1 Writing a Psychology Literature Review There are two main approaches to a literature review in psychology. One approach is to choose an area of research, read all the relevant studies, and organize them in a meaningful way. An example of an organizing theme is a conflict or controversy in the area, where you might first discuss the studies that support one side, then discuss the studies that support the other side. Another approach is to choose an organizing theme or a point that you want to make, then select your studies accordingly. Regardless of how you decide to organize your literature review, it will have two purposes: (1) to thoroughly describe work done on a specific area of research and (2) to evaluate this work. Both the descriptive and evaluative elements are important parts of the review. You can't do one or the other. If you just describe past research without evaluating it, you are merely summarizing information without digesting it. If you just discuss recent theories in an area without describing the work done to test those theories, then your arguments lack supporting empirical evidence. What to Evaluate Authors of literature reviews evaluate a body of literature by identifying relations, contradictions, gaps, and inconsistencies in the literature and by suggesting the next step needed to solve the research problem (APA Manual 2010, p. 10). A literature review may compare studies in terms of assumptions about the research question, experimental method, data analysis, and any conclusions drawn. Literature Reviews versus Research Articles Literature reviews survey research done in a particular area. Although they also evaluate methods and results, their main emphasis is on knitting together theories and results from a number of studies to describe the "big picture" of a field of research. Research articles, on the other hand, are empirical articles, specifically describing one or a few related studies. Research articles tend to focus on methods and results to document how a particular hypothesis was tested. The Introduction of a research article is like a condensed literature review that gives the rationale for the study that has been conducted. Published literature reviews are called review articles. The emphasis in review articles is on interpretation. By surveying all of the key studies done in a certain research area, a review article interprets how each line of research supports or fails to support a theory. Review articles are valuable, not only because they cite all the important research in the area surveyed, but also because they compare and evaluate all the key theories in a particular area of research. Again, notice the companion goals of a literature review: to describe and to evaluate. Steps in Developing a Literature Review Most literature reviews by students present the highlights of a research area and are not truly exhaustive. There is no strict rule, but a short literature review generally requires about 7-12 research articles and is about pages long. There are three main steps: (1) select a research topic, (2) collect and read the relevant articles, and (3) write the review article. This straightforward-sounding process in fact requires quite a bit of work. Suitable topics must be selected with care and discrimination. Finding the right articles can be a challenge. Finally, once you have selected your articles, you must read them and understand their implications before you can begin to write. Each step is discussed in more detail below.
2 SELECTING A TOPIC AND COLLECTING ARTICLES Selecting a topic, not writing the paper, is the hardest part of writing a competent literature review. Some research topics are much easier to write about than others. A fruitful topic covers a well-defined and well-studied area of research, and selecting such a topic will make your job much easier and the resulting paper much more satisfying to read as well as to write. Start early to select your topic and collect articles (not necessarily in that order). Don't underestimate the time and effort required before you can start writing. Plan to budget at least half of your time choosing and researching your topic, and the other half writing about it. Choose a Current, Well-studied, Specific Topic Choose a topic of current interest. Your goal is to summarize and evaluate current findings of a line of research. Pick a research topic about which articles are continuing to be published. Avoid defunct or little-known areas of research. To find out what's "hot", browse through recent issues of APA journals, particularly Psychological Bulletin, which consists entirely of review articles. And don't forget that the topic should be personally interesting, not just of current interest in the scientific community. Choose a well-researched area. An area that is well defined and well studied will give you more lines of research to choose from. A line of research is a series of studies by the same individual or laboratory. A line of research may be initiated by a professor working with a graduate student (e.g., Carter & Chen, 1988). Later studies may be conducted primarily by the graduate student (e.g., Chen & Carter, 1990), followed by studies done by the graduate-studentturned-professor and her or his students (Chen, Mulino, & Young, 1994). An area of major research interest will have several lines of research as different labs approach a theory in different ways. Narrow your topic. The topic in a short review article has to be very narrow. A broad topic such as hypnosis, telepathy, or dreaming has literally thousands of articles on it, and you won't be able to adequately cover such a topic in a relatively short paper. It is far more satisfying, to both the writer and the reader, to restrict your topic and cover it in depth. Comprehensiveness and narrowness of topic go hand in hand. DON T: Pick a broad topic (e.g., language production in early childhood) and present an article on different aspects of it (e.g., one on syntax, one on semantics, one on individual differences), because your coverage of each area will be too superficial. DO: Choose a narrower topic (e.g., production of passive constructions in English-speaking children ages 4-6 years) and explore in depth recent work done in this specific area. Unless you're already familiar with a research area, you usually cannot preselect a narrow enough topic. Go to the library or start an online literature search with a general topic in mind, then scan the articles that you find within that subject area to identify lines of research. Write about what interests you. Contrary to popular opinion, instructors like students to write about topics that they care about. If you're interested in the topic, you're likely to already know something about it, which will make it easier to gather information. As a result, you'll write a paper that is more fun to write and probably more fun to read, too. Library Research Do a preliminary search. Visit the library or do an online literature search before you even decide on a topic. You may find several promising topics simply by looking for well-defined lines of research. The right topic may not be the one that sounds most intriguing at first. You will not know enough about potential topics to decide on one until you see what research is available. Look for well-defined research areas, then identify lines of research within those areas.
