Partnership Basis and At Risk Rules: The New Section 752 Regulations and More
|
|
- Myles May
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 60TH ANNUAL MNCPA TAX CONFERENCE November 17-18, 2014 Minneapolis Convention Center ONLINE RESOURCES Session Handouts Most session handouts are available on the MNCPA website. To access: Go to Log in with your MNCPA username and password Note: Your conference registration fee must be paid in full to access session handouts online. CPE Transcript (Certificate of Attendance) Your official transcript will be available on the MNCPA website. To access: Go to Log in with your MNCPA username and password Note: Tax Conference transcripts will be available Friday, Nov. 21. MATERIALS DISCLAIMER Partnership Basis and At Risk Rules: The New Section 752 Regulations and More Michael Cole, MSPA, JD McGladrey LLP Minneapolis, MN Michael Cole, MSPA, JD, is a tax director and national leader in complex partnership structuring and compliance issues for McGladrey LLP. He has extensive experience in transactional and structuring engagements involving various entity forms. Cole began his career working at Ernst & Young, LLP as the first direct hire in the Transaction Advisory Services, Transaction Tax Center of Excellence and then moving on to serve as the head of taxation for Ironstate Holdings, LLC. These materials are provided for the exclusive, personal use of the customer. Any other reproduction, retransmission, republication or other use is expressly prohibited without prior written consent from the Minnesota Society of Certified Public Accountants (MNCPA) and/or the content author. The MNCPA makes no warranty, guarantee or representation as to the accuracy or completeness of these materials. The contents of these materials are subject to change without notice. The content authors and/or instructors are not engaged in rendering legal, accounting or professional service. If legal advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional person should be sought.
2 This page is intentionally blank.
3 Partnership Basis and At Risk Rules: The New Section 752 Regulations & More Agenda: At Risk and 465 Basis in a Partnership Examples 1 & The Past and Present Allocation of Debt Recourse and Nonrecourse Proposed 752 Regulations Examples Page 1
4 At Risk and At Risk: At-Risk and Section Determining Deductions I.R.C. 465 prevents taxpayers from taking a deduction in excess of the amount of risk as determined by the Code and associated regulations. There are two ways in which deductions allocated to an activity may be deductable by a taxpayer: - Deductions from an activity are generally allowed to the extent that there is income received or accrued in a taxable year. - In the alternative, losses in excess of income from an activity will be allowed to the extent that the taxpayer is at risk with respect to the activity at the close of the taxable year. See Treas. Reg (a). 4 Page 2
5 At Risk: The amount considered at risk 465(b)(1): - In general. For purposes of this section, a taxpayer shall be considered at risk for an activity with respect to amounts including: The amount of money and the adjusted basis of other property contributed by the taxpayer to the activity, and Amounts borrowed with respect to such activity 5 At Risk: Determining at risk for borrowed amounts 465(b)(2): - Borrowed amounts. For purposes of this section, a taxpayer shall be considered at risk with respect to amounts borrowed for use in an activity to the extent that he: Is personally liable for the repayment of such amounts, or Has pledged property, other than property used in such an activity, as security for such borrowed amount (to the extent of the net fair market value of the taxpayer s interest in such property). - No property shall be taken into account as security if such property is directly or indirectly financed by indebtedness which is secured by property 6 Page 3
6 At Risk: Beginning Amount At Risk in a Partnership - Generally, a partner s amount at risk is equal to the taxpayer s basis plus debt allocation less amount protected against loss. - The amount that is at risk is thereafter adjusted for items impacting basis and borrowed funds. Treas. Reg (a-b) 7 Basis in a Partnership 8 Page 4
7 Basis in Partnership Interest: Basis in a Partnership - Defined by Sections 722 and 723 Initial basis is of the property, including money, contributed by the partner in exchange for the interest 722 The basis of the property is equal to the adjusted basis that a partner held in such property increased by any gain triggered by 721(b), see Note: The impact of debt on basis of contributed property, the partner, and the alternative determination of basis under 705(b) are outside the scope of this presentation. Annual Adjustments to basis are completed under the rules of Basis in Partnership Interest Initial concepts - Inside Basis Basis of partnership assets - Outside Basis Partner s basis in partnership interest - Why are they different? - What is the impact if there is a difference? 743(b) or 734(b) adjustments (optional or mandatory) 10 Page 5
8 Basis in Partnership Interest Single Basis Concept - One single basis even though partners can own multiple classes of partnership interest - However, this single basis can have separate holding periods - IRS Legal Advice AM Cannot allocate tax items to different interests in disregarded entity Rev. Rul Partner has a unitary basis - Use FMV to determine portion sold - Liabilities complicate the issue 11 Basis in Partnership Interest Calculation of Basis - When do you calculate basis? A partner is only required to compute the basis of his partnership interest when the computation is necessary to determine his tax liability. When there has been a sale or exchange of all or a part of a partnership interest or a liquidation of a partner's entire interest in a partnership, the adjusted basis of the partner's interest should be determined as of the date of sale or exchange or liquidation Reg (a)(1) 12 Page 6
9 Basis in Partnership Interest Calculation of Basis - Ordering Rules under 705(a) Increased by - Contributions to the partnership and purchases of partnership interests ( 722 and 742) - Taxable income of the partnership - Income of the partnership exempt from tax - The excess of the deductions for depletion over the basis of the property subject to depletion 13 Basis in Partnership Interest Calculation of Basis - Ordering Rules under 705(a) Decreased by - Distributions of the partnership ( 733) Money is considered distributed before other property if made simultaneously. Basis adjustments for separate distributions are made in chronological order. - Losses of the partnership - Depletion - See Rev. Rul comprehensive example of basis calculation and ordering rules 14 Page 7
10 Basis in Partnership Interest Contribution of property - Partner receives basis equal to adjusted basis in partnership property. Distribution of property - Partner s basis is decreased by adjusted basis in partnership property (with limitations) Exceptions to general rules for - Disguised sales - Shifting of liabilities could cause gain recognition - Liquidating distributions 15 Basis in Partner s Interest: Annual adjustments to a Partner s Basis in the Partnership: Increased by the sum of his distributive share for the taxable year and prior taxable years of: - Taxable income of the partnership as determined under section 703(a) - Income of the partnership exempt from tax under this title, and - The excess of the deductions for depletion over the basis of the property subject to depletion; Decreased (but not below zero) by distributions by the partnership as provided in section 733 and by the sum of his distributive share for the taxable year and prior taxable years of: - Losses of the partnership, and - Expenditures of the partnership not deductible in computing its taxable income and not properly chargeable to capital account; I.R.C. 705(a)(1-2) 16 Page 8
11 Basis in Partnership Interest Calculation of Basis - Alternative rule under 705(b) Partners basis is equal to their proportionate share of all assets - When can you apply this rule The partner cannot practicably apply the general rule set forth in 705(a) Reasonable to conclude that the result produced will not vary substantially from the result obtainable under the general rule 17 Basis in Partnership Interest A partner s basis cannot be reduced below zero - 704(d) provides that deductions cannot be taken to the extent they exceed the partner s basis - 731(a)(1) causes gain recognition on any cash distributions to the extent they exceed the partner s basis - 732(b) provides that the basis of property distributed on liquidation is equal to the adjusted basis in partner s interest in the partnership, exception for money 18 Page 9
