DISCRIMINATION, HARASSMENT AND RETALIATION
|
|
- Gilbert Harvey
- 7 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 DISCRIMINATION, HARASSMENT AND RETALIATION POLICY MAKER LIABILITY EXCEPTION TO 1 ST AMENDMENT RETALIATION NOT APPLICABLE TO SHERIFF S DEPARTMENT LIEUTENANT IN CONTRACT CITY POLICE CHIEF ROLE The Orange County Sheriff s Department (OCSD) provided contract police services to the City of San Clemente. Plaintiff Hunt, one of 60 lieutenants on the OCSD force, was assigned as the San Clemente chief, where he oversaw some 56 officers and participated in local interactions with the city council and citizenry. However, he reported to an intermediate supervisor (not directly to Defendant/Sheriff Michael Corona) and had largely the operational authority of an administrator rather than a policy-making role. Hunt ran against Corona in the 2006 election for Orange County sheriff. Corona won, and shortly thereafter had Hunt investigated and ultimately demoted three ranks for the allegedly disloyal and disruptive statements Hunt had made during the campaign. Hunt sued for violation of 42 U.S.C. 1983, alleging improper retaliation against him based on an exercise of his 1 st Amendment rights. The Ninth Circuit reversed the lower court, finding that Hunt did not fall within the policy-maker liability exception to the 1 st Amendment. Hunt s position was not one for which political loyalty was an appropriate requirement, and thus his discipline based on his political speech constituted retaliation for protected speech. (Note: despite the retaliation ruling, the trial court s ruling in favor of Corona based on qualified immunity was affirmed.) Hunt v. County of Orange (9th Cir. 2012) 672 F.3d 606. SIMILARLY-SITUATED CLASS OF PLAINTIFFS MAY PIGGYBACK ON ONE PLAINTIFF S TIMELY DFEH COMPLAINT OF DISCRIMINATION TO SATISFY THE REQUIREMENT TO EXHAUST ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES Plaintiffs were retired Orange County employees who filed a lawsuit against the County (on behalf of themselves and several thousand other similarly-situated retirees) challenging the County s changes to its retiree medical benefit program. Specifically, the County had negotiated to (1) split the current employees and retirees into two pools for premium calculation, (2) reduce the monthly amount of money paid to retirees to be used toward medical benefit premiums, and (3) to reduce the overall retiree medical payment by half once the retiree reached the Medicare eligibility age. The retirees sued, claiming breach of contract, denial of due process and discrimination against the retirees based on age in violation of the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA). The trial court dismissed the retirees age discrimination for failure to exhaust administrative remedies because only one plaintiff James McConnell had filed a complaint with the Department of Fair Employment and Housing and obtained a right to sue letter. The Ninth Circuit reversed, finding that under federal law, so long as one plaintiff timely files an administrative complaint, a class of similarly-situated plaintiffs may piggyback on that complaint, thereby satisfying the exhaustion requirement. Harris v. County of Orange (9th Cir. 2012) 682 F.3d BB&K 2012 ANNUAL LABOR & EMPLOYMENT LAW UPDATE 1
2 STATISTICAL EVIDENCE OF DISPARATE TREATMENT CAN SUPPORT PRIMA FACIE INFERENCE OF DISCRIMINATION EVEN WHERE IT DOES NOT TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THE EMPLOYER S PROFFERED NON-DISCRIMINATORY REASONS FOR THE ADVERSE ACTION TAKEN In response to dramatically falling advertising revenues, CBS/KPIX-TV (KPIX) in San Francisco was forced to reduce its annual budget by 10% in the first quarter of KPIX laid off five members of its on air news team as part of a reduction in force to meet the budget cut. Plaintiffs Schechner (age 66) and Lobertini (age 48) were among the five laid off (along with three others aged 57, 56 and 51). Both were experienced, award-winning reporters, and KPIX did not allege that their performance had any bearing on their release. Plaintiffs sued based on age and gender discrimination. The trial court granted summary judgment for KPIX, finding that the statistical analysis plaintiffs provided failed to account for KPIX s legitimate nondiscriminatory reasons for discharge, and thus could not show a stark pattern of discrimination needed to establish a prima facie case of discrimination. The Ninth Circuit disagreed, finding that statistical evidence need not fail at the outset simply because it does not address the employer s alleged non-discriminatory reasons, although it will (in many cases) need to address variables other than age to give rise to an inference of discrimination. In this case, however, because KPIX had proffered legitimate non-discriminatory reasons for discharge (keeping news anchors intact so that cuts would be invisible to viewers, and then selecting layoff targets based on their dates of contract expiration), and plaintiffs failed to show the discharges were a pretext, the Ninth Circuit affirmed the summary judgment. Schechner v. KPIX-TV (9th Cir. 2012) 686 F.3d CALIFORNIA POLICE OFFICER REPORTS OF ALLEGED INTERNAL CORRUPTION ARE PART OF OFFICIAL DUTIES AND THUS NOT CONSTITUTIONALLY-PROTECTED SPEECH ON WHICH A RETALIATION CLAIM MAY BE BASED Detective Dahlia of the Burbank Police Department allegedly observed and was concerned about abusive interrogation techniques used by his colleagues with suspects. These techniques were being investigated by the Department, and some of the colleagues allegedly threatened and intimidated Dahlia to prevent him from speaking candidly with the internal affairs investigators. Dahlia reported the alleged threats