1 THE LAW OFFICES OF DIANA SANTA MARIA, P.A. UNIVERSITY PLACE 5220 SO. UNIVERSITY DRIVE SUITE 205C FT. LAUDERDALE, FL (954) Website: A WARP-SPEED OVERVIEW OF 10 OVERLOOKED, MISUNDERSTOOD AND PROBLEMATIC DEADLINES- WALKING THROUGH THE MINEFIELDS OF LITIGATION DIANA SANTA MARIA is the founding and managing partner of the Law Offices of Diana Santa Maria, P.A. in Ft. Lauderdale, Florida and is a graduate of the University of Miami (B.A. with honors, 1981) and the University of Miami School of Law (J.D. 1984). Since being admitted to The Florida Bar in 1985, she has devoted her practice to the representation of persons injured as a result of the negligence of others. From 1985 until 1991 she practiced with the law firm of Sheldon J. Schlesinger, P.A. in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, in the areas of Plaintiff=s Personal Injury, Medical Malpractice and Wrongful Death, both on the trial and appellate levels. In 1991 Ms. Santa Maria formed her own practice specializing in Plaintiff=s Personal Injury and Wrongful Death. She is a member of the American Board of Trial Advocates, a Sustaining Member of the Association of Trial Lawyers of America and she is rated by the Martindale-Hubbell Law Directory. An Eagle patron, Diana has served as a Director on the Academy of Florida Trial Lawyers Board of Directors since She served on the Academy=s Long Range Planning Committee from She also served as Chair of the Continuing Legal Education Committee from and as Chair of the Allies Committee from She has been the recipient of various awards given by the Academy including the AMost Valuable Staff Appreciation Award in 1997 and again in 2000, the Legislative Leadership AShoe Award (October 1997), the AAbove and Beyond the Call of Award (June 1999), the AWings of Award (June 2000) and the ABronze Award (June 2001). She also serves as an officer and director for the Coalition for Family Safety, and is a Flag trustee. Diana has been listed in Who=s Who in American Law, The International Who=s Who of Professionals, and Outstanding Young Women of America. She has lectured and written on numerous legal areas within her specialty, to include Seven Steps to Effective Mediation published in the June, 1997 TRIAL magazine. This year Diana was re-appointed by the president of the Florida Bar to continue her service as an attorney member of the Florida Bar=s Citizens Forum. She also serves as a member of the Florida Bar=s Grievance Committee for the 17th Judicial Circuit. She is listed in the Martindale-Hubbel Bar Register of Preeminent Lawyers and is a Member of the Million Dollar Advocate s Forum. Diana has served on the Board of Directors for ASPIRA of Florida, Inc. and has been Chair of ASPIRA of Broward, a non-profit community based youth organization dedicated to the leadership and
2 educational development of minority youth. THE LAW OFFICES OF DIANA SANTA MARIA, P.A. UNIVERSITY PLACE 5220 SO. UNIVERSITY DRIVE SUITE 205C FT. LAUDERDALE, FL (954) Website: A WARP-SPEED OVERVIEW OF 10 OVERLOOKED, MISUNDERSTOOD AND PROBLEMATIC DEADLINES- WALKING THROUGH THE MINEFIELDS OF LITIGATION This material was developed by Marc A. Gregg, Esq. and Diana Santa Maria, Esq., of the Law Offices of Diana Santa Maria, P.A. The authors gratefully acknowledge the contributions of others to this outline. The authors also wish to thank attorneys Barbara Green, Gene Polk, Reg Wilcox, Gene Harris, David Carter and Dutch Anderson, for their input and suggestions as this outline was being developed.
3 Issue #1 DEADLINES APPLICABLE TO PIP LITIGATION TIMING OF EUOs and PIP SUITS Summary: Common belief is that an insured cannot file a PIP suit against its carrier if the carrier has already scheduled an examination under oath (EUO), and that filing a PIP suit will vitiate the insured=s coverage under his policy. However, if the insurer is already in violation of the PIP statute, this is no longer the case. Insurance companies have relied on Goldman v. State Farm, 660 So.2d 300 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995), a fire loss case, for the proposition that submitting to examinations under oath is a condition precedent to filing suit. That is, if the insurer requests an examination under oath, and the plaintiff files a suit prior to the examination date, the plaintiff has willfully and materially beached his contract, precluding him from recovery under his policy. The law began to change with Central Metal Fabricators v. The Travelers, 703 So.2d 1251 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998), in which the court held that, because the Plaintiff repeatedly complied with prior examination requests, and only prematurely filed suit, the trial court was directed to simply stay or abate the Plaintiff=s suit until the examination under oath could be held. The law changed completely with Amador v. United Automobile Insurance Co., 748 So.2d 307 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999, review denied 767 So.2d 464, Fla. 2000). The insureds sought PIP benefits. Over 30 days after notice of the claim, United Auto scheduled examinations under oath. The insureds filed suit for breach (not paying claims within 30 days), and for declaratory judgment of whether United Auto could force them to submit to an examination under oath as a condition precedent to receiving PIP benefits. The court held that the insurer is in violation of the PIP statute on the 31 st day after a request for payment (subject to Areasonable of the claim), and the insured is free to file a PIP suit. Further the burden is on the insurance company to authenticate the claim with the statutory time period. And, although United Auto requested the EUO prior to suit being filed by the Plaintiff, the court held that under the PIP statute, because United Auto had failed to pay within 30 days, United Auto was in breach of contract, and could not deny the Plaintiffs access to the courts for purposes of enforcing the PIP statute. In State Farm v. Jenkins, 767 So.2d 622 (Fla. 4 th DCA 2000), State Farm was overdue on benefit payments when it requested Jenkins to submit to an EUO. Jenkins did not appear, and filed suit to recover unpaid benefits. The trial judge entered judgment for Jenkins, the circuit court affirmed, and the 4 th DCA denied a petition for writ of certiorari stating that Jenkins was free to file suit as State Farm was already more than 30 days overdue, citing to Amador.
