UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
|
|
- Harold Holmes
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Case :-cv-0-gmn-njk Document Filed 0// Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 0 0 VERN ELMER, an individual, vs. Plaintiff, JP MORGAN CHASE BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, a National Association; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., a Foreign Corporation; MTC FINANCIAL, INC., a Foreign Corporation; FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION, a Foreign Corporation; SCOTT B. DAVIS, an individual; KAREN L. DAVIS, an individual; DOES I through X; and ROE CORPORATIONS I through X, inclusive, Defendants, FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY, as Conservator of the Federal National Mortgage Corporation, Intervenor, JP MORGAN CHASE BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, a National Association; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., a Foreign Corporation; and FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION, a Foreign Corporation, vs. Counter-Plaintiffs, VERN ELMER; and SUNRISE RIDGE MASTER HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, Counter-Defendants. Page of Case No.: :-cv-0-gmn-njk ORDER
2 Case :-cv-0-gmn-njk Document Filed 0// Page of 0 0 Pending before the Court is the Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. filed by Defendant Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation ( Freddie Mac and Intervenor Federal Housing Finance Agency ( FHFA. Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Vern Elmer ( Elmer filed a Response (ECF No., and Freddie Mac and FHFA filed a Reply (ECF No.. I. BACKGROUND The present action involves the interplay between Nevada Revised Statutes. and U.S.C. as it relates to the parties interests in real property located at Pronghorn Ridge Avenue, Las Vegas, NV, (the Property. On September, 00, Scott Davis and Karen Davis (the Davises obtained a loan in the amount of $,000 from The Mortgage House, Inc. ( Mortgage House that was secured by a Deed of Trust on the Property. (Deed of Trust, ECF No. -. The Deed of Trust named Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. ( MERS as the beneficiary and T.D. Services Co. as the trustee. (Id.. Freddie Mac purchased the Davis Loan on October, 00 and has owned it ever since. See (Exs. A B to Am. Meyer Decl., ECF No. -. On September, 00, FHFA s Director placed Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac into conservatorships pursuant to HERA. See (Pollard Decl., ECF No. -. On December, 0, Nevada Association Services, Inc. ( NAS, as agent for Sunrise Ridge Master Homeowners Association (the HOA, recorded a Notice of Delinquent Assessment Lien against the Property for $,0.0. (Not. of Delinquent Assessment Lien, ECF No. -. Then on February 0, 0, NAS recorded a Notice of Default and Election to Sell, warning that the HOA would foreclose on its lien unless the assessment payments were brought up to date. (Not. of Default and Election to Sell, ECF No. -. On July, 0, NAS, as agent for the HOA, recorded a Notice of Foreclosure Sale, setting a foreclosure sale of The Court takes judicial notice of Exhibits (ECF Nos. - - of Elmer s Response. See Mack v. S. Bay Beer Distrib., F.d, (th Cir.. Each of these documents is publicly recorded in the Clark County Recorder s office. Page of
3 Case :-cv-0-gmn-njk Document Filed 0// Page of 0 0 the Property on August, 0. (Not. of Foreclosure Sale, ECF No. -. Elmer subsequently purchased the Property as the highest bidder at the November, 0 foreclosure sale. (Foreclosure Deed, ECF No. -. At no time during the process did FHFA, as conservator of Freddie Mac, consent to the HOA s foreclosure. See (Pollard Decl., ECF No. -. On March, 0, MERS assigned its beneficial interest in the Deed of Trust to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. ( Chase (Assignment of Deed of Trust, ECF No. -. Moreover, on May 0, 0, Chase substituted MTC Financial Inc. dba Trustee Corps ( Trustee Corps as the trustee of the Deed of Trust. (Substitution of Trustee, ECF No. -. Shortly thereafter, on August, 0, Trustee Corps recorded a Notice of Breach and Default and Election to Sell, indicating that the Davises had failed to perform obligations pursuant to the Deed of Trust. (Not. of Breach and Default and Election to Sell, ECF No. -. However, on October, 0, Trustee Corps recorded a Notice of Rescission. (Not. of Rescission, ECF No. -. On December, 0, Trustee Corps recorded a Notice of Trustee s Sale, setting a trustee sale of the Property on January, 0. (Not. of Trustee s Sale, ECF No. -. Freddie Mac subsequently purchased the Property as the highest bidder at the January, 0 trustee sale (Trustee s Deed Upon Sale, ECF No. -, and Chase assigned its beneficial interest in the Deed of Trust to Freddie Mac on March 0, 0 (Assignment of Deed of Trust, ECF No. -. Elmer initiated this action by filing the original complaint in state court on October, 0, asserting, inter alia, a claim for quiet title against Freddie Mac, MERS, Chase, and MTC Financial, Inc. (Compl., ECF No. -. MTC Financial, Inc. subsequently removed the action to this Court on December 0, 0. (Not. of Removal, ECF No.. On December, 0, Freddie Mac filed its Answer, asserting counterclaims against Elmer. (Ans. to Compl. & Counterclaims, ECF No.. On December, 0, Freddie Mac filed its Amended Answer, asserting counterclaims against Elmer and the HOA. (Am. Ans. To Compl. & Page of
4 Case :-cv-0-gmn-njk Document Filed 0// Page of Counterclaims, ECF No.. On January, 0, this Court entered an Order granting FHFA s unopposed Motion to Intervene. (Intervenor Order, ECF No.. Shortly thereafter, on February, 0, Freddie Mac and FHFA filed the pending Motion for Summary Judgment. (MSJ, ECF No.. On June, 0, the Court held a hearing on the pending Motion for Summary Judgment, which was attended by the parties in this case as well as the parties in several related cases pending before this Court involving the same issue addressed in this action s summary judgment motion. (Min. of Proceedings, ECF No.. After listening to the arguments presented by all parties present at the hearing, the Court took the motion under submission. 0 II. LEGAL STANDARD The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provide for summary adjudication when the 0 pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Fed. R. Civ. P. (a. Material facts are those that may affect the outcome of the case. See Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., U.S., (. A dispute as to a material fact is genuine if there is sufficient evidence for a reasonable jury to return a verdict for the nonmoving party. See id. Summary judgment is inappropriate if reasonable jurors, drawing all inferences in favor of the nonmoving party, could return a verdict in the nonmoving party s favor. Diaz v. Eagle Produce Ltd. P ship, F.d 0, 0 (th Cir. 00 (citing United States v. Shumway, F.d 0, 0 0 (th Cir.. A principal purpose of summary judgment is to isolate and dispose of factually unsupported claims. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, U.S., (. In determining summary judgment, a court applies a burden-shifting analysis. When These related cases are: Williston Investment Group, LLC v. JP Morgan Chase Bank NA, No. :-cv-0- GMN-PAL; and Skylights LLC vs. Fannie Mae, No. :-cv-00-gmn-vcf. Page of
