IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA SOUTHERN DIVISION

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA SOUTHERN DIVISION"

Transcription

1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA SOUTHERN DIVISION JEFFREY A. TRUEMAN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) Civil Case No. 7:12-CV-73-F ) vs. ) ) PLAINTIFF S SECOND AMENDED UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; ) COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY, A/K/A, BARACK H. OBAMA, II, ) INJUNCTIVE, AND DAMAGE RELIEF PRESIDENT-COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF; ) UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE ) UNITED STATES (U.S.) SUPREME SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF ) COURT S (SCOUS) FERES DOCTRINE VETERANS AFFAIRS WASHINGTON D.C.,) RULE OF LAW INCIDENT TO U.S. ERIC SHINSEKI, ET AL. ) MILITARY SERVICE HOLDING AND ITS ) NO-FAULT-NON-ADVERSARIAL Defendants. 1 ) SECOND RATIONALE MANDATE ) (FERES DOCTRINE MANDATE) ) & ) FEDERAL QUESTION CHALLENGES ) TO PREVENT THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH ) AND ITS DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ) (DOJ) FROM COVERING-UP CRIMES ) COMMITTED BY THE DEPARTMENT ) OF VETERANS AFFAIRS (DVA) AGAINST ) U.S. VETERANS AND FAMIILIES IN ) DIRECT VIOLATIONS OF THE FERES ) DOCTRINE EXEMPTION TO THE FIRST ) AND FIFTH AMENDMENTS TO THE U.S. ) CONSTITUTION (U.S. CONST.) AND THE ) FEDERAL TORT CLAIMS ACT (FTCA) ) AND FOR OTHER PUBLIC TRUST ) RELATED PURPOSES AS COMPILED ) OVER THE PAST 20 ½ THE VETERAN ) HAS BEEN DENIED EQUAL JUSTICE ) UNDER THE LAWS OF THE DVA; AS ) WITH MILLIONS OF OTHER U.S. ) VETERANS SIMILARLY SITUATED ) UNDER THE OBAMA-DVA 1 A revised listing of defendant parties from the First Amended Complaint is hereby incorporated at Section III. For clarity purposes and judicial economy the Plaintiff has opted to dismiss all First Amended Complaint defendants outside the jurisdiction of the honorable court. However, the Plaintiff intends to subpoena any and all government officials still employed by the Defendant DVA at trial for granting of all requested relief and equitable tolling related purposes in the interest of substantial justice under the Feres Doctrine Mandate theory and arguments. 1

2 COMES NOW, Plaintiff, Jeffrey A Trueman, (hereinafter Plaintiff or Veteran ), who respectfully submits this Second Amended Complaint in compliance with the Honorable Court s Order of June 17, I. INTRODUCTION 1. What would General George Washington have thought of the Feres Doctrine Rule of Law (Feres v. United States, 340 U.S. 135, 146 (1950) after making this statement at the New York Legislature in 1775: When we assumed the soldier, we didn t lay aside the citizen. Thus, applying the reasonable person theory does anyone really believe the American Revolution would have been won and United States (U.S.) Constitution ever been created if our Revolutionary soldiers were treated with the contempt, abuse, and betrayal such has been the case all U.S. Military and families have experienced since the December 4, 1950 Feres Doctrine judicial-legislation? The short answer is undisputedly no. Now, although the Defendant Obama Administration by and through its publically funded U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) attorneys posit the Plaintiff/Veteran brings this lawsuit because he simply doesn t like the treatment he is receiving under the Obama- Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) 3 and this civil rights action should be dismissed as such; the Veteran will begin this final attempt to prove to the federal courts the one argument never presented in his 20 ½ years of fighting for equal justice under the Feres doctrine second-rationale and its nexus to the federal question challenges and issues in this 2 For the record, the honorable Court ordered the Plaintiff to file Second Amended Complaint on or before July 8, 2013 or 21-days upon release of the Court s order (Docket Entry (DE) 37) and said Order was received by the Plaintiff by U.S. Mail on Friday, June 21, As such, the Plaintiff s Second Amended Complaint is hereby timely filed. Further, If it pleases the honorable Court the Plaintiff wishes to re-emphasis Defendant s docket entry number 27-4 and the Plaintiff s FTCA Standard Form 95 seeking damages in this federal cause of action and sum certain in the total amount of $4,400, arising from the DVA s willful failure to comply with the Feres Doctrine Mandate as set down by the U.S. Supreme Court (1950) as all personal injury damages amount to said sum certain figure. 3 For the purposes of the Plaintiff s case of first impression, federal question issues, challenges and equitable tolling related legal matters, theories and arguments the acronym DVA and its jointadministrative and medical systems include the Veterans Benefit Administration (Regional Office (RO)/Board of Veterans Appeals (BVA) administrative law)) and the Veterans Health Care System (VAHCS) statutory system under Title 38 United States Code (USC) et seq., have wantonly been violated due to a lack of checks and balances due to DOJ involvement in defending crimes against U.S. Veterans, loved ones, and the public in general. 2

3 litigation. That argument being the Feres Doctrine Rule of Law s exemption to the First Amendment of the United States Constitution and Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) has given rise to more deaths and injuries to both Veterans and their loved ones than all wars combined since the American Revolution. Although a bold statement, the Plaintiff affirmatively asserts and states as President Harry S. Truman once proclaimed during a 1948 presidential campaign speech and two-years prior to the Feres doctrine abomination after a supporter yelled out: "Give 'em Hell, Harry!" the president replied, "I don't give them Hell. I just tell the truth about them and they think it's Hell." Since this civil rights action was triggered by the Plaintiff to prevent irretrievable damage arising from the February 28, 2012, DVA Physician Assistant Sharon Troyon medical malpractice and neglect events (hereinafter Troyon-Incident ), and Defendants Obama et al picked this fight with the Veteran who came into this action with clean hands per se; the legal and medical malpractice dynamics have changed substantially and the Veteran who wheels the same last name as the President Truman is here to tell the truth about [Defendant DVA s great betrayal of all American Veterans and loved ones in conjunction with its 63-year ignorance and obstruction of justice under the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOUS) Feres doctrine secondrationale holding. To clarify, the Defendant Obama Administration by and through its publically funded United States U.S. DOJ attorneys conceived on behalf of the Chief Executive Obama who is the supervisory high official of all defendants in this lawsuit and primarily responsibility for the operations of the Obama-DVA have knowingly and willfully engaging in the filing of false information and lies against the Veteran honor and character as was the precise pattern of abuses beginning over 20 ½ years when the Veteran lost his exemplary military career under the then-bill Clinton Administration/Navy Department. Ever since that time, the Defendant- DVA-statutory violations of the Veteran s U.S. Constitutional property interests and all protections as declared by the December 4, 1950 SCOUS under its Incident to Military Service holding that mandates the Defendant DVA is to timely process, diagnose, refer, treat and compensation all U.S. Veterans for any military related physical or mental health injury in a nofault, non-adversarial manner under the Feres doctrine second-rationale (hereinafter Feres Doctrine Mandate ) has yet to be honored in wake of the Veteran s 11 ½ years of honorable service to the 3

4 country. 4 As the Obama-DOJ has pointed out in this litigation the totality of the DVA s obstructing the Veteran rights and entitlements to DVA benefits has been declared by Defendant DOJ Attorney Wilson (DE 27-2 pp 9-31); for which DVA-attorneys have refused to remedy under the no-fault, nonadversarial statutory processes to avoid making this matter an adversarial proceeding. 2. As the First Amended Complaint attempt to establish via its 70-page filing arising from all facts and circumstances the Veteran claims the Defendant DVA has willfully violated the Feres Doctrine Mandate beginning with the Clinton Administration and carrying on to the Obama Administration is proof positive the Veteran s military related medical claims and promised financial compensation for said injuries has not been redressed in a no-fault, non-adversarial manner 20 ½ years later as this Second Amended Complaint will establish in plain language. As such, the Plaintiff has removed the acronyms developed over a decade and one-half the Veteran advocated equal justice under [the Feres doctrine-second-rationale] law as the Founder of Veterans Equal Rights Protection Advocacy (V ERPA) (DE 25 Exh. 1) for which the Obama-DOJ asserted the acronyms were unintelligible (DE 33 1) and the Court agreed. Ironically, since the filing of the First Amended Complaint the Defendant DVA and the very corruption being litigated in this case has given rise to newly discovered DVA abuses and neglect of Veterans that merit incorporation in support of the Veteran s federal and North Carolina intentional infliction of emotional distress claims which all toll to March 1994, when the DVA-Health Care System officials initially ignored all the Veteran s January 11, 1994, Clinton Military Discharge Physical Examination documents (hereinafter Bouterse-Report )(DE 10 #5 Exh. E). 5 4 Plaintiff s Feres Doctrine Mandate argument is based upon the high court s December 4, 1950 Feres Doctrine Rule of Law holding that Defendant DVA is to provide simple, certain, and uniform no-fault, non-adversarial Title 38, USC compensation and medical treatment in lieu of uniformed waiver of constitutional rights and protections under the Feres doctrine Incident to Military Service judicial case law to petition the federal courts for redress of personal injury or wrongful death under the FTCA and all progenies over the past 63-years under the second of three rationales the SCOUS proclaim make the Feres doctrine constitutional is the primary federal question challenge in this case. In plain language is the Feres doctrine second-rationale constitutional? The short answer is no. 5 The nexus with the Bourterse-Report and the Veteran s Cushman-Precedent; (Cushman v. United States, Department of Veterans Affairs No , U.S. Court of Appeals for Federal Circuit (2009)) for due process and property interest claims violations by Defendant-DVA s failure to honor, diagnose, 4

