UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING OFFICER
|
|
- Francine Clark
- 1 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING OFFICER UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) Complainant, ) ) v. ) 8 U.S.C. 1324a Proceeding ) CASE NO. 92A00215 DAVID DAY d.b.a. ) DAVID DAY MASONRY ) Respondent. ) ) FINAL DECISION AND ORDER REGARDING CIVIL MONEY PENALTIES I. Introduction In 1986, the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 ("Act") was amended by the Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA), which made significant revisions in national policy with respect to illegal immigrants. 8 U.S.C. 1324a. Accompanying other dramatic changes, IRCA introduced the concept of controlling employment of undocumented aliens by providing an administrative mechanism for imposition of civil liabilities upon employers who hire, recruit, refer for a fee, or continue to employ unauthorized aliens in the United States. In addition to civil liability, employers face criminal fines and imprisonment for engaging in a pattern or practice of hiring or continuing to employ such aliens. Additionally, 8 U.S.C. 1324a also provides that the employer is liable for failing to attest, on a form established by the regulations, that the individual is not an unauthorized alien, and that the documents proving identity and work authorization have been verified. Imposition of orders to cease and desist with civil money penalties for violation of the proscriptions against hiring, and authorizes civil money penalties for paperwork violations is authorized by the statute. 8 U.S.C. 1324a(e)(4),(5). II. Procedural History 1751
2 On August 20, 1993, I issued a Decision and Order in this matter granting Complainant's Motions for Sanctions, Renewed Request to Deem Request for Admissions Admitted and Motion for Dismissal of Request for Hearing based upon abandonment. However, Complainant at that time did not address the five (5) factors regarding 274A(e)(5) of the Act for me to consider prior to arriving at civil money penalties. Therefore, I directed the Complainant to submit a statement or memorandum to me, within fifteen (15) days of receipt of my order, addressing those issues. I also permitted the Respondent to address these issues, if it wished. On August 24, 1993, for good cause, I granted Complainant's unopposed Motion requesting an enlargement of time to September 13, 1993 to file its Memorandum on the civil money penalties. On September 27, 1993, I received Complainant's Memorandum regarding application of 274A(e)(5) of the Act. In its Memorandum, Complainant urged the court to increase the civil money penalties from the amount requested in the Complaint. To date, Respondent has not filed any statement or memorandum regarding the imposition of the civil money penalties. III. Discussion With respect to the determination of the amount of civil money penalties to be set for violations of the paperwork requirements of 8 U.S.C. 1324a, Section 274A(e)(5) of the Act, which corresponds to 28 C.F.R (c)(iv), states: (T)he order under this subsection shall require the person or entity to pay a civil penalty in an amount of not less than $ and not more than $1,000, for each individual with respect to whom such violation occurred. In determining the amount of the penalty, due consideration shall be given to the size of the business of the employer being charged, the good faith of the employer, the seriousness of the violation, whether or not the individual was an unauthorized alien and the history of previous violation. I have previously held that I am not restricted to considering only these five (5) factors, though, when making my determination. See U.S. v. Pizzuto, 2 OCAHO 447 (8/21/92). The statute also states that the civil money penalty with respect to a knowing hire/continuing to employ violation is: (1) not less than $250 and not more than $2,000 for each unauthorized alien with respect to whom a violation of either such subsection occurred; 1752
3 (2) not less than $2,000 and not more than $5,000 for each such alien in the case of a person or entity previously subject to one order under this paragraph, or (3) not less than $3,000 and not more than $10,000 for each such alien in the case of a person or entity previously subject to more than one order under this paragraph, 8 U.S.C. 1324a(e)(4)(A). A reading of the above statute shows that in contrast to 8 U.S.C. 1324a(e)(5), when considering the appropriate amount of civil penalties to set for knowing hire/continuing to employ violations, of the Act, the statute is silent as to any mandatory or discretionary considerations. 8 U.S.C. 1324a(a)(1)(A), (a)(2); U.S. v. Buckingham Ltd., 1 OCAHO 151 (4/6/90). Thus, it is left to my sound discretion to set the civil penalty amount for knowing hire/continuing to employ violation, although I generally consider the five factors in my determination. It is important to note that I am not bound in my determination of the civil penalty amounts by Complainant's request in its Complaint. See, in general, 8 U.S.C. 1324a; U.S. v. Cafe Camino Real, Inc., 2 OCAHO 307 (3/25/91); U.S. v. Lane Coast Corporation, Inc., 2 OCAHO 379 (9/30/91). IV. Factors Under Section 274A(e)(5) 1. Size of the Business of the Employer Being Charged In its Memorandum, Complainant characterized the Respondent's business as being small to medium-sized and indicated that at the time of audit, Respondent employed approximately twenty-five employees. Complainant also indicated that Respondent had not provided it with sufficient financial information, despite discovery requests, to enable it to accurately assess Respondent's financial situation. Respondent did, however, supply a Schedule C (Form 1040) for 1992, which indicated that the Respondent was certainly not a large-sized company. Complainant suggested that, because the Respondent disobeyed the court's order and had not provided financial or other information enabling an accurate determination of its business size, its answers to the discovery request should be inferred as adverse to the Respondent. Thus, Respondent should be found to be a small-to-medium-size business with a fine amount aggravated accordingly. Respondent has not addressed this factor. After a review of the full record in this case, and based on the information before me, I find that the size of the Respondent's business will be considered small to medium size. I will not mitigate on this factor. 1753