5 Case :-cv-0-gmn-njk Document Filed 0// Page of 0 0 the party moving for summary judgment would bear the burden of proof at trial, it must come forward with evidence which would entitle it to a directed verdict if the evidence went uncontroverted at trial. In such a case, the moving party has the initial burden of establishing the absence of a genuine issue of fact on each issue material to its case. C.A.R. Transp. Brokerage Co. v. Darden Rests., Inc., F.d, 0 (th Cir. 000 (citations omitted. In contrast, when the nonmoving party bears the burden of proving the claim or defense, the moving party can meet its burden in two ways: ( by presenting evidence to negate an essential element of the nonmoving party s case; or ( by demonstrating that the nonmoving party failed to make a showing sufficient to establish an element essential to that party s case on which that party will bear the burden of proof at trial. See Celotex Corp., U.S. at. If the moving party fails to meet its initial burden, summary judgment must be denied and the court need not consider the nonmoving party s evidence. See Adickes v. S.H. Kress & Co., U.S., 0 (0. If the moving party satisfies its initial burden, the burden then shifts to the opposing party to establish that a genuine issue of material fact exists. See Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., U.S., (. To establish the existence of a factual dispute, the opposing party need not establish a material issue of fact conclusively in its favor. It is sufficient that the claimed factual dispute be shown to require a jury or judge to resolve the parties differing versions of the truth at trial. T.W. Elec. Serv., Inc. v. Pac. Elec. Contractors Ass n, 0 F.d, (th Cir.. In other words, the nonmoving party cannot avoid summary judgment by relying solely on conclusory allegations that are unsupported by factual data. See Taylor v. List, 0 F.d 00, 0 (th Cir.. Instead, the opposition must go beyond the assertions and allegations of the pleadings and set forth specific facts by producing competent evidence that shows a genuine issue for trial. See Celotex Corp., U.S. at. At summary judgment, a court s function is not to weigh the evidence and determine the Page of
6 Case :-cv-0-gmn-njk Document Filed 0// Page of truth but to determine whether there is a genuine issue for trial. See Anderson, U.S. at. The evidence of the nonmovant is to be believed, and all justifiable inferences are to be drawn in his favor. Id. at. But if the evidence of the nonmoving party is merely colorable or is not significantly probative, summary judgment may be granted. See id. at 0. III. DISCUSSION In the instant Motion for Summary Judgment, Freddie Mac and FHFA request that the 0 0 Court declare that U.S.C. (j( preempts any Nevada law that would permit a foreclosure on a superpriority lien to extinguish a property interest of Freddie Mac while it is under FHFA s conservatorship, the HOA Sale did not extinguish Freddie Mac s interest in the Deed of Trust and thus did not convey the Property free and clear to Plaintiff, and Freddie Mac s interest in the Property is superior to the interest of Plaintiff. (Mot. Summ. J. : :, ECF No.. The Court addressed the applicability of U.S.C. (j( in Skylights LLC v. Fannie Mae, 0 WL 0 (D. Nev. June, 0. After addressing many different arguments regarding the applicability of section (j(, the Court held that the plain language of section (j( prohibits property of FHFA from being subject to a foreclosure without its consent. Id. at *0. Here, Freddie Mac has held an interest in the Property since October, 00. See (Exs. A B to Am. Meyer Decl., ECF No. -. Accordingly, because FHFA held an interest in the Deed of Trust as conservator for Freddie Mac prior to the HOA foreclosure, section (j( prevents the HOA s foreclosure on the Property from extinguishing the Deed of Trust. IV. CONCLUSION IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Freddie Mac and FHFA s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. is GRANTED. The Court finds that U.S.C. (j( preempts Nevada Revised Statutes. to the extent that a homeowner association s foreclosure Page of
7 Case :-cv-0-gmn-njk Document Filed 0// Page of of its super-priority lien cannot extinguish a property interest of Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac while those entities are under FHFA s conservatorship. Accordingly, the HOA s foreclosure sale of its super-priority interest on the Property did not extinguish Freddie Mac s interest in the property secured by the Deed of Trust or convey the Property free and clear to Elmer. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Freddie Mac, FHFA, the Davises, Chase, and MERS are granted summary judgment on Elmer s claims for quiet title. DATED this th day of July, 0. 0 Gloria M. Navarro, Chief Judge United States District Judge 0 Page of
8 Case :-cv-0-gmn-njk Document 0 Filed 0// Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 0 0 PREMIER ONE HOLDINGS, INC., a Nevada Corporation, vs. Plaintiff, FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION; DOES I through X; and ROE BUSINESS ENTITIES I through X, Defendants, FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY, as Conservator of the Federal National Mortgage Corporation, Intervenor, FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, vs. Counter-Plaintiffs, PREMIER ONE HOLDINGS, INC.; and SOUTHERN TERRACE HOMEOWNER S ASSOCIATION, Counter-Defendants. Case No.: :-cv--gmn-njk ORDER Pending before the Court is the Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 0 filed by Defendant Federal National Mortgage Association annie Mae nor Federal -Defendant Premier One Holdings, Inc. Page of
9 Case :-cv-0-gmn-njk Document 0 Filed 0// Page of Premier One (ECF No.. I. BACKGROUND, and Fannie Mae and FHFA filed a Reply The present action involves the interplay between Nevada Revised Statutes. and U.S.C. as it relates to Garden Street, Las Vegas, NV, interests in real property located at Moon On November, 00, the Property 0 was secured by a Deed of Trust. (Deed of Trust, ECF No. -. The Deed of Trust named as the beneficiary and ReconTrust Company, N.A. as the trustee. (Id.. Fannie Mae acquired ownership of a mortgage loan secured by the Property on December, 00 and has owned it ever since. See (Exs. A B to Curcio Decl., ECF No.. conservatorships pursuant to HERA. See (Pollard Decl., ECF No.. On July, 00, MERS assigned its beneficial interest to BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP. (Corp. Assignment of Deed of Trust, ECF No. -. On October, 0, a Notice of Delinquent Assessment Lien was recorded against the Property. (See Foreclosure Deed, ECF No. -. Then on January, 0, a Notice of Default and Election to Sell was recorded against the Property. (See id.. On May, 0, (the HOA. (See id.. Premier One subsequently 0 purchased the Property as the highest bidder at the May, 0 foreclosure sale. (Id.. At no time during the process did FHFA, as conservator of Fannie Mae foreclosure. See (Pollard Decl., ECF No.. On August, 0, the beneficial interest in the Deed of Trust was assigned to The Court takes judicial notice of Exhibits (ECF Nos. - - of Judicial Notice (ECF No.. See Mack v. S. Bay Beer Distrib., F.d, (th Cir.. Each of these documents Page of
