Master Document Audit Program. Version 7.4, dated November 2006 B-1 Planning Considerations. Purpose and Scope
|
|
- Clifford Mathews
- 4 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Activity Code B-1 Planning Considerations Estimating System Survey (ICR) Purpose and Scope The major objectives of this audit are to: Evaluate the adequacy of and the contractor s compliance with the estimating system internal controls. Obtain a sufficient understanding of the contractor's estimating system and related internal control (including both manual and computerized activities) to plan the related audit effort. This requires that the auditor assess the adequacy of the contractor's policies and procedures, whether they have been implemented, and if they are working and being monitored effectively. Document the understanding of the estimating system internal controls in working papers and permanent files. Assess control risk as a basis to identify factors relevant to the design of substantive tests. Report on the understanding of the estimating system internal controls and assessment of control risk and the adequacy of the system for Government contracts. This audit is limited to the estimating system and related internal controls for major contractors, nonmajor contractors where the system is considered significant, and other contractors with substantial firm-fixed price contracts. Only those controls directly related to the contractor's estimating system, as defined below, will be audited under this assignment. Controls for interrelated audit concerns regarding the adequacy of the contractor's other major systems (i.e., labor, budget and planning, etc.) will be audited under separate assignments. While the controls for these areas are not part of this audit, the results of all audits of these interrelated controls must be considered in forming an overall audit conclusion on the estimating system internal controls. The results of this audit should be commented on in reports on related audit areas. When performing an update or follow-up examination, the audit steps should be adjusted and tailored accordingly. To the extent possible, prior audit effort should be used as a basis for validating the contractor's internal controls. Before beginning this examination, the auditor should be alert for internal control evaluations performed by the contractor or its external auditors relating to this audit area. In those cases where internal control evaluations have been performed, the auditor should 1 of 20
2 follow the guidance contained in CAM , Relying Upon the Work of Others. Before performing any examination of internal controls, the auditor should determine that the system contemplated for examination is material to the Government. Once it is determined that the system is material to the Government, the auditor should reassess the materiality of each section in the internal controls audit before performing any audit steps in that section. The scope of any audit depends on individual circumstances. The auditor is expected to exercise professional judgment, considering vulnerability and materiality, in deciding the scope of audit to be performed. The use of computers of all kinds in a contractor s accounting and management systems is so pervasive it is unlikely that any audit of them could be performed adequately without an examination of the internal controls over their automated aspects. Therefore, the auditor should become familiar with guidance contained in the Information System (IS) Auditing Knowledge Base that is found on DCAA s Intranet, prior to the beginning of this audit. In addition, in some instances, the assistance of IT specialists may be required to adequately evaluate the automated aspects of the internal controls. In these cases, auditors should coordinate, through their supervisory auditor, to contact their regional offices to obtain the necessary expertise. The internal control matrix (see Internal Control Matrix - Estimating System and Related Internal Controls) showing the interrelationships among the control objectives, example control activities, and audit procedures used in this audit program, is located in APPS under "Other Audit Guidance." The control objectives and the audit procedures have been fully integrated into this audit; therefore, the matrix is not needed unless it is desirable to see the associated example control activities and the interrelationships in a matrix format. The following Other Audit Guidance documents are available in APPS under Administrative Working Papers to assist the auditor in preparing the risk assessment, working papers, and letters, required for this audit. They should be tailored to fit the circumstances. EST - Announcement Ltr. to Contractor EST - Experience Info Worksheet - Bid Proposals EST - Experience Info Worksheet - Other EST - Interview Questionnaire EST - Notification Memo to ACO EST - Notification Memo to PCO References 1. CAM 3-300, Internal Control Audit Planning Summary (ICAPS) 2. CAM , Audit of Estimating System Internal Controls 3. CAM 9-303, Contractor Estimating Methods and Procedures-Cost Estimates 2 of 20
3 4. CAM , Audit Reports on Operations and Internal Control (System Audits) 5. DFARS , Estimating Systems B-1 Preliminary Steps W/P Reference 1. Research and Planning a. Become familiar with applicable sections of CAM , and any recent relevant Headquarters guidance not incorporated in the CAM located on the DCAA s intranet under DCAA Audit/Administrative Guidance. b. Perform the following steps using the permanent file: (1) Review prior estimating system audit working paper package. (2) Identify any flash estimating system reports issued (review ICRS database, as applicable). Document the results of (1) and (2) on W/P B-2. (3) Determine if there are any reported deficiencies in the other internal control system audits that impact the scope of this estimating system audit (review the ICRS database, as applicable). Document on W/P B-2. The results of the Control Environment and Overall Accounting Controls examination, if any, should also be evaluated and documented, in detail, under Control Environment, Section C-1, Step 1, of the W/Ps and under Information and Communications, Section E-1, Step 1. The results of the IT Systems General Internal Controls examination, if any, should also be evaluated and documented in detail under Information and Communications, Section E-1, Step 1. (4) Identify the sources for the detailed policies, procedures, charts, etc., called for in steps (a) through (d) below. Document the sources of data by listing the data, its source, and any changes since the last system audit. (a) Contractor s written estimating system policies and procedures. (b) Organization charts depicting the functional areas responsible for developing and processing estimating system related data. 3 of 20
4 (c) Estimating system flowcharts providing a pictorial overview of all manual and computerized processing steps. (d) Information systems documentation: (i) Pertinent record layouts of files created and/or used during the processing of estimating system related transactions. (ii) Database table definitions. (iii)source documents. (iv)information on the conversion of documents to computer media. (v) Subsidiary or master files affected by the system. (vi)relevant reports, journals, and ledgers produced in the flow of information to the estimating system reports. (5) Review audit lead sheets. (6) Review other related audits, for example: (a) Review bid proposals (or comparable assignment log) and summarize the findings in pricing proposal activity. Complete EST - Experience Info Worksheet Bid Proposals, if applicable. (b) Review and summarize the impact of noted defective pricing, suspected irregular conduct (SIC), and related CAS noncompliances. Complete EST - Experience Info Worksheet Other, if applicable. (c) Review files containing telephone requests for specific information and determine if there were any inconsistent estimating practices noted that impact the scope of this audit. (7) Consider the impact of the contractor s financial condition on the estimating system. (Refer to prior financial capability risk assessment or audits Code 176XX). 4 of 20
5 c. In planning and performing the examination, consider the fraud risk indicators specific to the audit. The principal sources for the applicable fraud risk indicators are: Handbook on Fraud Indicators for Contract Auditors, Section II.4 (IGDH , APO March 31, 1993) located at and CAM Figure Document in working paper B any identified fraud risk indicators and your response/actions to the identified risks (either individually or in combination). This should be done at the planning stage of the audit, as well as during the audit, if risk indicators are disclosed. If no risk indicators are identified, document this in working paper B. d. Obtain from the contractor its listing of proposals for the past twelve months (or most recently completed fiscal year) and summarize by customer, contract type, and dollar volume in order to determine the materiality of the estimating system. Complete the Materiality section of the ICAPS form at W/P A. e. Discuss the planned evaluation of the estimating system internal controls with the administrative contracting officer (ACO) and the contractor s major procurement activities to identify, understand, and document any concerns they may have of areas which should be evaluated. f. Coordinate with other DCAA offices (including FD if there are significant classified contracts) cognizant of other contractor segments to determine if any estimating-related system deficiencies should be considered in this audit. Also, coordinate and request any necessary assist audits at locations that perform effort affecting the estimating system. Document your need for assist audits on W/P B-3. g. Close coordination is required at FAOs cognizant of a shared services location and the FAOs cognizant of the segments serviced by the shared services. Document the objectives and procedures to be performed at the shared services location and the segment level. Request assist audits, as applicable. h. Determine the extent and results of the contractor s selfgovernance activities, internal and external audits, and coordinated audits related to the estimating system. (1) Request the contractor provide a list of completed internal and external audits and determine if any are related to the estimating system. 5 of 20
