CLASS ACTION DATA BREACH LITIGATION: IS THE TIDE TURNING IN PLANTIFFS FAVOR?
|
|
- Jonas Cobb
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 CLASS ACTION DATA BREACH LITIGATION: IS THE TIDE TURNING IN PLANTIFFS FAVOR? These days, it is rare to turn on the news and not hear about a new data breach affecting U.S. companies and consumers. In fact, a recent study revealed that data breaches continue to increase, with 888 occurring in the first six months of 2015, which involved a whopping 246 million records worldwide. A flurry of recent decisions, most notably the 7th Circuit s ruling in Remijas v. Neiman Marcus Group LLC, are making it easier for consumers to pursue damages from companies that fall victim to hackers. The rapid pace of litigation related to the unauthorized collection, use, or disclosure of consumer information has left district and circuit courts grappling with the fundamental question: Do plaintiffs have standing to bring a claim in the event of a data breach? Under Article III of the Constitution, a plaintiff must demonstrate the following to bring an action in federal court: 1) he/she suffered actual or imminent harm; 2) that is traceable to the defendant; and 3) that judicial action will likely redress the harm. This criteria has created quite the conundrum for appellate courts that must determine whether the release of private information constitutes an injury. While it may seem clear that an injury to a consumer has occurred if a hacker makes unauthorized charges on a consumer s credit card, what about scenarios in which information has been accessed, or potentially accessed, but no fraudulent activity has followed? Let s take a look at how these issues have historically played out in federal court and how recent developments may impact your company s purchase of cyber insurance.
2 CLASS ACTION DATA BREACH LITIGATION 2 THE EVOLUTION OF ARTICLE III DECISIONS Pisciotta v. Old Nat l Bancorp It all began in 2007 when the 7th Circuit ruled that after Old National Bancorp failed to adequately protect its consumers personal data, plaintiffs had standing to bring an action because the injury requirement of Article III could be satisfied simply by a threat of future harm or an increased risk of future harm. Krottner v. Starbucks Corp. In 2010, the 9th Circuit united with the 7th Circuit when it determined the threat of misuse from the theft of a laptop containing personal, unencrypted data qualified as an injury, and therefore met the requirements of Article III. Clapper v. Amnesty Int l USA In 2013, defense attorneys were ecstatic when the Supreme Court ruled on this case, which presented a unique fact pattern, and strengthened the requirements for Article III standing. A group of attorneys, human rights and media organizations argued that Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 was unconstitutional as it could potentially allow the government to engage in surveillance that may compromise the plaintiffs capacity to interact confidentially with their clients. Where intelligence actions and foreign affairs policies were concerned, the Supreme Court claimed it had often found standing lacking, further stating that imminence was a somewhat elastic concept, [but] it cannot be stretched beyond its purpose [to ensure] that the injury is certainly impending. Therefore, the Court held the alleged threat to the plaintiffs, which relies on a highly attenuated chain of possibilities, does not satisfy the requirement that threatened injury must be certainly impending. Remijas v. Neiman Marcus Group, LLC More recently, as data breach incidents at large retailers and other companies exploded, the plaintiffs bar saw the potential for huge classes with massive settlements and class action claim activity increased. With the stakes high, appellate litigation continued on this issue and Article III standing defenses began to erode. Reilly v. Ceridian Corp. In 2011, the 3rd Circuit criticized the 7th and 9th circuits skimpy rationale employed in the two cases above, when it reviewed the fact pattern in this case, suggesting that even though a computer firewall was compromised, there was no quantifiable risk of damage in the future, and therefore, no injury or standing. While defense attorneys continued for years to successfully cite the Clapper ruling to support plaintiffs insufficient standing at the district court level, this practice was brought to a halt in July of 2015 when the 7th Circuit once again sided with consumers. 350,000 records of Neiman Marcus customers were involved in a hack, 9,200 of which were later used fraudulently. Concerning the cards that were not subject to fraud, Neiman Marcus argued the potential risk of future identity theft or fraudulent charges was too speculative to constitute an injury.
