1 Chapter 5 Conditional CAPM 5.1 Conditional CAPM: Theory Risk According to the CAPM The CAPM is not a perfect model of expected returns. In the 40+ years of its history, many systematic deviations from it have been documented. (We will talk more about those deviations, or anomalies, later in the course). However, the CAPM made the point that still remains the central concept in modern finance theory: risk is not return variance. Rather, risk is the covariance of returns with an economy-wide source of volatility (namely, the market). Indeed, the variance created by the independent realizations of random outcomes can always be eliminated through diversification. For example, playing heads-andtails once and betting $100 on heads is a very risky thing to do. But playing headsand-tails times betting 1 cent is not risky at all, because the number of bets you win and lose will be approximately equal, and on average, according to the Law of Large Numbers, you will break even almost surely. The CAPM points out that not all risks in the economy can be handled this way. 78
2 5.1. CONDITIONAL CAPM: THEORY 79 Surely, the risk that the company will lose its visionary leader is huge if you hold one stock only, but the same risk is small if you hold hundreds of stocks in your portfolio. However, the risk of economy sliding into another recession will impact all stocks in any portfolio. No matter how diversified the portfolio is, it will be hit by the economy-wide shock. The question is only how much it will be hit. The CAPM says that risk is exactly this how much they will be hit, and only this type of risk is compensated in the market. The stock that does not react much to ups and downs in the economy has low risk (low beta) and will offer low expected return. Risk according to the CAPM: Any asset that appreciates when the market goes up and loses value when the market goes down, is risky and has to earn more than the risk-free rate. Risk is when the value drops when market goes down. The predictability of market returns provides important information that the amount of risk and the investors reluctance to bear it both change over time. In recessions, investors are very risk-averse and require a high return for bearing risk. In expansions, they are willing to take bigger risks for smaller return. It is therefore natural that the investors would wish to limit their risk exposure during recessions and increase the risk exposure during booms. However, the CAPM is a one-period model, in which such preferences cannot exist. This could be one of the reasons the CAPM fails to explain many regularities in returns Risk According to the Conditional CAPM Here is an example of how the Conditional CAPM works. Assume that recessions are three times shorter than expansions, that is, the economy spends 25% of time in a recession and 75% of time in an expansion. Assume also that the expected market risk
3 80 CHAPTER 5. CONDITIONAL CAPM premium is 4% during expansions and 12% during recessions. The average market risk premium is then % + 3 4% = 6%, just as we observe in the data. 4 Consider two stocks. One stock has the beta of 2 in recession and the beta of 2 3 in expansion. The other has the beta of 1 2 in recession and the beta of 7 in expansion. 6 The CAPM will see only the average beta of each stock: = 1 for the first 4 one and = 1 for the second one. Hence, the CAPM will predict that the 4 excess return to both stocks will be, on average, 6%. Stock A: Countercyclical Beta Stock B: Countercyclical Beta Market risk Stock Stock risk Market risk Stock Stock risk premium beta premium premium beta premium Recession (p=1/4) 12% 2 24% 12% 1/2 6% Expansion (p=3/4) 4% 2/3 8/3% 4% 7/6 14/3% Average 6% 1 8% 6% 1 5% Static CAPM 6% 1 6% 6% 1 6% However, in reality the first stock is expected to earn 2 12% = 24% in recessions and 2 3 4% = 8 % in expansions, which makes its expected excess return % % 1 4 = 8% on average. The second stock is expected to earn 1 12% = 6% 2 during recessions and % = % during expansions, which makes its expected excess return 14 3 % % 1 = 5% on average The first stock is the one that exhibits the undesirable behavior: its risk exposure (aka market beta) increases in recessions, when bearing risk is especially painful, and decreases in expansions, when investors do not mind bearing more risk. Hence, the first stock is riskier than what the CAPM would lead us to think and earns higher return, which cannot be explained by the CAPM. The CAPM would estimate that the first stock has an abnormal return (aka the alpha) of 2% per year, suggesting this is a good investment. The Conditional CAPM retorts that the extra reward comes to
