COVERED The Quarterly Newsletter for Policyholders and Brokers
|
|
- Edith Gallagher
- 7 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Winter 2015 From the Partners Desk: Everyone at Theall Group wishes you the very best for this coming year. And we have good news to share! Based on the Abuzour decision, there is now a way for judgment creditors to recover claims for economic loss directly from an errors and omissions insurance policy. Previously, the Ontario Court of appeal had held that only claims for injury to the person or property of another were recoverable directly from a defendant s insurer under the Insurance Act. In Abuzour, the court found an alternative, allowing the claimant to garnish the amounts under the insurance policy. In Acciona, for the first time in Canada, a court was asked to interpret the LEG 2/96 exclusion wording found in many course of construction policies. Under this exclusion, the costs that would have remedied or rectified the damage before it occurred were excluded, but the court found there was coverage for the significant costs to rectify the damage itself. - Larry Theall Finally a Solution! Proceeds Payable Under LawPro E&O Policy Are A Debt Subject To Garnishment By Judgement Creditors by James Norton Ever since the oft-criticized Perry decision, LawPro has hidden behind s.132 of the Insurance Act to avoid paying judgment creditors. Judgment creditors could only access insurance proceeds available to the judgment debtor in those cases where their claim was for injury or damage to the person or property of another i.e. not for economic losses. In a case that appears to be of first instance, judgment creditors were successful using garnishment to obtain indemnity under a LawPro errors and omissions policy that had insured their lawyers. The court rejected the insurer s position that insurance proceeds payable were not a debt subject to garnishment and the plaintiffs recovered their economic losses effectively circumventing s.132. Read the complete article on page 2. B.C. Supreme Court Finds Workmanship/Design Exclusion Does Not Exclude Costs To Remedy Damage Caused By Defective Workmanship by Camille Dunbar The British Columbia Supreme Court recently released its decision in Acciona Infrastructure Canada Inc. v. Allianz Global Risks US Insurance Company, which considered, for the first time in Canada, the LEG 2/96 clause, a workmanship/design exclusion clause. The Court also re-affirmed a number of insurance interpretation principles, particularly in relation to Course of Construction policies (sometimes referred to as Builders risk policies), including the definition of damage to insured property and whether a loss must be fortuitous in order to trigger coverage. Read the complete article on page 5. 1
2 Finally a Solution! Proceeds Payable Under LawPro E&O Policy Are A Debt Subject To Garnishment By Judgement Creditors by James Norton Ever since the oft-criticized Perry decision, 1 LawPro has hidden behind s.132 of the Insurance Act to avoid paying judgment creditors. Judgment creditors could only access insurance proceeds available to the judgment debtor in those cases where their claim was for injury or damage to the person or property of another i.e. not for economic losses. In a case that appears to be of first instance, judgment creditors were successful using garnishment to obtain indemnity under a LawPro errors and omissions policy that had insured their lawyers. 2 The court rejected the insurer s position that insurance proceeds payable were not a debt subject to garnishment and the plaintiffs recovered their economic losses effectively circumventing s.132. Originally, the plaintiffs were successful plaintiffs in an oppression remedy action. Settlement of that action in April, 2013 included payment to their lawyer s trust account of cash and bank drafts totalling over $3.6 million. The lawyer, through his professional corporation (hereinafter PC ), refused to release the settlement funds in accordance with the settlement, alleging concerns over the validity of the bank drafts. This forced the plaintiffs to bring motions to obtain, over the following 8 months, what turned out to be several court orders, including a contempt order, to compel PC to release the funds. These orders were ultimately useless to the plaintiffs because the lawyer left the country, trust money in hand. The plaintiffs, left with court orders against the lawyer and PC turned to LawPro for indemnification. LawPro is the insurance company that provides professional liability insurance to lawyers practicing in Ontario. The LawPro policy for 2013 contains the following coverage grant: A. Damages To pay on behalf of the INSURED all sums which the INSURED shall become legally obligated to pay as DAMAGES arising out of a CLAIM, provided the liability of the INSURED is the result of an error, omission or negligent act in the performance of or the failure to perform PROFESSIONAL SERVICES for others. It is also mandatory for Ontario lawyers to carry innocent party coverage, the purpose of which is to protect members of the public against fraudulent acts of lawyers. In this case, PC had $1 million of coverage for fraud during the relevant policy period. The $1 million limit was inclusive of investigative and defence costs. In other words, the policy limit was diminished any costs and expenses incurred in respect of defence and/or investigation of the claim reduced the amount available under the policy. The plaintiffs served LawPro with a notice of garnishment in excess of $3.6 million based on the court orders previously obtained. By way of LawPro s responding garnishee s statement, LawPro opposed the attempt to garnishee the policy on 1 Perry v. General Security Insurance Co. of Canada 1984 CarswellOnt 671, [1984] I.L.R O.R. (2d) 472, 4 O.A.C. 209, 7 C.C.L.I Abuzour v. Heydary 2014 CarswellOnt 15476, 2014 ONSC 6229 Continued on page
