Game Changers: Recent Cases that Make a Difference
|
|
- Barnard Dorsey
- 7 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Game Changers: Recent Cases that Make a Difference
2 Game Changing Case re: Diagnosis Vet claims SC for PTSD but when examined is diagnosed with another mental disorder and not PTSD. Does vet have to start all over again, claiming SC for the other mental disorder?
3 Clemons v. Shinseki Clemons: 23 Vet.App. 1 (2009) Background: Veteran claimed SC for PTSD VA medical records revealed several notations of anxiety disorder
4 Clemons Background (Cont d) Also med records that vet suffered from schizoid personality disorder and anxiety disorder multifaceted in origin BVA denied SC for PTSD: The veteran did not have a diagnosis of PTSD VAE not necessary b/c record clear that there is a lack of diagnosis of PTSD
5 Clemons Holding Court held: Vet incompetent to self diagnose mental condition Despite claiming SC for PTSD, evidence showed claim was for any mental disability that may reasonably be encompassed, based on Description of symptoms Description of claim Information gathered/submitted in support of claim
6 Clemons Holding (Cont d) Quotes Appellant did not file to receive benefits only for a particular diagnosis, but for the affliction his mental condition, whatever that is, causes him. Vet s claim for benefits based on PTSD encompassed benefits based on an anxiety disorder and/or a schizoid disorder b/c evidence developed during processing of claim indicated that the symptoms for which [he] was seeking VA benefits may have been caused by an anxiety and/or schizoid disorder
7 Clemons-- --Advocacy Tips 1) VA must determine the scope of a claim 2) A single claim can encompass more than 1 condition 3) Argue a for a broad reading of any claim where veteran is incompetent to self- diagnose Ex. Vet claims SC for ulcers, but has dx of GERD, chronic gastritis, and hiatal hernia Ex. Vet claims SC for asbestosis, but has dx of pleural plaques and pleural effusions
8 Clemons Game Changing Because: Even though vet claimed SC for a specific condition, VA may be obligated to consider SC for other diagnosed conditions as well if the vet mentions, or if vet s s records relate symptoms of the other conditions
9 Game Changing Case re: the Power of Lay Evidence
10 Davidson v. Shinseki Davidson: : 581 F.3d 1313 (Fed. Cir. 2009) Background: Widow of veteran claimed DIC Death certificate indicated accidental drowning Wife claimed death due to anxiety disorder related to service
11 Davidson Background (Cont d) VA examiner found it not at least as likely as not that death was result of acquired psychiatric disability Widow submitted written & oral testimony that vet committed suicide b/c of a mental disorder related to service
12 Davidson Background (Cont d) BVA found widow not competent to provide a probative (persuasive) opinion on a medical matter such as the etiology of a disability CAVC agreed, said lay statements do not eliminate the need for a valid medical opinion establishing a nexus between [a veteran s] death and the in-service disease
13 Davidson Federal Circuit Holding 38 U.S.C. 1154(a) requires VA to give due consideration to all pertinent medical and lay evidence Fed Cir has held that lay evidence can be competent and sufficient to establish a diagnosis, if: Layperson is competent to identify the condition Layperson is reporting a contemporaneous medical diagnosis Lay testimony describing symptoms at the time supports a later diagnosis by a medical professional CAVC & VA were wrong to conclude that a a valid medical opinion was required to establish nexus
14 Davidson: Advocacy Tips How far does this case go? Can sometimes argue lay testimony alone competent to show a diagnosis (Jandreau( Jandreau) Can sometimes argue lay testimony competent to establish nexus Ex. Consistent complaints of headaches from service, later diagnosed as migraines Competent to establish nexus? Ex. Consistent complaints of anxiety, nightmares, flashbacks from service, later diagnosed as PTSD Competent to establish nexus?
15 Davidson Game Changing because: lay testimony may not be categorically rejected in cases where the determinative issue involves either medical etiology or a medical diagnosis More room for advocates to use lay statements Are medical opinions as crucial as we thought?
16 Game Changing Cases re: Conditions not on Presumptive List
17 SC due to Herbicide Exposure for Condition not on Presumptive List Two Questions: 1) Can a veteran win service connection for a disability claimed as due to herbicide exposure under a theory of direct service connection? 2) If so, what type of medical nexus opinion is necessary?