4 5.1. CONDITIONAL CAPM: THEORY 81 the owners of the first stock in return for bearing the extra risk of undesirable beta changes, and the first stock is in fact as good investment as anything else. The second stock, to the contrary, exhibits the desirable behavior by lowering the beta when risks are high and raising the beta when risks are low. Thus, the second stock is less risky than what the CAPM says, and earns a lower return. The CAPM would attribute the negative alpha of -1% per year to the second stock, suggesting that it is a poor investment choice, but the Conditional CAPM shows that the second stock is a reasonable conservative investment. Risk according to the Conditional CAPM: In addition to the market risk as described by the CAPM, the countercyclicality of the market beta (i.e., higher beta in recessions) is another source of risk. Risk is when the risk exposure increases in bad times How Important is the Risk Captured by the Conditional CAPM In this subsection, we will try to estimate the amount of additional risk created by the changing beta. That is, we will try to answer the question: is it likely that the difference in the expected return as estimated by the CAPM and the Conditional CAPM substantial? To do that, we need to look at what went wrong with the static CAPM from the statistical standpoint. Let s recall the definition of covariance: Cov(X, Y ) E[(X E(X)) (Y E(Y ))] (5.1) That is, covariance is the expected value of the product between the two deviations from the average. Now, let s use the fact that expectation is linear, that is, the expected sum is the sum of expectations (E(X + Y ) = E(X) + E(Y )) and E(aX) = a E(X). E(X) and
5 82 CHAPTER 5. CONDITIONAL CAPM E(Y ) in (5.1) above are numbers, not random variables, therefore E[(X E(X)) (Y E(Y ))] = E[X Y E(X) Y E(Y ) X + E(X) E(Y )] = = E(X Y ) E(E(X) Y ) E(E(Y ) X) + E(E(X) E(Y )) = = E(X Y ) E(X) E(Y ) E(Y ) E(X) + E(X) E(Y ) = E(X Y ) E(X) E(Y ) I conclude that the definition of the covariance implies Cov(X, Y ) = E(X Y ) E(X) E(Y ) (5.2) E(X Y ) = Cov(X, Y ) + E(X) E(Y ) (5.3) Assume now that both the beta and the market risk premium are random variables. What we are interested in is the risk premium of the stock, E(β S R M ) = E(β S ) E(R M ) + Cov(β S, R M ) (5.4) That is, we are interested in the average product of the stock beta and the market risk premium in all states of the world. The static CAPM does not distinguish between the states of the world and assumes that if we see any variation in the stock beta and the market risk premium, this variation is pure noise. Therefore, the static CAPM suggests that we compute the product of the average beta and the average market risk premium. In reality, however, the variation in the stock beta and the market risk premium is not purely random. It is correlated, and the covariance term measures the bias in the estimate of the expected risk premium of the stock provided by the static CAPM. That is, if the covariance is positive (i.e, in most states of the world the stock beta and the market risk premium are either both high or both low, see Stock A from the numerical example above), then the static CAPM will underestimate the risk and the
6 5.1. CONDITIONAL CAPM: THEORY 83 expected risk premium of the stock. Conversely, if the correlation is negative (i.e., in most states of the world either the stock beta is high and the market risk premium is low, or vice versa), the static CAPM will overestimate the risk and the expected risk premium of the stock. The covariance term in (5.4) does much more than express the simple example in the previous subsection in the complex mathematical symbols. In fact, it gives the estimate of the bias in the static CAPM compared to the Conditional CAPM, that is, exactly what we are looking for in this section. We can now do some comparative statics, i.e., look at what the bias depends on. By definition again, the covariance is the product of the correlation and the two standard deviations, Cov(β S, R M ) Corr(β S, R M ) σ(β S ) σ(r M ) (5.5) We draw two important conclusions from (5.5). First, the bias in the static CAPM and, therefore, the usefulness of the Conditional CAPM increases in the correlation between the stock beta, β S, and the market risk premium, R M. If they are tightly related (for example, driven by the same variables like the four variables in Chapter 4, Section 1), the bias is large and the Conditional CAPM is important. If they vary pretty much independently of each other, there is little difference between the Conditional CAPM and the static CAPM. Once again: time variation in the market risk premium and the stock beta is a necessary, but insufficient condition for the Conditional CAPM usefulness. The Conditional CAPM is only useful if those two move together, not just move. Second, the usefulness of the Conditional CAPM increases in the variation in both the market risk premium and the stock beta. If both of them vary by a lot, the
7 84 CHAPTER 5. CONDITIONAL CAPM difference between the static CAPM and the Conditional CAPM is large, and using the correct model (the Conditional CAPM) is important. But do the market risk premium and the stocks betas vary enough to make the Conditional CAPM significantly different in its predictions from the static CAPM? Let s turn one last time to the numerical example from the previous section. Even if the risk premium in recession and in expansion is very different (in our example it triples from 4% to 12%, about what we figured out it would do - see Chapter 4, Section 1) and the betas vary by a lot (the beta differential between the first and second stocks changes from 1.5 in recession to -0.5 in expansion, which is unbelievably large compared to what we see in the data), the return differential is only 3%, way smaller than the most important deviations from the