4 Summary: Issue #2 DEADLINES APPLICABLE WHEN SUING A STATE AGENCY CLAIMS AGAINST THE STATE, FOR ITSELF AND FOR ITS AGENCIES OR SUBDIVISIONS A trap for the unwary. Although your negligence statute may have four years to run, state law requires that your claim must be presented and the state must deny the claim in writing, within 3 years after it accrues. Further, if the state agency does not respond within 6 months, the lack of response is taken as a final denial. Consequently, if you fail to make your claim, properly and in compliance with the statutory requirements, within 3years, your claim will end up time barred, even though your statute may have four years to run. In a medical malpractice or a wrongful death action, you have even less time. The agency=s failure to respond within 90 days constitutes a final denial. Fla. Stat. ' (6)(a) An action may not be instituted on a claim against the state or one of its agencies or subdivisions unless the claimant presents the claim in writing to the appropriate agency, and also, except as to any claim against a municipality or the Florida Space Authority, presents such claim in writing to the Department of Insurance, within 3 years after such claim accrues and the Department of Insurance or the appropriate agency denies the claim in writing; except that, if such claim is for contribution pursuant to s , it must be so presented within 6 months after the judgment against the tortfeasor seeking contribution has become final by lapse of time for appeal or after appellate review or, if there is no such judgment, within 6 months after the tortfeasor seeking contribution has either discharged the common liability by payment or agreed, while the action is pending against her or him, to discharge the common liability. (b) For purposes of this section, the requirements of notice to the agency and denial of the claim pursuant to paragraph (a) are conditions precedent to maintaining an action but shall not be deemed to be elements of the cause of action and shall not affect the date on which the cause of action accrues.... (d)... The failure of the Department of Insurance or the appropriate agency to make final disposition of a claim within 6 months after it is filed shall be deemed a final denial of the claim for purposes of this section. For purposes of this subsection, in medical malpractice actions, the failure of the Department of Insurance or the appropriate agency to make final disposition of a claim within 90 days after it is filed shall be deemed a final denial of the claim. The provisions of this subsection do not apply to such claims as may be asserted by counterclaim pursuant to s (7) In actions brought pursuant to this section, process shall be served upon the head of the agency concerned and also, except as to a defendant municipality or the Florida Space Authority, upon the Department of Insurance; and the department or the agency concerned shall have 30 days within which to plead thereto.
5 Issue #3 DEADLINES APPLICABLE WHEN THE TORTFEASOR DIES OR WHEN THE PLAINTIFF DIES I. TIMING AND PRACTICE ISSUES WHEN THE TORTFEASOR IS AN ESTATE Summary: Probate Statutes Taken together, these statutes bar civil actions to recover against estates, personal representatives or beneficiaries unless a claim is filed in the probate action within the required time. The time may be extended for specific, enumerated reasons. If you want to pursue a claim against the estate of a deceased tortfeasor, you must file a claim in the probate matter, in general within 3 months of the first publication of the notice to creditors (see statute below). However, claims against insurers, up to the limits of their applicable policies, are not affected by the statutes, and usual statutes of limitation apply. See Pezzi v. Brown, 697 So.2d 883 (Fla. 4 th DCA 1997); May v. Illinois Nat. Ins. Co., 771 So.2d 1143 (Fla. 2000) Limitations on claims against estates (1) Notwithstanding any other provision of the code, 2 years after the death of a person, neither the decedent's estate, the personal representative, if any, nor the beneficiaries shall be liable for any claim or cause of action against the decedent, whether or not letters of administration have been issued, except as provided in this section. (2) This section shall not apply to a creditor who has filed a claim pursuant to s within 2 years after the person's death, and whose claim has not been paid or otherwise disposed of pursuant to s Limitations on presentation of claims (1) If not barred by s , no claim... against the decedent's estate that arose before the death of the decedent... is binding on the estate, on the personal representative, or on any beneficiary unless filed in the probate proceeding on or before the later of the date that is 3 months after the time of the first publication of the notice to creditors or, as to any creditor required to be served with a copy of the notice to creditors, 30 days after the date of service on the creditor.... (2) No cause of action... shall survive the death of the person against whom the claim may be made, whether or not an action is pending at the death of the person, unless a claim is filed within the time periods set forth in this part. (3) Any claim not timely filed as provided in this section is barred... unless the court extends the time in which the claim may be filed. An extension may be granted only upon grounds of fraud, estoppel, or insufficient notice of the claims period. No independent action or declaratory action may
6 be brought upon a claim which was not timely filed unless an extension has been granted by the court. If the personal representative or any other interested person serves on the creditor a notice to file a petition for an extension, the creditor shall be limited to a period of 30 days from the date of service of the notice in which to file a petition for extension. (4) Nothing in this section affects or prevents:... (b) To the limits of casualty insurance protection only, any proceeding to establish liability that is protected by the casualty insurance. II. TIMING AND PRACTICE ISSUES WHEN THE PLAINTIFF DIES 1. Suggestion of Death If your Plaintiff dies during the pendency of litigation, you need to file a suggestion of death in the action, per Fla. R. Civ. P However, the trap is in the requirement that a Motion for Substitution must be filed in action within 90 days after the suggestion of death. The penalty for failing to move for substitution of parties within the delineated time is that the action shall be dismissed as to the deceased party.
