Modular and Prefabricated Infrastructure. ary Cudmore Principle, Data Center Practice, Deerns America

Transcription

1 Modular and Prefabricated Infrastructure ary Cudmore Principle, Data Center Practice, Deerns America

2 Agenda Modular design Containerized design Modular vs. containerized design Prefabricated infrastructure How modular? Identifying the right approach

3 What is Modular Design? The design of any system composed of separate components that can be connected together Modular design allows you to add or remove any one component or (module) without affecting the rest of the system The opposite of a modular design is an integrated design, in which no clear divisions exist between components

4 What is Containerized Design? The data center container can be part of a modular design or a stand-alone system for a specific application Multiple containers can be deployed to provide complete IT infrastructure IT Mechanical Electrical Combined

5 Modular vs. Containerized Design Modular Off-site construction/customization Design Containerized Designed for a single purpose Scalability Modules can be designed to match capitol to construction costs over phases Easy to add future capacity Scalability Limited by specific equipment/operating parameters Capacity Just-in-time procurement/deployment Capacity Limited by available container capacities

6 What is Prefrabricated Infrastructure? The Sweet Track

7 What is Prefabricated Infrastructure? Prefabrication is the practice of assembling components in a factory or manufacturing site and transporting complete assemblies or sub-assemblies to the construction site. IT E M

8 How Modular? Data Porch Concept

9 How Modular? Data Porch Concept

10 How Modular? Data Porch Concept

11 How Modular? Janus Supercomputer

12 How Modular? Janus Supercomputer

13 How Modular? APC Symmetra Modular UPS

14 Containerized Design ISO Containers

15 Containerized Electrical System

16 Containerized Cooling Systems

17 Containerized Server Racks

18 Containerized Design Interior Building Deployment

19 Prefrabricated Design Server Rack Enclosures

20 Prefrabricated Design Walk-In Enclosures

21 Prefabricated Design Electrical Distribution Center

22 Prefabricated Design Cooling System

23 Prefabricated Design Field Assembly

24 Prefabricated Design Field Assembly

25 Prefabricated Design Field Assembly

26 Prefabricated Design Field Assembly

27 Which Approach is Right for Me? Modular Allows the DC owner/operator to build or expand in an predesigned and phased approach Helps lower first cost (pay as you grow) Reliability and availability can be added with future modules Can benefit any DC owner/operator: colocation or enterprise

28 Which Approach is Right for Me? Containerized Specific solution in a non-flexible design and deployment Can be relocated and repurposed as part of your IT portfolio Can be deployed when DC is out of available floor space i.e. health care if no space in hospital to expand or build new DC, can be located on-site and tie into existing plant and electrical systems Storage or computing in high density applications

29 Which Approach is Right for Me? Prefabricated Saves engineering/design time Provides repeatable, deployable design to match growth Scale Quality control Cost containment Electrical and mechanical systems can be prefabricated in same plant Lends itself to DC owner/operators who build multiple DC s of the same type Colocation Large enterprise users with multiple sites

30 Which Approach is Right for Me? Project Timeline

31 Prefabricated Project Delivery Timeline

32 Prefabricated Project Delivery Timeline

33 Prefabricated Project Delivery Timeline

34 Delivery Coordination

35 Which Approach is Right for Me? - Building Blocks Standard IT building block what size? Analytical tools/modeling Level of reliability/maintainability Enterprise vs. colocation Mechanical and electrical systems must be in synch with IT building block Uncertain Day 1/future loads smaller blocks

36 Which Approach is Right for Me? - Comparison Matrix Delivery Method Labor Cost Modular Containerized Prefabricated Field Built Lower Lower Lower Higher

37 Which Approach is Right for Me? - Comparison Matrix Delivery Method Labor Cost Materials Cost Modular Lower Lower Containerized Lower Lower Prefabricated Lower Lower Field Built Higher Higher

38 Which Approach is Right for Me? - Comparison Matrix Delivery Method Labor Cost Materials Cost Shipping Cost Modular Lower Lower Neutral Containerized Lower Lower Higher Prefabricated Lower Lower Higher Field Built Higher Higher Lower

39 Which Approach is Right for Me? - Comparison Matrix Delivery Method Labor Cost Materials Cost Shipping Cost Cost Control Modular Lower Lower Neutral Neutral Containerized Lower Lower Higher Better Prefabricated Lower Lower Higher Best Field Built Higher Higher Lower Worst

40 Which Approach is Right for Me? - Comparison Matrix Delivery Method Labor Cost Materials Cost Shipping Cost Cost Control Construction Time Modular Lower Lower Neutral Neutral Neutral Containerized Lower Lower Higher Better Short Prefabricated Lower Lower Higher Best Shortest Field Built Higher Higher Lower Worst Longest

41 Which Approach is Right for Me? - Comparison Matrix Delivery Method Labor Cost Materials Cost Shipping Cost Cost Control Construction Time Testing/Cx Modular Lower Lower Neutral Neutral Neutral Neutral Containerized Lower Lower Higher Better Short Short Prefabricated Lower Lower Higher Best Shortest Shortest Field Built Higher Higher Lower Worst Longest Longest

42 Which Approach is Right for Me? - Comparison Matrix Delivery Method Labor Cost Materials Cost Shipping Cost Cost Control Construction Time Testing/Cx Quality Assurance Effect on Local Jobs Modular Lower Lower Neutral Neutral Neutral Neutral Neutral Neutral Containerized Lower Lower Higher Better Short Short Better Loss Prefabricated Lower Lower Higher Best Shortest Shortest Best Loss Field Built Higher Higher Lower Worst Longest Longest More Risk Retain

43 Which Approach is Right for Me? - Comparison Matrix Delivery Method Labor Cost Materials Cost Shipping Cost Cost Control Construction Time Testing/Cx Quality Assurance Effect on Local Jobs UL Listing/Inspections Modular Lower Lower Neutral Neutral Neutral Neutral Neutral Neutral Neutral Containerized Lower Lower Higher Better Short Short Better Loss Good Prefabricated Lower Lower Higher Best Shortest Shortest Best Loss Best Field Built Higher Higher Lower Worst Longest Longest More Risk Retain Worst

44 Recap Modular design Containerized design Modular vs. containerized design Prefabricated infrastructure How modular? Identifying the right approach

45 eerns brings CONCEPTS to LIFE th Street Suite 1200 Denver, CO