Development Control Committee 14 January, 2016 WD/D/15/ ITEM NUMBER 2
|
|
- Gwen Reed
- 7 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Development Control Committee 14 January, 2016 WD/D/15/ ITEM NUMBER 2 Application Number: WD/D/15/ Full Registration Date: 22 September, 2015 Application Site: EYPES MOUTH CAR PARK, MOUNT LANE, EYPE Proposal: Demolish existing Chalet & relocate/erect new Chalet to the rear of car park Applicant: Mr T & G Wingfield Digby Ward Members: Cllr S Christopher Case Officer: Joanne Langrish-Merritt The application has been brought to committee due to objections from the Parish Council. 1. Summary Recommendation 1.1 Approve subject to conditions 2. Description of development 2.1 The applicant is seeking permission to demolish the existing chalet and construct a replacement chalet to the rear of the car park. The site lies on the outskirts of the village of Eype within the AONB and Heritage Coast on the boundary of the World Heritage Site and a Site of Special Scientific Importance. The site forms part of the car park with the land sloping upwards towards the west. The existing chalet is positioned high on the slope in a prominent position which is visible from the car park and the adjacent South West Coast Path. This is a highly sensitive location within the Heritage Coast and the Dorset AONB. The surrounding landscape is open, coastal cliff top grassland making this a highly exposed and open location. The site is clearly seen from a long length of the South West Coast Path. 2.2 The proposal is to demolish the existing chalet and erect a replacement chalet towards the rear of the car park lower down the slope closer to the entrance and the chalets at Eypes Mouth Chalet Park. The plans propose a chalet with a similar size footprint although slightly larger to account for modern insulation. The applicant is intending the chalet to appear similar to the existing and therefore it would be constructed in a similar style with timber cladding and natural slate roofing. A small area of sitting out space has been identified around the chalet. The remaining car park would be retained
2 3. Main planning issues Principle of development Impact on AONB, Heritage Coast and visual amenity Impact on land stability and coastal erosion Impact on residential amenity Impact on parking 4. Statutory Consultations Parish/Town Council 4.1 Symondsbury Parish Council has objected to the application due to the reduction of parking spaces that the relocation of this chalet will cause. "The small village of the Eype does not have the capacity for parking within the village as the village consists of narrow winding lanes and relies heavily on this car park for tourism. We also have concerns regarding the obstruction of the footpath at the new location. They also requested confirmation that the ridge height will be no higher than the existing." Highway Authority 4.2 The Highway Authority has no objections 5. Other consultations 5.1 Natural England has no objections but has suggested that the Dorset AONB Team are consulted. 5.2 The Ministry of Defence has no objections 5.3 The Councils Technical Services Engineer has commented that: With regard to the demolition of the existing chalet, I agree with all measures recommended for minimising disturbance to the cliff - I have no further concerns with this element of the application. The relative size of the new chalet when compared with the existing is comparable so the loadings imposed by the new structure are unlikely to be significantly different. Ideally the drainage would run to a piped system, however, the disturbance caused by installing a new system could have a greater negative impact and therefore drainage to a soakaway 'field' where infiltration occurs over a large area, as opposed to being concentrated is acceptable in this instance. I don't agree with the statement made by Mr Dyke that the site will remain secure for the next 50 years. The coastal risk planning guidance suggests there is a small chance that the site could be lost in less than 20 years and with the current SMP policy showing no active intervention for the next 100 years, I would suggest that 50 years is perhaps not realistic. Despite the risks associated with the site, I would not object to the proposals. However, it should be made clear to the applicant that the new site is no less vulnerable and there is a real possibility that it may be lost much sooner than the suggested 50 years or so.
3 5.4 The Councils Landscape Officer has commented that: Given the prominence of the site in the coastal landscape, the Dorset AONB Team have been consulted, and make the following comments: Thank you for consulting the AONB Team regarding this application. I have reviewed the proposal in relation to our Management Plan and have also considered the proposal in the context of local and national planning policy. This review has led me to conclude that the proposal, which is located in a highly sensitive area, should not be supported. The site is located within the Dorset AONB, on the seaward side of the South West Coast Path (SWCP) to the west of Eype Mouth, where the path ascends the fringes of rising slumped cliffs toward Thorncombe Beacon. In addition to being within the AONB the site is also located within the West Dorset Heritage Coast and is within the immediate setting of the Dorset and East Devon Coast World Heritage Site (WHS). I would highlight the following aspects of the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) that I consider particularly relevant to this proposal: Paragraph 114, which relates to Heritage Coasts, which NPPF defines as areas of undeveloped coastline which are managed to conserve their natural beauty and, where appropriate, to improve accessibility for visitors. NPPF states that: Local planning authorities should maintain the character of the undeveloped coast, protecting and enhancing its distinctive landscapes, particularly in areas defined as Heritage Coast, and improve public access to and enjoyment of the coast. Paragraph 115 states that: Great weight should be given to conserving landscape and scenic beauty in National Parks, the Broads and Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty, which have the highest status of protection in relation to landscape and scenic beauty.... The site is located within the Chideock Hills landscape character area, as defined by the Dorset AONB Landscape Character Assessment (LCA). With reference to the visual character and perceptions of the landscape character area the LCA notes that: Impressive sweeping views of coastal landforms are found along the entire coast set against the greensand summits of Golden Cap, Thorncombe Beacon and the wooded Langdon Hill. It is within this visual context that the existing and replacement chalets are located. Dorset AONB has a suite of Special Qualities (SQs) that make it a unique and outstanding place, underpinning its designation as a nationally important landscape. These are the features that we need to conserve and enhance for the future and they should be considered in decisions affecting the AONB. There are two special qualities that I consider could be affected by the proposed development: Uninterrupted panoramic views to appreciate the complex pattern and textures of the surrounding landscapes An exceptional undeveloped coastline
4 The principal reason that I do not consider that the proposal for a replacement chalet conforms with the statutory purpose of Dorset AONB (this being the conservation and enhancement of the Area s natural beauty), is that the removal of the existing structure would enhance the natural character of the seascape at this location, by removing a manmade feature that intrudes into fine panoramic views along our exceptional undeveloped coastline. Such views include those along the WHS that are achieved from the SWCP National Trail. It is my understanding that if the replacement dwelling is not approved it will be the responsibility of the owner to make safe and remove the existing structure. I recommend that you confirm this position with the planning officer. If my interpretation is correct, there is an opportunity for enhancement of the AONB s SQs that would be missed were a replacement chalet approved. I have reviewed the plans for the replacement structure and I consider that the overall landscape and visual effects of the new structure very similar to the existing building. I should highlight that this comment is made with reference to pubic views, as opposed to the visual amenity of neighbours. The site of the relocated chalet is less elevated and further from coastal edge, although this distance will reduce in time due to on-going erosion. I note