1 6. İnşaat Yönetimi Kongresi, Kasım 2011, Bursa 321 Design and Design Management in Building Projects: A Review Abstract Rıfat Akbıyıklı 1, David Eaton 2 Design is that activity, largely executed by consultants and in-house disciplines, which translates the aspirations of the Client, into a series of documents, both drawn and written, which in combination can be used to procure the manufacture, assembly, commissioning and operation of both building elements and the project as a whole. Management of the design process is planned to ensure that the project requirements have been correctly interpreted in an agreed brief, with a consistent format of technical verification reports and design analysis audit trail, as set out in the project plan. This paper, based on a literature review, examines traditional design management and design and construction as an integrated system. The paper is an introductory part of an ongoing project to map design and design management practices in architectural and civil engineering practices. Keywords: Design, Design Management, Design Integration, Procurement Routes, Teamwork 1 Sakarya University, Department of Civil Engineering, Esentepe Campus, Adapazarı Sakarya, Tel: , 2 School of the Built Environment, 4th Floor Maxwell Building, University of Salford Salford, Greater Manchester, M5 4WT, United Kingdom, Tel: +44(0)
2 İnşaat Yönetimi Kongresi, Kasım 2011, Bursa Bina Projelerinde Tasarım ve Tasarım Yönetimi: Bir Ġnceleme Rıfat Akbıyıklı 1, David Eaton 2 Özet Tasarım, genellikle müģavirler ve Ģirket içi disiplinlerce yapılan ve ĠĢveren in amaç ve isteklerini hem bina ve hem de projenin tümünün üretiminin elde edilmesine, montajına ve onay ve teslimatı ile iģletmeye alınmasında kullanılan çizili ve yazılı bir seri dokümana dönüģtüren bir aktivitedir. Tasarım prosesinin (sürecinin) yönetimi, proje planında öngörüldüğü ve ortaya konduğu gibi projenin gereksinimleri önceden üzerinde mutabakat sağlanmıģ olan ve uyumlu formatta teknik tahkik raporları ile tasarım analizinin doğru bir özet raporuna dönüģtürülmelerini sağlamaktadır. Literatür incelemesine dayalı olan bu bildiri, geleneksel tasarım yönetimi ile tasarım ve yapımını bütünleģik bir sistem olarak incelemektedir. Bu bildiri, mimarlık ve inģaat mühendisliği bürolarının tasarım ve tasarım yönetimi uygulamalarının ayrıntılı bir haritasının çıkarılmasına iliģkin devam etmekte olan bir çalıģmanın baģlangıç bölümüdür. Tasarım bir kreativite (yaratıcılık) aktivitesi olarak vaka toplama ve özet ön bilgi toparlamadan ayrı bir süreçtir. Tasarım sentezi; projenin kalitesinin, maliyet planının, ihale elde edilmesinin ve yapım programlarının kurulabilmesi için kullanılmaktadır. Bu referans araçları daha sonra projenin iģ ilerlemesi, maliyet ve kalite parametrelerine karģı sürekli olarak ölçülebilen performans parametreleri olmaktadır. ÇeĢitli çalıģmalar, eksik ve hataların büyük bir yüzdesinin tasarım etaplarında alınan karar ve aksiyonlar nedeniyle oluģtuğunu tespit etmiģtir. (Cornick 1991) Buna karģılık zayıf bir tasarımın ise yapım aģamasındaki etkinlik seviyesi üzerinde çok etkisinin olduğu tespit edilmiģtir. (Ferguson, 1986) ÇağdaĢ yapıların artan karmaģıklığı, zaman (süre) ve kalite terimleri ile tasarımın performansının iyileģtirilmesi için bir baskı unsuru oluģturmaktadır. Önemli olmasına rağmen tasarım prosesinin yönetimi için, üretim (yapım) yönetimi ve genel proje yönetimi için harcanandan daha az araģtırma süresi ve çabası harcanmıģtır. (Austin ve diğ. 1994; Koskela ve diğ.1994) 1 Sakarya University, Department of Civil Engineering, Esentepe Campus, Adapazarı Sakarya, Tel: , 2 School of the Built Environment, 4th Floor Maxwell Building, University of Salford Salford, Greater Manchester, M5 4WT, United Kingdom, Tel: +44(0) ,
3 6. İnşaat Yönetimi Kongresi, Kasım 2011, Bursa 323 Tasarımın yönetilmesi zor bir süreçtir. Çok belirsiz bir çevre Ģartları içerisinde bazen belirli bir yıl süre alan binlerce karar, sayısız birbiri ile iliģkiler içermektedir. Ayrıca mimar, yapı mühendisleri, servis mühendisleri (elektrik, makine, havalandırma, tesisat) ve pazarlama mühendisleri gibi çok sayıda personele ihtiyaç duyulmaktadır (Powell ve Newland, 1994). Bu nedenle tasarım sürecinin karmaģıklık ve belirsizliğini minimize etmek için etkin bir planlama ve kontrol gerekmektedir. Zayıf iletiģim, eksik dokümantasyon, yanlıģ veya eksik girdi bilgisi, dengesiz kaynak ve tahsisat, disiplinler arası koordinasyonsuzluk ve yanlıģ karar alma tasarım yönetimindeki ana problemler olarak belirlenmiģtir (Cornick, 1991; Austin ve diğ. 1994, Koskela ve diğ. 1997). Anahtar kelimeler: Tasarım, Tasarım Yönetimi, Tasarım Entegrasyonu, Satınalma Yöntemleri, Takım ÇalıĢması Introduction Design activity is largely carried out by consultants and in-house disciplines, which translate the aspirations of the Client, into drawn and written media which can be used to procure the construction, commissioning and operation of the whole project. Design, as a creative activity is separate from the fact gathering and brief assembly process that precedes it. Design synthesis is used to establish the quality of the project, the cost plan, procurement and construction programs. These reference tools then become the performance parameters against which progress, cost and quality can be continuously measured. Studies have identified that a large percentage of defects arise through decisions or actions in design stages (Cornick, 1991) whilst poor design has a very strong impact on the level of efficiency during the production stage (Ferguson, 1986). The increasing complexity of modern buildings has significantly increased the pressure to improve the performance of the design in terms of time and quality. Despite its importance, less research time and effort has been dedicated to the management of the design process, than to production management and project management in general (Austin et al, 1994; Koskela et al, 1997). The small relative cost of the design process when compared to production costs disguises its true importance for overall performance (Austin et al, 1994). Design is a difficult process to manage. It involves thousands of decisions, sometimes over a period of years, with numerous interdependencies, within a highly uncertain environment. A large number of design personnel are needed: architects: structural engineers; service engineers; and marketing consultants (Powell and Newland, 1994). The design process therefore needs effective planning and control to minimise the effects of complexity and uncertainty. Poor communication; lack of adequate documentation; deficient or missing input information; unbalanced resource allocation; lack of coordination between disciplines; and erratic decision making; have been identified as the main problems in design management (Cornick, 1991, Austin et al. 1994, Koskela et al. 1997).
