1 PAGE 1 THE APPLICATION OF A VALUE ASSURANCE SYSTEM TO OIL & GAS DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS (Guido Mattu, Franca Marini) Ing. Guido Mattu More than 25 years experience in Engineering and Project Management activities in Oil & Gas development projects. At present Head of Project Services Dept. in charge to provide project services in the area of project planning and control, cost control, document management, value and risk management. Past member of the working group for the development of Eni E&P Development Project Management System (DMS). Expert in Project Management systems, member of PMI chapter Rome, he has been author of some papers in Oil & Gas conferences. Dr. Franca Marini She is Discipline Manager for Value & Risk Management performing activities related to: Risk Management, Stakeholders Management, and preparation of Assurance Checks, Decision Making, Value Improving Practices, Value Engineering, Lessons Learned capture, storage, diffusion. About 25 years experience in Planning and Scheduling, Progress Tracking, Reporting, Budget and Cost Control and Value Management in several development projects. She participated to the re-engineering of Eni Opportunity and Projects Development System, coordinating the Value Management group. Facilitator of Value & Risk Community of Practice, member of PMI Chapter Rome and SAVE, she has been author of some papers in Oil & Gas conferences.
2 PAGE 2 ABSTRACT The oil and gas industry performs considerable investments in very complex and risky environments to develop projects. To improve the capital effectiveness, the Major Oil&Gas Companies assess the project value performing reviews at specific milestones during project development. Most of the Companies management systems foresee a project subdivision in phases with some intermediate decision points. The Project Team presents to the Management the obtained results and the plans for the following phase; this data is evaluated and decisions on if and how to afford the next project phase are taken. The decisional process is supported by the recommendations that arise during the reviews performed by multidisciplinary, independent, expert teams. This practice assures both value and governance of projects that have a high level of risk from both a technical and an economical point of view. This paper will present: the methodology of Value assurance Checks; different types of project reviews; how to prepare and conduct a review with a double perspective: the preparation by the Project Team, the execution by the Review Team; some techniques and practices for planning and executing the reviews; the working experience and application of the project reviews in a major oil & gas Company. INTRODUCTION A development project, in the oil and gas industry, starts with a discovery well and concludes with a plant start-up. It usually requires several years to be realized and considerable investments in very complex and risky environment. To improve the capital effectiveness, the Major Oil&Gas Companies need to keep these considerable investments under control and monitor that these projects continue to effectively create value for the company. This is the main reason why most of the Oil&Gas Companies manage their projects through a development management system which states what has to be done, when and how. A series of reviews and checks performed at specific milestones during project development are a fundamental part of these development management systems. They assess the project value and support the Decision Makers on all major projects.
3 PAGE 3 DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Development projects usually consist in different project phases. A project phase is generally concluded with a review of the work accomplished and the deliverables to determine acceptance, whether extra work is still required, or whether the phase should be considered closed. A management review can also be held to reach a decision to start the activities of the next phase without closing the current phase, for example, when the project manager chooses fast tracking as the course of action. Although some difference in terminology is possible from one company to another, generally speaking main project phases are: Project Phases Evaluation Evaluation, assess the value of the opportunity and the alignment with business strategy based on preliminary reservoir scenarios and development concepts; Concept Selection Concept Selection, generate concept alternatives, select and optimise the preferred concept based on technical, economics and risks evaluation; Concept Definition Concept Definition, refine the selected concept, complete tendering and produces a Project Execution Plan which allows Project sanction; Execution Execution, execute the project, to achieve a fully operating system meeting cost, time and quality targets; Commissioning, Startup and Performance Test Commissioning, start-up and performance test, start-up, operate and evaluate the asset to maintain performance and maximum return to shareholders.. The Phase Review The review which is generally performed at the end of a project phase gives the access to a Gate, that is an intermediate decision point, when the management decides whether the project can progress or not. Evaluation Concept Concept G Selection G G Hand Execution Definition Over Commissioning, Start up and Performance Test While the decision making process looks at the overall project lifecycle to understand its value, gate approval commits funding and resources for the following project phase.