that the replacement structure is closer to the SWCP, although it is my understanding that the proposal will not physically restrict the use of the SWCP. While the closer proximity of the replacement structure to the path would restrict views to a greater degree than the existing chalet for a short duration, I do not consider this change to be of such magnitude as to be significant. Overall my concerns are not founded on the additional or alternative adverse effects, as compared with the existing structure. It is my opinion that new development in this location is not desirable and that accommodating a replacement chalet is not necessary. I understand that in Coastal Change Management Areas the Council would be obliged to consider replacement dwellings where property is affected by coastal erosion. However the site does not fall within such an area. New development in this location would not be permissible, in my opinion, and I do not consider there to be a compelling case to consider the replacement chalet as necessary development in this instance. I have considered the proposal in relation to Dorset AONB s Management Plan , which is a material consideration in the planning process and provides a framework to help guide authorities in fulfilling their statutory duty, informing the development of local planning policy and influencing development decisions. I consider that the proposal conflicts with the following objectives and policies: 1. Objective L1: Conserve and enhance the AONB and the character and quality of its distinctive landscapes and associated features: L1c: Conserve and enhance the special qualities of the AONB such as tranquillity and remoteness, wildness and dark skies
5 2. Objective L2: Conserve and enhance the AONB by removing, avoiding and reducing intrusive and degrading features: L2c: Remove, avoid and reduce intrusive and degrading features to restore and enhance landscape character and quality 3. Objective CS3: Maintain and enhance the open and undeveloped nature of the AONB s coastal landscapes and seascapes: CS3c: Conserve the undeveloped nature of the coast CS3d: Remove intrusive and urbanising features from the coast 4. Objective PH1: Support sustainable development that conserves and enhances the special qualities of the AONB: PH1a: Ensure that any necessary development affecting the AONB is sensitively sited and designed and conserves and enhances local character PH1g: Conserve and enhance the AONB s undeveloped rural character, panoramic views, tranquillity, remoteness and wildness 5. Objective PH2: Impacts of development and land use damaging to the AONB s special qualities are avoided and reduced PH2b: Protect the quality of uninterrupted panoramic views into, within and out of the AONB On the basis of the above comments, and the conflict with the statutory purpose of the AONB, its special qualities, and the Dorset AONB Management Policies set out above, I would conclude that the proposed development would fail to meet Local Plan policy ENV1(i). With the existing chalet forming a visually prominent development feature in the undeveloped coastline, prolonging its presence through this application as an intrusive structure would also fail to meet the policy objectives of ENV1(ii) and (iii) and the relevant criteria of ENV10. In favour of the application are the degrees of harm that would result from the development. The replacement chalet would be of near-identical appearance and scale, and set at a slightly lower elevation on the cliff-top. If you consider that the principle of development here is established, and a temporary extension of harmful development is justified, there will be an inevitable limit on the duration of the development due to the continued erosion of the cliff. However, as noted above, the landscape tests of the Local Plan would not be satisfied, and could therefore justify refusal of the application on landscape grounds. If you were minded to recommend approval of the application, conditions securing the removal of the existing chalet and the restoration the current site to grassland should be imposed, to conserve the undeveloped character of the cliff.
6 5.5 The Dorset County Rights of Way Officer has commented that The proposed works directly affect Footpath 34, Symondsbury and I strongly advise that the conditions below are included in any planning approval: A 2m wide useable route must be left between the fence to the north and the proposed development, to allow unhindered access to the footpath. This should be the flat area and not include the heavily vegetated bank. There should be no gates installed across the footpath 6. Other representations 6.1 Five letters of objection have been received. The main focus of the objections relate to: Loss of parking Height and scale of replacement chalet Location of the replacement chalet and possibility of it blocking the footpath Impact on the Heritage coast and AONB Impact on open aspect of the other chalets Impact on land stability Precedent One letter of support has been received Copies of the letters of representation are available to view on the website Human Rights 7.1 Article 6 - Right to a fair trial. 7.2 Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life and home. 7.3 The first protocol of Article 1 Protection of property 8. Relevant Planning History None 9. The Development Plan The West Dorset Weymouth and Portland Plan (2015) ENV1 Landscape, Seascape and sites of geological importance ENV5 Flood risk ENV7 Coastal erosion and land instability ENV12 Design ENV16 Amenity ECON6 New built tourist accommodation SUS2 - Distribution of development SUS4 - Replacement of buildings outside defined development boundaries HOUS6 - Other residential development outside defined development boundaries 10. Supplementary planning documents 10.1 Policy A, H and I of the Design and Sustainable Development Planning Guidelines
7 11. Supplementary planning guidance 11.1 None 12. Other Material Planning Considerations 12.1 National Planning Policy Framework (2012) Part 7 Design Part 10 Flooding and coastal erosion Part 11 Conserving and enhancing the Natural Environment Decision taking: Para Local planning authorities should approach decision-taking in a positive way to foster the delivery of sustainable development. The relationship between decision-taking and plan-making should be seamless, translating plans into high quality development on the ground. Para Local planning authorities should look for solutions rather than problems, and decision-takers at every level should seek to approve applications for sustainable development where possible. Local planning authorities should work proactively with applicants to secure developments that improve the economic, social and environmental conditions of the area. 13. Planning issues 13.1 Principle of development Policy HOUS6 allows for the replacement of an existing lawful dwelling-house located outside of the Defined Development Boundaries on a one-for-one basis. As the chalet has been in existence since the 1930s it does not have any form of residential restriction and the applicant initially applied for the replacement chalet to be an unrestricted dwelling. Policy HOUS6 allows for a one for one replacement provided that: The new building can be accommodated within the existing curtilage The new building is not significantly larger than the original and it does not adversely affect the appearance of the locality or its landscape setting The existing chalet does not have a clearly defined curtilage as such, however, it does have an area which is used by the applicants for sitting out. Nevertheless the proposed replacement chalet would be located outside of this area mainly due to the issues relating to the immediate risk of coastal erosion and as such the development would be contrary to this part of the policy. However the benefits of the proposed position should be also be considered. The replacement chalet would be moved further down the slope in a less prominent position and although it would not be within the 'curtilage' of the existing chalet it would be within the existing car park area and would be in a less obtrusive area closer to the other chalets The second part of the policy relates to the size of the replacement chalet. The replacement chalet would be 40cm longer and 40cm wider and the same height as the existing. The minimal increase in the lenght and width would be to account for the inclusion of modern insulation. Furthermore as stated above the location for the replacement chalet would be in less prominent, lower position adjacent to the existing chalet at Eypes Mouth Holiday Park. As such the proposal is considered to comply with this part of the policy.
