The liability of service providers in e-research Infrastructures: killing the messenger?
|
|
- Aron Thornton
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 The liability of service providers in e-research Infrastructures: killing the messenger? Paweł Kamocki Institut für Deutsche Sprache Mannheim, Germany Abstract Hosting Providers play an essential role in the development of Internet services such as e-research Infrastructures. In order to promote the development of such services, legislators on both sides of the Atlantic Ocean introduced safe harbour provisions to protect Service Providers (a category which includes Hosting Providers) from legal claims (e.g. of copyright infringement). Relevant provisions can be found in 512 of the United States Copyright Act and in art. 14 of the Directive 2000/31/EC (and its national implementations). The cornerstone of this framework is the passive role of the Hosting Provider through which he has no knowledge of the content that he hosts. With the arrival of Web 2.0, however, the role of Hosting Providers on the Internet changed; this change has been reflected in court decisions that have reached varying conclusions in the last few years. The purpose of this article is to present the existing framework (including recent case law from the US, Germany and France). Keywords: service provider, hosting provider, liability Since the first messenger who told Tigranes that Lucullus was coming had his head cut off for his pains, no one else would tell him anything, and so he sat in ignorance while the fires of war were already blazing around him, giving ear only to those who flattered him (Plutarch 1 ). 1. Introduction Hosting Providers are defined as a category of Internet Service Providers whose services consists of in general terms the storage of data provided by another person (which is referred to as Content Provider or editor). Hosting Providers, sometimes called the postmen of the Internet (Koelman, Hugenholtz, 1999), play an essential role in the development of Web 2.0 in general, and e- Research Infrastructures in particular. Needless to say, data stored by Hosting Providers may often be of illegal nature; in particular, they may infringe third party's intellectual property rights. This is true not only for social media or video services such as YouTube, but also in case of e-research Infrastructures. If the general rules of civil liability (or tort law) were strictly applied to these cases, Hosting Providers could be found liable for every such infringement. Of course, the Content Providers can also be found liable for such infringements, but in practice having the possibility to sue one or the other right holders would usually sue the Hosting Provider, easier to identify and a priori more solvent than the Content Provider. Therefore, in order to promote the development of e- commerce and other web services (which require a certain investment on the part of Internet Service Providers), the legislators on both sides of the Atlantic Ocean decided to 1 All quotes from Plutarch from: Plutarch's Lives. The Translation Called Dryden's. Corrected from the Greek and Revised by A.H. Clough, in 5 volumes (Boston: Little Brown and Co., 1906) introduce a legal framework containing liability limitations for Internet Service Providers (the so-called safe harbour or safe haven ). One of these limitations, concerning Hosting Providers, will be presented below. 2. Legal framework Statutory limitations on Internet Service Providers' liability were introduced in the United States by the Digital Millenium Copyright Act of 1998 (DMCA) and in the European Union by the e-commerce Directive of 8 June 2000 (Directive 2000/31/EC) In the United States The DMCA introduced 512 in the Copyright Act (17 U.S.C.). According to its subsection (c) A service provider shall not be liable ( ) for infringement of copyright by reason of the storage at the direction of a user of material that resides on a system or network controlled or operated by or for the service provider. This limitation, however, is subject to a set of conditions. First of all, the Hosting Provider can only benefit from the limitation if he does not have actual knowledge that the material is infringing. Secondly, he may not receive a financial benefit directly attributable to the infringing activity. Finally, upon obtaining a notification from copyright owners (the content of which is specified by the same section), he must respond expeditiously to remove, or disable access to the infringing material. Under 512(c), if one of these three conditions is not met, the hosting provider can be held liable for infringement. A modification to this principle, particularly important from the point of view of e-research Infrastructures, is contained in 512(e). According to this subsection, if the service provider is a nonprofit educational institution, the knowledge of the data provided by its employees (faculty members and graduate students) performing teaching or 4220
2 research functions shall not be presumed (as it is the case when it comes to other data provided by employees). It means that the liability limitation is still available to nonprofit educational institutions, even if the data are provided by its members (which is often the case in e- Research Infrastructures). Nevertheless, in CoStar v. LoopNet 2 the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit held (citing Religious Technology Center v. Netcom 3 ) that the DMCA was intended to be a floor, not a ceiling of protection and that despite the failure to meet the criteria of 512, an Internet Service Provider may still be exempted from liability for copyright infringement, e.g. if his conduit is of purely passive nature. It has to be noted here that such an approach (in which judges apply a limitation going beyond the scope of the statute) is only possible in common law jurisdictions. Further analysis of the US legal framework falls beyond the scope of this article. However, as it is substantially similar to the one adopted in the EU, further sections of this article remain relevant to the situation in the US In the European Union In the European Union, the liability of Hosting Providers is regulated by article 14 of the Directive 2000/31/EC, according to which: Member States shall ensure that the service provider is not liable for the information stored at the request of a recipient of the service. The EU framework is in fact much broader than the US framework; while 512 of the Copyright Act applies only to copyright infringement, art. 14 of the Directive 2000/31/EC also protects from any other claims (e.g. for unlawful processing of personal data or for defamation). However, unlike the US solution, the EU solution does not protect against claims for injunction (recital 45 of the Directive 2000/31/EC). Nevertheless, only the entities that meet the definition of a Hosting Provider can be eligible for this liability limitation, and only on a set of conditions Definitions Art. 14 defines a Hosting Provider as a provider of an information society service that consists of the storage of information provided by a recipient of the service. An information society service is further defined by the Directive 98/34/EC as any service normally provided for remuneration, at a distance, by electronic means and at the individual request of a recipient of services. Additionally, recital 42 of the Directive 2000/31/EC states that [t]he exemptions from liability ( ) cover only cases where the activity of the information society service provider is ( ) of a mere technical, automatic and passive nature, which implies that the information society service provider has neither knowledge of nor control over the information which is ( ) stored. This does not necessarily mean that the Directive requires that the Hosting Provider is in no way involved in the F.3d 544 (4th Cir. 2004) F. Supp (N.D. Cal. 1995) information transmitted (this requirement expressed in recital 43 applies to