Greene County, Virginia

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Greene County, Virginia"

Transcription

1 Greene County, Virginia Comprehensive Financial Review & Reservoir Project Analysis March 8, 2016 Member NYSE FINRA SIPC

2 Table of Contents 1 Credit Rating Overview 2 Financial Review 3 Existing Debt 4 Reservoir Project Greene County, Virginia Comprehensive Financial Review 1

3 Overview In preparation for the County s decision to proceed on the water reservoir project, Davenport & Company LLC, has undertaken a review of the County s Financial Health including but not limited to: Historic General Fund operating results; Fund balance levels; and, The County s current debt burden including future borrowing capacity. The Financial Review is designed to provide an assessment of the County s Financial Capacity on a once-in-ageneration project such as the reservoir. The Estimated cost of the Water Reservoir is in the $45-$65 million range. A project of this size will require the confidence of the Credit Markets and/or potential lenders. This analysis will also present multiple preliminary alternatives for capital funding of the reservoir. Greene County, Virginia Comprehensive Financial Review 2

4 Initial Observations At the upper end of the cost estimate, a potential $65 million bond issuance is approximately double the County s current outstanding debt. While Davenport would evaluate all financing alternatives, we believe the Water Reservoir Project would qualify as an eligible project for the Virginia Resources Authority s ( VRA ) pooled bond issuances. VRA will do an extensive credit review (as will other potential investors and lenders) for a project of this size and may require Greene County to receive an initial Issuer Credit Rating from the three National Credit Rating Agencies (Moody s, Standard & Poor s and Fitch). Additionally, VRA may require a Moral Obligation/Support Agreement from the County depending on the issuer of the bonds. Greene County, Virginia Comprehensive Financial Review 3

5 Credit Rating Overview Greene County, Virginia Greene County, Virginia Comprehensive Financial Review 4

6 Locally Rated Counties Warren County (Aa2/AA/AA) Fauquier County (Aa1/AA+/AA+) Rockingham County (Aa2/AAA/AA) Culpeper County (Aa2/AA+/AA) Spotsylvania County (Aa2/AA+/AA+) Albemarle County (Aaa/AAA/AAA) Botetourt County (Aa3/AA+) Appomattox County (Aa3/A+) Fluvanna County (Aa2/AA) Greene County, Virginia Comprehensive Financial Review 5

7 Rating Scale Moody's Credit Rating S&P Fitch Aaa AAA AAA Top Tier "Highest Possible Rating" Aa1 AA+ AA+ (Highest) Aa2 AA AA 2nd Tier "Very Strong (Middle) Aa3 AA- AA- (Lowest) A1 A+ (Highest) A2 A A 3rd Tier "Strong" (Middle) A3 A- A- (Lowest) Baa1 BBB+ BBB+ (Highest) 4th Tier "Adequate Baa2 BBB BBB (Middle) Capacity to Repay" Baa3 BBB- BBB- (Lowest) Considered Investment Grade BB, B, CCC, CC, C, D 5th - 10th Tiers "Below Investment Grade" Below Investment Grade Greene County, Virginia Comprehensive Financial Review 6

8 What are the Key Drivers to a Credit Rating? 1. Economic Base The Foundation of an Entity s Fiscal Health. Incorporation of local, regional and national economic factors. Demographic characteristics including population trends, employment and wealth levels. Tax base size, structure and diversity. Industry mix and composition of employment base. Local and regional patterns of Growth. 2. Financial Performance and Flexibility. Revenue and expenditure structure and patterns. Annual operating and budgetary performance. Financial leverage and fund balance position. Budgeting and long-term financial planning. Pension funding and insurance risk. 3. Debt Factors. Nature of pledged security and debt structure. Balance between accelerated debt issuance and under-investment in capital facilities. Debt burden measured against: Tax base. Total budget. 4. Management Factors. Range and growth of services provided in relation to capacity to provide services. Financial forecasting and management. Consistent and prudent budgeting practices. Adherence to long-range financial planning and policies. Greene County, Virginia Comprehensive Financial Review 7

9 Financial Review Greene County, Virginia Greene County, Virginia Comprehensive Financial Review 8

10 Strong Reserves Unassigned Fund Balance Unassigned Fund Balance Unassigned Fund Balance as a % of Expenditures Millions $20 $18 $16 $14 $12 $10 $8 $6 $4 $2 $ % 60.00% 50.00% 40.00% 30.00% 20.00% 10.00% 0.00% Unassigned Fund Balance Target General Fund Unassigned Fiscal Year General Fund Unassigned F und Balance General Fund Ex penditures Fund Balance as a % of Ex penditures Target ,937,902 33,788, % 20.00% ,749,748 28,946, % 20.00% ,324,141 26,739, % 20.00% ,171,461 27,648, % 20.00% ,267,167 26,413, % 20.00% ,472,630 33,871, % 20.00% ,540,316 31,785, % 20.00% ,199,735 32,977, % 20.00% In the General Fund, the County strives to maintain an unassigned fund balance to be used for unanticipated emergencies of approximately 20% of the actual GAAP basis expenditures and other financing sources and uses. Source: Greene County s 2015 CAFR. Greene County, Virginia Comprehensive Financial Review 9

11 Importance of Unassigned Fund Balance Why is maintaining a healthy unassigned/undesignated fund balance important? Provides comfort to potential lenders and the rating agencies as it relates to the County s financial strength / flexibility and thus allows the County to obtain competitive financing. Provides funds for unforeseen expenditures or revenue shortfalls that occur during a fiscal year. Provides funds for emergency situations (i.e. natural disaster). Allows for bond funded capital projects to begin prior to having borrowed funds on hand. Provides adequate month-to-month cash-flow and eliminates the need for costly cash-flow borrowing. Greene County, Virginia Comprehensive Financial Review 10

12 Strong Reserves Unassigned Fund Balance Unassigned Fund Balance Unassigned Fund balance as a % of Revenues Greene County, VA (NR) Greene County, VA (NR) National Aa1 Median National Aa2 Median National Aa3 Median National Aa1 Median National Aa2 Median National Aa3 Median Virginia Aa1 Median Virginia Aa2 Median Virginia Aa3 Median Virginia Aa1 Median Virginia Aa2 Median Virginia Aa3 Median Albemarle County, VA (AAA) Rockingham County, VA (Aa2) Orange County, VA (NR) Madison County, VA (NR) Albemarle County, VA (AAA) Rockingham County, VA (Aa2) Orange County, VA (NR) Madison County, VA (NR) $- $10,000,000 $20,000,000 $30,000,000 $40,000,000 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% Source: Moody s Investor Service Municipal Finance Ratio Analysis. Note: While the County s Fund Balance Policy uses expenditures as the base for calculating reserves, the following utilizes revenues as the base for comparability purposes. Greene County, Virginia Comprehensive Financial Review 11

13 Assessed Value Comparison Assessed value per capita is a measure of wealth and an important metric to the credit markets in determining ability to pay. Assessed Value Assessed Value Per Capita Greene County, VA (NR) Greene County, VA (NR) National Aa1 Median National Aa2 Median National Aa3 Median Virginia Aa1 Median Virginia Aa2 Median Virginia Aa3 Median Albemarle County, VA (AAA) Rockingham County, VA (Aa2) Orange County, VA (NR) Madison County, VA (NR) $0 $5 $10 $15 $20 $25 Billions National Aa1 Median National Aa2 Median National Aa3 Median Virginia Aa1 Median Virginia Aa2 Median Virginia Aa3 Median Albemarle County, VA (AAA) Rockingham County, VA (Aa2) Orange County, VA (NR) Madison County, VA (NR) $0 $30,000 $60,000 $90,000 $120,000 $150,000 $180,000 Source: Moody s Investor Service Municipal Finance Ratio Analysis. Greene County, Virginia Comprehensive Financial Review 12

14 Demographic Profile Wealth Levels Relatively high income supports ability to pay from a lender/investor perspective. Per Capita Income Median Family Income Greene County, VA (NR) Greene County, VA (NR) National Aa1 Median National Aa2 Median National Aa3 Median National Aa1 Median National Aa2 Median National Aa3 Median Virginia Aa1 Median Virginia Aa2 Median Virginia Aa3 Median Virginia Aa1 Median Virginia Aa2 Median Virginia Aa3 Median Albemarle County, VA (AAA) Rockingham County, VA (Aa2) Orange County, VA (NR) Madison County, VA (NR) Albemarle County, VA (AAA) Rockingham County, VA (Aa2) Orange County, VA (NR) Madison County, VA (NR) $0 $10,000 $20,000 $30,000 $40,000 $0 $20,000 $40,000 $60,000 $80,000 $100,000 $120,000 Source: Moody s Investor Service Municipal Finance Ratio Analysis. Greene County, Virginia Comprehensive Financial Review 13

15 Rate Comparison Residential Water & Sewer Rate at 5,000 gal/month EPA Affordability Guidelines Water and sewer bills deemed affordable up to 4% of median household income. Rapidan Service Authority Rapidan Service Authority (Greene County) Virginia Average Greene County MHI ~ $60,000 4% equates to $200 per moth water and sewer bill. Albemarle County Service Authority Augusta County Service Authority Louisa County Water Authority Rivanna Water & Sewer Authority Rockingham County Water & Sewer $- $20 $40 $60 $80 $100 Residential Water Rate 5,000 gal/month Rapidan Service Authority Rapidan Service Authority (Greene County) Residential Wastewater Rate 5,000 gal/month Rapidan Service Authority Rapidan Service Authority (Greene County) Virginia Average Virginia Average Albemarle County Service Authority Augusta County Service Authority Louisa County Water Authority Rivanna Water & Sewer Authority Rockingham County Water & Sewer $- $5 $10 $15 $20 $25 $30 $35 $40 Albemarle County Service Authority Augusta County Service Authority Louisa County Water Authority Rivanna Water & Sewer Authority Rockingham County Water & Sewer $- $10 $20 $30 $40 $50 $60 Source: Draper Aden 2015 Rate Study. Greene County, Virginia Comprehensive Financial Review 14