3 Initially, consider several topics. Don't get too attached to one topic before you see what research has been done. Search for helpful articles. Some articles will contribute more than others to your understanding of a topic. Sometimes you can find a pivotal article that can serve as a foundation for your paper. No one characteristic identifies a pivotal article. It may be exceptionally well written, contain particularly valuable citations, or clarify relationships between different but related lines of research. Try to find at least one article that you find really helpful before finalizing your topic. Two good sources of such articles in psychology are: Psychological Bulletin, mentioned above Current Directions in Psychological Science, published by the American Psychological Society, which has very general, short articles written by people who have published a lot in specific areas. Older review articles (written five or ten years ago) that you can update in your own review may help you to understand the history of a research area. To follow up on an older review article, use online searches to find out: whether authors of articles cited in an early review article have continued to do research in the area (e.g., PsycInfo) what recent studies have cited the authors from in the early review (e.g., Social Sciences Citation Index, or SSCI). Find readable articles. Some areas of research will be harder to understand than others. Scan the research articles in the topic areas you are considering to decide on the readability of research in those areas. Identify accessible articles. Avoid choosing a line of research in which all the articles have been published in journals found only in distant libraries ("distant" could mean Berkeley, Tacoma, or Health Sciences, depending on your mobility and transportation). NEVER assume that you can get articles through Inter-library Loan in time for a quarterly research project. Online research. Skillful use of online databases, such as PsycInfo, SSCI, or Medline, to narrow your search. Online search tools are rapidly changing. Consult your instructor or reference librarian if you're not sure how to conduct an online search. READING THE ARTICLES Reading research articles is different from other types of reading. It tends to be slow and sometimes frustrating if you are not familiar with the topic and the language of the field. A good understanding of the research literature is a necessary prerequisite for writing a competent review article yourself. Understanding the literature requires you to read, re-read, and mentally digest complex ideas. How to Proceed Read the easier articles first. Difficult, condensed, or poorly written articles will be easier to understand if you read them last. Scan the article. Identify (1) the research question, (2) specific hypotheses, (3) the findings, and (4) how the findings were interpreted. It may help to use a summary sheet to list these key points for each article. For the initial scan, don't read the articles straight through or you'll get bogged down in detail. Read each section on its own until you understand it. First, look at just the Abstract to get an overview of the study. How you proceed from here is entirely up to you. You may want to read the Introduction to get a quick picture of the background and hypotheses, then skip to the tables and figures in the Results, then scan the Discussion to get a general idea of how the results were reconciled to the hypotheses.
