1 World Intellectual Property Organization Guide to WIPO Services Helping you protect inventions, trademarks & designs resolve domain name & other IP disputes
3 The World Intellectual Property Organization offers a wide range of global IP services. They provide a highly efficient, fast and cost-effective means of helping innovators and creators both corporate and individual protect their inventions, trademarks and designs in multiple countries, and also resolve their IP disputes, including those involving domain names. This brochure offers a brief overview of these global services. Further information and contact details can be found at
4 THE PCT SYSTEM
5 Set up under WIPO s Patent COOPeraTIOn Treaty (PCT), the PCT system allows users to seek patent protection simultaneously in a large number of countries by filing a single international application. Filing under the PCT system postpones the national patent granting procedure, in the majority of cases, by up to 18 months on top of the normal 12-month priority period. Payment of the fees and translation costs associated with national patent applications is similarly delayed. At the end of that period (OF usually at least 30 months from the FIling date OF the earliest priority application), applicants should have received important value-added information that helps them to better understand the potential patentability of their inventions and thus to decide whether and where to seek patent protection. The system is widely used by applicants to keep their patenting options open for as long as possible. PCT International Applications Anyone who is a national or resident of a PCT Contracting State may file an international application. Applications may be filed with the national patent office of the Contracting State of which the applicant is a national (or resident), with a competent regional patent office, or with WIPO. Generally, applicants first file a national (or regional) application with their national (or regional) patent office and, within 12 months from the priority date, an international application under the PCT. The office with which the PCT application was filed transmits a copy of it to WIPO, which is responsible for: receiving and storing all application documents; performing a second formalities examination; publishing the application and related documents; translating the title and abstract of the international application and certain associated documents into English and/or French, where necessary; communicating documents to offices and third parties; providing legal advice on request to users; and providing PCT-related assistance to PCT members.
6 PCT International SearCH Within 16 months from the priority date, the PCT Regulations require that the international application be subjected to an international search, carried out by one of the competent International Searching Authorities (ISA) under the PCT. These are national or regional patent offices that have met certain qualifications and have been appointed by PCT Contracting States to perform this function. The resulting International Search Report (ISR) provides a listing of all documents considered relevant to the invention s patentability. The ISA also issues a nonbinding written opinion containing an analysis of the potential patentability of the invention in the light of the search report results. Both the ISR and written opinion are communicated to the applicant and WIPO. Applicants pay a search fee that varies depending on the ISA chosen. Where the content of the report and opinion suggests the granting of a patent is unlikely, the applicant may decide to withdraw or amend the application. The international application, ISR and any amendments are published by WIPO 18 months after the priority date. At that point, the claimed invention is disclosed in the public domain. PCT Supplementary International SearCH Before the expiration of 19 months from the priority date, the applicant has the option to request a Supplementary International Searching Authority (SISA) (an ISA willing to offer this service) to carry out an additional search of relevant documentation, specifically focusing on documents in the particular language in which that authority specializes. The goal of this additional search is to reduce the likelihood of further documents coming to light in the national phase that would make granting the patent unlikely. PCT International Preliminary Examination Applicants can request an optional international preliminary examination (IPE) within 22 months from the priority date. This provides a second evaluation of the potential patentability of an invention during the international phase, typically most useful when an applicant wishes to have the potential patentability of an amended application reviewed. At about 28 months from the priority date, the International Preliminary Examining Authority (IPEA) (all ISAs also act as IPEAs) sends the applicant its opinion on potential patentability. Fees for preliminary examination vary across IPEAs. Fees Applicants are required to pay an international filing fee, with a reduction for filing electronically. A 90 percent reduction in the international filing fee, as well as an exemption from the transmittal fee payable to WIPO when the application is filed with it, is available to certain applicants. The international search,
7 supplementary international search and international preliminary examination all have associated fees. PCT National Phase PCT applications do not result in issuance of international patents, and WIPO does not grant patents. The decision whether to confer patent rights remains in the hands of national and/or regional patent offices, and patent rights are limited to the jurisdiction of the patent granting authority. Applicants opting to proceed further, therefore, must enter the national/regional phase, usually within 30 months from the priority date. In addition to paying the official patent office fees, the applicant may need to submit a translation of the application, appoint a local agent and comply with certain national requirements. The national/regional offices then begin the granting procedure according to their national laws and ultimately decide whether to grant patent rights for the claimed invention, taking into account the PCT search, supplementary search and preliminary examination results. Additional information on PCT services, including the various fees involved in the application procedure, is available at: Patent Information Products The PatentscoPE Search Service Provides free and easy access to more than 2 million patent applications disclosed through the PCT system since 1978 (free of charge). PatentScope Web Service Automated download of published PCT application data on the publication date (cost: CHF 1,200 per year). Ultimately, the Pct: brings the world within reach; postpones the major costs associated with international patent protection; provides a strong basis for patenting decisions; and is used by the world s major corporations, research institutions and universities to seek international patent protection.
