1 Postural Assessment of Primary School Children working on Computers and the associated risk *Prachi Patel Visiting Faculty University Department of Resource Management SNDT Women s University, Juhu Mumbai India **Archana Bhatnagar Professor University Department of Resource Management SNDT Women s University, Juhu Mumbai India ***Manjit Kaur Chauhan Associate Professor University Department of Resource Management SNDT Women s University, Juhu Mumbai India Abstract The use of computers as a teaching tool is becoming disseminated in educationsystem, even in a developing country like India. The Government has emphasised for introducing computers in the education systems without giving proper guidelines for enhanced computer usage. The schools are clueless, so they invest in computers, software s and network infrastructure; but pays no attention to the ergonomic design issues and the needs of the students. Young children are operating adult size computer products on the workstations which are not made to fit them. Ergonomics comprise the scientific knowledge to ensure the comfort, safety, and efficacy of user. Therefore, the present study has as its purpose to investigate how computers are being used in schools of Mumbai. Computer workstations and the posture adopted by students while
2 working on them was studied. Table-chair combinations were inadequate for majority of the students with the seats height and desk height too high without the adjustability feature. Mismatch between the students dimensions and furniture dimensions were evident. Thus students were forced to assume awkward posture with majority having RULA Score of 5 or 6, thus increasing the postural risk. It can be concluded that by providing the students with proper computer workstation and teaching them appropriate guidelines on how to use this Adult tool will be helpful for children who are going to use computers more intensively than today s youths and workforce. Keywords: Primary School Children, Computers Workstation, Posture Risk. INTRODUCTION
3 Children and Computers: Most of the children from their birth are growing up in technologically rich environments in which they engage actively from an early age. So they are much more technically sound than the older generation were at their age, and they use computers and various other Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs), effortlessly. Data from the United States (De Bell & Chapman, 2003) indicate that 80% of the children are using computers by 5 years of age, whereas study from Australia (Starker et al., 2000) reported that 95% of children aged 5-14 use computers during or outside school hours. Computer is an essential part of almost all type of work, thus family members and the educational system actively promote the use of various technologies at home and schools respectively. For children, the age of exposure to computer and other ICTs is getting lower and lower with the usage hours per day increasing dramatically. As computers in the school system have become a mandatory item, the younger generation will continue to have more and longer computer classes throughout their schooling for educational and also entertainment purpose. Children have special needs, especially when working for a longer time on a device like computer which is designed for adult workforce. Studies suggest that schools too are making the same mistakes as office workplaces did in the 1980s, where computers are thrown on any flat surface thus creating very bad work habits (Mcgrane, 2001). These early exposures to adult-scaled input devices and mismatched furniture may place children at risk of injury both during their formative years and later in life. Computer, Workstation and Mismatch: Classroom learning environment have changed radically due to integration of various technology, but the physical environment has not changed to adapt them. School officials overlook the design safety of the computer centre in rush to get technology into schools (Mendels, 1999). The same old laboratory or nonadjustable classroom furniture is being used for computers by students of primary as well as secondary schools (Patel et al., 2013). The science of human factors and ergonomics has rarely been incorporated into the design of school furnishings. Children in modern societies are being increasingly exposed to computer use, and it will increase the risks of musculoskeletal injuries unless appropriate ergonomic guidelines are followed (Straker, 2001). The lack of adjustable computer furniture of school results in poor postures has been reported in Canada, USA and Australia (Greig et al, 2002; Oates et al, 1998; Zandvliet and Straker, 2001). The size and shape of computers, keyboards and pointing devices are also not tailored to children. (Bennett & Tien, 2003). Most children are now working for short periods of time on keyboards that are too high and incorrectly angled, looking sharply up at monitors (Oates et
4 al. 2000). While the risk is low, but likelihood of developing musculoskeletal problems can increase as they get older. Noro et al. (1997) reported mismatch between computer workstations and body size of school children. Zandvliet & Straker (2001) showed that lack of appropriate furniture in schools had resulted in poor postures by students and computer-related activities are risk factors for musculoskeletal pain (Hakala et al. 2006). As children are increasingly exposed to computer, it is possible that musculoskeletal injuries will also increase unless appropriate guidelines are followed (Straker 2001). Patel et al, (2013) found that computers are introduced in schools of Mumbai from standard 1st with an average of 2 4 students sharing one computer. Same computer furniture was shared by students of both primary and secondary school. Thus, Mismatch between the student s and furniture dimensions were evident, with seat and desk height too high than recommended levels. The number of complaints regarding student s visual or muscular discomfort during computer class was very low, and it could be related to the shorter duration of computer class. Posture adopted and the associated Risk: Oates, Evans and Hedge (1998) concluded that children were working in at risk postures, with keyboards and monitors too high, incorrect keyboard angle and legs dangling. Oates, et al., (2000) used the Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA) and revealed that all six schools had computer-equipped classrooms in which students assumed postures associated with high risk for the development of musculoskeletal disorders. They found that seated posture improved when the workstation had the adjustable tilt down system. A study on high school students by Jones and Orr (1998) indicated that 28%, 40%, 41% reported hand discomfort, neck/back pain, and body pain, respectively, after computer use. Self-reported carpal tunnel syndrome was found in 4% of the sample. Evidence reveals that 30% to 60% of school-age children self-report having some form of musculoskeletal discomfort that they thought was exacerbated by computer use (Jacobs & Baker, 2002). In a similar study byszeto (2002) found that the eyes and the neck were the most common body parts that students complained of having discomforts, followed by upper limb regions. Positive association between the number of hours spent on the computer and musculoskeletal discomfort leading to neck shoulder pain and low back pain was found by Hakala et al. (2006). Jacobs et al. (2009) suggested that physical set-up and individual styles of using media has an influence over discomfort. Dockrell et al. (2010) investigated the effect of a school-based ergonomic intervention (i.e., computer education and workstation modification) on children s posture and discomfort using a pre/post-test study design including RULA, Visual Display Unit (VDU) checklist and Self-reported discomfort. They found positive response to the