16 Debt Management Greene County, Virginia Greene County, Virginia Comprehensive Financial Review 15

17 Observations on Existing County Debt Greene County currently has $38.5 million of total outstanding debt. This debt is split relatively evenly between general government and utilities. All debt is retired rapidly, which provides capacity (see following page) to address future needs. Rating agencies and investors/lenders focus primarily on tax-supported debt (i.e. that which is supported from general tax revenue versus that supported from rates and charges.) Presently, all of the County s debt would be deemed tax-supported. Some debt, but not all, may be self supporting from Facility Fees. One of the key challenges for the Water Reservoir Project will be to determine if it should be funded from general revenues, or solely from rates and charges, or a mixture of the two. Greene County, Virginia Comprehensive Financial Review 16

18 Debt Capacity vs. Debt Affordability Debt Capacity versus Debt Affordability: Debt Capacity: The amount of debt the County can incur while staying within prudent financial guidelines. Think of Debt Capacity as the credit card limit. Debt Capacity is commonly measured by Debt to Assessed Value. Debt Affordability: The ability of the County to repay debt obligation with cash flow. Think of Debt Affordability as the ability to pay the credit card s monthly bill. Debt Affordability is commonly measured by Debt Service to Budget. Greene County, Virginia Comprehensive Financial Review 17

19 Debt as a Percentage of Assessed Value 4.0% 3.5% 3.0% 2.5% 2.0% 1.5% 1.0% 0.5% 0.0% Debt as a Percentage of Assessed Value Historic General Government Debt Existing Debt Historic Water & Sewer Debt Existing Water & Sewer Debt Debt as a Percentage of Assessed Value Greene County, VA (NR) National Aa1 Median National Aa2 Median National Aa3 Median Virginia Aa1 Median Virginia Aa2 Median Virginia Aa3 Median Albemarle County, VA (AAA) Rockingham County, VA (Aa2) Orange County, VA (NR) Madison County, VA (NR) 0.00% 0.50% 1.00% 1.50% 2.00% 2.50% Source: Moody s Investor Service Municipal Finance Ratio Analysis. Note: Taxable assessed values are assumed to grow 2.0% annually beginning in Fiscal Year Greene County, Virginia Comprehensive Financial Review 18

20 Debt Service as a Percentage of Revenues Debt Service as Percentage of Revenues 14% 12% 10% 8% 6% 4% 2% 0% Debt Service as a Percentage of Revenues Historic General Government Debt Existing General Government Debt Historic Water & Sewer Debt Existing Water & Sewer Debt Greene County, VA (NR) National Aa1 Median National Aa2 Median National Aa3 Median Virginia Aa1 Median Virginia Aa2 Median Virginia Aa3 Median Albemarle County, VA (AAA) Rockingham County, VA (Aa2) Orange County, VA (NR) Madison County, VA (NR) 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% Source: Moody s Investor Service Municipal Finance Ratio Analysis. Note: Expenditures are assumed to grow 2.0% annually beginning in Fiscal Year Greene County, Virginia Comprehensive Financial Review 19

21 Payout Ratio Total Outstanding Debt 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Greene County 10-Year Payout Ratio Greene County, VA (NR) National Aa1 Median National Aa2 Median National Aa3 Median Virginia Aa1 Median Virginia Aa2 Median Virginia Aa3 Median Albemarle County, VA (AAA) Rockingham County, VA (Aa2) Orange County, VA (NR) Madison County, VA (NR) 10-Year Payout Ratio 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Source: Moody s Investor Service Municipal Finance Ratio Analysis. Greene County, Virginia Comprehensive Financial Review 20

22 Existing Water & Sewer Debt Exisiting Water & Sewer Debt Service FY Principal Interest Total Payout Ratio 2016 $1,214,152 $934,422 $2,148, % ,230, ,258 2,112, % ,311, ,235 2,134, % ,336, ,206 2,099, % ,303, ,553 2,005, % ,361, ,197 2,001, % ,429, ,521 2,003, % ,493, ,831 1,995, % ,571, ,299 1,996, % ,656, ,091 2,000, % ,741, ,615 2,001, % , , , % , , , % , , , % , , , % , , , % ,000 96, , % ,000 76, , % ,000 55, , % ,000 34, , % ,000 11, , % Total $21,141,799 $7,920,754 $29, 062, 553 Millions $2.5 $2.0 $1.5 $1.0 $0.5 $0.0 Existing Water & Sewer Debt Principal Interest Current 10-Year payout for utility debt is high at 66%. Industry median is 40% according to Fitch Ratings. Greene County, Virginia Comprehensive Financial Review 21

23 Reservoir Project Greene County, Virginia Greene County, Virginia Comprehensive Financial Review 22

24 Potential Structures Status Quo Approach County backs debt service for reservoir Use of Facility Fees and taxes retire debt Rapidan Service Authority (RSA) operates facilities RSA bills users Establish Enterprise Fund County enters water business Develop rates, fees, and charges to support water operations Hybrid Approach County takes larger role in RSA County becomes regional water provider (i.e. Rivanna Water & Sewer Authority) Greene County, Virginia Comprehensive Financial Review 23

25 Facility Fees Available Revenue Under the current rate structure, regardless of the user s consumption level, the Rapidan Service Authority charges a minimum $10 Facility Fee to Greene County residents and $20 to businesses. May wish to evaluate other approaches. The agreement between Greene County and RSA requires the County to put the EDU Capacity charges in separate water and sewer enterprise funds, this does not hold for the Facility Fee The Facility Fee generates approximately $360,000 annually. Assuming Level Debt Service over 30 years at an interest rate of 5.00%, the current facility fee revenue can support a roughly $5.5 million bond issuance. For every $10 increase in the facility fee, the County can support about an additional $5.5 million of debt from the increased revenues. FY Estimated Debt Service Principal Interest Total 2016 $83,296 $276,704 $360, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,638 91, , ,069 77, , ,173 63, , ,982 49, , ,531 33, , ,857 17, ,000 Total $5,534,082 $5,265,918 $10,800,000 Greene County, Virginia Comprehensive Financial Review 24

26 Key Assumptions Case 1 Greene County, Virginia (the County ) is currently in the planning stages for a potential debt issuance for a Water Reservoir Project (the Project ). In order to see the effect of a potential new debt issuance, Davenport analyzed a $65 million borrowing for the Project. At this time, Davenport has assumed the following: Participation in the Virginia Resources Authority s ( VRA ) 2016 Fall Pool; Level debt service (payments) structure; 30 years amortization; and, 5.00% Interest Rate (inclusive of annual administration fee). Greene County, Virginia Comprehensive Financial Review 25

27 Estimated Debt Service Case 1 Reservoir Project FY Principal Interest Total 2017 $1,165,000 $3,004,208 $4,169, ,005,000 3,166,625 4,171, ,055,000 3,115,125 4,170, ,110,000 3,061,000 4,171, ,165,000 3,004,125 4,169, ,225,000 2,944,375 4,169, ,290,000 2,881,500 4,171, ,355,000 2,815,375 4,170, ,425,000 2,745,875 4,170, ,495,000 2,672,875 4,167, ,575,000 2,596,125 4,171, ,655,000 2,515,375 4,170, ,740,000 2,430,500 4,170, ,825,000 2,341,375 4,166, ,920,000 2,247,750 4,167, ,020,000 2,149,250 4,169, ,125,000 2,045,625 4,170, ,230,000 1,936,750 4,166, ,345,000 1,822,375 4,167, ,465,000 1,702,125 4,167, ,595,000 1,575,625 4,170, ,725,000 1,442,625 4,167, ,865,000 1,302,875 4,167, ,015,000 1,155,875 4,170, ,165,000 1,001,375 4,166, ,330, ,000 4,169, ,500, ,250 4,168, ,680, ,750 4,168, ,870, ,000 4,170, ,065, ,625 4,166,625 Total $65,000,000 $60,074,333 $125,074,333 Greene County, Virginia Comprehensive Financial Review 26

28 Impact on Key Debt Ratios Case 1 Debt as a Percentage of Assessed Value Debt Service as a Percentage of Revenues 6.0% 30% 5.0% 25% 4.0% 20% 3.0% 15% 2.0% 10% 1.0% 5% 0.0% 0% Historic General Government Debt Existing Debt Historic General Government Debt Existing General Government Debt Historic Water & Sewer Debt Existing Water & Sewer Debt Historic Water & Sewer Debt Existing Water & Sewer Debt Potential New Money Debt Potential New Money Debt Greene County, Virginia Comprehensive Financial Review 27

29 Cash Flow Impact Existing Debt Service Projected $65 Million Reservoir Total Estimated Debt Service Total Revenues Available* Additional Revenues Needed 2016 $4,403,269 $0 $4,403,269 $4,403, ,171,754 4,169,208 8,340,962 4,403,269 3,937, ,144,823 4,171,625 8,316,448 4,403,269 3,913, ,761,483 4,170,125 7,931,608 4,403,269 3,528, ,300,024 4,171,000 7,471,024 4,403,269 3,067, ,284,446 4,169,125 7,453,571 4,403,269 3,050, ,269,171 4,169,375 7,438,546 4,403,269 3,035, ,248,503 4,171,500 7,420,003 4,403,269 3,016, ,237,491 4,170,375 7,407,866 4,403,269 3,004, ,187,813 4,170,875 7,358,688 4,403,269 2,955, ,130,481 4,167,875 7,298,356 4,403,269 2,895, ,857,648 4,171,125 6,028,773 4,403,269 1,625, ,697,298 4,170,375 5,867,673 4,403,269 1,464, ,076,892 4,170,500 5,247,392 4,403, , ,997 4,166,375 5,130,372 4,403, , ,184 4,167,750 5,135,934 4,403, , ,075 4,169,250 5,132,325 4,403, , ,300 4,170,625 5,136,925 4,403, , ,791 4,166,750 5,124,541 4,403, , ,755 4,167,375 5,130,130 4,403, , ,410 4,167,125 5,122,535 4,403, , ,040 4,170,625 4,513,665 4,403, , ,167,625 4,167,625 4,403, ,167,875 4,167,875 4,403, ,170,875 4,170,875 4,403, ,166,375 4,166,375 4,403, ,169,000 4,169,000 4,403, ,168,250 4,168,250 4,403, ,168,750 4,168,750 4,403, ,170,000 4,170,000 4,403, ,166,625 4,166,625 4,403,269 Millions $9 $8 $7 $6 $5 $4 $3 $2 $1 $0 Existing & Projected Tax-Supported Debt Service Existing Debt Service Projected $65 Million Reservoir Total Revenues Available* Total $50,851,646 $125,074,333 $175,925,979 *Total Revenues available is estimated based on 2016 Debt Service. Greene County, Virginia Comprehensive Financial Review 28