8 Therefore, whilst the proposal would not comply with all parts of the policy there are considered to be benefits to the proposed replacement chalet and on balance the principle is considered to be acceptable. Nevertheless although the principle of the replacement of the chalet may be acceptable other considerations must be made The site lies within a potential coastal recession area; it is very close to the cliff edge and as such consideration has been given to the Shoreline Management Plan. The application site lies within the Cliff Top Recession area and in an area identified for 'no active intervention' consequently the site could be threatened in the medium-term i.e years. The current application whilst moving the chalet further down the slope would not move the chalet out of the cliff top recession area to an area less vulnerable to coastal erosion The Coastal Risk Planning guidance for West Dorset Weymouth and Portland states that: "No permanent development should occur in the area at risk of erosion along the cliff top or coastal slope seawards of the defined erosion bands...the type of development appropriate in this area are short terms holiday lets camping and caravan sites or facilities associated with tourism." 13.6 Furthermore Policy ENV7 states that "within coastal change management area no new development will be permitted for residential development or similarly occupied uses." 13.7 The existing chalet has been present on the site since the 1930s and as such the building has no restrictions in terms of its use. However the site is within the Cliff Top Recession Area where permanent residential accommodation would not be supported. Initially the applicant applied for the chalet as an unrestricted dwelling, however, following discussions with the applicant regarding the shoreline management area the applicant has agreed to the proposed chalet being restricted to holiday accommodation only. Therefore as with other replacement chalet applications at Eypes Mouth Chalet Park the Council would seek to restrict the occupation of the chalet to holiday purposes only especially as it is within the Cliff Top Recession area where permanent residential development would not be supported, but holiday accommodation would be acceptable Impact on the visual amenity AONB and Heritage Coast The overall footprint of the chalet is slightly larger than the existing and as such this small increase would not be readily noticeable. The proposed site of the chalet would be on lower ground and clustered together with the other chalets at Eypes Mouth Chalet Park which would further reduce its overall impact. Therefore whilst the replacement chalet would be visible from the public footpath it is not considered to have an additonal impact on the wider landscape. The replacement chalet would be dug into the slope to minimise its overall visual impact and it would have a ridge height no higher than the chalet to the rear (no 15).The proposed replacement chalet is to be of a similar design to the existing including the materials and finish which coupled with its position and height would minimise any adverse impact on this open landscape.
9 13.9 As the site would be located further down the slope within the parking area it is likely that any sitting out area would need to be delineated with a fence. It is important that this area is kept as open and clutter free as possible and therefore the applicant is intending to erect a low unobtrusive fence. There would be concern over the potential visual intrusion of domestic paraphernalia of any sort including benches or patios in this area and a condition removing permitted development rights for extensions, roof alterations and outbuildings would be attached to any permission The AONB Team and the Landscape Officer have both raised concerns in relation to the landscape impact of the proposed development. The AONB Team have commented that the proposed development is not desirable and that the removal of the existing structure could enhance the natural seascape by removing this manmade object. However it must be considered that the proposed chalet is of a similar scale and has a similar appearance to the existing chalet and would be in a less elevated position. Furthermore although the chalet would be moved further down the site it would still be within the coastal recession area and therefore the duration of the development would be restricted by the ongoing coastal erosion. Therefore taking into consideration the benefits of the proposed site, the replacement chalet is not considered to result in any further significant detrimental impact to the landscape character of the area than the existing and given the limited life span of the development is, on balance, considered to be acceptable The Landscape Officer, AONB Team, Technical Services Engineer and Natural England are keen for the redundant site to be returned to its original state and all debris removed. This area forms part of the SSSI and as such it will be returned to its natural form to prevent any further adverse harm especially when viewed from the adjacent footpath. As such a condition is recommended to be attached to any permission ensuring that the redundant area of the existing chalet will be returned to its natural state and all debris removed Impact on residential amenity The chalet would be moved from its current positon further down the slope to an area which is in close proximity to the other chalets at Eypes Mouth Chalet Park. Nevertheless the chalet has been positioned to the west of the chalets closest to the southern boundary to prevent an overbearing impact. The existing chalets to the north are more than 50m away and as such there is not considered to be an overbearing impact. The proposed chalet would have a ground floor window on the eastern elevation which would serve the proposed kitchen. The closest chalet to the east is set back from the southern boundary and although there is an existing window on the western elevation due to the position of the two chalets they would be at an oblique angle to each other. Therefore the proposed window in the eastern elevation would look towards the front garden area of no 15 which is adjacent to the existing footpath and parking area and not a private space. As such the proposed replacement chalet is not considered to result in a significant loss of residential amenity to warrant refusal.
10 13.13 Impact on instability and coastal erosion The replacement chalet would be of a similar scale to the existing with only a marginal increase. Therefore the loadings imposed by the new structure are unlikely to be significantly different. The coastal risk planning guidance suggests there is a small chance that the site could be lost in less than 20 years especially with the current Shoreline Management Plan policy showing no active intervention for the next 100 years. Although the chalet is being moved further down the slope it is not been moved out of the cliff top recession area. Therefore the chalet is prposed to be restricted to holiday accommodation only which would be an acceptable use in this area. Furthermore the Technical Service Engineer has assessed the proposals and has no objections. As such the proposal is considered to be acceptable in terms of instability and coastal erosion Impact on parking The existing car park is not a public car park but is voluntarily opened by the applicant to provide access to the beach. The proposed replacement chalet would result in the loss of 9 parking spaces. However the existing permanent area or hardstanding would not be affected and the adjacent grassy areas of te car park have their maion emphasis of use during the main summer season. This is in overall terms a sizeable car park. Therefore overall the loss of parking spaces would be modeest and as this is a privately owned car park it could be closed at any point preventing any parking from taking place at all. As such the proposed development is not considered to have a significantly adverse impact on parking to warrant refusal. Furthermore the Highway Authority has no objections Impact on Right of Way In accordance with the suggestion from the Dorset County Rights of Way Officer the position of the chalet has been moved 1m further south so that there is approximately 2m to the north of the chalet. This would allow adequate space for the designated South West Coast Path and would not result in any form of obstruction to the right of way. a condition would be attached to any permission preventing gates from being erected across the Right of Way. 14. Summary 14.1 The proposed chalet would be located further down the slope than the existing it would be of a similar scale and appearance to the existing and in a less prominent position. As such the proposal is not considered to result in a significantly adverse visual impact on the wider landscape of the AONB and heritage coast The chalet would be restricted to holiday accommodation only as it would be located in the cliff top recession area where permanent residential accommodation would not be supported, and removal of the existing chalet would resuklt in a visual enhancement. The chalet is also considered to be acceptable in terms of residential amenity and parking.
