The Stewardship Role of Accounting


 Marion Bennett
 1 years ago
 Views:
Transcription
1 The Stewardship Role of Accounting by Richard A. Young 1. Introduction One important role of accounting is in the valuation of an asset or firm. When markets are perfect one can value assets at their market value (marktomarket accounting) and the change in the book value of owner's equity, or income, measures the change in firm value. When markets are not perfect, accounting can still be used to approximate the change in the value of the firm. Recommended references on the valuation role of accounting include Edwards and Bell (1961), Feltham and Ohlson (1995), Ijiri (1975), Ohlson (1995), Paton (1922), and Paton and Littleton (1940). Under the valuation perspective the emphasis is on how accounting measures firm value. An important additional role of accounting that arises when markets are not perfect is stewardship. Large firms entrust assets and decisions to managers. Managers have informational advantages with respect to whether they made appropriate use of the assets to which they were entrusted. This situation is one example of a market imperfection. Accounting data may be used to mitigate the negative effects of manager's private information and, in turn, enhance firm value. There is an array of literature in accounting and finance that examines this issue. Recommended references on the stewardship role of accounting include Demski (1982) and Gjesdal (1981). Other stewardship references include Harris and Raviv (1978) and Jensen and Meckling (1976). The stewardship issue is also of continuing practical interest. For example, in the early 1980 s the magnitude of CEO salaries came under close scrutiny, and in the 90 s there has been considerable attention given to using residual income and its variants such as EVA (Economic Value Added) to improve firm performance. Under the stewardship perspective, the emphasis is on how accounting affects firm value. To give insight into how accounting and other information can influence manager behavior and hence firm value, it is useful to think about a simple insurance setting. We may think of automobile drivers as demanding insurance because they are risk averse, and large insurance companies can profit because they are less risk averse. If insurance companies approach risk neutrality, the optimal insurance contract from a risk sharing perspective would remove all the risk from the risk averse driver. Yet automobile insurance contracts often are characterized by deductibles, which leave some of the risk on the driver. One explanation is that the driver is able to affect the probability of an accident. Further, the driver may get enjoyment from speeding. Thus, once completely insured (i.e., Copyright
2 no deductibles), the driver would have incentives to be less careful than if not insured. The driver's ability to buy insurance affects the probability that an accident occurs. This situation is called moral hazard. Deductibles are useful because they give the insured a stake in whether an accident occurs. For the insurance company to make a profit it is important that they choose a premium and deductible that gives the insured the appropriate incentives to drive carefully. That is, they trade off the benefits of lower accident probabilities against the benefits of improved risk sharing. 1 The insurance metaphor can be usefully applied to the role of accounting information in mitigating the stewardship problem and hence increasing firm value. Since we are developing intuition at this stage, we shall think of information in a generic way. But we should keep in mind that data collected by accountants has characteristics that make it especially useful in mitigating the stewardship problem. 2. A simple stewardship setting We proceed with a stylized example. Alice is the risk neutral owner of a retail firm. 2 Ralph is her only sales employee. We assume that Ralph's actions can affect sales. Expected sales will be higher if he tries every customer on the list, is careful to set up appointments convenient for the customer, and makes sure he is on time and prepared to discuss the specific customer's needs. The relationship between Ralph's actions, the state of nature (s 1 or s 2 ), and sales is described in the table below. Note that, even if Ralph is diligent ), he might get unlucky and obtain low sales (e.g., he might not meet up with receptive customers). However, if he is not diligent ), he has no chance at high sales. 3 P(s 1 ) = 1/2 P(s 2 ) = 1/2 s 1 s 2 a L = 0 $100,000 $100,000 a H = 1 0 $100,000 $200,000 In order to address a control or stewardship problem, there must be potential conflict between Ralph and Alice over actions. This is accomplished by assuming Ralph has preferences for both payments and action. In particular, we assume Ralph has a utility 1 The same sort of intuition applies to a setting where individuals have private information regarding their own health. The premium appropriate to charge a healthy individual would be too low for individuals of poor health. One way the insurance company can sort those applying for insurance is to offer different deductible/premium combinations. This problem is referred to as adverse selection. 2 Accounting information may be used to better share risk or to help with the stewardship problem. The assumption of risk neutrality allows us to focus on the latter and makes it easier to work out the numerical example. 3 All that is really important is that the probability of sales be affected by the action. Richard A. Young 2 Copyright
