The examination of franchising
More informationUNITED NATIONS - ECOSOC ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE W0RKING PARTY ON GAS GAS TO POWER COMPETITION ASPECTS
UNITED NATIONS - ECOSOC ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE W0RKING PARTY ON GAS GAS TO POWER COMPETITION ASPECTS Walter TRETTON European Commission DG COMPETITION Geneva, 24 January 2006 GAS TO POWER Some
More informationOrganisation de Coopération et de Développement Économiques Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Unclassified DAF/COMP/WD(2015)56 DAF/COMP/WD(2015)56 Unclassified Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Économiques Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 14-Oct-2015 English
More informationTerritorial Restraints and Distribution in the European Union
Territorial Restraints and Distribution in the European Union Thomas G. Funke* The following article arose out of the 2013 ABA Antitrust Spring Meeting panel entitled Enforcing Territorial Restrictions
More informationCOMMISSION NOTICE. Guidelines on Vertical Restraints {C(2010) 2365} {SEC(2010) 413} {SEC(2010) 414}
EN EN EN EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, SEC(2010) 411 COMMISSION NOTICE Guidelines on Vertical Restraints {C(2010) 2365} {SEC(2010) 413} {SEC(2010) 414} EN EN COMMISSION NOTICE Guidelines on Vertical Restraints
More informationAFME Competition Law Policy Statement
AFME Competition Law Policy Statement This document sets out AFME s policy on competition law issues and provides guidance to AFME staff and its members to assist them with ensuring compliance with competition
More informationIs economic analysis in 102 cases still relevant post Intel?
E.CA Economics Is economic analysis in 102 cases still relevant post Intel? The Antitrust Enforcement Symposium, Oxford,, rev A critical review of the Intel judgement Hans W. Friederiszick E.CA Economics
More informationMinimum Advertised Price and Internet Distribution:
Minimum Advertised Price and Internet Distribution: A Transatlantic Perspective Rebecca Engola, Pioneer Electronics (USA) David Laing, Crowell & Moring / Washington Omar Wakil, Torys / Toronto Paula Riedel,
More informationHow competition law applies to co-operation between farming businesses: Frequently asked questions
How competition law applies to co-operation between farming businesses: Frequently asked questions November 2011 OFT740rev Crown copyright 2011 You may reuse this information (not including logos) free
More information13 November 2009. Question 4: Refusal to deal is only an administrative violation and administrative sanctions are imposed.
1 (5) REFUSAL TO DEAL Introduction This paper presents the FCA s experiences on how to evaluate refusals to deal. In the early 1990s, cases of unconditional refusal to deal were still lodged with the office.
More informationExecutive summary and overview of the national report for Denmark
Executive summary and overview of the national report for Denmark Section I Summary of findings There is no special legislation concerning damages for breach of EC or national competition law in Denmark,
More informationEnglish text only DIRECTORATE FOR FINANCIAL AND ENTERPRISE AFFAIRS COMPETITION COMMITTEE ANNUAL REPORT ON COMPETITION POLICY DEVELOPMENTS IN DENMARK
Unclassified DAF/COMP(2005)18/05 DAF/COMP(2005)18/05 Unclassified Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Economiques Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 26-May-2005 English
More informationAntitrust Law & Economics: Exclusionary Behavior, Bundled Discounts, and Refusals to Deal
Antitrust Law & Economics: Exclusionary Behavior, Bundled Discounts, and Refusals to Deal Timothy J. Muris Foundation Professor of Law George Mason University School of Law Introduction I ll discuss these
More informationCompetition Legislation. Competition Act 1998. Application in the Energy Sector
Competition Legislation Competition Act 1998 Application in the Energy Sector Contents Page Contents... 1 1. Introduction...2 2. Legal Context... 4 3. Economic Analysis... 12 4. Process for Investigation...
More informationCompetitive Assessment of the Spanish Food Supply Chain
Competitive Assessment of the Spanish Food Supply Chain José Antonio García Juan Delgado The Brattle Group, Ltd. Sucursal en España Torre Europa Paseo de la Castellana 95, Planta 15 28046 Madrid, Spain
More informationCPI Antitrust Chronicle November 2013 (1)
CPI Antitrust Chronicle November 2013 (1) RPM in the European Union: Any Developments Since Leegin? Filippo Amato Jones Day www.competitionpolicyinternational.com Competition Policy International, Inc.
