The Boomerang Effect of Traffic Citations

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "The Boomerang Effect of Traffic Citations"

Transcription

1 Trucking Law Admissions of Guilt By Brian Del Gatto and Michaelle Jean-Pierre The Boomerang Effect of Traffic Citations The general idea of cause is that without which another thing, called the effect, cannot be. The final cause is that for the sake of which anything is done. George William Howard, 7th Earl of Carlisle, Lord Morpeth The laws of cause and effect govern the universe as we know it. A cause is the basis for an action or response, whereas the effect is what happens as a result of the cause. For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. This fundamental law established by Sir Isaac Newton is visible in every aspect of life including the disposition of traffic citations. According to Florence Shinn, The game of life is the game of boomerangs. The boomerang is a curved device that can be used as a weapon or for sport. Boomerangs are believed to be one of the first heavierthan- air flying machines ever invented by human beings. Once thrown, the boomerang travels in an elliptical path and eventually returns to its point of origin. Although not curved, a traffic citation issued as a result of a vehicular collision may eventually return in the form of a subsequent civil litigation for personal injury, cargo or property damage. The citation may have little effect or prove disastrous when defending a civil action related to the accident. Generally, when an accident occurs, one of the parties is issued a traffic citation (usually the big, bad, tractor- trailer). The citation demands a response within a certain time frame. The cited party will have to decide in which manner to respond to the ticket: pay the fine, plead guilty or contest the ticket. Not uncommonly, a longhaul driver or a transportation company would rather pay a fine than fight a citation. We suspect that law enforcement officers are aware of this and give the benefit of the doubt to the non-truck driver during an accident investigation. Statutes of limitations for personal injury, cargo or property damage expire at various points after the date of an accident, depending on the state involved. Thus, in almost all scenarios, the cited party would have to respond to the traffic citation well in advance of a notice of civil litigation. Here is where the boomerang effect comes into play. Depending on the state, evidence of the disposition and a guilty plea to a traffic citation may be admissible and utilized as a weapon against a transportation company and driver at trial. A jury may view the citation and guilty plea as an n Brian Del Gatto is the managing partner of the Connecticut office of Wilson Elser, an executive committee member, and chair of the Motor Transportation and Logistics Practice Group at the firm. He has a nationwide Transportation Practice and is a member of TLA, TIDA, DRI and other transport organizations. Michaelle Jean-Pierre is a transportation team associate in the Wilson Elser Connecticut office. She graduated from University of Pittsburgh in May, 2002, and Pace Law School in May n For The Defense n February DRI. All rights reserved.

2 indication of fault, which may ultimately result in a verdict for the plaintiff, and possibly support a punitive damage award. In the words of Stephen R. Covey, While we are free to choose our actions, we are not free to choose the consequences of those actions. Consequences are governed by natural law. Once issued, a client must respond to a traffic citation. The cause is the issuance and disposition of the traffic citation. The manner in which a plea to the traffic citation plays out in a subsequent civil litigation is the effect. Depending on the type of plea, evidence of a traffic citation and its disposition may become a legal boomerang. Every transportation attorney responding to either an accident or defending a serious trucking mishap well after the event has come face-to-face with the laws of cause and effect. It is of the utmost importance in this situation that a transportation company, its driver, and under certain circumstances, the insurer, collaborate on how to respond to a citation. In our opinion, transportation companies should address pleading to a traffic citation much as they would address issues of post- accident drug and alcohol testing under the Federal Motor Carrier Regulations, which requires testing after accidents on drivers whose performance could have contributed to the accidents, as determined by a citation, and for all fatal accidents, even if a driver is not cited for a traffic infraction. 49 C.F.R Therefore, trucking companies should establish internal policy regarding pleadings to traffic citations. This article will focus mainly on noncriminal traffic citation issues surrounding the disposition of traffic tickets and their potential effect on subsequent civil litigation. Traffic Violations Traffic laws are generally adopted for the public s safety, to regulate the conduct of motor vehicle operators on state and local roadways and to protect against injuries from automobile collisions. State and local police issue traffic violations after motor vehicle accidents to drivers whom the police believe have caused or contributed to these accidents. Generally, a traffic citation states which law a driver violated and may contain a description of how the driver violated the law, as well as statements of the facts surrounding the incident. The citation also contains guidelines on how to respond to the citation. Normally, a driver may enter a plea by mail, pay a fine, or schedule a court date to appear before a judge, magistrate or hearing officer in connection with the traffic citation. Failure to respond to the citation may lead to a default judgment, an arrest and, in some cases, a suspended license. A traffic court s proceedings are usually short, and generally result in a plea bargain. A plea bargain is a negotiation between the prosecution and defense and sometimes the judge, depending on the jurisdiction that settles a dispute regarding an infraction. An example of a plea bargain is when a defendant pleads guilty to a traffic offense in exchange for payment of a fine. Often, transportation companies and their drivers accept plea bargains because of their convenience, for example, when faced with litigating at distances, or to avoid conducting trials. If a transportation company does not accept a plea bargain, a trial over the traffic ticket might ensue, and the penalties may be greater than the fine offered as part of the plea bargain. During a traffic citation trial, the prosecution and defense are permitted to introduce evidence to support their claims, such as issuing police officer testimony or witness testimony. The focus of traffic court trial is whether or not the accused did in fact violate the traffic ordinance. During the proceeding, generally the issues of negligence and damages are not litigated. Depending on the method of disposition and the nature of the plea that a defendant enters, a traffic court verdict may boomerang, years later, in subsequent civil litigation for personal injury arising from that motor vehicle accident. Guilty Plea as an Admission In every civil case, each party attempts to introduce evidence that causes prejudice to the other party or tends to prove its case either directly or circumstantially. Generally, all relevant evidence is admissible in trial unless there is a sound reason to exclude it. Evidence is relevant if it tends to make the existence of a fact that is consequential to determining an action more or less probable than would be the case without the evidence. Fed. R. Evid However, not all relevant evidence is admissible. Relevant evidence may be deemed inadmissible if its probative value is outweighed by the danger that it will unfairly prejudice the other side. Fed. R. Evid Typically, a party s assertion or conduct that is inconsistent with that party s position at trial may be offered into evidence A driver or the company that controls decision making should think twice prior to pleading guilty to a traffic citation as a knee-jerk reaction. against that party as an admission. Fed. R. Evid The admission can only be used against the person who made the statement. Basile v. Huntington Utilities Fuel, 400 N.Y.S.2d 150 (N.Y. App. Div. 1977). Further, an admission must appear to be against the interest of the declarant at the time of trial. Admissions are generally admissible in court because it is improbable that a party will admit anything adverse unless it is true. Cox v. State, 3 N.Y.2d 693, , 177 N.Y.S.2d 818 (N.Y. 1958); Reed v. McCord, 160 N.Y. 330, 54 N.E. 737 (N.Y. 1899). Depending on the jurisdiction, a guilty plea in response to a traffic infraction may be admissible against the declarant in civil litigation arising from the same occurrence as an admission against interest or as an admission by a party- opponent. Beale v. Speck, 127 Idaho 521, 530 (Idaho Ct. App. 1995). While some courts find traffic citation pleas unreliable evidence, several courts have admitted guilty pleas as evidence to support an issue. In Ryan v. Westgard, the Washington Court of Appeals held that guilty pleas for traffic offenses were admissible in subsequent civil litigation as statements against interest. Ryan v. Westgard, 530 P.2d 687 (Wash. Ct. App. 1975). For The Defense n February 2010 n 19