3 function defined over wealth (w) and action (a) as follows: U(w,a) = u(w) a. Ralph likes money and is either risk neutral or risk averse. That is, u > 0 and u 0. Further, we assume a L = 0 and a H = 10. Thus, for a given payment w, Ralph's utility (U) is lower under a H than under a L. This is a very simplistic way to capture conflict. We have simply assumed being diligent is costly to Ralph. For example, he may have to give up Monday night football or time with his family to take out a client. But be sure to understand the important thing is Ralph and Alice disagree about which action they should take. It is not important that we view choice of a L as being lazy. Nevertheless, for brevity we shall refer to Ralph s action as effort. The sequence of events is important. Alice first chooses a contract, and then offers it to Ralph. Then Ralph chooses either to accept the contract from Alice or to take an administrative position elsewhere. If he goes elsewhere, Ralph receives the certainty equivalent of $40,000 with no effort. If instead he decides to join Alice s firm, he then selects action a H or a L, according to his own selfinterest. Ralph and Alice know that the contract is enforceable as long as it is based on things that are publicly observable or easily verifiable. 4 Thus, Alice can commit to any payment scheme that is based on observable performance measures. We will consider cases where Ralph s action is and is not observed by Alice. Throughout, we assume both Ralph and Alice observe the sales level. We emphasize that this is an extremely simple example of a stewardship problem, but that makes it a good place to start. 3. Finding an optimal contract general approach Alice's objective is to offer the best contract which induces Ralph to join her firm and take the action she desires, recognizing that Ralph acts in his own best interests. In order to determine which contract Alice should offer, we proceed in the following steps: (1) find the leastcost contract that induces Ralph to join the firm and to choose a L, (2) find the leastcost contract that induces Ralph to join the firm and to choose a H, (3) determine which of these two contracts maximizes Alice s expected utility. 4 One reason that accounting is especially useful in contracting is that it often uses "hard" data (see Ijiri, 1975). For example, accounting tends to rely less on expectations of the future (which are hard to verify) and more on the effects of historical transactions. Richard A. Young 3 Copyright
4 4. Risk neutral incentives In this section we show that potential incentive problems are easily resolve when Ralph is risk neutral (u(w) = w), despite Ralph s aversion to effort and Alice s potential uncertainty about effort. Step (1): Inducing a L If Alice were interested in finding the leastcost contract that induces a L, she must make sure of two things: Ralph will participate in the firm, and he will prefer a L to a H. This is formally stated in the linear programming problem below. Notice it allows for the general case where both effort and sales are observable. The subscript denotes sales in thousands and the argument in parenthesis is effort. Minimize w 100 ) Participation: w 100 ) 40,000 (P) Incentive compatibility: w 100 ).5 w 100 ) +.5 w 200 )  10 (IC) The objective function is Alice s expected cost if she writes an act and salescontingent contract, assuming Ralph chooses a L. The (P) constraint ensures Ralph wishes to join Alice s firm if he chooses a L. The lefthand side of (P) reflects that if Ralph chooses a L, sales will definitely be 100,000 and his personal cost of effort is zero. The righthand side of (P) is Ralph s expected utility if he does not join the firm which under our assumptions is: U(40,000,0) = 40,000 0 = 40,000. The (IC) constraint ensures Ralph prefers a L to a H. The righthand side of (IC) reflects that if Ralph chooses a H, sales will be 100,000 with probability.5 and 200,000 with probability.5. One important thing to establish is that a L can be optimally induced with a simple, fixedwage contract. A fixedwage contract is one in which payment does not depend on sales. Thus, we substitute w 100 ) = w 100 ) = w 200 ) = w into the objective function and (P) and (IC) to obtain the following. Minimize w subject to: w 40,000 (P) w w 10 (IC) The solution is w = 40,000 and Alice s expected cost is 40,000. Observe that (P) is binding but (IC) is not binding. 5 The fact that (IC) is not binding tells us Alice would do no better if she could observe Ralph s action. 5 Not binding refers to a condition where the inequality is strict. Richard A. Young 4 Copyright
5 Step (2): Inducing a H If Alice were interested in finding the leastcost contract that induces a H, she must make sure Ralph will participate in the firm and will prefer a H to a L. Again, this program allows for the general case where both effort and sales are observable. Minimize.5 w 100 ) +.5 w 200 ) Participation:.5 w 100 ) +.5 w 200 ) 10 40,000 (P) Incentive compatibility:.5 w 100 ) +.5 w 200 )  10 w 100 ) (IC) The objective function is Alice s expected payment to Ralph, reflecting that when a H is chosen sales may be either 100,000 or 200,000. The lefthand side of (P) is now Ralph s expected utility if he chooses a H, and the righthand side is his expected utility if he does not join the firm. The righthand side of (IC) is Ralph s expected utility if he chooses a L. We see that the approach we tried earlier of paying Ralph the simple fixedwaged contract will not work, since IC would then appear as follows. w  10 w (IC) This is, of course, impossible. There are two ways to resolve this problem. One is to observe Ralph s action. But this is in general costly to Alice. We shall see that because Ralph is assumed to be risk neutral (for now), Alice can costlessly motivate a H without observing Ralph s action. To see this, assume the payment to Ralph depends only on sales. That is, let w 100 ) = w 100 ) = w 100, and w 200 ) = w 200. Now the program to find the leastcost contract is as follows. Minimize.5 w w w w ,000 (P).5 w w w 100 (IC) Now the (IC) constraint can be satisfied if Alice pays a larger amount for sales of 200,000 than for sales of 100,000, i.e., if she offers a bonus for high sales. To see this, we can rewrite (IC) as follows..5 (w w 100 ) 10 (IC) w w Notice that this means the optimal contract that induces a H must place risk on Ralph. But so far Ralph is assumed risk neutral, so Alice does not need to pay a risk premium. One solution to this program is w 200 = 39,010 and w 100 = 41,010. Alice s expected cost is 40,010. Another solution is to set w 200 = 70,010 and w 100 = 10,010. In fact, Alice could simply sell the firm to Ralph and let him absorb all the sales risk. Notice again that (IC) is not binding, indicating there is no reason for Alice to observe Ralph s effort. Richard A. Young 5 Copyright