18 Stefl v. Nicholson Stefl: 21 Vet.App. 120 (2007) Background: Vet claimed SC for disease not on presumptive AO list Positive, but speculative, medical nexus opinion VA obtained Medical Nexus Opinion Dr. opined vet s s disability not related to AO Reason: disease not on VA s s list of diseases presumed to be related to Agent Orange exposure
19 Stefl: Holding Court held: Direct service connection must be considered if raised by the record The absence of the vet s s diagnosed illness on the list at 38 C.F.R (e) is insufficient reason to deny SC
20 Polovick v. Shinseki Polovick: 23 Vet.App. 48 (2009) Background: Vet claimed SC for malignant glioma,, a cancer not listed on presumptive list Positive evidence -- Veteran provided three medical nexus opinions:
21 Polovick-- --Facts Dr. Dixon Vet s s treating physician Malignant glioma may well be connected to veteran s s exposure to AO
22 Dr. Bash Polovick Facts (Cont d) Board Certified radiologist/neuroradiology Glioma more likely than not related to AO exposure Based on review of studies used for IOM report IOM required minimum 95% confidence level to make presumptive list Bash s s analysis of IOM studies & other studies revealed it was more likely than not Long time lapse before emergence of tumor consistent with time lags associated with evolution of this type of tumor
23 Polovick Facts (Cont d) Dr. Montemarano Board certified radiologist, section chief at Walter Reed Tumor likely due to AO exposure Agreed with Dr. Bash s s statistical analysis Noted 2004 IOM update re: brain tumors and AO
24 Polovick Facts (Cont d) Dr. Montemarano opinion cont d: Interval between exposure to AO & emergence of tumor consistent with time period expected for induction and growth No other risks factors AO can cause genetic mutations
25 Polovick Facts (Cont d) VA provided Medical Nexus Exam & Opinion Drs. Mullick and Murakata Opined glioma unlikely due to AO Reasoned IOM s s 2002 study found limited/suggestive evidence of no association to brain tumors New literature didn t t show different data than that used by IOM
26 Polovick Holding Court held: Absence of illness on presumptive list insufficient to deny SC BVA cannot reject SC for sole reason that there is insufficient statistical evidence to add disease to presumptive list Allowing BVA to do so would result in denial of SC simply because there is no presumptive service connection
27 Stefl & Polovick Game Changing b/c: Possible for vet to win SC for disability claimed as due to herbicide exposure under a theory of direct service connection Gives advocates ideas re: how to win these claims What does it take to win?
28 Steft & Polovick: Advocacy Tips 1) Winning SC for disability not on list & claimed as due to AO is difficult 2) Need strong medical opinions 3) Opinions should address: a) IOM report, b) Other medical literature, c) Other risk factors d) Family history e) Timeline re exposure & emergency of disease f) Statistical confidence level
29 Game Changing Cases re: Congenital Conditions
30 Quirin v. Shinseki Quirin: 22 Vet.App. 390 (2009) Vet medically acceptable for induction Separation exam indicated impaired vision 20/60 in right & 20/100 in left 1992 VAE vet has congenital optic atrophy BVA cited VAGC that congenital defects more or less stationary in nature & congenital diseases capable of improving or deteriorating
31 Quirin Facts (Cont d) BVA concluded: Condition was a congenital defect, and There was no additional disability superimposed upon that defect
32 Quirin Holding BVA failed to apply VAGC opinion properly (see next slide) Evidence of worsening condition must be addressed Presumption of soundness applies b/c entrance exam silent as to eyes BVA improperly assumed vet s s visual acuity as poor at induction as at separation Needed to address whether clear & unmistakable evidince rebuts presumption of aggravation or if increase due to natural progress
33 Congenital Conditions VA Gen. Coun. Prec Provides guidance to determine if a disability is eligible for compensation Divides conditions between congenital defects and congenital diseases Diseases can get compensation Defects cannot get compensation If a injury or disability is superimposed on a defect, possible to receive compensation for the superimposed injury
34 Quirin: Advocacy Tips Pay attention to any worsening in service May indicate disability is disease not defect Review VAGC opinion for guidance If VA inconsistent in labeling disability, demand clarification Outline the proper VA inquiry for the claim adjudicator whether condition is static or changing
35 Quirin: Advocacy Tips Note that in Johnson (L.E.) v. Shinseki, Vet.App., No (Jan. 21, 2010), the BVA denied vet SC for spina bifida b/c it was a congenital or developmental defect, there was no evidence of superimposed disability, and because it was a congenital defect it could not have been aggravated by service (since defects are not able to worsen or improve) The CAVC affirmed
36 Quirin is Game Changing b/c: It opens up more possibilities for veterans and advocates Advocates may be able to get a medical opinion as to whether the vet s s condition is a defect or disease process (i.e., capable of worsening or improving) Quirin affirms that advocates and the VA should always look for evidence of worsening in medical records that may indicate whether defect or disease and is relevant to aggravation Quirin emphasizes that advocates should always look