3 CLASS ACTION DATA BREACH LITIGATION 3 Clapper does not, as the district court thought, foreclose any use whatsoever of future injuries to support Article III standing. The 7th Circuit, however, rejected this argument and declared that Clapper does not, as the district court thought, foreclose any use whatsoever of future injuries to support Article III standing. Further, the court refused to require the affected customers wait until hackers commit identity theft or credit-card fraud in order to give the class standing, because there is an objectively reasonable likelihood that such an injury will occur. Concerned that the court s precedential ruling would have long-term effects on data breach law, Neiman Marcus asked the appellate court in August of 2015 to rehear the matter en banc, claiming the decision all but declares that such breaches automatically confer standing. The 7th Circuit declined, allowing the suit to move forward in Illinois federal court. Nor did the court buy Coke s second argument that any injury suffered could not be traceable to Coke, citing that chain linking the loss of Plaintiff s SSN, credit cards, and banking information, and the subsequent identity attacks Plaintiff suffered, is plausible. The connection between the loss of sensitive PII like SSN and banking information and subsequent identity attacks is apparent from Plaintiff s complaint. A pre-trial conference in this case is set for November 12, 2015, and JLT will continue to monitor further developments. Enslin v. The Coca-Cola Co. In September of 2015, the Eastern District of Pennsylvania denied a motion to dismiss this case for lack of standing in yet another victory for class-action plaintiffs. Following an employee theft of 55 laptops containing the personal information of 74,000 current and former employees, Coke argued that any future harms the plaintiff might suffer were speculative, hypothetical, and not an injury-in-fact. Further, Coke claimed that even if an injury had been suffered, it was not fairly traceable to the conduct of the company. The court rejected Coke s first argument, claiming that unlike the plaintiffs in Clapper and Reilly, the plaintiff had already suffered palpable harm, including the alleged theft of funds from his bank accounts on two occasions, unauthorized use of four credit cards, and the unauthorized issuance of new credit cards. Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins During its fall 2015 term, the Supreme Court will determine whether Congress can confer Article III standing upon a plaintiff who has suffered no concrete harm by authorizing a private right of action based on a violation of a federal statute. Spokeo, Inc. operates a people search engine that compiles publicly-available information about individuals contact information, marital status, age, occupation, economic health, and wealth. The plaintiff
4 CLASS ACTION DATA BREACH LITIGATION 4 in this case claims that Spokeo created and made available for sale a report containing inaccurate information about him, specifically his education, employment, wealth, relationship status, and children. The district court initially dismissed the plaintiff s suit for lack of standing, but the 9th Circuit reversed, concluding the plaintiff had standing under Article III because he alleged violations of statutory rights created by the Fair Credit Reporting Act ( FCRA ), which were concrete, de facto injuries. Because the plaintiff alleged Spokeo violated his own rights versus the rights of others, the 9th Circuit concluded he had sufficiently satisfied the legal requirements for standing. Spokeo appealed to the Supreme Court, claiming the 9th Circuit erred in allowing the plaintiff to maintain a lawsuit in federal court based solely on an injury in law untethered to any concrete harm in other words, without any real-world injury, which will in turn allow any future plaintiff to satisfy standing by asserting a violation of a technical FCRA or other statutory requirement. The parties briefings have been filed and, interestingly, both highlight the conceivable impact of this decision not only for the future of data-breach litigation, but also for the general scope of Article III jurisdiction. Oral argument is currently scheduled for November 2, 2015, and JLT will continue to monitor further developments. THE FUTURE OF DATA BREACH LITIGATION where the number of data breaches seems to be growing by the day. Many companies, especially those with consumers, have understandably expressed concern about a flood of no-injury class actions under various statutes providing for statutory damages, such as FCRA, the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, and the Video Privacy Protection Act, among others. HOW WILL THESE CASES AFFECT CYBER INSURANCE AND PREMIUMS? Cyber insurance coverage in certain industries, most notably, retail and healthcare, is already facing pricing pressures due to the substantial claim activity over the past 36 months. Losses in those industries have been attributable to the size of the breaches, the data lost (credit card numbers and personal health care information), and the regulatory environment. If the erosion of the standing defense to these claims (where consumers really have not suffered much of a loss) continues, we can expect to see even more litigation, leading to increased defense costs and larger and more frequent settlements. All add to the challenges facing insurance carriers as they underwrite this risk and are likely to lead to higher premiums and more restrictive terms (certainly higher retention requirements). Large companies in any industry who maintain large amounts of personally identifiable information of their customers will continue to be targeted by the plaintiffs bar and may face new challenges on cyber insurance terms. Is the tide turning in favor of consumers? Only time will tell if these recent decisions are indicative of a more consumer-sympathetic legal system in an environment Only time will tell if these recent decisions are indicative of a more consumer-sympathetic legal system in an environment where the number of data breaches seems to be growing by the day.