4 Jot down the main conclusion of each article, either on your summary sheet or next to the abstract, so that you can see it at a glance. This quick summary will later help you to incorporate each article into your paper. Read for depth. After you have an idea of the main ideas in each article, identify the precise methods used and the theories tested. An in-depth understanding is necessary for comparing the work of different researchers. A careful reading will reveal subtle (and sometimes not-so-subtle) differences in theoretical outlook. For example, you should notice some overlap among articles in the work cited, but how do different authors cite the same work? One author (a supporter of an earlier author's work) may explain the method of the earlier study, delineate its results, and cite it repeatedly; a less enthusiastic author may simply include the earlier study as part of a long list of previous studies. Use such clues to discern differences in experimenter outlook. This exercise should be the most interesting part of your research, and your ability to write about them can enliven your literature review. Allow enough time. Before you can write about research, you have to evaluate it, which means that you first have to understand it. You have to digest it in order to understand it, which requires that you read it, thoroughly. This takes more time than many students realize. You're now ready for the last step: writing your review. WRITING THE LITERATURE REVIEW Number of articles reviewed. Published review articles may cite more than 100 studies. Fortunately, most instructors require fewer than 20 (5-15 is typical). However, writing a less than exhaustive literature review means that student authors must be discriminating in choosing the most representative articles. Length. Student papers are typically 8-20 pages, double-spaced, but standards vary. Check with your instructor for course guidelines. Organization. Remember, you either began your literature review process with some theme or point that you wanted to emphasize, or you discovered some sort of theme as you read your articles. Either way, the organization of your paper should highlight the main theme. Although no two reviews look exactly the same (at least, they shouldn't!), they tend to be organized something like this: Introduce research question (what it is, why it is worth examining) Narrow research question to the studies discussed. Briefly outline the organization of the paper (for example, if there is a major controversy in this literature, briefly describe it and state that you will present research supporting first one side, then the other. Or, if three methodologies have been used to address the question, briefly describe them and then state that you will compare the results obtained by the three methods). Describe studies in detail Compare and evaluate studies Discuss implications of studies (your judgment of what the studies show, and where to go from here)
5 It is common (and often better) to combine the description and evaluation sections. If you do combine them, don't forget to evaluate them. Headings. Headings delineate major sections to help show the organization of the paper. When you're writing your draft, headings also pinpoint organizational problems. They're useful only if they are specific. Vague article titles and headings are common weaknesses of student papers -- and one of the easiest weaknesses to correct. How to Proceed: 1. Make yourself comfortable. Give yourself whatever is an optimal environment for you. 2. When writing the introduction, start off with a research question (e.g., cognitive abilities of infants), progressively narrow it (category formation in infants), and finally state the specific lines of research you will be discussing (eight recent articles on infant discrimination of basic-level categories for concrete objects). You want to establish a brisk but even pace when moving from a broad topic to a specific topic, avoiding sudden jumps that will lose your reader. 3. Describe each article (or each line of research, depending on what makes sense), then compare them. Comparisons are essential; descriptions alone are not illuminating. What do you compare? The possibilities include: research assumptions, research theories tested, hypotheses stated, research designs used, variables selected (independent and dependent), equipment used, instructions given, results obtained, interpretation of results, researcher speculations about future studies. Your job is to determine which factors are relevant. All studies have strengths and weaknesses. Finding them will help you make meaningful comparisons. Hint: If you're having trouble here, it probably means that you don't thoroughly understand the articles. Go back and look at them again. 