10 Case :-cv-0-gmn-njk Document 0 Filed 0// Page of Nationstar Mortgage LLC Nationstar ent of Deed of Trust, ECF No. -. Moreover, Nationstar assigned its beneficial interest in the Deed of Trust to Fannie Mae on September, 0 (Assignment of Deed of Trust, ECF No. -. II. LEGAL STANDARD The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provide for summary adjudication when the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidav 0 0 may affect the outcome of the case. See Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., U.S., (. A dispute as to a material fact is genuine if there is sufficient evidence for a reasonable jury to return a verdict for the nonmoving party. See id. reasonable jurors, drawing all inferences in favor of the nonmoving party, could return a verdict Diaz v. Eagle Produce Ltd. P ship, F.d 0, 0 (th Cir. 00 (citing United States v. Shumway, F.d 0, 0 0 (th Cir.. A principal Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, U.S., (. In determining summary judgment, a court applies a burdenthe party moving for summary judgment would bear the burden of proof at trial, it must come forward with evidence which would entitle it to a directed verdict if the evidence went uncontroverted at trial. In such a case, the moving party has the initial burden of establishing the a C.A.R. Transp. Brokerage Co. v. Darden Rests., Inc., F.d, 0 (th Cir. 000 (citations omitted. In contrast, when the nonmoving party bears the burden of proving the claim or defense, the moving party can meet its burden in two ways: ( by presenting evidence to negate an Page of
11 Case :-cv-0-gmn-njk Document 0 Filed 0// Page of party failed to make a showing sufficient to establish an elem on which that party will bear the burden of proof at trial. See Celotex Corp., U.S. at. If the moving party fails to meet its initial burden, summary judgment must be denied and the court need not consider the U.S., 0 (0. See Adickes v. S.H. Kress & Co., 0 If the moving party satisfies its initial burden, the burden then shifts to the opposing party to establish that a genuine issue of material fact exists. See Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., U.S., (. To establish the existence of a factual dispute, the opposing party need not establish a material issue of fact conclusively in its favor. It is spute be shown to require a jury or judge to resolve the T.W. Elec. Serv., Inc. v. Pac. Elec. Contractors Ass n, 0 F.d, (th Cir.. In other words, the nonmoving party cannot avoid summary judgment by relying solely on conclusory allegations that are unsupported by factual data. See Taylor v. List, 0 F.d 00, 0 (th Cir.. Instead, the opposition must go beyond the assertions and allegations of the pleadings and set forth specific facts by producing competent evidence that shows a genuine issue for trial. See Celotex Corp., U.S. at. truth but to determine whether there is a genuine issue for trial. See Anderson, U.S. at. 0 Id. at. But if the evidence of the nonmoving party is merely colorable or is not significantly probative, summary judgment may be granted. See id. at 0. III. DISCUSSION In the instant Motion for Summary Judgment, Fannie Mac and FHFA request that the that would permit a foreclosure on a superpriority lien to extinguish a property interest of Fannie Mae while it is Page of
12 Case :-cv-0-gmn-njk Document 0 Filed 0// Page of 0 Fannie Mae Deed of Trust and thus did not convey the Property free and clear to Plaint Fannie Mae superior to the interest :, ECF No. 0. The Court addressed the applicability of U.S.C. (j( in Skylights LLC v. Fannie Mae, 0 WL 0 (D. Nev. June, 0. After addressing many different arguments regarding the applicability of section (j(, the Court held that the plain language of section (j( prohibits property of FHFA from being subject to a foreclosure without its consent. Id. at *0. Here, Fannie Mae has held an interest in the Property since December, 00. See (Exs. A B to Curcio Decl., ECF No.. Accordingly, because FHFA held an interest in the Deed of Trust as conservator for Fannie Mae prior to the HOA foreclosure, section (j( IV. CONCLUSION IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 0 is GRANTED. The Court finds that U.S.C. (j( preempts of its super-priority lien cannot extinguish a property interest of Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac 0 sale of its superproperty secured by the Deed of Trust or convey the Property free and clear to Premier One. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Fannie Mae and FHFA are granted summary DATED this th day of July, 0. Gloria M. Navarro, Chief Judge United States District Court Page of
13 Case :-cv-00-gmn-pal Document Filed 0// Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 0 0 WILLISTON INVESTMENT GROUP, LLC, a Nevada limited Liability Company, vs. Plaintiff, JP MORGAN CHASE BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, a National Association; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., a Foreign Corporation; MTC FINANCIAL, INC., a Foreign Corporation; FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION, a Foreign Corporation; ROBERT WAKEFIELD, an individual; DOES I through X; and ROE CORPORATIONS I through X, inclusive, Defendants, FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY, as Conservator of the Federal National Mortgage Corporation, Intervenor, JP MORGAN CHASE BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, a National Association; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., a Foreign Corporation; and FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION, a Foreign Corporation, vs. Counter-Plaintiffs, WILLISTON INVESTMENT GROUP, LLC; and DESERT LINN CONDOMINIUMS, Counter-Defendants. Case No.: :-cv-00-gmn-pal ORDER Page of
14 Case :-cv-00-gmn-pal Document Filed 0// Page of Pending before the Court is the Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. filed by Defendant Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation reddie Mac ff/counter-defendant Williston Investment Group, LLC Williston, and Freddie Mac and FHFA filed a Reply (ECF No.. I. BACKGROUND The present action involves the interplay between Nevada Revised Statutes. and U.S.C. as it relates to Placid Terrace, Henderson, NV, 0 interests in real property located at Lake On July, 00, Robert Wakefield 0 Wakefield obtained a loan in the amount of $,000 from Washington Mutual Bank, FA that was secured by a Deed of Trust on the Property. (Deed of Trust, ECF No. -. The Deed of Trust named WAMU as the beneficiary and California Reconveyance Company as the trustee. (Id.. Freddie Mac purchased the Wakefield Loan on August, 00 and has owned it ever since. See (Exs. A B to Am. Meyer Decl., ECF No. -. conservatorships pursuant to HERA. See (Pollard Decl., ECF No. -. On February, 0 Desert Linn Condominiums (the HOA, recorded a Notice of Delinquent Assessment Lien against 0 the Property for $,.. (Not. of Delinquent Assessment Lien, ECF No. -. Then on April 0, 0, NAS recorded a Notice of Default and Election to Sell, warning that the HOA would foreclose on its lien unless the assessment payments were brought up to date. (Not. of Default and Election to Sell, ECF No. -. On November, 0, NAS, as agent for the The Court takes judicial notice of Exhibits (ECF Nos. - - s Request for Judicial Notice (ECF No.. The Court also takes judicial notice of Exhibits, (ECF Nos. - -, - - of Williston Response. See Mack v. S. Bay Beer Distrib., F.d, (th Cir.. Each of these documents Page of
