1 Using Curriculum to Change How Teachers Teach Science and Students Learn Science A Paper Set Prepared by Susan M. Kowalski, Janet Carlson, Pamela Van Scotter, Brooke N. Bourdélat-Parks, Stephen R. Getty, Betty Stennett, and Paul Beardsley NARST Annual Conference Indianapolis, IN 25 March 2012
2 Flow of the Paper Set A Research-based Development Process Features of the Curriculum Teacher Practice Associated with Curriculum Student Learning Associated with the Curriculum
3 The Challenge 1 Middle school is a critical time for Inspiring student interest in science Establishing foundational understandings in science (Hanson, 2004; Beghetto, 2007) To inspire interest and promote understanding, we need Effective teaching practices Coherent, rigorous, focused instructional materials
4 The Challenge 2 Preponderance of materials are fragmented (AAAS, 2001; Schmidt, 2001) Two-thirds of middle school science teachers have a degree in a field other than science (Fulp, 2002) Teachers teaching out-of-field rely heavily on materials (Ball & Feiman-Nemser, 1988) Problems are most severe in low-income schools
5 The Challenge 3 Teachers need access to materials that support development of teacher content knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge. Achievement gaps by demographic subgroups persist nationwide The U.S. requires a scientifically literate citizenry to face global challenges
6 The Challenge 4 Science instruction must evolve to incorporate current knowledge about learning. Rigor, coherence, and focus of middle school science curricula need to be improved.
7 Our Perspective Effective curricula can be a valuable means to improve student interest and achievement in science. Taking Science to School, NRC, 2007
8 Curriculum (Matters) Research Development Design
9 Our Work to Address the Challenge Develop instructional materials that are beneficial to both teachers and students Part of a US Department of Education IES-funded Goal 2 development and innovation (Grant # R305A080422) Materials iteratively developed and tested (pilot study plus two feasibility tests) Materials include seven key features
10 Theoretical Framework for Approach to Learning Our curriculum development process draws on years of research on cognitive development and how humans learn Vygotsky (1962) and Piaget (1975) Summary of recent findings well-articulated more recently in the meta-analysis How People Learn (Bransford, Brown, & Cocking, 2000).
11 Theoretical Framework for Approach to Learning Key findings summarized in How People Learn include the following: Students come to class with their own conceptions about how the natural world works. Students need a strong foundation of knowledge upon which to build their understanding of new ideas. Students benefit from a metacognitive approach to learning where they are responsible for monitoring their own progress.
12 Features of the Curriculum Materials For students 1. Rigorous, coherent, and focused 2. The BSCS 5E Instructional Model 3. Comprehensive assessment package 4. Metacognitive strategies 5. Literacy strategies 6. Collaborative learning For teachers 7. Highly educative
13 Scope & Sequence Content Standards Science as inquiry Core concepts (physical) Core concepts (life) Core concepts (Earth- space) Mul0- disciplinary Unit Science & Society 6 th Grade Form and Func0on/ Evolu0on and equilibrium Science as a way of knowing Properties and changes in properties of matter Structure and function in living systems (cells) Regulation and behavior (structure and function) Structure of Earth systems Integrating chapter Natural hazards Risks and benefits Abilities of technological design 7 th Grade Constancy and Change / Evolu0on and equilibrium Science as a way of knowing Motions and forces Integrating chapter Reproduction and heredity Diversity and adaptations of organisms Inheritance and evolution of behavior Earth s history Integrating chapter Science and technology in society Understandings about science and technology 8 th Grade Systems and Subsystems / Energy and Science as a way of knowing Develop explanations using evidence Communicate scientific procedures and explanations Energy in energy out Transfer of energy Living energy Structure and function in living systems Regulation and behavior Populations and ecosystems Energy in earth systems Earth in the solar system Energy and your body Personal health Body systems
14 8 th Grade Systems and Subsystems /Energy and Science as Inquiry Science as a way of knowing Develop explanations using evidence Communicate scientific procedures and explanations Physical Science Energy in energy out Transfer of energy Life Science Living energy Structure and function in living systems Regulation and behavior Populations and ecosystems Earth-space Science Energy in earth systems Earth in the solar system Science & Society Energy and your body Personal health Body systems
15 Development Process Development team included scientists, teachers, and science educators Held a design conference Shared conceptual flow graphics for units and chapters BSCS 5E Instructional Model guided the development Engage, Explore, Explain, Elaborate, and Evaluate
16 Theoretical Framework Curriculum Four strands from Taking Science to School (NRC, 2007) guided our process. This report recommends that students 1. know, use, and interpret scientific explanations of the natural world, 2. generate and evaluate scientific evidence and explanations, 3. understand the nature and development of scientific knowledge, and 4. participate productively in scientific practices and discourse.