5 intervention with significant changes between the pre-intervention and post-intervention scores. Force, repetition, and posture are well-documented occupational risk factors for musculoskeletal injury in adults, and children may be exposed to higher muscle loads and nonneutral postures due to their use of larger size devices, oversized furniture and more activation forces required to operate computers. In addition, the cumulative exposures to force and repetition among these children will be greater than any prior generation (Johnson & Blackstone, 2007).As the Number of children using computers and other ICTs is increasing. Thus, the aim of this study was to assess computer workstation of school children, its postures and related risk. OBJECTIVES To find out various postures adopted by primary school children while working on computer. To assess the student s posture in relation with the existing computer workstation and identify the possible risk. To provide simple guidelines for healthy computing at school. METHODOLOGY Sample Size and Locale: A total of 120 students (60 boys and 60 girls), aged 5 12 years, from 2 primary schools in Mumbai, using computers in schools were adopted. Fifteen subjects from 4 different grades (i.e., 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th) were selected from each school. Both schools were missionary schools and henceforth referred as School A - Boy s school and School M - Girl s school. Tools: Observation, Photographic and Checklist method was used. Observation Technique- Students posture, computer workstation & environment was observed. Photographic Technique- Digital camera used, to collect images of children working on computers. Checklist- A well designed checklist for assessing students posture in relation to computer workstation and its accessories was formulated, using the checklist given by Cornell University (1996), OSHA (1997) and Ontario (2004). The checklist was divided in three main sections General information Information like the gender, age, height, standard/grade, etc. of the respondent student.
6 Furniture and Equipment - This section aims to acquire information associated with the computer, accessories, pointing device, environment and furniture when the child interacts with the computer. Postural Assessment Third section aims to attain information about the various types of posture adopted by the student and problems that may exist as a result of the working posture of the child. The divergence in the Posture adopted by the students was studied using Photographic Technique and RULA technique was used to assess the postural risk. Formulation of categories for classifying the Posture: Based on 12 criteria s of neutral computer working posture (Table.4) given by OSHA and Cornell University, the students were assessed and were given 1 score for each of the criteria fulfilled. Thus the total score of each student would range in between 0 to 12, where 0 score would be of those student not fulfilling any of the neutral posture criteria s and 12 score would be of those student not fulfilling all the criteria s. Three categories of Posture (i.e., Poor, average and good) were formulated to classify the students based on their postural scores. The scores of each student out of total 12 criteria s was calculated and categorized. The students who score anywhere between 0-4 were classified as Poor, the students qualifying for 5-8 score were classified as Average and students scoring 9-12 was graded as Good. Procedure: A purposive sampling technique was used. As 2 to 4 students shared a computer, the student actually working on the computer was selected and their workstation and related posture was recorded. Photographs of the subject while working on computers from various angles were taken. Stature height was measured after the class. Teachers were interviewed. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS Students General Profile: The average age and height of both the boys and girls from school A and school M is about 7-8 years and cm respectively. Table.1. General Information about the Students using Computers Parameters School - A [Boys: n = 60] School M [Girls: n = 60] Age (yrs) + SD (Range) (5-12) (5 10) Height (cms) + SD (Range) ( ) Description of Existing Computer Workstation (Table 2 and 3)
7 Both the schools mostly provided wooden/plastic stools in computer classrooms, with very few chairs available in school-m. The desks in school A were science lab wooden tables with storage underneath. Whereas School-M had specially designed wooden tables with keyboard tray. Seat and desk heights of both the schools were compared to Neufert and BIS standards and were found to be above the recommended levels (Patel et al, 2013). Similar study byrocha et al, (2003) on 126 schools of São Paulo found that the use of computers in the 5th - 8th year of schooling was predominant with an average of two to three students per computer, and an average duration of classes of up to 2 hours per week. Computer furniture lack height adjustments. Table 2. Dimensions of Computer Seating (All the measurements are in centimetres) Standards Parameters of School School BIS Neufert Chair / Stools A M (5-13 yrs) (3-11 yrs) Stool Height (cms) Chair Height (cms) Remark More than recommended More than recommended Table 3. Dimensions of Computer Desk (All the measurements are in centimetres) Parameters of Computer School A School - M Remark(Comparing with Neufert Desk Mean (Range) Mean (Range) Standards) Table Height (cms) 82.7 ( ) ( ) More than recommended i.e., cms Floor Screen Height (cms) More than recommended ( ) ( ) i.e., cms Floor Keyboard Height More than recommended (cms) ( ) ( ) i.e., cms
8 Fig 1. Photographs of Computer Lab in School A Fig. 2. Photographs of Computer Lab in School M Postural Assessment Posture was assessed using 12 criteria s of neutral working posture adopted by the student while working on computers in classroom (Table.4). Assessment of Upper Extremity: Out of 120, only 20 students (16.67%) had head and neck upright in line with torso. 50 students (41.67%) was found with trunk perpendicular to the floor. This was because the desk height was too high compared to seat height, thus in order to view the screen the students were forced to sit erect with trunk perpendicular to the floor. Only 1 student was found with forearm, wrist & hand is below the sitting elbow/waist height. Assessment of Lower Extremity: Out of 120 students, only 32 students (26.67%) were found seating with thighs parallel to the floor, and about 38 students (31.67%) were found with their feet resting flat on floor, foot ring or footrest among which were 34 girls (56.7%) as they were standing or sitting on edge and operating the computer. Oates, Evans and Hedge (1998) too had concluded that children were working in at risk postures with keyboards and monitors too high, incorrect keyboard angle and legs dangling. Body Angle: It was also viewed from the table that only about 14 students (11.67%) were working in the recommended angle of shoulder, elbow and wrist. It was very startling to discover the fact that around 104 students (86.7%) were assuming less than 90 degree angle for shoulder, elbow and wrist. This was majorly due to the high desk height with inappropriate sitting height. Mendels, (1999), too indicated that children are at risk for developing unhealthy postures and repetitive stress injuries due to keyboards and monitors set up higher than the recommended level leading to improper neck positioning and shoulder hunching; hence associated with neck and shoulder discomfort (Kroemer & Grandjean, 1997; Cook et al., 2000).
