1 Public Records Act Training Office of the California Attorney General
2 California Constitution, Article 1, Section 3, Subdivision B Constitutional amendment added by Proposition 59 Provides generalized right of access to be implemented by statute Statutes that provide access are to be liberally construed
3 California Constitution, Article 1, Section 3, Subdivision B Statutes that restrict access are to be narrowly construed Legislature must make findings justifying the need for new statutory provisions that restrict access
4 California Constitution, Article 1, Section 3, Subdivision B Constitutional provision expressly preserves: constitutional provisions or statutes restricting access that were in existence at the time.
5 California Constitution, Article 1, Section 3, Subdivision B Constitutional provision expressly preserves: individual rights of privacy. the rights of due process and equal protection of the laws.
6 Applicable Statutes Public Records Act (PRA), Government Code section Provides public access to state and local government records.
7 Applicable Statutes Legislative Open Records Act, Government Code section Provides public access to records of the Legislature.
8 Applicable Statutes Judicial records Case law provides access to judicial records.
9 Applicable Statutes Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. Section 552 Provides public access to records of the federal government.
10 Applicable Statutes If records are mistakenly sought under FOIA, California agency should: explain that FOIA covers federal government records. explain that PRA covers California government records. provide records in accordance with PRA.
11 Applicable Statutes Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. Section 552 Provides public access to records of the federal government.
12 Applicable Statutes Judicial records Case law provides access to judicial records.
13 Applicable Statutes Information Practices Act (IPA) vs. Public Records Act (PRA) PRA All government records are disclosable unless specifically made exempt Applies to state and local government records
14 Applicable Statutes Information Practices Act (IPA) vs. Public Records Act (PRA) How to reconcile these conflicting laws? IPA contains exemption for all records disclosed under PRA. Therefore, IPA does not shield records from disclosure that are otherwise disclosable under the PRA.
15 Applicable Statutes Information Practices Act (IPA) vs. Public Records Act (PRA) Records that are exempt from disclosure to public under the PRA may be accessible to the subject of the records under the IPA.
16 Public Records Act: Purposes Access to information about the conduct of the public s business is a fundamental and necessary right of every person in the state In providing access, PRA remains mindful of individual privacy rights
17 Public Records Act: Purposes Access permits public to monitor governmental activities Agency cannot deny access to disclosable records based on requester s intended usage
18 Public Records Act: Definitions Public record defined: Any writing that is owned, used or retained by a government agency in the conduct of its official business.
19 Public Records Act: Definitions Writing defined: Any means of recording information including paper, audio tape, video tape, compact disc, DVD, computer diskette, computer hard drive, etc.
20 Public Records Act: Definitions is expressly covered. Issues: When is no longer a record? When you place it in the trash? When it leaves your hard drive? When it is erased from the agency s back-up tape?
21 Public Records Act: Definitions During discovery in litigation, agency may be required to recover from back-up tapes At present, there are no cases or opinions regarding retrieval of trash under the PRA. PRA and litigation serve very different purposes. Based on the purposes of the PRA as discussed in Rogers v. Superior Court (1993) 19 Cal.App.4th 469, it seems unlikely that agencies would be asked to retrieve records from back-up tapes under the PRA.
22 Making A Request If agency were required to extract information from back-up tapes under PRA, full cost recovery likely (see subsequent discussion of costs.)