4 İnşaat Yönetimi Kongresi, Kasım 2011, Bursa Nature of Traditional Design Management (DM) Construction design is a specialised and highly demanding form of problem solving (Pressman, 1993; Lawson, 1997) where Stakeholders needs and requirements are conceptualised into a physical representation of procedures, drawings and technical specifications (Freire and Alarcon, 2000). It is a dynamic and complex multidisciplinary process, performed in a series of iterative steps to conceive, describe and justify increasingly detailed solutions to stakeholders needs (Sterman, 1992; Ogunlana et al, 1998; Baldwin et al, 1999). It is the key project process (Morris et al, 1999; Cockshaw, 2001), defining up to 70% of the final product cost (Kochan, 1991) and adding value by delivering: functionality; quality; enhanced services; reduced whole life costs, construction time and defects; while delivering wider social and environmental benefits (Treasury Task Force, 2000; Prescott, 1999). Effective design management ensures that all project requirements have been correctly interpreted in an agreed brief, with a consistent format of technical verification reports and design analysis audit trail, as set out in the project plan. In that respect, DM is an emergent professional discipline which separates the management function of a project s design phase from the design function. It is increasingly important in construction projects (Gray and Hughes, 2001). It is closely aligned to project management, to provide a fully co-ordinated project, on time, meeting all stakeholder needs by co-ordinating, controlling and monitoring design activities while interfacing with other project and external parties. It is typically realised by a design manager or team of managers depending on a project s size and complexity. Design planning An effective and workable design programme is essential to exert managerial control over the design process and improve co-ordination between parties (Austin et al, 1994). The low priority of design in project planning is attributed to construction accounting for the majority of the project costs. It is now recognised that construction efficiency and costs are heavily dependent on the quality of the design solution (Austin et al, 1998) and availability of information and hence the quality of the design programme. Newton and Hedges (1996) claim there is a poor understanding of the interdependency of information flows because separate disciplines do not understand how their work contributes to the whole, causing a fragmented approach to planning. The identification and co-ordination of cross-disciplinary information is left to the expertise of the design planner or project manager (Baldwin et al, 1994). This creates implications for the coordination of discrete design disciplines and general process control. Another facet of poor design planning is that resource allocation is often unbalanced (Cornick 1991, Austin et al 1994, Koskela et al 1997a). This can cause initial delays (Koskela et al 1997b; Love et al, 2000) but can also escalate into further problems.
5 6. İnşaat Yönetimi Kongresi, Kasım 2011, Bursa 325 Information management The principal management activity of any project is the processing of information (Baldwin et al, 1994; Heath et al, 1994), yet in the construction industry this is poorly performed (Latham, 1994; Kagioglou et al, 1998). Management is predominantly through schedules (Ballard, 1999) programmed to achieve the required information release to contractors (Austin et al, 1998). It does not consider the internal logic of the design process poor planning is a factor in poor information management (Formoso et al, 1998). As a result information transfer is not properly controlled; designers do not have the right information at the right time and are overloaded with unnecessary information (Huovila, 1997). This creates the risk of failure of design tasks, deficient analysis and wrong decisions with potential waste in the process due to rework (Huovila et al, 1997; BRE, 1995; O Brien, 1997; Frankenberger & Badke-Schaub, 1998). The erratic delivery of information and unpredictable completion of prerequisite design quickly results in the abandonment of design planning (Huovila et al, 1997), therefore perpetuating a cycle likely to create further difficulties. Design Changes Traditional construction is sequential with a low degree of collaboration between different domains. Over-specialization of functions leads to significant problems. Primarily, these result from the separation of design, engineering, and production and the inability of these functions to communicate effectively. Design changes are a significant problem having large administration costs (Machowski and Dale, 1995), accounting for 40-50% of total design hours (Koskela, 1992) and even in well-managed projects can cost between 5 to 15% of total construction costs (Morris et al, 1999; CIDA, 1994; Burati et al, 1992). When measured by cost, design caused defects are the biggest category of construction defects. Of design caused defects, those originating from missing coordination between disciplines form the largest category. Love et al (2000) highlight that such costs should be even higher as they do not represent the latent and indirect costs, nor the disruption of schedule delays, litigation costs and other intangible aspects such as buildability (Kagioglou et al, 1998). Morris et al, (1999) suggest that even well-managed projects led by industry leading managers, two-thirds by cost, of design changes are avoidable. This offers significant potential for improvement. Newton and Hedges (1996) observe that traditional DM techniques cannot predict the effect of change on the design programme and fees. As such, it is difficult to determine all the possible change paths and select the best (Mokhtar et al, 2000). Thus, if current tools cannot determine the impact of design changes and human judgement is unable to account for the interactions that determine its outcome (Richardson, 1991; Sterman, 1992) then design changes are made without exposure to all potential impacts. Such inability to predict the impact of changes must be considered as a barrier to effective control of design changes and therefore management of the design process. If change control is improved then there is more chance of project success.
