Lighting Appliances & Equipment

Transcription

1 IEA Energy Efficiency in Emerging Economies (E4) Training Week Lighting Appliances & Equipment Thursday, 9 th June 2016 #EnergyEfficientWorld 2015

2 7. Stakeholder involvement and communication Tim Farrell 2015

3 Scenario There is a need to involve product suppliers more in the organization of your programme. What could you do to address this and what might be the benefits?

4 Why involve Suppliers in S&L Programmes? Group Brainstorming Exercise Why involve suppliers in S&L Programmes? Who are Suppliers? Manufacturers Importers Distributors Retailers

5 Why involve Suppliers in S&L Programmes? Understand Obligations Builds industry support for the Program Strengthens Compliance Important for evaluation and tracking progress Why involve suppliers in S&L Programmes? Provides support Test methods MEPS levels Performance requirements Future revisions Educate Consumers About the Program Retailers educating Public/staff Data source and case studies Shapes and prioritises marketing, education and outreach materials

6 What can suppliers educate Consumers about? Raise awareness about the benefits of selecting energy efficiency appliances Provide targeted education and information materials Assist the interpretation of energy efficiency information to inform purchasing decisions Provide Information about energy-related programs e.g. incentives, rebates

7 Who are Suppliers? Manufacturers Importers Distributors Retailers Why involve suppliers in S&L Programmes? Group Brainstorming Exercise What type of events could engage suppliers?

8 What type of events could engage suppliers? Formal Consultation National Steering Groups National Standards Bodies Public Consultations Informal Liaison Stakeholder meetings Outreach Activities e.g. Workshops, Conferences etc Retailer Training

9 Communicating with Suppliers is Critical Formal consultation and informal liaison with suppliers Promoting the strategic plan and priorities Communicating regularly through various fora e.g. Annual Report, Newsletters, Website etc Providing updates e.g. successes, label transition, international test method updates etc Training activities and workshops e.g. registration databases, smart calculators and apps, understanding the label Publicising MV&E plans and results, including the results and outcomes of compliance and monitoring activities Need to consider many factors - impact, mix, timing, duration, resources, evaluation

10 In addition to suppliers, we need to communicate with a broader group of stakeholders Manufacturers Importers Distributors Stakeholders to communicate with in S&L Programmes? Retailers

11 In addition to suppliers, what other stakeholders do we need to communicate with? Manufacturers Testing Laboratories Importers Standards Organisations Distributors Government Stakeholders to communicate with in S&L Programmes? Retailers Consumers Associations Consumer Groups Installers

12 Why we might need to communicate with Government Formal requirement e.g. legislative, reviews To gain support for programme Adequate resourcing for S&L Programme Seek to expand product coverage Reporting on the evaluation of S&L programme or individual components Reporting the results of compliance and monitoring activities Proposing a Communication Campaign Proposing other complimentary actions such as: Public procurement of energy efficient products Incentive/Rebate programs Education of third parties (installers)

13 Stakeholder involvement and communication Key Messages Product suppliers have a critical role to play in S&L Programmes e.g. understanding obligations, strengthening compliance etc Many formal and informal opportunities exist for suppliers to participate in S&L Programmes e.g. Industry Associations, Technical Working Groups etc Need to communicate regularly and differently with key stakeholders, including suppliers and Government Engaging suppliers has proven to be critical to the success of S&L Programs, particularly enabling end-users to reap the benefits Tim Farrell Copenhagen Centre on Energy Efficiency (C2E2)

14 8. Use of ICT to make Programs Smarter Melanie Slade 2015

15 There are special grants available to government departments for smart initiatives that lead to reduced costs for business and government. What projects would you put forward?