to his union president, who then reported them to the city manager. During an investigation conducted by the LA Sheriff s Department, Dahlia disclosed the alleged unlawful conduct engaged in by his colleagues. Shortly thereafter, the police chief placed Dahlia on paid administrative leave, and Dahlia sued both the city and the colleagues involved in federal court for violations of 42 U.S.C He alleged retaliation for 1st Amendment protected speech, various whistleblower theories, and both intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress. The District Court granted defendants Rule 12(b)(6) motions to dismiss, finding that (1) his speech was made pursuant to official duties and thus was not constitutionally-protected, and (2) that placement on paid administrative leave is not an adverse employment action. Based on Ninth Circuit precedent (which this panel was openly hostile to), the appellate court affirmed the dismissal because, as a matter of law, California police officers are required (as part of their official duties) to disclosed information regarding acts of corruption. BB&K 2012 ANNUAL LABOR & EMPLOYMENT LAW UPDATE 2
3 As such, Dahlia s disclosures were pursuant to official duties and not protected speech. The court further concluded, however, that in some circumstances, placement on paid administrative leave can constitute adverse employment action if that action is reasonably likely to deter employees from engaging in protected activity. Dahlia v. Rodriguez (9th Cir. 2012) 689 F.3d EMPLOYEE ALLOWED TO PROCEED WITH CLAIMS OF HARASSMENT BECAUSE AGGREGATE OF EVIDENCE MIGHT ESTABLISH SUFFICIENT FACTUAL SUPPORT Mustafa Rehmani, a Muslim born in Pakistan, worked as a system test engineer for Ericsson, Inc. from February 2007 until November 13, 2009, the day that he was terminated. During his employment, he had coworkers from at least 12 different countries. Rehmani filed a lawsuit claiming that he was harassed because of his Pakistani nationality and Muslim faith during his employment by three of his coworkers who were from India, and that his supervisor failed to take any remedial action when he reported the conduct. Specifically, Rehmani complained that the Indian coworkers were frequently rude, dismissive and hostile toward him, as evidenced by their refusal to help him with projects, a comment about the need for India to bomb Pakistani terrorists, a question as to whether Rehmani would blow up a coworker if the coworker did not assist him, and a comment that Rehmani did not attend a prank birthday party that was given for him at work because he was out of the office celebrating 9/11 and planning terrorist attacks. Ericsson filed a motion for summary judgment, arguing that the comments were isolated, were not based on national origin or religion, and were neither severe nor pervasive. Ericsson also claimed that it appropriately responded to Rehmani s complaints, in that the employees who allegedly made the comments were not managers, Rehmani never asserted "harassment" or "discrimination" and never claimed that his alleged mistreatment was due to his being Pakistani or Muslim. Further, Ericsson conducted an investigation and concluded there was no discrimination or harassment, and warned employees against conduct like the 9/11 prank. The trial court granted the motion as to Rehmani s harassment claims based on national origin and religion, and Rehmani appealed. The court of appeal reversed the trial court s decision, and reinstated the claims. The appellate court explained that dismissal of the claims was not appropriate unless Ericsson could establish that Rehmani was not subjected to hostile work environment, and that Ericsson responded to Rehmani s complaints about the conduct with appropriate corrective action. While acknowledging that Rehmani's case may appear weak, the appellate court concluded that it could not conclude as a matter of law that the evidence Rehmani wishes to adduce was insufficient in the aggregate to establish claims for harassment based on national origin or religion. The court explained that Rehmani should be allowed to present this evidence to a trier of fact, who could decide either that the claims had merit, or alternatively could rule against Rehmani either because his interpersonal difficulties were not related to Indian employee's sentiments against non-indian employees or because his complaints were insufficient to trigger an investigation by Ericsson under the Fair Employment and Housing Act. Rehmani v. Superior Court (2012) 204 Cal.App.4th 945. BB&K 2012 ANNUAL LABOR & EMPLOYMENT LAW UPDATE 3
4 PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT MAY BE VICARIOUSLY LIABLE FOR THE NEGLIGENCE OF ADMINISTRATORS IN HIRING, SUPERVISING AND RETAINING A SEXUALLY ABUSIVE EMPLOYEE A former student sued his public high school guidance counselor and the school district for damages arising out of sexual harassment, abuse and molestation by the counselor when he was fifteen years old. He alleged that the school district knew or should have known that the counselor would commit wrongful sexual acts with minors based on her past sexual abuse of minors and her propensity and disposition to engage in such abuse. Therefore, he alleged the school district was liable for negligent hiring, retention and supervision of the counselor. The school district demurred to the complaint, alleging that there was no statutory authority to hold a public entity liable for negligent supervision, hiring or retention of employees. The trial court sustained the demurrer, dismissing the school district as a party, and the Court of Appeal affirmed. The California Supreme Court reversed. The Court noted that the Government Code provides that a