1 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 96, pp , April 1999 Cell Biology Pathways of As(III) detoxification in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (ACR3 YCF1 Sb(III) resistance ABC transporters) MALLIKA GHOSH, JIAN SHEN, AND BARRY P. ROSEN* Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI Communicated by H. Ronald Kaback, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, February 8, 1999 (received for review December 3, 1998) ABSTRACT Saccharomyces cerevisiae has two independent transport systems for the removal of arsenite from the cytosol. Acr3p is a plasma membrane transporter that confers resistance to arsenite, presumably by arsenite extrusion from the cells. Ycf1p, a member of the ABC transporter superfamily, catalyzes the ATP-driven uptake of As(III) into the vacuole, also producing resistance to arsenite. Vacuolar accumulation requires a reductant such as glutathione, suggesting that the substrate is the glutathione conjugate, As(GS) 3. Disruption of either the ACR3 or YCF1 gene results in sensitivity to arsenite and disruption of both genes produces additive hypersensitivity. Thus, Acr3p and Ycf1p represent separate pathways for the detoxification of arsenite in yeast. Exposure to drugs and metals frequently results in the acquisition of resistance mechanisms. Development of transport systems for the export or sequestration of heavy metals and drugs is one of the most commonly utilized strategies used by all cell types for producing resistance (1, 2). In bacteria efflux systems that produce resistance to salts of the metalloids arsenic and antimony have been characterized (3). The pathways of metalloid resistance in eukaryotes are less clear. In both Leishmania and Chinese hamster cells, resistance correlates with active extrusion of arsenite from resistant cells (4, 5), but the relevant genes or gene products have not been identified. Human multidrug resistance-associated protein (MRP), a member of the ABC transporter superfamily, also confers resistance to arsenite (6), but arsenite transport by MRP has not been demonstrated. The yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae can serve as a model system for the study of arsenite resistance in eukaryotes. Recently, three ACR (arsenic compounds resistance) genes related to resistance to arsenite and arsenate, ACR1, ACR2, and ACR3, were identified on chromosome XVI of S. cerevisiae (7). ACR1 encodes a putative transcription factor; insertional inactivation of ACR1 resulted in sensitivity to both arsenate and arsenite. ACR2 encodes a protein required for arsenate but not arsenite resistance that has been shown to be an arsenate reductase (8). ACR3 encodes a putative membrane protein. Disruption of ACR3 resulted in sensitivity to arsenite, leading to the hypothesis that it is a plasma membrane arsenite efflux transporter (9). In this report, we demonstrate that there are two parallel pathways for removal of toxic arsenite from yeast cytosol. The first pathway is extrusion of arsenite into the medium. We show that cells with an ACR3 disruption exhibit not only increased sensitivity to arsenite but also that deletion of ACR3 was directly correlated with increased arsenite accumulation, most likely reflecting loss of efflux activity. Both resistance and ability to prevent arsenite accumulation was restored by expression of ACR3 on a plasmid. The second pathway is The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C solely to indicate this fact. PNAS is available online at vacuolar sequestration of As(III) in a reaction catalyzed by the product of the YCF1 gene. Ycf1p (yeast cadmium factor protein), a close homologue of the human MRP, has been shown to be a vacuolar glutathione S-conjugate pump with a broad range of substrate specificity (10, 11) and confers cadmium resistance in S. cerevisiae by catalyzing sequestration of Cd(GS) 2 in the vacuole (12). Both MRP and a homologue from Arabidopsis thaliana complement a YFC1-disrupted yeast strain (13, 14). We show here that vacuolar membrane preparations exhibit uptake of 73 As(III) in the presence of MgATP and glutathione (GSH). No uptake was observed in vacuolar membrane vesicles prepared from a YCF1-disrupted strain. The YCF1-disrupted strain was sensitive to As(III), As(V), Sb(III), and Cd(II) whereas the ACR3-disrupted strain was sensitive to As(III) and As(V) but remained resistant to Sb(III) and Cd(II). An ACR3-YCF1 double disruption produced hypersensitivity to arsenite and arsenate. These results are consistent with ACR3 and YCF1 encoding independent transporters, either of which confers arsenite resistance. MATERIALS AND METHODS Strains and Plasmids. Plasmids and S. cerevisiae strains are described in Table 1. E. coli strain JM109 [reca1 supe44 enda1 hsdr17 gyra96 rela1 thi (lac-proab) F (trad36 proab laci q lacz M15)] was used for molecular cloning. Media. S. cerevisiae strains were grown at 30 C in complete yeast extract peptone dextrose (15) medium supplemented with 2% glucose. Alternatively, the minimal selective (15) medium with 2% glucose supplemented with auxotrophic requirements was used. Escherichia coli cells were grown in Luria Bertani medium (16) supplemented with 125 g ml ampicillin as required. DNA Manipulations. Cloning procedures were carried out as described (16, 17). Transformation of yeast cells was carried out by using a lithium acetate method (18). Yeast genomic DNA was isolated by using QIAamp spin column (Qiagen, Chatsworth, CA). Disruption of the ACR3 Gene. Disruption of the ACR3 gene was carried out by a one-step gene replacement method (19). A 3.1-kilobase (kb) fragment of yeast genomic DNA containing ACR3, ACR2, and a portion of ACR1 was amplified by PCR using a forward primer 5 -CGACATAAGCTTATCTT- GTCC-3 that hybridizes with a region 533 bp downstream of ACR3 and a reverse primer 5 -GTCATTTGAGAGATTCG- TACAGC-3 that hybridizes to a region 483 bp inside of ACR1. The fragment was ligated into pgem-t. The resulting plasmid pgem-t-acr3, carrying ACR3, ACR2, and a portion of ACR1, was digested with KpnI. The linearized plasmid was made blunt with T4 DNA polymerase, was digested with Abbreviations: MRP, multidrug resistance-associated protein; GSH, glutathione; kb, kilobase. *To whom requests for reprints should be addressed at: Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, 540 East Canfield Avenue, Detroit, MI