3 Trucking Law The court in Ryan stated that a plea of guilty to the negligent driving charge could be brought in to show the defendant s admission of negligence on his part at the time in question. It is true that the defendant faces a hard choice in whether to plead guilty to a charge that may be presented later in a civil case as an admission against himself or face the possibility It is not uncommon for people to plead guilty to traffic charges for reasons of convenience or expediency. 20 n For The Defense n February 2010 of conviction of a charge that may expose him to greater penalties. The choice is his, however, to be made in the face of the risks involved; and he must face the consequences of his choice. Id. at *695. There, the defendant was able to explain his reasons for pleading guilty and the jury was free to accept or reject his explanation. In Jacobs v. Goodspeed, the defendant, a driver who pled guilty to a citation for following too closely in violation of Connecticut Statute , also admitted to the same conduct in his motor vehicle accident report. Jacobs v. Goodspeed, 429 A.2d 915 (Conn. 1980). In Jacobs, the Supreme Court of Connecticut held that the defendant s guilty plea to the traffic infraction was an admission tending to prove his negligence, as was his statement in the motor vehicle accident report. Id. However, such admissions are not conclusive on the issue of negligence. Id. See also Beale v. Speck, 127 Idaho 521, 530 (Idaho Ct. App. 1995). As the court stated in Beale, The party against whom the evidence is offered is free to explain the circumstances under which the guilty plea was entered, and the jury, as the trier of fact, shall determine the weight to which that explanation is entitled. Beale v. Speck, 127 Idaho 521, 530 (Idaho Ct. App. 1995). In Jacobs, the defendant was able to minimize the boomerang effect by offering evidence explaining his position. In addition to the defendant s admissions, the jury considered evidence of adverse weather conditions, conflicting testimony regarding speed and allegations of third-party negligence. Fortunately for the defendant, the jury was able to weigh the guilty plea against all other evidence and enter a verdict for the defendant. Notwithstanding Jacobs or Ryan, evidence of a guilty plea may be interpreted as an admission of negligence, thereby undermining a defendant s introduction of circumstantial evidence when defending a case. Even though a defendant has the opportunity to explain the reasons for entering a guilty plea, it is up to the jury to determine the weight of the evidence. Thus, a driver or the company that controls decision making should think twice prior to pleading guilty to a traffic citation as a knee-jerk reaction. Guilty Plea as Evidence of Liability In New Jersey, evidence of a defendant s traffic offense- related guilty plea is admissible in a civil suit to establish liability arising from the same accident. Eaton v. Eaton, 575 A.2d 858 (N.J. 1990). However, it does not conclusively prove an offense. The party who entered the plea is allowed to present evidence to persuade a jury not to interpret the guilty plea as evidence of negligence. A defendant may want to present carefully crafted evidence that a plea was merely a compromise or entered for expediency or convenience to avoid the cost of contesting the charge. Regardless, a guilty plea coupled with circumstantial evidence surrounding an accident, may afford a plaintiff a basis for a favorable ruling on a motion for summary judgment. In McGraw v. Ranieri, for instance, the plaintiff moved for summary judgment citing the defendant s guilty plea to a traffic infraction. McGraw v. Ranieri, 608 N.Y.S.2d 577 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994). The New York Appellate Court in McGraw noted that the defendant s guilty plea was evidence of negligence and an admission that the defendant did act as charged. McGraw is an example of a case in which a plaintiff used a defendant s guilty plea as an evidentiary weapon in a summary judgment motion, cutting off the defendant s opportunity to rebut or explain the circumstances surrounding the guilty plea to a jury. Id. However, in New Jersey and some other states, a defendant can plead guilty with a civil reservation, or something similar, during traffic court proceedings, to prohibit a plaintiff from introducing a guilty plea as evidence in subsequent civil litigation. A civil reservation is a specific reservation made on behalf of a defendant opposing the use of a guilty plea in a civil suit. On a defendant s request, a court can order that a guilty plea will not serve as admissible evidence in any civil proceeding. N.J. Court 7:6-2(a)(1). This procedure allows a defendant driver to offensively combat the effect of pleading guilty to a traffic infraction in the event that a plaintiff subsequently files a civil suit. Guilty Pleas in Open Court In states such as Arkansas, Maryland and Texas, when a driver physically appears in court and knowingly and voluntarily pleads guilty to a traffic infraction, this evidence may be admissible in a subsequent civil litigation arising from the same occurrence. In addition, transcripts of the proceedings may be used. The reasons for admitting this evidence varies by jurisdiction. For example, in Dedman v. Porch, the Supreme Court of Arkansas held that evidence that a motorist had been cited for failure to yield the right-of-way and that he paid the ticket rather than appear in court, was not admissible as a statement against interest in a subsequent property damage action. Dedman v. Porch, 739 S.W.2d 685 (Ark. 1987). The court reasoned that the only proper evidence relating to a traffic violation conviction is a party s guilty plea in open court. Similarly, in Cox v. Bohman, the Texas Court of Appeals, held that unless a plea of guilty to a traffic offense was made in open court, according to law, evidence of such guilty plea is not admissible in a civil suit for damages arising out of negligence giving rise to the charge. Cox v. Bohman, 683 S.W.2d 757, 759 (Tex. App. 1984). In Maryland, an admission of guilt in open court is admissible as evidence in civil litigation arising from the same accident. The probative value is deemed to outweigh the potential, prejudicial effect of a guilty plea on a jury. Maryland courts

