1 ON THE INFORMATION STRUCTURE OF THE HUNGARIAN SENTENCE FERENC KIEFER Research Institute for Linguistics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest 1 Hungary Traditionally, information structure in Hungarian has always been considered to be identical to topic-comment structure, which has been defined partly in syntactico-semantic and partly in pragmatic terms. The present paper argues in favor of the postulation of two independent levels, one defined in terms of logical subject and logical predicate, the other in terms of topic and comment. The paper is going to show that a number of phenomena which pose problems for the traditional account can easily be explained on the two-level approach. Keywords: information structure, topic-comment, logical subject-logical predicate, word order 1. The Notion of Information Structure The information structure of the sentence is normally defined as the way in which the information contained in the sentence is presented. "The information structure of a sentence is the formal expression of the pragmatic structuring of a proposition in a discourse" (Lambrecht 1994: 6). Topic and focus are listed among the most important categories of information structure, "which have to do with a speaker's assessment of the relative predictability vs. unpredictability of the relations between propositions and their elements in given discourse situations" (ibid.). More precisely, "a referent is interpreted as the topic of a proposition ifin a given situation the proposition is construed as being about this referent, i.e. as expressing information which is relevant to and which increases the addressee's knowledge of this referent" (Lambrecht 1994: 131). Correspondingly, the comment is what is said about this referent and expresses new information. Cf. (l)(amb). (1) (a) What did the children do next? The children went to SCHOOL, (b) Who went to school? The CHILDREN went to school. Hungarian Studies 19/2 (2005) /2003/S Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest
2 256 FERENC KIEFER The sentence (l)(a) is about the children, i.e., the noun phrase the children is the topic of the sentence and the comment is that they went to school. At the same time, the topic is contextually bound by the preceding sentence. The sentence (l)(b), on the other hand, is about going to school, which is the topic, and it is asserted that this concerns the children, which constitutes the comment. For simplicity's sake let us dub this way of looking at information structure, which has been advocated by many scholars since the early 70s approach A." It should also be noted that Lambrecht did not have anything to say about the role of grammatical subject and grammatical predicate. So far so good. However, the notions of topic and comment have been known in the literature since they were introduced by Prague School scholars who have also been using the notion of "aboutness" for the definition of topic but in contradistinction to Lambrecht they have also pointed out that "topic-comment-articulation" is autonomous in the sense that it cannot be derived from the distinction between 'given' (i.e., known from the preceding context or situation) and 'new'. 3 Notice that the preceding context does not always determine uniquely the choice of topic and comment, as shown by the examples (2)(a)-(c) (Sgall et al. 1973). (2) (a) On Christmas Eve we expected our RELATIVES. (b) Uncle Fred came FIRST. (c) First came Uncle FRED. Here one either speaks about Uncle Fred and states when he came, or one speaks about the one who came first, and states who he was. Moreover, in some cases the whole sentence may represent new information yet the sentence does assert something about the referent of the subject noun phrase. (3) (a) What happened? (b) Mary broke her leg. No doubt, in a certain sense of "aboutness" the sentence (3)(b) is about Mary. That is, though the noun phrase Mary is not contextually bound, sentence (3)(b) asserts something about Mary, hence it must be the topic of the sentence. The two layers of information structure, i.e., topic-comment and given-news, however, have never been distinguished systematically. Let us dub the Praguian approach, approach B. We thus seem to have two different approaches, A and B, to topic-comment-articulation. On the approach A, 4 the topic represents at the same time given information (it is contextually bound) and the referent about which something is asserted. On the approach B, advocated by Prague school scholars, 5 the two layers, given information and aboutness are kept apart, which may but need not coincide.
3 ON THE INFORMATION STRUCTURE OF THE HUNGARIAN SENTENCE 257 In the present paper we are going to argue that approach B, to be elaborated in more detail in Section 3 below, is more adequate for the description of Hungarian sentence structure than approach A. 2. Word Order in Hungarian The relatively free word order in Hungarian has always been a great challenge to grammarians. Traditionally, following the teachings of classical grammars, Hungarian sentences have been analyzed in terms of grammatical subject and grammatical predicate, the notion of grammatical subject being defined in terms of aboutness. The typical questions asked in school grammars have been 'About what do we assert something?' and 'What do we assert?', the first question being used to identify the grammatical subject and the second the grammatical predicate (in declarative sentences). Furthermore, it is taken for granted that the subject noun phrase is always in the nominative. It is easy to see, however, that the two aspects of subjecthood are incompatible. Consider 6 (4) (a) Jánost elütötte a vonat. John-acc over-ran the train 'John was run over by the train' (b) Jánosnak tetszik Éva. John-dat likes Eve 'John likes Eve' It is quite evident that sentence (4)(a) is about Jánost 'John-acc' in spite of the fact that it is in the accusative case, and it is asserted about John that he was run over by the train; the subject noun phrase of the sentence is a vonat 'the train'. Similarly, the sentence (4)(b) is about Jánosnak 'John-dat' in spite of the fact that it is in the dative case, and it is asserted about John that he likes Eve; the subject noun phrase is Eva 'Eve'. From the above observations we may conclude that (i) aboutness cannot be a defining property of subjecthood; more importantly, (ii) word order is not defined by the grammatical subject - grammatical predicate articulation, since the grammatical subject has no fixed position (unlike in English or French), it may occupy various positions in the sentence and it may also occur in postverbal position. The 19th century Hungarian linguist Sámuel Brassai ( ) was the first to recognize the difference between word order rules in Hungarian and lndoeuropean languages. 7 At the same time, he found that both the fixed and the free word order languages display a sentence structure which begins with one or more complements carrying information already known. These complements "practically lay a basis for the meaning of the sentence in the listener's mind, i.e..
