1 Statement of The Sentencing Project To the Senate Judiciary Committee, Subcommittee on The Constitution, Civil Rights and Human Rights Hearing on The State of Civil and Human Rights in the United States December 9, 2014
2 1 TESTIMONY OF MARC MAUER, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR THE SENTENCING PROJECT M embers of the Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Human Rights: I am Marc Mauer, Executive Director of The Sentencing Project, an organization which has long been engaged in research and advocacy on federal sentencing policy, felony disenfranchisement, and racial disparities in the criminal justice system. I am submitting this statement on behalf of The Sentencing Project for inclusion in the record of the Subcommittee s hearing on The State of Civil and Human Rights in the United States. We commend the Subcommittee for continuing its examination of these important issues. In this written testimony, I seek to highlight the unsustainable rise in mass incarceration, the policies and practices that contribute to excessive imprisonment, associated racial disparities throughout the criminal justice system, and the deeply problematic policy of felony disenfranchisement. I urge the members of this Committee and the Congress as a whole to take action to address these problems. MASS INCARCERATION IN THE UNITED STATES The United States maintains the world s largest criminal justice system. Approximately seven million individuals are under some form of correctional control, including 2.2 million incarcerated in prisons or jails. 1 The U.S. incarcerates its people at a rate five to eight times that of the world s other liberal democracies. 2 In the past three decades, the number of federal prisoners has grown at a breathtaking rate of nearly 800%. 3 Even more so than in state prisons, this growth has largely been caused by the War on Drugs. In 1980, about 4,700 individuals were incarcerated in federal prisons for a drug offense. 4 By 2011, the number had grown to 94,600 a 20-fold increase in 30 years. 5 In the past two decades, the number of 1 U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics, Correctional Populations in the United States, See International Centre for Prison Studies, World Prison Brief. 3 See The Sentencing Project, Trends in U.S. Corrections, 2014 (citing Bureau of Justice Statistics Prisoners Series). 4 Id. 5 Id.
3 2 TESTIMONY OF MARC MAUER, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR THE SENTENCING PROJECT annual drug trafficking cases has increased 79%, from 13,721 cases in 1992 to 24,563 cases in Today half of federal prisoners are incarcerated for a drug offense. 7 Racial disparity pervades the U.S. criminal justice system. People of color are more likely than white Americans to be arrested; once arrested, they are more likely to be convicted; and once convicted, they are more likely to receive longer sentences. African-American males are six times as likely to be incarcerated as white males and Latino males are 2.5 times as likely. If current trends continue, one of every three black American males born today can expect to go to prison in his lifetime, as can one of every six Latino males compared to one of every seventeen white males. 8 Racial and ethnic disparities among women are less substantial than among men but remain prevalent. At the federal level, the heavy proportion of drug offenders has contributed to significant racial and ethnic disparities. In 2012, 74.4% of persons sentenced for federal drug trafficking offenses were either black (26.5%) or Hispanic (47.9%). 9 For cases involving powder cocaine, crack cocaine, or heroin, more than 80% of offenders were black or Hispanic. 10 The source of such disparities is deeper and more systemic than explicit racial discrimination. The U.S. in effect operates two distinct criminal justice systems: one for wealthy people and another for poor people and minorities. The former provides a vigorous adversarial system replete with constitutional protections for defendants. Yet the experiences of poor and minority defendants within the criminal justice system often differ substantially from that model due to the influence of policy and practice decisionmaking, allocation of resources, implicit bias, and other factors. 6 See USSC Webcast: Analysis of Drug Trafficking Offenders and Guidelines (available at: 7 See The Sentencing Project, Trends in U.S. Corrections, Id. 9 U. S. Sentencing Commission, 2013 Sourcebook of Federal Sentencing Statistics (available at: 2013). 10 Id.