30 Tax-Equivalent/Facility Fee Impact Case 1 FY Debt Service Requirements Projected Existing Tax- $65 Million Supported Reservoir Total Debt Service Debt Service Existing DS Budget Total Revenue Available for Debt Service Debt Service Cash Flow Surplus (Deficit) Revenue Adjusted Estimated Surplus/ from Prior Surplus/ Incremental Tax (Deficit) Tax Increase (Deficit) Equivalent ,403, ,403,269 4,403, ,171,754 4,169,208 8,340,962 4,403,269 (3,937,693) - (3,937,693) ,144,823 4,171,625 8,316,448 4,403,269 (3,913,179) 3,937,693 24, ,761,483 4,170,125 7,931,608 4,403,269 (3,528,340) 3,937, , ,300,024 4,171,000 7,471,024 4,403,269 (3,067,755) 3,937, , ,284,446 4,169,125 7,453,571 4,403,269 (3,050,302) 3,937, , ,269,171 4,169,375 7,438,546 4,403,269 (3,035,277) 3,937, , ,248,503 4,171,500 7,420,003 4,403,269 (3,016,735) 3,937, , ,237,491 4,170,375 7,407,866 4,403,269 (3,004,597) 3,937, , ,187,813 4,170,875 7,358,688 4,403,269 (2,955,419) 3,937, , ,130,481 4,167,875 7,298,356 4,403,269 (2,895,087) 3,937,693 1,042, ,857,648 4,171,125 6,028,773 4,403,269 (1,625,505) 3,937,693 2,312, ,697,298 4,170,375 5,867,673 4,403,269 (1,464,404) 3,937,693 2,473, ,076,892 4,170,500 5,247,392 4,403,269 (844,124) 3,937,693 3,093, ,997 4,166,375 5,130,372 4,403,269 (727,103) 3,937,693 3,210, ,184 4,167,750 5,135,934 4,403,269 (732,666) 3,937,693 3,205, ,075 4,169,250 5,132,325 4,403,269 (729,056) 3,937,693 3,208, ,300 4,170,625 5,136,925 4,403,269 (733,656) 3,937,693 3,204, ,791 4,166,750 5,124,541 4,403,269 (721,273) 3,937,693 3,216, ,755 4,167,375 5,130,130 4,403,269 (726,861) 3,937,693 3,210, ,410 4,167,125 5,122,535 4,403,269 (719,266) 3,937,693 3,218, ,040 4,170,625 4,513,665 4,403,269 (110,396) 3,937,693 3,827, ,167,625 4,167,625 4,403, ,644 3,937,693 4,173, ,167,875 4,167,875 4,403, ,394 3,937,693 4,173, ,170,875 4,170,875 4,403, ,394 3,937,693 4,170, ,166,375 4,166,375 4,403, ,894 3,937,693 4,174, ,169,000 4,169,000 4,403, ,269 3,937,693 4,171, ,168,250 4,168,250 4,403, ,019 3,937,693 4,172, ,168,750 4,168,750 4,403, ,519 3,937,693 4,172, ,170,000 4,170,000 4,403, ,269 3,937,693 4,170, ,166,625 4,166,625 4,403, ,644 3,937,693 4,174, Note: Raising the real estate tax rate by 21 cents would be approximately equal to increasing the Facility Fee from $10 to $110. Total Equivalent Tax Im pact: 21.0 Greene County, Virginia Comprehensive Financial Review 29

31 Key Assumptions Case 2 At this time, Davenport has assumed the following: 5 Year Bond Anticipation Note with 36 months of capitalized interest; Permanent Financing/Takeout of the BAN in Year 5; 5 years interest only; Structured Principal the next 5 years; and, Level Debt Service (payments) for the remaining 15 years. 5.00% Interest Rate under all scenarios. The surplus generated from the decline in debt service in Fiscal Years used to downsize the issue. Greene County, Virginia Comprehensive Financial Review 30

32 Estimated Debt Service Case 2 Reservoir Project FY Principal Interest Capitalized Int. Total 2017 $0 $3,493,000 $3,493,000 $ ,742,500 3,742, ,742,500 3,742, ,742, ,742, ,742, ,742, ,742, ,742, ,742, ,742, ,742, ,742, ,742, ,742, ,742, ,742, ,450,000 3,706, ,156, ,705,000 3,627, ,332, ,435,000 3,523, ,958, ,575,000 3,398, ,973, ,710,000 3,266, ,976, ,835,000 3,127, ,962, ,085,000 2,979, ,064, ,255,000 2,821, ,076, ,420,000 2,654, ,074, ,600,000 2,479, ,079, ,775,000 2,294, ,069, ,970,000 2,101, ,071, ,175,000 1,897, ,072, ,385,000 1,683, ,068, ,610,000 1,458, ,068, ,850,000 1,222, ,072, ,095, , ,068, ,360, , ,072, ,635, , ,072, ,925, , ,073,125 Total $74,850,000 $81,688, 250 $10,978,000 $145,560,250 Greene County, Virginia Comprehensive Financial Review 31

33 Impact on Key Debt Ratios Case 2 6.0% Debt as a Percentage of Assessed Value 25% Debt Service as a Percentage of Revenues 5.0% 20% 4.0% 3.0% 2.0% 15% 10% 1.0% 5% 0.0% 0% Historic General Government Debt Existing Debt Historic Water & Sewer Debt Existing Water & Sewer Debt Potential New Money Debt Historic General Government Debt Existing General Government Debt Historic Water & Sewer Debt Existing Water & Sewer Debt Potential New Money Debt Greene County, Virginia Comprehensive Financial Review 32

34 Cash Flow Impact Case 2 Existing Debt Service Projected $65 Million Reservoir Total Estimated Debt Service Total Revenues Available* Additional Revenues Needed 2016 $4,403,269 $0 $4,403,269 $4,403, ,171, ,171,754 4,403,269 (231,515) ,144, ,144,823 4,403,269 (258,446) ,761, ,761,483 4,403,269 (641,785) ,300,024 3,742,500 7,042,524 4,403,269 2,639, ,284,446 3,742,500 7,026,946 4,403,269 2,623, ,269,171 3,742,500 7,011,671 4,403,269 2,608, ,248,503 3,742,500 6,991,003 4,403,269 2,587, ,237,491 3,742,500 6,979,991 4,403,269 2,576, ,187,813 3,742,500 6,930,313 4,403,269 2,527, ,130,481 3,742,500 6,872,981 4,403,269 2,469, ,857,648 5,156,250 7,013,898 4,403,269 2,610, ,697,298 5,332,375 7,029,673 4,403,269 2,626, ,076,892 5,958,875 7,035,767 4,403,269 2,632, ,997 5,973,625 6,937,622 4,403,269 2,534, ,184 5,976,500 6,944,684 4,403,269 2,541, ,075 5,962,875 6,925,950 4,403,269 2,522, ,300 6,064,875 7,031,175 4,403,269 2,627, ,791 6,076,375 7,034,166 4,403,269 2,630, ,755 6,074,500 7,037,255 4,403,269 2,633, ,410 6,079,000 7,034,410 4,403,269 2,631, ,040 6,069,625 6,412,665 4,403,269 2,009, ,071,000 6,071,000 4,403,269 1,667, ,072,375 6,072,375 4,403,269 1,669, ,068,375 6,068,375 4,403,269 1,665, ,068,500 6,068,500 4,403,269 1,665, ,072,000 6,072,000 4,403,269 1,668, ,068,375 6,068,375 4,403,269 1,665, ,072,000 6,072,000 4,403,269 1,668, ,072,125 6,072,125 4,403,269 1,668, ,073,125 6,073,125 4,403,269 1,669,856 Millions $8 $7 $6 $5 $4 $3 $2 $1 $0 Existing & Projected Tax-Supported Debt Service Existing Debt Service Projected $65 Million Reservoir Total Revenues Available* Total $50,851,646 $145,560,250 $196,411,896 *Total Revenues available is estimated based on 2016 Debt Service. Greene County, Virginia Comprehensive Financial Review 33

35 Tax-Equivalent/Facility Fee Impact Case 2 Debt Service Requirements Existing DS Budget Debt Service Cash Flow Surplus (Deficit) FY Projected Total Revenue Available Existing Tax- $65 Million Revenue Adjusted Estimated for Debt Service Surplus/ Supported Reservoir Total from Prior Surplus/ Incremental Tax (Budgeted 2016 Debt (Deficit) Debt Service Debt Tax Increase (Deficit) Equivalent Service) Service ,403, ,403,269 4,403, ,171, ,171,754 4,403, , , ,144, ,144,823 4,403, , , ,761, ,761,483 4,403, , , ,300,024 3,742,500 7,042,524 4,403,269 (2,639,255) - (2,639,255) ,284,446 3,742,500 7,026,946 4,403,269 (2,623,677) 2,639,255 15, ,269,171 3,742,500 7,011,671 4,403,269 (2,608,402) 2,639,255 30, ,248,503 3,742,500 6,991,003 4,403,269 (2,587,735) 2,639,255 51, ,237,491 3,742,500 6,979,991 4,403,269 (2,576,722) 2,639,255 62, ,187,813 3,742,500 6,930,313 4,403,269 (2,527,044) 2,639, , ,130,481 3,742,500 6,872,981 4,403,269 (2,469,712) 2,639, , ,857,648 5,156,250 7,013,898 4,403,269 (2,610,630) 2,639,255 28, ,697,298 5,332,375 7,029,673 4,403,269 (2,626,404) 2,639,255 12, ,076,892 5,958,875 7,035,767 4,403,269 (2,632,499) 2,639,255 6, ,997 5,973,625 6,937,622 4,403,269 (2,534,353) 2,639, , ,184 5,976,500 6,944,684 4,403,269 (2,541,416) 2,639,255 97, ,075 5,962,875 6,925,950 4,403,269 (2,522,681) 2,639, , ,300 6,064,875 7,031,175 4,403,269 (2,627,906) 2,639,255 11, ,791 6,076,375 7,034,166 4,403,269 (2,630,898) 2,639,255 8, ,755 6,074,500 7,037,255 4,403,269 (2,633,986) 2,639,255 5, ,410 6,079,000 7,034,410 4,403,269 (2,631,141) 2,639,255 8, ,040 6,069,625 6,412,665 4,403,269 (2,009,396) 2,639, , ,071,000 6,071,000 4,403,269 (1,667,731) 2,639, , ,072,375 6,072,375 4,403,269 (1,669,106) 2,639, , ,068,375 6,068,375 4,403,269 (1,665,106) 2,639, , ,068,500 6,068,500 4,403,269 (1,665,231) 2,639, , ,072,000 6,072,000 4,403,269 (1,668,731) 2,639, , ,068,375 6,068,375 4,403,269 (1,665,106) 2,639, , ,072,000 6,072,000 4,403,269 (1,668,731) 2,639, , ,072,125 6,072,125 4,403,269 (1,668,856) 2,639, , ,073,125 6,073,125 4,403,269 (1,669,856) 2,639, , Note: Raising the real estate tax rate by 14 cents would be approximately equal to increasing the Facility Fee from $10 to $73. Note: Any Additional revenues raised prior to 2020 can be used to downsize the takeout of the Bond Anticipation Note. Total Equivalent Tax Im pact: 14.1 Greene County, Virginia Comprehensive Financial Review 34