16 Considerations Regulator/policy maker Industry Consumers Compliance Future Proofing

17 Registration Systems An essential component of a SMART standards and labelling programme Online systems can: Aid transparency Include automated checking Be part of a formal declaration Facilitate getting products on to the market more quickly Accommodate product innovation

18 Vietnam s Online Registration System >1000 enterprises 21 Categories of products >1000 applications/year

19 Vietnam s Online Registration System

20 Status Reporting

21 Program Impact Assessment Tool

22 Public Listing

23 Lessons Learnt from Vietnam Less mistakes in the application forms and data as there is an automatic checking of data on entry Improvement in collecting real market data Easier to identify models for check testing based on very high or incorrect claims Helped identify labels that needed to be regraded e.g. fans and washing machines

24 Next Generation of Systems Benefits to: Regulators Manufacturers Consumers

25 QR Data Flow in China (CEL) Register Consumers CEL Management Center Review and approve Registration Database match Webpage for mobile phone match scan QR code paste Manufacturers scan Market supervisors

26 Scanning QR CEL Consumer can use any QR code scanning APP to access QR CEL. CNIS has developed a specialised APP to help consumers get more information on energy efficiency

27 BEE Product database Bureau of Energy Efficiency

28 Need for the mobile app Impact assessment of India s labeling programme carried out in 2014, identified the following requirements: Increased consumer awareness Informed & Smart decisions by Consumers Consumer feedback mechanisms Market surveillance mechanisms Mobile app will provide real-time information Easy and improved access to product data Supported by US Department of Energy and CLASP under SEAD initiative Bureau of Energy Efficiency

29 Key features of the mobile App Multi platform mobile app focuses on all products covered under the S&L scheme Presents data in a format which is credible, comprehendible and readily accessible The app is linked with BEE s registration database and is updated on a daily basis Provides a platform to receive real time feedback Bureau of Energy Efficiency

30 Energy and Cost savings The App provides energy and cost savings of the labeled appliance using 1 Star as the basis Bureau of Energy Efficiency

31 Filter and Settings Allows users to filter products, change the settings and compare products Bureau of Energy Efficiency

32 Consumer Feedback Users can provide product specific or generic feedback Bureau of Energy Efficiency

33 Download the app The app can be downloaded at android playstore. Keywords for searching the app are BEE Star label, star rating, 5 star etc. Download From:

34 Considerations Regulator/policy maker Industry Consumers Compliance Future Proofing

35 9. Tracking progress and assessing the multiple benefits David Morgado #EnergyEfficientWorld 2015

36 QUESTION The Minister wants to know how effective your programme has been

37 Scenario S&L programme covering refrigerators, air conditioners, lighting and electric motors No existing evaluation framework or targets Baseline for each product type done 5 years ago when developing the S&L programme Online registration database in place Limited budget for a detailed evaluation of the effectiveness of MEPS and labels Significant information available from different agencies but dispersed

38 What do we need to consider? What is your understanding of effectiveness? Impact evaluation VS Process evaluation? What data would you need for each type of evaluation? How would you use the registration system to help evaluate your programme?

39 Basic Steps for Evaluation Objective and scope Define budget, approach, human and data resources needed Collect data Analyse data Report and disseminate findings Use findings to further update or improve the programme Should be part of the S&L programme from the start

40 What is effectiveness? Did it meet its goals and targets? What about the other benefits? Was it cost-effective? What was the compliance level? Where customers aware of the label? Did it reduce peak demand or reduce fossil fuel imports and support economic growth? Others? Perception can vary according to audience

41 Examples of indicators Energy savings per programme investment ($/kwh) Annual and cumulative energy savings (kwh) Compliance rates for MEPs and labels (0 100%) Share of sales by label over time (% per label rating) Average energy performance of products (kwh, EER) Avoided imported fossil fuels (toe) Avoided GHG emissions (CO 2 emissions) Peak demand reduction (MW) Household energy savings ($) Consumer awareness of label (%) Market penetration of energy efficient products (%)

42 Types of Evaluation Approaches Process Evaluation (generally qualitative), e.g.: Assessing consumer priorities in purchasing an appliance Tracking consumer awareness levels Monitoring correct display of labels in retail outlets (compliance) Evaluating administrative efficiency Checking and verifying manufacturer claims Impact Evaluation, e.g.: Influence of label on purchase decisions Tracking of sales-weighted efficiency and price trends Determination of energy savings