5 The Veteran s acquired psychological disorders clearly established therein in the Bouterse-Report establish the DVA has willfully denied redress of said conditions arising from his reprisal (crime) victim status is the smoking gun evidence the Veteran was denied no-fault, non-adversarial processing for Military Reprisal Trauma arising from his Clinton Navy Department wrongful discharge and under the Clinton-DVA over 20 ½ years ago screams his Feres Doctrine Mandate right were violated which subsequently gave rise to this Betrayal Trauma and CPTSD medical claims in this case Due to the fact that the Veteran s claims of constitutional due process and equal protection violations gave rise on January 14, 1994 under the Clinton-DVA when the Veteran by and through his honorable discharge was entitled to Defendant DVA benefits (DE 10 Exhibit A). 7 Immediately after his release from active duty the Veteran began the process of seeking reinstatement and into the U.S. Navy and also presented to the DVA-duel system of compensation medical care his claims of Military Reprisal Trauma and Betrayal Trauma to support his in-service-stressors documented refer and treat the incident to military service medical conditions in said report has ultimately resulted in the Veteran to suffer Chronic Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (CPTSD) in real-time was created on January 11, 1993 by Clinton Navy Department official named Lieutenant Bourterse only two days prior to the Veteran s honorable discharge signed-off on the very medical conditions in dispute in this case for which the DVA has neglected since January 14, 1994, the official day the Veteran became eligible for DVA benefits under the DVA-duel system of compensation and medical entitlements as mandated under the Veteran s Feres Doctrine Mandate theory. Under the Feres Doctrine Mandate as non-serviceconnected in lieu of service-connected to steal an estimated $300, or more from the Veteran since January 14, Thus, for equitable tolling relief and related purposes all willful and deliberately disregarded, overlooked, neglected and abandoned Bouterse-Report medical conditions are ripe and actionable under the Feres Doctrine Mandate as the Veteran argues the SCOUS did not attach any statute of limitations to its incident to military service holding. 6 For Case of First Impression purposes the question as to whether a military reprisal victim is a crime victim is a new question of law under the DVA-statutory process and warrants judicial determination since the DVA refuses to recognize said no-fault, non-adversarial argument in this case. Also, the Plaintiff concedes he inadvertently confused the DOJ s wording of unintelligible with unintelligent at DOJ s opposition filing at (DE 34) at that time due to extreme aggravation of his 20 ½ year neglected DVA-neglected Bouterse-Report acquired psychological disorders clearly cited on said documents as: 1), depression, 2), anxiety, 3) sleep problems as a victim of Military Whistleblower Protection Act reprisals. For said misunderstanding of said word the Veteran apologizes. 7 Exhibit A is the Veteran s Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty. 5

6 on the Bouterse-Report. 8 Due to the fact that the Veteran accused the Clinton Navy Department with human and civil rights abuses in its military s mental health program to destroy honorable men and women who expose corruption for the good of the nation as reported in the 1999, ABC News 20/20 an Abuse of Power? 9 and due to his V ERPA First Amendment activism on behalf of Veterans and 8 For clarity purposes in-service-stressors is a Title 38 USC DVA administrative adjudication term which is equivalent to the Title 10 USC U.S. Armed Forces Feres doctrine Incident to Military Service holding for compensation and pension benefits. 9 For the record, in the ABC interview at its headquarters in Washington D.C., the Veteran was asked by Mr. Sam Donaldson if he was related to President Truman. Although the Veteran has inquired with the Truman Library he doesn t believe that he is, yet one never knows. Nonetheless, as the Plaintiff keeps harping on and probably the most important SCOUS evidence arising out of the Clinton- Reprisal Matter- Matter and primary question presented to the SCOUS which today proves so true with regard to Executive Branch absolute power and misuse of the DOJ to cover up crimes against the United States and federal employees who stand tall to corruption: Whether the doctrine promulgated in Feres v. United States, 340 U.S. 135 (1950), (Feres doctrine), should be declared unconstitutional as it provides legal carte blanche for military command authority to intentionally and deliberately violate the human and constitutional rights of service members who engage in protected communications under the Military Whistleblower Protection Act, of 1989, as amended (MWP Act) Title 10 U.S.C. 1034? If applying the reasonable person theory, in January 1994 when the Veteran was ran out the back door of the Clinton Navy Department and all medical claims arising therein, were never going to be properly redress under the Clinton-DVA nor where they. As such, there is no disputing the fact that after the Clinton-DVA covered up the Clinton Navy Department reprisal related matters the Veteran was left to suffer from 1994 to 2001 absolutely no redress of the many mental health acquired disorders as a Military-Reprisal (crime) victim that form the foundation of this Post [Clinton Navy] Traumatic Stress Disorder giving rise to ultimate Chronic-PTSD (CPTSD) the Veteran continues to see redress under the so called Feres doctrine no-fault, non-adversarial second-rationale or Feres Doctrine Mandate for purpose of case of first impression and all federal question challenges in this civil right action. Again, the following introduction to the Abuse of Power? program is hereby incorporated as it sums up the Clinton Navy/DVA and now the Obama-DVA and DOJ high official corruption by attacking the Veteran s character and integrity by striking back at him via false official statements in this litigation for his criticism of the DVA in the best interests of the country : You will find the story we are about to show you very hard to believe I think. Indeed we consider it explosive! It s about the U.S. Military and the awesome power it can use to strike back at personnel who are in any way critical, even when their criticism may be in the best interests of the country. As the Plaintiff previously explained to the Court; in the wake of his retaliatory military discharge for believing in his constitutional oath and that the U.S. Armed Forces justice system worked as was evident by his correcting a top secret [nuclear war planning] security breach at his previous duty station before NAS Willow Grove and being awarded the 5 th highest military medal For Military Merit he found out differently under the Clinton Administration control of the U.S. military. Not only did the Clinton Navy 6

7 families is the precise reason why he was discriminated against and arbitrarily denied all lawful entitlements under the Feres Doctrine Mandate as highly documented in the related-matter Trueman v. Rumsfeld, et al., (Case No: 2:2003cv01503, filed September 24, 2004)(Case No: cert denied SCOUS January 9, 2006)(hereinafter Clinton Military Whistleblower Protection Act Reprisal-Matter or Clinton-Military-Reprisal-Matter ) for DVA medical malpractice, neglect, abandonment and reprisal and constitutional property interests redress the violations and judicial intervention and granting of all relief in this civil rights action. 10 Now, to understand the Plaintiff s two-decade-plus claims and requests for relief against Defendant DVA et al., we must go back in time to July 12, On said date, the Veteran Department and DoD strike back for the Veteran s exposing human and constitutional rights abuses within the Clinton Military s mental health system they carried over their obstructions of the Veteran s SCOUS proclaimed second-rationale entitlements as continued reprisals to clearly cover-up the wrongful discharge of the Veteran during the years 1994 to Subsequently, the cover up went so deep that when the G.W. Bush Administration took over control of the U.S. Government the Veteran s continued claims of obstruction of justice and denial of Feres Doctrine Mandate right and entitlements clearly took a back-seat after the September 11, 2001 (9/11) attacks on the United States from 2001 to Of course, Defendant Obama came into the White House promising that Veterans claims such as PTSD would be timely and justly addressed and now the Veteran finds himself in this adversarial proceeding because the Obama-Administration and DVA have failed to uphold their promises to all Veterans with PTSD such as the Plaintiff suffers in conjunction with his crime-victim status as a military reprisal survivor as it will allow him to begin the proper transition into civilian life even if 20 ½ years in violation of the Feres Doctrine Mandate. 10 The Rumsfeld case is incorporated herein in the wake of the Obama-DOJ s raising the case in its initial opposition filing. For the record, the Rumsfeld-Related-Matter actually gave rise from the Veteran s legal challenge against the Clinton Navy Department s involuntary military discharge and misuse of the military mental health system as a false pretext to carry out retaliatory discharge for engaging in protected communications under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), Inspectors General Act (IG Act) and Military Whistleblower Protection Act (MWP Act). Ironically, as with the Clinton-DOJ and its abuses of power and condoning and aiding of the cover up of official misconduct and retaliation of public servants such as a the Veteran for exposing corruption is once again front and center in the public domain under the Defendant Obama Administration and DOJ corruption scandals filling the airwaves in real time. That said, the Veteran challenged the illegality of his involuntary-discharge and raised federal question challenges against the constitutionality of the Feres doctrine exemption to the FTCA and sole discretion decision finality of the Secretary of Defense under Title 10 USC 1034 [Military [Reprisal] Protection Act] for the purposes of DVA malpractice and all relief in this lawsuit the medical conditions neglected by DVA for over 20-1/2 years gave rise during the Veteran s active duty service during the Clinton Administration for service-connected legal purposes. Of course, under the DVA- Title 38 USC Section 511 scheme as like the Title 10 USC 1034 scheme, the absolute power to ignore evidence, legal and medical arguments without judicial review is once again unconstitutional and a violation of Veterans First Amendment right to petition the government for redress of arbitrary and capricious decisions of the DVA-Secretary and his subordinates granted absolute power to destroy lives of Veterans due to no oversight by the federal courts. 7

8 initially enlisted in the U.S. Navy under the Regan Administration and assumed the oath to defend and protect the United States Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic so help [him] God and carried out his oath with the utmost of honor and integrity on behalf of the American People and always over the best interests of his own family, children s welfare, and his military career. 11 As the Veteran s active duty records show, from July 12, 1982 through December 23, 1992 (DE 3, #3 Exh C); he was considered an asset to the U.S. Navy and high decorated for his talents and dedication to duty and most importantly, was both mentally and physical fit for world-wide duty under both the Regan and G.H.W. Bush Administrations wherein the Veteran was considered an asset to the Navy and country as a public servant. 12 Of course, as history shows, in the wake of the Clinton Administration assuming control of the U.S. Armed Forces the gross contempt for the military, career vested citizens like the Veteran and the rule of law was quickly placed on the backburner in the wake of this most corrupted U.S. Government administration in American history as cited in the book Beyond the Scope of Justice: The Chilling Effects of the Feres Doctrine in the United States Armed Forces the Veteran authored to expose the Feres doctrine and the Open Letter from Colonel David Hackworth the most highly decorated Vietnam Veteran to Bill Clinton incorporated in the book explaining just how go alone to get along public servants can and do destroy the fabric of this nation and unquestionably more American, more patriotic and military loving citizens as the Veteran once was before experiencing the Clinton-military-experience. Since this is the last chance for the Veteran to receive justice in the federal judiciary he believes Colonel Hackworth s letter warrants incorporation as follows: 11 In the instant action the Plaintiff is now seeking judicial sanctions against the Obama-DOJ for intentionally and deliberately filing false information to attack the Veteran s honor and integrity as was the very foundation for all his presently disputed DVA-medically neglected claims to include, but not limited to Chronic-PTSD (CPTSD) predicated upon Military-Reprisal-Trauma and Betrayal- Trauma arising from the Clinton Navy Department and Clinton-DVA wrongful acts and omissions causing the Veteran to suffer acquired psychological disorders began prior to his leaving the military as the Veteran s written statement establishes. (DE 25 #2). 12 As the Veteran pointed out to the Court, on December 23, 1992, he was considered an asset to the U.S. Navy and no mention of any personal or professional misconduct and specifically alcohol abuse or mental shortfalls were cited in that smoking gun documentary evidence ignored by the SOCUS in the Clinton- Reprisal-Matter. 8