36 Enterprise Fund Approach Determine Enterprise Fund Revenue Requirements Operating budget (staffing, operation, administration) Capital investments (existing/future debt service) Reserve requirements Establishment of User Base Existing customer base Estimated quantities of water sales Forecast of future customers and water volumes Develop Financial Plan for Fund Beginning cash balances Current revenue streams Incremental revenues needs Develop rates, fees, and charges Greene County, Virginia Comprehensive Financial Review 35

37 Appendix Greene County, Virginia Greene County, Virginia Comprehensive Financial Review 36

38 Historic General Fund Results Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Revenues General Property Taxes $16,457,255 $16,630,394 $16,271,874 $17,202,455 $17,795,002 $18,093,338 Other Local Taxes 3,789,119 4,099,937 3,799,812 4,144,565 4,017,436 4,226,642 Permits, Privilege Fees & Regulatory Licenses 281, , , , , ,761 Fines & Forfeitures 183, ,098 79, , , ,057 Use of Money and Property 52,668 39,004 44,248 45,769 39,940 51,582 Charges for Services 2,258,311 1,919,950 2,207,860 2,266,141 2,251,331 2,429,070 Miscellaneous 200, , , , , ,391 Recovered Costs 7,955 17,003 10,863 11, , ,831 Intergovernmental 6,734,286 7,187,608 6,821,331 6,752,809 7,012,557 7,225,337 Total Revenues $29,965,007 $30,627,537 $29,651,467 $30,995,221 $31,892,977 $32,743,009 Expenditures General Government Administration $2,194,470 $2,289,610 $2,435,313 $2,456,653 $2,328,762 $2,469,394 Judicial Administration 651, , , , , ,349 Public Safety 5,260,704 5,770,110 5,706,798 6,159,573 6,483,005 6,691,754 Public Works 1,836,690 1,810,474 1,609,678 1,523,644 1,448,788 1,664,455 Health & Welfare 3,161,649 3,275,516 3,288,402 3,255,905 3,360,846 3,423,259 Education 8,642,007 9,362,405 9,733,700 11,554,274 13,131,659 12,741,966 Parks, Recreation & Cultural 498, , , , , ,156 Community Development 1,695,747 1,871,410 1,886,835 1,848,327 1,977,558 2,181,858 Nondepartmental 21,595 18,776 28,499 91,223 60,455 49,655 Capital outlays 1,369, , ,252 3,349, , ,305 Total Expenditures $25,331,724 $26,545,938 $26,183,167 $31,551,166 $30,778,581 $31,168,151 Excess (deficiency) of Revenues over Expenditures $4,633,283 $4,081,599 $3,468,300 ($555,945) $1,114,396 $1,574,858 Debt Service Principal Retirement $1,866,021 $1,913,782 $2,168,091 $1,812,188 $911,007 $1,035,199 Interest and Fiscal Charges 600, , , , ,756 71,063 Total Debt Service $2,466,192 $2,388,038 $2,721,550 $2,559,222 $1,039,763 $1,106,262 Other Financing Sources (Uses): Issuance of Notes Payable $0 $0 $0 $2,000,001 $0 $0 Issuance of Capital Leases 117, ,347 76, , , ,295 Transfers in 1,290, , , , Transfers out (1,190,107) (1,973,472) Total other financing sources (uses) $1,407,839 $1,102,137 $230,808 $2,320,630 ($1,006,947) ($1,809,177) Net change in fund balances $3,574,930 $2,795,698 $977,558 ($794,537) ($932,314) ($1,340,581) Fund Balance, Beginning of Year $9,918,981 $13,493,911 $16,289,609 $17,267,167 $16,472,630 $15,540,316 Fund Balance, End of Year $13,493,911 $16,289,609 $17,267,167 $16,472,630 $15,540,316 $14,199,735 Source: Greene County s CAFR. Greene County, Virginia Comprehensive Financial Review 37

39 Total Assessed Value Assessed Value of Taxable Real Property Billions $2.5 $2.0 $1.5 $1.0 $0.5 $ Real Estate Personal Property Public Service Assessed Value of Taxable Real Property Fiscal Year Real Personal Public Service Total Taxable Estate % Property % Corporation % Assessed Value % 2005 $997,124,352 N/A $86,977,145 N/A $36,472,249 N/A $1,120,573,746 N/A ,105,086,533 11% 94,736,819 9% 40,120,084 10% 1,239,943,436 11% ,367,588,892 24% 100,023,055 6% 29,459,777-27% 1,497,071,724 21% ,640,643,742 20% 106,142,606 6% 45,382,646 54% 1,792,168,994 20% ,793,032,015 9% 105,950,975 0% 41,346,332-9% 1,940,329,322 8% ,915,379,116 7% 103,821,194-2% 54,408,605 32% 2,073,608,915 7% ,894,195,815-1% 106,710,067 3% 54,004,950-1% 2,054,910,832-1% ,870,025,214-1% 110,638,820 4% 55,160,407 2% 2,035,824,441-1% ,823,328,015-2% 112,593,988 2% 58,554,406 6% 1,994,476,409-2% ,781,327,215-2% 111,246,053-1% 57,338,030-2% 1,949,911,298-2% ,795,290,615 1% 116,900,844 5% 60,309,478 5% 1,972,500,937 1% Source: Greene County s 2015 CAFR. Greene County, Virginia Comprehensive Financial Review 38

40 Summary of Debt Outstanding Summary of Greene County General Government & Schools Outstanding Issues Final Lender Year of Issue Type Pupose Original Issued Outstanding Maturity Rate(s) Call Date IDA of Greene County 2003 Rev Capital Improvement $1,170,500 7/31/2003 $372,400 10/15/ % Anytime VPSA 2011 G.O Schools $5,120,000 5/5/2011 $5,030,000 8/1/ % 8/1/2021 IDA of Greene County 2010 Rev N/A $811,329 12/20/2010 $635,308 12/15/ % N/A VPSA (QSCB) 2010 G.O Schools $2,470,000 7/8/2010 $1,860,000 6/15/ % Anytime Greene County 1995 G.O Schools $2,427,547 12/21/1995 $143,268 7/15/ % N/A Greene County 1997 G.O N/A $3,170,000 5/1/1997 $465,000 1/15/ % N/A Literary Loan 2007 G.O Schools $9,000,000 7/15/2007 $5,850,000 7/15/ % Anytime Literary Loan 1997 G.O Schools $5,000,000 7/1/1997 $1,000,000 7/1/ % Anytime Greene County 2006 Note Capital Improvement $218,207 7/24/2006 $39,154 7/24/ % Unkown Greene County 2007 Note Capital Improvement $600,000 4/5/2007 $205,862 4/5/ % Unkown Greene County 2013 Note Capital Improvement $2,000,000 5/5/2011 $1,750,338 8/1/ % Unkown TOTAL $17,351,330 Summary of Greene County Water & Sewer Outstanding Issues Final Lender Year of Issue Type Pupose Original Issued Outstanding Maturity Rate(s) Call Date VRA 2004 W&S Revenue Sewer $13,500,000 6/30/2004 $625,000 11/1/ % 11/1/2014 VRA 2011 W&S Revenue Sewer $8,110,000 11/16/2011 $8,110,000 11/4/ % 11/1/2021 VRA 2005 W&S Revenue Sewer $2,556,000 12/7/2005 $41,000 11/1/ % 11/1/2015 VRA 2005 W&S Revenue Water $7,864,000 12/7/2005 $204,000 11/1/ % 11/1/2015 VRA 2012 W&S Revenue Sewer $945,000 8/2/2012 $935,000 11/1/ % 11/1/2022 VRA 2012 W&S Revenue Water $2,890,000 8/2/2012 $2,860,000 11/1/ % 11/1/2022 RSA (VRA) (2) 2008 W&S Revenue Water & Sewer $3,600,000 6/19/2008 $402,000 11/1/ % 11/1/2018 RSA (VRA) (3) 2009 W&S Revenue Water & Sewer $1,780,000 6/17/2009 $1,385,000 11/1/ % 11/1/2019 RSA (VRA) (4) 2009 W&S Revenue Water & Sewer $8,210,000 6/17/2009 $2,059,795 11/1/ % 11/1/2019 VRA 2014 W&S Revenue Sewer $945,000 8/2/2012 $1,125,000 11/1/ % 11/1/2024 VRA 2014 W&S Revenue Water $3,445,000 7/29/2014 $3,395,005 11/1/ % 11/1/2024 Total $21,141,800 (1) Assumes these issues were currently calling the refunded bonds. (2) Greene County assumed 30% of the Rapidan Service Authority Issuance.Orginial amount shown is total issue but outsanding amount is Greene County Obligation. (3) Greene County assumed 100% of the Rapidan Service Authority Issuance. (4) Greene County assumed 33% of the Rapidan Service Authority Issuance.Orginial amount shown is total issue but outsanding amount is Greene County Obligation. Note: Blue shade denotes refunding opportunity. Greene County, Virginia Comprehensive Financial Review 39