4 3 TESTIMONY OF MARC MAUER, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR THE SENTENCING PROJECT THE IMPACT OF MANDATORY MINIMUM PENALTIES IN FEDERAL SENTENCING In 2011, the United States Sentencing Commission released an exemplary report to Congress, Mandatory Minimum Penalties in the Federal Criminal Justice System, which provides a comprehensive assessment of the impact of mandatory minimum penalties on federal sentencing. The Commission s analysis revealed that mandatory minimum penalties have contributed significantly to the overall federal prison population. As Judge Patti Saris, chair of the U.S. Sentencing Commission, wrote to the Senate Judiciary Committee last year, the bipartisan seven-member Commission unanimously agrees that [federal] mandatory minimum sentences in their current form have led to unintended results. Federal minimum penalties have not improved public safety but have exacerbated existing racial disparities within the criminal justice system. Federal Mandatory Minimums Have Not Improved Public Safety To date, there is virtually no data that demonstrates a direct link between federal mandatory penalties in particular and a decline in crime. Further, a broad range of research suggests that it is quite unlikely that these penalties would have such an impact. In examining the effect of federal mandatory penalties, the key data problem is that the federal court system handles only a small fraction, less than 10%, of all criminal cases. Therefore, attempting to draw any conclusions about the specific impact of federal mandatory penalties on crime rates is fraught with imprecision. To state that the adoption of such penalties by Congress in the 1980s was directly responsible for reductions in a wide variety of crimes that are generally prosecuted in state courts requires a great leap of faith that is not supported by the evidence. We can see this most clearly in the realm of drug offenses, the category in which federal mandatory penalties most often apply. Since drug offenses are widely prosecuted in both state and federal courts, a potential offender has no means of knowing in which court system he or she would be likely to be prosecuted (assuming, of course, that the offender is even thinking about the prospects of apprehension).
5 4 TESTIMONY OF MARC MAUER, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR THE SENTENCING PROJECT Therefore, it is virtually impossible to break out any uniquely federal impact of mandatory sentencing. Even aside from this problem, measuring the impact of harsh sentencing policies on crime rates is a complex undertaking. While it is the case that crime rates have generally been declining since the early 1990s and that this has taken place at a time when the prison population was rising, this does not necessarily suggest that there is a clear and unambiguous relationship between these two factors. Just prior to the beginnings of the crime decline, in the period , incarceration rates increased substantially and yet crime rates increased as well. While incarceration has some impact on crime, this effect is generally more modest than many believe. In its comprehensive 2014 report, The Growth of Incarceration in the United States, the National Research Council concluded that studies support the conclusion that the growth in incarceration rates reduced crime, but the magnitude of the reduction remains highly uncertain and the evidence suggests it was unlikely to have been large. 11 While there is little relevant data on the overall impact of federal mandatory penalties, there is nonetheless a broad range of evidence which suggests that it is unlikely that mandatory penalties for drug offenses have a significant impact on enhancing public safety. This is the case for several reasons: Deterrence is primarily a function of the certainty, not severity, of punishment. To the extent that sentencing policies may deter individuals from engaging in crime, the research literature generally shows that increases in the certainty of punishment are much more likely to produce an effect than enhancements to the severity of punishment, particularly when punishments in American courts are already severe. Merely extending the amount of punishment that will be imposed, when most offenders don t believe they will be apprehended, does little to add to any deterrent effect. In this regard, mandatory penalties increase severity, but have no direct impact on increasing certainty, and are therefore not likely to provide any significant additional deterrent effects. Mandatory penalties are particularly ineffective in addressing drug crimes. Drug offenses are particularly immune to being affected by more and longer prison terms. This is largely due to the replacement nature of these offenses, the fact that there is a 11 National Research Council, The Growth of Incarceration in the United States, 2014.
6 5 TESTIMONY OF MARC MAUER, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR THE SENTENCING PROJECT virtually endless supply of potential offenders in the drug trade. Since the vast majority of incarcerated drug offenders are from the lower and middle ranks of the drug trade, their imprisonment in effect creates a job opportunity for someone else seeking to earn some quick money. As long as there is a demand for illegal drugs, there will be a large pool of potential sellers. Mandatory penalties may adversely affect recidivism. Whatever one may think about the wisdom of mandatory sentencing, it is undeniable that such penalties serve to increase the length of time that offenders serve in prison by restricting the discretion of judges, corrections, and parole officials. By doing so, these policies may have a criminogenic effect. A 2002 review conducted by leading Canadian criminologists concluded that longer periods in prison were associated with a small increase in recidivism and that the results appear to give some credence to the prison as schools of crime perspective. 12 Federal mandatory penalties increase the challenges for successful reentry. While not a problem exclusive to mandatory sentencing, the combination of expanded federal prosecution of drug offenses along with the lengthier prison terms produced by mandatory penalties exacerbates the challenges of reentry. This is due to the fact that since federal prisoners can be housed anywhere in the country, many are in prisons far from their homes and are also serving long prison terms. This combination of circumstances contributes to eroding ties to family and community, the critical ingredients of successful reentry. Mandatory Minimums Exacerbate Racial Disparity In addition to the counterproductive effects of mandatory sentencing on public safety, mandatory minimum penalties also serve to exacerbate racial disparities within the criminal justice system. A combination of circumstances virtually ensures that this will be an inevitable outcome of such penalties. We have seen for some time that racial disparities are produced in federal case processing. As far back as 1991, the U.S. Sentencing Commission documented that, 12 Paula Smith, Claire Goggin, and Paul Gendreau, The Effects of Prison Sentences and Intermediate Sanctions on Recidivism: General Effects and Individual Differences, Solicitor General of Canada, 2002.