12 Basis in Partnership Interest Partner s Basis and Partner s Capital Account - Generally, basis will equal the sum of Tax basis capital account, and Partner s share of liabilities. - Partners can have negative or deficit capital accounts 19 Basis in Partnership Interest Treatment of liabilities Increase in a partner's share of partnership liabilities are treated as cash contributions by the partner - Decrease in a partner's share of partnership liabilities are treated as cash distributions to the partner - A liability to which property is subject shall, to the extent of the fair market value of such property, be considered as a liability of the owner of the property. 20 Page 10
13 Basis in Partnership Interest 704(b) vs. Tax Basis - Initial value is fair market value for contributed property under 704(b) - On distribution of property, the value of the property must be booked up to reflect FMV with a corresponding adjustment to partner s 704(b) capital accounts - Book-ups can be made when other significant transactions occur. See Reg (b)(2)(iv)(f) 21 Basis in Partnership Interest Other issues - A partner's note evidencing its obligation to make a future contribution to the partnership has no basis - Rev. Rul basis adjustment on charitable contribution of partnership property 22 Page 11
14 Example 1 Slide 1: Alex wishes to enter into a partnership with Bailey. They form a Delaware LLC and decide to use the default status as a partnership for tax reasons. The organization maintains its books and records in accordance with Treas. Reg (b). To capitalize the organization, Alex contributes depreciable machinery with a basis of $750,000 and a fair market value of $1,000,000. Bailey contributes cash of $1,000,000. The organization has no other debts or obligations. 23 Example 1 Slide 2: Alex has a stated capital account for calculations under 704 of $1,000,000. Her amount at risk, however, is only $750,000 because 722 provides that her basis is equal to the basis in the property determined under 723 increased by any gain under 721(b). Accordingly, her basis in the property contributed to the partnership was $750,000 no gain was recognized under 721(b) yielding an initial amount at risk of $750, Page 12
15 Example 1 Slide 3: Bailey has a stated capital account for calculations under 704 of $1,000,000. Her amount at risk is $1,000,000 because 722 provides that her basis is equal to the basis in the property determined under 723 increased by any gain under 721 (b). Accordingly, her basis in the property contributed to the partnership was $1,000,000 no gain was recognized under 721(b) yielding an initial amount at risk of $1,000, Example 2 Slide 1: Same facts as Example 1. At the end of the first year of operations the organization had a $2,000,000 loss. In a 50/50 partnership each person would receive an allocation loss equal to $1,000,000. For 704 accounting purposes each account would be reduced by $1,000,000 leaving a remaining capital account for tax book of $0. 26 Page 13
16 Example 2 Slide 2: Bailey had at risk basis at the end of the year equal to $1,000,000. The allocation of loss is therefore fully deductible on her personal return. Her at risk basis is now reduced to $0 the same as her 704 capital account. 27 Example 2 Slide 3: Alex had an at risk basis equal to $750,000 at the end of the year. The allocation of loss is available to offset the at risk value equal to $750,000. Alex may not have an at risk basis less than $0 the remaining $250,000 is not deductible on Alex s personal return as a suspended loss Alex will also now have a 704 capital account of $0. 28 Page 14
17 752 The Past and the Present The Past and the Present: Historic The Simple Methods Prior to 1988 Prior Treas. Reg (e) provided a simple method for the allocation of debt amongst the members of an organization. General Partners allocated liabilities in accordance with their ratios for sharing losses. Liabilities that are nonrecourse are allocated to partners in accordance with their profit sharing ratios. The major change in the law arises from the case Raphan v. U.S., 3 Cl. Ct. 457 (1983), rev d, 759 F.2d 879 (Fed. Cir. 1985). 30 Page 15
18 752 The Past and the Present: Historic Raphan v. U.S. Id. - A Limited Partnership had several investors and various debt obligations; however, the guarantees of the general partner w outside of the partnership agreement. - The Federal Claims Court had the first decision and provided that this was not made in a partner capacity and therefore the debt remained nonrecourse and is to be allocated to all partners according to profit ratios. - This appears to be inconsistent with the position that many thought should apply it was eventually overturned The Past and the Present: Historic Raphan v. U.S. The Backlash - The Act [P.L ] provides specifically that the Claims Court decision in Raphan v. United States is not to be followed for purposes of applying section 752 or the regulations thereunder. In addition, the Treasury is to revise and update its regulations under section 752, as soon as practicable, to reflect the overruling of the Raphan decision and to take account of current commercial practices and arrangements relating to partnership liabilities, including regulations concerning the treatment of guarantees, assumptions, indemnity agreements, and other similar arrangements. EXPLANATION OF THE REV. REDUCTION ACT OF 1984, JOINT COM. TAXATION 250 (Joint Comm. Print 1984). 32 Page 16
19 752 The Past and the Present: Current Generally, The Deficit Reduction Act of 1984 (P.L ) fortified the concept of At-Risk allocations of liabilities in entities taxed as partnerships It focused on preventing partners from deducting losses in excess of the amounts which the taxpayer actually risks losing as a result of an investment. Explanation of the Rev. Reduction Act of 1984, Joint Com. Taxation 250 (Joint Comm. Print 1984). 33 Allocation of Debt Recourse and Nonrecourse 34 Page 17
20 Allocation of Debt Recourse Debt - Recourse if and to the extent one or more partners (or related persons) bear the economic risk of loss (Reg ) - Economic risk of loss Based on constructive liquidation where a partner (or related person) is not entitled to reimbursement - All obligations are recognized - All of the partnership s assets, including cash, have a value of zero - Partnership disposes of all property - Income and loss is allocated to partner - Partnership liquidates 35 Current Law - 752: Recourse Liabilities Economic Risk of Loss: Measured by his ultimate responsibility to pay the creditor or to contribute additional funds to the partnership Constructive Liquidation - definition: - Partnership assets become worthless - Liabilities become due and payable in full - Partnership disposes of assets in a taxable exchange for no consideration other than relief from limited liabilities - Partnership allocates its items of income, gain, loss, deduction and credit among the partners and liquidates Direct Payment Obligations: - Economic risk also includes direct payment obligations - Can include guarantees, assumptions, indemnities and similar arrangements - Limited partners may not get the debt allocated to them if they would be entitled a reimbursement Disproportionate loss sharing: - Allocate losses in accordance with 704(b) and corresponding liabilities under Page 18
21 Allocation of Debt Qualified Nonrecourse Financing (Reg ) - Allocated under the nonrecourse debt rules. - No one is personally liable for repayment. - Used in the activity of holding real property. - Loaned or guaranteed by: Federal, state, or local government, or A person regularly involved in the business of lending (i.e., bank or savings and loan association) - Secured by real property used in the activity. 37 Allocation of Debt Nonrecourse debt (Reg (a)) - No partner or related person bears economic risk of loss - Three tiers of allocations Partner s share of minimum gain under 704(b) Partner s share of 704(c) minimum gain Excess nonrecourse debt - Partner s share of profits - Partnership agreement may specify provide it is consistent with allocations of some significant item - Allocate based on deductions related to debt - May first allocate based on 704(c) gain not considered in tier 2 38 Page 19
22 Allocation of Debt Nonrecourse Allocations Must allocate liabilities to partners that would bear the economic risk of loss with those liabilities Practical thought: If the partnership defaulted on its obligations, who would be on the hook from personal funds w/o right to reimbursement. 39 Nonrecourse Deductions Allocations of deductions attributable to nonrecourse debt do not have substantial economic effect - Lender (not partner) bears any economic loss Allocations based on partner s interest in the partnership (Reg ) 40 Page 20