4 have consistently held that admissions of guilt in open court are far more probative than a questionable acknowledgment of culpability that might be inferred from paying a preset fine in lieu of going to court. Briggeman v. Albert, 586 A.2d 15, 18 (Md. 1991). Hence, like a boomerang, a guilty plea in open court may return as evidence of negligence or as an admission against the declarant in a subsequent civil proceeding. Withdrawn Guilty Plea A defendant can later withdraw a guilty plea based on due process grounds; however, the withdrawn guilty plea could still resurface as evidence in a civil trial. In Cohens v. Hess, the defendant received a traffic infraction citation for failure to yield the right-of-way while making a left turn. Cohens v. Hess, 92 N.Y.2d 511 (N.Y. 1998). Approximately two weeks after the incident, the defendant pled guilty in Geneva City Court in New York for failure to obey a traffic- control device and was fined 75 dollars. Nearly three years after the defendant entered his plea, and six months after the plaintiff commenced a personal injury action, the defendant returned to Geneva City Court accompanied by his attorney and successfully moved the court to allow him to withdraw his previously entered guilty plea, and the court vacated the conviction. In support of his position, the defendant claimed that his earlier decision to enter the plea was not made with the advice of legal counsel. Because the defendant s motion went unopposed by the local district attorney, the Geneva City Court permitted the defendant to withdraw his plea and vacated the conviction. During the civil trial, the plaintiff tried to use the vacated plea to impeach the defendant s testimony on cross- examination. However, the trial court did not permit the plaintiff to introduce evidence of the vacated plea, shielding the defendant from the boomerang effect. Despite the trial court s ruling, the Court of Appeals of New York held that the withdrawn plea was admissible but that the defendant could offer his reasons for the withdrawn plea. The court reasoned that because a guilty plea to a traffic violation is admissible as proof of negligence in a subsequent civil litigation, a similar rule could apply in this case. The Cohens decision suggests that guilty pleas vacated on constitutional or statutory grounds would be inadmissible. Conversely, in other jurisdictions, such as Colorado, evidence of a plea of guilty, later withdrawn is not admissible in any civil or criminal action, case, or proceeding against the person who made the plea or offer. Colo. R. of Evid Guilty Pleas to Impeach In New York, a non- criminal traffic infraction and the penalty or punishment imposed cannot be used to affect or impair the convicted person s credibility as a witness. Ando v. Woodberry, 168 N.E.2d 520 (N.Y. 1960). However, a plaintiff can use the fact that a defendant pled guilty to a traffic offense as a prior inconsistent statement to impeach testimony concerning negligence. Cohens v. Hess, 705 N.E.2d 1202 (N.Y. 1998). The defendant is permitted an opportunity to explain the circumstances surrounding the guilty plea. Then the jury will evaluate the testimony and decide the weight of the plea. This may have a detrimental effect on the defense of the civil action. Guilty Pleas Governed by Statute Each state has its own procedures regarding admissibility of traffic citations. In Colorado, Florida, Maine, Minnesota and Oregon, statutes govern the admissibility of traffic infraction guilty pleas. Under Oregon statutes, a guilty plea in response to a criminal traffic citation is admissible as an admission against interest, whereas when the offense is a noncriminal traffic infraction, a guilty plea is inadmissible. Ryan v. Ohm, 593 P.2d 1296 (Or. Ct. App. 1979). In Maine, evidence of a defendant s admission to a traffic infraction of imprudent speeding is precluded by statute, which renders it inadmissible as an admission by party- opponent in subsequent civil litigation. Theriault v. Swan, 558 A.2d 369, 370 (Me. 1989). Under Florida law, no one can introduce an admission of guilt to a traffic infraction as evidence in any other proceeding. Carter v. Rukab, 437 So. 2d 761, (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983). Similarly, the Minnesota statute excludes pleas of guilt in traffic matters from being admitted into evidence in civil litigation. Within these five states, transportation companies, their drivers and the attorneys who defend them may be relieved to know that pleading guilty to a non- criminal traffic infraction will not boomerang, prejudicing cases. Courts will not admit a non- criminal guilty plea as evidence during subsequent civil litigation. Nolo Contendere Pleas A plea of nolo contendere permits the accused to neither admit nor deny committing the crime or infractions charged. Instead, he or she can simply consent to a punishment. Generally, a court will not permit a plaintiff to use evidence of a plea of nolo contendere as an admission of guilt in a subsequent civil trial. However, not all states offer the accused the option of pleading nolo contendere. Some courts have argued that a plea of nolo contendere should be admissible as an admission by conduct. As a form of circumstantial evidence, an act inconsistent with a party s trial claim may be shown as an admission. It is argued that the payment of a traffic fine is an implied admission that the defendant committed the act charged and, therefore, should be admissible. Conversely, it has been noted that pleas of nolo contendere may be entered for reasons of expediency or convenience and without much regard to guilt. Even though a plea may be regarded as an implied admission, its inconclusive and ambiguous nature dictates that it should be given no currency beyond the particular case in which it was entered. Lawrence v. Kozlowski, 372 A.2d 110 (Conn. 1976). Various jurisdictions have held that a plea of nolo contendere is inadmissible as either an admission by conduct or a verbal admission, even if followed by a finding of guilty and the imposition of a fine or other penalty. Casalo v. Claro, 165 A.2d 153 (Conn. 1960). Similarly, the mere payment of a fine without proof of a plea is not an admission, either verbal or by conduct. Id. Courts take into consideration the fact that most people tend to pay traffic fines by mail without intending to admit guilt. Accordingly, in those jurisdictions, the payment of a traffic fine is not considered a guilty plea or an express acknowledgment of guilt, but is considered equivalent to a plea of nolo contendere. La Rue v. Archer, 130 Idaho 267, 270 (Idaho Ct. App. 1997); For The Defense n February 2010 n 21

5 Trucking Law Admissibility of the Disposition of Traffic Citations Selected States Depending on the jurisdiction, the disposition of a traffic citation may ultimately affect the resolution of a civil action arising out of an accident. Below is a summary of certain state-specific rules regarding the admissibility of the disposition of traffic citations. State Alabama Arizona Arkansas Connecticut Delaware Georgia Maryland Michigan Nebraska New York Ohio Pennsylvania Tennessee Admissibility of Traffic Infractions in Subsequent Civil Litigation interest or an admission by a party opponent and creates rebuttable presumption of negligence, which may be explained at trial. A guilty plea to a traffic infraction is generally not admissible in a subsequent civil action. Evidence of guilty plea to traffic citation is admissible as some evidence of negligence, but a driver may explain reasons for guilty plea to jury at trial. A guilty plea to a traffic infraction is generally not admissible in a subsequent civil action. Hannah v. Ike Topper Structural Steel, 201 N.E.2d 63 (Ohio Ct. App. 1963). For instance, in Maryland, courts do not consider traffic fines paid either by mail or personally as the evidentiary equivalent of a guilty plea in open court. Instead, Maryland courts consider this consent to conviction. It is a well established rule in Maryland that a conviction, even by consent, is not admissible to prove liability in a subsequent civil action. Briggeman v. Albert, 586 A.2d at 17. The probative value is outweighed by its prejudicial effect, because a jury could possibly substitute the opinion of the issuing police offer or the traffic judge for its own. Other states, such as New Mexico and Oklahoma, have held that evidence of a traffic fine payment is inadmissible without an affirmative showing that a traffic fine was paid because the defendant believed him or herself guilty. Turner v. Silver, 587 P.2d 966 (N.M. Ct. App. 1978). In Turner v. Silver, the New Mexico Court of Appeals held that a traffic citation for obstructing traffic was admissible because the defendant understood that he was guilty of the charge. Id. The court also held that a party who is charged with a traffic offense and pays a fine because he or she understood or thought that he or she was guilty, is akin to a party who pleads guilty. It constitutes an admission against interest and is admissible evidence. Id. Additionally, in Walker v. Forrester, the appellee received a traffic citation for failure to devote attention to driving, which she paid by mail. Walker v. Forrester, 764 P.2d 1337 (Okla. 1988). The Supreme Court of Oklahoma stated that the case record did not contain proof that the appellee pled guilty to the traffic citation. To the contrary, in the appellee s deposition, she stated that she simply mailed the fine to the municipal clerk. Her deposition testimony was similar to a plea of nolo contendere. Accordingly, the court held that this evidence was only admissible in a subsequent civil proceeding when the defendant voluntarily and knowingly entered a plea of guilty to the traffic citation. Id. Collateral Estoppel Collateral estoppel is an affirmative defense used when an issue of ultimate fact has been determined by a valid and final judgment. Consequently, the issue cannot be relitigated between the same parties or their privies in subsequent litigation. Stevenson v. Wright, 273 Neb. 789, 793 (Neb. 2007). Collateral estoppel generally requires that: (1) the cases have identical facts and issues; (2) a court issued a final judgment on the merits in the previous case; and (3) the party against whom the plea is asserted must have been a party to or in privity with a party to the prior adjudication. Hadley v. Maxwell, 27 P.3d 600, 602 (Wash. 2001). Most jurisdictions have held that it is inappropriate to apply collateral estoppel to minor traffic offenses because of the little incentive to vigorously contest cases with small or nominal damages at stake. Id. It is not uncommon for people to plead guilty to traffic charges for reasons of convenience or expediency even though they may believe that they are innocent. The best example is the long-haul transport driver who would lose more wages contesting a traffic citation than the fine is worth. Needless to say, expediency wins out. Furthermore, traffic court proceedings often end in conviction by consent rather than by trial, thus depriving a defendant of a full and fair opportunity to litigate the issues involved in a traffic citation. For example, in Stevenson v. Wright, the Supreme Court of Nebraska noted that the traffic court proceedings only adjudicated whether the defendant operated his vehicle in a careless, reckless or negligent manner, whereas the civil trial raised issues of negligence and contributory negligence. Stevenson v. Wright, 273 Neb. 789 (Neb. 2007). 22 n For The Defense n February 2010

