Allocation of Liability for Continuous Damage Losses: All Sums v. Pro Rata
|
|
- Lindsey McLaughlin
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Allocation of Liability for Continuous Damage Losses: All Sums v. Pro Rata Best Practices for Policyholders and Insurers to Allocate Indemnity and Expenses WEDNESDAY, APRIL 18, pm Eastern 12pm Central 11am Mountain 10am Pacific Today s faculty features: Laura A. Foggan, Partner, Wiley Rein, Washington, D.C. Robert M. Horkovich, Shareholder, Anderson Kill & Olick, New York The audio portion of the conference may be accessed via the telephone or by using your computer's speakers. Please refer to the instructions ed to registrants for additional information. If you have any questions, please contact Customer Service at ext. 10.
2 Conference Materials If you have not printed the conference materials for this program, please complete the following steps: Click on the + sign next to Conference Materials in the middle of the lefthand column on your screen. Click on the tab labeled Handouts that appears, and there you will see a PDF of the slides for today's program. Double click on the PDF and a separate page will open. Print the slides by clicking on the printer icon.
3 Continuing Education Credits FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY For CLE purposes, please let us know how many people are listening at your location by completing each of the following steps: In the chat box, type (1) your company name and (2) the number of attendees at your location Click the SEND button beside the box
4 Tips for Optimal Quality Sound Quality If you are listening via your computer speakers, please note that the quality of your sound will vary depending on the speed and quality of your internet connection. If the sound quality is not satisfactory and you are listening via your computer speakers, you may listen via the phone: dial and enter your PIN -when prompted. Otherwise, please send us a chat or sound@straffordpub.com immediately so we can address the problem. If you dialed in and have any difficulties during the call, press *0 for assistance. Viewing Quality To maximize your screen, press the F11 key on your keyboard. To exit full screen, press the F11 key again.
5 Strafford Litigation Teleconference Allocation of Liability for Continuous Damage Losses: All Sums v. Pro Rata: Best Practices for Policyholders and Insurers to Allocate Indemnity and Expenses Wednesday, April 18, :00 p.m. Eastern Time / 12:00 p.m. Central Time / 11:00 a.m. Mountain Time / 10:00 a.m. Pacific Time Laura A. Foggan, Esq. WILEY REIN LLP lfoggan@wileyrein.com (202) Robert M. Horkovich, Esq. ANDERSON KILL & OLICK PC rhorkovich@andersonkill.com (212)
6 ALLOCATION OF LIABILITY (Robert Horkovich) All sums rule 6
7 ALLOCATION OF LIABILITY Pro rata/time on the risk allocation 7
8 COURT TREATMENT Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance Co. v. Roberts, et al., Nos , , 2012 WL (4th Cir. Feb. 3, 2012). Coverage is limited to bodily injury occur[ing] during the policy period. To hold the insurer liable for any other period would upend insurance underwriting. 8
9 COURT TREATMENT Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance Co. v. Roberts, et al., Nos , , 2012 WL (4th Cir. Feb. 3, 2012). A teenager sued the policyholder, a realty company, that had managed her home from her birth in January 1991 until November 1993, when the company sold the property, alleging the policyholder s negligence caused her to suffer lead poisoning. The claimant had been diagnosed with the condition in September 1992 and continued to exhibit an elevated blood lead level until August The insurer had issued liability insurance policies covering the period from January 1992 to January
10 COURT TREATMENT Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance Co. v. Roberts, et al., Nos , , 2012 WL (4th Cir. Feb. 3, 2012). The insurer believed that it should be liable only for a 22- month portion of the period of the underlying plaintiff s exposure to the risk of lead poisoning: from January 1992, when the first policy period started, to November 1993, when the policyholder sold the property. The underlying plaintiff countered that the insurer should be liable for the entire judgment in light of the joint and several liability of [its] insured. 10
11 COURT TREATMENT Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance Co. v. Roberts, et al., Nos , , 2012 WL (4th Cir. Feb. 3, 2012). Adopting pro rata allocation, the court rejected the underlying plaintiff s effort to impute the policyholder s joint and several liability to the insurer. That position defied the contract, Maryland law, and fundamental insurance principles. The insurer had contracted to provide coverage only for damages to which this insurance applies. Because the policies covered only harm occur[ing] during the policy period, the insurer was not liable for harm sustained outside that period. In contrast to the policyholder s joint and several liability, the question of an insurer s liability can be answered only by reference to the insurance contract. 11
12 COURT TREATMENT Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance Co. v. Roberts, et al., Nos , , 2012 WL (4th Cir. Feb. 3, 2012). Holding the insurer liable for the entire judgment would upend insurance underwriting. [The underlying plaintiff s] approach would impose the same amount of liability on an insurance company whether it provided coverage for one month or for 10 years. Not only would such an approach yield higher costs and accompanying higher policyholder premiums, it also would disincentize tortfeasors from obtaining comprehensive insurance coverage. 12
13 COURT TREATMENT Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance Co. v. Roberts, et al., Nos , , 2012 WL (4th Cir. Feb. 3, 2012). The pro rata approach not only allocates liability across multiple insurers of a single tortfeasor, but also accommodates the need to hold liable those businesses that chose not to purchase insurance or coverage by allocating liability to them for periods which they were uninsured. 13
14 COURT TREATMENT Boston Gas Co. v. Century Indemnity Co., 910 N.E. 2d 290, (Mass. 2009). Direct liability should be prorated among all insurance companies on the risk. Where it is not feasible to make fact-based allocation of losses for each policy period, losses should be allocated using time-on-the-risk method. 14
15 COURT TREATMENT Policyholders are responsible under time-on-the-risk method for any periods that they went without insurance. But, policyholders are liable for only a prorated portion of the per occurrence self-insured retention for each triggered policy period, to be prorated on same basis as the insurance companies liability, unless policy language unambiguously provides otherwise. 15
