3 Published by Project Management Institute 14 Campus Boulevard Newtown Square, PA USA Copyright 2015 Project Management Institute All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without written permission from the copyright holder. Distributed by Project Management Institute
4 TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface... 5 Chapter 1: Historical Context of Project Knowledge Services at NASA...10 Chapter 2: NASA Knowledge Services Governance...13 Chapter 3: Strategic Imperatives in the Modern Project Knowledge Environment...18 Chapter 4: The REAL (Rapid Engagement through Accelerated Learning) Model...23 Chapter 5: REAL Knowledge Examples at NASA...32 Chapter 6: Summary and Future Research...40 Conclusion...43 References...44
5 PREFACE REAL Knowledge at NASA presents a descriptive project practitioner centered Knowledge Model derived from experience in developing Knowledge Services (KS) at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). It involves an organizational knowledge systems perspective that better negotiates rapid change and accelerated learning in data-rich complex project environments. It discusses the modern project environment and reiterates the historical context of knowledge and learning at NASA and covers the strategic imperatives that guide the design and development of a Knowledge Services (KS) Model (KSM) for individuals, teams, and organizations. The operational components of knowledge capture and retention, sharing and application, and discovery and creation are specified as core processes with individual and organizational inputs of capabilities and expectations. Considerations for the design of KS at NASA are discussed, including governance, federated approach, mapping, biases and heuristics, and practitioner capabilities. Examples are described based on the presented strategic imperatives and Knowledge Model, and the authors close with a summary and recommendations for future research. This model allows organizations to validate and add imperatives within their context to better design knowledge services for diverse challenges and opportunities.
6 THE PROJECT KNOWLEDGE ENVIRONMENT How can organizations and practitioners best leverage project knowledge and knowledge services to get things done in the modern complex project environment? Based on research, experiences, and conversations across public, private, government, industry, academia, and professional organizations, practitioners say it is increasingly difficult to bring ideas to fruition and projects to completion. This difficulty is reflected through several facets of recent research. One study found only fifty-six percent (56%) of strategic initiatives meet original goals and business intent in surveyed project organizations, and also reported that forty-eight percent (48%) of projects that are not highly aligned to organizational strategy succeed (Project Management Institute, 2014). NASA collaborated with Aviation Week and industry leaders on the second annual Young Professionals Study and discovered that the top frustration of the under-thirty-five (35) workforce was bureaucracy and politics and that there is no time to innovate and create (Anselmo & Hedden, 2011). Experience at NASA over thirty (30) years suggests that significant improvements can be gained through a focus on the capture and flow of project knowledge in terms of organizational, individual, and team project factors within an organizational systems perspective. For NASA, knowledge involves the unique requirements, solutions, and expertise shared across individuals, teams, projects, programs, Mission Directorates, and Centers, often defined as codified knowledge (scientific knowledge, engineering and technical knowledge, and business processes) and know-how (techniques, processes, procedures and craftsmanship), presenting the classic dichotomy of explicit and tacit knowledge, where Polanyi (1966) first says of tacit knowledge, we can know more than we can tell. There are also other relevant types of knowledge that play a significant role, such as that in a social context. In one example, Neffinger and Kohut (2013) emphasized the importance of perceptions of strength and warmth in interpersonal and team environments and how an optimal balance of these characteristics informs social situations. A better understanding of the social
7 context of project knowledge can serve as a basis for improved prioritization and a more pragmatic approach to problem solving. Organizational disregard for this type of knowledge can lead to project failures such as those described by in the NASA Challenger and Columbia Shuttle disasters (Hoffman & Boyle, 2013), where the technical root causes were investigated but the underlying causes were poor team communications and lack of organizational learning. At the end of the day, NASA is a project organization. The driving motivation concerning knowledge is ultimately mission success. Complexity works against this focus on mission success, and it can take many forms: Confusing, vague, poorly defined priorities, strategies, lines of authority, governance, policies, roles and responsibilities and support, characterized by iterative reorganizations, constant budget changes, constant resource level adjustments, a proliferation of administrative burdens, and endless requirements. A proliferation of customers, stakeholders, and strategic partner interfaces at multiple levels of interest, involvement, and responsibility. Technical complexity and system integration issues within and across multiple disciplines and multiple systems. Increased data and information amount and availability for process input, throughput, and output. Multiple overlapping, conflicting, outdated processes and procedures that involve multiple points of contact distributed across multiple organizational levels and across multiple oversight and advisory entities, characterized by competing priorities, strategies, lines of authority, governance, policies, roles and responsibilities, and support requirements. Complexity drives a rapid pace of change that impacts organizational social, technical, strategic, and administrative systems. Davenport and Prusak (1998) recognized this when they defined future success in terms of organizations that know how to do new things well and quickly. The shelflives of products and services are increasingly being shortened, requiring a management methodology that is flexible and adaptable across the operational and strategic contexts to accommodate change, yet rigorous enough to ensure that progress continues toward goals and objectives in the most efficient and effective way possible. Project management is a discipline often applied to achieve