2 5002 Cell Biology: Ghosh et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96 (1999) Table 1. Strains and plasmids Strains plasmids Genotype description Source S. cerevisiae strains W303-1B MAT ade2-1 his3-11, 15 leu2-3, 112 ura3-1 trp-1 Ref. 45 MG100 MAT ade2-1 his3-11, 15 leu2-3, 112 ura3-1 trp-1 acr3::his3 This study DTY165 MAT ura3-52 his6 leu2-3, 112 his3-, 200 trp1-901 lys2-801 suc2- Ref. 10 DTY167 MAT ura3-52 his6 leu2-3, 112 his3-, 200 trp1-901 lys2-801 suc2- ycfl::hisg Ref. 10 MG101 MAT ura3-52 his6 leu2-3, 112 his3-, 200 trp1-901 lys2-801 suc2- acr3::ura3 This study MG102 MAT ura3-52 his6 leu2-3, 112 his3-, 200 trp1-901 lys2-801 suc2- ycfl::hisg acr3::ura3 This study Plasmids pgem-t E. coli cloning vector, Ap r Promega pgem-t-acr3 3.1-kbp PCR fragment containing ACR3, ACR2, and part of ACR1 cloned in pgem-t This study puc18-his kbp BamHI fragment containing HIS3 ligated into BamHI site of a puc18 derivative in S. Ackerman which the BamHI site proximal to the EcoRI site had been destroyed by a fill in reaction puc18-ura kbp HindIII fragment cloned into the HindIII site of puc18 S. Ackerman pgem-t-acr3-his3 1.1-kbp BamHI-KpnI fragment of pgem-t-acr3 replaced by 1.7-kbp BamHI-SmaI HIS3 This study fragment of puc18 pgem-t-acr3-ura kbp HindIII fragment containing URA3 cloned into KpnI site of pgem-t-acr3 This study YEp352 S. cerevisiae E. coli shuttle vector, Ap r, URA3 Ref. 21 YEpACR3 2.1-kbp EcoRI-PacI fragment containing ACR3 ligated into EcoRI-SmaI-digested YEp352 This study BamHI, which excised a 1,145-bp fragment that included all but the first 34 bp and last 35 bp of ACR3, and was ligated with a 1.7-kb HIS3 gene that had been obtained from plasmid puc18-his3-1 as a 1,769-bp BamHI-SmaI fragment. The resulting plasmid was digested with EcoRI, and the 3.6-kbp fragment was isolated, purified, and transformed into yeast strain W303 1B, producing the ACR3-disrupted strain MG100 by homologous recombination. Recombinants were selected for growth in the absence of histidine and were screened for arsenite sensitivity. Disruption of ACR3 was verified by PCR using a forward primer 5 -AGATCTATGTCAGAAGAT- CAAAAAAGTG-3 that introduces a BglII site immediately in front of the first ACR3 codon and hybridizes from that point. The reverse primer was 5 -GAATTCATTTCTATTGTTC- CATATATAATATGGTTTAAGGATCCTCG-3, which hybridizes at the last ACR3 codon and introduces an EcoRI site immediately following ACR3. To construct a strain with both ACR3 and YCF1 disrupted, a similar strategy was carried out starting with strain DTY167, in which YCF1 had been deleted (20). Plasmid pgem-t- ACR3 was digested at the unique KpnI site in ACR3, was made blunt with T4 DNA polymerase, and was ligated with URA3. URA3 was obtained from plasmid puc18-ura3 212 as a 1.17-kb HindIII fragment and was made blunt. The resulting plasmid was digested with EcoRI, and a 4.2-kb fragment was isolated, purified, and transformed into yeast strain DTY167, producing the ACR3-YCF1 double-disrupted strain MG102 by homologous recombination. Strain MG101, in which ACR3 of DTY165 was disrupted, was constructed similarly. Disruption of ACR3 in the resulting uracil prototrophs was verified by PCR, as described above. For complementation, ACR3 under control of its endogenous promoter was cloned from plasmid pgem-t-acr3 by digestion with PacI, was made blunt, and then was digested with EcoRI. The resulting 2.1-kb fragment was ligated with EcoRI-SmaI-digested yeast E. coli shuttle vector plasmid YEp352 (21). The ligation mixture was transformed into E. coli strain JM109, and the resulting plasmid, YEpACR3, was isolated and transformed into both wild-type and ACR3- disrupted W303 1B. The transformants were selected on minimal SD medium without uracil and histidine. Metal Ion Resistance Assays. Strains were grown overnight at 30 C in liquid minimal selective medium with 2% glucose and appropriate supplements. The cultures were diluted into minimal media to an OD 600 of 0.1 in presence of varying concentrations of the indicated additions and were incubated for an additional 24 hr, after which the growth was estimated from OD 600. For growth on solid media, cells were streaked from single colonies and were incubated for 3 4 days at 30 C. Membrane Preparations. For preparation of membrane vesicles, a 10-ml stationary phase culture of the appropriate yeast strain was diluted into 200 ml of fresh yeast extract peptone dextrose medium. The culture was grown at 30 C to an OD 600 of 1.0. The cells were chilled on ice for 20 min, were harvested at 4,000 g at 4 C, and were washed twice with a buffer consisting of 50 mm Tris HCl (ph 7.5), containing 5 mm Na 2 EDTA, 1 mm Na 2 EGTA, 0.3 M sucrose, 5 mg ml BSA, 20 mm -mercaptoethanol, and 1 mm 4-(2-aminoethyl)benzenesulfonylfluoride (buffer A). After the final wash, cells were suspended in 3 ml of buffer A per gram of wet cells and were passed through a French pressure cell at 20,000 psi. Diisopropylfluorophosphate (2.5 l g of wet cells) was immediately added, and the cells were disrupted by grinding with acid-washed glass beads ( m) (10 g g of wet cells) (22). The suspension was diluted with 30 ml of buffer B (10 mm Tris HCl, ph mm Na 2 EGTA 10% glycerol 20 mm -mercaptoethanol 1 mm 4-(2-aminoethyl)benzenesulfonylfluoride 2 mm MgCl 2 ) and was centrifuged at 3,000 g for 10 min at 4 C to remove the glass beads, unbroken cells, and cell debris. The supernatant suspension was centrifuged at 17,000 g for 40 min to remove organelles and then at 140,000 g for 1 hr. The pelleted membranes were washed once and were suspended in 2 ml of buffer C (75 mm Hepes KOH, ph M KCl 2 mm MgCl 2 ), all at 4 C. The suspension then was gently homogenized several times with a Wheaton Scientific homogenizer immersed in ice. The membrane vesicles were rapidly frozen in liquid nitrogen and were stored at 80 C until use. The protein content of the membrane vesicles was determined by an Amido Black filter assay (23). Membranes were separated into plasma membraneenriched and vacuolar membrane-enriched fractions by sucrose density gradient centrifugation (24). The membranes were layered on a four-step gradient containing 3 ml each of four different sucrose solutions [18%, 26%, 34%, and 68% (wt wt)] in buffer C. After centrifugation for 2 hr at 49,000 g in a Sorvall TH641 swinging bucket rotor at 4 C, two turbid sections were observed, one in the region of 26% sucrose and one at the interface of 34 and 68% sucrose. The turbid fractions were individually isolated, were diluted 3- to 10-fold with buffer C, and were centrifuged for 1 hr at 140,000 g. The pellet was suspended in 0.5 ml of buffer C containing 2 mm MgCl 2 and was stored at 80 C until use.