public entity is vicariously liable for any injury which its employee causes to the same extent as a private employer. Given the special relationship between public school personnel and students, the Court held that the school district s administrative and supervisory employees have a duty of reasonable care to protect students from foreseeable dangers, including from foreseeable injury at the hands of third parties acting negligently or intentionally. Therefore, a public school district may be vicariously liable under the Government Code for the negligence of administrators or supervisors in hiring, supervising and retaining a school employee who sexually harasses and abuses a student. C.A., a Minor, etc. v. William S. Hart Union High School District (2012) 53 Cal.4th 861. AN EMPLOYEE MAY NOT SUE FOR WRONGFUL TERMINATION IN VIOLATION OF PUBLIC POLICY BASED UPON AN EMPLOYER S REFUSAL TO RENEW AN EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT, BUT MAY SUE FOR RETALIATION. Touchstone Television Productions hired actress Nicollette Sheridan to appear in the first season of the television series Desperate Housewives. The agreement was for the series initial season but it gave Touchstone the exclusive option to renew her services on an annual basis for up to an additional six seasons. Touchstone exercised its option and renewed its agreement with Sheridan for seasons two, three, four and five. Sheridan alleges that during filming in season five, the creator, Marc Cherry, hit her and that she complained to Touchstone about the alleged battery. Approximately five months later, Touchstone informed Sheridan that it decided not to exercise its option for season six. Thereafter, she appeared in three more episodes and engaged in publicity for the series. She then filed suit, claiming she was wrongfully terminated in violation of public policy. The jury deadlocked and Touchstone moved for a directed verdict, claiming she was not terminated; rather, Touchstone had simply decided not to renew her contract. The trial court denied the motion and the Court of Appeal reversed. The Court of Appeal held that Sheridan could not sue for wrongful termination in violation of public policy based upon Touchstone s refusal to renew her employment contract because she was not fired, discharged or terminated. Furthermore, no cause of action exists for the tortious nonrenewal of an employment contract in violation of public policy. However, Sheridan could amend her complaint to allege a retaliation cause of action under Labor Code section 6310, BB&K 2012 ANNUAL LABOR & EMPLOYMENT LAW UPDATE 4
5 which permits an action for damages if the employee is, among other things, discriminated against because of complaints about unsafe work conditions. The Court of Appeal therefore issued a writ of mandate compelling the superior court to grant Touchstone s motion for directed verdict and to permit Sheridan to file an amended complaint with the retaliation cause of action. Touchstone Television Productions v. Superior Court (2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 676. BB&K 2012 ANNUAL LABOR & EMPLOYMENT LAW UPDATE 5
LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT LAW UPDATE FOR MAY 2016 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES CONFERENCE. Timothy L. Davis. Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP www.bwslaw.
LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT LAW UPDATE FOR MAY 2016 LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES CONFERENCE Timothy L. Davis Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP www.bwslaw.com OVERVIEW FOR 2016 UPDATE Labor Law Court Decisions Employment
More informationLabor & Employment Law Update
, California 90071, California 92260-4305 Wrongful Termination/Retaliation for First Quarter 2007 WRONGFUL TERMINATION Catherine Coble, Esq. Public employer has immunity against direct liability for wrongful
More informationINVESTIGATIONS GONE WILD: Potential Claims By Employees
INTRODUCTION INVESTIGATIONS GONE WILD: Potential Claims By Employees By: Maureen S. Binetti, Esq. Christopher R. Binetti, Paralegal Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, P.A. When can the investigation which may
More informationTHARPE & HOWELL BUSINESS LAW NEWSLETTER
This Newsletter is brought to you by Tharpe and Howell s Commercial Litigation Practices Group. For more information, contact Robert Freedman, chair of the Group, or David Binder, partner in charge of
More informationBy: Gerald M. Richardson
MANAGING THE RISKS POSED BY THE THREE PUBLIC POLICY WRONGFUL DISCHARGE CASES RECENTLY DECIDED BY THE MISSOURI SUPREME COURT By: Gerald M. Richardson I. An At Will Employee Can Sue His Employer on a Claim
More informationCase 3:14-cv-00671-HU Document 1 Filed 04/23/14 Page 1 of 12 Page ID#: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Case 3:14-cv-00671-HU Document 1 Filed 04/23/14 Page 1 of 12 Page ID#: 1 OSB#013943 sean.riddell@live.com Attorney At Law 4411 NE Tillamook St Portland, OR 97140 971-219-8453 Attorney for Plaintiff IN
More informationINVESTIGATING COMPLAINTS OF RETALIATION TIPS FOR MINIMIZING CLAIMS AND LITIGATION
INVESTIGATING COMPLAINTS OF RETALIATION TIPS FOR MINIMIZING CLAIMS AND LITIGATION Presented for California Association of Joint Powers Authorities by: Karen Kramer and Amy Oppenheimer November 5, 2014
More informationLABOR AND EMPLOYMENT LAW UPDATE
LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT LAW UPDATE John A. Ontiveros, Esq. League of Cities Conference May 6, 2011 TOPICS WE RE COVERING TODAY The Cat s Paw Case Third-party retaliation Accommodation under the FMLA (burden
More informationEmployment Practices Liability Insurance Claims are on the rise. Are you protected?
