1 On the attributes of a critical literature review Saunders, Mark N. K. 1 & Rojon, Céline 2 1 School of Management, University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7XH, United Kingdom; 2 Department of Psychology & School of Management, University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7XH United Kingdom. Details of corresponding author: Mark NK Saunders School of Management University of Surrey Guildford Surrey GU2 7XH United Kingdom Notes on contributors: Mark NK Saunders is Professor in Business Research Methods and Director of PhD Programmes in the School of Management at the University of Surrey. His research interests focus on two themes. The first, research methods, includes online research methods, methods for researching trust and the development of tools to learn about, understand and improve organisational relationships within a process consultation framework. The second, human resource aspects of the management of change, is concerned particularly with trust and justice. His research findings have been published in a range of journals including Employee Relations, European Journal of Work and Organisational Psychology, Field Methods, Personnel Review and Service Industries Journal. Recent books include: Research Methods for Business Students (2009, FT Prentice Hall), currently in its fifth edition, co-authored with Phil Lewis and Adrian Thornhill; and Organizational Trust: A Cultural Perspective (2010, Cambridge University Press) co-edited with Denise Skinner, Nicole Gillespie, Graham Dietz and Roy Lewicki. Céline Rojon is a PhD researcher in the Department of Psychology and the School of Management at the University of Surrey. Her research looks at the conceptualisation and measurement of individual workplace performance and includes, amongst others, a Systematic Review of the performance literature. She has previously conducted research into the validation of a new measure for use in cross-cultural coaching. Other research and practice interests are in the areas of assessment and selection, particularly the development and application of psychometrics.
2 Abstract Exploring and evaluating findings from previous research is an essential aspect of all research projects enabling the work to be set in the context of what is known and what is not known. This necessitates a critical review of the literature in which existing research is discussed and evaluated, thereby contextualising and justifying the project. In this research note we consider what is understood by being critical when reviewing prior to outlining the key attributes of a critical literature review. We conclude with a summary checklist to help ensure a literature review is critical. Keywords: literature review; critical; literature; review Introduction A thorough understanding of, and insight into, previous research that relates to a project is essential for the quality of the study, this usually being achieved by means of critically reviewing the extant literature. Yet, whilst much is written on the process of searching and recording the literature (for example: Hart, 1998), less is available regarding what makes a literature review critical. Notwithstanding excellent exceptions to this observation (for example the book by Wallace & Wray, 2011), the purpose of this research note is to offer clear guidance on the attributes of a critical literature review. We commence by outlining what is meant by being critical in the context of the literature review. We then outline and discuss what we consider are the key attributes of a critical literature review, concluding our note with a summary checklist. Being critical The significance of any research will, inevitably, be judged in relation to other people s research. All researchers therefore need to show they understand the context of their research: its key theories, concepts and ideas, and the major issues and debates about the research topic (Denyer & Tranfield, 2009). In doing this they are establishing what is already known about the topic and, if possible, identifying other research that is currently in progress. Their reading about others research will have enhanced their subject knowledge, helping them clarify further their research aim(s) and objective(s). Drawing on this reading they will have developed a clear written argument in their research publication about what the published literature indicates is known and not known about the topic (Wallace & Wray, 2011); including only that which is relevant. In other words, they will have critically reviewed the literature (Saunders, Lewis & Thornhill, 2009). The word critical, although widely used in academia, needs to be considered carefully within the context of the literature review. Fortunately, Mingers (2000) identifies four important aspects to a critical approach, which can be used to provide insights regarding what is meant by a critical