6 There, collateral estoppel was precluded because the issues were not identical, and the defendant s prior conviction did not derive from full and fair litigation. See also, State v. Gusman, 874 P.2d 1112, 1117 (Idaho 1994) (refusing to give collateral estoppel effect to license suspension hearings because they lack a full and fair opportunity to litigate); Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore, 439 U.S. 322, 329 (1979) (holding disincentive to vigorously contest cases with small or nominal damages at stake could be a reason not to apply collateral estoppel); Beale v. Speck, 903 P.2d 110, 119 (Idaho Ct. App. 1995) (holding collateral estoppel for convictions on misdemeanor traffic offenses generally inappropriate except perhaps for guilty pleas in open court); Rice v. Massalone, 554 N.Y.S.2d 294 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990) (holding that collateral estoppel was inappropriate after an administrative determination of liability for a traffic accident); Byrd v. People, 58 P.3d 50, 55 (Colo. 2002) (holding that the lesser consequences and procedures involved in infraction proceedings simply did not warrant the reliability necessary for estoppel to apply); Render v. City of Southfield, 2007 WL (Mich. Ct. App. 2007) (holding that evidence of a conviction on a charge of a traffic violation was not proof of civil liability because the elements of proximate causation and comparative negligence, which are fully examined in a civil action, are not adequately considered in traffic violation proceedings); Marotta v. Hoy, No. 8232, slip op. at 3, N.Y.S.2d 415, 417 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008) (holding that a determination concerning a traffic violation should not have collateral estoppel effect in a subsequent negligence action). As the procedures used to adjudicate traffic infractions are informal, most courts refuse to apply collateral estoppel, which would limit a full and fair consideration of the issue in a civil action. Regardless of whether a defendant was found guilty or acquitted during traffic court proceedings, the issues surrounding the traffic infraction may be re- litigated in a subsequent civil action. Thus, a traffic court verdict does not bind the parties in a subsequent civil action for personal injuries, and the defendant will have an opportunity to relitigate the issues surrounding the traffic infraction. Conclusion It is an enduring truth, which can never be altered, that every infraction of the Law of nature must carry its punitive consequences with it. We can never get beyond that range of cause and effect. Thomas Troward Regarding transport accidents, defense counsel will want to consider whether evidence of the disposition of a traffic citation will be used against defendants in subsequent civil litigation for personal injury. With proper planning and by offering sound legal advice, counsel can limit or eliminate the effects on trucking companies and drivers in civil actions. Advise clients that they will want to review applicable state statutes and common law prior to responding to a traffic citation. If we can take away the cause guilty pleas in turn, the effect will cease. It is imperative that defense counsel and trucking- related clients consider the civil ramifications preceding a traffic citation payment or before entering a guilty plea. As each jurisdiction maintains its own specific laws, advise clients to consult with an attorney regarding possible civil liability prior to responding to traffic citations and that transportation companies would be wise to establish a consistent policy on responding to both criminal and non- criminal citations. For The Defense n February 2010 n 23

Subchapter 6.600 Criminal Procedure in District Court

Subchapter 6.600 Criminal Procedure in District Court Subchapter 6.600 Criminal Procedure in District Court Rule 6.610 Criminal Procedure Generally (A) Precedence. Criminal cases have precedence over civil actions. (B) Pretrial. The court, on its own initiative

More information

Chapter 153. Violations and Fines 2013 EDITION. Related Laws Page 571 (2013 Edition)

Chapter 153. Violations and Fines 2013 EDITION. Related Laws Page 571 (2013 Edition) Chapter 153 2013 EDITION Violations and Fines VIOLATIONS (Generally) 153.005 Definitions 153.008 Violations described 153.012 Violation categories 153.015 Unclassified and specific fine violations 153.018

More information

DESCRIPTION OF THE FEDERAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM FOR DEFENDANTS

DESCRIPTION OF THE FEDERAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM FOR DEFENDANTS DESCRIPTION OF THE FEDERAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM FOR DEFENDANTS DESCRIPTION OF THE FEDERAL CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM FOR DEFENDANTS This pamphlet has been provided to help you better understand the federal

More information

Judge Sissy Hernandez Justice of The Peace Precinct Two 4641 Cohen Suite A El Paso, Texas 79924 (915) 751-7575. Traffic Offenses

Judge Sissy Hernandez Justice of The Peace Precinct Two 4641 Cohen Suite A El Paso, Texas 79924 (915) 751-7575. Traffic Offenses Judge Sissy Hernandez Justice of The Peace Precinct Two 4641 Cohen Suite A El Paso, Texas 79924 (915) 751-7575 Traffic Offenses The information contained in this packet is not offered as legal advice.

More information

RULES OF SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA PART THREE A CRIMINAL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE APPENDIX

RULES OF SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA PART THREE A CRIMINAL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE APPENDIX RULES OF SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA PART THREE A CRIMINAL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE APPENDIX Form 6. Suggested Questions to Be Put by the Court to an Accused Who Has Pleaded Guilty (Rule 3A:8). Before accepting

More information

General District Courts

General District Courts General District Courts To Understand Your Visit to Court You Should Know: It is the courts wish that you know your rights and duties. We want every person who comes here to receive fair treatment in accordance

More information

42 4 1301. Driving under the influence driving while impaired driving with excessive alcoholic content definitions penalties.

42 4 1301. Driving under the influence driving while impaired driving with excessive alcoholic content definitions penalties. 42 4 1301. Driving under the influence driving while impaired driving with excessive alcoholic content definitions penalties. (1) (a) It is a misdemeanor for any person who is under the influence of alcohol

More information

IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR WOODBURY COUNTY. WRITTEN PLEA OF GUILTY AND WAIVER OF RIGHTS (OWI First Offense)

IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR WOODBURY COUNTY. WRITTEN PLEA OF GUILTY AND WAIVER OF RIGHTS (OWI First Offense) IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR WOODBURY COUNTY THE STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff, vs. Defendant. CRIMINAL NO. WRITTEN PLEA OF GUILTY AND WAIVER OF RIGHTS (OWI First Offense) COMES NOW the above-named Defendant

More information

Chapter 813. Driving Under the Influence of Intoxicants 2013 EDITION. Title 59 Page 307 (2013 Edition)

Chapter 813. Driving Under the Influence of Intoxicants 2013 EDITION. Title 59 Page 307 (2013 Edition) Chapter 813 2013 EDITION Driving Under the Influence of Intoxicants GENERAL PROVISIONS 813.010 Driving under the influence of intoxicants; penalty 813.011 Felony driving under the influence of intoxicants;

More information

1 SB155 2 163895-1. 3 By Senator Brewbaker (N & P) 4 RFD: Local Legislation. 5 First Read: 05-MAR-15. Page 0

1 SB155 2 163895-1. 3 By Senator Brewbaker (N & P) 4 RFD: Local Legislation. 5 First Read: 05-MAR-15. Page 0 1 SB155 2 163895-1 3 By Senator Brewbaker (N & P) 4 RFD: Local Legislation 5 First Read: 05-MAR-15 Page 0 1 163895-1:n:01/05/2015:LLR/tj LRS2014-3787 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A BILL 10 TO BE ENTITLED 11 AN ACT

More information

APPEARANCE, PLEA AND WAIVER

APPEARANCE, PLEA AND WAIVER Guide to Municipal Court What Types of Cases Are Heard in Municipal Court? Cases heard in municipal court are divided into four general categories: Violations of motor vehicle and traffic laws Violations