More informationReview of recent CCSA experiences in the Telecommunications Sector Kazan, Russia. Selelo Ramohlola & Tapera Muzata 31 March 3 April 2015
Review of recent CCSA experiences in the Telecommunications Sector Kazan, Russia Selelo Ramohlola & Tapera Muzata 31 March 3 April 2015 Outline of Presentation Opening remarks Introduction & background
More informationEuropean Union Law and Online Gambling by Marcos Charif
With infringement proceedings, rulings by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) and the ongoing lack of online gambling regulation at EU level, it is important to understand the extent to which member states
More informationOnline Vertical Restraints Special Project Report
Online Vertical Restraints Special Project Report 2015 International Competition Network Annual Meeting Prepared by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission Note to the reader: This document
More informationLUISS GUIDO CARLI DOTTORATO DI RICERCA IN DIRITTO ED ECONOMIA CICLO XXIII TESI FINALE
LUISS GUIDO CARLI DOTTORATO DI RICERCA IN DIRITTO ED ECONOMIA CICLO XXIII TESI FINALE REBATES AND LOYALTY DISCOUNTS SCHEMES IN EU: TOWARDS A MORE ECONOMIC APPROACH? IL MARGIN SQUEEZE IN EUROPA DOPO LE
More informationD&I Quarterly Finland Q3 2014. D&I Quarterly 2014
D&I Quarterly Finland Q3 2014 D&I Quarterly 2014 TAX & STRUCTURING» Supreme Administrative Court Ruling in a Landmark Case Regarding Reclassification of an Intra-Group Loan» FATCA Agreement and the Exchange
More informationChapter 2, Section 7 of the Swedish Competition Act (2008:579) prohibits abuse of a dominant position. The prohibition reads as follows:
Sweden By Trine Osen Bergqvist Swedish Competition Authority 1 1. The Swedish Prohibition Chapter 2, Section 7 of the Swedish Competition Act (2008:579) prohibits abuse of a dominant position. The prohibition
More informationVertical integration, distributors or agents which to use?
Vertical integration, distributors or agents which to use? A Lexis PSL document produced in partnership with Neil Baylis of K&L Gates LLP Different ways to get products to market Distinguishing between
More informationEnglish - Or. English DIRECTORATE FOR FINANCIAL AND ENTERPRISE AFFAIRS COMPETITION COMMITTEE
For Official Use DAF/COMP/WD(2012)78 DAF/COMP/WD(2012)78 For Official Use Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Économiques Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 08-Oct-2012
More informationLatham & Watkins Litigation Antitrust & Competition
Number 1040 9 June 2010 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Litigation Antitrust & Competition New Antitrust Rules for the Motor Vehicle Sector Challenges Ahead for Car Manufacturers, Dealers, Spare Parts Suppliers
More informationWholesale and retail tariff regulation: defining an appropriate margin squeeze test
Wholesale and retail tariff regulation: defining an appropriate margin squeeze test Réf : 2010-P09-MR-UIT-Séminaire régional sur les coûts et tarifs pour les pays Membres du Groupe régional pour l Afrique
More informationEU MERGER CONTROL 4 NOVEMBRE 2005 NOËLLE LENOIR PRESIDENTE DE L'INSTITUT DE L'EUROPE DAN ROSKIS
EU MERGER CONTROL 4 NOVEMBRE 2005 NOËLLE LENOIR PRESIDENTE DE L'INSTITUT DE L'EUROPE DAN ROSKIS EU MERGER CONTROL Preliminary remarks : Background and Purposes 1 - EU Jurisdiction - Caught Transactions
More informationLiechtenstein. Heinz Frommelt. Sele Frommelt & Partners Attorneys at Law Ltd
Sele Frommelt & Partners Attorneys at Law Ltd Heinz Frommelt Sele Frommelt & Partners Attorneys at Law Ltd Legislation and jurisdiction 1 What is the relevant legislation and who enforces it? is a member
More informationFreedom to Provide Services. Henriette Boecken
Freedom to Provide Services Henriette Boecken Table of Contents A. Freedom to Provide Services, Art. 56 TFEU B. Case: Bundesdruckerei vs. Stadt Dortmund C. Opinions on the Issue D. Situation in Germany
More informationFramework-Document of 10 February 2012 on Antitrust Compliance Programmes
RÉPUBLIQUE FRANÇAISE Framework-Document of 10 February 2012 on Antitrust Compliance Programmes Compliance programmes are instruments that enable economic players to increase their chances of avoiding breaches
More informationIn case of any discrepancy between the original Danish text and the English translation of this Act, the Danish text shall prevail.