other categories of Service Providers) Conditions for liability limitation According to art of the Directive 2000/31/EC, a Hosting Provider is not liable for the information that he stores on condition that: (a) the provider does not have actual knowledge of illegal activity or information and, as regards claims for damages, is not aware of the facts or circumstances from which the illegal activity or information is apparent; or (b) the provider, upon obtaining such knowledge or awareness, acts expeditiously to remove or to disable access to the information. Because of the mere technical nature of their activity Hosting Providers are presumed not to know the content of the information that they store (it can be called a presumption of unawareness ). He can only obtain such knowledge upon being properly notified. The details of the notification procedure are not specified by the Directive and so they may differ across Member States; a detailed analysis of the notification procedure falls outside the scope of this article. It should be noted, however, that also the obligations of a Hosting Provider after notification (i.e. upon obtaining the knowledge of illegal activity or information that he stores) is also not defined in a precise way; the Directive says only that in such cases the Hosting Provider is required to act expeditiously to remove or disable access to the information. This seems to leave some leeway to the Member States, e.g. in deciding whether to follow a notice and take down or a notice and stay down approach, i.e. whether to oblige Hosting Providers only to remove the illegal content, or also to prevent its reappearance in the future. Moreover, recital 48 of the Directive expressly allows Member States to require Hosting Providers to apply duties of care in order to detect and prevent certain types of illegal activities. On the other hand, according to art. 15 Member States cannot impose on Hosting Providers a general obligation (...) to monitor the information that they ( ) store, nor a general obligation to actively seek facts or circumstances indicating illegal activity. Finally, which is particularly important for e-research Infrastructures, art of the Directive 2000/31/EC expressly states that the liability exemption should not apply when the recipient of the service (Content Provider) is acting under the authority or the control of the Hosting Provider. It means in practice that Hosting Providers are fully liable for the information that they store and that was provided by their employees. In such cases the presumption of unawarness cannot apply National implementations The Directive 2000/31/EC, like all the EU Directives and unlike EU Regulations, does not apply directly in the Member States. In order to become binding law for EU citizens, it had to be transposed into the legal system of every Member State. As discussed above, the Directive 4221
3 leaves an important amount of leeway to national legislators. Therefore, national provisions regulating the liability limitations may differ in details, even though they must follow the EU framework outlined above. Specific solutions adopted in different EU Member States are outside the scope of this article; however, the French and the German solutions will be very briefly presented below. In France, the Directive 2000/31/EC was finally transposed by the Loi no pour la confiance dans l'économie numérique of 22 June (LCEN). Art. 6 of the LCEN contains a detailed provision regulating the liability of Hosting Providers. Art. 6-I-2 specifies that the liability limitation may apply to both natural and legal persons, and even if they offer their services without remuneration. Art. 6-I-5 provides a list of informations that have to be included in a valid notification, while art. 6-I-4 states that the fact of submitting a false notification to a Hosting Provider is punishable by one year of imprisonment and by a fine of EUR. In Germany, the relevant provisions of the Directive are finally transposed into the Telemediengesetz of 26 February (TMG). Section 10 of the TMG has a very similar wording to the one used in art. 14 of the Directive; moreover, 7 makes it clear that as a general rule, Service Providers are liable for the information that they store or transmit (unless one of the liability limitations apply). In the German system, apart from 10 TMG, the doctrine of contributory infringement (Störerhaftung) plays an important role when it comes to Hosting Providers. The liability for contributory infringement can be engaged if: -there is a link of causality between the actions of the Hosting Provider and the infringement; -the Hosting Provider has a possibility to prevent the infringement; -the Hosting Provider violated his duty of care (Nordemann, 2011). The last element (duty of care) is decided on a case-bycase basis; the scope of the duty of care depends on the business model followed by the Hosting Provider, but it can be quite extensive (see e.g.: Rapidshare v. Atari 6 ; Ewald, 2013). 3. Case law Legal framework with such an amount of unclear notions ( mere technical, automatic and passive nature, act expeditiously...) is subject to interpretation by judges. It should be noted that the nature of Internet services is in constant evolution; in 1998 or in 2000, when the DMCA or the Directive 2000/31/EC were adopted, Web 2.0 services like YouTube or Facebook did not exist. This section will attempt to present a selection of most important European and US court decisions concerning the liability of Hosting Providers, with a special focus on France, Germany and the US. 4 JORF no du 22 juin 2004, page 11168, texte no. 2 5 BGBl. I no. S. 179, BGH I ZR 18/11 of 12 July 2012 As early as 1992 in what is believed to be one of the first Internet cases in the history of French law 7, the French Court of cassation exempted a minitel host centre from any liability for the content that it stored. In 1995, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California held that claims of direct and vicarious infringement failed against the operator of an online bulletin board service where a user had uploaded copyrighted material the case (Religious Technology Center v. Netcom 8. Note that part of these holdings were codified in the DMCA and, in 2004, the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit 9 held that the DMCA did not supplant or preempt the holdings of this case). The problems started when new participative services emerged in the first decade of the 21 st century. In the 2009 German case marions-kochbuch.de 10 the owner of an Internet portal in which users could post recipes (some of them with photos) were sued by a professional food photographer who found his photographs posted on the portal without his authorisation. The Federal Court of Justice decided that the liability limitation did not apply to the owner of the portal because it appropriated the users' content: it applied his own templates (including his logo) to the recipes sent by users (whose nicknames, however, were made apparent under the recipes) and the Terms of Use of the service specified that by sending the recipes the users allowed the owner of the portal to make them available to the public and to make commercial use of them. All these activities, according to the Court, suggested that the defendant's role wasn't of merely technical nature. In 2010's Tiscali case 11 the French Court of Cassation refused the benefit of the liability limitation to an Internet company on the grounds that it exceeded merely technical role of a Hosting Provider by selling advertising space on the websites that it hosted. It should be noted that under the current wording of art. 6-I-2 LCEN, the liability limitation is available to Hosting Providers who offer their services with or without remuneration; the argument of selling advertising space can therefore no longer be used (Thoumyre, 2010). Shortly after, a series of important preliminary rulings were rendered by the Court of Justice of the European Union 12. In 2010 in Google v. Louis Vuitton 13 the Court held that the liability limitation may apply to the operator of an Internet referencing service (like Google AdWords) if he does not play an active role. In 2011 in ebay v. L'Oreal 14 the Court held that the liability limitation did not 7 Cass Crim., 17 November 1992, no F. Supp (N.D. Cal. 1995) 9 CoStar v. LoopNet, 373 F.3d 544 (4th Cir. 2004) 10 BGH I ZR 166/07 of 12 November Cass 1 Civ., 14 January 2010, no If a national court is in doubt about the interpretation of EU law (e.g. the Directive 2000/31/EC) it may ask the CJUE for advice; this advice is called a preliminary ruling (see: 13 C-236/08 to C-238/08 of 23 March C-324/09 of 12 July 2001; in 2007, ebay was sued by 4222
