Does Peek v. Comm r Extend to Rollover as Business Start-ups (ROBS) Arrangements?

Save this PDF as:
 WORD  PNG  TXT  JPG

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Does Peek v. Comm r Extend to Rollover as Business Start-ups (ROBS) Arrangements?"

Transcription

1 Latham & Watkins Tax Department Number 1536 June 11, 2013 Does Peek v. Comm r Extend to Rollover as Business Start-ups (ROBS) Arrangements? A recent Tax Court decision interpreting the prohibited transaction rules will not likely apply to 401(k) plans. The United States Tax Court recently ruled against a group of taxpayers in a significant case concerning the legality of transactions involving self-directed IRAs. 1 Peek v. Commissioner is the first Tax Court decision to consider whether the owner of a self-directed IRA is prohibited from personally guaranteeing a loan by a company owned in part by an IRA. The Tax Court broadly interpreted Internal Revenue Code (Code) Section 4975(c)(1)(B), which prohibits any direct or indirect extension of credit between a plan and a disqualified person, and held that the taxpayers IRAs terminated when they engaged in a prohibited transaction by guaranteeing the company s debt to a third party. In the wake of this decision, some commentators have suggested that the Tax Court s holding in Peek may impact another innovative technique for capitalizing a business using 401(k) plan assets, commonly referred to as rollover as business start-ups or ROBS arrangements. While the Peek case represents a significant development in the tax laws applicable to IRAs, the case should not adversely impact typical ROBS arrangements, which qualify for a special exemption to certain prohibited transaction rules under ERISA Section 408(e), and are generally subject to different regulatory requirements. Peek v. Commissioner In 2001, the taxpayers in Peek used their self-directed IRAs to fund the purchase of Abbott Fire & Safety, Inc. from an unrelated third party. At that time, Abbott was a successful business specializing in the sale of fire alarms, sprinklers and other fire suppression equipment. The taxpayers acquired Abbott through a newly formed corporation FP Company which the taxpayers capitalized exclusively with their IRA assets. Each of the taxpayers IRAs transferred cash to FP Company in exchange for the company s stock. Following the transaction, the taxpayers IRAs collectively owned 100 percent of FP Company. FP Company then acquired Abbott using that cash (i.e., the proceeds from the stock sale to the IRAs), cash from a bank loan and promissory notes. The sellers required the taxpayers to personally guarantee the promissory note FP Company made to them. In subsequent years, the taxpayers rolled over the FP Company stock from traditional IRAs to Roth IRAs, which resulted in income to the taxpayers during those years. In 2006, the taxpayers sold FP Company for a substantial profit, which the taxpayers claimed was permanently shielded from tax on account of the FP Company stock being held by taxpayers Roth IRAs. The IRS challenged the tax treatment of the 2006 sale by arguing that the taxpayers personal guarantees on behalf of FP Company were prohibited transactions that caused their IRAs to terminate as of The IRS argued that the consequence of the IRA terminations was that the assets of the IRAs (i.e., the Latham & Watkins operates worldwide as a limited liability partnership organized under the laws of the State of Delaware (USA) with affiliated limited liability partnerships conducting the practice in the United Kingdom, France, Italy and Singapore and as affiliated partnerships conducting the practice in Hong Kong and Japan. Latham & Watkins practices in Saudi Arabia in association with the Law Office of Salman M. Al-Sudairi. In Qatar, Latham & Watkins LLP is licensed by the Qatar Financial Centre Authority. Under New York s Code of Professional Responsibility, portions of this communication contain attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Results depend upon a variety of factors unique to each representation. Please direct all inquiries regarding our conduct under New York s Disciplinary Rules to Latham & Watkins LLP, 885 Third Avenue, New York, NY , Phone: Copyright 2013 Latham & Watkins. All Rights Reserved.

2 FP Company stock) were deemed distributed in kind to the taxpayers as of 2001, and that the gain from the 2006 sale was fully taxable. The taxpayers countered that the separate identity of the FP Company must be respected under Department of Labor s (DOL) plan asset regulations, 2 and that their personal guarantees of the company s debt obligation were not indirect extensions of credit to their IRAs in contravention of the prohibited transaction rules. The Tax Court rejected the taxpayers protestation that they had not indirectly extended credit to the plan by guaranteeing the FP Company s debt obligation to the sellers of Abbott. The Tax Court reasoned that the taxpayers interpretation would permit taxpayers to easily and abusively avoid the Code s prohibited transaction rules simply by having the IRA create a shell subsidiary to whom the disqualified person could then make a loan. According to the Tax Court, such a narrow reading of the statute was inconsistent with Congressional intent and would rob it of its intended breadth. The Tax Court noted further that under existing precedent, an individual who guarantees a loan is indirectly extending credit to the debtor. 3 The Tax Court concluded that Section 4975(c)(1)(B) should be interpreted broadly and held that this Section prohibits taxpayers from making loans or loan guaranties either directly to their IRAs or indirectly to their IRAs by way of the entity owned by the IRAs. Although this case presented an issue of first impression for the Tax Court, the fact pattern is almost identical to the proposed transaction described in DOL Advisory Opinion 90-23A (July 3, 1990). 4 In that opinion, the DOL concluded more than 20 years ago that an IRA owner s personal guarantee of a loan to a company of which his IRA owned a 50 percent interest and the IRA of an unrelated individual owned the remaining interest would be a prohibited transaction under Code Section 4957(c)(1)(B). Thus, the Tax Court s opinion should be viewed as merely affirming the long-held position of the DOL with respect to such transactions, rather than a departure from existing law. Applicability of Peek to ROBS Arrangements ROBS arrangements typically involve rolling over a prior IRA or 401(k) plan account into a newly established 401(k) plan which a start-up business sponsored, and then investing the rollover funds in the stock of the new corporation. 5 At first blush, the IRA transaction in Peek shares some similarities with common ROBS arrangements. ROBS transactions typically involve the following sequential steps: (i) an aspiring entrepreneur establishes a new corporation; (ii) the corporation adopts a prototype 401(k) plan that specifically permits plan participants to direct the investment of their plan accounts into a selection of investments options, including employer stock; (iii) the entrepreneur elects to participate in the new 401(k) plan and, as permitted by the plan, directs a rollover or trustee-to-trustee transfer of retirement funds from another qualified retirement plan into the newly established corporate plan; (iv) the entrepreneur then directs the investment of his or her 401(k) plan account to purchase the corporation s newly issued stock at par value (i.e., the amount that the entrepreneur wishes to invest in the new business); and finally (v) the company utilizes the proceeds from the sale of stock to purchase an existing business or to begin a new venture. 6 Frequently, the newly formed business will also borrow from third parties, pay salaries to employees (including shareholders/plan participants), and engage in other routine business transactions with disqualified persons. 7 Commonly a corporate officer or shareholder will make or guarantee loans to the business, as the taxpayers did in Peek. So why should the result in Peek be any different for 401(k) plans that hold employer securities? The most critical distinction is that most 401(k) plans which offer employer securities as an investment option, including typical ROBS arrangements, operate under a specific exemption from the prohibited transaction rules (i.e., ERISA Section 408(e)) which permits certain types of retirement plans to acquire, hold and sell qualifying employer securities. Specifically, these rules permit an eligible individual account plan to acquire or sell qualifying employer securities (commonly referred to as QES Stock ) if: (i) the acquisition, Latham & Watkins Client Alert No June 11, 2013 Page 2