6 (2) If applicable, coordinate with the CAC or corporate office auditors to determine if any internal control weaknesses that might impact the estimating system were identified in management s internal control report or the independent auditor s attestation on management s assertion included in the annual report filed with the SEC. (3) In those cases where internal or external audits have been performed, the auditor should follow the guidance contained in CAM , Relying Upon the Work of Others. Document your preliminary evaluation and its impact on the scope of this examination. The evaluation of internal audit working papers is documented in detail in Section G-1, Step 2. i. Determine the need for technical specialist assistance and document your consideration on W/P B Entrance Conference and Preparation a. Prepare a written memorandum to the contractor to arrange for an entrance conference covering the areas highlighted in CAM 4-302, and any specific data or pertinent information not yet provided. b. Conduct an entrance conference as outlined in CAM 4-302, with particular emphasis on: (1) Requesting the contractor to provide, if applicable, a system orientation briefing or a demonstration of the estimating system transaction flow, including data input, data processing, data output, and related internal controls. Document under Information and Communications, Section E-1, Step 3. (2) Determining any changes in the estimating process since the last examination. (3) Discussing the contractor s risk assessment process. Overall understanding of contractor s processes will be documented under Contractor Risk Assessment, Section D-1. (4) Discussing the contractor s monitoring process to ensure that established manual and computerized controls are functioning as intended. Document under Monitoring, Section F-1. (5) Discussing any identified weaknesses which may have been previously reported and related follow-up actions taken. 6 of 20
7 3. Other Preliminary Steps a. Determine the degree a computerized system is used in the estimating process. b. Perform a high level cursory assessment to determine if the following exist: (1) A functional estimating organization with defined organizational responsibilities. (2) A written description of the work flow in the estimating process. (3) Policies and procedures for effectively controlling the estimating process. 4. Initial Risk Assessment Using the information obtained in steps 1, 2, and 3, prepare an initial risk assessment (W/P B) to determine the initial scope of the examination. C-1 Control Environment W/P Reference The control environment sets the tone of an organization, influencing the control consciousness of its people. It is the foundation for all other components of internal control, providing discipline and structure. The auditor should obtain a sufficient understanding of the control environment to determine the impact that it may have on the overall effectiveness of the estimating system internal controls. 1. Evaluate the most recently completed ICAPS for the Control Environment and Overall Accounting Controls for the rationale behind any moderate or high-risk assessment ratings and determine the impact, if any, on the effectiveness of the estimating system internal controls If an examination of the control environment has not been recently performed, evaluate all documented prior audit experience with the contractor, including permanent files, relevant audit reports and working papers, suspected irregular conduct (SIC) referrals and discussions with prior auditors. Obtain an understanding of the following factors: 7 of 20
8 a. Integrity and ethical values. b. Commitment to competence. c. Board of directors and/or audit committee participation. d. Management s philosophy and operating style. e. Organizational structure. f. Assignment of authority and responsibility. g. Human resource policies and procedures. 3. Document your overall assessment of the control environment and the impact that it has on the nature and extent of testing of each control objective (W/Ps G, H, I, J and K). D-1 Contractor s Risk Assessment W/P Reference The auditor should develop a sufficient understanding of the risk assessment process currently employed by the contractor in terms of its identification, analysis, and management of risks relevant to the preparation of contract cost data. 1. Meet with responsible personnel to obtain an overview of the various risk factors considered by management. 2. Once the various risk factors are identified, obtain an understanding of how management identifies the risks, estimates the significance of risks, assesses the likelihood of their occurrence, and relates them to contract reporting. 3. If applicable, obtain an overview of any plans, programs, or actions management may initiate to address specific risks. Keep in mind that, depending on the nature of specific risks, management may elect to accept a given risk due to costs or other considerations. 4. Document your overall understanding of the contractor s risk assessment practices and the impact that it has on the nature and extent of testing of each control objective (W/Ps G, H, I, J and K). E-1 Information and Communications W/P Reference Information and communication processes consist of the methods and 8 of 20
9 records established to record, process, summarize, and report contract cost data. The auditor should develop a sufficient understanding of the contractor s information and communication processes (relevant to contract cost data) to identify significant classes of transactions and how they are initiated, processed, controlled, and reported. A necessary step in understanding the information and communication process is to trace selected transactions through the system (see Step 5 below). This will assist in validating the contractor s demonstration of the system and identifying key controls requiring subsequent testing. 1. Since the accounting and information systems are integral components of information and communication processes, evaluate the most recently completed ICAPS for the Control Environment and Overall Accounting Controls and the IT Systems General Internal Controls for the rationale behind any moderate or high-risk assessment ratings and determine the potential impact, if any, on the effectiveness of the estimating system internal controls on information and communications. 2. Evaluate relevant permanent files, prior audit working papers, and any prior contractor demonstrations of its estimating system information and communication processes. 3. Determine if the contractor has made changes to the information and communication processes in its estimating system since the last demonstration. Evaluate the changes. If no prior systems demonstration was performed, have the contractor provide one. Contractor representatives providing the demonstration should possess a detailed knowledge of the estimating system. The demonstration provides the auditor an opportunity to query contractor personnel regarding internal controls and how they are monitored. The auditor should ensure that the demonstration addresses the internal control objectives outlined in CAM The contractor should include appropriate manual and computerized controls in its information processing that check for accuracy, completeness, and proper authorization of estimating related transactions. Have the contractor identify and demonstrate controls related to each of the areas listed in a. through e. below. Compare the contractor disclosed controls with the generic access control listing contained in the referenced CAM section and identify any controls not incorporated in the application. Verify the existence and adequacy of the contractor disclosed controls. Discuss any apparent deficiencies with the contractor. a. Access Controls (CAM ) b. Data Input Controls (CAM ) c. Processing Controls (CAM ) 9 of 20