7 Issue #4 DEADLINES APPLICABLE WHEN THE DEFENDANT=S INSURANCE COMPANY GOES BANKRUPT Summary: FIGA STATUTES Upon filing of an insurer=s bankruptcy, an automatic 6 month stay is obtained, which can be extended by the court. An additional consideration is the deadline for filing claims pursuant to the order of liquidation- you must settle or file within one year of that deadline (which is delineated in the order of Liquidation itself for each case) or your claim will be barred against both the association (FIGA) and the insured per statute. However, be careful as to whom you file a claim against in the bankruptcy action. Filing a claim releases the insured to the extent of the coverage, consequently you will be barred from pursuing a recovery against the insured beyond the $300, FIGA claim limits. Also, you can potentially settle with FIGA, but maintain a claim against the receiver, but not if you inadvertently release the receiver when you release FIGA. Read your release carefully. Fla. Stat. ' Stay of proceedings; reopening of default judgments All proceedings in which the insolvent insurer is a party or is obligated to defend a party in any court or before any quasi-judicial body or administrative board in this state shall be stayed for 6 months, or such additional period from the date the insolvency is adjudicated... provided that such stay may be extended for a period of time greater than 6 months upon proper application to a court of competent jurisdiction Limitation; certain actions A covered claim as defined herein with respect to which settlement is not effected and suit is not instituted against the insured of an insolvent insurer or the association within 1 year after the deadline for filing claims, or any extension thereof, with the receiver of the insolvent insurer shall thenceforth be barred as a claim against the association and the insured Releases The filing of a claim constitutes a release of the insured from liability to the claimant to the extent of the coverage or policy limits provided by the insolvent insurer....this release does not operate to discharge the Florida Insurance Guaranty Association or any other guaranty association from any of its responsibilities and duties set out in this chapter Effect of paid claims...
8 (2) The receiver, liquidator, or statutory successor of an insolvent insurer shall be bound by settlements of covered claims by the association (4) Any release of the association and its insured must clearly state whether or not any claim filed with the receiver in excess of the liability of the association under s is waived.
9 Issue #5 DEADLINES APPLICABLE TO FAILURE TO PROSECUTE THE CASE Dismissal for failure to prosecute Simple and deadly, Rule provides for the dismissal of actions in which there has been no record activity for a year. The one-year period is measured backwards from the time preceding the filing of the motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution. Frohman v.stella BAR-OR, 660 So.2d 633 (Fla. 1995). In general, action that moves the case along qualifies for record activity, while action that does not move the case forward does not. The case law contains numerous examples of each kind of activity. Fla. R. Civ. P Dismissal of Actions... (e) Failure to Prosecute. All actions in which it appears on the face of the record that no activity by filing of pleadings, order of court, or otherwise has occurred for a period of 1 year shall be dismissed by the court on its own motion or on the motion of any interested person, whether a party to the action or not, after reasonable notice to the parties, unless a stipulation staying the action is approved by the court or a stay order has been filed or a party shows good cause in writing at least 5 days before the hearing on the motion why the action should remain pending. Mere inaction for a period of less than 1 year shall not be sufficient cause for dismissal for failure to prosecute.
10 Issue #6 DEADLINES APPLICABLE WHEN SUMMARY JUDGMENT BECOMES AN ISSUE Fla. R. Civ. P Motion for summary judgment may be filed at any time after the expiration of 20 days from commencement of action or after service of a motion for summary judgment by the adverse party. The motion shall be served at least 20 days before the time set for hearing. $ However, supporting affidavits of the adverse party must be served: $ by mail at least 5 days prior to the day of hearing or $ by delivering the affidavits to the movant=s attorney no later than 5:00 p.m. 2 business days prior to the day of the hearing Note: Many local trial orders will limit the bringing of a Motion for Summary Judgment beyond a certain number of days before trial. Always check the court=s trial order to see the specific deadlines applicable in your case.
