Sandra K. McDonald Mountain West PEST

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Sandra K. McDonald Mountain West PEST"

Transcription

1 Sandra K. McDonald Mountain West PEST

2 THANKS to CWMA!!! Especially: Holly Postmus, Rio Blanco County Jana Gregg, Fremont County J.R. Phillips, Fremont County Tina Booton, Weld County Darrel Plane, Rio Grande County Fred Raish, CWMA President

3

4 FIFRA Federal Insecticide Act 1910 Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act 1947 Federal Environmental Pesticide Control Act 1972 (aka FIFRA 1972) Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA) 1996

5 Clean Water Act (CWA) National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit requirements 1972

6 Point Source Pollutant CWA requires a NPDES permit in order to discharge pollutants from point sources onto waters of the United States EPA has not required a NPDES permit to apply of aquatic pesticides, as long as these applications comply with the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA)

7 Tri-City Herald Nov. 9, 2001

8 Talent Irrigation Case Headwaters, Inc. & Oregon Natural Resources Council Action filed a citizen lawsuit against the Talent Irrigation District for violations of CWA by applying the aquatic herbicide Magnacide H to its canals without obtaining a NPDES permit

9 Headwaters vs. Talent Irrigation FIFRA nationally uniform labeling system, but no permitting system for individual application EPA approves pesticides with knowledge that pesticides containing pollutants may be discharged from point sources only pursuant to obtaining NPDES permit

10 Background Litigation Headwaters v. Talent (9th Circuit, 2001) League of Wilderness Defenders v. Forsgren (9th Circuit, 2002) Altman v. Town of Amherst (2nd Circuit, 2002) Fairhurst v. Hagener (9th Circuit, 2005)

11 Background Interim Statement issued August 2003 Clarified EPA s Position Interpretive Statement issued February 2005 Finalized Interim Statement

12 Background Proposed Rule published February 2005 Proposed to Codify Substance of Interpretive Statement Final Rule published November 27, 2006

13 EPA s Final Rule on Aquatic Pesticides November 27, 2006 EPA issued a final rule clarifying specific circumstances when a CWA permit is not required to apply pesticides to or around water

14 EPA s Final Rule on Aquatic Pesticides Rule confirmed EPA's past operating approach that pesticides legally registered under FIFRA for application to or near aquatic environments, and legally applied to control pests at those sites, are not subject to NPDES permit requirements

15 Background 6 th Circuit In December 2006, petitions for review were filed in all 11 Circuit Courts Petitions were consolidated in the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals

16 Litigation on Final Rule Petitions for review were filed in 11 Circuit Courts Petitions were consolidated in the 6 th Circuit Court of Appeals (National Cotton Council, et al. v. EPA) April 29, 2008 the 6 th Circuit heard oral arguments January 7, 2009 the 6 th Circuit Court issued a decision

17 Background 6 th Circuit January th Circuit vacated the CWA pesticides rule, stating that the rule was not a reasonable interpretation of the CWA

18 2009 Ruling National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits required for all biological and chemical pesticide applications that leave a residue in water when applications are made in, over, or near waters of the United States

19 6 th Circuit s Decision Court held that NPDES permits are required for: 1. All biological pesticide applications that are made in or over, including near waters of the US 2. Chemical pesticide applications that leave a residue or excess pesticide in water when such applications are made in or over, including near waters of the US

20 CWA Trumps FIFRA Residual pesticide left in water after application is a pollutant Irrigation canals are connected to natural waters of US CWA says discharge of pollutants into waters of the US requires a permit, which allows a polluter to discharge a specified amount of the pollutant

21 Response to Court s Decision April 9, US Government filed a Motion for Stay of the Mandate for a period of two years

22 Court Grants EPA 2-Year Stay June 8, 2009 US 6 th Circuit Court of Appeals granted EPA a two-year stay of the mandate in National Cotton Council et al. v. EPA until April 9, 2011

23 Stay until April 9, 2011 Provide EPA time to develop, propose and issue final NPDES general permits for unauthorized NPDES states, territories and tribes for pesticide applications covered under the decision EPA worked with NPDES authorized States to develop their general permits concurrent with the development of EPA s general permits to expedite implementation

24 Background 6 th Circuit March th Circuit granted EPA s second request for extension resulting in a stay of the mandate from April 9, 2011 until October 31, 2011

25 EPA = October 31, 2011 CDPHE = November 4, 2011

26 CWA NPDES Statutory Framework 40 CFR defines point source as: Any discernible, confined, and discrete conveyance, including but not limited to: Any pipe, ditch, channel, tunnel, conduit, well, discrete fissure, container, rolling stock, concentrated animal feeding operation, landfill leachate collection system, vessel or other floating craft from which pollutants are or may be discharged. The court ruled that discharges from pesticide applications are point sources (e.g., from a hose or an airplane)

27 CWA NPDES Statutory Framework 40 CFR defines discharge of a pollutant as: (a) Any addition of any pollutant or combination of pollutants to waters of the United States from any point source, The court ruled that biological pesticides and chemical pesticides that leave a residue are pollutants.

28 Discharge of a Pollutant any addition of any pollutant or combination of pollutants to Waters of the United States from any point source, or any addition of any pollutant or combination of pollutants to the water of the contiguous zone or the ocean from any point source other than a vessel or other floating craft that is being used as a means of transportation. This includes additions of pollutants into Waters of the United States from: surface runoff that is collected or channeled by man; discharges through pipes, sewers, or other conveyances, leading into privately owned treatment works. [Excerpted from 40 CFR 122.2] Appendix A: Definitions, Abbreviations, and Acronyms

29 CWA NPDES Statutory Framework 40 CFR defines Waters of the United States as: All waters which are currently used, were used in the past, or may be susceptible to use in interstate or foreign commerce, including all waters which are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide; All interstate waters, including interstate wetlands; All other waters such as intrastate lakes, rivers, streams (including intermittent streams), mudflats, sandflats, wetlands, sloughs, prairie potholes, wet meadows, playa lakes, or natural ponds the use, degradation, or destruction of which would affect or could affect interstate or foreign commerce; More information about waters of the U.S. EPA Guidance:

30 CWA NPDES Statutory Framework 40 CFR defines Waters of the United States as: All impoundments of waters otherwise defined as waters of the United States under this definition; Tributaries of waters identified in paragraphs (a) through (d) of this definition; The territorial sea; and Wetlands adjacent to waters (other than waters that are themselves wetlands) identified in paragraphs (a) through (f) of this definition. More information about waters of the U.S. EPA Guidance:

31 EPA NPDES Permitting Authority All discharges, including from Federal facilities: States: AK, ID, MA, NH, NM, OK State: TX (for oil, gas, and geothermal related discharges only) Territories/Other: All, except VI Discharges from Federal facilities only: CO, DE, VT, WA Discharges on Indian Country lands: All, except in ME Note: OK DEQ authorized but not to regulate pesticide activities.

32

33 State-Issued NPDES Permits State-issued general permits must meet all CWA requirements that the Federally-issued permit must meet but can be more stringent EPA does maintain an oversight role Citizens have a right to challenge EPA and state NPDES permits

34 Pesticides & NPDES Permits Failure to comply with the general NPDES permit requirements for all applications will be a violation of the CWA and subject to civil penalties of up to $37,500 per day CWA it allows for citizen suits against the applicator/entity

35

36 NPDES General Permit A general permit is designed to cover permittees with similar operations and/or type of discharge

37 NPDES in Colorado Environmental Protection Agency is responsible for administering Colorado's NPDES Permitting and Compliance Program on Federal and Tribal land

38 NPDES in Colorado Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Water Quality Control Division (WQCD) is responsible for administering Colorado's NPDES Permitting and Compliance Program on State and private land

39

40 Permit Fees EPA PGP = no fee CDPHE PGP = no fee

41

42 Web Resources EPA s Final Pesticide General Permit (PDF) (174 pp, 1.33MB)

43 EPA General Permit Signed October 31, 2011 Effective October 31, 2011 Expires December 31, 2016 (midnight) EPA PGP

44 Permit Conditions EPA PGP 9.8

45 Federal Facility any buildings, installations, structures, land, public works, equipment, aircraft, vessels, and other vehicles and property, owned, operated, or leased by, or constructed or manufactured for the purpose of leasing to, the federal government. Appendix A: Definitions, Abbreviations, and Acronyms

46 Indian Country (a) all land within the limits of any Indian reservation under the jurisdiction of the United States Government, notwithstanding the issuance of any patent, and including rights-of-way running through the reservation; (b) all dependent Indian communities within the borders of the United States, whether within the original or subsequently acquired territory thereof, and whether within or without the limits of a State, and (c) all Indian allotments, the Indian titles to which have not been extinguished, including rightsof-way running through the same. This definition includes all land held in trust for an Indian tribe. [18 U.S.C. 1151; 40 CFR 122.2] Appendix A: Definitions, Abbreviations, and Acronyms

47 For more information on EPA s PGP Pesticide permitting: Administrative Record for permit available at: (docket ID: EPA-HQ-OW ) Send any pesticide general permit related questions to: pgp@epa.gov

48

49 Web Resources CDPS Permit COG Pesticides General Permit PERMITs/PESTICIDES/COG860000per.pdf

50 COLORADO GENERAL PERMIT Permit No. COG CDPS GENERAL PERMIT FOR DISCHARGES FROM APPLICATIOSN OF PESTICIDES COLORADO DISCHARGE PERMIT SYSTEM In compliance with the provisions of the Colorado Water Quality Control Act, ( et seq., CRS, 1973 as amended), facilities engaged in applications of pesticides are authorized to discharge from locations throughout the State of Colorado to surface waters of the state. Such discharges shall be in accordance with conditions of this general permit.

51

52 Colorado General Permit Signed November 4, 2011 Effective November 4, 2011 Expires December 31, 2013 (midnight) CDPHE PGP

53 Colorado General Permit Modeled on EPA with very specific exceptions: Notice of Intent (Application) -- entities are NOT required to submit a Notice of Intent, for any discharges associated with applications of pesticides authorized under the Colorado General Permit CDPHE

54 CDPHE General Permit Modeled on EPA with very specific exceptions: Termination entities are NOT required to submit a Notice of Termination CDPHE

55 CDPHE General Permit Modeled on EPA with very specific exceptions: Certification of Compliance entities that exceed the PGPs Thresholds must submit a Certification of Compliance and implement Pest Management Practices and document those practices in a Pesticide Discharge Management Plan CDPHE

56 CDPHE General Permit Modeled on EPA with very specific exceptions: Annual Report entities are NOT required to submit an annual report CDPHE

57 CDPHE General Permit Modeled on EPA with very specific exceptions: Permit Term CDPHE permit expires December 31, 2013 EPA permit expires December 31, 2016 CDPHE

58 Limitations of Colorado Permits Water Quality Impaired Waters Waters Designated as Outstanding Waters Except for discharges from pesticide applications made to restore or maintain water quality or to protect public health or the environment that either do not degrade water quality or only degrade water quality on a short-term or temporary basis Water Currently or Previously Covered by another Permit CDPHE PGP 1.1.2

59 Surface waters of the state- Surface waters of the state of Colorado means any and all surface and subsurface waters which are contained in or flow in or through this State, but does not include waters in sewage systems, waters in treatment works of disposal systems, waters in potable water distribution systems, and all water withdrawn for use until use and treatment have been completed.