16 COURT TREATMENT No reasonable policyholder could have expected that a single one-year policy would cover all losses caused by toxic industrial wastes released into the environment over the course of several decades. Any reasonable insured purchasing a series of occurrence-based policies would have understood that each policy covered it only for property damage occurring during the policy year. Boston Gas, 910 N.E.2d at
17 COURT TREATMENT In sum, the pro rata allocation method promotes judicial efficiency, engenders stability and predictability in the insurance market, provides incentive for responsible commercial behavior, and produces an equitable result. Boston Gas, 910 N.E.2d at
18 COURT TREATMENT [T]he joint and several allocation method is improvident. It does not solve the Allocation problem; it merely postpones it. Boston Gas, 910 N.E.2d at 311 (quoting EnergyNorth Natural Gas, Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd s, 934 A.2d 517, 527 (N.H. 2007). 18
19 COURT TREATMENT (Robert Horkovich) State of California v. Continental Ins. Co., 88 Cal. Rptr. 3d 288 (2009), review pending, Cal. Sup. Court No. S
20 ALL-SUMS RULE (Robert Horkovich) In its all-sums ruling, the trial court had ruled in favor of the State: [O]nce coverage for continuous damage is triggered under a liability policy, the insurer is required to pay for all sums (up to the policy limits) of the insured s liability not just liability specifically allocable to damage during the policy period. 20
21 ALL-SUMS RULE (Robert Horkovich) Insuring Agreement: To pay on behalf of the Insured all sums which the Insured shall become obligated to pay by reason of liability imposed by law for damages because of injury to or destruction of property, including loss of use thereof. 21
22 ALL-SUMS RULE (Robert Horkovich) It is a settled rule that an insurer on the risk when continuous or progressively deteriorating damage or injury first manifests itself remains obligated to indemnify the insured for the entirety of the ensuing damage or injury. Montrose Chem. Corp. v. Admiral Ins. Co., 10 Cal. 4th 645, 686 (1995) (emphasis added). 22
23 ALL-SUMS RULE (Robert Horkovich) Every insurer that issued a liability policy for any period during which a continuous loss occurred was liable for the full extent of the loss up to the policy s limits. Armstrong World Indus., Inc. v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., 45 Cal. App. 4th 1, 49 (1996). 23
24 ALL-SUMS RULE (Robert Horkovich) The duty to indemnify is triggered if specified harm is caused by an included occurrence, so long as at least some such harm results within the policy period. It extends to all specified harm caused by an included occurrence, even if some such harm results beyond the policy period. Aerojet-General Corp. v. Transport Indem. Co., 17 Cal. 4th 38, (1997) (emphasis added). 24
25 ALL-SUMS RULE (Robert Horkovich) The all-sums approach, however, is not literally joint and several liability. The insurers are not jointly liable on each other s policies; rather, each insurer is severally liable on its own policy. 88 Cal. Rptr. 3d at 301 (emphasis in original). 25
26 ALL-SUMS RULE (Robert Horkovich) To summarize, then, in California, when there is a continuous loss spanning multiple policy periods, any insurer that covered any policy period is liable for the entire loss, up to the limits of its policy. 88 Cal. Rptr. 3d at 301 (emphasis in original). 26
27 ALL-SUMS RULE (Robert Horkovich) Implications of the ruling Each insurance company is wholly responsible for the whole loss imposed upon the policyholder up to its policy limits. The exposure of each insurance company is not limited to just the dollar liability presented only by that amount of property damage taking place during the policy period. 27
28 ALL-SUMS RULE Insurance Industry View: The California Supreme Court has not decided how indemnity should be allocated in a continuing loss context. Armstrong and Aerojet addressed the duty to defend, and statements in those opinions regarding the duty to indemnify were dicta. Later California appellate decisions addressing the duty to defend extended all sums to indemnity, in reliance on Montrose and Aerojet, although the indemnity issue was not presented or decided in those cases. 28
29 ALL-SUMS RULE Insurance Industry View: All-sums in the indemnity context is inconsistent with the policy language. Occurrence Definition: Occurrence means an accident or a continuous or repeated exposure to conditions which result in injury to persons or damage to property during the policy period. Policy Period Territory: This policy applies only to occurrences which take place during the policy period commencing and ending. 29
30 ALL-SUMS RULE Insurance Industry View: The all-sums approach is contrary to the California rules of contract interpretation. The all sums approach rewrites the insurance contracts replacing policy terms limiting coverage to property damage during the policy period with property damage during and before and after the policy period. The all sums approach deprives policy terms of meaning, contrary to the rule that each term in a contrary to the rule that each term in a contract must be given independent meaning and effect. (Civil Code 1641.) 30
31 ALL-SUMS RULE Insurance Industry View: The all-sums approach is objectively unreasonable. All sums unreasonably requires an insurer to pay all damage occurring over time (subject to other policy terms and Insurance Code 533), despite policy language limiting coverage to risk of harm during the policy period. All sums unreasonably requires insurers to pay for damage that took place in periods in which the insured did not buy insurance or its policies exclude coverage. 31
32 COURT TREATMENT Court treatment in other jurisdictions 32
33 ALL-SUMS RULE (Robert Horkovich) Other Jurisdictions That Have Adopted All-Sums : Washington: American Nat l Fire Ins. Co. v. B & L Trucking & Constr. Co., 951 P.2d 250, (Wash. 1998). See also Gruol Constr. Co. v. Ins. Co. of North America, 524 P.2d 427 (Wash. Ct. App. 1974). Oregon: Cascade Corp. v. American Home Assurance Co., 135 P.3d 450, (Or. Ct. App. 2006). Pennsylvania: J.H. France Refractories Co. v. Allstate Ins. Co., 626 A.2d 502, (Pa. 1993). 33
34 ALL-SUMS RULE (Robert Horkovich) Other Jurisdictions That Have Adopted All-Sums : Delaware: Monsanto Co. v. C.E. Heath Compensation and Liab. Ins. Co., 652 A.2d 30, 35 (Del. 1994); Viking Pump, Inc. v. Century Indem. Co., 2 A.3d 76 (Del. Ch. 2009) (applying New York law). Ohio: Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., 769 N.E.2d 835, 841 (Ohio 2002); Pennsylvania General Ins. Co. v. Park-Ohio Indus., 930 N.E.2d 800 (Ohio 2010). 34
35 ALL-SUMS RULE (Robert Horkovich) Other Jurisdictions That Have Adopted All-Sums : Illinois: Zurich Ins. Co. v. Raymark Indus., Inc., 514 N.E.2d 150, 165 (Ill. 1987); Caterpillar, Inc. v. Century Indem. Co., No , 2011 WL (Ill. App. Ct. Feb. 1, 2011) (defense). Massachusetts: Rubenstein v. Royal Ins. Co. of Am., 694 N.E.2d 381 (Mass. App. Ct. 1998), aff d, 708 N.E.2d 639 (Mass. 1999). Wisconsin: Plastics Engineering Co. v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 759 N.W. 2d 613 (Wis. 2009). 35