23 Making A Request Request may be made orally or in writing Recommend that agency confirm oral requests in writing Written requests facilitate agency compliance by reducing confusion about the records requested and permitting agency to track the request
24 Making A Request Request need not identify an exact record Request may identify records by their general content
25 Making A Request Request must still be sufficiently precise to permit the agency to locate the records Request should not be unduly burdensome
26 Making A Request Request should be specific and focused (Rogers v. Superior Court (1993) 19 Cal.App.4th 469.) Specific and focused requests facilitate prompt disclosure by government
27 Making A Request Open ended requests: Are burdensome Frustrate agency Are expensive for requester May lead to non-compliance
28 Making A Request When a request is not specific and focused, the agency has a duty to assist the public in focusing the request Assist in identifying requested information Describe physical location of the record
29 Making A Request When a request is not specific and focused, the agency has a duty to assist the public in focusing the request Describe technology in which the record is housed Help public to overcome any practical barriers to access
30 Agency Duty To Search Agency must make reasonable efforts to locate requested records. At a minimum, such efforts should include: consulting record indexes consulting knowledgeable people looking in logical places
31 Agency Duty To Search Special rule for electronic records Record must be provided in electronic format used by the agency if requested Software developed by the government is not disclosable Commercial software is not disclosable Data housed in protected software may still be disclosable
32 Inspection Of Records General Rule Agency records may be inspected at any time during regular office hours
33 Inspection Of Records In reality, the agency may need to: locate the requested records gather multiple records for inspection redact exempt information prior to inspection Appointment to inspect records may be necessary under these circumstances
34 Requesting Copies Of Records Agency should provide records promptly Agency has up to 10 days to: determine if it will comply with the request, and notify the requester of its determination.
35 Requesting Copies Of Records Agency may extend period to make this determination for up to 14 days if there is a need to: communicate with field offices examine voluminous records
36 Requesting Copies Of Records Agency may extend period to make this determination for up to 14 days if there is a need to: communicate with others who have an interest in the records. construct computer reports.
37 Requesting Copies Of Records Once the determination to comply with the request has been made, the agency has a reasonable period of time to provide the records Remember that records must be provided promptly
38 Requesting Copies Of Records If the agency cannot provide the records during the time for making a determination, it must provide a good faith estimate of when the copies will be available
39 Fees For Duplication Of Records Agency may charge the direct cost of duplication Direct cost includes: pro-rata cost of duplication equipment pro-rata cost of equipment operator (salary and benefits) DOJ charges $.10/ per page
40 Fees For Duplication Of Records Agency may charge the direct cost of duplication Direct costs do not include: research retrieval redaction
41 Fees For Duplication Of Records Issue: What, if any, are the direct costs of duplication associated with faxing or ing a record to a requester?
42 Fees For Duplication Of Records Special rules for electronic records Agency may recover full costs where agency is required to: extract or compile data undertake programming to produce data
43 Fees For Duplication Of Records Special rules for electronic records What does it mean to extract or compile data for purposes of this section? Full cost recovery probably not available for merely extracting or compiling information loaded in extractable fields in a data base such as an Excel spreadsheet.
44 Fees For Duplication Of Records Special rules for electronic records Some requesters contend that they can require agencies to create new records through extraction, compilation or programming even if the agency would otherwise have no need to create the record. We doubt that this is the correct interpretation of the special cost provision for electronic records.
45 Withholding Records Exemptions are generally discretionary, not mandatory Generally, the agency may redact exempt information; remainder of record must be disclosed Where exemptions render the entire record worthless, the entire record may be withheld
46 Withholding Records Agencies should consider disclosure issues in designing records Exempt and disclosable information segregated from one another so that a clerk can duplicate disclosable information without need for further review by an attorney or other agency personnel
47 Withholding Records Agencies need not provide privilege or exemption log of exempt records Agencies should provide a sufficient explanation of the reasons for withholding records so that the public can decide whether to challenge the agency s withholding
48 Withholding Records If exempt information is disclosed, the exemption is waived The following disclosures are not waivers: Disclosures pursuant to the Information Practices Act Disclosures made pursuant to discovery requests
49 Withholding Records The following disclosures are not waivers: Disclosures made pursuant to court order Disclosures to another government agency when there is a confidentiality agreement and the head of the agency designates those employees who are permitted to examine the records
50 Withholding Records Source of Exemptions Expressly provided in Gov. Code, 6254 Imported into section 6254, subd. (k) from other provisions of state or federal law Public interest balancing test under section 6255
51 Litigation and Legal Advice Exemptions Pending litigation (Gov. Code, 6254 (b)) Exempts records prepared for use in litigation Exemption lasts only for duration of litigation
52 Litigation and Legal Advice Exemptions Pending litigation (Gov. Code, 6254 (b)) Settlement itself is disclosable Depositions are disclosable
53 Litigation and Legal Advice Exemptions Pending litigation (Gov. Code, 6254 (b)) Exempts records prepared for use in litigation Exemption lasts only for duration of litigation
54 Litigation and Legal Advice Exemptions Attorney-client privilege ( Evid. Code, 954 imported into PRA via Gov. Code, 6254 ( k)) Although public disclosure generally waives the privilege, disclosure to opposing party for purpose of advancing negotiations does not constitute waiver (STI Outdoor v. Superior Court (2001) 91 Cal.App.4th 334, 341.)