Employment Practices Liability Insurance Claims are on the rise. Are you protected? Administered by Cooper & McCloskey Inc. What is Employment Practices Liability Insurance (EPLI)? (EPLI) protects companies
More informationFORC QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF INSURANCE LAW AND REGULATION
The plaintiff in Schmidt filed suit against her employer, Personalized Audio Visual, Inc. ("PAV") and PAV s president, Dennis Smith ("Smith"). 684 A.2d at 68. Her Complaint alleged several causes of action
More informationRetaliation and Whistleblower Claims
Retaliation and Whistleblower Claims 2012 Labor and Employment Relations Law Seminar Thomas W. Scrivner TWScrivner@michaelbest.com This presentation is intended for general information purposes only and
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE
Filed 1/5/11; pub. order 1/27/11 (see end of opn.) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE IRENE TROVATO, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. BECKMAN COULTER,
More information2.25 HOSTILE WORK ENVIRONMENT CLAIMS UNDER THE NEW JERSEY LAW AGAINST DISCRIMINATION (SEXUAL AND OTHER HARASSMENT) (05/2015)
2.25 HOSTILE WORK ENVIRONMENT CLAIMS UNDER THE NEW JERSEY LAW AGAINST DISCRIMINATION (SEXUAL AND OTHER HARASSMENT) (05/2015) The following charge is based on the Supreme Court's decision in Lehmann v.
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Jerry Keeler felt that his employer, ARAMARK, didn t appreciate his
FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit August 21, 2013 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court TENTH CIRCUIT QUINCEY GERALD KEELER, a/k/a Jerry, v. Plaintiff-Appellant,
More informationCharge / Complaint Processing At the EEOC and the DFEH
Charge / Complaint Processing At the EEOC and the DFEH Since you believe you have been discriminated or retaliated against on the basis of a protected characteristic, you should become aware of the following
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SOLANO. Defendants. ) THE PARTIES
'. 1 6 MILLSTONE PETERSON & WATTS, LLP Attorneys at Law GLENN W. PETERSON, ESQ (SBN 6 Lava Ridge Court, Suite Roseville, CA 661 Phone: -80-8 Fax: -80-8 Attorneys for Plaintiff Otto W. Giuliani ENDORSED
More informationNOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
Filed 7/7/16 P. v. Salazar CA5 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication
More informationEmployment - Federal Employers Liability Act. EMPLOYMENT FEDERAL RAILWAY SAFETY ACT. LEGAL OVERVIEW (GENERAL)
. EMPLOYMENT FEDERAL RAILWAY SAFETY ACT. LEGAL OVERVIEW (GENERAL) The Federal Railway Safety Act, 49 U.S.C. 20101 et seq., (the FRSA ) was enacted in 1970 to promote safety in every area of railroad operations
More informationJohn S. Adler. Focus Areas. Overview
Shareholder 501 W. Broadway Suite 900 San Diego, CA 92101 main: (619) 232-0441 direct: (619) 515-1807 fax: (619) 232-4302 jadler@littler.com Focus Areas Discrimination and Harassment Litigation and Trials
More informationNOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE
Filed 5/28/15 Lopez v. Fishel Co. CA4/3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified
More informationEmployment Practices Liability Insurance
Employment Practices Liability Insurance Claims Scenarios Type of Claim: Federal Lawsuit Cause of Action: Disability, Discrimination/Wrongful Failure to Hire Type of Insured: Marketing Firm Facts: An applicant
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SIX
Filed 12/18/14 Zulli v. Balfe CA2/6 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified
More informationDISABILITY DISCRIMINATION AND MEDICAL LEAVE
DISABILITY DISCRIMINATION AND MEDICAL LEAVE Ninth Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment in Disability Discrimination Case Plaintiff filed suit against her employer and its president and CEO for disability discrimination,
More informationRetail Industry Services Representative Experience
Retail Industry Services Representative Experience Attorneys: Scott W. Bermack Key Issues: pedestrian, parking lot, inadequate lighting, accident, brain injury Venue: NYS Supreme Court, Rockland County
More informationRETALIATION LAW CHANGES IN CASE LAW
RETALIATION LAW CHANGES IN CASE LAW A. History of Whislteblowing The term whistleblowing originated from the early British police force members, known as English Bobbies. When they saw illegal activity,
More informationConflicts of Interest Issues in Simultaneous Representation of Employers and Employees in Employment Law. Janet Savage 1
Conflicts of Interest Issues in Simultaneous Representation of Employers and Employees in Employment Law Janet Savage 1 Plaintiffs suing their former employers for wrongful discharge or employment discrimination
More informationLabor & Employment Law Newsletter
Labor & Employment Law Newsletter www.bortonpetrini.com Fall 2013 Employees to Exhaust All Administrative Remedies Before Filing Suit By Jonathan P. Geen, Esq. On August 27, 2013, the Court of Appeal for
More informationKey Definitions: VT LEG #309032 v.1
Key Definitions: Side-by-Side Comparison of Vermont s Law and New Jersey s CEPA Prepared on May 6, 2015 by Damien Leonard, Esq. Office of Legislative Council Defines employer to include both public and
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE
Filed 1/9/02; pub. order 1/28/02 (see end of opn.) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE ISRAEL P. CHAMBI, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. THE REGENTS OF
More informationCERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE
Filed 6/4/98 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE MIGHTY OAK TRUST et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, B100335 (Super. Ct.