6 Step (3): Select the optimal contract Risk neutral case Now that we have found the leastcost way to motivate a L and a H, we determine which contract maximizes Alice's expected utility, defined as expected sales minus expected payment to Ralph. The leastcost contracts are written below. Since in this example Contract RN2 gives Alice an expected utility level greater than Contract RN1, Alice optimally offers Contract RN2. Contract RN1 Contract RN2 w = 40,000 w 100 = 39,100 w 200 = 41,100 Ralph's optimal action a L a H Alice's expected utility 60, ,900 Ralph's expected utility 40,000 40,000 Finally, note that whichever level of effort is being motivated, no further improvement would be obtained by its observation. This implies that if Ralph were risk neutral, monitoring procedures such as internal auditing would not be valuable. Since we often observe monitoring of management behavior in practice, in order to understand it, we must expand the model. It turns out that by expanding the model to make Ralph risk averse, we will be able to derive a value to monitoring his effort. 5. Risk averse incentives In this section we will assume u(w) = w, which is a concave function and so captures risk aversion for Ralph. This assumption introduces a potential cost to Alice. If in order to induce incentives Alice must impose risk on Ralph, Alice will bear a cost due to the risk premium she must pay to induce Ralph to accept employment. Step (1): Inducing a L The mathematical program for the case where a L is to be induced is as follows. Again, the program allows for the general case where both effort and sales are observable. Minimize w 100 ) subject to: u(w 100 )) u(40,000) (P) u(w 100 )).5 u(w 100 )) +.5 u(w 200 ))  10 (IC) In the risk neutral analysis conducted in section 4 we demonstrated that a L can be induced without placing risk on Ralph. That solution will work here, of course. And we know this is a good idea from a risk sharing perspective, since now Ralph is risk averse and Alice is risk neutral. We show that a L can be motivated without imposing risk on Ralph by setting w,w 100 ) = w,w 100 ) = w,w 100 ) = w, which transforms the program as follows. Richard A. Young 6 Copyright
7 Minimize w u(w) u(40,000) (P) u(w) u(w)  10 (IC) Clearly, paying a fixed wage satisfies (IC) and is the leastcost way to satisfy (P) as well. The solution is w = 40,000, and Alice s expected cost is 40,000. Since (IC) is not binding, if a L is to be motivated there is no value to monitoring effort. Step (2): Inducing a H The program to find Alice s leastcost contract that induces a H when Ralph is risk averse is as follows. Minimize.5 w 100 ) +.5 w 200 ) subject to:.5 u(w 100 )) +.5 u(w 200 )) 10 u(40,000) (P).5 u(w 100 )) +.5 u(w 200 ))  10 u(w 100 )) (IC) Case I: Act observable Unlike the case where Ralph is risk neutral, it will be important whether effort is observable. To see this, first consider the case where effort is observable. The goal is to see if (IC) and (P) can be satisfied without placing risk on the risk averse manager. This means that w 100 ) = w 200 ) = w H. Simplify the notation further by setting w 100 ) = w L. Then the program to induce a H becomes as follows. Minimize w H subject to: u(w H ) 10 u(40,000) (P) u(w H )  10 u(w L ) (IC) Clearly a contract which sets w H = 40,000 and w L sufficiently small (say, zero) will satisfy (IC) and place no risk on the risk averse manager. So here, with the act observable, Alice s cost is 40,000. Case II: Act unobservable: We now consider the case where Alice cannot directly observe whether Ralph is diligent. Alice may find it prohibitively costly to determine Ralph's effort. For example, she probably does not want to follow Ralph around. If that was a good idea, she would do the selling herself. Where the effort is not observable by Alice, Ralph s pay cannot depend on effort. So Alice must set w 100 ) = w 100 ) = w 100 and w 200 ) = w 200 ) = w 200. The program becomes as follows. Minimize.5 w w 200 subject to:.5 u(w 100 ) +.5 u(w 200 ) 10 u(40,000) (P).5 u(w 100 ) +.5 u(w 200 )  10 u(w 100 ) (IC) Richard A. Young 7 Copyright
8 Rewriting (IC), we obtain the following, which is similar to the risk neutral, act unobservable case..5 [ u(w 200 )  u(w 100 ) ] 10 or u(w 200 )  u(w 100 ) 20 (IC) Here we see risk must be place on Ralph, as in the risk neutral case. Since placing risk on Ralph is costly to Alice, (IC) will be binding. So now both (IC) and (P) are binding. Finding an optimal contract in this case involves solving two equations and two unknowns. The solution is u(w 100 ) = u(40,000), so w 100 = 40,000, and u(w 200 ) = u(w 100 ) Further, with u(w) = w, we obtain w 200 = (200+20) 2 = 48,400. Alice s expected cost is.5(40,000) +.5(48,400) = 44,200 Step (3): select the optimal contract Now that we have found the leastcost way to motivate a L and a H, we check to see which contract maximizes Alice's expected utility. We consider the observability assumptions separately. If Alice could observe Ralph s effort, Contract RA2 is the leastcost contract that motivates a H. Since it provides Alice with an expected utility level greater than under Contract RA1, Alice optimally offers Contract RA2. Case I: Act observable Contract RA1 Contract RA2 w = 40,000 w H = 44,100, w L = 0 Ralph's optimal action a L a H Alice's expected utility 100,000 40,000 = 60, ,000 44,100 = 105,900 Ralph's expected utility If Alice were unable to observe Ralph s effort, Contract RA3 is the leastcost contract that motivates a H. Since it provides Alice with an expected utility level greater than under Contract RA1, Alice would optimally offer Contract RA3. Case II: Act unobservable Contract RA1 Contract RA3 w = $ 40,000 w 100 = 40,000 w 200 = 48,400 Ralph's optimal action a L a H Alice's expected utility 100,000 40,000 = 60, ,000 44,200 = 105,800 Ralph's expected utility Summary There are several things to note. First, in the case where Ralph is risk neutral incentive compatibility is not binding. Whether Ralph s action is observable or not, Richard A. Young 8 Copyright
9 inducing a H has the same expected cost to Alice. This means that an IS that revealed Ralph s action would have no value. Further, complicated performance systems, those that use different performance measures, would not be necessary. Second, consider the case where Ralph is risk averse. Here, Alice s expected cost of inducing a H is higher if she cannot observe his action. Her expected utility when inducing a H decreases from 105,900 to 105,800. That is, her expected utility is lower under Contract RA3 (the salescontingent contract) than if she could offer Contract RA2 (the actcontingent contract). The reason is when the act is unobservable, in order to motivate a H Alice must base Ralph's pay on the level of sales. Thus, Ralph faces risk, even if he chooses a H. Since Ralph is risk averse this is costly to Alice. In our example, when the act is observable Alice can place no risk on Ralph by offering him Contract RA2, which pays $44,100 for sure under a H. However, under Contract RA3 Alice pays an expected amount to Ralph of.5(40,000) +.5(48,400) = 