37 Game Changing Cases re: Proper Evaluation for SC Conditions
38 Tatum v. Shinseki (part 1) Tatum: 23 Vet.App (2009) Vet had a 10% disability evaluation for SC hypothyroidism rated rated under DC 7903 Vet filed a claim for increase The rating criteria under DC 7903:
39 Tatum v. Shinseki (part 1) 10%-- --fatigability, or; continuous meds required for control; 30%-- --fatigability; constipation, & mental sluggishness; 60%-- --muscular weakness, mental disturbance, & weight gain 100%-- --cold intolerance, muscular weakness, cardiovascular involvement, mental disturbance, bradycardia,, & sleepiness
40 Tatum v. Shinseki (part 1) C-file had: evidence that vet suffered from fatigability and mental sluggishness (2 or 3 criteria under 30%) evidence that vet suffered from weight gain (1 of 3 criteria listed under 60%) Board decided the veteran must have all three symptoms to get a 30% rating
41 Tatum v. Shinseki (part 1) Vet argued that under 38 C.F.R. 4.7, all 3 symptoms under 30% rating are not required CAVC agreed 38 C.F.R. 4.7 says: Where there is a question as to which of 2 evaluation shall be applied, higher evaluation will be assigned if disability picture more nearly approximates the criteria required for that rating. Otherwise, lower rating will be assigned
42 Tatum v. Shinseki (part 1) Also, 38 C.F.R. 4.21: It is not expected... that all cases will show all the findings specified in an applicable Diagnostic Code
43 Tatum v. Shinseki (part 1) CAVC held: BVA concluded erroneously that all 3 criteria were needed to establish entitlement to 30% rating 38 C.F.R. 4.7 & 4.21 vets do not necessarily need to have all criteria listed for the higher eval in order to receive the higher rating
44 Tatum v. Shinseki (part 2) Vet served from 5/79 to 11/91 Filed claim for SC for duodenitis w/ duodenal erosion & mild esophagitis (problems w/ gastrointestinal system) In 1992, VA granted SC for a stomach condition diagnosed as mild peptic ulcer disease and awarded 10% rating
45 Tatum v. Shinseki (part 2) Over time, evidence suggested vet did not suffer from a peptic ulcer anymore Vet did have other diagnoses for GI problems, including GERD, gastritis, esophagitis,, acid peptic disease, and hiatal hernia VA reduced peptic ulcer disease to 0%
46 Tatum v. Shinseki (part 2) Vet argued that she continued to suffer gastrointestinal problems & VA should have considered changing the DC under which GI disability is rated not reduce to 0% 38 C.F.R when doubt as to change in dx,, retain original dx with new dx in parentheses CAVC reversed reduction & reinstated prior rating
Update: Recent CAVC Cases. Recent Cases Help Advocates Detect VA Error
Update: Recent CAVC Cases Recent Cases Help Advocates Detect VA Error Summary of Cases Kahana Don t let VA/BVA give own med. opinion Savage Clarify unclear med. reports, don t just deny Clemons Don t let
More informationLAY STATEMENTS. Celeste Krikorian. MOPH NSO Annual Training Spring 2014 Orlando, FL 1
Celeste Krikorian MOPH NSO Annual Training Spring 2014 Orlando, FL 1 OBJECTIVES What are lay statements? Impact of lay statements! How lay statements can support claims! MOPH NSO Annual Training Spring
More informationCOMMON VA EFFECTIVE DATE ERRORS
COMMON VA EFFECTIVE DATE ERRORS Know the Rules that Will Give the Earliest Effective Date NVLSP 2011 1 (1) Evidence Received Prior to Expiration of Appeal Period The Effective Date Rule when New & Material
More informationCommon VA Errors in Claims for Increase
Common VA Errors in Claims for Increase Introduction The following rules are often not applied, or misapplied These propositions discuss statutes and regulations that try to fill in gaps in VA rating schedule
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS. No. 00-1889. On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals. (Decided January 28, 2002 )
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS No. 00-1889 DAVID PARKER, APPELLANT, V. A NTHONY J. PRINCIPI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE. On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Decided
More informationHYPO: HEARING LOSS. Comedy of VA Errors Creates Lengthy Delays ANSWERS AND ADVICE
HYPO: HEARING LOSS Comedy of VA Errors Creates Lengthy Delays ANSWERS AND ADVICE ANSWERS AND ADVICE Case was appealed to Veterans Court (CAVC): VA General Counsel (VAGC) and NVLSP attorneys agreed to file
More informationMental Disorders (Except initial PTSD and Eating Disorders) Examination
Mental Disorders (Except initial PTSD and Eating Disorders) Examination Name: Date of Exam: SSN: C-number: Place of Exam: The following health care providers can perform initial examinations for Mental
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit BURDELL VAUGHN, Claimant-Appellant v. ROBERT A. MCDONALD, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent-Appellee
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit RONNIE LAWSON, Claimant-Appellant, v. ERIC K. SHINSEKI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent-Appellee.