10 d. Error Correction and Submission (CAM ) e. Output Controls (CAM ) 5. Once the current estimating system information and communication processes are demonstrated by the contractor, selectively trace the development of a contractor s proposal through the estimating system, starting from the initiation of the proposal development process (e.g., response to RFP) to validate your understanding of the estimating system. By tracing a transaction, the auditor should document the validity and operation of the key controls demonstrated by the contractor in steps 2-4 above (e.g., estimates based on most current, accurate and completed data; cost or price analysis performed on subcontract proposals; proposal properly certified). Discrepancies between your understanding and the contractor s demonstration should be resolved prior to completing the remainder of this examination. 6. Document your confirmed understanding of the estimating system information and communication processes and obtain a written confirmation from the contractor indicating that they agree with this understanding. This documentation will typically take the form of system flowcharts or narrative descriptions, and can be prepared by the auditor or consist of documentation prepared by the contractor (see CAM 5-106). Based on your understanding of the contractor s estimating system information and communication processes, document the impact that it will have on the nature and extent of testing of each control objective (W/Ps G, H, I, J and K). F-1 Monitoring W/P Reference Monitoring is a process that assesses the quality of internal control performance over time. It involves assessing the design and operation of controls on a timely basis and taking necessary corrective actions. The auditor should develop a sufficient understanding of the contractor s ongoing monitoring activities and/or separate evaluations related to the estimating system internal controls. 1. Determine if ongoing monitoring procedures are incorporated into the normal recurring activities of the contractor s organization. These procedures should include regular management and supervisory activities. 2. Where applicable, determine the extent of internal audit involvement in performing monitoring functions through separate evaluations. 10 of 20
11 3. Determine and document the extent of monitoring activities being performed by external parties. 4. Document your overall understanding of the monitoring activity being performed at the contractor s location, and determine the impact it will have on the nature and extent of testing of each control objective (W/Ps G, H, I, J and K). G-1 Internal Audits W/P Reference The auditor should obtain an understanding of the contractor s control activities for this control objective. A detailed understanding of the control activities is essential to the assessment of control risk. Estimating system primary control objectives, as they relate to U.S. Government contracts, and examples of control activities the contractor may have implemented to achieve the control objectives, are provided in the internal control matrix on the DCAA intranet under audit programs Internal Control Matrix Estimating System and Related Internal Controls. The audit procedures for this control objective are also included in the internal control matrix. If the auditor determines that relevant internal control activities do not exist, or that the effort to perform tests is not justified, no control testing need be performed, and control risk will be assessed as high. 1. In planning the following audit procedures to understand the contractor s control activities, the auditor should recognize the other components of internal control and their impact on the nature and extent of testing to be performed. Document the impact of the internal control components on the nature and extent of testing on this control objective. Internal control components are as follows: Control environment Contractor risk assessment Information and communications Monitoring 2. Verify that periodic reviews of contractor s policies and procedures are conducted to ensure that: a. Policies and procedures are compliant with applicable Federal regulations. b. Policies and procedures have been implemented and are working effectively. 11 of 20
12 c. Follow-up actions are taken on recommendations resulting from management reviews. 3. Evaluate the contractor's record of completed internal audits and its current internal audit plan to determine if the estimating system is being subjected to periodic reviews in accordance with established policies and procedures. 4. Identify and selectively evaluate documentary evidence and the frequency of the contractor s management reviews to determine whether the scope of such reviews are appropriate, the conclusions sound, and appropriate follow-up actions were taken. 5. Identify any reviews which may have an impact on this examination, and evaluate the reports and supporting working papers to determine if any system deficiencies were noted, and the extent to which we can rely on the work performed (see CAM ). H-1 System Description W/P Reference The auditor should obtain an understanding of the contractor s control activities for this control objective. A detailed understanding of the control activities is essential to the assessment of control risk. Estimating system primary control objectives, as they relate to U.S. Government contracts, and examples of control activities the contractor may have implemented to achieve the control objectives, are provided in the internal control matrix on the DCAA intranet under audit programs Internal Control Matrix Estimating System and Related Internal Controls. The audit procedures for this control objective are also included in the internal control matrix. If the auditor determines that relevant internal control activities do not exist, or that the effort to perform tests is not justified, no control testing need be performed, and control risk will be assessed as high. 1. In planning the following audit procedures to understand the contractor s control activities, the auditor should recognize the other components of internal control and their impact on the nature and extent of testing to be performed. Document the impact of the internal control components on the nature and extent of testing on this control objective. Internal control components are as follows: Control environment Contractor risk assessment Information and communications 12 of 20
13 Monitoring 2. Contractors should establish and maintain an estimating system description, including policies, procedures, and operating instructions compliant with FAR and DFARS. a. Organization/Assignment of Responsibilities (1) Obtain organization charts and written policies, procedures, and directives describing the organizational structure, and responsibilities of the estimating group(s) and contributing departments. (2) Obtain flowcharts showing the flow of work in the estimating process and integration of data prepared by personnel responsible for various functions, such as accounting, cost control, budgeting, planning, purchasing, production control, engineering, estimating, and sales. Key decision and review points, and the time frame for the entire process, should be identified by the contractor. (3) Determine if the following characteristics of an adequate system exist: (a) Lines of authority, duties, and responsibilities are clearly defined. (b) Coordination among the various segments of the organization responsible for different parts of the estimate. (c) Designation of individuals authorized to approve requests for preparing estimates. (4) Interview selected employees involved in the proposal preparation process to determine if the actual responsibility for preparing, reviewing, and approving cost estimates is consistent with established policies and procedures. b. Policies and Procedures (1) Determine if written policies are established at a high enough organizational level to allow for proper implementation. (2) Determine if procedures are in writing and compatible with underlying policies. (3) Determine if: (a) Policies, procedures, and other written instructions are disseminated to all employees responsible for putting the estimates together. (b) Revisions to policies, procedures, and instructions are timely, as changes occur in the estimating system. 13 of 20
14 (4) Throughout the remainder of this examination, be alert for any areas in which established estimating policies and procedures are either inadequate or incomplete. c. Integration with Other Management Systems (1) Evaluate the contractor's policies and procedures to determine if they provide for the integration of information from other management systems, as appropriate. (2) Selectively evaluate recent pricing proposals or other cost estimates to determine if information from other management systems was appropriately integrated into the cost estimates. I-1 Training W/P Reference The auditor should obtain an understanding of the contractor s control activities for this control objective. A detailed understanding of the control activities is essential to the assessment of control risk. Estimating system primary control objectives, as they relate to U.S. Government contracts, and examples of control activities the contractor may have implemented to achieve the control objectives, are provided in the internal control matrix on the DCAA intranet under audit programs Internal Control Matrix Estimating System and Related Internal Controls. The audit procedures for this control objective are also included in the internal control matrix. If the auditor determines that relevant internal control activities do not exist, or that the effort to perform tests is not justified, no control testing need be performed, and control risk will be assessed as high. 1. In planning the following audit procedures to understand the contractor s control activities, the auditor should recognize the other components of internal control and their impact on the nature and extent of testing to be performed. Document the impact of the internal control components on the nature and extent of testing on this control objective. Internal control components are as follows: Control environment Contractor risk assessment Information and communications Monitoring 2. Policies and procedures should be established and implemented to assure that assigned personnel have sufficient training, experience, and 14 of 20