17 Development Process Use the Understanding by Design approach (Wiggins and McTighe, 2005) Backward Design Stage 1: What do we want students to learn? Stage 2: What will serve as evidence that they have learned? Stage 3: What should the learning sequence be? Begin the development with the Evaluate Then develop the Engage, Explore, Explain, and Elaborate for each chapter Iterative process
18 Review and Test Internal reviews were conducted by the team, and external reviews were conducted by content experts. First test of feasibility included 25 teachers Selected for diversity across Geographic location Urban, Suburban, Rural Student population
19 Formative Stage of Research Collected formative data Student pre-posttests Teacher surveys Classroom observations External reviews of teacher and student materials by experts Used rubrics designed to evaluate the extent to which the materials reflected each of the intended features
20 Iterative Revision Process The team revised the materials as necessary to attend to the external reviews of the materials, the observation data, and the student learning results following the first feasibility test. The team used the same backward design process and internal review process. These iterative steps resulted in 6 iterations of curriculum revision.
21 Second Test of Feasibility Tested materials around the US in second test of feasibility 24 field test teachers Approximately 2000 students Attended to diversity Hosted a three-day orientation for teachers Presenting results from this test
22 Characteristics of Participating Teachers & Students and their Schools 12 states 17% urban; 25% rural; 58% suburban districts 13% private schools; 87% public 2-100% of students from underrepresented groups (average: 50%) 2-37 years of teaching experience (average: 14 yrs)
23 Methodology Mixed Methods Student data modified Attitudes Toward Science Inventory (Weinburgh & Steele, 2000) Pre and Posttests (content and confidence) Sample student notebooks Curriculum data external expert reviews of features Teacher data Usability of each feature Observations RTOP (Sawada et al., 2002) BSCS Teacher Fidelity of Implementation Rubric (BSCS, 2009) BSCS Student Fidelity of Implementation rubric (BSCS, 2009) Collaboratives for Excellence in Teaching Preparation (CETP) 5-minute observation rubric (Lawrenz et al., 2007)
24 Ongoing Research Digital version of the program will be available at no monetary charge for use during the school year. Go to elearn.bscs.org to register and see the curriculum.
25 What is the Evidence of Usability and Feasibility of the Curriculum Features?
26 Features of the Curriculum Materials For students 1. Rigorous, coherent, and focused 2. The BSCS 5E Instructional Model 3. Comprehensive assessment package 4. Metacognitive strategies 5. Literacy strategies 6. Collaborative learning For teachers 7. Highly educative
27 Data Collection Key Feature External Review Classroom Observations Teacher Surveys Rigorous, coherent, and focused X X The BSCS 5E Instructional Model X X Comprehensive assessment package X X Metacognition strategies X X Literacy strategies X X X Collaborative learning X X X
28 Dominant theme of inquiry Feature 1: Enhancing Rigor, Coherence, and Focus Unifying concepts of energy and systems Chapter Organizers help students and teachers see where they are in the learning process by making connections between ideas explicit
29 Feature 1: Enhancing Rigor, Coherence, and Focus Teacher Surveys Not at all coherent Somewhat coherent Coherent Highly coherent External reviewers (combined results) Not at all coherent Low coherence Moderate coherence High coherence
30 Feature 2: The BSCS 5E Instructional Model Engage Evaluate Explore Elaborate Explain
31 Feature 2: The BSCS 5E Instructional Model External reviewers 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% Use of 5Es Data points represent the 4 units
32 Feature 2: The BSCS 5E Instructional Model Teacher Fidelity of Implementa0on to BSCS 5E Instruc0onal Model Percent of Possible Points 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% PS1 PS2 PS3 PS4 PS5 PS6 LS1 LS1a LS2 LS2a LS3 LS4 LS5 LS5a ES1 ES2 ES3 ES3a ES4 ES4a ES5 ES5a ES6 ES7 ES7a SS1 SS1a SS2 SS2a SS3 SS3a SS4 SS5 SS5a SS6 SS6a Teacher ID
33 Feature 2: The BSCS 5E Instructional Model Student Fidelity of Implementa0on to BSCS 5E Instruc0onal Model Percent of Possible Points 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% PS1 PS2 PS3 PS4 PS5 PS6 LS1 LS1a LS2 LS2a LS3 LS4 LS5 LS5a ES1 ES2 ES3 ES3a ES4 ES4a ES5 ES5a ES6 ES7 ES7a SS1 SS1a SS2 SS2a SS3 SS3a SS4 SS5 SS5a SS6 SS6a Teacher ID
34 Feature 3: Comprehensive Assessment Package
35 Feature 3: Comprehensive Assessment Package Teachers surveys Not at all effective Somewhat effective Effective Highly effective External reviewers 92% of elements Not incorporated Incorporated Very well incorporated
36 Feature 4: Metacognitive Strategies
37 Feature 4: Metacognitive Strategies
38 Feature 4: Metacognitive Strategies Teacher surveys Not at all effective Somewhat effective Effective Highly effective In a few cases, classroom observations showed that students tended to reflect back on thinking to the extent that teachers encouraged them to do so.