9 About 75 students (62.5%) were found working with trunk, hips and knees angle and 52 (43.33%) with more than Angle. It could be associated with students sitting erect and on edge of the seat to view the high computer screen. Only 29 students (24.17%) were found working with hips, knees and feet angle Likewise 82 students (68.33%) adopted less than 90 degrees hip, knees and feet angle. This was because they were resting their feet on foot ring or on the legs of the stools. Table.4. Frequency of different attributes of neutral posture adopted by Students School-A School-M A + M 12 Criteria s of Neutral Posture while working on (n=60) (n=60) (n =120) Computers Total (%) Total (%) Total (%) Upper Extremity Head & neck upright (straight), in line with torso 11 (18.3%) 9 (15%) 20 (16.67%) Head, neck & trunk facing forward 16 (26.7%) 6 (10%) 22 (18.33%) Trunk perpendicular to the floor 25 (41.7%) 25 (41.7%) 50 (41.67%) Shoulders, Upper arms & elbow relaxed & in line with torso 12 (20%) 12 (20%) 24 (20%) Forearms, wrist & hand straight line while 16 (26.7%) working 15 (25%) 31 (25.83%) Forearm, wrist & hand is below the elbow/waist height 0 1 (1.67%) 1 (0.83%) Lower Extremity Thighs are horizontal / parallel to the floor 19 (31.7%) 13 (21.7%) 32 (26.67%) Lower legs vertical / perpendicular to the floor 8 (13.3%) 17 (28.3%) 25 (20.83%) Feet rest flat on floor, foot ring or footrest 4 (6.67%) 34 (56.7%) 38 (31.67%) Other General- Body Angle formed Shoulder, Elbow & Wrist- less than (78.3%) 57 (95%) 104 (86.67%) (Recommended) 9 (15%) 5 (8.33%) 14 (11.67%) - more than (18.3%) 12 (20%) 23 (19.17%) Trunk, Hips & Knees - less than (8.33%) 0 5 (4.17%) (Recommended) 43 (71.7%) 32 (53.3%) 75 (62.5%)
10 - more than (33.3%) 32 (53.3%) 52 (43.33%) Hips, Knees & Feet - less than (71.7%) 39 (65%) 82 (68.33%) (Recommended) 17 (28.3%) 12 (20%) 29 (24.17%) - more than (28.3%) 17 (28.3%) 34 (28.33%) A Thenon neutral or awkward posture hinders the blood circulation, creates discomfort and stresses the muscles ultimately leading to pain in the body part if assumed for longer duration. Thus it can be concluded that most of the children were not working in posture recommended by Hedge, 2000 based on angles of bent. In the present scenario this could be credited to the fact that the workstation design was responsible for students adopting awkward posture. The similar observations were made by Murphy, Stevenson, and Abdoli (2005) as they also used OSHA guidelines for their study. Classification of the posture (Table.5) Based on the 12 criteria s of neutral working postureadopted by the students the classification of posture was done into three categories i.e., poor, average and good. (Table.5).It was found that none of the students from both the school qualified for good category. It was alarming to find that 77.5% of students were falling under the poor category which fulfilled only 0 4 criteria and only22.5% of the total students were falling under average category fulfilling 5-8 criteria. Table.5. Classification of Posture based on postural score gained by student with respect to 12 criteria s of neutral posture School A(n = 60) School M(n = 60) A + M (n = 120) Classification of Posture Total (%) Total (%) Total (%) Poor (0-4) 44 (73.3%) 49 (81.7 %) 93 (77.5 %) Average (5 8) 16 ( 26.7%) 11 (18.3 %) 27 (22.5 %) Good (9 12) Total More number of girls was adopting poor posture and this could be due to the fact that even though the furniture of the school N was specially designed for the computer purpose, but the stools provided didn t match with the desk height. Whereas in boys school even though the desk height were higher compared to girls school, but the stools provided were also high, thus the boys scored comparatively good upper extremity score than girls (Table.5).Thus it can be
11 summarized that the children from both the schools are at the postural risk. Similar results were found byrocha et al, (2003) and Kanea, Pilcherb, legge (2006). Thus they will develop musculoskeletal problems in long run if some measures are not taken immediately. The workstation needs to be redesigned with the help of ergonomic guidelines for the students, so that risks are minimized, mismatch between the furniture and user is reduced and good posture is secured for the better future of these students. Table.6. Description of posture adopted by students and the RULA Scores. Number of students RULA Score Sr. Postures Photos of Photos of adopting such posture N adopted boys girls Total RULA o Boys Girls (%) Remark (33.4) Further Investigationchange soon (18.4) 6 Further Investigationchange soon ` 46 (38.4) 6 Further Investigationchange soon (10) Further Investigationchange may be needed
12 TOTAL (100%) None of the above posture assumed by the students can be said completely GOOD, because it was observed that their postural score of RULA range from 3 6. Majority of students (71.8%) adopted posture that put them in the RULA final score category of 5 and 6, where further investigation as well as some change needs to be done soon. Similar study by Kelly et al. (2009) using RULA found that majority of the students posture while working on computers was in the Action Level 2 (65%) & AL 3 (30%) with significant increase in discomfort after class. Also if the student had an appropriate upper extremity posture, than they were found with legs either dangling or less of knee angle, thus with poor lower extremity and vice versa. The previous tables have already proven that the student had adopted poor posture and were found stretching, bending, twisting and tilting their body in order to view monitor screen and to operate the large size input device. This can also be correlated to the mismatch of the furniture dimensions with respect to the dimensions of the students. Thus many workstation design drawbacks facilitated the student to adopt poor or non neutral posture thus leading to postural discomforts which may eventually lead to Computer Related Injuries if sustained for an extended duration. MAJOR FINDINGS Related to Classroom Furniture Mismatch between the computer furniture, equipments and the student s anthropometry forced them to adopt awkward posture. Seat height and desk height was found to be inappropriate with respect to students height. Thus most of the students sitting the edge of the seat. The underside of the leg (thighs) was getting pressed while seating, with their legs either dangling or supported on legs of the high chair / stool. 