4 apply to the operator of an online marketplace who provides assistance by e.g. optimising the presentation of the offers for sale or by promoting such offers. It should be pointed out here one year before this ruling the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit exempted ebay from liability in a trademark case ebay v. Tiffany and Co 15. Finally, in 2012 in SABAM v. Netlog 16 the Court of Justice of the European Union stated that no obligation to install a file filtering system can be imposed on a Hosting Provider. These preliminary rulings had an impact on national judges. French judges applied the liability exemption e.g. to Dailymotion 17 and to Google Images 18 (Beurskens, Kamocki, Ketzan, 2013); more recently, however, in a personal data protection case, the Tribunal de grande instance of Paris found Google guilty of unlawful processing of personal data in Google Suggests, even though the Mountain View giant claimed that its activity is of purely automatic nature 19. In Spain, the liability exception was applied to YouTube 20. German courts, however, applied extended duties of care (see above) to services such as YouTube or Rapidshare. When it comes to ebay, after the CJUE's preliminary ruling, is reported to have settled with L'Oréal 21. Meanwhile, in 2013's case Columbia v. Fung 22 the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that Gary Fung, the owner of several popular torrent websites, was ineligible for the DMCA's safe harbour provision on the grounds that he had red flag knowledge of the infringing activity on his systems. On the other hand, in the same year YouTube was held not to have such knowledge 23. This abundant and constantly changing case law concerning the liability of Hosting Providers exposes the weaknesses of the existing framework: the fact that it is not adapted to Web 2.0 and that by not providing for a sufficient degree of legal security it may be an obstacle rather than a trigger to the development of Internet services. 4. Contractual Clauses Hosting Providers, aware of the lack of legal security concerning the applicability of safe harbour provisions, often try to shield themselves from claims with contractual clauses. Nevertheless, these clauses may not provide for sufficient protection. In fact, there is a chance L'Oréal in Belgium, Germany, the United Kingdom, France and Spain for selling counterfeit goods F.3d 93 (2d Cir. 2010) 16 C-360/10 of 16 February Cass 1 civ., 17 February 2011, no Cass 1 civ., 12 July 2012, no TGI Paris, 23 October Madrid Court of Appeal, no. 11/2014 of 14 January See: ecommercenews.eu, 17 January F.3d 1020 No In Viacom v. Youtube, 1:07-cv-2103, no. 452 (S.D.N.Y Apr. 18, 2013) that they may be declared invalid in the light of consumer protection rules. Consumer protection law applies to contracts between a consumer (defined as any natural person who is acting for purposes which are outside his trade, business, craft or profession 24 ) and a trader ( any natural or legal person who is acting for purposes relating to his trade, business, craft or profession 25 ). According to art. 3 of the Directive 93/13/EEC a contractual term is unfair if it has not been individually negotiated with the consumer and if it causes significant imbalance in the parties' rights and obligations under the contract. A limitation liability clause may therefore be regarded as an unfair term, and as such have no legal force. More importantly, even if they are enforceable, contractual clauses do not have binding force on third parties. It means that a right holder whose rights are violated by the data deposited by a Content Provider may still sue the Hosting Provider (because the contractual provision according to which only the Content Provider is liable has no binding force on him). Moreover, as Hosting Providers are usually more solvent than Content Providers, they constitute a better target for monetary relief claims. If a Hosting Provider is found liable for damages, a liability limitation clause in the deposition contract may give him a claim against the Content Provider. At this stage, however, the question of solvency is important again: the Content Provider may simply not be able to reimburse the damages that the hosting provider had to pay in the first time. Therefore, a contractual clause while still being a reasonable solution - may not provide for sufficient protection against claims for monetary relief. 5. Conclusions As a general rule, mere technical, automatic and passive role of the Hosting Provider gives him access to legal protection against liability claims. In practice, however, the way in which judges interpret this safe harbour provision varies greatly and the situation of Hosting Providers lacks legal certainty. In particular, the application of the framework discussed in this article to e- Research Infrastructures remains a grey area. 6. Acknowledgements The author wishes to thank Mr. Olivier Dacla and Erik Ketzan for their reliable advice, and Julia Wildgans for her assistance. 7. References Koelman, K; Hugenholtz, B. (1999). Online Service Provider Liability for Copyright Infringement. Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organisation. Nordemann, J.B. (2011). Liability for Copyright Infringements on the Internet: Host Providers (Content Providers) The German Approach. Journal of 24 Art. 2(1) of the Directive 2011/83/EU on consumer rights 25 Art. 2(2) of the Directive 2011/83/EU 4223
5 Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Electronic Commerce Law, 2, pp Ewald, K. (2013). Liability of one-click hosting providers for users' copyright infringement. International Law Office Newsletter, Thoumyre, L. (2010). Les notions d'éditeur et d'hébergeur dans l'économie numérique. Receuil Dalloz, 2010, p Berskens, M; Kamocki, P ; Ketzan, E. (2013) Implied Consent A Silent Revolution in Digital Copyright Law. U.S., German and French Perspectives. Revue Internationale du Droit d'auteur, 238, pp
EU regulatory framework for e-commerce
EU regulatory framework for e-commerce WTO Workshop Geneva, 18 th June 2013 Denis Sparas European Commission Directorate General for Internal Market and Services Outline E-commerce Directive E-commerce
More informationNinth Circuit Interprets DMCA Safe Harbor in Favor of Service Providers Like Veoh. By Yuo-Fong C. Amato, Associate
Ninth Circuit Interprets DMCA Safe Harbor in Favor of Service Providers Like Veoh By Yuo-Fong C. Amato, Associate The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals recently upheld summary judgment and a Rule 12(b)(6)
More informationilinc Legal & Technology Briefs The Liability of Internet Intermediaries In the EU
ilinc Legal & Technology Briefs The Liability of Internet Intermediaries In the EU Many start-ups fulfil an intermediary role within the online environment. These intermediary start-ups offer their users
More informationLiability of Internet Service Providers
Liability of Internet Service Providers Tsuneaki Hagiwara Manager of the Legal Department, Toppan Printing Co., Ltd. 1. U.S. Rules Limiting Liability of Internet Service Providers (1) Copyright Infringement
More informationHow Is The Liability Of Internet Service Providers Limited Under The Digital Millennium Copyright Act?