44,200. The difference in expected pay to Ralph (44,20044,100) is exactly the amount by which Alice's expected utility is lower in the act unobservable setting. The $100 is the risk premium that Alice must pay to induce Ralph to choose a H when the act is not observable. Third, we must check to see whether when the act is unobservable Alice still prefers that Ralph work hard. Why must we check? Remember that Alice's expected utility under Contract RA3 would be lower than it was under Contract RA2 (which was enforceable only when the act is observable). In fact, it is possible that when the act is observable Alice would prefer to motivate a H by offering Contract RA2, but when the act is unobservable she would prefer to motivate a L and hence offer Contract RA1. This dependence of the equilibrium action on whether it is observable may be a little counterintuitive, at least without careful thought. This phenomenon would occur if the risk premium Alice must provide to Ralph under Contract RA3 exceeded Alice's incremental expected profit that would result in the act observable case between Contract RA2 and Contract RA1. Fourth, this analysis can be used to determine the maximum amount that Alice would pay for a perfect IS that revealed Ralph's effort. Alice would pay up to 105, ,800 = $100 for perfect auditing. The argument is as follows. If auditing costs more than $100, she would not hire the auditor and offer Ralph Contract RA3 (the salescontingent contract). On the other hand, if auditing costs less than $100, she would hire the auditor and offer Contract RA2 (the actcontingent contract). Richard A. Young 9 Copyright
10 Selfstudy exercise Assume an incentive problem of the type above, with a relationship between Ralph's action, the state of nature, and sales dollars as follows. P(s 1 ) = 1/2 P(s 2 ) = 1/2 s 1 s 2 a L = 0 $Y $Y a H = 10 $100,000 $X Ralph has utility function for wealth (w) and effort of w  v, and has the option of going to an administrative position where he receives $40,000 for sure, and which requires no effort. Write down the optimal contract for each of the following cases, considering both the actobservable and actunobservable settings. Also, write down the maximum amount Alice would pay for perfect information about Ralph's action. CASE A: X = 200,000 Y = 101,000 CASE B: X = 108,300 Y = 100,000 CASE C: X = 108,000 Y = 100,000 Check Figures: Optimal Contract Act observable Act unobservable Value of information. A: w = 44,100 if a = a H w 100 = 44, , ,900 = 0 0 if a = a L w 200 = 44,100 w 101 =0 B: w = 44,100 if a = a H w = 40,000 60,05060,000 = 50 0 if a = a L C: w = 40,000 w = 40,000 60,00060,000 = 0 Richard A. Young 10 Copyright
11 References Demski, J., "Managerial Incentives," Information for Decision Making, A. Rappaport, ed., PrenticeHall, Edwards, E. and P. Bell, The Theory and Measurement of Business Income, University of California Press, Feltham, G. and J. Ohlson, "Valuation and Clean Surplus Accounting for Operating and Financial Activities," Contemporary Accounting Research, forthcoming, Gjesdal, F., "Accounting for Stewardship," Journal of Accounting Research, Spring Harris, M. and A. Raviv, "Some Results on Incentive Contracts with Application to Education and Employment, Health Insurance and Law Enforcement," American Economic Review (March 1978). Ijiri, Y., Theory of Accounting Measurement, AAA, Jensen, M. and W. Meckling, "Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure," Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 3, Ohlson, J., "Earnings, Book Values, and Dividends in Equity Valuation," Contemporary Accounting Research, forthcoming, Paton, W., Accounting Theory, Accounting Studies Press, Ltd., and A. Littleton, An Introduction to Corporate Accounting Standards. AAA, Richard A. Young 11 Copyright
Moral Hazard. Itay Goldstein. Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania
Moral Hazard Itay Goldstein Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania 1 PrincipalAgent Problem Basic problem in corporate finance: separation of ownership and control: o The owners of the firm are typically
More informationProblem Set 9 Solutions
Problem Set 9 s 1. A monopoly insurance company provides accident insurance to two types of customers: low risk customers, for whom the probability of an accident is 0.25, and high risk customers, for
More information2. Information Economics
2. Information Economics In General Equilibrium Theory all agents had full information regarding any variable of interest (prices, commodities, state of nature, cost function, preferences, etc.) In many
More informationManagerial Economics
Managerial Economics Unit 10: Information Asymmetries WinterEbmer Johannes Kepler University Linz Winter Term 2012 Managerial Economics: Unit 10  Information Asymmetries 1 / 28 Information asymmetries
More informationCapital Structure. Itay Goldstein. Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania
Capital Structure Itay Goldstein Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania 1 Debt and Equity There are two main types of financing: debt and equity. Consider a twoperiod world with dates 0 and 1. At
More informationTopics in Information Economics: Adverse Selection
Chapter 3 Topics in Information Economics: Adverse Selection 1. The adverse selection problem.. Akerlof s application to the secondhand car market. 3. Screening: A price discrimination model. 3.1 Introduction
More informationChoice under Uncertainty
Choice under Uncertainty Theoretical Concepts/Techniques Expected Utility Theory Representing choice under uncertainty in statecontingent space Utility Functions and Attitudes towards Risk Risk Neutrality
More informationLinear Programming Notes V Problem Transformations
Linear Programming Notes V Problem Transformations 1 Introduction Any linear programming problem can be rewritten in either of two standard forms. In the first form, the objective is to maximize, the material
More informationAsymmetric Information
Chapter 12 Asymmetric Information CHAPTER SUMMARY In situations of asymmetric information, the allocation of resources will not be economically efficient. The asymmetry can be resolved directly through
More informationWork incentives and household insurance: Sequential contracting with altruistic individuals and moral hazard
Work incentives and household insurance: Sequential contracting with altruistic individuals and moral hazard Cécile Aubert Abstract Two agents sequentially contracts with different principals under moral