9 Defending America David H. Hackworth 28 December 1999 OPEN LETTER TO PRESIDENT CLINTON Dear Mr. President, Seven years ago you took command of a lean fighting outfit that had just busted Saddam Hussein's chops in a war that was over faster than you could say, "Oh, Monica." Back in 1992, our warriors were combat-ready, battle-tested and bristling with magic spirit -- that fire in the belly which is the most crucial of all the elements of war. As this century closes, our military is 50 percent smaller than the armed forces George Bush placed in your trust, and their once-deadly edge has been dulled on the futile rocks of Iraq, Somalia, Haiti, Bosnia and Kosovo. The bumbled war with Serbia has only confirmed that today we simply don't have what it takes to replicate another Desert Storm. Mr. Clinton, you've tasked our forces to do too much with too little for too long. Their combat ability is frayed, and they and their loved ones are weary and dispirited. Daily, fine men and women from buck sergeant to bull colonel tell me, " I'm hanging it up. I can't take it anymore!" In more than a half-century of being a soldier or a writer about soldiers, I've seldom seen lower morale. Nor have I seen more self-serving senior leaders. From Secretary of Defense Bill Cohen in the bloated Pentagon to the generals and admirals who make up the most brass-heavy military bureaucracy in our country's history. Perhaps you can take credit for our booming economy -- of those sort of matters I'm ignorant. But you must also take responsibility for the weakening of our military -- you are the person under whose command our forces went from STRAC to SLACK. As Harry Truman once said, the buck stops at your desk. And I hold you accountable. Your feckless leadership and fickle policies began with your order that gays serve openly, followed by your policies earmarking the profession of arms as a place to provide females and minorities with equal opportunity. You and your advisors never got it straight that the U.S. military is not an equal job employer, but a finely honed sword forged only for the battlefield --- where survival and winning are dependent on skill, sacrifice, spirit, unit cohesion and discipline. These factors, mixed with total trust and caring leadership, allow a force to win. Battles are not won by how skin color or gender fits into a Pentagon personnel quota matrix, but by teams who've been sweated to perfection. Every serving senior brass hat has been personally approved by you. The majority fit into the same go-along-to-get-along and don't-rock-the-boat-mold. None have challenged your reckless misuse of our military or your wrongheaded personnel policies. Why should they? They weren't picked for stand-up leadership, but because they'd roll over. 9

10 There's not a Patton, Nimitz or Puller-type in the lot of them, and few are trusted by the folks they lead. But you can still redeem yourself - although don't think it can be by throwing more money at the Pentagon, even though the leading candidates hustling for your job say that's the fix. The answer is leadership. You need to begin by sacking Cohen and replacing him with a person of the stature of George C. Marshall. A leader with the integrity, know-how and guts to turn the U.S. military around. Cohen's (1) allowing the forces to be weakened, (2) mishandling of the war with Serbia or (3) his Anthrax disaster -- pick any one of the above -- are more than sufficient justification. At the beginning of World War II, our military's senior leadership was also sick. Marshall, then Army Chief of Staff, sacked the General Blimps and fast-promoted the Gavins, Ridgways and Pattons. Leaders who weren't afraid to make the sweeping, visionary changes that reshaped our military and took it from trench to mobile warfare. These savvy leaders performed a miracle and won a war even though the early odds were on the enemy's side. Besides sending Cohen packing, read Sun Tzu. There you'll learn the how vital the military is to the state and how a bad Commander - in - Chief can hobble an army. You still have the time to turn things around. Marshall did the job in less than a year, and he was fighting a two-front war. As Hack points out and worth reemphasis [e]very serving senior brass hat has been personally approved by you. The majority fit into the same go-along-to-get-along and don't-rock-the-boat-mold. None have challenged your reckless misuse of our military or your wrongheaded personnel policies goes to the heart of the criminal abuse of the Clinton mental health system and then the Clinton-DVA cover up of the medical damages and financial hardships the Veteran continues to suffer from the malicious labeling by Clinton Navy Department go-along-to-get-along officials for whom the entire world, not just the American people known from history that Clinton and his political hacks as with the Obama Administration attack honorable men and women and their character and mental stability who question these people s abuses of public powers For the record, Beyond the Scope of Justice was introduced into the Veteran s petition for reinstatement and the DVA statutory process as evidence to support the facts and circumstances as to how the Feres doctrine exemption to the FTCA allowed the Clinton Administration to violate the Veteran s human and civil rights via abuse of the military s mental health system. As the facts will show at trial in calling DVA defendant regional office officials said evidence was totally ignored for compensation and pension purposes to establish all physical and mental health conditions leading to CPTSD at this time were indeed service-connected and not non-service-connected as adjudicated by Defendant DVA/Regional Office to steal an estimated $400, in DVA pension owed the Veteran in real-time. 10

11 4. In conjunction with the Veteran s exemplary December 23, 1992, annual performance evaluation evidence the SCOUS-Rumsfeld record incorporated for medical malpractice and other public trust purposes established the Veteran s military records were excellent, commendable, perfect only six (6) weeks prior to engaging in protected communications under military and federal law on February 7, 1993, was met with resistance and a threat to of retaliatory military discharge if the Veteran proceeded up his chain of command with claims of fraud, waste and abuse within the Navy s Training & Administration of Reserve program at NAS Willow Grove, Pennsylvania. 14 As the for equitable tolling relief and related purposes; all willful and deliberately disregarded, overlooked, neglected and abandoned Bouterse-Report medical conditions are ripe and actionable under the Feres Doctrine Mandate if said mandate-theory is not to be challenged as unconstitutional is now tolled due to DOJ-Wilson s criminal activity. 15 As the SCOUS-Rumsfeld record firmly establishes on February 28, 1993, the Veteran after Notwithstanding the large sums of money the Clinton-DVA and all the way to the Obama-DVA continue to withhold from the Veteran a sad by true reality of so many others being denied equal justice under the Feres Doctrine Mandate is hereby incorporated by a book reviewer on January 23, 2001 with regard to Trueman s exposing the Feres doctrine and all the crimes being covered up in the U.S. Armed Forces command, legal and medical system as a result of said judicial-legislation: A very informative book, especially for those in the armed forces. Anyone who knows how the government works knows this book is so true to form. If you find something not right in the government or the armed forces don't dare tell anyone or they will try to make you look incompetent. They have doctors that will say you re mental and don't know what you re talking about. That's what seemed to happen to Jeff. It's a sad day when you can't trust the very people you're supposed to look up to. Way to go Jeff, I hope everyone reads this book. Another reader stated on Jun 12, 2005 and goes to the heart of this civil rights action and request for the Court to intervene under the separation of powers clause and the willful violations of the Defendant DVA and Feres Doctrine Mandate argument: Clear lucid, to the point and true! Read this book if you want to know the truth about this important civil rights issue that needs redress now! Source: Justice-Chilling-Effects-Doctrine/productreviews/ X/ref=sr_cr_hist_5?ie=UTF8&filterBy=addFiveStar&showViewpoints=0 14 Clearly, the threat of military discharge for upholding his military oath was not only a shocking event, but its carrying out was the foundation for the Veteran s Betrayal and Military Reprisal Trauma/PTSD in this case. 15 According to Title 18 USC 1001 Statements or entries generally proclaims the DOJ-Wilson filings as a crime under the following provisions applies in his judicial proceeding: 11

12 properly requesting through his chain of command to speak with the commanding officer was notified by then Captain Tony Broyles; If anyone is abusing their powers under my direction, I will see that corrective action is taken. To the contrary, from the period of February 28, 1993 to March 26, 1993, the Clinton Administration/Broyles command instead of questioning the Veteran s subordinates began in earnest a smear campaign to destroy the Veteran s military career and life in general. On March 27, 1993, the Veteran was informed by Broyles that the issues he raised had no merit and the February 7, 1993, threat of wrongful discharge was carried out via the Veteran being ordered for mental health evaluations to chill and neutralize his honor and character to cover up the highly documented corruption at NAS Willow Grove. 16 Henceforth, the Veteran is seeking vindication by the honorable Court that all present DVA-mental health untreated and compensated conditions arise from his status as a crime- (a) Except as otherwise provided in this section, whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the United States, knowingly and willfully (1) falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact; (2) makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation; or (3) makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry; shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years... (emphasis added). As for the equitable tolling doctrine surrounding the Veteran s FTCA claims they too should all toll as a direct and proximate result of DVA s continued patterns of malpractice, neglect and reprisal in violation of the Feres Doctrine Mandate. See Nicolai v. U.S. Bureau of Prisons, Dir., 4 F.3d 691, 693 (8th Cir. 1993). Because statutes of limitations protect important interests of certainty, accuracy, and repose, equitable tolling "is an exception to the rule, and should therefore be used only in exceptional circumstances." Dring v. McDonnell Douglas Corp., 58 F.3d 1323, 1330 (8th Cir. 1995); see Irwin, 498 U.S. at 96. "The party who is claiming the benefit of an exception to the operation of a statute of limitations bears the burden of showing that he is entitled to it." Wollman v. Gross, 637 F.2d 544, 549 (8th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 893 (1981). The Veteran believes if the Feres doctrine secondrationale is valid and a legitimate judicial-case law provision to preserve and protected good order and discipline in the U.S. Armed Forces and national security then all Veterans claims toll from the moment they enter the Defendant DVA system. If not, the Veteran argues the second-rationale is unconstitutional. 16 As the SCOUS-Clinton-Reprisal-Matter shows; the Veteran s in-service-stressors giving rise to depression, anxiety, insomnia and PTSD known to the Clinton-DVA as far back as January 14, 1994, was highly supported by sworn affidavits, statements, and documentary evidence completely denied redress and ultimately giving rise to Troyon-Incident PTSD claim under the Deasy-PTSD-Relief-Precedent; (Deasy v. United States, 99 F. 3d Court of Appeals, 10th Circuit 1996). Of course, the Veteran now suffers CPTSD as of this Second Amended Complaint. 12

13 victim dating back to his status as a First Class Petty officer in the Clinton Navy Department thus causing the Veteran to suffer medical conditions never exiting before the Clinton-Reprisals giving rise to CPTSD over this 20 ½ year period of time in direct violation of his constitutional property interests under the laws of the Defendant DVA and in direct violation of the Feres Doctrine Mandate and being brushed under the carpet by Obama-DOJ. 17 Therefore, combining all facts and circumstances in the Rumsfeld- Related-Matter and all constitutional property interest abuses by DVA in direct violation of the SCOUS second-rationale under Feres v. United States, and its exemption to the First Amendment s petition 17 In support of the Plaintiff s legal theory that Defendant DVA has overtly and covertly under the chilling effects of 38 U.S.C. 511where the final decision of the Defendant DVA Secretary is final and no judicial review in federal court is allowed such as under the provisions of the powerful Feres Doctrine Rule of Law and for equitable tolling argument set forth above; the Veteran cites the following DVA/BVA 1993 administrative law subject matter: Decision Citation: BVA Y92 BOARD OF VETERANS' APPEALS WASHINGTON, D.C DOCKET NO that clearly establishes Defendant DVA is fully aware of the Feres Doctrine Mandate and second-rationale CPTSD as far back as February1993 for DVA medical and compensation related purposes:... the Government of the United States is not liable under the Federal Tort Claims Act for injuries to servicemen for disability arising out of or in the course of activity incident to military service, as held by the United States Supreme Court in United States v. Johnson, 481 U.S. 681 (1987). That decision upheld this doctrine which was originally set forth in Feres v. United States, 340 U.S. 135 (1950), and referred to as the Feres doctrine. As for further equitable tolling clarification wherein the Plaintiff charges DVA with improperly evaluating and treating him with respect to all conditions contained on the Bouterse-Report giving rise to entitlement to benefits under 38 U.S.C (1991) as follows as far back as January 14, 1994; the day Defendant DVA was to address the Veteran s in-service-stressors the following excerpt from the above cited BVA case law applies wherein glaucoma is replaced with acquired psychological disorder to include CPTSD :... appeal wherein references have been made to improper evaluation or treatment of the veteran by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) with respect to visual problems after military service which, it is asserted, if properly done would have led to the early detection and treatment of glaucoma. This may be construed as a claim for entitlement to benefits under 38 U.S.C (1991), but this claim has not been adjudicated by the RO. Accordingly, this matter is also referred to the RO for clarification of the intent of the veteran, and appropriate consideration. In essence, the above cited Defendant BVA case establishes the Rumsfeld-Related-Matter is not a judicial bar to the Veteran seeking all medical related benefits and entitlements associated therein as the doctrine of res judicata is not applicable as the DOJ has attempted to apply in this litigation (DE 17). Therefore, the Veteran raises a federal question challenge as to whether medical claims based upon reprisal are barred by any statute of limitation. 13