4 PAGE 4 At the Gates, the Project Team presents to the Management the results obtained during the previous phase and their plans for the following phase; these data are evaluated and decisions on if and how to afford the next project phase are taken. The Gate process has 5 possible outcomes: Proceed: the project has met the approval criteria; Rework: the performed work is insufficient to support the recommendation; Hold: the project is viable, but not immediately; Change: the project can be made more viable by changing the scope; Kill: the project is not viable nor it will be in the future. The Importance of Gates This process demonstrated to really improve the effectiveness of capital investments, because it ensures both an appropriate level of control and value improvement. Gates set the overall objectives of each project phase, properly assess the project and identify value drivers, risks and uncertainties prior to committing to major expenditure. The phase objectives drive the identification of the necessary project activities and the activity results are documented in specific project deliverables, which support the decision making process at the gate. Decision Making The internal decision-making process at gates is intended to be a value-adding process through: Ensuring that investment decisions are made in a comprehensive and consistent manner; Considering all elements of a Project (e.g. technical, environmental, commercial) when making decisions; Providing uniformity and transparency of decision-making criteria across all Development Projects. Access to Gates Moreover, only proved and realistic value-adding projects are progressed, ensuring the best utilization of Company resources. This makes it easier for projects either to maintain or improve their stated targets. Projects improvements can be detected at an early stage and action measures can be put in place. The number of mandatory end-of-phase gates to be held during Development Projects may vary from 1 to 3 and depends on the specific Project Typology.
5 PAGE 5 The access to a gate can be made following the preparation of the corresponding Decision Support Packsge (DSP) or the execution of a Project Value Assurance Review (AR). Decision Support Package (DSP) The Decision Support Package (DSP) is a set of deliverables summarizing the key Project information required to support the decision-making process at gates. The DSP is the key to the gate. Its purpose is to provide sufficient information to decision makers on: The Project s completeness. Have all the activities been performed? Have the necessary deliverables been produced? The Project robustness. Have all the critical issues been considered and properly managed? The Project s readiness. Is the Project ready to proceed immediately once approval has been obtained? Are the right strategies, organisations, processes and systems in place, to ensure a successful completion of the next phase? Assurance Review (AR). Assurance Reviews (AR) are structured, independent reviews that challenge the Project Team to justify the conclusions of their work, identifying weaknesses and shortcomings, and making specific recommendations for improvements. They introduce additional outside perspectives in order to increase potential project value and allow the project to avoid the risk of missing opportunities for improving technical and business solutions. The AR takes a detailed look at different aspects of the Project and challenges the Project Team to demonstrate that these have been optimised (changes and improvements should be agreed on as a result of the process). An AR is performed by team-independent groups, including experts, Project Partners representatives, etc. Most of the reviews performed in projects executed in Joint Venture (JV) are performed by Review Teams consisting of experts from the Company's part of the JV. Review results are presented to and discussed with the Project Team in order to agree on improvement actions. The decisional process at Gates is mainly supported by the issue of recommendations and conclusions that arise during the reviews performed by multidisciplinary, independent, expert teams before accessing the gates. This practice is a very useful tool to assure the value of projects and the project governance on projects that constitute a high risk level from both a technical and economical point of view, such as projects in the oil & gas industry. In addition to end of phase gates, there may be specific cases where intermediate decision events within Project phases are required if circumstances justify such an event and if the associated risk has been identified and accepted (e.g. decisions for anticipating the procurement of long-lead items, or
6 PAGE 6 scheduled investment decisions required by contractual commitments with Partners and/or Governments, occurring before the end of a phase). PROJECT REVIEW TYPOLOGIES A Project review is an activity undertaken to determine the suitability, adequacy and effectiveness of the subject matter to achieve established objectives. The Importance of Value Review Value assurance is a process that aims at providing the Project Team with assurance and assistance at critical decision points, through a process of support, independent challenge and review. Value assurance is particularly important because Development Projects are capital intensive with long term returns. The higher is the Project importance, both in terms of Company financial exposure and in terms of strategic relevance and risk, the more the Project can benefit from Reviews monitoring. Value Assurance may help the Project Team to: Identify opportunities for value creation. Control Project performances Suggest possible improvements Solve technical problems The Value Management Plan Project Reviews are managed through a structured high level document: the Value Management Plan. The Value Management Plan defines the project s commitment to Assurance activities for the next phase. It contains at least the following information: Number, timing and duration of Assurance Checks for the next phase. Plan rationale. Scope and objective of each Assurance check: preliminary Terms of Reference, competencies requested, expected outcome. It may include also plans for other value management activities, such as, the decision making process, Value Improving Practices, etc. The Value Management Plan should be produced before the end of each project phase and added to the corresponding DSP together with available Value Assurance Activity reports delivered during the phase. Review vs. Audit A review is substantially different from an audit that is a systematic, independent and documented process for obtaining audit evidence and evaluating it objectively to determine the extent to which audit criteria are fulfilled. A review is an activity undertaken to determine the suitability, adequacy and effectiveness of the subject matter to achieve established objectives