8 the madrid SYSTEM for the international registration of marks
9 WITh more than 100 years of experience, the Madrid system has helped businesses establish more than a million marks WOrldWIde. It allows an applicant to apply for a trademark in any or many of the countries (or the organization) party to the Madrid system, by filing a single application at a national (or regional) trademark office of a member of the system. ThIS does away with the need to file multiple applications at multiple trademark offices. It also facilitates the subsequent management of the mark, as changes or renewals can be recorded through a single procedural step. To use the Madrid system, a trademark applicant must have a connection with a country or organization party to it through: a real and effective industrial or commercial establishment; domicile; or nationality. Applications for international registration are filed with the trademark office of the territory concerned, the office of origin, which then certifies and forwards the application to WIPO. WIPO examines international applications for conformity with formal requirements and, for those that do comply, the mark is recorded in the International Register of the Madrid system and published in the (electronic) WIPO Gazette of International Marks. WIPO then notifies the trademark offices of all countries (or regions) designated in the international application, and those offices carry out the substantive examination leading to confirmation or rejection of the international registration, according to domestic legislation, within a prescribed period of 12, or sometimes 18, months. A registration recorded in the International Register may have the same effect as one made directly with each designated Contracting Party if no final refusal is issued in any of the jurisdictions concerned. It may subsequently be maintained in force indefinitely by paying the prescribed fees, every 10 years, to WIPO. The scope of an international registration may subsequently be extended through the same procedure by designating additional members of the Madrid system. The Madrid Protocol provides for a link between the international registration system and the European Community Trade Mark system. Thus, it is possible to use the Madrid system to also obtain trademark protection under the Community Trade Mark system by designating the European Union.
10 Madrid System Online Services The services and tools available, free of charge, on WIPO s website ( include: an international application simulator; a fee calculator (for applicants whose country of origin is a least developed country (LDC), the basic fee is reduced by 90 percent); WIPO Gazette of International Marks online and pdf versions; an online database containing all international registrations currently in force or that have expired within the past six months; country fact sheets on national/regional intellectual property (IP) office procedures; online payment for some transactions and renewal of international registrations; Madrid System Goods & Services Manager online tool to help trademark applicants compile the list of goods and services that must accompany an international application; Madrid Real-time Status (mrs) provides the status in real time of trademark documents being processed by WIPO; Madrid Electronic Alert (mea) watch service designed to inform anyone interested in monitoring the status of certain international trademark registrations; and Madrid Portfolio Manager (mpm) secure online access to applicants international trademark portfolios. The unique, flexible and cost-effective services offered by the Madrid system facilitate the registration and management of one mark or a large trademark portfolio, empowering businesses to expand their markets abroad. Advantages of using the Madrid system Trademark owners can register their marks in many, or some, of the countries party to the system by filing: a single international application; in one language (English, French or Spanish); subject to one set of fees and deadlines. Thereafter, the international registration can be maintained and renewed through a single procedure.
11 > Suchard was the first international trademark registered under the Madrid Agreement Concerning the International Registration of Marks, in 1893.