14 clause and its nexus to absolute judicial bar of any and all incident to military service personal injury or death claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) of 1946 has been covered up by the Executive Branch of the U.S. Government far too long. Now, to better understand the ripeness and freshness of all claims and requests for relief in the First Amended Complaint now being clarified in this Second Amended Complaint as directed by the honorable Court for the Obama-DVA/DOJ to file an answer in this litigation; the Plaintiff incorporates a political analyst s quote that best explains his federal question challenges against the Obama-DVA and its duties and obligations under the SCOUS December 4, 1950 Feres doctrine incident to military service holding: Fifteen years in Washington DC politics is like fifteen minutes in real life... For the Veteran the issues giving rise to all his DVA neglected medical conditions for which ultimately gives rise to his Cushman-Relief 18 for due process and property interest claims violations by DVA giving rise to Deasy-Relief claims wherein the Veteran will prove via a preponderance of the evidence before the Court at both evidentiary hearings and trail that the Clinton Navy Department caused the Veteran to suffer acquired psychological disorders or mental health stressors he did not have at birth; or before he joined the U.S. Navy in To the contrary, the totality of the Veteran s Military/DVA records clearly establish all mental health injuries and ailments gave rise after he engaging in U.S. Constitutional First Amendment protected activities on February 7, 1993, that are the basis for his (Incident to Military Service PTSD) for which was unconstitutionally created and covered up by the Clinton-DVA from the onset of the Veteran s entrance into the DVA-statutory system on January 14, 1994 and so grossly neglected for the past 20 ½ years the Veteran suffers CPTSD in silence within his mind, body and soul is un-american to say the least. As such, the Veteran s good faith 18 As the court found in Cushman and it s relevant to this amended complaint to address constitutional due process and FDM-property matters the opinion states: This case involves an alleged violation of a veteran s right to due process under the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution, where the medical record on which his serviceconnected disability claim was evaluated contained an improperly altered document. In contending that a veteran has a protected property interest requiring fair adjudication of his claim for disability benefits, the Appellant raises a constitutional issue of first impression for this court. For the reasons discussed below, we find that a veteran alleging a service-connected disability has a due process right to fair adjudication of his claim for benefits. 14

15 efforts and duty to report and remedy corruption at Naval Air Station (NAS) Willow Grove 21 ½ years ago too him seem like 21 ½ minutes ago. Since the Obama-DVA and DOJ are now engaged in the very same type of cover up and abuses by providing this court, as it did in the Clinton-Reprisal--Related- Matter with false information to re-victimize the Veteran via similar claims the Veteran is abusing his pain medication contract etc., is just another overt act that supports the Veteran s primary claim in this litigation that he suffers Deasy-Precedent PTSD and ultimately CPTSD as a direct and proximate result of the Defendant DVA failing to provide him any SCOUS-second-rationale mental health counseling or compensation for the very injuries and ailments cited on his January 11, 1994, Clinton Navy Department Bouterse-Report. Thus, in light of the Cushman-Precedent violations that are continuing in the Obama-DVA that gave rise in the Clinton-DVA in combination with Troyon-Incident the very same pattern of official falsification of public records by DOJ to cover up said February 28, 2012, medical malpractice has triggered serious aggravation of the Veteran s deeply seated and tender CPTSD conditions. In other words, in light of the Obama-DOJ lack of candor toward the tribunal and false claims of prescription abuses and failure to comply with the DVA-pain medication agreement to cover up the Troyon-Incident is no different than what the Clinton Navy Department undertook to cover up the Veteran duty to report corruption whenever discovered in keeping with his constitutional oath is once again front-and-center before the federal courts and this time around the chilling effects of the Feres Doctrine cannot bar judicial redress of the Obama-Administration abuses of power in this case In plain language the Plaintiff argues under the Feres doctrine second-rationale there are no statute of limitations with regard to claims and requests for relief in this civil rights action to prevent all matters from proceeding to trial in the interest of substantial justice for the Veteran and other similarly situated U.S. Veterans denied proper Military Disability Evaluation System processing to ensure fullydeveloped military medical records for a smooth transition into the DVA-statutory system; as the totality of the evidence proves in this case. As a matter of fact and worth incorporating in this amended complaint to establish the Veteran has suffered incredible betrayal as far back as the Clinton-DOJ is the federal civil rights action of Keller v. United States Navy, Lekberg, et al., (citations omitted) and the Clinton-DOJ settling this matter out of court on one-reprisal related matter for $200, All told, the case was estimated to cost the American taxpayer half-a-million to defend the very group of NAS Willow Grove high officials that destroyed the Veteran s career but due to the Feres Doctrine Rule of Law the Veteran was never afforded the same justice as Keller a civilian employee at the Plaintiff s base received. A brief nexus to the Keller case was the fact that prior to and after the Veteran s retaliatory discharge he worked with Keller and several other civilian and military personnel to expose the widespread corruption 15

16 5. As of this Second Amended Complaint and the 21 ½ year juncture of the Veteran s February 7, 1993 threat of military discharge and all subsequent overt acts of withholding of favorable personnel actions and the taking of unfavorable personnel actions (criminal-reprisals) as firmly established in the Clinton-Reprisal-Matter and post-military and DVA gross neglect, malpractice and abandonment of the Veteran s in-service-stressors has ultimately deprived him the ability to smoothly transition into military life and caused him to suffer CPTSD due to the repeated pattern of medical neglect and malpractice under the laws of the Defendant-DVA. Although the traumatic events forming the Veteran s CPTSD began while he was serving on active duty in the U.S. Navy under the Clinton Administration due to false claims of mental health problems to chill and neutralize the Plaintiff from exposing willful, wanton and criminal abuses of the Clinton military s mental health system; those very Incident to Military Service medical conditions should have been timely redressed by the Clinton-DVA as far back as January Of course, as history show, in January 1994, then-commander-in-chief Bill Clinton was engaging in illegal sexual relations with an intern and there is no disputing the fact that that scandal took precedent by the Clinton political machine and known human and civil right violations being undertaken and condoned by the Clinton-DoD were brushed under the carpet and the same type of governmental abuses within the DOJ against public servants as the Veteran once was are continuing in real time under the Obama-DOJ. It is said that history repeats itself and as was the corruption in the Clinton DoD and DVA that covers the entire eight years Clinton was in control of the U.S Government at the base with then Senator Arlen Specter and Congressman Curt Weldon of Pennsylvania. The Plaintiff was the lead federal employee who took a group of betrayed, battered, and highly stressed federal employees to seeking congressional intervention to prevent reprisals of base personnel standing up to fraud, waste and abuse. Although one civilian committed suicide, the Plaintiff did stop another uniformed member of the Navy from shooting his corrupted boss ironically, one Lieutenant Commander Gumpright who was appointed by Lekberg to sit on the Veteran s administrative discharge board and a crystal clear conflict of interest wherein the Veteran military lawyer proclaimed a grave injustice took place at the board in discharging the Veteran without affording him due process of law in all aspects of the words. Subsequently, when the Plaintiff helped Keller from committing suicide and ultimately prevailing in his lawsuit the information and nexus was provided to the Clinton DOJ to investigate corruption in the Navy and DoDIG program. Shockingly, all evidence that should have compelled DOJ investigation was brushed under the carpet under the authority of then Civil Rights Division Director and now Massachusetts Governor Duval Patrick. 16

17 January 20, 1993 to January 20, The first act of reprisal in the Clinton Navy Department gave rise on February 7, 1993 and carried through until January 13, 1994, when the Veteran was involuntarilydischarged for exposing corruption within the Clinton Military s mental health system. Subsequently, on January 14, 1994, when the Veteran entered the Clinton-DVA claiming he was a crime-victim arising from the reprisals he was subjected to for engaging in First Amendment protected speech in conjunction with military and federal laws and was the foundation for all medical conditions he suffers today for which did not exist prior to his military service and for which the Clinton-DVA continued its obstruction of the Veteran s constitutional property rights under the Feres doctrine second-rationale until the Clinton clan left the White House the Veteran suffered continued reprisal in the Clinton-DVA from January 1994 to January 2001 by being denied lawful benefits and entitlements for the very reasons the Clinton Navy Department discharged the Veteran for to begin with. 6. In conjunction with the Troyon-Incident and all subsequent reprisals such as DOJ s false claims of addiction to besmirch the Veteran as was the very same malicious misconduct undertaken by the Clinton Navy Department to carry out his retaliatory military discharge; the Obama-DOJ bad faith filings with respect to the Plaintiff s previous request for Cushman/Deasy-Precedent-Relief the question before the Court is whether Military Reprisal Trauma and the failure of the DVA to identify and remedy said trauma has ultimately led the Veteran to suffer CPTSD 20 ½ years after his involuntary-honorable discharge and forms his Betrayal Trauma medical claims and the short answer is yes. 20 As the Veteran 20 Clearly, the Veteran finds himself in a Executive-Branch Catch-22 as the facts show for a period of eight-years wherein the Veteran s documented in-service-stressors on his discharge physical exam documents were undisputedly denied redress, causing the Veteran to suffer CPTSD due to the grossnegligent failures of Defendant DVA and their failure to properly and professionally redress, diagnose, refer and treat the Veteran as a crime-victim defeats the purpose of the SCOUS second-rationale. Now, the Obama DOJ to shield high official corruption and to cover up Defendants Obama and Shinseki s being placed on notice of the wrongful acts and omissions in this case since in or about 2009; the DOJfalse statements and lies to re-victimized and destroy the Veteran s honor and character once again calling for the Plaintiff to cite the Obama-DOJ as a defendant in this Second Amended Complaint especially in the wake of their filing false statements in this litigation and lack of candor toward the Court, (DE 35, 7) via false statements the Veteran suffers addiction to pain medication and all other false statements made by DOJ-Defendant Wilson as will be set forth under federal reprisal and state law intentional infliction of emotional distress claims and tolling of all claims in this case to January 14, 1994 in the latter. 17