4 2. Good Faith of the Employer I have reviewed the record in this case and find that Respondent has not acted in good faith in its responsibility to comply with the requirements of IRCA. I base this on the fact Respondent has not properly completed its Forms I-9, has not complied with its affirmative duty with regard to completion of Section 1 and/or Section 2 of the Form I-9, and has hired unauthorized workers. The Respondent has not addressed this factor. I will not mitigate based on this factor. 3. Seriousness of the Violation In my decision of August 20, 1993, I found that Respondent had hired three named individuals, after November 6, 1986, who were not authorized for employment in the United States and that Respondent knew that they were not authorized for employment in the United States. Additionally, in the alternative, I found that Respondent continued to employ these individuals knowing that they were not authorized for employment in the United States. I also found that Respondent failed to prepare the Forms I-9 for two-named individuals in violation of the Act and that Respondent failed to ensure that four- named individuals properly completed Section 1 of the Form I-9 and that these individuals were hired after November 6, I further found that the Respondent failed to complete Section 2 of the Forms I-9 for three-named individuals and also failed to complete Section 2 of the Forms I-9 within three business days of the hire with respect to one named individual hired after November 6, These actions were in violation of Section 274A(1)(b) of the Act. The Respondent has not responded to this factor. After a review of all the information of record and relevant case law, I find that the above mentioned violations are all serious and therefore, I will not mitigate based on this factor. 4. Whether or Not the Individual was an Unauthorized Alien As to Count I, all three individuals have been found to be unauthorized aliens. Respondent has made no argument based on this factor. I will not mitigate based on this factor. As to Count II, the two named individuals are also named in Count I and are unauthorized aliens. Respondent has made no argument based on this factor. I will not mitigate based on this factor. 1754
5 As to Count III, none of the individuals are unauthorized aliens. Respondent has made no argument on this factor. I will consider this when determining the civil money penalty. As to Count IV, none of these individuals are unauthorized aliens. Respondent has made no argument on this factor. I will consider this when determining the civil money penalty. As to Count V, this individual is not an unauthorized alien. Respondent has made no argument on this factor. I will consider this when determining the civil money penalty. 5. History of Previous Violations In its memorandum, the Complainant argued that there is no history of previous violations concerning this Respondent and that, therefore, this is not an aggravating nor a mitigating factor. The Respondent did not respond to this factor. After careful review of all the evidence of record, I have determined that I will consider this when determining the civil penalties. 6. Civil Penalty Amount In the conclusion of its Memorandum, Complainant urged the court to increase the fine penalty amount from that originally requested in the Complaint. Complainant refers the court to U.S. v. Ebrahim Banafsheha, 3 OCAHO 525 (9/13/93) wherein, upon modification of an ALJ Decision, the Chief Administrative Hearing Officer declared that the ALJ can increase or decrease the fine amounts proposed by the INS after considering the five factors, as long as his decision is not capricious or arbitrary. I am in agreement with Complainant that this particular Respondent did not act in a candid or respectful manner in dealing with the INS or the court. However, I must keep in mind that the function of the court, basically, is to make sure that Respondent is in compliance with the law; it is not to levy a fine which may be so severe as to put the Respondent out of business. In Count I of its Complaint, the Complainant requested a civil money penalty in the amount of $2,850.00, i.e., $ for each violation. 1755