In case of any discrepancy between the original Danish text and the English translation of this Act, the Danish text shall prevail. The Danish Competition Act (Consolidation Act No. 700 of 18 June 2013)
More informationfor Private Purchasers Engaged in Value Purchasing of Health Care
Anti-Trust Guidelines for Private Purchasers Engaged in Value Purchasing of Health Care Issued by Buying Value BUYINGVALUE Purchasing Health Care That s Proven to Work Tim Muris and Bilal Sayyed of Kirkland
More informationBRIEFING 14 June 2005. Re: European competition watchdog to dissect commercial insurance what is all the fuss about?
Avenue Louise 240, Box 5 1050 Brussels Telephone: 32 (0)2 626 05 00 Fax: 32 (0)2 626 05 10 www.steptoe.com E-Mail: pwoolfson@steptoe.com zsazaklidou@steptoe.com BRIEFING Re: European competition watchdog
More informationConsolidation, discounts and non-discrimination in the Belgian postal market
Belgian Institute for postal services and telecommunications Consolidation, discounts and non-discrimination in the Belgian postal market WIK Conference February 11th 2015 AXEL DESMEDT MEMBER OF THE BIPT
More informationGCR GLOBAL COMPETITION REVIEW
The European Antitrust Review 2015 Published by Global Competition Review in association with GCR GLOBAL COMPETITION REVIEW www.globalcompetitionreview.com Germany: Cartels Ulrich Schnelle and Volker Soyez
More informationAcer Incorporated. Antitrust and Fair Competition Guidelines
Acer Incorporated Antitrust and Fair Competition Guidelines Acer Incorporated, together with its affiliates and subsidiaries (collectively, we, Acer or Company ), hereby adopt the Antitrust and Fair Competition
More informationProhibition of Anticompetitive Agreements. Jūratė Šovienė Council Member
Prohibition of Anticompetitive Agreements Jūratė Šovienė Council Member Summary Introduction Competition like a social good Prohibition of anticompetitive agreements main notions types of anticompetitive
More information08 May 2003 INTRODUCTION
Comments by Cable and Wireless Submitted in Response to the Public Consultation on request by Singapore Telecommunications Limited for Exemption from Dominant Licensee Obligations with Respect to the International
More informationVertical Restraints in the Internet Economy
Vertical Restraints in the Internet Economy Meeting of the Working Group on Competition Law 10 October 2013 Background Paper 2 Bundeskartellamt Kaiser-Friedrich-Straße 16 53113 Bonn 3 Table of Contents
More informationCases COMP/AT.39740 Google Google s revised proposed commitments BEUC response to the questionnaire
Cases COMP/AT.39740 Google Google s revised proposed commitments BEUC response to the questionnaire Contact: Kostas Rossoglou/ Augusta Maciulevičiũtě digital@beuc.eu Ref.: X/2013/078-25/11/2013 BUREAU
More informationCompetition in EU Electricity Markets The Role of Antitrust Policy
Presentation at SNF-SESSA Conference, Bergen, March 4th, 2005. Competition in EU Electricity Markets The Role of Antitrust Policy Miguel de la Mano Member of the Chief Economist Team, DG Competition (*)
More informationReverse Payment Patent Settlements in Europe. John Schmidt, Shepherd and Wedderburn LLP
Reverse Payment Patent Settlements in Europe John Schmidt, Shepherd and Wedderburn LLP ABA Business Law Section Antitrust Committee Programme San Francisco APRIL 17 2015 What s the issue? Consider the
More informationCOMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES DIRECTORATE-GENERAL COMPETITION NEW ENTRANT NAME ADDRESS
COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES DIRECTORATE-GENERAL COMPETITION Information, Communication and Multimedia The Director Brussels, COMP.C1/ JTL/D/99* By Registered Post with advice of delivery NEW
More informationAntitrust Guidance Notes
Antitrust Guidance Notes Contents Introduction Overview of Antitrust laws 1 Anti-Competitive Agreements 1.1 Relationship with Competitors 1.1.1 Price fixing 1.1.2 Division of territories/market Sharing
More informationCefic REACH competition law compliance guidance
Cefic REACH competition law compliance guidance Could competition law apply to REACH activities? YES. It is expressly stated in the REACH Regulation (hereinafter REACH ) that this Regulation should be
More informationReport on the Analysis of Loyalty Discounts and Rebates Under Unilateral Conduct Laws
Report on the Analysis of Loyalty Discounts and Rebates Under Unilateral Conduct Laws Prepared by The Unilateral Conduct Working Group Presented at the 8 th Annual Conference of the ICN Zurich, Switzerland
More informationCompetition policy brief
Issue 2015-3 June 2015 ISBN 978-92-79-38783-8, ISSN: 2315-3113 Competition policy brief Occasional discussion papers by the Competition Directorate General of the European Commission The Interchange Fees
More informationNon Price Restriction Conducts in Japan
Non Price Restriction Conducts in Japan 5 th APEC Training Program on Competition Policy (6-8 December 2004 at Yogyakarta, Indonesia) Osamu IGARASHI Japan Fair Trade Commission Resident Advisor for KPPU
More informationThe guidance will be developed over time in the light of practical experience.