43 Examples of Evaluation Approaches Country China Canada European Union Thailand United States (Energy Star) Approach Process Survey on awareness and knowledge of the labeling program Impact Surveys by government (biannual) and Canadian Appliance Manufacturing Association (confidential shipment data) Process Survey to assess consumer attitudes and issues + interviews with manufacturers and retailers Impact Survey to assess compliance + independent tests in consumer association laboratories to evaluate accuracy of manufacturer product-performance declarations Process Behavior and attitudes of consumers with residential surveys (2,000 households) and influence on manufacturer decisions and market uptake (50 firms) Impact Impact on energy demand savings (actual measurements refrigerators and air conditioners) Process Survey on awareness and purchasing decisions Impact Energy savings + equipment sales

44 Key Questions Consumers: Are consumers aware of the energy label? Do they understand the energy label? Did they change their behaviour because of the energy label? How important is energy efficiency in the purchase decision? How effective are energy labels and marketing/promotional materials? What can be improved? Manufacturers/Suppliers/Retailers/Wholesalers: How has the progamme impacted their sales and market share? How has the programme impacted their advertising/sales strategy? How effective are energy labels and marketing/promotional materials? What can be improved?

45 Data Types and Sources Data Type Customer and retailer knowledge, awareness and understanding Availability of Products Main Data Sources Surveys of customers and retailers Sales data from manufacturers, trade associations or government (customs) Surveys of manufacturers and retailers Mandatory registration database Prices for Efficient Products Market Sales Surveys of customers, retailers and manufacturers Sales data from manufacturers, trade associations or government (customs) Surveys of customers and suppliers Manufacturer data Energy Use Independent laboratory data Metered end-use data Mandatory registration database Source: Vine et al, Evaluating the impact of appliance efficiency labelling programs and standards: process, impact and market transformation evaluations

46 What are the Multiple Benefits?

47 What are the Multiple Benefits? Examples: Energy savings Avoided imported fossil fuels Avoided GHG emissions Avoided generation capacity Peak demand reduction Household energy savings

48 What are the Multiple Benefits? Examples: GDP and TPES decoupling Additional employment Improved energy access Improved trade balance Reduction in energy prices Improved energy intensity in industry (e.g. motors) Improved air quality Lower public health spending

49 What are the Multiple Benefits? Examples: Reduction in energy subsidies Reduction in utility debt Reduced pressure on scarce domestic resources Reduction in impact on environment (e.g. water) Increase in household disposable income to invest in economy Higher value assets (e.g. public procurement, public buildings)

50 Multiple Benefits in Europe Source: European Commission,

51 Multiple Benefits in Europe Benefits to Consumers: Electric Oven A+ can save 230 compared to D class Standby MEPS can save 40 per household per year Overall savings estimate at 465 per year per household by 2020 Benefits to Producers and Retailers: 55 billion extra revenue per year for European business Protect EU industry from low quality and low cost products Approximately 30% non-eu countries have adopted EU product regulations Impact on Energy Security: Reduction in energy import of 65 million barrels of oil per year Last 5 years 100 billion saved Benefits for the Environment: 166 million toe in primary energy = TPES of Italy or 60 million households Source: European Commission,

52 TRACKING PROGRESS EXAMPLES

53 EU Energy Label for Cooling Appliances in 10 selected EU countries Source: EU Come On Labels Project

54 Evaluating EU Label Display in Shops 900 shops, 13 countries, 20 shops per country, 3 rounds from 2011 to 2013 Different results depending on appliance type Source: EU Come On Labels Project

55 Compliance of Refrigerators and Freezers in Germany 21 models selected for compliance verification 5 models failed Source: EU Come On Labels Project

56 Monitoring the Sales of Lighting Appliances in EU LED sales grew by 90% and Halogen sales by 20% from 2012 to 2013 Incandescent bulb sales fell by almost 2/3 in the same period = Phase- Out Sales according to type and voltage are also collected Source: IEA 4E Mapping and Benchmarking. EU Mapping Report, September 2014, mappingandbenchmarking.iea-4e.org