3 Continued from page 2: Finally a Solution! two grounds: (1) that the obligations under the policy were not a debt subject to garnishment under the Rules of Civil Procedure [specifically Rule 60.08] and (2) that LawPro had investigative and defence obligations to other individual lawyers associated with PC, the discharge of which may reduce are exhaust the policy limit in the future. Rule of the Rules of Civil Procedure provides that a creditor under an order for the payment or recovery of money may enforce it by garnishment of debts payable to the death or by other persons. LawPro argued that the LawPro policy obliged it to pay on behalf of the insured all sums which the insured became legally obligated to pay to a third-party as a result of a claim. In other words, as it had no obligation to pay anything to PC, there was no debt and, therefore, garnishment could not apply. In support of this position, LawPro relied upon a decision of the Ontario Superior Court ( Austin ) 3 where the judge was dealing with possible garnishment of a fire loss policy. Under the fire policy, the insured had an election to repair or replace or to receive a cash value payment. The court reasoned that if the insured elected to receive the cash value, this could be a debt and subject to garnishment but that if the insured decided to repair or replace the damaged dwelling, the insurer would then pay the costs of such directly to a contractor. Based on a contextual interpretation of the terms of the policy, the court concluded that in this latter case, the garnishee would not be in violation of the notice of garnishment if the proceeds of insurance were paid to third-party contractors instead of being paid to the Sheriff. Ultimately, the Ontario court determined that the Austin decision did not support the position advocated by LawPro as the commentary relied upon by LawPro was obiter. As there appeared to be no Canadian legal authority directly on point, the court turned to American decisions. Based on US case law, the court determined that the failure of a liability insurer to pay a judgment rendered against the insured upon a claim within the coverage of the policy constituted a breach of a condition of the contract and, by reason thereof, the insurer became indebted to the insured. In the context of garnishment, US courts have held that when a liability policy is involved and the insured has become legally liable to a third-party for claim covered by the policy, a debt arises from the insurer to the insured. Consequently, if the insurer does not pay the third-party, the insured, as promise under the policy, has a cause of action against the insurer and that cause of action of the insured is an asset of the insured, which can be taken for his debt by garnishment. In one particular case, the court permitted garnishment even though the language in the indemnity policy did not require the insurer to indemnify the insured for sums that the insured pays to third persons; instead, the wording of the liability policy was virtually identical to the LawPro policy coverage grant to pay on behalf of the insured all sums which the insured shall become legally obligated to pay. Taking into account the important factor that the 2013 policy was mandatory insurance, the court reasoned that it should not promote form over substance and thereby thwart public policy objectives behind mandatory insurance. The judge was clearly influenced by the fact that all lawyers in Ontario must have innocent party insurance precisely to protect the public against the type of fraud that was the subject of this garnishment. Courts should avoid interpretations that could render 3 Austin Powder Ltd. v. Howard 2003 CarswellOnt 2964, [2003] O.J. No. 3090, 124 A.C.W.S. (3d) 693 Continued on page
4 THEALLGROUP LLP Continued from page 3: Finally a Solution! mandatory insurance illusory and worthless. In the end result, the court concluded that the LawPro obligation to indemnify the lawyer and PC constituted a debt subject to garnishment under rule As to the second ground, LawPro attempted to characterize its obligations as competing duties to both indemnify and defend and that its duty to defend was a duty to provide a service which could not fall within the meaning of the term debt for the purposes of garnishment. It argued that the law did not permit the 2013 policy to be garnished in circumstances where the limits might be exhausted through the fulfillment of LawPro s obligation to defend possible claims against other lawyers in the future. The court categorically rejected this position holding that there was a clear indemnity obligation which had crystallized and was due and payable. It reasoned that to accede to LawPro s position, would be to impose an unwarranted restriction on the plaintiff s direct rights, essentially constituting an unwarranted rewriting of the insureds rights and LawPro s obligations under the policy. LawPro s potential defence obligations to possible future defendants did not take precedence over its indemnity obligations arising out of the court orders which the plaintiffs had obtained. The plaintiffs were successful garnishing the policy. 4
5 B.C. Supreme Court Finds Workmanship/Design Exclusion Does Not Exclude Costs To Remedy Damage Caused By Defective Workmanship by Camille Dunbar The British Columbia Supreme Court recently released its decision in Acciona Infrastructure Canada Inc. v. Allianz Global Risks US Insurance Company, 1 which considered for the first time in Canada the LEG 2/96 clause, a workmanship/design exclusion clause. The Court also re-affirmed a number of insurance interpretation principles, particularly in relation to Course of Construction (COC) policies, including the definition of damage to insured property and whether a loss must be fortuitous in order to trigger coverage. The plaintiffs were the design/build contractors for a $250 million public-private partnership (P3) project, which involved constructing a new hospital in Victoria, British Columbia. The project called for an eight-storey concrete structure, consisting of suspended concrete slab floors. During construction, the concrete slabs over-deflected, resulting in a concave recession in the centre of the slab. Although testing showed that the over-deflected slabs met the necessary safety requirements, the slabs were unfit to meet the serviceability standards of a large hospital that required level floors for wheeled equipment. The Court accepted the plaintiffs expert evidence that the cause of the over-deflection was improper formwork and shoring procedures that failed to account for the unusually thin design of the slabs. Extensive remedial work was required to correct the deflection. The plaintiffs sought recovery of the remedial costs incurred from the defendant insurers under a COC policy (the Policy ). The Policy s insuring agreement provided coverage for all risks of direct physical loss of or damage to the property insured, subject to Policy exclusions. In denying coverage, the insurers made the following arguments: 1) the over-deflection of the slabs were defects, and therefore did not constitute damage within the insuring agreement; 2) the loss was not fortuitous; and 3) the defects in material workmanship or design exclusion ( LEG 2/96 ) excluded all losses under the Policy. The Court noted that a COC policy is intended to provide the owner of a construction project with the promise that the contractors will have the funds to rebuild in case of loss, and to the contractors, the protection against the crippling cost of starting afresh in such an event, the whole without resort to litigation in case of