4 258 FERENC KIEFER they are calling attention, and pointing forward, connecting the mental activity of the listener with that of the speaker" (Brassai 1860: 341). 8 He refers to this initial part of the sentence as 'subject in a different sense' (1852), 'inchoativum' (1860, ), or 'introduction' (1874), or 'preparatory part' (1885). The second part of the sentence, including the verb, is the 'predicate' (1852), or 'bulk' ('mondatzöm', 1860, ), or 'message' (1874), or 'principal part' (1885). The function of this second part is "the communication of an action, or a circumstance of an action that the speaker supposes to be unknown to the listener" (Brassai 1874: 72). To return to our examples in (4)(a)-(b), the preparatory part of the sentence (4)(a) is Jánost ' John-acc'and the principal part elütötte a vonat 'was run over by the train', the preparatory part of the sentence (4)(b) is Jánosnak 'John-dat' and the principal part tetszik Éva 'likes Eve'. It can easily be seen that the preparatory part of the sentence is identical to what we called topic and the principal part of the sentence to what was termed comment in the previous section. In what follows we will therefore use the well-known terms topic and comment instead of Brassai's slightly idiosynchratic terms. 9 Brassai was thus first in recognizing that Hungarian word order is determined by topic-comment rather than by grammatical subject-grammatical predicate articulation. 10 Brassai also emphasized that in Hungarian any kind of complement can serve as topic (in contrast to English or French) 11 and that the topic may contain more than one complement (in contrast to German). Furthennore, not all sentences have a topic-comment articulation, the topic may remain implicit. Consider (5) (a) Marit Péter tegnap moziba vitte. Mary-acc Peter yesterday cinema-to took 'Yesterday Peter took Maiy to the cinema' (b) Megjöttek, arrived-they 'They arrived' In (5)(a) the topic contains both Marit and Peter, and in (5)(b) the topic is left implicit, which is only possible if both the speaker and the addressee know about whom or about what the predicate 'arrived' is asserted. Brassai made some further important observations concerning Hungarian sentence structure, which should not be left unmentioned. First, he emphasized the important role of stress in identifying the comment: the first element of the comment carries the strongest stress in the sentence. In contemporary research, too, it is generally assumed that one way to determine the boundary between topic and comment is stress: the first obligatory full stress marks the first element of the comment. Consider
5 ON THE INFORMATION STRUCTURE OF THE HUNGARIAN SENTENCE 259 (6) (a) Péter sokszor járt Párizsban. Peter often was Paris-in 'Peter has often been in Paris' (b) Péter "Annával találkozott Párizsban. Peter Ann-with met Paris-in 'Peter met ANN in Paris', 'It was Ann that Peter met in Paris' This observation is still used as one of the major tests to distinguish the two parts of the sentence. Another important observation made by Brassai concerned the so-called question test, which we have already made use of in the examples (l)(a)-(b). According to Brassai in order to distinguish between 'given' and 'new' information, one has to find out to what kind of question the sentence can be considered to be an adequate answer to. The noun phrase which is the common part of the question and the corresponding answer is the topic of the sentence. 12 Here are some more examples: (7) (a) A könyvet kinek adtad oda? - A könyvet PÉTERNEK adtam oda. the book-acc whom-to gave - I the book-acc Peter-dat gave-i 'Whom did you give the book?' I gave Peter the book, (b) Hol találkoztál Annával? - Annával a PARKBAN találkoztam. where met-you Ann-with - Ann-with the park-in met-i 'Where did you meet Ann?' 'I met Ann in the park' According to the question test in (7)(a) the topic is a könyvei 'the book-acc' and in (7)(b) Annával 'Ann-with', according to the test based on stress, the first element of the comment is Péternek 'Peter-dat' in (7)(a) and a parkban 'the park-in' in (7)(b). This conclusion would also be in full accordance with most present-day work on Hungarian syntax. Let us summarize Brassai's main merits: (i) Brassai argued convincingly that the word order rules in Hungarian cannot be formulated in terms of grammatical subject - grammatical predicate, word order is determined by topic-comment articulation; (ii) the topic can be identified by means of the question test (the common element of the question and the corresponding answer belong to the topic); (iii) the boundary between topic and comment is determined by stress: the first stressed element in the sentence is the first element of the comment; 13 (iv) typically, the topic occupies the sentence-initial position and it is followed by the comment. However, Brassai docs not make any distinction between topic, i.e., 'the subject in a different sense' and the thing which is known. In fact, he did not realize that (ii) and (iii) define two different things: the question test identifies whatever is contextually bound and the first obligatory full stress defines the boundary between the 'preparatory part' and the 'principal part' of the sentence. Consequently, Brassai is an early representative of approach A.