15 Case :-cv-00-gmn-pal Document Filed 0// Page of HOA, recorded a Notice of Foreclosure Sale, setting a foreclosure sale of the Property on December, 0. (Not. of Foreclosure Sale, ECF No. -. Williston subsequently purchased the Property as the highest bidder at the March, 0 foreclosure sale. (Foreclosure Deed, ECF No. -. At no time during the process did FHFA, as conservator of See (Pollard Decl., ECF No. -. On September, 00, WAMU submitted to receivership under the Federal Deposit 0 to a purchase and assumption agreement. (See Purchase and Assumption Agreement, ECH No. -. Moreover, on August, 0, Chase substituted Trustee Corps as the trustee of the Deed of Trust. (Substitution of Trustee, ECF No. -. Shortly thereafter, on August, 0, Trustee Corps recorded a Notice of Breach and Default and Election to Sell, indicating that Wakefield had failed to perform obligations pursuant to the Deed of Trust. (Not. of Breach and Default and Election to Sell, ECF No. -. On June, 0, Trustee Corps uly, 0. (Not. -. Freddie Mac subsequently purchased the Property as 0 the highest bidder at the Jul -, and Chase assigned its beneficial interest in the Deed of Trust to Freddie Mac on June, 0 (Assignment of Deed of Trust, ECF No. -. Williston initiated this action by filing the original complaint in state court on October, 0, asserting, inter alia, a claim for quiet title against Freddie Mac, MERS, Chase, and MTC Financial, Inc. (Compl. 0, ECF No. -. Chase and Freddie Mac subsequently removed the action to this Court on December 0, 0. (Not. of Removal, ECF No.. On December, 0, Freddie Mac filed its Answer, asserting counterclaims against Williston. (Ans. to Compl. & Counterclaims, ECF No.. On December, 0, Freddie Mac filed its Amended Answer, asserting counterclaims against Williston and the HOA. (Am. Ans. To Page of
16 Case :-cv-00-gmn-pal Document Filed 0// Page of Compl. & Counterclaims, ECF No.. On February 0, 0, this Court entered an Order granting to Intervene. (Intervenor Order, ECF No. 0. Shortly thereafter, on February, 0, Freddie Mac and FHFA filed the pending Motion for Summary Judgment. (MSJ, ECF No.. On June, 0, the Court held a hearing on the pending Motion for Summary Judgment, which was attended by the parties in this case as well as the parties in several related cases judgment motion. (Min. of Proceedings, ECF No.. After listening to the arguments presented by all parties present at the hearing, the Court took the motion under submission. 0 II. LEGAL STANDARD The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provide for summary adjudication when the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the 0 P. (a. Material facts are those that may affect the outcome of the case. See Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., U.S., (. A dispute as to a material fact is genuine if there is sufficient evidence for a reasonable jury to return a verdict for the nonmoving party. See id. reasonable jurors, drawing all inferences in favor of the nonmoving party, could return a verdict Diaz v. Eagle Produce Ltd. P ship, F.d 0, 0 (th Cir. 00 (citing United States v. Shumway, F.d 0, 0 0 (th Cir.. A Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, U.S., (. In determining summary judgment, a court applies a burden- These related cases are: Elmer v. JP Morgan Chase Bank NA, No. :-cv--gmn-njk; and Skylights LLC vs. Fannie Mae, No. :-cv-00-gmn-vcf. Page of
17 Case :-cv-00-gmn-pal Document Filed 0// Page of the party moving for summary judgment would bear the burden of proof at trial, it must come forward with evidence which would entitle it to a directed verdict if the evidence went uncontroverted at trial. In such a case, the moving party has the initial burden of establishing C.A.R. Transp. Brokerage Co. v. Darden Rests., Inc., F.d, 0 (th Cir. 000 (citations omitted. In contrast, when the nonmoving party bears the burden of proving the claim or defense, the moving party can meet its burden in two ways: ( by presenting evidence to negate an e; or ( by demonstrating that the nonmoving 0 on which that party will bear the burden of proof at trial. See Celotex Corp., U.S. at. If the moving party fails to meet its initial burden, summary judgment must be denied and See Adickes v. S.H. Kress & Co., U.S., 0 (0. If the moving party satisfies its initial burden, the burden then shifts to the opposing party to establish that a genuine issue of material fact exists. See Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., U.S., (. To establish the existence of a factual dispute, the opposing party need not establish a material issue of fact conclusively in its favor. It is 0 T.W. Elec. Serv., Inc. v. Pac. Elec. Contractors Ass n, 0 F.d, (th Cir.. In other words, the nonmoving party cannot avoid summary judgment by relying solely on conclusory allegations that are unsupported by factual data. See Taylor v. List, 0 F.d 00, 0 (th Cir.. Instead, the opposition must go beyond the assertions and allegations of the pleadings and set forth specific facts by producing competent evidence that shows a genuine issue for trial. See Celotex Corp., U.S. at. s function is not to weigh the evidence and determine the Page of
18 Case :-cv-00-gmn-pal Document Filed 0// Page of truth but to determine whether there is a genuine issue for trial. See Anderson, U.S. at. in Id. at. But if the evidence of the nonmoving party is merely colorable or is not significantly probative, summary judgment may be granted. See id. at 0. III. DISCUSSION In the instant Motion for Summary Judgment, Freddie Mac and FHFA request that the that would permit a foreclosure on a superpriority lien to extinguish a property interest of Freddie Mac while it is 0 0 superior to the interest of Plaintif (Mot. Summ. J. :, ECF No.. The Court addressed the applicability of U.S.C. (j( in Skylights LLC v. Fannie Mae, 0 WL 0 (D. Nev. June, 0. After addressing many different arguments regarding the applicability of section (j(, the Court held that the plain language of section (j( prohibits property of FHFA from being subject to a foreclosure without its consent. Id. at *0. Here, Freddie Mac has held an interest in the Property since August, 00. See (Exs. A B to Am. Meyer Decl., ECF No. -. Accordingly, because FHFA held an interest in the Deed of Trust as conservator for Freddie Mac prior to the HOA foreclosure, section (j( he Deed of Trust. IV. CONCLUSION IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Freddie Mac for Summary Judgment (ECF No. is GRANTED. The Court finds that U.S.C. (j( preempts Nevada Revised Statutes. to the extent that a homeowner asso Page of
19 Case :-cv-00-gmn-pal Document Filed 0// Page of of its super-priority lien cannot extinguish a property interest of Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac sale of its super-priority interest on the Proper property secured by the Deed of Trust or convey the Property free and clear to Williston. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Freddie Mac, FHFA, Wakefield, Chase, and MERS are granted summary judgment on Williston DATED this th day of July, 0. 0 Gloria M. Navarro, Chief Judge United States District Judge 0 Page of
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case :-cv-000-gmn-vcf Document Filed 0// Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 0 0 SKYLIGHTS LLC, vs. Plaintiff, DAVID BYRON; JENNIFER BYRON; CCSF LLC; FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION;
More informationCase 2:04-cv-03428-SRD-ALC Document 29 Filed 08/22/06 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA VERSUS NO: 04-3428
Case 2:04-cv-03428-SRD-ALC Document 29 Filed 08/22/06 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA EDWARD McGARRY, ET AL CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO: 04-3428 TRAVELERS LIFE AND ANNUITY
More informationCase 1:07-cv-00389-MJW-BNB Document 51 Filed 08/21/2008 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Case 1:07-cv-00389-MJW-BNB Document 51 Filed 08/21/2008 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 07-cv-00389-MJW-BNB ERNA GANSER, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT
More information2:09-cv-14271-LPZ-PJK Doc # 13 Filed 06/24/10 Pg 1 of 6 Pg ID 53 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
2:09-cv-14271-LPZ-PJK Doc # 13 Filed 06/24/10 Pg 1 of 6 Pg ID 53 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION v. Plaintiff, CASE NO. 09-14271 HON.