3 sale or lease is for adequate consideration; (ii) no commission is charged; and (iii) the plan is an eligible individual account plan as defined in ERISA Section 407(d)(3). 8 ROBS arrangements typically involve 401(k) profit sharing plans, which fall within the definition of an individual account plan and satisfy the requirements of this exemption. In contrast, an IRA is not an individual account plan and is not eligible for this exemption. ERISA Section 408(e) should be viewed as sufficiently broad to shield employers from scrutiny of routine (non-abusive) corporate transactions by the plan sponsor and other disqualified persons, which might otherwise constitute technical violations of the prohibited transaction rules (due to the employersponsored retirement plan s ownership of employer securities). If the plan sponsor and other fiduciaries routine corporate transactions did not fall within the purview of ERISA Section 408(e), the prohibited transaction rules would needlessly prohibit a myriad of legitimate business transactions and would ultimately nullify the exemption that Congress intended to provide. To accomplish its intended effect, ERISA Section 408(e) must be read to exempt the natural and necessary commercial consequences of owning corporate stock, rather than just the stock purchase or divestiture. Another important distinction between self-directed IRA transactions and ROBS arrangements involving 401(k) plans is that 401(k) plans do not present the same compliance risks that troubled the Tax Court or the IRS in Peek. In Peek, the Tax Court was concerned about opening the door for taxpayers to easily and abusively avoid the Code s prohibited transaction rules simply by having the IRA create a shell subsidiary. In the context of 401(k) plans, that risk is not present because of the exclusive benefit rule. 9 In order to be qualified under Section 401(a), an employer sponsored retirement plan must be operated for the exclusive benefit of the company s employees or their beneficiaries. 10 The exclusive benefit rule of Section 401(a) would not be satisfied if the plan sponsor were merely a shell subsidiary. In addition, 401(k) plans must comply with a whole host of other statutory and regulatory requirements that are not applicable to IRAs, such as performing annual valuations, compliance testing and filing annual detailed information returns (Forms 5500). Important tax and economic policy considerations also compel a different result for 401(k) plans than IRAs. Congress specifically intended to encourage 401(k) plans to invest in employer securities, within certain limits. The opportunity to invest in employer securities through retirement plans benefits employers and employees alike by aligning their economic interests. Outside the context of ROBS arrangements, many 401(k) plans permit participants to invest in employer stock. A number of large 401(k) plans, including plans sponsored by Coca-Cola and General Electric, include substantial allocations of employer stock. According to a 2012 report by Morningstar, as of 2010 employer stock constituted approximately eight percent of total 401(k) plan assets in the United States. Another recent report by the Employee Benefit Research Institute notes that as of 2009, 66 percent of plans with more than 5,000 participants offered employer stock as an investment opinion. Extending Peek to include transactions involving 401(k) plans could have a chilling effect on employer offers of such benefits. In conclusion, Peek s prohibition of indirect extensions of credit to a plan, through entities owned by the plan, should not apply to ROBS arrangements or other employer sponsored plans that qualify for a statutory prohibited transaction exemption under ERISA Section 408(e). Any other result is inconsistent with the statutory framework, would eviscerate the intent of Congress to encourage investment in employer securities by retirement plans and would have adverse economic and tax policy consequences. 11 Latham & Watkins Client Alert No June 11, 2013 Page 3

4 Will the IRS Attempt to Apply Peek to ROBS Arrangements? The IRS has not indicated it intends to argue that Peek applies to ROBS or other arrangements involving 401(k) plans. The IRS has scrutinized ROBS arrangements for more than a decade and has not previously pursued arguments similar to those it asserted in Peek. The IRS is undoubtedly sensitive to the fact that the stakes are much higher for businesses with ROBS arrangements than for taxpayers like Mr. Peek, due to the requirements that 401(k) plans unwind prohibited transactions and pay substantial penalties. And the IRS is also likely cognizant of the collateral impact such a challenge would have on other retirement plans holding employer securities. In the case of a 401(k) plan, an excise tax equal to 15 percent of the amount involved in the prohibited transaction is imposed on the disqualified person who participated in the prohibited transaction. 12 And, if the prohibited transaction is not corrected within the taxable period, an excise tax of 100 percent of the amount involved may be imposed. For many small businesses that have adopted retirement plans with ROBS features, correcting a corporate loan or shareholder guarantee to a lender without shutting down the business would be almost impossible. If the IRS were to challenge ROBS arrangements on this basis, well over 10,000 successful small businesses would face the devastating prospect of immediately shutting down and laying off tens of thousands of employees. 13 Particularly in these challenging economic conditions, the IRS, and ultimately the administration and Congress, are likely to recognize the turmoil that would ensue. Significantly, as recently as February 2013, the IRS publicly released a summary report from TE/GE s Employee Plans Compliance Unit describing the results of a compliance project examining ROBS. 14 The IRS s ROBS project began in 2009 and continued through September According to the IRS report, the Service examined a cross section of businesses including those in senior care, cleaning services, fitness, health food, real estate, machinery, daycare, pet products and services, and consulting. The Service noted that some ROBS arrangements were start-ups while others involved purchases of existing businesses. Presumably most, if not all, of the plan sponsors had paid salaries, borrowed funds or entered into arrangements that could be viewed as indirect extensions of credit under Peek. Yet the IRS has not pursued arguments similar to those it asserted in Peek in its examination of plans with ROBS features. Likewise, the IRS ROBS project report did not raise any of the arguments the IRS asserted in Peek, even though the ROBS report was published eight months after the final round of briefing in Peek. 15 Nor were these types of issues raised in an earlier October 1, 2008 memorandum entitled Guidelines regarding rollovers as business start-ups, which addressed certain concerns the Service had identified regarding ROBS arrangements at that time. At the very least, the Service s decision not to pursue the issues it raised in Peek in the context of ROBS arrangements could be viewed as a tacit acknowledgement that the IRS believes the issues in Peek are not applicable to ROBS and other 401(k) arrangements involving employer securities on account of ERISA Section 408(e). The Future of IRS Scrutiny of ROBS Arrangements Since 2008, IRS officials have publicly recognized that employers may utilize ROBS arrangements to serve legitimate business, tax and retirement planning purposes. The IRS has also identified valid concerns with some ROBS arrangements, particularly some plan sponsors failure to ensure that the plan is administered in compliance with the plan qualification requirements of Code Section 401(a) and related regulations. The IRS is also cognizant that ROBS arrangements pose the potential for abuse. But, for the most part, the IRS recent compliance concerns with ROBS arrangements have focused on routine administrative issues that can easily be corrected, such as plans neglecting to file Form Administrators and sponsors of ROBS arrangements should expect that the IRS will continue to closely monitor ROBS plans to ensure that they remain in compliance with the requirements of Code Section 401(a). The IRS, in turn, should continue to focus its efforts to educate inexperienced plan administrators regarding their compliance obligations and identifying areas of noncompliance. Latham & Watkins Client Alert No June 11, 2013 Page 4