12 THE HagUE SYSTEM FOR THE international REgiSTraTion of INDUSTrial DESignS
13 The Hague system allows applicants to register an industrial design in multiple countries by filing a single application with WIPO, thus enabling design owners to protect their designs WITh a minimum of formality and expense. ThIS does away with the need to file multiple applications at national or regional IP OFFICes. It also facilitates the subsequent management of the industrial design, as changes or renewals can be recorded through a single procedural step. International Applications International applications must contain a reproduction of the industrial design(s) for which protection is sought and may include up to 100 different designs. All designs must, however, belong to the same class of the International Classification for Industrial Designs (the Locarno Classification). Applicants may choose to file in English, French or Spanish, and they can also file electronically. Applicants for international design registration must: be a national of a Contracting Party, be domiciled in the territory of a Contracting Party, or have a real and effective industrial or commercial establishment in the territory of a Contracting Party. Under the 1999 Act of the Hague Agreement, anyone habitually residing in a Contracting Party may also file an international application. WIPO checks that international applications comply with the formal requirements, such as those relating to the quality of the industrial design reproductions and payment of the required fees. Three types of fees apply to international applications: a basic fee, publication fee and, for each designated Contracting Party, either a standard or an individual fee. Applicants from LDCs benefit from a 90 percent reduction in filing fees and standard designation fees. International applications that comply with those requirements are recorded in the International Register. That registration is published in the International Designs Bulletin (IDB) an electronic publication available on WIPO s website that contains all relevant data on international registrations, including a reproduction of the industrial design. International registrations are valid for an initial period of five years and may be renewed for additional periods of five years up to, in most cases, 15 years. Renewals may be made for all or some of the industrial designs included in the international registration and for all or some of the designated Contracting Parties.
14 WIPO does not examine applications for novelty of design. Upon publication of the registration in the IDB, the office of each designated Contracting Party proceeds with the substantive examination. An industrial design can be registered if it is new or original, and rights are limited to the jurisdiction of the authority with which the design has been registered. A Contracting Party can refuse to protect, in its territory, industrial designs that do not fulfill the substantive conditions for protection provided under its domestic legislation. Additional information, including a schedule of fees and an automatic fee calculator, is available at: Managing Industrial Designs A wide range of administrative and legal changes may be recorded in the International Register, such as: change in name and address of the holder; change in ownership of the international registration; renunciation of industrial designs; and limitation of some of the industrial designs. These changes may apply to any or all of the designated Contracting Parties. > Swatch is one of the biggest users of the Hague system.
15 Photo: Swatch
16 WIPO arbitration and MEdiaTion CENTER
17 The WIPO Center supports businesses, associations and their COunsel on the resolution of IP disputes outside the courts. It provides access to high-quality, efficient and cost-effective alternative dispute resolution (adr) procedures under the WIPO MediaTIOn, ArbITraTIOn, ExpedITed ArbITraTIOn and Expert DeterminaTIOn Rules, which parties may adopt by including a WIPO Clause in their contract. The WIPO Center also plays a leading role in the design and administration of tailor-made dispute resolution procedures, most prominently the UnIFOrm domain Name dispute ReSOluTIOn PolICy (udrp) see below. Wipo Center Procedures The WIPO Center has a strong commitment to the business needs of ADR parties. It offers case administration for the following ADR procedures, which may also be combined: Mediation An informal, confidential procedure in which a neutral intermediary, the mediator, assists the parties in reaching a settlement of the dispute. Mediation involves minimal risk and potentially significant benefits in the form of contractual settlement based on party interests. Arbitration A binding procedure in which a dispute is submitted, by agreement of the parties, to one or more arbitrators whose decision is final and enforceable under arbitral law. This confidential procedure permits parties to choose the arbitrator(s) comprising the tribunal, as well as the applicable law, language and venue of the arbitration. Expedited Arbitration An arbitration procedure carried out in a short time and at a reduced cost, involving a sole arbitrator unless the parties desire otherwise. Expert Determination A procedure in which a technical, scientific or related business issue between the parties is submitted to one or more experts who make a determination on the matter. The determination is contractually binding, unless the parties agree otherwise. The WIPO Center maintains a detailed database of 1,500 independent arbitrators, mediators and experts (neutrals) from more than 70 countries, with further neutrals added to meet the specific needs of each case it administers. Cases submitted include both contractual disputes (e.g., patent and software licenses) and non-contractual disputes (e.g., patent infringement).
