1 Ecclesiastical Insurance Claims Review and Case Law Update Spring Edition Issue 3
2 Introduction The implementation of the Jackson Reforms heralds the most wide-ranging changes there have ever been in the way in which personal injury claims are dealt with. Whilst the reforms present a number of challenging issues both to the insurance sector and legal profession alike, the underlying benefits are welcomed. Whilst Ecclesiastical was one of the few insurers prepared to fight cases on principle under the old regime, the levelling of the legal costs playing field will significantly assist them going forward by allowing them to defend cases without facing the risk of substantial and disproportionately high adverse costs orders in the event that those defences do not succeed. Jason Burt: Partner, Plexus Law
3 Charities: Considered a Soft Touch? It is a sad reality that even charities are not exempt from receiving claims of a dubious nature. It is undoubtedly the case that some claimants/claimant s solicitors perceive charities to be something of a soft touch when it comes to the defence of personal injury claims. Our teams of specialist claims handlers are alive to this and fight hard to ensure that our charity policyholders are afforded the very highest level of protection from unmeritorious claims. David Bonehill: Claims and Risk Services Director, Ecclesiastical Insurance Group
4 James v Ipswich Library and Reading Rooms The claimant was a member of the insured s library and reading rooms. It was alleged that whilst retrieving her coat from an internal cloakroom, the claimant tripped over a walking frame which had apparently been left by another member of the public. She sustained a nasty fracture to her right leg. claim has come to a very satisfactory end. On behalf of the trustees of the Ipswich Institute, I would like to record our grateful thanks for the principled stand our insurers have taken on this claim. On close examination, a number of issues came to light and as such, the claimant was put to proof as to her version of events. In addition, an extensive amount of evidence was produced by the defence team in support of the insured s case, evidence which ultimately persuaded the claimant to discontinue the claim and pay the defence s costs. The insured was actively involved in the defence throughout and was delighted with the outcome the
5 Breyley v Bidwell Brook Foundation The claimant was assisting the insured to take a group of young people with varying degrees of challenging behaviour on a visit to a local zoo. The claimant alleged that the young person she was assisting suddenly collapsed to the ground and grabbed the claimant pulling her down as well, ultimately causing an injury to her back. The claimant s case was that the insured knew the young person in question had a propensity to collapse in this way and that they had failed to properly instruct her in how to deal with the situation. The insured s position was that the young person had never previously acted like this and as a result, the incident was entirely unforeseeable. on the basis that the insured had undertaken appropriate reviews of the young person s care notes and had put in place an effective and suitable care regime and risk assessment. The case was successfully defended to trial in Torquay County Court, with the court ordering the claimant to pay the defence s costs. Pleased with the outcome the insured wrote thank you again for your support and direction in navigating the case of K B, so pleased that our insurers saw fit to defend this case with the backing of a robust and superb team a huge hurrah is due to our insurers. A robust denial was put forward
6 Solecki v Sue Ryder Care The claimant, an elderly lady who was a charity volunteer, sustained injury whilst attending one of the insured s high street shops. She allegedly tripped over a clothes rail which was obstructing a walkway, causing her to fall and sustain a severe fracture to her left leg. forced to discontinue the claim with an obligation to pay the costs of the defence. Initial investigations resulted in concerns regarding the accuracy of the claimant s accident description with evidence being discovered to suggest that the claimant s fall may have been caused by her tripping over her own shoe laces. The latter explanation was contained within the claimant s medical records which were obtained and examined by the defence team. Eventually, the weight of evidence put forward by the defence team was such that the claimant was
7 Social Activities Involving Risk On occasions, the decision to defend a particular claim is more about the bigger picture than the impact of the claim on an individual insured. Certain cases have the potential to ultimately influence the activities of our customers operating across the entire range of the niche markets we insure and they are never more prevalent than with claims involving activities which carry inherent risks to those participating in them. These issues are always considered by our specialist handling teams when defence strategies are formulated and as the following case reviews demonstrate, the current compensation culture need not force insureds to shy away from undertaking such activities, providing of course they are properly organised, supervised and risk assessed. Chris Lynwood: Ecclesiastical Technical Claims Manager
8 Jennifer Wilkin-Shaw v (1) Christopher Fuller (2) Kingsley School Bideford Enterprises Ltd A pupil of the insured s school tragically drowned as she attempted to cross a flooded brook whilst training to participate in the annual Ten Tors Expedition as part of her school team. Following a lengthy trial at the High Court in London the case was dismissed, a decision that was subsequently upheld by the Court of Appeal. It was alleged by the claimant that the school had failed in its obligation to ensure that those supervising the training had appropriate experience and were competent to organise and supervise it. In addition, it was said that the school should have removed the team from the moor prior to the accident because of inclement weather at the time and failed to ensure that a checkpoint was manned when the team arrived at the allotted time.