23 Proposed 752 Regulations 41 Proposed Introduction - The Proposed 752 Regulations maintain the general rule of allocating excess nonrecourse liabilities based on each partner s profit interest. The practical application of calculating a partner s true share of profits in the partnership is nearly impossible. Under the current regulations, there are three safe harbors that can be used to allocate excess nonrecourse liabilities. Using these safe harbors enables the partnership to abide by the law, while still giving some flexibility. 42 Page 21
24 Current Law - 752: Nonrecourse Liabilities Exculpatory Liabilities: - Liability that is nonrecourse in that no partner has any economic risk of loss related to the liability, but is not secured by specific partnership property (i.e. recourse to the partnership but not to any of the partners) - Often an issue in LLCs and LLPs - General partnerships do not have exculpatory liabilities because there is always at least one general partner that is personally liable for all liabilities Bifurcated Debt: - Occurs when a partner(s) bear the economic risk of loss with respect to a portion of the liability but not to the entire liability. The portion where the partner bears the economic risk of loss is treated as recourse specifically to that partner as a recourse liability. The remainder is treated as a nonrecourse liability. Partner Nonrecourse Loans and Guarantees: - A partner who lends money to the partnership on a nonrecourse basis bears the economic risk of loss for the liability - Same holds true for a partner guarantees an otherwise nonrecourse liability 43 Current Law - 752: Nonrecourse Liabilities Three Tiers: - Partner s share of partnership minimum gain as determined under 704(b) Regs concerning allocation of nonrecourse deductions - Amount of taxable gain that would be allocated to a partner under 704(c) principles if the partnership disposed of all property subject to non-recourse liabilities in a taxable transaction in full satisfaction of such liabilities and for no other consideration - Excess nonrecourse liabilities as determined in accordance with the partner s share of partnership profits The partnership agreement may state an allocation if reasonably consistent with the allocation of some significant item of partnership income or gain amount the partners. 44 Page 22
25 Proposed Regulations 752 Prop. Reg (b)(ii) has largest changes: - To recognize a liability as recourse it must satisfy (A-G) - Further, there is a review under Prop. Reg (k) when state law or other function would required repayment to determine the Net Value of partners other than individuals and estates Prop. Reg (b)(iii) is expanded to accommodate a Net Value Requirement for all partners other than individuals and estates 45 Proposed Regulations 752 (Summary) (A) The partner or related person is - Required to maintain a commercially reasonable net worth throughout the term of the payment obligation; or - Subject to commercially reasonable contractual restrictions on transfers of assets for inadequate consideration, (B) The partner or related person is required periodically to provide commercially reasonable documentation regarding financial condition, (C) The term of the obligation does not end prior to the liability, (D) The payment obligation does not require that the primary obligor or any other obligor with respect to the partnership liability directly or indirectly hold money or other liquid assets in an amount that exceeds the reasonable needs of such obligor, (E) The partner or related person received arm's length consideration for assuming the payment obligation 46 Page 23
26 Proposed Regulations 752 (Summary) (F) In the case of a guarantee or similar arrangement, the partner or related person is or would be liable up to the full amount of such partner's or related person's payment obligation if, and to the extent that, any amount of the partnership liability is not otherwise satisfied. For purposes of this paragraph (b)(3)(ii)(f), the terms of a guarantee or similar arrangement will be treated as modified by any right of indemnity, reimbursement, or similar arrangement regardless of whether that arrangement would be recognized under paragraph (b)(3) of this section. However, the preceding sentence does not apply to a right of proportionate contribution running between partners or related persons who are co-obligors with respect to a payment obligation for which each of them is jointly and severally liable. 47 Proposed Regulations 752 (Summary) (G) In the case of an indemnity, reimbursement agreement, or similar arrangement, the partner or related person is or would be liable up to the full amount of such partner's or related person's payment obligation if, and to the extent that, any amount of the indemnitee's or other benefitted party's payment obligation is satisfied. The indemnity, reimbursement agreement, or similar arrangement only satisfies this paragraph (b)(3)(ii)(g) if, before taking into account the indemnity, reimbursement agreement, or similar arrangement, the indemnitee's or other benefitted party's payment obligation is recognized under paragraph (b)(3) of this section or would be recognized under paragraph (b)(3) of this section if such person were a partner or related person. For purposes of this paragraph (b)(3)(ii)(g), the terms of an indemnity, reimbursement agreement, or similar arrangement will be treated as modified by any further right of indemnity, reimbursement, or similar arrangement regardless of whether that further arrangement would be recognized under paragraph (b)(3) of this section. However, the preceding sentence does not apply to a right of proportionate contribution running between partners or related persons who are co-obligors with respect to a payment obligation for which each of them is jointly and severally liable. 48 Page 24
27 Proposed Regulations 752 (iii) Satisfaction of obligation. (Summary) (B) Net value requirement. - In determining the extent to which a partner or related person other than an individual or a decedent's estate bears the economic risk of loss under paragraph (b)(1) of this section for a partnership liability other than a trade payable, a payment obligation is recognized only to the extent of the net value of the partner or related person as of the allocation date (as defined in paragraph (k)(2)(iv) of this section) that is allocated to the partnership liability. A partner or related person's net value is determined under the rules of paragraph (k) of this section. (C) Information to be provided regarding net value. - A partner that may be treated as bearing the economic risk of loss for a partnership liability based upon an obligation under paragraph (b)(1) of this section (a (b)(1) payment obligation) of a person, including the partner, other than an individual or a decedent's estate, must provide information to the partnership as to that person's net value that is appropriately allocable to the partnership's liabilities on a timely basis. 49 Example 3 Slide 1: Prop. Reg (f) Example 3 E, LLC F, LLC 50% 50% EF, LP 50 Page 25
28 Example 3 Slide 2: Prop. Reg (f) Example 3 Limited Liability Company EF purchases assets for $25,000 - $10,000 of cash originally contributed - $15,000 of debt F (the limited partner) guarantees the debt in full after the lender has extinguished all other sources The organization uses 704 accounting with a QIO E is solvent with a Net Value of $15,000 or more 51 Example 3 Slide 3: Prop. Reg (f) Example 3 Under the laws of most states - A general partner will have an unlimited deficit restoration obligation - Limited partners will not have such obligation Section 704 rules require the limited partner to have a qualified income offset for the amount of limited restoration to satiate the economic effect rules F does not have an allocation of recourse liabilities because E has enough value under (b)(iii) to pay the obligations of the LLC in the event of a default and therefore F does not have an obligation that requires an allocation of debt and E has $15,000 of a recourse liability 52 Page 26
29 Example 4 Slide 1: Prop. Reg (f) Example 12 A B C 33% 33% 33% A, B, & C are Individuals ABC, LLC 53 Example 4 Slide 2: Prop. Reg (f) Example 12 ABC, LLC borrows $1,000 for an asset purchase A agrees to be obligated in the amount of 25% of any uncollected value - This constitutes a partial guarantee under Prop. Reg (b)(ii)(F) and therefore is not recognized for the allocation of recourse debt - Assume $250 is not collected, A would only be liable for $62.50 The debt is, thus, nonrecourse and allocated under Page 27