11 15. Recommendation 15.1 Approve i. Standard 3 years ii. iii. Plans list Notwithstanding the provisions of the Town and County Planning (General Development) Order 2015 ( or any order provoking, re-enacting or modifying that order) no development permitted by Schedule 2, Part 1 Class A, B, C and E of the above order shall be carried out at the site, without the prior grant of planning permission from the Local Planning Authority. REASON: In the interests of visual amenity. iv. No development shall be commenced until details and samples of all external facing materials and finish for the walls and roof shall have been submitted to, and approved in writing by, the Local Planning Authority. Thereafter, unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority the development shall proceed in strict accordance with such materials as have been agreed. REASON: To ensure a satisfactory visual appearance of the development. v The building shall be used for holiday purposes only and shall not be used as the main, or sole, residence of the occupier. REASON: The Local Planning Authority is prepared to permit the use of the site only for holiday purposes because it is located in an area where permanent residential use is not supported. vi A register of all persons occupying the holiday accommodation hereby approved shall be kept by, or on behalf of, the owner/ owners of the holiday accommodation. The said register shall be made available for inspection during all reasonable hours at the request of a duly authorised officer of the Local Planning Authority, for such time as the development continues to be used as holiday accommodation. REASON: To ensure that the accommodation is used for holiday purposes only. vii No development shall commence until details of the finished floor levels and a section of the building hereby approved have been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. Such levels shall be relative to an ordnance datum or such other fixed feature as may be agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The development shall be carried out in accordance with the approved details. REASON In the interests of visual amenity viii Prior to the first occupation of the chalet hereby approved, the existing chalet shall be demolished and all debris removed from the site and the site shall be restored in accordance with a scheme to be submitted and agreed in writing by the local planning authority. REASON: In the interests of visual amenity
12 ix No gates shall be installed across the designated public footpath and its route shall be kept clear of obstruction. REASON: To prevent obstruction to the designated footpath to facilitate access.
Development Control Committee 14 April, 2016 WD/D/15/002369 ITEM NUMBER 04
Development Control Committee 14 April, 2016 WD/D/15/002369 ITEM NUMBER 04 Application Number: WD/D/15/002369 Full Registration Date: 23 September, 2015 Application Site: SHUTTERS, CLAPPENTAIL LANE, LYME
More informationDevelopment Control Committee 14 April, 2016 WD/D/15/002323 ITEM NUMBER 03. Proposal: Erection of 2no. dwellings in grounds of existing house
Development Control Committee 14 April, 2016 WD/D/15/002323 ITEM NUMBER 03 Application Number: WD/D/15/002323 Outline Registration Date: 19 October, 2015 Application Site: 10 WINTERS LANE, PORTESHAM, WEYMOUTH,
More informationDevelopment Control Committee 12 March, 2015 WD/D/14/002782 ITEM NUMBER 6
Development Control Committee 12 March, 2015 WD/D/14/002782 ITEM NUMBER 6 Application Number: WD/D/14/002782 Variation of condition Registration Date: 27 October, 2014 Application Site: UNIT 1, 43 SOUTH
More informationOrchard Barn, Newcastle Road, Blakelow, Cheshire, CW5 7ET. New Detached Double Garage Block with Integrated Garden Store and Loft Storage Area.
Application No: 13/2596N Location: Proposal: Applicant: Expiry Date: Orchard Barn, Newcastle Road, Blakelow, Cheshire, CW5 7ET New Detached Double Garage Block with Integrated Garden Store and Loft Storage
More informationK M D Hire Services, LONDON ROAD, NANTWICH, CW5 6LU
Application No: 11/2196N Location: Proposal: Applicant: Expiry Date: K M D Hire Services, LONDON ROAD, NANTWICH, CW5 6LU Extension and New Store Mr Dan Mellor 17-Aug-2011 SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION Approve
More informationDepartment for Communities and Local Government
Department for Communities and Local Government Permitted development for householders Technical Guidance April 2014 Department for Communities and Local Government Please note: This technical guidance
More informationDevelopment Control Committee 12 March, 2015 WD/D/14/002477 ITEM NUMBER 2. Proposal: Wheeled Sports Park and Associated Landscaping
Development Control Committee 12 March, 2015 WD/D/14/002477 ITEM NUMBER 2 Application Number: WD/D/14/002477 Full Registration Date: 17 September, 2014 Application Site: CAR PARK, CHARMOUTH ROAD, LYME
More informationBASILDON BOROUGH COUNCIL
BASILDON BOROUGH COUNCIL Report to: Planning Committee December 05 PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 5/00699/FULL DEMOLITION OF ALL EXISTING OUTBUILDINGS AND REMOVAL OF ASSOCIATED LAWFUL USES AND TWO NO. RESIDENTIAL
More informationDESIGN AND ACCESS STATEMENT
CHANGE OF USE OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL ANNEXE TO A SEPARATE DWELLING AND CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW WALL FENCE AND GATES AT LITTLE NOOKE CHAPEL LANE WYRE PIDDLE PERSHORE WORCESTERSHIRE WR10 2JA 1.0 INTRODUCTION
More informationTHE TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 Grant of Planning Permission
Civic Offices Havant Hampshire PO9 2AX Tel (023)9247 4174 Fax(023)9244 6588 DX50005 Havant www.havant.gov.uk To: ADP Architects Ltd Richmond Court 94 Botley Road Park Gate Southampton, Hants SO311BA For:
More informationReference: 05/00928/FUL Officer: Mr David Jeanes
DEVELOPMENT CONTROL BOARD 5 January 2006 Reference: 05/00928/FUL Officer: Mr David Jeanes Location: Proposal: Applicant: Whiffens Farm Clement Street Sutton-At-Hone Kent BR8 7PQ Retrospective application
More informationK M D Hire Services, LONDON ROAD, NANTWICH, CW5 6LU
Application No: 11/2196N Location: Proposal: Applicant: Expiry Date: K M D Hire Services, LONDON ROAD, NANTWICH, CW5 6LU Extension and New Store Mr Dan Mellor 17-Aug-2011 SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION Approve
More informationManchester City Council Item 6 Planning and Highways Committee 8 May 2014
Application Number 104843/FO/2014/N1 Date of Appln 28th Feb 2014 Committee Date 8th May 2014 Ward Moston Ward Proposal Location Applicant Agent Change of use of ground floor to a hot food takeaway (Fish
More informationThe Green Belt A Guide for Householders
The Green Belt A Guide for Householders Introduction Much of Mole Valley lies within the Metropolitan Green Belt. This leaflet outlines the purpose, importance and characteristics of the Green Belt and
More information13 Oakleigh Gardens London N20 9AB
Location 13 Oakleigh Gardens London N20 9AB Reference: 15/00608/HSE Received: 2nd February 2015 Accepted: 2nd February 2015 Ward: Oakleigh Expiry 30th March 2015 Applicant: Mr A Peqini Proposal: Single
More information143 RUMBUSH LANE SHIRLEY SOLIHULL
2014/514 143 RUMBUSH LANE SHIRLEY Application No: Ward/Area: Location: 2014/514/S BLYTHE 143 RUMBUSH LANE SHIRLEY SOLIHULL Date Registered: 14/03/2014 Applicant: Proposal: MR JAMIE LONG DEMOLITION OF GARAGE
More informationIntroduction. Two storey & first floor rear extensions. two storey rear 1
Introduction This advice leaflet has been produced to help in the planning of your house extension, by identifying the main points to consider, in order to achieve an acceptable proposal. This leaflet
More informationSubject: APPLICATION 10/02650/CA. DEMOLITION OF YOUTH CLUB, DEEPDALE LANE, BOSTON SPA, WETHERBY.