9 Fletcher v Outward Bound Trust The claimant sustained an injury to his wrist whilst participating in a gorge scramble organised by the insured as part of a team building exercise requested by the claimant s employers. One of the challenges was to enter a water-filled gorge and swim into a small cave behind a waterfall. In so doing, the claimant struck his hand against the side of the gorge resulting in injury. Although the injury was initially thought to be minor, the claimant went on to develop complex regional pain syndrome resulting in significant ongoing disability. certainly discourage employers from providing activities for their employees which are clearly there for their overall benefit and would upset the balance of risk. The insured was delighted to be vindicated and said can I just reiterate my thanks for your considerable support and advice throughout this case. Our eventual success is due in no small part to your efforts and those of your colleagues at Plexus Law. The case was dismissed following a four-day trial with the judge accepting that the insured had taken all steps necessary to reduce the inherent risks of the activity to a reasonable level, helpfully stating that to impose a greater obligation would almost
10 Bell v St Saviour s and St Olave s School The claimant, a pupil at the defendant s school, was participating in a hockey match as part of a sports lesson. He was struck in the face by a hockey stick being wielded by a fellow pupil, sustaining serious fractures to five teeth. The case centred upon the insured s alleged failure to compel pupils to wear mouth guards. Their policy only strongly recommending the use of such protective equipment. The claimant s case was that given the potential risk of injury was so high, the insured should have made the wearing of mouth guards mandatory. The case was dismissed with the claimant being ordered to pay the costs of the defence. insured was very pleased with the outcome Congratulations! I have read the judgment very carefully and feel that HHJ Redgrave has produced an entirely sound and wellbalanced summary of the arguments. Clearly her judgment has been very largely based around a defence which was well organised and highly professionally prepared may I thank you on behalf of the Governing Body and once again congratulate you on your excellent management of the case. Given the potential consequences of an adverse finding of liability, the
11 Employee Violence: Vicarious Responsibility Claims emanating from violent assaults within the workplace are becoming more common. When such assaults occur, they often create a high profile, emotionally charged atmosphere within the organisation in question which can impact upon the way in which any subsequent claim is managed. Our teams of specialist claims handlers have extensive experience of dealing with the intricate and complex legal issues that arise in such cases and ensure that the same are dealt with as efficiently and sensitively as possible Jane Abbott: Senior Claims Handler
12 Weddall v Barchester Healthcare Ltd The insured operated a home where people with severe mental health issues resided and were supported with their daily living needs. On the day in question, one of the claimant s colleagues called in sick. In line with his instructions, the claimant telephoned another colleague, who was at home at the time, and asked if he would volunteer to cover the vacant shift. The colleague had had a bad day at home and by the time the call was made, was very drunk. He did not react well to the call and believed that the claimant mocked his drunken state. Soon after the call, the colleague rode to the insured s premises on his bicycle, saw the claimant in the front garden and made, in the words of the judge an utterly unprovoked attack, very violent. The assault was so severe that the aggressor was eventually convicted in the criminal courts and received a 15-month term of imprisonment. The claim at first instance was successfully defended at trial, heard at the Norwich County Court, with the claimant being ordered to pay the costs of the defence. The claimant appealed, contending that an employer should be responsible for any response of an employee who is requested, in the course of his/her employment, to undertake work on the employer s behalf. The Court of Appeal disagreed and dismissed the appeal. In doing so, the Court of Appeal issued formal guidance to employers regarding the extent of their vicarious liability for employees, concluding that the trial judge was right in stating that an employer is not to be held vicariously liable for every act that one person might commit against another occasioned by/emanating from their employment but otherwise sufficiently specifically connected with it.