30 Example 5 Slide 1: Prop. Reg (f) Example 11 A B C 33% 33% 33% A, B, & C are Individuals ABC, LLC 55 Example 5 Slide 2: Prop. Reg (f) Example 11 ABC, LLC takes out a loan for $1,000 A agrees to pay $300 for any uncollected amount B agrees to pay up to $200 if the bank does not recover $200 C agrees to indemnify A for $50 and all of B s obligation 56 Page 28
31 Example 5 Slide 3: Prop. Reg (f) Example 11 B s guarantee is not recognized under Prop. Reg (b)(ii)(F) because it is not an obligation related to any amount of unrecovered value; instead it is only if not more than $200 is recovered C s indemnity of B is not recognized because for C to have a valid indemnity it must be related to a recognized liability - In other words, because B did not have a recognized liability C cannot have a recognized indemnity 57 Example 5 Slide 4: Prop. Reg (f) Example 11 A has a valid obligation to pay the amount of $300 However, C has now indemnified A for the first $50 A s obligation is now modified and accordingly A no longer has a payment for any amount A s obligation is no longer recognized under (F) 58 Page 29
32 Example 5 Slide 5: Prop. Reg (f) Example 11 C has a valid obligation because but for his indemnity, A would have had a fully valid and recognized obligation A & B do not have any recognized obligations The remaining $950 is allocated as nonrecourse debt under Overlapping Economic Risk of Loss Prop. Treas. Reg (a): When a the value of the overall economic risk of loss is in excess to the partnership obligations the proportionate amount of the risk is allocated to each member by using the following formula Recourse Debt X Portion of Economic Risk Total Economic Risk 60 Page 30
33 Example 6 Slide 1: Overlapping Economic Risk of Loss A & B form partnership AB and agree to waive contribution rights against one another. To facilitate business needs the partnership takes out a loan for $1,000 to which A guarantees the total 1,000 and B guarantees 500. The Economic Risk of Loss of A & B is 1,500 (1, ) This is in excess of the 1,000 outstanding loan and therefore is overlapping Calculating the Recourse Allocations - A s recourse allocation is 1,000 * (1,000/1,500) = B s recourse allocation is 500 * (1,000/1,500) = 333 Prop. Treas. Reg (f) Example (9). 61 Prop. Treas. Reg : Nonrecourse Allocation Issues Nonrecourse & Liquidation Ratios - The alteration to the nonrecourse allocations provides that after accounting for: Partner s share of minimum gain under 704(b) Partner s share of 704(c) minimum gain Allocations may be completed in accordance with members liquidation ratio, meaning, the portion of liquidation proceeds allocated to that member in liquation. Remaining Nonrecourse Debt X Partner s Capital Account Total All Capital Accounts 62 Page 31
34 Example 7 - Slide 1:Prop. Treas. Reg Prop. Reg (c) Example 2. X & Y create XY, LLC by contributing $100 each for a total capital of 200. The organization liquidates in accordance with positive capital accounts and uses 704 as its basis for maintaining books & records. AB borrows 50 to purchase two parcels of land. Parcel A has a value of 50 and parcel B with a value of 200. The debt is general organizational debt not secured by any asset (in other words not Qualified Financing). 63 Example 7 - Slide 2:Prop. Treas. Reg Year 1 There is no activity in the organization or depreciation on the land. - XY is a 50/50 partnership X s liquidation value is calculated as * (125/250) = 125 Y s liquidation value is calculated as * (125/250) = Page 32
35 Special Rules for Related Parties: Prop. Reg (Generally) When a related party, that is not a partner, guarantees debt of the partnership, the related party(ies) shall share equally in the portion of related debt. Prop. Reg (b)(3) When a partner guarantees debt of the organization, that debt is allocated at the lowest level of direct ownership up to the amount of the guarantee. Prop. Reg (b)(2) Entities and transactions structured to avoid the related party allocations under the proposed regulations will be void and such parties will be deemed related for the application of the regulation. Prop. Reg (b)(4) 65 Example 8 Slide 1: Prop. Reg Example 7 A is an Individual A 100% 50% X 50% X & Y are Corporations Y 100% P, LLC P is a Limited Liability Company 66 Page 33
36 Example 8 Slide 2: Prop. Reg Example 7 Partnership P takes out a loan of $1,000 Company Y guarantees 100% of the debt Neither X nor A are the lender of the funds (b)(2) of the proposed regulations will not apply and therefore X & A are treated as related to Y for determining the allocation of recourse obligations Consequently, X & A share equally in the recourse allocation at $500 each 67 Example 9 Slide 1: Prop. Reg Example 4 A is an Individual 100% A 100% 50% X Y 79% 50% 21% 50% X, Y, & Z are Corporations Z P, LLC P is a Limited Liability Company 68 Page 34
37 Example 9 Slide 2: Prop. Reg Example 4 Partnership P takes out $2,000 of debt X agrees to guarantee $1,200 of the debt Z guarantees all $2, Example 9 Slide 3: Prop. Reg Example 4 Under (b)(2) the determination of allocation of recourse liabilities to which X has guaranteed is made as though X is unrelated to any other partner - As a result, X is treated as having recourse allocation of $1,200 Z guaranteed all $2,000 of the obligation - The partnership may only allocate $2,000 and X has an automatic allocation of $1,200 because X is a direct partner with an obligation - The remaining $800 is therefore available for allocation and, similar to Example 8, the related parties (X & Y) to Z will share the allocation evenly Total Recourse allocations: - X gets $1,600 ( 1,200 + ½ * 800 ) - Y gets $400 ( ½ * 800 ) 70 Page 35
38 Presenter Michael Cole, MS, JD - Senior Manager - McGladrey, LLP Mike.Cole@mcgladrey.com 71 McGladrey LLP is the U.S. member of the RSM International ( RSMI ) network of independent accounting, tax and consulting firms. The member firms of RSMI collaborate to provide services to global clients, but are separate and distinct legal entities which cannot obligate each other. Each member firm is responsible only for its own acts and omissions, and not those of any other party. McGladrey, the McGladrey signature, The McGladrey Classic logo, The power of being understood, Power comes from being understood and Experience the power of being understood are trademarks of McGladrey LLP. Page 36
39 60TH ANNUAL MNCPA TAX CONFERENCE November 17-18, 2014 Minneapolis Convention Center, Minneapolis, MN Please rate the following using the scale below: 5=Excellent, 4=Very Good, 3=Average, 2=Fair, 1=Poor F1. Partnership Basis and At Risk Rules: The New Section 752 Regulations and More Excellent Poor Relevancy of Topic Stated Objectives Met Overall Satisfaction Michael Cole, MSPA, JD Knowledge of Subject Presentation Skills Quality of Materials Engagement of Participants Do you have any additional feedback regarding the instructor and/or materials? If so, please share it with us. What would you like to learn at the 2015 conference? Who would you like to hear speak at the 2015 conference? Thank you for your feedback and suggestions. We appreciate your input. Minnesota Society of Certified Public Accountants
Illinois Institute for Continuing Legal Education. Limited Liability Companies vs. S Corporations. Essential Tax Issues
Illinois Institute for Continuing Legal Education Limited Liability Companies vs. S Corporations Essential Tax Issues By James A. Nepple Nepple Law, PLC 1515 Fourth Avenue, Suite 300 Rock Island, Illinois
More informationALLOCATION OF PARTNERSHIP LIABILITIES AND NONRECOURSE DEDUCTIONS. April 2000
ALLOCATION OF PARTNERSHIP LIABILITIES AND NONRECOURSE DEDUCTIONS April 2000 I. General Concepts The adjusted basis of a partner's interest in the partnership is important for many purposes. A. When Basis
More informationS Corporation Mergers and Acquisitions: Tax Planning Strategies for Favorable Outcomes
60TH ANNUAL MNCPA TAX CONFERENCE November 17-18, 2014 Minneapolis Convention Center ONLINE RESOURCES Session Handouts Most session handouts are available on the MNCPA website. To access: Go to www.mncpa.org/materials
More informationCHOICE OF ENTITY OUTLINE
CHOICE OF ENTITY OUTLINE by Belan K. Wagner This article is an outline of a lecture which we recently gave at a San Francisco tax conference. While to many of you the topic may seem old hat, we focused
More informationPartner Level Loss Limits Secs. 704(d), 465, and 469. Chapter 10
Partner Level Loss Limits Secs. 704(d), 465, and 469 Chapter 10 CCA 201308028 10-11 Taxpayer Friendly view of Reg. 1.465-6(d) regarding guarantees of LLC debt 10-12 Under the "guarantee rule" of prop.