15 guidance to perform estimating tasks in accordance with established procedures. a. Evaluate the contractor's policies and procedures to determine if they require periodic training of all employees involved in the estimating process, including, when appropriate, the use of statistical aids and advanced estimating techniques. b. Evaluate records of completed training or other evidence indicating that appropriate employees have been trained in accordance with the policies and procedures. J-1 Cost Estimate Development W/P Reference The auditor should obtain an understanding of the contractor s control activities for this control objective. A detailed understanding of the control activities is essential to the assessment of control risk. Estimating system primary control objectives, as they relate to U.S. Government contracts, and examples of control activities the contractor may have implemented to achieve the control objectives, are provided in the internal control matrix on the DCAA intranet under audit programs Internal Control Matrix Estimating System and Related Internal Controls. The audit procedures for this control objective are also included in the internal control matrix. If the auditor determines that relevant internal control activities do not exist, or that the effort to perform tests is not justified, no control testing need be performed, and control risk will be assessed as high. 1. In planning the following audit procedures to understand the contractor s control activities, the auditor should recognize the other components of internal control and their impact on the nature and extent of testing to be performed. Document the impact of the internal control components on the nature and extent of testing on this control objective. Internal control components are as follows:: Control environment Contractor risk assessment Information and communications Monitoring 2. Policies and procedures should be established and implemented to ensure that cost estimates are developed using acceptable estimating methods and rationale, and that supporting data is current, accurate, 15 of 20
16 and complete. a. Evaluate the adequacy and appropriateness of the methods employed in preparing cost estimates for each proposal type. Consider the following: (1) The nature of the products or services procured. (2) The degree of firmness of specifications. (3) The contractor's experience with the same or similar products or services. (4) The extent detailed cost data can be derived from the accounting system, adjunct statistical records, etc. (5) The relative dollar amount of the estimates. (6) Cost and time restrictions on the preparation of the estimates. b. Evaluate the extent to which the contractor has identified the estimating practices for sensitive cost areas. c. Determine if the contractor has procedures in place to ensure that practices used to estimate costs are consistent with accounting practices used in accumulating costs (CAS 401/FAR and (d)), and to ensure that estimated costs are consistently classified between direct and indirect (CAS 402/FAR and (a)). d. Evaluate the extent to which estimating methods make use of historical data relating to entire products and individual tasks; and indirect cost ratios and percentage factors applicable to a common base. e. Determine if cost estimates based upon prior cost experience consider: (1) Differences in complexity, quantity, rate of production, state of development, etc., between items previously produced and those for which estimates are being developed. (2) Applicability of preproduction engineering, special tooling, plant rearrangement, and other nonrecurring costs. (3) Anticipated changes in production methods, material usage, prices, wage rates, labor efficiency, production volume, plant capacity and make-or-buy structure. f. Evaluate the applicability of historical standard cost variance factors. (Where standards have been revised to represent expected actual cost, historical cost variances are not applicable). g. Evaluate the appropriateness of escalation factors proposed, and 16 of 20
17 the methods used to apply them to the cost elements. h. Evaluate the availability and use of incurred cost records in developing estimates if the contractor is given the authorization to proceed before a contract price is negotiated. i. Evaluate the propriety of using company-wide forward pricing factors for preparing cost estimates. Are such factors current, based upon reliable cost data and procedures, and correctly applied? j. Evaluate the reasonableness of formula pricing methods for spare parts to ensure that individual elements of cost are not duplicated in both base costs and loading factors. k. If used by the contractor, evaluate the adequacy of catalog pricing and prepriced listing methods for developing reasonable prices for spare parts proposals. l. Evaluate the adequacy of the contractor's methods for developing cost estimates for contract changes. (1) Do the estimates properly reflect the nature and scope of the change and the status of the work in process at the time the change is issued? (2) Are the contractor's procedures for pricing deleted work correct? (Work deleted, but not yet performed, should be priced at estimated current cost). m. Determine if proposals are submitted on the appropriate forms, and if related supporting data contains enough detail to permit an adequate evaluation of cost estimates. Is the basis for each cost element disclosed? n. When a certificate of current cost or pricing data is required, does the contractor adequately identify the cost or pricing data submitted? o. Evaluate the contractor's policies and procedures to determine if they establish responsibility for the review and analysis of subcontracts. p. Selectively evaluate recent pricing proposals or other cost estimates to determine if cost/price analysis of subcontracts was performed, as required by the policies and procedures. q. Determine if controls are in place to ensure: (1) Timely submission of data at all phases of the proposal preparation process. (2) Uniformity of approach, detection of errors, and prevention of 17 of 20
18 cost duplication. r. Determine if the following characteristics of an adequate system exist: (1) Adequate supervision in each area, and at each level of the estimating process. (2) Managerial reviews at interim points, and upon completion of the estimating process. (3) Management reviews covering soundness of judgmental estimates, adherence to established procedures, and compliance with pertinent regulations. (4) Estimators who summarize and document the conditions, assumptions, contingencies, qualifications, risks, etc., taken into consideration in developing estimates. s. Determine whether proposed direct labor rates reflect the total hours employees are expected to work during the year as covered in CAM 9-505b, Evaluation of Estimated Direct Labor Rates. K-1 Contract Certification W/P Reference The auditor should obtain an understanding of the contractor s control activities for this control objective. A detailed understanding of the control activities is essential to the assessment of control risk. Estimating system primary control objectives, as they relate to U.S. Government contracts, and examples of control activities the contractor may have implemented to achieve the control objectives, are provided in the internal control matrix on the DCAA intranet under audit programs Internal Control Matrix Estimating System and Related Internal Controls. The audit procedures for this control objective are also included in the internal control matrix. If the auditor determines that relevant internal control activities do not exist, or that the effort to perform tests is not justified, no control testing need be performed, and control risk will be assessed as high. 1. In planning the following audit procedures to understand the contractor s control activities, the auditor should recognize the other components of internal control and their impact on the nature and extent of testing to be performed. Document the impact of the internal control components on the nature and extent of testing on this control objective. Internal control components are as follows: Control environment 18 of 20