55 Litigation and Legal Advice Exemptions Attorney work product (Code Civ. Proc., imported into PRA via Gov. Code, 6254 (k)) Protects impressions and conclusions of attorney Exemption is permanent Applies to legal advice in litigation and nonlitigation contexts
56 Litigation and Legal Advice Exemptions Evid. Code, 1040 imported into PRA via Gov. Code, 6254 (k) Protects confidential information when in public interest to do so Often duplicative of public interest balancing test under Gov. Code, 6255
57 Litigation and Legal Advice Exemptions Evid. Code, 1040 imported into PRA via Gov. Code, 6254 (k) PRA exemptions in the context of discovery Litigants may make requests before or during litigation
58 Litigation and Legal Advice Exemptions Evid. Code, 1040 imported into PRA via Gov. Code, 6254 (k) If agency believes PRA request violates discovery order, agency should use collateral estoppel to defeat the request Agencies may not use PRA exemptions to defeat discovery requests; must use Evid. Code, 1040
59 Exemption For Personnel Records Gov. Code, 6254, Subd. C Exemption applies to personnel, medical or similar records whose disclosure would constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy Usually involves personal information required by employer
60 Exemption For Personnel Records Gov. Code, 6254, Subd. C Exemption generally does not cover information that would be exchanged at a cocktail party, such as educational background, employment background and training Personnel records are defined by content, not by location
61 Exemption For Personnel Records Gov. Code, 6254, Subd. C Performance evaluations are exempt from disclosure Case law is unsettled regarding when disclosure of personnel actions are required to be disclosed:
62 Exemption For Personnel Records Gov. Code, 6254, Subd. C Court required disclosure if there were substantial evidence of wrongdoing irrespective of outcome; nondisclosable only if charges found to be groundless (AFSCME v. Regents of University of California (1978) 80 Cal.App.3d 913; and Bakersfield City School District v. Superior Court (2004) 118 Cal.App.4 th 1041.)
63 Exemption For Personnel Records Gov. Code, 6254, Subd. C Where agency publicized personnel action to deter similar conduct, court found that personnel action was nondisclosable unless there were a compelling governmental justification (Payton v. City of Santa Clara (1982) 132 Cal.App.3d 152.)
64 Exemption For Personnel Records Gov. Code, 6254, Subd. C When an agency files a personnel action with the State Personnel Board, the filing is a disclosable public record unless it involves a peace officer (Copley Press, Inc. v. Superior Court of San Diego County (2006) 39 Cal.4th 1272, held that the county civil service commission s files of peace officer disciplinary actions are confidential records of the employing agency within the meaning of Pen. Code, and )
65 Exemption For Investigatory Records Gov. Code, 6254, Subd. F Protects complaints to, and investigatory, intelligence and security records of, the Attorney General Protects investigatory records used for law enforcement, licensing or correctional purposes Law enforcement purposes refers to traditional criminal law enforcement
66 Exemption For Personnel Records Gov. Code, 6254, Subd. C When an agency files a personnel action with the State Personnel Board, the filing is a disclosable public record unless it involves a peace officer (Copley Press, Inc. v. Superior Court of San Diego County (2006) 39 Cal.4th 1272, held that the county civil service commission s files of peace officer disciplinary actions are confidential records of the employing agency within the meaning of Pen. Code, and )
67 Exemption For Investigatory Records Gov. Code, 6254, Subd. F Agencies with non-licensing administrative authority must use public interest balancing test to protect investigative records; they cannot invoke the investigatory exemption of section 6254(f) Public interest in nondisclosure is strongest during pendency of investigation
68 Public Interest Balancing Test Gov. Code, 6255 Protects records where the public interest in nondisclosure clearly outweighs the public interest in disclosure Public interest in nondisclosure does not refer to the administrative convenience of a public agency, but to the broader interests of the public in general
69 Public Interest Balancing Test Gov. Code, 6255 San Jose v. Superior Court (1999) 74 Cal.App.4th 1008, outlines the three-step test for the public interest balancing test: The public interest in disclosure The public interest in nondisclosure Less intrusive alternatives to satisfy the public interest in disclosure
70 Public Interest Balancing Test Gov. Code, 6255 In San Jose, the press requested copies of citizen complaints about airport noise. Public interest in disclosure: Monitor the governmental response to these complaints
71 Public Interest Balancing Test Gov. Code, 6255 Public interest in nondisclosure: Disclosure intrudes upon complainant privacy Chilling effect on citizen complaints
72 Public Interest Balancing Test Gov. Code, 6255 Less burdensome alternatives: Press can attend city council meetings in which noise complaints were discussed Press can contact interest groups involved in both sides of the airport noise debate Press can visit affected neighborhoods
73 Public Interest Balancing Test Gov. Code, 6255 Court concluded that city was justified in withholding names of complainants. Remember the agency bears the burden of demonstrating that the public interest is best served by maintaining the confidentiality of the records.