3 literature review. These are: critique of rhetoric; critique of tradition; critique of authority; critique of objectivity. The first, the critique of rhetoric, means appraising or evaluating a problem with effective use of language. In the context of our critical literature review, this emphasises the need to use our skills to make reasoned judgements and to argue effectively in writing. The other three aspects Mingers identifies also have implications for being critical when reviewing the work of others. They emphasise using evidence and ideas in the literature to help us question (where justification exists) the conventional wisdom, the critique of tradition and the dominant view, the critique of authority. Finally, being critical in our review may also include recognition that the knowledge and information we are discussing are not value free, the critique of objectivity. Being critical in reviewing the literature is, therefore, a combination of our knowledge and understanding of what has been written, our evaluation and judgement skills and our ability to structure these clearly and logically in writing. To do this we need to be aware of the key attributes of the critical literature review. It is these which we now consider. Attributes of a critical review (1) Identifies and includes the most relevant and significant research to the topic In considering the content of our critical review, we need to be aware of the key academic theories within our chosen topic that are pertinent to or contextualise our research. Whilst we should have read the literature that is closely related to our research aim(s) and objective(s), that which is less closely related is more likely to cause us problems (Gall, Gall & Borg, 2006). For some research topics, particularly new research areas, there is unlikely to be much closely related literature and so we will have to review more broadly. For other topics where research has been undertaken over a number of years we may be able to focus on more closely related literature (Saunders et al., 2009). It is, however, impossible to review every single piece of the literature. Fortunately, the purpose of the literature review is not to provide a summary of everything that has been written on the research topic, but to review the most relevant and significant research relating to our topic. If our review is effective, clear gaps in what is known will be identified that have not been researched previously (Corbin & Strauss, 2008). Discussing and explaining these will provide the academic context for our research, also allowing us to show how our findings and theories relate to earlier research. Assessing the relevance of the literature in relation to our research depends on our aim(s) and objective(s). Initially we will be looking for relevance to the topic, not critically assessing the ideas contained within. When doing this, it helps to have thought about criteria for assessing the relevance of each item of literature. In contrast, assessing the value of literature is concerned with its theoretical and methodological rigour (Hodgkinson, Herriot & Anderson, 2001). Where we
4 think ideas, arguments or research findings reported are unclear, biased or inconsistent with other work and need to be researched further, we need to justify why. This is not easy and requires careful thought and clear argument. (2) Discusses and evaluates research A common mistake with critical literature reviews is that they become uncritical listings or catalogues of previous research (Saunders & Lewis, 2011). Often they are little more than annotated bibliographies (Hart, 1998), individual items being selected because they fit with what the researcher is proposing (Greenhalgh, 1997). It is, however, not the purpose of a critical review to just describe what each author has written, one author after another. Rather, as we begin to read and evaluate the literature, we need to think how to combine the academic theories and ideas thematically to form the critical review. This review will need to evaluate research that has already been undertaken in the area of the study, show and explain the relationships between published research findings and reference the literature in which they were reported. Sometimes we may be highly critical of the earlier research reported in the literature and seek to question or revise it through our research. However, we must still review this research, explain clearly why we consider it requires revision and justify our own ideas through clear argument and with reference to literature. In discussing and evaluating the literature, the precise structure we use will depend on the research aim(s) and objective(s). It is helpful to think of our review as a thematic funnel in which we first provide a general overview of the key themes and ideas before narrowing down to our research aim(s) and objective(s). We then need to discuss each theme in turn comparing and contrasting what different authors say about them. As we compare and contrast researchers findings about each theme, we are writing critically (Saunders & Lewis, 2011). (3) Identifies recognised experts As we have mentioned, it is impossible to read everything. Yet we need to be sure that the critical review discusses the key research already undertaken and that we have positioned our study clearly within the wider context. This will inevitably mean being able to identify the relevant and significant theories and recognised experts in relation to the topic. For some research topics there will be a pre-existing, clearly developed theoretical base. For others we will need to integrate a number of different theoretical strands to develop our understanding. (4) Contextualises and justifies your aim(s) and objective(s) Creswell (2007) highlights three ways in which researchers use the literature. Firstly, they use it to explicitly frame their research aim(s) in the initial stages of the research. Secondly, they use it to provide the context and theoretical framework for the research and, finally, to help place the research findings within the wider body of knowledge. For the purposes of the critical review, the second of these ways is crucial. To contextualise and justify our research aim(s) and objective(s), we need to integrate the different ideas from the literature to form a coherent and cohesive argument. However, it is worth remembering that the literature we read for our review should also inform our methodology, being referenced as appropriate. Similarly we will need to refer back to the literature when discussing our findings.