36 ALL-SUMS RULE (Robert Horkovich) Other Jurisdictions That Have Adopted All-Sums : Texas: Union Pac. Res. Co. v. Continental Ins. Co. (Tex. Dist. Ct. Dec. 17, 1998), No , reprinted in 13 Mealey s Litig. Rep. Ins. No. 11, Section A (Jan. 19, 1999). Arkansas: Murphy Oil USA, Inc. v. United States Fid. & Guar. Co. (Ark. Cir. Ct. Feb. 21, 1995) No , reprinted in 9 Mealey s Litig. Rep. Ins. No. 19, Section I (Mar. 21, 1995). 36
37 ALL-SUMS RULE (Robert Horkovich) Memorandum of Meeting of Discussion Group Asbestosis April 21, 1977 The majority also contended that each carrier on risk during any part of that period could be fully responsible for the cost of defense and loss. 37
38 ALLOCATION RULE Insurance Industry View: Numerous courts across the country have endorsed allocation of loss during the policy period. We do not believe that these policy provisions can reasonably be read to mean that one single-year policy out of dozens of triggered policies must indemnify the insured s liability for the total amount of pollution caused by events over a period of decades, including events that happened both before and after the policy period. (Public Serv. Co. of Colorado v. Wallis & Cos., 986 P.2d 924, 939 (Colo. 1999).) 38
39 ALLOCATION RULE Other Jurisdictions Adopting Allocation: Nebraska: Dutton-Lainson Co. v. Continental Ins. Co., 778 N.W.2d 433 (Neb. 2010). Vermont: Towns v. Northern Security Ins. Co., 964 A. 2d 1150 (Vt. 2008). Colorado: Public Serv. Co. of Colorado v. Wallis & Cos., 986 P.2d 924 (Colo. 1999). 39
40 ALLOCATION RULE Other Jurisdictions Adopting Allocation: New York: Consolidated Edison Co. of New York v. Allstate Ins. Co., 774 N.E.2d 687 (N.Y. 2002). Connecticut: Security Ins. Co. of Hartford v. Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co., 826 A.2d 107 (Conn. 2003). New Jersey: Carter-Wallace, Inc. v. Admiral Ins. Co., 712 A.2d 1116 (N.J. 1998). 40
41 ALLOCATION RULE Other Jurisdictions Adopting Allocation: Minnesota: Domtar, Inc. v. Niagara Fire Ins. Co., 563 N.W.2d 724 (Minn. 1997); Cargill, Inc. v. Ace American Ins. Co., 784 N.W.2d 341 (Minn. 2010) (defense). Utah: Sharon Steel Corp. v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., 931 P.2d 127 (Utah 1997). 41
42 ALLOCATION RULE Other Jurisdictions Adopting Allocation: Idaho: Empire Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. North Pacific Ins. Co., 905 P.2d 1025 (Idaho 1995). Louisiana: Southern Silica of Louisiana, Inc. v. Louisiana Insurance Guar. Ass n, 979 So. 2d 460 (La. 2008). New Hampshire: Energy North Natural Gas, Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, 934 A.2d 517 (N.H. 2007). 42
43 COURT TREATMENT (Robert Horkovich/Laura Foggan) Comparison of these rulings -- and a debate about what s next where courts apply an all sums rule 43
44 COURT TREATMENT Leading Case Example: What s Next After All Sums Defense Costs Cargill, Inc. v. ACE American Insurance Co., No. A (Minn. June 30, 2010). The Minnesota Supreme Court held that the primary insurer could seek equitable contribution for defense costs from any other insurer that also has a duty to defend the same risk. Defense costs would be allocated equally amongst all the primary insurers on the risk. 44
45 COURT TREATMENT Leading Case Example: What s Next After All Sums: Indemnity Costs Pennsylvania General Insurance Co. v. Park-Ohio Industries, Inc., 126 Ohio St.3d 98, 930 N.E.2d 800 (Ohio 2010). The Ohio Supreme Court reaffirmed all-sums but found a contribution right against other insurers. It held that it would be inequitable to deny contribution from nontargeted insurers based solely on the policyholder s failure to give them prompt notice. Contribution would be allowed unless the non-targeted insurers could show prejudice. 45
46 Insurer Perspective Re Set-Off Where the policyholder has compromised a coverage dispute with another insurer, the remaining insurers should be allowed to set off the share of the carrier with whom the policyholder settled. Through a set off, the policyholder is held to the agreement it made in compromising its coverage claim against another party and the remaining insurer s share of responsibility is not somehow expanded by the policyholder s actions. Each insurer should face liability no greater than for the time its policy was in force. Further, under no circumstances should a double recovery be allowed. 46
47 Insurer Perspective Re Contribution Contribution is far from a panacea for the unlucky insurer that is targeted under all sums to respond in full for damage spanning multiple policies. Allowing all sums liability and forcing a targeted insurer to seek contribution or subrogation impermissibly foists the evidentiary burden of proving coverage under other policies on the insurer, not the policyholder. This approach is neither fair nor efficient. 47
48 Policyholder Perspective Re Set-Off (Robert Horkovich) [T]he insured must first be fully compensated for its loss before any set-off is ever allowed. [The insurance company] bears the burden of establishing a double recovery. Were we to hold that the insured bears the burden of proving it had not received a double recovery, such a rule would encourage litigation and reward the non-settling insurer for refusing to settle. Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Commercial Union Ins. Co., 15 P.3d 115, (Wn. 2001) 48
49 Policyholder Perspective Re Contribution (Robert Horkovich) Equitable right. Difficult for a breaching insurance company to seek equity. E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc. v. Acc. & Cas. Ins. Co., No. 82 Civ. 7327, 1997 WL , at *3 (SDNY May 13, 1997) The non-settling insurers ask the Court to reward them for not settling the case and give them the benefit of monies paid by the settling defendants. A rule allocating such a windfall to non-settling insurers would encourage insurers to refuse to settle and force the case to trial, knowing that they will never be required to pay more than what they are legally obligated to pay and hoping that they can reap a windfall if settlements by other insurers prove to be in excess of their legal obligation. The courts should not encourage that type of dog in the manger approach to litigation. No rights vest in an insurance company to seek contribution or subrogation if at all at least until after the breaching insurance company pays full judgment. Policyholder must be made whole. Policyholder does not have to pay self-insured or vertical gap allocations or even insolvent insurance company shares. 49
Allocating Defense Costs Among Multiple Insurers and Between Covered and Uncovered Claims
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Allocating Defense Costs Among Multiple Insurers and Between Covered and Uncovered Claims Methods of Allocation Among Insurers and Allocation to
More informationLiability For Long-Tail Claims: Pro Rata Or All Sums?