74 Public Interest Balancing Test Gov. Code, 6255 Any state agency (other than constitutional officers) that wishes to assert the public interest balancing test must first receive approval from the Governor s Legal Affairs Secretary
75 Deliberations, Correspondence, And Drafts Deliberative process privilege Protects records involved in the decisionmaking process Implemented through public interest balancing test in Gov. Code, 6255 Permits candid debate and airing of potential solutions
76 Deliberations, Correspondence, And Drafts Deliberative process privilege Focuses on recommendatory speech not facts Sometimes facts are inextricably intertwined with recommendatory speech and thus are exempt as well
77 Deliberations, Correspondence, And Drafts Deliberative process privilege Advisors may be from inside or outside the government Deliberative process privilege may be overcome by a narrow request with high public interest
78 Deliberations, Correspondence, And Drafts Correspondence Exemptions Only the Governor and the Legislature have correspondence exemptions Correspondence means letters from persons outside the government
79 Deliberations, Correspondence, And Drafts Correspondence Exemptions Governor s action requests and budget change proposals would be protected by the deliberative process privilege not the correspondence exemption Some agencies use the balancing test to protect the names and addresses of persons who write the agency
80 Deliberations, Correspondence, And Drafts Drafts, notes and memoranda (Gov. Code, 6254 (a)) Protects preliminary drafts, notes and memoranda that are not retained in the ordinary course of business where the public interest in nondisclosure outweighs the public interest in disclosure
81 Deliberations, Correspondence, And Drafts Drafts, notes and memoranda (Gov. Code, 6254 (a)) Difficult test to understand and apply (Citizens for a Better Environment v. California Department of Food and Agriculture (1985) 171 Cal.App.3d 704.) Deliberative process privilege exemption is easier to understand and apply
82 Copyright and Trade Secrets Copyright Federal agencies excluded from federal copyright protection, but States are not expressly excluded Copyright protection presumably imported into PRA via Gov. Code, 6254 (k)
83 Copyright and Trade Secrets Copyright Gov. Code, (software developed by government) implicitly endorses copyright protection for California government records
84 Copyright and Trade Secrets Copyright County of Suffolk v. First American Real Estate Solutions (2001) 261 F.3d 179, required disclosure of copyrighted government mapping data but prohibited the requester from distributing the information
85 Copyright and Trade Secrets Copyright This approach balanced disclosure under New York Public Records Act and copyright protection
86 Copyright and Trade Secrets Trade Secrets Trade secrets not expressly exempt However, the confidentiality of trade secrets is protected by Evid. Code, 1060, and is imported into the PRA via Gov. Code, 6254(k)
87 Copyright and Trade Secrets Trade Secrets Section of the Civil Code states that trade secret, for purposes of the PRA, is defined by the definition that was in use in One must look to case law and the Restatement of Torts to determine the definition.