6 260 FERENC KIEFER In what follows I am going to show that approach A fails to account for a number of phenomena and that approach B, which makes a distinction between given-new, on the one hand, and logical subject-logical predicate, on the other, must be favored over approach A. 3. Some Problems with Approach A 3.1. Non-specific Referring Expressions? The indefinite pronouns valaki 'somebody' and valami 'something' cannot be contextually bound in the sentences (8)(a)-(b). (8) (a) Valaki kopogott az ajtón. somebody knocked the door-at 'Somebody was knocking at the door' (b) Valami leesett a tetőről. something fell the roof-from 'Something fell from the roof These sentences do not induce any existential presupposition either, they rather assert the existence of somebody or something. 14 There is thus no way to interpret valaki 'somebody' in (8)(a) and valami 'something' in (8)(b) as topic: neither one is a referring expression (a specific noun phrase) and neither one is contextually bound. But both sentences (8)(a) and (b) can be answers to the question 'What happened?'. That is, in both cases the whole sentence represents new information. 15 At the same time, in (8)(a) it is asserted that there was somebody who was knocking at the door, and similarly in (8)(b) it is is asserted that there was something that fell down from the roof Two Different Topicless Sentences? Notice that the question 'What happened?' can often be answered in two different ways, e.g. 17 (9) (a) Bodri megharapta Marit. Bodri bit Mary-acc 'Bodri bit Mary' (b) Marit megharapta Bodri. Mary-acc bit Bodri 'Mary was bitten by Bodri'
7 ON THE INFORMATION STRUCTURE OF THE HUNGARIAN SENTENCE 261 If the sentences (9)(a)-(b) are considered answers to the question 'What happened?', they are both topicless. Nevertheless the sentence (9)(a) is an assertion about Bodri and (9)(b) an assertion about Marit. Consequently, the structure of the assertion (what is asserted about what) is independent of topic-comment articulation 'Truncated' Topics? Sometimes only a fraction of a noun phrase may belong to the topic. This has to do with the fact that only specific noun phrases may be fully contextually bound. In the sentence (10) the noun phrase valamelyik gyerek 'one of the children' is non-specific and can never be fully contextually bound hence it cannot function as atopic. 18 (10) Valamelyik gyerek minden feladatot megoldott, one (of them) child all problem-acc solved 'One of the children solved all the problems' Yet sentence (10) asserts about one of the children that it solved the problem. On the other hand, if a set of children is contextually given, then, gyerek 'child', which is the head noun of the subject noun phrase, is contextually bound, and the sentence can be paraphrased as 'From among the children one solved all the problems'. In other words, in that case the topic of (10) is gyerek 'child' but not valamelyik gyerek 'one of the children'. Once again, the two articulations are different The Problem of Quantified Noun Phrases Consider the following sentences: 20 (11) (a) Sok kutya "három járókelőt is megharapott, many dog three passer-by-acc even bit 'Many dogs bit even three passers-by' (b) "Sok kutya megharapta a három járókelőt, many dog bit the three passer-by-acc. 'Many dogs bit the three passers-by' In (1 l)(a) the comment begins with három 'three' since it carries the first obligatory full stress. In (1 l)(b), on the other hand, it is the first element of the sentence that carries the heaviest stress, consequently the whole sentence must be consid-
8 262 FERENC KIEFER ered comment. Notice, however, that both sentences assert something about sok kutya 'many dogs'. The above examples may suffice to show that aboutness in the sense of being an assertion about a referent and aboutness in the sense of contextual boundedness are two different things. Let us introduce the term 'logical subject' for the NP about which something is asserted and the term 'logical predicate' for what is asserted about that NP. We will keep the traditional terms 'topic' and 'comment' to denote 'given' and 'new', i.e., the pragmatic articulation of the sentence. The logical subject need not be known from the discourse context but if a full NP is the topic, it is at the same time the logical subject. To return to our examples, it can easily be seen that in terms of the above distinction sentences (8)(a)-(b) are topicless but both have a logical subject. In the given context sentences (9)(a)-(b), which are semantically (truth-functionally) equivalent are topicless, too, but they have two different logical subject-logical predicate articulations. The sentence (10) is not topicless and though the full noun phrase valamelyik gyerek 'one of the children' is the logical subject, only gyerek 'child' may belong to the topic. In the sentence (11 )(a) sok kutya 'many dogs' can be both logical subject and topic, whereas in (1 l)(b) it cannot be the topic though it is the logical subject. It can thus be claimed that syntactic structure in Hungarian (including word order) is based on logical subject-logical predicate and not on topic-comment articulation, the latter determines the information structure of the sentence in discourse. In sum, then, by postulating two different levels, a syntactico-semantic and a pragmatic one, we arrive at a more adequate analysis of Hungarian sentences, hence approach B is to be favored over approach A. There are also sentences in Hungarian which evidently are topicless and at the same time may be analyzed as lacking a logical subject. Sentences with the order verb-subject (VS) all belong here. Such sentences are used to report events and are often referred to as 'event reporting sentences'. 21 Consider (12) (a) Megérkezett a postás. arrived the postman 'The postman arrived' (b) Kitört a háború, broke out the war 'The war broke out' The sentence (12)(a) is not an assertion about the postman, nor is (12)(b) an assertion about the war. Moreover, everything contained in (12)(a)-(b) is new information. Consequently, these sentences have neither a logical subject nor a topic. They are asserted about a situation, which - in a somewhat metaphorical sense - can also be considered the logical subject of the assertion. 22