5 (5) Consider and discuss research that supports and opposes your ideas Having identified research that is relevant to our study, we should be able to provide a reasonably detailed, constructively critical analysis of the key literature that relates to the aim(s) and objective(s). Within this we need to include research that corroborates our ideas, showing clear links from these supporting publications to the empirical work that will follow. It is also necessary to include and discuss research that is counter to our opinions. This is crucial to provide readers with a comprehensive picture of the extant literature. Indeed, within the critical review, we need to juxtapose different authors ideas and form our own views based on these (Saunders et al., 2009). (6) Justifies points made logically with valid evidence When reviewing critically, an important aspect to consider is how convincingly authors are arguing and if their conclusions can be justified by the evidence (Wallace & Wray, 2011). This assessment should be applied to our critical literature review as a whole, where we need to ensure that we provide a detailed analysis of, and commentary on, the merits and faults of the key literature in relation to our research, ensuring that our arguments and ideas are justified with appropriate evidence and in a logical manner. (7) Distinguishes between fact and opinion When reading and evaluating the literature, we need to distinguish clearly between facts (in other words presented information that is backed up by evidence, such as the findings from a study) and opinions (in other words subjective thoughts or beliefs about something that may be supported by an argument, but that can not necessarily be justified by evidence). Distinguishing between fact and opinion is important not only when we read and evaluate the literature, but possibly even more so when we write the review care needs to be taken here to clearly distinguish between what has been demonstrated in previous research (facts) and how we consider this applies to our own research (opinions). (8) Includes research that has been published since the start of the project For most research projects, the literature search will be an early activity. Despite this early start, it is usually necessary to continue searching throughout the project s life to ensure that our knowledge of the chosen area is up to date. (9) References all sources fully In considering the content of your critical review, we need to reference sources clearly and completely to enable those reading your article to find the original publications without difficulty. Within this we need to ensure that references are in the exact format required for the publication. Whilst most journals detail the precise format required other guides (for example: American Psychological Association, 2005; Neville, 2010) can also be helpful. Summary Having drafted your literature review, it is crucial to ensure it is actually critical. To provide support in this, we conclude by offering the following questions as a summary checklist: 1. Is research that is most relevant and significant to the topic identified and included?
6 2. Is this research discussed and evaluated using a clear structure that will be logical to the reader? 3. Is the work of recognised experts on the topic identified and referred to? 4. Are the research aim(s) and objective(s) explicitly stated and contextualised? 5. Is research that supports and research that opposes the main arguments included, using clearly reasoned judgements? 6. Are points made logically and justified with valid argument and/or evidence? 7. Are fact and opinion distinguished clearly? 8. Is relevant research that has been published since the start of the project included? 9. Have all sources been referenced fully in the required format? References American Psychological Association (2005). Concise Rules of the APA Style. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Creswell, J.W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Denyer, D., & Tranfield, D. (2009). Producing a systematic review. In D. Buchanan & A. Bryman (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational research methods (pp ). London, United Kingdom: Sage. Gall, M.D., Gall, J.P., & Borg, W. (2006). Educational research: An introduction (8th ed.). New York: Longman. Greenhalgh, T. (1997). Papers that summarize other papers (systematic reviews and metaanalyses). British Medical Journal, 315, Hart, C. (1998). Doing a literature review. London, United Kingdom: Sage. Hodgkinson, G.P., Herriot, P., & Anderson, N. (2001). Re-aligning the stakeholders in management research: Lessons from industrial, work and organizational psychology. British Journal of Management, 12, Special Issue, S41 S48. Mingers, J. (2000). What is it to be critical? Teaching a critical approach to management undergraduates. Management Learning, 31(2), Neville, C. (2010). The Complete Guide to Referencing and Avoiding Plagiarism (2nd ed.). Maidenhead, United Kingdom: Open University Press. Saunders, M.N.K., & Lewis, P. (2011). Doing Research in Business and Management. Harlow, United Kingdom: Pearson. Saunders, M.N.K., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2009). Research Methods for Business Students (5th ed.). Harlow, United Kingdom: FT Prentice Hall. Wallace, M. & Wray, A. (2006). Critical reading and writing for postgraduates. London, United Kingdom: Sage.