11 Issue #7 DEADLINES APPLICABLE TO PROPOSALS FOR SETTLEMENT Fla. R. Civ. P , Fla. Stat '768.79, Fla. Stat. ' Summary: The timing of service of a proposal for settlement, combined with its phrasing, strictly controls its impact. Joint proposals must be distinguishable as to the terms and the amount attributable to each party, or the proposal may deemed invalid. Successive proposals may be made, and entitlement to fees may be triggered by any of the proposals. Fla. R. Civ. P Applies to all proposals for settlement authorized by Florida law, and supercedes all other provisions of the rules and statutes that are inconsistent with this Rule (e.g. time provisions of Fla. Stat. '45.061) $ On defendant- serve no earlier than 90 days after service of process $ On Plaintiff- serve no earlier than 90 days after action commenced $ Can serve no later than 45 days before the earliest of 1 st day of trial docket or 1 st day trial is set $ Joint proposal to more than 1 party shall state amount and terms attributable to each $ Serve on parties but do not file unless necessary to enforce the Rule $ Rejected unless written acceptance within 30 days. $ Determination of good faith is discretionary with the Court. Fla. Stat. ' $ The making of an offer does not preclude making a subsequent offer
12 Issue #8 DEADLINES APPLICABLE TO MOTIONS FOR NEW TRIAL, REHEARING, AND APPEAL OF AN ADVERSE VERDICT OR RULING Fla. R. Civ. P Motion for new trial or rehearing shall be served no later than 10 days after $ return of the verdict in jury action or date of filing judgment in non-jury action $ If motion relies on affidavits, they must be served with the motion $ Opposing party then has 10 days to serve opposing affidavits Motion may be amended to state new grounds (in court=s discretion) at any time before the motion is determined Court may order rehearing or new trial on its own initiative within 10 days of entry of judgment, or within the time of ruling on a timely motion for new trial or rehearing Motion to alter or amend a judgment shall be served no later than 10 days after the entry of judgment. Note: there is no 10 day deadline for filing a motion for rehearing of a non-final order. The court has jurisdiction until the final judgment to reconsider interlocutory orders; however, if you do move for a rehearing, the motion does not toll the time for filing a notice of appeal or cert petition. The time for a notice of appeal or cert petition is 30 days from the original order and a motion for rehearing does not extend the time. Fla. R. App. P Order granting new trial must be appealed within 30 days of the order granting it Note: Orders denying new trial can not be appealed- you need to appeal the judgment, within 30 days of the rendition of the judgment 3. Attorneys fees on appeal Get your Motion in on time (no later than the time for service of the reply brief), and in the right format, or miss your opportunity. Rule Costs and Attorneys Fees... (b) Attorneys= Fees. A motion for attorneys= fees may be served not later than the time for service of the reply brief and shall state the grounds on which recovery is sought....
13 Summary: Issue #9 DEADLINES APPLICABLE TO MEDICAL MALPRACTICE- CHAPTER 766 Two year statute of limitations from date of incident or time the incident is discovered (but in no event any later than a maximum of four years from date of incident, with certain exceptions for children 8 years of age or younger). An extra (automatic) 90 days may be obtained by filing a petition with the clerk of court. Another 90 days is obtained by serving the pre-suit notice letter, which is in addition to the 90 days obtained by filing an extension. At the end of the second 90 days, suit must be filed within 60 days of the end of the presuit period.. Fla. Stat. '95.11 (b) An action for medical malpractice shall be commenced within 2 years from the time the incident giving rise to the action occurred or within 2 years from the time the incident is discovered, or should have been discovered with the exercise of due diligence; however, in no event shall the action be commenced later than 4 years from the date of the incident or occurrence out of which the cause of action accrued, except that this 4-year period shall not bar an action brought on behalf of a minor on or before the child's eighth birthday.... The limitation of actions within this subsection shall be limited to the health care provider and persons in privity with the provider of health care. In those actions covered by this paragraph in which it can be shown that fraud, concealment, or intentional misrepresentation of fact prevented the discovery of the injury the period of limitations is extended forward 2 years from the time that the injury is discovered or should have been discovered with the exercise of due diligence, but in no event to exceed 7 years from the date the incident giving rise to the injury occurred, except that this 7-year period shall not bar an action brought on behalf of a minor on or before the child's eighth birthday. This paragraph shall not apply to actions for which ss provide the exclusive remedy. Fla. Stat ' (2) Upon petition to the clerk of the court where the suit will be filed... an automatic 90-day extension of the statute of limitations shall be granted.... This period shall be in addition to other tolling periods.... The provisions of this subsection shall not be deemed to revive a cause of action on which the statute of limitations has run. The 90 day period is a genuine extension of time, to be tacked on to the end of the limitations period, and does not run simultaneously with the 90 day tolling period upon mailing of the notice of intent to initiate litigation. Fla. Stat. ' Notice before filing action for medical malpractice; pre-suit screening period; offers for admission of liability and for arbitration; informal discovery; review
14 (2) After completion of pre-suit investigation... and prior to filing a claim for medical malpractice, a claimant shall notify each prospective defendant... of intent to initiate litigation for medical malpractice. Following the initiation of a suit... and service of the complaint... the claimant shall provide a copy of the complaint to the Department of Health.... (3)(a) No suit may be filed for a period of 90 days after notice is mailed to any prospective defendant... (b) At or before the end of the 90 days, the insurer or self-insurer shall provide the claimant with a response: 1. Rejecting the claim; 2. Making a settlement offer; or 3. Making an offer of admission of liability and for arbitration on the issue of damages.... (c)... Failure of the prospective defendant or insurer or self-insurer to reply to the notice within 90 days after receipt shall be deemed a final rejection of the claim.... (d) Within 30 days of receipt of a response by a prospective defendant, insurer, or self-insurer to a claimant represented by an attorney, the attorney shall advise the claimant in writing of the response... (4) The notice of intent to initiate litigation shall be served within the time limits set forth in s However, during the 90-day period, the statute of limitations is tolled as to all potential defendants. Upon stipulation by the parties, the 90-day period may be extended and the statute of limitations is tolled during any such extension. Upon receiving notice of termination of negotiations in an extended period, the claimant shall have 60 days or the remainder of the period of the statute of limitations, whichever is greater, within which to file suit.... (10) If a prospective defendant makes an offer to admit liability and for arbitration on the issue of damages, the claimant has 50 days from the date of receipt of the offer to accept or reject it.... If the claimant rejects the offer, he or she may then file suit. (a)... Upon rejection of the offer to admit liability and for arbitration, the claimant has 60 days or the remainder of the period of the statute of limitations, whichever period is greater, in which to file suit. (b) If the offer to admit liability and for arbitration on damages is accepted, the parties have 30 days from the date of acceptance to settle the amount of damages. If the parties have not reached agreement after 30 days, they shall proceed to binding arbitration to determine the amount of damages as follows: 1. Each party shall identify his or her arbitrator to the opposing party not later than 35 days after the date of acceptance. 2. The two arbitrators shall, within 1 week after they are notified of their appointment, agree upon a third arbitrator. If they cannot agree on a third arbitrator, selection of the third arbitrator shall be in accordance with chapter 682.