13 Preserving the Integrity and Aesthetics of Heritage Properties Ecclesiastical are acutely aware of the importance of preserving the originality of historic/heritage properties and the problems this can, on occasion, create for those owners who permit visitors access to their premises. In 2003, Ecclesiastical and Plexus Law defended the interests of a parochial church council (PCC) of a medieval church in a claim brought by a visitor who allegedly stumbled on an uneven pathway. Accepting the defence we put forward on behalf of the PCC, the judge stated it would be highly undesirable if we required the appearance of our medieval country church to be infected by warning notices or surrounded by flat grating systems which was suggested to be the appropriate solution in this case. Such an attitude would offend anyone s sense of reasonableness and proportionality and taking into account the costs of such remedial works and the damage to the aesthetic features of the building, thus creating a very strong precedent which has helped us defend many other policyholders over the years. The following case demonstrates that Ecclesiastical s appetite for defending the owners of heritage properties has not diminished in any way. Sarah Cox: Ecclesiastical Technical Claims Consultant, Property Investor Claims
14 Jones v Hampton Court Castle and Gardens In early September 2010, whilst attending a wedding reception at the 15th century castle and gardens, a member of the wedding party failed to notice the presence of one of the castle s hahas and stepped into the same, falling a distance of four feet and fracturing his leg in the process. The claimant alleged that the haha was inherently dangerous and even though its presence was highlighted by a marker rope, insisted that it should either have been fenced off, or had its presence drawn to the public s attention by warning signs. In addition, it was alleged that the general lighting in the area was inadequate and should have been improved. A robust defence of the claim was maintained on the basis that the haha was an intrinsic feature of the castle and to have it removed or altered in any way would have a significant impact on the aesthetics of the property. An argument which also held true in relation to the installation of fixed barriers or high visibility warning signs. Accepting the defendant s arguments, the court dismissed the claim, the trial judge saying I have also considered the issue and the fact that the defendant s premises is a Grade 1 listed building. It is clearly a historic building and I must take that into account when considering to what extent signage and warning signs should be placed around the premises. The insured was delighted with the response, writing Thank you very much for you and your team s efforts on the court case. We are all so pleased to hear the result. I hope more of these sorts of cases are publicised to help stem the flow of no win no fee claims.
15 Putting the Issue of Work Equipment to Bed It is important that even claims of very limited value are properly considered as they can, on occasion, have the potential to create adverse precedents that can significantly impact upon organisations unconnected with the claim itself. The following two cases provide excellent examples of where minor claims include novel allegations which, if upheld by the court, could have significantly expanded the strict liability provisions of the Work Equipment Regulations, something which could have affected all employers across the country. Carol O Donnell: Ecclesiastical Technical Claims Consultant
16 Sylvester v Leonard Cheshire Trust The claimant sustained injury to her fingers whilst attempting to place a fitted bed sheet on to a bed within the insured s care facility. The claimant alleged that the bed sheet was defective work equipment because it had shrunk in the wash and that as a result, the strict liability provisions of the Work Equipment Regulations should apply. Although a very modest claim in terms of value, the assertion that the bed sheet should be considered an item of work equipment significantly increased the importance of the matter, not only for the insured but also for any business that required members of staff to make up beds etc. A robust defence was maintained throughout the claim, despite facing several logistical difficulties arising out of the fact that a number of potentially relevant witnesses had left the insured s employment. Ultimately, the claimant was forced to discontinue the claim on a no order as to costs basis, the costs concession from the defence point of view being granted to reflect the litigation risks emanating from the lack of witness evidence.