18 cited in his SCOUS petition for CPTSD related purposes: Trueman reasonably believes, the serious Public Trust issues of corruption as will be cited herein have been dismissed without accountability due to the Feres Doctrine... [and sought] [a] legal precedent to ensure, all honorable men and women serving our Nation who report corruption for the good of the Nation, receive absolute constitutional due process and equal protection of law under 10 U.S.C and was not a good enough argument for the SCOUS to hear the Clinton-Reprisal-Matter then the undisputed fact and argument in this case is that since January 14, 1994, the Defendant-DVA had an affirmative duty to redress all reprisal related in-service-stressors under the Feres Doctrine Mandate and failed to do so causing the Veteran to suffer CPTSD. As the Veteran proclaimed in his SCOUS petition which rings so-true today as history has shown us with the 9/11 attacks and all on-going Obama- Administration corruption being covered up by the Obama-DOJ as in this case by DOJ s willful and deliberate placement of false and misleading information to the Court to discredit the Veteran as was the pattern of abuse leading to the SCOUS petition to begin with: Trueman asserts, when he enlisted in our armed forces he did not waive his constitutional rights nor conscience. Trueman is just one American. However, if one American can be destroyed for fighting corruption we all can be destroyed and we all will. Trueman, is just one American brining this Complaint, but, this Complaint speaks for countless honorable Americans destroyed by the Feres Doctrine. Now, the Obama-DOJ as was the case with the Clinton-DVA/DOJ who advanced the personal destruction of the Veteran s life to include his children by the Veteran seeks full-vindication at this time by the honorable Court under the separation of powers clause of the United States Constitution under the Feres Doctrine Mandate if the SCOUS-second-rationale is truly a constitutionally valid rationale. In addition to all the aforementioned claims of the Veteran that failing to protect honor men and women in the U.S. Government in general from political hacks and abusers of power can and does lead to personal injury and wrongful deaths of Americans as 9/11 and all other presently reported Obama-Administration corruption has been widely reported in the national and world-wide media in real-time. Nonetheless, as the Veteran proclaimed to this Court in his initial filings he almost took his own live on November 13, 2009, due to the long untreated and neglected human and civil rights abuses he suffered in his postmilitary life for 15-years due to the negative stigmatizing of his character that is the primary reason 18

19 today the Veteran cannot find and hold gainful employment (DE fn. 84). Subsequently, after petitioning for redress through all legal avenues in the Clinton DoDIG, DOJ, DVA to simply obtain his SCOUS Feres Doctrine mandated second-rationale entitlements after helping many other Veterans obtain theirs he walked away to begin the process of living out his life free of all government intrusions and abuses until the egregious events of the February 28, 2012, Troyon-Incident as set forth in the original complaint as follows: On February 28, 2012, Plaintiff was subjected to Defendant [Troyon s] bias in administering pain medication as proclaimed by her staff before Plaintiff ever saw the defendant. In the wake of a 45-minute initial consult with Defendant [Troyon], she took radical medical steps that have immediately injured the Plaintiff, both mentally and physically. Defendant [Troyon] did not provide informed consent to the Plaintiff to change is long and productive [pain management program] and instructed Plaintiff via a sticky-note to wean off his pain medication within a five-day period. Defendant [Troyon] then informed the Plaintiff to return in two months for a follow-up. Plaintiff believe the acts and omissions of Defendant [Troyon] are not in the best interest of his confirmed [Feres Doctrine Mandated Incident to Military Service] injuries and ailments and further believes abandonment has occurred by the actions and ill-actions of Defendants. 21 (DE 3 23). Although, the Troyon-Incident has led to major disruptions in the Veteran s life such as 1), dropping out of college after he was achieving honors in his pre-law program, 2), creation of financial hardships and injury to his credit standing, 3), having to flee the State of North Carolina to South Carolina to obtain new DVA medical care, 4), aggravation of all Bouterse-Report-acquired psychological disorders to include PTSD/CPTSD the most egregious wrongful acts and omissions to date has been the DOJ s false official statements to the Court to besmirch and injury the Veteran s honor, integrity and character to cover up the Troyon-Incident. As a matter of fact, the outrageous misconduct of the Obama-DOJ mirrors the very same reprisal tactics employed by the Clinton Navy Department giving rise to all the Veteran s present 21 The accompanying footnote proclaimed: Plaintiff affirmatively asserts that after February 28, 2012, for over a week, he suffered serious depression, anxiety and insomnia as he did on February 28, 1994, when the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) and Inspector General (IG) military related matters were official noticed upon the command. Plaintiff has been down this road before with the military and barred judicial redress due to the Feres doctrine. Ironically, it s the Feres doctrine mandate for which the Plaintiff raises with this honorable court for expedited hearing and temporary injunction against Defendants for medical negligence. 19

20 medical concerns and conditions. As such, the PTSD the Veteran was suffering at the time of his involuntary-honorable discharge has now developed into CPTSD due to DVA neglect and malpractice and all tolled as direct and proximate result of the February 28, 2012, Troyon-Incident and of course, all subsequent Obama-DVA command, legal and medical abuses being advanced by all other defendants to include Defendant-DOJ Wilson. The Executive Branch misconduct in this case mirrors the very same human and civil rights abuses that are the direct and proximate cause of the Veteran s acquired psychological disorders to include PTSD giving rise due to the criminal and malicious abuse of the Clinton Navy Department in destroying the Veteran s honor, integrity and character by unlawful orders for mental health examinations to cover up the corruption he reported on behalf of his subordinates on February 7, 1993 and in the public trust as his military oath of office mandated. 7. The Plaintiff now believes with this substantive introduction of the facts, circumstances and overview of the totality of his U.S. Armed Forces and Defendant DVA records he has answered the Obama-DOJ question What did you say? (DE 36 p. 7); in preparing to present his claims and request for damages in this amended complaint to receive Cushman & Deasy-Relief and to obtain all lawful entitlements under the Feres Doctrine Mandate to remedy all Clinton-DVA obstructions that has led to the Veteran to suffer 20 ½ years of CPTSD now being covered up by Obama-DOJ with taxpayers money leading to the Feres Doctrine Mandate federal question challenges and newly developing public trust questions whether it s in the country s best interest for the DOJ to cover up corruption in the DVA by engaging in criminal activity by falsification of public documents as DOJ-Wilson has achieved in this case. From the onset of this litigation and the initial reply of the DOJ on behalf of the Obama Administration and its DVA; these publically funded lawyers have attacked the Veteran s crystal clear claims of physician assistant malpractice and subsequent claims of neglect, abandonment, and official misconduct vis-à-vis the very same pattern of abuses the Veteran suffered under the Clinton Navy Department by falsification of his official records and false claims of drug abuse and addiction to coverup all malpractice matters he argues are actionable, dating back to January 14, 1994, under the equitable tolling doctrine. The DOJ has attacked the Veteran by proclaiming false addiction claims and even went 20

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE

Department of Defense DIRECTIVE Department of Defense DIRECTIVE NUMBER 7050.06 April 17, 2015 IG DoD SUBJECT: Military Whistleblower Protection References: See Enclosure 1 1. PURPOSE. This directive reissues DoD Directive (DoDD) 7050.06

More information

Introduction (916) 653-0799 (800) 952-5665.

Introduction (916) 653-0799 (800) 952-5665. Introduction On January 1, 2000, California's Whistleblower Protection Act (WPA) (Government Code sections 8547 et seq.) was significantly amended. The Legislature amended this law to strengthen protections

More information

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case :-cv-00-loa Document Filed 0// Page of 0 Bradley Jardis, vs. Keith M. Knowlton, L.L.C. SBN 0 S. Rural Road, Suite 0, PMB# Tempe, Arizona -00 (0 -; FAX (0 - Keith M. Knowlton - SBN 0 Attorney for Plaintiff

More information

Compliance Plan False Claims Act & Whistleblower Provisions Purpose/Policy/Procedures

Compliance Plan False Claims Act & Whistleblower Provisions Purpose/Policy/Procedures CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF SYRACUSE, NY and TOOMEY RESIDENTIAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICES Compliance Plan False Claims Act & Whistleblower Provisions Purpose/Policy/Procedures Purpose:

More information

ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY SECTION: CORPORATE COMPLIANCE Revised Date: 2/26/15 TITLE: FALSE CLAIMS ACT & WHISTLEBLOWER PROVISIONS

ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY SECTION: CORPORATE COMPLIANCE Revised Date: 2/26/15 TITLE: FALSE CLAIMS ACT & WHISTLEBLOWER PROVISIONS Corporate Compliance Plan AD-819-0 Reporting of Compliance Concerns & Non-retaliation AD-807-0 Compliance Training Policy CFC ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY AD-819-1 SECTION: CORPORATE COMPLIANCE Revised Date:

More information

HERITAGE FARM POLICY AND PROCEDURES. Policy: False Claims Act and Whistleblower Provisions

HERITAGE FARM POLICY AND PROCEDURES. Policy: False Claims Act and Whistleblower Provisions HERITAGE FARM POLICY AND PROCEDURES Policy: False Claims Act and Whistleblower Provisions Date: October 8, 2013 Rationale: It is Heritage Farm s intent to make sure all claims are submitted in a timely

More information

Title: Preventing and Reporting Fraud, Waste and Abuse in Federal Health Care Programs. Area Manual: Corporate Compliance Page: Page 1 of 10

Title: Preventing and Reporting Fraud, Waste and Abuse in Federal Health Care Programs. Area Manual: Corporate Compliance Page: Page 1 of 10 Title: Preventing and Reporting Fraud, Waste and Abuse in Federal Health Care Programs Area Manual: Corporate Compliance Page: Page 1 of 10 Reference Number: I-70 Effective Date: 10/02 Contact Person:

More information

VA CHARACTER OF DISCHARGE REVIEW: AN ALTERNATIVE TO A DISCHARGE UPGRADE

VA CHARACTER OF DISCHARGE REVIEW: AN ALTERNATIVE TO A DISCHARGE UPGRADE VA CHARACTER OF DISCHARGE REVIEW: AN ALTERNATIVE TO A DISCHARGE UPGRADE Some veterans are able to access VA benefits immediately. People with Honorable and General discharges are typically able to access

More information

Policy and Procedure: Corporate Compliance Topic: False Claims Act and Whistleblower Provisions, Deficit Reduction Act

Policy and Procedure: Corporate Compliance Topic: False Claims Act and Whistleblower Provisions, Deficit Reduction Act Policy and Procedure: Corporate Compliance Topic: False Claims Act and Whistleblower Provisions, Deficit Reduction Act SCOPE OF POLICY This policy applies to all CFS employees, including trainees, volunteers,

More information

Case 3:14-cv-00671-HU Document 1 Filed 04/23/14 Page 1 of 12 Page ID#: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Case 3:14-cv-00671-HU Document 1 Filed 04/23/14 Page 1 of 12 Page ID#: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON Case 3:14-cv-00671-HU Document 1 Filed 04/23/14 Page 1 of 12 Page ID#: 1 OSB#013943 sean.riddell@live.com Attorney At Law 4411 NE Tillamook St Portland, OR 97140 971-219-8453 Attorney for Plaintiff IN

More information

Prevention of Fraud, Waste and Abuse

Prevention of Fraud, Waste and Abuse Procedure 1910 Responsible Office: Yale Medical Group Effective Date: 01/01/2007 Responsible Department: Administration Last Revision Date: 09/20/2013 Prevention of Fraud, Waste and Abuse Policy Statement...