6 İnşaat Yönetimi Kongresi, Kasım 2011, Bursa The management of design is problematic due to the following design problems: Poor briefing and communication; Inadequacies in the technical knowledge of designers; Lack of confidence in preplanning for design work; Lack of adequate documentation; Deficient or missing input information; Unbalanced resource allocation; Lack of coordination between disciplines; Erratic decision making; Lack of effective planning and control to minimize the effects of complexity and uncertainty. (Ballard and Koskela(1998) and Tzortzopoulos and Formoso (1999) While sites can operate on a definition of quality as conformance to requirements, design must produce those requirements from identification of client needs! Many design decisions are reciprocally independent, making the management of work flow among the various specialists important and difficult. Early design stages are notoriously hard to evaluate and against progress milestones. In general, the design phase, being one of the early phases of the project life cycle is found to be a major source of problems for the subsequent phases, even to the extent of undermining systematic management during construction (Ballard & Koskela, 1998) (Figure 1). Design activity Consultant design Overlapping wedges Trade design Briefing Design Engineering Procurement Construction Occupation Project Life-Cycle Figure 1. Design Activity versus Project-life Cycle To overcome these problems, new methods of working and organizational structures which facilitate and integrate design, development and production are necessary.
7 6. İnşaat Yönetimi Kongresi, Kasım 2011, Bursa 327 Design and Construction as an Integrated System Construction involves many people with different skills, knowledge and interests working together for a short period and then separating upon completion of the project. This creates problems for both the design and construction processes, due to the large number of interfaces and communication difficulties (Kagioglou et al, 1998). Therefore, while it is clear that the integration of design and construction is vital to project success it is also a fundamental weakness in the industry (Egan, 1998). Integration during the design phase is also crucial. It prevents problems in subsequent phases, and is necessary for the development of suitable design solutions (Mitropoulos and Tatum, 2000) and ultimately to achieve client satisfaction (Ferguson and Teicholz, 1992). The existing construction system consists of independent professionals - The designer, contractor and client relationship is a linear delivery system. These processes can also be viewed as an integrated system: Design is a process of defining a client s requirements, represented by detailed plans and specifications; Construction planning is a process of identifying activities and resources required to realize the plans and specifications as a physical reality; Construction is the implementation of the activities and resources to deliver a facility to meet the clients requirements. The two central aspects of an integrated construction system are: An underlying common data model to permit data integration between phases; System control mechanisms to integrate operational efficiency. In an integrated system design and construction planning proceed simultaneously, examining various alternatives from both viewpoints thus eliminating the necessity of extensive revisions under the guise of value engineering. In order to support integrated design and construction, information must be shared, and managed to actively promote integration. The review of design and constructability can then be carried out concurrently as the project progresses seamlessly from design to construction. Design stage decisions are multi-dimensional - made by individuals often belonging to different organizations - combining factors ranging from the highly subjective to the perfectly objective. They are made over prolonged periods of time in an iterative manner and may be revisited weeks, months and even years after they were originally taken. There is considerable potential for misunderstandings, inappropriate changes, changes which give rise to unforeseen difficulties, decisions which are not notified to all interested parties, and many other similar problems. However, the concept of a truly integrated system cannot be realized whilst the owner assumes the traditional risk-reward dilemma. Alternative forms of risk transfer are a pre-requisite.
8 İnşaat Yönetimi Kongresi, Kasım 2011, Bursa Design Stages and Methodology The basic approach to design relies on decomposition and integration. Since design problems are large and complex, they have to be decomposed to yield sub-problems that are small enough to solve. Alternative ways to decompose design problems are: Decomposition by functions of the facility; By spatial locations of its parts; By links of various functions or parts. Functional Design - The objective of functional design is to treat the facility as a complex system of interrelated spaces which are organized systematically according to the functions to be performed in these spaces in order to serve a collection of needs. The arrangement of the physical spaces is an iterative process. Selected rules or strategies (heuristic approach) are used in search of a solution. This approach is based on the following considerations (Hendrickson, 1989). Identification of the goals and constraints for specified tasks; Determination of the current state of each task in the iterative process; Evaluation of the differences between the current state and the goals; Directing the search towards the goals on the basis of past experience. Structural Design - involves synthesis and analysis. Synthesis is inductive while analysis is deductive. Synthesis is more akin to creativity than to knowledge. The conception is subjective since there is no established procedure for generating innovative and successful alternatives. The initial selection relies on the judgment of the designer. Once selected it is vigorously analysed to ensure that it can sustain the demands of its environment. For traditional structures (E.g. office buildings), standard systems are derived from the past experience of many designers. However, in many situations, designs must be developed to meet particular requirements. The interplay of structural form and materials affects the selection of a structural system, which in turn may influence the method of construction (Figure 2). Design Management Research Design management research has focused on: design planning and controlling change (Austin et al, 1998); control of design activities (Ballard and Howell, 1998); managing the integration of design phase teams (Austin et al, 1999; Austin et al, 2001; Business Round Table, 2002); and collaborative working (Steele et al, 2001).