negligence by anyone connected with the construction, a risk accepted by the insurers at the outset. It is in this context that the Court embarked upon its analysis. The Court held that the over-deflection (as well as surface cracking and stretching of the rebar) constituted damage under the Policy. The Court noted that while some degree of deflection and cracking is expected, the slabs experienced significant degrees of deflection throughout the facility, resulting in permanent deformity which rendered the slabs unfit for its intended purpose. The slabs were left in an altered physical state, which courts have held to be the touchstone for a finding of damage. As to the requirement of fortuity, the court stated that fortuity is inherent in the Policy as the risk undertaken by the insurer is intended to insure against possible, unintended consequences. What is required to trigger coverage is that the damage is both unexpected and unintended from the standpoint of the insured. The Court found that the over-deflection and cracking were unintended and unexpected, as the slabs were not designed to deflect to such a degree as to render them unfit for their intended use. Therefore, the fortuity requirement was met BCSC 1568 (CanLII) [Acciona]. Continued on page
6 THEALLGROUP LLP Continued from page 5: Supreme Court Finds Workmanship/Design Exclusion Does Not Exclude Costs To... The Court then considered what it noted to be the central coverage issue: whether the loss was excluded under the LEG 2/96 workmanship/design exclusion. The wording of the exclusion is as follows: This Policy does not insure: (b) all costs rendered necessary by defects of material workmanship, design, plan, or specification, and should damage occur to any portion of the Insured Property containing any of the said defects the cost of replacement or rectification which is hereby excluded is that cost which would have been incurred if replacement or rectification of the Insured Property had been put in hand immediately prior to the said damage. For the purpose of this policy and not merely this exclusion it is understood and agreed that any portion of the Insured Property shall not be regarded as damaged solely by virtue of the existence of any defect of material workmanship, design, plan or specification. The Court held that, as worded, the exclusion was not limited to defective design of the work or facility as a whole. Rather, it included any defects of material workmanship, design, plan, or specification, which would include defective design of component pieces of the work, including the formwork and shoring/reshoring. The failure to account for the particular design was, the Court found, a defect in workmanship within the meaning of the exclusion. However, the Court noted that, when read as a whole, what is excluded under the LEG 2/96 clause are only those costs that would have remedied or rectified the defect immediately before any consequential or resulting damage occurred. The damage in this case was the cracking and over-deflection of the slabs. The defect in material workmanship was the improper formwork and shoring/reshoring procedures adopted that resulted in the damage to the slabs. Therefore, the LEG 2/96 clause excluded only those costs that would have remedied or rectified the defect before the cracking and over deflections occurred (i.e. the costs of implementing proper formwork and shoring/reshoring procedures or incorporating additional camber into the formwork), which would have been minimal. Ultimately, the plaintiffs were awarded over $8 million for their costs incurred in remedy the concrete slabs. This decision provides a welcome and thorough review of the general principles of insurance policy interpretation, and for the first time, a Canadian interpretation of the LEG 2/96 workmanship/design exclusion. The Court in Acciona was clear: where insurers have language available to them that will remove an ambiguity from the meaning of an exclusion clause or will clearly specify the scope of an exclusion, they should incorporate such language. Otherwise, the normal principles of interpretation will apply, including the principle that coverage provisions will be interpreted broadly and exclusion clauses narrowly. The decision also provides helpful clarity on the definition of damage under a COC policy and the requirement of fortuity to trigger coverage. The Exchange Tower, P.O. Box King St. West, Suite 2120 Toronto, Ontario, M5X 1C8 Tel Fax
Fault Exclusions in Course of Construction Policies: Ledcor and Acciona Infrastructure
Fault Exclusions in Course of Construction Policies: Ledcor and Acciona Infrastructure Rory Barnable and Anthony H. Gatensby 1, McCague Borlack LLP Course of construction policies ( COC ), also known as
More informationA&E Briefings. Indemnification Clauses: Uninsurable Contractual Liability. Structuring risk management solutions
A&E Briefings Structuring risk management solutions Spring 2012 Indemnification Clauses: Uninsurable Contractual Liability J. Kent Holland, J.D. ConstructionRisk, LLC Professional consultants are judged
More informationCase Comment: Hardie v Kamloops Towne Lodge Ltd 2014 BCSC 955
BC Court upholds denial of coverage under CGL policy for the cost to dispose of the insured s defective product In this Issue Case Comment: Tien Lung Takewon-Do Club v Lloyd s Underwriters 2014 ABQB 146
More informationRISK MANAGEMENT IN CONTRACTS
RISK MANAGEMENT IN CONTRACTS There are many circumstances in which an Institution will contract with another party including service contracts, sales agreements, leases, practicum placement and affiliation
More informationACCIDENT BENEFIT CONTINGENCY FEE RETAINER AGREEMENT
ACCIDENT BENEFIT CONTINGENCY FEE RETAINER AGREEMENT This contingency fee retainer agreement is B E T W E E N : Bogoroch & Associates LLP Sun Life Financial Tower 150 King Street West, Suite 1707 Toronto,
More informationSamantha Ip Clark Wilson LLP tel. 604.643.3172 ssi@cwilson.com D/RJR/682791.1
by Samantha Ip Clark Wilson LLP tel. 604.643.3172 ssi@cwilson.com D/RJR/682791.1 TABLE OF CONTENTS A. INTRODUCTION...1 B. GENERAL INFORMATION ON THE TYPES OF LIABILITY INSURANCE...1 1. GENERAL LIABILITY
More informationIndemnity Coverage under a CGL Policy after Progressive Homes
Indemnity Coverage under a CGL Policy after Progressive Homes By Thomas G. Heintzman, O.C., Q.C. 2012 CBA National Construction Law Conference: September 28-29, St. John s Newfoundland 2 Progressive Homes
More informationConstruction Defect Coverage Recap For 1st Quarter
Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com Construction Defect Coverage Recap For 1st Quarter
More informationRE: 1562860 ONTARIO LTD. c.o.b. as SHOELESS JOE S Plaintiff v. INSURANCE PORTFOLIO INC. and CHRISTOPHER CONIGLIO. Defendants v.