7 PAGE 7 Types of Project Review There are different types of project reviews, having different objectives, different durations, and being applied at different times in the project. Here below we illustrate the most frequently used types of Project Reviews. Assurance Review: Assurance Reviews (ARs) are independent reviews examining all the aspects of a Project before accessing a gate, although additional ARs could be also required for Pre-execution Investment and/or major Project Changes. Assurance Reviews need to focus mainly on those aspects of the project that require most attention. ARs take a broad view of the Project before a gate and provide assurance and assistance both to the Project Team and to the Decision Makers. This allows at least the following: Project Team and the Decision Makers to take both assistance and assurance from AR Team recommendations; The Project Team to be more confident in accessing the gate and committed to action for achieving the improvement points. The Decision Making process to be more effective benefiting from different qualified view points and more efficient through focus on recommendations and critical issues. Examination of all the aspects before accessing a gate. Moreover an AR: Tests the Project Team s technical and strategic recommendations against Decision Makers needs and expectations; Provides external challenge to the Project Team at each key decision stage; Helps to assess the validity and robustness of the work done and the key areas that require attention; Assists in maximising the value of the opportunity; Appraises the readiness of any Project to proceed into its next stage, including soundness for capital allocation; Facilitates best practice transfer into the Project Team; Captures lessons learned for dissemination across the other Projects; Verifies that HSE and Quality requirements are satisfied. ARs could last from a few days to one or two weeks, depending on Project category and phase.
8 PAGE 8 The independent review team is usually a multidisciplinary team that should integrate different types of expertise: economics, technical, HSE and Quality, local business, etc. They should check that the Project meets Stakeholders needs and evaluate project readiness to proceed to next Phase. The broad focus of the review is to stimulate feedback, creating learning opportunities and identifying possible recommendations. They look in detail at different project s aspects and challenge the Project Team to demonstrate that these have been optimised and assess the project robustness identifying weaknesses and making specific recommendations for improvements. They confirm that the current phase has been completed in accordance with objectives and is consistent with Company requirements, ready to proceed to the next phase and assess the suitability of future plans and strategies. At the end of each AR, an Assurance Review report is delivered and added to the corresponding Decision Support Package, together with the Project Team s resolutions of outstanding issues addressed by the AR team (response to AR). This report contains a summary of the AR findings and conclusions, including any areas of weakness and gaps requiring further focused attention. Progress Assurance Review PAR is a specific type of assurance review carried out on projects with a long execution phase. PARs are intended to provide confidence that the development project is meeting its objectives and make specific recommendations that will positively contribute to the project efforts. The main objective of these assurance reviews is to examine project activities, deliverable and events which, collectively, provide confidence in the following: That the performance requirements are being satisfactorily progressed during implementation That the key project risks are clearly identified and mitigation plans are being properly managed The adequacy and the correct application of project management systems, processes and resources for technical activities, HSE, close-out of findings The needs of a PAR on a Strategic/Significant Project are planned yearly between the Project Team and the PAR Team Leader. The PAR is carried out, as a rule, during the Execution phase, analyzing on-site project structure, organization, cost, timing and contracts status, identifying critical situation, the relevant causes and possible mitigation/corrective/improvement actions, involving all major technical/functional areas. The PAR Team, before performing the visit on site, performs a preliminary analysis of the Project based on Project Documentation available and information deriving from past Review activities. This analysis is aimed at verifying project status and to define critical areas. A PAR is usually carried out through analysis and verification of technical/functional areas defined by the PAR Project Team through meetings, document review and survey performed to Head Quarter Project Team, local Project Team, site and contractors main offices/workshop. This analysis should lead to the identification of critical situations and associated causes, finalising relevant findings. A preliminary feedback report is issued to summarize PAR results; this is discussed before issuing a final Feedback Report with Action Plan.