More informationInitial Evaluation for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Examination
Initial Evaluation for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Examination Name: Date of Exam: SSN: C-number: Place of Exam: The following health care providers can perform initial examinations for PTSD. a board-certified
More information5.4 TOTAL DISABILITY RATINGS BASED ON INDIVIDUAL UNEMPLOYABILITY As discussed earlier, the Schedule for Rating Disabilities is comprised of ten grades of disability which are based on the average impairment
More informationM21-1MR Part I Manual for Disability Compensation Veterans Rights
M21-1MR Part I Manual for Disability Compensation Veterans Rights Pages downloaded from VA.gov and assembled with normal pagination vs. weird VA pagination (that is impossible to track) by Benjamin Krause
More informationDEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS Veterans Benefits Administration Washington, D.C. 20420. All VA Regional Offices and Centers Fast Letter 14-08
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS Veterans Benefits Administration Washington, D.C. 20420 August 14, 2014 In Reply Refer To: 212B All VA Regional Offices and Centers Fast Letter 14-08 SUBJ: Final Rule: Disease
More informationBOARD OF VETERANS' APPEALS DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS WASHINGTON, DC 20420
BOARD OF VETERANS' APPEALS DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS WASHINGTON, DC 20420 IN THE APPEAL OF DOCKET NO. 11-31 051 ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office in Houston,
More informationVeterans Service-Connected Compensation What it is and How to Get it
Veterans Service-Connected Compensation What it is and How to Get it May 22, 2012 Presenters David L. Houppert, Esq. National a Service Director VetsFirst, a program of United Spinal Association E-mail:
More informationNEHMER UPDATE AND SOME RETRO BENEFITS YOU MIGHT NOT KNOW ABOUT: DEA, HEALTHCARE REFUNDS, & CHAMPVA
NEHMER UPDATE AND SOME RETRO BENEFITS YOU MIGHT NOT KNOW ABOUT: DEA, HEALTHCARE REFUNDS, & CHAMPVA Presented by: NVLSP NVLSP 2012 1 Requirements for Comp Based on AO Exposure (38 U.S.C. 1116(a), 38 C.F.R
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS N O. 05-0080. On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS N O. 05-0080 SANTIAGO M. JUAREZ, APPELLANT, V. JAMES B. PEAKE, M.D., SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE. On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit LOUIS CLAY, Claimant-Appellant v. ROBERT A. MCDONALD, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent-Appellee
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ZAWADI Z. ALLEN, SR., Claimant-Appellant v. ROBERT A. MCDONALD, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent-Appellee
More informationDocumentation Requirements ADHD
Documentation Requirements ADHD Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is considered a neurobiological disability that interferes with a person s ability to sustain attention, focus on a task
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ARTHUR L. GHEE, Claimant-Appellant v. ROBERT A. MCDONALD, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent-Appellee
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO. 01-1536. On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals. (Decided October 3, 2002 )
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO. 01-1536 JOHN H. CHARLES, APPELLANT, V. ANTHONY J. PRINCIPI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE. On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO. 13-0540. On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals. (Decided February 9, 2015)
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO. 13-0540 ROBERT FOUNTAIN, APPELLANT, V. ROBERT A. MCDONALD, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE. On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals
More informationHYPOTHETICAL--ANSWER SERVICE CONNECTION FOR HEARING LOSS AND TINNITUS
HYPOTHETICAL--ANSWER SERVICE CONNECTION FOR HEARING LOSS AND TINNITUS ANSWER ENTITLEMENT TO SERVICE CONNECTION FOR BILATERAL HEARING LOSS AND TINNITUS. I. Background A. The facts presented are from a real
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO. 03-1204. On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals. (Decided July 20, 2006 )
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO. 03-1204 DARRYL D. BRADFORD, APPELLANT, V. R. JAMES NICHOLSON, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE. On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals
More informationSpecial Monthly Compensation (SMC) and the new SMC(t) Benefit. A General Overview
Special Monthly Compensation (SMC) and the new SMC(t) Benefit A General Overview Introduction to SMC SMC paid in addition to comp paid under Rating Schedule SMC Compensates vets for SC loss or loss of
More informationBRB No. 10-0411 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
BRB No. 10-0411 CHARLES SPRALLING v. Claimant-Petitioner ELECTRIC BOAT CORPORATION Self-Insured Employer-Respondent DATE ISSUED: 02/16/2011 DECISION and ORDER Appeal of the Decision and Order Denying Benefits
More informationOn April 6, 2004, a Board Hearing Officer confirmed the Case Manager s findings.