17 Spencer v Barchester Healthcare The claimant was employed by the insured as a care assistant. She volunteered to take part in an internal sports day for the benefit of the residents. The sports day consisted of a number of fun activities including a sack race (where pillow cases were used as the sacks). Whilst participating the claimant stumbled and fell, sustaining very minor soft tissue injury to her knee. It was the claimant s contention that the pillow case was work equipment and should be considered defective on the basis it was not suitable/ inappropriate to be used on account of the fact that it was too stiff. involved the issue of the social benefit of activities carrying an inherent risk. The implications of an adverse finding on liability would have impacted on a number of niche markets insured by Ecclesiastical and as such, a bespoke defence strategy was invoked from the outset. As a result of the evidence collated, the claimant was ultimately required to discontinue the case with an obligation to pay the defence s costs. This was an interesting case not only because it sought to expand the boundaries of the Work Equipment Regulations, but also because it
18 Conclusion As the above selection of cases demonstrates, Ecclesiastical has the expertise to defend the interests of our policyholders if the circumstances of a claim demand such a course of action. However, we also embrace our responsibility to do the right thing. Claims which should be settled are settled as expeditiously, ethically and fairly as possible. More than that, we recognise our duty to protect the interests of our customers across the entire claims arena and on occasion this necessitates a more pragmatic approach to the resolution of disputes so as to avoid the creation of adverse precedents that could impact our niche markets. Our teams of specialist claims handlers take such considerations into account when formulating the best way in which to proceed with any claim. David Bonehill Claims and Risk Services Director, Ecclesiastical Insurance Group. Plexus Law fee earners acting on Ecclesiastical s behalf in relation to the cases featured in this review include: Rebekah Walker, Jacqui Kendall, Alan Rennie, Nick Yates, Ruth Sheret, Gemma Knight, Deborah Grant and Jason Burt.
19 T: Plexus Law is a trading name of Parabis Law LLP, a Limited Liability Partnership. Incorporated in England & Wales. Reg No: OC Registered office: 8 Bedford Park, Croydon, Surrey CR0 2AP Parabis Law LLP is authorised and regulated by the SRA.
Do you operate a business in a heritage property? Your guide to defending public liability claims Our partners The Heritage Alliance, set up in 2002 to promote the central role of the independent movement
Accidents at Work Everything you need to know Falling from ladders, slipping on a wet floor, lifting a heavy item, cutting yourself on a machine. Even in the 21st Century the workplace is still dangerous
Legal Watch: Personal Injury February 2014 Issue 007 Civil Procedure/Compliance with Directions Almost every day brings more post Jackson/Mitchell cases. Although these are non-personal injury cases we
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH FIXED RECOVERABLE COSTS PROPOSALS FOR CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE: Implications for patients access to justice and for patient safety Briefing by Action against Medical Accidents (AvMA) October
Legal Watch: Personal Injury 15th January 2015 Issue: 047 Public liability The difference between a local authority s powers and its duties was examined in Foulds (Deceased) v Devon County Council [Lawtel
GWASANAETHAU AMBIWLANS CYMRU YMDDIRIEDOLAETH GIG WELSH AMBULANCE SERVICES NHS TRUST CLAIMS MANAGEMENT POLICY Clinical Negligence, Personal Injury, Losses and Compensation Claims Approved by Date Review
Legal Watch: Personal Injury 2nd October 2014 Issue: 034 Causation/pre-existing condition The case of Reaney v University Hospital of North Staffordshire NHS Trust and another (2014) EWHC 3016 (QB) deals
LE Law Services Ltd 127 High Road Loughton Essex IG10 4LT Telephone: 020 8508 4961 Facsimile: 020 8508 6359 www.lelaw.co.uk L.E. LAW INFORMATION SHEET NO. 11 GUIDE TO PERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS 1. Introduction
Ministry of Justice Consultation: Whiplash Reform: Proposals on Fixed Costs For Medical Examinations / Reports and Related Issues Response from the Motor Accident Solicitors Society May 2014 Introduction
C.M. Haughey Solicitors Compensation Guide www.cmhaugheysolicitors.ie Athena Goddess of Wisdom, Strength and Strategy. When your experience needs our experience About Us C. M. Haughey Solicitors, located
PERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS Frequently Asked Questions 1. Can I make a claim? If you have been injured because of the fault of someone else, you can claim financial compensation through the courts. The dependants
Equality and Diversity Forum response to the consultation on employer liability for harassment of employees by third parties The Equality and Diversity Forum (EDF) is a network of national organisations
Making a Victim Personal Statement Victims have a right to explain how a crime has affected them A guide for all criminal justice practitioners Part 1 About this guide The Victim Personal Statement (VPS)
Advice Note An overview of civil proceedings in England Introduction There is no civil code in England; English civil law comprises of essentially legislation by Parliament and decisions by the courts.