9 PAGE 9 The scope of these ARs includes: The control of physical progress, spending, costs and schedule; Progress in the contractual aspects of project implementation; The close out of outstanding issues from AR3; The implementation of management systems to ensure maintenance of the integrity of the facilities during the design, construction, installation, commissioning, and operational phase of the project; A statement of conformance to operations and maintenance requirements; An account of progress towards operational readiness and assurance for production operations and maintenance; The well execution plan and its interaction with reservoir performance. The review team should make recommendations to improve project performance, to update the Project Execution Plan and provide validation of the revised cost and schedule outlook by examination of systems, resources, conformance to plans, risk tolerability and operability criteria. These ARs should be held either periodically (e.g. once/twice a year) or before important project execution milestones, such as: before wells execution, before construction or installation, before commissioning and handover to production. Peer Review Peer Reviews (PR) are recommended independent reviews examining specific Project activities or work steps to assure appropriate quality. There are no mandatory PRs. The need for PRs should be defined at the pre-gate AR for the following phase, where the review group will establish their scope and timing by mutual agreement with the Project Team. Peer Reviews usually have narrower terms of reference than ARs, and cover the role of an intermediate validation point within a phase. Peer Assist A Peer Assist (PA) is an activity in which experienced internal or external professionals with appropriate levels of expertise will suggest improvement points, will challenge and verify work in progress. PAs are requested by the Project Team to identify and remedy Project gaps with value-enhancing contributions, further technical expertise or specific know-how. The PAs are usually of a technical nature only, often single discipline and are usually required at an interim stage of a study.
10 PAGE 10 HOW TO PREPARE A PROJECT REVIEW Role of the Project Team Preparation A Project Review is called and prepared by the Project Team. Usually the project schedule already includes tentative dates of next reviews, which have been planned in the Value Management Plan presented in the previous DSP. When the project is approaching the end of the phase, the Project Team starts to prepare the Decision Support Package. This package should clearly state and demonstrate the results obtained during the phase that is concluding, describing the activities performed, afforded criticalities, technical studies. But the DSP should also contain strategies, objectives and requests for the approaching phase. In a very strict synthesis the Project Team present the project to the Management stating what they are planning to do, and what resources are required (budget, time, manpower). The Review Team is independent, which means not involved in the project. They do not know the project, its difficulties and criticalities and what has been performed up to that moment. The DSP is a tool to let the Review Team understand how they can really add value to the project. For this reason is very important to prepare a clear and exhaustive DSP. As soon as the DSP preparation has reached a good level, the Project Manager contacts the Review Team Leader to agree the review date. A short document called Terms of Reference is produced. This includes a short description of the project, the review objectives, the suggested composition of the review team, a tentative agenda, and the logistics. Based on the Terms of Reference, the Review Team leader starts to organize the event. Some project deliverables are made available to the review team before the actual session in order to enable project background understanding and main review topic framing. This pre-reading documentation should contain relevant project deliverables such as Project Execution Plan, Basis of Design, reports from previous reviews, etc. so that the review team can gain an understanding of project status. HOW TO EXECUTE A PROJECT REVIEW The Role of the Review Team Execution Project Reviews are executed by a dedicated team. The team usually comprises a team leader and a variable number of team members. The Team Leader plays a key role; he is external to and independent of the project, he should have a substantial previous experience of reviews, he is part of the senior staff with a broad knowledge and experience of typical key driver issues (technical, commercial, etc.) coordinates and ensures progress of the review, cooperates in selection of review team members, keep the project team informed, promotes a collaborative atmosphere and collects best ideas. The number and type of team members depends on the nature, size and vulnerability of the project phase being reviewed.