1 CLAIM HISTORY AND APPEAL PROCEEDINGS: The Worker was employed in a coal mine operation from 1978 until 2001, primarily as a long wall electrician. He was also a member of the mine rescue team (a Drägerman
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS. Appeal No. 13-1445 SHERMAN J. LIGHTLE, Appellant, ERIC K. SHINSEKI, Appellee. BRIEF FOR APPELLANT
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS Appeal No. 13-1445 SHERMAN J. LIGHTLE, Appellant, v. ERIC K. SHINSEKI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Appellee. BRIEF FOR APPELLANT Steven M. Amundson
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit JOE A. VANN, JR., Claimant-Appellant v. ROBERT A. MCDONALD, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO. 11-3814. On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO. 11-3814 PATRICIA A. MARTIN, APPELLANT, V. ERIC K. SHINSEKI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE. On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals
More informationService Officer Training. Structure. Benefits Appeals Hearings Resources
Service Officer Training 1 VA Structure VA Law Benefits Appeals Hearings Resources 2 Veterans Benefits Administration (VBA) Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Board of Veterans Appeals (BVA) Court of
More informationDAV DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS. Service Bulletin. December 2009. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS (VA) http://www.va.gov
DAV DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS 807 MAINE AVENUE, S.W. WASHINGTON, D.C. 20024-2410 (202) 554-3501 FAX (202) 554-3581 Service Bulletin December 2009 DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS (VA) http://www.va.gov
More informationUnited States Department of Labor Employees Compensation Appeals Board DECISION AND ORDER
United States Department of Labor B.P., Appellant and DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, Baltimore, MD, Employer Docket No. 13-1726 Issued: January 30, 2014 Appearances: Appellant,
More informationDISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS. Service Bulletin. October 2009. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS (VA)
DAV DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS 807 MAINE AVENUE, S.W. WASHINGTON, D.C. 20024-2410 (202) 554-3501 FAX (202) 554-3581 Service Bulletin October 2009 DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS (VA) http://www.va.gov Presumption
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS. No. 10-922. On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS No. 10-922 JOE L. MONZINGO, APPELLANT, V. ERIC K. SHINSEKI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE. On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Argued
More informationHow To Find Out If The Gulf War And Health Effects Of Serving In The Gulf Wars Are Linked To Health Outcomes
Gulf War and Health: Update of Health Effects of Serving in the Gulf War Statement of Stephen L. Hauser, M.D. Professor and Chair of Neurology University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine
More information3 r-t. ~l> ro - ro r-t. OJ ~ ro. r-tcro. OJ V) n l> -< OJ n. ' tl. r-t. r-t :J. r-t C --; --; C --; 0. '--""" ro. r:; ) C') V) --;...-.. ro. r..
J./ fd r..) ' tl => ) ill ~ ~?"j J r:; ) C')..,..J - 0 :J ro r-t --; ""C 0 OJ --; C r-t C -- n 3 r-t ro - 0 :J r-t :J r-t 0 ---n 0 ~l> r-tcro < --; 0 OJ n :J OJ V) n l> -< OJ ~ ro OJ 0' --; V) --;...-..
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Case: 15-30322 Document: 00513241147 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/21/2015 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT KENNETH L. MORGAN, JR., Summary Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth
More informationPage 1 of 9. Table of Contents
Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary Page 2 2. Introduction.. Page 3 3. Definitions of Occupational Disease. Page 4 4. Occupational Disease Branch. Page 6 5. Adversarial vs. Inquiry.. Page 7 6. Quicker
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS. No. 12-2017. On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS No. 12-2017 JIMMY H. FLOORE, APPELLANT, V. ERIC K. SHINSEKI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE. On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Argued
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO. 08-0531. On Appeal from the Board of Veterans Appeals. (Decided October 7, 2009)
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO. 08-0531 LINDA L. SWINNEY, APPELLANT, V. ERIC K. SHINSEKI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE. On Appeal from the Board of Veterans Appeals (Decided
More informationFREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT THE FMLA. The Family Medical Leave Act ( FMLA ) gives employees the right to take up to 12
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT THE FMLA The Family Medical Leave Act ( FMLA ) gives employees the right to take up to 12 weeks of unpaid leave in order to: 1) care for a newly born or adopted child;
More informationInstructions for Completing MEDICAL ASSESSMENT FORM For Students with Permanent Disabilities
Instructions for Completing MEDICAL ASSESSMENT FORM For Students with Permanent Disabilities Nova Scotia Student Assistance requires this form to be completed by a qualified medical assessor in order to
More informationWORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1894/06
WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1894/06 BEFORE: R. Nairn : Vice-Chair HEARING: September 25, 2006 at Windsor Oral DATE OF DECISION: October 16, 2006 NEUTRAL CITATION: 2006
More informationEvaluation and Assessment and Eligibility Regulations 2011
303.10 Developmental delay. As used in this part, developmental delay, when used with respect to an individual residing in a State, has the meaning given to that term under 303.300. 303.10 Developmental
More informationObjective: Provide information regarding 4 Department of Veterans Affairs programs.