88 Copyright and Trade Secrets Trade Secrets Agency must determine whether records submitted to it are protected by trade secret If not protected, agency must disclose Agency may wish to withhold for limited period in order for holder of right to seek protection in court
89 Enforcement Mandate, injunctive relief, declaratory relief If plaintiff prevails, plaintiff receives court costs and attorney s fees Plaintiff prevails if suit motivates disclosure
90 Enforcement Once suit is filed, any voluntary disclosure by agency means plaintiff has prevailed Plaintiff need not prevail on all issues; one issue is probably sufficient Agency receives fees only if suit is adjudged totally frivolous
91 Where To Get More Information Summary of the California Public Records Act ic_records_act.pdf Guidelines For Access to Department of Justice Public Records
E-Discovery: New to California 1 Patrick O Donnell and Martin Dean 2 Introduction The New Electronic Discovery Act The new Electronic Discovery Act, Assembly Bill 5 (Evans), has modernized California law
Summary of the California Public Records Act 2004 California Attorney General s Office SUMMARY CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RECORDS ACT GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 1 6250 ET SEQ. August, 2004 I OVERVIEW Legislation enacting
SELF-STUDY: LITIGATION edited by Bo Links Cell Phones and Public Records by Gregory J. Rolen California prides itself on its dedication to open government. Agencies and boards at the state, county, and
Illinois Freedom of Information Act Frequently Asked Questions By the Public The Illinois Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) is designed to ensure that Illinois residents can obtain information about their
Responding to Public Records Requests for Personnel Records Ben Richter, WASB Staff Counsel Public Records - Basics Record means any material on which written, drawn, printed, spoken, visual or electromagnetic
Illinois Freedom of Information Act Frequently Asked Questions By Public Bodies The Illinois Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) is designed to ensure that the public has access to information about their
Public Records I. As a public institution, the University is subject to public oversight. One important means the Legislature has created to assure such oversight is the ability of the public to have access
THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT A User s Guide By The Freedom of Information Clearinghouse A Project of Ralph Nader (Revised 11/05) The Freedom of Information Act ( FOIA ) was enacted by Congress in 1966
What is ediscovery? Electronic discovery ( ediscovery ) is discovery of electronic information in litigation. ediscovery in California is governed generally by the Civil Discovery Act. In 2009, the California
A GUIDE TO THE NEW JERSEY OPEN PUBLIC MEETINGS ACT WHAT IS THE OPEN PUBLIC MEETINGS LAW? The Open Public Meetings Law, which is commonly referred to as the Sunshine Law, was enacted in 1975. It establishes
TEXAS OPEN RECORDS LAWS MADE EASY ANSWERS TO THE MOST FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT OPEN RECORDS ATTORNEY GENERAL S MUNICIPAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE Municipal Affairs Section Office of the Attorney General
California Special Districts Association Districts Stronger Together California Public Records Act Compliance Manual for Special Districts A GUIDE TO UNDERSTANDING THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RECORDS ACT Introduction
Rhode Island Department of Attorney General Peter F. Kilmartin, Attorney General Rhode Island s Access to Public Records Act ( APRA ) The Purpose The right to access public records and the right to dignity
Public Information Program Public Records Policy Purpose This policy is adopted pursuant to the Government Records Access and Management Act Utah Code Ann. 63G-2-701 ( GRAMA ) and applies to District records