Portfolio Media, Inc. 648 Broadway, Suite 200 New York, NY 10012 www.law360.com Phone: +1 212 537 6331 Fax: +1 212 537 6371 customerservice@portfoliomedia.com Liability For Long-Tail Claims: Pro Rata Or
More informationProgressive Damage Construction Defect Cases
Construction Law Allocation of Risk Among Multiple Insurers By R. Michael Ethridge and Katherine W. Sullivan Progressive Damage Construction Defect Cases The landscape surrounding these issues is constantly
More informationPerformance Bonds and CGL Insurance In Construction Projects: Navigating the Interplay Between Insurance and Surety
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Performance Bonds and CGL Insurance In Construction Projects: Navigating the Interplay Between Insurance and Surety Minimizing Risks and Maximizing
More informationRevisiting The Duty to Defend After the Exhaustion of the Policy Limits
Revisiting The Duty to Defend After the Exhaustion of the Policy Limits Introduction The duty to defend and the duty to indemnify are distinct duties with the duty to defend wider in scope than the duty
More informationfor Landlords and Tenants Negotiating Insurance, Indemnity and Mutual Waiver of Subrogation Provisions
Presenting a live 90 minute webinar with interactive Q&A Commercial Leases: Risk Mitigation Strategies for Landlords and Tenants Negotiating Insurance, Indemnity and Mutual Waiver of Subrogation Provisions
More informationOvercoming Ethical Challenges for Multi-Firm Lawyers and Their Firms: Fiduciary Duty, Conflict, Fee-Splitting and More
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Overcoming Ethical Challenges for Multi-Firm Lawyers and Their Firms: Fiduciary Duty, Conflict, Fee-Splitting and More TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 16, 2014
More informationPayment and Performance Surety Bonds in Construction Projects: Perspectives of Owners, Contractors and Sureties
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Payment and Performance Surety Bonds in Construction Projects: Perspectives of Owners, Contractors and Sureties Asserting and Defending Surety Bond
More informationSTACKING COMMERCIAL INSURANCE COVERAGE INSURER & POLICYHOLDER PERSPECTIVES
STACKING COMMERCIAL INSURANCE COVERAGE INSURER & POLICYHOLDER PERSPECTIVES Lawrence D. Mason Chicago, IL lmason@smsm.com Sherilyn Pastor Newark, NJ spastor@mccarter.com Lon A. Berk McLean, VA lberk@hunton.com
More informationExcess Insurance: Questions Raised by Qualcomm and Issues Relating to the Duty to Defend
ACI s 2 nd National Forum on Insurance Allocation June 25-26, 2015 PLEASE SEND PRESENTATION TO m.richardson@americanconference.com Excess Insurance: Questions Raised by Qualcomm and Issues Relating to
More informationIs Fair Fair?: All Sums and the Allocation of Deductibles
Is Fair Fair?: All Sums and the Allocation of Deductibles by Lorelie S. Masters and Jerold Oshinsky Mr. Oshinsky is a partner at Jenner & Block LLP in Los Angeles. He is co-author of Practitioner s Guide
More informationMARY KAY VYSKOCIL. The Ritz Carlton Hotel, Pentagon City, Virginia, (Washington, D.C.), ALLOCATION, Copyright 2000
MEALEY'S INSURANCE 101 CONFERENCE: A PRACTICAL INTRODUCTION MARY KAY VYSKOCIL SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP SEPTEMBER 15, 2000 The Ritz Carlton Hotel, Pentagon City, Virginia, (Washington, D.C.), ALLOCATION,
More informationWest Virginia Court Resolves Issues Of First Impression On Insurance Coverage For Delayed Manifestation Claims
MEALEY S TM LITIGATION REPORT Insurance West Virginia Court Resolves Issues Of First Impression On Insurance Coverage For Delayed Manifestation Claims by John T. Waldron, III Sara N. Brown K&L Gates LLP
More informationThe continued growth of jury verdicts, the rise of mass torts, the development of intricate,
Excess Insurance Rights and Obligations By Patrick J. Boley Excess insurance is playing an increasingly prominent role in the resolution of liability claims. The continued growth of jury verdicts, the
More informationCasualty Insurance. Long-Term Professional Liability Cases: Who Is Responsible For Nursing Home Claims? By Walter J. Andrews and Syed S.
March, 2005 No. 5 Casualty Insurance In This Issue Walter Andrews is a partner in the McLean, VA office of Hunton & Williams. His practice focuses on complex insurance coverage litigation and counseling.