More information10.0 AT-RISK LIMITATIONS
Page 1 of 21 Table of Contents 10.0 AT-RISK LIMITATIONS 10.1 General Overview IRC 465, R&TC 17551, and R&TC 24691 10.2 Amount At-Risk 10.3 Contributions of Cash or Other Property 10.4 Contributions of
More informationIRS Proposes Significant Changes to Rules for Allocating
Latham & Watkins Tax Department Number 1644 February 6, 2014 IRS Proposes Significant Changes to Rules for Allocating Partnership Liabilities Proposed Regulations seek to curtail perceived abuses, including
More informationS Corporation Partnership Basis. Vicki H. Meyer CPA Thomas Howell Ferguson, PA vmeyer@thf-cpa.com 850-668-8100
S Corporation Partnership Basis Vicki H. Meyer CPA Thomas Howell Ferguson, PA vmeyer@thf-cpa.com 850-668-8100 WHY FIRM RISK MECHANICS STRATEGIES What Basis Does Limits the amount of loss that can be deducted.
More informationTreatment of COD Income by Partnerships
Treatment of COD Income by Partnerships Stafford Presentation January 28, 2015 Polsinelli PC. In California, Polsinelli LLP Allocation of COD Income COD income is allocated to those partners who are partners
More informationNew Partnership Debt for Equity Exchange Regulations Navigating Issues With COD Income, Gains and Losses, and Other Aspects of Sect.
Presenting a live 110 minute teleconference with interactive Q&A New Partnership Debt for Equity Exchange Regulations Navigating Issues With COD Income, Gains and Losses, and Other Aspects of Sect. 108(e)(8)
More informationGuidance on disguised sales of property to or by a partnership and the treatment of partnership liabilities issued
from Mergers & Acquisitions Guidance on disguised sales of property to or by a partnership and the treatment of partnership liabilities issued February 3, 2014 In brief On January 29, 2014, the IRS issued
More informationContribution Of Appreciated Property To A Partnership: More Than Just A Nice Credit To The Capital Account
Contribution Of Appreciated Property To A Partnership: More Than Just A Nice Credit To The Capital Account Walter R. Rogers, Jr. Make sure your partnership clients appreciate the consequences of contributing
More informationLLC Member Guarantees of LLC Debt and "Qualified Nonrecourse Financing"
Office of Chief Counsel Internal Revenue Service Memorandum Number: AM2014-003 Release Date: 4/4/2014 CC:PSI:02:AWBryson POSTN-122768-13 UILC: 465.01-00, 465.04-01 date: August 27, 2013 to: from: Division
More informationUNTIL THE TAX LAWYER ARRIVES: UNDERSTANDING TAX PROVISIONS IN LLC AGREEMENTS
UNTIL THE TAX LAWYER ARRIVES: UNDERSTANDING TAX PROVISIONS IN LLC AGREEMENTS Gary E. Fluhrer Foster Pepper & Shefelman PLLC 1111 Third Avenue, Suite 3400 Seattle, Washington 98101 Robert G. Gottlieb Venable,
More informationLeveraging New IRS Rules Eliminating 36-Month Testing Period for Cancellation of Debt Income
Leveraging New IRS Rules Eliminating 36-Month Testing Period for Cancellation of Debt Income MONDAY, DECEMBER 15, 2014, 1:00-2:50 pm Eastern IMPORTANT INFORMATION This program is approved for 2 CPE credit
More informationPartnership Flip Structuring Tax Perspectives. Tom Stevens Deloitte Tax LLP
Partnership Flip Structuring Tax Perspectives Tom Stevens Deloitte Tax LLP September 30, 2014 Tax Incentives are Integral to Project Economics What if I can t monetize the incentives currently? 1-year
More informationWhat does it mean for real property to be secured by or encumbered by debt?
What does it mean for real property to be secured by or encumbered by debt? Todd Golub Beverly Katz David A. Miller Baker & McKenzie LLP Internal Revenue Service Ernst & Young LLP Chicago, Illinois Washington,
More informationOpportunities and Pitfalls Under Sections 351 and 721
College of William & Mary Law School William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository William & Mary Annual Tax Conference Conferences, Events, and Lectures 2007 Opportunities and Pitfalls Under Sections
More informationPresentation for. CSEA IRS/Practitioner Fall Seminars. S Corporation. Darrell Early, IRS. Date September 27, 2012
Presentation for CSEA IRS/Practitioner Fall Seminars S Corporation Darrell Early, IRS Date September 27, 2012 Agenda What is an S Corporation? Why would a Corporation make the S election? How does a Corporation
More informationTax Issues In Acquiring Debt
Tax Issues In Acquiring Debt Charles R. Beaudrot Partner, Tax and Real Estate Capital Markets Practices 404.504.7753 cbeaudrot@mmmlaw.com Timothy S. Pollock Partner, Tax, Real Estate and Real Estate Capital
More informationAdvanced Topics in Low Income Housing Tax Credits. (Clifton Hall)
Advanced Topics in Low Income Housing Tax Credits (Clifton Hall) Biographical Information Tim Flaherty, CPA is the managing partner of Salmin, Celona, Wehrle & Flaherty, LLP, CPAs and also heads up the
More informationReverse Allocations: More Than Meets the Eye
Passthrough Entities/September October 2002 Reverse Allocations: More Than Meets the Eye By Howard E. Abrams 2002 H.E. Abrams Howard Abrams explains the intricacies of maintaining capital accounts for
More informationWhat s News in Tax Analysis That Matters from Washington National Tax
What s News in Tax Analysis That Matters from Washington National Tax Overview of Partnership Taxation: Contributions, Distributions, and General Principles KPMG has authored a new edition of its treatise
More informationReal Estate Debt Workout Tax Issues & Coping Strategies
Real Estate Debt Workout Tax Issues & Coping Strategies Charles R. Beaudrot Partner, Tax and Real Estate Capital Markets Practices 404.504.7753 cbeaudrot@mmmlaw.com Timothy S. Pollock Partner, Tax, Real
More informationFARM LEGAL SERIES June 2015 Tax Considerations in Liquidations and Reorganizations
Agricultural Business Management FARM LEGAL SERIES June 2015 Tax Considerations in Liquidations and Reorganizations Phillip L. Kunkel, Jeffrey A. Peterson, S. Scott Wick Attorneys, Gray Plant Mooty INTRODUCTION
More informationAdjustments Following Sales of Partnership Interests. SUMMARY: This document finalizes regulations relating to the
[4830-01-u] DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Internal Revenue Service 26 CFR Parts 1 and 602 [TD 8847] RIN 1545-AS39 Adjustments Following Sales of Partnership Interests AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
More informationTHE WINDOW FOR USING PHANTOM GUARANTEES TO GENERATE TAX BENEFITS MAY SOON BE CLOSING
THE WINDOW FOR USING PHANTOM GUARANTEES TO GENERATE TAX BENEFITS MAY SOON BE CLOSING For many years, it has been fairly common for partners of partnerships 1 to guarantee partnership debt in an effort
More informationRe: Revenue Ruling 99-6 Related to the Conversion of Partnerships to Disregarded Entities
October 1, 2013 Mr. Daniel Werfel Acting Commissioner Internal Revenue Service 1111 Constitution Avenue, Room 3000 Washington, DC 20024 Re: Revenue Ruling 99-6 Related to the Conversion of Partnerships
More informationSelected Debt Restructuring Issues. Friday, January 22, 2010 Tax Law Section
Selected Debt Restructuring Issues Friday, January 22, 2010 Tax Law Section Robert E. August, Esq. Merline & Meacham, PA P.O. Box 10796 Greenville, SC 29603 p. (864) 242-4080 f. (864) 242-5758 baugust@merlineandmeacham.com
More informationPresented by: David L. Rice, Esq. For CalCPA Pasadena Discussion Group. (c) David L. Rice
Presented by: David L. Rice, Esq. For CalCPA Pasadena Discussion Group 1 Mortgage defaults and foreclosures are of a national concern. In 2011, nearly 5,000,000 borrowers are behind on their mortgage.