15 3. Not later than 30 days after the selection of a third arbitrator, the parties shall file written arguments with each arbitrator and with each other indicating total damages. 4. Unless otherwise determined by the arbitration panel, within 10 days after the receipt of such arguments, unless the parties have agreed to a settlement, there shall be a 1-day hearing, at which formal rules of evidence and the rules of civil procedure shall not apply, during which each party shall present evidence as to damages No later than 2 weeks after the hearing, the arbitrators shall notify the parties of their determination of the total award.... Fla.R.Civ.P. Rule Medical Malpractice Pre-suit Screening Rule Applies only to the procedures prescribed by Fla. Stat. ' Notice of intent to initiate litigation shall be served by certified mail, return receipt requested, prior to the expiration of any applicable statute of limitations or statute of repose. If an extension has been granted under section (2) (section now renumbered as ), Florida Statutes, or by agreement of the parties, the notice shall be served within the extended period. The action may not be filed against any defendant until 90 days after the notice of intent to initiate litigation was mailed to that party. The action may be filed against any party at any time after the notice of intent to initiate litigation has been mailed after the claimant has received a written rejection of the claim from that party. To avoid being barred by the applicable statute of limitations, an action must be filed within 60 days or within the remainder of the time of the statute of limitations after the notice of intent to initiate litigation was received, whichever is longer, and the earliest of the following: The expiration of 90 days after the date of receipt of the notice of intent to initiate litigation. The expiration of 180 days after mailing of the notice of intent to initiate litigation if the claim is controlled by section (6)(a), Florida Statutes. Receipt by claimant of a written rejection of the claim. The expiration of any extension of the 90-day pre-suit screening period stipulated to by the parties in accordance with section (4) (section now renumbered as ), Florida Statutes. Issue #10 DEADLINES FOR NURSING HOME NEGLIGENCE - PRESUIT AND LITIGATION TIME PERIODS In a nutshell, the NEW nursing home statutes are applicable to causes of action accruing on or after May 15, 2001, and provide for a shorter period than medical malpractice/negligence cases. Also, your nursing home case is mediated almost
16 immediately following the conclusion of presuit, unless the parties agree to an extension of time to mediate. STATUTORY PERIOD: TWO (2) YEARS UNLESS FRAUD The statutory period is normally two (2) years Afrom the time the incident giving rise to the action occurred or within 2 years from the time the incident is discovered or should have been discovered with the exercise of due However, there are circumstances where the statutory period may be extended to four (4) and even six (6) years depending on whether fraudulent concealment or intentional misrepresentation of facts are present. [' ] PRESUIT PERIOD - Personal Injury OR Death Claim: 75 DAYS If the case involves Apersonal or of a resident and the case is against a Anursing or Aassisted-living an affidavit by an expert is not required. The claimant=s attorney provides a Anotice of via certified mail, to the potential defendant and must the basis of the claim which delineates the negligence and identifies which statutory rights under Chapters (1) and (2) & (3) of the Florida Statutes were violated. This certification should include language that states the alleged injuries based on information Areasonably at the time of the presuit notice. [' (2)] The presuit notice period is 75 days from date of return However, the presuit notice certification is if defendant facility fails to timely provide the resident=s records. [' ] MEDIATION FOLLOWING PRESUIT: 30 DAYS Pursuant to the statute, mediation shall take place Awithin 30 after the claimant=s receipt of the defendant=s response to the presuit claim. The 30 day limitation, however, may be extended by agreement of the parties. [' (11)] To prevent any ambiguity, formalize the agreement in writing. TOLLING OF STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS: AN ADDITIONAL 60 DAYS Upon completion of mediation, claimant has 60 days or remainder of statute period, whichever is greater, to file a civil complaint. [' (11)]. Also, at time of serving complaint, Plaintiff must serve a copy of the complaint alleging violation of Chapter 400 to the Agency for Health Care Administration in Tallahassee. [' (6)]