8 this flexibility and adaptability, thus handling the knowledge requirements for projects to better perform under these increased burdens makes sense. For NASA, a project knowledge systems perspective best addresses handling complexity within an environment of increasingly constrained resources. As mentioned, one form of complexity is the amount of available data and information. According to the independent research organization SINTEF (Dragland, 2013), ninety (90) percent of the data in the world has been generated over the past two (2) years, an incredible statistic that reinforced a claim by former Google Chief Executive Officer Eric Schmidt at the 2010 Techonomy Conference (Kirkpatrick, 2010) that humans currently create as much information in two days as they did from the dawn of man through the year Regardless of competing perspectives from diverse organizations, it is an accelerating revolution of data, information, and knowledge that demands effectiveness and efficiency in the core processes of how it is captured and retained, shared and applied, and results in discovery and creation. Change is accelerated by this expansion of data and information and requires organizations to better address strategy and decisions. Learning is alternately enabled and hindered by the rapid development and implementation of technological tools accompanying this relentless pace of change and churn. On one hand, it ensures data and information availability twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week. On the other hand, the capability to process the data and information into usable and actionable knowledge and wisdom and to focus organizations and practitioners on implementing solutions suffers. This wealth of data and information interferes with focusing, prioritizing, and moving confidently into the future, because planning often suffers when new data and information obscure the original intent. The inductive process of building a list of good ideas is worthless without the deductive prioritization of what is truly important in terms of context, urgency, and relevance, the magic that is delivered through good leadership. This burden of change is ultimately placed squarely on the shoulders of what is termed the NASA technical workforce, practitioners possessing specialized skills that contribute to engineering efforts involving the disciplines of math, science, and technology. Over the years, their responsibility has shifted from a focus on the operational project objectives of scope, technical performance, quality, schedule, and cost to a more encompassing responsibility of functional activities,
9 which includes business management, commercialization, new technology identification and development, strategy development, and often much more. What is the nature of these barriers and complications originating from multiple sources on the path to achievement? Some are political, others related to competence at the organizational, team, and individual levels. Some concern leadership capability accompanied by poor communications up, down, or laterally in the organization. Perhaps there are incorrect, ill-defined expectations and a lack of strategic alignment in the project or across the larger organization. Others may reflect significant external market or business change. Regardless, they conspire in the dark corners of organizations to create a lack of focus and mission, a fragmenting of common purpose into special interests and personal agendas, and ultimately stasis, a potential death knell for modern organizations in a volatile competitive world. A strategic knowledge systems perspective is essential to uncover and define project relationships and the risks inherent in project knowledge interfaces. This is critical since it provides insight into the nature of the realities that others live in. Unless this is analyzed and contingencies are planned for, the risk of failure increases. Fortunately the message is getting through to senior executives. In a Conference Board (Hackett, 2000) research report on Knowledge Management (KM), eighty percent (80%) of surveyed organizations had KM activities underway, sixty percent (60%) expected an enterprisewide KM system to be in place within the next five (5) years, and twenty-five percent (25%) had a Chief Knowledge Officer or Chief Learning Officer in place. At the end of the day, capturing and effectively relating the journey to achieve outcomes is a story that each individual and team creates and shares. For NASA, key knowledge imperatives and knowledge tools have been developed over the years to help project teams in their efforts. Relating this context helps in understanding where NASA is today and how these lessons can inform other project organizations. Barriers and complications conspire in the dark corners of organizations to create a lack of focus and mission, a fragmenting of common purpose into special interests and personal agendas, and ultimately stasis, a potential death knell for modern organizations in a volatile competitive world.