11 PAGE 11 They should be external to and independent of the project. Composition and competencies of the review team vary according to the focus of the review. However the team should always include individuals capable of reviewing from global perspectives and with reference to typical key drivers (economical, commercial, etc.) They contribute to the execution of the review and ensure integration of their views with views of the other team members. The Review Process A Project Review is executed following a specific process, which includes: Pre-event step (preparation of the pre-reading material, review organization and logistics); Execution step which includes: 1. Information: align review team with process and rules; carry out presentations and interviews; share project documentation. 2. Development: review documentation, identify relevant themes; carry-out in depth interviews; draw conclusion for identified theme; draft preliminary theme report Drawing of finding & recommendations: integrate developed theme identifying: priorities and interconnections; discuss and check most relevant findings with the project team; revisit and adjust findings and prioritise recommendations; produce final report. Post-execution step which includes: Close-out: present final report; define action plan. The SAVE Process This process is in line with the process described for a Value Study in the Value Management SAVE Body of Knowledge. It is a tested and common way of proceeding and it guarantees the exhaustive, correct and comprehensive development of the event. PROJECT REVIEW REPORT A Project Review report usually includes a short background of the project, a summary of the review results and the detail of both findings and recommendations. Recommendations represent the core content of an AR Report. They are usually shared with the Project Team before being presented to the Gate and, at the end of review activities, the AR Team should not only state them but also evaluate them in terms of: Importance: the potential impact of issue Urgency: how quickly they need to be solved Importance is evaluated on a three point scale: High importance: potential to significantly impact achieving project objectives
12 PAGE 12 Medium importance: potential for significant value erosion through schedule, costs, reserves, or revenue Low importance: potential for value erosion A three-point scale usually utilized for the evaluation of urgency is: High urgency: before (e.g. before proceeding to the next phase) Medium urgency before (e.g. before the next AR) Low urgency before (e.g. before project start up Illustrations Here below an example illustrates how recommendations arose from an AR are classified: Importance H M L Prioritized recommendations L M H Urgency Importance High: Potential to significantly impact achieving project objectives Medium: Potential for significant value erosion (>5% NPV) Low: Potential for minor value erosion (<5% NPV) Urgency High: Before Gate 2 (1Q 2007) Medium: Before Gate 3 (1Q 2008) Low: Before Start up Production (1Q 2011) A Total of 35 recommendations are made, 21 of which are of High Urgency CONCLUSIONS The process of Project Reviews is clearly described by international standards such as PMI Body of Knowledge and SAVE methodology for Value Management is very similar. Moreover this process is widely applied by all major Oil & Gas Companies and has been followed for many years. This is due to real and tangible results leading to a more efficient project management practice. The use of Project Reviews allows documenting periodically project objectives, project activities and results. The statement and discussion of project targets and plans together with achieved results allow the issue of recommendations focusing on criticalities and their possible solutions creating a continuous improvement process. The application of these practices leads to a better allocation of resources and supports the decision making process. For all these reasons it is strongly suggested that this system should be applied also to projects outside the Oil & Gas industry.
Gateway review guidebook for project owners and review teams The State of Queensland (Queensland Treasury and Trade) 2013. First published by the Queensland Government, Department of Infrastructure and
Overview Part A: Strategic assessment Part B1: Business case developing the business case Part B2: Business case procurement options Part B3: Business case funding and financing options Part C: Project
Contact us: If you have any queries about the APM Competence Framework, please contact us on 01844 271681 or by email to: firstname.lastname@example.org Contents Rating scale 4 1 Ethics, compliance and professionalism
Benefits realisation Gate 5 The State of Queensland (Queensland Treasury and Trade) 2013. First published by the Queensland Government, Department of Infrastructure and Planning, January 2010. The Queensland
Project Management Guidelines Overview Section 86-1506 (5) directs the NITC to adopt guidelines regarding project planning and management. The goal of project management is to achieve the objectives of
Project Systems Management Providing Value-Added Solutions UPSTREAM MIDSTREAM AUTOMATION PROCESS & INDUSTRIAL PIPELINE PROCESS PLANTS Adding Value to Your Project Mustang couples global engineering, design,
Enterprise Performance Life Cycle Management Guideline Version 2.1 PREPARED BY THE ENTERPRISE PROGRAM MANAGEMENT OFFICE MAY 2011 Table of Contents Document Control...i 1. Introduction... 2 1.1 Purpose...