QBE European Operations Technical claims brief Monthly update June 2015 Technical claims brief Monthly update June 2015 Contents FCA sets out their findings after looking at delegated authority arrangements
Spinal Injuries INJURY & NEGLIGENCE SPECIALISTS Injury & Negligence My solicitors looked after me. They were reliable, friendly, always kept in touch and always made me feel valued. Joseph Burns (Manchester)
highways express Helping you manage your Highways claims Introduction Highway authorities are facing increasing pressure to provide high quality highway services while maintaining tight control of costs
Expert. Clear. Professional. PROFESSIONAL NEGLIGENCE CLAIMS STREAMLINE SERVICE SMALL CLAIMS AND STREAMLINE SERVICES Bringing a claim in professional negligence can be expensive. We want to make sure we
Securing safe, clean drinking water for all Enforcement policy Introduction The Drinking Water Inspectorate (DWI) is the independent regulator of drinking water in England and Wales set up in 1990 by Parliament
Disclaimer In all cases solicitors must ensure that any agreement with a client is made in compliance with their professional duties, the requirements of the SRA and any statutory requirements depending
A CLIENT GUIDE TO CLAIMING DAMAGES FOR CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE 1. INTRODUCTION Making a claim for damages (compensation) for clinical negligence can be a worrying and stressful experience. We recognise that
Legal Watch What s on the horizon January 2014 Introduction Welcome to the first joint Plexus/Greenwoods review of what the next quarter holds for those involved in personal injury claims. In This Issue:
Legal Watch: Personal Injury 2nd July 2014 Issue: 025 Part 36 As can be seen from the case of Supergroup Plc v Justenough Software Corp Inc [Lawtel 30/06/2014] Part 36 is still the subject of varying interpretations.
MODEL DIRECTIONS FOR CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE CASES (2012) - before Master Roberts and Master Cook Introductory note. These are the Model Directions for use in the first Case Management Conference in clinical
Legal Support Service South West Support for life after childhood brain and other serious injuries www.childbraininjurytrust.org.uk Hello and welcome to the Legal Support Services booklet for the South
www.personalinjury.ffw.com Freephone 0800 358 3848 www.personalinjury.ffw.com Freephone 0800 358 3848 Medical Negligence A client s guide head and shoulders above the rest in terms of skills, experience
Legal Action / Claiming Compensation in Scotland This help sheet explains your legal rights if you have been injured as a result of medical treatment and the steps involved in seeking compensation through
QBE European Operations Professional practices update Undertakings - a guide QBE Professional practices update - Undertakings - a guide/jan 2013 1 Undertakings - a guide Introduction Undertakings given
Slips and trips in the retail sector IOSH - 8 July 2009 Presented by Helen Devery Partner, BLM Manchester business services construction & property insurance & indemnity leisure media & technology public
Underpinning Legal Framework This document sets out to provide an overview of what the law requires and how to comply with it. It also explains what may happen following an accident or incident. Criminal
A publication by Cute Injury How to make a personal injury claim A CLEAR AND CONCISE GUIDE TO THE PERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS PROCESS We provide professional and impartial advice from the outset and throughout
EXPLANATION OF LEGAL TERMS Affidavit: After the event litigation insurance: Application notice: Bar Council: Barrister: Basic Charges: Before the Event Legal Expenses Insurance: Bill of costs: Bolam test:
Access to Justice Civil Litigation Reforms & AIG Start The reforms AIG Response day 1-5 day 6-20 day 21-25 AIG process map Overview and key Changes For more details of the reforms click here > The Jackson
SPECIAL EDITION DECEMBER 2013 The Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013 ("ERRA") Claims handlers will no doubt be aware that Section 69 of this Act applies to all causes of action arising after 1 October
Wotton-under-Edge Town Council Disciplinary Procedure Adopted March 2015 1. PROCEDURE This procedure is designed to help and encourage all council employees to achieve and maintain high standards of conduct
Dispute Resolution Bringing A Small Claim Kirwans is one of the North West s most forward thinking law firms. As an allservicing firm, our success has been built upon delivering expert knowledge and expertise
Health & Safety for Businesses and the Voluntary Sector Key Principles KEY PRINCIPLES 1 Key Principles Introduction The importance of managing health and safety effectively cannot be over-emphasised. Ensuring
Introduction QBE and BLM Mock Trial David Evans 6 November 2012 Introduction Welcome to the QBE and BLM Mock Trial 2012. Firstly we would like to thank QBE for arranging and hosting this event. The scenario
This booklet was published with the generous support of Warren Collins Birmingham, Bristol, Cardiff, Newcastle, Lancaster, Leeds, London, Manchester, Sheffield and Wimbledon. www.simpsonmillar.co.uk Telephone:
www.ffw.com/personalinjury Freephone 0800 358 3848 www.ffw.com/personalinjury Freephone 0800 358 3848 Medical Negligence A guide for clients The team provides a first class service at all levels of experience.