2012 International Conference on Economics Marketing and Management IPEDR Vol.28 (2012) (2012) IACSIT Press, Singapore How Is The Liability Of Internet Service Providers Limited Under The Digital Millennium
More informationPRESENTATION OVERVIEW. Trademark Infringement Cases in the U.S. and Europe involving ebay, Inc.
PRESENTATION OVERVIEW 1 Trademark Infringement Cases in the U.S. and Europe involving ebay, Inc. Presented by: Austin Renfroe Howrey LLP What constitutes trademark infringement? Applicable EU law ebay
More informationA clean and open Internet: Public consultation on procedures for notifying and acting on illegal content hosted by online intermediaries
A clean and open Internet: Public consultation on procedures for notifying and acting on illegal content hosted by online intermediaries Questions marked with an asterisk * require an answer to be given.
More informationCombating Contributory Infringement on the Internet
Page 1 of 5 May 1, 2014 Vol. 69 No. 9 Back to Bulletin Main Page Susan M. Kayser and Lucy J. Wheatley, Jones Day, Washington, D.C., USA Chiang Ling Li, Jones Day, Hong Kong SAR, China Marc Groebl and Gregor
More informationINTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW IN THE INFORMATION SOCIETY
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW IN THE INFORMATION SOCIETY IP LAW AND LINKING AND SEARCH ENGINES J A R L E R O A R S Æ B Ø EXHAUSTION PRINCIPLE (MOVED FRO LAST LECTURE) Article 7 Exhaustion of the rights conferred
More informationSupported by. World Trademark Review. Anti-counterfeiting. Poland. Contributing firm Patpol Patent & Trademark Attorneys.
Supported by World Trademark Review Anti-counterfeiting 2012 Poland Contributing firm A Global Guide Poland Contributing firm Authors Jaromir Piwowar and Bartek Kochlewski Legal framework Rights holders
More information'Safe Harbor' For Online Service Providers
Portfolio Media, Inc. 648 Broadway, Suite 200 New York, NY 10012 www.law360.com Phone: +1 212 537 6331 Fax: +1 212 537 6371 customerservice@portfoliomedia.com 'Safe Harbor' For Online Service Providers
More informationViacom sues Google over YouTube video clips
1 Viacom sues Google over YouTube video clips Google and Viacom headquarters. Viacom has feuded publicly with YouTube and its parent Google about the unauthorized posting of its programming online. 2 The
More informationWorld Book. Protection of IP France. www.plg.eu.com 1. TRADE MARKS 1.1 INTRODUCTION
World Book 1. TRADE MARKS 1.1 INTRODUCTION In, trade marks are protected by Book VII of the French Intellectual Property Code (the Code), the provisions of which were modified by the Act n 91-7 of January
More informationFiltering for Copyright Enforcement in Europe after the Sabam cases
Filtering for Copyright Enforcement in Europe after the Sabam cases Stefan Kulk a, Frederik Zuiderveen Borgesius b a PhD Researcher, Centre for Intellectual Property Law (University of Utrecht) s.kulk[at]uu.nl
More informationETNO Reflection Document on the future of electronic commerce in the internal market and the implementation of the e-commerce Directive
ETNO Reflection Document on the future of electronic commerce in the internal market and the implementation of the e-commerce Directive November 2010 Executive Summary ETNO welcomes the European Commission
More informationCase: 5:10-cv-01912-DAP Doc #: 21 Filed: 03/14/11 1 of 8. PageID #: 358 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Case: 5:10-cv-01912-DAP Doc #: 21 Filed: 03/14/11 1 of 8. PageID #: 358 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION UNIQUE PRODUCT SOLUTIONS, LTD., ) Case No. 5:10-CV-1912 )
More informationLEGAL UPDATE THIRD PARTY POP-UP ADVERTISEMENTS: U-HAUL INT L, INC. V. WHENU.COM. Andrew J. Sinclair
LEGAL UPDATE THIRD PARTY POP-UP ADVERTISEMENTS: U-HAUL INT L, INC. V. WHENU.COM Andrew J. Sinclair I. INTRODUCTION Pop-up advertising has been an enormous success for internet advertisers 1 and a huge
More informationOnline Copyright Infringement. Discussion Paper
Online Copyright Infringement Discussion Paper July 2014 Introduction There are a number of factors that contribute to online copyright infringement in Australia. These factors include the availability
More informationLiability of Online Publishers for User Generated Content: A European Perspective
Liability of Online Publishers for User Generated Content: A European Perspective TIMOTHY PINTO, NIRI SHAN, STEFAN FREYTAG, ELISABETH VON BRAUNSCHWEIG, AND VALÉRIE AUMAGE Free speech is thriving online
More informationElectronic Commerce ELECTRONIC COMMERCE ACT 2001. Act. No. 2001-07 Commencement LN. 2001/013 22.3.2001 Assent 14.3.2001
ELECTRONIC COMMERCE ACT 2001 Principal Act Act. No. Commencement LN. 2001/013 22.3.2001 Assent 14.3.2001 Amending enactments Relevant current provisions Commencement date 2001/018 Corrigendum 22.3.2001
More informationThe Distinction Between Insurance Agent and Insurance Broker in California. Robert W. Hogeboom, Esq. 1 (213) 614-7304. May 2006
The Distinction Between Insurance Agent and Insurance Broker in California Robert W. Hogeboom, Esq. 1 (213) 614-7304 May 2006 The legal distinction between an insurance agent and insurance broker is under
More informationThe Role of Internet Service Providers in Stopping Internet Copyright Infringement. Jennie Ness Regional IP Attaché U.S. Commercial Service
The Role of Internet Service Providers in Stopping Internet Copyright Infringement Jennie Ness Regional IP Attaché U.S. Commercial Service New Means of Distribution Webcasting or Streaming Uploading and
More informationCOMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT. on the existing EU legal framework applicable to lifestyle and wellbeing apps. Accompanying the document
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 10.4.2014 SWD(2014) 135 final COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT on the existing EU legal framework applicable to lifestyle and wellbeing apps Accompanying the document GREEN
More informationSafe Harbor for Online Service Providers Under Section 512(c) of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act
Safe Harbor for Online Service Providers Under Section 512(c) of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act Brian T. Yeh Legislative Attorney March 26, 2014 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov
More informationSafe Harbor for Online Service Providers Under Section 512(c) of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act
Safe Harbor for Online Service Providers Under Section 512(c) of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act Brian T. Yeh Legislative Attorney March 26, 2014 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov
More informationFacts About Copyright Infringement Law
MARKETING AND ADVERTISING THROUGH SOCIAL MEDIA Ann H. Chen, Wm. Wrigley Jr. Company Gonzalo E. Mon, Kelley Drye & Warren LLP Sylvie G. Motz, Practical Law Company, Inc. Overview Endorsements Promotions
More informationRural Internet Service Provider Liability An Overview of Liability Issues Faced by ISPs Now and in the Future
Rural Internet Service Provider Liability An Overview of Liability Issues Faced by ISPs Now and in the Future Charlotte, North Carolina May 5, 2005 Joshua Zeldis 1 Presentation Agenda General Overview
More informationUse of Competitor's Trademark in Keyword Advertising: Infringement or Not?
Use of Competitor's Trademark in Keyword Advertising: Infringement or Not? Grady M. Garrison and Laura P. Merritt Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz P.C. Michael M. Lafeber Briggs and Morgan,
More informationYearbook. Building IP value in the 21st century. Taking a ride on the Birthday Train. KUHNEN & WACKER Intellectual Property Law Firm Christian Thomas
Published by Yearbook 2016 Building IP value in the 21st century Taking a ride on the Birthday Train KUHNEN & WACKER Intellectual Property Law Firm Christian Thomas KUHNEN & WACKER Intellectual Property
More informationMaking a cross border claim in the EU
Making a cross border claim in the EU serving the community through the administration of justice Using the European Order for Payment procedure or the European Small Claims procedure Version: 2.0 Date
More informationOPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL. Opn. No. 2000-1
Page 1 of 6 Opn. No. 2000-1 US CONST, FOURTH AMEND; CRIMINAL PROCEDURE LAW 1.20, 140.10, 140.25, 140.30; PENAL LAW 10.00; 8 USC, CH 12, 1252c, 1253(c), 1254(a)(1), 1255a, 1324(a) and (c), 1325(b). New
More informationA Critical Review of China s Approach to Limitation of the Internet Service Provider s Liability: A Comparative Perspective
Journal of Intellectual Property Rights Vol 16, May, 2011, pp 235-245 A Critical Review of China s Approach to Limitation of the Internet Service Provider s Liability: A Comparative Perspective Wenqi Liu
More informationAVCC. Australian Vice-Chancellors Committee the council of Australia s university presidents. Peer-to-Peer File Sharing: the Legal Landscape
AVCC Australian Vice-Chancellors Committee the council of Australia s university presidents Peer-to-Peer File Sharing: the Legal Landscape November 2003 This work in copyright free to universities and
More informationCONCERNS WITH THE LEAKED INTERNET CHAPTER OF ACTA
CONCERNS WITH THE LEAKED INTERNET CHAPTER OF ACTA The U.S. proposal for an Internet chapter in the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) has been leaked to the press and widely disseminated on the
More informationExcuses, Excuses Copyright Carolyn E. Wright, Esq. www.photoattorney.com All Rights Reserved
Excuses, Excuses Copyright Carolyn E. Wright, Esq. www.photoattorney.com All Rights Reserved When someone infringes your copyright, the infringer usually offers some excuse to try to avoid liability. Many
More informationGENERAL SOFTWARE LICENCE TERMS AND CONDITIONS of Fritz & Macziol GmbH Current as of March 2014
GENERAL SOFTWARE LICENCE TERMS AND CONDITIONS of Fritz & Macziol GmbH Current as of March 2014 Section 1 Preamble The following software licence terms and conditions stipulate the extent of the rights
More informationEMI v UPC. THE DECISION AND CONSEQUENCES FOR IRISH ISPs AND COPYRIGHT HOLDERS
EMI v UPC THE DECISION AND CONSEQUENCES FOR IRISH ISPs AND COPYRIGHT HOLDERS Sally-Anne Hinfey, DFMG Solicitors, IE 1 Introduction EMI v UPC 2 is a particularly controversial intellectual property judgment
More informationLegal Research Record
Legal Research Record Summary of problem(s) Design and Dress Limited (DDL) has experienced problems due to the alleged harassment of one of their employees, Susie Baker, by another employee, Stephen Harding
More informationWebsites & Copyright. INFORMATION SHEET G057v12 April 2014. info@copyright.org.au www.copyright.org.au
INFORMATION SHEET G057v12 April 2014 Websites & Copyright This information sheet is for web developers, bloggers, website designers, startups, businesses and anyone interested in copyright issues relevant
More informationUCO Copyright Compliance Starting Point for Al Copyright Concerns: 1. Is the work Copyrighted? 2. Is the class traditional or Online?