18 FaCTors for Consideration in an IP Dispute Although IP disputes can be resolved through court litigation, parties are increasingly looking for private and internationally effective means of resolving them out of court. Arbitration and mediation allow parties to sidestep jurisdictional issues and resolve their disputes in a single neutral forum, while saving time and money. Common Features of Many IP Disputes International ADR: Offers a single proceeding even where several jurisdictions are involved. The procedure and nationality of the mediator or decisionmaker appointed can be neutral as to law, language and the institutional culture of the parties. Court litigation: May involve multiple proceedings under different laws, with the risk of obtaining conflicting results. An actual or perceived home court advantage of a party litigating in its own country is also a consideration. Technical ADR: Parties to ADR proceedings can select neutral(s) with relevant expertise. Court litigation: Decision-makers in court litigation may not have the relevant expertise. Urgency ADR: Neutrals and parties can opt to shorten the procedure. WIPO arbitration may also include provisional measures and does not preclude seeking court-ordered injunctions. Court litigation: Procedures are often drawn-out. Injunctive relief is, however, available in certain jurisdictions. finality of decision ADR: Proceedings have limited appeal options. Court litigation: Offers the possibility of appeal. confidentiality, trade secrets and risk to reputation ADR: The proceedings, settlement and award are all confidential. Court litigation: Proceedings are public.
19 WIPO Domain Name Dispute Resolution The WIPO Center is internationally recognized as the leading dispute resolution service provider for challenges related to abusive registration and use of Internet domain names, a practice commonly known as cybersquatting. The UDRP is the principal domain name dispute resolution policy administered by the Center. Based on recommendations made by WIPO, the UDRP provides trademark owners worldwide with an effective administrative transfer remedy against clear cases of bad-faith registration and use of domain names infringing on their rights. This concerns all international domains and a growing number of country code domains. This two-month, WIPO procedure involves cost-effective services such as model pleadings, online filing and communication, and a free legal index. Cases are decided by panelists appointed by the Center or by the parties from a special WIPO list. Transfer decisions normally are implemented directly by domain name registrars. Interested persons may subscribe through the WIPO Center s website to receive a daily notification of newly published decisions. WIPO s paperless UDRP procedure removes the requirement for mandatory filing and notification of paper pleadings, reducing the time and cost involved in submitting UDRP filings and saving up to one million pages of paper per year. Web information The Center s website ( contains guides and models for its procedures, as well as the WIPO Clauses and Rules in different languages; offers constantly updated information on the Center s activities; and allows interested parties to register for Center events or to subscribe to its electronic newsletters.
20 For more information contact WIPO at World Intellectual Property Organization 34, chemin des Colombettes P.O. Box 18 CH-1211 Geneva 20 Switzerland Telephone: Fax : WIPO Publication No. 1020E ISBN Edition
Resolving IP and Technology Disputes Through WIPO ADR Getting back to business Intellectual property (IP) is a central component of today s knowledge economy, and its efficient exploitation is of growing
Protecting Your Marks Abroad THE MADRID SYSTEM Today s global economy provides a world of opportunity for smart businesses both large and small selling goods and services beyond their national borders.