Originator: Victoria Hinchliff Walker Tel: 39 51343 Report of the Chief Planning Officer PLANS PANEL EAST Date: 28 th October 2010 Subject: APPLICATION 10/02650/CA. DEMOLITION OF YOUTH CLUB, DEEPDALE LANE,
More informationDevelopment Management Report
Committee and Date Central Planning Committee 5 th April 2012 Item 13 Public Development Management Report Responsible Officer: Stuart Thomas email: stuart.thomas@shropshire.gov.uk Tel: 01743 252665 Fax:
More informationPERMISSION A GUIDE FOR EXTENDING A DETACHED OR SEMI-DETACHED HOUSE
PLANNING PERMISSION A GUIDE FOR EXTENDING A DETACHED OR SEMI-DETACHED HOUSE Introduction Foreword by Councilor Dave Smith - Chair of the Planning & Highways Committee. Planning Permissions B Owners of
More information1. That the application be REFUSED for the following reason :
Page 1 7. FULL APPLICATION CHANGE OF USE OF LAND FOR THE SITING OF ONE RESIDENTIAL CARAVAN AT MOORSIDE QUARRY, MOORSIDE LANE, POTT SHRIGLEY. (NP/CEC/0810/0814, P5394, 09.08.2010, 394699/379646/JK) APPLICANT:
More information10.1 WILL HEY FARM WATFORD LANE NEW MILLS RETENSION OF NEW STABLE BLOCK, SAND PADDOCK AND ASSOCIATED EARTHWORKS AND LANDSCAPING (FULL - MINOR)
HPK/2012/0207 03/04/2012 WILL HEY FARM WATFORD LANE NEW MILLS MR & MRS M WILSON KIRSTY WILSON EQUINE AND WILL HEY FARM BED & BREAKFAST RETENSION OF NEW STABLE BLOCK, SAND PADDOCK AND ASSOCIATED EARTHWORKS
More informationMount Browne (Surrey Police Head Quarters), Sandy Lane, Guildford Vision Statement. November 2013. with
Mount Browne (Surrey Police Head Quarters), Sandy Lane, Guildford Vision Statement November 2013 with Tibbalds Planning & Urban Design 19 Maltings Place 169 Tower Bridge Road London SE1 3JB Telephone 020
More informationAPPLICATION NO. 15/P/00168 RECEIVED: 27-Mar-2015. Change of use of shop to residential flat (first floor) and shop alterations
DATE OF COMMITTEE: 12-May-2015 APPLICATION NO. 15/P/00168 RECEIVED: 27-Mar-2015 PROPOSAL: Change of use of shop to residential flat (first floor) and shop alterations LOCATION: APPLICATION TYPE: APPLICANT:
More informationGuidance on Householder permitted development rights
FORWARD CONTENTS CLOSE Guidance on Householder permitted development rights Circular 1/2012 CONTENTS BACK FORWARD CLOSE 1. INTRODUCTION 04 2. BEFORE STARTING 05 3. MAIN CONCEPTS 07 Principal elevation
More informationThe land is allocated within the Westbury on Trym Conservation Area and the land is protected by a blanket TPO 340.
SITE DESCRIPTION The site is occupied by a large single dwelling house which was built in 2007. The building is surrounded by large trees and has a substantial rear garden. The land is allocated within
More informationPLANNING SERVICES UNIT
SUPPLEMENTARY PLANNING GUIDANCE DEVELOPMENT INVOLVING HORSES PLANNING SERVICES UNIT 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 This document provides supplementary planning guidance on development involving horses, which is
More informationPlanning & Building Control Division. Development. East Ayrshire Planning. Design Guidance
Planning & Building Control Division Design Guidance 1 East Ayrshire Planning Design Guidance Householder Development 1 EAST AYRSHIRE PLANNING: DESIGN GUIDANCE Design of the built environment can affect
More informationGeneral Advice. 2 front extensions
Introduction This advice leaflet has been produced to help in the planning of your house extension, by identifying the main points to consider, in order to achieve an acceptable proposal. This leaflet
More informationItem Date Received 11th February 2015 Officer Mr Sav Patel Target Date 8th April 2015 Ward Abbey
PLANNING COMMITTEE Date: 5 TH AUGUST 2015 Application Number 15/0068/FUL Agenda Item Date Received 11th February 2015 Officer Mr Sav Patel Target Date 8th April 2015 Ward Abbey Site 10 Coldhams Lane Cambridge
More informationLEWES DISTRICT AND SOUTH DOWNS NATIONAL PARK AUTHORITY LEWES DISTRICT JOINT CORE STRATEGY INDEPENDENT EXAMINATION
1 LEWES DISTRICT AND SOUTH DOWNS NATIONAL PARK AUTHORITY LEWES DISTRICT JOINT CORE STRATEGY INDEPENDENT EXAMINATION STATEMENT BY CROUDACE STRATEGIC LIMITED ISSUES 7 AND 8 STRATEGIC SITES (POLICIES SP5/SP6)
More informationAGENT(S) / APPLICANT(S): AGENT Dave Dickerson, DK Architects. APPLICANT Halton Housing Trust. DEVELOPMENT PLAN ALLOCATION: Greenspace.
APPLICATION NO: 14/00168/FUL LOCATION: Land to the west of 19 Crow Wood Lane, Widnes. PROPOSAL: Proposed erection of 10 no. 1 bedroom apartments with individual access doors arranged in 2no. 2 storey height
More information3. The consent hereby granted does not include any external alterations.
Keith WARD 23 02/00425/FUL 19th March 2002 Change of use of retail shop to form pool room at 150 Mid Street Keith Banffshire AB55 3BJ for Mr Gordon Maver Comments: This application is being referred to
More informationResidential design guidance: Roof extensions
Residential design guidance: Roof extensions Introduction Conversions of roof-space to useable accommodation can be a relatively cheap and effective way to extend residential property. However, roof alterations
More informationLong Ditton Ward: Alex King Expiry Date: 24/03/2010 Location:
Application No: 2009/2315 Application Type: FULL Case Officer: Long Ditton Ward: Alex King Expiry Date: 24/03/2010 Location: Kingston House Portsmouth Road Thames Ditton Surrey Proposal: Variation of Condition
More informationCHANGE OF USE FROM AGRICULTURE TO A USE FOR CARAVAN STORAGE COMPOUND AND OPERATIONAL DEVELOPMENT.
