1 Communication of Clinically Relevant Information in Electronic Health Records: A Comparison between Structured Data and Unrestricted Physician Language Communication of Clinically Relevant Information in Electronic Health Records: A Comparison between Structured Data and Unrestricted Physician Language by Philip Resnik, PhD; Michael Niv, PhD; Michael Nossal, MA; Andrew Kapit; and Richard Toren Abstract We report on a study comparing unrestricted physician dictations with structured input in electronic health records. The results suggest a need for attention to the contrast between physicians naturally occurring language and the information permitted by structured data entry. We suggest that technology that automatically populates structured EHR fields directly from physician dictations, rather than controlling physician input, may answer the needs of the EHR without sacrificing physicians ability to fully communicate clinically relevant information. Introduction It is widely believed that electronic health record (EHR) systems will be critical to the delivery of consistent, high quality health care. 1 Widespread adoption of EHRs will change healthcare in ways that we can only imagine at this point, ranging from more effective information sharing to biosurveillance, monitoring of interventions, and medical research based on large-scale analysis of clinical records. In order for EHRs to be effective for many of these purposes, raw clinical data will need to be transformed into clinical information. The distinction between these concepts is familiar in knowledge management and information science within a framework known as the DIKW (data, information, knowledge, wisdom) hierarchy (e.g., see Cleveland 2 ). Data can be characterized as raw or unprocessed the pixels on a screen before the objects take shape for us, or the words that constitute a physician s dictation. Information arises from data by means of adding structure and categories in order to create units for example, the set of physical conditions in a patient s clinical history, or the list of medications the patient is taking. Knowledge arises when we identify relationships between units for example, identifying how a patient s prior conditions influence current problems, or how a combination of medications affects the outcome of treatment. Finally, wisdom is the ability to make good choices, informed by our knowledge and by our ability to assess the quality of our own predictions based on the knowledge we have. Interoperability between systems that use EHRs requires shared understandings at the level of information. The structure and categories assumed by one system must correspond to the structure and categories assigned by a different system if they are to work together. As a simple example, if the category PatientID is conceptualized as name plus date of birth in one system and Social Security number
2 Perspectives in Health Information Management, CAC Proceedings; Fall 2008 in a different system, then it will be difficult or impossible to achieve a shared, comprehensive view of a patient s information that takes the information from both systems into account. Similar concerns apply with respect to clinical categories. For example, a researcher might be interested in medical records labeled at the information level as involving a patient who suffered a myocardial infarction, regardless of whether, at the data level, that event had been described as myocardial infarction, MI, or heart attack. In order to achieve commonality at the level of information, one proposed approach is to change the way physicians interact with health information systems: instead of entering traditional clinical dictations expressed in natural language, physicians are asked to structure and categorize at the time of input. In effect, this approach transforms the physician s process from semi-structured creation of data to structured entry of information. For example, the EHR system might require that the term myocardial infarction be chosen from a list, and given that entry, it might prompt the physician for additional information known to be associated with that diagnosis. We will refer to this form of information input interchangeably as structured or discrete data entry. 3 Structured data entry has advantages. For example, it eliminates or at least drastically reduces the problem of variable terminology, by forcing the input of a standardized term or concept. This means that information technology systems developed in accord with the standard will have a much easier time interacting with each other. Structured input may also foster more complete gathering and entry of information, since a structured, systematic process, like any checklist, helps to ensure that necessary steps are not skipped; this can potentially lead to improved quality of care. 4 At the same time, structured data entry has its disadvantages. Trachtenbarg, based on personal experience and discussion with more than 50 organizations, comments that clicking or typing text multiple times is generally slower than dictating, also citing Waegemann and colleagues. 5, 6 He also observes that discrete data may not catch the nuances of patient variability and recommends using discrete data selectively rather than trying to use it for everything. 7, 8 Trachtenbarg s point about using discrete data selectively raises an important question. Although EHRs generally include opportunities for free-text entry, we have already seen that much of the value in electronic records comes from standardization of information, and unrestricted free-text fields work against the ability to completely standardize the information in the record. Therefore one can expect that as EHRs become more widespread, the demands for standardization may lead to pressure on physicians to forgo free text wherever possible. If physicians restrict themselves primarily to structured data entry, what happens to the nuances of patient variability to which Trachtenbarg refers? To state the question more generally, what information is lost when free dictation of data is replaced with structured entry of information? To our knowledge, nobody has yet attempted to answer this particular question; it appears rather more typical for studies of EHRs to focus on costs, economic value, and effect on quality of care, 9 all of which are important but none of which bear directly on the question of what information is conveyed or not conveyed by the EHR. In this paper, therefore, we report on an initial study designed to assess the information in standard, narrowly structured EHR formats as compared with dictated free text. Experimental Design A set of 20 naturally dictated cardiology notes was sampled from a collection of 2,000 notes. 