50 % students hand resting on hard and sharp edge. Non adjustable furniture used by both primary and secondary school children. Related to Computer and input devices 2 to 4 students shared a computer, thus only few students had computer monitor and input devices within their easy reach Most of monitor placed above the sitting eye level. Input device were of adult sized and were place above the recommended waist height while sitting.
13 Related to Computer Accessories None of the schools provided wrist/ palm support, document holder, space for writing, space for keeping books/ bags and footrest. Related to Teachers Teachers were not aware about computer ergonomics and its application. Teachers were not having sufficient time to attend to all the students, as teacher student ratio was approximately 1:30. No health & Safety instructions, in use & arrangement of computer and its furniture were given to students and teachers. Students were made to sit roll number wise or randomly on computers. CONCLUSION Computers are being used increasingly by people of all ages. They are also becoming an important educational medium in the school system in the Asian countries. The schools are rapidly applying this technology in schools at very early age. The last generations of children barely touched computers and were therefore at little risk. Today skids will be exposed to prolonged periods of computer for all their childhood and also their adulthood. Unless we quickly develop some accurate and valid guidelines for the use of computers by children and see them implemented, we risk permanent scarring of a generation of children. So emphasis needs to be placed on teaching children how to properly use the computers and the workstations. Considering the magnitude of the problem, the study was undertaken to evaluate the existing computer workstation design for primary school children, amount of time spent and the posture adopted.the findings showed that due to the high seat height and desk height the students were forced to assume awkward and poor posture while working on computers. Student s feet were unable to reach the ground, thus many students had their legs dangling which may lead to an increase in tissue pressure on the posterior aspect of the thighs. Also it was commonly found that students placed their buttocks forward on the edge of the seat, especially while typing and working on computers. Due to high table height the students were forced to lift their arms and shoulders or bent their wrist while operating the input device. Over that, 2 to 4 students shared a computer, thus only few students had computer monitor and input devices within their easy reach. Twisting of neck and back, bending neck and back, stretching of trunk, extended hands, stooping, and leaning of back, neck, trunk or legs were commonly adopted. Even while not operating computers, student kept adopting awkward posture.
14 The findings of posture were quite alarming as it was observed that none of the student fulfilled all the criteria s of neutral working posture. On further analysis based on the classification of posture developed by the researcher confirmed that 77.5% of students adopted poor posture, indicating the postural risk and musculoskeletal problem in near future. RULA score also ranged from 5 6 for around 71.8% of population thus indicating further Investigation and changes required very soon. The duration of computer work often is relatively short. However, as computer use becomes more intense both at school and at home, the consequences of these mismatches between the furniture and the children and the resulting poor postures may become more serious. Teaching children good computer habits now will protect them from a future of painful injury. Tomorrow s Worker is in today s schools. Thus proper attention has to be paid on their workstation, which will help to prevent computer related problems in the future. RECOMMENDATION Recommendation for the Teachers Train Teachers about computer ergonomics including workstation setup, good working posture and good computing habits. If good computing skills are taught to students while introducing computers from early age, then it will help reduce the magnitude of computer related problems in later life. As students are not aware about their working posture, teachers can act as a mentor to teach them good computer habits and skills. Provide Proper sitting height Teacher should make student sit at an appropriate height (i.e., when typing on keyboard, the hands should be at or slightly below sitting waist height). If the hands are found to be above waist height, teacher can increase the seat height and provide proper footrest to support dangling legs. Recommendation for the Administrators Split level desk with a lower surface for placement of keyboard and mouse, and a higher surface for the monitor is a better option. Edges to rest the arm should be soft, smooth and rounded, Provide Kids size computer device, wrist rest/ arm supportand the document holders as per the requirement. Saddle type of stool can also be suggested in place of normal stool since they are height adjustable and also will keep the student in upright sitting posture, thus reducing the need of back rest. Different height of footring in the stool is a good option if footrest cannot be provided.