9 6. İnşaat Yönetimi Kongresi, Kasım 2011, Bursa 329 ASSUMED (SUPPOSED) LOADS STRUCTURAL MODEL CHECKING System Materials Dimensions Calculations Section Forces Deformations Checking stresses Other Structural Solutions; economy Dimensioning Detail design and drawing Execution (Production) Figure 2. Structural Design Flow for Buildings There is much material to draw on in terms of identifying problems but there are few practices on which research has been able to build. Work by Austin et al (1999), Cross (1989), Gray et al (1994), Gray and Hughes (2001), Kagioglou et al (1998) and Process Protocol 2; Lafford et al (1998), has influenced this research. Other industries offer significant work for adaptation to construction. Lean Production (Womack et al, 1990), and Concurrent Engineering (Sheath et al, 1996) are initiatives from the automotive, manufacturing and aerospace industries which hold valuable lessons for managing the construction design process. They offer useful guidance for improving the DM process in the construction industry. However, the construction environment is significantly more complex than manufacturing, automotive and aerospace industries and consequently such innovations require more development to be implemented successfully (Marosszeky & Karim, 1997). New Paradigm - variability in the future has to be considered when trying to envision the design management. The properties of adaptability and self-correcting systems that evolve to meet change whilst respecting the constraints of the environment are critical to the development and control of design. A paradigm shift in storing and communicating design information has occurred. The object model allows design and analysis simultaneously across the life of the project. This shift implies a different way of thinking. The International Alliance for Interoperability (IAI) universal objectoriented data model (IAI, 2011) suggests that a holistic or systems approach to the process is necessary to make the new paradigm work. This is a major cognitive shift.
10 İnşaat Yönetimi Kongresi, Kasım 2011, Bursa Building Information Modelling (BIM) is an important aspect of this strategy, enabling the exchange of interoperable digital data. This representation includes 3D geometry, 4D phasing (3D space + time), 5D costing (4D + cost), as well as spatial information, geodesic information, and properties of building components and elements. Conclusions; Emerging Trends, Future Issues and Vision The construction industry has changed markedly over the last twenty years and this has put an increasing pressure on design teams and design professionals to deliver. The key trends affecting design team performance can be summarized in the following three areas: Contractors at the Heart of the Design Process: - The establishment of Design-Build procurement and the increasing use of PFI (Private Finance Initiative) has led to earlier contractor involvement. Contractors can now find themselves at the heart of the design process, in a position to influence or control design outcomes. In the worst examples of contractor-led projects the design team is treated as just another member of the supply chain and the inherent importance of good design is often lost by a one dimensional approach to management. Typical construction management methods are not applicable to design and new methods need to be adopted for managing design work. Increasing Specialism within Design - The complexity of modern materials, systems and solutions require defined specialist knowledge such that designers move from being generalists to specialists. More designers are involved, which is further compounded by the increasing importance of design input from trade contractors. With more parties and more technically complex solutions, even the most experienced Design Manager can fail to ensure that correct information is supplied at the correct time. Recognition that Design is a Process - The traditional view is that all designs are unique and therefore cannot be planned or managed. This view is no longer valid; design is a process, which if correctly represented can be repeated from one project to the next and can be defined, measured and improved upon. It is now possible to pay design teams in a similar manner to contractors, based on their performance, avoiding exhaustion of fees before design is complete. By defining the process and measuring the design team s output, the design team can be properly managed and their fee based on performance rather time spent. Brandon (1999) stated his vision as: A competitive industry working collaboratively for mutual advantage in order to reduce conflict, aid communication, seek efficiencies, upgrade the industry and its staff to be comparable with other industries, delivering a product over its full life-cycle which is of high quality, and high value and responsive to time objectives by those commissioning the product. In a fast changing design environment, the value of management decisions depends on:
11 6. İnşaat Yönetimi Kongresi, Kasım 2011, Bursa 331 The quality of information available; The ability to access the information effectively. A more effective and competitive construction industry will thus be achieved. References Austin, S., Baldwin, A. and Newton, A. (1994). Manipulating the Flow of Design Information to Improve the Programming of Building Design. London, Spon, Construction Management and Economics, 12 (5) Austin, S.A., Baldwin, A.N., Li, B., Waskett, P., (1998), Analytical design planning technique (ADePT): programming the building design process, Department of Civil and Building Engineering, Loughborough University, Leicestershire. Austin, S., Baldwin, A., Hammond, J., Murray, M., Root, D., Thomson, D. and Thorpe, A.(2001), Design Chains: A handbook for integrated collaborative design, Thomas Telford, London. Austin, S.A., Baldwin, A.N., Newton, A.J., (1996), A data flow model to plan and manage the build design process, Journal of Engineering Design, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp Baldwin, A.N., Austin, S.A., Hassan, T.M., Thorpe, A., (1999), Modelling information flow during the conceptual and schematic stages of building design, Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp Ballard, G. and Howell, G.(1998), Shielding production: Essential step in production control, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE. Vol. 124, No.1, pp Ballard, G. and Koskela L. (1998). On the agenda of design management. Proc. 6th Annual Lean Construction Conference. Guarujá, Brazil Brandon P.S. (1999), Process/Product Development in 2000 Beyond, Berkeley Stanford Workshop CE & M. BRE, Building Research Establishment 1995, Project management: network analysis. Burati, J.L., Farrington, J.J. and Ledbetter, W.B., 1992, Causes of quality deviations in design and construction, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol.118, No. 1, pp Business Round Table, 2002, Teamwork2000 an experiment in collaborative working, Business Round Table, Kenley, Surrey, UK. CIDA, 1995 Measuring up or muddling through: Best practice in the Australian nonresidential construction industry, Construction Industry Development Agency and Master Builders, Australia, Sydney, Australia, pp Cockshaw, Sir A., 2001, Changing Construction Culture. Interdisciplinary design in practice, (eds. R. Spence, S. Macmillan, and P. Kirby), Thomas Telford, London, pp Common, G., Johansen, E., Greenwood, D., 2000, A Survey of the Take-Up of Lean Concepts among UK Construction Companies, Proceeding of Conference of the 8 th International Conference for the Group for Lean Construction, Brighton, England.