19 Contractor risk assessment Information and communications Monitoring 2. Policies and procedures should be established and implemented to ensure that all cost or pricing data is current, accurate, and complete as of the date of agreement on price. a. Evaluate the contractor's policies and procedures to determine if they adequately provide for updating of cost or pricing data up to the point of agreement on price. b. Selectively evaluate recent post-award audits to determine if they indicate that the contractor is not updating cost or pricing data, as provided for in the policies and procedures. A-1 Concluding Steps W/P Reference 1. Assessment Of Control Risk a. Considering all five components of internal control (control environment, contractor risk assessment, information and communications, monitoring, and control activities that relate to control objectives), assess control risk for each of the relevant control objectives (internal audits, system description, training, cost estimate development, and contract certification). For each of the objectives, summarize the characteristics which support the assessed level of control risk and specifically identify any internal control weaknesses or system deficiencies. b. Determine if the estimating system is adequate to reasonably assure proper pricing, administration, and settlement of Government contracts in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. c. Based on the assessments above, determine the impact on the scope of other audits. d. Complete the ICAPS form at W/P A (see CAM 3-305). e. Coordinate the results of audit with the supervisor. The supervisor and the FAO manager should review and initial the ICAPS form at W/P A before the exit conference is performed. If it is determined that additional audit steps are needed, any additional planned audit effort should be accomplished as part of this examination or immediately thereafter. Any delays in completion of this audit 19 of 20
20 effort should be documented and approved by management. 2. Summary Steps a. Prepare a draft audit report in accordance with CAM b. Conduct an exit conference with the contractor in accordance with CAM c. Finalize the audit report incorporating the contractor's response and audit rejoinder. d. If the contractor has EVMS covered contracts, provide comments in the audit report on whether any findings are likely to impact the contractor's EVMS ( b). Discuss findings and recommendations relating to the EVMS with the Contract Administration Office EVMS Monitor prior to issuance of the report. Immediately evaluate the impact of these findings on specific EVMS covered contracts and provide the details in flash EVMS surveillance reports ( b). e. Update the permanent file in accordance with CAM b (MAAR #3). Retain a copy of the approved W/P A ICAPS form. After the audit report is issued, update the ICRS database using the information on the approved W/P A ICAPS form and file the approved W/P A ICAPS form in the Electronic Contractor Permanent File (ECPF). (The control risk assessment (Section II) and overall system opinion (Section III) in the ICAPS may not be updated until the system report supporting the change is issued (CAM 3-306a).) 20 of 20
INTERNAL CONTROL MATRIX FOR AUDIT OF ESTIMATING SYSTEM CONTROLS Version No. 3.2 June 2006. 31-d Page 1 of 7
INTERNAL CONTROL MATRIX FOR AUDIT OF ESTIMATING SYSTEM CONTROLS Version No. 3.2 June 2006 Control Objectives Example Control Activities Audit Procedures 1. INTERNAL AUDITS Management should periodically
Activity Code 12500 Material Management and Accounting System (MMAS) Version 9.10, dated September 2015 B-1 Planning Considerations
Activity Code 12500 Material Management and Accounting System (MMAS) Version 9.10, dated September 2015 B-1 Planning Considerations Audit Specific Independence Determination Members of the audit team and
Master Document Audit Program
Activity Code 11510 B-1 Planning Considerations Information Technology General System Controls Audit Specific Independence Determination Members of the audit team and internal specialists consulting on
Post Award Accounting System Audit at Nonmajor Contractors
Activity Code 17740 B-1 Planning Considerations Post Award Accounting System Audit at Nonmajor Contractors To provide general guidance for the audit of the adequacy and suitability of nonmajor contractor
Master Document Audit Program. Version 1.5, dated September 2015 B-01 Planning Considerations
Activity Code 11070 Version 1.5, dated September 2015 B-01 Planning Considerations Accounting System Audit Audit Specific Independence Determination Members of the audit team and internal specialists consulting
October 14, 2015 5(1)
October 14, 2015 5(1) Paragraph CHAPTER 5 Table of Contents 5-000 Audit of Policies, Procedures, and Internal Controls Relative to Accounting and Management Systems Page 5-001 Scope of Chapter... 501 5-100
MAAR 13 Purchase Existence and Consumption
Activity Code 10320 B-1 Planning Considerations MAAR 13 Purchase Existence and Consumption Audit Specific Independence Determination Members of the audit team and internal specialists consulting on this
Master Document Audit Program. or Interviews. Version 3.21, dated April 2016 B-1 Planning Considerations
Activity Code 10310 Version 3.21, dated April 2016 B-1 Planning Considerations Non-Major Contractors Labor Floor Checks or Interviews Audit Specific Independence Determination Members of the audit team
January 2004 5(1) CHAPTER 5. Table of Contents
January 2004 5(1) Paragraph CHAPTER 5 Table of Contents 5-000 Audit of Policies, Procedures, and Internal Controls Relative to Accounting and Management Systems Page 5-001 Scope of Chapter... 501 5-100
Master Document Audit Program. Version 1.8, dated November 2015. B-01 Planning Considerations
Activity Code 11060 Control Environment Version 1.8, dated November 2015 B-01 Planning Considerations Audit Specific Independence Determination Members of the audit team and internal specialists consulting
Master Document Audit Program. Activity Code 19404 Compliance Audit CAS 404 Version 5.15, dated November 2015 B-1 Planning Considerations
Activity Code 19404 Compliance Audit CAS 404 B-1 Planning Considerations Audit Specific Independence Determination Members of the audit team and internal specialists consulting on this audit must complete
Master Document Audit Program. Activity Code 19409 Compliance Audit CAS 409 Version 5.16, dated November 2015 B-1 Planning Considerations
Activity Code 19409 Compliance Audit CAS 409 B-1 Planning Considerations Audit Specific Independence Determination Members of the audit team and internal specialists consulting on this audit must complete
Post Award Accounting System Audit at Nonmajor Contractors
Activity Code 17741 Version 3.1, dated November 2015 B-01 Planning Considerations Post Award Accounting System Audit at Nonmajor Contractors Audit Specific Independence Determination Members of the audit
Master Document Audit Program. Version No. 2.9, updated November 2015 B-1 Planning Considerations
Activity Code B-1 Planning Considerations Cost Realism Audit Specific Independence Determination Members of the audit team and internal specialists consulting on this audit must complete the Audit Specific
DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 8725 JOHN J. KINGMAN ROAD, SUITE 2135 FORT BELVOIR, VA 22060-6219
DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 8725 JOHN J. KINGMAN ROAD, SUITE 2135 FORT BELVOIR, VA 22060-6219 IN REPLY REFER TO PAS 730.3.B.2 July 23, 2009 09-PAS-014(R) MEMORANDUM FOR REGIONAL
Master Document Audit Program. Business System Deficiency Report Assignment. Version No. 1.3, dated June 2014 B-1 Planning Considerations
Activity Code 11090 B-1 Planning Considerations Business System Deficiency Report Assignment Audit Specific Independence Determination Members of the audit team and internal specialists consulting on this
OAIG-AUD (ATTN: AFTS Audit Suggestions) Inspector General of the Department of Defense 400 Army Navy Drive (Room 801) Arlington, VA 22202-4704
Additional Copies The Office of Audit Policy and Oversight, Office of the Assistant Inspector General for Auditing of the Department of Defense, prepared this report. To obtain additional copies of this
Preaward Survey of Prospective Contractor Accounting System
Activity Code 17740 B-1 Planning Considerations Preaward Survey of Prospective Contractor Accounting System Purpose and Scope The major objectives of this audit are to obtain an understanding of the accounting
Master Document Audit Program. Activity Code 19500 Cost Impact Statement (Price Adjustment) Version 4.17, dated April 2016 B-1 Planning Considerations
Activity Code 19500 Cost Impact Statement (Price Adjustment) Version 4.17, dated April 2016 B-1 Planning Considerations Audit Specific Independence Determination Members of the audit team and internal
How To Audit A Government Contractor
Activity Code 17740 Version 6.11, dated November 2015 B-1 Planning Considerations Preaward Survey of Prospective Contractor Accounting System Audit Specific Independence Determination Members of the audit
July 6, 2015 11(1) CHAPTER 11
July 6, 2015 11(1) CHAPTER 11 Table of Contents Paragraph Page 11-000 Audit of Contractor Compliance with Contract Financial Management Requirements 11-001 Scope of Chapter... 1101 11-100 Section 1 ---
PAS 730.3.B.2.4 April 24, 2012 12-PAS-012(R)
DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 8725 JOHN J. KINGMAN ROAD, SUITE 2135 FORT BELVOIR, VA 22060-6219 IN REPLY REFER TO April 24, 2012 MEMORANDUM FOR REGIONAL DIRECTORS, DCAA DIRECTOR,
October 1, 2015 4(1)
October 1, 2015 4(1) Paragraph CHAPTER 4 Table of Contents 4-000 General Audit Requirements Page 4-001 Scope of Chapter... 401 4-100 Section 1 --- FAO Coordination with Procurement and Contract Administration
Master Document Audit Program. Version 1.14, dated November 2015
Activity Code 11010 Billing Audit Version 1.14, dated November 2015 Audit Specific Independence Determination Members of the audit team and internal specialists consulting on this audit must complete the
DCAA Contract Audit Manual
D(1) APPENDIX D Table of Contents Paragraph Page D-000 Technical Specialist Assistance D-001 Scope... D1 D-100 Section 1 --- Deciding Whether Technical Specialist Assistance is Needed D-101 General...