5 While there is some risk that the Service could reverse course and pursue ROBS or other 401(k) plan arrangements for indirect prohibited transactions, as it did in Peek, there is no reason to believe the Service will attempt do so. It is likely that the IRS will recognize that it can avoid potentially adverse economic and tax policy consequences by resisting any urge to extend its victory in Peek to 401(k) arrangements. And the Service is on solid legal footing if it does so; 401(k) plans are distinguishable from self-directed IRAs due to the applicability of ERISA Section 408(e), robust compliance requirements, and clear congressional intent to encourage retirements plan participants to invest in employer securities. If you have questions about this Client Alert, please contact one of the authors listed below or the Latham lawyer with whom you normally consult: Brian C. McManus Washington, D.C. Theodore J. Wu Washington, D.C. Client Alert is published by Latham & Watkins as a news reporting service to clients and other friends. The information contained in this publication should not be construed as legal advice. Should further analysis or explanation of the subject matter be required, please contact the lawyer with whom you normally consult. A complete list of Latham s Client Alerts can be found at If you wish to update your contact details or customize the information you receive from Latham & Watkins, visit to subscribe to the firm s global client mailings program. Endnotes 1 Peek v. Comm r, 140 T.C. No. 12, 2013 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 13 (May 9, 2013). 2 See 29 C.F.R. Section Janpol v. Comm r, 101 T.C. 518, 527 (1993). 4 See also DOL Advisory Opinion A (Oct. 27, 2009). 5 For a detailed description of tax issues involved in ROBS arrangements, see BNA Insights: Surviving IRS Scrutiny of ROBS Arrangements, Daily Tax Rep. (BNA) No. 54, at J-1 (March 21, 2011) (co-authored by Brian C. McManus and Mark Matthews). 6 Id. 7 Disqualified persons under the Code include: an employer whose employees are covered by the plan; plan fiduciaries, counsel, and employees of the plan; service providers; and certain officers, directors, shareholders, and employees of the employer are covered by the plan. Code Section 4972(e)(2). 8 The term individual account plan includes a profit sharing, stock bonus, thrift or savings plan. ERISA Section 407(d)(3)(A). 9 See Code Section 401(a). 10 Consistent with Code Section 401(a), Treas. Reg. Section (a)(2)(i) further requires, in part, that a qualified pension plan be established and maintained by an employer to provide for the livelihood of employees or their beneficiaries after the retirement of the employees. See also Treas. Reg. Section (a)(3)(ii), which provides that a qualified plan be established by an employer for the exclusive benefit of its employees or their beneficiaries in order to be qualified. Latham & Watkins Client Alert No June 11, 2013 Page 5

6 11 See Chao v. Hall Holding Co., 285 F.3d 415 (6th Cir. 2002); Kuper v. Iovenko, 66 F.3d 1447, 1458 (6th Cir. 1995). 12 See Code Section 4975(a) and (b); see also Rev. Rul , C.B Administrators of ROBS plans have publicly stated that they currently administer in excess of 10, (k) plans with ROBS features. 14 See Employee Plans Compliance Unit (EPCU) Completed Projects Project with Summary Reports Rollovers as Business Start-ups (ROBS) at Project-with-Summary-Reports-%E2%80%93-Rollovers-as-Business-Start-Ups-(ROBS). 15 The IRS filed its final reply brief with the Tax Court in Peek on July 20, 2012, well before the IRS s ROBS report was issued. Latham & Watkins Client Alert No June 11, 2013 Page 6

IRS Proposes Significant Changes to Rules for Allocating

IRS Proposes Significant Changes to Rules for Allocating Latham & Watkins Tax Department Number 1644 February 6, 2014 IRS Proposes Significant Changes to Rules for Allocating Partnership Liabilities Proposed Regulations seek to curtail perceived abuses, including

More information

The Final Municipal Advisor Rule: Navigating the Minefield

The Final Municipal Advisor Rule: Navigating the Minefield Latham & Watkins Financial Institutions Regulatory Practice Number 1614 November 22, 2013 The Final Municipal Advisor Rule: Navigating the Minefield While the final rule narrows the scope and reach of

More information

10 Facts About the Affordable Care Act and Worker Classification

10 Facts About the Affordable Care Act and Worker Classification Latham & Watkins Tax Controversy Practice Number 1611 November 18, 2013 10 Facts About the Affordable Care Act and Worker Classification Businesses subject to the Affordable Care Act s shared responsibility

More information

Rollovers as Business Start-Up Transactions Are Under Attack by the IRS

Rollovers as Business Start-Up Transactions Are Under Attack by the IRS Rollovers as Business Start-Up Transactions Are Under Attack by the IRS by Edward K. Zollars, CPA Recent developments suggest the IRS is getting serious about challenging taxpayers who have used their

More information

Potential Pitfalls in IRA Money Movement and Non Public Investments

Potential Pitfalls in IRA Money Movement and Non Public Investments ADVISORS JOURNAL (August 2010, Current Comment 10 36) Potential Pitfalls in IRA Money Movement and Non Public Investments Owners of IRAs and other types of qualified plan accounts are allowed a great deal

More information

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit No. 14-1310 Terry L. Ellis; Sheila K. Ellis l Petitioners - Appellants v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue l Respondent - Appellee Appeal from the

More information

RE: Legality of the Self-Directed IRA LLC for Investment in American Eagle Coins and Precious Metals, and Permissible Storage Arrangements

RE: Legality of the Self-Directed IRA LLC for Investment in American Eagle Coins and Precious Metals, and Permissible Storage Arrangements Mr. Dale Whitaker Chief Financial Officer Augusta Precious Metals 8484 Wilshire Blvd., Suite # 515 Beverly Hills, CA 90211 RE: Legality of the Self-Directed IRA LLC for Investment in American Eagle Coins

More information

Comparison of Typical MLP and Yieldco Structures

Comparison of Typical MLP and Yieldco Structures Sean T. Wheeler Latham & Watkins Practice Comparison of Typical and Structures The rise of master limited partnerships (s) as an asset class has coincided with investors desire for stable and growing cash

More information

INVESTING IRA AND QUALIFIED RETIREMENT PLAN ASSETS IN REAL ESTATE

INVESTING IRA AND QUALIFIED RETIREMENT PLAN ASSETS IN REAL ESTATE INVESTING IRA AND QUALIFIED RETIREMENT PLAN ASSETS IN REAL ESTATE By: Charles M. Lax, Esq. I. DEFINITIONS A. What is a prohibited transaction? 1. A prohibited transaction is defined in IRC 4975(c)(1) as

More information

Examinations of Rollovers as Business Start-Ups (ROBS) Arrangements: A Guide to Surviving IRS Scrutiny

Examinations of Rollovers as Business Start-Ups (ROBS) Arrangements: A Guide to Surviving IRS Scrutiny A BNA, INC. DAILY TAX REPORT! Reproduced with permission from Daily Tax Report, 54 DTR J-1, 3/21/2011. Copyright 2011 by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. (800-372-1033) http:// www.bna.com Examinations

More information

Client Alert. New Treasury Regulations Make it Easier to Issue Tack-On Bonds or Loans. But New FATCA Regulations Add Complexity.