More informationRisk and Insurance. Vani Borooah University of Ulster
Risk and Insurance Vani Borooah University of Ulster Gambles An action with more than one possible outcome, such that with each outcome there is an associated probability of that outcome occurring. If
More informationMarket Equilibrium and Applications
Market Equilibrium and Applications I. Market Equilibrium In the previous chapter, we discussed demand and supply, both for individual consumers and firms and for markets. In this chapter, we will combine
More informationInstitute for Empirical Research in Economics University of Zurich. Working Paper Series ISSN 14240459. Working Paper No. 229
Institute for Empirical Research in Economics University of Zurich Working Paper Series ISSN 14240459 Working Paper No. 229 On the Notion of the First Best in Standard Hidden Action Problems Christian
More informationAn example of externalities  the multiplicative case
An example of externalities  the multiplicative case Yossi Spiegel Consider an exchange economy with two agents, A and B, who consume two goods, x and y. This economy however, differs from the usual exchange
More informationEconomics of Insurance
Economics of Insurance In this last lecture, we cover most topics of Economics of Information within a single application. Through this, you will see how the differential informational assumptions allow
More informationInformation asymmetries
Adverse selection 1 Repeat: Information asymmetries Problems before a contract is written: Adverse selection i.e. trading partner cannot observe quality of the other partner Use signaling g or screening
More informationTheory of the Firm. Itay Goldstein. Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania
Theory of the Firm Itay Goldstein Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania 1 Boundaries of the Firm Firms are economic units that make decisions, produce, sell, etc. What determines the optimal size
More informationApplied Economics For Managers Recitation 5 Tuesday July 6th 2004
Applied Economics For Managers Recitation 5 Tuesday July 6th 2004 Outline 1 Uncertainty and asset prices 2 Informational efficiency  rational expectations, random walks 3 Asymmetric information  lemons,
More informationIncentive Compensation for Risk Managers when Effort is Unobservable
Incentive Compensation for Risk Managers when Effort is Unobservable by Paul Kupiec 1 This Draft: October 2013 Abstract In a stylized model of a financial intermediary, risk managers can expend effort
More information8.7 Mathematical Induction
8.7. MATHEMATICAL INDUCTION 8135 8.7 Mathematical Induction Objective Prove a statement by mathematical induction Many mathematical facts are established by first observing a pattern, then making a conjecture
More informationMoral Hazard and Adverse Selection. Topic 6
Moral Hazard and Adverse Selection Topic 6 Outline 1. Government as a Provider of Insurance. 2. Adverse Selection and the Supply of Insurance. 3. Moral Hazard. 4. Moral Hazard and Incentives in Organizations.
More informationChapter 5 Uncertainty and Consumer Behavior
Chapter 5 Uncertainty and Consumer Behavior Questions for Review 1. What does it mean to say that a person is risk averse? Why are some people likely to be risk averse while others are risk lovers? A riskaverse
More informationLinear Programming Notes VII Sensitivity Analysis
Linear Programming Notes VII Sensitivity Analysis 1 Introduction When you use a mathematical model to describe reality you must make approximations. The world is more complicated than the kinds of optimization
More informationThe gain from insurance (full information)
The gain from insurance (full information) W 2 U U 1 E W W 2 W 45 W c E(W ) W 1 W 1 Figure 1: Demand for insurance Risk aversion: u (EW ) >Eu(W ), Risk averse individuals dislike uncertainty Assumptions:
More informationPay for performance. Intrinsic (interested in the job as such) Extrinsic motivation. Pay Work environment, nonpay characteristics, benefits
Pay for performance Motivation Intrinsic (interested in the job as such) Extrinsic motivation Pay Work environment, nonpay characteristics, benefits Inefficient to rely on intrinsic motivation only Workers
More information1 Uncertainty and Preferences
In this chapter, we present the theory of consumer preferences on risky outcomes. The theory is then applied to study the demand for insurance. Consider the following story. John wants to mail a package
More informationThe MarketClearing Model
Chapter 5 The MarketClearing Model Most of the models that we use in this book build on two common assumptions. First, we assume that there exist markets for all goods present in the economy, and that
More informationChapter 3. The Concept of Elasticity and Consumer and Producer Surplus. Chapter Objectives. Chapter Outline
Chapter 3 The Concept of Elasticity and Consumer and roducer Surplus Chapter Objectives After reading this chapter you should be able to Understand that elasticity, the responsiveness of quantity to changes
More informationDecision Making under Uncertainty
6.825 Techniques in Artificial Intelligence Decision Making under Uncertainty How to make one decision in the face of uncertainty Lecture 19 1 In the next two lectures, we ll look at the question of how
More informationCHAPTER 8 PROFIT MAXIMIZATION AND COMPETITIVE SUPPLY
CHAPTER 8 PROFIT MAXIMIZATION AND COMPETITIVE SUPPLY REVIEW QUESTIONS 1. Why would a firm that incurs losses choose to produce rather than shut down? Losses occur when revenues do not cover total costs.
More informationThe Reasonable Person Negligence Standard and Liability Insurance. Vickie Bajtelsmit * Colorado State University
\ins\liab\dlirpr.v3a 060607 The Reasonable Person Negligence Standard and Liability Insurance Vickie Bajtelsmit * Colorado State University Paul Thistle University of Nevada Las Vegas Thistle s research
More informationECON 459 Game Theory. Lecture Notes Auctions. Luca Anderlini Spring 2015
ECON 459 Game Theory Lecture Notes Auctions Luca Anderlini Spring 2015 These notes have been used before. If you can still spot any errors or have any suggestions for improvement, please let me know. 1
More informationIncreasing for all. Convex for all. ( ) Increasing for all (remember that the log function is only defined for ). ( ) Concave for all.
1. Differentiation The first derivative of a function measures by how much changes in reaction to an infinitesimal shift in its argument. The largest the derivative (in absolute value), the faster is evolving.