More informationAPPENDIX 4. A. State Courts. Alaska Superior Court. Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals Alabama Circuit Court. Arizona Superior Court
APPENDIX 4 COURT ABBREVIATIONS This appendix contains abbreviations for federal courts. Abbreviations for state courts can be developed by consulting Appendix 1 and Rule 2 concerning abbreviations and
More informationBuilder's Risk Insurance for Construction Projects: Legal Issues
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Builder's Risk Insurance for Construction Projects: Legal Issues Evaluating Scope of Coverage, Policy Exclusions and Coverage Extensions and Sub-Limits
More informationCommercial Leases: Risk Mitigation Strategies for Landlords and Tenants
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Commercial Leases: Risk Mitigation Strategies for Landlords and Tenants WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 10, 2012 1pm Eastern 12pm Central 11am Mountain 10am
More informationSTATE BY STATE ANTI-INDEMNITY STATUTES. Sole or Partial Negligence. Alaska X Alaska Stat. 45.45.900. Except for hazardous substances.
State STATE BY STATE ANTI-INDEMNITY STATUTES Sole Negligence Sole or Partial Negligence Closes A.I. Loophole Comments Alabama Alaska Alaska Stat. 45.45.900. Except for hazardous substances. Arizona (Private
More informationThat s A Wrap What Every Claims And Construction Professional Needs To Know About Wrap-up Insurance Programs
2015 CLM Atlanta Conference November 5-6, 2015 in Atlanta, GA That s A Wrap What Every Claims And Construction Professional Needs To Know About Wrap-up Insurance Programs In the construction industry,
More informationHenkel Corp v. Hartford Accident
2008 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 3-27-2008 Henkel Corp v. Hartford Accident Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 06-4856 Follow
More informationPLAINTIFF, LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY S MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Case 1:09-cv-11579-JLT Document 24 Filed 08/09/10 Page 1 of 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) Case No.: 09-11579 ACE AMERICAN
More informationPrimary vs. Excess/Umbrella:
Primary vs. Excess/Umbrella: Hammering, Dropping, Exhausting and More Neil Selman Selman Breitman LLP 11766 Wilshire Boulevard, Sixth Floor Los Angeles, CA 90025-6538 (310) 445-0800 nselman@selmanbreitman.com
More informationThe question whether a jurisdiction should adopt an all sums or pro rata allocation
All Sums In Action Mary F. Licari Bates & Carey LLP 191 North Wacker Drive Suite 2400 Chicago, Illinois 60606 (312) 762-3100 (312) 762-3200 (Fax) mlicari@batescarey.com This paper presents an overview
More informationHow To Defend A Policy In Nevada
Insurance for In-House Counsel April 2014 Kevin Stolworthy, Esq. / Conor Flynn, Esq. / Matthew Stafford, Esq. Commercial General Liability Insurance ( CGL insurance ) Purpose of CGL Insurance CGL insurance
More informationEXCESS OF LOSS COVERAGE FOR SELF-INSURERS: IS IT INSURANCE OR REINSURANCE (Revisited)? Robert M. Hall
EXCESS OF LOSS COVERAGE FOR SELF-INSURERS: IS IT INSURANCE OR REINSURANCE (Revisited)? By Robert M. Hall Mr. Hall is an attorney, a former law firm partner, a former insurance and reinsurance executive
More information50 STATE DEDUCTIBLE REIMBURSEMENT CHART July 2007
MATTHIESEN, WICKERT & LEHRER, S.C. 1111 E. Sumner Street P.O. Box 270670 Hartford, WI 53027 (262) 673-7850 (262) 673-3766 (Fax) www.mwl-law.com 50 STATE DEDUCTIBLE REIMBURSEMENT CHART July 2007 STATE ALABAMA
More informationChapter XI INSURANCE. While many insurance policies do not cover environmental remediation and damages, insurance. A. General Liability Insurance
Chapter XI INSURANCE There are several different types of insurance that may apply to environmental problems. While many insurance policies do not cover environmental remediation and damages, insurance
More informationIntroduction to Insurance Policies
Chapter 1 Introduction to Insurance Policies 1-1 TYPES OF POLICIES 1-1:1 Personal Lines Versus Commercial Lines Policies Personal lines policies are purchased by an individual, rather than an organization,
More informationEXPLORING THE SELF-INSURED - INSURER RELATIONSHIP
EXPLORING THE SELF-INSURED - INSURER RELATIONSHIP I. INTRODUCTION By: Jay Barry Harris and Hema Patel Mehta Fineman Krekstein & Harris, P.C. 30 S. 17 th Street, Suite 1800 Philadelphia, PA 19103 215-893-9300
More informationExcess Carriers Duty to Defend: When Follow Form Means Drop Down and Other Issues
Excess Carriers Duty to Defend: When Follow Form Means Drop Down and Other Issues ABA Insurance Coverage Litigation Committee CLE Seminar March 1-3, 2012 Nicholas J. Boos Natalie G. Maciolek Sedgwick LLP
More informationState v. Continental Insurance Company
Public Land and Resources Law Review Volume 0 Fall 2012 Case Summaries State v. Continental Insurance Company John M. Newman john.newman@umontana.edu Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.umt.edu/plrlr
More informationMedical Expert Depositions in Workers' Comp Cases
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Medical Expert Depositions in Workers' Comp Cases Effective Techniques for Deposing Experts and Raising Strategic Objections TUESDAY, MARCH 11,
More informationIn The NO. 14-98-00234-CV. UNITED STATES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION, Appellant
Affirmed and Opinion filed January 13, 2000. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-98-00234-CV UNITED STATES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION, Appellant V. UNDERWRITERS AT INTEREST and STEVEN RICHARD BISHOP,
More informationCase 2:14-cv-00170-TS Document 45 Filed 05/11/15 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH
Case 2:14-cv-00170-TS Document 45 Filed 05/11/15 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA, a Connecticut corporation, and
More informationMEALEY S LITIGATION REPORT:
MEALEY S LITIGATION REPORT: Insurance Vol. 21, #24 April 24, 2007 Commentary Is Injury In Fact Really A Trigger In Insurance Coverage? By Vance A. Woodward [Editor s Note: Vance A. Woodward is a senior
More informationMEDICAL MALPRACTICE STATE STATUTORY
MEDICAL MALPRACTICE STATE STATUTORY REFERENCE GUIDE 41 MEDICAL MALPRACTICE STATE STATUTORY REFERENCE GUIDE The following references to statutes relevant to medical malpractice cases are intended exclusively
More informationTable of Mortgage Broker (and Originator) Bond Laws by State Current as of July 1, 2010
Alabama Ala. Code 5-25-5 Bond only required where licensee does not submit evidence of net worth. Loan originators may be covered by Alaska 25,000 Alaska Stat. 06.60.045 Arizona $10,000-$15,000 Ariz. Rev.