COURT FILE NO.: 4022A/07 (Milton) DATE: 20090401 SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE - ONTARIO RE: 1562860 ONTARIO LTD. c.o.b. as SHOELESS JOE S Plaintiff v. INSURANCE PORTFOLIO INC. and CHRISTOPHER CONIGLIO Defendants
More informationCase Name: Trainor v. Barker
Page 1 Case Name: Trainor v. Barker Between Patricia Trainor, David Bruce Trainor, Carl Phillip Trainor and Deanna Rachael Trainor by her litigation guardian Patricia Trainor, Plaintiffs, and Aaron Gary
More informationDefending Against Negligent Inspections Claims: Best Practices to Reduce Costly Actions
Defending Against Negligent Inspections Claims: Best Practices to Reduce Costly Actions Andrew J. Heal, LL.M. 416.583.5901 aheal@healandco.com Larry Ptashynski Manager of Inspections City of Vaughan 905.832.8511
More informationAXA Insurance v. Ani-Wall Concrete Forming Coverage for Faulty Concrete
AXA Insurance v. Ani-Wall Concrete Forming Coverage for Faulty Concrete Thomas J. Donnelly THOMAS GOLD PETTINGILL LLP MARCH 2009 AXA Insurance v. Ani-Wall Concrete Forming Coverage for Faulty Concrete
More informationNOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND HEARING
NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND HEARING This Notice summarizes your rights under the proposed settlement of a class action lawsuit as described below. You are eligible to receive a portion
More informationInformation, Statistics and Tips from the Lawyers Insurance Fund
FAMILY LAW BASICS 2014 UPDATE PAPER 10.1 Information, Statistics and Tips from the Lawyers Insurance Fund These materials were prepared by Edna M. Ritchie of the Lawyers Insurance Fund, Law Society of
More informationIndemnification Clauses, Part 1* Discussion from a/e ProNet's Risk Management and Contract Guide. J. Kent Holland, Jr., Esq.
Indemnification Clauses, Part 1* Discussion from a/e ProNet's Risk Management and Contract Guide J. Kent Holland, Jr., Esq. Issue: Indemnification provisions in contracts may require the design professional
More informationInsuring Against Loss at the Construction Site
Insuring Against Loss at the Construction Site A. Introduction The typical construction project, if there is such a beast, presents insurable risks of two kinds. There is the risk of damage to property
More informationIn an ever changing business and social environment it has become increasingly
DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS INSURANCE ISSUES By: National Business Institute June 20, 2008 Howard L. Lieber FISHER KANARIS, P.C. 200 South Wacker Drive 22nd Floor Chicago, Illinois 60606 312/474-1400 In an
More informationInsurance and Post Project Dispute Resolution
CONSTRUCTION LAW 2014 PAPER 4.1 Insurance and Post Project Dispute Resolution These materials were prepared by Craig A. Wallace, P.Eng., and Matthew Stainsby, both of Shapiro Hankinson & Knutson Law Corporation,
More informationAlliance Insurance Company of Zimbabwe (Private) Limited
Alliance Insurance Company of Zimbabwe (Private) Limited MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL INDEMNITY POLICY WHEREAS the Insured, as defined herein, has made to Insurers a written proposal or risk profile bearing the
More informationCALIFORNIA FALSE CLAIMS ACT GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 12650-12656
CALIFORNIA FALSE CLAIMS ACT GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 12650-12656 12650. (a) This article shall be known and may be cited as the False Claims Act. (b) For purposes of this article: (1) "Claim" includes any
More informationTelstra Corporation Limited ABN 33 051 775 556 Standard Terms and Conditions of Purchase Order
Telstra Corporation Limited ABN 33 051 775 556 Standard Terms and Conditions of Purchase Order APPLICATION These Terms and Conditions apply to the Purchase Order unless the Purchase Order refers to a formal
More informationWorkplace Related Injuries
Workplace Related Injuries A Discussion of the Relevant Provisions of New York State Labor Law By: WARREN S. KOSTER, ESQ. CALLAN, REGENSTREICH, KOSTER & BRADY ONE WHITEHALL STREET NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10004
More informationPCL Constructors Canada Inc. v. Encon Group
Page 1 PCL Constructors Canada Inc. v. Encon Group PCL Constructors Canada Inc. (Applicant) and The Encon Group, Encon Insurance Managers Inc., Temple Insurance Company (Respondents) Ontario Superior Court
More informationUnderstanding How Termination and Severance Pay will be Offset Against Disability Benefits**
August 2013 Labour & Employment Law Section Understanding How Termination and Severance Pay will be Offset Against Disability Benefits** Hugh R. Scher and Caroline Schulz The relationship between disability
More informationCONTINGENCY FEE RETAINER AGREEMENT. This contingency fee retainer agreement is. Tel: 905 850 2642 Fax: 905 850 8544 Toll Free: 1-866-850 2642.