2014/1898 BIRMINGHAM ROAD MERIDEN Application No: Ward/Area: Location: 2014/1898/S MERIDEN BIRMINGHAM ROAD MERIDEN Date Registered: 21/11/2014 Applicant: Proposal: MR VAUGHN WILLIAMS CHANGE OF USE FROM
More informationCONSERVATION AREAS. Residential Planning Guidelines DO I NEED PLANNING PERMISSION? Examples of Development that require Planning Permission
CONSERVATION AREAS Residential Planning Guidelines DO I NEED PLANNING PERMISSION? Examples of Development that require Planning Permission Windturbines will usually require planning permission Extensions
More information1.1 The application property is an extended two-storey semi-detached house fronting Bedale Road. The side garden adjoins a link road to Wydale Road.
COMMITTEE REPORT Date: 13 October 2011 Ward: Osbaldwick Team: Major and Parish: Osbaldwick Parish Commercial Team Council Reference: 11/02264/FUL Application at: 27 Bedale Avenue Osbaldwick York YO10 3NG
More informationAGRICULTURAL BUILDING WITH PHOTOVOLTARIC SOLAR PANELS TO SOUTH FACING ROOF
DC/2015/00494 AGRICULTURAL BUILDING WITH PHOTOVOLTARIC SOLAR PANELS TO SOUTH FACING ROOF LAND AT ONEN, ADJACENT TO B4233, NP25 5EN. RECOMMENDATION: APPROVE Case Officer: Elizabeth Bennett Date Registered:
More informationR&S. August 2014 Prepared by RandS Associated Srl. 1. Introduction
Building Engineer UK Registration Board n.075077h Design and Access Statement for Application for Planning Permission for demolition of a garage and construction of an extension to an existing Victorian
More informationDevelopment Control Committee 10 March, 2016 WD/D/15/000929 ITEM NUMBER 03
Development Control Committee 10 March, 2016 WD/D/15/000929 ITEM NUMBER 03 Application Number: WD/D/15/000929 Outline Registration Date: 12 May, 2015 Application Site: CROSSWAYS GARAGE, WARMWELL ROAD,
More informationItem D3 Wind Swanley Technology ogy College, St Mary s Road, Swanley SE/09/
Wind turbine with 15m mast and solar photovoltaic panels Swanley Technology ogy College, St Mary s Road, Swanley SE/09/ /09/889 A report by Head of Planning Applications Group to Planning Applications
More informationan Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
Appeal Decision Site visit made on 3 April 2013 by Simon Warder MA BSc(Hons) DipUD(Dist) MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government Decision date: 15 April
More informationPalmer Street/Great Barr Street, (former MacDermid warehouse), Digbeth, Birmingham, B9 4AY
Committee Date: 23/01/2014 Application Number: 2013/09236/PA Accepted: 16/12/2013 Application Type: Full Planning Target Date: 17/03/2014 Ward: Nechells Palmer Street/Great Barr Street, (former MacDermid
More informationErection of replacement warehouse building and erection of two buildings in connection with builder s merchants
Plan: O 02/00708/FUL Thames Ward (A) Address: Development: Applicant: London Works, Ripple Road, Barking Erection of replacement warehouse building and erection of two buildings in connection with builder
More informationRelevant Planning History P/2006/1070: Demolition of building and construction of supermarket and 14 2 bed flats. Withdrawn.
P/2010/1404/MPA St Marychurch Ward Former G A Insurance Buildng, Greenway Road/St Marychurch Road, St Marychurch Torquay Demolition of former G A building; formation of up to 7 retail units for purposes
More informationExempted Development - Frequently Asked Questions
Exempted Development - Frequently Asked Questions Important Pre-Conditions Please note all exempted development is subject to certain restrictions as set out in Articles 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 of the Regulations.
More informationCouncillor R. Hollingworth has requested that this application be considered by the Committee, rather than being determined under delegated powers.
Name of Applicant Type of Certificate Proposal Map/Plan Policy Plan Date Mr Timothy D. Hosking A Proposed extension to form bespoke living accommodation for disabled family member (As augmented by information
More informationAPPLICATION FOR PLANNING PERMISSION FOR A SOIL TREATMENT FACILITY AT KINGS CLIFFE LANDFILL SITE, STAMFORD, NORTHAMPTONSHIRE
APPLICATION FOR PLANNING PERMISSION FOR A SOIL TREATMENT FACILITY AT KINGS CLIFFE LANDFILL SITE, STAMFORD, NORTHAMPTONSHIRE DESIGN AND ACCESS STATEMENT Report Reference: AU/KC/SPH/1449/01/D&A/FIN Baddesley
More informationTHE ROYAL BOROUGH OF KENSINGTON AND CHELSEA PLANNING APPLICATIONS COMMITTEE 16/06/2015
THE ROYAL BOROUGH OF KENSINGTON AND CHELSEA PLANNING APPLICATIONS COMMITTEE 16/06/2015 REPORT BY THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, PLANNING AND BOROUGH DEVELOPMENT Application: /PP/15/02000 Agenda Item: N34 Address:
More informationAdvice can also be sought from specific specialist officers in the Council.