More information

Criminal Justice System Commonly Used Terms & Definitions

Criminal Justice System Commonly Used Terms & Definitions Criminal Justice System Commonly Used Terms & Definitions A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Accused: Acquittal: Adjudication: Admissible Evidence: Affidavit: Alford Doctrine: Appeal:

More information

GLOSSARY OF SELECTED LEGAL TERMS

GLOSSARY OF SELECTED LEGAL TERMS GLOSSARY OF SELECTED LEGAL TERMS Sources: US Courts : http://www.uscourts.gov/library/glossary.html New York State Unified Court System: http://www.nycourts.gov/lawlibraries/glossary.shtml Acquittal A

More information

Driving under the influence of alcohol, drugs, or other intoxicating substances;

Driving under the influence of alcohol, drugs, or other intoxicating substances; OCGA 40-6-391 Brief Description Driving under the influence of alcohol, drugs, or other intoxicating substances; Statutory Language (a) A person shall not drive or be in actual physical control of any

More information

Maricopa County Attorney s Office Adult Criminal Case Process

Maricopa County Attorney s Office Adult Criminal Case Process The following is a brief description of the process to prosecute an adult accused of committing a felony offense. Most misdemeanor offenses are handled by municipal prosecutors; cases involving minors

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2010-IA-02028-SCT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2010-IA-02028-SCT IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2010-IA-02028-SCT RENE C. LEVARIO v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DATE OF JUDGMENT: 11/23/2010 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. ROBERT P. KREBS COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: JACKSON COUNTY

More information

Information for Crime Victims and Witnesses

Information for Crime Victims and Witnesses Office of the Attorney General Information for Crime Victims and Witnesses MARCH 2009 LAWRENCE WASDEN Attorney General Criminal Law Division Special Prosecutions Unit Telephone: (208) 332-3096 Fax: (208)

More information

BASIC CRIMINAL LAW. Joe Bodiford. Overview of a criminal case Presented by: Board Certified Criminal Trial Lawyer

BASIC CRIMINAL LAW. Joe Bodiford. Overview of a criminal case Presented by: Board Certified Criminal Trial Lawyer BASIC CRIMINAL LAW Overview of a criminal case Presented by: Joe Bodiford Board Certified Criminal Trial Lawyer www.floridacriminaldefense.com www.blawgger.com THE FLORIDA CRIMINAL PROCESS Source: http://www.fsu.edu/~crimdo/cj-flowchart.html

More information

T E X A S Y O U N G L A W Y E R S A S S O C I A T I O N A N D S T A T E B A R O F T E X A S G UIDE T O C O URT

T E X A S Y O U N G L A W Y E R S A S S O C I A T I O N A N D S T A T E B A R O F T E X A S G UIDE T O C O URT T E X A S Y O U N G L A W Y E R S A S S O C I A T I O N A N D S T A T E B A R O F T E X A S G UIDE T O T RAFFIC C O URT A G UIDE T O T RAFFIC C O URT Prepared and distributed as a Public Service by the

More information

IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS WESTERN DISTRICT

IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS WESTERN DISTRICT IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS WESTERN DISTRICT STATE OF MISSOURI, v. ROBERT E. WHEELER, Respondent, Appellant. WD76448 OPINION FILED: August 19, 2014 Appeal from the Circuit Court of Caldwell County,

More information

The Circuit Court. Judges and Clerks. Jurisdiction

The Circuit Court. Judges and Clerks. Jurisdiction The Circuit Court The circuit court is the trial court of general jurisdiction in Virginia, and the court has authority to try a full range of both civil and criminal cases. Civil cases involve disputes

More information

Glossary of Court-related Terms

Glossary of Court-related Terms Glossary of Court-related Terms Acquittal Adjudication Appeal Arraignment Arrest Bail Bailiff Beyond a reasonable doubt Burden of proof Capital offense Certification Charge Circumstantial evidence Citation

More information

Offering Defense Witnesses to New York Grand Juries. Your client has just been held for the action of the Grand Jury. Although you

Offering Defense Witnesses to New York Grand Juries. Your client has just been held for the action of the Grand Jury. Although you Offering Defense Witnesses to New York Grand Juries By: Mark M. Baker 1 Your client has just been held for the action of the Grand Jury. Although you have a valid defense, you do not want your client to

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO. Docket No. 40135 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO. Docket No. 40135 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 40135 STATE OF IDAHO, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JUAN L. JUAREZ, Defendant-Appellant. 2013 Opinion No. 60 Filed: November 12, 2013 Stephen W. Kenyon,

More information

You need legal help to protect your livelihood, which requires you to drive every day. Call Mr. Singh right away at 916-939-5151.

You need legal help to protect your livelihood, which requires you to drive every day. Call Mr. Singh right away at 916-939-5151. What is Driving Under the Influence (DUI)? Vehicle Code Sections 23151 and 23152 are the drunk driving laws. VC 23152(a) makes it unlawful to drive a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or drugs.

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE EDWIN SCARBOROUGH, Defendant Below- Appellant, v. STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff Below- Appellee. No. 38, 2014 Court Below Superior Court of the State of Delaware,

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO. Docket No. 40618 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO. Docket No. 40618 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 40618 LARRY DEAN CORWIN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. STATE OF IDAHO, Respondent. 2014 Unpublished Opinion No. 386 Filed: February 20, 2014 Stephen

More information

Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals

Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals RENDERED: MARCH 14, 2008; 2:00 P.M. NOT TO BE PUBLISHED Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals NO. 2007-CA-001304-MR DONALD T. CHRISTY APPELLANT v. APPEAL FROM MASON CIRCUIT COURT HONORABLE STOCKTON

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ STREET ADDRESS: MAILING ADDRESS: CITY AND ZIP CODE: BRANCH NAME:

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ STREET ADDRESS: MAILING ADDRESS: CITY AND ZIP CODE: BRANCH NAME: SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ STREET ADDRESS: MAILING ADDRESS: CITY AND ZIP CODE: BRANCH NAME: : PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA v. DUI ADVISEMENT OF RIGHTS, WAIVER, AND PLEA FORM

More information

Glossary of Terms Acquittal Affidavit Allegation Appeal Arraignment Arrest Warrant Assistant District Attorney General Attachment Bail Bailiff Bench

Glossary of Terms Acquittal Affidavit Allegation Appeal Arraignment Arrest Warrant Assistant District Attorney General Attachment Bail Bailiff Bench Glossary of Terms The Glossary of Terms defines some of the most common legal terms in easy-tounderstand language. Terms are listed in alphabetical order. A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W

More information

Your Guide to Illinois Traffic Courts

Your Guide to Illinois Traffic Courts Consumer Legal Guide Your Guide to Illinois Traffic Courts Presented by the Illinois Judges Association and the Illinois State Bar Association Illinois Judges Association Traffic courts hear more cases

More information

STATE OF ARIZONA, Appellee, ROY MATTHEW SOVINE, Appellant. No. 1 CA-CR 14-0094

STATE OF ARIZONA, Appellee, ROY MATTHEW SOVINE, Appellant. No. 1 CA-CR 14-0094 NOTICE: NOT FOR PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION DOES NOT CREATE LEGAL PRECEDENT AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS AUTHORIZED. IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION

More information

Decades of Successful Sex Crimes Defense Contact the Innocence Legal Team Now

Decades of Successful Sex Crimes Defense Contact the Innocence Legal Team Now Criminal Court Felonies The U.S. has the highest rate of felony conviction and imprisonment of any industrialized nation. A felony crime is more serious than a misdemeanor, but the same offense can be

More information

Law & The Courts Resource Guide

Law & The Courts Resource Guide Law & The Courts Resource Guide - what to do in case of an auto accident - your rights in traffic court - your rights if arrested table of contents What To Do In Case Of An Auto Accident...1 Your Rights

More information

****************************************************** The officially released date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the

****************************************************** The officially released date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the ****************************************************** The officially released date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal

More information

A Victim s Guide to Understanding the Criminal Justice System

A Victim s Guide to Understanding the Criminal Justice System A Victim s Guide to Understanding the Criminal Justice System The Bartholomew County Prosecutor s Office Victim Assistance Program Prosecutor: William Nash 234 Washington Street Columbus, IN 47201 Telephone:

More information

1 VERGERONT, J. 1 Daniel Stormer was convicted of operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated, third offense, contrary to WIS. STAT.