Freedom of Information Act Awareness Guidance No. 14 International Relations The Information Commissioner s Office (ICO) has produced this guidance as part of a series of good practice guidance designed
More information11 th BALTIC COMPETITION CONFERENCE Emeritus Professor Richard Whish 10 September 2014
11 th BALTIC COMPETITION CONFERENCE Emeritus Professor Richard Whish 10 September 2014 STRUCTURE OF PRESENTATION CARTELS OTHER HORIZONTAL AGREEMENTS VERTICAL AGREEMENTS ABUSE OF DOMINANCE COMMITMENT DECISIONS
More informationEconomics Chapter 7 Review
Name: Class: Date: ID: A Economics Chapter 7 Review Matching a. perfect competition e. imperfect competition b. efficiency f. price and output c. start-up costs g. technological barrier d. commodity h.
More informationCompany directors and competition law
Company directors and competition law OFT Guidance June 2011 OFT1340 Crown copyright 2011 You may reuse this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of
More informationFirst German Decisions Applying the ECJ s Huawei v. ZTE Framework on Injunctions for Standard Essential Patents
February 18, 2016 First German Decisions Applying the ECJ s Huawei v. ZTE Framework on Injunctions for Standard Essential Patents By Rufus Pichler and Holger Kastler Two recent German court decisions address
More informationMargin Squeeze in the EU
Margin Squeeze in the EU Word count 15462 Submission date 31 August 2011 SUBMITTED IN PART FULFILMENT OF THE DEGREE OF LL.M IN THE UNIVERISTY OF GLASGOW 1 1 INTRODUCTION... 4 1.1 TeliaSonera preliminary
More informationCase No COMP/M.5730 - TELEFONICA/ HANSENET TELEKOMMUNIKATION. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE
EN Case No COMP/M.5730 - TELEFONICA/ HANSENET TELEKOMMUNIKATION Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 29/01/2010
More informationFair Competition Commission. THE FAIR COMPETITION COMMISSION PROCEDURE RULES, 2013 Rule 33(2) MERGER NOTIFICATION (Application for Merger Clearance)
FCC.8 Fair Competition Commission THE FAIR COMPETITION COMMISSION PROCEDURE RULES, 2013 Rule 33(2) To: The Fair Competition Commission MERGER NOTIFICATION (Application for Merger Clearance) Application
More informationFactsheet on the Right to be
101010 100101 1010 101 Factsheet on the Right to be 100 Forgotten ruling (C-131/12) 101 101 1) What is the case about and what did 100 the Court rule? 10 In 2010 a Spanish citizen lodged a complaint against
More informationRemarks on Vertical Restraints Offline & Online. Ali Hortaçsu Department of Economics University of Chicago
Remarks on Vertical Restraints Offline & Online Ali Hortaçsu Department of Economics University of Chicago VR 1.0: Pro-competitive? Vertical contracts and/or integration help align incentives of upstream
More informationVATM Position Paper: Voice over IP
The German telecommunications market is currently in intensive discussions concerning Voice over IP (VoIP) or Internet telephony. A number of companies already offer VoIP products for the mass market.