More information

GLOSSARY OF SELECTED LEGAL TERMS

GLOSSARY OF SELECTED LEGAL TERMS GLOSSARY OF SELECTED LEGAL TERMS Sources: US Courts : http://www.uscourts.gov/library/glossary.html New York State Unified Court System: http://www.nycourts.gov/lawlibraries/glossary.shtml Acquittal A

More information

Please scroll down and continue reading for my response to the government s motion that I be examined by a government expert

Please scroll down and continue reading for my response to the government s motion that I be examined by a government expert My detractors on the internet, of which I have many, largely made up of tax lawyers who try to discredit me because I represent a threat their livelihood, and certain people whose ideas on the income tax

More information

2013 IL App (3d) 120130-U. Order filed September 23, 2013 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS THIRD DISTRICT A.D., 2013

2013 IL App (3d) 120130-U. Order filed September 23, 2013 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS THIRD DISTRICT A.D., 2013 NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances allowed under Rule 23(e)(1). 2013 IL App (3d) 120130-U Order

More information

COUNTY OF ORANGE. False Claims Act and Whistleblower Provisions Policy and Procedures

COUNTY OF ORANGE. False Claims Act and Whistleblower Provisions Policy and Procedures COUNTY OF ORANGE False Claims Act and Whistleblower Provisions Policy and Procedures COUNTY OF ORANGE FALSE CLAIMS ACT AND WHISTLEBLOWER PROVISIONS POLICY AND PROCEDURES I. Purpose. The County of Orange

More information

PRACTICAL ADVICE ON THE MOST EFFECTIVE WAY TO SETTLE YOUR CASE WITH THE GOVERNMENT

PRACTICAL ADVICE ON THE MOST EFFECTIVE WAY TO SETTLE YOUR CASE WITH THE GOVERNMENT PRACTICAL ADVICE ON THE MOST EFFECTIVE WAY TO SETTLE YOUR CASE WITH THE GOVERNMENT This article is collaboration between the panel moderator Brian J. Alexander and panel participants, Richard Saltsman,

More information

Case: 1:16-cv-00951 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/22/16 Page 1 of 18 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Case: 1:16-cv-00951 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/22/16 Page 1 of 18 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION Case: 1:16-cv-00951 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/22/16 Page 1 of 18 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PAMELA ANDERSON, Individually and ) as Independent

More information

Case 8:13-cv-01731-VMC-TBM Document 36 Filed 03/17/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID 134 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Case 8:13-cv-01731-VMC-TBM Document 36 Filed 03/17/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID 134 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION Case 8:13-cv-01731-VMC-TBM Document 36 Filed 03/17/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID 134 JOHN and JOANNA ROBERTS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 8:13-cv-1731-T-33TBM

More information

NASD REGULATION, INC. OFFICE OF HEARING OFFICERS. : No. C11970032 v. : : Hearing Officer - SW : : Respondent. :

NASD REGULATION, INC. OFFICE OF HEARING OFFICERS. : No. C11970032 v. : : Hearing Officer - SW : : Respondent. : NASD REGULATION, INC. OFFICE OF HEARING OFFICERS : DEPARTMENT OF ENFORCEMENT, : : Complainant, : Disciplinary Proceeding : No. C11970032 v. : : Hearing Officer - SW : : Respondent. : : ORDER GRANTING MOTION

More information

Policies and Procedures: WVUPC Policy Pursuant to the Requirements of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005

Policies and Procedures: WVUPC Policy Pursuant to the Requirements of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 POLICY/PROCEDURE NO.: B-17 Effective date: Jan. 1, 2007 Date(s) of review/revision: Nov. 1, 2015 Policies and Procedures: WVUPC Policy Pursuant to the Requirements of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005

More information

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division PUBLISHED UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division IN RE: WILLIAM G. DADE ) Case No. 00-32487 ANN E. DADE ) Chapter 7 Debtors. ) ) ) DEBORAH R. JOHNSON ) Adversary

More information

ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY MANUAL

ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY MANUAL SUPERSEDES: New PAGE: 838.00 POLICY: 1. It is the policy of Onondaga County hereinafter referred to as the County, to comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations, both civil

More information

Case 5:14-cv-00590-OLG Document 9 Filed 07/31/14 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION

Case 5:14-cv-00590-OLG Document 9 Filed 07/31/14 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION Case 5:14-cv-00590-OLG Document 9 Filed 07/31/14 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION DESTINY ANNMARIE RIOS Plaintiff VS. CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:14-cv-00590

More information

NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital Sites: All Centers Hospital Policy and Procedure Manual Number: D160 Page 1 of 9

NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital Sites: All Centers Hospital Policy and Procedure Manual Number: D160 Page 1 of 9 Page 1 of 9 TITLE: FEDERAL DEFICIT REDUCTION ACT OF 2005 FRAUD AND ABUSE PROVISIONS POLICY: NewYork- Presbyterian Hospital (NYP or the Hospital) is committed to preventing and detecting any fraud, waste,

More information

Fraud, Waste and Abuse Prevention and Education Policy

Fraud, Waste and Abuse Prevention and Education Policy Corporate Compliance Fraud, Waste and Abuse Prevention and Education Policy The Compliance Program at the Cortland Regional Medical Center (CRMC) demonstrates our commitment to uphold all federal and state

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA BROWARD DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No.: COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA BROWARD DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No.: COMPLAINT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA BROWARD DIVISION NANCY PRITCHARD, v. Plaintiff, Case No.: KAPLAN HIGHER EDUCATION CORPORATION; KAPLAN HIGHER EDUCATION CORPORATION, as PLAN ADMINISTRATOR;

More information

CALIFORNIA FALSE CLAIMS ACT GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 12650-12656

CALIFORNIA FALSE CLAIMS ACT GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 12650-12656 CALIFORNIA FALSE CLAIMS ACT GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 12650-12656 12650. (a) This article shall be known and may be cited as the False Claims Act. (b) For purposes of this article: (1) "Claim" includes any

More information

Broward County False Claims Ordinance. (a) This article shall be known and may be cited as the Broward County False Claims Ordinance.

Broward County False Claims Ordinance. (a) This article shall be known and may be cited as the Broward County False Claims Ordinance. Broward County False Claims Ordinance Sec. 1-276. - Short title; purpose. (a) This article shall be known and may be cited as the Broward County False Claims Ordinance. (b) The purpose of the Broward County

More information

MONTEFIORE HEALTH SYSTEM ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY AND PROCEDURE SUBJECT: SUMMARY OF FEDERAL AND STATE NUMBER: JC31.1 FALSE CLAIMS LAWS

MONTEFIORE HEALTH SYSTEM ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY AND PROCEDURE SUBJECT: SUMMARY OF FEDERAL AND STATE NUMBER: JC31.1 FALSE CLAIMS LAWS MONTEFIORE HEALTH SYSTEM ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY AND PROCEDURE SUBJECT: SUMMARY OF FEDERAL AND STATE NUMBER: JC31.1 FALSE CLAIMS LAWS OWNER: DEPARTMENT OF COMPLIANCE EFFECTIVE: REVIEW/REVISED: SUPERCEDES:

More information

North Shore LIJ Health System, Inc.

North Shore LIJ Health System, Inc. North Shore LIJ Health System, Inc. POLICY TITLE: Detecting and Preventing Fraud, Waste, Abuse and Misconduct POLICY #: 800.09 System Approval Date: 6/23/14 Site Implementation Date: Prepared by: Office

More information

Metropolitan Jewish Health System and its Participating Agencies and Programs [MJHS]

Metropolitan Jewish Health System and its Participating Agencies and Programs [MJHS] Metropolitan Jewish Health System and its Participating Agencies and Programs [MJHS] POLICY PURSUANT TO THE FEDERAL DEFICIT REDUCTION ACT OF 2005: Detection and Prevention of Fraud, Waste, and Abuse and

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON Portland Division. V. CRYSTAL COX, Pro Se Defendant

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON Portland Division. V. CRYSTAL COX, Pro Se Defendant Crystal L. Cox Attorney Pro Se UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON Portland Division OBSIDIAN FINANCE GROUP, LLC and KEVIN D. PADRICK, Plaintiffs, V. CRYSTAL COX, Pro Se Defendant Objection

More information

VILLAGECARE CORPORATE COMPLIANCE POLICY AND PROCEDURE MANUAL ORIGINAL EFFECTIVE DATE: JANUARY 1, 2007

VILLAGECARE CORPORATE COMPLIANCE POLICY AND PROCEDURE MANUAL ORIGINAL EFFECTIVE DATE: JANUARY 1, 2007 VILLAGECARE CORPORATE COMPLIANCE POLICY AND PROCEDURE MANUAL SUBJECT: COMPLIANCE WITH FEDERAL AND STATE FALSE CLAIMS LAWS AND DETECTION AND PREVENTION OF FRAUD, WASTE AND ABUSE LAST POLICY REVISION EFFECTIVE

More information

NC General Statutes - Chapter 1 Article 51 1

NC General Statutes - Chapter 1 Article 51 1 Article 51. False Claims Act. 1-605. Short title; purpose. (a) This Article shall be known and may be cited as the False Claims Act. (b) The purpose of this Article is to deter persons from knowingly causing

More information

ERISA Causes of Action *

ERISA Causes of Action * 1 ERISA Causes of Action * ERISA authorizes a variety of causes of action to remedy violations of the statute, to enforce the terms of a benefit plan, or to provide other relief to a plan, its participants

More information

METHODIST HEALTH SYSTEM ADMINISTRATIVE TITLE: DETECTING FRAUD AND ABUSE AND AN OVERVIEW OF THE FEDERAL AND STATE FALSE CLAIMS ACTS

METHODIST HEALTH SYSTEM ADMINISTRATIVE TITLE: DETECTING FRAUD AND ABUSE AND AN OVERVIEW OF THE FEDERAL AND STATE FALSE CLAIMS ACTS METHODIST HEALTH SYSTEM ADMINISTRATIVE Formulated: 6/19/07 Reviewed: Revised: Effective: 10/30/07 TITLE: DETECTING FRAUD AND ABUSE AND AN OVERVIEW OF THE FEDERAL AND STATE FALSE CLAIMS ACTS PURPOSE: Methodist

More information

Tuesday 18th November, 2008.