15 Fig 3.Simple and economic stools Fig 4. Adjustable, padded Chair with backrest Fig 5. Sit Stand Workstation Fig 6. Split level desk (Acknowledgement) I would like to thank all the students, whose cooperation made this study possible. Thanks to both the schools and their teachers for their support. Special thanks to my loving Mom and my family.
16 References Cook, C., Burgess-Limerick, R., & Chang, S. (2000). The prevalence of neck and upper extremity musculoskeletal symptoms in computer mouse users. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 26(3), Cornell University Ergonomics Web,(1996). URLhttp://ergo.human.cornell.edu/cuvdtchecklist.html DeBell, M. and Chapman, C. (2003). Computer and Internet Use by Children and Adolescents in U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Washington, DC. Dockrell S, Earle D, Galvin R., (2010). Computer-related posture and discomfort in primary school children: The effects of a school-based ergonomic intervention. Computers & Education 55 (2010) Greig, A., Straker, L., & Briggs, A. (2002). The effect of individually adjusted workstations on upper quadrant posture and muscle activity in school children, Work 18(3), Hakala, P., Rimpela, A., Saarni, L. and Salminen, J. (2006). Frequent Computer-related Activities Increase the Risk of Neck-Shoulder and Low Back Pain in Adolescents. Eur. J. Pub. Health 16: Hedge, A. (2000). Workstation Ergonomic Guidelines use by the Children. Cornell University, NY, MSNBC Today Show. Jacobs, K., and Baker, N. (2002). The association between children s computer use and musculoskeletal discomfort. Work: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation, 18 (3) (2002), Jacobs, K., Hudak, S. and McGiffert, J. (2009) Computer-related Posture and Musculoskeletal Discomfort in Middle School Students. Work 32: Johnson, P.W., Blackstone J.M. (2007). Children and gender differences in exposure and how anthropometric differences can be incorporated into the design of computer input devices. Scandinavian Journal of Work Environmental Health, Supplement (3): Jones Chester S., and OrrBetsy. (1998). Computer-related musculoskeletal pain and Discomfort among high school students. American Journal of Health Studies: 14(1). Kanea P.J., M, Pilcherb., and S.J, Legg. (2006). Development of a Furniture System to Match Student Needs in New Zealand Schools. International Ergonomic Association. Kelly, G., Dockrell, S. and Galvin, R. (2009). Computer Use in School: Its effect on Posture and Discomfort in schoolchildren. Work 32:
17 Kroemer, K., &Grandjean, E. (1997). Fitting the Task to the Human (5th ed.). London: Taylor & Francis. McAtamney, L., Corlett, N., (1993). RULA: a survey method for the investigation of workrelated upper limb disorders. Applied. Ergonomics. 24, McGrane, S. (2001, January 4, 2001). Creating a Generation of Slouchers. New York Times. Mendels, P. (1999). Children Risk Computer Injuries, study warns. The New York Times. Posture checklist for computer users. URL - Murphy, C., Stevenson, J., and Abdoli, M., (2005). Children s Postural Habits While Working At Computer Workstations. ISB XXth Congress - ASB 29th Annual Meeting July 31 - August 5, Cleveland, Ohio. Noro, K., Okamoto, T. and Kojima, M. (1997). Computer Operation by Primary School Children in Japan - present condition and issues. Work With Display Units '97. Oates, S., Evans, G.W. and Hedge, A. (1998). An anthropometric & postural risk assessment of children s school computer work environments. Computers in the Schools, 14, Ontario Ministry of Labour. (2004). Computer Ergonomics: Workstation Layout and Lighting Professional and Specialized Services. URL: OSHA. (1997). Working Safely with Video Display Terminals (OSHA 3092). Washington DC: US Department of Labor. URL: [2002, August]. Patel P, Bhatnagar A, Rauf I, De A, Chauhan MK., (2013). Assessment of Primary School Children Working on Computer Workstation, HWWE-2012 Ergo 2012: Safety for All. Astral International Publishing House, Delhi. ISBN: Rocha, Lys Esther; Casarotto, Raquel Aparecida And Sznelwar, Laerte (2003). Ergonomics and the use of computers: a study with primary and secondary in state of São Paulo. Educ. Pesqui. [online], vol.29, n.1, pp ISSN. Straker, L., Harris, C. and Zandvliet, D. (2000). Scarring a Generation of Schoolchildren through poor Introduction of Information Technology. Proceedings of XIVth Triennial Congress- IEA, San Diego. Straker, L. (2001). Are Children at more Risk of Developing Musculoskeletal Disorders from Working with Computers or with Paper? Advances in Occupational Ergonomics and Safety (Amsterdam), Szeto, G., & Ng, J.K-F. (2000). A comparison of wrist posture and forearm muscle activities while using an alternative keyboard and a standard keyboard. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 10(3), Zandvliet, D.B. and Straker, L.M. (2001). Physical and Psychosocial aspects of the Learning Environment in Information Technology Rich Classrooms. Ergonomics, 44 (9):
University of the Sunshine Coast Ergonomic Self-Assessment Name: Date: This information and self-assessment is a general guide to the ergonomic set up of your workstation to minimise the risk of musculoskeletal
Preventing Overuse Injuries at Work The Optimal Office Work Station Use an adjustable chair with good lumbar support. Keep your feet flat on a supportive surface (floor or foot rest). Your knees should