10 Language in each dictation was manually highlighted independently by two annotators, with text being highlighted if it conveyed information that would be captured in structured data entry according to a government-mandated EHR standard currently in use. 11, 12 Inter-annotator consistency was assessed by computing per-word agreement on the decision to highlight or not highlight for content-bearing words. 13 Word-level agreement on the notes was 91.4 percent, establishing that human annotators can agree reasonably on an interpretation of what language would and would not correspond to information included in this EHR standard s structured information. For example, in the sentence I recommend a stress dual-isotope nuclear study in the very near future to look for possible exercise-induced myocardial ischemia, the test is included, as is recommend, because the specification states that tests can be
3 Communication of Clinically Relevant Information in Electronic Health Records: A Comparison between Structured Data and Unrestricted Physician Language categorized as events, recommendations, requests, and the like. However, the specification makes no provision for encoding hypothesized conditions for which the test would be seeking to obtain evidence, nor for encoding vague temporal specifications like in the very near future. An independent MD cardiologist and a cardiology expert (the experts ) each independently reviewed all 20 notes. 14 Their task focused entirely on communication of clinically relevant information; EHRs were in fact not mentioned in the instructions. For each note, each expert was asked to imagine himself as a physician assuming responsibility for the patient, and to imagine that the highlighting had been added by the previous physician, indicating what he or she believed to be clinically relevant and necessary to include in the communication. Clinically relevant was defined to mean anything pertinent to the patient s current condition or future care. Each expert identified all spans of text that he felt should have been highlighted as clinically relevant, but had not been, and assigned a 1 5 rating indicating the seriousness of each omission. The instructions defined 1 as indicating omissions of minimal severity and 5 as meaning that failing to mark up the language was extremely severe, in terms of having serious consequences for the care of the patient if that clinically relevant information had not been communicated to you. The experts spent an average of about three hours on this task. Results and Analysis The primary question of interest here is whether, and to what extent, the naturally occurring dictations contain clinically relevant information that does not fit into discrete (non-free-text) fields specified in the EHR standard. By highlighting information that would be included according to that standard, and then asking experts to identify omitted information, we provide a way to answer this question quantitatively. Our analysis looks at omitted text spans identified by the MD cardiologist, and we also consider spans for which both experts independent judgments agreed. We break out three categories for omissions: a seriousness rating of three or greater ( ), four or greater ( ), or five ( ). The percentages in Table 1 represent the proportion of 20 notes for which at least one omission occurred in that category. The next row shows the average number of such omissions per document. For example, the second column in Table 1 shows that 100 percent of the notes were identified by the MD cardiologist as containing at least one omission rated with severity of 3 or higher, with 5.25 such omissions on average. Moreover, he found omissions with serious consequences for the care of the patient (severity rating equal to 5) in fully 55 percent of the notes. The first column in Table 1 uses a more conservative analysis criterion, considering only omissions that both experts identified independently, and categorizing severity using the minimum of their two ratings. (For example, an omitted span rated 4 by one expert and 3 by the other would count toward the category, not.) Even with that more conservative criterion, 50 percent of the notes contain at least one omission that both experts agree is of seriousness 4 or greater on a 5-point scale. Now, it is possible that the EHR specification we used 15 could be extended straightforwardly to include some kinds of missing information. For example, that specification includes no field capturing negative patient reports of symptoms (e.g., denies any chest discomfort ), but such fields could be added. What is of greater interest, however, is information that seems difficult to include within any discrete entry framework. Analyzing the omissions flagged by our experts, we found several categories of clinically relevant information that appear to be uncontemplated in terms of discrete data entry, and for which it would seem challenging to extend current EHRs, even in principle. 16 One such category includes nuanced or detailed elaborations of information. For example, the cardiologist found it relevant that after identifying reporting severe pain in one patient s neck and back, the dictating physician adds that she was almost brought to tears just in getting her up on the examination table. Both experts found it relevant that a patient was able to walk on flat levels and walk at a moderate pace for one hour without abnormal shortness of breath or chest pain.