1 VERGERONT, J. 1 Daniel Stormer was convicted of operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated, third offense, contrary to WIS. STAT. COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 31, 2001 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk, Court of Appeals of Wisconsin NOTICE This opinion is subject to further editing. If published, the official version will

More information

CRIMINAL COURT IN MINNESOTA: Understanding the Process so You can Sleep at Night

CRIMINAL COURT IN MINNESOTA: Understanding the Process so You can Sleep at Night RYAN PACYGA CRIMINAL DEFENSE 333 South 7 th Street, Suite 2850 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612-339-5844 www.arrestedmn.com More information on the YouTube channel Ryan Pacyga CRIMINAL COURT IN MINNESOTA: Understanding

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF IMPERIAL. People v. Case No. Advisement of Rights, Waiver, and Plea Form

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF IMPERIAL. People v. Case No. Advisement of Rights, Waiver, and Plea Form SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF IMPERIAL People v. Case No. Advisement of Rights, Waiver, and Plea Form Vehicle Code 23152 Fill out this form if you wish to plead guilty or no contest to the charges

More information

A Citizen s Guide to the Criminal Justice System: From Arraignment to Appeal

A Citizen s Guide to the Criminal Justice System: From Arraignment to Appeal A Citizen s Guide to the Criminal Justice System: From Arraignment to Appeal Presented by the Office of the Richmond County District Attorney Acting District Attorney Daniel L. Master, Jr. 130 Stuyvesant

More information

20-28.3. Seizure, impoundment, forfeiture of motor vehicles for offenses involving impaired driving while license revoked or without license and insurance, and for felony speeding to elude arrest. (a)

More information

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS. No. 03-CV-1445. Appeal from the Superior Court of the District of Columbia (CA-3748-02)

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS. No. 03-CV-1445. Appeal from the Superior Court of the District of Columbia (CA-3748-02) Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections

More information

No. 1-12-0762 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

No. 1-12-0762 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT 2014 IL App (1st) 120762-U No. 1-12-0762 FIFTH DIVISION February 28, 2014 NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances

More information

THE THREAT OF BAD FAITH LITIGATION ETHICAL HANDLING OF CLAIMS AND GOOD FAITH SETTLEMENT PRACTICES. By Craig R. White

THE THREAT OF BAD FAITH LITIGATION ETHICAL HANDLING OF CLAIMS AND GOOD FAITH SETTLEMENT PRACTICES. By Craig R. White THE THREAT OF BAD FAITH LITIGATION ETHICAL HANDLING OF CLAIMS AND GOOD FAITH SETTLEMENT PRACTICES By Craig R. White SKEDSVOLD & WHITE, LLC. 1050 Crown Pointe Parkway Suite 710 Atlanta, Georgia 30338 (770)

More information

GUIDE TO WHAT TO EXPECT

GUIDE TO WHAT TO EXPECT D e l Si g n o r e L a w GUIDE TO WHAT TO EXPECT AT A CLERK MAGISTRATE HEARING What you need to know about your Massachusetts clerk magistrate hearing. Authored by Attorneys Michael DelSignore And Julie

More information

Case 2:09-cv-00532-JPH Document 23 Filed 02/02/10 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 2:09-cv-00532-JPH Document 23 Filed 02/02/10 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Case 2:09-cv-00532-JPH Document 23 Filed 02/02/10 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MICHAEL WALKER : CIVIL ACTION : v. : : NO. 09-532 BIG BURGER RESTAURANTS,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE DIVISION. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) ) v. ) No. ) (Judge ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE DIVISION. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) ) v. ) No. ) (Judge ) ) ) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) ) v. ) No. ) (Judge ) ) ) PETITION TO ENTER A PLEA OF GUILTY (Misdemeanor) I,, respectfully represent

More information

OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY Third Judicial District Of Kansas Chadwick J. Taylor, District Attorney

OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY Third Judicial District Of Kansas Chadwick J. Taylor, District Attorney OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY Third Judicial District Of Kansas Chadwick J. Taylor, District Attorney Shawnee County Courthouse Fax: (785) 251-4909 200 SE 7th Street, Suite 214 Family Law Fax: (785)

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO. Docket No. 41952 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO. Docket No. 41952 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 41952 MICHAEL T. HAYES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. STATE OF IDAHO, Respondent. 2015 Unpublished Opinion No. 634 Filed: September 16, 2015 Stephen

More information

The Secretary of State presents her compliments to Their Excellencies. and Messieurs and Mesdames the Chiefs of Mission and wishes to reaffirm,

The Secretary of State presents her compliments to Their Excellencies. and Messieurs and Mesdames the Chiefs of Mission and wishes to reaffirm, 10-181 The Secretary of State presents her compliments to Their Excellencies and Messieurs and Mesdames the Chiefs of Mission and wishes to reaffirm, as the exclusive driver licensing authority for members

More information

APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Dane County: STEVEN D. EBERT, Judge. Affirmed.

APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Dane County: STEVEN D. EBERT, Judge. Affirmed. COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED August 28, 2008 David R. Schanker Clerk of Court of Appeals NOTICE This opinion is subject to further editing. If published, the official version will appear in

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE STATE OF DELAWARE, No. 169, 2014 Plaintiff-Below, Appellant, Court Below: Superior Court v. of the State of Delaware, in and for New Castle County ANDY LABOY,

More information

Stages in a Capital Case from http://deathpenaltyinfo.msu.edu/

Stages in a Capital Case from http://deathpenaltyinfo.msu.edu/ Stages in a Capital Case from http://deathpenaltyinfo.msu.edu/ Note that not every case goes through all of the steps outlined here. Some states have different procedures. I. Pre-Trial Crimes that would

More information

First Regular Session Sixty-ninth General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO INTRODUCED HOUSE SPONSORSHIP SENATE SPONSORSHIP

First Regular Session Sixty-ninth General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO INTRODUCED HOUSE SPONSORSHIP SENATE SPONSORSHIP First Regular Session Sixty-ninth General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO INTRODUCED LLS NO. 1-01.01 Richard Sweetman x HOUSE BILL 1- Waller, HOUSE SPONSORSHIP (None), SENATE SPONSORSHIP House Committees Judiciary

More information

Ignition Interlocks: Every State, For Every Convicted Drunk Driver

Ignition Interlocks: Every State, For Every Convicted Drunk Driver Ignition Interlocks: Every State, For Every Convicted Drunk Driver In 2013, 10,076 people were killed in crashes caused by a drunk driver with a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of.08 or greater. General

More information

TYPE OF OFFENSE(S) AND SECTION NUMBER(S) LIST OFFENSE(S), CASE NUMBER(S) AND DATE(S) CASE NUMBER(S) AND DATE(S)