39 Feature 5: Literacy Strategies
40 Feature 5: Literacy Strategies
41 Feature 5: Literacy Strategies Teacher surveys Not at all effective Somewhat effective Effective Highly effective External reviews Results for almost all elements of Science and Society unit Not at all effective Somewhat effective Highly effective
42 CCCR Strategy Feature 6: Collaborative Learning Consider-Contribute-Consult-Revise Strategy Use and reflect on teamwork skills
43 Feature 6: Collaborative Learning Teacher surveys Not at all effective Somewhat effective Effective Highly effective External reviews Element not present Element present Element present and clearly supported
44 Classroom observations Use of collaborative learning Feature 6: Collaborative Learning Feature not evident Feature evident When collaborative learning was seen, other elements rated Feature not evident Feature evident
45 Discussion Based on teacher surveys, external reviews, and classroom observations Each of the 6 key features related to students were found to be usable and feasible for students and teachers In several chapters, revisions were made after the second field test to further strengthen the key elements
46 What do the Data Say about Teacher Practice Associated with Curriculum?
47 Theoretical Framework for Approach to Teaching Teachers play an interpretive role in bringing curricula to life for their students Select elements for inclusion Emphasize or deemphasize curricular elements
48 Theoretical Framework A complex teacher-curriculum relationship exists (Remillard, 2005) Contextually based Dependent on both the teacher and the curriculum Tightly interconnected with other teacher practices
49 Theoretical Framework Curriculum materials could contribute to professional practice if they were created with closer attention to processes of curricular enactment. (Ball & Cohen, 1996, p. 7, emphasis in original)
50 Theoretical Framework To support teachers, curricular materials should be educative. That is, they should be designed to promote teacher learning as well as student learning. Nine design heuristics of educative science materials guided the development of teacher support materials (Davis & Krajcik, 2005). Nine heuristics articulate roles for materials in three major areas (total of 24 elements) PCK for Science Topics PCK for Scientific Inquiry Subject Matter Knowledge
51 Educative Materials Heuristics and Elements of Curriculum Materials Educative Materials Major Area PCK for Science Topics Element in Materials Information on common student conceptions Information on pedagogical strategies Explanations and instructions for process and procedure steps Suggestions for specific opportunities for individual and group assessment Outcomes and Indicators of Success Samples of student work
52 Educative Materials Heuristics and Elements of Curriculum Materials Educative Materials Major Area PCK for Scientific Inquiry Elements in Materials Descriptions of the nature of each E and rationale for the instructional model Extensive use of focus questions within units Multiple activities for students to ask and answer their own questions with support for teachers on how to guide students toward appropriate questions Rationale for the importance of having students design their own investigations Multiple opportunities for students to use an explanation template and guidance to teachers for fading scaffolds Multiple opportunities for students to collaborate with guidance for both teachers and students on how to share ideas successfully.
53 Educative Materials Heuristics and Elements of Curriculum Materials Educative Materials Major Area Subject Matter Knowledge Element in Materials Comprehensive teacher background information on science content Teacher background materials extend beyond the level of understanding required by students Teacher background materials illustrate the relationships between key ideas and everyday phenomena
54 Example Design Heuristic 4 (includes 2 elements) Instructional materials should support teachers in anticipating, understanding, and dealing with students ideas about science Curriculum materials should help teachers recognize the importance of students ideas and help teachers identify likely student ideas within a topic Curriculum materials should help teachers gain insight into how they might be able to deal with the ideas in their teaching, for example, by giving suggestions of thought experiments likely to promote the development of more scientific ideas.
55 Design Heuristic 4 in Science and Society Unit, Chapter 5 Chapter rated comprehensive and thorough by an external evaluator Evidence: In the Engage phase, the Process and Procedure section (p. 12) highlights a particular idea that students might have: Some may say that they don t want to know anything about diabetes. The TE provides a suggestion for how to address this idea: Encourage them to think of questions a person who just found out they had diabetes might want to know.
56 Data Collection in Service of Iterative Development External reviews of teacher materials Review rubric aligned with nine heuristics Each of 24 elements scored on a scale Little or none Some Comprehensive and thorough
57 Teacher surveys Data Collection in Service of Iterative Development Administered after every activity Included items related to both teacher support materials and student materials Included extensive comments on enactment Included extensive comments on any changes teachers made and why (sequence, omissions, augmentations, etc.)
58 Teacher Observations RTOP (Sawada et al., 2002) Data Collection in Service of Iterative Development BSCS Fidelity of Implementation Rubric (BSCS, 2009) Student Tests (Pre and Post)
59 Results First, a caveat The data presented here resulted from a development study. Because the purpose of the data collection was to inform revisions to the materials, the data are not of sufficient scope to make broad generalizations. For example, there was no comparison group in this study; therefore, we cannot make claims about the benefit of these materials over others.