More informationCase 4:13-cv-01104 Document 40 Filed in TXSD on 02/26/15 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
Case 4:13-cv-01104 Document 40 Filed in TXSD on 02/26/15 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION SHARON JACKSON, et al. Plaintiffs, v. CIVIL ACTION H-13-1104
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION JAMES D. FOWLER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No.: 08-cv-2785 ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) Judge Robert M. Dow,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, 8:03CV165 Plaintiff, v. WOODMEN OF THE WORLD LIFE INSURANCE SOCIETY and/or OMAHA WOODMEN LIFE INSURANCE
More informationHow To Defend Yourself In A Court Case Against A Trust
U.S. BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS ENTERED TAWANA C. MARSHALL, CLERK THE DATE OF ENTRY IS ON THE COURT'S DOCKET The following constitutes the order of the Court. Signed January 20, 2005.
More informationCASE 0:05-cv-01578-JMR-JJG Document 59 Filed 09/18/06 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA 05-CV-1578(JMR/JJG)
CASE 0:05-cv-01578-JMR-JJG Document 59 Filed 09/18/06 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA 05-CV-1578(JMR/JJG) State of Minnesota ) ) v. ) ORDER ) Robert B. Beale, Rebecca S.
More informationCase 3:13-cv-00714-M-BK Document 33 Filed 01/09/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID 1185
Case 3:13-cv-00714-M-BK Document 33 Filed 01/09/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID 1185 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION KHYBER HOLDINGS LLC, Cross-Claimant, v.
More informationCase 2:14-cv-02386-MVL-DEK Document 33 Filed 04/14/15 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Case 2:14-cv-02386-MVL-DEK Document 33 Filed 04/14/15 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA KIRSTEN D'JUVE CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO: 14-2386 AMERICAN MODERN HOME INSURANCE
More informationCase 1:05-cv-00050-GC Document 29 Filed 12/13/05 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 245 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Case 1:05-cv-00050-GC Document 29 Filed 12/13/05 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 245 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE BUSINESS LENDERS, LLC, Plaintiff, v. Civil No. 05-50-B-C RITANNE CAVANAUGH GAZAK,
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO In Re: JUDGE RICHARD L. SPEER Metropolitan Environmental, Inc. Debtor(s (Related Case: 01-35756 Bruce C. French, Trustee Plaintiff(s v.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 1 PAUL ELKINS and KATHY ELKINS, husband and wife, v. Plaintiffs, QBE INSURANCE CORPORATION, a foreign insurer; COMMUNITYASSOCIATION
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Thompson v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company et al Doc. 1 1 1 WO William U. Thompson, v. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Plaintiff, Property & Casualty Insurance
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Case :-cv-00-kjd-pal Document Filed // Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA SERGIO A. MEDINA, v. Plaintiff, QUALITY LOAN SERVICE CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. Case No. -CV-00-KJD-PAL
More informationCase 3:10-cv-00072-BH Document 38 Filed 02/24/11 Page 1 of 8 PageID 250
Case 3:10-cv-00072-BH Document 38 Filed 02/24/11 Page 1 of 8 PageID 250 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES, d/b/a FCC
More informationCASE 0:10-cv-01132-MJD-FLN Document 106 Filed 06/06/11 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
CASE 0:10-cv-01132-MJD-FLN Document 106 Filed 06/06/11 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA In re: Mirapex Products Liability Litigation 07-MD-1836 (MJD/FLN) This document relates
More informationCase 1:07-cv-01264-RMC Document 34 Filed 03/17/10 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MEMORANDUM OPINION
Case 1:07-cv-01264-RMC Document 34 Filed 03/17/10 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JAMES C. STEPHENS, et al., v. Plaintiffs, US AIRWAYS GROUP, et al., Defendants.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION. v. Case No: 8:14-cv-588-T-30MAP ORDER
Walker v. Transworld Systems, Inc. Doc. 35 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION NEVADA WALKER, Plaintiff, v. Case No: 8:14-cv-588-T-30MAP TRANSWORLD SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Main Document Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN RE CASE NO. 512-bk-03367-RNO STEVEN RICHARD ALECKNA JAIME SUE ALECKNA CHAPTER 7 Debtors ***********************************
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. H-10-4634 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION RLI INSURANCE COMPANY, VS. Plaintiff, WILLBROS CONSTRUCTION (U.S.) LLC, et al., Defendants. CIVIL ACTION NO. H-10-4634 MEMORANDUM
More informationCase 2:14-cv-00170-TS Document 45 Filed 05/11/15 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH
Case 2:14-cv-00170-TS Document 45 Filed 05/11/15 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA, a Connecticut corporation, and
More informationCase 2:06-cv-02026-CM Document 114 Filed 03/10/09 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
Case 2:06-cv-02026-CM Document 114 Filed 03/10/09 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS ) METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE ) COMPANY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) CIVIL ACTION v.