4 Perspectives in Health Information Management, CAC Proceedings; Fall 2008 Another category is temporal or logical context. For example, both experts found it relevant that a patient s nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (fast heart rate) occurred during post myocardial infarction care far removed from the time of his infarction. The cardiologist found it highly relevant, for another patient, that the dictating physician was hesitant to recommend his FAA certification renewal without a repeat of a previous catheterization. A third category includes relevant information about the dictating physician s thought process. In one case, the physician recommends continuing Toprol because it seems to be controlling [the patient s] palpitations well. In another, the dictating physician considers discomfort to be suggestive of angina. In a third, the dictating physician expresses a belief that results of stress testing would rule out significant major coronary artery disease, despite it being a somewhat incomplete study. The second column in Table 2 shows the results of an analysis in which we considered only omissions only of these kinds that is, omissions it would seem difficult to remediate in the EHR without doing violence to the entire concept of discrete data entry. This analysis is strictly more conservative than the analysis reported in Table 1, since it assumes that parts of the dictation would be included in discrete data entry even if they are not part of the current EHR specification. Yet even on this more conservative criterion, we find that, according to the cardiologist, fully 45 percent of the notes nearly half contain at least one omission that would seriously affect the care of the patient, rated 5 on a 5-point scale. Every note but one (95 percent) contains at least one omission that he would rate with severity 3, 4, or 5. Finally, we adopt a still more conservative version of this analysis, restricting our attention to difficult-to-remediate omissions and considering only missing information that both experts agree is clinically relevant (Table 2, first column). For severity ratings of 3 or higher, there is at least one such omission in 50 percent of the notes, and over the full data set they occur on average about once per note. The experts agree that in 25 percent of the notes, there is at least one piece of information omitted whose consequences for the patient s care would merit a seriousness rating of 4 on a 5-point scale. Structured Representations without Structured Input In the previous section we saw that clinically significant information can be omitted if physician communication is limited to the structured information within a standard electronic health record rather than a full dictation. This presents us with something of a dilemma. On the one hand, many of the benefits of electronic health records depend on the fact that they contain standardized, structured encodings of patients information. On the other hand, if clinicians enter structured information rather than free dictations, important information may be lost. A possible solution to this dilemma emerges from the recognition that structured representations are not the same thing as structured input. The benefits of EHRs depend on the discrete information they contain, not on physicians entering information discretely. Within the technical discipline of natural language processing (NLP), a core interest of many researchers and developers for two decades has been information extraction, the automatic identification of information in unstructured text, 17 including techniques explored in clinical domains. 18 The abstraction of information for high-accuracy automated coding 19 already contains many of the elements needed in order to successfully map unrestricted dictations to standard code sets for diagnoses and procedures, as well as many other information categories identified in the EHR. A potential alternative to restricting physicians input, therefore, is to allow physicians to focus on the care of the patient, and express themselves clinically as they always have, using natural, unrestricted language. NLP software can automatically derive structured information that satisfies the need of many applications for consistent, discrete representations.
5 Communication of Clinically Relevant Information in Electronic Health Records: A Comparison between Structured Data and Unrestricted Physician Language This approach has the advantage of preserving a key property of the data-information-knowledgewisdom hierarchy, namely the fact that knowledge creation is a cyclical process. At any given time, the information categories we choose in our structured representations are determined by our current state of knowledge. By preserving the physicians original language, the data, it becomes possible to return to medical records retrospectively with new knowledge in hand and to reanalyze it according to new information categories. As an example, physicians started describing ground-glass opacity, a kind of hazy opacity within the lungs, with the introduction of 64-slice CT scans around In principle, 16 years worth of medical records could be mined for clinical connections related to this phenomenon. But would we have access now to all that information if those medical records had been created via structured input, rather than free dictation? It seems unlikely: the concept (as ground glass appearance ) first appeared in a standardized nomenclature (MedDRA) in If clinicians had entered information by selecting among existing information categories, this concept would not have been there to select for 10 years. Conclusions In this paper we have performed what is, to our knowledge, the first systematic comparison between free natural language dictations and the information codified by structured categories within an EHR. There are several limitations that should be discussed. First, our interest in natural language processing gives rise to the possibility of experimenter bias. To address this, we have erred on the side of caution whenever possible. For example, not only do we establish reasonable inter-annotator agreement for the task of extracting information relevant to structured EHRs from free dictations, but we consider information to be highlighted if either annotator highlighted it. Similarly, one could reasonably argue that an omission matters if either expert flagged it, but in our both experts analysis, an omission is only an omission if it was identified independently by both experts, and its severity category is based on the minimum of their two ratings. We go even further by including an analysis, in Table 2, that gives