10 CHAPTER ONE HISTORICAL CONTEXT OF PROJECT KNOWLEDGE SERVICES AT NASA In pursuit of what really works in project knowledge, how did NASA evolve to the point of appointing the first Chief Knowledge Officer (CKO) for the agency and establishing Center and Mission Directorate CKOs across the organization? Many organizations face defining events that can drive organizational change and provide lessons for the future. For NASA, these defining events at a macro level are well known not only to employees but also to the general public. The changes that these events drove in the fabric of the organization are not as evident, especially through the lenses of knowledge and organizational learning. As discussed in previous articles (Hoffman & Boyle, 2013) addressing the historical context, governance, and priorities of agency knowledge services, there are several events that have shaped the agency. One was the Challenger disaster in 1986 that killed seven (7) astronauts and forced the agency into brutal introspection. It resulted in the creation of a training program called the Program and Project Management Initiative (PPMI) that promoted project management capabilities in advance of agency needs. At a time where large, expensive,
11 long duration programs and projects developed project practitioners through individual experience, coaching, and mentoring, this disaster forced a change toward systematized, codified, and vastly improved individual preparation. Another defining event were the Mars Mission Failures in (the Climate Orbiter, Polar Lander, and Deep Space 2 Probes) that occurred during the era of Faster, Better, Cheaper (FBC), a management paradigm adapting NASA to increasing mission demands in an environment of diminishing resources. These mission failures and resulting investigations changed the agency s focus from individual to team capabilities and shifted emphasis to shared stories; the development of new policy guidance to prevent the operational mistakes that drove the failures; and a more disciplined approach to include better testing in science missions that did not involve crew safety issues. The Columbia disaster echoed the Challenger in 2003, where in this instance detaching foam damaged the wing on ascent of the vehicle and ultimately resulted in vehicle disintegration upon descent, killing seven (7) astronauts. The Columbia Accident Investigation Board (CAIB) discovered that NASA managers made assumptions that were technically indefensible, such as the assumption that the leading edge materials were tougher than the thermal tiles and could not be easily compromised. They also found that team processes, communications, and interpersonal dynamics were ineffective and NASA managers heard but did not listen to engineering and safety concerns (National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 2003). As a result, technical options were not fully explored and the vehicle and crew were lost. This forced a re-learning of lessons from case studies, new multi-discipline knowledge-sharing forums, and major governance and policy changes such as: the creation of the NASA Engineering Safety Center (NESC) to support technical knowledge and capability; a change in NASA governance on the balance of power in technical missions; and an emphasis on defining technical authority in mission decisions. NASA also adopted mechanisms to improve communications and interpersonal dynamics that can defeat Organizational Silence, the tendency to say or do little despite the presence of significant organizational threats, and Normalization of Deviance, the organizational acceptance of risky situations and behavior due to increased frequency over time (Vaughan, 1996). The ghosts of Challenger and Columbia still haunt the agency. In 2011,
12 the NASA Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel (ASAP) reported that the agency needed to create a more systematic approach capturing implicit and explicit knowledge and recommended the appointment of a formal agency-level Chief Knowledge Officer (CKO), supported by a set of appointed CKOs at each Center and Mission Directorate. ASAP was established in 1968 to iteratively evaluate NASA, through direct observation of operations and decision making, in terms of safety performance and providing advice to NASA senior leadership on how to improve that performance. In the aftermath of the Columbia accident, Congress required that the ASAP submit an annual report to the NASA Administrator and to Congress. The annual report examines agency compliance with the recommendations of the CAIB, as well as management and cultural factors related to safety. Recently, the ASAP review team asked NASA project personnel, What is being done to ensure these lessons are being formally and systematically captured and made accessible across the whole organization? The responses indicated there was no system that effectively captured, shared, and allowed other projects to find these critical lessons. The issues of searchability, findability, and applicability continue to be great challenges. Projects are committed to identifying and sharing critical knowledge and lessons within a team, but it is rare to find knowledge across a system of systems and across project boundaries. In an increasingly complex and interconnected world, this integration can spell the difference between success and failure. The Agency readily concurred with the CKO recommendation in 2011, focusing the agency s knowledge strategy effort by appointing an agency CKO within the Office of the Chief Engineer (OCE) and designating CKO positions across Centers, Mission Directorates, and Functional offices. The OCE evolved its functions toward serving as an enterprise-wide project management office (PMO), creating a structure responsible for developing and implementing the strategy, policy, standards, workforce development, advanced concepts, mission architecture, integration across program and mission boundaries, and program assessment for overall technical workforce development that supports project and program success at an enterprise level (PMI, 2012).
13 CHAPTER TWO NASA KNOWLEDGE SERVICES GOVERNANCE Any NASA knowledge management approach needs to be adaptable and flexible enough to accommodate the varied requirements and cultural characteristics of each Center, Mission Directorate, and Functional Office. A federated model was the best fit for the agency, defining the NASA CKO as a facilitator and champion for agency knowledge services, not to serve as an overseer and direct manager. It struck a balance between autonomy and responsibility, where Centers, Mission Directorates, and Functional Offices were free to determine the knowledge approach that best fits their particular needs, but were responsible for sharing knowledge that benefitted the overall agency. The governance document for NASA Knowledge, NPD 7120 NASA Knowledge Policy for Programs and Projects (National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 2013) was collaboratively rewritten because NASA had greatly expanded its knowledge activities over the past several years to include a wider array of services than simply capturing and retaining lessons learned. The new policy ensured that NASA manages knowledge resources in a way that enables the agency to execute programs, projects, and missions
14 with the highest likelihood of mission success, emphasizing a KS integrated strategic framework. It also defined the roles and responsibilities for CKOs at the Centers, Mission Directorates, and Functional Offices. The new policy addressed a set of KS priorities that clarified NASA objectives for project knowledge and emphasized the development and implementation of future knowledge initiatives, measures, and metrics (Figure 1): In terms of people, sustain and expand the use of the agency s intellectual capital across NASA s enterprises and generations through better networks, alliances, and communities of practice. In terms of people, increase collaboration across organizational barriers through promotion of a culture of openness. In terms of systems, support the technical workforce in executing NASA s missions efficiently and effectively through lessons learned, mishap reports, and promulgation of best practices.»» In terms of systems, create an integrated infrastructure of knowledge that identifies the value of information and aligns practitioner and organizational imperatives through accessible information and userfriendly services.