TYPE OF OFFENSE(S) AND SECTION NUMBER(S) LIST OFFENSE(S), CASE NUMBER(S) AND DATE(S) CASE NUMBER(S) AND DATE(S) SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA Reserved for Clerk s File Stamp COUNTY: COUNTY OF EL DORADO PLAINTIFF: PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEFENDANT: DUI ADVISEMENT OF RIGHTS, WAIVER, AND PLEA FORM (Vehicle

More information

DEFENDING TRAFFIC TICKETS A Resource for Pro Se Litigants

DEFENDING TRAFFIC TICKETS A Resource for Pro Se Litigants DEFENDING TRAFFIC TICKETS A Resource for Pro Se Litigants Marcel Krzystek, Esq. 5353 W. Dartmouth Avenue, Suite 510 Denver, Colorado 80228 Telephone: (303) 988-1561 Email: m_krzystek@yahoo.com As a criminal

More information

VIRGINIA ACTS OF ASSEMBLY -- 2015 SESSION

VIRGINIA ACTS OF ASSEMBLY -- 2015 SESSION VIRGINIA ACTS OF ASSEMBLY -- 2015 SESSION CHAPTER 585 An Act to amend and reenact 38.2-2206 of the Code of Virginia and to amend the Code of Virginia by adding in Article 7 of Chapter 3 of Title 8.01 a

More information

Event Data Recorders and Their Role in. Automobile Accident Litigation

Event Data Recorders and Their Role in. Automobile Accident Litigation Event Data Recorders and Their Role in Automobile Accident Litigation by Jason A. Koch jkoch@jlolaw.com 8519 Eagle Point Boulevard, Suite 100 Lake Elmo, Minnesota 55042-8624 (651) 290-6500 I. Event Data

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA Appellee : : v. : : WILLIAM JOHN LOTT, : : Appellant : No. 148 EDA 2015

More information

N.W.2d. Petition for further review from the Court of Appeals,

N.W.2d. Petition for further review from the Court of Appeals, 88 285 NEBRASKA REPORTS Neb. Ct. R. 3-310(P) and 3-323(B) of the disciplinary rules within 60 days after an order imposing costs and expenses, if any, is entered by this court. Judgment of suspension.

More information

ARREST! What Happens Now?

ARREST! What Happens Now? Personal Injury Wrongful Death Slip & Fall Automobile Accidents Trucking Accidents Motorcycle Accidents Medical Malpractice Criminal Defense You re Under ARREST! What Happens Now? Do NOT Speak to Police

More information

Making Sure The Left Hand Knows What The Right Hand Is Doing Representing Health Care Providers In Medical Negligence Cases by: Troy J. Crotts, Esq.

Making Sure The Left Hand Knows What The Right Hand Is Doing Representing Health Care Providers In Medical Negligence Cases by: Troy J. Crotts, Esq. Making Sure The Left Hand Knows What The Right Hand Is Doing Representing Health Care Providers In Medical Negligence Cases by: Troy J. Crotts, Esq. Florida Continues as National Leader in Disciplinary

More information

The N.C. State Bar v. Wood NO. COA10-463. (Filed 1 February 2011) 1. Attorneys disciplinary action convicted of criminal offense

The N.C. State Bar v. Wood NO. COA10-463. (Filed 1 February 2011) 1. Attorneys disciplinary action convicted of criminal offense The N.C. State Bar v. Wood NO. COA10-463 (Filed 1 February 2011) 1. Attorneys disciplinary action convicted of criminal offense The North Carolina State Bar Disciplinary Hearing Commission did not err

More information

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE Filed 5/3/13 Turner v. Shiomoto CA4/3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for

More information

HOW A TYPICAL CRIMINAL CASE IS PROSECUTED IN ALASKA

HOW A TYPICAL CRIMINAL CASE IS PROSECUTED IN ALASKA HOW A TYPICAL CRIMINAL CASE IS PROSECUTED IN ALASKA The Office of Victims Rights receives many inquiries from victims about how a criminal case in Alaska is investigated by police and then prosecuted by

More information

Personal Injury Litigation

Personal Injury Litigation Personal Injury Litigation The Anatomy of a New York Personal Injury Lawsuit An ebook by Stuart DiMartini, Esq. 1325 Sixth Avenue, 27 th Floor New York, NY 10019 212-5181532 dimartinilaw.com Introduction

More information

Postaccident Police Investigations

Postaccident Police Investigations To Cooperate or Not That Is the Question! By Brian Del Gatto and Julia Paridis Postaccident Police Investigations Use of response teams, as well as driver training, can limit potentially damaging statements.

More information

First Regular Session Seventieth General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO INTRODUCED SENATE SPONSORSHIP

First Regular Session Seventieth General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO INTRODUCED SENATE SPONSORSHIP First Regular Session Seventieth General Assembly STATE OF COLORADO INTRODUCED LLS NO. 1-00.01 Richard Sweetman x HOUSE BILL 1- HOUSE SPONSORSHIP Saine and McCann, Cooke and Johnston, SENATE SPONSORSHIP

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA MARICOPA COUNTY LC2014-000424-001 DT 01/22/2015 THE HON. CRANE MCCLENNEN HIGHER COURT RULING / REMAND

SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA MARICOPA COUNTY LC2014-000424-001 DT 01/22/2015 THE HON. CRANE MCCLENNEN HIGHER COURT RULING / REMAND Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court *** Filed *** 01/26/2015 8:00 AM THE HON. CRANE MCCLENNEN STATE OF ARIZONA CLERK OF THE COURT J. Eaton Deputy GARY L SHUPE v. MONICA RENEE JONES (001) JEAN JACQUES CABOU

More information

Nebraska Ethics Advisory Opinion for Lawyers No. 09-03. Question Presented. Facts

Nebraska Ethics Advisory Opinion for Lawyers No. 09-03. Question Presented. Facts Nebraska Ethics Advisory Opinion for Lawyers No. 09-03 IF THE VICTIM IN A CRIMINAL CASE THAT A COUNTY ATTORNEY IS PROSECUTING HAS RETAINED COUNSEL TO REPRESENT HIM IN A CIVIL CASE ARISING FROM THE SAME

More information

GOPY7. for DUI with property damage, and one for driving with a. two for driving under the. No. 86,019 STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner,

GOPY7. for DUI with property damage, and one for driving with a. two for driving under the. No. 86,019 STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, No. 86,019 GOPY7 STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, vs. WILLIAM R. WOODRUFF, Respondent. [May 16, 19961 GRIMES, C.J. We have for review State v. WoodrUf f, 654 So. 2d 585 (Fla. 3d DCA 19951, which expressly

More information

No. 108,809 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, SHANE RAIKES, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT

No. 108,809 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, SHANE RAIKES, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. No. 108,809 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. SHANE RAIKES, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT Generally, issues not raised before the district court, even constitutional

More information

Criminal Law. Month Content Skills August. Define the term jurisprudence. Introduction to law. What is law? Explain several reasons for having laws.