Formulating a convincing rationale for a research study Rojon, Céline 1 & Saunders, Mark N. K. 2 1 Department of Psychology & The Surrey Business School, University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7XH United
Post-Graduate Certificate in Higher Education (PGCHE) Module 3: Individual Project (Part-time) Page 1 of 7 ifs School of Finance MODULE SPECIFICATION 1. Title Individual Project 2. Start date September
Literature Reviews 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. What is a Literature Review? Choosing Material Searching for Good Material Assessing the Literature Developing the Literature Review Placing the Literature Review
The Literature Review in the Masters Dissertation Roberta Sammut If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of giants Isaac Newton Why are reviews needed Research information is like small
Topic 3 Review of Literature LEARNING OUTCOMES By the end of this topic, you should be able to: 1. Define what is review of literature; 2. Identify the importance of a good literature review; 3. List the
Learning Enhancement Team Writing a Dissertation This Study Guide addresses the task of writing a dissertation. It aims to help you to feel confident in the construction of this extended piece of writing,
PROGRAMMME SPECIFICATION FOR MA in LEADERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT (HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE SERVICES) MA in LEADERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT (HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE SERVICES) 1. Award 2. Route Management (Health and
Research Philosophies Importance and Relevance 0. INTRODUCTION When undertaking research of this nature, it is important to consider different research paradigms and matters of ontology and epistemology.
Biographical Note Professor Jennifer Rowley can be contacted at the School of Management and Social Sciences, Edge Hill College of Higher Education, Ormskirk, Lancashire, England L39 4QP. by Jennifer Rowley
WRITING A CRITICAL ARTICLE REVIEW A critical article review briefly describes the content of an article and, more importantly, provides an in-depth analysis and evaluation of its ideas and purpose. The
FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING OUTSOURCING AN EXPLORATORY STUDY OF SERVICE PROVIDERS AND THEIR CLIENTS IN AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND. Graham Ray, Accounting Lecturer, School of Commerce and Management, Southern
Business School Writing an Essay What is an essay? An essay is usually written in response to a question or series of questions. The writer's purpose is to convince the reader that his or her way of analysing,
Unit Options and s BSc Health Psychology (Full-Time) Core units Year 1 Foundations to Psychology Introduction to Psychological Research and Data Analysis Psychology in Everyday Life Health and Wellbeing
MA Thesis Handbook AY2014-2015 Program on International Relations New York University Fifth Floor 19 University Place New York, New York 10003 The thesis The thesis is the culmination of independent supervised
Assessment Modes: Critical Review of a Body of Knowledge Criteria In order to demonstrate functioning at Masters level in a critical review of a body of knowledge students will: show familiarity at first
Lancaster University Doctoral Programme in Clinical Psychology Guidelines for Thesis Format: Advice to internal and external examiners This document sets out the guidelines for assessing Lancaster DClinPsy
ELS Effective Learning Service Planning a Critical Review For appointments contact: firstname.lastname@example.org or email@example.com web: www.qmu.ac.uk/els Planning and writing a critical review The following
Planning your research Many students find that it helps to break their thesis into smaller tasks, and to plan when and how each task will be completed. Primary tasks of a thesis include - Selecting a research
Programme(s) Module Code(s) Curriculum Theme Module Title Assessment Type Type Submission Deadline City University London School of Community & Health Sciences Assessment Specification BSc (Hons) Adult
Library, Teaching and Learning Writing Essays and other assignments 2013 Lincoln University Writing at University During your degree at Lincoln University you will complete essays, reports, and other kinds