More informationTOP 10 THINGS EVERY NON-TAX LAWYER SHOULD KNOW ABOUT PARTNERSHIP TAX
TOP 10 THINGS EVERY NON-TAX LAWYER SHOULD KNOW ABOUT PARTNERSHIP TAX Charlottesville-Albemarle Bar Association Continuing Legal Education January 29, 2014 Jeffrey G. Lenhart, JD, LLM 530 East Main Street
More informationTax Considerations in Debt-for-Equity Partnership Debt Restructuring. Part I: Creditor s Perspective
Tax Considerations in Debt-for-Equity Partnership Debt Restructuring Part I: Creditor s Perspective Capital Markets Subcommittee August 2013 Introduction This paper provides an overview of the various
More informationCross Species Conversions and Mergers
Cross Species Conversions and Mergers 591 Cross Species Conversions and Mergers JOHN B. TRUSKOWSKI * The adoption by many states of both conversion statutes 1 statutes allowing one form of business organization,
More informationTax Talk For Tough Times: A Primer On Cancellation Of Debt And Related Partnership Matters
Tax Talk For Tough Times: A Primer On Cancellation Of Debt And Related Partnership Matters Walter R. Rogers, Jr. Tough times often result in canceled debt and unexpected income. Walter R. Rogers, Jr.,
More informationChapter 1 What Is a Partnership? Reading: Paragraphs 101 106. 1. What is a partnership?
Chapter 1 What Is a Partnership? Reading: Paragraphs 101 106. 1. What is a partnership? 2. Define each of the following in terms of the liability of the partners: General partnership Limited partnership
More informationReal Estate Accounting Potpourri. Presented by: Jason Thompson Kimberly Brown and Stephanie Onzay
Real Estate Accounting Potpourri Presented by: Jason Thompson Kimberly Brown and Stephanie Onzay Tax Consequences of Debt Discharge & Foreclosure Rules Outline Tax consequences of forgiven debt if: Insolvent
More informationSupplementary Slides AES 2015
Supplementary Slides AES 2015 March 15 April 15 June 30 Sept 15 Sept 30 Oct 15 Nov 15 P/S S corp 6 Mos. C Corp 5Mos. Trust 5.5 Mos. Indiv FBAR 6Mos. 5500 23A 3.5 Mos. New Slide S Corp Stock Sale A/B FMV
More informationDISCHARGE OF INDEBTEDNESS INCOME PLANNING OPPORTUNITIES
DISCHARGE OF INDEBTEDNESS INCOME PLANNING OPPORTUNITIES Thomas Mammarella Gordon, Fournaris & Mammarella, P.A. 1925 Lovering Avenue Wilmington, DE 19806 Tel: (302) 652-2900 Fax: (302) 652-1142 tmammarella@gfmlaw.com
More informationTHE AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE Continuing Legal Education. Estate Planning in Depth
711 THE AMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE Continuing Legal Education Estate Planning in Depth Cosponsored by Continuing Legal Education for Wisconsin (CLEW) June 21-26, 2015 Madison, Wisconsin Tentative Thoughts
More informationPartner's Instructions for Schedule K-1 (Form 1065)
2014 Partner's Instructions for Schedule K-1 (Form 1065) Partner's Share of Income, Deductions, Credits, etc. (For Partner's Use Only) Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service Section references
More informationDefinition of Limited Recourse Debt Discussion Paper - Australia
Clarifying the definition of limited recourse debt Discussion paper July 2012 Commonwealth of Australia 2012 ISBN 978 0 642 74838 6 This publication is available for your use under a Creative Commons Attribution
More informationTax Provisions of Partnership and LLC Agreements: Learning to Read and Write Again
Tax Provisions of Partnership and LLC Agreements: Learning to Read and Write Again American Bar Association Business Law Section Steven R. Schneider Brian J. O Connor O 1 Introduction Understand the partners
More informationFEDERAL HISTORIC REHABILITATION TAX CREDITS
FEDERAL HISTORIC REHABILITATION TAX CREDITS July 24, 2013 Roundtable Breakfast Hunton & Williams LLP 200 Park Avenue, 52 nd Floor New York, New York Cameron N. Cosby Hunton & Williams LLP Riverfront Plaza,
More informationPROPOSED CHANGES TO THE TAXATION OF PARTNERSHIP EQUITY-BASED COMPENSATION
PROPOSED CHANGES TO THE TAXATION OF PARTNERSHIP EQUITY-BASED COMPENSATION John Gatti For various non-tax reasons, the use of entities that are taxed as partnerships including limited liability companies,
More informationCross Border Tax Issues
Cross Border Tax Issues By Reinhold G. Krahn December 2000 This is a general overview of the subject matter and should not be relied upon as legal advice or opinion. For specific legal advice on the information
More informationFederal Income Taxation Chapter 7 Receipt Subject to Offsetting Liability
Presentation: Federal Income Taxation Chapter 7 Receipt Subject to Offsetting Liability Professors Wells September 21, 2015 Transactions with Borrowed Funds p.437 No income realized upon the receipt of
More information2012 NEF CPA Town Hall
2012 NEF CPA Town Hall A forum to discuss IRC Section 704(b) There is an ancient belief that the gods love the obscure and hate the obvious. Without benefit of divinity, modern men of similar persuasion
More informationREAL ESTATE DEBT OUTS ) AND FORECLOSURES: SELECTED TAX CONSEQUENCES
REAL ESTATE DEBT RESTRUCTURING ( WORK- OUTS ) AND FORECLOSURES: SELECTED TAX CONSEQUENCES Presented by Robert Falb Robert Honigman Arent Fox LLP Washington, DC New York, NY Los Angeles, CA October 15 and
More informationISSUES TO CONSIDER IN STRUCTURING A PARTNER BUY-OUT: SALE VERSUS REDEMPTION
ISSUES TO CONSIDER IN STRUCTURING A PARTNER BUY-OUT: SALE VERSUS REDEMPTION ABC LLC is owned equally by individuals A, B, and C. C wishes to retire from the partnership. Should he sell his interest equally
More informationTransfer of Partnership Interests/ Assets
Transfer of Partnership Interests/ Assets Part I: Disguised Sales Section 707 (a)(2)b Global Change The regulations under Section 707(a)(1)(B) set forth rules as to when a contribution to the partnership
More informationTHE PARTNER S PERSPECTIVE by Charles R. Levun, Esq.