PCT FAQs Protecting your Inventions Abroad: Frequently Asked Questions About the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) April 2015 Overview of the PCT System Inventions are the object of International Authorities
GUIDE TO THE INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION OF INDUSTRIAL DESIGNS UNDER THE HAGUE AGREEMENT (updated January 2015) World Intellectual Property Organization GENEVA 2015 ii GUIDE TO THE INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
The Introduction to the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) Moscow, Russian Federation June 2, 2015 Thomas MARLOW Policy Officer PCT Business Development Division Patents and Technology Sector World Intellectual
13.1 Efficient alternative dispute resolution (ADR) for intellectual property disputes More and more rights holders are recognizing the benefits of using private neutral mechanisms that allow parties to
GUIDE TO THE INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION OF MARKS UNDER THE MADRID AGREEMENT AND THE MADRID PROTOCOL (updated 2014) World Intellectual Property Organization GENEVA 2014 ii GUIDE TO THE INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
The Madrid System Key Elements and Recent Developments André Ntamack Head, Examination and Registration Section Brands and Designs Sector, WIPO Tokyo 8 and 9 March 2012 General Overview The Madrid System
RULES FOR RESOLUTION OF.PL DOMAIN NAME DISPUTES OF THE COURT OF ARBITRATION AT THE POLISH CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Chapter I Introductory provisions 1 Application of Rules 1. Disputes over infringement of rights
A guide to applying for your trade mark overseas Copyright All content in this publication is provided under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence, with the exception of:
Sunrise Challenge Policy 1. Purpose. This Sunrise Registration Challenge Policy (the Policy ) has been adopted by domen d.o.o. ( domen ) and is incorporated by reference into the Sunrise registration agreement
Representing Yourself In Employment Arbitration: An Employee s Guide What is the American Arbitration Association? The American Arbitration Association (AAA ) is a not-for-profit, private, public service
Chapter 1800 Patent Cooperation Treaty 1801 Basic Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) Principles 1802 PCT Definitions 1803 Reservations Under the PCT Taken by the United States of America 1804 [Reserved] 1805
An Enhanced European Patent System The Select Committee The Preparatory Committee An Enhanced European Patent System In December 2012 the Council of the European Union and the European Parliament agreed
12 Tex. Intell. Prop. L.J. 69 Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal Fall 2003 Articles THE MADRID PROTOCOL: SPECIAL ISSUES FOR U.S. PRACTITIONERS Linda M. Merritt a1 Copyright (c) 2003 State Bar of Texas,
How does the PCT work? The PCT system has two distinct phases (stages) of patent procedure the international phase, followed by the national phase. The international phase provides you with: recognition
How to File an International Patent Application Milan Kapadia, IIPI istockphoto / Simon A. Webber, 2007 This report does not constitute legal advice. This document does not establish an attorney-client
Implementing Regulations under the Benelux Convention on Intellectual Property (Trademarks and Designs) * The Executive Board of the Benelux Trademark Office and the Executive Board of the Benelux Designs
R epresenting P roducers and D i str i b utors w orldwide Guide to IFTA Arbitration IFTA Arbitration Independent Film & Television Alliance 10850 Wilshire Boulevard / 9th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90024-4321
ANNEX II General Overview of the Lisbon Agreement for the Protection of Appellations of Origin and Their International Registration Introduction 1. The Lisbon Agreement for the Protection of Appellations
KENYA NETWORK INFORMATION CENTRE ALTERNATIVE DOMAIN NAME DISPUTE RESOLUTION POLICY 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I... 4 Definitions Interpretation and Applications... 4 Definitions and Interpretation... 4 Application...