5 ABOUT JLT Jardine Lloyd Thompson (JLT) is the world s leading specialty focused provider of insurance, reinsurance, and employee benefits related advice, brokerage and associated services. We provide our clients with deep specialist knowledge, advocacy, tailored advice, and service excellence. Our 10,600 experts worldwide are focused on our client industries and are supported by the second largest international placement network with unparalleled capabilities and resources in 135 countries. JLT Specialty USA is the U.S. platform of the leading specialty business advisory firm, Jardine Lloyd Thompson Group. Our experts have deep industry and product experience serving leading US and global firms. Our key to client success is our freedom to be creative, collaborative, and analytical while challenging conventions, redefining problems, creating new analytical insights, and exploring new boundaries to deliver solutions for each client s unique business and risks. Contacts Ryan Griffin Vice President Cyber and E&O Practice ryan.griffin@jltus.com Lindsey Roser Senior Vice President Legal & Claims Practice lindsey.roser@jltus.com JLT Group JLT Specialty USA 1520 Market Street, Suite 300 Denver, CO JLT Specialty USA
2015 ROBINS KAPLANLLP TOOLS, TIPS, AND TRENDS: DATA PRIVACY AND CYBERSECURITY
TOOLS, TIPS, AND TRENDS: DATA PRIVACY AND CYBERSECURITY PANEL MEMBERS Stacy Bettison, Founder and President, BETTISON Candice Ciresi, Head of Stratasys US Legal and Legal Counsel to SSYS, Inc and LATAM
More informationRecent Court Rulings May Affect Protection Responsibilities
FINPRO Practice april 2013 Recent Court Rulings May Affect Companies Cyber and Data Protection Responsibilities Contents: Krottner v. starbucks corp. page 2 Clapper v. amnesty international page 3 Amgen,
More informationReducing Cyber Risk in Your Organization
Reducing Cyber Risk in Your Organization White Paper 2016 The First Step to Reducing Cyber Risk Understanding Your Cyber Assets With nearly 80,000 cyber security incidents worldwide in 2014 and more than
More informationData Breach Litigation:
Data Breach Litigation: Empirical analysis and Current trends Tonia Klausner, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, PC Sasha Romanosky, RAND 11/6/2013 How is US policy addressing harms caused by data breaches?
More informationTHE C/EO PERSPECTIVE: WHAT YOU DON T KNOW WILL HURT YOU
THE C/EO PERSPECTIVE: WHAT YOU DON T KNOW WILL HURT YOU Cyber Liability in the Boardroom What you don t know will hurt you. ABOUT JLT SPECIALTY JLT Specialty Insurance Services is the U.S. platform of
More informationData Breach Law and Litigation
Technological Evolution The Impact of Social Media, Big Data and Privacy on Business Data Security: Before and After a Breach Occurs Archis A. Parasharami Partner Mayer Brown LLP David Hale Chief Privacy
More informationTHE BBA TABLE OF CONTENTS CONTACT US The Boston Bar Journal
THE BBA TABLE OF CONTENTS CONTACT US The Boston Bar Journal Legal Analysis Data Breach Class Action Litigation A Tough Road for Plaintiffs By Timothy H. Madden Introduction With the increased prevalence
More informationGALLAGHER CYBER LIABILITY PRACTICE. Tailored Solutions for Cyber Liability and Professional Liability
GALLAGHER CYBER LIABILITY PRACTICE Tailored Solutions for Cyber Liability and Professional Liability Are you exposed to cyber risk? Like nearly every other business, you have probably capitalized on the
More informationREGULATION OF COMPANIES DATA SECURITY PRACTICES UNDER THE FTC ACT AND CALIFORNIA UNFAIR COMPETITION LAW By Kathryn F. Russo 1
REGULATION OF COMPANIES DATA SECURITY PRACTICES UNDER THE FTC ACT AND CALIFORNIA UNFAIR COMPETITION LAW By Kathryn F. Russo 1 I. Introduction News of data breaches dominates the headlines. Technology is
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT THOMAS ROBINS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SPOKEO, INC., a California corporation,
More informationA Year in Review: Data Breaches and Lessons Learned Monday, October 29, 2012 9:00-10:00 a.m.