CONTINGENCY FEE RETAINER AGREEMENT This contingency fee retainer agreement is B E T W E E N : POTESTIO LAW FIRM 401 Bay Street, Suite 1400 Toronto ON M5H 2Y4 Tel: 905 850 2642 Fax: 905 850 8544 Toll Free:
More informationA. For the consideration agreed below to be paid to Contractor by City, Contractor shall provide
STATE OF TEXAS CONTRACT FOR SERVICES COUNTY OF DALLAS THIS CONTRACT is made and entered into by and between the CITY OF DALLAS, a Texas municipal corporation, located in Dallas County, Texas (hereinafter
More informationB.C. LAWYERS COMPULSORY PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER: LPL 00-01-01
B.C. LAWYERS COMPULSORY PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER: LPL 00-01-01 INSURER: THE LSBC CAPTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. (the Company ) Administrative Offices, 6th Floor, 845 Cambie Street
More informationINDIAN HARBOR INSURANCE COMPANY (herein called the Company)
INDIAN HARBOR INSURANCE COMPANY (herein called the Company) This is a claims made Policy with defense expenses included. Please read and review the Policy carefully. INSURANCE AGENTS AND BROKERS ERRORS
More informationIndemnity Agreements & California s Crawford Decision: Its Implications and Strategies for Defense
Indemnity Agreements & California s Crawford Decision: Its Implications and Strategies for Defense Prepared for the Construction Law Section Meeting at the 2011 Annual Meeting of the Federation of Defense
More informationBasis Clauses. A practical guide to basis clauses in insurance contracts Guide 2013
Basis Clauses A practical guide to basis clauses in insurance contracts Guide 2013 Contents Contents... 3 1. Executive Summary... 4 2. Introduction to basis clauses... 5 3. Identifying basis clauses proposal
More informationClient Alert. Powerine II Significant Insurance Coverage Implications for Administrative Cleanup Costs. Insurance Recovery. Environmental Litigation
Powerine II Significant Insurance Coverage Implications for Administrative Cleanup Costs by Stewart S. Harrison Insurance Recovery Environmental Litigation In welcome news to umbrella policyholders, the
More informationBUILDING CONTRACT MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT AND CONDITIONS OF CONTRACT
BUILDING CONTRACT MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT AND CONDITIONS OF CONTRACT MADE and entered into by and between: (hereinafter referred to as the OWNER); and (hereinafter referred to as the BUILDER) WHEREAS the
More informationWHEN A HOME WARRANTY PROVIDER
WHEN A HOME WARRANTY PROVIDER SUES ITS MEMBER-BUILDER, IS THE CLAIM COVERED BY THE BUILDER S CGL POLICY? Brian D. Rhodes and Shelley M. Armstrong May 2014 1 CONTACT LAWYER Brian D. Rhodes 604-891-0363
More informationEXTENDED WARRANTY POLICY WORDING
EXTENDED WARRANTY POLICY WORDING Underwritten by Guardrisk Insurance Company Limited, an Authorized Financial Services Provider, FSP license number 75. Tracker Agility (Pty) Limited is an Authorized Financial
More informationG U E S T E S S A Y S
Comparing and Maximizing Performance Bond and Commercial General Liability Protections Frank L. Pohl, Esq. and James C. Washburn, Esq. Often when acting as the prime on a construction project, the design
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA THE LSBC CAPTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY PLAINTIFF NOTICE OF CIVIL CLAIM
Form 1 (Rule 3-1(1)) No. Vancouver Registry IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA BETWEEN AND THE LSBC CAPTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT NOTICE OF CIVIL CLAIM This action has been started
More informationStrata Corporations and the new Limitation Act By Shawn M. Smith Cleveland Doan LLP
Strata Corporations and the new Limitation Act By Shawn M. Smith Cleveland Doan LLP The application of limitation periods has generally not been given much consideration in the strata community. That is
More informationRecent changes to the Home Building Act, 1989 and Home Warranty Insurance
Recent changes to the Home Building Act, 1989 and Home Warranty Insurance David Andrews and Colin Grace Grace Lawyers Pty Ltd a legislative scheme intended to provide significant rights to consumers in
More informationIntroduction to Directors and Offi cers Liability Insurance
CHAPTER 1 Martin J. O Leary Introduction to Directors and Offi cers Liability Insurance The following is a brief, general overview of coverage afforded under the Directors and Officers Liability Insurance
More informationWork Injury Compensation Insurance (Contract)
Work Injury Compensation Insurance (Contract) Policy Wordings Please read this insurance Policy carefully to ensure that you understand the terms and conditions and that this Policy meets your requirements.
More information7.4.1 Be required to make exhaustive or continuous on-site reviews;
SUPPLEMENTARY CONDITIONS TO THE CANADIAN STANDARD FORM OF CONTRACT FOR ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES DOCUMENT SIX 2006 EDITION RAIC 6 2006 FRASER HEALTH PROJECTS The following Supplementary Conditions are specific
More informationMASSACHUSETTS CUSTOMIZED PRACTICE COVERAGE TITLE INSURANCE AGENT LIABILITY COVERAGE UNIT
(hereinafter called "the Company") MASSACHUSETTS CUSTOMIZED PRACTICE COVERAGE TITLE INSURANCE AGENT LIABILITY COVERAGE UNIT In consideration of the payment of the premium, in reliance upon the statements
More informationWork Injury Compensation Insurance (Annual)
Work Injury Compensation Insurance (Annual) Policy Wordings Please read this insurance Policy carefully to ensure that you understand the terms and conditions and that this Policy meets your requirements.
More informationBill 34 The New Limitation Act: Significant Changes and Transition Issues Explained
Bill 34 The New Limitation Act: Significant Changes and Transition Issues Explained A Presentation for CLE Employment Law Conference 2013 Pan Pacific Hotel Vancouver, BC May 9, 2013 Carman J. Overholt,
More informationPRO-DEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY
PRO-DEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY IMPORTANT: This Fund has a MAXIMUM AMOUNT PAYABLE. Supplementary payment and damages are paid as incurred until the Fund is exhausted. No further payments will be made on
More informationWhat You Should Know About General Agreements of Indemnity and Why You Should Know It
What You Should Know About General Agreements of Indemnity and Why You Should Know It Summary When a contractor (for purposes of this discussion, contractor includes subcontractor) first seeks surety credit,
More informationWhat are the main liability policies you should consider for your commercial business?