15 Figure 1: NASA Knowledge Services Strategic Framework One of the most striking things that the agency s knowledge community discovered was the sheer depth and breadth of activity underway across the agency. Some of this activity was found through self-service, such as typing a query in a search box and getting answers that point in the right direction, involving one person at a time and that works best with explicit knowledge that does not require a lot of context or personal judgment. At the other extreme, tacit knowledge that was dependent on context and personal judgment was transmitted through social interaction at meetings and storytelling. Given this range of knowledge activities, the NASA knowledge community identified an initial set of knowledge categories that addressed most of the activities taking place across NASA that could be populated on the first-ever Agency Knowledge Map (Figure 2):»» Online Tools Include but are not limited to: portals; document repositories; collaboration and sharing sites; video libraries.
16 Search/Tag/Taxonomy Tools Dedicated search engine for knowledge (e.g., Google Search Appliance) and any initiatives related to meta-tagging or taxonomy. Case Studies/Publications Original documents or multimedia case studies that capture project stories and associated lessons learned or best practices. Lessons Learned/Knowledge Processes Any defined process that an organization uses to identify or capture knowledge, lessons learned, or best practices, including: Lessons Learned Information System vetting process; organization-specific lessons learned processes; benchmarking; cases; knowledge-sharing recognition programs; knowledge product validation processes; communications about expectations related to knowledge sharing. Knowledge Networks Any defined knowledge network, such as: a community of practice; expert locator; mass collaboration activity; workspaces specifically designed to enable exchanges and collaboration. Social Exchanges Any activities that bring people together in person to share knowledge (e.g., forums, workshops, Lunch and Learn/Pause and Learn, etc.). The reach of these activities can be multiplied through online tools such as videos and virtual dialogues. The agency is now linking all identified products and series to the map and creating active links to the resources. The categories are not a perfect fit for every type of knowledge activity across diverse organizations and multiple disciplines, but the hurdle cleared was the awareness that the perfect is the enemy of the good. The knowledge community used these categories as an initial starting point that could be institutionalized, modified, and clarified during subsequent iterative reviews.
17 Figure 2: NASA Knowledge Map and Legend The NASA knowledge community also recognized that there are valuable lessons to be learned from other domestic and international organizations in the federal government, industry, academia, and professional organizations. In extending the community beyond the core NASA footprint, the CKO Office is involved with several important communities of practice, two examples of which are: the Federal Knowledge Management (KM) Community that meets quarterly for sharing best practices and leveraging lessons learned; and the International Project Management Committee (IPMC) and Knowledge Management Technical Committee under the International Astronautical Federation (IAF).