6 In Count II of the Complaint, Complainant requested civil money penalties in the amount of $ for two individuals i.e., $ for each individual violation. In Count III of the Complaint, Complainant requested civil money penalties in the amount of $920.00, i.e., $ for each of the four individuals named. In Count IV of the Complaint, Complainant requested civil money penalties of $690.00, i.e., $ for each of the three individual violations. In Count V of the Complaint, Complainant requested civil money penalties in the amount of $ for the one in violation. Thus, in total the civil money penalties requested amounted to $5, After, careful consideration and review of my findings with regard to the five factors of 274A(e)(5), the entire record of evidence in this matter, and using a judgmental approach, I have determined that the requested civil money penalties by the INS of $5, is well within the parameters of 28 C.F.R (c)(5) and is found to be reasonable and appropriate under the circumstances of this particular case. Thus the Respondent is Ordered to pay to Complainant the sum of $5, in civil money penalties and to cease and desist from violating the proscriptions against hiring and/or continuing to employ unauthorized aliens in the United States, pursuant to 8 U.S.C. 1324a. Pursuant to 28 C.F.R (a), this Decision and Order is the final Decision and Order of the Attorney General unless within thirty days from this date, the Chief Administrative Hearing Officer shall have modified or vacated this Decision and Order. IT IS SO ORDERED this 10th day of November, 1993 at San Diego, California. E. MILTON FROSBURG Administrative Law Judge 1756
Chapter 5- External I-9 Attorney Audits
Chapter 5- External I-9 Attorney Audits 5.0 The External I-9 Audit The private external compliance audit contains the Form I-9 audit, the compliance program audit (Chapter 6) the liability audit (Chapter
THE DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY OFFICE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE WASHINGTON, D.C.
THE DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY OFFICE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE WASHINGTON, D.C. DIRECTOR, ) OFFICE OF PROFESSIONAL ) RESPONSIBILITY, ) ) Complainant, ) ) Complaint No. 2010-08
Florida Senate - 2016 SB 872
By Senator Bean 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 A bill to be entitled An act relating to federal immigration enforcement; providing a short title; creating
Katherine (Kacey) M. Coleman, Esq.
Katherine (Kacey) M. Coleman, Esq. 2014 "ICE is committed to establishing a meaningful I-9 inspection program to promote compliance with the law. This nationwide effort is a first step in ICE s longterm
Case4:12-cv-03288-KAW Document2-1 Filed06/25/12 Page1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION
Case4:12-cv-03288-KAW Document2-1 Filed06/25/12 Page1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION STANDING ORDER FOR MAGISTRATE JUDGE KANDIS A. WESTMORE (Revised
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING OFFICER
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING OFFICER ) NOE RODRIGUEZ, ) Complainant, ) 8 U.S.C. 1324b Proceeding ) v. ) OCAHO Case
MODEL LAW ON MOTOR VEHICLE INSPECTION BY INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS AND SELF INSPECTORS
MODEL LAW ON MOTOR VEHICLE INSPECTION BY INDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS AND SELF INSPECTORS Section 1. Definitions.-- As used in this act, the term: (1) "Contractor" means any person, corporation, or partnership
Wendy Musell Stewart & Musell, LLP
Wendy Musell Stewart & Musell, LLP In 2011, the federal government is the Nation's largest employer with about 2.0 million civilian employees. 600,000 employees approximately in the US Postal Service Laws
INDIANA FALSE CLAIMS AND WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION ACT. IC 5-11-5.5 Chapter 5.5. False Claims and Whistleblower Protection
As amended by P.L.79-2007. INDIANA FALSE CLAIMS AND WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION ACT IC 5-11-5.5 Chapter 5.5. False Claims and Whistleblower Protection IC 5-11-5.5-1 Definitions Sec. 1. The following definitions
Case: 5:10-cv-01912-DAP Doc #: 21 Filed: 03/14/11 1 of 8. PageID #: 358 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Case: 5:10-cv-01912-DAP Doc #: 21 Filed: 03/14/11 1 of 8. PageID #: 358 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION UNIQUE PRODUCT SOLUTIONS, LTD., ) Case No. 5:10-CV-1912 )
11 HB 87/CSFA A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT
House Bill 87 (COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE) (AM) By: Representatives Ramsey of the 72 nd, Golick of the 34 th, Dempsey of the 13 th, Austin of the 10 th, Allison of the 8 th, and others A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
Immigration Compliance for the Restaurant and Foodservice Industry: What to Do BEFORE (and After) the Government Comes Knocking
Immigration Compliance for the Restaurant and Foodservice Industry: What to Do BEFORE (and After) the Government Comes Knocking March 4, 2012 Presented by Kristine A. Sova and Dismas N. Locaria of Venable
U.S. Department of Justice. United States Attorney Southern District of New York. May 11, 2010
U.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Southern District of New York The Silvio J. Mollo Building One Saint Andrew s Plaza New York, New York 10007 By Hand Michael Pancer, Esq. 105 West F Street
COUNTY INFRACTIONS AND JUDICIAL MATTER DEFINITIONS. For use in this chapter, the following terms are defined:
DALLAS COUNTY, IOWA TITLE I - POLICY AND ADMINISTRATION COUNTY INFRACTIONS AND JUDICIAL MATTER 2.01 Definitions 2.03 Civil Infractions 2.02 Violations, Penalties and Alternative Relief 2.04 Criminal Infractions
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM RE: ) Supreme Court Case No. PRM 06-006 ) ) QMENDING PROMULGATION ORDER ) PROMULGATION ORDER NO. YO. 06-006-02 ON THE LOCAL RULES 06-006-10 DF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF GUAM )
ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597
AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY APRIL 14, 2015 california legislature 2015 16 regular session ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597 Introduced by Assembly Member Cooley February 24, 2015 An act to amend Sections 36 and 877 of, and
Is Your Company s I-9 Audit Notice in the Mail?