60 Results Successful incorporation of MOST educative features: Two elements out of 24 needed enhancement: The curriculum materials should help teachers adapt and use approaches for collecting and analyzing data across multiple topic areas even when the data being collected seem fairly different (e.g. plant growth as opposed to weather conditions). Curriculum materials should help teachers recognize the importance of having students design their own investigations.
61 Examples of Changes to Materials Based on Review Collecting and Analyzing Data Teacher s Guide helps teachers adapt and use vector notation as a means of collecting and analyzing data by 1. introducing the technique as students investigate planetary velocities around a central star and 2. showing teachers how to adapt the technique as students investigate the relative strengths of gravitational forces of attraction between planetary objects.
62 Examples of Changes to Materials Based on Review Importance of Having Students Design Investigations Revised a Teacher s Guide for helping students design investigations. The introductory paragraphs of this guide provide extensive rationale for the importance of providing experiment design opportunities to students.
63 Results Evidence of teacher use of reform-based practice: Mean RTOP score (100 possible) This study: 63.3 Nationally for MS science: 50 (Sawada et al., 2002) Finding aligns with that of another BSCS study: HS materials Random assignment External researchers conducting observations BSCS teachers had RTOP scores > 2 standard deviations above control teachers
64 Results Mean Fidelity of Implementation (FoI) score: 88% Significant correlation between FoI and RTOP: r =.423; p =.040 Fidelity ~ RTOP Association with student learning??? Hierarchical linear modeling (students nested within teachers) FoI neared significance (p =.056) in predicting mean student posttest (adjusted by pretest and student demographics) RTOP non-significant (p =.456)
65 Results in short Use of the materials is positively associated with reform-based teaching practices and is also associated with improved student achievement.
66 What is the Evidence of Student Learning?
67 Proficiencies of Science Students should be able to know, use, and interpret scientific explanations of the natural world; generate and evaluate scientific evidence and explanations; understand the nature and development of scientific knowledge; and Participate productively in scientific practices and discourse (NRC, 2007)
68 Methods Pre- and Posttests Content Questions Confidence Questions Student Notebooks Classroom Observations CETP 5-minute observation protocol (Lawrenz et al., 2007) Fidelity of Implementation of the BSCS 5E Instructional Model: Students in the Classroom [Student FoI] (BSCS, 2009)
69 Content Questions Unit Strand 1: Know, use, and interpret scientific information Mean Difference (SE) Content Gain p Effect Size (95% CI) Earth Science 5.23 (.19) (1.01 to 1.23) Physical Science 3.65 (.24) (0.66 to 0.91) Life Science 3.84 (.25) (0.51 to 0.79) Science and Society 5.93 (.23) (1.14 to 1.43)
70 Achievement Gains by Demographic Group Subject Student Group N p Value Effect Size Earth Science Gender Boys 329 < Girls 380 < Race/Ethnicity White/Asian 330 < Underrepresented 379 < ELL Status English Native 631 < ELL 78 < FRL Status No FRL 415 < FRL 294 <
71 Achievement Gains by Demographic Group Subject Student Group N p Value Effect Size Life Science Gender Boys 182 < Girls 225 < Race/Ethnicity White/Asian 266 < Underrepresented 141 < ELL Status English Native 346 < ELL 61 < FRL Status No FRL 335 < FRL 72 <
72 Achievement Gains by Demographic Group Subject Student Group N p Value Effect Size Physical Science Gender Boys 269 < Girls 248 < Race/Ethnicity White/Asian 256 < Underrepresented 261 < ELL Status English Native 419 < ELL 98 < FRL Status No FRL 327 < FRL 190 <
73 Achievement Gains by Demographic Group Subject Student Group N p Value Effect Size Science and Society Gender Boys 199 < Girls 257 < Race/Ethnicity White/Asian 158 < Underrepresented 298 < ELL Status English Native 315 < ELL 141 < FRL Status No FRL 234 < FRL 222 <
74 Putting Achievement Gains in Context Lynch and colleagues (2005) conducted a study comparing highly rated reform materials (Chemistry That Applies, State of Michigan, 1993) to business as usual. Group N p Value Effect Size Chemistry that Applies Business as Usual 1087 p < p <
75 Confidence Questions Strand 1: Know, use, and interpret scientific information Unit Confidence Gain Mean Difference (SE) p Effect Size (95% CI) Earth Science 10.8 (.52) (0.66 to 0.88) Physical Science 3.10 (.50) (0.14 to 0.41) Life Science 11.5 (.95) (0.49 to 1.04) Science and Society (.62) (0.65 to 0.92)
76 Example of Change in Content and Confidence Q. Suppose you can measure the total amount of energy in different feeding levels. Which level would have the LEAST amount of energy? A. Plants and other producers B. Herbivores that eat plants C. Carnivores that eat herbivores D. Secondary carnivores that eat other carnivores How confident are you that you answered the question correctly?