4. Based on your comparisons, evaluate the work done in the area you are researching. State its strengths, weaknesses, and what remains to be done. Your assertions must be well supported by evidence. Then recommend future studies (specify how future work would add to that already done). Don't start writing too early. Budget plenty of time for research and reading. If you start to write too soon, you'll tend to "freeze" or to write in circles because you don't yet have enough to say. Leave time for breaks. Leave time to step away (you'll have a fresh perspective when you return), to revise, and if possible to give your paper to others to read. A complex paper like a literature review will require at least three drafts. Use specific language and support your arguments with concrete examples. Avoid vague references such as "this" (e.g., "this illustrates" should be "this experiment illustrates"). Sentences that start with "I feel" often signal unsupported statements and should be revised or deleted. Paraphrase, don't quote. In scientific writing, paraphrasing an author's ideas is more common than using direct quotes. For information on how to document the source of a paraphrase or quote, see the next section, "APA Citation Format" or the APA Manual (2010). Evaluate what you report. Your goal is to synthesize the research, not just describe it. Many writers find it easy to give detailed descriptions but balk at evaluating the work of established scientists. Do it anyway. Evaluation requires more thought and entails more risk, but without it, your paper is little more than a book report. Avoid plagiarism. Plagiarism is easy to avoid if you give credit where credit is due. Whenever you cite someone else's ideas or use their language, give the name of the author and the year of publication (see next section). Using old review
6 articles as a starting point for your paper is not plagiarism, as long as you don't present someone else's ideas as your own. APA CITATION FORMAT For a literature review, don't use the headings found in published empirical articles (Introduction, Method, Results, and Discussion). Instead, use conceptual headings to delineate different paper sections. For example, a review paper on the topic of whether facial expressions are universally understood across cultures might include headings such as Studies Conducted in Western Cultures and Studies Conducted in Non-Western Cultures. Dividing the paper into different sections with headings makes the information more organized and accessible to the reader. The following information is taken from the handout APA Citations: Condensed Guide available at: I. REFERENCE SECTION Double-space references. Do not indent first line of a source; do indent all following lines (known as a hanging indent; APA Publication Manual, 6 th Ed.). Use only one space after periods, not two. The 6th Edition of the APA Publication Manual requires extra references information related to finding that reference using online tools like PsychInfo and journal websites. A. Journal article by one author with doi (digital object identifier): Thompson, L. (1990). Negotiation behavior and outcomes: Empirical evidence and theoretical issues. Psychological Bulletin, 108, doi: / B. Journal article by two authors when reference was retrieved from a hard-copy print version: Loesche, L. S., & Tsai, S. D. (1998). Beneficial effects of caffeine on writing style. Human Behaviour, 5, C. Journal article by three to seven authors and referenced when doi is not available and the reference was retrieved online: Saywitz, K. J., Mannarino, A. P., Berliner, L., & Cohen, J. A. (2000). Treatment for sexually abused children and adolescents. American Psychologist, 55, Retrieved from D. Journal article, more than seven authors with doi, as an advance online publication (i.e., journal has not gone to print yet, but.pdf of article is already available online): Wolchik, S. A., West, S. G., Sandler, I. N., Tein, J., Coatsworth, D., Lengua, L.,... Griffin, W. A. (2000). An experimental evaluation of theory-based mother and mother-child programs for children of divorce. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, Advance online publication. doi: // X
7 E. Book chapter: Booth, D. A. (1980). Conditioned reactions in motivation. In F. M. Toates & T. R. Hall (Eds.), Analysis of motivational processes (pp ). New York: Academic Press. F. Book: Toates, F. M., & Hall, T. R. (Eds.). (1980). Analysis of motivational processes. New York: Academic Press. Note: If more than one city is given for the publisher of a book, name the most convenient city for locating the book (e.g., Academic Press is published in New York and London; cite only New York). 2. CITATIONS IN TEXT A. First time cited One author: Thompson (1990) reviewed research on negotiation and found that it spans many disciplines. Negotiation research spans many disciplines (Thompson, 1990). This effect has been widely studied (Abbott, 1991; Kelso, 1998; Martini, 1992). Note: With multiple references (see example 3 above), cite authors in alphabetical order. Two to five authors (use & within parentheses; use and outside parentheses): Becker and Seligman's (1996) findings contradicted this result. This result was later contradicted (Becker & Seligman, 1996). Medvec, Madey, and Gilovich (1995) examined the influence of "what might have been" thoughts on satisfaction among a group of Olympic medalists. Research on Olympic medalists has shown that bronze medalists are more satisfied than silver medalists (Medvec, Madey, & Gilovich, 1995). Six or more authors (Cite only the last name of the first author, followed by "et al." and the year of publication): Barakat et al. (1995) attempted to... Recent research (Barakat et al., 1995) has found that... Note: "et al." is from the Latin "et alia", which means "and others". "Et" is a whole word (no period); "al." is an abbreviation.