THE LAW OFFICES OF DIANA SANTA MARIA, P.A. University Place 5220 South University Drive SUITE 205C FT. LAUDERDALE, FL. 33328 (954) 434-1077 1-800-668-2156 Website: www.santamarialaw.net e-mail address:email@example.com
CIVIL PROCEDURE 101 Presentation by: Judge Emily Peacock, Scott Silverman, Esq. and Loren Beer, Esq. The Federal Rules govern the conduct of all civil actions brought in Federal district courts. The Florida
Province of Alberta LIMITATIONS ACT Revised Statutes of Alberta 2000 Current as of December 17, 2014 Office Consolidation Published by Alberta Queen s Printer Alberta Queen s Printer 5 th Floor, Park Plaza
AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY APRIL 14, 2015 california legislature 2015 16 regular session ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597 Introduced by Assembly Member Cooley February 24, 2015 An act to amend Sections 36 and 877 of, and
Title XLV TORTS Chapter 768 NEGLIGENCE View Entire Chapter 768.28 Waiver of sovereign immunity in tort actions; recovery limits; limitation on attorney fees; statute of limitations; exclusions; indemnification;
PLEASE NOTE: Legislative Information cannot perform research, provide legal advice, or interpret Maine law. For legal assistance, please contact a qualified attorney. Be it enacted by the People of the
california legislature 2015 16 regular session ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597 Introduced by Assembly Member Cooley February 24, 2015 An act to amend Sections 36 and 877 of, and to add Chapter 6 (commencing with
Broward County False Claims Ordinance Sec. 1-276. - Short title; purpose. (a) This article shall be known and may be cited as the Broward County False Claims Ordinance. (b) The purpose of the Broward County
COLORADO REVISED STATUTES Title 13. Courts and Court Procedure Damages Regulation of Actions and Proceedings Article 20. Actions Part 8. Construction Defect Actions for Property Loss and Damage Construction
FLORIDA SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY WAIVER Florida Educational Risk Management Association July 22, 2011 Lisa J. Augspurger, Esq. Bush & Augspurger, P.A. Orlando/Tallahassee Chapter 2010-26 C.S.S.B. No. 2060 TORTS--CLAIMS--SOVEREIGN
13-20-801. Short title Colorado Revised Statutes Title 13; Article 20; Part 8: CONSTRUCTION DEFECT ACTIONS FOR PROPERTY LOSS AND DAMAGE 1 This part 8 shall be known and may be cited as the Construction
Minnesota False Claims Act Minnesota Stat. 15C.01 to 15C.16) 15C.01 DEFINITIONS Subdivision 1. Scope. --For purposes of this chapter, the terms in this section have the meanings given them. Subd. 2. Claim.
Page 1 LEXSEE 694 ne2d 1220 INDIANA FARMERS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant-Intervenor, vs. KEVIN RICHIE, Appellee-Plaintiff. vs. LOUIS D. EVANS, SPECIAL ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF LEANNE M. SMITH,
SENATE BILL 1ST LEGISLATURE - STATE OF NEW MEXICO - FIRST SESSION, INTRODUCED BY Joseph Cervantes 1 ENDORSED BY THE COURTS, CORRECTIONS AND JUSTICE COMMITTEE AN ACT RELATING TO CIVIL ACTIONS; CLARIFYING
CALIFORNIA FALSE CLAIMS ACT GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 12650-12656 12650. (a) This article shall be known and may be cited as the False Claims Act. (b) For purposes of this article: (1) "Claim" includes any
DISTRICT COURT, EL PASO COUNTY, COLORADO Court address: P.O. Box 2980 270 South Tejon Street Colorado Springs, CO 80903 DATE FILED: July 29, 2014 2:12 PM CASE NUMBER: 2013CV2249 Phone Number: (719) 452-5279
Article 19. Claims Against the Estate. 28A-19-1. Manner of presentation of claims. (a) A claim against a decedent's estate must be in writing and state the amount or item claimed, or other relief sought,
CIVIL TRIAL RULES of the COURTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, TEXAS Table of Contents GENERAL MATTERS Addendum to Local Rules Rule 1.10 Time Standards for the Disposition of Cases...2 Rule 1.11 Annual Calendar...3
Pg 1 of 10 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------------x In re: SOUND SHORE MEDICAL CENTER OF WESTCHESTER, et al., 1 Debtors.