41 Total Outstanding Debt Total Outstanding Debt Service FY Principal Interest Total Payout Ratio 2016 $2,939,581 $1,463,688 $4,403, % ,820,000 1,351,754 4,171, % ,902,218 1,242,605 4,144, % ,628,404 1,133,079 3,761, % ,260,909 1,039,114 3,300, % ,333, ,997 3,284, % ,411, ,043 3,269, % ,488, ,551 3,248, % ,581, ,563 3,237, % ,640, ,237 3,187, % ,691, ,801 3,130, % ,496, ,205 1,857, % ,382, ,434 1,697, % , ,892 1,076, % , , , % , , , % , , , % , , , % , , , % ,000 72, , % ,000 35, , % ,000 8, , % Millions $5.0 $4.5 $4.0 $3.5 $3.0 $2.5 $2.0 $1.5 $1.0 $0.5 $0.0 Total Outstanding Debt Principal Interest Total $38,493,129 $12,358,517 $50, 851, 646 Greene County, Virginia Comprehensive Financial Review 40

42 Existing General Government & Schools Debt Exisiting General Government & Schools Debt Service FY Principal Interest Total Payout Ratio 2016 $1,725,429 $529,266 $2,254, % ,589, ,496 2,059, % ,590, ,370 2,009, % ,291, ,873 1,662, % , ,561 1,294, % , ,800 1,282, % , ,522 1,265, % , ,721 1,253, % ,010, ,264 1,240, % , ,147 1,187, % , ,187 1,129, % , ,775 1,117, % , , , % , , , % ,000 98, , % ,000 87, , % ,000 76, , % ,000 64, , % ,000 51, , % ,000 38, , % ,000 23, , % ,000 8, , % Millions $2.5 $2.0 $1.5 $1.0 $0.5 $0.0 Existing General Government & Schools Debt Principal Interest Total $17,351,330 $4,437,763 $21, 789, 093 Greene County, Virginia Comprehensive Financial Review 41

43 Contact Information Richmond Headquarters One James Center 901 East Cary Street, Suite 1100, Richmond, Virginia Telephone: (804) Toll-Free: (800) Courtney E. Rogers Senior Vice President Douglas J. Gebhardt Associate Vice President Joseph D. Mason Senior Vice President Gary D. LeClair, Jr. Analyst Greene County, Virginia Comprehensive Financial Review 42

44 Disclaimer The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC ) has clarified that a broker, dealer or municipal securities dealer engaging in municipal advisory activities outside the scope of underwriting a particular issuance of municipal securities should be subject to municipal advisor registration. Davenport & Company LLC ( Davenport ) has registered as a municipal advisor with the SEC. As a registered municipal advisor Davenport may provide advice to a municipal entity or obligated person. An obligated person is an entity other than a municipal entity, such as a not for profit corporation, that has commenced an application or negotiation with an entity to issue municipal securities on its behalf and for which it will provide support. If and when an issuer engages Davenport to provide financial advisory or consultant services with respect to the issuance of municipal securities, Davenport is obligated to evidence such a financial advisory relationship with a written agreement. When acting as a registered municipal advisor Davenport is a fiduciary required by federal law to act in the best interest of a municipal entity without regard to its own financial or other interests. Davenport is not a fiduciary when it acts as a registered investment advisor, when advising an obligated person, or when acting as an underwriter, though it is required to deal fairly with such persons, This material was prepared by public finance, or other non-research personnel of Davenport. This material was not produced by a research analyst, although it may refer to a Davenport research analyst or research report. Unless otherwise indicated, these views (if any) are the author s and may differ from those of the Davenport fixed income or research department or others in the firm. Davenport may perform or seek to perform financial advisory services for the issuers of the securities and instruments mentioned herein. This material has been prepared for information purposes only and is not a solicitation of any offer to buy or sell any security/instrument or to participate in any trading strategy. Any such offer would be made only after a prospective participant had completed its own independent investigation of the securities, instruments or transactions and received all information it required to make its own investment decision, including, where applicable, a review of any offering circular or memorandum describing such security or instrument. That information would contain material information not contained herein and to which prospective participants are referred. This material is based on public information as of the specified date, and may be stale thereafter. We have no obligation to tell you when information herein may change. We make no representation or warranty with respect to the completeness of this material. Davenport has no obligation to continue to publish information on the securities/instruments mentioned herein. Recipients are required to comply with any legal or contractual restrictions on their purchase, holding, sale, exercise of rights or performance of obligations under any securities/instruments transaction. The securities/instruments discussed in this material may not be suitable for all investors or issuers. Recipients should seek independent financial advice prior to making any investment decision based on this material. This material does not provide individually tailored investment advice or offer tax, regulatory, accounting or legal advice. Prior to entering into any proposed transaction, recipients should determine, in consultation with their own investment, legal, tax, regulatory and accounting advisors, the economic risks and merits, as well as the legal, tax, regulatory and accounting characteristics and consequences, of the transaction. You should consider this material as only a single factor in making an investment decision. The value of and income from investments and the cost of borrowing may vary because of changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates, default rates, prepayment rates, securities/instruments prices, market indexes, operational or financial conditions or companies or other factors. There may be time limitations on the exercise of options or other rights in securities/instruments transactions. Past performance is not necessarily a guide to future performance and estimates of future performance are based on assumptions that may not be realized. Actual events may differ from those assumed and changes to any assumptions may have a material impact on any projections or estimates. Other events not taken into account may occur and may significantly affect the projections or estimates. Certain assumptions may have been made for modeling purposes or to simplify the presentation and/or calculation of any projections or estimates, and Davenport does not represent that any such assumptions will reflect actual future events. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that estimated returns or projections will be realized or that actual returns or performance results will not materially differ from those estimated herein. This material may not be sold or redistributed without the prior written consent of Davenport. Version 01/13/2014 GL/DJG/CR Greene County, Virginia Comprehensive Financial Review 43

Discussion Items Prepared for the Advisory Board

Discussion Items Prepared for the Advisory Board Discussion Items Prepared for the Advisory Board Albemarle County, Virginia July 29, 2015 Member NYSE FINRA SIPC The Role of a Financial Advisor The Role of the Financial Advisor includes but is not limited

More information

City of Rocky Mount, North Carolina

City of Rocky Mount, North Carolina Event Center Financing Discussion Materials City of Rocky Mount, North Carolina Member NYSE FINRA SIPC Event Center Financing Options City of Rocky Mount, NC 2 Event Center Project Overview The City is

More information

Debt Management. Debt Management

Debt Management. Debt Management Debt Management Capital Expenditures vs. Current Expenditures Local government expenditures can be broadly categorized as either current or capital. Generally, current expenditures are related to ongoing

More information

Mecklenburg County, North Carolina Debt Policy

Mecklenburg County, North Carolina Debt Policy Mecklenburg County, North Carolina Debt Policy Introduction Mecklenburg County recognizes that one of the keys to sound financial management is a debt policy. These benefits are recognized by bond rating

More information

DEBT MANAGEMENT. Capital vs. Current Expenditures

DEBT MANAGEMENT. Capital vs. Current Expenditures DEBT MANAGEMENT Capital vs. Current Expenditures Local government expenditures can be broadly categorized as either current or capital. Generally, current expenditures are related to on-going operations

More information

DEBT MANAGEMENT POLICY

DEBT MANAGEMENT POLICY Introduction New Hanover County recognizes that a formal debt policy is essential to effective financial management. Adherence to a debt management policy signals to rating agencies and the capital markets

More information

City of Philadelphia Debt Management Policy December 2009

City of Philadelphia Debt Management Policy December 2009 City of Philadelphia Debt Management Policy December 2009 I. INTRODUCTION While the issuance of debt is often an appropriate method of financing capital projects and major equipment acquisition, it needs

More information

DEBT MANAGEMENT POLICY ANNUAL UPDATE HUMBOLDT COUNTY, NEVADA

DEBT MANAGEMENT POLICY ANNUAL UPDATE HUMBOLDT COUNTY, NEVADA DEBT MANAGEMENT POLICY ANNUAL UPDATE HUMBOLDT COUNTY, NEVADA July, 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. ABILITY TO AFFORD EXISTING GENERAL OBLIGATION DEBT, AUTHORIZED FUTURE GENERAL OBLIGATION

More information

Debt Management Policy

Debt Management Policy Debt Management Policy Introduction One of the keys to sound financial management is the development of a debt policy. This need is recognized by bond rating agencies, and development of a debt policy

More information

Fiscal Year 2013-14 LAUSD Debt Report and Debt Management Policy Changes

Fiscal Year 2013-14 LAUSD Debt Report and Debt Management Policy Changes Fiscal Year 2013-14 LAUSD Debt Report and Debt Management Policy Changes Presentation to the Budget, Facilities and Audit Committee Office of the Chief Financial Officer May 7, 2015 District s Debt Policy

More information

Introduction to Municipal Bonds

Introduction to Municipal Bonds 2011 Fall Leadership Summit Marriott, Columbia, South Carolina September 27-28, 2011 Introduction to Municipal Bonds A. Reid Cavnar Senior Vice President Reid.cavnar@merchantcapital.com This document has

More information

Consolidated Debt Service. #254 Consolidated Debt Service

Consolidated Debt Service. #254 Consolidated Debt Service #254 Consolidated Debt Service Fund Overview This LOB provides for the debt service expenditures for the general obligation bonds of the County as well as the general obligation bonds for the Fairfax County

More information

LONG TERM OBLIGATION (LTO) FINANCING POLICY A Strategy for the Acquisition or Replacement of City Assets

LONG TERM OBLIGATION (LTO) FINANCING POLICY A Strategy for the Acquisition or Replacement of City Assets PURPOSE CITY OF LINDSBORG LONG TERM OBLIGATION (LTO) FINANCING POLICY A Strategy for the Acquisition or Replacement of City Assets The Long-Term Obligation Financing (LTO) Policy Statement sets forth comprehensive