9 ON THE INFORMATION STRUCTURE OF THE HUNGARIAN SENTENCE 263 To summarize, then, out of the four logical possibilities: (a) an NP is logical subject but not topic, (b) an NP is both logical subject and topic, (c) an NP is neither logical subject nor topic, (d) an NP is topic but not logical subject; for obvious reasons only the last one is excluded. References Brassai, Sámuel, "Tapogatódzások a magyar nyelv körül" [Exploring the Hungarian Language]. Pesti Napló 802, 803 (1852), 861, 86, 865, 876, 877, 878, 885 (1853). Brassai, Sámuel, "A magyar mondat I." [The Hungarian Sentence]. Magyar Akadémiai Értesítő. A Nyelv- és Széptudományi Osztály Közlönye 1(1860): Brassai, Sámuel, "A magyar mondatról II III." [On the Hungarian Sentence]. Magyar Akadémiai Értesítő. A Nyelv- és Széptudományi Osztály Közlönye 3( ): 3-128, Brassai, Sámuel, Laelius. Hogyan kell és hogyan nem kell magyarázni az iskolában a latin auktorokat? [Laelius. How to explain and how not to explain the Latin authors at school?] Kolozsvár: Stein, Brassai, Samuel, "A mondat dualizmusa" [The Dualism of the Sentence]. Értekezések a Magyar Tudományos Akadémia Nyelv- és Széptudományi Osztálya Köréből 12(1885). É. Kiss, Katalin, "Sámuel Brassai's theory of the sentence." In: Kiefer, Ferenc, ed. Hungarian Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1982, E. Kiss, Katalin, Configurationality in Hungarian. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó, É. Kiss, Katalin, "Mondattan" [Syntax]. É. Kiss, Katalin, Kiefer, Ferenc, and Siptár, Péter, Új magyarnyelvtan [New Hungarian Grammar]. Budapest: Osiris, 1999, É. Kiss, Katalin, Syntax of Hungarian. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Gabelentz, Georg von der, "Ideen zu einer vergleichenden Syntax - Wort- und Satzstellung." Zeitschrift für Völkerpsychologie und Sprachwissenschaft 6(1869): Gabelentz, Georg von der, "Weiteres zur vergleichenden Syntax." Zeitschriftfür Völkerpsychologie und Sprachwissenschaft 8( 1875): Gécseg, Zsuzsanna, "Topik és logikai alany a magyar mondatban" [Topic and logical subject in Hungarian sentences]. Gécseg, Zsuzsanna - Ferenc Kiefer, "The notion of topic and the problem of quantification in Hungarian." In: Broekhuis, Hans, Norbert Corver, Riny Huybregts, Ursula Kleinhenz, and Jan Koster, Organizing Grammar. Linguistic Studies in Honor ofhenk van Riemsdijk. Berlin-New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 2005, Gécseg Zsuzsanna - Ferenc Kiefer, "A new look at information structure in Hungarian." (forthcoming) Hatcher, Anna G, "Syntax and the Sentence." Word 12(1956): Kiefer, Ferenc, "Functional sentence perspective and presuppositions." Acta Linguistica Hungarica 27(1-2) (1977), Kiefer, Ferenc, "Brassai Sámuel és a XIX. század nyelvtudománya" [Sámuel Brassai and 19th century linguistics]. Nyelv- és Irodalomtudományi Közlemények (Kolozsvár) 41(2) (1998): Kuno, Susumo, "Functional sentence perspective: a case study from Japanese and English". Linguistic Inquiry 3(1972): Kuroda, Sige-Yuki, "The categorical and the thetic judgment: evidence from Japanese syntax". Foundations of Language 9(1972):
10 264 FERENC KIEFER Lambrecht, Knud, Information Structure and Sentence Form. Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Maleczki, Márta, "A határozatlan alanyok különféle értelmezései a magyar semleges mondatokban" [The various interpretations of nonspecific subject noun phrases in neutral sentences] In: Büky, László - Maleczki, Márta (eds.), A mai magyar nyelv leírásának újabb módszerei Vol. Ill, 1998, Sgall, Petr, Eva Hajicová, Eva Benesová, Topic, Focus and Generative Semantics. Kronberg- Taunus: Scriptor, Weil, Henri, De l'ordre des mots dans les langues anciennes comparées aux langues modernes. Paris, Notes 1 Benczúr utca 33, H-Î068 Budapest, Hungary. fax: (36-l) The notion of topic-comment articulation (and also that of functional sentence perspective) was introduced into Anglo-American linguistics by Susumo Kuno in Kuno Lambrecht does, of course, refer to the work of Prague School linguists, however, without paying attention to the twofold distinction topic-comment and given-new. Represented also by Katalin É. Kiss (1987, 1999, 2002) and in a considerable number of articles. 5 Cf. Sgall Hajicová Benesová 1973 and the references cited therein. 6 Examples from É. Kiss 1987: Cf. Brassai 1852, 1860, , 1874, Cited by É. Kiss (1982: 336). It is worth quoting in this connection Lambrecht (1994: 6) who mentions identifiability and activation as the second type of categories of information structure: these categories "have to do with a speaker's assumptions about the statuses of the mental representations of discourse referents in the addressee's mind at the time of the utterance". The difference between Lambrecht and Brassai is a matter of wording. Brassai was never happy with the terms he proposed that is why he came up with a new term in each of his major works. 