18 CHAPTER THREE STRATEGIC IMPERATIVES IN THE MODERN PROJECT KNOWLEDGE ENVIRONMENT With the NASA historical context in mind, and reflecting on its journey to project excellence, what has emerged as driving strategic imperatives that inform the development of KS at NASA and, through analogy, other organizations? At its core, NASA is a project organization fixated on mission success. There are twelve (12) mutually reinforcing strategic imperatives that have emerged from interviews, studies, and experience. These guide the design, implementation, and evaluation of Knowledge Services for NASA, and are discussed in no particular order of priority. One critical strategic imperative is Leadership. It is ironic that one of the more fragmented disciplines provides valuable answers for the application of KS in organizations. Without effective leadership, KS and its results are at best serendipitous, at worst fail. The essence of leadership occurs with an insight that things should change, but also a profound realization that the reasons for change may be clear to leaders themselves but not necessarily to others. There exists an external stakeholder community as well as a core internal project team to lead,
19 and both should be understood and managed. Additionally, good leaders align projects with organizational strategy, mission and goals, which is admittedly easier said than done in the modern environment of information overload and change. Successful implementation happens with a carefully articulated vision, leadership focus on that vision, and attention to detail on implementation. It is a Project World. Varied organizations worldwide require a methodology allowing for rigor in managing temporary, unique initiatives toward the achievement of defined requirements and project goals and outcomes that are aligned to organizational strategy in an era of constrained resources. In this context, project management is uniquely positioned as an adaptable discipline that fits these requirements and can maximize the use of learning to promote efficiency and effectiveness. Again, the alignment of project goals to organizational strategy through good leadership is critical. Knowledge is the essential element for the creation of successful physical and virtual products and services. It can be viewed as an organized set of content, skills, and capabilities gained through experience as well as through formal and informal learning that organizations and practitioners apply to make sense of new and existing data and information. It can also exist as previously analyzed and formatted lessons and stories that are already adaptable to new situations. The ascendance of leaders that can validate the realities to which projects are able to apply knowledge and base decisions on is key. Talent Management addresses the specification, identification, nurturing, transfer, maintenance, and expansion of the competitive advantage of practitioner expertise and competence. It encompasses the broad definition of diversity that goes beyond the classic categories of color, race, religion, and national origin to domestic and international variables important to geographically dispersed multi-cultural teams, such as multi-generational, cross-discipline, and cross-experiential variables. This allows diverse groups to bring a diversity of experience, attitudes, knowledge, focus, and interests to the table, strengthening both inductive and deductive problem-solving approaches and nurturing innovation. Good leaders link talent management with executive sponsorship, organizational strategy, and the core work of the organization. They also achieve operational efficiencies by learning, working, and collaborating together at a distance independent of time and geography and leverage smart networks that provide content, access and connection to
20 project data, information and knowledge. For NASA, talent management is represented as the variables of Abilities, Assignments, Attitudes, and Alliances (Figure 4). Portfolio Management integrates projects with strategy and creates an organizing framework and focus that drives organizational purpose and activities. They provide a centralized function that promulgates a systems view of knowledge, where stove-piped disciplines and activities can transcend boundaries and discover and apply cross-disciplinary knowledge to increase competitive advantage and better achieve results. Organizational expectations can also be tested against reality at this level and adjusted and communicated accordingly to eliminate or mitigate errors and achieve better decisions. Certification establishes objective, validated standards and functions to benchmark achievements in defined categories of practitioner performance and capability. It also provides organizations and practitioners a way to establish trust with superiors, peers, team members, customers and stakeholders, and provides a framework for adapting to change as well as a method to address emerging performance requirements. For practitioners, it provides a roadmap for individual development and serves to link organizational performance and individual capability (Duarte et al., 1995). Since people are essential in projects, certification allows for objective definitions of the four (4) Talent Management variables of Abilities, Assignments, Attitudes, and Alliances. An example of a discipline standard is A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide) (Project Management Institute, 2013), which specifies the ten (10) Knowledge Areas that currently define the framework of the discipline. Transparency is an important consideration as the network of organizational portfolio sponsors, project team members, customers, stakeholders, strategic partners, suppliers, and other interested parties tie into organizational strategy and project operations through information and communication technology tools. In this environment, nothing is hidden for long, and errors travel at the speed of light. Communications with each interface should be carefully defined across intensity and frequency dimensions, for example where external stakeholder communities may expect to be informed about progress at a higher level, but not as frequently or in-depth as internal leadership. Transparency that is formally built into the strategic business process encourages innovation,