57 Impact of Standards on Annual Energy Consumption of Refrigerators in the US

58 Impact of Standards on Annual Energy Consumption of Clothes Washers in the US Source: IEA 4E Annual Report 2015,

59 Energy Consumption and Sales of Refrigerators in the US Total Consumption of All Refrigerated Appliances in the stock (TWh/year) Stock rising while total consumption is decreasing slightly Freezer Consumption (TWh/year) Refrigerator-Freezer Consumption (GWh/year) Installed Refrigerator-Freezers (millions) Installed Freezers (millions) Source: IEA 4E Mapping and Benchmarking. US Mapping Report, December 2012, mappingandbenchmarking.iea-4e.org Number of refrigerated appliances in the installed stock (millions)

60 Energy Star Label in the US Cumulative Savings since 1992 = > 3,000 TWh by 2014 In 2012, global electricity generation = 22,668 TWh Brand awareness rose from 40% in 2000 to >85% in 2014 Source: Energy Star, Overview of 2014 Achievements,

61 Summary Plan and budget ahead! If you have limited budget keep the goals simple and prioritise Assess the multiple benefits as these can help secure funding and support from other ministries (e.g. health, environment) Use new technologies and approaches to reduce staff time in administrative work (e.g. online registration systems) Work with industry associations and utilities to assess the multiple benefits

62 Where do I get help? Appliances and Equipment Efficiency Accelerator & Global Initiatives SEAD, CLASP & SE4All Tim Farrell 2015

63 Sources of Further Assistance 1. Super Efficient Appliance Deployment (SEAD) 2. Collaborative Labelling Appliance and Standards Programme (CLASP) 3. Sustainable Energy for All (SE4All) 4. Climate Technology Centre and Network (CTCN) 5. C2E2 s Knowledge Management System

64 1. Super Efficient Appliance Deployment (SEAD) Initiative of the Clean Energy Ministerial (CEM) Task within International Partnership for Energy Efficiency Cooperation (IPEEC) Promote the manufacture, purchase, and use of energyefficient appliances, lighting, and equipment worldwide 17 Participating Governments including Brazil, India, Indonesia, Mexico and South Africa (China is an observer) Engages with government to provide technical support and conduct research including prioritisation

65 SEAD Policy Exchange Forum Discussion forum for government policy makers Information exchange on policies, activities and opportunities for accelerating global progress on energy-efficient equipment and appliances Share best practices and the lessons learned on appliance energy efficiency Available to SEAD and non-sead government representatives via regular web-based calls Opportunities for bilateral and multilateral cooperation. or

66 Clean Energy Solutions Center: CleanEnergySolutions.org Ask an Expert Finance.CleanEnergySolutions.org Benefits of the Ask an Expert Service Quick and Easy access to assistance. No cost for assistance and no commitment. Objective assistance from experts is personalized to help governments meet local clean energy goals. High-quality assistance includes: Access to a collaborative network of over 50 vetted, international experts with authority on clean energy policies and financing. Independent review of assistance to ensure quality. To request assistance, go to cleanenergysolutions.org/expert Ask an Expert has delivered no-cost assistance for over 190 requests from 90+ countries. Expert support available to developing countries Request can come from staff or officials at all levels of government national, regional, local. Service also supports organizations working with governments.

67 2. Collaborative Labelling Appliance and Standards Programme (CLASP) Mission To improve the environmental and energy performance of the appliances and related systems we use every day, lessening their impacts on people and the world around us. CLASP develops and shares transformative policy and market solutions in collaboration with global experts and local stakeholders CLASP Video

68 CLASP Resources & Tools for Policy Makers S&L Policy Toolkit S&L Guidebook MV&E Guidebook Product and Policy Analysis Tool (PPAT)

69 One Goal: 3. Sustainable Energy for All (SE4All) Achieving Sustainable Energy for All by 2030 Three Objectives:

70 Global Energy Efficiency Accelerator Platform A key partnership and leadership mechanism for implementing energy efficiency Showcasing government and private sector commitments Sharing information and creating implementation partnerships Tracking progress and identifying priority opportunities Bridging the gap to energy efficiency finance

71 Our broader partners 110 countries developing energy efficiency actions with the Accelerators Links to the G20 and UNFCCC processes Countries SE4ALL's Network and the wider international energy efficiency community Global Energy Efficiency Accelerator Platform Connection with city initiatives Cities and organizations e.g. C40, ICLEI, Covenant of Mayors Companies and Private Sector Links with active companies and industry bodies Links with the Global Alliance on Energy Productivity, Clean Energy Ministerial