10 Apparently, the first linguist who was aware of the problem of word order was Henri Weil (1844) rediscovered in the 30s by Prague School scholars. Word order was discussed more thoroughly by Georg von der Gabelentz in two papers published in 1869 and 1875, respectively. Brassai 1885 contains a critical examination of the latter. For a brief comparison of Weil and von der Gabelentz see Kiefer ' This latter statement needs some refinment: only specific noun phrases can function as topics, in other words, the topic must be a referring expression. Cf. the contrast between Egy könyvet nem találok a lakásban 'There is a (specific) book that I don't find in the apartment' - Nem találok egv könyvet a lakásban T don't find a (any) book in the apartment' or T don't find a (certain) book in the apartment' (É. Kiss 1987: 76-77). The first use of the question test is attributed to Hatcher 1956 but, as we saw, it had already been proposed by Brassai in Since optionally the topic, too, can carry stress and in addition to full stress the sentence normally also contains elements, which carry secondary stress, Brassai's formulation is not quite adequate: 'the first stressed element' must be replaced by 'the element which carries the first obligatory stress'. 14 Contrary to É. Kiss 2002: 11.
11 THE INFORMATION STRUCTURE OF THE HUNGARIAN SENTENCE 265 Such sentences are usually referred to as sentences expressing a thetic judgment or simply thetic sentences. Cf. Kuroda 1972 for the term 'thetic judgment'. Such sentences are called categorical since they express a categorical judgment. Cf. Kuroda 1972 for the term 'categorical judgment'. The examples are taken from Gécseg - Kiefer (forthcoming). Zsuzsanna Gécseg's example (p.c.). For details cf. Gécseg - Kiefer Cf. Gécseg Cf. the discussion of'event reporting sentences' in Lambrecht 1994: Cf. Maleczki 1998.
Labex TransfertS The syntactic position of the subject in Hungarian existential constructions Zsuzsanna GÉCSEG University of Szeged, Hungary email@example.com Canonical locational clause Introduction
The compositional semantics of same Mike Solomon Amherst College Abstract Barker (2007) proposes the first strictly compositional semantic analysis of internal same. I show that Barker s analysis fails
Sounds Like Like Peter Lasersohn University of Rochester Abstract: It is argued that the verb sound is ambiguous between one reading where it denotes a two-place relation between individuals and properties,
COMPARATIVES WITHOUT DEGREES: A NEW APPROACH FRIEDERIKE MOLTMANN IHPST, Paris firstname.lastname@example.org It has become common to analyse comparatives by using degrees, so that John is happier than Mary would
Experimental investigation of the exhaustivity of structural focus Lilla Pintér Pázmány Péter Catholic University, Hungary Research Institute for Linguistics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences 5 th Central
Terence Parsons (1990) : Events in the Semantics of English, A Study in Subatomic Semantics Martha Palmer LING 7800/CSCI 7000 October 28, 2014 Terminology : Conditional if/then statement : Exisistential
THE ENGLISH SENTENCE (Materials based on: Huddleston, R. & Pullum, G.K. (Eds.)., 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. London: CUP and Greenbaum, S., & Quirk, R. 1990. A Student's Grammar
EXTRACT 1 Basic concepts It has become a tradition to begin monographs and textbooks on morphology with a tribute to the German poet Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, who invented the term Morphologie in 1790
Syntactic Theory Background and Transformational Grammar Dr. Dan Flickinger & PD Dr. Valia Kordoni Department of Computational Linguistics Saarland University October 28, 2011 Early work on grammar There
Overview of topics What is Syntax? Word Classes What to remember and understand: Ling 201 Syntax 1 Jirka Hana April 10, 2006 Syntax, difference between syntax and semantics, open/closed class words, all
1 Context, Complex Sentences, and Propositional Content Friederike Moltmann Department of Philosophy University of Stirling December 2003 Abstract In some recent developments of semantic theory, in particular
PÁZMÁNY PÉTER KATOLIKUS EGYETEM BÖLCSÉSZETTUDOMÁNYI KAR DOKTORI DISSZERTÁCIÓ HALM TAMÁS THE GRAMMAR OF FREE-CHOICE ITEMS IN HUNGARIAN THESIS BOOKLET NYELVTUDOMÁNYI DOKTORI ISKOLA ELMÉLETI NYELVÉSZET MŰHELY
Philos Stud (2010) 150:187 220 DOI 10.1007/s11098-009-9383-9 Relative truth and the first person Friederike Moltmann Published online: 15 April 2009 Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009 Abstract
Frege s theory of sense Jeff Speaks August 25, 2011 1. Three arguments that there must be more to meaning than reference... 1 1.1. Frege s puzzle about identity sentences 1.2. Understanding and knowledge
EÖTVÖS LORÁND TUDOMÁNYEGYETEM BÖLCSÉSZETTUDOMÁNYI KAR DOKTORI DISSZERTÁCIÓ GYURIS BEÁTA THE SEMANTICS OF CONTRASTIVE TOPICS IN HUNGARIAN NYELVTUDOMÁNYI DOKTORI ISKOLA ELMÉLETI NYELVÉSZETI DOKTORI PROGRAM
English Descriptive Grammar 2015/2016 Code: 103410 ECTS Credits: 6 Degree Type Year Semester 2500245 English Studies FB 1 1 2501902 English and Catalan FB 1 1 2501907 English and Classics FB 1 1 2501910
2 The role of background knowledge in language comprehension has been formalized as schema theory, any text, either spoken or written, does not by itself carry meaning. Rather, according to schema theory,
Rethinking the relationship between transitive and intransitive verbs Students with whom I have studied grammar will remember my frustration at the idea that linking verbs can be intransitive. Nonsense!