This standard outlines general workstation and work practices to be followed in order to reduce the risk factors for developing musculoskeletal injuries (MSIs) and visual strain from working at computer
Loss Prevention Reference Note Adjusting the Computer Workstation Line of Sight Neck Posture Arm Posture Back Posture Adjustability Glare Viewing Distance Work Surfaces Mouse Position Leg Space Leg Support
SECTION 13- ERGOMICS 13.1 Ergonomic Procedure 13.2 Video Display Terminal (VDT) Checklist 13.3 Neutral Position Reviewed: May 2009, October 2008 Date Accepted: April 2002 Draft Date: December 2001 13.1
A User s GUIDE To Arranging Your Computer Workstation 1 In Are you comfortable at your workstation? today s office environment people often work on personal computers for an extended period of time. This
Schoolbags How heavy is too heavy? Person s Weight (lb.) Maximum Backpack Weight (lb.) 60 5 60-75 10 100 15 125 18 150 20 200 or more 25** ** No one should carry more than 25 lb. Ergonomics for Schoolchildren
Computer Workstation Assessment Tool University of New Hampshire Person evaluated Job Title Department Address Contact Number Date of evaluation Name of evaluator Check off the items that you observe to
Ergonomics for Schoolchildren and Young Workers Schoolchildren and Backpacks Schoolchildren everywhere are being asked to carry more and more weight around on their backs. There are many reasons why children
ERGONOMICS University at Albany Office of Environmental Health and Safety 2010 WHAT IS ERGONOMICS? From the Greek: ergon work and nomoi natural laws Defined by Webster as: Biotechnology WHAT IS ERGONOMICS?
Computer Workstation Ergonomic Self Evaluation Use this guidance to perform a preliminary evaluation of your workstation, and make any adjustments that are necessary to achieve a correct neutral posture.
A guide for employees This booklet has been developed as a guide to assist in the prevention of muscular discomfort and strain that can sometimes be associated with computer use. The information provided
Conducting an Office Ergonomics Audit Presented By: Kavita Chauhan, R.Kin, B.Sc. Kin & Hlth., Ergonomic Specialist ABOUT Inc. International Ergonomics Consulting & Training organization providing Professional
ERGONOMICS The goal of ergonomics is to reduce your exposure to work hazards. A hazard is defined as a physical factor within your work environment that can harm your body. Ergonomic hazards include working
COMPUTER ERGONOMICS Making Things a Little Easier COURSE OBJECTIVES Understand the definition of ergonomics Understand Primary Causes of Cumulative Trauma Disorders (CTDs). Understand ways to prevent CTDs
WORKPLACE ERGONOMICS This handout has the aim of preventing workplace injuries and covers: 1. Workstation tips and design 2. Exercises for rest breaks 3. Work station Set Up Checklists Sit with your bo
Computer, Ergonomics and Laptops Preventative approach Many people suffer unnecessary aches and pains when using computers, laptops and other types of electronic devices. Schools have a moral and legal
DISPLAY SCREEN EQUIPMENT SETTING UP AND USING THE WORKSTATION Adjusting the Workstation The workstation includes: the chair a footrest, if required the keyboard, mouse or other input devices the display
ROSA Rapid Office Strain Assessment Michael Sonne, MHK, CK. email@example.com Rapid Office Strain Assessment ROSA is a picture based posture checklist designed to quantify exposure to risk factors in
Ergonomics and Children: How to prevent Injury in the Classroom Professor Alan Hedge Cornell University Dept. Design & Environmental Analysis Ithaca, NY 14853-4401 Session presented at the National Ergonomics
Common Symptoms in the Office Environment and Proper Adjustments Shoulder Stress Improper postures of the shoulders and neck, such as shrugging (hunching shoulders up toward the ears), abduction (holding
RISK CONTROL SERVICES : from Liberty Mutual Insurance Ergonomic Tips for Computer Workstations, Laptops and Mobile Devices HIGHLIGHTS: How to create a good ergonomic match between operator and workstation
Presented by Fiona Wolfenden & Tessie Phan Aim To provide the user with the knowledge and skills to: Ergonomically setup their workstation Perform correct pause stretch exercises 2 Ergonomics Workplace
UN Medical Services in New York Configuring your Computer Workstation in 8 Steps This page contains a practical description of the best way how to configure your computer workstation yourself. MSD will
Ergonomic Solutions Adjusting your Workstation to Fit You Kelly Haidar Carol Schmeidler UB Environment, Health & Safety What This Isn t A Scientific Study The end-all, cure-all Infallible Guaranteed 100%
Office Workstation Checklist Can the workstation be adjusted to ensure proper posture by Yes No adjusting knee and hip angles to achieve comfort and variability supporting heels and toes on the floor or
Are you sitting safely?... Avoiding musculoskeletal problems during your thesis write-up Dr Chris Williams Email: firstname.lastname@example.org This session will cover: Risks of work-related upper limb
Ergonomics Checklist - Computer and General Workstations 1 Information to collect before conducting the Ergonomics Assessment 1. Evaluation Completed by 2. Date 3. Employee Name(s) observed 4. Department