Veterans Benefits Objective: Provide information regarding 4 Department of Veterans Affairs programs. OEF/OIF/OND Case Management Peer Support VA Claims and Benefits Vocational Rehabilitation Structure
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO. 10-3605. On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO. 10-3605 ROBERT L. TRAFTER, APPELLANT, V. ERIC K. SHINSEKI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE. On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IA Construction Corporation and : Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., : Petitioners : : v. : No. 2151 C.D. 2013 : Argued: November 10, 2014 Workers Compensation Appeal
More informationTRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY. Revised VA Rating Schedule for TBI
TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY Revised VA Rating Schedule for TBI 1 WHAT IS TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY OR TBI? TBI is an injury to the Brain from External Force Results in immediate effects such as LOC Amnesia Neurological
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT No. 03-2860 Tamela J. Petrillo, et al., * * Plaintiffs - Appellants, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Northern District
More informationHow To Get Social Security Disability Benefits
WINNING SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY BENEFITS: A STEP BY STEP BY STEP GUIDE TO UNDERSTANDING AND APPLYING FOR SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY BENEFITS By ELLIOTT ANDALMAN, ESQ Foreword Here at Andalman & Flynn,
More informationClaims Agent / Attorney Accreditation
Claims Agent / Attorney Accreditation VA Form VA21a After an affirmative determination of character and fitness for practice before the VA, claims agent applicants must achieve a score of 75 percent or
More informationHELEN M. SAFKO, Petitioner. DIRECTOR Office Workers' Compensation Program, United States Department of Labor, Respondent
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT NOT PRECEDENTIAL No. 03-4314 HELEN M. SAFKO, Petitioner DIRECTOR Office Workers' Compensation Program, United States Department of Labor, v. Respondent
More informationIf you do not use the calculator-generated text, you MUST notify the Rating Job Aids mailbox. Please describe the error in detail.
HEARING LOSS CALCULATOR USER GUIDE HL Calculator v4.7 Index Hearing Loss Calculator.....3 How to Navigate the Hearing Loss Calculator User Guide.4 Hearing Loss Calculator - Starting the Program..5 New
More informationBurns and Roe Asbestos Personal Injury Settlement Trust Instructions for Filing Claims
The Burns and Roe Asbestos Personal Injury Settlement Trust (the "Trust") was established pursuant to the Plan of Reorganizaton of Burns and Roe Enterprises, Inc., and Burns and Roe Construction Group,
More informationMarilyn Townsend ATTORNEY AT LAW
Admitted to practice in WI, D.C., MD, GA Marilyn Townsend ATTORNEY AT LAW 122 WEST WASHINGTON AVENUE MADISON, WISCONSIN 53703 Phone (608) 255-5111 Fax (608) 255-3358 Excerpts from Letter to Client on Fibromyalgia
More informationInsurance Tips. Obtaining Services
Insurance Tips The information below is designed to provide an overview of how to obtain insurance coverage for speech-language pathology (speech therapy) and audiology services. The American Speech-Language-Hearing
More informationCarpentertown Coal and Coke Co v. Director OWCP US Dept of Labor
2015 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 1-7-2015 Carpentertown Coal and Coke Co v. Director OWCP US Dept of Labor Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2015
More informationDepartment of Veterans Affairs VHA DIRECTIVE 2013-002 Veterans Health Administration Washington, DC 20420 January 14, 2013
Department of Veterans Affairs VHA DIRECTIVE 2013-002 Veterans Health Administration Washington, DC 20420 DOCUMENTATION OF MEDICAL EVIDENCE FOR DISABILITY EVALUATION PURPOSES 1. PURPOSE: This Veterans
More informationAGENT ORANGE CLAIMS. Presented by: Rick Spataro Staff Attorney NVLSP
AGENT ORANGE CLAIMS Presented by: Rick Spataro Staff Attorney NVLSP Requirements for Compensation Based on Agent Orange Exposure Veterans qualify for presumptive service connection of diseases related
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO. 07-0790. On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO. 07-0790 DENISE LORETH, APPELLANT, V. ERIC K. SHINSEKI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE. On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Argued
More informationKAISER ALUMINUM & CHEMICAL CORPORATION ASBESTOS PERSONAL INJURY TRUST
KAISER ALUMINUM & CHEMICAL CORPORATION ASBESTOS PERSONAL INJURY TRUST Dual Claimants Frequently Asked Questions Q. How does the Trust review a lung cancer claim where the injured party also had silica
More informationThe Field of Counseling
Gainful Employment Information The Field of Counseling Job Outlook Veterans Administration one of the most honorable places to practice counseling is with the VA. Over recent years, the Veteran s Administration
More informationService Connection - A Guide to RBA2000