More informationENERGISTICS CONSORTIUM, INC. ANTITRUST COMPLIANCE POLICY
ENERGISTICS CONSORTIUM, INC. ANTITRUST COMPLIANCE POLICY This document contains the Antitrust Policy, Antitrust Guidelines and Antitrust Reminder that together represent the antitrust compliance program
More informationAgency and Distributorship Agreements.DOC. Agency and Distributorship Agreements
Agency and Distributorship Agreements.DOC Agency and Distributorship Agreements Contents 1. Introduction... 1 2. Agent Versus Distributor... 1 3. Competition Law... 2 4. The Agreement... 4 5. Agency Agreements
More informationNote on 2 nd market test of Google s commitments. November 2013
Note on 2 nd market test of Google s commitments. November 2013 [1]. According to its press release, the Commission has found, on a preliminary basis, four areas of concern: a. The favourable treatment,
More informationCOMMISSION RECOMMENDATION. of 9.10.2014. (Text with EEA relevance)
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 9.10.2014 C(2014) 7174 final COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION of 9.10.2014 on relevant product and service markets within the electronic communications sector susceptible to ex ante
More informationTHE PORTUGUESE PARLIAMENT. Law No 19/2012. of 8 May
2012-07-09 THE PORTUGUESE PARLIAMENT Law No 19/2012 of 8 May Hereby approves the new competition act, repealing Laws No 18/2003 of 11 June and No 39/2006 of 25 August, and makes the second amendment to
More informationYEARBOOK of ANTITRUST and REGULATORY STUDIES
Shall selective, above-cost price cutting in the newspaper market be qualified as anticompetitive exclusion? Case comment to the judgement of the Supreme Court of 19 August 2009 Marquard Media Polska (Ref.
More informationFood Law and Due Diligence Defence
The Society of Food Hygiene and Technology INTRODUCTION This document explains the general requirements of food law and covers the main EC and UK legislation on food imports and exports, safety, traceability,
More informationBAGS v AMRAC Exclusionary entry, sponsored entry and entry assistance: are they legitimate concepts in antitrust?
BAGS v AMRAC Exclusionary entry, sponsored entry and entry assistance: are they legitimate concepts in antitrust? Dr Bill Bishop ACE Conference, Berlin, 27 November 2009 The Industry 60 racetracks BAGS,
More informationIFLR. Merger Control Survey 2015. Lead contributors Ian Giles and Marc Waha. Merger Control Survey 2015 www.iflr.com
Merger Control Survey 2015 www.iflr.com Merger Control Survey 2015 Lead contributors Ian Giles and Marc Waha IFLR international financial law review SURVEY PARTICIPANTS AUSTRALIA BRAZIL CANADA CHINA EUROPEAN
More informationICN Special Program for Kyoto Annual Conference. Report on Abuse of Superior Bargaining Position. Prepared by
ICN Special Program for Kyoto Annual Conference Report on Abuse of Superior Bargaining Position Prepared by Task Force for Abuse of Superior Bargaining Position TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION...3 II.
More informationGREIF, INC. ANTITRUST/COMPETITION COMPLIANCE POLICY RIGID INDUSTRIAL PACKAGING & SERVICES* FLEXIBLE PRODUCTS & SERVICES
GREIF, INC. ANTITRUST/COMPETITION COMPLIANCE POLICY RIGID INDUSTRIAL PACKAGING & SERVICES* FLEXIBLE PRODUCTS & SERVICES As an employee of Greif or its subsidiaries ( Greif ) *, you are subject to Greif
More informationGlobal Forum on Competition
s Unclassified DAF/COMP/GF/WD(2014)39 DAF/COMP/GF/WD(2014)39 Unclassified Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Économiques Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 04-Feb-2014
More informationContents. Preface by the Committee on Competition Law and Policy... 7
Foreword This report on Competition Policy and Vertical Restraints: Franchising Agreements explores the application of competition policy to vertical relationships in the context of franchised distribution
More informationA Competition Law Assessment of Platform Most-Favoured-Customer Clauses
A Competition Law Assessment of Platform Most-Favoured-Customer Clauses Pınar Akman School of Law University of Leeds CCP Working Paper 15-12 Abstract Most-favoured-customer (MFC) clauses adopted by online
More informationLaw Antimonopoly of China a Model of European Inspiration
Theoretical and Applied Economics Volume XVIII (2011), No. 8(561), pp. 75-82 Law Antimonopoly of China a Model of European Inspiration Cornelia LEFTER Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies cornelialefter@ase.ro