CAPM we will consider later in the course. This is called the Lewellen-Nagel (JFE 2006) critique: the variations in betas and the expected market risk premium are too small to make the Conditional CAPM successful in explaining the return differentials between different groups of stocks we observe in the real-life data. 5.2 Conditional CAPM in the Data First Look at the Value Effect Petkova and Zhang (JFE 2005) use the Conditional CAPM in the effort to explain one of the most important and stubborn anomalies in finance - the value effect. The simple CAPM cannot explain why value firms (mature companies with low market-to-book) earn on average higher returns than growth firms (young fast-growing companies with high market-to-book). Market-to-book is the ratio of the firm s market capitalization to its book value
8 5.2. CONDITIONAL CAPM IN THE DATA 85 of equity. Market-to-book higher than 1 signals the existence of growth potential, market-to-book lower than 1 is the sign of poor prospects. High market-to-book ratios are characteristic of risky high tech firms, for which a high proportion of the value is their future that has not yet found its way to the books. Low market-to-book firms are generally mature companies with few expansion opportunities, but steady cash flows and high dividends. Hence, it is pretty surprising that value firms beat growth firms, since most people would say that growth firms are riskier. The following regression illustrates the value effect: HML t = 0.58 (0.12) 0.27 (0.03) (MKT t RF t ) (5.6) The variable on the left-hand side is the zero-investment portfolio that sells growth firms and uses the proceeds to buy value firms 1. It is regressed on the excess return to the market portfolio (value-weighted CRSP index is used as a proxy). According to the CAPM, the intercept of the regression (aka the alpha), which measures abnormal return, should be zero. It is important to understand why the CAPM predicts that the alpha in (5.6) should be zero. It will allow us to understand why the alpha is the measure of abnormal returns and enable us to use it to measure the deviations from the CAPM (anomalies) and the performance of actively managed portfolios (e.g., mutual funds). 1 Data footnote: The sample period in the regression is from August 1963 to December The HML portfolio is one of the Fama-French factors we will discuss later. To form it, we sort all firms into three market-to-book groups (top 30%, middle 40%, bottom 30%) and two size groups (below median and above median). Then in each size group we buy value firms (bottom 30% on market-to-book) and sell growth firms (top 30% on market-to-book). The returns to the two value minus growth portfolios are value-weighted. The HML return is the simple average of the returns to the two value minus growth portfolios (value minus growth for small firms and value minus growth for large firms). The portfolio is called HML as an acronym for high minus low, because Fama and French in their paper sorted firms on book-to-market, not market-to-book, and value firms have high book-to-market.
9 86 CHAPTER 5. CONDITIONAL CAPM The CAPM implies that for each asset (a stock, a bond, an option) E(R t ) = RF t + β (E(MKT t ) RF t ) E(R t ) RF t = β (E(MKT t ) RF t ) (5.7) The rearranging of the terms on the right implies that the asset s risk premium is exactly proportional to the market risk premium, and the beta is the coefficient of proportionality. Therefore, the CAPM predicts that in the regression of excess returns to any asset on the excess return to the market the intercept (the alpha) is zero. If the alpha is not zero, the CAPM is violated. The positive alpha implies that the asset earns the return above what is a fair compensation for risk β (E(MKT t ) RF t ), and vice versa. Also, pay attention to the fact that the regression prescribed by the CAPM has excess returns both on the left and on the right. Why is (5.6) different? It is different because we are looking at the zero-investment portfolio that shorts growth firms and uses the proceeds to finance the purchases of value firms. 2 Essentially, we are looking at the difference in the (excess) returns between value firms and growth firms. You can interpret (5.6) as two regressions E(H t ) RF t = β H (E(MKT t ) RF t ) (5.8) E(L t ) RF t = β L (E(MKT t ) RF t ) (5.9) Now deduct (5.9) from (5.8), and you will get (5.6) - the risk-free rate cancels in the process, and thus does not appear in (5.6). Now, let s go back to the alpha, our measure of abnormal return and the CAPM validity. In regression (5.6), the alpha far exceeds zero: it is 0.59% (59 bp) per month 2 By law, you have to leave the proceeds from the short sale with the lender, and the lender will pay you close to the risk-free rate on those. That is, when you short (e.g., growth stocks), the government makes you go long in the Treasury bill. To complete the zero-investment strategy (HML) in real life, you have to do an extra deal: borrow at the risk-free rate or close and buy the long part (value stocks). Then you will be long in value stocks, short in Treasuries, short in growth stocks, and long in Treasuries, all for the same sum of money. The Treasuries positions cancel out, and you hold the HML portfolio with no cash invested.