77 Changes in Understanding and Confidence Frequency of selecting A (Misconception) Frequency of selecting D (Correct Answer) Which answer had the highest confidence rating? Pretest Misconception (answer A) Posttest Correct answer (answer D)
78 Science Notebooks Element of Explanation (N = 75) Generate and Evaluate Scientific Evidence and Explanations Mean SD Claim Evidence Reasoning Score of 2 indicates that responses were often accurate but incomplete.
79 Context for Understanding Scientific Evidence and Explanation Scores Ruiz-Primo and colleagues (2010) scored students explanations in notebooks Completeness Complete explanations with claim, evidence, and reasoning Percent of Students 18.1% Provide only claim and evidence 12.0% Provide only claim 40.3% Provide only data 9.7%
80 Understanding the Nature of Scientific Evidence and Explanations Science as Inquiry Assessment Significant gains from pretest to posttest (p <.001) Effect size d = 0.1 Science notebooks Students were able to generate accurate but incomplete explanations from evidence
81 Productive Participation in Scientific Discourse Classroom Observations: CETP 5-minute observation protocol What cognitive demands were placed on students during each 5-minute segment of time? Passively receiving information? Applying knowledge? Generating Explanations? > 60% of class time To what extent were students on task? Majority of students on task > 90% of class time.
82 Productive Participation in Scientific Discourse Student Fidelity of Implementation Participation closely aligned with developers intentions Example: materials provided clear protocols for sharing work with other students and revising work based on that feedback
83 Implications Development We offer a model of research-based curriculum development. We offer a model of how to incorporate key features of curricula.
84 Implications Student Learning Research-based curricula can play an important role supporting student science proficiency Students can learn challenging content; Students can generate scientific explanations; Students can understand how scientific knowledge develops; and Students can participate productively in scientific discourse.
85 Implications Teachers Curriculum materials can be beneficial for both teachers and students. Educative materials may enhance teacher practice and student learning.
86 Dissemination Model Ongoing R&D model for materials through online curriculum dissemination beginning Fall 2012 Materials available free of monetary charge in exchange for student pre/post data and teacher usability data elearn.bscs.org
87 Future Research Efficacy trial to increase our confidence in making causal claims between use of the instructional materials and their effects on teacher practice. Further development work (for grades 6-7)
88 Thanks to the Team! Janet Carlson (PI) Pam Van Scotter (Co-PI) Susan M. Kowalski (project lead-- research) Brooke N. Bourdelát-Parks (developer) Betty Stennett (project lead--development) Stephen R. Getty (developer) Paul Beardsley (developer)
89 Thanks! Research supported by the Institute for Education Sciences (IES) Grant Number R305A This presentation and the associated paper will be available at Monday afternoon
Supporting the Implementation of NGSS through Research: Curriculum Materials Janet Carlson, BSCS/Stanford University Elizabeth A. Davis, University of Michigan Cory Buxton, University of Georgia Curriculum
The Next Generation Science Standards and the Life Sciences The important features of life science standards for elementary, middle, and high school levels Rodger W. Bybee Publication of the Next Generation
Abstract Title Page Title: The Effects of Research-Based Curriculum Materials and Curriculum-Based Professional Development on High School Science Achievement: Results of a Cluster-Randomized Trial Authors
Key Principles for ELL Instruction (v6) The Common Core State Standards (CCSS) in English Language Arts and Mathematics as well as the soon-to-be released Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) require
A Framework for Developing Pedagogical Content Knowledge: The Role of Transformative Professional Development and Educative Curriculum Materials Presented at the European Science Education Research Association
Talent Development Secondary Assessment, Curriculum, and Instruction Blueprint Practices to Support a Culture of Success The Blueprint: The Blueprint targets curriculum, instruction and assessment as key
Master of Education in Middle School Science This program is designed for middle school teachers who are seeking a second license in General Science or who wish to obtain greater knowledge of science education.