Criminal Law. Month Content Skills August. Define the term jurisprudence. Introduction to law. What is law? Explain several reasons for having laws. Criminal Law Month Content Skills August Introduction to law Define the term jurisprudence. What is law? Explain several reasons for having laws. Discuss the relationship between laws and values. Give

More information

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CARBON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CRIMINAL LAW

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CARBON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CRIMINAL LAW IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CARBON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CRIMINAL LAW COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : : vs. : NO: 272 CR 2011 : KEITH NORBIN MCINAW, : Defendant : Michael S. Greek, Esquire Eric J. Conrad,

More information

Chapter 6B STATE ELIGIBILITY GUIDELINES. Last Amended: 1 July 2006. Manual of Legal Aid

Chapter 6B STATE ELIGIBILITY GUIDELINES. Last Amended: 1 July 2006. Manual of Legal Aid Chapter 6B STATE ELIGIBILITY GUIDELINES Last Amended: 1 July 2006 Manual of Legal Aid TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 6B - STATE ELIGIBILITY GUIDELINES GENERAL...3 PROVISION OF LEGAL ASSISTANCE...3 GENERAL GUIDELINES

More information

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, BELMONT COUNTY, OHIO. State of Ohio, ) ) Plaintiff ) ) CASE NO.: vs. ) ) DRUG COURT PLEA, ) ) Defendant )

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, BELMONT COUNTY, OHIO. State of Ohio, ) ) Plaintiff ) ) CASE NO.: vs. ) ) DRUG COURT PLEA, ) ) Defendant ) COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, BELMONT COUNTY, OHIO State of Ohio, ) ) Plaintiff ) ) CASE NO.: vs. ) ) DRUG COURT PLEA, ) ) Defendant ) I,, being before the Court this day and with my counsel, Attorney, represent

More information

STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A10-1884. State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Jolene Kay Coleman, Appellant.

STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A10-1884. State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Jolene Kay Coleman, Appellant. STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A10-1884 State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Jolene Kay Coleman, Appellant. Filed January 3, 2012 Affirmed Kalitowski, Judge Hennepin County District Court File No.

More information

NOT ACTUAL PROTECTION: ACTUAL INNOCENCE STANDARD FOR CRIMINAL DEFENSE ATTORNEYS IN CALIFORNIA DOES NOT ELIMINATE ACTUAL LAWSUITS AND ACTUAL PAYMENTS

NOT ACTUAL PROTECTION: ACTUAL INNOCENCE STANDARD FOR CRIMINAL DEFENSE ATTORNEYS IN CALIFORNIA DOES NOT ELIMINATE ACTUAL LAWSUITS AND ACTUAL PAYMENTS NOT ACTUAL PROTECTION: ACTUAL INNOCENCE STANDARD FOR CRIMINAL DEFENSE ATTORNEYS IN CALIFORNIA DOES NOT ELIMINATE ACTUAL LAWSUITS AND ACTUAL PAYMENTS By Celeste King, JD and Barrett Breitung, JD* In 1998

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ORLANDO INGRAM, No. 460, 2014 Defendant Below, Appellant, Court Below: Superior Court of the State of Delaware in v. and for Kent County STATE OF DELAWARE,

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE KEVIN D. TALLEY, Defendant-Below No. 172, 2003 Appellant, v. Cr. ID No. 0108005719 STATE OF DELAWARE, Court Below: Superior Court of the State of Delaware,

More information

CALIFORNIA FALSE CLAIMS ACT GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 12650-12656

CALIFORNIA FALSE CLAIMS ACT GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 12650-12656 CALIFORNIA FALSE CLAIMS ACT GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 12650-12656 12650. (a) This article shall be known and may be cited as the False Claims Act. (b) For purposes of this article: (1) "Claim" includes any

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION. v. CASE NO. 8:15-CR-244-T-23AEP PLEA AGREEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION. v. CASE NO. 8:15-CR-244-T-23AEP PLEA AGREEMENT Case 8:15-cr-00244-SDM-AEP Document 3 Filed 07/08/15 Page 1 of 15 PageID 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CASE NO. 8:15-CR-244-T-23AEP

More information

HP0868, LD 1187, item 1, 123rd Maine State Legislature An Act To Recoup Health Care Funds through the Maine False Claims Act

HP0868, LD 1187, item 1, 123rd Maine State Legislature An Act To Recoup Health Care Funds through the Maine False Claims Act PLEASE NOTE: Legislative Information cannot perform research, provide legal advice, or interpret Maine law. For legal assistance, please contact a qualified attorney. Be it enacted by the People of the

More information

MARK PEREZ, APPELLANT THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE STATE S BRIEF

MARK PEREZ, APPELLANT THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE STATE S BRIEF Nos. 05-11-01575-CR and 05-11-01576-CR The State Waives Oral Argument 5th Court of Appeals FILED: 06/04/2012 14:00 Lisa Matz, Clerk IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT DALLAS MARK

More information

Recording Telephone Calls with Parties in Different Jurisdictions

Recording Telephone Calls with Parties in Different Jurisdictions United States Telephone Recording Laws Legal Aspects of Recording Telephone Conversations: A Practical Guide The federal Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2510 et seq.,

More information

Michael Gayoso, Jr. Office of the County Attorney TH

Michael Gayoso, Jr. Office of the County Attorney TH Michael Gayoso, Jr. Office of the County Attorney TH 11 Judicial District/Crawford County, Kansas DIVERSION PROGRAM -- DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE Pursuant to K.S.A. 22-2906 et seq. the Crawford County

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. JOSHUA ALLEN KURTZ Appellant No. 1727 MDA 2014 Appeal from the

More information

I N T H E COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

I N T H E COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res

More information

PUBLISH UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT

PUBLISH UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT Filed 9/25/96 PUBLISH UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 95-3409 GERALD T. CECIL, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT

More information

Case 1:05-cr-10037-GAO Document 459 Filed 09/24/14 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS CRIMINAL NO.

Case 1:05-cr-10037-GAO Document 459 Filed 09/24/14 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS CRIMINAL NO. Case 1:05-cr-10037-GAO Document 459 Filed 09/24/14 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS CRIMINAL NO. 05-10037-GAO-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. GRANT BOYD, Defendant. O TOOLE,

More information

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs November 04, 2014

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs November 04, 2014 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs November 04, 2014 WILLIAM NEWSON v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Madison County No. C13358 Roy B. Morgan,

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2013-CP-00221-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2013-CP-00221-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2013-CP-00221-COA FREDDIE LEE MARTIN A/K/A FREDDIE L. MARTIN APPELLANT v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 01/08/2013 TRIAL JUDGE:

More information

Case 1:07-cv-00389-MJW-BNB Document 51 Filed 08/21/2008 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case 1:07-cv-00389-MJW-BNB Document 51 Filed 08/21/2008 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Case 1:07-cv-00389-MJW-BNB Document 51 Filed 08/21/2008 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 07-cv-00389-MJW-BNB ERNA GANSER, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D, this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral

More information

Defenses to Driving Without Insurance. 1. What are the penalties for driving without insurance?

Defenses to Driving Without Insurance. 1. What are the penalties for driving without insurance? Defenses to Driving Without Insurance 1. What are the penalties for driving without insurance? New Jersey law requires all drivers to have insurance on their motor vehicles. A driver must have insurance

More information

What you don t know can hurt you.

What you don t know can hurt you. What you don t know can hurt you. Why you need a defense lawyer if you are charged with a misdemeanor. A misdemeanor conviction is SERIOUS A misdemeanor is not a minor crime. If you are convicted of a

More information

A Federal Criminal Case Timeline

A Federal Criminal Case Timeline A Federal Criminal Case Timeline The following timeline is a very broad overview of the progress of a federal felony case. Many variables can change the speed or course of the case, including settlement

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE THOMAS ALBANESE, No. 654, 2011 Defendant Below, Appellant, Court Below Superior Court of the State of Delaware in and for v. Sussex County STATE OF DELAWARE,

More information

Wisconsin Operating While Intoxicated Law A Client's Guide to the Language and Procedure

Wisconsin Operating While Intoxicated Law A Client's Guide to the Language and Procedure Wisconsin Operating While Intoxicated Law A Client's Guide to the Language and Procedure BAKKE NORMAN L A W O F F I C E S Welcome Thank you for considering Bakke Norman, S.C. to represent your interests.

More information