International Association of Privacy Professionals Practical Privacy Series A Year in Review: Data Breaches and Lessons Learned Monday, October 29, 2012 9:00-10:00 a.m. Michael A. Vatis 212 506 3927 mvatis@steptoe.com
More informationData Breach Litigation
What Happens to Information Stolen in a Data Breach and Why It Matters in Litigation By: Joseph H. Wieseman and Alex M. Barfield Hawkins Parnell Thackston & Young, LLP Joseph H. Wieseman is a partner at
More information2014 IL App (5th) 120588-U NO. 5-12-0588 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIFTH DISTRICT
NOTICE Decision filed 01/23/14. The text of this decision may be changed or corrected prior to the filing of a Petition for Rehearing or the disposition of the same. 2014 IL App (5th) 120588-U NO. 5-12-0588
More informationExpert Analysis Employee Data Privacy Issues: Risk And Responsibility in Cyberincidents
Westlaw Journal Employment Litigation News and Analysis Legislation Regulation Expert Commentary VOLUME 29, issue 15 / february 18, 2015 Expert Analysis Employee Data Privacy Issues: Risk And Responsibility
More informationThe Matrix Reloaded: Cybersecurity and Data Protection for Employers. Jodi D. Taylor
The Matrix Reloaded: Cybersecurity and Data Protection for Employers Jodi D. Taylor Why Talk About This Now? Landscape is changing Enforcement by federal and state governments on the rise Legislation on
More informationIllinois Official Reports
Illinois Official Reports Appellate Court Certain Underwriters at Lloyd s London v. The Burlington Insurance Co., 2015 IL App (1st) 141408 Appellate Court Caption CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD S LONDON,
More informationStanding To Challenge Corporate Searches?
Portfolio Media, Inc. 648 Broadway, Suite 200 New York, NY 10012 www.law360.com Phone: +1 212 537 6331 Fax: +1 212 537 6371 customerservice@portfoliomedia.com Standing To Challenge Corporate Searches?
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 14-4173 MICHAEL J. MANDELBROT; MANDELBROT LAW FIRM,
Case: 14-4173 Document: 003112102053 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/15/2015 NOT PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 14-4173 MICHAEL J. MANDELBROT; MANDELBROT LAW FIRM, v. Appellants
More informationHenkel Corp v. Hartford Accident
2008 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 3-27-2008 Henkel Corp v. Hartford Accident Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 06-4856 Follow
More informationEMERGING CYBER RISK CYBER ATTACKS AND PROPERTY DAMAGE: WILL INSURANCE RESPOND?
EMERGING CYBER RISK CYBER ATTACKS AND PROPERTY DAMAGE: WILL INSURANCE RESPOND? ABOUT JLT SPECIALTY JLT Specialty Insurance Services is the U.S. platform of JLT Group, the leading specialty business adivsory
More informationConsumer Reporting Agencies and Federal Law
Privacy and Information Security Law Randy Canis CLASS 11 Financial Data pt. 1; Data Security 1 Financial Data pt. 1 2 A. THE FAIR CREDIT REPORTING ACT 3 Credit Reports Why do credit reports matter? Credit
More informationReducing Risk. Raising Expectations. CyberRisk and Professional Liability
Reducing Risk. Raising Expectations. CyberRisk and Professional Liability Are you exposed to CyberRisk? Like nearly every other business, you have likely capitalized on the advancements in technology today
More informationJoe A. Ramirez Catherine Crane
RIMS/RMAFP PRESENTATION Joe A. Ramirez Catherine Crane RISK TRANSFER VIA INSURANCE Most Common Method Involves Assessment of Risk and Loss Potential Risk of Loss Transferred For a Premium Insurance Contract
More information2015 IL App (1st) 141985-U. No. 1-14-1985 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT
2015 IL App (1st) 141985-U No. 1-14-1985 NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances allowed under Rule 23(e)(1).
More informationHow to Respond When Sensitive Customer and Employee Data is Breached, Stolen or Compromised
ACE USA Podcast Released June 24, 2010 How to Respond When Sensitive Customer and Employee Data is Breached, Stolen or Compromised Moderator: Richard Tallo Senior Vice President, ACE North America Marketing
More informationInsurers Not Obligated to Defend in ZIP Code Coverage Suits
Insurers Not Obligated to Defend in ZIP Code Coverage Suits By Bryana Blessinger Hill & Lamb LLP Portland, Oregon Insurers are increasingly faced with privacy and data-breach related claims. One of the
More informationCLASS ACTION. Westlaw Journal. Expert Analysis The State of Coverage Disputes Concerning Advertising And Privacy Claims
Westlaw Journal CLASS ACTION Litigation News and Analysis Legislation Regulation Expert Commentary VOLUME 19, ISSUE 8 / SEPTEMBER 2012 Expert Analysis The State of Coverage Disputes Concerning Advertising
More information2015 IL App (3d) 140144-U. Order filed September 2, 2015 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS THIRD DISTRICT A.D., 2015
NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances allowed under Rule 23(e(1. 2015 IL App (3d 140144-U Order filed
More informationNOT RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION File Name: 12a1235n.06. No. 11-2254 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION File Name: 12a1235n.06 No. 11-2254 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT JOHN T. SYRON, v. Plaintiff-Appellant, RELIASTAR LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 07-3147 NAUTILUS INSURANCE COMPANY, an Arizona corporation, v. Plaintiff-Appellant, 1452-4 N. MILWAUKEE AVENUE, LLC, GREAT CENTRAL INSURANCE
More informationInsurance Coverage In Consumer Class Actions