2011 Table of Contents Purposes for the Teacher Work Sample... Contextual Factors prompt and rubric... Design for Instruction prompt and rubric... Analysis of Student Learning prompt and rubric Reflection
Research Monograph No. 12 Current Conceptions of Science Achievement and Implications for Assessment and Equity in Large Education Systems Okhee Lee National Institute for Science Education (NISE) Publications
Intel Teach Essentials Course Instructional Practices and Classroom Use of Technology Survey Report September 2006 Wendy Martin, Simon Shulman Education Development Center/Center for Children and Technology
Course Description: Utah State Office of Education Elementary STEM Endorsement Course Framework Nature of Science and Engineering In this course participants will experience introductory explorations of
Epidemiology Curriculum The Georgia Performance Standards are designed to provide students with the knowledge and skills for proficiency in science. The Project 2061 s Benchmarks for Science Literacy is
Environmental Science Curriculum The Georgia Performance Standards are designed to provide students with the knowledge and skills for proficiency in science. The Project 2061 s Benchmarks for Science Literacy
APA 04 Proposal The effects of highly rated science curriculum on goal orientation engagement and learning Purpose The paper to be presented describes a study of goal orientation (Pintrich, 2000), engagement
ASSESSING MIDDLE SCHOOL STUDENTS CONTENT KNOWLEDGE AND SCIENTIFIC REASONING THROUGH WRITTEN EXPLANATIONS Joseph S. Krajcik and Katherine L. McNeill University of Michigan Modified from McNeill, K. L. &
Assessing Pedagogical Content Knowledge Among Secondary School Science Teachers Janet Carlson BSCS Colorado Springs Julie Gess-Newsome Center for Science Teaching & Learning Northern Arizona University
Utah Comprehensive Counseling and Guidance Program Evaluation Report John Carey and Karen Harrington Center for School Counseling Outcome Research School of Education University of Massachusetts Amherst
Teacher Work Sample Rubrics To be completed as part of the Requirements during the Directed Teaching Semester Middle Level Program Secondary Program The following assignments and rubrics have been developed
From High School Teaching to Designing Curriculum: Inspiring the Next Generation of Earth Scientists Sara R. Walkup Science Curriculum Specialist The Learning Design Group at the Lawrence Hall of Science
Re-Visioning Graduate Teacher Education in North Carolina MA in History, Secondary Education with Licensure in History and Social Studies Appalachian State University A. Description of how the Proposed
Principal Performance Review Office of School Quality Division of Teaching and Learning Principal Practice Observation Tool 2014-15 The was created as an evidence gathering tool to be used by evaluators
Evidence of Complex Reasoning in Technology and Science: Notes From Inner City Detroit, Michigan, USA Nancy Butler Songer Professor, Learning Technologies and Science Education School of Education, The
Student Learning Objective (SLO) Template This template should be completed while referring to the SLO Template Checklist Document. Teacher Name: Special education teacher in resource classroom Content
Access For All Learners Building Blocks to Integrate Content and Literacy Instruction The UC Berkeley History-Social Science Project (UCBHSSP) has developed classroomtested literacy strategies to improve
Science in CTE: Good Instruction is Good Instruction AMBER MCCULLOCH, K-12 SCIENCE SPECIALIST, OSPI LEARNING AND TEACHING SCIENCE REBECCA WALLACE, PROGRAM SUPERVISOR AGRICULTURE SCIENCES EDUCATION, OSPI
Abstract Name Teacher Professional Development Programs in Grades 3-8: Promoting Teachers and Students Content Knowledge in Science and Engineering MSP Project Name: Partnership to Improve Student Achievement
Next Generation Science Standards Educator Leadership Institute, 2015 Introductions Carol Baker - firstname.lastname@example.org Jennifer Smith - email@example.com Mary Wirth - firstname.lastname@example.org Your Turn
Using Science Notebooks PDI-7 NSTA National Conference, San Antonio, Texas Betty Stennett and Brooke Bourdélat-Parks Science Educators, BSCS BSCS Mission To transform science teaching and learning through
Scientific and Engineering Practices in K 12 Classrooms Understanding A Framework for K 12 Science Education by Rodger W. Bybee This morning I watched Sesame Street. During the show, characters acted like
Framework Vision for Science Education and Implications for Next Generation Science Standards Presentation by Brett D. Moulding Partnership for Effective Science Teaching and Learning Vision for Science
Detroit Area Pre-College Engineering Program (DAPCEP), founded in 1976 to provide STEM classes for Pre College students in Southeast Michigan. DAPCEP offers high quality education in classes in Detroit
Abstract Title: Identifying and measuring factors related to student learning: the promise and pitfalls of teacher instructional logs MSP Project Name: Assessing Teacher Learning About Science Teaching
Session Title: Teaching Computational Thinking through Mobilize and the New Big Data Explosion MSP Project Name: MOBILIZE: Mobilizing for Innovative Computer Science Teaching and Learning Presenters: Jane
EQuIP RUBRIC GRADES K-5 INTERACTIVE SCIENCE. I. Alignment to the NGSS II. Instructional Supports III. Monitoring Student Progress The lesson or unit aligns with the conceptual shifts of the NGSS: A. Grade-appropriate
Biology Curriculum The Georgia Performance Standards are designed to provide students with the knowledge and skills for proficiency in science. The Project 2061 s Benchmarks for Science Literacy is used
Teacher Evaluation Missouri s Educator Evaluation System Teacher Evaluation Protocol Introduction Missouri s Educator Evaluation System was created and refined by hundreds of educators across the state.