60 Impaired Waters Impaired waters are those that have been identified by a State, Territory, Tribe, or EPA pursuant to Section 303(d) of the CWA as not meeting applicable water quality standards Impaired waters include both waters with EPA-approved and EPA-established Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs), and those for which EPA has not yet approved or established a TMDL

61

62

63

64

65 Permits divided into eight parts: 1. Coverage under the permit 2. Technology-based effluent limitations 3. Water quality-based effluent limitations 4. Monitoring 5. Pesticide discharge management plan 6. Corrective action 7. Reporting and recordkeeping 8. Contact information

66 PGP Overview Structured by pesticide use patterns Established different requirements for different types of pesticide use patterns different types of operators and different sizes of areas treated and managed for the control of pests EPA s Notice of Intent and CDPHE s Compliance Certification requirements are based on the size of areas treated and the type of entity making the decision to perform pesticide applications.

67 EPA PGP Parts EPA s PGP includes four appendices with additional conditions and guidance for permittees: a) definitions b) standard permit conditions c) notice of intent requirements d) notice of termination requirements

68

69 The general permit is structured by pesticide use patterns

70 Operators should carefully read each part of the permit to assess whether or what portion of the requirements in each part may apply to their activities

71 Operator for the purpose of this permit, means any entity associated with the application of pesticides which results in a discharge to Waters of the United States that meets either of the following two criteria: (i) any entity who performs the application of a pesticide or who has day-to-day control of the application (i.e., they are authorized to direct workers to carry out those activities); or (ii) any entity with control over the decision to perform pesticide applications including the ability to modify those decisions. Appendix A: Definitions, Abbreviations, and Acronyms

72 NPDES General Permit A general permit is designed to cover permittees with similar operations and/or type of discharge Locations where more stringent requirements are necessary require an individual permit

73 Alternative Permit If EPA or CDPHE requires an Operator to apply for an individual permit, the Operator will be notified in writing that a permit application is required EPA PGP / CDPHE PGP 1.3

74 EPA NPDES Pesticide General Permit covers anyone in Colorado (Federal/Tribal) discharging a pesticide in, over, or near a water of the United States for: Mosquito and Other Flying Insect Pest Control Weed and Algae Pest Control (Aquatic) Animal Pest Control (Aquatic) Forest Canopy Pest Control EPA PGP 1.1.1

75 CDPHE NPDES Pesticide General Permit covers anyone in Colorado (state/private) discharging a pesticide in, over, or near a water of the state: Mosquito and Other Flying Insect Pest Control Weed and Algae Pest Control (Aquatic) Animal Pest Control (Aquatic) Forest Canopy Pest Control CDPHE PGP 1.1.1

76 Mosquito and Other Flying Insect Pest Control to control public health/nuisance and other flying insect pests that develop or are present during a portion of their life cycle in or above standing or flowing water. Public health/nuisance and other flying insect pests in this use category include mosquitoes and black flies. EPA PGP a / CDPHE PGP a

77 Mosquito and Other Flying Insect Pest Control From EPA PGP Factsheet Mosquito and Other Flying Insect Pest Control includes the application, by any means, of chemical and biological insecticides and larvicides into or over water to control insects that breed or live in, over, or near Waters of the United States.

78 Note: EPA recognizes that mosquito adulticides are applied to forest canopies, and this application is covered under the Mosquito and Other Flying Insect Pest Control use pattern

79 Weed and Algae Pest Control to control weeds, algae, and pathogens that are pests in water and at water's edge, including ditches and/or canals. EPA PGP b / CDPHE PGP b

80 Weed and Algae Pest Control From EPA PGP Factsheet Weed and Algae Pest Control includes the application, by any means, of contact or systemic herbicides to control vegetation and algae (and plant pathogens such as fungi) in Waters of the United States and at water s edge, including ditches and/or canals.

81 Animal Pest Control (Aquatic) to control animal pests in water and at water's edge. Animal pests in this use category include fish, lampreys, insects, mollusks, and pathogens. EPA PGP c / CDPHE PGP c

82 Animal Pest Control (Aquatic) From EPA PGP Factsheet includes the application, by any means, of pesticides into Waters of the United States to control a range of animal pests for purposes such as fisheries management, invasive species eradication or equipment operation and maintenance.

83 EPA intends for the phrase at water s edge to allow coverage of activities targeting pests that are not necessarily in the water but are near the water such that control of the pests may unavoidably involve a point-source discharge of pesticides to Waters of the U.S.

84 Forest Canopy Pest Control application of a pesticide to a forest canopy to control the population of a pest species (e.g., insect or pathogen) where, to target the pests effectively, a portion of the pesticide unavoidably will be applied over and deposited to water. EPA PGP d / CDPHE PGP d

85 Forest Canopy Pest Control From EPA s PGP Factsheet includes pest control projects in, over, or to forest canopies (aerially or from the ground) to control pests in the forest canopy where Waters of the U.S. exist below the canopy. Pests are not necessarily aquatic (e.g., airborne non-aquatic insects) but are detrimental to industry, the environment, and public health

86 Note: EPA intends that Forest Canopy Pest Control can include both mature and immature forest canopies, including canopies that may not be continuously connected, where control of pests associated with the canopy (i.e., branches and leaves of the trees) may unavoidably involve point source discharges of pesticides to Waters of the U.S.

87 Irrigation Return Flows and Agricultural Runoff Do not require NPDES permits because they are specifically exempted from the CWA

88 No Permit Required Pesticides applications for the purpose of controlling pests on agricultural crops, forest floors, or range lands where there will be no point source discharge of pollutants from that pesticide application

89 Not Covered Pesticides labeled for terrestrial use are prohibited by the label to have a direct discharge into a water are not covered by either permit

90 Not Covered Spray drift resulting from pesticide applications with the exception of those use patterns that may include drift as an accepted method of application (e.g., mosquito fog)

91 Dry Ditches Discharges to control pests in or near areas that are Waters of the U.S., even when these areas are dry for much of the year, may be covered by this permit, if one is required Forest or range lands that include dry washes and ephemeral streams, to control pests that may be found in these occasionally wet areas, including pests that may also be found in upland areas

92 Dry Ditches Coverage is granted to the extent that a permit is needed for discharges from pesticide applications to rangelands, forestry, park lands, rights-of-way, wetlands and other areas, and the activity falls within one of the four use categories

93 Stormwater runoff Non-agricultural stormwater runoff that may contain pesticides is not be eligible for coverage Existing stormwater permits for construction, industry, and municipalities already address pesticides in stormwater

94 Stormwater runoff Stormwater runoff is either: a) already required to obtain NPDES permit coverage as established in section 402(p) of the CWA b) classified as a discharge for which NPDES permit coverage is not currently required The regulations that specify what types of stormwater require NPDES permits can be found in 40 CFR

95 PGP Exclusion Discharges of any pesticide to 1. waters impaired for that pesticide or 2. any Tier 3 waters (i.e., outstanding national resource waters) 1. except for pesticide applications made to restore or maintain water quality or to protect public health or the environment that either do not degrade water quality or only degrade water quality on a short-term or temporary basis EPA PGP 1.1.2

96 Tier 3 Waters for antidegradation purposes, pursuant to 40 CFR (a)(3), Tier 3 waters are identified by States or Tribes as having high quality waters constituting an Outstanding National Resource Water (ONRW), which may include waters of National Parks and State Parks, wildlife refuges, and waters of exceptional recreational or ecological significance. Appendix A: Definitions, Abbreviations, and Acronyms

97 Web Resources A list of impaired waters, both with EPAapproved or EPA-established total maximum daily loads (TMDLs) and waters for which EPA has not yet approved or established a TMDL is available at index.html

98 Web Resources A list of Colorado s Outstanding waters in geographic areas covered under this permit is available at ccregs/index.html.

99

100 Pesticides Permit Decision Tool EPA s interactive tool for potential permittees: Determine if an NPDES permit will be needed for the pesticide application For those who determine they need a permit, determine if they are eligible for coverage under EPA's PGP If they are eligible for coverage under EPA's PGP, understand the PGP requirements

101 Web Resources Interactive Decision-making tool: cfm

102

103

104 Other Federal and State Laws Operators (Applicators and Decision-makers) must comply with all other applicable federal and state laws and regulations that pertain to the application of pesticides The permit does not negate the requirements under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) and its implementing regulations to use registered pesticides consistent with the product s labeling EPA PGP 1.5 / CDPHE PGP 1.5

105 FIFRA Compliance Permittee must comply with the pesticide label requirements (FIFRA) and all of the conditions of this general permit Permit does not supersede or preempt federal or state label requirements or any other applicable laws and regulations

106

107 FIFRA Labeling Pesticide use inconsistent with certain FIFRA labeling requirements could result in the Operator being held liable for a CWA violation as well as a FIFRA violation

108

109

110

111

112

113

114 Operator Any entity associated with an application of a pesticide which results in a discharge to waters of the U.S./state 1) Decision-maker 2) Applicator EPA PGP 1.0 / CDPHE PGP 1.0

115 Decision-maker any entity with control over the decision to perform pesticide applications including the ability to modify those decisions that result in a discharge to Waters of the United States. Appendix A: Definitions, Abbreviations, and Acronyms

116 Decision-maker Entity paying for or making the decision to perform pesticide application

117 Applicator any entity who performs the application of a pesticide or who has day-to-day control of the application (i.e., they are authorized to direct workers to carry out those activities) that results in a discharge to Waters of the United States. Appendix A: Definitions, Abbreviations, and Acronyms

118 Applicator Main role is to apply pesticide when needed

119 EPA believes the Decision-maker is the appropriate Operator to submit the NOI Decision-maker generally will be aware of the need for pesticide application before the For-Hire Applicator and is able to submit an NOI further in advance of the application activities than is a For-Hire Applicator, who may not be aware of the decision to apply a pesticide until well-after the decision is made and application is imminent

120 More than one Operator may be responsible for complying with this permit for any single pesticide application

121 Entities Any Agency with pest management for land resource stewardship as an integral part of the organization's operations Entities with a specific responsibility to control pests Local government or other entities that apply pesticides in excess of specified annual treatment area thresholds Dischargers to Tier 3 waterbodies Dischargers to Waters of the U.S. containing NMFS Listed Resources of Concern EPA PGP Table 1-1 / CDPHE PGP Table 7-2

122 Land resource stewardship Agencies (typically public or quasipublic, though not exclusively so) for whom pest control is central to the organizational land stewardship purpose

123 Pest Control Districts Mosquito control districts (or similar pest control districts, such as vector control districts) Weed control districts (or other similar special purpose districts created with a responsibility of pest control)

124 Irrigation Districts Irrigation control districts (or other similar public or private entities supplying irrigation waters)

125 Small Entity any (1) private enterprise that does not exceed the Small Business Administration size standard as identified at 13 CFR , or (2) local government that serves a population of 10,000 or less. Appendix A: Definitions, Abbreviations, and Acronyms

126 Large Entity Decision-maker any entity that is not a small entity. Appendix A: Definitions, Abbreviations, and Acronyms

127

128 Annual Treatment Area Threshold an area (in acres) or linear distance (in miles) in a calendar year to which a Decision-maker is authorizing and/or performing pesticide applications in that area for activities covered under this permit. Appendix A: Definitions, Abbreviations, and Acronyms

129 Treatment Area the entire area, whether over land or water, where a pesticide application is intended to provide pesticidal benefits within the pest management area. In some instances, the treatment area will be larger than the area where pesticides are actually applied. For example, the treatment area for a stationary drip treatment into a canal includes the entire width and length of the canal over which the pesticide is intended to control weeds. Similarly, the treatment area for a lake or marine area is the water surface area where the application is intended to provide pesticidal benefits. Appendix A: Definitions, Abbreviations, and Acronyms