Client Alert. New Treasury Regulations Make it Easier to Issue Tack-On Bonds or Loans. But New FATCA Regulations Add Complexity. Number 1417 October 6, 2015 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Corporate & Tax Departments New Treasury Regulations Make it Easier to Issue Tack-On Bonds or Loans But New FATCA Regulations Add Complexity The

More information

Self-Directed IRA Myths By Richard K. Matta Copyright 2009

Self-Directed IRA Myths By Richard K. Matta Copyright 2009 Self-Directed IRA Myths By Richard K. Matta Copyright 2009 Introduction A search of the internet quickly reveals that there are hundreds, if not thousands, of websites promoting one of the hottest financial

More information

This article is directed to the growing number of entrepreneurs who are financing new businesses using their own retirement funds,

This article is directed to the growing number of entrepreneurs who are financing new businesses using their own retirement funds, This article is directed to the growing number of entrepreneurs who are financing new businesses using their own retirement funds, a funding mechanism called a Roll-Over Business Start-up (ROBS). Opinions

More information

IRAs as Shareholders in Subchapter S Corporations Who Is An Individual?

IRAs as Shareholders in Subchapter S Corporations Who Is An Individual? IRAs as Shareholders in Subchapter S Corporations Who Is An Individual? 2321 N. Loop Drive, Ste 200 Ames, Iowa 50010 www.calt.iastate.edu October 1, 2009 by Roger A. McEowen* Updated on March 26, 2012

More information

CONSIDERATIONS IN ESTABLISHING A LEVERAGED ESOP

CONSIDERATIONS IN ESTABLISHING A LEVERAGED ESOP AUTHOR John A. Wilhelm, Partner Venable, LLP 8010 Towers Crescent Drive Suite 300 Vienna, VA 22182 PH: 703.760.1917 FAX: 703.821.8949 JAWilhelm@Venable.com CONSIDERATIONS IN ESTABLISHING A LEVERAGED ESOP

More information

T.C. Memo. 2013-245 UNITED STATES TAX COURT. TERRY L. ELLIS AND SHEILA K. ELLIS, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

T.C. Memo. 2013-245 UNITED STATES TAX COURT. TERRY L. ELLIS AND SHEILA K. ELLIS, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent T.C. Memo. 2013-245 UNITED STATES TAX COURT TERRY L. ELLIS AND SHEILA K. ELLIS, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 12960-11. Filed October 29, 2013. Troy Renkenmeyer,

More information

SELF-DIRECTING IRA ASSETS INTO RELATED INVESTMENTS OR INVESTMENTS WITH RELATIVES ISSUES, CONCERNS AND POSSIBLE CONSEQUENCES 1. By Pamela D.

SELF-DIRECTING IRA ASSETS INTO RELATED INVESTMENTS OR INVESTMENTS WITH RELATIVES ISSUES, CONCERNS AND POSSIBLE CONSEQUENCES 1. By Pamela D. SELF-DIRECTING IRA ASSETS INTO RELATED INVESTMENTS OR INVESTMENTS WITH RELATIVES ISSUES, CONCERNS AND POSSIBLE CONSEQUENCES 1 I. How These Questions Arise By Pamela D. Perdue 2 Anyone who deals with IRAs,

More information

1 The author often recommends that estate planning clients contribute all of their investment assets to limited

1 The author often recommends that estate planning clients contribute all of their investment assets to limited ASSET PROTECTION PLANNING FOR THE IRA R. Glen Woods Woods Erickson Whitaker Miles & Maurice LLP 1349 Galleria Drive Henderson, NV 89014 (702) 433-9696 RGWoods@wewmmlaw.com Many business owners, professionals

More information

WHAT IS A ROBS? (Rollovers as Business Start-ups)

WHAT IS A ROBS? (Rollovers as Business Start-ups) WHAT IS A ROBS? (Rollovers as Business Start-ups) Legal Arrangement involving a C-Corporation Utilized Prohibited Transaction Exemptions (in Employment Retirement Income Securities Act (ERISA) and Internal

More information

Welfare Benefits, Insurance Commissions, Fees, and PEOs. PEO Insider June 2007. Tess J. Ferrera

Welfare Benefits, Insurance Commissions, Fees, and PEOs. PEO Insider June 2007. Tess J. Ferrera Welfare Benefits, Insurance Commissions, Fees, and PEOs PEO Insider June 2007 Tess J. Ferrera A growing number of PEOs are earning commissions from the sale of health insurance products to worksite employers

More information

Life Insurance in Qualified Defined Contribution Plans

Life Insurance in Qualified Defined Contribution Plans ARTICLE 30 Life Insurance in Qualified Defined Contribution Plans By Elizabeth A. LaCombe At first blush, offering life insurance in a qualified defined contribution plan sounds like a cost efficient way

More information

Client Alert. Accountants and Auditors as SEC Whistleblowers. Categories of Persons Eligible or Not Eligible for SEC Whistleblower Awards

Client Alert. Accountants and Auditors as SEC Whistleblowers. Categories of Persons Eligible or Not Eligible for SEC Whistleblower Awards Number 1462 February 5, 2013 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Litigation Department Accountants and Auditors as SEC Whistleblowers Nearly every public company and financial industry firm subject to the enforcement

More information

PURCHASING REAL ESTATE IN A SELF DIRECTED IRA OR QUALIFIED PENSION PLAN. By Maurice M. Glazer, CEO GLAZER FINANCIAL NETWORK

PURCHASING REAL ESTATE IN A SELF DIRECTED IRA OR QUALIFIED PENSION PLAN. By Maurice M. Glazer, CEO GLAZER FINANCIAL NETWORK PURCHASING REAL ESTATE IN A SELF DIRECTED IRA OR QUALIFIED PENSION PLAN By Maurice M. Glazer, CEO GLAZER FINANCIAL NETWORK In today s market or lack of market, most baby boomers have most of their retirement

More information

Re: EBSA RIN 1210-AB32. Definition of the Term Fiduciary ; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice

Re: EBSA RIN 1210-AB32. Definition of the Term Fiduciary ; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice Via Electronic Submission to www.regulations.gov July 21, 2015 Office of Regulations and Interpretations Employee Benefits Security Administration Attn: Conflict of Interest Rule, Room N-5655 U.S. Department

More information

What is an ESOP? ESOPs are defined contribution pension plans that invest primarily in the stock of the plan sponsor

What is an ESOP? ESOPs are defined contribution pension plans that invest primarily in the stock of the plan sponsor Employee Stock Ownership Plans May 2013 http://aicpa.org/ebpaqc ebpaqc@aicpa.org Topix Primer Series The AICPA Employee Benefit Plan Audit Quality Center (EBPAQC) has developed this primer to provide Center

More information

Examples of Parachute Payments Some typical examples of parachute payments include the following: September 2009

Examples of Parachute Payments Some typical examples of parachute payments include the following: September 2009 September 2009 Introduction Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code imposes special tax penalties on employers who make golden parachute payments that are considered excessive in the eyes of the tax

More information

May 2, 2008 Pennsylvania Realty Transfer Tax No. RTT-08-003 Substitution of IRA Custodian Transfer from IRA Custodian to IRA Owner

May 2, 2008 Pennsylvania Realty Transfer Tax No. RTT-08-003 Substitution of IRA Custodian Transfer from IRA Custodian to IRA Owner May 2, 2008 Pennsylvania Realty Transfer Tax No. RTT-08-003 Substitution of IRA Custodian Transfer from IRA Custodian to IRA Owner ISSUES: 1. Is a deed that evidences the change in a person s individual

More information

Client Alert. New Treasury Regulations Put Issuers at Increased Risk for Cancellation of Indebtedness Income in Debt-for-Debt Exchanges.