College/School/Major Division Assessment Results for 2012-2013 1) College/School: School of Agriculture: Animal Science Unit 2) Review your student learning outcomes (SLOs). Please update as needed. The
Engineering Connections for Middle School Science Teachers Debra Brockway, Stevens Institute of Technology Greg Bartus, Stevens Institute of Technology Beth McGrath, Stevens Institute of Technology Abstract
Literacy Culminating Experience 11/10 p. 1 CIG 697 Culminating Experience Masters Degree in Curriculum & Instruction (M. Ed.) Reading Specialist / Literacy Education / Children s & Young Adult Literature
February 28, 2014 An Evaluation of Kansas City Reading Programs for Turn the Page Kansas City Leigh Anne Taylor Knight, Ed. D. Hajar Aghababa, Ph. D. Jiaxi Quan, Ph.D. Pat Oslund, M.A. Technical Assistance:
California State University, Fresno (07-08) Section A-1 Contextual Information Masters Degree in Education or Advanced Specialist Certification Early Childhood Education Emphasis California State University,
Student Learning Objective (SLO) Template This template should be completed while referring to the SLO Template Checklist. Teacher Name: Content Area and Course(s): Science Grade Level(s): 6 th Grade Academic
College and Career Readiness Instructor Certification Course Catalog CORE Instructional Certificate The CORE Instructional Certificate: This credential prepares instructors to provide quality adult education
March 2014 SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT FRAMEWORK 2.0 Table of Contents STRAND I: TEACHING FOR LEARNING... 3 Standard 1: Curriculum... 3 A. Alignment... 3 B. Coherence... 3 Standard 2: Instruction... 3 C. Instructional
The BSCS 5E Instructional Model: Origins, Effectiveness, and Applications by Rodger W. Bybee, Joseph A. Taylor, April Gardner, Pamela Van Scotter, Janet Carlson Powell, Anne Westbrook, and Nancy Landes
Teaching Chemistry using Inquiry and the Three Representations of Chemistry Laurie Taylor Abstract: Science education researchers advocate for a method of teaching science that makes science accessible
709 Technology s Impact on Human Resource Development across the Life Span: Pedagogy Starts with Andragogy Pamela Clinton Hopkins, Charles E. Cowell, Debra Jorden, Rochell McWhorter, Rita L. Dobbs, and
Sample Model Course Pathway Options (developed by Michigan Standards Review Committee) Model Course Mapping Resource A Resource Developed by the Michigan Standards Review Team To Support Options for Meeting
Indiana s Department of Education STEM Education Rubric The rubric that follows provides an outline for the implementation of STEM attributes in schools. The rubric is designed to show varying levels of
Each curriculum includes over 3000 hours of development over the course of two years. In addition to this development time, units are pilot tested across Massachusetts and Field tested across the United
Principles to Actions Executive Summary In 1989 the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) launched the standards-based education movement in North America with the release of Curriculum and
Kindergarten to Grade 4 Manitoba Foundations for Scientific Literacy The Five Foundations Manitoba Foundations for Scientific Literacy To develop scientifically literate students, science learning experiences
COLLEGE READINESS A First Look at Higher Performing High Schools School Qualities that Educators Believe Contribute Most to College and Career Readiness 2012 by ACT, Inc. All rights reserved. A First Look
CONNECTICUT STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Common Core of Teaching (CCT) Rubric for Effective Teaching The Common Core of Teaching (CCT) Instrument will be used to evaluate teacher performance and practice
Power Calculation Using the Online Variance Almanac (Web VA): A User s Guide Larry V. Hedges & E.C. Hedberg This research was supported by the National Science Foundation under Award Nos. 0129365 and 0815295.
Appendix 2: Science Grades 6-8 Subcommittee Report SCIENCE GRADES 6-8 SUBCOMMITTEE REPORT 3 June 2015 and 4 June 2015 Teacher Leader Center 140N Lindquist Hall 240 S Madison Street Iowa City, Iowa 52242
HOW DO THE NATIONAL SCIENCE EDUCATION STANDARDS SUPPORT THE TEACHING OF ENGINEERING PRINCIPLES AND DESIGN? 1 M. Sami Fadali 2 and Mike Robinson 3 Abstract - The recently developed National Science Education
The Renaissance Partnership For Improving Teacher Quality TEACHER WORK SAMPLE Performance Prompt Teaching Process Standards Scoring Rubrics June 2002 Representatives from the 11 Renaissance Partnership
UNLV Department of Curriculum and Instruction Masters in Education Degree with an emphasis in Science Education Culminating Experience The culminating experience for the Masters of Education degree with
Standards Based Philosophy and Practices Vision: Develop and implement with fidelity and accountability a guaranteed and viable curriculum that is standards-based. Increase student achievement by focusing
Proposal Title: Implementation of Argument-Driven Inquiry for General Chemistry Laboratory Courses Abstract: Argument-driven inquiry is a laboratory curriculum that has been developed, extensively researched,
21st Century Community Learning Centers Grant Monitoring Support Contract No. ED-04-CO-0027 Task Order No. 0005 For the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Elementary and Secondary Education Evaluation
Using Science Notebooks to Develop Conceptual Understanding in Science Pam Van Scotter Connie Hvidsten www.bscs.org/sessions 11 March 2011 NSTA National Conference San Francisco, CA Goals for Today s Session
Research and Digital Game- based Play: A Review of Martha Madison White Paper Compiled by Anne Snyder, Ph.D. Second Avenue Learning is a certified women- owned business, specializing in the creation of
Standards for Engineering, Technology, and the Applications of Science One of the most important messages of the Next Generation Science Standards for teachers, parents, and students is that science is
1. Quality of program outcomes What direct measures of student learning/achievement does the program use: CLA, program assessment (portfolio, common final/question set, licensure exams, exit exam, etc.)