8 B. Citing the same article within the same paragraph Note: The guidelines below refer only to correct citation of sources in the text (see examples). However, when you cite a source in parentheses at the end of a sentence, always include both author and year. If you cite a paper in the text more than once in a single paragraph, omit the year in subsequent citations, unless you are citing more than one work by the same author. To cite a reference by three or more authors more than once in the same paragraph, use only the first author's last name followed by "et al." Note: If you have multiple sources with three or more authors that have the same first author, include additional names to distinguish the sources from one another.for example: Jones, Smith, Cleaver, et al. found that In contrast, Jones, Smith, Simpson, et al. found C. Citing the same article in subsequent paragraphs One or two authors: Use the same format as for the first citation. Three or more authors: Include only the first author's last name followed by "et al." and the year of publication: Medvec et al. (1995) examined the influence of "what might have been" thoughts on satisfaction among Olympic medalists. Research on satisfaction among Olympic medalists has shown that bronze medalists are more satisfied than silver medalists (Medvic et al., 1995). D. Secondary sources Use sparingly and only when necessary. Suppose that you want to refer to a 1989 study by Nguyen and Lee, which you read about in a 1996 study by Becker and Seligman. Use one of the following citations: Nguyen and Lee (as cited in Becker & Seligman, 1996) found the opposite effect in two-year-olds. The opposite effect was observed in two-year-olds (Nguyen & Lee, as cited in Becker & Seligman, 1996). In the References, list only Becker and Seligman (the source that you read). Reference: American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6 th ed.). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
University of Connecticut Writing Center Writing a Psychology Literature Review There are two main approaches to a literature review in psychology. One approach is to choose an area of research, read all
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON Psychology Writing Center Phone: 206.685.8278 3937 15th Avenue NE firstname.lastname@example.org Box 351525 http://depts.washington.edu/psywc/handouts.shtml Writing a Psychology Literature
APA Style Citations & References A Guide for Psychology Undergraduates 1 Why Cite? Whenever you report something that you have read, you have an ethical and a practical responsibility to cite where you
WRITING ACROSS THE CURRICULUM Writing in Social Work The Hunter College social work curriculum is divided into four major methods: Casework, Group Work, Community Organizing and Planning, and Administration.
Writing Thesis Defense Papers The point of these papers is for you to explain and defend a thesis of your own critically analyzing the reasoning offered in support of a claim made by one of the philosophers
SCIENCE PROJECT PAGE 1 Introduction YES!!! It s that Science Fair time of year. No amount of groaning is going to make it go away. Just imagine the inquiry and organizational skills you ll learn and practice.
Writing in Psychology General Advice and Key Characteristics 1 Taking a Psychological Approach to Knowledge Like other social scientists, psychologists carefully observe human behavior and ask questions
How to undertake a literature search and review for dissertations and final year projects As part of your project or dissertation, you will need to undertake a literature search. This is a search designed
THIS IS THE RUNNING HEAD IN UP TO 50 CHARACTERS 1 (The running head is what gets printed across the top of journal pages. The 50 characters include spaces. It usually contains as much as the title that
THE CLAREMONT GRADUATE UNIVERSITY FACULTY IN PSYCHOLOGY GUIDE TO PREPARING MASTERS THESIS/PUBLISHABLE PAPER PROPOSALS OVERVIEW The proposal is an essential step toward the completion of the Masters thesis
1 IN TEXT CITATIONS IN APA (AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, 2009) STYLE When paraphrasing an author s idea, put the author s last name, a comma, and the year of publication either in parentheses (parenthetical)
HOW TO USE SOURCES IN YOUR PAPER A Tutorial Using outside research sources I m lost!! Most writers who are asked to use outside research sources in their academic papers have problems at one time or another
School of Education Handbook For MA Field Project/ Thesis (O&L-655) Master of Arts in Organization & Leadership 2015-2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction...3 Purpose...3 M.A. Field Project Format...4 M.A.