UCO Copyright Compliance As members of the UCO community, all faculty and staff members are expected to comply with federal copyright law. Unauthorized use of copyrighted material is illegal and may result
More informationQueensland WHISTLEBLOWERS PROTECTION ACT 1994
Queensland WHISTLEBLOWERS PROTECTION ACT 1994 Act No. 68 of 1994 Queensland WHISTLEBLOWERS PROTECTION ACT 1994 Section PART 1 PRELIMINARY TABLE OF PROVISIONS Division 1 Title and commencement Page 1 Short
More informationGoogle Inc v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2013] HCA 1: Misleading and Deceptive Representations
153 Google Inc v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2013] HCA 1: Misleading and Deceptive Representations GRAHAM HANSEN* Digital technologies have created new problems for the law. In recent
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 12-13210. D.C. Docket No. 4:08-cv-00167-HL. versus
Case: 12-13210 Date Filed: 03/27/2014 Page: 1 of 12 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 12-13210 D.C. Docket No. 4:08-cv-00167-HL AMERICAN FAMILY LIFE ASSURANCE
More informationPatents in Europe 2013/2014
In association with Unitary patent and Unified Patent Court: the proposed framework Rainer K Kuhnen Patents in Europe 2013/2014 Helping business compete in the global economy Unitary patent and Unified
More informationThe Fate of Anti-Assignment Clauses After Bankruptcy
Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com The Fate of Anti-Assignment Clauses After Bankruptcy
More informationCOMITE MARITIME INTERNATIONAL THE IMPLEMENTATION IN NATIONAL LAW OF MANDATORY INSURANCE PROVISIONS IN INTERNATIONAL CONVENTIONS
Esplanade 6, 20354 Hamburg Telefon: 040/350 97-0 Telefax: 040/350 97 211 E-Mail: Info@Seerecht.de www.seerecht.de COMITE MARITIME INTERNATIONAL THE IMPLEMENTATION IN NATIONAL LAW OF MANDATORY INSURANCE
More informationCovered California. Terms and Conditions of Use
Terms and Conditions of Use Contents: Purpose Of This Agreement Privacy Policy Modification Of This Agreement Permission To Act On Your Behalf How We Identify You Registration Additional Terms For Products
More information3. FACT SHEET ON INCORPORATED SOCIETIES
DECEMBER 2005 FACT SHEET ON 3. FACT SHEET ON This fact sheet deals with incorporated societies. These are organisations that have at least 15 members and are registered under the Incorporated Societies
More informationManagement liability - Employment practices liability Policy wording
Special definitions for this section Benefits Claim Defence costs The General terms and conditions and the following terms and conditions all apply to this section. Any compensation awarded to an employee
More informationDECONSTRUCTING GOOGLE: JOINED CASES C-236/08 TO C- 238/08 ( GOOGLE FRANCE )
DECONSTRUCTING GOOGLE: JOINED CASES C-236/08 TO C- 238/08 ( GOOGLE FRANCE ) or is google responsible for potential trademark infringement comitted via its adword service? Ernesto Cebollero, Alicante 17th
More informationISP liability in Denmark
ISP liability in Denmark Clement Salung Petersen Assistant Professor, PhD Centre for Information and Innovation Law www.ciir.dk Dias 1 A Danish perspective on ISP liability ISP liability Mere conduit,
More informationTAXING BANKRUPTCY LIQUIDATION SALES. By Bruce A. Emard 1
TAXING BANKRUPTCY LIQUIDATION SALES I. Introduction By Bruce A. Emard 1 California taxes liquidation sales of tangible personal property (TPP) under its Sales and Use Tax Law (the Sales and Use Tax Law
More informationPatent Litigation in Europe - Presence and Future
Patent Litigation in Europe - Presence and Future Innovation Support Training Program (ISTP) Module 2 / November 27, 2006 Christian W. Appelt German and European Patent and Trademark Attorney Patent Litigation
More informationLiability of Internet Service Providers for Third Party Online Copyright Infringement: A Study of the US and Indian Laws
Journal of Intellectual Property Rights Vol 12, November 2007, pp 553-561 Liability of Internet Service Providers for Third Party Online Copyright Infringement: A Study of the US and Indian Laws Thilini
More informationA reservation request accompanied by its accepted payment shall be deemed a firm order.
RESERVATION SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS for the 62 nd Annual SSC Meeting of the ISTH. The rates listed have been negotiated by c accommodation for the 62 nd Annual SSC Meeting of the ISTH to be held at
More informationTERMS AND CONDITIONS OF USE OF THE WEBSITE GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS
TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF USE OF THE WEBSITE GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS Preamble Touscoprod, an EURL with capital of 7,500 Euros, listed on the Paris Companies Registry as number 510 096 365, with registered
More informationMODEL CONTRACTS FOR SMALL FIRMS LEGAL GUIDANCE FOR DOING INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS
MODEL CONTRACTS FOR SMALL FIRMS LEGAL GUIDANCE FOR DOING INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS International Trade Centre, August 2010 Contents Foreword Acknowledgements Introduction Chapter 1 International Contractual
More informationECTA 35th Annual Conference, Dubrovnik 24 June 2016. Mr Justice Richard Arnold
Infringement under Article 10(2)(a) Trade Marks Directive (Recast)/ Article 9(2)(a) European Union Trade Mark Regulation and effect on the functions of the trade mark ECTA 35th Annual Conference, Dubrovnik
More informationIn the Technology-Driven, File Sharing Era, Copyright Protection Remains Alive and Well As a Tool to Combat Active Inducements to Infringe
In the Technology-Driven, File Sharing Era, Copyright Protection Remains Alive and Well As a Tool to Combat Active Inducements to Infringe On June 27, 2005, the Supreme Court in Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios
More information'Making Available' Cases Still Making Trouble
Portfolio Media, Inc. 648 Broadway, Suite 200 New York, NY 10012 www.law360.com Phone: +1 212 537 6331 Fax: +1 212 537 6371 customerservice@portfoliomedia.com 'Making Available' Cases Still Making Trouble
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION JPM NETWORKS, LLC, ) d/b/a KWIKBOOST ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. ) 3:14-cv-1507 JCM FIRST VENTURE, LLC )
More informationBuilding Work Contractors Act 1995
Version: 21.11.2015 South Australia Building Work Contractors Act 1995 An Act to regulate building work contractors and the supervision of building work; and for other purposes. Contents Part 1 Preliminary
More informationCommentary. By Gregory Nylen
Commentary Perfect 10, Inc. v. Visa International Service, Association, 494 F.3d 788 (9th Cir. 2007): A Free Pass For Merchant Account Providers For Secondary Liability In Trademark Counterfeiting Cases?