More informationQuiz 1 Sample Questions IE406 Introduction to Mathematical Programming Dr. Ralphs
Quiz 1 Sample Questions IE406 Introduction to Mathematical Programming Dr. Ralphs These questions are from previous years and should you give you some idea of what to expect on Quiz 1. 1. Consider the
More informationAnalyzing the Demand for Deductible Insurance
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 18:3 3 1999 1999 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Manufactured in The Netherlands. Analyzing the emand for eductible Insurance JACK MEYER epartment of Economics, Michigan State
More informationCHAPTER 3 Numbers and Numeral Systems
CHAPTER 3 Numbers and Numeral Systems Numbers play an important role in almost all areas of mathematics, not least in calculus. Virtually all calculus books contain a thorough description of the natural,
More informationEconomics 1011a: Intermediate Microeconomics
Lecture 12: More Uncertainty Economics 1011a: Intermediate Microeconomics Lecture 12: More on Uncertainty Thursday, October 23, 2008 Last class we introduced choice under uncertainty. Today we will explore
More informationDemand and supply of health insurance. Folland et al Chapter 8
Demand and supply of health Folland et al Chapter 8 Chris Auld Economics 317 February 9, 2011 What is insurance? From an individual s perspective, insurance transfers wealth from good states of the world
More informationP r. Notes on the Intrinsic Valuation Models and BKM Chapter 18. Roger Craine 9/2005. Overview on Intrinsic Asset Valuation
Notes on the Intrinsic Valuation Models and BKM Chapter 8 Roger Craine 9/5 Overview on Intrinsic Asset Valuation An asset is a promise to a stream of future payoffs. Unlike a commodity that you consume,
More informationReturning Cash to the Owners: Dividend Policy
Returning Cash to the Owners: Dividend Policy Aswath Damodaran Aswath Damodaran 1 First Principles Invest in projects that yield a return greater than the minimum acceptable hurdle rate. The hurdle rate
More informationAdverse selection in health insurance: are first best. contracts impossible?
Adverse selection in health insurance: are first best contracts impossible? David Alary CERPEMSDF, University Paris Dauphine Franck Bien EuRISCO LEGOS, University Paris Dauphine Abstract In this note,
More informationChapter 4. Introduction to Risk Management
Chapter 4 Introduction to Risk Management Basic Risk Management Firms convert inputs into goods and services output input commodity producer buyer A firm is profitable if the cost of what it produces exceeds
More informationWrap ISA and Wrap Personal Portfolio 1/26
Wrap ISA and Wrap Personal Portfolio 1/26 Terms and conditions These terms govern your relationship with Standard Life Savings, a company authorised and regulated by the FCA which is part of the Standard
More informationNotes  Gruber, Public Finance Chapter 20.3 A calculation that finds the optimal income tax in a simple model: Gruber and Saez (2002).
Notes  Gruber, Public Finance Chapter 20.3 A calculation that finds the optimal income tax in a simple model: Gruber and Saez (2002). Description of the model. This is a special case of a Mirrlees model.
More informationLecture notes on Moral Hazard, i.e. the Hidden Action PrincipleAgent Model
Lecture notes on Moral Hazard, i.e. the Hidden Action PrincipleAgent Model Allan CollardWexler April 19, 2012 CoWritten with John Asker and Vasiliki Skreta 1 Reading for next week: Make Versus Buy in
More informationUNIVERSITY OF VIENNA
WORKING PAPERS Egbert Dierker Hildegard Dierker Birgit Grodal Nonexistence of Constrained Efficient Equilibria when Markets are Incomplete August 2001 Working Paper No: 0111 DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS UNIVERSITY
More informationWeek 4 Market Failure due to Moral Hazard The PrincipalAgent Problem
Week 4 Market Failure due to Moral Hazard The PrincipalAgent Problem PrincipalAgent Issues Adverse selection arises because one side of the market cannot observe the quality of the product or the customer
More informationUncertainty. BEE2017 Microeconomics
Uncertainty BEE2017 Microeconomics Uncertainty: The share prices of Amazon and the difficulty of investment decisions Contingent consumption 1. What consumption or wealth will you get in each possible
More informationReview chapters 19, 20, 21,22, 23, 24, 8 Know how to compute the tax burden on consumers and on producers, given pretax equilibrium price and
Review chapters 19, 20, 21,22, 23, 24, 8 Know how to compute the tax burden on consumers and on producers, given pretax equilibrium price and posttax equilibrium price: Consumer tax burden equals (posttax
More informationTOPIC 4: ASYMMETRIC INFORMATION MODELS OF CAPITAL STRUCTURE
TOPIC 4: ASYMMETRIC INFORMATION MODELS OF CAPITAL STRUCTURE 1. Introduction The recent economic literature has emphasized a lot the importance of asymmetric information to our understanding of a wide range
More informationMANAGEMENT OPTIONS AND VALUE PER SHARE
1 MANAGEMENT OPTIONS AND VALUE PER SHARE Once you have valued the equity in a firm, it may appear to be a relatively simple exercise to estimate the value per share. All it seems you need to do is divide
More informationExample 1. Consider the following two portfolios: 2. Buy one c(s(t), 20, τ, r) and sell one c(s(t), 10, τ, r).
Chapter 4 PutCall Parity 1 Bull and Bear Financial analysts use words such as bull and bear to describe the trend in stock markets. Generally speaking, a bull market is characterized by rising prices.
More informationCHAPTER 3 COSTVOLUMEPROFIT ANALYSIS
CHAPTER 3 COSTVOLUMEPROFIT ANALYSIS NOTATION USED IN CHAPTER 3 SOLUTIONS SP: Selling price VCU: Variable cost per unit CMU: Contribution margin per unit FC: Fixed costs TOI: Target operating income 31
More informationNotes 10: An Equation Based Model of the Macroeconomy
Notes 10: An Equation Based Model of the Macroeconomy In this note, I am going to provide a simple mathematical framework for 8 of the 9 major curves in our class (excluding only the labor supply curve).