130 Pest Management Area The area of land, including any water, for which an Operator has responsibility and is authorized to conduct pest management activities as covered by this permit (e.g., for an Operator who is a mosquito control district, the pest management area is the total area of the district). Appendix A: Definitions, Abbreviations, and Acronyms

131 Treatment Area Two options May be comprised of many discontinuous individual locations where pesticides are being applied within a pest management area May be one specific area

132 EPA does not expect Operators (Applicators and Decision-makers) to have to document each specific spot on a map where pesticide has been applied Rather, for any given pest control project, EPA generally expects Operators (Applicators and Decision-makers) to consolidate records within the bounds of that project

133 Thresholds for Decision-makers > 6,400 acres/calendar year Mosquito and Other Flying Insect Pest Control larvaciding activities not included in the total Forest Canopy Pest Control EPA PGP Table 1-1 / CDPHE PGP Table 7-2

134 Thresholds for Decision-makers Mosquito and Other Flying Insect Pest Control Forest Canopy Pest Control Count each pesticide application activity to a treatment area as a separate area treated

135 Thresholds for Decision-makers > 20 linear miles OR > 80 surface acres Weed and Algae Pest Control Animal Pest Control EPA PGP Table 1-1 / CDPHE PGP Table 7-2

136 Thresholds for Decision-makers Weed & Algae Pest Control Animal Control Pest Control Count each treatment area only once, regardless of the number of pesticide application activities performed in a given year

137 Ditches -- CDPHE In accordance with the Colorado Water Quality Control Act, a permit is not required for any flow or return flow of irrigation water into state waters except as may be required by the federal act or regulations CDPHE recommends that Decision-makers include areas of application to ditches, even if they are dry at the time of application, in their calculations for determining if they meet thresholds for submittal of a Compliance Certification

138 CDPHE -- Flood Irrigation To the extent that waters in a field following flood irrigation are not waters of the state (are waters withdrawn for use), permit coverage is not needed for application of pesticides to those waters because it is not considered a discharge to waters of the state CDPHE would consider commingling of those waters with irrigation water to be irrigation return flow and/or surface runoff from an agricultural field, and therefore the discharge of the commingled water would be exempt from permit requirements

139

140 Technology-based effluent limitations in the PGP provide further protections beyond compliance with existing FIFRA requirements

141 Minimize to reduce and/or eliminate pesticide discharges to waters of the United States through the use of Pest Management Measures to the extent technologically available and economically practicable and achievable. Appendix A: Definitions, Abbreviations, and Acronyms

142 Pest Management Measure any practice used to meet the effluent limitations that comply with manufacturer specifications, industry standards and recommended industry practices related to the application of pesticides, relevant legal requirements and other provisions that a prudent Operator would implement to reduce and/or eliminate pesticide discharges to waters of the United States. Appendix A: Definitions, Abbreviations, and Acronyms

143 Minimize Use only the amount of pesticide & frequency of application necessary to control the target pest Perform equipment maintenance and calibration Assess weather conditions prior to pesticide application Accurately identifying the pest problem Efficiently and effectively managing the pest problem Properly use pesticides EPA PGP 2.1 / CDPHE PGP 2.1

144

145

146 Technology-Based Effluent Limits Applicators must Maintain pesticide application equipment in proper operational condition Assess weather conditions EPA PGP 2.1 / CDPHE PGP 2.1

147

148 Effluent Limits Water Quality-Based Effluent Limits EPA expects that compliance with FIFRA in addition to compliance with the conditions in the permit will control discharges as necessary to meet applicable water quality standards

149 Water Quality-based Effluent Limitations Operators must control its discharge as necessary to meet applicable water quality standards EPA PGP 3.0 / CDPHE PGP 3.0

150

151

152

153 All Applicators Minimize the discharge of pesticides: AMOUNT -- use only the amount of pesticide and frequency of pesticide application necessary to control the target pest use equipment and application procedures appropriate for this task EPA PGP / CDPHE PGP 2.1.1

154 All Applicators Minimize the discharge of pesticides: MAINTENANCE -- Maintain pesticide application equipment in proper operating condition, including requirement to calibrate, clean, and repair such equipment and prevent leaks, spills, or other unintended discharges EPA PGP / CDPHE PGP 2.1.2

155 All Applicators Minimize the discharge of pesticides: APPLICABLE FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS -- Assess weather conditions (e.g. temperature, precipitation and wind speed) in the treatment area to ensure application is consistent with all applicable federal requirements EPA PGP / CDPHE PGP 2.1.3

156 All Applicators Minimize Pesticide Discharges MONITOR for Adverse Incidents and comply with Adverse Incident Reporting EPA PGP 4.1 / CDPHE PGP 4.1

157 Decision-Makers Responsibilities: For All Decision-makers Must minimize the discharge of pesticides to surface waters of the U.S./State from the application of pesticides, through the use of Pest Management Measures: Must use only the amount of pesticide and frequency of pesticide application necessary to control the target pest EPA PGP 2.2 / CDPHE PGP 2.2

158 Decision-Maker Responsibilities For some Decision Makers Based on entity type and size of entity EPA PGP / CDPHE PGP 2.2

159

160 Certain Decision-makers who perform more significant pesticide applications will be required to submit: Any Agency for which pest management for land resource stewardship is an integral part of the organization's operations. Other types of entities with a specific responsibility to control pests (e.g., mosquito and weed control districts, irrigation districts) Other entities that apply pesticides in excess of specified annual treatment area thresholds Dischargers to Tier 3 waterbodies Dischargers to Waters of the U.S. containing NMFS Listed Resources of Concern EPA PGP Table 1-1 / CDPHE PGP Table 7-2

161 Entities Required to Submit NOI/ Compliance Certification Any Agency for which pest management for land resource stewardship is an integral part of the organization's operations EPA PGP Table 1-1 / CDPHE PGP Table 7-2

162 Entities Required to Submit NOI/Compliance Certification Other types of entities with a specific responsibility to control pests mosquito, weed, and other pest control districts irrigation districts EPA PGP Table 1-1 / CDPHE PGP Table 7-2

163 Entities Required to Submit NOI/Compliance Certification Local government or other entities that apply pesticides in excess of specified annual treatment area thresholds Thresholds differ according to specific use pattern > 80 surface acres or 20 miles Weed & Algae Control Animal Pest Control > 6,400 acres Mosquito & Flying Insect Pest Control Forest Canopy Pest Control EPA PGP Table 1-1 / CDPHE PGP Table 7-2

164 Entities Required to Submit NOI/Compliance Certification Dischargers to Tier 3 waterbodies EPA PGP Table 1-1 / CDPHE PGP Table 7-2

165

166 Web Resources A list of impaired waters, both with EPAapproved or EPA-established total maximum daily loads (TMDLs) and waters for which EPA has not yet approved or established a TMDL is available at index.html

167

168

169 Entities Required to Submit NOI/Compliance Certification Dischargers to Waters of the U.S. containing NMFS Listed Resources of Concern EPA PGP Table 1-1 / CDPHE PGP Table 7-2

170 Decision-makers required to submit NOI as a result of discharges to Waters of the U.S. containing NMFS Listed Resources of Concern Limited to: NMFS Species/Habitat Salmon, Sturgeon, Eulachon Locations ID, WA, OR, CA, NH, MA & DC Maps available at EPA expects that less than 2% of the total number of Operators under this permit who will need to meet additional ESA requirements

171 Research & Demonstration Operators of pesticide research and development activities are not required to submit a Notice of Intent/Compliance Certification Operators are still required to comply with PGP requirements to the extent those requirements do not conflict with the research plan

172 Pesticide Research and Development Activities undertaken on a systematic basis to gain new knowledge (research) and/or the application of research findings or other scientific knowledge for the creation of new or significantly improved products or processes (experimental development). Appendix A: Definitions, Abbreviations, and Acronyms

173

174 EPA NOI requirements are based on the size of areas treated and the entity making the decision to perform pesticide applications

175 EPA Notice of Intent Identify the responsible entity and provide basic contact information Description of entity: e.g., federal, state or local government agency, public utility, homeowner s assn., commercial/business establishment Type of discharges: pesticide use patterns) Receiving water(s)

176 Web Resources Appendix D. Notice of Intent Form (PDF) (10 pp, 345K)

177

178 Electronic NOI Submission (enoi) Decision-makers must file an enoi unless requesting a waiver because the use of enoi would incur undue burden or expense (will need to provide reason in paper NOI) EPA website includes guidance on how to use enoi system EPA PGP 1.1.2

179 Web Resources Filing an Electronic Notice of Intent using EPA s enoi System View and Search Pesticide General Permit NOIs earch.cfm

180

181 Operator Type determines EPA NOI Submission Deadline Decision-maker with a discharge in response to a Declared Pest Emergency for which that activity triggers the NOI requirement At least 30 days after beginning discharge EPA PGP Table 1-2

182 Operator Type determines EPA NOI Submission Deadline Decision-maker with any discharge to Waters of the U.S. containing NMFS Listed Resources of Concern At least 30 days before any discharge Decision-maker with any discharge to Waters of the U.S. containing NMFS Listed Resources of Concern, in response to a Declared Pest Emergency Situation Within 15 days after beginning to discharge EPA PGP Table 1-2

183 Declared Pest Emergency Situation an event defined by a public declaration by a federal agency, state, or local government of a pest problem determined to require control through application of a pesticide beginning less than ten days after identification of the need for pest control. This public declaration may be based on: (1) Significant risk to human health; (2) Significant economic loss; or (3) Significant risk to: (i) Endangered species, (ii) Threatened species, (iii) Beneficial organisms, or (iv) The environment. Appendix A: Definitions, Abbreviations, and Acronyms

184 Operator Type determines EPA NOI Submission Deadline Decision-maker that exceeds any annual treatment area threshold At least 10 days before exceeding an annual treatment area threshold EPA PGP Table 1-2

185 Operator Type determines EPA NOI Submission Deadline Decision-maker otherwise required to submit an NOI At least 10 days before any discharge for which an NOI is required EPA PGP Table 1-2

186 EPA Notice of Termination To terminate EPA PGP coverage, a Decisionmaker who is required to submit Notice, must submit Notice of Termination Decision-makers are responsible for complying with the terms of this permit until authorization is terminated Decision-makers who are required to submit annual reports must do so for the portion of the year up through the date of termination EPA PGP

187 EPA Notice of Termination Deadlines Submit within 30 days of the occurrence of one of triggering events: 1. A new Decision-maker has taken over responsibility for the pest control activity 2. Decision-maker has ceased aquatic pesticide application covered under the general permit 3. There is not and no longer will be pesticide discharge 4. Decision-maker has obtained coverage under an individual permit or an alternative general permit EPA PGP

188 Web Resources Appendix E. Notice of Termination (PDF) (5 pp, 272K)

189

190

191 CDPHE Compliance Certification Must at least include the following information: a. Operator name b. Operator Type c. Operator Representatives and Contact Information d. Applicator name, Applicator Representatives, and Contact Information e. Pest Management Areas and related information CDPHE PGP 7.6.1

192 CDPHE Discharge to Outstanding Water Decision-maker with an eligible discharge to an Outstanding Water ALL applications to an Outstanding Water require submission of Compliance Certification CDPHE PGP Table 7-2

193 CDPHE Land Resource Stewardship Any Agency for which pest management for land resource stewardship is an integral part of the organization s operations Required to submit Compliance Certification for all pest control activities resulting in a discharge to surface waters of the State CDPHE PGP Table 7-2