12 İnşaat Yönetimi Kongresi, Kasım 2011, Bursa Cornick, T. (1991). Quality Management for Building Design. Rushden, Butterworth, 218 pp. Cross, N. (1989), Engineering Design Methods: Strategies for Product Design, John Wiley & Sons, New York. Egan, Sir J., 1998, Rethinking Construction: the report of the construction task force, Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, London, UK. Ferguson, I. (1989). Buildability in Practice. London, Mitchell. 175 pp. Ferguson, K.J. and Teicholz, P.M., 1992, Industrial facility quality perspectives in owner organisations, Technical Report 17, CIFE, Stanford University. Formoso, C.T., Tzotzopoulos, P., Jobim, M.S.S., Liedtke, R, (1998), Developing a protocol for managing the design process in the building industry, Proceedings of the 6th International Group for Lean Construction Conference, Guaruja, Brazil. Frankenberger, E. and Badke-Schaub, P., 1998 Modelling design processes in industry- empirical investigations of design work in practice, Automation in Construction, Vol. 7, No. 2-3, pp Freire, J. and Alarcon, L.F. 2000, Achieving a lean design process in Proceeding of the 8th International Group for Lean Construction Conference, Brighton, England. Gray, C. & Hughes, W. (2001), Building Design Management, Butterworth-Heinemann, UK. Gray, C., Hughes, W. and Bennett, (1994), The Successful Management of Design, Centre for Strategic Studies in Construction, The University of Reading. Heath, T., Scott, D., Boyland, M., 1994 A prototype computer based design management tool, Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 12, No. 6, pp Hendrikson C.(1998), Project Management for Construction, 1 st Edition, Prentice Hall. Howard R. (1999), Visions of Some Priorities for Design and Construction Research in Future, Berkeley Stanford CE & M Workshop. Howard R. (2000), Design Management Optional Module Workbook 1, University of Bath, UK. Huovila, P.; Koskela, L., and Lautanala, M. (1997). Fast or Concurrent: The Art of Getting Construction Improved. In Alarcon, L.F. (Ed.) Lean Construction, Rotterdam: A.A. Balkema: pp IAI, International Alliance for Interoperability, 2011, accessed on August 15, 2011 Kagioglou, M. Cooper, R., Aouad, G., Hinks, J., Sexton, M., Sheath, D., (1998a), Generic design and construction process protocol final report, University of Salford, Salford, UK Kagioglou, M., Cooper, R., Aouad, G., Sexton, M., and Sheath, D. (1998b). A Generic Guide to the Design and Construction Process Protocol. Research Report. The University of Salford, Salford, UK. Kochan, A., 1991, Boothroyd / Dewhirst quantify your designs, Assembly Automation, Vol.11, No. 3, pp
13 6. İnşaat Yönetimi Kongresi, Kasım 2011, Bursa 333 Koskela, L. (1992). Application of the New Production philosophy to Construction. Technical Report No. 72, Stanford, CIFE, Stanford University. Koskela, L. (1999), Management of Production in Construction: A Theoretical View, July 1999, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA, Proceedings IGLC-7 Koskela, L., Ballard, G. & Tanhuanpää, V.P. (1997). Towards lean design management. Proc. 5th Annual Conf. Intl. Group for Lean Construction, Gold Coast, Australia, July, pp Koskela, L., Huovila, P. and Leinonen, J. (2002), Design Management in Building Construction: From Theory to Practice, Journal of Construction Research, Vol. 3, No. 1, 1-16 World Scientific Publishing Company) Lafford, G., Penny, C., O Hana, S., Scott, N., Tulett, M., Buttfield, A., (1998), Managing the Design Process in Civil Engineering Design and Build - a guide for Clients, Designers and Contractors, Funders Report CP/59, Construction Industry Research and Information Association, London. Latham, M. (1994), Constructing the Team Final Report of the Government Industry Review of Procurement and Contractual Arrangements in the UK Construction Industry, HMSO Publications, UK. Lawson, B. (1997). How Designers Think: the design process demystified. London, Architectural Press. 216 pp. Love, P.E.D., Mandal, P., Smith, J., Li, H. 2000, Modelling the dynamics of design error induced rework in construction, Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 18, Pt. 5, pp Machowski F. and Dale, 1995, The application of quality costing to engineering changes, International Journal of Materials and Product Technology, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp Marosszeky, M. and Karim, K., 1997, Benchmarking a tool for lean construction, Proceedings of the 5th International Group for Lean Construction Conference, Gold Coast, Australia. Mitropoulos, P. and Tatum, C.B., (2000), Management-driven integration, Journal of Management in Engineering, Vol. 16, Pt. 1, pp Mokhtar, A., Bedard, C., Fazio, P., (2000) Collaborative planning and scheduling of interrelated design changes, Journal of Architectural Engineering, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp Morris, J., Rogerson, J., Jared, G., (1999), A tool for modelling the briefing and design decision making processes in construction, School of Industrial and Manufacturing Science, Cranfield University, Cranfield, UK. Newton, A. and Hedges, I., (1996), The improved planning and management of multidisciplinary building design, CIBSE / ASHRAE Joint National Conference. O Brien, M.J., 1997, Integration at the limit: construction systems, International Journal of Construction Information Technology, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp Ogunlana, S., Lim, J., Saeed, K. (1998), DESMAN: a dynamic model for managing civil engineering projects, Computers and Structures, Vol. 67, No. 5, pp Powell, J. A.; Newland, P., (1994), Informing multimedia: a sensitive interface to data for construction design professionals Design Studies, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp 285.