Estudios de lingüística inglesa aplicada ADVERB ORIENTATION: SEMANTICS AND PRAGMATICS José María García Núñez Universidad de Cádiz Orientation is a well known property of some adverbs in English. Early
In: Marcelo Dascal (Ed.), Dialogue: An Interdisciplinary Approach, Amsterdam / Philadelphia (Benjamins), 1985, S. 205-211. Georg Meggle TO HELL WITH SPEECH ACT THEORY 0. During the last few years semantics,
Discourse Markers in English Writing Li FENG Abstract Many devices, such as reference, substitution, ellipsis, and discourse marker, contribute to a discourse s cohesion and coherence. This paper focuses
COLING 82, J. Horeck~ (ed.j North-Holland Publishing Compa~y Academia, 1982 COMPUTATIONAL DATA ANALYSIS FOR SYNTAX Ludmila UhliFova - Zva Nebeska - Jan Kralik Czech Language Institute Czechoslovak Academy
Sentence Structure/Sentence Types HANDOUT This handout is designed to give you a very brief (and, of necessity, incomplete) overview of the different types of sentence structure and how the elements of
15 4 15 Russell (1) The professor was drunk. (2)Russell "On denoting", Mind 14,1905 x (professor (x) y (professor (y) x y) drunk(x) ) "There is an x who is a professor, and there is no y such that y is
CHAPTER 7 GENERAL PROOF SYSTEMS 1 Introduction Proof systems are built to prove statements. They can be thought as an inference machine with special statements, called provable statements, or sometimes
Language Meaning and Use Raymond Hickey, English Linguistics Website: www.uni-due.de/ele Types of meaning There are four recognisable types of meaning: lexical meaning, grammatical meaning, sentence meaning
Paraphrasing controlled English texts Kaarel Kaljurand Institute of Computational Linguistics, University of Zurich email@example.com Abstract. We discuss paraphrasing controlled English texts, by defining
1 An Analysis of the Eleventh Grade Students Monitor Use in Speaking Performance based on Krashen s (1982) Monitor Hypothesis at SMAN 4 Jember Moh. Rofid Fikroni, Musli Ariani, Sugeng Ariyanto Language
Theory and Practice in English Studies 3 (2005): Proceedings from the Eighth Conference of British, American and Canadian Studies. Brno: Masarykova univerzita Syntactic and Semantic Differences between
Writing Thesis Defense Papers The point of these papers is for you to explain and defend a thesis of your own critically analyzing the reasoning offered in support of a claim made by one of the philosophers
Noam Chomsky: Aspects of the Theory of Syntax notes Julia Krysztofiak May 16, 2006 1 Methodological preliminaries 1.1 Generative grammars as theories of linguistic competence The study is concerned with
Lengua Inglesa II 2009-2010 Topic 3: Grammatical Units Subtopic 1: Units and Boundaries Subtopic 2: The Noun Phrase Mick O Donnell VI-bis 302 firstname.lastname@example.org 1. Units and rank scale Unit: any stretch
AnInterval-Based Semantics for Degree Questions: Negative Islands and Their Obviation Márta Abrusán and Benjamin Spector InstitutJean-Nicod(CNRS,Paris) and Harvard University Introduction The goal of this
Course Description (MA Degree) Eng. 508 Semantics (3 Credit hrs.) This course is an introduction to the issues of meaning and logical interpretation in natural language. The first part of the course concentrates
Aquinas on Essence, Existence, and Divine Simplicity Strange but Consistent In the third question of the Summa Theologiae, Aquinas is concerned with divine simplicity. This is important for him both theologically
Svetlana Sokolova President and CEO of PROMT, PhD. How the Computer Translates Machine translation is a special field of computer application where almost everyone believes that he/she is a specialist.