This article first appeared in the October 2010 issue of The Corporate Counselor. Insurance Coverage In Consumer Class Actions John W. McGuinness and Justin F. Lavella The business world is an increasingly
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Case: 2:13-cv-00118-MHW-MRA Doc #: 40 Filed: 02/10/14 Page: 1 of 31 PAGEID #: 402 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION Mohammad S. Galaria, individually and on behalf
More informationRISKY BUSINESS SEMINAR CYBER LIABILITY DISCUSSION
RISKY BUSINESS SEMINAR CYBER LIABILITY DISCUSSION October 23, 2015 THREAT ENVIRONMENT Growing incentive for insiders to abuse access to sensitive data for financial gain Disgruntled current and former
More informationUNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No. 2319. September Term, 2012 MARY LYONS KENNETH HAUTMAN A/K/A JOHN HAUTMAN
UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND No. 2319 September Term, 2012 MARY LYONS v. KENNETH HAUTMAN A/K/A JOHN HAUTMAN Zarnoch, Graeff, Moylan, Charles E. Jr. (Retired, Specially Assigned),
More informationArbitration in Seamen Cases
Arbitration in Seamen Cases Recently, seamen have been facing mandatory arbitration provisions in their employment agreements which deny them their rights to a jury trial under the Jones Act, and also
More informationNo. 3 09 0033 THIRD DISTRICT A.D., 2009
No. 3 09 0033 Filed December 16, 2009 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS THIRD DISTRICT A.D., 2009 KEPPLE AND COMPANY, INC., ) Appeal from the Circuit Court an Illinois Corporation, ) of the 10th Judicial
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:14-CV-2872 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION BEVERLY T PETERS, VS. Plaintiff, ST. JOSEPH SERVICES CORPORATION d/b/a ST. JOSEPH HEALTH SYSTEM, et al, Defendants. CIVIL ACTION
More information2015 IL App (1st) 142304-U. No. 1-14-2304 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT
2015 IL App (1st 142304-U SECOND DIVISION May 5, 2015 No. 1-14-2304 NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Workers Compensation Reinsurance Association and Minnesota Workers Compensation Insurers Association, Inc., Plaintiffs, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA v. Civil No. 07-3371 (JNE/AJB)
More informationStanding In Data Breach Cases
Standing in Data Breach Cases: A Review of Recent Trends Published in the Bloomberg BNA Class Action Litigation Report on September 25, 2015. By Simon J. Frankel, Robert D. Fram, Amanda C. Lynch For most
More information2013 IL App (3d) 120130-U. Order filed September 23, 2013 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS THIRD DISTRICT A.D., 2013
NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances allowed under Rule 23(e)(1). 2013 IL App (3d) 120130-U Order
More informationData Breach Response Basic Principles Under U.S. State and Federal Law. ABA Litigation Section Core Knowledge January 2015 1
Data Breach Response Basic Principles Under U.S. State and Federal Law ABA Litigation Section Core Knowledge January 2015 1 I. Introduction Data breaches have become an unfortunate reality for many of
More informationCLOUD SECURITY LAW MICHAEL KEELING, PE, ESQ. KEELING LAW OFFICES, PC PHOENIX AND CORONADO
CLOUD SECURITY LAW MICHAEL KEELING, PE, ESQ. KEELING LAW OFFICES, PC PHOENIX AND CORONADO NOTE: Information contained in this presentation is intended for informational purposes ONLY. It is not intended
More informationData Breach and Senior Living Communities May 29, 2015
Data Breach and Senior Living Communities May 29, 2015 Todays Objectives: 1. Discuss Current Data Breach Trends & Issues 2. Understanding Why The Senior Living Industry May Be A Target 3. Data Breach Costs
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 14 3122 HILARY REMIJAS, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, et al., Plaintiffs Appellants, v. NEIMAN MARCUS GROUP,
More informationDiscussion on Network Security & Privacy Liability Exposures and Insurance
Discussion on Network Security & Privacy Liability Exposures and Insurance Presented By: Kevin Violette Errors & Omissions Senior Broker, R.T. Specialty, LLC February, 25 2014 HFMA Washington-Alaska Chapter
More informationCommonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals
RENDERED: DECEMBER 7, 2012; 10:00 A.M. NOT TO BE PUBLISHED ORDERED PUBLISHED FEBRUARY 8, 2013; 10:00 A.M. Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals NO. 2011-CA-000990-MR RANDY PEZZAROSSI APPELLANT APPEAL
More informationNo. 1-15-0941 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT
2015 IL App (1st) 150941-U SIXTH DIVISION December 18, 2015 No. 1-15-0941 NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DENIS SHEILS AND HARRIET SHEILS : CIVIL ACTION : v. : : UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA : NO. 97-5510 MEDICAL CENTER, : JANET RENO,
More informationData Privacy and Cybersecurity Task Force
Data Privacy and Cybersecurity Task Force key contact Josephine Cicchetti Shareholder T: 202.965.8162 F: 202.965.8104 email We provide clients across industries with comprehensive counsel on complex, evolving,
More informationThe Enforceability of Mediated Settlement Agreements. By: Thomas J. Smith The Law Offices of Thomas J. Smith San Antonio, Texas
The Enforceability of Mediated Settlement Agreements By: Thomas J. Smith The Law Offices of Thomas J. Smith San Antonio, Texas NIGHTMARE ON MEDIATION STREET You mediate a case where the Plaintiff is suing
More informationCyber and Privacy Risk What Are the Trends? Is Insurance the Answer?