14 İnşaat Yönetimi Kongresi, Kasım 2011, Bursa Prescott, Rt. Hon. J., 1999, Department of Transport and the Regions press release, 19 July. Pressman, A., 1993, Architecture 101: a guide to the design studio, Wiley, New York. Richardson, G., 1991, Feedback thought in social science and systems theory, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, USA. Sheath, D.M., Woolley, H., Cooper, R., Hinks, J. and Aouad, G., 1996, A process for change the development of a generic design and construction process protocol for the UK construction industry, Proceedings of InCIT 96, Syndey, Australia. Steele, J., Parker, A., Kirby, P., 2001, Working Together: Short Courses for Design Teams. In Interdisciplinary design in practice, (eds. R. Spence, S. Macmillan, and P. Kirby), Thomas Telford, London, pp Sterman, J.D., 1992, Systems dynamics modelling for project management, working paper, Systems Dynamics Group, Sloan School of Management, MIT, Cambridge, MA. Treasury Task Force, 2000, How to Achieve Design Quality in PFI Projects, Technical Note 7, HM Treasury. Tzorzopoulos P. & Formoso C.T., (1999), Considerations on Application of Lean Construction Principles to Design Management, Proceedings IGLC 7, University of California, CA, USA. Womack, J.P., Jones, D.T., Roos, D., (1990), The Machine that Changed the World, Harper Perennial.
What is effective Design Management? Design Management is becoming increasingly recognised as critical to the success of complex construction projects. However, the role of the Design Manager is poorly
Bridging the Gap Between Design and Use Processes: Sector-Based Problems of a CRM Oriented Approach Kerem ERCOSKUN *, Alaattin KANOGLU **, Abstract: Architectural Design and Facility Management are seen
PLANNING THE PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT PROCESS IN CONSTRUCTION: AN EXPLORATORY CASE STUDY Patricia Tzortzopoulos 1, Carlos Torres Formoso 2, Martin Betts 3 ABSTRACT The emergence of a new production paradigm
A PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION DESIGN CHANGE MANAGEMENT TOOL TO AID IN MAKING INFORMED DESIGN DECISIONS H.Hindmarch 1, A.W.Gale 1 and R.E.Harrison 2 1 Department of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering,
Supply Chain Management - Theoretical Constructs for Construction SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT - THEORETICAL CONSTRUCTS FOR CONSTRUCTION Scott Fernie 1, David Root 2 and Tony Thorpe 3 ABSTRACT This paper describes
A FRAMEWORK FOR PRE-PROJECT PLANNING M.A. Sherif 1 and A.D.F. Price 2 Dept of Civil and Building Engineering, Loughborough University, Leicestershire, LE11 3TU, UK Construction organizations have to overcome
Conceptualizing Total Quality Management (TQM) for Improving Housing Areas for the Urban Poor Abstract This paper examines the concept of TQM and investigates and identifies factors in all three phases
ResearcH JournaL 2014 / VOL 06.02 www.perkinswill.com PERKINS+WILL RESEARCH JOURNAL / VOL 06.02 02. IMPACT OF LEAN PRINCIPLES ON TIMELY PROJECT COMPLETION Helena O Connor, CAU-RJ, LEEP AP, email@example.com
Strategic Application of Lean Thinking STRATEGIC APPLICATION OF LEAN THINKING Naomi Garnett 1, Daniel T. Jones 2, and Simon Murray 3 ABSTRACT As a result of a recent initiative by the UK Government, practitioners
Improving the Design-Construction Interface IMPROVING THE DESIGN-CONSTRUCTION INTERFACE Luis F. Alarcón 1 and Daniel A. Mardones 2 ABSTRACT In building projects customer requirements, constructive aspects
Gateway review guidebook for project owners and review teams The State of Queensland (Queensland Treasury and Trade) 2013. First published by the Queensland Government, Department of Infrastructure and
The ASCE 8th International Conference on Computing in Civil and Building EngineeringStandford University California, USA, August 14-17, 2000, pp130-137 Integrated Information Management and Exchange for
Dynamic Change Management for Fast-tracking Construction Projects by Moonseo Park 1 ABSTRACT: Uncertainties make construction dynamic and unstable, mostly by creating non value-adding change iterations
DESIGN MANAGEMENT IN A CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Janthea Andersen, Michael Nycyk, Lesley Jolly and David Radcliffe Catalyst Research Centre for Society and Technology, University of Queensland. Abstract Design
Delivering Efficiency Through Collaborative Working CWC Products and Services CWC Products and Services Leadership organisational development Project and business excellence through collaborative working
MANAGING CONSTRUCTION PROJECT CHANGE IN THE KNOWLEDGE AGE: A CASE STUDY S. Senaratne and M. G. Sexton Research Institute for the Built and Human Environment, School of Construction & Property Management,
STAGE 1 STANDARD FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER ROLE DESCRIPTION - THE MATURE, PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER The following characterises the senior practice role that the mature, Professional Engineer may be expected
Playing Games: Evaluating The Impact of Lean Production Strategies on Project Cost and Schedule PLAYING GAMES: EVALUATING THE IMPACT OF LEAN PRODUCTION STRATEGIES ON PROJECT COST AND SCHEDULE Luis F. Alarcón
PROCESS-PARAMETER-INTERFACE MODEL FOR LEAN DESIGN MANAGEMENT D.K.H. Chua 1, A. Tyagi 2 ABSTRACT Successful management of design is critical to cost-effectiveness, timeliness and quality of the entire project.