Tuesday 18th November, 2008. Tuesday 18th November, 2008. On March 19, 2008 came the Virginia Board of Bar Examiners, by W. Scott Street, III, its Secretary-Treasurer, and presented to the Court a petition, approved by the Virginia

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MEMORANDUM. BUCKWALTER, J. May 8, 2002

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MEMORANDUM. BUCKWALTER, J. May 8, 2002 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION v. NO. 01-0272 M. ROBERT ULLMAN, Defendant. MEMORANDUM BUCKWALTER, J. May

More information

Queensland WHISTLEBLOWERS PROTECTION ACT 1994

Queensland WHISTLEBLOWERS PROTECTION ACT 1994 Queensland WHISTLEBLOWERS PROTECTION ACT 1994 Act No. 68 of 1994 Queensland WHISTLEBLOWERS PROTECTION ACT 1994 Section PART 1 PRELIMINARY TABLE OF PROVISIONS Division 1 Title and commencement Page 1 Short

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 99,491. KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Appellant, JILL POWELL, Appellee. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 99,491. KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Appellant, JILL POWELL, Appellee. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 99,491 KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Appellant, v. JILL POWELL, Appellee. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. Under the Kansas Act for Judicial Review and Civil Enforcement

More information

BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT PANEL B FINDINGS AND ORDER

BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT PANEL B FINDINGS AND ORDER BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT PANEL B IN RE: JAMES WARREN STANLEY ARKANSAS BAR ID No. 75124 CPC Docket No. 2015-021 FINDINGS AND ORDER James Warren Stanley is an attorney from

More information

Accountability Report Card Summary 2013 Pennsylvania

Accountability Report Card Summary 2013 Pennsylvania Accountability Report Card Summary 2013 Pennsylvania Pennsylvania has a passable state whistleblower law: Scoring 61 out of a possible 100; Ranking 17 th out of 51 (50 states and the District of Columbia).

More information

DISCHARGE UPGRADE MANUAL

DISCHARGE UPGRADE MANUAL DISCHARGE UPGRADE MANUAL Produced by the Justice for Veterans Campaign 1405 Montopolis Dr. Austin, Texas 78741 Using a question and answer format, this Discharge Upgrade Manual (the Manual ) is intended

More information

A summary of administrative remedies found in the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act

A summary of administrative remedies found in the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act BLACK HILLS SPECIAL SERVICES COOPERATIVE'S POLICY TO PROVIDE EDUCATION CONCERNING FALSE CLAIMS LIABILITY, ANTI-RETALIATION PROTECTIONS FOR REPORTING WRONGDOING AND DETECTING AND PREVENTING FRAUD, WASTE

More information

SMALL CLAIMS RULES. (d) Record of Proceedings. A record shall be made of all small claims court proceedings.

SMALL CLAIMS RULES. (d) Record of Proceedings. A record shall be made of all small claims court proceedings. SMALL CLAIMS RULES Rule 501. Scope and Purpose (a) How Known and Cited. These rules for the small claims division for the county court are additions to C.R.C.P. and shall be known and cited as the Colorado

More information

EDUCATION ABOUT FALSE CLAIMS RECOVERY

EDUCATION ABOUT FALSE CLAIMS RECOVERY Type: MGI Corporate Policy Number: M 700 Effective Date: June 2014 Supersedes: AP 201, 4/12 Revised: 6/14 EDUCATION ABOUT FALSE CLAIMS RECOVERY I. PURPOSE This policy is intended to ensure compliance with

More information

CHAMPAIGN COUNTY NURSING HOME SUMMARY OF ANTI-FRAUD AND ABUSE POLICIES

CHAMPAIGN COUNTY NURSING HOME SUMMARY OF ANTI-FRAUD AND ABUSE POLICIES 1. PURPOSE CHAMPAIGN COUNTY NURSING HOME SUMMARY OF ANTI-FRAUD AND ABUSE POLICIES Champaign County Nursing Home ( CCNH ) has established anti-fraud and abuse policies to prevent fraud, waste, and abuse

More information

CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA. ANSWER ) Defendant. ) )

CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA. ANSWER ) Defendant. ) ) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ANS (NAME) (ADDRESS) (CITY, STATE, ZIP) (TELEPHONE) Defendant Pro Se DISTRICT COURT CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA ) ) Case No.: Plaintiff,

More information

P.O. Box 11615, Eugene, OR 97440 Tel: (541) 484-2692 Fax: (541) 484-3004 Email: andys@fseee.org

P.O. Box 11615, Eugene, OR 97440 Tel: (541) 484-2692 Fax: (541) 484-3004 Email: andys@fseee.org P.O. Box 11615, Eugene, OR 97440 Tel: (541) 484-2692 Fax: (541) 484-3004 Email: andys@fseee.org October 6, 2010 Liz Brown, Attorney U.S. Office of Special Counsel 1301 Clay Street, Suite 1220N Oakland,

More information

The Federal False Claims Act: An Opportunity for Justice. By C. Dean Furman 2006

The Federal False Claims Act: An Opportunity for Justice. By C. Dean Furman 2006 The Federal False Claims Act: An Opportunity for Justice By C. Dean Furman 2006 Using a rarely invoked federal statute, the False Claims Act, attorneys can help our clients be private attorney generals,

More information

HP0868, LD 1187, item 1, 123rd Maine State Legislature An Act To Recoup Health Care Funds through the Maine False Claims Act

HP0868, LD 1187, item 1, 123rd Maine State Legislature An Act To Recoup Health Care Funds through the Maine False Claims Act PLEASE NOTE: Legislative Information cannot perform research, provide legal advice, or interpret Maine law. For legal assistance, please contact a qualified attorney. Be it enacted by the People of the

More information

VNSNY CORPORATE. DRA Policy

VNSNY CORPORATE. DRA Policy VNSNY CORPORATE DRA Policy TITLE: FEDERAL DEFICIT REDUCTION ACT OF 2005: POLICY REGARDING THE DETECTION & PREVENTION OF FRAUD, WASTE AND ABUSE AND APPLICABLE FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS APPLIES TO: VNSNY ENTITIES

More information

Corporate Counsel Beware: Limits Of 'No Contact Rule'

Corporate Counsel Beware: Limits Of 'No Contact Rule' Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com Corporate Counsel Beware: Limits Of 'No Contact Rule'

More information

FEDERAL & NEW YORK STATUTES RELATING TO FILING FALSE CLAIMS

FEDERAL & NEW YORK STATUTES RELATING TO FILING FALSE CLAIMS FEDERAL & NEW YORK STATUTES RELATING TO FILING FALSE CLAIMS I. FEDERAL LAWS False Claims Act (31 USC 3729-3733) The False Claims Act ("FCA") provides, in pertinent part, that: (a) Any person who (1) knowingly

More information

INVESTIGATIONS GONE WILD: Potential Claims By Employees

INVESTIGATIONS GONE WILD: Potential Claims By Employees INTRODUCTION INVESTIGATIONS GONE WILD: Potential Claims By Employees By: Maureen S. Binetti, Esq. Christopher R. Binetti, Paralegal Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, P.A. When can the investigation which may

More information

HACKENSACK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER Administrative Policy Manual

HACKENSACK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER Administrative Policy Manual HACKENSACK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER Administrative Policy Manual Fraud and Abuse Prevention DRA Compliance Policy #: 1521 Original Issue: December, 2007 Page 1 of 6 Policy It is the policy of Hackensack

More information

PITTSBURGH CARE PARTNERSHIP, INC. COMMUNITY LIFE PROGRAM POLICY AND PROCEDURE MANUAL. False Claims Act Explanation and Reporting Requirements

PITTSBURGH CARE PARTNERSHIP, INC. COMMUNITY LIFE PROGRAM POLICY AND PROCEDURE MANUAL. False Claims Act Explanation and Reporting Requirements SUBJECT: False Claims Act Explanation and Reporting Requirements NUMBER: 1004 CROSS REFERENCE NUMBER: 1823 REG. REF.: 31 U.S.C. 37-29 PURPOSE: POLICY: The purposes of this policy are to describe the Federal

More information

IN COURT OF APPEALS. DECISION DATED AND FILED July 14, 2015. Appeal No. 2014AP1151 DISTRICT I MICHAEL L. ROBINSON, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

IN COURT OF APPEALS. DECISION DATED AND FILED July 14, 2015. Appeal No. 2014AP1151 DISTRICT I MICHAEL L. ROBINSON, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 14, 2015 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appeals NOTICE This opinion is subject to further editing. If published, the official version will appear in the

More information

What to Do When Your Witness Testimony Doesn t Match His or Her Declaration

What to Do When Your Witness Testimony Doesn t Match His or Her Declaration What to Do When Your Witness Testimony Doesn t Match His or Her Declaration Russell R. Yurk Jennings, Haug & Cunningham, L.L.P. 2800 N. Central Avenue, Suite 1800 Phoenix, AZ 85004-1049 (602) 234-7819

More information

No. 04-3753 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. 427 F.3d 1048; 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 22999

No. 04-3753 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. 427 F.3d 1048; 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 22999 RONALD WARRUM, in his capacity as Personal Representative of the Estate of JOSEPH F. SAYYAH, Deceased, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee. No. 04-3753 UNITED STATES COURT

More information

AN ACT IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

AN ACT IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AN ACT IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA To amend the District of Columbia Procurement Practices Act of 1985 to make the District s false claims act consistent with federal law and thereby qualify

More information

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit RONNIE LAWSON, Claimant-Appellant, v. ERIC K. SHINSEKI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent-Appellee.

More information

Cardinal McCloskey Services Corporate Compliance False Claims Act and Whistleblower Provisions

Cardinal McCloskey Services Corporate Compliance False Claims Act and Whistleblower Provisions Cardinal McCloskey Services Corporate Compliance False Claims Act and Whistleblower Provisions Purpose: Cardinal McCloskey Services is committed to prompt, complete and accurate billing of all services

More information

Case 1:15-cv-00553 Document 1 Filed 04/14/15 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:15-cv-00553 Document 1 Filed 04/14/15 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Case 1:15-cv-00553 Document 1 Filed 04/14/15 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE 1899 L Street, NW, 12 th Floor Washington, DC 20036 Plaintiff,

More information

HB 2845. Introduced by Representative Patterson AN ACT

HB 2845. Introduced by Representative Patterson AN ACT REFERENCE TITLE: state false claims actions State of Arizona House of Representatives Fiftieth Legislature Second Regular Session HB Introduced by Representative Patterson AN ACT AMENDING TITLE, ARIZONA

More information

Accountability Report Card Summary 2013 New Mexico

Accountability Report Card Summary 2013 New Mexico Accountability Report Card Summary 2013 New Mexico New Mexico has a pretty strong state whistleblower law: Scoring 72 out of a possible 100 points; Ranking 4 th out of 51 (50 states and the District of

More information

Law Enforcement Officers Bill of Rights. Sections 112.532-534, F.S. 112.532 Law enforcement officers' and correctional officers' rights.