Functions of the International Bureau Mikhail GAVRIKOV Senior Program Officer PCT International Cooperation Division WIPO Tehran, Iran June 18-19, 2014 Inventions are the objects of International Searching
Common Regulations under the Madrid Agreement Concerning the International Registration of Marks and the Protocol Relating to that Agreement (as in force on January 1, 2015) LIST OF RULES Chapter 1: General
REGISTRATION OF PATENTS IN PCT SIGNATORY LATIN AMERICAN COUNTRIES I. THE INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION Each international application is subject of an international search, i.e. a high level search conducted
Philippines Philippines Philippinen Report Q173 in the name of the Philippine Group Issues of co-existence of trademarks and domain names: public versus private international registration systems 1. Analysis
.ME Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Rules") (As approved by domen on November 13, 2015) Administrative proceedings for the resolution of disputes under the Uniform Dispute
Chapter I.versicherung Eligibility Requirements Dispute Resolution Policy (ERDRP) 1. This policy has been adopted by all accredited Domain Name Registrars for Domain Names ending in.versicherung. 2. The
CIETAC Online ADR Practice Domain Name Dispute Resolution System Li Hu Introduction The article intends to introduce and discuss CIETAC Online ADR practice its domain name dispute resolution system. For
MADRID SYSTEM FOR THE INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION OF TRADEMARKS BY MRS. DIPMALA P. MATHAPATI EXAMINER OF TRADEMARK OFFICE OF THE CONTROLLER GENERAL OF PATENTS, DESIGNS AND TRADEMARKS TRADE MARKS REGISTRY
2 4 years, dependent on complexity of the invention, amendment(s), the search and examination processes etc. Guide to applying for patents in Singapore (as at 30 April 2014) 8. Publication of patent application
Program: Master s of Intellectual Property Law (Comprehensive) Syllabus Syllabus No. 2005 C A. GENERAL RULES AND CONDITIONS: 1. This plan Conforms to the valid regulations of programs of graduate studies.
Sunrise Challenge Policy 1. Purpose. This Sunrise Challenge Policy (the Policy ) has been adopted by Mobile Top Level Domain, Ltd ( mtld ) and is incorporated by reference into the Sunrise registration
Trademark registration requirements in United Arab Emirates: - Power of attorney legalized up to the United Arab Emirates Consulate; - Design of the trademark in JPEG format in case of a graphical trademark
126 STAT. 1527 Public Law 112 211 112th Congress An Act To implement the provisions of the Hague Agreement and the Patent Law Treaty. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United
1. NOTIFICATION OF USE OF DSI DISPUTE SOLUTIONS, INC. ARBITRATION RULES Any company intending to incorporate these rules or to refer to the alternative dispute resolution (ADR) services of Dispute Solutions,
INFORMATION NOTICE NO. 8/2013 Hague Agreement Concerning the International Registration of Industrial Designs Amendments to the Common Regulations and to the Administrative Instructions 1. At its thirty-second
THE GOVERNMENT No. 103/2006/ND - CP THE SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF VIETNAM Independence Freedom Happiness ------------------------------ DECREE Hanoi, September 22, 2006 Making detailed provisions and providing
IP Arbitration in Hong Kong John Budge, Vice Chairperson, Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre Overview Growth in IP disputes in Asia and worldwide Resolution of IP disputes through arbitration Example
IATA Legal Department Montreal - Geneva 1999 International Air Transport Association. All rights reserved. Montreal Geneva CONTENTS Introduction Scope Article 1 Commencing the Arbitration Contractually
China Contributing firm Wan Hui Da Law Firm & Intellectual Property Agency Author Huang Hui Senior partner 55 China Wan Hui Da Law Firm & Intellectual Property Agency 1. Legal framework After many years
Domain Name Control Considerations When implementing an Internet presence, credit unions should establish controls to facilitate control over domain names. Credit unions should: 1. understand the Domain
RESERVED NAMES CHALLENGE POLICY 1.0 Title: Reserve Names Challenge Policy Version Control: 1.0 Date of Implementation: 2015-03-16 2.0 Summary This Reserved Names Challenge Policy (the Policy ) has been