Last updated 6/26/07. City of Bellevue Records and Information Management Program PUBLIC RECORDS ACT RULES The Public Records Act, RCW 42.56, requires public agencies to make identifiable, non-exempt public
The Freedom of Information Act Made Simple. What s the main point? Main Point: to ensure that electors are fully advised of the activities/decisions of their officials Principles of Interpretation: construed
Administrative Procedure Number: 010 Effective: 7/3/89 Supercedes: 1 of 10 Subject: PUBLIC RECORDS 1.0. PURPOSE: To establish the policy and procedure governing compliance of the campus with all regulations
THE PEOPLE S BUSINESS: A Guide to the California Public Records Act ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS AUTHORS OF THE PEOPLE S BUSINESS The League gratefully acknowledges the work of the Public Records Act Publication Committee,
Chapter 82 - RECORDS MANAGEMENT Sections: 8010 - Government records findings Recognition of public policy. The council of Salt Lake County finds the following: A. It is in the best interests of Salt Lake
Aida S. Montano Bill Analysis Legislative Service Commission Sub. H.B. 9 * 126th General Assembly (As Reported by H. Civil and Commercial Law) Reps. Oelslager, Flowers, Buehrer, White, Trakas BILL SUMMARY
THE CITIZEN ADVOCACY CENTER S GUIDE TO THE MICHIGAN FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT AND OPEN MEETINGS ACT Open government statutes are cornerstone laws that ensure the public s capacity to play an essential
Texas Public Information Act Lara Nehman, Texas Rural Water Association Telephone: 512-472-8591 LaraNehman[at]earthlink.net 1 Texas Public Information Act Codified at Tx. Gov t. Code Chapter 552. Requires
FOIA 2010: A Busy Year in Review Legal/Legislative Update 2011 IAPD/IPRA Soaring to New Heights Conference Hilton Chicago Jason Anselment Legal/Legislative Counsel Illinois Association of Park Districts
Article 51. False Claims Act. 1-605. Short title; purpose. (a) This Article shall be known and may be cited as the False Claims Act. (b) The purpose of this Article is to deter persons from knowingly causing
Wisconsin s Public Records & Open Meetings Laws Practical information for University of Wisconsin Chairs September 14, 2012 Public Policy and Purpose [I]t is declared to be the public policy of this state
THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA) AND DISCOVERY TWO DIFFERENT AVENUES FOR ACCESSING AGENCY RECORDS AND THE BENEFITS OF LEVERAGING E- DISCOVERY TOOLS FOR FOIA The Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and
Article 33C. Meetings of Public Bodies. 143-318.9. Public policy. Whereas the public bodies that administer the legislative, policy-making, quasi-judicial, administrative, and advisory functions of North
Chapter 2.82 RECORDS MANAGEMENT 2.82.010 Government records findings--recognition of public policy. The council of Salt Lake County finds the following: A. It is in the best interests of Salt Lake County
A Practical Approach to Video Surveillance Technology San Diego Metropolitan Transit System Karen Landers San Diego Metropolitan Transit System 1255 Imperial Avenue, Suite 1000 San Diego, CA 92101 (619)
AITKIN COUNTY GUIDELINES AND PROCEDURES FOR MINNESOTA GOVERNMENT DATA PRACTICES ACT Aitkin County Adopted by the Aitkin County Board of Commissioners July 28, 2015 To the extent that the Minnesota Government
REFERENCE TITLE: state false claims actions State of Arizona House of Representatives Fiftieth Legislature Second Regular Session HB Introduced by Representative Patterson AN ACT AMENDING TITLE, ARIZONA
PUBLIC RECORDS REQUEST Policy. I. Purpose The purpose of this chapter is to ensure compliance with the provisions of the Washington Public Records Act, Chapter 42.56 RCW, and other applicable law relating
DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO 1437 Bannock Street Denver, CO 80202 IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF COLORADO INDEPENDENT ETHICS COMMISSION AND COLORADO ETHICS WATCH Plaintiff v.