Natural Language News Generation from Big Data Bastian Haarmann, Lukas Sikorski Abstract In this paper, we introduce an NLG application for the automatic creation of ready-to-publish texts from big data.
44 ANALYSIS explicating logical truth, and, thus, also consequence and inconsistency. Let C1 and C2 be distinct moral codes formulated in English. Let C1 contain a norm N and C2 its negation. The moral
Identificational Focus revisited: The issue of exhaustivity (Paper presented at CLS 50) Katalin É. Kiss Lilla Pintér 1. Introduction This paper argues for a modified version of the analysis of identificational
Contrastive topics between syntax and pragmatics in Hungarian: an experimental analysis Beáta Gyuris Katalin Mády RIL, HAS, Budapest LMU, Munich 1 Introduction The aim of this contribution 1 is to present
The structure of the English Sentence In this first part of the grammar you are going to review the most common structures in English. In addition, you will study some structures that differ from the normal
Section 8 Foreign Languages Article 1 OVERALL OBJECTIVE To develop students communication abilities such as accurately understanding and appropriately conveying information, ideas,, deepening their understanding
From Logic to Montague Grammar: Some Formal and Conceptual Foundations of Semantic Theory Syllabus Linguistics 720 Tuesday, Thursday 2:30 3:45 Room: Dickinson 110 Course Instructor: Seth Cable Course Mentor:
A Note on the Optimal Supply of Public Goods and the Distortionary Cost of Taxation Louis Kaplow * Abstract In a recent article, I demonstrated that, under standard simplifying assumptions, it is possible
FRAMING EFFECTS A framing effect is usually said to occur when equivalent descriptions of a decision problem lead to systematically different decisions. Framing has been a major topic of research in the
Pragmatic analysis of hotel websites in terms of interpersonal relationships Theses of the PhD dissertation by Kovács Péterné Dudás Andrea Eötvös Loránd University Faculty of Humanities Doctoral School
Semester III Group B Grammar 3 Mrs. Skirdj Sentence structure The subject is a noun, noun phrase or pronoun representing the person or thing that performs the action of the verb. There are two types of
JASON STANLEY CONTEXT AND LOGICAL FORM ABSTRACT. In this paper, I defend the thesis that all effects of extra-linguistic context on the truth-conditions of an assertion are traceable to elements in the
Movement and Binding Gereon Müller Institut für Linguistik Universität Leipzig SoSe 2008 www.uni-leipzig.de/ muellerg Gereon Müller (Institut für Linguistik) Constraints in Syntax 4 SoSe 2008 1 / 35 Principles
Business School Writing an Essay What is an essay? An essay is usually written in response to a question or series of questions. The writer's purpose is to convince the reader that his or her way of analysing,
Julia Hirschberg AT&T Bell Laboratories Murray Hill, New Jersey 07974 Comparing the questions -proposed for this discourse panel with those identified for the TINLAP-2 panel eight years ago, it becomes
1 RELATIVE CLAUSE: Does it Specify Which One? Or Does it Just Describe the One and Only? 2 Contents INTRODUCTION...3 THEORY...4 The Concept... 4 Specifying Clauses... 4 Describing Clauses... 5 The Rule...
Basic Notions of Information Structure * Manfred Krifka Humboldt Universität zu Berlin and Zentrum für Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Berlin Abstract. This article takes stock of the basic notions of Information
2. SEMANTIC RELATIONS 2.0 Review: meaning, sense, reference A word has meaning by having both sense and reference. Sense: Word meaning: = concept Sentence meaning: = proposition (1) a. The man kissed the
CRITICAL AND CREATIVE THINKING RUBRIC GRADUATE PROGRAMS Adapted from the AACU LEAP rubrics, the Bases of Competence skills, Ontario Council of Academic Vice-Presidents Graduate Degree Level Expectations,
Parts of Speech Skills Team, University of Hull Language comes before grammar, which is only an attempt to describe a language. Knowing the grammar of a language does not mean you can speak or write it
CHARTES D'ANGLAIS SOMMAIRE CHARTE NIVEAU A1 Pages 2-4 CHARTE NIVEAU A2 Pages 5-7 CHARTE NIVEAU B1 Pages 8-10 CHARTE NIVEAU B2 Pages 11-14 CHARTE NIVEAU C1 Pages 15-17 MAJ, le 11 juin 2014 A1 Skills-based
The Essay Guide: Developing Points/Depth of Analysis W3 Developing Points/Depth of Analysis Point Evidence Explanation The Point Evidence Explanation rule is one that is still useful at FE and undergraduate
ON EXTERNAL OBJECTS By Immanuel Kant From Critique of Pure Reason (1781) General Observations on The Transcendental Aesthetic To avoid all misapprehension, it is necessary to explain, as clearly as possible,
Governance in the Project Management World Published January 2013. 12/6/12 Executive Summary This paper examines "governance", its potential role in project management and the governance environment in
Grammar What is a noun? A noun is a word used to name a person, animal, place, thing, and abstract idea. What are the two types of nouns? Common Noun A common noun is a noun referring to a person, place,