More information

Process of Municipal Bond Debt Issuance

Process of Municipal Bond Debt Issuance Process of Municipal Bond Debt Issuance Public Financial Management, Inc. Asset Management LLC Advisors Public Financial Management, Inc. 221 W. 6 th St., Suite 1900 Austin, TX 78701 512.614.5325 5325

More information

Developing a Debt Management Policy

Developing a Debt Management Policy California Debt and Investments Advisory Commission The Mechanics of a Bond Sale Developing a Debt Management Policy David Persselin, City of San José Jo Mortensen, Public Resources Advisory Group March

More information

City of Philadelphia Debt Management Policy August 2015

City of Philadelphia Debt Management Policy August 2015 City of Philadelphia Debt Management Policy August 2015 I. INTRODUCTION While the issuance of debt is often an appropriate method of financing capital projects and major equipment acquisition, it needs

More information

Debt Management. Policy/Procedure. I. Purpose

Debt Management. Policy/Procedure. I. Purpose Debt Management Policy/Procedure I. Purpose This Debt Management Policy is designed to provide a useful framework by which decisions will be made concerning the use and management of debt but is not intended

More information

Understanding Fixed Income

Understanding Fixed Income Understanding Fixed Income 2014 AMP Capital Investors Limited ABN 59 001 777 591 AFSL 232497 Understanding Fixed Income About fixed income at AMP Capital Our global presence helps us deliver outstanding

More information

Request for Proposals for Underwriters Friday, January 2, 2015. Riverside Regional Jail Authority Series 2015 Jail Facility Revenue Refunding Bonds

Request for Proposals for Underwriters Friday, January 2, 2015. Riverside Regional Jail Authority Series 2015 Jail Facility Revenue Refunding Bonds One James Center 901 East Cary Street Suite 1100 Richmond, Virginia 23219 (804) 697-2900 Request for Proposals for Underwriters Friday, January 2, 2015 Riverside Regional Jail Authority Series 2015 Jail

More information

MEMORANDUM. Response to School Board Questions on Master Lease Program

MEMORANDUM. Response to School Board Questions on Master Lease Program MEMORANDUM To: From: RE: Vivian McGettigan Janet Romanchyk Joseph Mason David Rose Response to School Board Questions on Master Lease Program Date: July 31, 2007 cc: Christopher Kulp R.T. Taylor Davenport

More information

Financing Educational Infrastructure in Virginia

Financing Educational Infrastructure in Virginia Financing Educational Infrastructure in Virginia Evie Whitley, Director of Debt Management, Commonwealth of Virginia Deidre Jett, Program Manager, Virginia Public School Authority December 11, 2014 Financing

More information

City of San Diego General Fund Reserve Benchmark and Review

City of San Diego General Fund Reserve Benchmark and Review OFFICE OF THE INDEPENDENT BUDGET ANALYST REPORT Date Issued: September 20, 2012 IBA Report Number: 12-37 Budget and Finance Committee Date: September 26, 2012 Item Number: 5 City of San Diego General Fund

More information

FLUVANNA COUNTY, VIRGINIA

FLUVANNA COUNTY, VIRGINIA PRESENTATION TO: FLUVANNA COUNTY, VIRGINIA FINANCING UPDATE November 7, 2012 CAPITAL LEASES Sheriff Vehicles $256,750 Non-Bank Qualified Loan - Issued to BB & T - interest rate of 2.05% - Estimated loan

More information

DEBT MANAGEMENT POLICY

DEBT MANAGEMENT POLICY DEBT MANAGEMENT POLICY This policy sets forth the principles that will govern the use of debt to finance University capital projects and assigns responsibilities for the management of University debt.

More information

WEST BASIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT Debt Management Policy Administrative Code Exhibit G January 2015

WEST BASIN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT Debt Management Policy Administrative Code Exhibit G January 2015 1.0 Purpose The purpose of this Debt Management Policy ( Policy ) is to establish parameters and provide guidance as to the issuance, management, continuing evaluation of and reporting on all debt obligations.

More information

SKAGIT COUNTY DEBT POLICY. Page 1 of 12

SKAGIT COUNTY DEBT POLICY. Page 1 of 12 SKAGIT COUNTY DEBT POLICY Page 1 of 12 SKAGIT COUNTY DEBT POLICY INDEX Page I. Roles and Responsibilities 3 II. Debt and Capital Planning 3-4 III. Credit Objectives 4-5 IV. Purpose, Type and Use of Debt

More information

Rating Agency Changes and Updated Guidelines

Rating Agency Changes and Updated Guidelines Rating Agency Changes and Updated Guidelines North Carolina Local Government Investment Association 2015 Winter Conference Member NYSE FINRA SIPC February 10, 2015 Rating Agency Changes and Updated Guidelines

More information

March 14, 2014. RE: Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department Fiscal Year 2014 Financial Plan

March 14, 2014. RE: Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department Fiscal Year 2014 Financial Plan REGIONAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE 201 NORTH STONE AVENUE TUCSON, ARIZONA 857011207 March 14, 2014 The Honorable Chair and Members Pima County Board of Supervisors 130 West Congress Street,

More information

Debt Management Policies & Guidelines

Debt Management Policies & Guidelines Debt Management Policies & Guidelines January, 2004 PREPARED BY: ANDREW E. MEISNER, COUNTY TREASURER PATRICK M. DOHANY, COUNTY TREASURER I. COUNTY'S DEBT POLICY A. Purpose The County recognizes the foundation

More information

Section I. Introduction

Section I. Introduction Section I. Introduction Purpose and Overview In its publication entitled Best Practice Debt Management Policy, the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) states that Debt management policies are

More information

SunTrust Bank Higher Education Industry Update. March 25, 2015

SunTrust Bank Higher Education Industry Update. March 25, 2015 SunTrust Bank Higher Education Industry Update March 25, 2015 Using Click the orange arrow to show/hide the GoToWebinar toolbar To ask a question, simply enter your question here. SunTrust Bank Higher

More information

June, 2015 DEBT MANAGEMENT PLAN COUNTY OF ELKO, NEVADA

June, 2015 DEBT MANAGEMENT PLAN COUNTY OF ELKO, NEVADA June, 2015 DEBT MANAGEMENT PLAN COUNTY OF ELKO, NEVADA Introduction The County of Elko (the "County") has a Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) which is a multi-year planning document that identifies and prioritizes

More information

Preparing Your Fixed Income Portfolio for Rising Interest Rates

Preparing Your Fixed Income Portfolio for Rising Interest Rates fixed income portfolio august 2013 2 Bond Fundamentals 3 Products to Hedge Interest Rates 4 Strategies to Mitigate the Effect of Rising Rates 6 Investment Considerations Preparing Your Fixed Income Portfolio

More information

DEBT CAPACITY AND AFFORDABILITY

DEBT CAPACITY AND AFFORDABILITY SESSION ONE: DEBT CAPACITY AND AFFORDABILITY Danny Kim, Partner, Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP Nikolai J. Sklaroff, Director West Region, Public Finance, Wells Fargo Securities March 18, 2015 Riverside,

More information

MODEL DEBT MANAGEMENT POLICY

MODEL DEBT MANAGEMENT POLICY MODEL DEBT MANAGEMENT POLICY Use this model policy as a template in writing a Governmental Entity s policy. This policy is not all-inclusive, but addresses the basic areas and provides guidance concerning

More information

CASTAIC LAKE WATER AGENCY DEBT MANAGEMENT POLICY (WHOLESALE WATER SYSTEM) (Board Approved; Revised January 2012)

CASTAIC LAKE WATER AGENCY DEBT MANAGEMENT POLICY (WHOLESALE WATER SYSTEM) (Board Approved; Revised January 2012) CASTAIC LAKE WATER AGENCY DEBT MANAGEMENT POLICY (WHOLESALE WATER SYSTEM) (Board Approved; Revised January 2012) INTRODUCTION The Agency s overriding goal in issuing debt is to respond to, and provide

More information

Mobile County Commission Debt Management Policy Adopted February 27, 2012

Mobile County Commission Debt Management Policy Adopted February 27, 2012 Mobile County Commission Debt Management Policy I. Purpose The Mobile County Commission recognizes the foundation of any well-managed debt program is a comprehensive debt management policy. A debt management

More information

State Debt Management Presentation February 2013. Kristin A. Hanson, Assistant Commissioner, Treasury

State Debt Management Presentation February 2013. Kristin A. Hanson, Assistant Commissioner, Treasury State Debt Management Presentation February 2013 Kristin A. Hanson, Assistant Commissioner, Treasury What is a Bond? Municipal bonds are debt securities issued by states, cities, counties and other governmental

More information

Contra Costa County, California Debt Management Policy

Contra Costa County, California Debt Management Policy Contra Costa County, California Debt Management Policy County Administration 651 Pine Street, 10 th Floor Martinez, California 94553 925-335-1023 lisa.driscoll@cao.cccounty.us Resolution No. 2015/245 Resolution

More information

CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA DEBT MANAGEMENT PROCEDURES MANUAL

CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA DEBT MANAGEMENT PROCEDURES MANUAL CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA DEBT MANAGEMENT PROCEDURES MANUAL OVERVIEW This Procedures Manual has been drafted to assist in the development of goals, procedures for implementation and standards for reporting

More information

Debt Policy. I. Purpose of the Debt Policy

Debt Policy. I. Purpose of the Debt Policy Debt Policy I. Purpose of the Debt Policy In support of its mission, (University) maintains a long term strategic plan. The strategic plan establishes University wide priorities as well as divisional programmatic

More information

Virginia State University Policies Manual. Title: Debt Management Guidelines and Procedures Policy: 1500

Virginia State University Policies Manual. Title: Debt Management Guidelines and Procedures Policy: 1500 Purpose a. To provide guidance to Virginia State University in undertaking long-term debt obligations benefiting the University. b. To provide a structured framework for the issuance of long-term debt

More information

Debt Management Plan. Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012. www.maricopa.gov

Debt Management Plan. Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012. www.maricopa.gov Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012 www.maricopa.gov Maricopa County, Arizona Debt Management Plan Table of Contents INTRODUCTION TO DEBT... 1 Current Debt Situation... 1 Debt Issuance History... 2 Financing

More information

BUDGET AND FINANCIAL PLAN SUMMARY FILE

BUDGET AND FINANCIAL PLAN SUMMARY FILE REVENUE & FINANCING SOURCES Operating Revenues Charges for services Rental & financing income Last Year (Actual) 2014 Other operating revenues 0 Nonoperating Revenues Current Year (Estimated) 2015 Next

More information

Bonds, in the most generic sense, are issued with three essential components.