School of Business, Management and Economics Department of Business and Management MSc in Global Supply Chain and Logistics Management Course Handbook 2013/14 2013 Entry Table of Contents School of Business,
WRITING A LITERATURE REVIEW What is a literature review? A critical assessment of the current state of knowledge on a topic; Or A critical assessment of the current state of knowledge on a topic with a
School of Business, Management and Economics Department of Business and Management MSc Financial Risk and Investment Analysis Course Handbook 2013/14 2013 Entry Table of Contents School of Business, Management
Guidelines for developing the HDR thesis proposal Overview All early childhood HDR candidates are required to deliver a research proposal during the first year of enrolment. It is expected that the thesis
1 What are research, evaluation and audit? Barbara Sen, Maria J. Grant and Hannah Spring I don t do research. I don t have the time. I am too busy with the day to day running of the library. I do evaluations
Running head: SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS IN IWO PSYCHOLOGY On the Experience of Conducting a Systematic Review in Industrial, Work and Organizational Psychology: Yes, It Is Worthwhile Abstract Systematic Review
Preparing an MRR A guidance note 1 Purpose The purpose of this document is to offer guidance on the Management Research Report (MRR). For the purposes of this document, we are using MRR to represent both
James Hardiman Library Guidance notes on planning a systematic review In contrast to the traditional or narrative literature review, systematic literature reviews use a more rigorous and well-defined approach
Guidelines for Preparation of Review Protocols Type of document: Policy _x_ Guideline Procedure Version: 1.0, January 1 2001 Decision: Steering Group, Date? A Campbell Systematic Review is meant to review
UNIVERSITY OF READING MARKING CRITERIA CLASSIFICATION FRAMEWORK FOR TAUGHT POSTGRADUATE PROGRAMMES (for non-greenlands cohorts entering Autumn Term 2008 and thereafter) (for Greenlands cohorts entering
Introduction to Dissertations Learning Enhancement Team LET@mdx.ac.uk Variety is the Spice of Life! Different Schools.Different Rules Can you use I in an academic text? Should an essay have section headings?
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH METHDOLOGY Module Outline Code: QRM ( ) Duration: 1 week The module will comprise a total of thirty hours teaching. Credits: 3 Description: The Qualitative research method module is
Programme Specification (Postgraduate) Date amended: 1. Programme Title (EdD) 2. Awarding body or institution University of Leicester 3. a) Mode of Study part time b) Type of Study postgraduate research
IB Business & Management Internal Assessment HL Guide Book And Summer Assignment 2012-2013 1 Summer 2012 Summer Reading Assignment-You must read and complete the following assignments: 1. Select one of
Critical Practice: Graphics and Illustration (GRAP 2022) Critical reading and writing Rita Frangiosa Language and Learning Adviser (EASS) Learning and Teaching Unit Aims of session Overview of assignment
Research Design and Methodology Week 6 What have we done so far? What is Research? Clarifying your research Literature Review Research Paradigm what s the next step in the research process? Research Proposal
Writing the Literature Review / Using the Literature Most research reports and theses have a literature review, which discusses the "literature" around your research topic. The lit. review is often the
School Psychology Doctoral Program Dissertation Outline 1 Final Version 6/2/2006 Instructions: Double Underline means the item should be a title or heading in your dissertation. Do not deviate from the
Case study as a research strategy: Investigating extreme weather resilience of construction SMEs in the UK Gayan Wedawatta School of the Built Environment, the University of Salford, UK firstname.lastname@example.org
T A S M A N I A N C E R T I F I C A T E Modern World History O F E D U C A T I O N HSM315110, TQA Level 3, Size Value = 15 THE COURSE DOCUMENT This document contains the following sections: LEARNING STATEMENT...