the EHR credit for discrete information types that could be added to the standard even if they are not currently present. Even under these most conservative assumptions, we find that 50 percent of the notes include at least one omission rated 3 or higher on a 5-point scale, and 25 percent contain omissions rated 4 or higher (Table 2, first column). A second limitation of this study is its size, which is limited by the overwhelmingly manual nature of the component tasks. We find it likely that a larger and broader sample, going beyond cardiology notes, will reinforce the main point more strongly. In 20 notes we found a wide variety of clinically relevant information that was not anticipated in an EHR standard as being relevant. We predict that a larger sample will expose an even wider variety. A third limitation of this study is the fact that we manually annotate text in dictations that would correspond to an EHR s discrete data fields, in effect simulating an EHR via its specification, rather than observing what physicians do in practice. This limitation is also one of the study s primary virtues, since it abstracts away from specific EHR implementations and permits a direct comparison of discrete information (or information that can be made discrete) with unrestricted dictation. At the same time, it raises the question of whether physicians would use free-text fields available in EHRs to augment discretely entered information, mitigating the omissions we found. This is a sensible question to ask. Trachtenbarg s comments on the relative efficiency of dictated versus structured input 21 lead us to suspect that the latter will discourage users from troubling to enter free-text elaborations, nuances, and reasoning that would have shown up in their naturally occurring dictations. More important, though, the existence of free-text fields is itself a concession to the need for EHRs to carry clinically relevant information that cannot be captured using discrete fields and predefined nomenclatures. Given that such a need exists, it is imperative that we evaluate the impact of structured data on inter-physician communication, considering potential information lost as well as potential value added.
6 Perspectives in Health Information Management, CAC Proceedings; Fall 2008 In this paper we have begun by asking to what extent naturally occurring dictations contain clinically relevant information that would be lost using discrete (non-free-text) fields specified in an EHR standard. Even under quite conservative assumptions, we have found that important clinical information, detail, and nuance would fail to be captured by an EHR standard s discrete fields, with potentially serious consequences for the patient. Such omissions could potentially influence not only clinical care, but the progression from data to information to knowledge discovery in clinical research. Clearly the question merits further attention and study. Philip Resnik, PhD, is a strategic technology advisor for CodeRyte, Inc., in Bethesda, MD, and an associate professor in the Department of Linguistics and the Institute for Advanced Computer Studies at the University of Maryland. Michael Niv, PhD, is lead software architect at CodeRyte, Inc., in Bethesda, MD. Michael Nossal, MA, is a senior NLP engineer at CodeRyte, Inc., in Bethesda, MD. Andrew Kapit is CEO of CodeRyte, Inc., in Bethesda, MD. Richard Toren is co-founder and president of CodeRyte, Inc., in Bethesda, MD. Acknowledgments The authors thank Lyle Schofield, the participating cardiologist, and an anonymous reviewer for their helpful comments.
7 Communication of Clinically Relevant Information in Electronic Health Records: A Comparison between Structured Data and Unrestricted Physician Language Notes 1. Kaiser, Frieda, James Angus, and Helen Stevens (Editors). e-ms Clinical Document Architecture Implementation Guide. Government of British Columbia, Cleveland, Harland. Information as a Resource. The Futurist, December 1982, pp Trachtenbarg, D. EHRs Fix Everything And Nine Other Myths. Family Practice Management 14, no. 3 (2007, March): It is not entirely clear whether this potential is realized using current EHRs. See Linder, J., J. Ma, D. Bates, B. Middleton, and R. Stafford. Electronic Health Record Use and the Quality of Ambulatory Care in the United States. Archives of Internal Medicine 167 (2007): Trachtenbarg, D. EHRs Fix Everything And Nine Other Myths. 6. Waegemann, C. P., C. Tessier, A. Barbash, et al., for the Consensus Workgroup on Health Information Capture and Report Generation. Healthcare Documentation: A Report on Information Capture and Report Generation. Boston, MA: Medical Records Institute, June Trachtenbarg, D. EHRs Fix Everything And Nine Other Myths. 8. For an informal user-satisfaction survey among 408 family physicians, see Adler, K.G., and R. L. Edsall. An EHR User-Satisfaction Survey: Advice from 408 Family Physicians. Family Practice Management 12, no. 9 (2005, October): Shekelle, P. G., S. C. Morton, and E. B. Keeler. Costs and Benefits of Health Information Technology. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No AHRQ Publication No. 06-E006. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, April A sequence of 20 continuous notes was chosen starting at a random point in the collection. No two notes concerned the same patient, and no more than three notes were dictated by the same physician. 11. Kaiser, Frieda, James Angus, and Helen Stevens (Editors). e-ms Clinical Document Architecture Implementation Guide. 12. Guidelines for annotation were developed by independently marking up held-out development notes, comparing the results, and augmenting/revising the guidelines. There is currently vigorous effort among U.S. EHR standards bodies (the American Health Information Community and the Healthcare Information Technology Standards Panel) to define specific EHR standards. As soon as such a standard emerges, we plan to replicate this study using it, further extending our experimentation with a larger sample size and notes from other medical specialties. One annotator is a coauthor on this paper. 13. Words on a standard stoplist (the, and, etc.) were considered irrelevant, so highlighting pain and neck in the phrase pain in the neck would be considered equivalent to highlighting the full phrase. 14. The latter is a coauthor on this paper. 15. Kaiser, Frieda, James Angus, and Helen Stevens (Editors). e-ms Clinical Document Architecture Implementation Guide. 16. These three categories are neither mutually exclusive nor exhaustive. They illustrate patterns we found when we attempted to identify omissions that could be remediated by extending the EHR in obvious ways.