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS Veterans Benefits Administration Washington, D.C. 20420 March 15, 2011 All VBA Regional Offices and Centers Fast Letter 11-09 SUBJ: Procedures for Rating Infectious Diseases
More informationAsbestos Brochure. Jim Wyatt - jwyatt@hamers.com Stephen Ball - sball@hamers.com. Freephone: 0800 591 999. www.hamers.com
Jim Wyatt - jwyatt@hamers.com Stephen Ball - sball@hamers.com Freephone: 0800 591 999 5 Earls Court, Priory Park East, Hull, HU4 7DY Tel: 01482 326666 Fax: 01482 324432 Aspect Court, 47 Park Square East,
More informationOverview. Geriatric Overview. Chapter 26. Geriatrics 9/11/2012
Chapter 26 Geriatrics Slide 1 Overview Trauma Common Medical Emergencies Special Considerations in the Elderly Medication Considerations Abuse and Neglect Expanding the Role of EMS Slide 2 Geriatric Overview
More informationUnited States Department of Labor Employees Compensation Appeals Board DECISION AND ORDER
United States Department of Labor E.B., claiming as widow of N.B., Appellant and DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, NAVAL SEA SYSTEMS COMMAND-SHIPYARDS, Philadelphia, PA, Employer Appearances: Appellant, pro se Office
More informationAGENT ORANGE IN Thailand ASSOCIATED TO malignant lymphoma. On appeal from the Department of Veterans Affairs Regional Office in Newark, New Jersey
AGENT ORANGE IN Thailand ASSOCIATED TO malignant lymphoma Citation Nr: 0418252 Decision Date: 07/09/04 Archive Date: 07/21/04 DOCKET NO. 99-08 894A ) DATE ) ) On appeal from the Department of Veterans
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2007-7052 JAMES M. HALL, v. Claimant-Appellant, GORDON H. MANSFIELD, Acting Secretary of Veterans Affairs,
More informationDESCRIPTION OF FORENSIC POPULATION
SERVICES FOR FORENSIC CLIENTS GENERAL LEGAL RIGHTS CHAPTER 13 DESCRIPTION OF FORENSIC POPULATION The forensic program for the State of Missouri is designed to provide services to all circuit courtordered
More informationThe GED Test - Accommodations
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (FAQs) GED Test Accommodations Questions about the process of requesting accommodations on the GED test What types of conditions or impairments might need to be accommodated?
More informationDisease/Illness GUIDE TO PLEURAL PLAQUES. What are Pleural Plaques? www.simpsonmillar.co.uk Telephone 0844 858 3200
GUIDE TO PLEURAL PLAQUES What are Pleural Plaques? The most common injury caused by asbestos exposure is pleural plaques, which appear as white or yellow thickening on the pleura. They often appear frequently
More informationFederal Recovery Coordination Program. Karen Guice, MD, MPP Executive Director
Federal Recovery Coordination Program Karen Guice, MD, MPP Executive Director CONCEPT The President s Commission on Care for America s Returning Wounded Warriors Immediately create comprehensive patient-centered
More informationREPORTER. Decision of the Appeal Division
WORKERS COMPENSATION REPORTER Decision of the Appeal Division Number: 00-1682 Date: October 26, 2000 Panel: Marguerite Mousseau Subject: Whether Worker Suffered Psychological Impairment Constituting a
More informationWikiLeaks Document Release
WikiLeaks Document Release February 2, 2009 Congressional Research Service Report RS20519 ASBESTOS COMPENSATION ACT OF 2000 Henry Cohen, American Law Division Updated April 13, 2000 Abstract. This report
More informationWorkers Compensation Board of Nova Scotia. Issues Identification Paper Chronic Pain: Causal Connection to Original Compensable Injury
Workers Compensation Board of Nova Scotia Issues Identification Paper Chronic Pain: Causal Connection to Original Compensable Injury Date: April 16, 2007 Table of Contents Introduction.2 Background.4 What
More informationHow To Cover Occupational Therapy
Guidelines for Medical Necessity Determination for Occupational Therapy These Guidelines for Medical Necessity Determination (Guidelines) identify the clinical information MassHealth needs to determine
More informationInstructions for Completing MEDICAL ASSESSMENT FORM For Students with Permanent Disabilities
Instructions for Completing MEDICAL ASSESSMENT FORM For Students with Permanent Disabilities This form must be completed by a qualified medical assessor in order to verify the applicant s permanent disability
More informationREPORT ON CONSULTATIONS:
REPORT ON CONSULTATIONS: Amending the Workers Compensation Act to Provide Presumptive Coverage for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder JUNE 2015 A Report Prepared by the Workers Compensation Board on behalf
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 14-3702 MARK WARREN TETZLAFF, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EDUCATIONAL CREDIT MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 08-1722 NANCY LOVE, v. Plaintiff-Appellant, NATIONAL CITY CORPORATION WELFARE BENEFITS PLAN, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR
Filed 4/21/99 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR GENERAL DYNAMICS CORP., Petitioner, v. No. B126555 (W.C.A.B. No. 96 LBO