194 CDPHE Pest Control Districts Irrigation districts Weed control districts, or similar pest control districts Mosquito control districts Required to submit Compliance Certification for all pest control activities resulting in a discharge to surface waters of the State CDPHE PGP Table 7-2

195 CDPHE Local Government Local governments or other entities that exceed the annual treatment area threshold: > 80 surface acres or 20 miles Weed & Algae Control Animal Pest Control > 6,400 acres Mosquito & Flying Insect Pest Control Forest Canopy Pest Control Required to submit Compliance Certification CDPHE PGP Table 7-2

196 CDPHE Other entities Other entities that exceed the annual treatment area threshold: > 80 surface acres or 20 miles Weed & Algae Control Animal Pest Control > 6,400 acres Mosquito & Flying Insect Pest Control Forest Canopy Pest Control Required to submit Compliance Certification CDPHE PGP Table 7-2

197 CDPHE Compliance Certification Deadlines For applications authorized under this permit November 4, June 30, 2013 Compliance Certifications are due to be received by the Division no later than July 1, 2013 CDPHE PGP 7.6.2

198 CDPHE Compliance Certification Deadlines After June 30, 2013 Compliance Certifications are due: At least 10 days before exceeding an annual treatment area threshold any discharge for which a Compliance Certification is required CDPHE PGP Table 7-3

199 CDPHE Compliance Certification Deadlines After June 30, 2013 Compliance Certifications are due: At least 30 days after beginning discharge for Declared Pest Emergency for which that activity triggers the Compliance Certification CDPHE PGP Table 7-3

200 Declared Pest Emergency Situation an event defined by a public declaration by a federal agency, state, or local government of a pest problem determined to require control through application of a pesticide beginning less than ten days after identification of the need for pest control. This public declaration may be based on: (1) Significant risk to human health; (2) Significant economic loss; or (3) Significant risk to: (i) Endangered species, (ii) Threatened species, (iii) Beneficial organisms, or (iv) The environment.

201

202 Pest Management Measures Any Decision-makers who is or will be required to submit a Notice of Intent/Compliance Certification Prior to the first pesticide application covered under this permit that will result in a discharge to surface waters of the U.S./State At least once each calendar year prior to the first pesticide application for that calendar year

203 Pest Management In developing the Pest Management Measures for each pest management area, the Decisionmaker must evaluate the management options, including a combination of these management options, considering impact to water quality, impact to non-target organisms, feasibility, and cost effectiveness EPA PGP 2.2 / CDPHE PGP 2.2

204 Pest Management Measures Identify the Problem Pest Management Pesticide Use Site Monitoring EPA PGP 2.2 / CDPHE PGP 2.2

205 Identify the Problem 1. Identify areas with pest problems and characterize the extent of the problems, including, for example, water use goals not attained (e.g., wildlife habitat, fisheries, vegetation, and recreation) 2. Identify target pest(s) 3. Identify possible factors causing or contributing to the pest problem (e.g., nutrients, invasive species, etc.) 4. Establish any pest- and site-specific action threshold 5. In the event there are no data for the pest management area in the past calendar year, use other available data as appropriate EPA PGP a / CDPHE PGP a

206 Action Threshold the point at which pest populations or environmental conditions necessitate that pest control action be taken based on economic, human health, aesthetic, or other effects. An action threshold may be based on current and/or past environmental factors that are or have been demonstrated to be conducive to pest emergence and/or growth, as well as past and/or current pest presence. Action thresholds are those conditions that indicate both the need for control actions and the proper timing of such actions. Appendix A: Definitions, Abbreviations, and Acronyms

207 Pest Management Management Options: a. No action b. Prevention c. Mechanical or physical methods d. Cultural methods e. Biological control agents f. Pesticides EPA PGP b / CDPHE PGP b

208 No Action No action is to be taken, although pest problem has been identified

209 Prevention Preventing introductions of possible pest Identifying primary pathways of introduction and actions to cut off those pathways is essential to prevention

210 Mechanical or Physical Methods Mechanical control techniques will vary depending on the pest dewatering pressure washing abrasive scrubbing weed removal by hand or machine

211 Cultural Method Include the use of pond dyes and water-level drawdown

212 Biological Control Biological control may be achieved through the introduction of diseases, predators, or parasites

213 Pesticide Use If a pesticide is selected to manage pests, any Decision-maker required to submit a Notice of Intent/Compliance Certification must: 1. Conduct surveillance in an area that is representative of the pest problem prior to each pesticide application to assess the pest management area and to determine when the action threshold(s) is met EPA PGP c / CDPHE PGP c

214 Pesticide Use If a pesticide is selected to manage pests, any Decision-maker required to submit a Notice of Intent/Compliance Certification must: 2. Reduce the impact on the environment and non-target organisms by applying the pesticide only when the action threshold has been met EPA PGP c / CDPHE PGP c

215 Pesticide Use Include a list of active ingredient(s) evaluated Identify specific equipment or methods that will prevent or reduce the risks to non-target organisms and pesticide discharges to surface water

216

217 Recordkeeping Requirements for Different Types of Operators All Operators All Operators who are For-Hire Applicators Any Decision-maker required to submit a NOI/Compliance Certification and who is a small entity Any Decision-maker required to submit a NOI/Compliance Certification and who is a large entity Retention of Records: All Operators EPA PGP 7.0 / CDPHE PGP 7.0

218 Recordkeeping Requirements Document records within 14 days Retain any records required under the Permits for at least 3 years from the date that coverage under the Permit expires or is terminated All records kept under the PGP must be provided upon request EPA PGP 7.0 / CDPHE PGP 7.0

219 Recordkeeping and Reporting All Operators: Copy of any Adverse Incident Reporting Copy of any corrective action documentation Copy of any spill and leak or other unpermitted discharge documentation EPA PGP 7.1 / CDPHE PGP 7.1

220 Recordkeeping and Reporting For-Hire Applicators: Documentation of equipment calibration Information of each treatment area EPA PGP 7.2 / CDPHE PGP 7.2

221 Recordkeeping and Reporting For-Hire Applicators -- Information of each treatment area 1. Description of each treatment area, including location and size (acres or linear feet) of treatment area and identification of any waters, either by name or by location, to which pesticide(s) are discharged 2. Pesticide use pattern(s) (i.e., mosquito and other flying insects, weed and algae, animal pest, or forest canopy) 3. Target pest(s) 4. Name of each pesticide product used including the EPA registration number 5. Quantity of each pesticide product applied to each treatment area 6. Pesticide application date(s) 7. Whether or not visual monitoring was conducted during pesticide application and/or post-application and if not, why not and whether monitoring identified any possible or observable adverse incidents caused by application of pesticides EPA PGP 7.2 / CDPHE PGP 7.2

222 Public Availability of Documents While not required to be submitted to EPA, interested persons can request a copy of the PDMP through EPA, at which point EPA will likely request the Operator to provide a copy of the PDMP By requiring members of the public to request a copy of the PDMP through EPA, the Agency is able to provide the Operators (Applicators and Decisionmakers) with assurance that any Confidential Business Information that may be contained within its PDMP is not released to the public

223 Public Availability of Documents NOIs will be publicly available once submitted through the enoi system NOIs generally will be available to the public for 10 days before permit coverage begins During this time period, issues can be raised with EPA, who has the authority to deny coverage

224 EPA Recordkeeping and Reporting Decision-maker required to submit an NOI and also a Small Entity: Submit and retain a copy of the NOI Pesticide Discharge Evaluation Worksheet Documentation of equipment calibration if also an Applicator EPA PGP 7.3

225 EPA Recordkeeping and Reporting Decision-maker required to submit an NOI and also a Large Entity Submit and retain copy of the NOI Copy of Pesticide Discharge Management Plan (PDMP) Submit and retain copies of Annual Reports If also an Applicator -- Documentation of equipment calibration EPA PGP 7.4

226 EPA Annual Report Like the Notice of Intent and Notice of Termination, EPA requires that Decisionmakers complete and submit the Annual Report form electronically using EPA's enoi system Unless enoi is otherwise unavailable or the Decision-maker has obtained a waiver from the requirement to use enoi for submitting the Annual Report

227 EPA Annual Report Template Any Decision-maker required to submit an NOI and a large entity Report includes: Decision-maker and applicator information NPDES permit tracking number(s) Locations, use pattern, and pesticides information Annual Report to be submitted to EPA no later than February 15 of the following year

228 Web Resources Appendix G. Annual Report Template (PDF) (7 pp, 254K)

229

230 EPA Annual Report Once required to submit an annual report for one year, an annual report must be filed each subsequent year of this permit whether or not you have discharges from the application of pesticides EPA PGP 7.6

231 Pesticide application activities that do not result in discharges of pesticides to Waters of the U.S. should not be included in the annual report since those discharges do not require NPDES permit coverage.

232 CDPHE Recordkeeping Decision-maker Required to Submit a Compliance Certification and also a Small Entity Copy of the Compliance Certification and any correspondence exchanged between the Decision-maker and CDPHE specific to coverage under this permit Documentation of equipment calibration (only if Decision-maker is also the Applicator) CDPHE PGP 7.3

233 CDPHE Recordkeeping Decision-maker Required to Submit a Compliance Certification and also a Small Entity Information on each treatment area to which pesticides are discharged, including: 1. Description of treatment area, including location and size (acres or linear feet) of treatment area and identification of any surface waters of the State, either by name or by location, to which pesticide(s) are discharged 2. Pesticide use pattern(s) 3. Target pest(s) and explanation of need for pest control 4. Description of pest management measure(s) implemented prior to the first pesticide application CDPHE PGP 7.3

234 CDPHE Recordkeeping Decision-maker Required to Submit a Compliance Certification and also a Small Entity Information on each treatment area to which pesticides are discharged, including: 6. Name of each pesticide product used including the EPA registration number 7. Quantity of each pesticide product applied to each treatment area 8. Pesticide Application Start Date 9. Pesticide Application End Date 10. Whether or not visual monitoring was conducted during pesticide application and/or post-application and if not, why not and whether monitoring identified any possible or observable adverse incidents caused by application of pesticides CDPHE PGP 7.3

235 CDPHE Recordkeeping Recordkeeping for Any Decision-maker Required to Submit a Compliance Certification and also a Large Entity Copy of the Compliance Certification and any correspondence exchanged between the Decision-maker and CDPHE specific to coverage under this permit A copy of the PDMP, including any modifications made to the PDMP during the term of this permit Documentation of equipment calibration (only if Decision-maker is also the Applicator) CDPHE PGP 7.4

236 CDPHE Recordkeeping Recordkeeping for Any Decision-maker Required to Submit a Compliance Certification and also a Large Entity Information on each treatment area to which pesticides are discharged, including: 1. Description of each treatment area, including location and size (acres or linear feet) of treatment area and identification of any surface waters of the State, either by name or by location, to which pesticide(s) are discharged 2. Pesticide use pattern(s) (i.e., mosquito and other flying insects, weed and algae, animal pest, or forest canopy) 3. Target pest(s) and explanation of need for pest control 4. Action Thresholds 5. Method and/or data used to determine that action threshold(s) has been met CDPHE PGP 7.4

237 CDPHE Recordkeeping Recordkeeping for Any Decision-maker Required to Submit a Compliance Certification and also a Large Entity Information on each treatment area to which pesticides are discharged, including: 6. Description of pest management measure(s) implemented prior to the first pesticide application 7. Company name and contact information for pesticide applicator 8. Name of each pesticide product used including the EPA registration number 9. Quantity of each pesticide product applied to each treatment area 10. Pesticide application date(s) 11. Whether or not visual monitoring was conducted during pesticide application and/or post-application and if not, why not and whether monitoring identified any possible or observable adverse incidents caused by application of pesticides CDPHE PGP 7.4