8 Perspectives in Health Information Management, CAC Proceedings; Fall Grishman, Ralph, and Beth Sundheim. Message Understanding Conference 6: A Brief History. Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING), I, Copenhagen, 1996, Hripcsak, G., C. Friedman, P. O. Alderson, W. DuMouchel, S. B. Johnson, and P. D. Clayton. Unlocking Clinical Data from Narrative Reports: A Study of Natural Language Processing. Annals of Internal Medicine 122, no. 9 (1995, May 1): Resnik, P., M. Niv, M. Nossal, G. Schnitzer, J. Stoner, A. Kapit, and R. Toren. Using Intrinsic and Extrinsic Metrics to Evaluate Accuracy and Facilitation in Computer-assisted Coding. Perspectives in Health Information Management, Computer-assisted Coding Conference Proceedings, Fall Engeler, C., J. Tashjian, S. Trenkner, and J. Walsh. Ground Glass Opacity of the Lung Parenchyma: A Guide to Analysis with High-Resolution CT. American Journal of Roentgenology 160 (1993): Trachtenbarg, D. EHRs Fix Everything And Nine Other Myths.
9 Communication of Clinically Relevant Information in Electronic Health Records: A Comparison between Structured Data and Unrestricted Physician Language Table 1 Both experts MD cardiologist Rating Percent of notes 0% 50% 85% 55% 85% 100% Number per note
10 Perspectives in Health Information Management, CAC Proceedings; Fall 2008 Table 2 Both experts MD cardiologist Rating 5 5 Percent of notes 0% 25% 50% 45% 80% 95% Number per note
Find the signal in the noise Electronic Health Records: The challenge The adoption of Electronic Health Records (EHRs) in the USA is rapidly increasing, due to the Health Information Technology and Clinical
Use of the Delphi Method to Generate a Gold Standard for the Medical Coding Industry Use of the Delphi Method to Generate a Gold Standard for the Medical Coding Industry by M. Elliott Familant, PhD; Stuart
April 8, 2015 The Honorable Michael Burgess, MD 2336 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, DC 20515 RE: Comments on Discussion Draft Ensuring Interoperability of Qualified Electronic Health Records.
Realistic expectations can help your conversion to electronic EHRs Fix Everything and Nine Other Myths David E. Trachtenbarg, MD Two physician groups implement the same electronic health record (EHR) system.
The What, When, Where and How of Natural Language Processing There s a mystique that surrounds natural language processing (NLP) technology, regarding how it works, and what it can and cannot do. Although
WHITE PAPER QualityAnalytics Bridging Clinical Documentation and Quality of Care 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The US Healthcare system is undergoing a gradual, but steady transformation. At the center of this transformation
WHITE PAPER Clintegrity 360 QualityAnalytics Bridging Clinical Documentation and Quality of Care HEALTHCARE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The US Healthcare system is undergoing a gradual, but steady transformation.