Previews of TDWI course books offer an opportunity to see the quality of our material and help you to select the courses that best fit your needs. The previews cannot be printed. TDWI strives to provide
Executive Leadership MBA Course Descriptions MBA 608: Interpersonal Leadership and Managing Organizational Behavior (3 credits) This course provides rising stars learning opportunities to take the next
Executive Leadership MBA Course Descriptions MBA 608: Interpersonal Leadership and Managing Organizational Behavior (3 credits) This course provides rising stars learning opportunities to take the next
WHY DO I NEED A PROGRAM MANAGEMENT OFFICE (AND HOW DO I GET ONE)? Due to the often complex and risky nature of projects, many organizations experience pressure for consistency in strategy, communication,
2010 Computing & Communications Services 2010 / 10 / 04 Final Kent Percival, M.Sc., P.Eng. Defining the Value of the Business Analyst In achieving its vision, key CCS partnerships involve working directly
Strategic Business and Operations Framework Understanding the Framework June 30, 2012 Table of Contents The Pathway to Success: The Strategic Business and Operations Framework... 3 What is the Strategic
Integrated Risk Management: A Framework for Fraser Health For further information contact: Integrated Risk Management Fraser Health Corporate Office 300, 10334 152A Street Surrey, BC V3R 8T4 Phone: (604)
Program Management Professional (PgMP) Examination Content Outline Project Management Institute Program Management Professional (PgMP ) Examination Content Outline April 2011 Published by: Project Management
The TrainingFolks Approach The importance of superior management, leadership and interpersonal skills are critical to both individual and organizational success. It is also critical to apply these skills
Banking Application Modernization and Portfolio Management Key Challenges and Success Factors As part of their long-term strategic plans, banks are seeking to capitalize on their legacy applications. Acquired
International Society of Exposure Science (ISES) Strategic Plan: Creating a Safer and Healthier World by Advancing The Science of Exposure 2008 2011 Executive Summary Changes in the field of exposure have
Plan 0 07 Mapping the Library for the Global Network University NYU DIVISION OF LIBRARIES Our Mission New York University Libraries is a global organization that advances learning, research, and scholarly
National Standards of Practice for Entrepreneurship Education Facilitate student motivation Enhance opportunities for work and life Increase invention and innovation Strengthen economies Effective entrepreneurship
perspective Progressive Organization Progressive organization Owing to rapid changes in today s digital world, the data landscape is constantly shifting and creating new complexities. Today, organizations
Drive to the top The journey, lessons, and standards of global business services kpmg.com The new normal for global enterprises is about doing more with less while at the same time driving the top line
PMI Virtual Library 2011 Daniel D. Magruder Assessing the Appropriate Level of Project, Program, and PMO Structure By Daniel D. Magruder, PMP Executive Summary Does your organization have in-flight projects
By Bill Wilder, Director, Life Cycle Institute Life Cycle Engineering 2013 www.lce.com Success at last! The new employee self-service module has finally been implemented - on the third try. The promised
DoD CIVILIAN LEADER DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK COMPETENCY DEFINITIONS Leading Change Definition: This core competency involves the ability to bring about strategic change, both within and outside the organization,
DEVELOP A PIPELINE OF SUCCESSFUL LEADERS AT ALL LEVELS. INDIVIDUAL DEVELOPMENT Results That Matter Sustained Impact for You, Your Business and the World. What matters most to you? How individuals thrive,
The Kaieteur Institute For Knowledge Management THE e-knowledge BASED INNOVATION SEMINAR OVERVIEW! Introduction Knowledge is a new form of renewable and intangible energy that is transforming many organizations.
Leadership Development Program (Level I and Level II) PR O GR A M OV ER V IE W Our Leadership Development Programs (LDP Level I and Level II) are designed to address the development needs of managers and
WHITE PAPER Business Architecture: Dispelling Ten Common Myths William Ulrich, TSG, Inc. Whynde Kuehn, S2E Consulting Inc. Business Architecture: An Evolving Discipline B usiness architecture is a maturing
Questions to Guide Your Evolution to Managing to Outcomes Important Note: The following list of questions is a companion piece to Social Outcomes: A Revolution in the Making. In Social Outcomes: A Revolution
Analyst Position Description September 4, 2015 Analysis Position Description September 4, 2015 Page i Table of Contents General Characteristics... 1 Career Path... 2 Explanation of Proficiency Level Definitions...
TALENT OPTIMIZATION Transforming HR and Human Capital Management for Business Growth TALENT OPTIMIZATION Transforming HR and Human Capital Management for Business Growth THE TALENT OPTIMIZATION OBJECTIVE
September 2015 IFAC Member Compliance Program Strategy, 2016 2018 This Strategy is issued by the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC ) with the advice and oversight of the Compliance Advisory
White Paper from Global Process Innovation by Jim Boots Fourteen Metrics for a BPM Program This white paper presents 14 metrics which may be useful for monitoring progress on a BPM program or initiative.