238

239 Pesticide Discharge Management Plan Any large entity Decision-maker required to submit a Notice of Intent/Compliance Certification must prepare a PDMP Except for applications made in response to a Declared Pest Emergency Situation EPA PGP 5.0 / CDPHE PGP 5.0

240 Pesticide Discharge Management Plan Contents PDMP Team Pest Management Area Description Control Measure Description Schedules and Procedures Spill Response Procedures Adverse Incident Response Procedures Pesticide Monitoring Schedules and Procedures Signature Requirements EPA PGP 5.1 / CDPHE PGP 5.1

241 PDMP Constitutes a tool both to assist the large entity Decision-maker in documenting what pest management measures it is implementing to meet the effluent limitations Assist the permitting/compliance authority in determining whether the effluent limitations are being met

242 PDMP Developing a PDMP helps large entity Decisionmakers ensure they have 1. taken steps to identify the pest problem 2. evaluated pest management options 3. selected appropriate pest management measures to control pesticide discharges

243 PDMP The PDMP must be kept up-to date and modified whenever necessary to document any corrective actions as necessary to meet the effluent limitations in this permit

244 PDMP Decision-makers may choose to reference other documents, such as a pre-existing pest management plan or spill prevention and response plan, in the PDMP rather than recreating the same text in the PDMP Ensure that a copy of relevant portions of those referenced documents is attached to the PDMP and is located on-site and it is available for review

245 PDMP Team Decision-makers must identify all the persons (by name and contact information) that compose the team as well as each person s individual responsibilities, including person(s): responsible for managing pests in relation to the pest management area responsible for developing and revising the PDMP responsible for developing, revising, and implementing corrective actions and other effluent limitation requirements EPA PGP / CDPHE PGP 5.1.1

246 PDMP Problem Identification Decision-makers must document the following: Pest problem description description of the pest problem at the pest management area, including identification of the target pest(s), source(s) of the pest problem, and source of data used to identify the problem EPA PGP / CDPHE PGP 5.1.2

247 PDMP Problem Identification Decision-makers must document the following: Action Threshold(s) Describe the action threshold(s) for the pest management area, including data used in developing the action threshold(s) and method(s) to determine when the action threshold(s) has been met EPA PGP / CDPHE PGP 5.1.2

248 PDMP Problem Identification Decision-makers must document the following: General location map include a general location map (e.g., USGS quadrangle map, a portion of a city or county map, or other map) that identifies the geographic boundaries of the area to which the plan applies and location of the surface waters of the State EPA PGP / CDPHE PGP 5.1.2

249 PDMP Problem Identification Decision-makers must document the following: Water quality standards Document any Outstanding Waters and any water(s) identified as impaired by a substance which either is an active ingredient or a degradate of such an active ingredient EPA PGP / CDPHE PGP 5.1.2

250 PDMP Pest Management Options Evaluation Decision-makers must document the evaluation of the pest management options, including combination of the pest management options, to control the target pest(s) Decision-makers must consider the impact to water quality, impact to non-target organisms, feasibility, cost effectiveness, and any relevant previous Pest Management Measures EPA PGP / CDPHE PGP 5.1.3

251 PDMP Response Procedures Spill Response Procedures At a minimum: Procedures for expeditiously stopping, containing, and cleaning up leaks, spills, and other releases to surface waters Employees who may cause, detect, or respond to a spill or leak must be trained in these procedures and have necessary spill response equipment available (one should be a member of the PDMP team) Procedures for notification of appropriate facility personnel, emergency response agencies, and regulatory agencies EPA PGP a / CDPHE PGP a

252 PDMP Response Procedures Adverse Incident Response Procedures At a minimum: Procedures for responding to any adverse incident resulting from pesticide applications Procedures for notification of the adverse incident, both internal to the Decision-maker s agency/organization and external Contact information for the Division, nearest emergency medical facility, and nearest hazardous chemical responder must be in locations that are readily accessible and available EPA PGP b / CDPHE PGP b

253 PDMP Modifications Whenever necessary to address any of the triggering conditions for corrective action When a change in pest control activities significantly changes the type or quantity of pollutants discharged EPA PGP 5.2 / CDPHE PGP 5.2

254 PDMP Modifications Changes to the PDMP must be made before the next pesticide application that results in a discharge, if practicable, or if not, no later than 90 days after any change in pesticide application activities EPA PGP 5.2 / CDPHE PGP 5.2

255 PDMP Availability PDMP and all supporting documents must be readily available, upon request, and copies of any of these documents provided, upon request, to CDPHE, EPA, or another State, Tribal, or local agency governing discharges or pesticide applications within their respective jurisdictions EPA PGP 5.3 / CDPHE PGP 5.3

256 PDMP Availability PDMPs may be provided to the public Confidential Business Information will be withheld EPA PGP 5.3 / CDPHE PGP 5.3

257 Signature Requirements The PDMP must be signed and certified in accordance with the signatory requirements in the Standard Permit Conditions The signature requirement includes an acknowledgment that there are significant penalties for submitting false information EPA PGP / CDPHE PGP 5.1.5

258 Signatory Requirements For a corporation: By a responsible corporate officer: (i) a president, secretary, treasurer, or vice-president of the corporation in charge of a principal business function, or any other person who performs similar policy- or decision-making functions for the corporation, or (ii) the manager of one or more manufacturing, production, or operating facilities, provided, the manager is authorized to make management decisions that govern the operation of the regulated activity including having the explicit or implicit duty of making major capital investment recommendations, and initiating and directing other comprehensive measures to assure long-term environmental compliance with environmental laws and regulations; the manager can ensure that the necessary systems are established or actions taken to gather complete and accurate information for permit application requirements; and where authority to sign documents has been assigned or delegated to the manager in accordance with corporate procedures. Appendix B, Subsection B.11

259 Signatory Requirements For a partnership or sole proprietorship: By a general partner or the proprietor Appendix B, Subsection B.11

260 Signatory Requirements For a municipality, state, federal, or other public agency: By either a principal executive officer or ranking elected official (i) (ii) the chief executive officer of the agency, or a senior executive officer having responsibility for the overall operations of a principal geographic unit or the agency (e.g., Regional Administrator of EPA). Appendix B, Subsection B.11

261 PDMP Modifications The PDMP must be updated Whenever any of the triggering conditions for corrective action occur When a review following the triggering conditions requires the Operator to revise his/her Pest Management Measures as necessary to meet the effluent limitations All changes to the PDMP must be made before the next pesticide application that results in a discharge, if practicable, or if not, no later than 90 days after any change in pesticide application activities or after an annual review EPA PGP 5.2 / CDPHE PGP 5.2

262 Web Resources Pesticide Discharge Management Plan Template template.doc

263

264

265 EPA Form Pesticide Discharge Evaluation Worksheet Required for any Decision-maker required to submit an Notice of Intent and also a Small Entity Must retain at the address provided on the NOI Worksheet includes: Decision-maker and applicator information NPDES permit tracking number(s) Contact person name, title, address, and phone number Locations and pesticide product use information

266 Web Resources Appendix F. Pesticide Discharge Evaluation Worksheet (PDF) (5 pp, 233K)

267

268

269 Monitoring Applicator Responsibility Must conduct visual monitoring to detect observable adverse incidents that may be related to the pesticide discharge All Operators If any post-application surveillance, must conduct visual monitoring to detect observable adverse incidents that may be related to the pesticide discharge EPA PGP 4.0 / CDPHE PGP 4.0

270

271 Adverse Incident Documentation and Reporting If an operator becomes aware of an adverse incident which may have resulted from your discharge, this triggers: notification and reporting, and as necessary, corrective action Notify EPA Regional contact/cdphe by telephone within 24 hours or as soon as possible of your discovery of the incident EPA PGP 6.4 / CDPHE PGP 6.4

272 Adverse Incident an unusual or unexpected incident that an Operator has observed upon inspection or of which the Operator otherwise become aware, in which: 1. There is evidence that a person or non-target organism has likely been exposed to a pesticide residue, and 2. The person or non-target organism suffered a toxic or adverse effect. Appendix A: Definitions, Abbreviations, and Acronyms

273 Adverse Incident The phrase toxic or adverse effects includes effects that occur within Waters of the U.S./state on non-target plants, fish or wildlife that are unusual or unexpected (e.g., effects are to organisms not otherwise described on the pesticide product label or otherwise not expected to be present) as a result of exposure to a pesticide residue, and may include: Distressed or dead juvenile and small fishes Washed up or floating fish Fish swimming abnormally or erratically Fish lying lethargically at water surface or in shallow water Fish that are listless or nonresponsive to disturbance Stunting, wilting, or desiccation of non-target submerged or emergent aquatic plants Other dead or visibly distressed non-target aquatic organisms (amphibians, turtles, invertebrates, etc.) Appendix A: Definitions, Abbreviations, and Acronyms

274 EPA Adverse Incident Template 30-day Adverse Incident Report Includes Operator name/telephone number/mailing address; date/location of adverse incident; description of the adverse incident identified including EPA registration number of product used and description of steps taken or will take to contain any adverse effects

275 Adverse Incident Report Template Where multiple Operators are authorized for a discharge that results in an adverse incident Reporting by any one of the Operators constitutes compliance for all of the Operators Provided a copy of this report is also provided to all of the other authorized Operators within 30 days of the reportable adverse incident

276 Web Resources Appendix H. Adverse Incident Template (PDF) (8 pp, 253K)

277

GENERAL NPDES PERMIT FOR PESTICIDE APPLICATION POINT SOURCE DISCHARGES. Leslie Lowry Illinois Environmental Protection Agency

GENERAL NPDES PERMIT FOR PESTICIDE APPLICATION POINT SOURCE DISCHARGES. Leslie Lowry Illinois Environmental Protection Agency GENERAL NPDES PERMIT FOR PESTICIDE APPLICATION POINT SOURCE DISCHARGES Leslie Lowry Illinois Environmental Protection Agency TOPICS TO BE DISCUSSED Background Scope Overview of General Permit Key Websites

More information

AZPDES ARIZONA PESTICIDE GENERAL PERMIT. SWVMA Annual Conference October 29, 2014

AZPDES ARIZONA PESTICIDE GENERAL PERMIT. SWVMA Annual Conference October 29, 2014 AZPDES ARIZONA PESTICIDE GENERAL PERMIT SWVMA Annual Conference October 29, 2014 CWA Clean Water Act Background The CWA establishes national permitting framework for the discharge of pollutants from point

More information

from Pesticide Applications

from Pesticide Applications Clean Water Act (CWA)- Permitting of Discharges from Pesticide Applications Speakers: Allison Wiedeman - Chief, Rural Branch, Water Permits Division, EPA Headquarters Jack Faulk - Project Team Leader Albuquerque,

More information

CDPS ANNUAL REPORT FOR DISCHARGES FROM THE APPLICATION OF PESTICIDES COG860000

CDPS ANNUAL REPORT FOR DISCHARGES FROM THE APPLICATION OF PESTICIDES COG860000 ANNUAL REPORT FOR DISCHARGES FROM THE APPLICATION OF PESTICIDES COG860000 PHOTO COPIES, FAXED COPIES, PDF COPIES, or EMAILED COPIES WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED NOTE: SUBMISSION OF THIS REPORT CONSTITUTES A RECORD