Running head: SAMPLE FOR STUDENTS 1 Sample APA Paper for Students Interested in Learning APA Style 6th Edition Jeffrey H. Kahn Illinois State University Author Note Jeffrey H. Kahn, Department of Psychology,
Academic Integrity Writing the Research Paper A C A D E M I C I N T E G R I T Y W R I T I N G T H E R E S E A R C H P A P E R Academic Integrity is an impressive-sounding phrase. What does it mean? While
WRITING A CRITICAL ARTICLE REVIEW A critical article review briefly describes the content of an article and, more importantly, provides an in-depth analysis and evaluation of its ideas and purpose. The
California Lutheran University Information Literacy Curriculum Map Graduate Psychology Department Student Outcomes Outcome 1 LO1 determines the nature and extent of the information needed. Outcome 2 LO2
Literature Reviews 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. What is a Literature Review? Choosing Material Searching for Good Material Assessing the Literature Developing the Literature Review Placing the Literature Review
GUIDELINES FOR FORMAT AND CONTENT OF THE DISSERTATION CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION TO THE STUDY Background This section should be approximately 2-5 pages of background narrative, citing literature as appropriate
Writing Academic Essays at University Philip Seaton, Hokkaido University Writing Academic Essays at University Page 2/ What is Research? Video 1 In this video series, I will be introducing you to the basics
Appalachian State University Master of Public Administration Program Writing Guide Introduction Students should use the following guidelines to complete written assignments in the Appalachian State University
Research Proposal Guidelines: APA Style - 1 Running head: RESEARCH PROPOSAL GUIDELINES: APA STYLE APA Style: An Example Outline of a Research Proposal Your Name School of Health & Applied Human Sciences
Library, Teaching and Learning Writing Essays and other assignments 2013 Lincoln University Writing at University During your degree at Lincoln University you will complete essays, reports, and other kinds
1 A Guide to Referencing Using APA Style Based on the 6 th Edition of the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association Updated September 2012 2 Contents Section 1: Aspects of referencing
California Lutheran University Information Literacy Curriculum Map Graduate Psychology Department Student Learning Outcomes Learning Outcome 1 LO1 literate student determines the nature and extent of the
A P A 6 th Edition Sample Paper Text Margins 1 inch all around Typing -Do not break (hyphenate) words at end of a line. -Indent the first line of every paragraph except for the abstract page (The default
The Scientific Literature page 1 The Scientific Literature In Psychology As we saw in the reading on science and the scientific method, falsifiability and replication are aspects of the scientific method
Writing the Literature Review / Using the Literature Most research reports and theses have a literature review, which discusses the "literature" around your research topic. The lit. review is often the
Check in and introductions Reading academic articles - strategies Essay Basics : The assignment fulfilling requirements Three prewriting strategies & the dynamic outline Genre types of writing: anecdotal
Thesis Statement Script This workshop has been designed for a 50-minute class, and should last no more than 45 minutes if run as efficiently as possible. In longer classes, this leaves extra time which
School Psychology Doctoral Program Dissertation Outline 1 Final Version 6/2/2006 Instructions: Double Underline means the item should be a title or heading in your dissertation. Do not deviate from the
Writing an essay Look back If this is not your first essay, take a look at your previous one. Did your tutor make any suggestions that you need to bear in mind for this essay? Did you learn anything else
Guide to APA Style Dr. Blakemore PSY 100 What is APA style? Writing style developed by the American Psychological Association Used in many social and behavioral sciences and other fields such as communication,
RESEARCH METHODS IN PSYCHOLOGY Psychology 431W MWF 10:15-11:05 Lab T 9:45-11:35 Spring, 2011 Professor: Sue Kelley Webpage: www.lycoming.edu/~kelley/exper.htm Office: D101-B, Academic Center Telephone:
Examinations Page 1 MODULE 2 STUDENT GUIDE TO NOTE TAKING Examinations Page 2 Why take notes? I have a good memory: It s just short" o s t o f u s c a n r e l a t e t o t h i s q u o t e. H a v e y o u
Writing Your Research Paper ENG 112 Professor Katherine Delhagen *adapted from Empire State College Purpose of Research Paper Through the process of writing a research paper, you learn more about the topic
1 2 WRITING EFFECTIVE ESSAY EXAMS An essay exam offers you the opportunity to show your instructor what you know. This booklet presents before-, during-, and after-exam strategies that will help you demonstrate
WRITING A RESEARCH PAPER FOR A GRADUATE SEMINAR IN POLITICAL SCIENCE Ashley Leeds Rice University Here are some basic tips to help you in writing your research paper. The guide is divided into six sections
COM207: CREATIVE WRITING: FICTION SYLLABUS LECTURE HOURS/CREDITS: 3/3 CATALOG DESCRIPTION Prerequisite: ENG101 English Composition I Students study a variety of short fiction for story structure and write
PSYCHOLOGY PROGRAM LEARNING GOALS AND OUTCOMES BY COURSE LISTING Psychology 1010: General Psychology Learning Goals and Outcomes LEARNING GOAL 1: KNOWLEDGE BASE OF PSYCHOLOGY Demonstrate familiarity with
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, FRESNO DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHOLOGY UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR UNDERGRADUATE PSYCHOLOGY MAJORS Goals -- Knowledge, skills and values unique to psychology 1.