Canterbury City Council Validation of Planning Applications Guidance note 2010: Introduction Up to date advice on the validation of planning applications is contained in the CLG Guidance on information
More informationHouseholder Applications: Supplementary Planning Guidance GENERAL POINTS
Householder Applications: Supplementary Planning Guidance Environment Committee: 28 January 2004 Chief Planning Officer Town Hall The Parade Epsom Surrey KT18 5BY tel 01372 732000 web www.epsom-ewell.gov.uk
More informationPerth and Kinross Council Development Control Committee 18 March 2009 Recommendation by Development Quality Manager
Perth and Kinross Council Development Control Committee 18 March 2009 Recommendation by Development Quality Manager 4(9) 09/161 Alteration and Extension to Existing Public House to Provide a New Bookmakers
More informationWalsall Council Validation Guide for submitting a Householder Planning Application
Walsall Council Validation Guide for submitting a Householder Planning Application Householder Planning Application Guide Introduction This guide offers help to people who are submitting a Householder
More informationDesign and Access Statement. 141-145 Earls Court Road London SW5 9RH
J U L I A N A R E N D T A S S O C I A T E S 1 7 a P i n d o c k M e w s L i t t l e V e n i c e L o n d o n W 9 2 P Y F + 4 4 2 0 7 2 8 6 9 9 0 1 Design and Access Statement T + 4 4 2 0 7 2 8 6 9 9 9 1
More informationDevelopment Management Officer Report Committee Application. Summary
Development Management Officer Report Committee Application Summary Committee Meeting Date: 15 Dec 2015 Item Number: Application ID: Z/2014/0978/F Target Date: 31 st October 2014 Proposal: Single storey
More informationDecision Due Date: 18 April 2015
App.No: 150195 Decision Due Date: 18 April 2015 Ward: Devonshire Officer: Richard Elder Site visit date: 8 May 2015 Site Notice(s) Expiry date: 27 March 2015 Neighbour Con Expiry: 27 March 2015 Press Notice(s):
More information73 MAIN STREET SHIRLEY SOLIHULL
2014/58/S 73 MAIN STREET SHIRLEY Application No: Ward/Area: Location: 2014/58/S BLYTHE 73 MAIN STREET SHIRLEY SOLIHULL Date Registered: 13/01/2014 Applicant: Proposal: WILLIAM HILL ORGANIZATION LTD CHANGE
More informationDidcot Further Expansion
Didcot Further Expansion Landscape and Visual Resources Appendix 2 to the RPS Examination Statement Prepared by: October 2011 RPS Mallams Court 18 Milton Park Abingdon Oxon OX14 4RP Tel 01235 838 200 Fax
More informationApplication No : 13/00389/FULL2 Ward: Bromley Town. Applicant : Bromley Conservative Club Objections : NO
SECTION 2 Applications meriting special consideration Application No : 13/00389/FULL2 Ward: Bromley Town Address : Lancaster House 7 Elmfield Road Bromley BR1 1LT OS Grid Ref: E: 540487 N: 169009 Applicant
More informationWard: Purley DELEGATED BUSINESS MEETING Lead Officer: Head of Planning Control week of 23/03/2009
Ward: Purley DELEGATED BUSINESS MEETING Lead Officer: Head of Planning Control week of 23/03/2009 Application No. 09/00389/LP - 51-61 Whytecliffe Road South, Purley, CR8 1. SUMMARY 1.1 This report concerns
More informationTaking In Charge Policy
COMHAIRLE CONTAE CHORCAÍ CORK COUNTY COUNCIL Taking In Charge Policy for Private Housing Developments 17 th October 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS... 2 1 POLICY OBJECTIVE... 3 2 POLICY OVERVIEW...
More informationGeneral Advice. 2 rear single storey
Introduction This advice leaflet has been produced to help in the planning of your house extension, by identifying the main points to consider, in order to achieve an acceptable proposal. This leaflet
More informationRelating to Supplementary Guidance Rural Development (RD) 1 and Special Types of Rural Land (STRL) type 2.
PLANNING ADVICE 13/2012 HOUSING AND BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT IN THE COUNTRYSIDE AND GREENBELT Relating to Supplementary Guidance Rural Development (RD) 1 and Special Types of Rural Land (STRL) type 2. CONTENTS
More informationSolar Panels to be Affixed to the Roof of an Existing Warehouse Unit
Application No: 11/1683N Location: Proposal: Applicant: Expiry Date: UNIT DC 360, FOURTH AVENUE, CREWE Solar Panels to be Affixed to the Roof of an Existing Warehouse Unit Mr A Fornal, Juwi Renewable Energies
More informationapproval of matters specified in conditions; and The Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (Scotland) Regulations 2013
Application for: planning permission; planning permission in principle; further applications; approval of matters specified in conditions; and mineral workings (if the planning authority do not have a
More informationThis application was referred by Cllr Cloke from Weekly Report No 1649 for consideration by the Committee. The reason(s) are as follows:
SITE PLAN ATTACHED 06. 23 HIGH STREET INGATESTONE ESSEX CM4 9DU PARTIAL DEMOLITION OF LISTED BUILDING. CHANGE OF USE FROM OFFICES TO 5 FLATS (1 X 1 BEDROOM, 4 X 2 BEDROOMS), AND ERECTION OF 2 BEDROOM COTTAGE
More informationRochdale Unitary Development Plan Review: 2001-2016: Inspector s Report
CHAPTER 11: LEISURE AND TOURISM G/LT/1 (Part One Policy) Leisure and Tourism Objections: 215/3 Sport England 215/4 Sport England 98/16 Countryside Agency North West Key Issues: should the policy be more
More informationDo I need planning permission?
Do I need planning permission? Advice for householders on house improvements on house improvements Planning Services www.leeds.gov.uk/planning What does this leaflet cover? Certain minor changes to a house
More informationDesign Guidance for Perimeter Fencing at Schools for Nottinghamshire County Council
APPENDIX 1 Design Guidance for Perimeter Fencing at Schools for Nottinghamshire County Council Introduction: The purpose of this guide is to set out some parameters for assessing planning applications
More informationPlease describe the proposal accurately and concisely. State the number of storeys proposed and the position of any extensions.
Householder Application for Planning Permission for Works or Extension to a Dwelling and for Relevant Demolition in a Conservation Area Town and Country Planning Act 1990 1. Applicant Name and Address
More informationReference BA/2012/0220/CU Target date 12/09/2012. 113-115 Bridge Road, Lowestoft, Suffolk, NR33 9JU
Broads Authority Planning Committee 17 August 2012 Application for Determination Parish Oulton Broad Reference BA/2012/0220/CU Target date 12/09/2012 Location Proposal Applicant Recommendation Reason referred
More informationHARROGATE BOROUGH COUNCIL
HARROGATE BOROUGH COUNCIL PLANNING COMMITTEE AGENDA ITEM 6: LIST OF PLANS. DATE: 31 July 2007 PLAN: 02 CASE NUMBER: 07/02712/RG3 GRID REF: EAST 430361NORTH 454848 APPLICATION NO. 6.79.1519.B.RG3 DATE MADE
More informationGlossop Design & Place Making Strategy
Supplementary Planning Document to the High Peak Local Plan June 2011 Design Brief for the Town Hall Complex GILLESPIES I GERALD EVE Reproduced from the Ordnance Survey map with the permission of Ordnance
More informationReport to Planning applications committee Item Date 6 March 2014 Head of planning services
Report to Planning applications committee Item Date 6 March 2014 Report of Head of planning services 4(7) Subject 13/02051/F Former Wellesley First School Wellesley Avenue North Norwich NR1 4NT Description:
More informationPlanning and Listed Building Consent Applications for the retention of a fence, to part of the perimeter to Gayton Hall, Gayton, Wirral.