Minnesota Society for Healthcare Risk Management September 22, 2011 Cyber and Privacy Risk What Are the Trends? Is Insurance the Answer? Melissa Krasnow, Partner, Dorsey & Whitney, and Certified Information
More informationTHE THREAT OF BAD FAITH LITIGATION ETHICAL HANDLING OF CLAIMS AND GOOD FAITH SETTLEMENT PRACTICES. By Craig R. White
THE THREAT OF BAD FAITH LITIGATION ETHICAL HANDLING OF CLAIMS AND GOOD FAITH SETTLEMENT PRACTICES By Craig R. White SKEDSVOLD & WHITE, LLC. 1050 Crown Pointe Parkway Suite 710 Atlanta, Georgia 30338 (770)
More informationKBR Ruling Likely To Encourage More FCA Litigation
Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com KBR Ruling Likely To Encourage More FCA Litigation
More informationCase: 1:10-cv-02125 Document #: 55 Filed: 02/03/11 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:411
Case: 1:10-cv-02125 Document #: 55 Filed: 02/03/11 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:411 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION GUARANTEE TRUST LIFE ) INSURANCE COMPANY, ) ) Plaintiff,
More informationCase 1:13-cv-01650-TWP-MJD Document 24 Filed 06/27/14 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: <pageid>
Case 1:13-cv-01650-TWP-MJD Document 24 Filed 06/27/14 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION SEAN SMITH, v. Plaintiff, UTAH VALLEY
More informationAnatomy of a Hotel Breach
Page 1 of 6 Anatomy of a Hotel Breach Written by Sandy B. Garfinkel Monday, 09 June 2014 15:22 Like 0 Tweet 0 0 Data breach incidents have dominated the news in 2014, and they are only becoming more frequent
More information2016 IL App (4th) 150142-UB NO. 4-15-0142 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FOURTH DISTRICT
NOTICE This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances allowed under Rule 23(e(1. 2016 IL App (4th 150142-UB NO. 4-15-0142
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA PROGRESSIVE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, CASE NO.: 2014-CV-000079-A-O Lower Case No.: 2012-SC-002127-O Appellant, v.
More information2014 IL App (1st) 130250-U. No. 1-13-0250 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT
2014 IL App (1st) 130250-U FIFTH DIVISION September 12, 2014 No. 1-13-0250 NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited
More information2013 IL App (5th) 120093WC-U NO. 5-12-0093WC IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIFTH DISTRICT WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION DIVISION
NOTICE Decision filed 08/20/13. The text of this decision may be changed or corrected prior to the filing of a Petition for Rehearing or the disposition of the same. 2013 IL App (5th 120093WC-U NO. 5-12-0093WC
More informationNo. 14-3981 THE RESIDENCES AT BAY POINT CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC.