7 6 TESTIMONY OF MARC MAUER, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR THE SENTENCING PROJECT The disparate application of mandatory minimum sentences in cases in which available data strongly suggest that a mandatory minimum is applicable appears to be related to the race of the defendant, where whites are more likely than non-whites to be sentenced below the applicable mandatory minimum. In its 2011 report on mandatory minimum penalties, the Commission found that of federal drug offenders convicted of an offense carrying a mandatory minimum penalty, 18.4% of white defendants were subject to a mandatory minimum penalty at sentencing, compared to 40.4% of black defendants and 39.6% of Hispanic defendants. 13 Why, though, would mandatory penalties uniquely produce such disproportionate racial and ethnic effects? Several factors are key in understanding these dynamics. First, and most critical, is the fact that mandatory penalties in the federal system have most often been applied to the prosecution of drug offenses. As a wealth of documentation has shown, the drug war has had extremely disproportionate effects on African American communities in particular. This is not initially a function of sentencing policy, but rather law enforcement priorities; ultimately, this results in the application of harsh penalties to a population that is not necessarily representative of all persons who have violated the applicable laws. Blacks are no more likely to use or sell drugs than whites, and yet they have a significantly higher rate of arrests. African Americans encompass 14 percent of regular drug users but are 37 percent of those who are arrested for drug crimes. There is no more obvious example of this than the figure of African Americans constituting at least 80% of those being charged with federal crack cocaine offenses over a 20-year period, a finding that contributed to the adoption of the Fair Sentencing Act by Congress in A second, and somewhat more subtle, effect of mandatory penalties is that many such policies provide increasingly harsh punishments to offenders based on prior convictions. This produces a disproportionate racial impact because defendants of color are more likely to have a prior record than are white defendants. Some people would argue that this is due to greater involvement in crime, while others would contend that this results from disproportionate processing by the criminal justice 13 U.S. Sentencing Commission, Report to the Congress: Mandatory Minimum Penalties in the Federal Criminal Justice System, 2011.
8 7 TESTIMONY OF MARC MAUER, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR THE SENTENCING PROJECT system. But regardless of one s perspective, it is undeniable that this will be the case. Therefore, it is virtually inevitable that minority defendants will experience these penalties disproportionately. FELONY DISENFRANCHISEMENT The United States is the most restrictive nation in the industrialized world in denying the right to vote to citizens convicted of crimes. A remarkable 5.85 million Americans are prohibited from voting because of a current or past felony conviction. 14 Felony disenfranchisement policies vary widely by state. 15 Two states, Maine and Vermont, place no restrictions on voting, including for persons currently incarcerated in state prisons. The other 48 states and the District of Columbia deny the right to vote while incarcerated for a felony; 35 of these states disenfranchise persons on probation and/or parole as well; and in 12 states some or all individuals convicted of a felony lose the right to vote even after completing all conditions of their sentence. Incarcerated persons represent only about a quarter of the total disenfranchised population. The other 75 percent of disenfranchised citizens live in their communities, either under probation or parole supervision or having completed their sentence. This includes an estimated 2.6 million people, or 45 percent of the total disenfranchised population, who are disenfranchised in states that restrict voting rights even after completion of sentence. 16 Rights restoration practices vary widely across states and are subject to the turns of political climate and leadership, which has led some states to vacillate between reform and regression. 17 In Florida, the clemency board voted in 2007 to automatically restore voting rights for many persons with non-violent felony 14 Uggen, C., Shannon, S., & Manza, J., The Sentencing Project, State-level estimates of felon disenfranchisement in the Unites States, 2010 (available at: 10.pdf). 15 See The Sentencing Project, Felony Disenfranchisement: A Primer (available at: pdf). 16 Id. 17 Id.