3 Cell Biology: Ghosh et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96 (1999) 5003 The membranes were analyzed for localization markers by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and immunoblotting. Samples were dissolved in 0.1 ml of SDS sample buffer, were incubated for 5 min at room temperature, and were analyzed by SDS PAGE (25) by using a 10% polyacrylamide gel. Proteins were electrophoretically transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane (0.2- m pore size) and were immunoblotted overnight at 25 mv and 4 C with either of an antibody directed against Pma1p or Pho8p, each at a dilution of 1:2,000. A chemiluminescent assay was used to detect the antigen antibody reaction. The filter was incubated with 10 ml of the enhanced chemiluminescence solution (New England Nuclear) and was exposed on x-ray film for 1 min at room temperature. Transport Assays. For uptake assays in vivo, cells were grown in yeast extract peptone dextrose medium containing 2% glucose at 30 C to exponential phase, followed by induction with 0.1 mm sodium arsenite for an additional 24 hr. The cells were washed twice with cold degassed water and once with degassed buffer C and were suspended at a density of cells ml in buffer C. To initiate the assay, 0.1 ml of cells was diluted with 0.9 ml of buffer C containing 0.1 M glucose. After 30 min at 30 C, Na 73 2 AsO 2 was added to a final concentration of 5 M. Portions (0.1 ml) were withdrawn at intervals and were filtered through nitrocellulose filters (0.2- m pore size; Whatman). The filters were washed with 5 ml of room temperature buffer C and were dried, and the radioactivity was quantified in liquid scintillation counter. 73 Na 2 AsO 2 was prepared by reduction of radioactive arsenate (26). For uptake assays in vitro, frozen membrane vesicles were thawed rapidly and were stored on ice until use. Unless otherwise noted, the transport assay contained 5 mm MgCl 2, 0.1 mm Na 2 73 AsO 2, and 0.4 mm GSH in buffer C. Vesicles were added at 0.5 mg ml of membrane protein. After 5 min at room temperature, the reaction was initiated by addition of ATP to a final concentration of 10 mm in a total volume of 0.3 ml. At intervals, samples (50 l) were withdrawn and filtered on wet nitrocellulose filters. The filters were washed with 5 ml of cold buffer C and were dried, and radioactivity was measured. In control experiments, ATP was replaced with AMP at a final concentration of 10 mm. RESULTS ACR3 Confers Arsenite Resistance in S. cerevisiae. The 1,212-bp ACR3 gene in S. cerevisiae strains W303 1B and DTY167 was disrupted, producing strains MG100 and MG101, respectively. Disruption of ACR3 had no effect on growth of cells in the absence of arsenite. Cultures derived from single colony isolates with the ACR3 disruption exhibited sensitivity to both arsenite (Fig. 1A) and arsenate (Fig. 1B). MG101 was as resistant to Sb(III) (Fig. 1C) and Cd(II) (Fig. 1D) asits parent DTY165, indicating that Acr3p is specific for As(III). To confirm that arsenite sensitivity was the result of disruption of ACR3, the wild-type and disrupted strains were separately transformed with the ACR3-bearing plasmid YEpACR3. The plasmid complemented the arsenite and arsenate sensitive phenotypes (data not shown). It is interesting to note that cells expressing ACR3 on this multicopy plasmid exhibited in- FIG. 1. Metal ion sensitivity of S. cerevisiae strains with disruptions of ACR3 and or YCF1. Cells were grown in liquid selective minimal medium with the indicated concentrations of sodium arsenite [As(III)] (A), sodium arsenate [As(V)] (B), potassium antimonyl tartrate [Sb(III)] (C), or Cd(OAc) 2 [Cd(II)] (D). Strains were DTY165 (parental) ( ); MG101 (acr3::ura3) (E); DTY167 (ycf1::hisg) ( ); and MG102 (acr3::ura3 ycf1::hisg) ( ).
4 5004 Cell Biology: Ghosh et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96 (1999) creased resistance to both arsenite and arsenate compared with parental strains. If the amount of the putative positive transcription factor Acr1p were limiting for expression of the ACR genes, an increase in resistance with ACR3 alone would not occur. If Acr2p were limiting for arsenate resistance, then ACR3 alone would not produce an increase in resistance to arsenate as well as arsenite. These results indicate that the amount of Acr3p is rate-limiting for resistance to both oxidized and reduced arsenic salts. YCF1 Confers Arsenite Resistance in S. cerevisiae. MRP, an ABC transporter, has been reported to confer resistance to arsenite in human cells (6). Similarly PgpA, a Leishmania MRP homologue, has been associated with arsenite resistance (27). In S. cerevisiae, YCF1, which confers cadmium resistance, encodes a close homologue of MRP (10, 11). The YCF1- disrupted strain DTY167 (20) was examined for metal ion sensitivity (Fig. 1). Disruption of either ACR3 or YCF1 resulted in equivalent sensitivity to arsenite (Fig. 1A). These results are consistent with ACR3 and YCF1 encoding independent pathways for arsenite detoxification. Double disruption of both genes in strain MG102 resulted in additive hypersensitivity. Similar results were found for arsenate (Fig. 1B). This was anticipated because Acr2p reduces arsenate to arsenite (8), which then can be transported by either system. In contrast, only YCF1 conferred resistance also to Sb(III) and Cd(II) (Fig. 1 C and D). Considering the chemical similarity of As(III) and Sb(III), it is surprising that ACR3 does not produce antimonite resistance. However, the results demonstrate that the substrate specificity of Acr3p and Ycf1p differ; the former is a specific arsenic transporter whereas the latter has a broader range of metal ion substrates. Acr3p Is a Plasma Membrane Arsenite Exporter. Decreased accumulation of arsenite from cells of E. coli expressing arsenite resistance genes reflects active extrusion; cells resistant to arsenite do not accumulate radiolabeled arsenite whereas sensitive cells accumulate