INTERNAL CONTROL MATRIX FOR AUDIT OF BILLING SYSTEM CONTROLS Version No. 4.2 August 2006
INTERNAL CONTROL MATRIX FOR AUDIT OF BILLING SYSTEM CONTROLS Version No. 4.2 August 2006 1. MANAGEMENT REVIEWS The contractor should have policies and procedures for periodic monitoring of the billing
January 15, 2016 3(1) CHAPTER 3
January 15, 2016 3(1) CHAPTER 3 Paragraph Table of Contents 3-000 Audit Planning Page 3-001 Scope of Chapter... 301 3-100 Section 1 --- Introduction to Contract Audit Planning 3-101 Requirements Planning...
Master Document Audit Program. Progress Payment, Percentage of Completion. Version 5.8, dated November 2015 B-1 Planning Considerations
Activity Code 17500 Version 5.8, dated November 2015 B-1 Planning Considerations Progress Payment, Percentage of Completion Audit Specific Independence Determination Members of the audit team and internal
Objectives of the Incurred Cost Audit
36 Contract Management March 2011 Government contractors who incur costs on behalf of the government via contracts, grants, loans, or other contract vehicles are subject to incurred cost audits by the
September 16, 2015 6(1) CHAPTER 6
September 16, 2015 6(1) CHAPTER 6 Paragraph Table of Contents 6-000 Incurred Costs Audit Procedures Page 6-001 Scope of Chapter... 601 6-100 Section 1 --- Introduction to Incurred Cost Audit Objectives
Master Document Audit Program. Version 4.7, dated November 2015 B-1 Planning Considerations
Activity Code 10110 Version 4.7, dated November 2015 B-1 Planning Considerations A-133 Audit Audit Specific Independence Determination Members of the audit team and internal specialists consulting on this
INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ON REVIEW ENGAGEMENTS 2410 REVIEW OF INTERIM FINANCIAL INFORMATION PERFORMED BY THE INDEPENDENT AUDITOR OF THE ENTITY CONTENTS
INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ON ENGAGEMENTS 2410 OF INTERIM FINANCIAL INFORMATION PERFORMED BY THE INDEPENDENT AUDITOR OF THE ENTITY (Effective for reviews of interim financial information for periods beginning
Direct and Indirect Labor. The Scenario
Direct and Indirect Labor The Scenario Risk Assessment-Research and Planning: The auditor was assigned to perform a floor check audit for a medium sized contractor during the end of the third quarter of
The Changing Government Contractor Environment
The Changing Government Contractor Environment 1 Federal Government Contracting DCAA FY 2014 Report to Congress DCAA Audit Guidance Business systems Federal regulatory rule changes State Contracting (Dept.
Uncompensated Overtime
Uncompensated Overtime 1 Table of Contents Risk Assessment Research and Planning Risk Assessment Labor System Entrance Conference Preliminary Analytical Procedures Audit Team Brainstorming for Fraud Risk
Position Classification Standard for Management and Program Clerical and Assistance Series, GS-0344
Position Classification Standard for Management and Program Clerical and Assistance Series, GS-0344 Table of Contents SERIES DEFINITION... 2 EXCLUSIONS... 2 OCCUPATIONAL INFORMATION... 3 TITLES... 6 EVALUATING
Review of Audits Issued by the Defense Contract Audit Agency in FY 2012 and FY 2013
Report No. DODIG-2014-109 Inspector General U.S. Department of Defense SEPTEMBER 8, 2014 Review of Audits Issued by the Defense Contract Audit Agency in FY 2012 and FY 2013 INTEGRITY EFFICIENCY ACCOUNTABILITY
Master Document Audit Program. Version 4.14, dated November 2015 B-1 Planning Considerations
Activity Code 17200 B-1 Planning Considerations Claim Audit, Other Audit Specific Independence Determination Members of the audit team and internal specialists consulting on this audit must complete the
DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY CHECKLIST FOR DETERMINING ADEQUACY OF CONTRACTOR INCURRED COST PROPOSAL
Instructions: This form should be completed for each proposal submission and maintained in the permanent file. Adequacy reviews of contractor incurred cost proposals include an assessment for completeness
CHAPTER 8. Table of Contents
July 29, 2015 8(1) Paragraph CHAPTER 8 Table of Contents 8-000 Cost Accounting Standards Page 8-001 Scope of Chapter... 801 8-100 Section 1 --- Overview - Cost Accounting Standards Board (CASB) Rules and
Department of Defense Inspector General OAIG-Audit Policy and Oversight ATTN: APO, Suite 11D28 4800 Mark Center Drive Alexandria, VA 22350-1500
Additional Copies To obtain additional copies of the final report, visit www.dodig.mil/audit/reports or contact the Office of the Assistant Inspector General for Audit Policy and Oversight at (703) 604-8760
INTERNAL AUDITING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL
INTERNAL AUDITING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Contents A. INTERNAL AUDIT OVERVIEW... 5 A.1 RATIONALE... 5 A-2 CHARTER... 5 A-3 MISSION STATEMENT, OBJECTIVES AND VALUES... 9 A-3.1
DCAA Audit R 4 Rights to Records, Requirements & Remedies
San Diego Chapters Present DCAA Audit R 4 Rights to Records, Requirements & Remedies A Seminar with Panel Discussion and Audience Participation February 18, 2009 This Morning s Agenda 8:30 Introduction
THE DCAA AUDIT BECOMING DCAA COMPLIANT
THE DCAA AUDIT Created to oversee government spending on behalf of the American tax-payer, the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) is responsible for supervising all Department of Defense (DoD) contracts.
DCAA Initiatives/Current Issues
Defense Contract Audit Agency DCAA Initiatives/Current Issues Maryland Association of CPAs 2010 Government Contractors' Conference September 21, 2010 Kenneth J. Saccoccia Assistant Director Policy and
Preaward and Post Award Accounting System Audits. November 17, 2011 Pikes Peak NCMA Roland Wick
Preaward and Post Award Accounting System Audits November 17, 2011 Pikes Peak NCMA Roland Wick OVERVIEW This presentation will provide: 1. The basic criteria for the Preaward and Post Award accounting
Chapter 6 Labor-Charging Systems and Other Considerations
6 Chapter 6 Labor-Charging Systems and Other Considerations The purpose of this chapter is to provide interpretive guidance only. This chapter is not intended to be authoritative or to supersede the FAR.