More informationYearbook. Building IP value in the 21st century. Beyond the unitary patent: nothing new under the sun?
Beyond the unitary patent: nothing new under the sun? Anna Barlocci and Mathieu de Rooij, ZBM Patents & Trademarks Yearbook 2015 Building IP value in the 21st century 12 13 14 ZBM Patents & Trademarks
More informationWebsite Disclaimer http://www.website-law.co.uk/ourdocumentlicence.html. Disclaimer 1
Website Disclaimer http://www.website-law.co.uk/ourdocumentlicence.html (1) Introduction Disclaimer 1 This disclaimer governs your use of our website; by using our website, you accept this disclaimer in
More informationCase: 1:13-cv-00260 Document #: 55 Filed: 08/16/13 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:<pageid>
Case: 1:13-cv-00260 Document #: 55 Filed: 08/16/13 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION DENTAL USA, INC. Plaintiff, v. No. 13 CV 260
More informationWhat You Need to Know and What You Need to Do
South Central Wisconsin MLS Corporation 4801 Forest Run Road, Suite 101 Madison, WI 53704 Phone (608) 240-2800 Fax (608) 240-2801 What You Need to Know and What You Need to Do A Real Estate Broker s Risk
More informationHow To Control Content On The Cloud
1 EXPERT GROUP MEETING ON CLOUD COMPUTING CONTRACTS SYNTHESIS OF THE MEETING OF 30 APRIL 2014 On 30 April 2014, the Expert Group on Cloud Computing Contracts met for the sixth time. Three sessions were
More informationComments of Verizon Communications on the Draft Convention on Jurisdiction and Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters
Comments of Verizon Communications on the Draft Convention on Jurisdiction and Foreign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters Verizon Communications appreciates the opportunity to submit comments on
More informationWays Manufacturers Can Shut Down Unauthorized Resellers
Ways Manufacturers Can Shut Down Unauthorized Resellers Law360, New York (July 26, 2016, 4:54 PM ET) -- The internet has become a dominant marketplace for consumer products and services. Historically,
More informationUnauthorized Practice of Law
Unauthorized Practice of Law Maryland, Virginia and the District of Columbia - Laws, Regulations and Procedures for how to file a complaint against a Notario Publico Overview Notary v. Notario Publico
More informationAdopted by. the Assembly of the Paris Union for the Protection of Industrial Property. and
845(E) Joint Recommendation Concerning Provisions on the Protection of Marks, and Other Industrial Property Rights in Signs, on the Internet (with Explanatory Notes) Adopted by the Assembly of the Paris
More informationTRADEMARKS AND THE INTERNET
TRADEMARKS AND THE INTERNET TRADEMARK LAW A trademark or service mark is a word, name, symbol or device used to identify goods or services and distinguish them from others. Trademarks and service marks
More informationDr. Paul P. Polanski PREVENTIVE MEASURES TO BE TAKEN BY DILIGENT HOSTING SERVICE PROVIDERS IN THE LIGHT OF L OREAL V EBAY RULING
. 1 Dr. Paul P. Polanski, polanski@kozminski.edu.pl Kozminski University ABSTRACT. The present contribution discusses the latest ruling of the European Court of Justice in the case of L Oreal v ebay, which
More informationCCBE POSITION WITH RESPECT TO THE FREE CHOICE OF A LAWYER IN RELATION TO LEGAL EXPENSES INSURANCE
CCBE POSITION WITH RESPECT TO THE FREE CHOICE OF A LAWYER IN RELATION TO LEGAL EXPENSES INSURANCE CCBE position with respect to the free choice of a lawyer in relation to legal expenses insurance The Council
More informationSPAIN. Written by Pedro Alemán Laín and Javier Martinez Bavière, Pedro Alemán Abogados. Trends and Hot Topics in the Spanish Media Law Market
SPAIN Written by Pedro Alemán Laín and Javier Martinez Bavière, Pedro Alemán Abogados Besides the difficult times that the music, film and television industry have been undergoing, we have seen clear signs
More informationInternational Tax Alert
Global Insights A Review of Key Regulatory Issues Impacting International Tax Practices European Union: German dividend withholding tax violates the principle of free movement of capital (ECJ, October
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN DECISION AND ORDER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN STANDARD PROCESS, INC., Plaintiff, v. Case No. 06-C-843 DR. SCOTT J. BANKS, Defendant. DECISION AND ORDER Standard Process, Inc. ( Standard Process
More informationTerms and Conditions.