A PUBLICATION BY: GODFREY MORROW GODFREY INSURANCE MORROW AND INSURANCE FINANCIAL AND SERVICES FINANCIAL LTD. SERVICES LTD. 2012 What are the main liability policies you should consider for your commercial
More informationUnited States Workers Compensation/Indemnification Overview
United States Workers Compensation/Indemnification Overview January 18, 2012 Jill Kirila jill.kirila@squiresanders.com Kevin Hess kevin.hess@squiresanders.com 36 Offices in 17 Countries Workers Compensation
More informationHedging Risk: Construction Bonds, Insurance and Indemnities
Panel Discussion: Andrew J. Heal, LL.M. Brendan Bowles Hedging Risk: Construction Bonds, Insurance and Indemnities Construction Law Primer Andrew J. Heal aheal@healandco.com 416.583.5901 Heal & Co. LLP
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL TRIAL DIVISION
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL TRIAL DIVISION JOHN FRAZIER HUNT, : DECEMBER TERM, 2004 Plaintiff, : No. 2742 v. : (Commerce Program) NATIONAL
More informationMedical Liability Insurance Related Problems and Damages in Medical Malpractice Lawsuits Stephen Ballantine
Medical Liability Insurance Related Problems and Damages in Medical Malpractice Lawsuits Stephen Ballantine 3 rd Arab Conference on Medical Liability Workshop 12 November 2014 1 INTRODUCTION 1. Objectives
More informationTHIS AGREEMENT is made the day of 20. THE LAW AID TRUST of 205 William Street, Melbourne, Victoria (hereinafter called
1 THIS AGREEMENT is made the day of 20 B E T W E E N: THE LAW AID TRUST of 205 William Street, Melbourne, Victoria (hereinafter called Law Aid ) AND [NAME OF SOLICITOR FIRM] of [STREET ADDRESS OF FIRM]
More informationNewsletter No. 194 (EN) Directors and Officers (D&O) Liability Insurance in Hong Kong
Newsletter No. 194 (EN) Directors and Officers (D&O) Liability Insurance in Hong Kong December 2015 All r ig ht s r e ser ved Lo r e nz & P art ner s 2015 Although Lorenz & Partners always pays great attention
More information2014 IL App (1st) 123454-U No. 1-12-3454 February 11, 2014 Modified Upon Rehearing April 30, 2014 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST DISTRICT
2014 IL App (1st) 123454-U No. 1-12-3454 February 11, 2014 Modified Upon Rehearing April 30, 2014 THIRD DIVISION NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING THIS NOTICE MAY AFFECT YOUR RIGHTS PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY
SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING MYSPINE, PS, a Washington professional services corporation; BODY RECOVERY CLINIC LLC, a Washington Limited Liability Company; and YAROSLAV KUTSY, Plaintiffs,
More informationContract Guide Course for Design Professionals: Part II
Contract Guide Course for Design Professionals: Part II Presented by: J. Kent Holland, J.D. ConstructionRisk, LLC Kent@ConstructionRisk.com 703-623-1932 1 AIA Registered Course This program is registered
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS 444444444444 NO. 11-0425 444444444444 PETROLEUM SOLUTIONS, INC., PETITIONER, v. BILL HEAD D/B/A BILL HEAD ENTERPRISES AND TITEFLEX CORPORATION, RESPONDENTS 4444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444
More informationErrors and Omissions Insurance. 1.0 Introduction and Definition
Errors and Omissions Insurance 1.0 Introduction and Definition 1.1 Under the terms of this policy the word employee means any trustee of the Board of Education, any employee of the Hicksville Board of
More informationPRACTICE GUIDELINES MEMORANDUM. RE: Sample Bankruptcy Motions and Orders for Personal Injury Practitioners and Trustees
PRACTICE GUIDELINES MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Attorneys Practicing Before Me And Other Interested Persons C. Timothy Corcoran, III United States Bankruptcy Judge DATE: January 3, 2000 1 RE: Sample Bankruptcy
More informationSANTAM UMBRELLA LIABILITY
SANTAM UMBRELLA LIABILITY DEFINED EVENTS 1. Damages, costs, fees and expenses which the insured shall become legally liable to pay consequent upon Injury, Damage, Malice or Negligent Advice which occur
More informationNEW MEXICO SELF-INSURERS' FUND WORKERS' COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY PLAN
NEW MEXICO SELF-INSURERS' FUND WORKERS' COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY PLAN In return for the payment of the premium and subject to all terms of this Policy, we agree with you as follows. GENERAL
More informationPROFESSIONAL INDEMNITY INSURANCE SCHEME 1JULY 2011 TO 30 JUNE 2012
PROFESSIONAL INDEMNITY INSURANCE SCHEME 1JULY 2011 TO 30 JUNE 2012 PROFESSIONAL INDEMNITY INSURANCE In consideration of the Attorneys Fidelity Fund, for and on behalf of every insured (as defined in this
More informationTwo Texas Cases That You Need To Know When You Settle Lawsuits Or Claims
Two Texas Cases That You Need To Know When You Settle Lawsuits Or Claims Lauren Pierce Cooper & Scully, P.C. 900 Jackson Street, Suite 100 Dallas, Texas 75202 Tel: 214-712-9539 Email: lauren.pierce@cooperscully.com
More informationBefore : Mr Justice Morgan - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Between :
Neutral Citation Number: [2014] EWHC 3848 (Ch) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CHANCERY DIVISION 1 Case No: HC12A02388 Royal Courts of Justice, Rolls Building Fetter Lane, London, EC4A 1NL Date: Tuesday,