How to Write a Marketing Plan: Identifying Your Market (Part 1 of 5) Any good marketing student will tell you that marketing consists of the four functions used to create a sale: The right product to the
Jan/Feb 2007 What Does Research Tell Us About Teaching Reading to English Language Learners? By Suzanne Irujo, ELL Outlook Contributing Writer As a classroom teacher, I was largely ignorant of, and definitely
APA General Format: Research Papers General format for papers written in APA style is covered in the first chapter of the Publication Manual (Call number here at Morrisville College Library: REF BF 76.7.P83
MASTERS IN EDUCATION THESIS CHAPTER WRITING RUBRICS Chapter 1: Definition of Problem Objective: to define the /problem project focus. Written in present tense. Chapter 1 Novice Proficient Advance Components
Creating APA Style Research Papers (6th Ed.) All the recommended formatting in this guide was created with Microsoft Word 2010 for Windows and Word 2011 for Mac. If you are going to use another version
Section Three Nursing Research Procedures Page 25 Research Competency Nursing majors are expected to develop their research skills throughout the program and demonstrate this skill in the final research
Writing a Literature Review Paper 1. Your first question when assigned a literature review paper may be what is it? 2. First, let s look at what a literature review is not. a. It s not an annotated bibliography.
WESTERN UNIVERSITY LONDON CANADA Department of Psychology Summer Distance 2015 Psychology 3301F Section 001 - Online Clinical Psychology 1.0 CALENDAR DESCRIPTION This course offers a survey of major topics
Running head: NEUROSCIENCE TERM PAPER 1 Format, Style, and Suggested Topics for Neuroscience Term Paper W. Jeffrey Wilson Albion College NEUROSCIENCE TERM PAPER 2 Abstract A term paper on any topic concerning
A research essay is a piece of writing that provides information about a particular topic that you have researched; it is about a topic you are not familiar with. You can learn about the topic by reading
How to write an Academic Business Report Tessa Owens Writing an Academic Business Report Writing a report may be divided into six broad areas: 1. identification and acquisition of relevant sources 2. preliminary
SIXTH EDITION APA GUIDELINES 1 THE UNIVERSITY OF AKRON COLLEGE OF NURSING American Psychological Association (APA) Style Guidelines Sixth Edition The following information is provided as the highlights
BSN GUIDE 1 BSN GUIDE FOR SCHOLARLY PAPERS This guide is to assist the BSN student in utilizing the American Psychological Association (APA) format and writing in a professional style. The focus of this
LEARNING OUTCOMES FOR THE PSYCHOLOGY MAJOR Goal 1. Knowledge Base of Psychology Demonstrate familiarity with the major concepts, theoretical perspectives, empirical findings, and historical trends in psychology.
Public Safety Management Degree Program Syllabus for Community Risk Reduction for the Fire and Emergency Services UST 427, 3 Credit Hour Course, Spring Term 2014 PROFESSOR Bernard W. Becker, III, MS, EFO,
1 EDF65 Literature Review & Research Proposal Directions 1) Introduction You may choose any quantitative research study related to education or psychology. While not required, I encourage you to propose
Writing an Empirical Paper in APA Style A lab report is a writeup of an experiment and has the same components as a published research study. This handout provides general tips on how to write a psychology
Running head: SAMPLE APA PAPER FOR STUDENTS 1 RUNNING HEAD: Yes, it will say, Running head:...., but only on the first page. Use an abbreviated form of the title (not exceeding 50 characters, which will
Guide to Formatting 1 Header (consisting of the first 2-3 words of the title) w/page number at.5 from the top of page, 1 from right edge of page, and right justified. Insert the page number in the header,
Questia Writing Center 9 Step Writing Guide F A research paper is your opinion on a topic, informed by research you have done. It is not a summary of others thoughts, a personal essay or a review or critique.