JAMS Dispute Resolution Rules for Surety Bond Disputes Effective February 2015 JAMS DISPUTE RESOLUTION RULES FOR SURETY BOND DISPUTES JAMS provides arbitration and mediation services worldwide. We resolve
ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION CENTER WIPO LIST OF NEUTRALS BIOGRAPHICAL DATA Alan Lawrence LIMBURY Strategic Resolution 2 Crown Street Woolloomooloo, NSW 2011 Australia Telephone: +61 2 9368 0274 Facsimile:
WIPO ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION CENTER WIPO LIST OF NEUTRALS BIOGRAPHICAL DATA Vinod K. AGARWAL Universal Advisory Services M-104, Dharma Apartments 2, 1.P. Extension, Patparganj Delhi 110 092 India Telephone:
November 2002 JAPAN PATENT ATTORNEYS ASSOCIATION International Activities Committee 1. SUMMARY OF REVISIONS OF THE JAPANESE PATENT LAW AND THE JAPANESE TRADEMARK LAW 1-1. Object The Japanese Patent Law
Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the "Rules") As approved by the ICANN Board of Directors on 30 October 2009. These Rules are in effect for all UDRP proceedings in which a complaint
RULES OFTHE COURT OF ARBITRATION IN MATTERS CONCERNING INTERNET DOMAIN NAMES AT THE POLISH CHAMBER OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS The following provisions constitute the Rules Court of
PCT Applicant s Guide National Phase National Chapter Page 1 EUROPEAN PATENT OFFICE (O) AS DESIGNATED (OR ELECTED) OFFICE CONTENTS THE ENTRY INTO THE NATIONAL PHASE SUMMARY THE PROCEDURE IN THE NATIONAL
MADRID AGREEMENT CONCERNING THE INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION OF MARKS of April 14, 1891, as revised at Brussels on December 14, 1900, at Washington on June 2, 1911, at The Hague on November 6, 1925, at London
U.S. Intellectual Property Law: A Brief Introduction LeClairRyan Thomas M. Pitegoff 885 Third Avenue Sixteenth Floor New York, New York 10022 Phone: 212.634.5032 firstname.lastname@example.org WWW.LECLAIRRYAN.COM
ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION CENTER WIPO LIST OF NEUTRALS BIOGRAPHICAL DATA Cecil O.D. BRANSON, Q.C. 886 Walker s Hook Road Salt Spring Island, BC V8K 1B6 Canada Telephone: +1 250 537 2639 Fax: +1 250 357
Consumer Code for Home Builders This document contains the Rules that govern the behaviour of Home Builders and Home Warranty Bodies First Edition January 2010 Contents Meaning of words... 3 Introduction...
Canon USA, Inc. WEBVIEW LIVESCOPE SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT KIT DEVELOPER LICENSE AGREEMENT This Webview Livescope Software Development Kit Developer License ("Agreement") between you, the "Developer" and the
Service Description for the Registration and Administration of Domain Names by Swisscom 1 Area of application This Service Description govern the conditions for the registration, administration, and use
Intellectual Property Protection for Websites By Donika Ilieva, IP and ICT lawyer Nowadays companies cannot afford to ignore the internet, which provides a global market where they can place their products
NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, VA 22314 DATE: December 2002 LETTER NO.: 02-CU-16 TO: All Federally-Insured Credit Unions SUBJ: Protection of Credit Union Internet Addresses
Intellectual Property Protection in the Cayman Islands Foreword This memorandum has been prepared for the assistance of those who are seeking information on the protection and enforcement of intellectual
Policy Statement May 2015 International Federation of Accountants Policy for Reproducing, or Translating and Reproducing, Publications of the International Federation of Accountants This document was developed
Domain Name Dispute Resolution Copyright 2011 Supreme Council of Information and Communication Technology (ictqatar) Table of Contents Rules for Qatar Domains Registry Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy...
An Introduction to Trademark & Patent Law Presented by Lindsay Kaplan & Nicki Kennedy Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP Presented to June 18, 2015 2015 Kilpatrick Townsend Intro to Trademark Law Presented
Customer Responsiveness Strategy Dated 23 June 2006. Telstra Corporation Limited (ABN 33 051 775 556) ( Telstra ) Disclaimer This Customer Responsiveness Strategy is being published in furtherance of Telstra
Patent Law* TABLE OF CONTENTS Articles I. General Provisions... 1-3 II. Subject Matter of the Patent Protection Patentable Invention... 4 Novelty of an Invention... 5-6 Inventive Step... 7 Industrial Applicability...