Planning and Listed Building Consent Applications for the retention of a fence, to part of the perimeter to Gayton Hall, Gayton, Wirral. Planning, Design and Access Statement August 2009 Taylor Young /
More informationThe achievement of all indicators for policies in the whole plan collectively contribute to the delivery of Policy 1
Cornwall Local Plan 2010-2030: Proposed Monitoring Framework Part 1: Strategic Policies Policy 1: Presumption in Favour of Sustainable Development Policy 2: Spatial Strategy Policy 2a Key Targets Job provision
More informationGuidance Note on the Need for Planning Permission for the Development of Existing Houses and Flats (effective from 6 February 2012)
de Guidance Note on the Need for Planning Permission for the Development of Existing Houses and Flats (effective from 6 February 2012) Introduction The rules governing permitted development (that is, whether
More informationSEVENOAKS DISTRICT COUNCIL RESIDENTIAL EXTENSIONS SUPPLEMENTARY PLANNING DOCUMENT
SEVENOAKS DISTRICT COUNCIL RESIDENTIAL EXTENSIONS SUPPLEMENTARY PLANNING DOCUMENT Adopted by the Council On 7 May 2009 1 CONTENT AND STRUCTURE 1 Introduction What is the Supplementary Planning Document?
More informationGloucester City Council
Gloucester City Council Interim Adoption Supplementary Planning Document August 2008 CONTENTS page 1-2 page 3-6 page 7-19 page 18-26 page 27 1. Introduction 2. Before you design your extension Good Neighbourliness
More informationPlanning Design and Access and Heritage Statement 12.102 DS 001
Planning Design and Access and Heritage Statement 12.102 DS 001 New single bedroom dwelling incorporating existing structure at 142 Ringswell Gardens, Bath This statement should be read in conjunction
More information4 Alternatives and Design Evolution
4 Introduction 4.1 This Chapter describes the considerations and constraints influencing the siting, layout and massing of the Development. It also describes the main alternatives to the Development that
More informationCOASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT ZONE CODE SECTIONS 12.20.2 prior to LCP certification. The MASTER LAND USE APPLICATION INSTRUCTION SHEET 500' RADIUS should also be followed, except that a 100-foot radius map
More informationDEVELOPMENT BRIEF FOR LAND AT ALLOA ROAD, TULLIBODY
DEVELOPMENT BRIEF FOR LAND AT ALLOA ROAD, TULLIBODY 1.0 Introduction and Purpose 1.1 Clackmannanshire Council is seeking to dispose of a site at Alloa Road, Tullibody for redevelopment. The site extends
More informationApplication Decision
Application Decision By Gina Warman Appointed by the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs The Planning Inspectorate Common Land Casework Team 4/05 Kite Wing Temple Quay House 2 The
More informationHOUSING STANDARDS POLICY TRANSITION STATEMENT IMPLEMENTATION: OCTOBER 2015. May 2015
HOUSING STANDARDS POLICY TRANSITION STATEMENT IMPLEMENTATION: OCTOBER 2015 May 2015 MAYOR OF LONDON Housing Standards: Transition Policy Statement. On 25 March 2015 through a written ministerial statement,
More information3.0 Planning Policies
3.0 Planning Policies 3.1 National Policy 3.1.1 Government Planning Policy Guidance Notes (PPGs), and Planning Policy Statements (PPSs) provide the background to most aspects of the planning system. The
More informationChange of use of an existing vacant office building to a Bed & Breakfast Guest House (Use Class C1) with proprietor's accommodation.
Item 4a Case Officer Ward Proposal Location Applicant 13/00168/FUL Caron Taylor Adlington And Anderton Change of use of an existing vacant office building to a Bed & Breakfast Guest House (Use Class C1)
More informationCITY OF VAUGHAN SCHEDULE O LOT GRADING DESIGN FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
Page 1 CITY OF VAUGHAN SCHEDULE O LOT GRADING DESIGN FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT CIVIC CENTRE 2141 MAJOR MACKENZIE DRIVE MAPLE ONTARIO L6A 1T1 905-832-2281 Page 2 SECTION 1 - GENERAL OBJECTIVES To provide
More informationApplication for Planning Permission for Relevant Demolition in a Conservation Area Town and Country Planning Act 1990
Application for Planning Permission for Relevant Demolition in a Conservation Area Town and Country Planning Act 1990 1. Applicant Name and Address Please enter the Applicant Details, including full name
More informationKINGSTON TOWN PLANNING SUB-COMMITTEE 23 MARCH 2005. YELLOW BOX STORAGE 163-165, LONDON ROAD AND 50, GORDON ROAD, Application Number: 05/12156
APPENDIX C KINGSTON TOWN PLANNING SUB-COMMITTEE 23 MARCH 2005 YELLOW BOX STORAGE 163-165, LONDON ROAD AND 50, GORDON ROAD, Application Number: 05/12156 REPORT BY HEAD OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY
More informationHousehold waste & recycling storage requirements
South Gloucestershire Council Guidance for Developers on Household waste & recycling storage requirements INTRODUCTION As part of the Council s aim to improve the quality of life for residents as well
More informationShepway Core Strategy Development Plan Document Examination in Public
Shepway Core Strategy Development Plan Document Examination in Public Public Hearing Statement on behalf of Taylor Wimpey (Respondent References 900 and 921) Wednesday 2 May 2012 Matter 1 Spatial Strategy,
More informationAztech Architecture Your Guide to Overshadowing, Daylight & Sunlight. 1 P age
Aztech Architecture Your Guide to Overshadowing, Daylight & Sunlight 1 P age Welcome Sometimes people fear they may suffer a loss of daylight or sunlight if their homes and gardens are overshadowed by
More information1 Welcome. The exhibition comprises a series of boards which provide some background information to show you our initial ideas for the site.
1 Welcome Thank you for taking the time to attend this public exhibition of our proposals for residential development on Land at Daws Farm, Back Road, Writtle (site shown opposite). The exhibition comprises
More informationYour Home and Planning Permission. A guide for householders in Northern Ireland
Your Home and Planning Permission A guide for householders in Northern Ireland ISBN: 978-1-907053-22-1 INTRODUCTION The Department s aim is to improve the quality of life of the people of Northern Ireland
More informationSite Assessment for Neighbourhood Plans: A toolkit for neighbourhood planners
Site Assessment for Neighbourhood Plans: A toolkit for neighbourhood planners Action the COI Table Of Contents Introduction... 3 Benefit of carrying out a site assessment... 4 How to carry out a site assessment
More informationSatellite Dishes. for Houses and Flats. Development Advice Note
Development Advice Note Satellite Dishes for Houses and Flats The purpose of this leaflet is to give general advice on where planning permission would be required for the installation of a satellite dish
More informationDevelopment proposals will require to demonstrate, according to scale, type and location, that they:-
Appendix 2 : Relevant Development Plan Policies Angus Local Plan Review 2009 Policy S1 : Development Boundaries (a) Within development boundaries proposals for new development on sites not allocated on
More informationThe Roaches Asset Management Review. Draft Objectives for External Consultation. Fundamental Principles
The Roaches Asset Management Review Draft Objectives for External Consultation Fundamental Principles the area of land under review is the Roaches Estate and Gradbach Car Park as shown on the attached
More information