More informationLarry A. Burns, District Judge, Presiding
Case: 11-55379 06/ 26/ 2012 ID: 8228066 DktEntry: 25-1 Page: 1 of 5 FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION JUN 26 2012 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U. S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, 8:03CV165 Plaintiff, v. WOODMEN OF THE WORLD LIFE INSURANCE SOCIETY and/or OMAHA WOODMEN LIFE INSURANCE
More informationThe Basics of Sexual Harassment
The Basics of Sexual Harassment Sexual Harassment is a violation both of Federal Law and the laws of most states. For employers, it is fairly easy to take steps to prevent sexual harassment and to defeat
More information24/7 Whistleblower Program
Bidding to Other Public Entities and Outsourcing 4/8/2010 Complaint alleging unfair competition in contracting practices. t sustained 5/14/2010 Lack of supporting evidence. Citizen with Shoulder Injury
More informationEmployment Law Alerts
Employment Law Alerts May 1998 Recent New Jersey Supreme Court Decision on Workplace Harassment Lowenstein Sandler s Employment Law Practice Group has prepared this series of Employment Alerts to advise
More information2012 Updates in Employment Law Gerald T. Husch December 18, 2012
2012 Updates in Employment Law Gerald T. Husch December 18, 2012 Moffatt Thomas Sexual Harassment (SH) Analysis governing claim for SH under Title VII applies to SH claim brought under IHRA. Faragher/Ellerth
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT
Filed 10/11/13 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT ED AGUILAR, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. B238853 (Los Angeles County
More informationtrial court and Court of Appeals found that the Plaintiff's case was barred by the statute of limitations.
RESULTS Appellate Court upholds decision that malpractice action barred September 2, 2015 The South Carolina Court of Appeals recently upheld a summary judgment obtained by David Overstreet and Mike McCall
More informationPresented by: Matthew S. Brick Maria E. Brownell Brick Gentry, P.C.
Presented by: Matthew S. Brick Maria E. Brownell Brick Gentry, P.C. Two Rules for Today: Rule #1 No Good Deed Goes Unpunished! Two Rules for Today: Rule #2 If It Wasn t Written Down, It Didn t Happen!
More informationCase 2:08-cv-04154-HGB-KWR Document 13 Filed 04/20/09 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Case 2:08-cv-04154-HGB-KWR Document 13 Filed 04/20/09 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA BEATRIZ ICAZA CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO: 08-4154 SAM SEELIG AND SLS ARTS, INC.,
More informationAccountability Report Card Summary 2013 New Mexico
Accountability Report Card Summary 2013 New Mexico New Mexico has a pretty strong state whistleblower law: Scoring 72 out of a possible 100 points; Ranking 4 th out of 51 (50 states and the District of
More informationParticipation on University of California Employment Practices Liability Program Defense Panel for UC Davis and UC Davis Health Systems Application
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL BERKELEY * DAVIS * IRVINE * LOS ANGELES * MERCED * RIVERSIDE * SAN DIEGO * SAN FRANCISCO SANTA BARBARA * SANTA CRUZ 1111 Franklin
More informationFEBRUARY 1997 LAW REVIEW MOLESTATION LIABILITY EXAMINES SCOPE OF EMPLOYMENT & FORESEEABILITY. James C. Kozlowski, J.D., Ph.D. 1997 James C.