Information sheet Pre-Action Protocol for Low Value Personal Injury (Employers Liability and Public Liability) Claims You have received this information sheet as it is likely that your claim will proceed
DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE 1. PURPOSE AND SCOPE This procedure is designed to help and encourage all council employees to achieve and maintain high standards of conduct whilst at work or representing the council.
SUBMISSION OF THE BAR COUNCIL OF IRELAND TO THE JOINT COMMITTEE ON HEALTH AND CHILDREN ON THE CHALLENGE OF RISING COSTS IN PROFESSIONAL MEDICAL INDEMNITY INSURANCE 1. INTRODUCTION (a) General Remarks 1.
COMMITTEE ON COURT PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE REVIEW OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE IN RELATION TO PERSONAL INJURIES LITIGATION THE SUBMISSIONS OF THE ASSOCIATION OF PERSONAL INJURY LAWYERS FEBRUARY 2003 The executive
Step-by-step guide to pursuing a medical negligence claim Suffering from medical negligence can be a painful and distressing experience for anyone. This short guide offers some advice to help people thinking
Abuse and Sexual Assault INJURY & NEGLIGENCE SPECIALISTS Injury & Negligence WELCOME TO PANNONE PART OF SLATER & GORDON We have years of experience dealing with cases of abuse and sexual assault and know
Legal Research Record Summary of problem(s) Design and Dress Limited (DDL) has experienced problems due to the alleged harassment of one of their employees, Susie Baker, by another employee, Stephen Harding
Ministry of Justice Whiplash Reform Programme: consultation on independence in medical reporting and expert accreditation Question 1: Do you agree that the proposed amendments to paragraphs 7.1A(1) and
Conditional Fee Agreement: What You Need to Know This document forms an important part of your agreement with us. Please read it carefully. Definitions of words used in this document and the accompanying
Transport Committee cycling consultation Thompsons Solicitors has been standing up for the injured and mistreated since the firm was founded by Harry Thompson in 1921. We have fought for millions of people,
Headquarters Army Legal Assistance Catterick Barracks British Forces Post Office 39 Tel Civilian: (0049) (0)521 9254 3191 or 3196 Fax Civilian: (0049) (0)521 9254 3115 Tel Military: 94 8(81) 3191 or 3196
WORK AT HEIGHT ESSENTIAL ACCIDENT & FATALITY STRATEGY ACCIDENT AND FATALITY STRATEGY No matter how well something is planned, accidents can happen, and when they do people often react to a situation on
EX342 Coming to a court hearing? Some things you should know Court hearings in the High Court and county courts If you are a limited company, you are treated as a person and can be represented at the hearing
The criminal and civil justice systems in England and Wales Introduction Important differences exist between UK civil and criminal proceedings that have implications for fraud investigations, including
Legal Watch: Personal Injury 23rd July 2015 Issue: 071 Part 36 In the commercial claim of Dutton and others v Minards and others [Lawtel 20/07/2015] we have yet another case dealing with Part 36. Former
Page 1 Schools Group Bulletin David Smellie November 2009 The Vetting and Barring Scheme As you will know from our electronic briefing on 14 October 2009, further changes under the Scheme were introduced
Conditional Fee Agreement: What You Need to Know This document forms an important part of your agreement with us. Please read it carefully. Definitions of words used in this document and the accompanying
EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM TO THE CIVIL PROCEDURE (AMENDMENT No.8) RULES 2014 2014 No. 3299 (L. 36) 1. This explanatory memorandum has been prepared by the Ministry of Justice and is laid before Parliament
STAFF DISCIPLINE, CONDUCT AND GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE 1. Introduction Disciplinary issues arise when problems of conduct or capability are identified by the employer and management seeks to address them through
WISBOROUGH GREEN PARISH COUNCIL DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE 1. PURPOSE AND SCOPE This procedure is designed to help and encourage all council employees to achieve and maintain high standards of conduct whilst
Expert evidence A guide for expert witnesses and their clients (Second edition) Addendum, June 2009 1. Introduction 1.1 The second edition of this Guide was published in October 2003, in order to set out
Court of Appeal warning about no win no fee agreements Pankhurst v White and MIB grotesque fee arrangements both sides paid the cost On the 15 th December 2010, the Court of Appeal fired a warning shot
GUIDE TO PERSONAL INJURY/ACCIDENT CLAIMS At Richard Grogan & Associates we have Solicitors with significant experience and expertise who will advise and guide you through all matters relating to bringing
DEFENDANT PERSONAL INJURY MB MOORE BLATCH solicitors Moore Blatch PI Defendant Services Our Insurance Division has acted on behalf of composites, syndicates, self-insured and fleet clients for many years.