Healthcare Data: Secondary Use through Interoperability Floyd Eisenberg MD MPH July 18, 2007 NCVHS Agenda Policies, Enablers, Restrictions Date Re-Use Landscape Sources of Data for Quality Measurement,
DATA WAREHOUSING IN THE HEALTHCARE ENVIRONMENT By W H Inmon For years organizations had unintegrated data. With unintegrated data there was a lot of pain. No one could look across the information of the
Natural Language Processing Supporting Clinical Decision Support Applications for Enhancing Clinical Decision Making NIH Worksop; Bethesda, MD, April 24, 2012 Stephane M. Meystre, MD, PhD Department of
Quantitative study reveals data about VNA, ECM and clinical content Survey reveals preference for a patient-centric, unified health record that presents all relevant data at the point of care Fueled by
Compass Interdisciplinary Virtual Conference 19-30 Oct 2009 10 Things New Scholars should do to get published Duane Wegener Professor of Social Psychology, Purdue University Hello, I hope you re having
Real- time Performance Improvement for Patient Safety one two Introduction Real- time Value Proposition three Patient Safety Indicators four five six Point- of- care Alerts & Advice Documentation Improvement
Chapter 2: Research Methodology 1. Type of Research 2. Sources of Data 3. Instruments for Data Collection 4. Research Methods 5. Sampling 6. Limitations of the Study 6 Chapter 2: Research Methodology Research
WHEN YOU CONSULT A STATISTICIAN... WHAT TO EXPECT SECTION ON STATISTICAL CONSULTING AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION 2003 When you consult a statistician, you enlist the help of a professional who is particularly
STUDENT NAME: Osama Jarkas DATE: August 10 th, 2015 PROJECT TITLE: Analysis of ECG Exercise Stress Testing and Framingham Risk Score in Chest Pain Patients PRIMARY SUPERVISOR NAME: Dr. Edward Tan DEPARTMENT:
TITLE Dori Whittaker, Director of Solutions Management, M*Modal Challenges Impacting Clinical Documentation HITECH Act, Meaningful Use EHR mandate and adoption Need for cost savings Migration to ICD 10
CLINICAL DOCUMENTATION TRENDS IN THE UNITED STATES, 2013-2016 October 2013 Table of Contents Executive Summary... 2 Clinical Documentation Today... 4 Clinical Documentation in 2016... 8 Recommendations
GE Healthcare Rest assured MAC 5500 resting ECG analysis system Since 1965, GE has introduced on-going innovation, which has profoundly impacted healthcare delivery, clinical guidelines and ECG standards.
Physician Practice Case Study Medical Device/EHR Connectivity Success Story Connected Vital Signs and ECG Devices Improve Workflow, Patient Care and the Bottom Line at Cardiology of Tulsa Through a collaboration
Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise White Paper Retrieve ECG for Display Integration Profile This white paper provides information regarding the Retrieve ECG for Display, or simply ECG Display, Integration
M*Modal White Paper WP CI Collaborative Intelligence: Unlocking the Power of Narrative Documentation See us at HIMSS booth 5725 WP CI Page 2 Current Situation The healthcare industry is currently undergoing
Tutorials, M. Duncan Research Note 3 October 2002 Scripting Healthcare Scheduling Software Demonstrations Many healthcare software vendors offer products claiming to handle the enterprisewide scheduling
Chapter 4 The Scientific Data Mining Process When I use a word, Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, it means just what I choose it to mean neither more nor less. Lewis Carroll [87, p. 214] In
Pulmonary Rehabilitation Use it or lose it??? By John R. Goodman BS RRT Of all the forms of Rehabilitation that are available in medicine, pulmonary rehabilitation is a relative newcomer. For example Cardiac
Calculating the Real Cost of ED Physician Documentation My Experience With ED Physician Documentation Systems: Rationale for Increased Physician-Patient Interaction and Reduced Documentation Costs By Stephen
Electronic Health Record: A Step to Quality Care Viewpoint paper focus on quality metrics. The electronic health record holds promise to improve the quality of healthcare and lower care costs. Table of
EHR: A Step to Quality Care How will we know if EHRs are truly delivering? Viewpoint Paper Table of contents Introduction................................................................... 1 Defining quality................................................................