the metalloid (28). Accumulation of 73 AsO 2 1 into cells of S. cerevisiae was examined (Fig. 2). In the parental strains W303 1B and DTY165 exclusion of radiolabeled arsenite was observed, consistent with active efflux. Cells of MG100, with an ACR3 disruption, accumulated 10-fold more arsenite over a 60-min period, consonant with inability to extrude the metalloid. In contrast, disruption of YCF1 had no effect on accumulation; cells of DTY167 were able to exclude arsenite as efficiently as its parent. These results are consistent with Acr3p catalyzing arsenite efflux through the plasma membrane. In these experiments, the cells were induced with sodium arsenite; even wild-type cells were unable to exclude arsenite without induction (data not shown). Ycf1p Is a Vacuolar Arsenite Pump. Since Ycf1p has been shown to catalyze ATP-coupled Cd(GS) 2 transport into vacuoles (12), crude membranes prepared from S. cerevisiae were fractionated by sucrose density gradient centrifugation. By Western blot analysis, a dense fraction was found to react with an antibody against Pma1p, the plasma membrane H - translocating ATPase (29) (Fig. 3 Inset). A light fraction reacted with an antibody directed against Pho8p, a vacuolar membrane enzyme (30). Vacuolar membrane vesicles prepared from cells of S. cerevisiae DTY165 accumulated radiolabeled arsenite (Fig. 3). In contrast to cellular extrusion, in vitro transport activity did not depend on induction with arsenite (data not shown). Accumulation required reduced glutathione under conditions in which arsenite spontaneously forms an As(GS) 3 conjugate (31). This result is consistent with the fact that many of the substrates of MRP and its homologues are S-glutathione conjugates (10, 32). Of interest, tris(2- carboxyethyl)phosphine, a strong nonthiol reductant, was as effective as GSH (data not shown). Phosphine complexes of Tc(III) are substrates of P-glycoprotein (33), suggesting that phosphines form adducts with As(III) that are recognized by Ycf1p. Accumulation in vacuolar membrane vesicles required MgATP (Fig. 3). MnATP, CaATP, or other Mg 2 -nucleoside triphosphates could substitute to varying degrees (data not shown). 73 As(GS) 3 transport was totally inhibited by equimolar amounts of Cd(II), Sb(III), Hg(II), or the organoarsenical phenylarsine oxide (data not shown). In those experiments, GSH was added in excess over both As(III) and competitor, which would result in spontaneous formation of their respective S-glutathione conjugates. These results are consistent with those metal ions being competitive substrates. The effect of the ionophores valinomycin and carbonyl cyanide-p-trifluoromethoxyphenylhydrazone was examined. Neither inhibited (data FIG. 2. ACR3-encoded arsenite exclusion from cells of S. cerevisiae. 73 AsO 2 accumulation was measured in cells of W303 1B (parental) (E); MG100 (acr3::his3)( ); DTY165 (parental) ( ); and DTY167 (ycf1::hisg) ( ). FIG. 3. YCF1-encoded 73 As(GS) 3 accumulation in vacuoles of S. cerevisiae. As(GS) 3 accumulation was assayed in the plasma membrane-enriched (PM) and vacuolar membrane-enriched (VM) fractions from cells of DTY165 or DTY As(GS) 3 was prepared by mixing 0.1 mm Na 2 73 AsO 2 and 0.4 mm GSH. Accumulation was assayed with 5 mm MgCl 2 and 10 mm ATP, unless otherwise noted. Curves: ( ), DTY165 VM; (E), DTY165 VM - ATP; ( ), DTY165 VM - GSH; ( ), DTY165 PM; ( ), DTY167 VM; (F), DTY167 PM. (Inset) Membranes from strains DTY165 and DTY167 fractionated by sucrose density gradient centrifugation were analyzed by immunoblotting with antibody against the plasma membrane Pma1p or the vacuolar membrane Pho8p. The arrows indicate the predicted position of Pma1p and Pho8p estimated from the migration of proteins of known molecular mass.
5 Cell Biology: Ghosh et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96 (1999) 5005 FIG. 4. Detoxification of arsenicals in prokaryotes and eukaryotes. On the left is the phylogenetic relationships of representative members of the three independently evolved families of arsenite transporters (accession numbers in parentheses). (A) ArsB family: pi258, Staphylococcus aureus plasmid pi258 (M86824); psx267, Staphylococcus xylosus plasmid psx267 (M80565); Staphylococcus epidermis (S57521); E. coli (U00039); E. coli plasmid R46 (U38947); E. coli plasmid R773 (J02591); Yersinia enterocolitica (U58366); Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Z96072). (B) Acr3p family: S. cerevisiae Acr3p (Q06598); B. subtilis YqcL (D844321); Archaeglobus fulgidus (AE001071); Synechocystis sp. (D90914). (C) ABC ATPases: Three members of this large superfamily have been shown to confer arsenite resistance, including PgpA of Leishmania tarentolae (P21441); the S. cerevisiae Ycf1p cadmium resistance protein (S51863); and the human MRP1 ( ). A closely related homologue is AtMRP3 from A. thaliana (U92650). Other members of the ABC superfamily that are probably not arsenite pumps are human cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) (L49339) and P-glycoprotein (MDR1) (P08183). (D) On the right is a comparison of arsenite transport pathways in E. coli and S. cerevisiae. Although the pathways of resistance are similar in overall design, the prokaryotic proteins are unrelated evolutionarily to their eukaryotic analogues. In both E. coli and yeast, the first step is arsenate detoxification by reduction to arsenite catalyzed by the ArsC or Acr2p enzyme, respectively. Arsenite then is extruded from cells by a plasma membrane carrier protein, ArsB or Acr3p, respectively. Both carriers are proposed to be anion uniporters, coupled to the membrane potential. In S. cerevisiae, there is a second, parallel pathway for removal of arsenite from cytosol in which the ATP-coupled Ycf1p pump catalyzes sequestration of As(GS) 3 in the vacuole. not shown), consistent with 73 As(GS) 3 transport being catalyzed by a primary ATP-coupled pump. Arsenite accumulation into vacuoles was not affected by