Computer Workstation Ergonomics As we spend increasing amounts of time at our computer workstation, we need to be aware of how the design and arrangement of our equipment can impact our comfort, health,
Ergonomics is the science of adjusting environments, tasks, or procedures to fit you, the healthcare worker. When tasks or environments are not ergonomically designed, a hazard can be created. These hazards
Issue Date: April 2011 Review Date: April 2013 Page Number: 1 of 8 A well designed screen based workstation can help to reduce the risk of discomfort, pain and injury. The following checklist is provided
Evaluation and Design Strategy of an Upper Limb supporting for desktop work Ghi-Hwei Kao 1,2, a, Chia-Chi Tai 1, b, Chih-Hsi Ssu 1, c, Chin-Yuan Wang 1, d, Horng-Yi Yu 1, e 1 National Taipei University
Workplace Job Accommodations Solutions for Effective Return to Work Workplace Job Accommodations Solutions for Effective Return to Work Published by 102 275 Broadway Winnipeg, MB R3C 4M6 www.mflohc.mb.ca
Ergonomic Workplace Evaluation ISE 210, Human Factors and Ergonomics San Jose State University Fall 2003 Robert Murphy Table of Contents Introduction... 2 Task... 2 Equipment... 4 Workers... 5 Observations
Guidelines for Setting up your Computer Workstation Follow the steps below to set up your computer workstation. If you still have concerns about your workstation contact your local OSLO (Occupational Strains
Design & Environmental Analysis 670 Class Term Project Radiology Workplace Assessment Client Henry Ford Hospital - Radiology Department Coordinated by Carl Zylak Professor Alan Hedge Cornell University
CORE STRENGTH EXERCISES The main muscles involved with Core Strength include muscles of the abdomen, hip flexors and low back postural muscles. It is important to maintain proper strength of these muscles
The Importance of Proper Body Mechanics - Keeping Your Spine Healthy Body mechanics is a term used to describe the ways we move as we go about our daily lives. It includes how we hold our bodies when we
Stretch at Your Desk Program UT LivingWell Stretch at Your Desk Video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mslxjh0gtoq The HealthPoint Occupational Health Program is part of Human Resource Services, University
SETTING UP THE COMPUTER WORKSTATION TO FIT YOU TABLE OF CONTENTS Adjusting Your Chair...1 Adjusting an Adjustable Working Surface...2 Adjusting a Non-adjustable Working Surface...3 Adjusting Your Keyboard...3
Workstation Set-Up Appendix 1 This guidance supplements the Council s policy on display screen equipment. 1 Introduction 1.1 The correct workstation set-up can prevent, or alleviate, many of the problems
Elementary School Teachers' Working Comfort while Using Computers in School and at Home Inger M. Williams, Ph. D. Cergos Consultant in Computer Ergonomics for Offices and Schools Adjunct Assistant Professor,
Ergonomics in the Workplace Ergonomics in the Workplace 1 Introduction The purpose of this short guide is to provide information to the reader on the subject of Ergonomics. It also provides guidance on
SOAS, UNIVERSITY OF LONDON POLICY FOR THE USE OF DISPLAY SCREEN EQUIPMENT This policy sets out SOAS s responsibilities and procedures for ensuring the safe use of display screen equipment in accordance
Display Screen Equipment (DSE) Posture Guidance (including Agile Working) Avoid sustained static postures. Remember that even appropriate postures become inappropriate when maintained for too long. Move
Exercise 1: Knee to Chest Starting Position: Lie on your back on a table or firm surface. Action: Clasp your hands behind the thigh and pull it towards your chest. Keep the opposite leg flat on the surface
Workplace safety: lifting One of the biggest concerns in the workplace is lifting and loading. When you lift something, the load on your spine increases and your spine can only bear so much before it is
Obesity in the Office Obesity, which now afflicts a third of all American adults, has consequences in the workplace. Though normally not seen in epidemic proportions among office workers, it is no longer
Using ESA s Office Ergonomics Hazard Identification Checklist This checklist is designed to help you and your supervisor identify office based jobs or tasks with design-related hazards that may increase
OFFICE ERGONOMICS A Self-Assessment Guide Environmental Health and Safety Office safety.dal.ca REVISED 2013 The Dalhousie Safety Office produced this Guide to help faculty, staff and students create comfortable
UC Davis Health System - Computer Workstation Self Evaluation Assessment Date: Employee Name: Employee ID#: Department: Supervisor: Union Affiliation: Date of Hire (if new hire) Reason for Assessment (circle
Proper Workstation Setup A Step by Step Guide to help you organize your workstation and reduce the risk of injury Step 1 Review Work Habits Working in a stationary position for long periods will increase
The Eighth PanPacific Conference on Occupational Ergonomics (PPCOE 2007) October 79, 2007, Bangkok, Thailand ERGONOMIC INTERVENTION FOR IMPROVING WORK POSTURE DURING NOTEBOOK COMPUTER OPERATION Nuchrawee
1 Peper, E., & Gibney, K, H. (1999). Computer related symptoms: A major problem for college students. Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the Association for Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback.