Guidelines for a PROJECT EXECUTION PLAN 1. OBJECTIVES The objectives of this guideline are: To provide a standard template for Project Execution Plans (PEP); To identify the critical items which need to
IT Professional Standards Information Security Discipline Sub-discipline 605 Information Security Testing and Information Assurance Methodologies December 2012 Draft Version 0.6 DOCUMENT REVIEW Document
Better Business Cases Single Stage Light Business Case Template Prepared by: Prepared for: Date: Version: Status: Better Business Cases Single Stage Light Business Case Template Document Control Document
Technology based Project Management Consulting (T-PMC): Innovate to Reduce Costs Graham Freeth, North African Oil and Gas Summit, Tunis, Tunisia October 2009 J P Kenny Offices World Wide Aberdeen Stavanger
Guide to IT Project Management Guidelines to be used in conjunction with the ECU Project Management Policy Guideline Owner: Chief Information Officer Keywords: Project Management, Project Delivery, Project
PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN TEMPLATE < PROJECT NAME > Date of Issue: < date > Document Revision #: < version # > Project Manager: < name > Project Management Plan < Insert Project Name > Revision History Name
AIPM PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCY STANDARDS FOR PROJECT MANAGEMENT PART B CERTIFIED PRACTISING PROJECT PRACTITIONER (CPPP) Copyright: Australian Institute of Project Management Document Information Document
The Gateway Review Process The Gateway Review Process examines programs and projects at key decision points. It aims to provide timely advice to the Senior Responsible Owner (SRO) as the person responsible
PPP Governance The Governance of Projects, Programs and Portfolios (PPP) (sometimes called project governance for convenience) is the sub-set of corporate and organisational governance 1 focused on assisting
Client information note Assessment process Management systems service outline Overview The accreditation requirements define that there are four elements to the assessment process: assessment of the system
Investment decision Gate 3 The State of Queensland (Queensland Treasury and Trade) 2013. First published by the Queensland Government, Department of Infrastructure and Planning, January 2010. The Queensland
METHOD 12 3 empowering managers to succeed Project Management Guidebook ISBN 0-473-10445-8 A bout this e-book This e-book was created by Method123 (see www.method123.com) to help provide you with a simple
End-to-end project delivery framework Introduction This document outlines end-to-end project mechanisms, including key activities, stage gates, templates, governance, and tools for monitoring and controls.
2 of 34 Revision Summary Revision Number Date Description of Revisions Initial issue of the document. Table of Contents Item Description Page 1. Introduction and Purpose... 5 2. Project Management Approach...
Developing a Business Case Figures don t lie but liars figure. Attributed to Mark Twain and others The business case document is a formal, written argument intended to convince a decision maker to approve
AUSTRALIAN ENGINEERING COMPETENCY STANDARDS STAGE 2 - EXPERIENCED The Stage 2 Competency Standards are the profession's expression of the knowledge and skill base, engineering application abilities, and
Project Governance A N T I C I P A T I N G A N A U D I T Public sector Project Management characteristics Multi-million rand projects Often National interest projects Subject to intense scrutiny Uncertainty
PROJECT MANAGEMENT PLAN Outline VERSION 0.0 STATUS: OUTLINE DATE: Project Name Project Management Plan Document Information Document Title Version Author Owner Project Management Plan Amendment History
PROJECT MANAGEMENT MATURITY ASSESSMENT At PM Academy we believe that assessing the maturity of your project is the first step in improving the infrastructure surrounding project management in your organisation.