Chapter 2 What is evidence and evidence-based practice? AIMS When you have read this chapter, you should understand: What evidence is Where evidence comes from How we find the evidence and what we do with
Grounded Theory Contents 1 Introduction... 1 2 Applications of grounded theory... 1 3 Outline of the design... 2 4 Strengths and weaknesses of grounded theory... 6 5 References... 6 1 Introduction This
2011 International Conference on Financial Management and Economics IPEDR vol.11 (2011) (2011) IACSIT Press, Singapore The Relevance of Glaserian and Straussian Grounded Theory Approaches in Researching
REPORT WRITING The Principle Differences Between Report & Essay Writing The principles for researching, drafting, editing and rewriting a report are the same as those described above for essay writing.
Postgraduate School BOOKS ON RESEARCH INTERVIEWS AVAILABLE IN THE UFS LIBRARY Compiled by R du Plessis Alvesson, M. 2011. Interpreting interviews. Los Angeles, Calif. : SAGE. (300.723 ALV). Researchers
Connections to the Common Core State Standards for Literacy in Middle and High School Science This document is based on the Connections to the Common Core State Standards for Literacy in Science and Technical
How to write an Academic Business Report Tessa Owens Writing an Academic Business Report Writing a report may be divided into six broad areas: 1. identification and acquisition of relevant sources 2. preliminary
Sample Size and Grounded Theory S. B. Thomson 1 Abstract Interviews are one of the most frequently used method of data collection and grounded theory has emerged as one of the most commonly used methodological
MODULE DESCRIPTOR TITLE Application of Critical Thinking and Reflection in Practice SI MODULE CODE 23-7016-00S CREDITS 15 LEVEL 7 JACS CODE SUBJECT GROUP DEPARTMET ursing and Midwifery MODULE LEADER Carole
Developing your Graduate Attributes: MA in Marketing The MA in Marketing involves studying theory and practice. The programme is distinctive in that it adopts a critical marketing and management studies
Essay Writing By the end of this section you should be able to; Interpret essay questions successfully O BJECTIVES Plan personal objectives Actively search for information Construct a logical essay plan
Professional Diploma in Marketing Project Management in Marketing Senior Examiner Assessment Report March 2013 The Chartered Institute of Marketing 2013 Contents This report contains the following information:
Summary of a review of literature on the impact of working context and support on the postgraduate research student learning experience Diana Leonard Institute of Education, University of London Who is
Nottingham Trent University Course Specification Basic Course Information 1. Awarding Institution: Nottingham Trent University 2. School/Campus: School of Social Sciences, City Campus 3. Final Award, Course
DOCTOR IN EDUCATION COURSE DESCRIPTIONS A. CORE COURSES NEDD 800 Professionalism, Ethics, and the Self This introductory core course will explore and interrogate ideas surrounding professionalism and professionalization.
Research Courses in the CPED Education Doctorate: What s the Difference? Purpose The purpose of this study is to examine the characteristics and attributes of research courses taught in Education Doctorate
STUDY OF RELIGION Year 11 Task 1 Scaffold Timeline for completing this task When using an inquiry process, time management becomes crucial. It is very easy to get lost in the process. To help you, here
Guidelines and criteria for drafting a PhD proposal November 2012 Contents 1. Why a PhD proposal?... 2 2. The criteria used by the doctoral committee... 2 2.1 General criteria... 2 2.2 Specific criteria...
Social Work This programme is no longer recruiting. Please refer to the updated specification for the programme of the same name. Final award BA (Hons) Intermediate awards Cert HE, Dip HE available UCAS
2012-2013 UNIVERSITY OF THESSALY Master of Science in SPORT & EXERCISE PSYCHOLOGY TITLE OF MODULE: Analysis of Qualitative Data CODE OF MODULE: C MAIN LECTURER: Stiliani Chroni Tel:+30.2431047048, Email:
S WORKING DRAFT FOR PILOT ACROSS GRADUATE PROGRAMS Approved by GASCC; Revised by the Assessment Council, Spring 2013 April 2 nd, 2013 Notre Dame de Namur University Note: Most rubrics adapted from AAC&U
Doing a non-fiction book review Before starting a book review, it is important to know what a book review is. A book review consists of information from or about a book and the reviewer s reaction to it.