More informationManagerial Economics Prof. Trupti Mishra S.J.M. School of Management Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay
(Refer Slide Time: 00:39) Managerial Economics Prof. Trupti Mishra S.J.M. School of Management Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay Lecture  3 Introduction to Managerial Economics (Contd ) So, welcome
More informationChapter 2: Agency costs and the amount of leverage
Chapter 2: Agency costs and the amount of leverage Corporate Finance  MSc in Finance (BGSE) Albert BanalEstañol Universitat Pompeu Fabra and Barcelona GSE Albert BanalEstañol (UPF and BGSE) Chapter
More informationThe Macroeconomy in the Long Run The Classical Model
PP556 Macroeconomic Questions The Macroeconomy in the ong Run The Classical Model what determines the economy s total output/income how the prices of the factors of production are determined how total
More informationMath 016. Materials With Exercises
Math 06 Materials With Exercises June 00, nd version TABLE OF CONTENTS Lesson Natural numbers; Operations on natural numbers: Multiplication by powers of 0; Opposite operations; Commutative Property of
More information3.4. Solving Simultaneous Linear Equations. Introduction. Prerequisites. Learning Outcomes
Solving Simultaneous Linear Equations 3.4 Introduction Equations often arise in which there is more than one unknown quantity. When this is the case there will usually be more than one equation involved.
More informationCHAPTER 4. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CHAPTER 4. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Accounting standards require statements that show the financial position, earnings, cash flows, and investment (distribution) by (to) owners. These measurements are reported,
More informationOptimal insurance contracts with adverse selection and comonotonic background risk
Optimal insurance contracts with adverse selection and comonotonic background risk Alary D. Bien F. TSE (LERNA) University Paris Dauphine Abstract In this note, we consider an adverse selection problem
More informationImperfect information Up to now, consider only firms and consumers who are perfectly informed about market conditions: 1. prices, range of products
Imperfect information Up to now, consider only firms and consumers who are perfectly informed about market conditions: 1. prices, range of products available 2. characteristics or relative qualities of
More informationFigure 1.1: The capital market. From your previous accounting studies, identify the main functions of a capital market.
Financial managers do not operate in a vacuum; they depend on longterm funds from the capital market, which acts as an intermediary for the allocation of investors capital through debt and equity (see
More informationInternational Financial Accounting (IFA)
International Financial Accounting (IFA) Part I Accounting Regulation; Normative Theories of Accounting DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND LAW ROBERTO DI PIETRA SIENA, NOVEMBER 4, 2013 1 INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL
More informationSensitivity Analysis 3.1 AN EXAMPLE FOR ANALYSIS
Sensitivity Analysis 3 We have already been introduced to sensitivity analysis in Chapter via the geometry of a simple example. We saw that the values of the decision variables and those of the slack and
More informationChapter 22: Exchange in Capital Markets
Chapter 22: Exchange in Capital Markets 22.1: Introduction We are now in a position to examine trade in capital markets. We know that some people borrow and some people save. After a moment s reflection
More informationCompetitive Market Equilibrium
Chapter 14 Competitive Market Equilibrium We have spent the bulk of our time up to now developing relationships between economic variables and the behavior of agents such as consumers, workers and producers.
More informationPrice Discrimination: Part 2. Sotiris Georganas
Price Discrimination: Part 2 Sotiris Georganas 1 More pricing techniques We will look at some further pricing techniques... 1. Nonlinear pricing (2nd degree price discrimination) 2. Bundling 2 Nonlinear
More informationProblem Set 1 Solutions
Health Economics Economics 156 Prof. Jay Bhattacharya Problem Set 1 Solutions A. Risk Aversion Consider a risk averse consumer with probability p of becoming sick. Let I s be the consumer s income if he
More informationChapter 1: The binomial asset pricing model
Chapter 1: The binomial asset pricing model Simone Calogero April 17, 2015 Contents 1 The binomial model 1 2 1+1 dimensional stock markets 4 3 Arbitrage portfolio 8 4 Implementation of the binomial model
More informationChapter 16 Monopolistic Competition and Product Differentiation
Goldwasser AP Microeconomics Chapter 16 Monopolistic Competition and Product Differentiation BEFORE YOU READ THE CHAPTER Summary This chapter develops the model of monopolistic competition. It also discusses
More informationMore Tutorial at Corporate Finance
Corporate Finance Question 1. The cost of capital (8 points) St. Claire Enterprises is a levered firm. The equity cost of capital for St. Claire is 7%. The debt cost of capital for St. Claire is 2%. Assume
More informationChapter 5. Market Equilibrium 5.1 EQUILIBRIUM, EXCESS DEMAND, EXCESS SUPPLY
Chapter 5 Price SS p f This chapter will be built on the foundation laid down in Chapters 2 and 4 where we studied the consumer and firm behaviour when they are price takers. In Chapter 2, we have seen
More informationRegulation and Bankers Incentives
Regulation and Bankers Incentives Fabiana Gómez University of Bristol Jorge Ponce Banco Central del Uruguay May 7, 2015 Preliminary and incomplete Abstract We formally analyze and compare the effects of
More informationMidterm Exam:Answer Sheet
Econ 497 Barry W. Ickes Spring 2007 Midterm Exam:Answer Sheet 1. (25%) Consider a portfolio, c, comprised of a riskfree and risky asset, with returns given by r f and E(r p ), respectively. Let y be the
More informationGuide to SRW Section 1.7: Solving inequalities
Guide to SRW Section 1.7: Solving inequalities When you solve the equation x 2 = 9, the answer is written as two very simple equations: x = 3 (or) x = 3 The diagram of the solution is 65 43 21 0
More informationIntermediate Microeconomics. Chapter 13 Monopoly
Intermediate Microeconomics Chapter 13 Monopoly Noncompetitive market Price maker = economic decision maker that recognizes that its quantity choice has an influence on the price at which it buys or sells
More informationPrice Discrimination and Monopoly: Nonlinear Pricing
Discrimination and Monopoly: 1 Introduction Annual subscriptions generally cost less in total than oneoff purchases Buying in bulk usually offers a price discount these are price discrimination reflecting
More informationWe never talked directly about the next two questions, but THINK about them they are related to everything we ve talked about during the past week:
ECO 220 Intermediate Microeconomics Professor Mike Rizzo Third COLLECTED Problem Set SOLUTIONS This is an assignment that WILL be collected and graded. Please feel free to talk about the assignment with
More informationShortRun Production and Costs
ShortRun Production and Costs The purpose of this section is to discuss the underlying work of firms in the shortrun the production of goods and services. Why is understanding production important to
More information3.2. Solving quadratic equations. Introduction. Prerequisites. Learning Outcomes. Learning Style
Solving quadratic equations 3.2 Introduction A quadratic equation is one which can be written in the form ax 2 + bx + c = 0 where a, b and c are numbers and x is the unknown whose value(s) we wish to find.