Project Assessment Framework Policy Overview July 2015 Component of the Project Assessment Framework (PAF) This document forms part of the Project Assessment Framework, as outlined below. Overarching policy
Introduction to the ITS Project Management Methodology In September 1999 the Joint Legislative Committee on Performance Evaluation and Expenditure Review (PEER) produced a report entitled Major Computer
Guidance Note: Corporate Governance - Board of Directors March 2015 Ce document est aussi disponible en français. Applicability The Guidance Note: Corporate Governance - Board of Directors (the Guidance
AIPM PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCY STANDARDS FOR PROJECT MANAGEMENT PART D CERTIFIED PRACTISING PROJECT DIRECTOR (CPPD) Jan 2011 Version 1.2 Copyright: Australian Institute of Project Management Jan 2011 Version
1. What is PRINCE2? Projects In a Controlled Environment Structured project management method Generic based on proven principles Isolates the management from the specialist 2 1.1. What is a Project? Change
IA Metrics Why And How To Measure Goodness Of Information Assurance Nadya I. Bartol PSM Users Group Conference July 2005 Agenda! IA Metrics Overview! ISO/IEC 21827 (SSE-CMM) Overview! Applying IA metrics
TEC Capital Asset Management Standard January 2011 TEC Capital Asset Management Standard Tertiary Education Commission January 2011 0 Table of contents Introduction 2 Capital Asset Management 3 Defining
Delivery Management Guidelines Delivery Process 2 - Project Management Version control Version 9-1 Date 2010-10-18 Status Approved The IDMS Prov Infr Strat DP1: Portfolio Management DP1-1 Infrastructure
Project & Program Sponsorship Effective sponsorship is a key element in the successful delivery of projects and programs; the way a sponsor interacts with the project and other managers can create or destroy
Step by Step Project Planning Contents Introduction The Planning Process 1 Create a Project Plan...1 Create a Resource Plan...1 Create a Financial Plan...1 Create a Quality Plan...2 Create a Risk Plan...2
Truly Managing a Project and Keeping Sane While Wrestling Elegantly With PMBOK, Scrum and CMMI (Together or Any Combination) Neil Potter The Process Group Lead Appraiser / Improvement Coach Organization
pm4dev, 2016 management for development series Project Scope Management PROJECT MANAGEMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATIONS PROJECT MANAGEMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATIONS A methodology to manage development
PORTFOLIO, PROGRAMME & PROJECT MANAGEMENT MATURITY MODEL (P3M3) 1st February 2006 Version 1.0 1 P3M3 Version 1.0 The OGC logo is a Registered Trade Mark of the Office of Government Commerce This is a Value
Biometrics Enterprise Architecture Project Management Plan (BMEA PMP) Version 1.0 Prepared by: Date: November 24, 2008 Revision History Purpose Revision Date Level 11/17/2009 First Draft 1.0 Responsible
Brief 21 August 2011 Public Procurement Performance Measurement C O N T E N T S What is the rationale for measuring performance in public procurement? What are the benefits of effective performance management?
The Project Management Knowledge Areas as defined by PMI (PMBOK, 2004) is the processes required to ensure that the various elements of the project are properly coordinated. the processes required to ensure
Government of Western Australia Department of Finance Government Procurement Gateway Tender Decision Workbook ABOUT THIS WORKBOOK This workbook supports the Gateway review Tender Decision. It is the fourth
PMP Examination Tasks Puzzle game Here is a great game to play to test your knowledge of the tasks you will be tested on in the actual examination. What we have done is take each of the domain tasks in
Chapter 2 Establishing a Quality Assurance and Improvement Program O v e rv i e w IIA Practice Guide, Quality Assurance and Improvement Program, states that Quality should be built in to, and not on to,
INTERNAL AUDIT CHARTER AND TERMS OF REFERENCE CHARTERED INSTITUTE OF INTERNAL AUDIT DEFINITION OF INTERNAL AUDIT Internal auditing is an independent, objective assurance and consulting activity designed
Development, Acquisition, Implementation, and Maintenance of Application Systems Part of a series of notes to help Centers review their own Center internal management processes from the point of view of
Evidence guidelines Published by the National Regulatory System for Community Housing Directorate. Document Identification: 003-04-13/NRSD Publication date: January 2014 Supported by the Commonwealth Government
Confident in our Future, Risk Management Policy Statement and Strategy Risk Management Policy Statement Introduction Risk management aims to maximise opportunities and minimise exposure to ensure the residents
Evaluation Guidance Note Series UNIFEM Evaluation Unit October 2009 Guidance Note on Developing Terms of Reference (ToR) for Evaluations Terms of Reference (ToR) What? Why? And How? These guidelines aim
CPM -100: Principles of Project Management Lesson E: Risk and Procurement Management Presented by Sam Lane email@example.com Ph: 703-883-7149 Presented at the IPM 2002 Fall Conference Prepared by the Washington,
09 May 2016 Following up recommendations/management actions Chartered Institute of Internal Auditors At the conclusion of an audit, findings and proposed recommendations are discussed with management and
NATIONAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AUTHORITY - UGANDA National IT Project Management Methodology Project Reporting Support Guide Version 0.5 Project Reporting Support Guide version 0.5 Page 1 Document Version
PROJECT MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES FOR PROJECTS FUNDED BY THE NATIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY (UP TO 20 MILLION IN VALUE) december 2011 Table of Contents Section A 1. Introduction 4 1.1 Purpose 4 1.2 Applicability
Head of Engineering Job Description (Job Code and Level: E006) Definition: Overall responsibility and accountability for the Engineering function across the UK which will include people and budgetary management.