Law Enforcement Officers Bill of Rights. Sections 112.532-534, F.S. 112.532 Law enforcement officers' and correctional officers' rights. Law Enforcement Officers Bill of Rights Sections 112.532-534, F.S. 112.532 Law enforcement officers' and correctional officers' rights.-- All law enforcement officers and correctional officers employed

More information

Title XLV TORTS. Chapter 768 NEGLIGENCE. View Entire Chapter

Title XLV TORTS. Chapter 768 NEGLIGENCE. View Entire Chapter Title XLV TORTS Chapter 768 NEGLIGENCE View Entire Chapter 768.28 Waiver of sovereign immunity in tort actions; recovery limits; limitation on attorney fees; statute of limitations; exclusions; indemnification;

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Case: 13-20206 Document: 00512651962 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/04/2014 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS United States Court of Appeals FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Fifth Circuit FILED June 4, 2014 UNITED STATES

More information

The False Claims Act: A Primer

The False Claims Act: A Primer The False Claims Act: A Primer The False Claims Act (FCA), 31 U.S.C. 3729-3733 was enacted in 1863 by a Congress concerned that suppliers of goods to the Union Army during the Civil War were defrauding

More information

United States Court of Appeals

United States Court of Appeals In the United States Court of Appeals No. 13-1186 For the Seventh Circuit IN RE: JAMES G. HERMAN, Debtor-Appellee. APPEAL OF: JOHN P. MILLER Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern

More information

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Compliance Program and False Claims Recovery

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Compliance Program and False Claims Recovery EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Compliance Program and False Claims Recovery INTRODUCTION: The Federal Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, also known as the DRA, requires that providers give their employees, medical staff,

More information

ONE MAN S FIGHT AGAINST CORRUPTION IN LAS VEGAS, NEVADA

ONE MAN S FIGHT AGAINST CORRUPTION IN LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 1 2 ONE MAN S FIGHT AGAINST CORRUPTION IN LAS VEGAS, NEVADA The Series Episode Eight CORRUPTION IN THE OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA FRAUDULENT MISSION STATEMENT TO NEVADA S SENIORS:

More information

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597 AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY APRIL 14, 2015 california legislature 2015 16 regular session ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597 Introduced by Assembly Member Cooley February 24, 2015 An act to amend Sections 36 and 877 of, and

More information

SOUTH NASSAU COMMUNITIES HOSPITAL One Healthy Way, Oceanside, NY 11572

SOUTH NASSAU COMMUNITIES HOSPITAL One Healthy Way, Oceanside, NY 11572 SOUTH NASSAU COMMUNITIES HOSPITAL One Healthy Way, Oceanside, NY 11572 POLICY TITLE: Compliance with Applicable Federal and State False Claims Acts POLICY NUMBER: OF-ADM-232 DEPARTMENT: Hospital-wide CROSS-REFERENCE:

More information

A Bill Regular Session, 2015 SENATE BILL 830

A Bill Regular Session, 2015 SENATE BILL 830 Stricken language would be deleted from and underlined language would be added to present law. State of Arkansas 90th General Assembly A Bill Regular Session, 2015 SENATE BILL 830 By: Senator D. Sanders

More information

United States Court of Appeals

United States Court of Appeals In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 14 1449 BASHIR SHEIKH, Plaintiff Appellant, v. GRANT REGIONAL HEALTH CENTER, Defendant Appellee. Appeal from the United States District

More information

False Claims Act Policy 650-117 Effective Date 01/01/2007 Compliance Manual

False Claims Act Policy 650-117 Effective Date 01/01/2007 Compliance Manual False Claims Act Policy 650-117 POLICY Monroe County Healthcare Authority is committed to the highest possible standards of ethical, moral and legal business conduct. Prevention of health care fraud, waste

More information

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE WEIH STEVE CHANG, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. N15C-10-100 EMD ) JENNIFER L. MAYO, ) ) Defendant. ) Submitted: June 6, 2016 Decided: June 28,

More information

WikiLeaks Document Release

WikiLeaks Document Release WikiLeaks Document Release February 2, 2009 Congressional Research Service Report RS20519 ASBESTOS COMPENSATION ACT OF 2000 Henry Cohen, American Law Division Updated April 13, 2000 Abstract. This report

More information

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF RECEIPT OF WESTERN DENTAL S NOTICE OF PRIVACY PRACTICE

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF RECEIPT OF WESTERN DENTAL S NOTICE OF PRIVACY PRACTICE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF RECEIPT OF WESTERN DENTAL S NOTICE OF PRIVACY PRACTICE By signing this document, I acknowledge that I have received a copy of Western Dental s Joint Notice of Privacy Practices. Name

More information

Case5:15-cv-03698-HRL Document1 Filed08/12/15 Page1 of 10

Case5:15-cv-03698-HRL Document1 Filed08/12/15 Page1 of 10 Case:-cv-0-HRL Document Filed0// Page of 0 Donald E. J. Kilmer, Jr. [SBN: ] LAW OFFICES OF DONALD KILMER Willow Street, Suite 0 San Jose, California Voice: (0) - Fax: (0) - E-Mail: Don@DKLawOffice.com

More information

5037 Employee Education About False Claims Recovery 5037. The purpose of this policy is to educate employees, contractors, and agents on

5037 Employee Education About False Claims Recovery 5037. The purpose of this policy is to educate employees, contractors, and agents on 5037 Employee Education About False Claims Recovery 5037 The purpose of this policy is to educate employees, contractors, and agents on the requirements of the Deficit Reduction Act (DRA) of 2005 which

More information

STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OFMICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, v. Case No. Hon. Magistrate Judge UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,

STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OFMICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, v. Case No. Hon. Magistrate Judge UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, 2:13-cv-12939-PJD-MJH Doc # 1 Filed 07/06/13 Pg 1 of 11 Pg ID 1 DETROIT FREE PRESS, a Michigan corporation, STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OFMICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION Plaintiff, v. Case No. Hon.

More information

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit YVONNE MURPHY HICKMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee 2015-5134 Appeal from the

More information

PREVIEW PLEASE DO NOT COPY THIS DOCUMENT THANK YOU. LegalFormsForTexas.Com

PREVIEW PLEASE DO NOT COPY THIS DOCUMENT THANK YOU. LegalFormsForTexas.Com Form: Plaintiff's original petition-wrongful Death [Name], PLAINTIFF vs. [Name], DEFENDANT [ IN THE [Type of Court] COURT [Court number] PLAINTIFF'S ORIGINAL PETITION 1. DISCOVERY CONTROL PLAN 1.1 Plaintiff

More information

51ST LEGISLATURE - STATE OF NEW MEXICO - FIRST SESSION, 2013

51ST LEGISLATURE - STATE OF NEW MEXICO - FIRST SESSION, 2013 SENATE BILL 1ST LEGISLATURE - STATE OF NEW MEXICO - FIRST SESSION, INTRODUCED BY Joseph Cervantes 1 ENDORSED BY THE COURTS, CORRECTIONS AND JUSTICE COMMITTEE AN ACT RELATING TO CIVIL ACTIONS; CLARIFYING

More information

HEALTH OCCUPATIONS TITLE 19. SOCIAL WORKERS SUBTITLE 3. LICENSING

HEALTH OCCUPATIONS TITLE 19. SOCIAL WORKERS SUBTITLE 3. LICENSING HEALTH OCCUPATIONS TITLE 19. SOCIAL WORKERS SUBTITLE 3. LICENSING 19-301. License required; exceptions; practice without license (a) In general. -- Except as otherwise provided in this title, an individual

More information

Summary: The Organization directs its activities in full compliance with Federal, State and Local laws and regulations.

Summary: The Organization directs its activities in full compliance with Federal, State and Local laws and regulations. Sunrise Community, Inc. and Affiliates, the Organization, shall comply with Section 6032 of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005. The Whistleblower Protection Policy is designed to encourage and enable directors,

More information

INDIANA FALSE CLAIMS AND WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION ACT. IC 5-11-5.5 Chapter 5.5. False Claims and Whistleblower Protection

INDIANA FALSE CLAIMS AND WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION ACT. IC 5-11-5.5 Chapter 5.5. False Claims and Whistleblower Protection As amended by P.L.79-2007. INDIANA FALSE CLAIMS AND WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION ACT IC 5-11-5.5 Chapter 5.5. False Claims and Whistleblower Protection IC 5-11-5.5-1 Definitions Sec. 1. The following definitions

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA M E M O R A N D U M A N D O R D E R

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA M E M O R A N D U M A N D O R D E R IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CLEOPATRA MCDOUGAL-SADDLER : CIVIL ACTION : vs. : : ALEXIS M. HERMAN, SECRETARY, : NO. 97-1908 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR : M

More information

Top Ten Organizational Commitments Needed to Make IGO Whistleblower Protection Policies Effective 1

Top Ten Organizational Commitments Needed to Make IGO Whistleblower Protection Policies Effective 1 1612 K Street Suite 1100 Washington, DC, USA 20006 202-408-0034 fax: 202-408-9855 Website: www.whistleblower.org Top Ten Organizational Commitments Needed to Make IGO Whistleblower Protection Policies

More information

Securities Whistleblower Incentives and Protection

Securities Whistleblower Incentives and Protection Securities Whistleblower Incentives and Protection 15 USC 78u-6 (As added by P.L. 111-203.) 15 USC 78u-6 78u-6. Securities whistleblower incentives and protection (a) Definitions. In this section the following

More information

Subtitle B Increasing Regulatory Enforcement and Remedies

Subtitle B Increasing Regulatory Enforcement and Remedies H. R. 4173 466 activities and evaluates the effectiveness of the Ombudsman during the preceding year. The Investor Advocate shall include the reports required under this section in the reports required

More information

Compliance with False Claims Act

Compliance with False Claims Act MH Policy and Procedure Document Number: MH-COMPLY-001 Document Owner: Corporate Compliance Officer Date Last Author: Corporate Compliance Officer General Description Purpose: To establish written guidelines

More information

case 2:09-cv-00201-WCL-APR document 19 filed 10/26/09 page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION

case 2:09-cv-00201-WCL-APR document 19 filed 10/26/09 page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION case 2:09-cv-00201-WCL-APR document 19 filed 10/26/09 page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION ANDRE CHEAIRS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Cause No.: 2:09-CV-201

More information

GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Department of Employment Services

GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Department of Employment Services GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Department of Employment Services VINCENT C. GRAY MAYOR LISA MARÍA MALLORY DIRECTOR COMPENSATION REVIEW BOARD CRB No. 12-042 DENISE CALLENS, Claimant Petitioner,

More information

Central LHIN Governance Manual. Title: Whistleblower Policy Policy Number: GP-003

Central LHIN Governance Manual. Title: Whistleblower Policy Policy Number: GP-003 Central LHIN Governance Manual Title: Whistleblower Policy Policy Number: GP-003 Purpose: Originated: September 25, 2012 Board Approved: September 25, 2012 To set out the LHIN s obligations under the Public

More information