Bonds, in the most generic sense, are issued with three essential components. Page 1 of 5 Bond Basics Often considered to be one of the most conservative of all investments, bonds actually provide benefits to both conservative and more aggressive investors alike. The variety of

More information

Prospectus Baird Funds

Prospectus Baird Funds Prospectus Baird Funds May 1, 2014 Baird Ultra Short Bond Fund (Institutional Class: BUBIX) (Investor Class: BUBSX) Baird Short-Term Bond Fund (Institutional Class: BSBIX) (Investor Class: BSBSX) Baird

More information

Education Infrastructure: Financing K-12 Capital Projects in Virginia

Education Infrastructure: Financing K-12 Capital Projects in Virginia Education Infrastructure: Financing K-12 Capital Projects in Virginia Lisa Williams, Partner, McGuireWoods LLC Deidre Jett, Program Manager, Virginia Public School Authority, May 21, 2015 Financing K-12

More information

Nonprofit Organizations Committee Legal Quick Hit:

Nonprofit Organizations Committee Legal Quick Hit: Nonprofit Organizations Committee Legal Quick Hit: Tax-Exempt Financing for Tax-Exempt Organizations: Is Your Nonprofit Eligible, and Do the Benefits Outweigh the Costs? MODERATOR: JEFFREY S. TENENBAUM,

More information

Community Unit School District 220 4:40 Page 1 of 5

Community Unit School District 220 4:40 Page 1 of 5 Page 1 of 5 DEBT MANAGEMENT The policies set forth in this Debt Management Policy (the Policy ) have been developed to provide guidelines relative to the issuance, sale, statutory compliance, and investment

More information

quality of life. spending water and rebuild its project s costs cost of infrastructure for every

quality of life. spending water and rebuild its project s costs cost of infrastructure for every A Cost Effective Approach to Increasing Investment in Water Infrastructure: The Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Authority (WIFIA) Background. High-quality and quality of life in the United

More information

Debt Management Policy - Adjustment of the Authority S tenderancing Program

Debt Management Policy - Adjustment of the Authority S tenderancing Program Debt Management Policy Purpose It is the policy of the Miami-Dade Expressway Authority (MDX) to finance the acquisition of capital assets/infrastructure and capital asset improvements of the MDX System

More information

BUDGET AND FINANCIAL PLAN SUMMARY FILE

BUDGET AND FINANCIAL PLAN SUMMARY FILE BUDGET AND FINANCIAL PLAN SUMMARY FILE BUDGETED REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN CURRENT NET ASSETS Last Year (Actual) 2013 Current Year (Estimated) 2014 Adopted 2015 Proposed 2016 Proposed 2017

More information

Strategy. Appendix A Debt. History and Background. Purpose of Review

Strategy. Appendix A Debt. History and Background. Purpose of Review Appendix A Debt Strategy History and Background During the late I 980s and the early I 990s, the City of Winnipeg incurred significant debt for capital purposes. In the mid-i 990s, the cost to service

More information

General Obligation Limited Tax

General Obligation Limited Tax New Issue: Moody's assigns Baa1 rating to the City of Mansfield's (OH) $2.3 million Various Purpose Refunding Bonds (General Obligation - Limited Tax), Series 2013; negative outlook removed Global Credit

More information

DEBT MANAGEMENT POLICY

DEBT MANAGEMENT POLICY Page 1 of 5 DEBT LIMITS Credit Ratings The school district seeks to maintain the highest possible credit ratings for all categories of short- and long-term debt that can be achieved without compromising

More information

Priority Senior Secured Income Fund, Inc.

Priority Senior Secured Income Fund, Inc. Priority Senior Secured Income Fund, Inc. This material is neither an offer to sell nor the solicitation of an offer to buy any security. Such an offer can be made only by prospectus, which has been filed

More information

CITY OF SEATTLE DEBT MANAGEMENT POLICIES

CITY OF SEATTLE DEBT MANAGEMENT POLICIES CITY OF SEATTLE DEBT MANAGEMENT POLICIES Introduction The following policies are enacted to maintain standard and rational practices for the issuance and management of debt by the City of Seattle. Their

More information

Public Employees Individual Retirement Account Fund/Deferred Compensation Plan (A Component Unit of the State of Alabama)

Public Employees Individual Retirement Account Fund/Deferred Compensation Plan (A Component Unit of the State of Alabama) Public Employees Individual Retirement Account Fund/Deferred Compensation Plan (A Component Unit of the State of Alabama) FINANCIAL STATEMENTS For the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2014 201 South Union

More information

Freeze Partnerships: Establishing the Preferred Rate

Freeze Partnerships: Establishing the Preferred Rate Freeze Partnerships: Establishing the Preferred Rate Aaron M. Stumpf, CPA/ABV astumpf@srr.com Brian A. Hock bhock@srr.com Overview n n n Partnership freezes involving related party transfers are generally

More information

City of Missoula Debt Management. Major Bond Issues. Outstanding Debt DEBT MANAGEMENT. City of Missoula FY 2015 Annual Budget Page I - 1

City of Missoula Debt Management. Major Bond Issues. Outstanding Debt DEBT MANAGEMENT. City of Missoula FY 2015 Annual Budget Page I - 1 City of Missoula Debt Management Debt in a governmental entity is an effective financial management tool. Active debt management provides fiscal advantages to the City of Missoula and its citizens. Debt

More information

NOTE ON LOAN CAPITAL MARKETS

NOTE ON LOAN CAPITAL MARKETS The structure and use of loan products Most businesses use one or more loan products. A company may have a syndicated loan, backstop, line of credit, standby letter of credit, bridge loan, mortgage, or

More information

State Debt Management Update. Office of the State Treasurer January 8, 2014

State Debt Management Update. Office of the State Treasurer January 8, 2014 State Debt Management Update Office of the State Treasurer January 8, 2014 0 0 Highlights from 2013, Concerns and Priorities for 2014 2 0 Highlights from 2013 2013 Session: Worked with Committees to review

More information

Tax Exempt Bond Financing For Affordable Housing Projects

Tax Exempt Bond Financing For Affordable Housing Projects Tax Exempt Bond Financing For Affordable Housing Projects April 9, 2015 Sujyot S. Patel Partner Dinsmore & Shohl LLP (513) 639-9256 Sujyot.patel@dinsmore.com Lewis Diaz Partner Dinsmore & Shohl LLP (513)

More information

DEBT MANAGEMENT POLICY

DEBT MANAGEMENT POLICY DEBT MANAGEMENT POLICY STLOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DI RICT BOARD OF EDUCATION Prepared by: The Office of the Chief Financial Officer September 13, 2011 DEBT MANAGEMENT POLICY Index Background... 3 Article

More information

Municipal Advisory Agreement

Municipal Advisory Agreement Municipal Advisory Agreement William Logan Director of Finance This letter will set forth the terms of the Municipal Advisory Agreement (the Agreement ) pursuant to which MAS Financial Advisory Services

More information

Many directors of public enterprises

Many directors of public enterprises Management & Careers The Finance Director s Role in Helping Public Enterprises Look their Best By Bryan A. Mantz Finance directors of public enterprises face special challenges; developing expertise in

More information

Davenport & Company LLC Financial Advisor

Davenport & Company LLC Financial Advisor PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED JANUARY 22, 2016 THIS PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT AND THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN ARE SUBJECT TO COMPLETION OR AMENDMENT IN A FINAL OFFICIAL STATEMENT. Under

More information

AFFIRMS A1 RATING ON $9 MILLION GENERAL OBLIGATION UNLIMITED TAX DEBT OUTSTANDING

AFFIRMS A1 RATING ON $9 MILLION GENERAL OBLIGATION UNLIMITED TAX DEBT OUTSTANDING Rating Update: MOODY'S DOWNGRADES TO A2 FROM A1 THE CITY OF YPSILANTI'S (MI) RATING ON $16 MILLION OUTSTANDING RATED GO LIMITED TAX DEBT; ASSIGNS NEGATIVE OUTLOOK Global Credit Research - 22 Sep 2011 AFFIRMS

More information

DISTRICT BILLING AND COLLECTION SERVICES FOR SEWER AGENCY CHARGES. Finance Committee May 28, 2013

DISTRICT BILLING AND COLLECTION SERVICES FOR SEWER AGENCY CHARGES. Finance Committee May 28, 2013 DISTRICT BILLING AND COLLECTION SERVICES FOR SEWER AGENCY CHARGES Finance Committee May 28, 2013 BACKGROUND Services provided by the District since the 1960 s Six sewer agencies in service area Standard

More information

APPENDIX IV-10 FORM HUD 1731 - PROSPECTUS GINNIE MAE I MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES (CONSTRUCTION AND PERMANENT LOAN SECURITIES)

APPENDIX IV-10 FORM HUD 1731 - PROSPECTUS GINNIE MAE I MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES (CONSTRUCTION AND PERMANENT LOAN SECURITIES) GINNIE MAE 5500.3, REV. 1 APPENDIX IV-10 FORM HUD 1731 - PROSPECTUS GINNIE MAE I MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES (CONSTRUCTION AND PERMANENT LOAN SECURITIES) Applicability: Purpose: Prepared by: Prepared in:

More information

State of North Carolina

State of North Carolina State of North Carolina Debt Affordability Study February 1, 2015 Debt Affordability Advisory Committee Department of State Treasurer 325 North Salisbury Street Raleigh, NC 27603-1385 Phone: 919-508-5176

More information

City National Rochdale Intermediate Fixed Income Fund a series of City National Rochdale Funds

City National Rochdale Intermediate Fixed Income Fund a series of City National Rochdale Funds City National Rochdale Intermediate Fixed Income Fund a series of City National Rochdale Funds SUMMARY PROSPECTUS DATED JANUARY 31, 2015, AS SUPPLEMENTED MAY 1, 2015 Class: Class N Institutional Class