THE PARTNER S PERSPECTIVE by Charles R. Levun, Esq. Charles R. Levun, JD, CPA, is a Partner in the Chicago-area law firm of Levun, Goodman & Cohen, Adjunct Professor of Law at the IIT Chicago-Kent Graduate
More informationA PRIMER ON THE HISTORIC REHABILITATION TAX CREDIT
COMBINING HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND BROWNFIELD DEVELOPMENT INCENTIVES AND TAX CREDITS: CASE STUDIES IN CREATIVE DEAL MAKING A PRIMER ON THE HISTORIC REHABILITATION TAX CREDIT John H. Gadon Lane Powell
More informationFranchise Tax Board 4905BE Booklet Offer In Compromise for Business Entities
State of California Franchise Tax Board 4905BE Booklet Offer In Compromise for Business Entities What you should know before preparing an Offer in Compromise Are you an OIC Candidate? If your business
More informationLynn F. Chandler Smith Moore Leatherwood LLP
GRANTS OF PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS AS COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES 2010 South Carolina Bar Convention Probate, Estate Planning & Trust/Tax Law Section Seminar January 22, 2009 Lynn F. Chandler Smith Moore Leatherwood
More information2010 Partner s Instructions for Schedule K-1 (Form 1065) Partner s Share of Income, Deductions, Credits, etc. (For Partner s Use Only)
2010 Partner s Instructions for Schedule K-1 (Form 1065) Partner s Share of Income, Deductions, Credits, etc. (For Partner s Use Only) Section references are to the Internal Revenue Code unless otherwise
More informationALERT. New Proposed 752 Regulations to Alter Partnership- Level Debt Allocations. Tax March 2014
ALERT Tax March 2014 New Proposed 752 Regulations to Alter Partnership- Level Debt Allocations On January 29, 2014, the Internal Revenue Service and Treasury Department issued a notice of proposed rule-making,
More informationLimited Liability Company (LLC)
Vertex Wealth Management LLC Michael Aluotto President Private Wealth Manager 1325 Franklin Ave., Ste. 335 Garden City, NY 11530 516-294-8200 mjaluotto@1stallied.com Limited Liability Company (LLC) Page
More informationPartner s Instructions for Schedule K-1 (Form 1065) Partner s Share of Income, Deductions, Credits, etc. (For Partner s Use Only)
2009 Partner s Instructions for Schedule K-1 (Form 1065) Partner s Share of Income, Deductions, Credits, etc. (For Partner s Use Only) Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service Section references
More informationSect. 108 and Cancellation of Debt Income: Navigating IRS Rules
Sect. 108 and Cancellation of Debt Income: Navigating IRS Rules Wayne R. Strasbaugh Ballard Spahr LLP 1735 Market Street, 51st Floor Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103 strasbaugh@ballardspahr.com October
More informationCORPORATE FORMATIONS AND CAPITAL STRUCTURE
2 C H A P T E R CORPORATE FORMATIONS AND CAPITAL STRUCTURE LEARNING OBJECTIVES After studying this chapter, you should be able to 1 Explain the tax advantages and disadvantages of alternative business
More informationSample Corporate Cross Purchase Agreement
Sample Corporate Cross Purchase Agreement (Optional Disability Buy-Out) This sample agreement has been prepared as a guide to assist attorneys. Our publication, Buy-Sell Arrangements, A Guide for Professional
More informationNotice 97-34, 1997-1 CB 422, 6/02/1997, IRC Sec(s). 6048
Notice 97-34, 1997-1 CB 422, 6/02/1997, IRC Sec(s). 6048 Returns of foreign trusts foreign gift reporting requirements tax This notice provides guidance regarding the new foreign trust and foreign gift
More informationSPECIAL ALERT: MORTGAGE FORGIVENESS DEBT RELIEF ACT OF 2007 BRINGS TAX CHANGES TO REAL ESTATE
SPECIAL ALERT: MORTGAGE FORGIVENESS DEBT RELIEF ACT OF 2007 BRINGS TAX CHANGES TO REAL ESTATE By Patricia Hughes Mills, J.D., L.L.M. Associate Professor of Clinical Accounting University of Southern California
More informationObjectives. Discuss S corp fringe benefits.
S Corporations Objectives Define an S corp. Identify the benefits of being an S corp. Determine how an entity elects to be an S corp. Establish how an S corp is taxed. Describe the S corp shareholder s
More informationWith credit markets in turmoil, many questions have arisen as to the
10 US federal income tax consequences of investing in distressed MBS and mortgage assets Donald Gray Carden and Zey Nasser With credit markets in turmoil, many questions have arisen as to the US federal
More informationPRICKLIEST PROVISIONS IN A PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT: ALLOCATIONS
PRICKLIEST PROVISIONS IN A PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT: ALLOCATIONS A P P R O A C H E S T O A L L O C A T I O N S I N P A R T N E R S H I P A G R E E M E N T S A N D T H E I R I M P L I C A T I O N S Jennifer
More informationENTITY OVERVIEW OF LLCs, LPs AND LLPs
2002, Davis, Malm & D Agostine, P.C. ENTITY OVERVIEW OF LLCs, LPs AND LLPs John D. Chambliss Davis, Malm & D Agostine, P.C. A. SUMMARY OF RELEVANT STATUTES AND ENTITY TYPES 1. The Limited Liability Company
More informationAdvanced Markets Combining Estate Planning Techniques A Powerful Strategy
Life insurance can help meet many wealth transfer goals. The death benefit could cover estate taxes, for instance, avoiding liquidation of much of the estate to meet the estate tax bill. Even though a
More informationINTRODUCTION TO REVERSE EXCHANGES
INTRODUCTION TO REVERSE EXCHANGES By Lee David Medinets, Esq. Certified Exchange Specialist Senior Counsel, Madison Exchange, LLC The purpose of this memo is to give introductory, generic information on
More informationStructuring Equity Compensation for Partnerships and LLCs
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Structuring Equity Compensation for Partnerships and LLCs Navigating Capital and Profits Interests Plus Section 409A and Tax Consequences TUESDAY,
More informationBusiness Entity Conversions: Income Tax Consequences You May Not Anticipate
Presenting a live 110-minute teleconference with interactive Q&A Business Entity Conversions: Income Tax Consequences You May Not Anticipate Understanding and Navigating Complex Federal Income Tax Implications
More informationPass-Through Entities and COD Income:
Presenting a live 110-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Pass-Through Entities and COD Income: Sheltering Solvent Entity Owners From Insolvent Entity Taxable COD Income WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 28, 2015 1pm
More informationI. THE FUNDAMENTALS OF LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES, LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIPS AND LIMITED PARTNERSHIPS
I. THE FUNDAMENTALS OF LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES, LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIPS AND LIMITED PARTNERSHIPS A. Overview of Relevant Statutes. 1. Limited Liability Company (LLC). LLCs were created to fill
More informationBuying and Selling a Partnership Interest: A Checklist for the Tax Advisor 1
Buying and Selling a Partnership Interest: A Checklist for the Tax Advisor 1 Howard E. Abrams Warren Distinguished Professor, USD School of Law I. Tax Issues for the Selling Partner A. Computation of Gain
More informationSuppose you represent a limited partnership (call it
Conversion and Domestication under the New Jersey Revised Uniform Limited Liability Company Act by Ira B Marcus, Sean Aylward and Denise Walsh Suppose you represent a limited partnership (call it OldCo
More informationS Corporations General Overview
S Corporations General Overview Richard Furlong Jr. Senior Stakeholder Liaison Define an S Corp An "S corporation" is a an entity that qualifies as a small business corporation that has an S election in
More informationChapter 18. Corporations: Distributions Not in Complete Liquidation. Eugene Willis, William H. Hoffman, Jr., David M. Maloney and William A.