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. No. 96-11134. Summary Calendar. Rosser B. MELTON, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. No. 96-11134 Summary Calendar. Rosser B. MELTON, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TEACHERS INSURANCE & ANNUITY ASSOCIATION of AMERICA, Defendant- Appellee, United
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND JOAN FALLOWS KLUGE, Plaintiff, v. Civil No. L-10-00022 LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA Defendant. MEMORANDUM Plaintiff, Joan Fallows
More informationCase 3:12-cv-01004-JPG-PMF Document 123 Filed 04/11/14 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #2498 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Case 3:12-cv-01004-JPG-PMF Document 123 Filed 04/11/14 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #2498 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS HAMILTON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL DISTRICT, an Illinois governmental
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. Kauffman, J. April 18, 2008
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA EVELYN THOMAS v. COMMUNITY COLLEGE OF PHILADELPHIA CIVIL ACTION NO. 06-5372 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Kauffman, J. April 18, 2008
More informationCase 3:12-cv-01348-HZ Document 32 Filed 03/08/13 Page 1 of 8 Page ID#: 144
Case 3:12-cv-01348-HZ Document 32 Filed 03/08/13 Page 1 of 8 Page ID#: 144 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION KELLY J. YOX, an individual, v. Plaintiff, No.
More informationF I L E D September 13, 2011
Case: 10-11190 Document: 00511600940 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/13/2011 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS United States Court of Appeals FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Fifth Circuit F I L E D September 13, 2011
More informationHow To Get A Summary Judgment In A Well Service Case In Texas
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION JASON LONG, Plaintiff, v. NO. 0:00-CV-000 ABC THE CHABON GROUP, INC., Defendant. DEFENDANT S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MEMORANDUM. GREEN, S.J. September, 1999
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION v. No. 96-CV-4598 PATRICIA M. CURRY KELLY, et al., Defendants.
More informationCase 1:10-cv-10170-NMG Document 38 Filed 06/15/11 Page 1 of 9. United States District Court District of Massachusetts MEMORANDUM & ORDER
Case 1:10-cv-10170-NMG Document 38 Filed 06/15/11 Page 1 of 9 WESTERN WORLD INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff, v. JAMES CZECH and WILLIAMS BUILDING COMPANY, INC., Defendants. United States District Court
More informationCase 1:14-cv-21077-BB Document 78 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/04/15 16:32:47 Page 1 of 7
Case 1:14-cv-21077-BB Document 78 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/04/15 16:32:47 Page 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ARCH SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, v. Plaintiff, JOSEPH MAYA,
More informationCase 0:05-cv-02409-DSD-RLE Document 51 Filed 03/16/2006 Page 1 of 6. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Civil No.
Case 0:05-cv-02409-DSD-RLE Document 51 Filed 03/16/2006 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Civil No. 05-2409(DSD/RLE) Kristine Forbes (Lamke) and Morgan Koop, Plaintiffs, v.
More informationCase 3:14-cv-00348-BAS-BLM Document 55 Filed 10/23/14 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-00-bas-blm Document Filed 0// Page of 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JORDAN MARKS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Plaintiff, CRUNCH
More information8:09-cv-00341-LSC-FG3 Doc # 276 Filed: 07/19/13 Page 1 of 5 - Page ID # 3979 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
8:09-cv-00341-LSC-FG3 Doc # 276 Filed: 07/19/13 Page 1 of 5 - Page ID # 3979 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA MICHAEL S. ARGENYI, Plaintiff, v. CREIGHTON UNIVERSITY, Defendant.
More informationCase 4:06-cv-00191 Document 12 Filed in TXSD on 05/25/06 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
Case 4:06-cv-00191 Document 12 Filed in TXSD on 05/25/06 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION BARBARA S. QUINN, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. H-06-00191
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Presently before the court are the Motions to Dismiss
Michael Bowe v. American Mortgage Network, Inc. et al Doc. 1 O NO JS- UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 MICHAEL BOWE, v. Plaintiff, AMERICAN MORTGAGE NETWORK, INC.;
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT CRISTOBAL COLON, Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED v. Case No.
More informationCase 3:08-cv-00486-G -BF Document 19 Filed 07/10/08 Page 1 of 13 PageID 340 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Case 3:08-cv-00486-G -BF Document 19 Filed 07/10/08 Page 1 of 13 PageID 340 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION MARK ROTELLA, ET AL., VS. Plaintiffs, MID-CONTINENT CASUALTY
More informationCase 4:13-cv-03228 Document 20 Filed in TXSD on 03/04/15 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ORDER
Case 4:13-cv-03228 Document 20 Filed in TXSD on 03/04/15 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION DAVID W. BROWN, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION H-13-3228 WELLS
More informationOPINION. Before the Court is the Trustee s Motion for Summary Judgment. State Farm
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN RE : CHAPTER 7 AMERICAN REHAB & PHYSICAL : THERAPY, INC. : DEBTOR : CASE NO. 04-14562 ROBERT H. HOLBER, TRUSTEE : PLAINTIFF
More informationCase: 1:12-cv-02107-DCN Doc #: 61 Filed: 09/11/14 1 of 16. PageID #: <pageid>
Case: 1:12-cv-02107-DCN Doc #: 61 Filed: 09/11/14 1 of 16. PageID #: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION HILDA L. SOLIS, Secretary of Labor,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
Case: 1:10-cv-00117 Document #: 114 Filed: 11/08/10 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:1538 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION BRIANNA GREENE, on behalf of ) herself and others
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN In re: Case No. DT 09-08254 AURORA OIL & GAS CORPORATION, Chapter 11 Hon. Scott W. Dales Debtor. / Page 1 of 5 FRONTIER ENERGY, LLC,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION. v. 1:11-CV-1397-CAP ORDER
Case 1:11-cv-01397-CAP Document 69 Filed 02/27/13 Page 1 of 10 TAMMY DRUMMONDS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. v. 1:11-CV-1397-CAP
More informationCase 14-50028 Doc 30 Filed 03/16/15 EOD 03/16/15 15:59:28 Pg 1 of 8 SO ORDERED: March 16, 2015. Jeffrey J. Graham United States Bankruptcy Judge
Case 14-50028 Doc 30 Filed 03/16/15 EOD 03/16/15 15:59:28 Pg 1 of 8 SO ORDERED: March 16, 2015. Jeffrey J. Graham United States Bankruptcy Judge UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT GEAUGA COUNTY, OHIO
[Cite as BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P. v. Untisz, 2013-Ohio-993.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT GEAUGA COUNTY, OHIO BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP, f.k.a. COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING,
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN MACOMB COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT. Case No. 2012-4691-CH OPINION AND ORDER
STATE OF MICHIGAN MACOMB COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT JOHN E. BUTERBAUGH and CARRIE BUTERBAUGH, Plaintiffs, vs. Case No. 2012-4691-CH SELENE FINANCIAL, LP, JPMORGAN MORTGAGE ACQUISITION CORP., AS TRUSTEE FOR THE
More informationCase 1:05-cv-00151-RAE Doc #47 Filed 11/10/05 Page 1 of 7 Page ID#<pageID> UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Case 1:05-cv-00151-RAE Doc #47 Filed 11/10/05 Page 1 of 7 Page ID# UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION TIMOTHY J. VANDENBERG, v. Plaintiff, Case No. 1:05-CV-151
More information2:08-cv-12533-DPH-PJK Doc # 67 Filed 03/26/13 Pg 1 of 7 Pg ID 2147 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
2:08-cv-12533-DPH-PJK Doc # 67 Filed 03/26/13 Pg 1 of 7 Pg ID 2147 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION OLD REPUBLIC INSURANCE COMPANY, v. Plaintiff, MICHIGAN CATASTROPHIC
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MEMORANDUM. Ludwig. J. July 9, 2010
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA KATHLEEN M. KELLY : CIVIL ACTION : v. : : No. 09-1641 NATIONAL LIABILITY & FIRE : INSURANCE COMPANY : MEMORANDUM Ludwig. J.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION EEOC versus BROWN & GROUP RETAIL, INC. CIVIL ACTION NO. H-06-3074 Memorandum and Order Regarding Discovery Motions,
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WINSTON-SALEM DIVISION
SO ORDERED. SIGNED this 22nd day of February, 2013. UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WINSTON-SALEM DIVISION In re: Joseph Walter Melara and Shyrell Lynn Melara, Case No.