More informationThe Expert Navigators in Maritime, Transportation and Insurance Law
The Expert Navigators in Maritime, Transportation and Insurance Law Isaacs & Co. is one of Canada's leading full-service maritime, transportation and insurance law firms and concentrates on all areas of
More informationTerms and Conditions of Sale
Broadberry Data Systems Limited ("The Company") Terms and Conditions of Sale 1. General a) Unless otherwise expressly agreed in writing by a Director (or authorised executive) of the Company all goods
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Citation: Merlo v. Canada (Attorney General), 2013 BCSC 1136 Date: 20130625 Docket: S122255 Registry: Vancouver Between: Brought under the Class Proceedings Act,
More informationSOLICITORS EXCESS PROFESSIONAL INDEMNITY INSURANCE POLICY
SOLICITORS EXCESS PROFESSIONAL INDEMNITY INSURANCE POLICY DECLARATIONS Policy Number: Chubb Insurance Company of Europe SE (herein called the Company ) Item 1. Policyholder: Address Item 2. Limit of Liability:
More informationNavigating the Statute of Limitations in Texas
Navigating the Statute of Limitations in Texas Wesley G. Johnson Cooper & Scully, P.C. 900 Jackson Street, Suite 100 Dallas, TX 75202 Telephone: 214-712 712-9500 Telecopy: 214-712 712-9540 Email: Wes.Johnson@CooperScully.com
More informationCLASSIC A-SIDE MANAGEMENT LIABILITY INSURANCE COVERAGE FORM
CLASSIC A-SIDE MANAGEMENT LIABILITY INSURANCE COVERAGE FORM THIS IS A CLAIMS MADE POLICY WITH DEFENSE EXPENSES INCLUDED IN THE LIMIT OF LIABILITY. PLEASE READ AND REVIEW THE POLICY CAREFULLY. In consideration
More informationSubmit a Valid Claim Form Deadline: February 12, 2016 Ask to be excluded Deadline: November 24, 2015. Object Deadline: November 24, 2015
NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT California Superior Court, County of Los Angeles IF FIRE INSURANCE EXCHANGE APPLIED DEPRECIATION WHEN CALCULATING A PAYMENT MADE TO YOU ON A PROPERTY LOSS INSURANCE CLAIM,
More informationRULE 90 GARNISHMENTS AND SEQUESTRATION. (c) A "garnishee" is the person summoned as garnishee in the writ of garnishment or
RULE 90 GARNISHMENTS AND SEQUESTRATION 90.01 DEFINITIONS In this Rule 90: (a) A "garnishor" is a judgment creditor; (b) A "debtor" is a judgment debtor; (c) A "garnishee" is the person summoned as garnishee
More informationReinsurance. Piercing The Veil Of Reinsurance: Reinsurance Cut Throughs In Insurance Carrier Insolvencies MEALEY S LITIGATION REPORT
MEALEY S LITIGATION REPORT Reinsurance Piercing The Veil Of Reinsurance: Reinsurance Cut Throughs In Insurance Carrier Insolvencies by Joseph C. Monahan, Esq. Saul Ewing LLP Philadelphia, PA A commentary
More informationFIRE ON THE ICE: RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN THE LAW OF NEGLIGENCE REGARDING CAUSATION
Aaron L. Sherriff FIRE ON THE ICE: RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN THE LAW OF NEGLIGENCE REGARDING CAUSATION 2 Aaron L. Sherriff TABLE OF CONTENTS I. THE CGL POLICY... 3 II. NEGLIGENCE... 3 III. MR. HANKE... 4
More informationHow To Defend An Employee Against An Employee In A Construction Accident
Risk-Shifting Agreements In Construction Contracts: Why Insurance May Not Work The Way It Used To David S. White The newer additional-insured clause might leave the owner and subcontractor without the
More informationConstruction Bonds. Vanessa S. Werden 604.408.2033 vsw@shk.ca
Construction Bonds Vanessa S. Werden 604.408.2033 vsw@shk.ca What is a bond? A bond is a special form of contract whereby one party guarantees the performance by another party of certain obligations. A
More informationTEMPLE LITIGATION ADVANTAGE INSURANCE FOR DISBURSEMENTS AND OPPONENT S COSTS Certificate of Insurance
TEMPLE LITIGATION ADVANTAGE INSURANCE FOR DISBURSEMENTS AND OPPONENT S COSTS Certificate of Insurance In return for the payment of the Premium specified in the Schedule and based on any Information that
More informationBLENHEIM ATTORNEYS AT AMSTERDAM
WESTERDOKSDIJK 40, 1013 AE AMSTERDAM POSTBOX 10302, 1001 EH AMSTERDAM TELEPHONE: + 31 (0) 20 5210 100 FACSIMILE: + 31 (0) 20 5210 101 http://www.blenheim.nl :mail@blenheim.nl The information provided by
More informationHP0868, LD 1187, item 1, 123rd Maine State Legislature An Act To Recoup Health Care Funds through the Maine False Claims Act
PLEASE NOTE: Legislative Information cannot perform research, provide legal advice, or interpret Maine law. For legal assistance, please contact a qualified attorney. Be it enacted by the People of the
More informationContracting with Suppliers A Balanced Approach to Indemnities and Limitations of Liability!!"#$%&'(&)*+,"-&
Contracting with Suppliers A Balanced Approach to Indemnities and Limitations of Liability!!"#$%&'(&)*+,"-& "#$%!&'!&())! Co-presented by the Association of Corporate Counsel Ontario Chapter and WeirFoulds
More informationTHE ADDITIONAL INSURED: DEFENCE, INDEMNITY AND HOLD HARMLESS THE DEAFENING SILENCE
THE ADDITIONAL INSURED: DEFENCE, INDEMNITY AND HOLD HARMLESS THE DEAFENING SILENCE THE BIFURCATION The Agreement: indemnity, hold harmless and policy of insurance. COVERAGE UNDER AN ADDITIONAL INSURED
More informationSMALL CLAIMS DIVISION INFORMATION
SMALL CLAIMS DIVISION INFORMATION PARTIES The individual or corporation who initiates an action is known as the plaintiff. The individual or corporation against whom an action is brought is known as the