10 5.2. CONDITIONAL CAPM IN THE DATA 87 and highly significant (0.58/0.12 = ). This is the value effect: even though value firms have lower beta than growth firms (by in the regression), they earn higher return. The return differential between value and growth beats the CAPM prediction by 7% (0.59% 12) per year. (We will talk more about the value effect and the HML portfolio when we get to the Fama-French model and anomalies) Empirical Setup Petkova and Zhang allow the beta to change over time by making it a linear function of the four macroeconomic variables we discussed when we talked about long-run return predictability - the default premium (DEF ), the dividend yield (DIV ), the Treasury bill rate (T B), and the term premium (T ERM). That is, Petkova and Zhang assume that β t = γ 0 + γ 1 DEF t 1 + γ 2 DIV t 1 + γ 3 T B t 1 + γ 4 T ERM t 1 (5.10) and MKT t RF t = λ 0 + λ 1 DEF t 1 + λ 2 DIV t 1 + λ 3 T B t 1 + λ 4 T ERM t 1 (5.11) Notice that Petkova and Zhang assume that the beta of HML depends on the same four variables which we found to be the predictors of the market risk premium in Chapter 4, Section 1. This is not a coincidence: as discussed in Section 1.3 of this chapter, the extra explanatory power of the Conditional CAPM compared to the static CAPM is proportional to the correlation between the asset s beta and the market risk premium (see equation (5.4)). Petkova and Zhang are trying to capture as much of this correlation as possible. Empirical Advice: When you estimate Conditional CAPM, assume that the beta depends only on the macroeconomic variables that predict the market risk premium. Putting the variables that do not in (5.10) gets you no extra mileage.
11 88 CHAPTER 5. CONDITIONAL CAPM The Conditional CAPM Petkova and Zhang estimate requires running the regression HML t = α + β t (MKT t RF t ) (5.12) If the intercept α is insignificantly different from zero, then the Conditional CAPM is capable of explaining the value effect. Given their specification of β t, Petkova and Zhang estimate the following regression: HML t = α+(γ 0 +γ 1 DEF t 1 +γ 2 DIV t 1 +γ 3 T B t 1 +γ 4 T ERM t 1 ) (MKT t RF t ) or, after rearranging, (5.13) HML t = α + γ 0 (MKT t RF t ) + γ 1 DEF t 1 (MKT t RF t ) +γ 2 DIV t 1 (MKT t RF t ) + γ 3 T B t 1 (MKT t RF t ) (5.14) +γ 4 T ERM t 1 (MKT t RF t ) which means regressing the HML return not only on the excess market return, as in the simple CAPM, but also on the products of the excess market return with the macro variables. When Petkova and Zhang estimate (5.15), they get, with rearranging back to the form of (5.13), the following result that we discuss in the next subsection: HML t = ( 0.36 (0.115) (0.09) (0.08) 0.11 DEF t (0.03) DIV t (0.02) T B t (0.03) T ERM t 1) (MKT t RF t ) (5.15)
12 5.2. CONDITIONAL CAPM IN THE DATA Interpreting the Results What do we conclude from the regression above? First, the good news: the macro variables we use predict the market beta of the value minus growth strategy in a reasonable way. If the Conditional CAPM is to explain the value effect, the market beta of the value minus growth strategy has to increase during recessions. In recessions, the dividend yield, the default premium, and the term premium are high, so they should be positively related to the market beta of HML and have positive coefficients in the regression estimated above. The default premium and the term premium, as we see in (5.15), have negative, but insignificant coefficients. In regression (5.15), the only significant coefficient out of the three is the coefficient on the dividend yield, and it has the correct positive sign. Its magnitude suggests that if the dividend yield increases by 1%, the market beta of the value minus growth strategy increases by 0.2. Given that the dividend yield changes by up to 2% from peak to trough, the impact of dividend yield on the beta seems economically sizeable. Also, the Treasury bill rate (the measure of expected inflation) is low during recessions, hence it should be negatively related with the market beta of HML, if the market beta is to increase in recessions. In (5.15), the coefficient on the Treasury bill rate is significantly different from zero and economically large. It implies that the decrease in the Treasury bill rate by 1% per year triggers, on average, the increase in the market beta differential between value and growth by Given that the Treasury bill rate can vary easily by 3% to 5% within one business cycle, the coefficient in (5.15) suggests that the impact of expected inflation can cause the beta differential between value firms and growth firms change by up to Now the bad news: the alpha is still highly significant (0.45/0.115 = 3.9 2),
13 90 CHAPTER 5. CONDITIONAL CAPM meaning that the Conditional CAPM cannot handle the value effect. Compared to (5.6), where we estimate the ordinary CAPM, the alpha decreases by only 13 bp per month (1.6% per year). This is consistent with the Lewellen-Nagel critique - it seems that, despite the seemingly strong dependence of the beta on the macro variables in (5.15), the variation of the beta and the expected risk premium are not enough to make a big impact. To show that the variation in the beta is not large enough, I perform the following experiment: first, I use (5.11) to estimate expected market risk premium and partition the sample into the months with the expected market risk premium (predicted values from (5.11)) in the top 25% (recession) and the months with the expected market risk premium in the bottom 25% (boom). I use (5.10) with coefficients from (5.15) to form the series of the market beta of the value minus growth strategy and average the beta in the recession months and the boom months (as defined above). I find that during recessions the market beta of the HML is , and during booms it is -0.41, consistent with the estimates in (5.15) Conditional CAPM Works, but Not by Enough The results in the previous paragraph bring us to two conclusions. First, while it is true that following the value minus growth strategy is riskier in recessions than in booms, growth is always riskier than value, and therefore growth stocks should have higher average returns (whereas in the data they earn by 46 bp per month less than value firms). Hence, there is no way the Conditional CAPM can explain the value effect. Second, the variation in the market betas is indeed too small. We should not add up the coefficients in (5.15) and conclude that if both expected inflation and dividend