More information

Questions & Answers on New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection s Draft Pesticide General Permit

Questions & Answers on New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection s Draft Pesticide General Permit Questions & Answers on New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection s Draft Pesticide General Permit 1. What is the New Jersey Discharge Elimination System (NJPDES) Permit? The New Jersey Pollutant

More information

Minnesota Pollution Control Agency

Minnesota Pollution Control Agency STATE OF MINNESOTA Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Industrial Division National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) / State Disposal System (SDS) General Permit MNG87C000 Aquatic Nuisance

More information

Minnesota Pollution Control Agency

Minnesota Pollution Control Agency STATE OF MINNESOTA Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Industrial Division National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) / State Disposal System (SDS) General Permit MNG87B000 Forest Canopy Insect

More information

Appendix A Definitions, Abbreviations, and Acronyms

Appendix A Definitions, Abbreviations, and Acronyms A.1 Definitions Appendix A Definitions, Abbreviations, and Acronyms Action Threshold the point at which pest populations or environmental conditions necessitate that pest control action be taken based

More information

Louisiana Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (LPDES) Pesticide General Permit (PGP) LAG870000

Louisiana Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (LPDES) Pesticide General Permit (PGP) LAG870000 Louisiana Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (LPDES) Pesticide General Permit (PGP) LAG870000 Louisiana Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (LPDES) Pesticide General Permit (PGP) LAG 870000 Louisiana

More information

Statement of Leonard Felix. National Agricultural Aviation Association. Before the

Statement of Leonard Felix. National Agricultural Aviation Association. Before the Statement of Leonard Felix National Agricultural Aviation Association Before the House Committee on Small Business Subcommittee on Agriculture, Energy and Trade November 17, 2011 Adrift in New Regulatory

More information

CHAPTER 62-624 MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEMS

CHAPTER 62-624 MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEMS CHAPTER 62-624 MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEMS 62-624.100 Policy and Purpose. 62-624.200 Definitions. 62-624.300 General Provisions. 62-624.310 General Conditions, Individual Permits. 62-624.400

More information

February 16, 2011. Testimony of the Pesticide Policy Coalition

February 16, 2011. Testimony of the Pesticide Policy Coalition www.pesticidepolicy.org February 16, 2011 Testimony of the Pesticide Policy Coalition Submitted to United States House of Representatives Committee on Agriculture, Subcommittee on Nutrition and Horticulture

More information

NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION

NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION I. INTRODUCTION NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION SPDES GENERAL PERMIT FOR POINT SOURCE DISCHARGES TO SURFACE WATERS OF NEW YORK from PESTICIDE APPLICATIONS FACT SHEET In January

More information

Pest Management Area # of ##

Pest Management Area # of ## UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, DC 20460 ANNUAL REPORTING FORM FOR THE PESTICIDE GENERAL PERMIT (PGP) FOR DISCHARGES FROM THE APPLICATION OF PESTICIDES Form Approved OMB No. 2040-0284

More information

Section 401 Water Quality Certification

Section 401 Water Quality Certification Section 401 Water Quality Certification Department of Health Environmental Management Division Clean Water Branch Voice: (808) 586-4309 Fax: (808) 586-4352 http://www.hawaii.gov/health/environmental/water/cleanwater/index.html

More information

Ocean Dumping Act: A Summary of the Law

Ocean Dumping Act: A Summary of the Law Claudia Copeland Specialist in Resources and Environmental Policy December 15, 2010 Congressional Research Service CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress 7-5700 www.crs.gov

More information

Guide to agrichemical use in Resource Management Plans Northland Region as at October 2011

Guide to agrichemical use in Resource Management Plans Northland Region as at October 2011 Guide to agrichemical use in Resource Management Plans Northland Region as at October 2011 Northland Regional Air Quality Plan Note: This guide is intended to assist users and applicators understanding

More information

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS WATERS OF THE U.S. PROPOSAL

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS WATERS OF THE U.S. PROPOSAL QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS WATERS OF THE U.S. PROPOSAL Key Background Congress enacted the modern Clean Water Act in 1972 to address pollution entering the nation s waters to complement statutes such as the

More information

TESTIMONY OF DR. STEVEN BRADBURY DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

TESTIMONY OF DR. STEVEN BRADBURY DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY TESTIMONY OF DR. STEVEN BRADBURY DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF PESTICIDE PROGRAMS U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON NUTRITION AND HORTICULTURE OF THE AGRICULTURE COMMITTEE AND SUBCOMMITTEE

More information

New Waters of the United States Definition Released

New Waters of the United States Definition Released County Action Needed New Waters of the United States Definition Released Counties are strongly encouraged to submit written comments on potential impacts of the proposed regulation to the Federal Register

More information

Environmental Health & Safety

Environmental Health & Safety Environmental Health & Safety Title: Oil Spill Notification, Reporting, and Response Effective Date: 04/01/2008 Document #: PBS-007-001.JPB Revision Date: Rev. 0 I. Purpose of the Policy: To ensure Oil

More information

MASSACHUSETTS COASTAL NONPOINT PROGRAM NOAA/EPA DECISIONS ON CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL

MASSACHUSETTS COASTAL NONPOINT PROGRAM NOAA/EPA DECISIONS ON CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL MASSACHUSETTS COASTAL NONPOINT PROGRAM NOAA/EPA DECISIONS ON CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOREWORD This document contains the basis for NOAA and EPA s decision to fully approve Massachusetts Coastal Nonpoint

More information

Integrated Pest Management Policy for City-Owned Facilities

Integrated Pest Management Policy for City-Owned Facilities Page 1 of 6 ARTICLE XII Integrated Pest Management Policy for City-Owned Facilities Section 1 Background The City s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the California Regional

More information

Conservation Tax Credit Regulations Chapter 391-1-6 A-1 RULES OF GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES CHAPTER 391-1-6

Conservation Tax Credit Regulations Chapter 391-1-6 A-1 RULES OF GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES CHAPTER 391-1-6 Conservation Tax Credit Regulations Chapter 391-1-6 A-1 RULES OF GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES CHAPTER 391-1-6 GEORGIA CONSERVATION TAX CREDIT PROGRAM TABLE OF CONTENTS 391-1-6-.01 Purpose and

More information

SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT

SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT A. The Secretary may issue permits, after notice and opportunity for public hearings for the discharge of dredged or fill material into the navigable waters at specified

More information

PUBLIC NOTICE Application for Permit

PUBLIC NOTICE Application for Permit PUBLIC NOTICE Application for Permit 30-Day Notice Issue Date: June 20, 2016 Expiration Date: July 20, 2016 US Army Corps of Engineers No: NWP-2010-535 Oregon Department of State Lands No: 58311-RF Interested

More information

EPA and the Army Corps Proposed Rule to Define Waters of the United States

EPA and the Army Corps Proposed Rule to Define Waters of the United States EPA and the Army Corps Proposed Rule to Define Waters of the United States Claudia Copeland Specialist in Resources and Environmental Policy March 27, 2014 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov

More information

Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission Page 1 Chapter 216 - Water Quality Performance Standards For Urban Development

Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission Page 1 Chapter 216 - Water Quality Performance Standards For Urban Development Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission Page 1 SUBCHAPTER B : MUNICIPAL WATER POLLUTION CONTROL AND ABATEMENT 216.21-216.30 Effective March 9, 1999 216.21. Purpose and Policy. (a) The purpose of

More information

B. Reduce the use of broad spectrum pesticides when feasible. C. Create awareness among City staff of less-toxic pest management techniques.

B. Reduce the use of broad spectrum pesticides when feasible. C. Create awareness among City staff of less-toxic pest management techniques. City of Newark MAINTENANCE POLICY: INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT POLICY ORIGINAL DATE: January 11, 2010; revised May 24, 2012 PURPOSE: The purpose of the City of Newark s Integrated Pest Management (IPM)

More information

CHAPTER 61-28 CONTROL, PREVENTION, AND ABATEMENT OF POLLUTION OF SURFACE WATERS

CHAPTER 61-28 CONTROL, PREVENTION, AND ABATEMENT OF POLLUTION OF SURFACE WATERS CHAPTER 61-28 CONTROL, PREVENTION, AND ABATEMENT OF POLLUTION OF SURFACE WATERS 61-28-01. Statement of policy. It is hereby declared to be the policy of the state of North Dakota to act in the public interest

More information

CHAPTER 173 270 WAC PUGET SOUND HIGHWAY RUNOFF PROGRAM. Last Update: 5/21/91 WAC 173 270 010 Purpose, authority, and applicability.

CHAPTER 173 270 WAC PUGET SOUND HIGHWAY RUNOFF PROGRAM. Last Update: 5/21/91 WAC 173 270 010 Purpose, authority, and applicability. CHAPTER 173 270 WAC PUGET SOUND HIGHWAY RUNOFF PROGRAM WAC 173 270 010 Purpose, authority, and applicability. 173 270 020 Definitions. 173 270 030 Best management practices. 173 270 040 Vegetation management

More information

Environmental Compliance Questionnaire for National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Federal Financial Assistance Applicants

Environmental Compliance Questionnaire for National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Federal Financial Assistance Applicants OMB Approval No.: 0648-0538 Environmental Compliance Questionnaire for National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Federal Financial Assistance Applicants Instructions The National Environmental Policy

More information

TOWN OF WOODSIDE RESOLUTION ADOPTING AN UPDATED INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT POLICY

TOWN OF WOODSIDE RESOLUTION ADOPTING AN UPDATED INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT POLICY TOWN OF WOODSIDE Report to Town Council Agenda Item 3 Prepared by: Kevin Bryant, Assistant Town Manager September 27, 2011 Approved by: Susan George, Town Manager SUBJECT: RESOLUTION ADOPTING AN UPDATED

More information

Restoring Anadromous Fish Habitat in Big Canyon Creek Watershed. Summary Report 2002

Restoring Anadromous Fish Habitat in Big Canyon Creek Watershed. Summary Report 2002 Restoring Anadromous Fish Habitat in Big Canyon Creek Watershed Summary Report 2002 DOE/BP-00005268-5 November 2002 This Document should be cited as follows: "Restoring Anadromous Fish Habitat in Big Canyon

More information

https://orm.usace.army.mil/orm2/f?p=106:34:4198546103662037::no::

https://orm.usace.army.mil/orm2/f?p=106:34:4198546103662037::no:: Page 1 of 6 APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM U.S. Army Corps of Engineers JD Status: DRAFT SECTION I: BACKGROUND INFORMATION A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION

More information

SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER QUALITY PROTECTION AND RESTORATION PROGRAM AND LAND STEWARDSHIP INITIATIVES INFORMATION FOR APPLICANTS

SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER QUALITY PROTECTION AND RESTORATION PROGRAM AND LAND STEWARDSHIP INITIATIVES INFORMATION FOR APPLICANTS June 2015 SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER QUALITY PROTECTION AND RESTORATION PROGRAM AND LAND STEWARDSHIP INITIATIVES INFORMATION FOR APPLICANTS Steven Bellone, Suffolk County Executive Joanne Minieri, Deputy County

More information

Chapter 2 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for Park Operations

Chapter 2 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for Park Operations SWPPP for Park Operations 2 Chapter 2 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for Park Operations Bordered by Lake Washington & Lake Sammamish, the City of Bellevue has more than 60 miles of streams,

More information

REGULATORY GUIDANCE LETTER

REGULATORY GUIDANCE LETTER REGULATORY GUIDANCE LETTER. 07-02 Date: July 4, 2007 SUBJECT: Exemptions for Construction or Maintenance of Irrigation Ditches and Maintenance of Drainage Ditches Under Section 404 of Clean Water Act 1.