More informationCase 4:04-cv-00622 Document 43 Filed in TXSD on 04/04/06 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
Case 4:04-cv-00622 Document 43 Filed in TXSD on 04/04/06 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION IRFAN LALANI, Plaintiff, VS. CIVIL ACTION NO. H-04-0622 TEXAS
More informationCase 1:09-cv-21435-MGC Document 208 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/01/2011 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 1:09-cv-21435-MGC Document 208 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/01/2011 Page 1 of 6 E. JENNIFER NEWMAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 09-21435-Civ-COOKE/TURNOFF vs. Plaintiff
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY CENTRAL DIVISION (at Lexington)
Case: 5:14-cv-00136-DCR-REW Doc #: 138 Filed: 04/15/15 Page: 1 of 8 - Page ID#: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY CENTRAL DIVISION (at Lexington GEORGE VINCENT VAUGHN, Plaintiff,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE. This is an appeal from a district court's grant of summary
IN THE THE STATE MARGARET OWENS, Appellant, vs. SANTA BARBARA VILLAGE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCATION, A CORPORATION, Respondent. ORDER AFFIRMANCE No. 49481 FILE APR 3 0 2 TRACIE K. LINDEMAN CLERK BY This is an
More informationCASE 0:08-cv-01383-JNE-FLN Document 128 Filed 03/03/10 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
CASE 0:08-cv-01383-JNE-FLN Document 128 Filed 03/03/10 Page 1 of 7 Marquette Business Credit, Inc., Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA v. Civil No. 08-1383 (JNE/FLN) ORDER International
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION ) CHARLES HONEYCUTT, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) NO. 02-2710 Ml/V ) FIRST FEDERAL BANK, a FSB d/b/a ) First Federal
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
CASE 0:09-cv-00013-DWF-RLE Document 94 Filed 05/12/10 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Tri-Marketing, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, Civil No. 09-13 (DWF/RLE) Plaintiff and
More informationCase 0:14-cv-62840-JIC Document 44 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/30/2015 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 0:14-cv-62840-JIC Document 44 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/30/2015 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES LIABILITY INSURANCE COMPANY, v. Plaintiff, KELLEY VENTURES, LLC, KEVIN P. KELLEY, and PHOENIX MOTORS, INC.,
More informationTEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-12-00691-CV Grace Shamel and Stephen Shamel, Appellants v. Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC; Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Indenture Trustee
More information2:12-cv-12017-SJM-MAR Doc # 9 Filed 03/31/13 Pg 1 of 8 Pg ID 391 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
2:12-cv-12017-SJM-MAR Doc # 9 Filed 03/31/13 Pg 1 of 8 Pg ID 391 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION DONALD L. DUBUQUE, et al. Plaintiffs, v. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE
More informationCase 1:04-cv-00561-RHC Doc #105 Filed 01/31/06 Page 1 of 12 Page ID#<pageID>
Case 1:04-cv-00561-RHC Doc #105 Filed 01/31/06 Page 1 of 12 Page ID# UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION PRICE, HENEVELD, COOPER, DEWITT, & LITTON,
More informationTHE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION
Case 5:10-cv-00044-CAR Document 280 Filed 11/18/11 Page 1 of 14 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION TERRY CARTRETTE TINDALL, : : Plaintiff, : v. : Civil Action
More informationNOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 13a0142n.06. No. 11-4347 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
DOUGLAS C. RAMSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 13a0142n.06 No. 11-4347 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, a New York insurance company, v. Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION BRENDA D. FLUSTY and BETTY A. KRIDER, Co-Personal
More informationNOT RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION File Name: 14a0721n.06. No. 13-2126 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION File Name: 14a0721n.06 No. 13-2126 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT PATRICK RUGIERO, v. Plaintiff-Appellee, NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC; FANNIE MAE; MORTGAGE
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA VERSUS NO. 14-615 TORUS SPECIALTY INSURANCE CO., ET AL.
Case 2:14-cv-00615-JTM-SS Document 47 Filed 06/16/15 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA DELLA CUPPS, ET AL. CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 14-615 TORUS SPECIALTY INSURANCE
More informationCase 2:14-cv-01934-MBN Document 91 Filed 08/25/15 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA VERSUS NUMBER: 14-1934
Case 2:14-cv-01934-MBN Document 91 Filed 08/25/15 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA GREG EDWARDS CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NUMBER: 14-1934 ROWAN COMPANIES, INC. SECTION:
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATHENS DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATHENS DIVISION STEVEN MORRIS, individually, as surviving spouse of Patricia Morris, deceased, and as the Administrator of the Estate
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA * * *
Case :0-cv-0-RLH -PAL Document Filed 0// Page of 0 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA * * * RIGHTHAVEN, LLC, a Nevada limitedliability company, Plaintiff, vs. THOMAS A. DIBIASE, an individual,
More informationCase 8:12-cv-01398-MSS-TBM Document 28 Filed 05/29/13 Page 1 of 9 PageID 440 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
Case 8:12-cv-01398-MSS-TBM Document 28 Filed 05/29/13 Page 1 of 9 PageID 440 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION JENNIFER CUNNINGHAM, and BARRY CUNNINGHAM, Plaintiffs,
More informationCase 3:13-cv-00054 Document 120 Filed in TXSD on 05/04/15 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION ORDER
Case 3:13-cv-00054 Document 120 Filed in TXSD on 05/04/15 Page 1 of 7 This case is being reviewed for possible publication by American Maritime Cases, Inc. ( AMC ). If this case is published in AMC s book
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIRACIANE ARMAND, CASE NO.: 92-1473-CIV-MORENO Plaintiff, vs. SECRETARY OF EDUCATION OF THE UNITED STATES, CITIBANK (New York State), a New
More informationCase 1:12-cv-02486-LTB-KLM Document 62 Filed 10/27/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 11
Case 1:12-cv-02486-LTB-KLM Document 62 Filed 10/27/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 11 Civil Case No. 12-cv-02486-LTB-KLM STEVEN R. JOHNSTON, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
More informationCase 2:10-cv-10078-NGE-MAR Document 16 Filed 10/13/10 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Case 2:10-cv-10078-NGE-MAR Document 16 Filed 10/13/10 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION Keith Hartop, v. Plaintiff, Case No. 10-10078 Honorable Nancy
More informationCase 2:10-cv-00741-GMN-LRL Document 10 Filed 08/17/10 Page 1 of 6
Case :0-cv-00-GMN-LRL Document 0 Filed 0//0 Page of 0 Michael J. McCue (NV Bar No. 0 Nikkya G. Williams (NV Bar No. Telephone: (0-0 Facsimile: (0 - Attorneys for Defendants Jan Klerks and Stichting Wolkenkrabbers
More informationPending before the Court in the above-entitled matter are Plaintiff s motion for
Case 1:08-cv-00225-EJL-CWD Document 34 Filed 03/02/10 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE STATE OF IDAHO OREGON MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, an Oregon corporation, Plaintiff, Case No.