7 Conclusions and suggestions for further research This research has devised an approach to analyzing system-level coordination from the point of view of product architecture. The analysis was conducted
Journal of Philosophy, Inc. Counterparts of Persons and Their Bodies Author(s): David Lewis Reviewed work(s): Source: The Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 68, No. 7 (Apr. 8, 1971), pp. 203-211 Published by:
Examining domain widening and NPI any 1 Ana Arregui University of Ottawa 1. Introduction This squib examines domain widening (DW) as used in the analysis of NPI any. Since Kadmon and Landman s (1993) influential
J. T. M. Miller, Department of Philosophy, University of Durham 1 Methodological Issues for Interdisciplinary Research Much of the apparent difficulty of interdisciplinary research stems from the nature
Generating Sentences from Different Perspectives Lee Fedder, The Computer Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Pembroke Street, Cambridge CB2 3QG, England. If@uk.ac.cam.cl Keywords : Generation, Natural
Honors German 3/ German 3 Curriculum Timeline Unit 1 Standards Objectives Content Additional Resources Performance Tasks Assessments 3 weeks Die ACTFL Students will be able Vocabulary: Handouts Students
Chapter 9 Apparent or real? On the complementary distribution of identificational focus and the verbal particle Katalin É. Kiss 1. Introduction Chapter 2 of this book has argued that in the Hungarian sentence,
Acta Linguistica 38 (1988) 118-130 Compositionality, of, word-formation András Kornai Stanford University 0 Introduction One of the criteria generally applied in distinguishing lexical processes from syntactic
Course participation 1. Shows a wide range of knowledge in contemporary issues in HRM Draws accurately on a few classic theories of HRM Draws accurately on a variety of classic theories of HRM and is sometimes
Development models R. Kuiper and E.J. Luit 1 Introduction We reconsider the classical development models: the Waterfall Model [Bo76], the V-Model [Ro86], the Spiral Model [Bo88], together with the further
The College Standard Writing College Papers: Identifying Standards and Critical Thinking Challenges Building Blocks Grammar Vocabulary Questions The Goals of Academic Writing Thesis Argument Research Plagiarism
CAMBRIDGE FIRST SERIES WRITING & USE OF ENGLISH LINKERS When sitting the Cambridge First exam, one of the things most candidates may have problems with is the accurate use of linkers. Linkers are words
Electronic offprint from baltic linguistics Vol. 3, 2012 ISSN 2081-7533 Nɪᴄᴏʟᴇ Nᴀᴜ, A Short Grammar of Latgalian. (Languages of the World/Materials, 482.) München: ʟɪɴᴄᴏᴍ Europa, 2011, 119 pp. ɪѕʙɴ 978-3-86288-055-3.
Faculty of Arts University of Groningen Pronouns: A case of production-before-comprehension A study on the the comprehension and production of pronouns and reflexives in Dutch children Petra Hendriks Jennifer
WHAT ARE MATHEMATICAL PROOFS AND WHY THEY ARE IMPORTANT? introduction Many students seem to have trouble with the notion of a mathematical proof. People that come to a course like Math 216, who certainly
Focussing as Predication Abstract The paper argues for a new approach to structural focus, which eliminates the problems raised by the standard F(ocus)P theory. The starting point of the analysis is the
ET0258.03-042040020 1 Decision of Technical Board of Appeal 3.5.1 dated 21 April 2004 T 258/03-3.5.1 (Language of the proceedings) Composition of the Board: Chairman: Members: S. V. Steinbrener R. S. Wibergh
A Primer in the Semantics of English Some Nuts and Bolts 2000-2010 by Terence Parsons A Primer in the Semantics of English Some Nuts and Bolts Chapter 0: Preliminary Issues 0.1 What Sentences Do 0.2 Standing-for
Moholy-Nagy University of Arts & Design Doctoral Training YOU ARE HERE the boof of Péter Maczó about the infodesign THESES FOR THE DLA DEGREE Budapest, March 2009 INTRODUCTION It is not about the destination.
Aporia vol. 18 no. 1 2008 Charles Hartshorne and the Ontological Argument Joshua Ernst Th e ontological argument distinguishes itself from the cosmological and teleological arguments for God s existence
Linguistics & Cognitive Science 07.201* History of Cognitive Science Fall term 2000 formal account of pivotal role of linguistics in the development of cognitive science relation to psychology, AI, & philosophy
M.A. Handbook Department of Theological Studies Concordia University Updated October 2015 Mailing Address: Department of Theological Studies Concordia University 1455 Boulevard De Maisonneuve West Montreal,
The English Genitive Alternation s and of genitives in English The English s genitive freely alternates with the of genitive in many situations: Mary s brother the brother of Mary the man s house the house
CS4025: Pragmatics Resolving referring Expressions Interpreting intention in dialogue Conversational Implicature For more info: J&M, chap 18,19 in 1 st ed; 21,24 in 2 nd Computing Science, University of
A Knowledge-based System for Translating FOL Formulas into NL Sentences Aikaterini Mpagouli, Ioannis Hatzilygeroudis University of Patras, School of Engineering Department of Computer Engineering & Informatics,