More informationBEPS ACTIONS 8-10. Revised Guidance on Profit Splits
BEPS ACTIONS 8-10 Revised Guidance on Profit Splits DISCUSSION DRAFT ON THE REVISED GUIDANCE ON PROFIT SPLITS 4 July 2016 Public comments are invited on this discussion draft which deals with the clarification
More informationCOMPETITION LAW COMPLIANCE GUIDELINE. Adopted by the Board of Directors
COMPETITION LAW COMPLIANCE GUIDELINE Adopted by the Board of Directors 1. INTRODUCTION The competition laws are intended to preserve competition by prohibiting concerted practices that restrict competition,
More informationCAN GENDER DIFFERENTIATED ACTUARIAL FACTORS STILL BE USED WHEN DETERMINING PREMIUMS AND BENEFITS UNDER INSURANCE CONTRACTS? THE TEST-ACHATS CASE
A&L GOODBODY BONELLI EREDE PAPPALARDO BREDIN PRAT CAN GENDER DIFFERENTIATED ACTUARIAL FACTORS STILL BE USED WHEN DETERMINING PREMIUMS AND BENEFITS UNDER INSURANCE CONTRACTS? THE TEST-ACHATS CASE DE BRAUW
More informationPostal Operators. Delivering Success through Telecom Strategies
Postal Operators Delivering Success through Telecom Strategies By Mike Greening, Michael Dargue, Hsing-Ren Chiam and Scott Appleton With the rise of digital communications, mail volumes have declined and
More informationLEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Sixty-third Legislature First Regular Session - 2015 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES HOUSE BILL NO.
LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Sixty-third Legislature First Regular Session - IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES HOUSE BILL NO. BY HEALTH AND WELFARE COMMITTEE 0 AN ACT RELATING TO PHARMACIES; AMENDING
More informationLECTURE #15: MICROECONOMICS CHAPTER 17
LECTURE #15: MICROECONOMICS CHAPTER 17 I. IMPORTANT DEFINITIONS A. Oligopoly: a market structure with a few sellers offering similar or identical products. B. Game Theory: the study of how people behave
More informationResponse to European Commission inquiry into the European business insurance sector pursuant to Article 17 of Regulation 1/2003
Response to European Commission inquiry into the European business insurance sector pursuant to Article 17 of Regulation 1/2003 Executive summary The ABI believes the Commission is correct to place business
More informationDOC NO: INFOSOC 53/15 DATE ISSUED: June 2015. Resolution on the open and neutral Internet
DOC NO: INFOSOC 53/15 DATE ISSUED: June 2015 Resolution on the open and neutral Internet Introduction This resolution builds on the TACD net neutrality resolutions of April 2010 1 and June 2014 2, which
More informationAppendix E New Zealand s regulatory approach to international shipping
330 International Freight Transport Services Appendix E New Zealand s regulatory approach to international shipping This appendix examines New Zealand s approach to the economic regulation of international
More informationORANGE FRANCE TELECOM GROUP
ORANGE FRANCE TELECOM GROUP Response to an IDA Public Consultation on Revised Preliminary Decision on the Request by Singapore Telecommunications Limited for exemption from Dominant Licensee obligations
More informationResponse to Consultation and Decisions
Response to Consultation and Decisions Wholesale Call Origination and Wholesale Call Termination Markets Response to Consultation Document No. 10/76 and decisions amending price control obligations and
More informationUnbundling in Europe: Recent Trends
Unbundling in Europe: Recent Trends Sophie BISMUT IDATE, Montpellier O ver the past few years, a radical change has come about in the role of the copper local loop that connects subscribers to their operator's
More informationQuantitative restrictions on imports and all measures having equivalent effect shall be prohibited between Member States.
The Legal Helpdesk Support Schemes and Free Movement Law An overview over the latest developments Dr. Dörte Fouquet, Rechtsanwältin, Partner, BBH Jana Viktoria Nysten, LL.M., Advocaat, Attorney at law,
More informationAcross Platforms Parity Agreements
Across Platforms Parity Agreements Paolo Buccirossi Lear Laboratorio di economia, antitrust, regolamentazione Rome, 26.06.2015 Outline What is APPA? Quick reference to the case law Theories of harm Efficiency
More informationResearch Ideas in Antitrust and Consumer Protection: A View from the FTC
Research Ideas in Antitrust and Consumer Protection: A View from the FTC Michael R. Baye Director of the Bureau of Economics, FTC & Kelley School of Business, Indiana University These are my views and
More information