Client Alert. New Treasury Regulations Put Issuers at Increased Risk for Cancellation of Indebtedness Income in Debt-for-Debt Exchanges. Number 1399 September 20, 2012 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Tax Department New Treasury Regulations Put Issuers at Increased Risk for Cancellation of Indebtedness Income in Debt-for-Debt Exchanges In

More information

Business Start-Ups with Tax-Deferred Retirement Plan Assets Justin L. Mills, Esq. 1 2014

Business Start-Ups with Tax-Deferred Retirement Plan Assets Justin L. Mills, Esq. 1 2014 Business Start-Ups with Tax-Deferred Retirement Plan Assets Justin L. Mills, Esq. 1 2014 Experts estimate that the aggregate value of all assets held by defined benefit plans, defined contribution plans

More information

CFTC Issues Guidance, Exemptions In Advance of SEF Rule Compliance Date

CFTC Issues Guidance, Exemptions In Advance of SEF Rule Compliance Date Latham & Watkins Derivatives Practice Number 1594 October 17, 2013 CFTC Issues Guidance, Exemptions In Advance of SEF Rule Compliance Date Staff responds to industry concerns and confusion surrounding

More information

Employee Relations. Employee Benefits. Stopping Pension Leaks: New Rules Requiring Default IRA Rollovers Go Into Effect In 2005. Anne E.

Employee Relations. Employee Benefits. Stopping Pension Leaks: New Rules Requiring Default IRA Rollovers Go Into Effect In 2005. Anne E. VOL. 30, NO. 4 SPRING 2005 Employee Relations L A W J O U R N A L Employee Benefits Stopping Pension Leaks: New Rules Requiring Default IRA Rollovers Go Into Effect In 2005 Anne E. Moran One of the primary

More information

PART III. ADMINISTRATIVE, PROCEDURAL, AND MISCELLANEOUS..01 Introduction. This revenue procedure describes steps that may be taken to

PART III. ADMINISTRATIVE, PROCEDURAL, AND MISCELLANEOUS..01 Introduction. This revenue procedure describes steps that may be taken to PART III. ADMINISTRATIVE, PROCEDURAL, AND MISCELLANEOUS 26 CFR 601.201: Rulings and determination letters (Also, Part I, 401; 1.401(a)-2.) Rev. Proc. 2002-21 SECTION 1. INTRODUCTION.01 Introduction. This

More information

Buyer Beware! Self-Directed IRAs and Prohibited Transactions

Buyer Beware! Self-Directed IRAs and Prohibited Transactions SRSelf-Directed IRAs & PTs 2014 sample.wpd 2/28/14 Buyer Beware! Self-Directed IRAs and Prohibited Transactions What the T&E practitioner needs to know 2014 Edition Natalie B. Choate, Esq. Nutter McClennen

More information

Presents: The Solo 401(k) Plan The Ultimate Retirement Solution for the Self Employed January 2012

Presents: The Solo 401(k) Plan The Ultimate Retirement Solution for the Self Employed January 2012 Presents: The Solo 401(k) Plan The Ultimate Retirement Solution for the Self Employed January 2012 Disclaimer: The information provided in this presentation/document is not legal advice, but general information

More information

Investment Treaty Arbitration: A Primer

Investment Treaty Arbitration: A Primer Latham & Watkins International Arbitration Practice Number 1563 July 29, 2013 Investment Treaty Arbitration: A Primer International investors enjoy varying degrees of protection and opportunities to seek

More information

The Federal Circuit Affirms a Court of Federal Claims Decision Dismissing Foreign Tax Credit Refund Claims as Untimely

The Federal Circuit Affirms a Court of Federal Claims Decision Dismissing Foreign Tax Credit Refund Claims as Untimely Tax Controversy Services IRS Insights In this issue: The Federal Circuit Affirms a Court of Federal Claims Decision Dismissing Foreign Tax Credit Refund Claims as Untimely... 1 The Court of Federal Claims

More information

Client Update DOL Catches Many in Expanded Fiduciary Net; Is Proposed Exemption an Escape Hatch or a Trap Door?

Client Update DOL Catches Many in Expanded Fiduciary Net; Is Proposed Exemption an Escape Hatch or a Trap Door? 1 Client Update DOL Catches Many in Expanded Fiduciary Net; Is Proposed Exemption an Escape Hatch or a Trap Door? NEW YORK Lawrence K. Cagney lkcagney@debevoise.com Jonathan F. Lewis jflewis@debevoise.com

More information

Cross Species Conversions and Mergers

Cross Species Conversions and Mergers Cross Species Conversions and Mergers 591 Cross Species Conversions and Mergers JOHN B. TRUSKOWSKI * The adoption by many states of both conversion statutes 1 statutes allowing one form of business organization,

More information

Another Look at U.S. Federal Income Tax Treatment of Contingent Earnout Payments

Another Look at U.S. Federal Income Tax Treatment of Contingent Earnout Payments Another Look at U.S. Federal Income Tax Treatment of Contingent Earnout Payments idan netser I. Introduction The sale of a company in an M&A transaction often involves consideration to the selling shareholders

More information

The Benefits of Mandatory Distributions

The Benefits of Mandatory Distributions The Benefits of Mandatory Distributions A WHITE PAPER BY FRED REISH AND BRUCE ASHTON C. Frederick Reish (310) 203-4047 Fred.Reish@dbr.com www.drinkerbiddle.com/freish Bruce L. Ashton (310) 203-4048 Bruce.Ashton@dbr.com

More information

Avoiding Fiduciary Liability In Real Estate Investments Made By Pension Plans

Avoiding Fiduciary Liability In Real Estate Investments Made By Pension Plans Avoiding Fiduciary Liability In Real Estate Investments Made By Pension Plans Stanley L. Iezman Stanley Iezman is Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of American Realty Advisors and is responsible

More information

Global Report: New Requirements Impact Retirement Plans Qualified Under Puerto Rico Tax Code

Global Report: New Requirements Impact Retirement Plans Qualified Under Puerto Rico Tax Code Global Report: New Requirements Impact Retirement Plans Qualified Under Puerto Rico Tax Code April 2011 On January 31, 2011, the Puerto Rico legislature adopted a new tax code that substantially affects

More information

DOL Issues Automatic Rollover Rules for Small Cash-Outs

DOL Issues Automatic Rollover Rules for Small Cash-Outs Important Information Distributions and Withdrawals October 2004 DOL Issues Automatic Rollover Rules for Small Cash-Outs WHO'S AFFECTED These rules affect qualified defined benefit plans and defined contribution

More information

Moss Adams Introduction to ESOPs

Moss Adams Introduction to ESOPs Moss Adams Introduction to ESOPs Looking for an exit strategy Have you considered an ESOP? Since 1984, we have performed over 2,000 Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) valuations for companies with as

More information

Employee Relations. Terminating 403(b) Arrangements: IRS Guidance Answers Some Questions, Avoids Others. Anne E. Moran