Graduate School Into the groove, Rebecca Watts, Graduate School Research Images Competition 2012 The Graduate School guide to Surviving the viva You have submitted your thesis and now all you have to do
GUIDELINES FOR REVIEWING QUANTITATIVE DESCRIPTIVE STUDIES These guidelines are intended to promote quality and consistency in CLEAR reviews of selected studies that use statistical techniques and other
USAGE OF NVIVO SOFTWARE FOR QUALITATIVE DATA ANALYSIS Muhammad Azeem Assessment Expert, PEAS University of Education, Lahore PAKISTAN email@example.com Naseer Ahmad Salfi Doctoral Research Fellow
Programme Specification Title: Marketing Final Award: Master of Science (MSc) With Exit Awards at: Postgraduate Certificate (PG Cert) Postgraduate Diploma (PG Dip) Master of Science (MSc) To be delivered
Guide to CQI Qualifications for learners CQI Qualifications and Professional Recognition Quality management is about improving organisational performance in delivering product and service that meet customer
London School of Commerce Programme Specification for the Cardiff Metropolitan University Bachelor of Arts (Hons) in Business Studies 1 Contents Page 1. Aims and Objectives 3 2. Programme Learning Outcomes
NON-PROBABILITY SAMPLING TECHNIQUES PRESENTED BY Name: WINNIE MUGERA Reg No: L50/62004/2013 RESEARCH METHODS LDP 603 UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI Date: APRIL 2013 SAMPLING Sampling is the use of a subset of the
Programme Curriculum for Master Programme in Managing People, Knowledge and Change 1. Identification Name of programme Scope of programme Level Programme code Master Programme in Managing People, Knowledge
Writing essays What is an essay? Why write an essay? How to research, plan and write an essay Language and style Presentation of your work An essay-writing checklist For further information and the full
LITERATURE REVIEW PURPOSE It provides a framework for establishing the importance of your study Benchmark for comparing the results of your study to other findings Presents results of other studies that
HND degree top-up students perceptions of their experience at the University of Worcester: how can future students experiences be improved? Lerverne Barber and Dr Nick Breeze University of Worcester (firstname.lastname@example.org
The SARH (DFID) Systematic Review (SR) Programme for South Asia About systematic reviews What are systematic reviews? A systematic review is a high-level overview of primary research on a particular research
http://www.ic.daad.de/accra Information Center Accra How to Write a Research Proposal Please note: The following recommendations are only suggestions. They do not guarantee a successful research application.
How to write a history essay How to write a history essay 2 How to write a history essay This guide was produced on the basis of the History QAA Benchmark, and while consulting in particular helpful guidelines
The College Standard Writing College Papers: Identifying Standards and Critical Thinking Challenges Building Blocks Grammar Vocabulary Questions The Goals of Academic Writing Thesis Argument Research Plagiarism
WRITING A RESEARCH PAPER FOR A GRADUATE SEMINAR IN POLITICAL SCIENCE Ashley Leeds Rice University Here are some basic tips to help you in writing your research paper. The guide is divided into six sections
Writing an essay Look back If this is not your first essay, take a look at your previous one. Did your tutor make any suggestions that you need to bear in mind for this essay? Did you learn anything else
Doctor of Clinical Psychology Programme of study for the degree of Doctor of Clinical Psychology 1. The following may be accepted as a candidate for the degree of Doctor of Clinical Psychology: Graduates
REFERENCING OVERVIEW These guides cover different elements of referencing and can be used together or separately depending on your prior knowledge or needs. References and Bibliographies - an introduction
IAM Level 5 Diploma in Business and Administrative Management Qualification handbook 2011 edition Published by the IAM IAM 2011 Registered charity number 254807 Published 2011 All rights reserved. This