Chapter 18 Corporations: Distributions Not in Complete Liquidation Eugene Willis, William H. Hoffman, Jr., David M. Maloney and William A. Raabe Copyright 2004 South-Western/Thomson Learning Taxable Dividends
More informationNH&RA Fall Developers Forum October 18-19, 2010 A Few Things to Remember About Debt Restructuring
NH&RA Fall Developers Forum October 18-19, 2010 A Few Things to Remember About Debt Restructuring Forrest Milder, Nixon Peabody LLP Roger Yorkshaitis, Gatehouse Group, Inc., Overview -- 1 The cancellation
More informationTRANSACTIONS BETWEEN A PARTNER AND THE PARTNERSHIP
TRANSACTIONS BETWEEN A PARTNER AND THE PARTNERSHIP (a) IN GENERAL Transactions between partners and partnerships are governed by Code Section 707. Congress amended this provision in the 1984 Tax Reform
More informationPENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE ISSUED: January 3, 2008 REVISED: April 18, 2008
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE ISSUED: January 3, 2008 REVISED: April 18, 2008 Realty Transfer Tax Bulletin 2008 01 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS: THE RULE IN BAEHR BROS. (61 PA. CODE 91.170) The Department
More informationPartner's Instructions for Schedule K-1 (Form 1065)
2012 Partner's Instructions for Schedule K-1 (Form 1065) Partner's Share of Income, Deductions, Credits, etc. (For Partner's Use Only) Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service Section references
More informationPlanning Using and Business Valuation. For producer use only. Not for presentation to the public.
Business Succession Planning Using Buy-Sell Agreements and Business Valuation This material was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, to avoid penalties imposed under the Internal Revenue
More informationTAXATION OF LIFE INSURANCE POLICIES IN AN EVOLVING SECONDARY MARKETPLACE
TAXATION OF LIFE INSURANCE POLICIES IN AN EVOLVING SECONDARY MARKETPLACE Published by Insurance Studies Institute March 3, 2008 A non profit foundation dedicated to advancing knowledge and understanding
More informationINFORMATION FOR OBSERVERS
30 Cannon Street, London EC4M 6XH, United Kingdom Tel: +44 (0)20 7246 6410 Fax: +44 (0)20 7246 6411 E-mail: iasb@iasb.org Website: www.iasb.org International Accounting Standards Board This document is
More informationReal Estate Partnerships and Joint Venture Agreements: Tax Challenges Part I Partnership/joint venture formation
Real Estate Partnerships and Joint Venture Agreements: Tax Challenges Part I Partnership/joint venture formation Carey Smith Carey.Smith@aporter.com 202.942.5538 August 29, 2012 2 Part I Agenda Cash capital
More informationLimited Liability Company Partnership or Corporation
Introduction 1 While an entity with more than one owner may be classified for federal income tax purposes as either an or a partnership, for state entity law purposes the entity may be one of the following:
More informationSeveral Thoughts on Drafting Target Allocation Provisions
Several Thoughts on Drafting Target Allocation Provisions Terence Floyd Cuff Loeb & Loeb LLP Los Angeles, California Copyright, 2009, Terence Floyd Cuff, All rights reserved Table of Contents 1. Simplicity....
More informationPartner's Instructions for Schedule K-1 (Form 1065-B)
2015 Partner's Instructions for Schedule K-1 (Form 1065-B) Partner's Share of Income (Loss) From an Electing Large Partnership (For Partner's Use Only) Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service
More informationHow To Calculate Profit From A Partnership Sale
Dispositions and Partial Dispositions of a Partnership Interest By Howard E. Abrams 1 Howard Abrams demonstrates the computation of gain or loss on the sale of a partnership in cases where some, but not
More information26 CFR 1.121-1: Exclusion of gain from sale or exchange of a principal residence. (Also: 61, 165, 691, 1001; 1.61-6, 1.165-1, 1.691(a)-1, 1.1001-1.
Section 121. Exclusion of gain from sale of principal residence 26 CFR 1.121-1: Exclusion of gain from sale or exchange of a principal residence. (Also: 61, 165, 691, 1001; 1.61-6, 1.165-1, 1.691(a)-1,
More informationLoan Agreement (Short Form)
Loan Agreement (Short Form) Document 2050A Access to this document and the LeapLaw web site is provided with the understanding that neither LeapLaw Inc. nor any of the providers of information that appear
More informationSmall Business Assistance Office
Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development Small Business Assistance Office The Single Member Limited Liability Company (SMLLC) As An Alternative to the Sole Proprietorship Some Frequently
More informationThis revenue procedure specifies the conditions under which the Internal Revenue
Part III Administrative, Procedural, and Miscellaneous 26 CFR 601.201: Rulings and determination letters. (Also Part I, 267, 511, 512, 707, 761, 856, 1031, 1361; 1.761-1, 1.761-2; 301.7701-1, 301.7701-2,
More information1/5/2016. S Corporations. Objectives. Define an S Corp
S Corporations Objectives Define an S corp. Identify the benefits of being an S corp. Determine how an entity elects to be an S corp. Establish how an S corp is taxed. Describe the S corp shareholder s
More informationMBA allows no more than two loans at a time. Consolidations of loans is allowed.
403(B) LOAN RULES Ministers Benefit Association (MBA) has elected to make loans available to our members. Under the MBA 403(b) Retirement Plan (Plan), loans will be made available to all members having
More informationImproving the tax treatment of bad debts in related party financing
Improving the tax treatment of bad debts in related party financing Discussion paper July 2012 Commonwealth of Australia 2012 ISBN 978 0 642 74837 9 This publication is available for your use under a Creative
More informationTaxable Bonds = -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------
Number: 200641002 Release Date: 10/13/2006 Internal Revenue Service Index Number: 141.00-00, 141.01-02, 141.02-00 ----------------------------- ------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------
More informationIs Cancellation of Debt Income Taxable? One question that I am asked often these days is whether cancellation of debt (COD) income is taxable or not?
Is Cancellation of Debt Income Taxable? One question that I am asked often these days is whether cancellation of debt (COD) income is taxable or not? For tax purposes, the general rule is that all debt
More informationFactoring of Receivables
LMSB-04-0606-004 Internal Revenue Service Factoring of Receivables Audit Technique Guide (ATG) NOTE: This guide is current through the publication date. Since changes may have occurred after the publication
More informationCorporate Tax Segment 5A Dividends
Corporate Tax Segment 5A Dividends University of Leiden International Tax Center May 2007 Professor William P. Streng University of Houston Law Center 4/30/2007 (c) William P. Streng 1 Nonliquidating Distributions
More information