14 5.2. CONDITIONAL CAPM IN THE DATA 91 yield can move the market beta of HML by 0.4, it will change by 0.8 from recession to expansion. In many instances, the macro variables pull in different directions - e.g., in the 70s both the dividend yield and the Treasury bill rate were high. We can even perform a back-of-envelope calculation based on the beta differential computed in the end of the last subsection. Recessions and booms in the definition of this paragraph take 50% of the sample, the expected risk premium varies between recessions and booms by 1% per month at most (see our exercises in the long-run predictability sections or just obtain the expected risk premium from (5.11) and average it in recessions and booms). Hence, if we are to explain the value effect of about 0.6% per month, the difference in the market beta of the HML portfolio between recessions and booms should be 1.2 (0.5 1% 1.2 = 0.6%). The beta differential of we observe in the data gives us the chance to explain at most 15 bp of the value effect, close to the change in the alphas we observe as we go from (5.6) to (5.15). What have we learned about the Conditional CAPM? Good news: the Conditional CAPM shows that following the value minus growth strategy is relatively more risky during recessions, which is an important observation. We can perform the same sort of estimation for any asset we consider (e.g., a mutual fund offered in 401(k)), and it will give us a heads-up on the potential risks we may face. Bad news: according to the Conditional CAPM, risk and risk exposure do not change by enough to make an economically large impact. In particular, the slopes in (5.15) are sizeable, but the model as a whole does not work well. Hence, if we need a precise quantitative answer about whether the risk discovered by the Conditional CAPM is fairly compensated by the observed return, we may want to try something else, which will be the point of the next sections.
Models of Risk and Return Aswath Damodaran Aswath Damodaran 1 First Principles Invest in projects that yield a return greater than the minimum acceptable hurdle rate. The hurdle rate should be higher for
Review for Exam Instructions: Please read carefully The exam will have 1 multiple choice questions and 5 work problems. Questions in the multiple choice section will be either concept or calculation questions.
Chapter 5 Risk and Return ANSWERS TO SELECTED END-OF-CHAPTER QUESTIONS 5-1 a. Stand-alone risk is only a part of total risk and pertains to the risk an investor takes by holding only one asset. Risk is
CHAPTER 10 RISK AND RETURN: THE CAPITAL ASSET PRICING MODEL (CAPM) Answers to Concepts Review and Critical Thinking Questions 1. Some of the risk in holding any asset is unique to the asset in question.
Review for Exam 2 Instructions: Please read carefully The exam will have 25 multiple choice questions and 5 work problems You are not responsible for any topics that are not covered in the lecture note
Chapter 11, Risk and Return 1. A portfolio is. A) a group of assets, such as stocks and bonds, held as a collective unit by an investor B) the expected return on a risky asset C) the expected return on
Chapter 7 Risk, Return, and the Capital Asset Pricing Model MULTIPLE CHOICE 1. Suppose Sarah can borrow and lend at the risk free-rate of 3%. Which of the following four risky portfolios should she hold
CHAPE 0 Capital Markets and the Pricing of isk Chapter Synopsis 0. A First Look at isk and eturn Historically there has been a large difference in the returns and variability from investing in different
Market Efficiency and Behavioral Finance Chapter 12 Market Efficiency if stock prices reflect firm performance, should we be able to predict them? if prices were to be predictable, that would create the
CHAPTER 11: ARBITRAGE PRICING THEORY 1. The revised estimate of the expected rate of return on the stock would be the old estimate plus the sum of the products of the unexpected change in each factor times
Answers to Concepts in Review 1. A portfolio is simply a collection of investments assembled to meet a common investment goal. An efficient portfolio is a portfolio offering the highest expected return
1. Overview Module 7 Asset pricing models Prepared by Pamela Peterson Drake, Ph.D., CFA Asset pricing models are different ways of interpreting how investors value investments. Most models are based on
Chapter 10 Introduction to Risk, Return, and the Opportunity Cost of Capital Chapter 10 Topics Rates of Return Risk Premiums Expected Return Portfolio Return and Risk Risk Diversification Unique & Market
Equity Risk Premiums: Looking backwards and forwards Aswath Damodaran Aswath Damodaran 1 What is the Equity Risk Premium? Intuitively, the equity risk premium measures what investors demand over and above
Chapter 8 Risk and Return: Capital Market Theory Chapter 8 Contents Learning Objectives 1. Portfolio Returns and Portfolio Risk 1. Calculate the expected rate of return and volatility for a portfolio of
Problem 1. Consider a risky asset. Suppose the expected rate of return on the risky asset is 15%, the standard deviation of the asset return is 22%, and the risk-free rate is 6%. What is your optimal position
Capital Market Equilibrium and the Capital Asset Pricing Model Econ 422 Investment, Capital & Finance Spring 21 June 1, 21 1 The Risk of Individual Assets Investors require compensation for bearing risk.