Article 5. Depositions and Discovery. Rule 26. General provisions governing discovery. (a) Discovery methods. Parties may obtain discovery by one or more of the following methods: depositions upon oral
DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONICALLY-STORED INFORMATION IN STATE COURT: WHAT TO DO WHEN YOUR COURT S RULES DON T HELP Presented by Frank H. Gassler, Esq. Written by Jeffrey M. James, Esq. Over the last few years,
MS 893: Freedom of Information Act Administration Effective Date: September 30, 2004 Supersedes: 5/1/88; 10/18/84 Responsible Office: Management 1.0 Background The Peace Corps' policies with respect to
Illinois Open Meetings Act Frequently Asked Questions for Public Bodies The Illinois Open Meetings Act (OMA) is designed to ensure that the public has access to information about government and its decision-making
SMITHSONIAN DIRECTIVE 113, July 24, 2012 RESPONDING TO SUBPOENAS AND REQUESTS FOR EXPERT WITNESS SERVICES I. Purpose 1 II. Scope 1 III. Roles and Responsibilities 3 IV. Policy 4 V. Definitions 5 5 I. Purpose
Public Inspection of Criminal Case Files You ve Got to Keep Them Separate Katie Tefft Program Attorney TMCEC Public Information Act (PIA) Rule 12 Common-Law Right To Judge Judy, Please send me copies of
Franchise Tax Board ANALYSIS OF ORIGINAL BILL Author: Evans Analyst: Deborah Barrett Bill Number: AB 5 See Legislative Related Bills: History Telephone: 845-4301 Introduced Date: December 1, 2008 Attorney:
Friday 31st October, 2008. It is ordered that the Rules heretofore adopted and promulgated by this Court and now in effect be and they hereby are amended to become effective January 1, 2009. Amend Rules
Rule 45. Subpoena. (a) Form; Issuance. (1) Every subpoena shall state all of the following: a. The title of the action, the name of the court in which the action is pending, the number of the civil action,
Michigan s Sunshine Laws OMA Basics of Michigan s Open Meetings Act 1 Policy of the Act The basic intent of the Act is to strengthen the right of all Michigan citizens to know what goes on in government
Case4:12-cv-03288-KAW Document2-1 Filed06/25/12 Page1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION STANDING ORDER FOR MAGISTRATE JUDGE KANDIS A. WESTMORE (Revised
GOVERNMENT DATA PRACTICES AND OPEN MEETINGS: THE BASICS Stacie Christensen, Information Policy Analysis Division (IPAD) MN Department of Administration Who We Are and What We Do 2 Information Policy Analysis
1. Title 2. Policy Texas Public Information Act Sec. 1 Sec. 2 Sec. 3 Sec. 4 State Law. It is the policy of the State of Texas that each person is entitled, unless otherwise expressly provided by law, at
Citizen Advocacy Center s Journalist Guide to the Freedom of Information Act A popular government without proper information or the means of acquiring it is but a prologue to a farce or a tragedy or perhaps
PENNSYLVANIA SUNSHINE ACT 65 Pa.C.S.A. 701 701. Short title of chapter This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the Sunshine Act. 702. Legislative findings and declaration (a) Findings.--The General
Article 3. Family Law Arbitration Act. 50-41. Purpose; short title. (a) It is the policy of this State to allow, by agreement of all parties, the arbitration of all issues arising from a marital separation
COMMON INTEREST AGREEMENT BETWEEN PARTICIPATING AGENCIES OF THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR This Agreement is made and entered into by and between participating
Electronic Access Policy for Circuit Court Records of the Illinois Courts Administrative Office of the Illinois Courts Cynthia Y. Cobbs, Director Revision Effective April 1, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION
Published on Arkansas Judiciary (https://courts.arkansas.gov) Rule 26. General Provisions Governing Discovery. (a) Discovery Methods. Parties may obtain discovery by one or more of the following methods:
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 Please note: This sample document is redacted from an actual research and writing project we did for a customer some time ago. It reflects the law as of the date we completed it. Because
As amended by P.L.79-2007. INDIANA FALSE CLAIMS AND WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION ACT IC 5-11-5.5 Chapter 5.5. False Claims and Whistleblower Protection IC 5-11-5.5-1 Definitions Sec. 1. The following definitions
Can You Keep A Secret? How the Attorney- Client and Self-Evaluative Privileges Can Apply to Your Compliance Practice Pamela J. Grimm firstname.lastname@example.org Associate Counsel UPMC Health System 200 Lothrop
THE BBA TABLE OF CONTENTS CONTACT US The Boston Bar Journal Practice Tips Getting Uncle Sam To Talk: Obtaining Potentially Important Evidence from the FBI For Use in Civil Proceedings By Joseph L. Sulman
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK... X AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL USA, CENTER : FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, INC., and : WASHINGTON SQUARE LEGAL SERVICES, : INC., v. Plaintiffs, CENTRAL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION JANICE LEE, ) ) Case No. Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) BETHESDA HOSPITAL, INC. ) ) Defendant. ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT
Introduction: The People s Right to Access to Government Records The following request is made pursuant to the California Public Records Act and the decisions in KNSD Channels 7/39 v. Superior Court (Vasquez)
Assistant City Attorney Roger Allen City Attorney s Office Madison, Wisconsin WISCONSIN'S PUBLIC RECORDS LAW OVERVIEW 1 Inspection: THE PRESUMPTION Public policy favors the inspection of government records.