Employee Relations. Terminating 403(b) Arrangements: IRS Guidance Answers Some Questions, Avoids Others. Anne E. Moran VOL. 36, NO. 2 AUTUMN 2011 Employee Relations L A W J O U R N A L Employee Benefits Terminating 403(b) Arrangements: IRS Guidance Answers Some Questions, Avoids Others Anne E. Moran T he legal requirements

More information

TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE GENERAL INFORMATION B-3 CERTAIN FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES B-3 PUBLISHED RATINGS B-7 ADMINISTRATION B-7

TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE GENERAL INFORMATION B-3 CERTAIN FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES B-3 PUBLISHED RATINGS B-7 ADMINISTRATION B-7 STATEMENT OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION INDIVIDUAL VARIABLE ANNUITY ISSUED BY JEFFERSON NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY AND JEFFERSON NATIONAL LIFE ANNUITY ACCOUNT G ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE: P.O. BOX 36840,

More information

Application for Traditional, Roth, Rollover, & SEP IRA

Application for Traditional, Roth, Rollover, & SEP IRA See the instructions for Self-Directed Traditional Roth, Rollover & SEP IRA in Section 4 of the application package. Check One: New Contribution Year 20 Transfer from another IRA Check One: Traditional

More information

Sheldon Harold Smith, for petitioners. Shawn P. Nowlan, E. Abigail Raines, and John Q. Walsh, Jr., for respondent.

Sheldon Harold Smith, for petitioners. Shawn P. Nowlan, E. Abigail Raines, and John Q. Walsh, Jr., for respondent. 216 LAWRENCE F. PEEK AND SARA L. PEEK, PETITIONERS v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT DARRELL G. FLECK AND KIMBERLY J. FLECK, PETITIONERS v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT Docket

More information

ERSOP Entrepreneur Rollover Stock Ownership Plan. Real Estate Management Company

ERSOP Entrepreneur Rollover Stock Ownership Plan. Real Estate Management Company Entrepreneur Rollover Stock Ownership Plan Real Estate Management Company First: Are you going to be Active or Passive? All of our clients have that entrepreneurial spirit, they choose ACTIVE. They are

More information

Employee Benefits & Investment Management Update

Employee Benefits & Investment Management Update Employee Benefits & Investment Management Update Department of Labor Revises Investment Advice Definition May 2015 On April 14, 2015, the Department of Labor (Department) released a long-awaited proposed

More information

Choosing a Tribal Business Structure

Choosing a Tribal Business Structure U. S. Department of the Interior ϐ Division of Economic Development Tribal Economic Development Principles at a Glance Series Choosing a Tribal Business Structure Office of Indian Energy and Economic Development

More information

The US Private Equity Fund Compliance Guide

The US Private Equity Fund Compliance Guide The US Private Equity Fund Compliance Guide How to register and maintain an active and effective compliance program under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 Edited by Charles Lerner, Fiduciary Compliance

More information

IRS Captive Insurance Ruling Creates Opportunities for Plan Sponsors

IRS Captive Insurance Ruling Creates Opportunities for Plan Sponsors July 28, 2014 Authors: Theodore R. Groom Kara M. Soderstrom If you have questions, please contact your regular Groom attorney or one of the attorneys listed below: Theodore R. Groom tgroom@groom.com (202)

More information

Rollovers as Business Start-Ups (ROBS) 401(k) Plan Business Financing: A Personal Employment Act

Rollovers as Business Start-Ups (ROBS) 401(k) Plan Business Financing: A Personal Employment Act ARTICLE 20 Rollovers as Business Start-Ups (ROBS) 401(k) Plan Business Financing: A Personal Employment Act By Matthew J. Kaftan This article will outline the significant benefits and significant risks

More information

DIVORCE AND LIFE INSURANCE, QUALIFIED PLANS AND IRAS 2013-2015

DIVORCE AND LIFE INSURANCE, QUALIFIED PLANS AND IRAS 2013-2015 DIVORCE AND LIFE INSURANCE, QUALIFIED PLANS AND IRAS 2013-2015 I. INTRODUCTION In a divorce, property is generally divided between the spouses. Generally, all assets of the spouses, whether individual,

More information

PROPOSED CHANGES TO THE TAXATION OF PARTNERSHIP EQUITY-BASED COMPENSATION

PROPOSED CHANGES TO THE TAXATION OF PARTNERSHIP EQUITY-BASED COMPENSATION PROPOSED CHANGES TO THE TAXATION OF PARTNERSHIP EQUITY-BASED COMPENSATION John Gatti For various non-tax reasons, the use of entities that are taxed as partnerships including limited liability companies,

More information

DISCOUNTING TRANSFER TAXES WITH LIMITED LIABILITY CORPORATIONS AND FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIPS 1. By: Andrew J. Willms, J.D., LL.M. Willms, S.C.

DISCOUNTING TRANSFER TAXES WITH LIMITED LIABILITY CORPORATIONS AND FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIPS 1. By: Andrew J. Willms, J.D., LL.M. Willms, S.C. DISCOUNTING TRANSFER TAXES WITH LIMITED LIABILITY CORPORATIONS AND FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIPS 1 By: Andrew J. Willms, J.D., LL.M. Willms, S.C. Introduction It has been suggested that estate and gift taxes

More information

TAXATION OF REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUSTS. January 2012 J. Walker Johnson and Alexis MacIvor

TAXATION OF REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUSTS. January 2012 J. Walker Johnson and Alexis MacIvor TAXATION OF REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUSTS January 2012 J. Walker Johnson and Alexis MacIvor I. Taxation of Real Estate Investment Trusts A. Qualification as a REIT 1. Eligible entities Section 856(a) lists

More information

Private equity funds need not fear tax consequences of Sun Capital, but should they be concerned about where the IRS might take it?

Private equity funds need not fear tax consequences of Sun Capital, but should they be concerned about where the IRS might take it? Private Equity Tax Alert Nixon Peabody LLP November 18, 2013 Private equity funds need not fear tax consequences of Sun Capital, but should they be concerned about where the IRS might take it? By Christian

More information

COLLECTIVE INVESTMENT FUNDS ACT Act 174 of 1941. The People of the State of Michigan enact:

COLLECTIVE INVESTMENT FUNDS ACT Act 174 of 1941. The People of the State of Michigan enact: COLLECTIVE INVESTMENT FUNDS ACT Act 174 of 1941 AN ACT to authorize the establishment and the maintenance of common trust funds and collective investment funds; to authorize investments or participations

More information

T he restrictions of Sections 23A and Regulation W

T he restrictions of Sections 23A and Regulation W BNA s Banking Report Reproduced with permission from BNA s Banking Report, 100 BBR 109, 1/15/13, 01/15/2013. Copyright 2013 by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. (800-372-1033) http://www.bna.com REGULATION

More information

Affiliate Transaction Restrictions for Banks: Your Guide to the Requirements

Affiliate Transaction Restrictions for Banks: Your Guide to the Requirements Affiliate Transaction Restrictions for Banks: Your Guide to the Requirements Presented by Practical Law Company Speakers: November 10, 2011 William E. Stern, Esq. Partner Goodwin Procter LLP Jeremy Estabrooks,

More information

Employment Issues in the United Arab Emirates

Employment Issues in the United Arab Emirates LW.com Employment Issues in the United Arab Emirates Second Edition The purpose of this memorandum is to summarise employment issues arising in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). This note focuses on the