Material Transfers and Material Management and Accounting System (MMAS)
Material Transfers and Material Management and Accounting System (MMAS) The Scenario Risk Assessment-Research and Planning: The auditor was assigned an audit of major contractor MIL s Material Management
May 11, 2016 2(1) CHAPTER 2. Table of Contents
May 11, 2016 2(1) CHAPTER 2 Paragraph Table of Contents 2-000 Auditing Standards Page 2-001 Scope of Chapter... 201 2-100 Section 1 --- Auditing Standards and DCAA Audits 2-101 Generally Accepted Government
TOWN OF SILVERTHORNE, COLORADO RFP for Independent Professional Auditing Services
Nature of Services Required A. General The Town is soliciting the services of qualified firms of certified public accountants to audit its financial statements for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2011,
Evaluation of Defense Contract Management Agency Actions on Reported DoD Contractor Business System Deficiencies
Inspector General U.S. Department of Defense Report No. DODIG-2016-001 OCTOBER 1, 2015 Evaluation of Defense Contract Management Agency Actions on Reported DoD Contractor Business System Deficiencies INTEGRITY
Accounting Systems: Complying with FAR Requirements. John S. Sroka, CPA Acquisition Cost/Price Analyst
Accounting Systems: Complying with FAR Requirements John S. Sroka, CPA Acquisition Cost/Price Analyst Background Information FAR Requirements FAR Part 9: Contractor Qualifications FAR Part 16: Cost-reimbursement
How to Develop a FAR-Compliant Cost or Price Proposal
How to Develop a FAR-Compliant Cost or Price Proposal May 21, 2014 Presenter: Paul H. Calabrese Rubino & Company, CPAs & Consultants Senior Manager Tel: 301-214-4137 pcalabrese@rubino.com www.linkedin.com/in/pcalabrese
INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS FOR THE PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE OF INTERNAL AUDITING (STANDARDS)
INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS FOR THE PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE OF INTERNAL AUDITING (STANDARDS) Revised: October 2012 i Table of contents Attribute Standards... 3 1000 Purpose, Authority, and Responsibility...
SCHEDULES OF CHAPTER 40B MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE PROFIT FROM SALES AND TOTAL CHAPTER 40B COSTS EXAMINATION PROGRAM
7/30/07 SCHEDULES OF CHAPTER 40B MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE PROFIT FROM SALES AND TOTAL CHAPTER 40B COSTS Instructions: EXAMINATION PROGRAM This Model Program lists the major procedures and steps that should be
Review of Consultant/Professional Services Cost Accounts
Review of Consultant/Professional Services Cost Accounts 1 Table of Contents Risk Assessment Research and Planning Entrance Conference Preliminary Analytical Procedures Results from Preliminary Analytical
Internal Surveillance
Page 1 of 18 Internal Surveillance A contract having Earned Value Management System (EVMS) requires the contractor to maintain an effective management control system consistent with EVM industry standards
Division of Insurance Internal Control Questionnaire For the period July 1, 2013 through June 30, 2014
Official Audit Report Issued March 6, 2015 Internal Control Questionnaire For the period July 1, 2013 through June 30, 2014 State House Room 230 Boston, MA 02133 auditor@sao.state.ma.us www.mass.gov/auditor
NCMA MEETING PREPARING FOR A DCAA PRICE PROPOSAL AUDIT JUNE 8, 2011
NCMA MEETING 1 PREPARING FOR A DCAA PRICE PROPOSAL AUDIT JUNE 8, 2011 Denise M. Hunt DCAA LM Mt. Laurel Resident Office Forward Pricing Technical Specialist DCAA OVERVIEW AND PRICE PROPOSAL AUDIT PROCESS
Imperial County. Office of the Auditor-Controller. Internal Audit Standard Practice Manual
Imperial County Internal Audit Standard Practice Manual Imperial County Internal Audit Standard Practice Manual Table of Contents Chapter 1 Our Mission, Our Authority, Our Responsibility 1-6 Chapter 2
Strategic Implications of the New DFARS Business System Rule Co-presented by Venable LLP and Argy, Wiltse & Robinson June 12, 2012
Strategic Implications of the New DFARS Business System Rule Co-presented by Venable LLP and Argy, Wiltse & Robinson June 12, 2012 1 Panelists Robert A. ( Rob ) Burton, Partner, Venable LLP A 30-year veteran
DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY GUIDE FOR DETERMINING ADEQUACY OF CONTRACTOR INCURRED COST PROPOSAL
Instructions: This form should be completed for each proposal submission and maintained in the permanent file. Adequacy reviews of contractor incurred cost proposals include verification for completeness
January 2004 6(1) CHAPTER 6. Table of Contents
January 2004 6(1) Paragraph CHAPTER 6 Table of Contents 6-000 Incurred Costs Audit Procedures Page 6-001 Scope of Chapter... 601 6-100 Section 1 --- Introduction to Incurred Cost Audit Objectives 6-101
GAO DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDITS. Actions Needed to Improve DCAA's Access to and Use of Defense Company Internal Audit Reports
GAO United States Government Accountability Office Report to the Committee on Armed Services, U.S. Senate December 2011 DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDITS Actions Needed to Improve DCAA's Access to and Use of Defense
DCAA Perspective: Key Subcontracting Practices for Maintaining Approved Business Systems Accounting System and Estimating System
DCAA Perspective: Key Subcontracting Practices for Maintaining Approved Business Systems Accounting System and Estimating System Breakout Session A Alfred J. Massey, Western Region, Special Programs Manager,
INTERNAL CONTROL MATRIX FOR AUDIT OF LABOR AND ACCOUNTING CONTROLS Version No. 4.2 June 2006
INTERNAL CONTROL MATRIX FOR AUDIT OF LABOR AND ACCOUNTING CONTROLS Version No. 4.2 June 2006 Control Objectives ExampleControl Activities Audit Procedures 1. MANAGEMENT REVIEWS Monitor the overall integrity
What Exactly is an Acceptable Accounting System?
What Exactly is an Acceptable Accounting System? Kristen Soles, CPA Member Stephanie Widzinski, CPA Senior Manager September 27, 2012 Agenda Review DFARS Business System Rule What Agency is Responsible
TIER II STANDARD FOR FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SPECIALISTS
Job Classification Manual Page 1 of 60 TIER II STANDARD FOR FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SPECIALISTS INTRODUCTION 1. This grade level standard illustrates the application of the ICSC Master Standard (Tier I) to
GAO. Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government. Internal Control. United States General Accounting Office.
GAO United States General Accounting Office Internal Control November 1999 Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government GAO/AIMD-00-21.3.1 Foreword Federal policymakers and program managers
Table of Contents: Chapter 2 Internal Control
Table of Contents: Chapter 2 Chapter 2... 2 2.1 Establishing an Effective System... 2 2.1.1 Sample Plan Elements... 5 2.1.2 Limitations of... 7 2.2 Approvals... 7 2.3 PCard... 7 2.4 Payroll... 7 2.5 Reconciliation
Understanding the Entity and Its Environment and Assessing the Risks of Material Misstatement
Understanding the Entity and Its Environment 1667 AU Section 314 Understanding the Entity and Its Environment and Assessing the Risks of Material Misstatement (Supersedes SAS No. 55.) Source: SAS No. 109.
REPORT 2014/078 INTERNAL AUDIT DIVISION
INTERNAL AUDIT DIVISION REPORT 2014/078 Audit of the Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) Managing Agent role for the Somalia Common Humanitarian Fund Overall results relating to
Position Classification Flysheet for Grants Management Series, 1109
Position Classification Flysheet for Grants Management Series, 1109 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION...2 COVERAGE...2 ESTABLISHING THE OCCUPATIONAL SERIES AND STANDARD...2 GENERAL SERIES DETERMINATION GUIDELINES...3
Position Classification Standard for Procurement Clerical and Technician Series, GS-1106. Table of Contents
Position Classification Standard for Procurement Clerical and Technician Series, GS-1106 Table of Contents SERIES DEFINITION... 2 EXCLUSIONS... 2 DEFINITIONS... 3 OCCUPATIONAL INFORMATION... 3 TITLES...