Derivative claims against directors - are you at risk? December 2010 1 Background It is more than three years since the ( Act ) introduced a new statutory regime for derivative claims. Concerns were raised
WESTERN AUSTRALIAN FEDERATION OF SEXUAL ASSAULT SERVICES (WAFSAS) FORUM 4 October 2005, Perth Criminal Injuries Compensation By Helen Porter, Office of Criminal Injuries Compensation. INTRODUCTION In this
SAFETY REVIEW NOT SPECIFIED IN CONTRACT James C. Kozlowski, J.D., Ph.D. 2008 James C. Kozlowski In contracting for personal services, an architect's duty depends on the particular agreement entered into
QBE European Operations UK Casualty Claims Policyholder guide March 2013 2013 Jackson reforms and Ministry of Justice Claims Extension UK Casualty Claims Policyholder guide March 2013 2013 Jackson reforms
Tel: 020 8492 2290 I N C O R P O R A T I N G D O N A L D G A L B R A I T H & C O Guide to compensation claims against the police This guide is designed to provide a general overview to bringing compensation
Legal Watch: Personal Injury 19th February 2015 Issue: 052 Civil procedure/expert witnesses One of the concerns practitioners have in the post Jackson era is the extent to which the courts will allow time
SUMMARY DECISION NO. 710/94 Negligence (duty of care) (occupational health and safety); Negligence (worker); Transfer of costs. The accident employer appealed a decision which refused the accident employer's
1 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Aims: as far as is reasonably practicable, to ensure the health and safety of pupils, employees and others in relation to moving and handling; to remove or reduce the risk of manual
Policy Title: Disciplinary & Grievance Policy Ref: BPC 008 Author: Philip Miskel Evoy & Lynn Gibbon Date: January 2013 Version 2 Review Date: January 2014 Introduction This policy is designed to ensure
Ministry of Justice Consultation Court Fees: Proposals for Reform Response from the Motor Accident Solicitors Society January 2014 Introduction This response is prepared on behalf of the Motor Accident
MODEL DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURE FOR SMALL ORGANISATIONS Employers should comply with the Acas Code of Practice for disciplinary and grievance procedures which can be downloaded from www.acas.org.uk/dgcode2009.
Health & Safety Regulations Everything you need to know Not all of those people injured at work would be entitled to compensation from their employer. In order to recover damages it is necessary to show
Personal Injury Accreditation Scheme Guidance In this guidance you can find: A. An introduction to the Accreditation Scheme B. Who is eligible to apply for membership? C. What types of membership are available?
A Practical Summary of the New Supreme Court Civil Rules for Clark Wilson LLP Insurance Clients by: Jennifer Loeb Clark Wilson LLP tel. 604.891.7766 firstname.lastname@example.org Edited by: Larry Munn Clark Wilson LLP
APPROVED BY COUNCIL September 2002 ROYAL HOLLOWAY University of London DISCIPLINARY POLICY AND PROCEDURE (for all staff other than academic teaching staff) Disciplinary Policy and Procedure September 2002
A brief guide to professional negligence claims Contents Introduction Do I have a claim? Important considerations Pre-action protocol procedure Court proceedings Contact information Introduction Claims
First published in the Solicitors Journal April 2011 Let us not bend with the remover to remove There are alternatives to Sir Rupert Jackson s recommendations that have the benefit that they might actually
Bar Council response to the Reducing Legal Costs in Clinical Negligence Claims pre-consultation paper 1. This is the response of the General Council of the Bar of England and Wales (the Bar Council) to