9 8 TESTIMONY OF MARC MAUER, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR THE SENTENCING PROJECT convictions. As a result, more than 100,000 people regained the right to vote. But with a new governor taking office in 2011, this decision was reversed and individuals must now wait at least five years after completing their sentence to apply for rights restoration. Similarly, in Iowa, then-governor Vilsack issued an executive order in 2005 automatically restoring the voting rights of all persons who had completed their sentences, but this order was rescinded in 2011 by Governor Branstad. Felony disenfranchisement policies have a disproportionate impact on communities of color. Black Americans of voting age are four times as likely to lose their voting rights than the rest of the adult population, with one of every 13 black adults disenfranchised nationally. 18 In three states Florida (23 percent), Kentucky (22 percent), and Virginia (20 percent) more than one in five black adults is disenfranchised. In total, 2.2 million African Americans are banned from voting. 19 Public opinion surveys report that eight in ten U.S. residents support voting rights for citizens who have completed their sentence, and nearly two-thirds support voting rights for those on probation or parole. 20 In recent years, heightened public awareness of felony disenfranchisement has resulted in successful state-level reform efforts, from legislative changes expanding voting rights to grassroots voter registration initiatives targeting individuals with felony convictions. Since 1997, 23 states have modified felony disenfranchisement provisions to expand voter eligibility. Among these: Eight states either repealed or amended lifetime disenfranchisement laws. Two states expanded voting rights to persons on probation or parole. Ten states eased the restoration process for persons seeking to have their right to vote restored after the completion of their sentence. Three states improved data and information sharing. As a result of successful reform efforts from 1997 to 2010, an estimated 800,000 citizens have regained the right to vote. 18 Id. 19 Id. 20 Id.
10 9 TESTIMONY OF MARC MAUER, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR THE SENTENCING PROJECT Although reform efforts have been substantial in recent years, the overall disenfranchisement rate has increased dramatically in conjunction with the growing U.S. prison population, rising from 1.17 million in 1976 to 5.85 million by Restoring the vote to persons leaving prison can aid in their transition back into community life. The revocation of voting rights compounds the isolation of formerly incarcerated individuals from their communities. Civic participation has been linked with lower recidivism rates. In one study, among individuals who had been arrested previously, 27% of nonvoters were rearrested, compared with 12% of voters. 21 Although the limitations of the data available preclude proof of direct causation, the authors state that it is clear that voting appears to be part of a package of pro-social behavior that is linked to desistance from crime. The dramatic growth of the U.S. prison population in the last 40 years has led to record levels of disenfranchisement. Denying the right to vote to an entire class of citizens is deeply problematic to a democratic society and counterproductive to effective reentry. Fortunately, many states are reconsidering their archaic disenfranchisement policies, but there is still much work to be done. CONCLUSION Recent events in Ferguson, Missouri and in New York City have heightened awareness about our criminal justice system and highlight the need for a broad national examination of the policies and practices that contribute to excessive incarceration and racial disparities. For communities of color, confrontations with law enforcement are far too common. Excessive police encounters erode trust and cooperation, contribute to the over-representation of people of color in prisons and jails, and lead to the disproportionate rate of fatal police encounters among unarmed African American men. We can only hope that these tragedies will lead to a constructive response that brings national attention, and ultimately reform, to the problems of race and our criminal justice system. 21 Id.