More information

Part B Integrated Monitoring Design for Comprehensive Assessment and Identification of Impaired Waters Contents

Part B Integrated Monitoring Design for Comprehensive Assessment and Identification of Impaired Waters Contents Part B Integrated Monitoring Design for Comprehensive Assessment and Identification of Impaired Waters Contents Chapter 10. Selecting Metrics or Indicators of WQS Attainment... 10-2 Chapter 11. Monitoring

More information

National Marine Sanctuaries Act

National Marine Sanctuaries Act Please note: This text is from the fourth edition of Federal Historic Preservation Laws, published in 2006 by the National Center for Cultural Resources, National Park Service, Department of the Interior.

More information

3. The submittal shall include a proposed scope of work to confirm the provided project description;

3. The submittal shall include a proposed scope of work to confirm the provided project description; QIN Shoreline Master Program Project Summary The Shoreline Master Program (SMP) development process for the Quinault Indian Nation (QIN) includes the completion of inventory and analysis report with corresponding

More information

American Forest Foundation (AFF) 2010-2015 Standards of Sustainability for Forest Certification

American Forest Foundation (AFF) 2010-2015 Standards of Sustainability for Forest Certification American Forest Foundation (AFF) 2010-2015 Standards of Sustainability for Forest Certification Standards Prologue The American Forest Foundation s (AFF) 2010-2015 Standards of Sustainability for Forest

More information

WQBELs Part II: Characterizing the Effluent and Receiving Water. David Hair Environmental Engineer US Environmental Protection Agency Washington, DC

WQBELs Part II: Characterizing the Effluent and Receiving Water. David Hair Environmental Engineer US Environmental Protection Agency Washington, DC WQBELs Part II: Characterizing the Effluent and Receiving Water NPDES Permit Writers Course Online Training Curriculum Presenters David Hair Environmental Engineer US Environmental Protection Agency Washington,

More information

State and Territory Coastal Management Program Managers

State and Territory Coastal Management Program Managers MEMORANDUM FOR: FROM: SUBJECT: State and Territory Coastal Management Program Managers Jeffrey R. Benoit Director Final Program Change Guidance Attached is the Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management

More information

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Case: 14-73353, 11/24/2015, ID: 9770038, DktEntry: 121-1, Page 1 of 12 ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE No. 14-73353 COUNCIL,

More information

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SIDEWALK WAIVER REQUEST STAFF REPORT Date: November 7, 2013

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SIDEWALK WAIVER REQUEST STAFF REPORT Date: November 7, 2013 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SIDEWALK WAIVER REQUEST STAFF REPORT Date: November 7, 2013 NAME LOCATION Audubon Properties, LLC. 4700 & 4960 Dauphin Island Parkway West side of Dauphin Island Parkway, 580

More information

Environmental Law Primer. Adapted from Vermont Law School s Environmental Law Primer for Journalists

Environmental Law Primer. Adapted from Vermont Law School s Environmental Law Primer for Journalists Environmental Law Primer Adapted from Vermont Law School s Environmental Law Primer for Journalists General Categories Command and Control Liability Disclosure Ecosystem and Place-based Programs Marketable

More information

STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN (SWMP)

STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN (SWMP) ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, SAFETY & RISK MANAGEMENT OFFICE STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN (SWMP) DEL MAR COLLEGE CO-PERMITEE (Previously TXS 000601) January 24, 2009 1.0 INTRODUCTION S TORM W ATER M ANAGEMENT

More information

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SECTION B, ELEMENT 4 WATER RESOURCES. April 20, 2010 EXHIBIT 1

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SECTION B, ELEMENT 4 WATER RESOURCES. April 20, 2010 EXHIBIT 1 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SECTION B, ELEMENT 4 WATER RESOURCES April 20, 2010 EXHIBIT 1 ELEMENT 4 WATER RESOURCES TABLE OF CONTENTS 4.1 INTRODUCTION 4.2 GOALS AND POLICIES 4.2.A General Goals and Policies 1 4.2.B

More information

Environmental Protection Programs Applicable to Modern Agriculture

Environmental Protection Programs Applicable to Modern Agriculture Environmental Protection Programs Applicable to Modern Agriculture Prepared by: Anthony D. Kanagy Legal Research Assistant The Agricultural Law Research and Education Center September 1, 1999 The purpose

More information

Remaining Wetland Acreage 1,500,000 915,960 584,040-39%

Remaining Wetland Acreage 1,500,000 915,960 584,040-39% NEW JERSEY Original Wetland Acreage Remaining Wetland Acreage Acreage Lost % Lost 1,500,000 915,960 584,040-39% New Jersey Wetlands: Nearly 99 percent of New Jersey s wetlands are palustrine or estuarine.

More information

PHASE 1: Pest Management Plan Development

PHASE 1: Pest Management Plan Development B.C. Integrated Pest Management Regulations for Forestry, Noxious Weed and Industrial Vegetation Managers Summary of Requirements and Explanatory Notes PHASE 1: Pest Management Plan Development Ministry

More information

Pamela Birak, Jordan Lake State Park, Chatham County, NC

Pamela Birak, Jordan Lake State Park, Chatham County, NC Pamela Birak, Jordan Lake State Park, Chatham County, NC 3 Lakes, Reservoirs, and Ponds Forty-six states, Puerto Rico, and the District of Columbia (collectively referred to as states in the rest of this

More information

AGENCY: Federal Crop Insurance Corporation, USDA. SUMMARY: The Federal Crop Insurance Corporation (FCIC) amends the Common

AGENCY: Federal Crop Insurance Corporation, USDA. SUMMARY: The Federal Crop Insurance Corporation (FCIC) amends the Common This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 06/22/2016 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2016-14735, and on FDsys.gov DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Federal Crop

More information

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT MEDFORD DISTRICT GRANTS PASS FIELD OFFICE 2164 NE Spalding Ave Grants Pass, OR 97526

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT MEDFORD DISTRICT GRANTS PASS FIELD OFFICE 2164 NE Spalding Ave Grants Pass, OR 97526 A. Background U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT MEDFORD DISTRICT GRANTS PASS FIELD OFFICE 2164 NE Spalding Ave Grants Pass, OR 97526 Categorical Exclusion Determination and Decision

More information

ON-SITE WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS ACT

ON-SITE WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS ACT ON-SITE WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS ACT Revised and reproduced by the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment June, 2012 (PLEASE NOTE: This is an unofficial copy of this statute. The official

More information

Clean Water Services. Ecosystems Services Case Study: Tualatin River, Washington

Clean Water Services. Ecosystems Services Case Study: Tualatin River, Washington Viewed broadly, the concept of ecosystem services describes the many resources and services provided by nature. Typically, traditional planning and development practices do not adequately represent the

More information

How To Plan A Buffer Zone

How To Plan A Buffer Zone Backyard Buffers Protecting Habitat and Water Quality What is a buffer? A buffer (also called a riparian buffer area or zone) is the strip of natural vegetation along the bank of a stream, lake or other

More information

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of. Kansas; Infrastructure SIP Requirements for the 2008 Ozone

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of. Kansas; Infrastructure SIP Requirements for the 2008 Ozone This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 08/27/2015 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2015-20892, and on FDsys.gov 6560-50-P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

More information

CDPHE. The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, the State agency responsible for hazardous waste site compliance and oversight.

CDPHE. The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, the State agency responsible for hazardous waste site compliance and oversight. Glossary This section presents definitions of terms in this report. Baseline. The condition of a natural resource that would have existed but for the release of hazardous substances. Baseline conditions

More information

GROWER ADVISORY Agriculture Regulations of the Wetlands Protection Act

GROWER ADVISORY Agriculture Regulations of the Wetlands Protection Act Cape Cod Cranberry Growers Association GROWER ADVISORY Agriculture Regulations of the Wetlands Protection Act Cranberry Bogs and the Agricultural Exemption The Massachusetts Wetlands Protection Act (WPA)

More information

Water Quality Certification and Licenses in Virginia - A General Opinions Overview

Water Quality Certification and Licenses in Virginia - A General Opinions Overview Official Attorney General Opinions On Matters Related To Wetlands And Dunes Issues Attorney General Opinions CONTENTS May 25, 1978 June 20, 1979 February 9, 1981 May 25, 1982 September 1, 1982 September

More information

Nutrient Management Plan Implementation Workshop

Nutrient Management Plan Implementation Workshop Nutrient Management Plan Implementation Workshop Sam Sampath CAFO Permitting Coordinator, WPD, EPA, Region 4 October 19-20, 2010 Hilton Garden Inn, Atlanta 1 Highlights of 2008 CAFO Final Rule Revises

More information

ORGANIC. PEST MANAGEMENT POLICY for. Turf and Landscape

ORGANIC. PEST MANAGEMENT POLICY for. Turf and Landscape WAYNE 0. ATTRIDGE, D TOWN OF MARBLEHEAD Board of Health 7 WIDGER ROAD CARL D. GOODMAN, Esq., Ch MARBLEHEAD, MA 01945 DAVID B. BECKER, D.M.D., (781-631-0212) HELAINE R. HA ORGANIC PEST MANAGEMENT POLICY

More information

Wildlife Habitat Conservation and Management Program

Wildlife Habitat Conservation and Management Program Wildlife Habitat Conservation and Management Program Manual for Counties and Cities Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife 2015 Table of Contents 1. Introduction Purpose of the habitat program Objective

More information

Carlton Fields Memorandum

Carlton Fields Memorandum Carlton Fields Memorandum TO: FROM: RE: DAN WEEDE FRED RUSHING RIPARIAN BUFFER DATE: JULY 26, 2013 BACKGROUND Both the state of Georgia and the city of Atlanta 1 have certain guidelines that must be followed

More information

ARTICLE 11. STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY

ARTICLE 11. STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ARTICLE 11. STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY Rule 1. Environmental Assessment; Activities of State Agencies 327 IAC 11-1-1 The environmental assessment (Repealed) Sec. 1. (Repealed by Water Pollution Control

More information

AGRICULTURAL PESTS ACT

AGRICULTURAL PESTS ACT Province of Alberta AGRICULTURAL PESTS ACT Revised Statutes of Alberta 2000 Current as of November 1, 2014 Office Consolidation Published by Alberta Queen s Printer Alberta Queen s Printer 7 th Floor,

More information

CHAPTER 8: FEDERAL & ARIZONA AGRICULTURAL LAWS

CHAPTER 8: FEDERAL & ARIZONA AGRICULTURAL LAWS CHAPTER 8: FEDERAL & ARIZONA AGRICULTURAL LAWS This is a part of publication az1149: Arizona Agricultural Pesticide Applicator Training Manual, 2000, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, The University

More information

NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (NEPA) Council on Environmental Quality Executive Office of the President

NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (NEPA) Council on Environmental Quality Executive Office of the President NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (NEPA) Council on Environmental Quality Executive Office of the President TITLE: PART 1500 -- PURPOSE, POLICY, AND MANDATE Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 7609) and E.O. 11514,

More information

Environmental Protection Agency

Environmental Protection Agency Vol. 79 Monday, No. 76 April 21, 2014 Part II Department of Defense Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers 33 CFR Part 328 Environmental Protection Agency 40 CFR Parts 110, 112, 116, et al. Definition

More information

ORDINANCE NO. -03 CITY OF BETTENDORF STORM WATER ORDINANCE

ORDINANCE NO. -03 CITY OF BETTENDORF STORM WATER ORDINANCE ORDINANCE NO. -03 CITY OF BETTENDORF STORM WATER ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE PROHIBITING POLLUTION, DISCHARGE INTO THE STORM WATER COLLECTION FACILITIES WITHIN THE CITY, AND PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR THE VIOLATION

More information

Water Quality Trading Internal Management Directive [Early DRAFT for policy forum discussion]

Water Quality Trading Internal Management Directive [Early DRAFT for policy forum discussion] Water Quality Trading in NPDES Permits Water Quality Trading Internal Management Directive [Early DRAFT for policy forum discussion] July 14, 2015 Water Quality Division 700 NE Multnomah St. Portland,

More information

Attorney General of the State of New York. Consumer Frauds and Protection Bureau. Environmental Protection Bureau. 1996.