More informationNumber of Occurrences For Asbestos Claims: Not A One Size Fits All Analysis
March 2007 Number of Occurrences For Asbestos Claims: Not A One Size Fits All Analysis Contributor: Linda Bondi Morrison California Illinois New Jersey New York www.tresslerllp.com Please note that statutes
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit No. 15-1547 Continental Casualty Company lllllllllllllllllllllplaintiff - Appellee v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA llllllllllllllllllllldefendant
More informationCUNDIFF V. STATE FARM: ALLOWING DOUBLE RECOVERY UNDER UIM COVERAGE
CUNDIFF V. STATE FARM: ALLOWING DOUBLE RECOVERY UNDER UIM COVERAGE AND WORKERS COMPENSATION Melissa Healy INTRODUCTION In Cundiff v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., the Arizona Supreme Court
More informationCase 3:08-cv-00685-B Document 235 Filed 10/16/09 Page 1 of 9 PageID 12363 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Case 3:08-cv-00685-B Document 235 Filed 10/16/09 Page 1 of 9 PageID 12363 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION TRAMMELL CROW RESIDENTIAL COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL
More informationPursuing Insurance Bad Faith Claims Over Personal Injury Claim Delays, Denials and Low Ball Offers
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Pursuing Insurance Bad Faith Claims Over Personal Injury Claim Delays, Denials and Low Ball Offers Considerations and Best Practices for Proving
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND MARYLAND ACCOUNTING SERVICES, INC., et al. Plaintiffs, v. Case No. CCB-11-CV-00145 CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant. MEMORANDUM Plaintiffs
More informationThis chart accompanies Protection From Creditors for Retirement Plan Assets, in the January 2014 issue of The Tax Adviser.
This chart accompanies Protection From Creditors for Retirement Plan Assets, in the January 2014 issue of The Tax Adviser. State-by-state analysis of IRAs as exempt property State State Statute IRA Alabama
More informationSolar Leases: Legal Considerations for Property Owners
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Solar Leases: Legal Considerations for Property Owners Analyzing Lease Sites and Deal Structures and Addressing Key Document Provisions WEDNESDAY,
More informationSURVEY OF THE CURRENT INSURANCE REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT FOR AFFINITY MARKETIG 1 A
SURVEY OF THE CURRENT INSURANCE REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT FOR AFFINITY MARKETIG ARRANGEMENTS (FORC Journal: Vol. 23 Edition 4 - Winter 2012) Kevin G. Fitzgerald, Esq. (414) 297-5841 N. Wesley Strickland (850)
More informationMINIMUM CAPITAL & SURPLUS AND STATUTORY DEPOSITS AND WHO THEY PROTECT. By: Ann Monaco Warren, Esq. 573.634.2522
MINIMUM CAPITAL & SURPLUS AND STATUTORY DEPOSITS AND WHO THEY PROTECT By: Ann Monaco Warren, Esq. 573.634.2522 With the spotlight on the financial integrity and solvency of corporations in the U.S. by
More informationModel Regulation Service April 2005 GUIDELINES ON CORPORATE OWNED LIFE INSURANCE
Model Regulation Service April 2005 Corporate Owned Life Insurance (COLI) is life insurance a corporate employer buys covering one or more employees. With COLI, the employer is generally the applicant,
More informationDefending Take-Home Exposure Cases Duty in the Context of Premises and Employer Liability
Defending Take-Home Exposure Cases Duty in the Context of Premises and Employer Liability Presented by Deborah K. St. Lawrence Thompson, Counsel Miles & Stockbridge, P.C. Baltimore, Maryland September
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
FOR PUBLICATION ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: ROBERT M. EDWARDS, JR. Jones Obenchain, LLP South Bend, Indiana ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE: KATHRYN A. MOLL Nation Schoening Moll Fortville, Indiana IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
More informationThe Insurance Coverage Law Information Center
The following article is from National Underwriter s latest online resource, FC&S Legal: The Insurance Coverage Law Information Center. The Insurance Coverage Law Information Center BETTER LATE THAN NEVER:
More informationIn Search of Consistency in Insurance Claims Handling: Discovery of Insurance Companies Files on Reserves and Other Policyholders Claims
In Search of Consistency in Insurance Claims Handling: Discovery of Insurance Companies Files on Reserves and Other Policyholders Claims MARSHALL GILINSKY AND AMY L. FRANCISCO The authors discuss the value
More informationTENDERING CLAIMS UNDER YOUR CGL INSURANCE POLICY By Nick M. Campbell, Esq. GREEN & CAMPBELL, LLP. A. History of Commercial Liability Policies
TENDERING CLAIMS UNDER YOUR CGL INSURANCE POLICY By Nick M. Campbell, Esq. GREEN & CAMPBELL, LLP Please note that this article is only intended to provide some general educational information regarding
More informationSecond Annual Conference September 16, 2015 to September 18, 2015 Chicago, IL
Second Annual Conference September 16, 2015 to September 18, 2015 Chicago, IL Using Insurance Coverage to Mitigate Cybersecurity Risks To Warranty and Service Contract Businesses Barry Buchman, Partner
More informationFOLLOW THE SETTLEMENTS: BAD CLAIMS HANDLING EXCEPTION. Robert M. Hall
FOLLOW THE SETTLEMENTS: BAD CLAIMS HANDLING EXCEPTION By Robert M. Hall [Mr. Hall is a former law firm partner, a former insurance and reinsurance company executive and acts as an insurance consultant
More informationRecent Developments and Issues in Insurance Coverage for Asbestos Claims
Recent Developments and Issues in Insurance Coverage for Asbestos Claims Presented by: Lawrence A. Hobel Linda Bondi Morrison Cutting-Edge Issues in Asbestos Litigation Conference March 17, 2014 Topics»
More informationF I L E D August 9, 2011
Case: 10-30886 Document: 00511566112 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/09/2011 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS United States Court of Appeals FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Fifth Circuit F I L E D August 9, 2011 Lyle
More informationSTATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A07-784. Court of Appeals Meyer, J. Took no part, Page and Gildea, JJ.
STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT A07-784 Court of Appeals Meyer, J. Took no part, Page and Gildea, JJ. In re Continental Casualty Company and Continental Insurance Company, Petitioners. Continental
More informationANDREW S. AMER. As New York s highest court has held:
REINSURANCE ISSUES ARISING FROM MASS TORT SETTLEMENTS ANDREW S. AMER SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP MARCH 6, 2003 Mass tort claims continue to overwhelm the US court system and are now becoming more prevalent
More informationERISA Retirement Plans: Fiduciary Compliance and Risk Management for Investment Fund Selection and Fee Disclosures
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A ERISA Retirement Plans: Fiduciary Compliance and Risk Management for Investment Fund Selection and Fee Disclosures Discharging Fiduciary Duties
More informationCase 1:11-cv-00912-TJM-DJS Document 196 Filed 06/20/14 Page 1 of 13. Plaintiff, v. 1:11-CV-912. Defendants. DECISION and ORDER
Case 1:11-cv-00912-TJM-DJS Document 196 Filed 06/20/14 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PACIFIC EMPLOYERS
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:12-CV-341 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Case 3:12-cv-00341 Document 30 Filed in TXSD on 03/31/14 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION PAC-VAN, INC., Plaintiff, VS. CHS, INC. D/B/A CHS COOPERATIVES,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I. ---o0o--- ST. PAUL FIRE & MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Minnesota corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, vs.
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCCQ-14-0000727 29-JUN-2015 10:56 AM IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I ---o0o--- ST. PAUL FIRE & MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Minnesota corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant,
More informationPersistence Of Trigger, Allocation Disputes
Portfolio Media, Inc. 648 Broadway, Suite 200 New York, NY 10012 www.law360.com Phone: +1 212 537 6331 Fax: +1 212 537 6371 customerservice@portfoliomedia.com Persistence Of Trigger, Allocation Disputes
More informationUPDATE. Insurance Coverage
UPDATE Insurance Coverage MARCH 2003 The Insurance Coverage Risks Involved in Corporate Asset Transfers A Review of the California Supreme Court s Henkel Decision INTRODUCTION Acquisitions of businesses
More informationBy Heather Howell Wright, Bradley Arant Boult Cummings, LLP. (Published July 24, 2013 in Insurance Coverage, by the ABA Section Of Litigation)
Tiara Condominium: The Demise of the Economic Loss Rule in Construction Defect Litigation and Impact on the Property Damage Requirement in a General Liability Policy By Heather Howell Wright, Bradley Arant
More information122G5X. Time of Request: Tuesday, August 21, 2012 Client ID/Project Name: Firm Number of Lines: 166 Job Number: 1826:366154235. Research Information
Time of Request: Tuesday, August 21, 2012 Client ID/Project Name: Firm Number of Lines: 166 Job Number: 1826:366154235 Research Information Service: LEXSEE(R) Feature Print Request: Current Document: 1
More informationPresenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Self-Insured Retentions and Deductibles: Key Coverage Issues Navigating the Impact on Claims Settlement, Policy Limits, Obligations of Excess Insurers
More informationBuilder's Risk and CGL Insurance for Construction Projects: Mitigating Developer and Contractor Risks
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Builder's Risk and CGL Insurance for Construction Projects: Mitigating Developer and Contractor Risks Evaluating Scope of Coverage, Covered Losses,
More information1 of 1 DOCUMENT. New Appleman Insurance Law Practice Guide. Copyright 2009, Matthew Bender & Company, Inc., a member of the LexisNexis Group.
Page 1 1 of 1 DOCUMENT New Appleman Insurance Law Practice Guide Copyright 2009, Matthew Bender & Company, Inc., a member of the LexisNexis Group. Volume 3: Separate Insurance Lines Chapter 39 UNDERSTANDING
More informationChristine K. Noma Wendel, Rosen, Black & Dean LLP March 2014
Christine K. Noma Wendel, Rosen, Black & Dean LLP March 2014 You just discovered that the commercial or industrial property that you own is polluted. This discovery may have occurred during the negotiations
More informationCase 8:13-cv-00295-EAK-TGW Document 145 Filed 02/12/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID 5551 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
Case 8:13-cv-00295-EAK-TGW Document 145 Filed 02/12/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID 5551 SUMMIT CONTRACTORS, INC., Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION v. CASE NO. 8:13-CV-295-T-17TGW
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT. Israel : : v. : No. 3:98cv302(JBA) : State Farm Mutual Automobile : Insurance Company et al.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT Israel : : v. : No. 3:98cv302(JBA) : State Farm Mutual Automobile : Insurance Company et al. : Ruling on Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. #82] After
More informationPresenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A. Today s faculty features:
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Triggering Liability for Continuous First-Party Property Loss Spanning Multiple Policy Periods Determining the Appropriate Trigger to Maximize Coverage
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL TRIAL DIVISION
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL TRIAL DIVISION PRUDENTIAL PROPERTY : MAY TERM, 2004 & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, : No. 0621
More informationKeyspan Gas E. Corp. v Munich Reins. Am., Inc. 2014 NY Slip Op 24306. Supreme Court, New York County. Scarpulla, J.
[*1] Keyspan Gas E. Corp. v Munich Reins. Am., Inc 2014 NY Slip Op 24306 Decided on October 14, 2014 Supreme Court, New York County Scarpulla, J. Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant
More informationPENNSYLVANIA NATIONAL MUTUAL CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. JOHN D. ST. JOHN, et al., Defendants NO. 09-06388
Page 1 PENNSYLVANIA NATIONAL MUTUAL CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. JOHN D. ST. JOHN, et al., Defendants NO. 09-06388 COMMON PLEAS COURT OF CHESTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA 2011 Pa. Dist. & Cnty.
More informationCan You Trust A Certificate Of Insurance?
Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com Can You Trust A Certificate Of Insurance? Law360,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Case: 13-20512 Document: 00512673150 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/23/2014 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS United States Court of Appeals FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Fifth Circuit FILED June 23, 2014 Lyle W.