MOLESTATION LIABILITY EXAMINES SCOPE OF EMPLOYMENT & FORESEEABILITY James C. Kozlowski, J.D., Ph.D. 1997 James C. Kozlowski In determining agency liability for sexual molestation by its employees, an employer
More informationNOT RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION File Name: 13a0927n.06. No. 13-5221 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION File Name: 13a0927n.06 No. 13-5221 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT Gaylus Bailey, v. Plaintiff-Appellant, Real Time Staffing Services, Inc., dba Select
More informationLabor and Employment Litigation Update
Labor and Employment Litigation Update Friday, May 6, 2011 General Session; 10:45 a.m. 12:00 p.m. John A. Ontiveros, Jackson Lewis League of California Cities City Attorneys Department 2011 Spring Conference
More informationMI: RELEASE OF FORMER FF S PERSONNEL FILE TO PRESS NEGATIVE STORY - RETALIATION LAWSUIT REINSTATED
MI: RELEASE OF FORMER FF S PERSONNEL FILE TO PRESS NEGATIVE STORY - RETALIATION LAWSUIT REINSTATED On March 13, 2014, in Mark Laster v. City of Kalamazoo, et al, the U.S. Court of Appeals for 6 th Circuit
More informationMinimizing Employee Retaliation: Do the Right Thing! Ashley E. Bonner, WSO-CST Senior Risk Control Consultant Trident Public Risk Solutions
Minimizing Employee Retaliation: Do the Right Thing! Ashley E. Bonner, WSO-CST Senior Risk Control Consultant Trident Public Risk Solutions Roadmap 1. Definition of Retaliation 2. Frequency & Severity
More informationEMPLOYMENT PRACTICES LIABILITY ENDORSEMENT
ENDORSEMENT NO: This endorsement, effective 12:01 am, policy number forms part of issued to: by: THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES LIABILITY ENDORSEMENT
More informationIntroduction (916) 653-0799 (800) 952-5665.
Introduction On January 1, 2000, California's Whistleblower Protection Act (WPA) (Government Code sections 8547 et seq.) was significantly amended. The Legislature amended this law to strengthen protections
More informationD.C., A MINOR V. HARVARD-WESTLAKE SCH., 98 Cal. Rptr. 3d 300. Plaintiff D.C., a student, appealed a Los Angeles Superior Court decision in favor of
D.C., A MINOR V. HARVARD-WESTLAKE SCH., 98 Cal. Rptr. 3d 300 Raquel Rivera Rutgers Conflict Resolution Law Journal November 22, 2010 Brief Summary: Plaintiff D.C., a student, appealed a Los Angeles Superior
More informationEmploymEnt law. www.mpplaw.com
EmploymEnt law 360 www.mpplaw.com about our practice morris polich & purdy s Employment Law attorneys provide full service employment representation to public and private employers of all sizes, from
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. No. 93-1789. George S. ROBERTSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. No. 93-1789. George S. ROBERTSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BELL HELICOPTER TEXTRON, INC., Defendant-Appellee. Sept. 26, 1994. Appeal from the United States
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE
Filed 9/17/15; pub. order 10/13/15 (see end of opn.) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE MOBILE MEDICAL SERVICES FOR PHYSICIANS AND ADVANCED PRACTICE
More informationNo. 1-10-2072 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances allowed under Rule 23(e)(1). SIXTH DIVISION JUNE 30, 2011 IN
More informationElizabeth Grossman United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Regional Attorney, New York District Office
Elizabeth Grossman United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Regional Attorney, New York District Office Age Discrimination In Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA) Protects individuals who are 40
More information2.22 UNLAWFUL EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES UNDER THE NEW JERSEY LAW AGAINST DISCRIMINATION (LAD) RETALIATION (N.J.S.A. 10:5-12(d)) (9/09) NOTE TO THE COURT
CHARGE 2.22 Page 1 of 8 2.22 UNLAWFUL EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES UNDER THE NEW JERSEY LAW AGAINST DISCRIMINATION (LAD) RETALIATION (N.J.S.A. 10:5-12(d)) (9/09) NOTE TO THE COURT The Law Against Discrimination
More informationAccountability Report Card Summary 2013 Tennessee
Accountability Report Card Summary 2013 Tennessee Tennessee has one of the strongest state whistleblower laws: Scoring 75 out of a possible 100; Ranking 3 rd out of 51 (50 states and the District of Columbia).
More informationEmployment Representative Experience
Employment Representative Experience Key Issues: Employee vs. Independent Contractor Client Type: Defendant Health Insurance Company Description: The sales agents of a health insurance company claimed
More informationFORM INTERROGATORIES EMPLOYMENT LAW
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): TELEPHONE NO.: FAX NO. (Optional): E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): ATTORNEY FOR (Name): SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SHORT
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS 444444444444 NO. 14-0582 444444444444 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, PETITIONER, v. GINGER WEATHERSPOON, RESPONDENT 4444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444 ON
More informationAccountability Report Card Summary 2013 Massachusetts
Accountability Report Card Summary 2013 Massachusetts Massachusetts has a relatively good state whistleblower law: Scoring 64 out of a possible 100 points; and Ranking 11 th out of 51 (50 states and the
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FIVE B254585
Filed 2/26/15 Vega v. Goradia CA2/5 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified
More information(1) It was something fairly and naturally incidental to the employer's business assigned to the employee; and
Employer Liability for Employee Conduct by Lisa Mann 05-01-2000 EMPLOYER LIABILITY FOR EMPLOYEE CONDUCT: When Does An Employer Have to Pay? by Lisa Mann Modrall, Sperling, Roehl, Harris & Sisk, P.A. Employers
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT
Filed 2/11/15 Estate of Thomson CA2/8 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit MICHAEL N. OHNSTAD, Petitioner v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent 2015-3220 Petition for review
More informationWHAT POLICIES SHOULD AN EMPLOYER HAVE IN PLACE TO PREVENT LAWSUITS?