PART III Discovery CHAPTER 8 Overview of the Discovery Process Generally, discovery is conducted freely by the parties without court intervention. Disclosure can be obtained through depositions, interrogatories,
Records Management Plan Harris County, Texas Prepared By: Harris County CTS Reviewed and Approved by: The County Attorney s Office The District Attorney s Office The County Auditor s Office October 13,
IC 4-22-2 Chapter 2. Adoption of Administrative Rules IC 4-22-2-0.1 Application of certain amendments to chapter Sec. 0.1. The amendments made to this chapter by P.L.44-1995 apply as follows: (1) The amendments
RULE CHANGE 2015(08) CHAPTER 38 PUBLIC ACCESS TO INFORMATION AND RECORDS Rule 1. Public Access to Information and Records These rules shall be known and cited as the Public Access to Information and Records
Act Definitions Policy Representative Sample a sample that satisfies each type of information or document requested. A representative sample is only used when the responsive documents are voluminous to
1. Access is presumed. Wisconsin Department of Justice Office of the Attorney General PUBLIC RECORDS 101 August 22, 2016 A. The public records statutes shall be construed in every instance with a presumption
INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING THE LOS ANGELES WORLD AIRPORTS NON-DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT Please read and execute the attached Los Angeles World Airports (LAWA) Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA). The LAWA NDA must
Cornell University ILR School DigitalCommons@ILR Consent Decrees Labor and Employment Law Program --0 EEOC v. Southwest Airlines Co. Judge Jeffrey S. White Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/condec
ELECTRONIC MEDIA AND USE POLICY A-50 1 of 9 Purpose: The purpose of this policy is to establish guidelines for proper use of all forms of electronic media. As used in this policy, electronic media includes,
63rd Legislature HB0345 AN ACT REVISING THE MONTANA FALSE CLAIMS ACT; REVISING CIVIL PENALTIES TO PROVIDE FOR INFLATION ADJUSTMENTS; REVISING PUBLIC DISCLOSURE PROVISIONS; REVISING THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS;
A Timely Analysis of Legal Developments A S A P In This Issue: July 2009 On June 30, 2009 California became the 22nd state to enact separate rules that specifically address electronic discovery. The new
OBTAINING INFORMATION FROM GOVERNMENT SOURCES FOR INVESTIGATIONS AND LITIGATION April 4, 2013 Bev Dankowitz U.S. Department of Labor 1 I. OVERVIEW A. DOL s disclosure policies generally more transparency
WRITTEN DIRECTIVES DIRECTIVE: 01.003 Date Issued: 5/8/2002 Date Revised: 2/28/2007 CALEA Standard: 1.2.2-a, 2.3.3-c & 6.7.1 SUBJECT: PUBLIC RECORDS ACT A. AUTHORITY AND PURPOSE 1. The Revised Code of Washington
House Engrossed State of Arizona House of Representatives Fifty-first Legislature First Regular Session HOUSE BILL AN ACT AMENDING TITLE, CHAPTER, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES, BY ADDING ARTICLE ; RELATING
ARTICLE STATE GOVERNMENT TITLE 10. GOVERNMENTAL PROCEDURES SUBTITLE 5. MEETINGS 10-501. Public policy. (a) It is essential to the maintenance of a democratic society that, except in special and appropriate
Email and E-Records Retention Issues under the Public Records Act Wednesday, May 8, 2013 Opening General Session; 1:00 2:45 p.m. Eric W. Danly, City Attorney, Cloverdale and Petaluma, Chair, CPRA Committee
The Administrative Procedure Act became effective January 1, 1995, with a general effective date of September 12, 2013. Please note however some section effective dates may be retroactive or may have a
1.0 POLICY It is the policy of the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA) to make official public records, including electronic records, available to the public for inspection and copying
GENERAL INSURANCE STATISTICAL AGENCY Policy on Access to Information and Protection of Privacy APPROVED DEC 17, 2007 The General Insurance Statistical Agency (GISA) is committed to being a transparent,