More informationCase: 1:10-cv-00268 Document #: 134 Filed: 06/14/11 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:1817
Case: 1:10-cv-00268 Document #: 134 Filed: 06/14/11 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:1817 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION TAMMY DOBBIN, COLLEEN DOBBIN, )
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-21136-CIV-ZLOCH. THIS MATTER is before the Court upon Plaintiff PMG Collins,
PMG Collins, LLC v. Allianz Global Risks US Insurance Company Doc. 60 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-21136-CIV-ZLOCH PMG COLLINS, LLC, Plaintiff, O R D E R ALLIANZ
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE PHARMASTEM THERAPEUTICS, INC., Plaintiff, v. C.A. No. 02-148 GMS VIACELL INC., CRYO-CELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., CORCELL, INC., STEMCYTE, INC.,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND MARYLAND ACCOUNTING SERVICES, INC., et al. Plaintiffs, v. Case No. CCB-11-CV-00145 CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant. MEMORANDUM Plaintiffs
More informationCase: 1:06-cv-06591 Document #: 106 Filed: 01/15/08 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:<pageid>
Case: 1:06-cv-06591 Document #: 106 Filed: 01/15/08 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION T. McGANN PLUMBING, INC., Plaintiff,
More informationSTEPHEN S. EDWARDS, individually and as Trustee of the Super Trust Fund, u/t/d June 15, 2001, Plaintiff/Appellant,
NOTICE: NOT FOR PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZ. R. SUP. CT. 111(c), THIS DECISION DOES NOT CREATE LEGAL PRECEDENT AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS AUTHORIZED. IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION ONE STEPHEN
More informationCase 1:05-cv-00025-WDQ Document 20 Filed 06/08/05 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
Case 1:05-cv-00025-WDQ Document 20 Filed 06/08/05 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND KELVIN NASH, #308058 * Plaintiff, * v. CIVIL ACTION NO. WDQ-05-25 * DOUGLAS
More informationCase 1:08-cv-06957 Document 45 Filed 10/19/2009 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
Case 1:08-cv-06957 Document 45 Filed 10/19/2009 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ROBERT F. CAVOTO, ) ) Plaintiff, Counter-Defendant,
More informationU.S. v. BROWN, Cite as 104 AFTR 2d 2009-7835, 12/28/2009, Code Sec(s) 6672; 7403
Checkpoint Contents Federal Library Federal Source Materials Federal Tax Decisions American Federal Tax Reports American Federal Tax Reports (Current Year) 2009 AFTR 2d Vol. 104 104 AFTR 2d 2009-7867 -
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL TRIAL DIVISION
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL TRIAL DIVISION DIAMOND STATE INSURANCE CO., : April Term, 2000 Plaintiff, : v. : No. 0395 : NUFAB CORP.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 7:12-CV-148 (HL) ORDER
Case 7:12-cv-00148-HL Document 43 Filed 11/07/13 Page 1 of 11 CHRISTY LYNN WATFORD, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION v. Plaintiff, Civil Action No.
More informationCase 08-00058-8-JRL Doc 40 Filed 05/20/09 Entered 05/20/09 14:28:43 Page 1 of 6
Case 08-00058-8-JRL Doc 40 Filed 05/20/09 Entered 05/20/09 14:28:43 Page 1 of 6 SO ORDERED. SIGNED this 20 day of May, 2009. J. Rich Leonard United States Bankruptcy Judge IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY
More information5:05-cv-60218-JCO-MAR Doc # 277 Filed 01/03/08 Pg 1 of 10 Pg ID 3230 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
5:05-cv-60218-JCO-MAR Doc # 277 Filed 01/03/08 Pg 1 of 10 Pg ID 3230 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ROOFERS LOCAL 149 SECURITY BENEFIT TRUST FUND, et al., Plaintiffs,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re ) Chapter 11 ) AVENTINE RENEWABLE ENERGY ) Case No. 09-11214(KG) HOLDINGS, INC., a Delaware ) (Jointly Administered) Corporation,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MEMORANDUM. ROBERT F. KELLY, Sr. J. OCTOBER 12, 2006
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JEANNETTE KRIZMAN, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION v. No. 06 402 AAA MID-ATLANTIC, INC., Defendant. MEMORANDUM ROBERT F. KELLY, Sr.
More informationCase 2:15-ap-01122-RK Doc 61 Filed 05/09/16 Entered 05/09/16 13:51:33 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 6 NOT FOR PUBLICATION
Case :-ap-0-rk Doc Filed 0/0/ Entered 0/0/ :: Desc Main Document Page of 0 In re: L. Scott Apparel, Inc., NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Debtor. Howard
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. Memorandum and Order
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CAROSELLA & FERRY, P.C., Plaintiff, v. TIG INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. CIVIL ACTION NO. 00-2344 Memorandum and Order YOHN,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Case :0-cv-00-KJD-GWF Document Filed 0/0/ Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 0 THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. CHARLES JAJDELSKI, v. Plaintiff/Relator, KAPLAN, INC., Defendant.
More informationSummary Judgment - Showing Case Paper
Case 5:03-cv-00175-DF Document 40 Filed 05/16/05 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION LINDA DENT, : : Plaintiff, : : vs. : 5:03CV175 (DF) :
More information