As amended by Chapter 16 of the 2013 Minnesota Session Laws. 15C.01 DEFINITIONS MINNESOTA FALSE CLAIMS ACT Subdivision 1. Scope. --For purposes of this chapter, the terms in this section have the meanings
SMALL CLAIMS RULES Rule 501. Scope and Purpose (a) How Known and Cited. These rules for the small claims division for the county court are additions to C.R.C.P. and shall be known and cited as the Colorado
VIRGINIA ACTS OF ASSEMBLY -- 2015 SESSION CHAPTER 585 An Act to amend and reenact 38.2-2206 of the Code of Virginia and to amend the Code of Virginia by adding in Article 7 of Chapter 3 of Title 8.01 a
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA ATHENA F. GRAINGER, as personal representative of the ESTATE OF SAMUEL GUS FELOS, Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION
What Trustees Should Know About Florida s New Attorneys Fee Statute By David P. Hathaway and David J. Akins Introduction More and more lawsuits are filed in Florida alleging that the trustee of a trust
REFERENCE TITLE: state false claims actions State of Arizona House of Representatives Fiftieth Legislature Second Regular Session HB Introduced by Representative Patterson AN ACT AMENDING TITLE, ARIZONA
LIMITATION OF CERTAIN ACTIONS ACT CHAPTER 7:09 Act 36 of 1997 Amended by 2 of 2000 Current Authorised Pages Pages Authorised (inclusive) by L.R.O. 1 18.. L.R.O. 2 Chap. 7:09 Limitation of Certain Actions
NOTICE Decision filed 10/15/15. The text of this decision may be changed or corrected prior to the filing of a Petition for Rehearing or the disposition of the same. 2015 IL App (5th 140227-U NO. 5-14-0227
PRACTICE GUIDELINES MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Attorneys Practicing Before Me And Other Interested Persons C. Timothy Corcoran, III United States Bankruptcy Judge DATE: January 3, 2000 1 RE: Sample Bankruptcy
AN ACT IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA To amend the District of Columbia Procurement Practices Act of 1985 to make the District s false claims act consistent with federal law and thereby qualify
Article 14. Dissolution. Part 1. Voluntary Dissolution. 55-14-01. Dissolution by incorporators or directors. (a) The board of directors or, if the corporation has no directors, a majority of the incorporators
Filed 2/11/15 Estate of Thomson CA2/8 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified
CHAPTER 2011-233 Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 479 An act relating to medical malpractice; creating ss. 458.3175, 459.0066,
Stricken language would be deleted from and underlined language would be added to present law. State of Arkansas 90th General Assembly A Bill Regular Session, 2015 SENATE BILL 830 By: Senator D. Sanders
BILL ANALYSIS C.S.S.B. 1309 By: Wentworth Civil Practices Committee Report (Substituted) BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE C.S.S.B. 1309 gives the State of Texas civil remedies to be invoked by the attorney general
0 STATE OF WYOMING LSO-0 HOUSE BILL NO. HB00 Plaintiffs in wrongful death actions. Sponsored by: Representative(s) Greear and Lubnau A BILL for AN ACT relating to civil procedure; amending and clarifying
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT CRISTOBAL COLON, Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED v. Case No.
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN PROBATE LAW WRONGFUL DEATH CASES by Sidney C. Summey WHITE, ARNOLD & DOWD, PC Suite 500 2025 Third Avenue North Birmingham, AL 35203 205-715-2690 firstname.lastname@example.org Alabama
SUBCHAPTER II. LIMITATIONS. Article 3. Limitations, General Provisions. 1-14. Repealed by Session Laws 1967, c. 954, s. 4. 1-15. Statute runs from accrual of action. (a) Civil actions can only be commenced
33 U.S.C. 3729-33 FALSE CLAIMS ACT STATUTORY LANGUAGE 31 U.S.C. 3729. False claims (a) LIABILITY FOR CERTAIN ACTS. (1) IN GENERAL. Subject to paragraph (2), any person who (A) knowingly presents, or causes
THE THREAT OF BAD FAITH LITIGATION ETHICAL HANDLING OF CLAIMS AND GOOD FAITH SETTLEMENT PRACTICES By Craig R. White SKEDSVOLD & WHITE, LLC. 1050 Crown Pointe Parkway Suite 710 Atlanta, Georgia 30338 (770)
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA ALAN B. BOOKMAN, AS SUCCESSOR PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF DEBORAH E. IRBY, DECEASED, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION
~tate of m:ennessee PUBLIC CHAPTER NO. 353 HOUSE BILL NO. 493 By Representative Sargent Substituted for: Senate Bill No. 601 By Senator Johnson AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Section 6-55-202
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA JOSE H. CORTES, M.D., Petitioner, v. EDNA P. WILLIAMS, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA MEDICAL THERAPIES, LLC, f/k/a MEDICAL THERAPIES, INC., d/b/a ORLANDO PAIN CLINIC, as assignee of SONJA M. RICKS, CASE
Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency for the District of Columbia Page 2 III. DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY The General Counsel is delegated authority pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2672 to consider, ascertain,
Chapter No. 367] PUBLIC ACTS, 2001 1 CHAPTER NO. 367 HOUSE BILL NO. 779 By Representatives Briley, Hargett, Pleasant Substituted for: Senate Bill No. 261 By Senator Cohen AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code
Article 51. False Claims Act. 1-605. Short title; purpose. (a) This Article shall be known and may be cited as the False Claims Act. (b) The purpose of this Article is to deter persons from knowingly causing
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Case No. SC05-1150 In Re: Petition to Amend Rule Rule 4-1.5(f)(4)(B) of the Rules of Professional Conduct / as follows: RESPONSE OF HARRY A. SHEVIN, ESQUIRE IN OPPOSITION TO PETITION
RULE 4-1.5 FEES AND COSTS FOR LEGAL SERVICES (a) Illegal, Prohibited, or Clearly Excessive Fees and Costs. [no change] (b) Factors to Be Considered in Determining Reasonable Fees and Costs. [no change]
If you have questions or would like further information regarding Statutes of Limitations, please contact: Christopher Johnston 312-540-7568 email@example.com Result Oriented. Success Driven. www.querrey.com