Felony Disenfranchisement: A Primer A striking 5.85 million Americans are prohibited from voting due to laws that disenfranchise citizens convicted of felony offenses. 1 Felony disenfranchisement rates
TESTIMONY OF THE LAWYERS COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS UNDER LAW SUBMITTED TO: U.S. SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE OCTOBER 19, 2015 Testimony of the Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights Under Law Submitted by Kimberly
Testimony of Marc Mauer Executive Director The Sentencing Project Collateral Consequences of Criminal Convictions: Barriers to Reentry for the Formerly Incarcerated Prepared for House Judiciary Subcommittee
Trends in U.S. Corrections 1,600,000 U.S. State and Federal Prison Population, 1925-2014 2014: 1,508,636 1,400,000 1,200,000 1,000,000 800,000 600,000 400,000 200,000 0 1925 1930 1934 1938 1942 1946 1950
Overview of Federal Criminal Cases Fiscal Year 2012 Glenn R. Schmitt Jennifer Dukes Office of Research and Data The United States Sentencing Commission 1 received information on 84,360 federal criminal
SENTENCING REFORM FOR NONVIOLENT OFFENSES: BENEFITS AND ESTIMATED SAVINGS FOR ILLINOIS LISE MCKEAN, PH.D. SUSAN K. SHAPIRO CENTER FOR IMPACT RESEARCH OCTOBER 2004 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS PROJECT FUNDER Chicago
Creating an Equitable Future in washington state 20 5 BLACK WELL-BEING BEYOND Criminal Justice Strong communities depend on trust. When people feel confident that they are protected and have the opportunity
Speaker Sheldon Silver Breaking New York s Addiction to Prison: Reforming New York s Rockefeller Drug Laws In 1973 New York enacted, what were considered at the time, the harshest drug laws in the nation.
: RACE AND IMPRISONMENT IN TEXAS The disparate incarceration of Latinos and African Americans in the Lone Star State A ny discussion about the impact of incarceration in this country must acknowledge that
Incarcerated Parents and Their Children Trends 1991-2007 February 2009 For further information: The Sentencing Project 514 Tenth St. NW Suite 1000 Washington, D.C. 20004 (202) 628-0871 www.sentencingproject.org
2012 Party Platforms On Criminal Justice Policy September 2012 1 2012 PARTY PLATFORMS ON CRIMINAL JUSTICE POLICY THE SENTENCING PROJECT The Washington Post recently reported that the gulf between Republicans
Alternative Sentencing in the Federal Criminal Justice System UNITED STATES SENTENCING COMMISSION United States Sentencing Commission One Columbus Circle, N.E. Washington, DC 20002 www.ussc.gov Patti B.
Removal of Youth in the Adult Criminal Justice System: A State Trends Update Rebecca Gasca on behalf of Campaign for Youth Justice Juvenile Court founded in 1899 to create a separate justice system for
The Pennsylvania RISON OCIETY JUSTICE AND COMPASSION SINCE 1787 JUVENILE LIFE WITHOUT PAROLE PREPARED FOR THE PENNSYLVANIA SENATE JUDICIARY COMMiTTEE TESTIMONY OF WILLIAM DIMASCIO EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR THE
Race, Place, and Poverty An Urban Ethnographers Symposium on Low-Income Men U.S. Department of Health & Human Services ASPE/Human Services Policy URBAN INSTITUTE A product of the Low-Income Working Families
Issue Brief: Social Economic Status/ Class Criminal Justice in the U.S. Key Words: Criminal Justice, Low Socio Economic Class, Discrimination, Inequality, Description: This brief focuses on the relationship
The Changing Racial Dynamics of the War on Drugs Marc Mauer April 2009 For further information: The Sentencing Project 514 Tenth St. NW Suite 1000 Washington, DC 20004 (202) 628-0871 www.sentencingproject.org
U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report Federal Justice Statistics Program Federal Drug Offenders, 999 with Trends 984-99 August 200, NCJ 87285
Criminal Justice and the Planner s Role Beth Altshuler Raimi + Associates April 18, 2015 American Planning Association Seattle, WA 2 Public Health Social Sustainability & Climate Change Equity Community