More information

Missouri Municipal League Annual Conference Debt Management Policies

Missouri Municipal League Annual Conference Debt Management Policies Missouri Municipal League Annual Conference Debt Management Policies Benjamin Hart Vice President Assurance Services September 21, 2015 Learning Objectives Understand the role of debt and different types

More information

Public Improvement Districts

Public Improvement Districts R.R. Tripp Davenport, III 100 Crescent Court, Suite 700 Dallas, Texas 75201 (214) 418-1588 Disclosure FMS ROLE AS UNDERWRITER AND NOT FINANCIAL ADVISOR FMSbonds, Inc., is providing the information contained

More information

University of Washington Debt Management Annual Report

University of Washington Debt Management Annual Report VII. STANDING COMMITTEES F 9 B. Finance and Asset Management Committee Debt Management Annual Report INFORMATION The Board of Regents is charged with adopting the University s Debt Management Policy, establishing

More information

Current Ratio - General Fund

Current Ratio - General Fund Current Ratio - General Fund Are General Fund expenses able to be paid as they come due? Description: This measure is designed to focus on the liquidity position of the County s General Fund that has arisen

More information

Presented by Erin Gore Executive VP, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Doug Brown Director, Wells Fargo Securities

Presented by Erin Gore Executive VP, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Doug Brown Director, Wells Fargo Securities Primer on Debt Financing and Treasury Management Presented by Erin Gore Executive VP, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Doug Brown Director, Wells Fargo Securities Disclosure This communication is for informational

More information

January 2015 State of Alaska State Bond Committee Debt Management Policies And State Debt Capacity

January 2015 State of Alaska State Bond Committee Debt Management Policies And State Debt Capacity January 2015 State of Alaska State Bond Committee Debt Management Policies And State Debt Capacity Page 1 of 26 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary Page 3 Introduction Page 5 Discussion of Credit Ratings

More information

b. provide guidelines to control the overall debt management process so that all liabilities are managed in accordance with stated objectives;

b. provide guidelines to control the overall debt management process so that all liabilities are managed in accordance with stated objectives; Policy 6.085 Debt Management 1. Purpose The purpose of this Policy is to establish guidance for the issuance and management of the debt of the School District. Such debt includes short-term and long-term

More information

1. General Obligation Bonds (G.O.s): Bonds backed by the full taxing power of the issuer.

1. General Obligation Bonds (G.O.s): Bonds backed by the full taxing power of the issuer. S&P INDICES Fixed Income February 2010 S&P Fixed Income Indices: Municipal Bond Investor Tool Kit Key Terms Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT): An extra tax that some taxpayers are required to pay in addition

More information

DEBT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM UPDATE

DEBT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM UPDATE Photo by marnox1 DEBT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM UPDATE Precipitated by changes in Credit Ratings Methodology and the Franchise Fee Debt Issuance 1 DEBT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM ELEMENTS Process for issuance of debt

More information

MML Bay State Life Insurance Company Management s Discussion and Analysis Of the 2005 Financial Condition and Results of Operations

MML Bay State Life Insurance Company Management s Discussion and Analysis Of the 2005 Financial Condition and Results of Operations MML Bay State Life Insurance Company Management s Discussion and Analysis Of the 2005 Financial Condition and Results of Operations General Management s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and

More information

Highlands Ranch Metropolitan District, Colorado; General Obligation

Highlands Ranch Metropolitan District, Colorado; General Obligation Summary: Highlands Ranch Metropolitan District, Colorado; General Obligation Primary Credit Analyst: Bryan A Moore, San Francisco (1) 415-371-5077; bryan.moore@standardandpoors.com Secondary Contact: Lisa

More information

STATE OF CONNECTICUT CLEAN WATER FUND - DRINKING WATER FEDERAL REVOLVING LOAN ACCOUNT (STATE REVOLVING FUND)

STATE OF CONNECTICUT CLEAN WATER FUND - DRINKING WATER FEDERAL REVOLVING LOAN ACCOUNT (STATE REVOLVING FUND) STATE OF CONNECTICUT CLEAN WATER FUND - DRINKING WATER FEDERAL REVOLVING LOAN ACCOUNT (STATE REVOLVING FUND) AUDIT REPORTS AND SCHEDULES IN ACCORDANCE WITH OMB CIRCULAR A-133 June 30, 2014 and 2013 STATE

More information

State of Arkansas Construction Assistance Revolving Loan Fund Program

State of Arkansas Construction Assistance Revolving Loan Fund Program Independent Auditor s Report and Financial Statements Contents Independent Auditor s Report... 1 Management s Discussion and Analysis... 4 Financial Statements Statements of Net Position... 9 Statements

More information

Capital Financing and Debt Management Policy

Capital Financing and Debt Management Policy Capital Financing and Debt Management Policy Policy Statement A policy governing the use and administration of capital financing and debt Purpose This policy establishes objectives, standards of care,

More information

DEBT MANAGEMENT POLICY AND PROPOSED CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION (COPs) TRANSACTION

DEBT MANAGEMENT POLICY AND PROPOSED CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION (COPs) TRANSACTION DEBT MANAGEMENT POLICY AND PROPOSED CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION (COPs) TRANSACTION Los Angeles Unified School District Office of the Chief Financial Officer Background Since 1990, District has issued

More information

Role of Financial Advisors

Role of Financial Advisors Local School Finance Emporium Financial Advisor What You Need to Know May 2012 Keygent LLC 999 N. Sepulveda Blvd., Suite 570 El Segundo, CA 90245 (310) 322 4222 Role of Financial Advisors A financial advisor

More information

DEBT MANAGEMENT POLICY POLICY, PROCESSES AND PROCEDURES

DEBT MANAGEMENT POLICY POLICY, PROCESSES AND PROCEDURES DEBT MANAGEMENT POLICY POLICY, PROCESSES AND PROCEDURES 1 RECOMMENDED THAT the Debt Management Policy and the contents thereof be tabled for approval at the Mayoral Committee. Version Version 2 Date March

More information

State. 2011 Report. Prepared by. December 2011. Page 1

State. 2011 Report. Prepared by. December 2011. Page 1 State of Florida 2011 Debt Affordability Report Prepared by The Division of Bond Finance December 2011 Page 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary... 1 Introduction... 4 Composition of Outstanding Florida

More information

DEBT MANAGEMENT. Debt Service Fund... 186 Leasing Fund... 190 Leasing Equipment Acquisition Fund... 191

DEBT MANAGEMENT. Debt Service Fund... 186 Leasing Fund... 190 Leasing Equipment Acquisition Fund... 191 DEBT MANAGEMENT Debt Service Fund... 186 Leasing Fund... 190 Leasing Equipment Acquisition Fund... 191 185 DEBT SERVICE FUND PROGRAM DESCRIPTIONS Debt service expenditures include the City s general governmental

More information

SECTION 7 DEBT MANAGEMENT POLICY LAS VEGAS VALLEY WATER DISTRICT FISCAL YEAR 2015-16 OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGET

SECTION 7 DEBT MANAGEMENT POLICY LAS VEGAS VALLEY WATER DISTRICT FISCAL YEAR 2015-16 OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGET SECTION 7 DEBT MANAGEMENT POLICY LAS VEGAS VALLEY WATER DISTRICT FISCAL YEAR 2015-16 OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGET In Accordance With NRS 350.013 June 30, 2015 7-1 Table of Contents Introduction... 7-3

More information

Orange Unified School District

Orange Unified School District Orange Unified School District March 14, 2013 Overview of California Education Finance Keygent LLC 999 N. Sepulveda Blvd., Suite 500 El Segundo, CA 90245 (310) 322 4222 Table of Contents Section I. Introduction

More information

Debt Management Policy

Debt Management Policy Debt Management Policy Purpose To establish a policy for the issuance of debt and financing instruments for the City. Policy The attached document, Debt Management Guidelines, establishes the scope and

More information

BEDFORD COUNTY TENNESSEE. Debt Management Policy

BEDFORD COUNTY TENNESSEE. Debt Management Policy BEDFORD COUNTY TENNESSEE Debt Management Policy Formally Adopted: November 8, 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction... i Introductory Statement...1 Goals and Objectives...1 Transparency...1 Professionals...2

More information

A GUIDE TO MUTUAL FUND INVESTING

A GUIDE TO MUTUAL FUND INVESTING Many investors turn to mutual funds to meet their long-term financial goals. They offer the benefits of diversification and professional management and are seen as an easy and efficient way to invest.

More information

MSD Exhibit No. MSD 3F 2015 Rate Change Proceeding BETHANY PUGH Direct Testimony Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District February 26, 2015

MSD Exhibit No. MSD 3F 2015 Rate Change Proceeding BETHANY PUGH Direct Testimony Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District February 26, 2015 MSD Exhibit No. MSD F 0 Rate Change Proceeding BETHANY PUGH Direct Testimony Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District February, 0 Table of Contents Witness Background and Experience... Financial Plan Assumptions...

More information

Nashua Pre-filed Testimony Of Steven A. Adams First Southwest Company. 1. What is your name and by whom are you employed?

Nashua Pre-filed Testimony Of Steven A. Adams First Southwest Company. 1. What is your name and by whom are you employed? Nashua Pre-filed Testimony Of Steven A. Adams First Southwest Company 1. What is your name and by whom are you employed? My name is Steven Adams. I am a Senior Vice President for First Southwest Company,

More information

Administrative Regulations POLICY STATUS: POLICY NUMBER: POLICY ADDRESS:

Administrative Regulations POLICY STATUS: POLICY NUMBER: POLICY ADDRESS: CATEGORY: POLICY STATUS: Administrative Regulations POLICY TITLE: POLICY NUMBER: POLICY ADDRESS: POLICY PURPOSE: APPLIES TO: SUB-SECTIONS: POLICY STATEMENT Debt Policy In support of its mission, the University

More information

IPS RIA, LLC CRD No. 172840

IPS RIA, LLC CRD No. 172840 IPS RIA, LLC CRD No. 172840 ADVISORY CLIENT BROCHURE 10000 N. Central Expressway Suite 1100 Dallas, Texas 75231 O: 214.443.2400 F: 214-443.2424 FORM ADV PART 2A BROCHURE 1/26/2015 This brochure provides

More information