October 20, 2015 9(1)
October 20, 2015 9(1) CHAPTER 9 Paragraph Table of Contents Page 9-000 Audit of Cost Estimates and Price Proposals 9-001 Scope of Chapter... 901 9-002 Related Audit Guidance... 901 9-003 The Total Audit
Agreed-Upon Procedures Engagements
Agreed-Upon Procedures Engagements 1323 AT Section 201 Agreed-Upon Procedures Engagements Source: SSAE No. 10; SSAE No. 11. Effective when the subject matter or assertion is as of or for a period ending
INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS FOR THE PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE OF INTERNAL AUDITING (STANDARDS)
INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS FOR THE PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE OF INTERNAL AUDITING (STANDARDS) Introduction to the International Standards Internal auditing is conducted in diverse legal and cultural environments;
U.S. Customs and Border Protection Office of International Trade Regulatory audit. Focused Assessment Pre-Assessment Survey Audit Program
U.S. Customs and Border Protection Office of International Trade Regulatory audit Focused Assessment Pre-Assessment Survey Audit Program TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW OF THE FOCUSED ASSESSEMENT PRE-ASSESSMENT
INTERNAL AUDIT DIVISION AUDIT REPORT 2013/073
INTERNAL AUDIT DIVISION AUDIT REPORT 2013/073 Audit of maintenance and building services provided by the Office of Central Support Services at Headquarters Overall results relating to the Office of Central
Audit Expectations for Small Businesses
Audit Expectations for Small Businesses DEFENSE CONTRACT CONSULTING Joseph A. Dalton, CGFM/CFE/CAP Over 31 Years -Supervisory/Auditor Service- DCAA Retired Captain, U. S. Naval Reserve 1996 BUSINESS NO.
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING Between Defense Contract Audit Agency and Department of Homeland Security
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING Between Defense Contract Audit Agency and Department of Homeland Security 1. PURPOSE This memorandum sets forth an understanding of contract audit coverage and related audit
Achieve. Performance objectives
Achieve Performance objectives Performance objectives are benchmarks of effective performance that describe the types of work activities students and affiliates will be involved in as trainee accountants.
Defense Contract Audit Agency NAVAIR Small Business Aviation Technology Conference
Defense Contract Audit Agency NAVAIR Small Business Aviation Technology Conference November 29-30, 2006 t Defense Contract Audit Agency Established in 1965 Separate Agency of the Department of Defense
Government Contract Accounting Are You DCAA Compliant? Procurement Technical Assistance Program (PTAP)
Government Contract Accounting Are You DCAA Compliant? Procurement Technical Assistance Program (PTAP) NH Presentation October 20, 2010 Presented by: Fred Kline, MBA, CPA Tom Martin MBA, CPA Malcolm Young,
Contractor Purchasing System Reviews (CPSRs)
Contractor Purchasing System Reviews (CPSRs) San Diego Chapter on February 17, 2010 Panel members: Carl DeWoody Dan Kearney Lil Smith Jim Southerland Facilitator: Maurice Caskey 1 Outline Introduction
GAO DCAA AUDITS. Allegations That Certain Audits at Three Locations Did Not Meet Professional Standards Were Substantiated
GAO United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Addressees July 2008 DCAA AUDITS Allegations That Certain Audits at Three Locations Did Not Meet Professional Standards Were Substantiated
MISSION STATEMENT OBJECTIVES IN ACCOMPLISHING OUR MISSION
MISSION STATEMENT Internal Audit exists to support administration and the Board of Directors in the effective discharge of their responsibilities. Using our knowledge and professional judgment, we will
QUALITY CONTROL REVIEW REPORT
IG-02-007 QUALITY CONTROL REVIEW REPORT ERNST & YOUNG LLP AND DEFENSE CONTRACT AUDIT AGENCY AUDIT OF SOUTHWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE, FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 24, 1999 January 23, 2002 OFFICE OF INSPECTOR
Chapter 5. Planning the Audit Engagement
Chapter 5 Planning the Audit Engagement A. Purpose for Planning the Engagement Engagement planning is performed to provide a means for developing an understanding of the business objectives of the auditee,
CHAPTER 2. 2-000 Preaward Surveys of Prospective Contractor Accounting Systems
CHAPTER 2 2-000 Preaward Surveys of Prospective Contractor Accounting Systems 2-101 Preaward Survey Overview A preaward survey is an evaluation, usually made by the cognizant contract administration office,
Master Document Audit Program. Version 2.1, dated February 2016 B-1 Planning Considerations
Activity Code 10100 Version 2.1, dated February 2016 B-1 Planning Considerations Post Year End Incurred Cost Audit Audit Specific Independence Determination Members of the audit team and internal specialists
April 2007 Report No. 07-030. An Audit Report on Residential Child Care Contract Management at the Department of Family and Protective Services
John Keel, CPA State Auditor Residential Child Care Contract Management at the Department of Family and Protective Services Report No. 07-030 Residential Child Care Contract Management at the Department
Government Accounting, Estimating, and Billing Systems: Pitfalls and Answers
Curtis Matthews, Managing Partner Government Accounting, Estimating, and Billing Systems: Pitfalls and Answers Findley Gillespie, Senior Manager May 18, 2011 1 The material appearing in this presentation
OBSERVATIONS FROM 2010 INSPECTIONS OF DOMESTIC ANNUALLY INSPECTED FIRMS REGARDING DEFICIENCIES IN AUDITS OF INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
1666 K Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20006 Telephone: (202) 207-9100 Facsimile: (202) 862-8430 www.pcaobus.org OBSERVATIONS FROM 2010 INSPECTIONS OF DOMESTIC ANNUALLY INSPECTED FIRMS REGARDING DEFICIENCIES
UNIT 34: COST ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
UNIT CERTIFICATION Statement of Completion has satisfactorily completed training in the duty of this Unit under the conditions described below and in accordance with the overall standard(s) for this Unit.
Performing Audit Procedures in Response to Assessed Risks and Evaluating the Audit Evidence Obtained
Performing Audit Procedures in Response to Assessed Risks 1781 AU Section 318 Performing Audit Procedures in Response to Assessed Risks and Evaluating the Audit Evidence Obtained (Supersedes SAS No. 55.)
Reasons for Change Orders
T E X A S D E PA R T M E N T O F T R A N S P O R TAT I O N A change order is defined in the 2004 Standard Specification Book as a written order to the Contractor detailing changes to the specified work,
Position Classification Standard for Financial Analysis Series, GS-1160. Table of Contents
Position Classification Standard for Financial Analysis Series, GS-1160 Table of Contents SERIES DEFINITION... 2 EXCLUSIONS... 2 TITLES... 3 EXPLANATORY STATEMENT... 4 EVALUATION NOTES... 8 SPECIAL EVALUATION
Appendix 1 CJC CONTRACT MANAGEMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES. Criminal Justice Commission Contract Management Policies and Procedures
CJC CONTRACT MANAGEMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES SNYOPSIS: The CJC was created by a Palm Beach County ordinance in 1988. It has 21 public sector members representing local, state, and federal criminal justice
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING Between Defense Contract Audit Agency and Department of Homeland Security
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING Between Defense Contract Audit Agency and Department of Homeland Security 1. PURPOSE This memorandum sets forth an understanding of contract audit coverage and related audit