g b agerstein bocian agne strategies To: Interested Parties From: GBA Strategies Date: October 11, 2011 Youth Justice System Survey An estimated 250,000 youth are tried, sentenced, or incarcerated as adults
It s time to shift gears on criminal justice VOTER TOOLKIT 2014 Who are the most powerful elected officials most voters have never voted for? ANSWER: Your District Attorney & Sheriff THE POWER OF THE DISTRICT
Statistics on Women in the Justice System January, 2014 All material is available though the web site of the Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS): http://www.bjs.gov/ unless otherwise cited. Note that correctional
CRIMINAL LAW UPDATE 2014 LEGISLATURE André de Gruy Capital Defender Corrections and Criminal Justice Task Force Created - HB 1231 2013 Leg. Judge and Prosecutor concerns about lack of certainty in sentencing/time-served
T H E M I N N E S O T A C O U N T Y A T T O R N E Y S A S S O C I A T I O N Minnesota County Attorneys Association Policy Positions on Drug Control and Enforcement Adopted: September 17, 2004 Introduction
How to Apply for a Pardon State of California Office of the Governor Statement of Philosophy A California Governor's pardon is an honor traditionally granted only to individuals who have demonstrated exemplary
Testimony of Benjamin Ruddell, Criminal Justice Policy Attorney, ACLU of Illinois Before the Illinois State Commission on Criminal Justice and Sentencing Reform July 27, 2015 The ACLU of Illinois was overjoyed
Criminal Justice 101 The Criminal Justice System in Colorado and the Impact on Individuals with Mental Illness April 2009 Acronyms DOC = Department of Corrections DYC = Division of Youth Corrections DCJ
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT COMMUTATIONS AND PARDONS Q1: What does the term executive clemency mean? A: Executive clemency is a catch-all term that includes all the different ways a state s governor
Using Administrative Records to Report Federal Criminal Case Processing Statistics John Scalia, Jr. Statistician Bureau of Justice Statistics U.S. Department of Justice Federal criminal case processing
The Murphy Roadmap: Criminal Justice Reform Paid for by Friends of Patrick Murphy. PAGE 2 THE MURPHY ROADMAP: CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFORM The Murphy Roadmap: Criminal Justice Reform We need to restore balance
MARCH 2012 Public Opinion on Sentencing and Corrections Policy in America 2012 polling, consistent with 2010 research, indicates that voters are concerned first and foremost with keeping communities and
2011 REGULAR SESSION HB 463 PENAL CODE AND CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES LEGISLATION Full text of the bill: http://www.lrc.ky.gov/record/11rs/hb463.htm SECTION 1. -description of reasoning behind legislation SECTION
Background information on restoration of voting rights in Kentucky Prepared by Kentuckians For The Commonwealth Last updated, August 2013 A. What does the Kentucky Constitution say about who is eligible
Immediate Sanction Probation Pilot Program Presented to the House Appropriations Committee September 16, 2013 Meredith Farrar-Owens Virginia Criminal Sentencing Commission Directive for Immediate Sanction
CLAIRE GASTANAGA EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR \ / ACLU AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION of VIRGINIA March 7, 2016 The Honorable Terry McAuliffe Governor of Virginia Office of the Governor Patrick Henry Building, Third
AB 109 is DANGEROUS Governor Brown signed AB 109 the Criminal Justice Realignment Bill into law on April 5, 2011. Governor Brown stated in his signing message on AB 109 - "For too long, the state s prison
A PHILANTHROPIC PARTNERSHIP FOR BLACK COMMUNITIES Criminal Justice BLACK FACTS Criminal Justice: UnEqual Opportunity BLACK MEN HAVE AN INCARCERATION RATE NEARLY 7 TIMES HIGHER THAN THEIR WHITE MALE COUNTERPARTS.