Assist. Assist. Prof. Prof. Dr. Dr. Şaban Çelik Yaşar University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences Department of 015/016 Fall Semester : Izmir- Turkey Risk andrate Rate of Return of Return
1 The present value of the exercise price does not change in one hour if the risk-free rate does not change, so the change in call put is the change in the stock price. The change in call put is $4, so
LIQUIDITY AND ASSET PRICING Evidence for the London Stock Exchange Timo Hubers (358022) Bachelor thesis Bachelor Bedrijfseconomie Tilburg University May 2012 Supervisor: M. Nie MSc Table of Contents Chapter
Trading Is Hazardous to Your Wealth: The Common Stock Investment Performance of Individual Investors BRAD M. BARBER TERRANCE ODEAN Presenter: Hsuan-Chi Chen ABSTRACT Individual investors who hold common
Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Plan B and other Reports Graduate Studies 3-2014 Optimal Debt-to-Equity Ratios and Stock Returns Courtney D. Winn Utah State University Follow this
Chapter 7 Portfolio Theory and Other sset Pricing Models NSWERS TO END-OF-CHPTER QUESTIONS 7-1 a. portfolio is made up of a group of individual assets held in combination. n asset that would be relatively
MBA 8230 Corporation Finance (Part II) Practice Final Exam #2 1. Which of the following input factors, if increased, would result in a decrease in the value of a call option? a. the volatility of the company's
2. Capital Asset pricing Model Dr. Youchang Wu WS 2007 Asset Management Youchang Wu 1 Efficient frontier in the presence of a risk-free asset Asset Management Youchang Wu 2 Capital market line When a risk-free
CAPM, Arbitrage, and Linear Factor Models CAPM, Arbitrage, Linear Factor Models 1/ 41 Introduction We now assume all investors actually choose mean-variance e cient portfolios. By equating these investors
Chapter 6 The Tradeoff Between Risk and Return MULTIPLE CHOICE 1. Which of the following is an example of systematic risk? a. IBM posts lower than expected earnings. b. Intel announces record earnings.
1. Solutions to PS 1: 1. a. (iv) b. (ii) [6.75/(1.34) = 10.2] c. (i) Writing a call entails unlimited potential losses as the stock price rises. 7. The bill has a maturity of one-half year, and an annualized
Chapter 10 Some Lessons from Capital Market History Key Concepts and Skills Know how to calculate the return on an investment Understand the historical returns on various types of investments Understand
Cost of Capital Presentation for ERRA Tariff Committee Dr. Konstantin Petrov / Waisum Cheng / Dr. Daniel Grote April 2009 Experience you can trust. Agenda 1.Definition of Cost of Capital a) Concept and
The CAPM & Multifactor Models Business Finance 722 Investment Management Professor Karl B. Diether The Ohio State University Fisher College of Business Review and Clarification In the last few lectures
Econ 422 Summer 2006 Final Exam Solutions This is a closed book exam. However, you are allowed one page of notes (double-sided). Answer all questions. For the numerical problems, if you make a computational
The CAPM (Capital Asset Pricing Model) Massachusetts Institute of Technology CAPM Slide 1 of NPV Dependent on Discount Rate Schedule Discussed NPV and time value of money Choice of discount rate influences
Journal of Exclusive Management Science May 2015 Vol 4 Issue 5 ISSN 2277 5684 A Study on the Emprical Testing Of Capital Asset Pricing Model on Selected Energy Sector Companies Listed In NSE Abstract *S.A.