NGSS Framework Mark s Quick Version A 6 page version of the 283 page original http://www.nextgenscience.org/ A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas PRINCIPLES
Inquiry-Based Instruction in Iowa: A Report on the Implementation of Every Learner Inquires in Year 2 July 2008 Submitted to Kathy McKee Iowa Department of Education Prepared by Jonathan Margolin, Ph.D.,
1 HANDBOOK FOR THE POST MASTERS CERTIFICATE PROGRAM FOR LEADERSHIP IN EDUCATION CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK AT A GLANCE Consistent with our mission to promote quality teaching and learning in P-12 school settings,
Masters of Science in Curriculum & Instruction Special Education Emphasis Alignment of Summative Assessments to InTASC Standards The Courses in the TESL Emphasis are aligned to MN Board of Teaching Standards
Aurora University Master s Degree in Teacher Leadership Program for Life Science A Summary Evaluation of Year Two Prepared by Carolyn Kerkla October, 2010 Introduction This report summarizes the evaluation
Curriculum and Instruction Core curriculum is the foundation of Tier 1 instruction and is the basis for building K-12 literacy in Arizona students. The curriculum at each level must be based upon the 2010
Parent and Community Survey Results and Analysis Lake Washington School District May 20 June 12, 2014 Overview Parents and community members were invited to share feedback on opportunities for the district
Missouri School Counselor Performance Assessment (MoSCPA) Task Requirements Task 2: Implementing Program Components In this task, you will demonstrate your ability to implement program components within
The New Illinois Learning Standards Incorporating the Next Generation Science Standards (NILS-Science) Illinois Vision of K-12 Science Education All Illinois K-12 students will be better prepared for entrance
THE FRAMEWORK FOR PRINCIPAL PREPARATION PROGRAM GUIDELINES PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 1 Purpose Of all the educational research conducted over the last 30 years in the search to improve student
DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DEGREE Educational Leadership Doctor of Philosophy Degree Major Course Requirements EDU710 (3.0 credit hours) Ethical and Legal Issues in Education/Leadership This course is an intensive
EEC3212 Integrated Social Sciences, Humanities, and Arts EEC3212 Integrated Social Sciences, Humanities, and Arts Course Description: The student will learn to plan, implement, and assess developmentally
1 Advanced Placement Environmental Science: Implications of Gender and Ethnicity Rebecca Penwell Brenau University INTRODUCTION One of the challenges of science attitude research is that many studies have
Rover Races Middle School NGSS, Common Core, and 21 st Century Skills Alignment Document WHAT STUDENTS DO: Establishing Communication Procedures. Following Curiosity on Mars often means roving to places
Evaluating the Impact of Engineering is Elementary Year 2 of Implementation in Minneapolis and Hopkins Public Schools Executive Summary Cathy P. Lachapelle, Jonathan D. Hertel, Preeya Phadnis and Christine
Summary of the Practice. provides online and face-to-face instructional tools and supports to help secondary mathematics teachers improve student performance while supporting sustainable teaching practices.
EXPEDITIONARY LEARNING SCHOOL PERFORMANCE REPORT www.elschools.org Expeditionary Learning 2010 www.elschools.org Expeditionary Learning 2010 A National Network Impact in 2009-2010 165 Schools 29 States
Formative Assessment and Unit Graphic Organizer INTRODUCTION The Formative Assessment is an engage activity in which students consider whether they agree or disagree with statements about the social nature
LEVEL 1 LICENSURE PORTFOLIO Part I Purpose Principles to Be Addressed Required Documentation Directions Entry 1: Analyzing the School Counseling Environment Candidates analyze the school counseling environment
Asset-Based Instruction Boston, Massachusetts Summary of the Practice. has made asset-based instruction one of its priorities in its efforts to improve the quality of teaching and learning. The premise
1 Conley, D. T. (2005). College Knowledge: What it Really Takes for Students to Succeed and What We Can Do to Get Them Ready. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. College Knowledge is based on research conducted
Using Learning Progressions to Inform Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment Design Namsoo Shin 1, Shawn Y. Stevens 1, César Delgado 1, Joseph Krajcik 1 & James Pellegrino 3. Paper submitted to the annual
FRAMEWORK FOR EFFECTIVE TEACHING Newark Public Schools Teacher Performance Evaluation A GUIDEBOOK FOR TEACHERS & ADMINISTRATORS 2014-2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS Letter from the Superintendent... iii Introduction...