DRUG POLICY, CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND MASS IMPRISONMENT Bryan Stevenson * Working Paper Prepared for the First Meeting of the Commission Geneva, 24-25 January 2011 * Bryan Stevenson is the Executive Director
Uneven Justice: Rates of Incarceration By Race and Ethnicity Marc Mauer and Ryan S. King July 2007 For further information: The Sentencing Project 514 10 th St. NW Suite 1000 Washington, D.C. 20004 (202)
The Color of Justice An Analysis of Juvenile Adult Court Transfers in California JANUARY Page 20001 : An Analysis of Juvenile Adult Court Transfers in California By Mike Males, PhD and Dan Macallair, MPA
Testimony Submitted for the Record On behalf of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops Committee on Domestic Justice and Human Development, Catholic Charities USA, and The Society of St. Vincent
The Consequences of a Juvenile Delinquency Record in Minnesota 1. Is it true that a juvenile delinquency record will not limit a young person s future opportunities in Minnesota? No, it is not true. Although
Eliminating Barriers to Reentry: Positive Steps for Families Georgia Justice Project Direct Service Holistic Criminal Defense Social service support, during case, after case, and after release Criminal
Prepared by: Bexar County Court at Law No. 1 Adult Drug Court Program Drug Courts presentation Presiding Judge: Honorable Al Alonso Session Objectives: As a result of this session, you will be able to:
A PRIMER: WHAT STATE DEFENDERS MUST KNOW ABOUT FEDERAL LAW Wendy Holton Attorney, Helena, Montana WHolton@mt.net If you practice state criminal law you must have a basic understanding of federal law. PART
514 10TH S TREET NW, S UITE 1000 WASHINGTON, DC 20004 TEL: 202.628.0871 FAX: 202.628.1091 S TAFF@S ENTENCINGPROJECT.ORG WWW.SENTENCINGPROJECT.ORG STUDIES OF VOTING BEHAVIOR AND FELONY DISENFRANCHISEMENT
Reforming Mississippi s Prison System Prepared by the JFA Institute with assistance from the Mississippi Department of Corrections for the Public Safety Performance Project, the Pew Center on the States
Drug Policies in the State of Michigan Economic Effects Executive Summary News Walker: Keep reforming drug laws Home» Publications» Drug Policies in the State of Michigan Economic Effects» Drug Policies
Criminal Justice Policy Workgroup: Background Information 1 Criminal Justice Vision Statement This vision statement was created using the data from our needs assessment, as well as the information presented
FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION A Governor and Cabinet Agency Created in 1941 STATUS UPDATE: Restoration of Civil Rights (RCR) Cases Granted 2009 and 2010 presented to the Florida Board of Executive Clemency
Proposition 5 Nonviolent Offenders. Sentencing, Parole and Rehabilitation. Statute. SUMMARY This measure (1) expands drug treatment diversion programs for criminal offenders, (2) modifies parole supervision
U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report April 2014 ncj 244205 Recidivism of Prisoners Released in 30 States in 2005: Patterns from 2005 to 2010
U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report Truth in Sentencing January 99, NCJ 170032 in State Prisons By Paula M. Ditton Doris James Wilson BJS Statisticians
MEMORANDUM To: From: NYSDA Members Al O'Connor, New York State Defenders Association Date: December 14, 2004 Re: Rockefeller Drug Law Reform (A.11895) Today, Governor Pataki plans to sign the Rockefeller
February 21, 2013 Promoting Successful Rehabilitation and Reentry of Ex-Drug Offenders Rachel Cooper email@example.com Jeanie Donovan firstname.lastname@example.org To promote the successful rehabilitation and reentry
The Chicago Lawyers' Committee's Review of Alternatives for Non- Violent Offenders High incarceration rates have necessarily shed light on the issue of incarcerating non-violent offenders. With approximately
GROWTH IN THE U.S. EX-FELON AND EX-PRISONER POPULATION, 1948 TO 2010 Sarah Shannon, Christopher Uggen, Melissa Thompson, Jason Schnittker, and Michael Massoglia Abstract The steep rise in U.S. criminal
TESTIMONY OF THE LAWYERS COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS UNDER LAW SUBMITTED TO: U.S. SENATE JUDICIARY SUBCOMMITTEE ON CRIME AND TERRORISM Hearing on: Body Cameras: Can Technology Increase Protection for Law
AS MUCH AS TIMES CHANGE FEDERAL DRUG CHARGES STAY THE SAME A White Paper Presented by Ron Cordova, Attorney-at-Law AN OVERVIEW OF FEDERAL DRUG CRIMES AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF CONVICTION California s stance
York County DUI Prevention Initiative The Case That Got It Started Gender: Male Age: 50 Prior DUI in 1999 Two previous incarcerations for Public Drunkenness Per previous policy: Transported for a blood