More information

I. Introduction. II. Methods of Pension De-Risking

I. Introduction. II. Methods of Pension De-Risking TESTIMONY OF ROBERT S. NEWMAN Covington & Burling LLP ERISA Advisory Council United States Department of Labor Hearing on PRIVATE SECTOR PENSION DE-RISKING AND PARTICIPANT PROTECTIONS June 5, 2013 I. Introduction

More information

2013 Expert Series What Trustees in Bankruptcy Need to Know About Pension Plans Marcia Wagner, Esq., Managing Director, Wagner Law Group

2013 Expert Series What Trustees in Bankruptcy Need to Know About Pension Plans Marcia Wagner, Esq., Managing Director, Wagner Law Group 2013 Expert Series What Trustees in Bankruptcy Need to Know About Pension Plans Marcia Wagner, Esq., Managing Director, Wagner Law Group On September 18, 2013, PenChecks Trust hosted What Trustees in Bankruptcy

More information

This Chief Counsel Advice responds to your request for assistance. This advice may not be used or cited as precedent.

This Chief Counsel Advice responds to your request for assistance. This advice may not be used or cited as precedent. Office of Chief Counsel Internal Revenue Service memorandum Number: 201147024 Release Date: 11/25/2011 CC:ITA:5 POSTF-115572-11 UILC: 61.49-01, 263.00-00, 1001.00-00, 1012.00-00, 1221.00-00, 1222.00-00

More information

SPOUSAL ROLLOVERS: HOW AND WHEN

SPOUSAL ROLLOVERS: HOW AND WHEN SPOUSAL ROLLOVERS: HOW AND WHEN Marcia Chadwick Holt Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP Denver, Colorado A. Spousal Rollovers: In General 1. The Rules. Both Qualified Plans and Traditional IRAs are subject to the

More information

COMMENTARY. Once More Unto the Breach The New Fiduciary Definition. Background

COMMENTARY. Once More Unto the Breach The New Fiduciary Definition. Background APRIL 2015 COMMENTARY Once More Unto the Breach The New Fiduciary Definition On April 14, 2015, the Department of Labor (the Department ) re-proposed regulations (the Proposed Regulations ) that define

More information

February 12, 2002 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE NATIONAL OFFICE FIELD SERVICE ADVICE MEMORANDUM FOR ASSOCIATE AREA COUNSEL (FINANCIAL SERVICES)

February 12, 2002 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE NATIONAL OFFICE FIELD SERVICE ADVICE MEMORANDUM FOR ASSOCIATE AREA COUNSEL (FINANCIAL SERVICES) DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224 OFFICE OF CHIEF COUNSEL February 12, 2002 Number: 200212030 Release Date: 3/22/2002 CC:CORP:4/POSTS-162257-01 UILC: 302.00-00,

More information

Internal Revenue Service

Internal Revenue Service Internal Revenue Service Number: 200924034 Release Date: 6/12/2009 Index Number: 468B.00-00, 468B.04-01, 468B.07-00, 461.00-00, 162.00-00, 172.00-00, 172.01-00, 172.01-05, 172.06-00 -----------------------

More information

K&LNGAlert. Investment Management/ERISA Fiduciary New Prohibited Transaction Rules and ERISA Fidelity Bond Requirements

K&LNGAlert. Investment Management/ERISA Fiduciary New Prohibited Transaction Rules and ERISA Fidelity Bond Requirements K&LNGAlert AUGUST 2006 Investment Management/ERISA Fiduciary New Prohibited Transaction Rules and ERISA Fidelity Bond Requirements The Pension Protection Act of 2006 (the Act ), recently passed by Congress

More information

Contents. Define ESOP 3. ESOP Advantages 4. Creating an ESOP 5. ESOP Tax Advantages 6. ESOP Laws 7. ESOP Rollover (Section 1042) 8.

Contents. Define ESOP 3. ESOP Advantages 4. Creating an ESOP 5. ESOP Tax Advantages 6. ESOP Laws 7. ESOP Rollover (Section 1042) 8. ESOPs Contents Define ESOP 3 ESOP Advantages 4 Creating an ESOP 5 ESOP Tax Advantages 6 ESOP Laws 7 ESOP Rollover (Section 1042) 8 ESOP Valuation 9 ESOP Distribution 10 Repurchase Obligation 11 Disadvantages

More information

Internal Revenue Service

Internal Revenue Service Internal Revenue Service Number: 200925003 Release Date: 6/19/2009 Index Number: 2511.00-00, 2042.00-00, 61.09-38 ------------------------- ------------------------- ---------------------------- Department

More information

Benefits Practice Resource Center

Benefits Practice Resource Center Benefits Practice Resource Center Reproduced with permission from Benefit Practitioners Strategy Guide, BPRC,, 06/08/2015. Copyright 2015 by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. (800-372-1033) http://www.bna.com

More information

This revenue procedure specifies the conditions under which the Internal Revenue

This revenue procedure specifies the conditions under which the Internal Revenue Part III Administrative, Procedural, and Miscellaneous 26 CFR 601.201: Rulings and determination letters. (Also Part I, 267, 511, 512, 707, 761, 856, 1031, 1361; 1.761-1, 1.761-2; 301.7701-1, 301.7701-2,

More information

Clifford Kirsch Mark Smith April 28, 2015. An Overview of the Regulatory Framework Applying to Collective Trusts

Clifford Kirsch Mark Smith April 28, 2015. An Overview of the Regulatory Framework Applying to Collective Trusts Clifford Kirsch Mark Smith April 28, 2015 An Overview of the Regulatory Framework Applying to Collective Trusts Speakers Cliff Kirsch New York, NY 212.389.5052 clifford.kirsch@sutherland.com Mark Smith

More information

RETIREMENT NEWS. March/April 2014 P.O. Box 1789 302 East Main Street Albertville, AL 35950 (800) 545-6741

RETIREMENT NEWS. March/April 2014 P.O. Box 1789 302 East Main Street Albertville, AL 35950 (800) 545-6741 March/April 2014 P.O. Box 1789 302 East Main Street Albertville, AL 35950 (800) 545-6741 RETIREMENT NEWS In plan Roth Rollovers The in-plan Roth rollover (IRR) was created by the Small Business Jobs and

More information

Savings Incentive Match Plan for Employees (SIMPLE) For Use with a Non-DFI IRS Model Form 5304-SIMPLE

Savings Incentive Match Plan for Employees (SIMPLE) For Use with a Non-DFI IRS Model Form 5304-SIMPLE Savings Incentive Match Plan for Employees (SIMPLE) For Use with a Non-DFI IRS Model Form 5304-SIMPLE Form 5304-SIMPLE (Rev. August 2005) Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service Savings Incentive

More information

US Department of Labor s Fiduciary Rule Introduces a Brave New World

US Department of Labor s Fiduciary Rule Introduces a Brave New World Latham & Watkins Benefits, Compensation & Employment Practice and Financial Institutions Industry Group May 4, 2016 Number 1962 US Department of Labor s Fiduciary Rule Introduces a Brave New World Final