CLINICAL DOCUMENTATION DRIVING PERFORMANCE IN THE NEW WORLD OF HEALTHCARE Patient CARE Financial Integrity HEALTHCARE S New REALITIES A host of critical imperatives from Meaningful Use and ACOs, to ICD-10,
How to Save a Failing Project: Chaos to Control By Authors Ralph R. Young, Steven M. Brady, & Dennis C. Nagle, Jr. (A book review by R. Max Wideman) The views expressed in this article are strictly those
Testimony to the Meaningful Use Workgroup, ONC Panel 1: Current HIT Support of Care Coordination August 5, 2010 Dr. Bates, Dr. Tang, Dr. Hripcsak, and Members of the Meaningful Use Workgroup: Thank you
Pediatric Cardiac Rehabilitation Program Lynne Telfer, RN Introduction Congenital heart disease is the number 1 birth defect in the world. Heart disease is second only to asthma as the leading cause of
CROSS EXAMINATION OF AN EXPERT WITNESS IN A CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE CASE Mark Montgomery Post Office Box 161 Durham, NC 27702 (919) 680-6249 email@example.com Opinion Testimony by a Pediatrician/Nurse/Counselor/Social
A Health Data Consulting White Paper 1056 6th Ave S Edmonds, WA 98020-4035 206-478-8227 www.healthdataconsulting.com ICD-10-CM The Case for Moving Forward Joseph C Nichols MD Principal 23 March 2012 THE
3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 CARE GUIDELINES FROM MCG Evidence-based guidelines from MCG span the continuum of care, supporting clinical decisions and care planning, easing transitions between care settings, and
Coding, billing and documentation tips for effective reimbursement Beth Milligan, MD, FAAFP, CHCOM, CPE Objectives Explain the importance of clinical documentation Understand the principles of documentation
Creating A Functional Bridge With The EMR Presentation to Kentucky HFMA Reid W Coleman MD FACP CMIO, Nuance Communications Inc. 2002-2013 Nuance Communications, Inc. All rights reserved. Page 1 Disclosures
Meet Richard Saitz, M.D., MPH Richard Saitz, M.D., MPH, is a professor of medicine and epidemiology at Boston University, and also primary care physician and director of the Clinical Addiction Research
Martin S. Kohn, MD, MS, FACEP, FACPE Chief Medical Scientist, Care Delivery Systems IBM Research firstname.lastname@example.org Putting IBM Watson to Work In Healthcare 2 SB 1275 Medical data in an electronic or
Core research questions for natural language processing of clinical text Noémie Elhadad email@example.com NLP s promise for medicine and health } Increasingly large amounts of texts } Clinical literature
IBM Institute for Knowledge-Based Organizations Trust and knowledge sharing: A critical combination Recently, the IBM Institute for Knowledge-Based Organizations (IKO) studied the role of trust in knowledge
Clinical Decision Making in Emergency Medicine Ponte Vedra 2010 Evidence based decision support Clinical Decision Support: Applied Decision Aids in the Electronic Medical Record The ED as a high risk settings
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Health Information Technology Initiative Major Accomplishments: 2004-2006 In 2006, HHS achieved several major milestones to meet the President s call for most
THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY, DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHOLOGY Cognitive Area Program The guiding principle in the Cognitive Area graduate training program is to involve students from their very first year in the
Cerner Ambulatory Cloudy Forecast: Predictions for Big Data Large and Small Practices in Cloudy Forecast: Predictions for Big Data in Large and Small Medical Practices Whether gathering a patient s history,
Automated Coding Software: Development and Use to Enhance Anti Fraud Activities Contract Number: HHSP23320054100EC July 11, 2005 Submitted by: Foundation of Research and Education American Health Information
Teaching Risk Management: Addressing ACGME Core Competencies Kiki Nissen, MD, FACP Steven V. Angus, MD, FACP Wendy Miller, MD Adam R. Silverman, MD, FACP Abstract Background Risk management is an important
Meeting today s coding challenges with computer assisted coding as a focal point for positive change in Health Information Management Stuart Covit 1, M. Elliott Familant, PhD 1, Cecilia Hilerio, RHIA 2,
June 2, 2016 The Honorable Karen DeSalvo, MD, MPH, M. Sc. Acting Assistant Secretary for Health, National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, Department of Health and Human Services Attention:
E Case #[personal information] WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL BETWEEN: WORKER APPELLANT and WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND RESPONDENT DECISION This is an appeal from the decision
Teaching Health Policy and Economics in a Medical School Using a Simulation Game Gwendolyn C. Morrison 1,2, Ph.D.; Gene Beyt 3, M.D.; Thomas Inui 2,4, M.D.; Debra Litzelman 4, M.D. 1 Indiana University-Purdue