Restoration of Civil Rights Helping People regain their Civil Liberties Consequences of a Felony Food Stamps and social security benefits: People convicted of a felony for possession or sell of controlled
ABA COMMISSION ON EFFECTIVE CRIMINAL SANCTIONS The ABA Commission on Effective Criminal Sanctions has developed a series of policy recommendations that it anticipates will provide the basis for a broad
HANDOUT 1: Purpose and Principles of Sentencing in Canada Principles of Sentencing The Criminal Code of Canada outlines the principles and purpose of sentencing in s. 718. These principles are placed in
District of Columbia Truth-in-Sentencing Commission 950 Pennsylvania Avenue Northwest, Washington, AC. 20530 The Honorable Linda Cropp The District of Columbia Council 441 Fourth Street, N.W. Washington,
Display 27: Major Criminal Justice Initiatives in Virginia (1988 1998) During the last decade, Virginia lawmakers have enacted various laws to respond to crime in Virginia. This section summarizes some
SAN FRANCISCO JUSTICE REINVESTMENT INITIATIVE: RACIAL AND ETHNIC DISPARITIES ANALYSIS FOR THE REENTRY COUNCIL SUMMARY OF KEY FINDINGS SAN FRANCISCO JUSTICE REINVESTMENT INITIATIVE: RACIAL AND ETHNIC DISPARITIES
Criminal Records & Employment: Data on the Disproportionate Impact on Communities of Color Updated November 30, 2009 Madeline Neighly Margaret (Peggy) Stevenson Oakland, California 510-409-2427 email@example.com
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) ) v. ) No. ) (Judge ) ) ) PETITION TO ENTER A PLEA OF GUILTY (Misdemeanor) I,, respectfully represent
THE DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES CRIMINAL JUSTICE PROGRAM HANDBOOK MAY 2015 Criminal Justice The Criminal Justice Program offers a course of study to prepare the pre-service student for
December 18, 2007 Hon. Edmund G. Brown Jr. Attorney General 1300 I Street, 17 th Floor Sacramento, California 95814 Attention: Ms. Krystal Paris Initiative Coordinator Dear Attorney General Brown: Pursuant
A Decade of Truth-In- Sentencing in Virginia A decade ago, Virginia abolished parole and adopted truth-in-sentencing for convicted felons. Over 200,000 criminals have been punished under noparole laws.
STATEMENT OF RICHARD S. HARTUNIAN UNITED STATES ATTORNEY NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK - - - BEFORE THE CHARLES COLSON TASK FORCE ON FEDERAL CORRECTIONS - - - WASHINGTON, DC JANUARY 27, 2015 Chairman Watts,
RACE, CLASS AND THE WAR ON DRUGS A community forum examining the disproportionately adverse effects of current drug law enforcement on racial minorities and the poor sponsored by King County Bar Association
Potential for Change: Public Attitudes and Policy Preferences for Juvenile Justice Systems Reform Executive Summary: Washington A Center for Children s Law and Policy Report Introduction New polling data
June 15, 2015 Hon. Kamala D. Harris Attorney General 1300 I Street, 17 th Floor Sacramento, California 95814 Attention: Ms. Ashley Johansson Initiative Coordinator Dear Attorney General Harris: Pursuant
Section-by-Section Analysis of the Second Chance Act: Sec. 1. Short Title. Part I Improvements to Existing Programs This section names the short title of the act as the Second Chance Act of 2007: Community
RESOLUTION NO.: 2015-A011 GENERAL CONVENTION OF THE EPISCOPAL CHURCH 2015 ARCHIVES RESEARCH REPORT TITLE: PROPOSER: TOPIC: Recommit to Criminal Justice Reform Study and Advocacy Executive Council Criminal
House Proposal of Amendment S. 292 An act relating to term probation, the right to bail, medical care of inmates, and a reduction in the number of nonviolent prisoners, probationers, and detainees. The
Standing Committee on Justice, Human Rights, Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness Ottawa, November 24, 2005 Speaking Notes Bill C-215: An Act to amend the Criminal Code (consecutive sentence for use
MANDATORY MINIMUMS AND DRUG LAW MATERIALS. 1) Enough lesson handouts for each student (end of lesson).. 2) Re- useable white board and markers if you want them TAKEAWAYS Students will understand mandatory
ENROLLED Regular Session, 1997 HOUSE BILL NO. 2412 BY REPRESENTATIVE JACK SMITH AN ACT To enact Chapter 33 of Title 13 of the Louisiana Revised Statutes of 1950, comprised of R.S. 13:5301 through 5304,
12 Collateral damage occurs in any war, including America s War on Crime. Ironically, our zealous efforts to keep communities safe may have actually destabilized and divided them. The vast expansion of
Current Issues in the Rehabilitation of Convicted Felons in Florida Jessica Bratton Incarceration is a primary form of punishment for felony offenses in the state of Florida (Ward&Brown, 2004).According