CHAPTER 7: OPTIMAL RIKY PORTFOLIO PROLEM ET 1. (a) and (e).. (a) and (c). After real estate is added to the portfolio, there are four asset classes in the portfolio: stocks, bonds, cash and real estate.
ON THE RISK ADJUSTED DISCOUNT RATE FOR DETERMINING LIFE OFFICE APPRAISAL VALUES BY M. SHERRIS B.A., M.B.A., F.I.A., F.I.A.A. 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 A number of papers have been written in recent years that
Volatility and Premiums in US Equity Returns Eugene F. Fama and Kenneth R. French * Understanding volatility is crucial for informed investment decisions. This paper explores the volatility of the market,
Estimating the Cost of Equity Capital for Insurance Firms with Multi-period Asset Pricing Models Alexander Barinov a Steven W. Pottier b Jianren Xu *, c This version: October 7, 2014 * Corresponding author.
Excess Implied Return (EIR) 1 1. Overview EXCESS IMPLIED RETURN (EIR) Dan Gode and James Ohlson Investors often start their analysis using screens that provide preliminary indicators of mispriced stocks.
A Farewell to Put/Call Parity Dallas Brozik, Marshall University Abstract The concept of put/call parity has long been a fundamental tenet of certain asset pricing models. Though some research has examined
7. Bonds and Interest rates 1 2 Yields and rates I m thinking of buying a bond that has a face value of $1000, pays semiannual coupons of $40 and has 7 years to maturity. The market price is $943. Fixed
CAPITAL STRUCTURE AND DIVIDEND POLICY Capital Structure In the section of the notes titled Cost of Capital, we examined how the cost of capital is determined. From those notes, you should have discovered
Mean-Variance Portfolio Analysis and the Capital Asset Pricing Model 1 Introduction In this handout we develop a model that can be used to determine how a risk-averse investor can choose an optimal asset
Capital Asset Pricing Model Homework Problems Portfolio weights and expected return 1. Consider a portfolio of 300 shares of firm A worth $10/share and 50 shares of firm B worth $40/share. You expect a
DESCRIPTION OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND INVESTMENT RISKS A. General The services offered by Prochoice Stockbrokers cover a wide range of Financial Instruments. Every type of financial instrument carries
CHAPTER 6 Risk, Return, and the Capital Asset Pricing Model 1 Topics in Chapter Basic return concepts Basic risk concepts Stand-alone risk Portfolio (market) risk Risk and return: CAPM/SML 2 What are investment
CHAPTER 11: THE EFFICIENT MARKET HYPOTHESIS PROBLEM SETS 1. The correlation coefficient between stock returns for two non-overlapping periods should be zero. If not, one could use returns from one period
Chapter 12 1. Suppose that your 58-year-old father works for the Ruffy Stuffed Toy Company and has contributed regularly to his company-matched savings plan for the past 15 years. Ruffy contributes $0.50
A Review of Cross Sectional Regression for Financial Data You should already know this material from previous study But I will offer a review, with a focus on issues which arise in finance 1 TYPES OF FINANCIAL
RISKS IN MUTUAL FUND INVESTMENTS Classification of Investors Investors can be classified based on their Risk Tolerance Levels : Low Risk Tolerance Moderate Risk Tolerance High Risk Tolerance Fund Classification
THE CAPITAL ASSET PRICING MODEL Szabolcs Sebestyén firstname.lastname@example.org Master in Finance INVESTMENTS Sebestyén (ISCTE-IUL) CAPM Investments 1 / 30 Outline 1 Introduction 2 The Traditional Approach
FIN 432 Investment Analysis and Management Review Notes for Midterm Exam Chapter 1 1. Investment vs. investments 2. Real assets vs. financial assets 3. Investment process Investment policy, asset allocation,
Lecture 2: Equilibrium Investments FIN460-Papanikolaou Equilibrium 1/ 33 Overview 1. Introduction 2. Assumptions 3. The Market Portfolio 4. The Capital Market Line 5. The Security Market Line 6. Conclusions
Econ 497 Barry W. Ickes Spring 2007 Midterm Exam:Answer Sheet 1. (25%) Consider a portfolio, c, comprised of a risk-free and risky asset, with returns given by r f and E(r p ), respectively. Let y be the
Disentangling value, growth, and the equity risk premium The discounted cash flow (DCF) model is a theoretically sound method to value stocks. However, any model is only as good as the inputs and, as JASON
Copyright c 2005 by Karl Sigman 1 Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) We now assume an idealized framework for an open market place, where all the risky assets refer to (say) all the tradeable stocks available
Distinction Between Interest Rates and Returns Rate of Return RET = C + P t+1 P t =i c + g P t C where: i c = = current yield P t g = P t+1 P t P t = capital gain Key Facts about Relationship Between Interest
Chapter 10 Capital Markets and the Pricing of Risk 10-1. The figure below shows the one-year return distribution for RCS stock. Calculate a. The expected return. b. The standard deviation of the return.