Public Record Office Victoria PROS 10/10 Strategic Management Guideline 5 Records Management Strategy Version Number: 1.0 Issue Date: 19/07/2010 Expiry Date: 19/07/2015 State of Victoria 2010 Version 1.0
A SYSTEMS MODEL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT Richard Brian Barber Research Student School of Civil Engineering Australian Defence Force Academy Canberra ACT Australia 2600 firstname.lastname@example.org INTRODUCTION
IMPLEMENTING ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR A LEAN DESIGN PROCESS André Carneiro Giandon 1, Ricardo Mendes Junior 2 and Sergio Scheer 3 ABSTRACT This paper analyzes how the implementation of
School of Computing and Technology We offer employmentfocused education and research in computing, the built environment and engineering, giving our students industry-relevant skills and knowledge. Applied
Software Engineering Prof. N. L. Sarda Computer Science & Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay Lecture - 2 Introduction to Software Engineering Challenges, Process Models etc (Part 2) This
Welcome to the November 2009 INSIGHTS published by acumen7. The purpose of this newsletter is to bring you new perspectives on key subjects to stimulate your own thoughts and ideas. In each edition (which
Introduction to Procurement Why is procurement important? Client needs are unique and consequently each project meeting those needs has unique characteristics. This means that achieving the right project
WorkPlan: Database for Work Package Production Scheduling WORKPLAN: DATABASE FOR WORK PACKAGE PRODUCTION SCHEDULING Hyun Jeong Choo 1, Iris D. Tommelein 2, Glenn Ballard 3, and Todd R. Zabelle 4 ABSTRACT
University of Huddersfield Repository Tzortzopoulos, Patricia and Cooper, Rachel Design management from a contractor s perspective: the need for clarity Original Citation Tzortzopoulos, Patricia and Cooper,
CURRICULUM for Diploma of Technology in Project Management Revised 1 April 2011 Table of contents 1. Introduction 2. The purpose of the programme 3. Programme duration 4. Programme title 5. Admission requirements
Message from the Chief Executive of the RCM The Midwifery Leadership Competency Framework has been derived from both the NHS Leadership Qualities Framework and the Clinical Leadership Competency Framework.
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE CLIENT, CLIENTS PROJECT TEAM AND THE EPCM PROJECT TEAM Mr C. A. F. Sweet The South Institute of Mining and Metallurgy The inter-relationship between these parties and the effect
aaca NCSA 01 The National Competency Standards in Architecture aaca Architects Accreditation Council of Australia PO Box 236 Civic Square ACT 2608 NCSA 01 Competency Based Assessment in Architecture THE
ON IMPROVEMENT IN CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT ABSTRACT Diego Vinicius Souza de Souza 1 and Lauri Koskela 2 The aim of this paper is to provide a discussion on improvement in construction supply
THE USE OF VISUALISATION TO COMMUNICATE DESIGN INFORMATION TO CONSTRUCTION SITES A. Ganah 1, C. Anumba and N. Bouchlaghem Civil & Building Engineering Dept. Loughborough University, LE11 3TU, UK Architectural
IMPACT: International Journal of Research in Engineering & Technology (IMPACT: IJRET) ISSN(E): 2321-8843; ISSN(P): 2347-4599 Vol. 2, Issue 6, Jun 2014, 33-44 Impact Journals APPLICATION AND ANALYSIS OF
THE OOPS GAME: HOW MUCH PLANNING IS ENGOUGH? ABSTRACT Gregory Howell 1 & Min Liu 2 The future is unknown and unknowable. In the face of this reality, planning tries to assure an outcome certain. The Oops
Why CPM based project management thinking is obsolete? Professor Lauri Koskela School of the Built Environment University of Salford Questions Why did we not think about waste reduction before we heard
Automation and Robotics in Construction XI D.A. Chamberlain (Editor) 1994 Elsevier Science By. 281 Lauri Koskela* and Ron Sharpe Flow process analysis in construction CSIRO, Division for Building, Construction
Development, Acquisition, Implementation, and Maintenance of Application Systems Part of a series of notes to help Centers review their own Center internal management processes from the point of view of
THE DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION OF PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT PROCESS MODELS IN CONSTRUCTION COMPANIES Patricia Tzortzopoulos Research Institute for the Built and Human Environment School of Construction and Property
The Architect and the Construction Industry Stephen Brookhouse April 2014 Objectives of this session To give an overview of the UK context for construction To consider recent changes in the industry To
A Systems Approach for the ment and Management of Physical Infrastructure Dr D.S. Thorpe Queensland Department of Main s, Australia E-mail: David.S.Thorpe@Mains.qld.gov.au ABSTRACT: A methodology has been
CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES IN IMPLEMENTING LEAN AND BIM ON AN INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT Bhargav Dave 1, Stefan Boddy 2 and Lauri Koskela 3 ABSTRACT: It has been realised through research and practice that
Competence Criteria for Associate (ACIBSE) FACTSHEET A21 The competence criteria for the Associate grade of CIBSE (ACIBSE) is directly aligned to the Competence Statements issued by the Engineering Council,
Development a fuzzy system for change prediction in construction projects I. A. Motawa 1, C. J. Anumba 1, A. El-Hamalawi 1, P. Chung 2, M. Yeoh 2 and M. Sun 3 1 Department of Civil & Building Engineering,
Developing a Model for Planning and Controlling Production in Small Sized Building Firms DEVELOPING A MODEL FOR PLANNING AND CONTROLLING PRODUCTION IN SMALL SIZED BUILDING FIRMS Carlos T. Formoso 1, Maurício
: Delivering Value from IS & IT Investments John Ward and Elizabeth Daniel John Wiley & Son Ltd ISBN: 9780470094631, 399 pages Theme of the Book This book explores a process and practical tools and frameworks
THE EDUCATION FRAMEWORK FOR MASTERS DEGREE PROGRAMMES SECTION 1 General Information about the CIOB INDEX REFERENCE SUBJECT PAGE REFERENCE Section 1 General Information about the CIOB Page 3 1.1 About the
Interoperable Learning Leveraging Building Information Modeling (BIM) in Construction Management and Structural Engineering Education Eric L. Richards and Caroline M. Clevenger, PhD Colorado State University