SUNRISE DISPUTE RESOLUTION POLICY This Sunrise Dispute Resolution Policy (the SDRP ) is incorporated by reference into the Registry-Registrant Agreement. This SDRP shall become effective as of February
ORGANISATION MONDIALE DE LA PROPRIÉTÉ INTELLECTUELLE Centre d arbitrage et de médiation de l OMPI WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center WIPO LIST OF NEUTRALS BIOGRAPHICAL
Quality Management Manual Nordic Patent Institute For the Following Processes: Statutory work Business Services for private customers Level 1 Policy, Goals and Organisation Version dated 30.05.2011 1 of
ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION CENTER WIPO LIST OF NEUTRALS BIOGRAPHICAL DATA Seth M. REISS Seth M. Reiss, AAL, ALLLC 3770 Lurline Drive Honolulu, Hawaii 96816 United States of America Telephone: +1 808 521
Electronic Funds Transfer Agreement This Electronic Funds Transfer Agreement is the contract which covers your and our rights and responsibilities concerning the electronic funds transfer (EFT) services
THE PHONE RINGS FROM DOWN SOUTH: WHAT ISSUES SHOULD I CONSIDER FOR EXPANDING MY U.S. FRANCHISE INTO CANADA? By Leonard H. Polsky Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP Vancouver, British Columbia SYNOPSIS Canadian
TPP Text submitted by New Zealand CHAPTER X INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY Section A: General Provisions Article x.1: Objectives 1. Each Party confirms its commitment to reducing impediments to trade and investment
Intellectual Property Rights in the USA Intellectual Property Office is an operating name of the Patent Office Contents Intellectual property rights in the USA What are intellectual property rights? International
APPENDIX 3.13 SCC ARBITRATION RULES OF THE ARBITRATION INSTITUTE OF THE STOCKHOLM CHAMBER OF COMMERCE (as from 1 January 2010) Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce Article 1 About
Enforcement of International Registrations under the Geneva Act of the Hague Agreement A Pan-European Perspective Dr Henning Hartwig BARDEHLE PAGENBERG Partnership Prepared for AIPLA Annual Meeting Washington
GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS Contents A. SCOPE...3 B. CONFIDENTIALITY, NAME, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND TAX EXEMPT STATUS OF THE WTO...3 B.1. Confidentiality...3 B.2. Use of the name, logo or official seal
ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION CENTER WIPO LIST OF NEUTRALS BIOGRAPHICAL DATA John E. KIDD The Savoy on Palm 401 South Palm Avenue Sarasota, FL 34236 United States of America Telephone: +1 941 955 5433 Fax:
IPO BUSINESS SOLUTIONS Ramsay Shonge, Automation Expert IPO Business Solutions Division IPOBSD: Mission and Objectives To provide tools and services that enable IP Offices around the world to participate
L 162/40 COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 874/2004 of 28 April 2004 laying down public policy rules concerning the implementation and functions of the.eu Top Level Domain and the principles governing registration
TrademarkAuthority Legal Services Engagement Agreement 1. THE PARTIES / EFFECTIVE DATE. This TrademarkAuthority Legal Services Engagement Agreement ( Agreement ) is made between ( Pearl Cohen ), the exclusive
Trademark With a heavyweight reputation and a national reach across the market (World Trademark Review 1000), Fish & Richardson is among the top trademark firms in the United States. Our practice includes
Economic Analysis and Statistics Division Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry GLOSSARY OF PATENT TERMINOLOGY Applicant...2 Applicant country...2 Application for a patent...2 Application date...2
ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION CENTER WIPO LIST OF NEUTRALS BIOGRAPHICAL DATA Prof. Dr. Hong XUE School of Law Beijing Normal University 19 Xin Jie Kou Wai Street Beijing 100875 China Telephone: +86 10 82425692
International Applications Filed Prior to January 1, 2004 I. Introduction The PCT (Patent Cooperation Treaty) is an international agreement for the purpose of unifying and simplifying the procedures for
CIRA Domain Name Dispute Resolution Rules Version 1.5 (July 28, 2014) Proceedings for the resolution of disputes under the CIRA Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the Policy ), shall be governed by
22 00 11 33 Administered Arbitration Rules HONG KONG INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE ADMINISTERED ARBITRATION RULES Introduction These Rules have been adopted by the Council of the Hong Kong International