WHAT POLICIES SHOULD AN EMPLOYER HAVE IN PLACE TO PREVENT LAWSUITS? Many Employers Are Unaware of the Types of Policies Necessary to Limit Lawsuit Risk or of How to Effectively Draft Employment Policies
More informationUndocumented Workers Employment Rights
Undocumented Workers Employment Rights YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS 1. What legal rights do I have as an undocumented worker? With a few exceptions, undocumented workers enjoy the legal rights and remedies provided
More informationv. Record No. 011732 OPINION BY JUSTICE ELIZABETH B. LACY March 1, 2002 TRACTOR SUPPLY COMPANY
Present: All the Justices LINDA ROWAN v. Record No. 011732 OPINION BY JUSTICE ELIZABETH B. LACY March 1, 2002 TRACTOR SUPPLY COMPANY UPON A QUESTION OF LAW CERTIFIED BY THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA WEINSTEIN SUPPLY CORPORATION : : v. : CIVIL ACTION : HOME INSURANCE COMPANIES, : THE HOME INDEMNITY COMPANY, : No. 97-7195 THE
More informationEmployer Must Show Economic Injury to Successfully Invoke Key Employee Exception Under the Family and Medical Leave Act
June 1, 2011 I. EMPLOYMENT LAW Employer Must Show Economic Injury to Successfully Invoke Key Employee Exception Under the Family and Medical Leave Act In Johnson v. Resources for Human Development, Inc.,
More informationGUIDANCE ON SEXUAL HARASSMENT FOR ALL EMPLOYERS IN NEW YORK STATE
ANDREW M. CUOMO Governor HELEN DIANE FOSTER Commissioner GUIDANCE ON SEXUAL HARASSMENT FOR ALL EMPLOYERS IN NEW YORK STATE STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS Sex discrimination is unlawful pursuant to the New York
More informationPublic Sector Employment Law Update League of CA Cities Annual Conference September 7, 2012
Public Sector Employment Law Update League of CA Cities Annual Conference September 7, 2012 Presented By: Richard Whitmore Discipline County Could Terminate State Licensed Commissioner And Sealer For Failing
More informationEEO 101 The Basic Theories of Employment Discrimination
EEO 101 The Basic Theories of Employment Discrimination An overview of the anti-discrimination statutes enforced by the EEOC An introduction to the theories under which claims of discrimination can be
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 13 2018 PATRICIA BANKS, Plaintiff Appellant, v. CHICAGO BOARD OF EDUCATION and FLORENCE GONZALES, Defendants Appellees. Appeal from the
More informationWHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION. Labor & Employment Law Section Fall Meeting Kaatskill Mountain Club Resort, Hunter, NY September 21, 2012
I. Federal Whistleblower Protection: WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION Labor & Employment Law Section Fall Meeting Kaatskill Mountain Club Resort, Hunter, NY September 21, 2012 A. Sarbanes Oxley: Most recent law
More informationAdrian G. Driscoll's Representative Experience
Adrian G. Driscoll's Representative Experience Practice Area: Construction, Coverage, Insurance Services, Lawyers, Professional Liability Key Issues: Attorney Malpractice; Attorney's Fees and Costs; Construction
More informationERISA Causes of Action *
1 ERISA Causes of Action * ERISA authorizes a variety of causes of action to remedy violations of the statute, to enforce the terms of a benefit plan, or to provide other relief to a plan, its participants
More informationFEHC Regulations for AB1825 Prevention of Sexual Harassment Training
FEHC Regulations for AB1825 Prevention of Sexual Harassment Training The following discusses the requirements of AB 1825 (Gov Code section 12950.1) as clarified by the Fair Employment & Housing Commission
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DAVID WABAKKEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION; J. W. MORGAN; GEORGE DIMAGGIO; GARY
More information2013 IL App (3d) 120130-U. Order filed September 23, 2013 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS THIRD DISTRICT A.D., 2013
NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances allowed under Rule 23(e)(1). 2013 IL App (3d) 120130-U Order
More informationU.S. Department of Labor
INFORMATION ABOUT FILING A WHISTLEBLOWER OR RETALIATION COMPLAINT WITH OSHA FOR ALL EMPLOYEES: OSHA administers the whistleblower protection provisions of more than twenty whistleblower protection statutes,
More informationThis opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2006).
This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2006). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A08-0222 Karyn Larson Smith, Appellant, vs. Argosy
More informationIN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST DISTRICT
2016 IL App (1st) 150810-U Nos. 1-15-0810, 1-15-0942 cons. Fourth Division June 30, 2016 NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 14 1449 BASHIR SHEIKH, Plaintiff Appellant, v. GRANT REGIONAL HEALTH CENTER, Defendant Appellee. Appeal from the United States District
More informationNOT RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION File Name: 14a0721n.06. No. 13-2126 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION File Name: 14a0721n.06 No. 13-2126 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT PATRICK RUGIERO, v. Plaintiff-Appellee, NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC; FANNIE MAE; MORTGAGE
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS, v. LAURA G. RODRIGUEZ, Appellant, Appellee. No. 08-11-00235-CV Appeal from the County Court at Law No.