Terms and Conditions. We ask that you read them through and keep a copy for your own records, just in case you need to refer back to them at any time. By ordering or using a Systems Integration (UK) Ltd.service
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND : : : : : : : MEMORANDUM
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND CATHERINE HOWELL, et al. Plaintiffs v. STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANIES, et al. Defendants Civil No. L-04-1494 MEMORANDUM This is a proposed
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND NICOLE MARIE CRUZ, Plaintiff, v. C.A. No. 05-38S HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. DECISION AND ORDER WILLIAM E. SMITH, United
More informationThe Saskatchewan Medical Care Insurance Act
1 SASKATCHEWAN MEDICAL CARE INSURANCE c. S-29 The Saskatchewan Medical Care Insurance Act being Chapter S-29 of The Revised Statutes of Saskatchewan, 1978 (effective February 26, 1979) as amended by the
More informationA COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE LIABILITY OF INTERNET SERVICE PROVIDERS IN THE CONTEXT OF COPYRIGHT INGFINGEMENT IN THE U.S., EUROPEAN UNION AND POLAND
2009] M. Lesiak: An Analysis of the Liability of Internet Service Providers 279 A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE LIABILITY OF INTERNET SERVICE PROVIDERS IN THE CONTEXT OF COPYRIGHT INGFINGEMENT IN THE U.S.,
More informationInternational Patent Litigation and Jurisdiction. Study of Hypothetical Question 1 Under the Hague Draft Convention and Japanese Laws
International Patent Litigation and Jurisdiction Study of Hypothetical Question 1 Under the Hague Draft Convention and Japanese Laws Yoshio Kumakura Attorney at Law Nakamura & Partners 1 The 1999 Draft
More informationWeb Terms & Conditions
PART 1: OUR AGREEMENT WITH YOU 1. AGREEMENT 1.1 Parties This Agreement is made between Cheap Web Designers (ACN 126 117 619) of Suite 504, 365 Little Collins Street Melbourne VIC 3000 ("CWD") and YOU the
More informationSummary of Advisory Report: Consumer rights in the internal market
Summary of Advisory Report: Consumer rights in the internal market Foreword In June 2009, the Committee for Consumer Affairs (CCA) of the Social and Economic Council of the Netherlands presented an advisory
More informationAct XLVIII of 2008 on Essential Conditions of and Certain Limitations to Business Advertising Activity
Act XLVIII of 2008 on Essential Conditions of and Certain Limitations to Business Advertising Activity /competition law related provisions of the Act/ In order to protect the health of citizens, in particular
More informationINTELLECTUAL PROPERTY UPDATE
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY UPDATE May 2007 1 Hogan & Hartson LLP INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY UPDATE Supreme Court Holds That 35 U.S.C. 271(f) Does Not Apply To Golden Master Disks In a decision handed down April
More information1.3 Your access to and use of the Site, including your order of Products through the Site, is subject to these terms and conditions.
Home Support Network Terms and Conditions General 1.1 This Home Care site at www.homesupportnetwork.com.au ( Site ) is a shopping website where you can browse, select and order products advertised on the
More informationTax Relief for Gifts To European Charities. UK tax law provides a number of reliefs and exemptions connected to charities.
Tax Relief for Gifts To European Charities Introduction UK tax law provides a number of reliefs and exemptions connected to charities. For example, the Gift Aid scheme allows donations to be deducted from
More informationFALSE CLAIMS ACT STATUTORY LANGUAGE
33 U.S.C. 3729-33 FALSE CLAIMS ACT STATUTORY LANGUAGE 31 U.S.C. 3729. False claims (a) LIABILITY FOR CERTAIN ACTS. (1) IN GENERAL. Subject to paragraph (2), any person who (A) knowingly presents, or causes
More informationIMPORTANT IT IS DEAMED THAT YOU HAVE READ AND AGREE TO ALL TERMS & CONDITIONS BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE.
Terms & conditions for the use of this Website IMPORTANT IT IS DEAMED THAT YOU HAVE READ AND AGREE TO ALL TERMS & CONDITIONS BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE. By using this website you are deemed to have full
More informationGENERAL TERMS OF USE
GENERAL TERMS OF USE 1. Purpose and Scope 1.1. The Website at www.lvmhprize.com is the internet site set up by LVMH Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton ("LVMH") for the LVMH Prize for Young Fashion Designers and
More informationCOPYRIGHT, PEER-TO-PEER FILE SHARING AND DMCA SUBPOENAS
1 of 6 8/16/2007 9:16 AM TOPIC: COPYRIGHT, PEER-TO-PEER FILE SHARING AND DMCA SUBPOENAS INTRODUCTION: This past summer saw developments relating to peer-to-peer ( P2P ) music file sharing. Of most significance,
More informationProtection from Harassment Bill
Protection from Harassment Bill Bill No. 12/2014. Read the first time on 3rd March 2014. PROTECTION FROM HARASSMENT ACT 2014 (No. of 2014) Section ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I PRELIMINARY 1. Short title
More informationTranslation from German. GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS of mangoart GmbH Bräuergasse 11, 4470 Enns, Austria +43 7223 / 912 78, office@mangoart.
Translation from German GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS of mangoart GmbH Bräuergasse 11, 4470 Enns, Austria +43 7223 / 912 78, office@mangoart.at 1. Applicability; Conclusion of contract 1.1 mangoart GmbH
More informationPUBLIC COU CIL OF THE EUROPEA U IO. Brussels, 30 June 2005 (05.07) (OR. fr) 10748/05 LIMITE JUR 291 JUSTCIV 130 CODEC 579
Conseil UE COU CIL OF THE EUROPEA U IO Brussels, 30 June 2005 (05.07) (OR. fr) PUBLIC 10748/05 LIMITE 291 JUSTCIV 130 CODEC 579 OPI IO OF THE LEGAL SERVICE Subject : Proposal for a Regulation of the European
More informationThe State of South Carolina OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
The State of South Carolina OFFCE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERA CHARES M. CONDON ATTORNEY GENERA Buford S. Mabry, Jr., Chief Counsel SC Department of Natural Resources Post Office Box 167 Columbia, South Carolina
More informationDrafting and enforcing non-compete agreements in the European Union: the examples of France, Germany and Italy
Drafting and enforcing non-compete agreements in the European Union: the examples of France, Germany and Italy Yasmine Tarasewicz Partner June 17, 2010 1 Introduction Non-competition in the relations between
More informationDefensive Strategies in False Marking Suits After Stauffer and Pequignot
Defensive Strategies in False Marking Suits After Stauffer and Pequignot Contributed by Angie M. Hankins, Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP Many companies inadvertently mark their products with expired patents.
More information