Attorney General of the State of New York. Consumer Frauds and Protection Bureau. Environmental Protection Bureau. 1996. Attorney General of the State of New York. Consumer Frauds and Protection Bureau. Environmental Protection Bureau. 1996. In the matter of Monsanto Company, respondent. Assurance of discontinuance pursuant

More information

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY Environmental Assessment

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY Environmental Assessment DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY Environmental Assessment Water Protection Bureau Name of Project: Applicant: Ueland Land Development LLC Type of Project: Proposed discharge of treated domestic wastewater

More information

How To Decide If A Dam Removal Is Safe For Water Quality

How To Decide If A Dam Removal Is Safe For Water Quality Report Issue Paper: Water Quality Certification Procedures for Klamath River Restoration Project By: Steve Kirk and Debra Sturdevant March 2012 Last Updated: 3/14/12 DEQ 11-WQ-047 This report prepared

More information

CHAPTER 372-68 WAC WATER POLLUTION CONTROL AND ABATEMENT PLANS FOR SEWAGE DRAINAGE BASINS

CHAPTER 372-68 WAC WATER POLLUTION CONTROL AND ABATEMENT PLANS FOR SEWAGE DRAINAGE BASINS CHAPTER 372-68 WAC WATER POLLUTION CONTROL AND ABATEMENT PLANS FOR SEWAGE DRAINAGE BASINS Last Update: 6/8/88 WAC 372-68-010 Authority. 372-68-020 Purpose. 372-68-030 Definitions. 372-68-040 Planning guide.

More information

8.4 L FUNGICIDE NET CONTENTS: Contains Iprodione For Control of Diseases in Canola WARNING: SKIN AND EYE IRRITANT

8.4 L FUNGICIDE NET CONTENTS: Contains Iprodione For Control of Diseases in Canola WARNING: SKIN AND EYE IRRITANT FUNGICIDE NET CONTENTS: 8.4 L Contains Iprodione For Control of Diseases in Canola AGRICULTURAL GUARANTEE: Iprodione........ 240 g/l Contains 1,2-benzisothiazolin-3-one at 0.014% as a preservative REGISTRATION

More information

Section 4 General Strategies and Tools

Section 4 General Strategies and Tools Section 4 General Strategies and Tools Key planning issues for WRIA 35 have been identified in Sections 5 and 6 in the areas of water supply, instream flow, water quality, and aquatic habitat. General

More information

Tier 1 General Permit for the Discharge of Storm Water Associated with Industrial Activity. Table of Contents

Tier 1 General Permit for the Discharge of Storm Water Associated with Industrial Activity. Table of Contents Page 2 of 25 Tier 1 General Permit for the Discharge of Storm Water Associated with Industrial Activity Table of Contents Page 1. Application Requirements 3 2. Permit Applicability Criteria 4 3. Storm

More information

STATEMENT OF JOSEPH G. PIZARCHIK, DIRECTOR OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING RECLAMATION AND ENFORCEMENT U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BEFORE THE

STATEMENT OF JOSEPH G. PIZARCHIK, DIRECTOR OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING RECLAMATION AND ENFORCEMENT U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BEFORE THE STATEMENT OF JOSEPH G. PIZARCHIK, DIRECTOR OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING RECLAMATION AND ENFORCEMENT U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON ENVIRONMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS U.S. SENATE ON THE IMPLICATIONS

More information

UNITED STATE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENICY\ REGIONS

UNITED STATE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENICY\ REGIONS UNITED STATE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENICY\ REGIONS IN THE MATTER OF: DMI Martin County Farms, LLC, Carmel, Indiana. Respondent ) ) ) Docket No.: CWA-05-2016 0011 ) ) ) ) Consent Agreement and Final

More information

Economic Analysis of Proposed Revised Definition of Waters of the United States

Economic Analysis of Proposed Revised Definition of Waters of the United States Economic Analysis of Proposed Revised Definition of Waters of the United States March 2014 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency primary author U.S. Army Corps of Engineers contributing author US EPA assembled

More information

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION BUREAU OF WATER SUPPLY MANAGEMENT. Principles for Ground Water Pollution Prevention and Remediation

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION BUREAU OF WATER SUPPLY MANAGEMENT. Principles for Ground Water Pollution Prevention and Remediation DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION BUREAU OF WATER SUPPLY MANAGEMENT DOCUMENT NUMBER: 383-0800-001 EFFECTIVE DATE: December 1, 1996 TITLE: AUTHORITY: POLICY: Principles for Ground Water Pollution Prevention

More information

National Environmental Policy Act/ Clean Water Act Section 404 (NEPA/404) Merger Process and Agreement for Transportation Projects in Colorado

National Environmental Policy Act/ Clean Water Act Section 404 (NEPA/404) Merger Process and Agreement for Transportation Projects in Colorado Background In a May 12, 2003, letter from Mr. James L. Connaughton, Executive Office of the President, Council on Environmental Quality, to Mr. Norman Y. Minneta, Secretary of Transportation, Mr. Connaughton

More information

RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS. THIS DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS is made this day of, 20, by RECITALS

RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS. THIS DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS is made this day of, 20, by RECITALS STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS THIS DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS is made this day of, 20, by, ("Declarant"), A New York corporation with offices at,, New York.

More information

ALBUQUERQUE BERNALILLO COUNTY WATER UTILITY AUTHORITY WATER WASTE ORDINANCE

ALBUQUERQUE BERNALILLO COUNTY WATER UTILITY AUTHORITY WATER WASTE ORDINANCE 4-1-1 SHORT TITLE... 1 4-1-2 INTENT... 1 4-1-3 DEFINITIONS... 1 4-1-4 WATERING RESTRICTIONS... 4 4-1-5 WATER WASTE... 5 4-1-6 SPECIAL PERMITS... 6 4-1-7 VARIANCES, EXEMPTIONS AND APPEALS... 7 4-1-8 FEES;

More information

How To Get A Stormwater Discharge Permit In A City Of Scottsdale

How To Get A Stormwater Discharge Permit In A City Of Scottsdale Environmental Regulations Guide Section 4 Pollution Prevention 4. 0 Pollution Prevention The Pollution Prevention Act (PPA) focuses on source reduction, i.e. on reducing the amount of pollution through

More information

Chubb Group of Insurance Companies 15 Mountain View Road, Warren, NJ 07059

Chubb Group of Insurance Companies 15 Mountain View Road, Warren, NJ 07059 Chubb Group of Insurance Companies 15 Mountain View Road, Warren, NJ 07059 COUNTRY CLUB POLLUTION LIABILITY APPLICATION FOR DESIGNATED SITES. NOTE: PLEASE COMPLETE AN APPLICATION FOR EACH SITE TO BE INSURED

More information

CPL Grant Program Insurance Requirements

CPL Grant Program Insurance Requirements CPL Grant Program Insurance Requirements Grantees are required to carry insurance that meets or exceeds the requirements of the landowner whose land they will be working on. Insurance requirements for

More information

Application Form 2E. Facilities Which Do Not Discharge Process Wastewater

Application Form 2E. Facilities Which Do Not Discharge Process Wastewater United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water Enforcement and Permits Washington, DC 20460 EPA Form 3510-2E Revised August 1990 Permits Division Application Form 2E Facilities Which Do

More information

Chapter 3 SENSITIVE AREAS AND VEGETATED CORRIDORS

Chapter 3 SENSITIVE AREAS AND VEGETATED CORRIDORS Chapter 3 3.01 General Provisions 3.01.1 Introduction 3.01.2 Application and Interpretation of Chapter 3.01.3 Unbuildable Lots 3.01.4 Other Permits 3.01.5 Prohibited Activities 3.02 Service Provider Letter

More information

State Water Resources Control Board

State Water Resources Control Board Alan C. Lloyd Ph D. Secretary for Environmental Protection State Water Resources Control Board Division of Water Quality 1001 I Street Sacramento, California 95814 (916) 341-5538 Mailing Address: P.O.

More information

INFORMATION SHEET ORDER NO. R5-2011-XXXX TRIANGLE ROCK PRODUCTS, INC. FLORIN ROAD AGGREGATE PLANT SACRAMENTO COUNTY

INFORMATION SHEET ORDER NO. R5-2011-XXXX TRIANGLE ROCK PRODUCTS, INC. FLORIN ROAD AGGREGATE PLANT SACRAMENTO COUNTY ORDER NO. R5-2011-XXXX INFORMATION SHEET Background Triangle Rock, Inc. (Discharger) submitted a Report of Waste Discharge (RWD) on 23 August 2010. The Discharger is expanding the mining operations at

More information

Source Water Protection Practices Bulletin Managing Sanitary Sewer Overflows and Combined Sewer Overflows to Prevent Contamination of Drinking Water

Source Water Protection Practices Bulletin Managing Sanitary Sewer Overflows and Combined Sewer Overflows to Prevent Contamination of Drinking Water United States Office of Water EPA 916-F-01-032 Environmental Protection (4606) July 2001 Agency Source Water Protection Practices Bulletin Managing Sanitary Sewer Overflows and Combined Sewer Overflows

More information

Best Management Practices for Integrated Mosquito Management. American Mosquito Control Association

Best Management Practices for Integrated Mosquito Management. American Mosquito Control Association Best Management Practices for Integrated Mosquito Management American Mosquito Control Association December 2, 2009 OVERVIEW OF INTEGRATED MOSQUITO MANAGEMENT Integrated Pest Management (IPM) was first

More information

COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STORMWATER FIELD INSPECTION REPORT - ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION

COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STORMWATER FIELD INSPECTION REPORT - ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STORMWATER FIELD INSPECTION REPORT - ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION (1) Project Name: (2) Project Contractor: (3) Erosion Control Supervisor/SWMP Administrator: (4) CDOT Project

More information

State of Florida. Department of Environmental Protection. Generic Permit. For. Stormwater Discharge from Large and Small Construction Activities

State of Florida. Department of Environmental Protection. Generic Permit. For. Stormwater Discharge from Large and Small Construction Activities State of Florida Department of Environmental Protection Generic Permit For Stormwater Discharge from Large and Small Construction Activities February 2009 This permit is issued under the provisions of

More information

MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT AMONG THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES AND THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT AMONG THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES AND THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT AMONG THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES AND THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, WILMINGTON

More information

REFERENCE. All National Grid personnel who plan and perform work involving protected water resources are responsible for:

REFERENCE. All National Grid personnel who plan and perform work involving protected water resources are responsible for: EG-30NY ENVIRONMENTAL GUIDANCE PAGE 1 of 9 DATE 10/1/10 EP 3 Natural Resource Protection 1.0 SCOPE AND RESPONSIBILITIES National Grid s New York service territory encompasses thousands of wetlands, lakes,

More information