disruption of ACR3 (data not shown), indicating that this ATP-coupled transport reaction is not catalyzed by Acr3p. Because disruption of YCF1 produced arsenite sensitivity, it was reasonable to consider that the transport activity is caused by the activity of the vacuolar Ycf1p pump. Although the vacuolar membranes from the parental strain DTY165 accumulated 73 As(GS) 3, vacuolar membranes from the YCF1- disrupted strain DTY167 exhibited no accumulation, nor did the plasma membrane fractions from either strain (Fig. 3). Thus, the in vitro transport activity reflects catalysis by Ycf1p and not Acr3p. DISCUSSION The pressure of environmental exposure to arsenic has resulted in the independent evolution of three distinct arsenite transporters. In both prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms, resistance to arsenicals has been correlated with active extrusion (4, 5, 28). In prokaryotes, arsenite resistance is primarily linked to the ArsB family of arsenite efflux proteins (Fig. 4A) (3). However, no eukaryotic ArsB orthologues have been identified to date. Recently, an arsenite resistance gene encoding a putative membrane protein was identified in Bacillus subtilis (34). Homologues of this protein have been identified in other bacteria (35), in archaea (36), and in S. cerevisiae (7), defining a second family of arsenite resistance proteins that we call the Acr3p family (Fig. 4B). From our experiments, it is clear that a subgroup of the ABC superfamily forms a third class of arsenite resistance proteins (Fig. 4C). We propose that arsenite detoxification mechanisms are nearly universal in nature and that the pathways will have similar steps even if they are the products of independent evolution (Fig. 4D). The first step is reduction of arsenate to arsenite. Because geological sources of arsenicals are exposed to the oxidizing atmosphere, aqueous arsenical salts, such as those that contaminate drinking water from geochemical sources, are usually in the form of arsenate. In both bacteria
6 5006 Cell Biology: Ghosh et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96 (1999) and yeast, enzymatic reduction is catalyzed by members of three evolutionarily unrelated families of arsenate reductases. (7, 8, 37, 38). The next step in the pathway is removal of arsenite from the cytosol (Fig. 4D). As discussed above, transport proteins for the detoxification of arsenite also have evolved independently at least three times: ArsB, Acr3p, and Ycf1p. In both bacteria and yeast, active extrusion out of the cell is catalyzed by either ArsB or Acr3p, but, in yeast, Ycf1p provides a second, independent way to remove arsenite from the cytosol by sequestering it in the vacuole as the glutathione conjugate. Arsenicals and antimonials have a long history of usage as antimicrobial agents (39, 40), and resistance to these metalloids is of clinical importance in treatment of infectious diseases caused by trypanosomatid parasites (40 42). Moreover, arsenite in the form of arsenic trioxide has been shown to be an effective treatment for acute promyelocytic leukemia (43). In a recent study, arsenite treatment produced complete remission of acute promyelocytic leukemia in 11 of 12 patients (44). Three of the eleven patients became unresponsive to treatment with arsenite, suggesting that resistance may have arisen in those individuals. Thus, it is important to determine the routes of arsenic detoxification in higher eukaryotes, including humans. At this point, S. cerevisiae is the only eukaryotic organism for which the pathways of arsenical resistance have been defined, and arsenite-sensitive yeast strains may prove of value in identifying the genes for other eukaryotic transporters. We thank S. Ackerman (Wayne State University) for strains, plasmids, advice, and thoughtful discussion. We also thank R. Nakamoto (University of Virginia) and R. Rao (Johns Hopkins University) for suggestions and advice. We are grateful to D. Thiele (University of Michigan) for strains and advice. Thanks are due C. Slayman (Yale University) for Pma1p antibody and N. Davis (Wayne State University) for Pho8 antibody. This work was supported by U.S. Public Health Service Grant GM Dey, S. & Rosen, B. P. (1995) in Drug Transport in Antimicrobial and Anticancer Chemotherapy, ed. Georgopapadakou, N. H. (Dekker, New York), pp Rosen, B. P. (1996) J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 1, Xu, C., Zhou, T., Kuroda, M. & Rosen, B. P. (1998) J. Biochem. 123, Dey, S., Papadopoulou, B., Haimeur, A., Roy, G., Grondin, K., Dou, D., Rosen, B. P. & Ouellette, M. (1994) Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 67, Wang, Z., Dey, S., Rosen, B. P. & Rossman, T. G. (1996) Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 137, Cole, S. P., Sparks, K. E., Fraser, K., Loe, D. W., Grant, C. E., Wilson, G. M. & Deeley, R. G. (1994) Cancer Res. 54, Bobrowicz, P., Wysocki, R., Owsianik, G., Goffeau, A. & Ulaszewski, S. (1997) Yeast 13, Mukhopadhyay, R. & Rosen, B. P. (1998) FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 168, Wysocki, R., Bobrowicz, P. & Ulaszewski, S. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, Li, Z. S., Szczypka, M., Lu, Y. P., Thiele, D. J. & Rea, P. A. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, Szczypka, M. S., Wemmie, J. A., Moye-Rowley, W. S. & Thiele, D. J. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, Li, Z. S., Lu, Y. P., Zhen, R. G., Szczypka, M., Thiele, D. J. & Rea, P. A. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, Tommasini, R., Vogt, E., Fromenteau, M., Hortensteiner, S., Matile, P., Amrhein, N. & Martinoia, E. (1998) Plant. J. 13, Tommasini, R., Evers, R., Vogt, E., Mornet, C., Zaman, G. J., Schinkel, A. H., Borst, P. & Martinoia, E. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93, Adams, A., Gottschling, D. E., Kaiser, C. & Stearns, T. (1998) Methods in Yeast Genetics: A Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Course Manual (Cold Spring Harbor Lab. Press, Plainview, NY.). 16. Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F. & Maniatis, T. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual (Cold Spring Harbor Lab. Press, Plainview, NY). 17. Guthrie, C. & Fink, G. R. (1991) Methods Enzymol. 194, Ito, H., Fukuda, Y., Murata, K. & Kimura, A. (1983) J. Bacteriol. 153, Rothstein, R. J. (1983) Methods Enzymol. 101, Wemmie, J. A., Szczypka, M. S., Thiele, D. J. & Moye-Rowley, W. S. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, Hill, J. E., Myers, A. M., Koerner, T. J. & Tzagoloff, A. (1986) Yeast 2, Dey, S., Ouellette, M., Lightbody, J., Papadopoulou, B. & Rosen, B. P. (1996) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93, Kaplan, R. S. & Pedersen, P. L. (1985) Anal. Biochem. 150, Sorin, A., Rosas, G. & Rao, R. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, Laemmli, U. K. (1970) Nature (London) 227, Reay, P. F. & Asher, C. J. (1977) Anal. Biochem. 78, Ouellette, M. & Borst, P. (1991) Res. Microbiol. 142, Mobley, H. L. & Rosen, B. P. (1982) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 79, Vasilyeva, E. A., Minkov, I. B., Fitin, A. F. & Vinogradov, A. D. (1982) Biochem. J. 202, Klionsky, D. J. & Emr, S. D. (1989) EMBO J. 8, Delnomdedieu, M., Basti, M. M., Otvos, J. D. & Thomas, D. J. (1994) Chem. Biol. Interact. 90, Leier, I., Jedlitschky, G., Buchholz, U., Cole, S. P., Deeley, R. G. & Keppler, D. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, Luker, G. D., Rao, V. V., Crankshaw, C. L., Dahlheimer, J. & Piwnica-Worms, D. (1997) Biochemistry 36, Sato, T. & Kobayashi, Y. (1998) J. Bacteriol. 180, Kaneko, T. & Tabata, S. (1997) Plant Cell Physiol. 38, Klenk, H. P., Clayton, R. A., Tomb, J. F., White, O., Nelson, K. E., Ketchum, K. A., Dodson, R. J., Gwinn, M., Hickey, E. K., Peterson, J. D., et al. (1997) Nature (London) 390, Ji, G., Garber, E. A., Armes, L. G., Chen, C. M., Fuchs, J. A. & Silver, S. (1994) Biochemistry 33, Gladysheva, T. B., Oden, K. L. & Rosen, B. P. (1994) Biochemistry 33, Fairlamb, A. H., Henderson, G. B. & Cerami, A. (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86, Borst, P. & Ouellette, M. (1995) Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 49, Fairlamb, A. H. (1989) Parasitology 99, Grogl, M., Thomason, T. N. & Franke, E. D. (1992) Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 47, Chen, Z., Wang, Z. Y. & Chen, S. J. (1997) Pharmacol. Ther. 76, Soignet, S. L., Maslak, P., Wang, Z. G., Jhanwar, S., Calleja, E., Dardashti, L. J., Corso, D., DeBlasio, A., Gabrilove, J., et al. (1998) N. Engl. J. Med. 339, Bowman, S., Ackerman, S. H., Griffiths, D. E. & Tzagoloff, A. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266,
Chromatin Immunoprecipitation A) Prepare a yeast culture (see the Galactose Induction Protocol for details). 1) Start a small culture (e.g. 2 ml) in YEPD or selective media from a single colony. 2) Spin
Lecture 36: Basics of DNA Cloning-II Note: Before starting this lecture students should have completed Lecture 35 Sequential steps involved in DNA cloning using plasmid DNA as vector: Molecular cloning
Molecular Biology Techniques: A Classroom Laboratory Manual THIRD EDITION Susan Carson Heather B. Miller D.Scott Witherow ELSEVIER AMSTERDAM BOSTON HEIDELBERG LONDON NEW YORK OXFORD PARIS SAN DIEGO SAN
HCS604.03 Exercise 1 Dr. Jones Spring 2005 Recombinant DNA (Molecular Cloning) exercise: The purpose of this exercise is to learn techniques used to create recombinant DNA or clone genes. You will clone
Southern Blot Analysis (from Baker lab, university of Florida) DNA Prep Prepare DNA via your favorite method. You may find a protocol under Mini Yeast Genomic Prep. Restriction Digest 1.Digest DNA with
Home Contacts Order Catalog Support Search Alphabetical Index Numerical Index Restriction Endonucleases Modifying Enzymes PCR Kits Markers Nucleic Acids Nucleotides & Oligonucleotides Media Transfection
ELUTION OF DNA FROM AGAROSE GELS OBTECTIVE: To isolate specific bands or regions of agarose-separated DNA for use in subsequent experiments and/or procedures. INTRODUCTION: It is sometimes necessary to
Product Manual Pure-IP Western Blot Detection Kit Catalog Number PRB-5002 20 blots FOR RESEARCH USE ONLY Not for use in diagnostic procedures Introduction The technique of immunoprecipitation (IP) is used
292PR 01 G-Biosciences 1-800-628-7730 1-314-991-6034 firstname.lastname@example.org A Geno Technology, Inc. (USA) brand name Classic Immunoprecipitation Utilizes Protein A/G Agarose for Antibody Binding (Cat.
In vitro analysis of pri-mirna processing by Drosha-DGCR8 complex (Narry Kim s lab) 1-1. Preparation of radiolabeled pri-mirna transcript The RNA substrate for a cropping reaction can be prepared by in
pcas-guide System Validation in Genome Editing Tagging HSP60 with HA tag genome editing The latest tool in genome editing CRISPR/Cas9 allows for specific genome disruption and replacement in a flexible
WESTERN BLOTTING TIPS AND TROUBLESHOOTING GUIDE TIPS FOR SUCCESSFUL WESTERB BLOTS TROUBLESHOOTING GUIDE 1. Suboptimal protein transfer. This is the most common complaint with western blotting and could
Biotechnology and Recombinant DNA Recombinant DNA procedures - an overview Biotechnology: The use of microorganisms, cells, or cell components to make a product. Foods, antibiotics, vitamins, enzymes Recombinant
Supplemental Text/Tables PCR Amplification and Sequencing PCR was carried out in a reaction volume of 20 µl using the ABI AmpliTaq GOLD kit (ABI, Foster City, CA). Each PCR reaction contained 20 ng genomic
ASSAY OF β-galactosidase IN YEAST (Obtained from John Stebbins, Triezenberg lab) There are two basic methods for the in vitro assay of B-galactosidase activity from yeast. They differ mainly in the method
Expression and Purification of Recombinant Protein in bacteria and Yeast Presented By: Puspa pandey, Mohit sachdeva & Ming yu DNA Vectors Molecular carriers which carry fragments of DNA into host cell.