More informationThe Human Right to Health Denied - Feinberg s Rejection of BP Illness Claims
Upholding our human right to a healthy environment The Human Right to Health Denied: Feinberg s Rejection of BP Illness Claims Breaks with Past Practices By Nathalie Walker & Monique Harden Advocates for
More informationKaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation Asbestos PI Trust. Filing Instructions
The Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation Asbestos PI Trust (the "Trust") was established as a result of the bankruptcy of the Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation. The Trust was created to process,
More informationVA BENEFITS FOR SERVICEMEMBERS, VETERANS, AND FAMILIES. Veterans and the Fully Developed Claims (FDC) Program VETERANS BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION
VA BENEFITS FOR SERVICEMEMBERS, VETERANS, AND FAMILIES Veterans and the Fully Developed Claims (FDC) Program SUMMER 2013 Asking Questions Audience polls, questions and answers, and chat broadcasts will
More informationMedical Records Analysis
Medical Records Analysis Karen A. Mulroy, Partner Evans & Dixon, L.L.C. The analysis of medical legal issues posed in any case can be complicated, requiring some close reading and detective work to both
More informationHamers S O L I C I T O R S. Jim Wyatt jwyatt@hamers.com. Freephone: 0800 591 999. 5 Earls Court, Priory Park, East, Hull HU4 7DY
Hamers S O L I C I T O R S Jim Wyatt jwyatt@hamers.com Freephone: 0800 591 999 5 Earls Court, Priory Park, East, Hull HU4 7DY Tel: 01482 326666 Fax: 01482 324432 www.hamers.com Hamers Solicitors LP is
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
ZARA D. TARPLEY, FILED United States Court of Appeals UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Tenth Circuit Plaintiff-Appellant, FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT February 4, 2015 Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court v. CAROLYN
More informationFactsheet F111-04 Compensation under subsection 7(2) of the SRCA for F-111 workers
of the SRCA for F-111 workers Purpose This Factsheet provides information about how to claim compensation under subsection 7(2) of the Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988 (SRCA) for F-111
More informationResponding to the Needs of Justice-Involved Veterans. Mark Mayhew, LCSW VA Justice Outreach Coordinator
Responding to the Needs of Justice-Involved Veterans Mark Mayhew, LCSW VA Justice Outreach Coordinator There is inherent sympathy for those who sustain damage in defense of country, whether that damage
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) No. 3:02-CR-30 ) CHARLES MICHAEL BEATTY ) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This criminal case
More informationDepartment of Defense MANUAL
Department of Defense MANUAL NUMBER 1341.12 August 10, 2015 USD(P&R) SUBJECT: Special Compensation for Assistance with Activities of Daily Living (SCAADL) Process References: See Enclosure 1 1. PURPOSE.
More informationOrder filed April 28, 2015. 2015 IL App (4th) 140465WC-U NO. 4-14-0465WC IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FOURTH DISTRICT
Order filed April 28, 2015 NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances allowed under Rule 23(e)(1). 2015
More informationInstructions for Filing Claims
The ARTRA 524(g) Asbestos Trust (the "Trust") was established as a result of the bankruptcy of the ARTRA Group. The Trust was created to process, liquidate and pay valid asbestos personal injury claims
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
FIDELITY & GUARANTY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, FILED United States Court of Appeals UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Tenth Circuit Plaintiff - Appellee, FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT February 18, 2015 Elisabeth A.
More informationVeterans Disability Claims 1 Copyright 2013 Marc Whitehead All Rights Reserved Worldwide. Marc Whitehead & Associates, Attorneys at Law, L.L.P.
Veterans Disability Claims 1 WARNING: This ebook is for your personal use only. You may NOT Give Away, Share Or Resell This Intellectual Property In Any Way All Rights Reserved Copyright 2013 Marc Whitehead.
More informationVeterans Affairs: Health Care and Benefits for Veterans Exposed to Agent Orange
Order Code RL34370 Veterans Affairs: Health Care and Benefits for Veterans Exposed to Agent Orange February 11, 2008 Sidath Viranga Panangala Analyst in Veterans Policy Domestic Social Policy Division
More informationGeneral Information on Representing Yourself in a Workers Compensation Case
General Information on Representing Yourself in a Workers Compensation Case Idaho Industrial Commission PO Box 83720 Boise, ID 83720-0041 Telephone: (208) 334-6000 Fax: (208) 332-7558 www.iic.idaho.gov
More informationUnited States Department of Labor Employees Compensation Appeals Board DECISION AND ORDER
United States Department of Labor C.B., Appellant and DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, Lexington, KY, Employer Appearances: Joshua S. Harp, Esq., for the appellant Office
More information