NOT PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 14-3981 THE RESIDENCES AT BAY POINT CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. v. THE STANDARD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, d/b/a TRAVELERS INDMNITY
More informationClapper Dethroned: Imminent Injury and Standing for Data Breach Lawsuits in Light of Ashley Madison
Washington and Lee Law Review Online Volume 73 Issue 1 Article 3 6-1-2016 Clapper Dethroned: Imminent Injury and Standing for Data Breach Lawsuits in Light of Ashley Madison Arthur R. Vorbrodt Washington
More informationTHE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE COLLEGE OF INFORMATION SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY
THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE COLLEGE OF INFORMATION SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY THE POTENTIAL ROLE OF CYBER-LIABILITY INSURANCE IN DATA BREACH LITIGATION ERIC S. MCCOY SPRING 2016
More informationv. CASE NO.: CVA1 09-16 Lower Court Case No.: 2008-CC-7009-O
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA ELOURDE COLIN, Appellant, v. CASE NO.: CVA1 09-16 Lower Court Case No.: 2008-CC-7009-O PROGRESSIVE AMERICAN INSURANCE
More information2015 IL App (5th) 140227-U NO. 5-14-0227 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIFTH DISTRICT
NOTICE Decision filed 10/15/15. The text of this decision may be changed or corrected prior to the filing of a Petition for Rehearing or the disposition of the same. 2015 IL App (5th 140227-U NO. 5-14-0227
More informationManaging Jones Act Personal Injury Litigation The Vessel Owner s Perspective. Lawrence R. DeMarcay, III
Managing Jones Act Personal Injury Litigation The Vessel Owner s Perspective by Lawrence R. DeMarcay, III Presented to the Offshore Marine Services Association / Loyola College of Law Industry Seminar
More information2016 CO 51. After Unleaded Software, Inc., failed to deliver contracted-for websites and
Opinions of the Colorado Supreme Court are available to the public and can be accessed through the Judicial Branch s homepage at http://www.courts.state.co.us. Opinions are also posted on the Colorado
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA PLAINTIFF S BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA RICHMOND DIVISION MICHAEL GLENN WHITE, et. al. Plaintiffs v. VIRGINIA BOARD OF EDUCATION; et. al., Defendants. Case No. 3:00CV386
More information2014 IL App (1st) 123454-U No. 1-12-3454 February 11, 2014 Modified Upon Rehearing April 30, 2014 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST DISTRICT
2014 IL App (1st) 123454-U No. 1-12-3454 February 11, 2014 Modified Upon Rehearing April 30, 2014 THIRD DIVISION NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO COLORADO CRIMINAL DEFENSE BAR, a Colorado non-profit corporation; COLORADO CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFORM COALITION, a Colorado
More informationIn the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District
In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION TWO FRANCIS GRAHAM, ) No. ED97421 ) Respondent, ) Appeal from the Circuit Court ) of St. Louis County vs. ) ) Honorable Steven H. Goldman STATE
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA HOWARD MEDICAL, INC. t/a CIVIL ACTION ADVANCE AMBULANCE SERVICE, NO. 00-5977 Plaintiff, v. TEMPLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL, t/a TEMPLE
More informationPRESENT: THE HONORABLE DAVID O. CARTER, JUDGE
Case 8:13-cv-01292-DOC-JCG Document 70 Filed 08/27/14 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #:1073 Title: JACOB PETERSEN V. TOWNSEND FARMS INC. ET AL. PRESENT: THE HONORABLE DAVID O. CARTER, JUDGE Julie Barrera Courtroom
More informationSeventh Circuit Expands the Based Upon Exception to Jurisdiction in False Claims Act Lawsuits
Seventh Circuit Expands the Based Upon Exception to Jurisdiction in False Claims Act Lawsuits Robert R. Stauffer and Sandi J. Toll As the authors explain, a recent appellate court decision should expand
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL TRIAL DIVISION
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL TRIAL DIVISION JOHN FRAZIER HUNT, : DECEMBER TERM, 2004 Plaintiff, : No. 2742 v. : (Commerce Program) NATIONAL
More informationIllinois Official Reports
Illinois Official Reports Appellate Court Pekin Insurance Co. v. Rada Development, LLC, 2014 IL App (1st) 133947 Appellate Court Caption PEKIN INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RADA DEVELOPMENT,
More informationIN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST DISTRICT
2016 IL App (1st) 150810-U Nos. 1-15-0810, 1-15-0942 cons. Fourth Division June 30, 2016 NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in
More informationHit ratios are still very low for Security & Privacy coverage: What are companies waiting for?
Hit ratios are still very low for Security & Privacy coverage: What are companies waiting for? Authored by Neeraj Sahni and Tim Stapleton Neeraj Sahni is Director, Insurance Channel at Kroll Cyber Investigations
More informationCase 2:04-cv-02247-JWS Document 45 Filed 10/26/05 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Case 2:04-cv-02247-JWS Document 45 Filed 10/26/05 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA GERALD and COREY ANDERSON, Plaintiffs, CIV 04-2247 PHX JWS vs. ORDER AND OPINION [Re: Motion
More informationBlack Hats, Firewalls, and Data Loss: Insurers Confront Data Breach Litigation
Thomas W. Curvin Phillip E. Stano Mark Thibodeaux Tracey K. Ledbetter December 9, 2014 Black Hats, Firewalls, and Data Loss: Insurers Confront Data Breach Litigation INSURANCE AND FINANCIAL SERVICES LITIGATION
More informationFollow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2008
2008 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 10-23-2008 Motise v. Parrish Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 08-1881 Follow this and additional
More informationHOW DID NETWORK SECURITY AND PRIVACY ISSUES BECOME D&O EXPOSURES?