More information

9/29/2014. Recent Legal and Regulatory Developments. Agenda

9/29/2014. Recent Legal and Regulatory Developments. Agenda Recent Legal and Regulatory Developments Ben F. Wells, Esq. Dinsmore & Shohl, LLP (202) 372-9119 ben.wells@dinsmore.com Robert F. Schatz, Esq. Schatz Brown Glassman Kossow LLP (860) 231-1054 rschatz@esopplus.com

More information

Legality of the Self-Directed IRA and Storage of Precious Metals

Legality of the Self-Directed IRA and Storage of Precious Metals DELIA LAW Ph 800.980.3398 Fx 619.330.3507 Cell 619.985.7101 12707 High Bluff Drive Suite 200 San Diego, CA 92130 10800 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 1101 Los Angeles, CA 90024 www.deliataxattorneys.com www.losangeles-tax-attorneys.com

More information

Comparison of common business entities:

Comparison of common business entities: Business Planning Comparison of common business entities: 1661505 8/11/2016 Sole proprietorship General partnership Limited partnership C Corporation S Corporation Business owned by Sole proprietor Partners

More information

PEOs Deemed MEWAs Have State and Federal Regulatory Concerns. PEO Insider Autumn 2007. Tess J. Ferrera

PEOs Deemed MEWAs Have State and Federal Regulatory Concerns. PEO Insider Autumn 2007. Tess J. Ferrera PEOs Deemed MEWAs Have State and Federal Regulatory Concerns PEO Insider Autumn 2007 Tess J. Ferrera The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), with exceptions not relevant here, defines

More information

YOUR. ESOP Summary Plan Description

YOUR. ESOP Summary Plan Description YOUR ESOP Summary Plan Description TO OUR EMPLOYEES KeHE Distributors, Inc. ( Company ) maintains the KeHE Distributors, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan ( Plan ) so that you and other employees may

More information

ROTH IRA DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

ROTH IRA DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Toll Free: 1-800-962-4238 www.pensco.com ROTH IRA DISCLOSURE STATEMENT This Disclosure Statement summarizes the requirements for the Roth Individual Retirement Account (Roth IRA). The rules under which

More information

Memorandum. Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP. Unrelated Business Taxable Income: Income from Royalty Interests

Memorandum. Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP. Unrelated Business Taxable Income: Income from Royalty Interests Memorandum To: From: Re: Noble Royalties, Inc. Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP Unrelated Business Taxable Income: Income from Royalty Interests Date: February 23, 2009 This memorandum addresses the

More information

For Business Owner, Partners, and Spouse(s) Only Individual 401(k) Plan

For Business Owner, Partners, and Spouse(s) Only Individual 401(k) Plan Administration Manual For Business Owner, Partners, and Spouse(s) Only Individual 401(k) Plan Delaware Charter Guarantee & Trust Company d/b/a Principal Trust Company Mailing Address: P.O. Box 8963 Wilmington,

More information

U.S. Department of Labor Sues Cactus Feeders, Inc. for Millions Over ESOP Plan What s the Beef?

U.S. Department of Labor Sues Cactus Feeders, Inc. for Millions Over ESOP Plan What s the Beef? washburnlaw.edu/waltr Article 2016-008 April 4, 2016 U.S. Department of Labor Sues Cactus Feeders, Inc. for Millions Over ESOP Plan What s the Beef? Roger A. McEowen Kansas Farm Bureau Professor of Agricultural

More information

TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING # 10-01 WARNING

TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING # 10-01 WARNING TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE LETTER RULING # 10-01 WARNING Letter rulings are binding on the Department only with respect to the individual taxpayer being addressed in the ruling. This presentation

More information

M&A tax recent guidance

M&A tax recent guidance This Month in M&A / Issue 14 / May 2014 Did you know? p2 / Chief Counsel Advice p4 / Other guidance p5 / PwC s M&A publications p7 M&A tax recent guidance This month features: IRS to issue Section 367

More information

Trust Arrangements Purporting to Provide Nondiscriminatory Post- Retirement Medical and Life Insurance Benefits

Trust Arrangements Purporting to Provide Nondiscriminatory Post- Retirement Medical and Life Insurance Benefits Part III -- Administrative, Procedural, and Miscellaneous Trust Arrangements Purporting to Provide Nondiscriminatory Post- Retirement Medical and Life Insurance Benefits Notice 2007-84 Sections 419 and

More information

Simplified Employee Pension (SEP)

Simplified Employee Pension (SEP) Marblehead Financial Services Bill Bartin, CFP Located at Marblehead Bank 21 Atlantic Avenue Marblehead, MA 01945 781-476-0600 781-715-4629 wbartin@infinexgroup.com Simplified Employee Pension (SEP) Page

More information

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking and notice of public hearing. SUMMARY: This document contains proposed regulations relating to basis of

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking and notice of public hearing. SUMMARY: This document contains proposed regulations relating to basis of [4830-01-p] DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Internal Revenue Service 26 CFR Part 1 [REG-134042-07] RIN 1545-BG81 Basis of Indebtedness of S Corporations to their Shareholders AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service

More information

AUI Supplemental Retirement Annuity Plan Summary Plan Description

AUI Supplemental Retirement Annuity Plan Summary Plan Description AUI Supplemental Retirement Annuity Plan Summary Plan Description November 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1. What kind of plan is this?...1 2. Who is eligible to participate in the Plan?...2 3. Do I need

More information

Sweeping New DOL Proposal on Fiduciary Investment Advice

Sweeping New DOL Proposal on Fiduciary Investment Advice Sweeping New DOL Proposal on Fiduciary Investment Advice Edward E. Bintz, Edward A. Frueh, and Douglas S. Pelley April 2015 The long-anticipated proposed fiduciary regulation was released by the Department

More information

Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP)

Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) The basics: The ESOP is essentially a stock bonus plan in which employer stock may be used for contributions. How It Works Employer contributes company stock or cash

More information

RB 38-03 Handbook: Trust and Asset Management Subject: Introduction to Individual Retirements Accounts Section: 160

RB 38-03 Handbook: Trust and Asset Management Subject: Introduction to Individual Retirements Accounts Section: 160 Office of Thrift Supervision May 20, 2010 Department of the Treasury Regulatory Bulletin RB 38-03 Handbook: Trust and Asset Management Subject: Introduction to Individual Retirements Accounts Section:

More information

TRADITIONAL IRA DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

TRADITIONAL IRA DISCLOSURE STATEMENT TRADITIONAL IRA DISCLOSURE STATEMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS REVOCATION OF ACCOUNT... 1 STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS... 1 (1) Qualification Requirements... 1 (2) Required Distribution Rules... 1 (3) Approved Form....

More information

The Treasury Department and Internal Revenue Service (IRS) are reviewing the

The Treasury Department and Internal Revenue Service (IRS) are reviewing the Part III. Administrative, Procedural, and Miscellaneous Split-dollar life insurance arrangements. Notice 2001-10 I. PURPOSE The Treasury Department and Internal Revenue Service (IRS) are reviewing the

More information

Exercising Fiduciary Authority and Control Over the Investment Menu in 403(b) Plans Subject to ERISA

Exercising Fiduciary Authority and Control Over the Investment Menu in 403(b) Plans Subject to ERISA Reproduced with permission from Tax Management Compensation Planning Journal, 38 CPJ 299, 11/05/2010. Copyright 2010 by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. (800-372-1033) http://www.bna.com Exercising

More information