IMPLEMENTING PPC IN KOREA S CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY Chul-woo Lim 1, Jung-ho Yu 2, and Chang-duk Kim 3 ABSTRACT Developed by the Lean Construction Institute, the Last Planner System (LPS) consists of four
Change Manager Master Level Competency Model The Change Manager Master competency model sets an independent industry benchmark for SENIOR level change management practitioners. The model was launched in
Developing Collaborative Environments A Holistic Software Development Methodology Marge Petersen and John Mitchiner Sandia National Laboratories email@example.com firstname.lastname@example.org Abstract Sandia National
Cambridge International Certificate in Teaching with Digital Technologies 6224 Cambridge International Diploma in Teaching with Digital Technologies 6225 For examination in 2015 Preface This syllabus sets
SUPPORTING THE RAIL INDUSTRY UNIQUE SOLUTIONS FOR UNIQUE SITUATIONS WWW.SGS.COM/RAIL OUR UNIQUE SOLUTION TO YOUR UNIQUE SITUATION SGS is recognised as the global benchmark for quality and integrity. We
INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING DESIGN, ICED 07 28-31 AUGUST 2007, CITE DES SCIENCES ET DE L'INDUSTRIE, PARIS, FRANCE Nydia González 1, Franck Marle 1 and Jean-Claude Bocquet 1 1 Ecole Centrale
WHAT KIND OF PRODUCTION IS CONSTRUCTION? Glenn Ballard 1 and Greg Howell 2 ABSTRACT Applicability of lean principles to construction might seem to require that construction s differentiating characteristics
Whole Life Costing and Cost Management Framework for Construction Projects in Nigeria H. Onukwube Senior Lecturer, Department of Building, University of Lagos, Akoka, Yaba, Lagos. Nigeria. Email: email@example.com
Implementing the European Foundation for Quality Management Excellence Model Dr. Paul WATSON, United Kingdom Key words: Total Quality Management, Continuous Improvement. ABSTRACT The European Foundation
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Handbook for Quality Assurance and Accreditation in Saudi Arabia PART 1 THE SYSTEM FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE AND ACCREDITATION Ver. 2.0 THE SYSTEM
Standardised Process Improvement for Construction Enterprises (SPICE) M.Finnemore, M.Sarshar Dept. of Surveying, University of Salford, Salford, UK ABSTRACT This paper describes the current status of the
HOUSE BUILDING SUPPLY CHAIN STRATEGIES: Selecting The Right Strategy To Meet Customer Requirements Paul Childerhouse 1, Séverine M. Hong-Minh 2 and, Mohamed M. Naim 3 ABSTRACT Supply chain management has
Evaluating Building Systems Based on Production Process Management and Lean Construction Concepts EVALUATING BUILDING SYSTEMS BASED ON PRODUCTION PROCESS MANAGEMENT AND LEAN CONSTRUCTION CONCEPTS Alberto
THE ROLE OF PROJECT MANAGERS IN PARTNERING ARRANGEMENTS N. Watts 1, P.A. Watson 2 and A. Griffith 1. 1 Centre for the Built Environment, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield,S1 1WB, UK 2 School of Environment
Report on the Development and Validation of the Best Practice Decision Matrix Report 2001-003-C-03 The research described in this report was carried out by Project Leader Researcher Tony Sidwell Rosemary
Communication Improvement for Integrated Construction Supply Chain Management Systems HU Wenfa 1, HE Xinhua 2 1. School of Economics and Management, Tongji University, P.R.China, 200092 2. School of Economics
A COORDINATOR'S VISION by George Ang and Leo Hendriks George Ang and Leo Hendriks have taken over the leadership of W60 and were introduced to readers earlier. Here they set out their vision of the Performance
RIBA Plan of Work 2013: Consultation document The RIBA is undertaking a comprehensive review of the RIBA Plan of Work. This document sets out the reasons and the rationale behind that review as well as
Performance Standards and Test Procedures for Environmental Data Management Software Martin Lloyd Dr M H Lloyd, Farside Technology Research / SIRA Environmental Ltd 12 Acorn Industrial Park, Crayford Road,
The Role of Project Management Office in the Organization with the Knowledge Approach Mahsa Khaksefidi * Member faculty of Velayat University, Iranshahr, Iran *Corresponding Author. Email: firstname.lastname@example.org
Delhi Business Review Vol. 3, No. 1, January - June 2002 SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT IN CONSTRUCTION SCOPE, BENEFITS AND BARRIERS Syed Mahmood Ahmed Salman Azhar Irtishad Ahmad SUPPLY chain management (SCM)
Reaching CMM Levels 2 and 3 with the Rational Unified Process Rational Software White Paper TP174 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION... 1 LEVEL-2, REPEATABLE... 3 Requirements Management... 3 Software Project
KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT AND ITS APPLICATION TO LEAN CONSTRUCTION Yu-Cheng Lin 1 and H. Ping Tserng 2 ABSTRACT Knowledge Management (KM) has become one of the most significant terms in the IT industry. Knowledge
AN APPROACH FOR EVALUATING THE SATISFACTION OF A CONSTRUCTION PROJECT TEAM Chinyere Nzekwe-Excel 1, Chris Nwagboso, David Proverbs and Panos Georgakis MA115, SEBE, University of Wolverhampton, Wulfruna
STRATEGIC DESIGN MANAGEMENT FOR SUSTAINABILITY: PROCESS GOVERNS OUTCOME Vera M. NOVAK Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA, email@example.com Summary The complexity of sustainability issues reveals the
MANAGING DIGITAL CONTINUITY Project Name Digital Continuity Project DRAFT FOR CONSULTATION Date: November 2009 Page 1 of 56 Contents Introduction... 4 What is this Guidance about?... 4 Who is this guidance
Defining Program Types Typologies are based on the inherent characteristics of the project or program (not the industry they are based in). Significant work has been done defining the different types of
University of Cambridge: Programme Specifications Every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information in this programme specification. Programme specifications are produced and then reviewed
THE TOYOTA PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM APPLIED TO A DESIGN MANAGEMENT WORKSHOP MODEL Mikael Hygum Thyssen 1, Stephen Emmitt 2, Sten Bonke 3 and Anders Kirk- Christoffersen 4 ABSTRACT Within a lean framework
INTRODUCTION TO RAPID PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT (RPD) SCHEMATIC REPRESENTATION FOR NEW INTERNATIONAL PRODUCTS DEVELOPMENT The scheme below considers the product design concept, main outlines and shape were defined