HOW DID NETWORK SECURITY AND PRIVACY ISSUES BECOME D&O EXPOSURES? MODERATOR: Richard J. Bortnick, Esq., Defense Attorney, Cozen O Connor PANELISTS: Anjali Das, MBA, Esq., Partner, Wilson Elser Moskowitz
More informationFILED December 18, 2015 Carla Bender 4 th District Appellate Court, IL
NOTICE This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances allowed under Rule 23(e(1. 2015 IL App (4th 150340-U NO. 4-15-0340
More informationManaging Legal Risks in Light of Recent Security Breaches. Daniel Lim
Managing Legal Risks in Light of Recent Security Breaches Daniel Lim Agenda Review of Recent Data Breaches Recent Cases & Legal Standards Class Actions Consumer Data Investigations PHI, PII What To Do
More information3:13-cv-00999-TLW Date Filed 03/31/15 Entry Number 110 Page 1 of 36 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION
3:13-cv-00999-TLW Date Filed 03/31/15 Entry Number 110 Page 1 of 36 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION Richard G. Beck, Beverly Watson, ) Cheryl Gajadhar, Jeffery
More informationNo. 1-11-1354 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT
2012 IL App (1st 1111354-U SIXTH DIVISION April 20, 2012 No. 1-11-1354 NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances
More informationConstruction Defect Coverage Recap For 1st Quarter
Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com Construction Defect Coverage Recap For 1st Quarter
More informationTRENDS IN CYBER LIABILITY Presented by Chris DiIenno Data Privacy and Network Security Group Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith
TRENDS IN CYBER LIABILITY Presented by Chris DiIenno Data Privacy and Network Security Group Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith Types of Data at Stake Residents, constituents, employees PII Personally Identifiable
More informationReverse and Render in part; Affirm in part; Opinion Filed December 29, 2014. In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
Reverse and Render in part; Affirm in part; Opinion Filed December 29, 2014. S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-01546-CV OKLAHOMA SURETY COMPANY, Appellant/Cross-Appellee
More informationChallenging EEOC Conciliation Charges
Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com Challenging EEOC Conciliation Charges Law360, New
More informationNOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT ALFREDO MEJIA, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D13-2248 ) CITIZENS
More informationSHAWNTELLE ALLEN, Plaintiff/Appellant, SCF NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY; RALPH MORRIS, Defendanst/Appellees. No. 1 CA-CV 14-0058
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE. IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION. Case No. 2:12-cv-45-FtM-29SPC OPINION AND ORDER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION SOUTH BAY PLANTATION CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., a not for profit corporation also known as SOUTH BAY PLANTATION ASSOCIATES,
More informationIn this insurance coverage dispute, plaintiffrespondent. Keyspan Gas East Corporation seeks a declaration that
================================================================= This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. -----------------------------------------------------------------
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals
USCA Case #12-5117 Document #1394950 Filed: 09/18/2012 Page 1 of 5 United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT No. 12-5117 September Term, 2012 FILED ON: SEPTEMBER 18, 2012 CENTER
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 11-13737. D.C. Docket Nos. 8:10-cv-02360-VMC ; 8:90-bk-10016-PMG
Case: 11-13737 Date Filed: 11/06/2012 Page: 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 11-13737 [DO NOT PUBLISH] D.C. Docket Nos. 8:10-cv-02360-VMC ; 8:90-bk-10016-PMG In
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CHRISTOPHER JOHNSON, Petitioner/Defendant, v. Case No.: SC09-1045 Lower Case Nos.:4D08-3090; 07-10734 CF10B STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent/Plaintiff. / PETITIONER S JURISDICTIONAL
More informationCase 4:06-cv-00191 Document 12 Filed in TXSD on 05/25/06 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
Case 4:06-cv-00191 Document 12 Filed in TXSD on 05/25/06 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION BARBARA S. QUINN, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. H-06-00191
More information2015 IL App (1st) 141310-U. No. 1-14-1310 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT
2015 IL App (1st) 141310-U FIRST DIVISION October 5, 2015 No. 1-14-1310 NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances
More information