HELPFUL HINTS FOR A HEALTHY BACK 1. Standing and Walking For correct posture, balance your head above your shoulders, eyes straight ahead, everything else falls into place. Try to point toes straight ahead
SOAS, UNIVERSITY OF LONDON POLICY FOR THE USE OF DISPLAY SCREEN EQUIPMENT This policy sets out SOAS s responsibilities and procedures for ensuring the safe use of display screen equipment in accordance
Fact sheet Exercises for older adults undergoing rehabilitation Flexibility refers to the amount of movement possible around a joint and is necessary for normal activities of daily living such as stretching,
Office Ergonomics Guidelines for preventing Musculoskeletal Injuries january 2010 Table of Contents introduction 4 The purpose of this guide Getting familiar with the jargon Good Posture versus Poor Posture
Stretching Exercises General Guidelines Perform stretching exercises at least 2 3 days per week and preferably more Hold each stretch for 15 20 seconds Relax and breathe normally Stretching is most effective
Hospital Emergency Room Ergonomic Evaluations & Recommendations Karleigh Burns Janna Burrows Chris Moe Lily Nirenberg Course taught by Professor Alan Hedge DEA 470, Spring 2004 Introduction Computers &
Office and Computer Workstation Ergonomics Margaret Cook PhD Occupational Health and Safety Science Programs Today s presentation What is the ideal workstation: Equipment: Seating/Chairs Sit/Stand/Active
AbilityNet Factsheet March 2015 Repetitive strain injury (RSI) in the workplace This factsheet looks at repetitive strain injury (RSI) the term most often used to describe the pain felt in muscles, nerves
ToThePOINT Best Practices LOSS CONTROL SERVICES Office Ergonomics A Critical Factor in Workplace Safety WORKER SAFETY The fastest growing category of workplace injury is a group of conditions called Musculoskeletal
Stretching in the Office Legs: Quads, Hamstrings, IT band, Hip flexors, Gluts, Calves Quads: Standing @ desk maintaining upright posture, grab one leg @ a time by foot or ankle and bring it towards backside
Ergonomics Program California State University Dominguez Hills RISK MANAGEMENT/ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH and OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY March 2012 1 Contents Introduction... 4 Purpose... 4 Responsibilities... 5 Managers...
Office Ergonomics A Practical Approachproach to Office Ergonomics ErgoSystems Consulting Group, Inc. Minneapolis, MN Voice: 952-401-9296 Web: www.ergosystemsconsulting.com Welcome to ErgoSystems! Who sits
Physical Capability Strength Test: One Component of the Selection Process One aspect of the Power Systems Institute selection process is to successfully complete and achieve a passing score on a physical
Fact Sheet: Occupational Overuse Syndrome (OOS) What is OOS? Occupational Overuse Syndrome (OOS) is the term given to a range of conditions characterised by discomfort or persistent pain in muscles, tendons
AbilityNet Factsheet September 2015 Repetitive strain injury (RSI) in the workplace This factsheet looks at repetitive strain injury (RSI) the term most often used to describe the pain felt in muscles,
Computer Workstations: Design & Adjustment Background This guideline outlines a practical approach for the optimal design and adjustment of computer workstations. The majority of University staff use a
Mike s Top Ten Tips for Reducing Back Pain The following article explains ways of preventing, reducing or eliminating back pain. I have found them to be very useful to myself, my clients and my patients.
E EXERCISE USING STRETCHES AND POSTURE PROMOTING ACTIVITIES! ERGO TIPS HOW? Chin Tuck Side Stretch Back Bend Shoulder Roll Tennis Elbow Stretch Loose Golfer Shoulder Stretch Hand Spread See ERGO-cise handout
Range of Motion A guide for you after spinal cord injury Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Program This booklet has been written by the health care providers who provide care to people who have a spinal
Laboratory ERGONOMICS UBC, Human Resources Workplace Health Services http://www.hr.ubc.ca/health/ergonomics/laboratory/ WorkSafe BC Statistics (2010): Research Labs Other 59% Injury Cost RSI 16% Overexertion
The ergonomics of tablet use in business applications An Ergonomic Solutions white paper by Melanie Swann MSc(Hons), Grad IOSH For more information and contact details, please go to ergonomic-solutions.net
Cardiac Rehab Program: Stretching Exercises Walk around the room, step side to side, ride a bike or walk on a treadmill for at least 5 minutes to warm up before doing these stretches. Stretch warm muscles
Kamla-Raj 2007 J. Hum. Ecol., 22(3): 235-244 (2007) Anthropometric Consideration for Designing Class Room Furniture in Rural Schools G. C. Khaspuri, S.K. Sau and P. C. Dhara* Ergonomics and Sports Physiology
Injury Prevention in the Library Workplace Why the human body and libraries don t mix and what to do about it Ryan O Connor Accredited Exercise Physiologist (AEP) BSc Ex. & Sports Science ESSAM Objectives
Do you sit at a desk all day? Does your 9 to 5 leave no time for structured exercise..? Staying healthy at work is easier than you might think: Try building the following desk based exercises into your
Your consent to our cookies if you continue to use this website.