DOES IT PAY TO HAVE FAT TAILS? EXAMINING KURTOSIS AND THE CROSS-SECTION OF STOCK RETURNS By Benjamin M. Blau 1, Abdullah Masud 2, and Ryan J. Whitby 3 Abstract: Xiong and Idzorek (2011) show that extremely
AFM 472 Midterm Examination Monday Oct. 24, 2011 A. Huang Name: Answer Key Student Number: Section (circle one): 10:00am 1:00pm 2:30pm Instructions: 1. Answer all questions in the space provided. If space
Learn about bond investing Investor education The dual roles bonds can play in your portfolio Bonds can play an important role in a welldiversified investment portfolio, helping to offset the volatility
CHAPTER 13: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE ON SECURITY RETURNS Note: For end-of-chapter-problems in Chapter 13, the focus is on the estimation procedure. To keep the exercise feasible the sample was limited to returns
Using Duration Times Spread to Forecast Credit Risk European Bond Commission / VBA Patrick Houweling, PhD Head of Quantitative Credits Research Robeco Asset Management Quantitative Strategies Forecasting
Interpreting Market Responses to Economic Data Patrick D Arcy and Emily Poole* This article discusses how bond, equity and foreign exchange markets have responded to the surprise component of Australian
STOCKHOLM SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS Active Management in Swedish National Pension Funds An Analysis of Performance in the AP-funds Sara Blomstergren (20336) Jennifer Lindgren (20146) December 2008 Master Thesis
What Do Short-Term Liquidity Ratios Measure? What Is Working Capital? HOCK international - 2004 1 HOCK international - 2004 2 How Is the Current Ratio Calculated? How Is the Quick Ratio Calculated? HOCK
Chapter 5 Uncertainty and Consumer Behavior Questions for Review 1. What does it mean to say that a person is risk averse? Why are some people likely to be risk averse while others are risk lovers? A risk-averse
1. In case of perfect diversification, the systematic risk is nil. Wel Dlp Portfolio And Risk Management 2. The objectives of investors while putting money in various avenues are:- (a) Safety (b) Capital
Regression Analysis Pekka Tolonen Outline of Topics Simple linear regression: the form and estimation Hypothesis testing and statistical significance Empirical application: the capital asset pricing model
NorthCoast Investment Advisory Team 203.532.7000 email@example.com NORTHCOAST ASSET MANAGEMENT An established leader in the field of tactical investment management, specializing in quantitative research
An Implied ERP Base year cash flow (last 12 mths) Dividends (TTM): 42.66 + Buybacks (TTM): 63.43 = Cash to investors (TTM): 106.09 Payout ratio assumed to stay stable. 106.09 growing @ 5.55% a year Expected
A Basic Introduction to the Methodology Used to Determine a Discount Rate By Dubravka Tosic, Ph.D. The term discount rate is one of the most fundamental, widely used terms in finance and economics. Whether
UVA-F-1604 Rev. Mar. 4, 011 PORTFOLIO SELECTION AND THE CAPITAL ASSET PRICING MODEL What portfolio would you recommend to a 8-year-old who has just been promoted to a management position, and what portfolio
Appendices with Supplementary Materials for CAPM for Estimating Cost of Equity Capital: Interpreting the Empirical Evidence This document contains supplementary material to the paper titled CAPM for estimating
Do the asset pricing factors predict future economy growth? An Australian study. Bin Liu Amalia Di Iorio Abstract In this paper we examine whether past returns of the market portfolio (MKT), the size portfolio
Chapter 5 Risk and Return Learning Goals 1. Understand the meaning and fundamentals of risk, return, and risk aversion. 2. Describe procedures for assessing and measuring the risk of a single asset. 3.
72 Analyzing the Effect of Change in Money Supply on Stock Prices I. Introduction Billions of dollars worth of shares are traded in the stock market on a daily basis. Many people depend on the stock market
FRBSF ECONOMIC LETTER 213-23 August 19, 213 The Price of Stock and Bond Risk in Recoveries BY SIMON KWAN Investor aversion to risk varies over the course of the economic cycle. In the current recovery,
FIN-469 Investments Analysis Professor Michel A. Robe Practice Set #4 and Solutions. What to do with this practice set? To help students prepare for the assignment and the exams, practice sets with solutions
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY We find persistent performance disparities when comparing three leading benchmarks for U.S. small cap equity, with the MSCI U.S. Small Cap 1750 and the S&P Small Cap 600 outperforming