1. A recombinant DNA molecules is one that is a. produced through the process of crossing over that occurs in meiosis b. constructed from DNA from different sources c. constructed from novel combinations
Common Course Topics Biology 1414: Introduction to Biotechnology I Assumptions Students may be enrolled in this course for several reasons; they are enrolled in the Biotechnology Program, they need a science
Biotechnology and Recombinant DNA (Chapter 9) Lecture Materials for Amy Warenda Czura, Ph.D. Suffolk County Community College Primary Source for figures and content: Eastern Campus Tortora, G.J. Microbiology
Biotechnology s oratories Biotechnology Name Location Person in Charge Programs Served Courses Served General Biology W12-039 Zahra Yassin General Microbiology M12-132 Aisha Echtibi General (Basic Course)
Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP) Day 1 A) DNA shearing 1. Samples Dissect tissue (One Mouse OBs) of interest and transfer to an eppendorf containing 0.5 ml of dissecting media (on ice) or PBS but without
restriction enzymes 350 Home Restriction Enzymes (endonucleases): molecular scissors that cut DNA Properties of widely used Type II restriction enzymes: recognize a single sequence of bases in dsdna, usually
TRI Reagent For processing tissues, cells cultured in monolayer or cell pellets Catalog Number T9424 Store at room temperature. TECHNICAL BULLETIN Product Description TRI Reagent is a quick and convenient
RevertAid Premium First Strand cdna Synthesis Kit #K1651, #K1652 CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS #K1651 Lot QUALITY CONTROL RT-PCR using 100 fg of control GAPDH RNA and GAPDH control primers generated a prominent
Western Blotting Sive Lab Protocol March 2007 Prepare samples: For zebrafish embryos: Option 1: Take live embryos and put into 1.5 ml tube with E3. Centrifuge gently for 1-2 minutes -yolk lipids will rise
Protocol for GenomePlex Whole Genome Amplification from Formalin-Fixed Parrafin-Embedded (FFPE) tissue Application Guide... 2 I. Description... 2 II. Product Components... 2 III. Materials to be Supplied
BIOTECHNOLOGY Levels: 11-12 Units of Credit: 1.0 CIP Code: 51.1201 Prerequisite: Biology or Chemistry Skill Certificates: #708 COURSE DESCRIPTION is an exploratory course designed to create an awareness
Microbiology Laboratory: MOLECULAR IDENTIFICATION OF UNKNOWN BACTERIA Classical Microbiology courses are typically structured to introduce the identification of bacterial species using a series of biochemical
Recombinant DNA & Genetic Engineering g Genetic Manipulation: Tools Kathleen Hill Associate Professor Department of Biology The University of Western Ontario Tools for Genetic Manipulation DNA, RNA, cdna
SUPPLEMENTARY FIGURES Fig. S1: Effect of ISO- and TAC-treatments on the biosynthesis of FAS-II elongation products in M. tb H37Ra. LC/MS chromatograms showing a decrease in products with elemental compositions
Pre/Post-quiz Assessment Study Biol. 462 Lab [Correct answer is italicized. Blue questions are in post-quiz only.] Students: to assess whether or not the laboratory of this course helps you learn concepts
CLONTECH Innovative Tools to Accelerate Discovery Antibodies Protocol Guide PT3407-1 (PR99224) Published 14 September 1999 FOR RESEARCH USE ONLY Table of Contents I. Introduction 3 II. Materials Required
To make Glycerol Stocks of Plasmids ** To be done in the hood and use RNase/DNase free tips** 1. In a 10 ml sterile tube add 3 ml autoclaved LB broth and 1.5 ul antibiotic (@ 100 ug/ul) or 3 ul antibiotic
CHAPTER 6: RECOMBINANT DNA TECHNOLOGY YEAR III PHARM.D DR. V. CHITRA INTRODUCTION DNA : DNA is deoxyribose nucleic acid. It is made up of a base consisting of sugar, phosphate and one nitrogen base.the
Western Blotting All steps are carried out at room temperature unless otherwise indicated. Recipes for all solutions highlighted bold are included at the end of the protocol. SDS-PAGE 1. Construct an SDS-PAGE
pmod2-puro A plasmid containing a synthetic Puromycin resistance gene Catalog # pmod2-puro For research use only Version # 11H29-MM PrOduct information content: - 20 mg of lyophilized pmod2-puro plasmid
20.109 MOD1 DNA ENGINEERING Fall 2010 Exploiting science for engineering: BRCA2 targeted therapies Orsi Kiraly Engelward lab Homologous recombination is important No HR chromosomal aberrations cell death
DNA Fingerprinting Unless they are identical twins, individuals have unique DNA DNA fingerprinting The name used for the unambiguous identifying technique that takes advantage of differences in DNA sequence
Chapter 9 Biotechnology and Recombinant DNA Biotechnology and Recombinant DNA Q&A Interferons are species specific, so that interferons to be used in humans must be produced in human cells. Can you think
Bacterial Transformation and Plasmid Purification Chapter 5: Background History of Transformation and Plasmids Bacterial methods of DNA transfer Transformation: when bacteria take up DNA from their environment
Running protein gels and detection of proteins 1. Protein concentration determination using the BIO RAD reagent This assay uses a colour change reaction to give a direct measurement of protein concentration.
Biotechnology Chapter 20: Biotechnology: DNA Technology & Genomics The BIG Questions How can we use our knowledge of DNA to: o Diagnose disease or defect? o Cure disease or defect? o Change/improve organisms?