Whitepaper Bridging the IT Business Gap The Role of an Enterprise Architect Today s enterprises understand the value that Information Technology (IT) can bring to their business. IT supports day-to-day
TRANSFORMING ORGANIZATIONS IT STARTS WITH CHANGE MANAGEMENT COMMUNICATIONS. HUMAN CAPITAL. LEARNING SOLUTIONS. In today s globalized and inter-connected economy, organizations deal with continually shifting
The New International Standard on the Practice of Risk Management A Comparison of ISO 31000:2009 and the COSO ERM Framework Dorothy Gjerdrum, ARM-P, Chair of the ISO 31000 US TAG and Executive Director,
High Performance Culture Change by Curt J. Howes Organization Performance Strategies What is Culture Culture is to the organization what personality is to the individual. It is the pattern of shared beliefs,
Management Fundamentals in Healthcare Organizations University of Minnesota School of Public Health LEARNING MODEL The learning model underlying the Management Fundamentals Certificate is an application
Internal Auditing Guidelines Recommendations on Internal Auditing for Lottery Operators Issued by the WLA Security and Risk Management Committee V1.0, March 2007 The WLA Internal Auditing Guidelines may
Provisional Translation Document 1, The 7th Meeting, Working Group on Voluntary Efforts and Continuous Improvement of Nuclear Safety, Advisory Committee for Natural Resources and Energy Working Group on
SPE Strategic Plan 2013-2017 APPROVED BY THE SPE BOARD OF DIRECTORS MARCH 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction... 3 Strategic Framework... 5 Strategic Priorities... 6 Appendix A: Strategic Planning Steering
Wilhelmenia Ravenell IT Manager Eli Lilly and Company Agenda Introductions The Service Management Framework Keys of a successful Service management transformation Why transform? ROI and the customer experience
Entrepreneurship at Princeton A statement by President Christopher L. Eisgruber and Provost David S. Lee Recently, an advisory committee on Princeton entrepreneurship submitted a report to us that described
The Leader s Edge How Best Practices Programs Can Be Used Most Effectively to Support the Growth of Women Leaders The Leaders Edge research study completed in February, 2004 demonstrates the need for companies
Draft: April 10, 2016 NORTHEASTERN 2025 Distinctively Excellent PhD Education Context We are in a moment of Northeastern s history when our PhD programs have the opportunity to excel by building on the
Agile Master Data Management TM : Data Governance in Action A whitepaper by First San Francisco Partners First San Francisco Partners Whitepaper Executive Summary What do data management, master data management,
Chapter 13: Knowledge Management In Nutshell Information Technology For Management Turban, McLean, Wetherbe John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Objectives Define knowledge and describe the different types of knowledge.
Building and Sustaining a Strong Organization Amid Challenge And Change KPMG LLP The Issue Today s market realities offer businesses little choice but to embrace change. Companies in almost every industry
Project Management for Implementing the Smart Grid By Power System Engineering, Inc. Abstract PM Methodology Using a Repeatable Project Management Approach Project management solutions for the Smart Grid
Bridgework: An Effective Approach to Transition from Risk Assessment to Enterprise Risk Management @Copyright Cura Software. All rights reserved. No part of this document may be transmitted or copied without
UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION MISSION, VISION & STRATEGIC PRIORITIES Approved by SBA General Faculty (April 2012) Introduction In 1926, we embarked on a noble experiment the creation
By S. Michael McLaughlin and Karen DeToro Much attention has been focused recently on enterprise risk management (ERM), not just in the insurance industry but in other industries as well. Across all industries,
Business Analysis Standardization & Maturity Contact Us: 210.399.4240 email@example.com Copyright 2014 Enfocus Solutions Inc. Enfocus Requirements Suite is a trademark of Enfocus Solutions Inc.
Arkansas Teaching Standards The Arkansas Department of Education has adopted the 2011 Model Core Teaching Standards developed by Interstate Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (InTASC) to replace
Introduction A network is a group of people, working across organizational and/or geographic boundaries, who collectively create, apply and test solutions to one or more common challenges. This document
Operations Excellence in Professional Services Firms Published by KENNEDY KENNEDY Consulting Research Consulting Research & Advisory & Advisory Sponsored by Table of Contents Introduction... 3 Market Challenges
Customer Practice Profile Pulling it all together: Integrated Solutions for Governance, Risk and Compliance The business case for a new enterprise approach to GRC Integrated solutions for Governance, Risk
The Future of Census Bureau Operations Version 1.0 April 25, 2013 The Future of Census Bureau Operations Page ii [This page intentionally left blank] The Future of Census Bureau Operations Page iii Document
Aligning Business Strategies and Project Management 1 Table of Contents Introduction... 3 Project Management... 4 Business Strategy... 4 Aligning Business Strategy & Projects... 5 Role of Management...
KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT TALKS: 3 rd GENERATION KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT and Beyond! Even given its short life span, Knowledge Management has clearly evolved through three distinct eras, and is already entering
Change Management in Higher Education: Using Model and Design Thinking to Develop Ideas that Work for your Institution By Michael P. Meotti Ed Policy Group Introduction Change and innovation are hot topics
Driving Project Success with Organizational Change Management Agenda Introductions & Objectives OCM Defined Driving Project Success with OCM Building an OCM Capability Case Study: OPRS ERM Program Speakers
MODULE 10 CHANGE MANAGEMENT AND COMMUNICATION PART OF A MODULAR TRAINING RESOURCE Commonwealth of Australia 2015. With the exception of the Commonwealth Coat of Arms and where otherwise noted all material
SAP Thought Leadership Business Intelligence IMPLEMENTING BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE STANDARDS SAVE MONEY AND IMPROVE BUSINESS INSIGHT Your business intelligence strategy should take into account all sources
Partnering for Project Success: Project Manager and Business Analyst Collaboration By Barbara Carkenord, CBAP, Chris Cartwright, PMP, Robin Grace, CBAP, Larry Goldsmith, PMP, Elizabeth Larson, PMP, CBAP,
Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (2007). The leadership challenge (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Reviewed by Chelsea Truesdell Introduction The Leadership Challenge serves as a resource for any
The following is intended to outline our general product direction. It is intended for information purposes only, and may not be incorporated into any contract. It is not a commitment to deliver any material,
2014 2013 INSERT COMPANY LOGO HERE 20142013 North North American American IT Professional SSL Certificate Services Customer Product Value Leadership Enhancement Award Award Customer Value Enhancement Award
GOING BEYOND TRADITIONAL DATA GOVERNANCE: SIX STEPS FOR BUILDING AN INFLUENTIAL DATA-DRIVEN ORGANIZATION In an environment of rapidly evolving technology, customer behavior, and competition, data has become
Introduction CSR / Sustainability Governance and Management Assessment By Coro Strandberg Principal, Strandberg Consulting www.corostrandberg.com June 2015 Companies which adopt CSR or sustainability 1
Bridging the Gap: Traditional to Agile Project Management ABSTRACT I. S. Parente 1 1 Susan Parente, PMP, PMI ACP, CISSP, PMI RMP, ITIL, MSEM; S3 Technologies, LLC, Principal Consultant; parente@s3 tec.com
Fortune 500 Medical Devices Company Addresses Unique Device Identification New FDA regulation was driver for new data governance and technology strategies that could be leveraged for enterprise-wide benefit
Academy of Program/Project & Engineering Leadership An agency-wide resource for technical workforce development Dr. Ed Hoffman, Director March 2008 The NASA Mission One word summary: EXPLORATION the best
Knowledge Management An 8-Point Primer January 2014 Clobridge Consulting Linking people with information & knowledge www.clobridgeconsulting.com The Knowledge Management 8-Point Primer What is Knowledge
Survey Highlights Managing on a Global Scale Findings From Hewitt s 2009 Global Study What does it mean to be a global organization? As companies large small continue to exp their global footprint, the
Governing the Learning Organization in an Era Of Strategic Human Capital Development and Management by Grant Ricketts (Saba) and Brook Manville (United Way) "For many organizations, governance represents
Introduction An integrated PKM methodology enables organizations to maximize their investments by ensuring initiatives are on time and within budget, while sharing project challenges and successes that
Experience the commitment WHITE PAPER The multisourcing approach to IT consolidation The proven commercial practice of multisourcing services integration can help state and local governments achieve IT
Talent & Organization Organization Change Driving successful change to deliver improved business performance and achieve business benefits Accenture Organization Change Distinctive solutions for transformational,
TRANSFORMING ORGANIZATIONS IT STARTS WITH CHANGE MANAGEMENT THE POWER TO TRANSFORM In today s globalized and inter-connected economy, organizations deal with continually shifting market conditions, customer
WILSON LEARNING'S POINT-OF-VIEW ON SALES LEADERSHIP MANAGING THE PROCESS, LEADING THE PEOPLE POSITION PAPER It is an all-too-common story: a top-flight salesperson is promoted to sales manager. The organization
BUILDING ENTREPRENEURSHIP DEVELOPMENT SYSTEMS IN NORTHERN IOWA 1 COMMON ROOTS, DIFFERENT APPROACHES BACKGROUND ON THE JOHN PAPPAJOHN ENTREPRENEURIAL CENTERS (JPEC) IN IOWA John Pappajohn s roots are in
PMO as Change Agent Brian M. Horgan, Project Director, The United Illuminating Company Abstract A Project Management Office ( PMO ) is an agent for change in furtherance of strategy. This paper will discuss
Data Analysis: The Cornerstone of Effective Internal Auditing A CaseWare Analytics Research Report Contents Why Data Analysis Step 1: Foundation - Fix Any Cracks First Step 2: Risk - Where to Look Step
The positive are intended for use as a guide only and are not exhaustive. Not ALL will be applicable to ALL roles within a grade and in some cases may be appropriate to a Attribute 1: COMMUNICATION Level
Asset management Your asset is your business. The more challenging the economy, the more valuable the asset becomes. Decisions are magnified. Risk is amplified. Data is about more than numbers. It tells
Article by Peter Mihailidis, Rad Miletich and Adel Khreich: Peter Mihailidis is an Associate Director with bluevisions, a project and program management consultancy based in Milsons Point in Sydney. Peter
OPTIMUS SBR CHOICE TOOLS. PRECISION AIM. BOLD ATTITUDE. Optimizing Results with Business Intelligence Governance This paper investigates the importance of establishing a robust Business Intelligence (BI)
Project Management Institute STRATEGIC PLAN Prepared by: PMI Board of Directors Last Revised: 30 November 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS OVERVIEW... 1 PMI S CORE IDEOLOGY... 3 Core Purpose.... 3 Our Core Values...