2 Case Number 001: Petition of Complaint Research Research Report Contents 1 Petition of complaint research 2 Process and content of research 3 Judgment on the complaint 4 Recommendation to the other party
Proposal Writing: The Business of Science By Wendy Sanders The NIH System of Review The NIH has a dual system of review. The first (and most important) level of review is carried out by a designated study
CLINICAL Radiology by Nonradiologists: Is Report Documentation Adequate? Shelley Nan Weiner, MD Objective: To determine if the quality of medical imaging reports differs significantly between radiologists
Electronic Implementation of National Nursing Standards NANDA, NOC and NIC as an Effective Teaching Tool Sharon K. Allred, Kevin F. Smith, MD, MPH, and Laura Flowers, MPH A B S T R A C T With the increased
Evaluating Teaching Innovation By Richard James The evaluation of teaching and learning, and particularly of teaching and learning innovation, has become a priority in universities. The idea in writing
How Will an ECG Management System with Electronic Storage and Recall Benefit my Facility? ECG management has been available in the industry for over twenty- five years. Until now it has been both expensive
C U S T O M E R C A S E S T U D Y Dragon Medical Practice Edition Couples Dragon Medical Practice Edition and eclinicalworks EHR to Achieve Significant Improvements in Level of Service and Responsiveness
CHAPTER 2 Functional EHR Systems Chapter Overview Chapter 2 of the student text describes the various forms of storing EHR data and the value of using standardized codes for those data. The chapter covers
A VOICE MEDIATED SYSTEM FOR STRUCTURED ENTRY OF MEDICAL DATA IST-2001-38143 ATVN-EU-GP Conference Applications Relating to Health 1-3 December 2005, Pułtusk near Warsaw, Poland 1 AGENDA AND TIME SCHEDULE
AHS s Headache Coding Corner A user-friendly guide to CPT and ICD coding Stuart Black, MD Part 1 General Issues in Evaluation and Management (E&M) in Headache By better understanding the Evaluation and
WHITE PAPER NUANCE CLINTEGRITY 360 A CLINICALLY-DRIVEN APPROACH TO ICD-10 HEALTHCARE CURRENT INDUSTRY APPROACH In anticipation of the October 1, 2014 ICD-10 implementation, most hospitals and health systems
Growing the Digital Business: Spotlight on Mobile Apps Accenture Mobility Research 2015 Introduction 2 In the past five years, companies have spent considerable time, money and attention developing mobile
GE Healthcare The heart of cardiology is connectivity The MUSE * v8 Cardiology Information System Cardiac technology. Innovation to advance care. Success in today s healthcare environment requires your
Objective: The patient progress note serves as a basis for planning patient care, documenting communication between the health care provider and any other health professional contributing to the patient's
Palliative Care The Relief You Need When You re Experiencing the Symptoms of Serious Illness Healthcare & Rehab Centre Palliative Care Improving quality of life when you re seriously ill Dealing with the
Patient Similarity-guided Decision Support Tanveer Syeda-Mahmood, PhD IBM Almaden Research Center May 2014 2014 IBM Corporation What is clinical decision support? Rule-based expert systems curated by people,
Produced by the Deloitte Center for Health Solutions Issue Brief: Physician perspectives about health information technology 2 Foreword The national debate around health care reform and the quest for a
Global Headquarters: 5 Speen Street Framingham, MA 01701 USA P.508.935.4445 F.508.988.7881 www.idc-hi.com U n l o cking the Power of Unstructured Data W H I T E P A P E R Sponsored by: IBM Susan Feldman
Shellie Sulzberger, LPN, CPC, ICDCT-CM Coding & Compliance Initiatives, Inc. Reasonable efforts have been made to provide the most accurate and current information on CPT 2015 code changes. However codes,
Adverse Event Reporting and Electronic Health Records Mitra Rocca Office of Translational Sciences Center for Drug Evaluation and Research U.S. Food and Drug Administration Team Michael Ibara, Pfizer George
PROJECT 3: The Puget Sound Health Clinic Database System CSE100/INFO 100 Fluency with Information Technology Spring 2002 Introduction... 1 Context... 1 Needs Analysis: Identifying Important Entities...
Research Study Capturing Dark Data & Handwritten Information as Part of Your Information Governance Process What s inside? About The Study... 02 Introduction... 03 What is Information Governance?... 04
Qualitative Methods in Empirical Studies of Software Engineering by Carolyn B. Seaman Overview topics of the paper qualitative methods data collection methods participant observation interviewing coding
Partial regulatory impact assessment on a proposed bill to reverse House of Lords judgment in Johnston v NEI International Combustion Ltd The ABI s Response to the Scottish Government s Consultation 1.
Main Effect of Screening for Coronary Artery Disease Using CT Angiography on Mortality and Cardiac Events in High risk Patients with Diabetes: The FACTOR-64 Randomized Clinical Trial Joseph B. Muhlestein,