The Master Program in Public Policy, Administration and Law I The Purpose of the MRP Writing a Major Research Paper (MRP)* Candidates must produce a piece of original research or criticism on any approved
How to Provide Constructive Feedback That Won t Exasperate Your Students as Columbia University Graduate School of Arts & Sciences Teaching Center It s mid-semester. The honeymoon is over. You and your
Stages of the Research Process Breaking it Down Dividing up the stages of the research and writing processes might seem logical and instinctive to you, but many first-year students will be writing their
Writing a Course Paper Capella University 225 South 6th Street, 9th Floor Minneapolis, MN 55402 1-888-CAPELLA (227-3552) Table of Contents Creating Major Sections... 3 Writing Fundamentals... 7 Expressing
Undergraduate Psychology Major Learning Goals and Outcomes i Goal 1: Knowledge Base of Psychology Demonstrate familiarity with the major concepts, theoretical perspectives, empirical findings, and historical
1 P a g e Introduction The (ACRL) Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education (2000) provides general performance indicators and outcomes to use in undergraduate settings. The following
Use the Academic Word List vocabulary to make tips on Academic Writing Use some of the words below to give advice on good academic writing. abstract accompany accurate/ accuracy/ inaccurate/ inaccuracy
Referencing Academic writing requires that you read and cite the work of others. Any material that is not your own must be sourced to the original author. Every book, article, thesis and all electronic
GUIDE TO WRITING YOUR RESEARCH PAPER Ashley Leeds Rice University Here are some basic tips to help you in writing your research paper. The guide is divided into six sections covering distinct aspects of
School of Public Service and Health PADM 699 Master s Capstone Seminar in Public Administration 3 Credit Hours Prerequisite: Completion of all MPA coursework Length of Course: 16 Weeks Instructor Information
How to Write A Solid AP Psychology Free Response Question 1. Read before answering. Carefully read both of the questions before you start to write anything. Decide which question you are more comfortable
Introduction to Dissertations Learning Enhancement Team LET@mdx.ac.uk Variety is the Spice of Life! Different Schools.Different Rules Can you use I in an academic text? Should an essay have section headings?
General Psychology - Course Syllabus PSY-001-4 Location: Murchison Gymnasium, Room 4 Fall Semester 2015 Time: MWF 8:00 9:05 a.m. Professor: Ronald E. See, PhD Office: Winter Hall 338 Phone: 805-565-7062
TAKING NOTES I. There are many reasons for taking lecture notes. A. Making yourself take notes forces you to listen carefully and test your understanding of the material. B. When you are reviewing, notes
Environmental Chemistry Letters 1. EDITORIAL PROCEDURE - REVIEW ARTICLES For review articles please follow the general instructions for original articles below, with the following exceptions: - The page
DRAFT TJ PROGRAM OF STUDIES: AP PSYCHOLOGY COURSE DESCRIPTION AP Psychology engages students in a rigorous appraisal of many facets of our current understanding of psychology. The course is based on the
Guidelines for Writing An APA Style Lab Report Research articles in psychology follow a specific format as set forth by the American Psychological Association (APA Style). The following sections describe
NORTHERN VIRGINIA COMMUNITY COLLEGE PSYCHOLOGY 211 - RESEARCH METHODOLOGY FOR THE BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Dr. Rosalyn M. King, Professor DETAILED TOPICAL OVERVIEW AND WORKING SYLLABUS CLASS 1: INTRODUCTIONS
Writing the Empirical Social Science Research Paper: A Guide for the Perplexed Josh Pasek University of Michigan January 24, 2012 Correspondence about this manuscript should be addressed to Josh Pasek,
Office of Research and Graduate Studies Duncan Hayse, MA, MFA Coordinator Theses, Doctoral Projects, and Dissertations CONTACT: http://www.uiw.edu/orgs/writing/index.html email@example.com APA review for