More informationSettling Wage/Hour Claims: Weighing Settlement Options, Negotiating Damages, and Ensuring Court Approval
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Settling Wage/Hour Claims: Weighing Settlement Options, Negotiating Damages, and Ensuring Court Approval WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 15, 2014 1pm Eastern
More informationRIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS OF THE INSURED, PRIMARY INSURER AND EXCESS INSURERS IN LARGE LOSS CASES. Linda S. Woolf. Introduction
RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS OF THE INSURED, PRIMARY INSURER AND EXCESS INSURERS IN LARGE LOSS CASES Linda S. Woolf Introduction In today s litigation arena, where an increasing number of cases implicate multiple
More informationStructuring Rooftop Lease Agreements: Legal and Business Considerations
Presenting a live 90 minute webinar with interactive Q&A Structuring Rooftop Lease Agreements: Legal and Business Considerations Negotiating Leases for Telecom Equipment, Solar Energy, Commercial Farming,
More informationALABAMA COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS
REL: 12/09/2005 STATE FARM v. BROWN Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions,
More informationCase 2:09-cv-00532-JPH Document 23 Filed 02/02/10 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 2:09-cv-00532-JPH Document 23 Filed 02/02/10 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MICHAEL WALKER : CIVIL ACTION : v. : : NO. 09-532 BIG BURGER RESTAURANTS,
More informationInsurance Due Diligence in M&A Deals: Evaluating Coverage and Gaps, Mitigating Risks and Potential Liabilities
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Insurance Due Diligence in M&A Deals: Evaluating Coverage and Gaps, Mitigating Risks and Potential Liabilities THURSDAY, OCTOBER 29, 2015 1pm Eastern
More informationPRO-RATA APPORTIONMENT IN LONG-TAIL CONTAMINATION CASES: WILL PRESUMED EFFICIENCIES UNDERCUT ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUPS?
PRO-RATA APPORTIONMENT IN LONG-TAIL CONTAMINATION CASES: WILL PRESUMED EFFICIENCIES UNDERCUT ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUPS? BENJAMIN S. REILLY * Abstract: Environmental contamination often causes injuries that
More informationReinsurance. Piercing The Veil Of Reinsurance: Reinsurance Cut Throughs In Insurance Carrier Insolvencies MEALEY S LITIGATION REPORT
MEALEY S LITIGATION REPORT Reinsurance Piercing The Veil Of Reinsurance: Reinsurance Cut Throughs In Insurance Carrier Insolvencies by Joseph C. Monahan, Esq. Saul Ewing LLP Philadelphia, PA A commentary
More informationHow To Listen To A Conference On A Computer Or Cell Phone
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A M&A Auctions: Successful Bidding Strategies Planning and Executing Winning Bids, Minimizing Costs of Losing Bids THURSDAY, JANUARY 8, 2015 1pm Eastern
More informationCRS Report for Congress
Order Code RL32928 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Breastfeeding and Jury Duty: State Laws, Court Rules, and Related Issues May 17, 2005 Douglas Reid Weimer Legislative Attorney American
More informationJACKSON BROOK INSTITUTE, INC., et al. MAINE INSURANCE GUARANTY ASSOCIATION. [ 1] The United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Maine (Haines,
MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT Decision: 2004 ME 140 Docket: Fed-04-273 Argued: October 20, 2004 Decided: November 10, 2004 Reporter of Decisions Panel: SAUFLEY, C.J., and CLIFFORD, RUDMAN, ALEXANDER, CALKINS,
More informationHow To Defend Yourself In A Lawsuit Against A Car Insurance Policy In Illinois
Case: 1:10-cv-08146 Document #: 27 Filed: 06/29/11 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:342 TKK USA INC., f/k/a The Thermos Company, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION Plaintiff,
More informationEstate Planning Using LLCs and Limited Partnerships Achieving Estate Tax Savings Through Valuation Discounts, Protecting Against Creditor Claims
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A Estate Planning Using LLCs and Limited Partnerships Achieving Estate Tax Savings Through Valuation Discounts, Protecting Against Creditor Claims
More informationCase 3:10-cv-01946-SRU Document 1 Filed 12/10/10 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :
Case 310-cv-01946-SRU Document 1 Filed 12/10/10 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY as successor to THE AETNA CASUALTY AND SURETY CO.,
More informationIN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST DISTRICT
2016 IL App (1st) 150810-U Nos. 1-15-0810, 1-15-0942 cons. Fourth Division June 30, 2016 NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in
More information710.00 LIABILITY INSURANCE
710.00 LIABILITY INSURANCE INTRODUCTION A contract of liability insurance contains an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. Scroggins v. Allstate Ins. Co., 74 Ill.App.3d 1027, 1029; 393 N.E.2d
More informationCLASS ACTION. Westlaw Journal. Expert Analysis The State of Coverage Disputes Concerning Advertising And Privacy Claims
Westlaw Journal CLASS ACTION Litigation News and Analysis Legislation Regulation Expert Commentary VOLUME 19, ISSUE 8 / SEPTEMBER 2012 Expert Analysis The State of Coverage Disputes Concerning Advertising
More informationJUDGMENT AFFIRMED. Division II Opinion by JUDGE TERRY Casebolt and Furman, JJ., concur. Announced June 10, 2010
COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS Court of Appeals No. 09CA0830 Arapahoe County District Court No. 08CV1981 Honorable Michael Spear, Judge Travelers Property Casualty Company of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v.
More information2014 IL App (5th) 120588-U NO. 5-12-0588 IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIFTH DISTRICT
NOTICE Decision filed 01/23/14. The text of this decision may be changed or corrected prior to the filing of a Petition for Rehearing or the disposition of the same. 2014 IL App (5th) 120588-U NO. 5-12-0588
More informationRolling the Dice: Insurer s Bad Faith Failure to Settle within Limits
Rolling the Dice: Insurer s Bad Faith Failure to Settle within Limits By: Attorney Jeffrey J Vita and Attorney Bethany DiMarzio Clearly the obligation to accept a good-faith settlement within the policy
More information