More informationAdministrative Bulletin
STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE DATE: 1/27/2015 NO. 15-03 EXPIRES: Indefinite DISTRIBUTION: A - MANAGEMENT Administrative Bulletin x B - MGMT& SUPERVISORY C - ALL EMPLOYEES SUBJECT Equal Employment
More informationCase3:15-cv-01367 Document1 Filed03/24/15 Page1 of 9
Case:-cv-0 Document Filed0// Page of 0 David M. Poore, SBN Scott A. Brown, SBN 0 BROWN POORE LLP 0 Treat Blvd., Suite Walnut Creek, California Telephone: () - dpoore@bplegalgroup.com James Mills, SBN LAW
More information2005-C -2496 CHARLES ALBERT AND DENISE ALBERT v. FARM BUREAU INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL. (Parish of Lafayette)
FOR IMMEDIATE NEWS RELEASE NEWS RELEASE # 0 FROM: CLERK OF SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA The Opinions handed down on the 17th day of October, 200, are as follows: PER CURIAM: 2005-C -249 CHARLES ALBERT AND
More informationDepartment of Energy No. AL 2014-03 Acquisition Regulation January 6, 2014 ACQUISITION LETTER
G Department of Energy No. AL 2014-03 Acquisition Regulation January 6, 2014 ACQUISITION LETTER This Acquisition Letter is issued under the authority of the Senior Procurement Executives of DOE and NNSA.
More informationOffice of Personnel Management. Policy Policy Number: Definitions. Communicate: To give a verbal or written report to an appropriate authority.
Citation: Arkansas Code Annotated 21-1-601 through 608, 21-1-610; 21-1-123 and 124 Office of Personnel Management Policy 1 Forms: Fraud Reporting Complaint Form Definitions Adverse action: To discharge,
More informationThe Brach Eichler LLC Employment Group is pleased to provide our clients and contacts with this month s Employment Law Update. HR TIP OF THE MONTH
Subscribe to our email list July 2012 Matthew M. Collins, Esq. mcollins@bracheichler.com 973.403.3151 Anthony M. Rainone, Esq. arainone@bracheichler.com 973.364.8372 The Brach Eichler LLC Employment Group
More informationEMPLOYER S DUTY TO MONITOR WEBSITE USE
EMPLOYER S DUTY TO MONITOR WEBSITE USE An employer must carefully administer the actions of his or her employees for several reasons. Under New York law, it is well settled that under the doctrine of respondeat
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE
HONORABLE RICHARD A. JONES 1 1 1 MICHAEL CONTI, v. ORDER 1 Plaintiff, CORPORATE SERVICES GROUP, INC., et al., Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE CASE NO.
More informationFEDERAL LAWS RELATING TO FRAUD, WASTE AND ABUSE
FEDERAL LAWS RELATING TO FRAUD, WASTE AND ABUSE FEDERAL CIVIL FALSE CLAIMS ACT The federal civil False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. 3729, et seq., ( FCA ) was originally enacted in 1863 to combat fraud perpetrated
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Case: 10-60762 Document: 00511435084 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/05/2011 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS United States Court of Appeals FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Fifth Circuit F I L E D April 5, 2011 Summary
More informationv. Record No. 090250 OPINION BY JUSTICE BARBARA MILANO KEENAN February 25, 2010 COUNTY OF GOOCHLAND
PRESENT: All the Justices DAVID F. LIGON, III v. Record No. 090250 OPINION BY JUSTICE BARBARA MILANO KEENAN February 25, 2010 COUNTY OF GOOCHLAND FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF GOOCHLAND COUNTY Timothy K. Sanner,
More informationSouth Carolina s Statutory Whistleblower Protections. A Review for SC Qui Tam Attorneys, SC Whistleblower Lawyers & SC Fraud Law Firms
South Carolina s Statutory Whistleblower Protections A Review for SC Qui Tam Attorneys, SC Whistleblower Lawyers & SC Fraud Law Firms South Carolina whistleblowers who are employed by a South Carolina
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, WEST DISTRICT 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
JAMES W. JOHNSTON ATTORNEY AT LAW 00 S. Flower Street, Suite 10 Los Angeles, California 001 State Bar No. (1) 1- Attorney for Plaintiff IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO,
More informationSEXUAL HARASSMENT. Taylor s Special Care Services, Inc. Simon Pop, MBA Chief Operating Officer 2015-2016
SEXUAL HARASSMENT Taylor s Special Care Services, Inc. Simon Pop, MBA Chief Operating Officer 2015-2016 1 Agenda Overview-Why talk about sexual harassment? Why get training? Statistics What is sexual harassment?
More information