More informationLECTURES ON REAL OPTIONS: PART I BASIC CONCEPTS
LECTURES ON REAL OPTIONS: PART I BASIC CONCEPTS Robert S. Pindyck Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA 02142 Robert Pindyck (MIT) LECTURES ON REAL OPTIONS PART I August, 2008 1 / 44 Introduction
More informationAn example of externalities  the additive case
An example of externalities  the additive case Yossi Spiegel Consider an exchange economy with two agents, A and B, who consume two goods, x and y. The preferences of the two agents are represented by
More informationCopyright 1997, David G. Messerschmitt. All rights reserved. Economics tutorial. David G. Messerschmitt CS 2946, EE 290X, BA 296.
Economics tutorial David G. Messerschmitt CS 2946, EE 290X, BA 296.5 Copyright 1997, David G. Messerschmitt 3/5/97 1 Here we give a quick tutorial on the economics material that has been covered in class.
More informationUnraveling versus Unraveling: A Memo on Competitive Equilibriums and Trade in Insurance Markets
Unraveling versus Unraveling: A Memo on Competitive Equilibriums and Trade in Insurance Markets Nathaniel Hendren January, 2014 Abstract Both Akerlof (1970) and Rothschild and Stiglitz (1976) show that
More informationDemand for Health Insurance
Demand for Health Insurance Demand for Health Insurance is principally derived from the uncertainty or randomness with which illnesses befall individuals. Consequently, the derived demand for health insurance
More informationChapter 23: Asymmetric Information
Chapter 23: Asymmetric Information Asymmetric Information Adverse Selection Moral Hazard Lemons Market SecondBest Mechanism Designs Principal Agent Market Failure Signaling Screening Insurance Employer/
More informationChoice under Uncertainty
Choice under Uncertainty Part 1: Expected Utility Function, Attitudes towards Risk, Demand for Insurance Slide 1 Choice under Uncertainty We ll analyze the underlying assumptions of expected utility theory
More informationCHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION, BACKGROUND, AND MOTIVATION. Over the last decades, risk analysis and corporate risk management activities have
Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION, BACKGROUND, AND MOTIVATION 1.1 INTRODUCTION Over the last decades, risk analysis and corporate risk management activities have become very important elements for both financial
More informationChapter 1. The Role and Environment of Managerial Finance. Learning Goals. Learning Goals (cont.)
Chapter 1 The Role and Environment of Managerial Finance Learning Goals 1. Define finance, its major areas and opportunities available in this field, and the legal forms of business organization. 2. Describe
More informationECON4510 Finance theory Diderik Lund, 20 October 2009
Derivative assets By derivative assets we mean assets that derive their values from the values of other assets, called the underlying assets. For short called derivatives (derivater). The underlying assets
More informationFinance 350: Problem Set 8 Alternative Solutions
Finance 35: Problem Set 8 Alternative Solutions Note: Where appropriate, the final answer for each problem is given in bold italics for those not interested in the discussion of the solution. All payoff
More informationCHAPTER 3. Arbitrage and Financial Decision Making. Chapter Synopsis
CHAPTER 3 Arbitrage and Financial Decision Making Chapter Synopsis 3.1 Valuing Decisions When considering an investment opportunity, a financial manager must systematically compare the costs and benefits
More informationECO 317 Economics of Uncertainty Fall Term 2009 Week 5 Precepts October 21 Insurance, Portfolio Choice  Questions
ECO 37 Economics of Uncertainty Fall Term 2009 Week 5 Precepts October 2 Insurance, Portfolio Choice  Questions Important Note: To get the best value out of this precept, come with your calculator or
More informationOther observable variables as arguments besides S.
Valuation of options before expiration Consider European options with time t until expiration. Value now of receiving c T at expiration? (Value now of receiving p T at expiration?) Have candidate model
More informationPrice Discrimination 1
Price Discrimination 1 Introduction Price Discrimination describes strategies used by firms to extract surplus from customers Examples of price discrimination presumably profitable should affect market
More informationChapter 5 Applications of Supply and Demand
1. Elasticity of Demand (E d ) Chapter 5 Applications of Supply and Demand Measures the responsiveness of Q d to a change in price. How much does Q d change (%) when P changes (%)? We can use a formula
More informationEconomics 200C, Spring 2012 Practice Midterm Answer Notes
Economics 200C, Spring 2012 Practice Midterm Answer Notes I tried to write questions that are in the same form, the same length, and the same difficulty as the actual exam questions I failed I think that
More informationScreening by the Company You Keep: Joint Liability Lending and the Peer Selection Maitreesh Ghatak presented by Chi Wan
Screening by the Company You Keep: Joint Liability Lending and the Peer Selection Maitreesh Ghatak presented by Chi Wan 1. Introduction The paper looks at an economic environment where borrowers have some
More information