More informationReal Estate Errors & Omissions Indemnity Plan
B R I T I S H C O L U M B I A Real Estate Errors & Omissions Indemnity Plan No. RE0398 Issued by Real Estate Errors and Omissions Insurance Corporation (Herein called the Corporation ) Pursuant to the
More informationState v. Continental Insurance Company
Public Land and Resources Law Review Volume 0 Fall 2012 Case Summaries State v. Continental Insurance Company John M. Newman john.newman@umontana.edu Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.umt.edu/plrlr
More informationConstruction Conference
m a c d o n a l d d e v i n. c o m Construction Conference September 21, 2007 The Economic Loss Rule as a Design Professional s Defense to Owner/Contractor Claims Presented by Greg Ziegler Macdonald Devin,
More informationMotor Legal Expenses Insurance
Motor Legal Expenses Insurance Motor Legal Expenses Insurance Policy Document Certificate of Insurance This insurance is underwritten by Inter Partner Assistance SA and managed on their behalf by Arc Legal
More informationLIABILITY INSURANCE: RESERVATION OF RIGHTS, INTERVENTION, AND DECLARATORY JUDGMENTS
LIABILITY INSURANCE: RESERVATION OF RIGHTS, INTERVENTION, AND DECLARATORY JUDGMENTS Liability insurance policies describe two duties on the part of a liability insurer: the duty to defend a suit against
More informationProvince of Alberta LIMITATIONS ACT. Revised Statutes of Alberta 2000 Chapter L-12. Current as of December 17, 2014. Office Consolidation
Province of Alberta LIMITATIONS ACT Revised Statutes of Alberta 2000 Current as of December 17, 2014 Office Consolidation Published by Alberta Queen s Printer Alberta Queen s Printer 5 th Floor, Park Plaza
More informationAre you covered? Coverage issues for construction professionals Part 2
Professional Risks - Construction Part 2 June 2015 Are you covered? Coverage issues for construction professionals Part 2 In this two part guide we will be looking at issues that frequently arise when
More informationTITLE 2 - RULES OF PROCEDURE CHAPTER 2-2 CIVIL ACTIONS, LIMITATIONS AND LIABILITY CIVIL ACTIONS
TITLE 2 - RULES OF PROCEDURE CHAPTER 2-2 2-2-1 Availability of Civil Actions CIVIL ACTIONS (a) Civil actions are those causes, within the jurisdiction of the Tribal Court, originating in: (1) Tribal law,
More informationInsurance Journal. Defending Until the End When Does the Duty to. Volume 1, Issue 3 Editor Keoni Norgren. May 1, 2013
Insurance Journal May 1, 2013 In this Issue Volume 1, Issue 3 Editor Keoni Norgren Defending Until the End When Does the Duty to Defend End? Cyber Liability Laws in Canada Dolden Wallace Folick Welcomes
More informationPolicy of Insurance under the HBCF (Home Building Compensation Fund)
Policy of Insurance under the HBCF (Home Building Compensation Fund) How to read the policy (i) The policy covers you for the types of loss, and for the amounts of loss, described in clause 1. (ii) Clause
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS NO. 13-1006 IN RE ESSEX INSURANCE COMPANY, RELATOR ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS PER CURIAM Rafael Zuniga sued San Diego Tortilla (SDT) for personal injuries and then added
More informationGreen Design & Construction: How to Manage the Risks
Green Design & Construction: How to Manage the Risks www.redvectorenterprise.com A RedVector Enterprise White Paper Green Design & Construction: How to Manage the Risks By: J. Kent Holland, Jr. Introduction
More informationrequiring the insurers of the firm ceasing practice to continue insuring that firm for a prescribed period, or
The Succeeding Practice Rule The professional indemnity insurance regulations are designed to prevent situations whereby a client s valid claims are not covered by any professional indemnity insurance
More informationCase Comment: Stroszyn v. Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance. Dolden Wallace Folick goes viral on December 1, 2013
Insurance Journal November 12, 2013 Volume 1, Issue 6 Editor Keoni Norgren Damages in Secondary Market Class Actions An Insurer Friendly Decision from the Ontario Bench In this Issue Case Comment: Stroszyn
More informationNPSA GENERAL PROVISIONS
NPSA GENERAL PROVISIONS 1. Independent Contractor. A. It is understood and agreed that CONTRACTOR (including CONTRACTOR s employees) is an independent contractor and that no relationship of employer-employee
More informationTariff and billing handbook. 6. Costs and contributions
Tariff and billing handbook 6. Costs and contributions Legal Aid Ontario Title: Tariff and Billing /Handbook Author: Lawyer Services & Payments Last updated: November 2012 Table of Contents 1. Introduction...1
More informationNotice of Proposed Class Action Settlement and Fairness Hearing
Notice of Proposed Class Action Settlement and Fairness Hearing Minor, et al. v. Congoleum Corporation United States District Court District Of New Jersey Case No.: 3:13-cv-07727-PGS-LHG This is a Notice
More informationErect Safe Scaffolding (Australia) Pty Limited v Sutton (6 June 2008)
Erect Safe Scaffolding (Australia) Pty Limited v Sutton (6 June 2008) Introduction: Claims for accidents on building sites usually involve multiple parties. There are often contracts between the parties
More information