72 The strength of the Accelerator Platform Global Energy Efficiency Accelerator Platform Building District Energy Lighting Secretariat Communications Co-ordination Tracking activity Measuring results City and Country Commitments to Energy Efficiency Action Opportunity Assessment Develop Strategy and Plans Build the Enabling Environment Formulate Initiatives and Investments Achievement of municipal, national and global energy efficiency objectives New Sector Accelerators under development Vehicle Fuel Efficiency Industry Appliances & Equipment Global Team Platform ownership High-level oversight

73 Building Efficiency Accelerator Industrial Efficiency Accelerator Vehicle Fuel Efficiency Accelerator District Energy Accelerator Global Energy Efficiency Accelerator Platform Partnerships with 30+ globally active building EE organisations; 23 subnational governments now committed to take policy and project actions; commencement of in-depth work with Mexico City; >$10m funding from GEF and in-kind sources Promoting EMS for more than 300 organisations in 20 countries; mobilized 70 companies from developing countries to support EE at COP21; active links with corporate commitment campaigns such as We Commit and EP100 Focus on country commitments to fuel efficiency goals and targets with support extended to 65 countries in 2016; announced at COP21 that 100 countries had committed to average 50% improvement in fuel economy of all vehicles by 2050 Established over 20 regional partners; flagship District Energy in Cities report and 25 regional training/outreach events engaging 98 cities; secured over $11.1m GEF and in-kind funding to support 31 cities in China, India, Serbia, Colombia and Chile Lighting Accelerator Appliances and Equipment Accelerator 20 funded country programs under management; expert Taskforces to develop best practice policy recommendations for five focus products (lighting, refrigerators, air conditioners, electric motors, and distribution transformers) and mobilize partner manufacturers, government officials and ~20 technical institutions; country assessments completed for 96 countries in appliances, 150 countries for off-grid lighting; Global Lighting Challenge launched, led by the Clean Energy Ministerial and en.lighten initiative

74 The Benefits of Improving Energy Efficiency in the Top Six High-consuming Products Source: UNEP, 2014 (estimated annual figures for 2030)

75 Integrated Policy Approach to Transform Markets Minimum Energy Performance Standards Supporting policies promoting demand for efficient products including innovative financing mechanisms, loans and grants Successful market transformation Monitoring, verification and enforcement programmes discouraging non-compliant products Environmentally sound life-cycle management mercury, electronic waste, ozone depleting substances, To partner U4E, an interested country needs to fill in the country endorsement form

76 4. Climate Technology Centre and Network (CTCN) Connecting Countries with Technology Solutions

77 CTCN service areas and core sectors Mission: Stimulate technology cooperation and enhance the development and transfer of technologies to developing country Parties at their request.

78 Technical Assistance Requests by Country 100+ Active Projects

79 Examples of CTCN Requests Colombia Country Dominican Republic Uruguay Albania Iran Bhutan Senegal Ghana, Kenya, Mauritius, Namibia Request Monitoring and evaluation of national promotion policies for energy efficiency (EE) and renewable energy (RE) against national targets Efficient lighting (NAMA design) Replacement project of fluorinated refrigerants for end users of refrigeration equipment in the dairy sector in Uruguay Regional Energy Efficiency Action Plan for ESD in Albania Micro Combined Heat and Power Technology Reducing GHG Emissions from Transport by Improving Public Transport Systems through Capacity Building and Use of Technology Development of energy efficiency projects in industries and services Green Cooling Africa Initiative

80 5. Knowledge Management System kms.energyefficiencycentre.org

81 Sources of Further Assistance 1. Super Efficient Appliance Deployment (SEAD) 2. Collaborative Labelling Appliance and Standards Programme (CLASP) 3. Sustainable Energy for All (SE4All) 4. Climate Technology Centre and Network (CTCN) 5. C2E2 s Knowledge Management System Tim Farrell Copenhagen Centre on Energy Efficiency (C2E2) UN City, Copenhagen, Denmark

82 Evaluation of Training Program Mark Ellis 2015

83 Complete evaluation form hand out