Health and Life Sciences Faculty Course Title: Biological and Forensic Science Module code: 216 BMS Module Title: Molecular Genetics Overview of the Recombinant DNA technology- the process of subcloning
Genomic DNA Extraction Kit INSTRUCTION MANUAL Table of Contents Introduction 3 Kit Components 3 Storage Conditions 4 Recommended Equipment and Reagents 4 Introduction to the Protocol 4 General Overview
HIS-Select Nickel Affinity Gel Catalog Number P6611 Storage Temperature 2 8 C TECHNICAL BULLETIN Product Description HIS-Select Nickel Affinity Gel is an immobilized metalion affinity chromatography (IMAC)
INTRODUCTION To close the yellow note, click once to select it and then click the box in the upper left corner. To open the note, double click (Mac OS) or right click (Windows) on the note icon. Transformation
DNA SPOOLING 1 ISOLATION OF DNA FROM ONION INTRODUCTION This laboratory protocol will demonstrate several basic steps required for isolation of chromosomal DNA from cells. To extract the chromosomal DNA,
i 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Human Hepatitis B virus (HBV) 1 1.1.1 Pathogenesis of Hepatitis B 1 1.1.2 Genome organization of HBV 3 1.1.3 Structure of HBV virion 5 1.1.4 HBV life cycle 5 1.1.5 Experimental models
Lecture 13: DNA Technology DNA Sequencing Genetic Markers - RFLPs polymerase chain reaction (PCR) products of biotechnology DNA Sequencing determine order of nucleotides in a strand of DNA > bases = A,
Chapter 20. Biotechnology: DNA Technology & Genomics 2003-2004 The BIG Questions How can we use our knowledge of DNA to: diagnose disease or defect? cure disease or defect? change/improve organisms? What
Plant Genomic DNA Extraction using CTAB Introduction The search for a more efficient means of extracting DNA of both higher quality and yield has lead to the development of a variety of protocols, however
AP BIOLOGY 2007 SCORING GUIDELINES Question 4 A bacterial plasmid is 100 kb in length. The plasmid DNA was digested to completion with two restriction enzymes in three separate treatments: EcoRI, HaeIII,
HighPure Maxi Plasmid Kit For purification of high pure plasmid DNA with high yields www.tiangen.com PP120109 HighPure Maxi Plasmid Kit Kit Contents Storage Cat.no. DP116 Contents RNaseA (100 mg/ml) Buffer
Topic J10+11: Molecular-biological methods + Clinical virology I (hepatitis A, B & C, HIV) To study: PCR, ELISA, your own notes from serology reactions Task J10/1: DNA isolation of the etiological agent
DNA Isolation Kit for Cells and Tissues for 10 isolations of 00 mg each for tissue or 5 x 10 7 cultured cells Cat. No. 11 81 770 001 Principle Starting material Application Time required Results Benefits
Lab 10: Bacterial Transformation, part 2, DNA plasmid preps, Determining DNA Concentration and Purity Today you analyze the results of your bacterial transformation from last week and determine the efficiency
CLONING IN ESCHERICHIA COLI Introduction: In this laboratory, you will carry out a simple cloning experiment in E. coli. Specifically, you will first create a recombinant DNA molecule by carrying out a
Common Course Topics Biology 1406: Cell and Molecular Biology 1. Introduction to biology --the scientific study of organisms --properties of life --assumptions, methods and limitations of science --underlying
AP Biology Name AP Lab 8: Biotechnology (Bacterial Transformation) The bacterium Escherichia coli (E. coli) is a common inhabitant of the human colon and can be easily grown in inexpensive suspension culture.
EXPERIMENT VI PURIFICATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF PROTEINS I- Protein isolation and dialysis In order to investigate its structure and properties a protein must be obtained in pure form. Since proteins
Name: Class: Date: Genetic Technology Multiple Choice Identify the choice that best completes the statement or answers the question. 1. An application of using DNA technology to help environmental scientists
Induction of Enzyme Activity in Bacteria:The Lac Operon Preparation for Laboratory: Web Tutorial - Lac Operon - submit questions I. Background: For the last week you explored the functioning of the enzyme
Investigating a Eukaryotic Genome: Cloning and Sequencing a Fragment of Yeast DNA Credits: This lab was created by Sarah C.R. Elgin and developed and written by Kathleen Weston-Hafer. Specific protocols
Method for Western Blotting Western Blotting ELECTROPHORESIS Prepare and run an SDS PAGE gel. Select a gel percent which will give the best resolution for the size of antigen being analyzed (if known).
The Need for a PARP in vivo Pharmacodynamic Assay Jay George, Ph.D., Chief Scientific Officer, Trevigen, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD For further infomation, please contact: William Booth, Ph.D. Tel: +44 (0)1235
Protocol for Western Blotting Materials Materials used on Day 3 Protease inhibitor stock: 1 μg/μl pepstatin A in DMSO 200 μm leupeptin in OG Buffer 200 mm PMSF: Freshly made. Ex) 34.8 mg PMSF in 1 ml isopropanol
DNA Ligase enzyme catalysing formation of phosphodiesteric bound between group 3 -OH of one end of DNA molecule and group 5 -phosphate of the second end of DNA DNA ligase ATP (or NAD+) Ligase cofactors
INSTRUCTIONS Frozen-EZ Yeast Transformation II Catalog No. T2001 Highlights High transformation efficiency that yields approximately 10 5-10 6 transformants per μg plasmid DNA (circular). Frozen storage
Recombinant DNA Technology Dates in the Development of Gene Cloning: 1965 - plasmids 1967 - ligase 1970 - restriction endonucleases 1972 - first experiments in gene splicing 1974 - worldwide moratorium
Promega Notes Number 71, 1999, p. 10 Blunt-End Pfu DNA Polymerase- Generated PCR Fragments into pgem -T Vector Systems By Kimberly Knoche, Ph.D., and Dan Kephart, Ph.D. Promega Corporation Corresponding
INSTRUCTION MANUAL ZymoPURE Plasmid Gigaprep Kit Catalog Nos. D4204 (Patent Pending) Highlights The fastest spin-column based procedure for purifying up to 10 mg of ultra-pure endotoxin-free transfection-grade
SPARK DNA Sample Prep Kit Ion Torrent (SPK0002-V08) Frequently Asked Questions Under what circumstances would I use SPARK DNA Sample Prep Kit for Ion Torrent? Enzymatics SPARK DNA Sample Prep Kit for Ion
BIOECHNOLOGY I RECOMBINN DN LIGION LB 9 RECOMBINN DN LIGION SUDEN GUIDE GOL he objective of this lab is to perform DN ligation to construct a recombinant plasmid. OBJECIVES fter completion, the student
BIOTECHNOLOGY What can we do with DNA? Biotechnology Manipulation of biological organisms or their components for research and industrial purpose Usually manipulate DNA itself How to study individual gene?
Western Blotting: Mini-gels Materials a Protein Extraction Buffer (for callus or kernel), Solution Stock Final Volume Tris-HCl ph 80 1 M 200 mm 20 ml NaCl 4 M 100 mm 25 ml Sucrose 2 M 400 mm 20 ml EDTA
METHOD USED TO EXTRACT TOTAL MUSCLE PROTEIN FOR WESTERN BLOT USING TRIS-EDTA BUFFER* SOLUTIONS FOR SAMPLE EXTRACTION 1. Tris-EDTA Buffer, ph 8.3 1 liter 50 mm Tris 6.06 g 10 mm EDTA 3.72 g Adjust ph to
European Medicines Agency July 1996 CPMP/ICH/139/95 ICH Topic Q 5 B Quality of Biotechnological Products: Analysis of the Expression Construct in Cell Lines Used for Production of r-dna Derived Protein
Protein Purification and Analysis Numbers of genes: Humans ~40,000 genes Yeast ~6000 genes Bacteria ~3000 genes Solubility of proteins important for purification: 60-80% soluble, 20-40% membrane Some proteins
Transporters in membrane vesicles LIMO award 2011 for technical excellence NCMLS building Jeroen van den Heuvel Dept Pharmacology & Toxicology Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre DNA helix staircase
Your consent to our cookies if you continue to use this website.