Insurance Code section 11580.2 (a) (1) No policy of bodily injury liability insurance covering liability arising out of the ownership, maintenance, or use of any motor vehicle, except for policies that
Senate Bill 202 By: Senators Unterman of the 45th, Mullis of the 53rd and Chance of the 16th A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT 1 2 3 4 To amend Article 5 of Chapter 8 of Title 31 of the Official Code of Georgia
FLORIDA WRONGFUL DEATH ACT (STATUTES) Disclaimer: This is part of the 2012 version of Florida Statutes and it is offered for general information purposes. The statutes on this site should not be relied
Jurisdictional Limits The justice courts have exclusive jurisdiction or the authority to hear all civil actions when the amount involved, exclusive of interest, costs and awarded attorney fees when authorized
NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances allowed under Rule 23(e(1. 2015 IL App (3d 140144-U Order filed
Rules of the City of New York Title 61 - Office of Collective Bargaining Chapter 1 - Practice and Procedure 1-01 Definitions 1-02 Representation Proceedings 1-03 Collective Bargaining 1-04 Mediation 1-05
SUBCHAPTER XIII. PROVISIONAL REMEDIES. Article 34. Arrest and Bail. 1-409. Arrest only as herein prescribed. No person may be arrested in a civil action except as prescribed by this Article, but this provision
AMENDMENTS TO THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Rule 6. Computing and Extending Time; Time for Motion Papers (a) Computing Time. The following rules apply in computing any time period specified in these
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC00-600 DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL 4th DISTRICT NO. 98-2918 JAMIE BARDOL AND LORI BARDOL, v. MARY MARTIN, Petitioners, Respondent. / ON REVIEW FROM THE FOURTH DISTRICT
No. 79,712 ANNA RUE CAMP, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, V. ST. PAUL FIRE & MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. [February 4, 19931 McDONALD, J. In Camp v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.,
Reed Armstrong Quarterly January 2009 http://www.reedarmstrong.com/default.asp Contributors: William B. Starnes II Tori L. Cox IN THIS ISSUE: Joint and Several Liability The Fault of Settled Tortfeasors
Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed August 16, 2001. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-00-00177-CV HENRY P. MASSEY AND ANN A. MASSEY, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF COURTNEY
Case 109-cv-03701-JPO-JCF Document 362 Filed 08/04/15 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x FORT WORTH EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT FUND, On Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly
JUDICIAL BRANCH MEMORANDUM To: Attorneys; Legal Assistants; Litigants From: Patricia A. Lenz, Superior Court Administrator Julie W. Howard, Strafford Superior Court Clerk Date: Updated December 16, 2013
NY PIP Rule Revisions Effective February 1, 2009 Arbitration Forums, Inc. (AF) has worked in collaboration with the New York State Insurance Department and the Loss Transfer Committee to incorporate revisions
TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE PART V - RULES OF PRACTICE IN JUSTICE COURTS Adopted by the Supreme Court of Texas Justice Court, Pct 1 1 of 24 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1. GENERAL... 6 RULE 523. DISTRICT
Case 3:06-cv-00701-MJR-DGW Document 526 Filed 07/20/15 Page 1 of 8 Page ID #13631 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ANTHONY ABBOTT, et al., ) ) No: 06-701-MJR-DGW Plaintiffs,
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 A bill to be entitled An act relating to mortgage foreclosures; amending s. 95.11, F.S.; revising the limitations period for commencing
TEXAS UNFAIR CLAIMS STATUTES AND REGULATIONS 541.060. UNFAIR SETTLEMENT PRACTICES. (a) It is an unfair method of competition or an unfair or deceptive act or practice in the business of insurance to engage
No. 2-14-1168 Order filed October 15, 2015 NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances allowed under Rule
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR FLAGLER COUNTY, FLORIDA WILLIAM G. MAYFIELD, on behalf of himself and all other persons similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. CASE NO. 2009-CA-002245
LAWS OF WISCONSIN-CH. 81 121 No. 52, S.] [Published May 9, 1941. CHAPTER 81. AN ACT to create 268.22 to 268.34 of the statutes, providing for the disposition of property of absentees unheard of for a certain
WASHINGTON INSURANCE GUARANTY ASSOCIATION ACT Section 48.32.010. Purpose 48.32.020. Scope 48.32.030. Definitions 48.32.040. Creation of the association-required accounts 48.32.050. Board of directors 48.32.060.
JUSTICE COURT # 2 GRAHAM COUNTY STATE OF ARIZONA P.O. BOX 1159, 136 WEST CENTER STREET, PIMA AZ 85543 PHONE (928) 485-2771 FAX (928) 485-9961 SMALL CLAIMS INSTRUCTIONS FOR FILING ***EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1,
No. 70,109 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Petitioner, v. PAIGE SOLDOVERE, Respondent. [January 28, 19881 McDONALD, C. J. The decision of the district court in this case, artme-ortatlon v. Soldovere, 500
H GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION HOUSE DRH-TG- (/01) D Short Title: Tort Reform Act of. (Public) Sponsors: Referred to: Representatives Blust and Daughtry (Primary Sponsors). 1 A BILL TO BE
Appeal Bonds, Sureties, and Stays Appellate Lawyers Association April 22, 2009 Brad Elward Peoria Office The Effect of a Judgment A judgment is immediately subject to enforcement and collection. Illinois
APPLICATION TO THE SACRAMENTO COUNTY BAR/ INDIGENT DEFENSE PANEL (IDP) 1. Read the enclosed summary of Program Description, Trial Requirements, Rules, Application, Agreement and Authorization and Release
Case 3:09-cv-01222-MMH-JRK Document 33 Filed 08/10/10 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION PHL VARIABLE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, vs. Case No. 3:09-cv-1222-J-34JRK