The Business Case Justification Solutions for Capital Project Delivery Improvement (White Paper) Table of Contents Page Introduction... 3 Business Case Structure... 5 Business Case Process... 6 Detailed
The Asset Management Landscape ISBN 978-0-9871799-1-3 Issued November 2011 www.gfmam.org The Asset Management Landscape www.gfmam.org ISBN 978-0-9871799-1-3 Published November 2011 This version replaces
Logan City Council Strategic Planning and Performance Management Framework 1 Table of contents 1. Overview 3 a) Purpose 3 b) Key Features 3 2. Context 4 a) National Framework for Sustainability 4 b) Elements
THE PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR A NEW LEADERSHIP PARADIGM by Edward P. Mahler, PMP - Director Project Administration Institute Larchmont, N.Y., USA Introduction Project team members also have responsibilities
Public Sector Auditing.. Private Sector Thinking CENTRAL LINCOLNSHIRE LOCAL PLAN HIGHLIGHT REPORT Date: 7 th November 2014 Author: Rachel Abbott Principal Auditor Introduction & Scope The National Planning
IPAA PROFESSIONAL CAPABILITIES PROJECT Procurement Capability Standards Definition Professional Role Procurement is the process of acquiring goods and/or services. It can include: identifying a procurement
Business Success through Excellence in Project Management (Better, Cheaper, Faster and Safer Projects) Process and Tools that Enable Project Teams to Achieve World-Class Performance and thereby Improve
AIPM PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCY STANDARDS FOR PROJECT MANAGEMENT PART F CERTIFIED PRACTICING PORTFOLIO EXECUTIVE (CPPE) JUNE 2014 Version 2.1 DOCUMENT CONTROL Document Information Document Title Release Authority
Do not remove this if sending to pagerunnerr Page Title The Transport Business Cases January 2013 1 Contents Introduction... 3 1. The Transport Business Case... 4 Phase One preparing the Strategic Business
This CMC Competence Framework specifies the cluster of related abilities, commitments, knowledge, and skills that a management consultant should demonstrate in practice in order to successfully complete
Project Management Certificate (IT Professionals) Whether your field is architecture or information technology, successful planning involves a carefully crafted set of steps to planned and measurable goals.
Page 6-1 6.0 Procurement procedure 1 Infrastructure 6.1 Overview Introduction Procurement procedure 1 Infrastructure consists of four parts: guidelines for understanding the strategic context for the procurement
Enterprise Architecture Governance Plan Phase 1 Report Enterprise Architecture Governance Plan Report and Recommendations for the Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium 20 January 2012 2 Smarter Balanced
Project Governance a board responsibility Corporate Governance Network November 2015 1 Contents Page Introduction 3 Board responsibilities 3 What is project governance? 4 The boards duties in respect of
MARCH 2012 Version 1.10 Strategic Risk Policy Update March 2012 v1.10.doc Document History Current Version Document Name Risk Management Policy Statement and Strategic Framework Last Updated By Alan Till
Crosswalk Between Current and New PMP Task Classifications Domain 01 Initiating the Project Conduct project selection methods (e.g., cost benefit analysis, selection criteria) through meetings with the
CLACKMANNANSHIRE COUNCIL THIS PAPER RELATES TO ITEM 05 ON THE AGENDA Report to: Resources and Audit Committee Date of Meeting: 24 September 2015 Subject: External Audit BV Performance Report: Delivering
Executive Project Review Prepared for: Prepared by: Table of contents Introduction... 3 WHY an Executive Project Review?... 3 WHO is Involved?... 4 WHAT is an Executive Project Review?... 5 WHEN? - Schedule
Qlik UKI Consulting Services Catalogue The key to a successful Qlik project lies in the right people, the right skills, and the right activities in the right order www.qlik.co.uk Table of Contents Introduction