Is Your Company s I-9 Audit Notice in the Mail? by Charles M. Miller 1 On January 20, 2011, ICE Director John Morton focused on I-9 employment verification efforts by Fortune 500 companies by announcing
Comment [1]: BDERIV. Comment [2]: EDERIV
56-1001. Short title. This act shall be known and may be cited as the "Oklahoma Medicaid Program Integrity Act". Added by Laws 1989, c. 220, 1, operative July 1, 1989. 56-1002. Definitions. As used in
SUBJECT: Department Policy Concerning Charging Criminal Offenses, Disposition of Charges, and Sentencing
TO: FROM: All Federal Prosecutors John Ashcroft Attorney General SUBJECT: Department Policy Concerning Charging Criminal Offenses, Disposition of Charges, and Sentencing INTRODUCTION The passage of the
TABLE OF CONTENTS. This act shall be known and may be cited as the Appraisal Management Company Registration Act.
Appraisal Management Company Registration Act 63 P.S. 457.21 457.31 (Current through 02/02/2012) (When referring to section numbers, use a truncated version of the number after the decimal point. For example,
ABCs of Immigration: I-9 Compliance - Avoiding Immigration Bombshells. by Greg Siskind
ABCs of Immigration: I-9 Compliance - Avoiding Immigration Bombshells by Greg Siskind While immigration can be a highly divisive issue, employers need to focus on complying with the law. Most employers
Chapter I. 1. Purpose. 2. Your Representations. 3. Cancellations. 4. Mandatory Administrative Proceeding. dotversicherung-registry GmbH
Chapter I.versicherung Eligibility Requirements Dispute Resolution Policy (ERDRP) 1. This policy has been adopted by all accredited Domain Name Registrars for Domain Names ending in.versicherung. 2. The
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE : STATE OF CONNECTICUT, and : STATE OF CONNECTICUT : Plaintiffs, : : v. : Civ. No. : HEALTH NET OF THE NORTHEAST, INC., : HEALTH
I-9'S : COMPLYING WITH REGULATIONS
-Background & Purpose of the I-9 Form -Employer Responsibilities -Penalties under IRCA -Preparing the I-9, verifying documents -Amendments and Re-verification I-9'S : COMPLYING WITH REGULATIONS Background
What To Do When The Government Comes Knocking
What To Do When The Government Comes Knocking Are You Ready? Michael Colgan Harrington 860.240.6049 mharrington@murthalaw.com Lauren Meris Filiberto 203.772.7733 lfiliberto@murthalaw.com March 20, 2013
LITTLE TRAVERSE BAY BANDS OF ODAWA INDIANS
LITTLE TRAVERSE BAY BANDS OF ODAWA INDIANS TRIBAL COURT Chapter 7 Appellate Procedures Court Rule Adopted 4/7/2002 Appellate Procedures Page 1 of 12 Chapter 7 Appellate Procedures Table of Contents 7.000
Regular Session, 2008. ACT No. 858. To amend and reenact R.S. 9:3573.1, 3573.2(A), 3573.3(1), (8), (9) and (10), 3573.4,
Regular Session, 0 SENATE BILL NO. ACT No. BY SENATOR MARIONNEAUX 0 AN ACT To amend and reenact R.S. :.,.(A),.(), (), () and (0),.,.(A)(),.0(C),.(B) and (C),.(B) and (C), and., and to repeal R.S. :.(),.,
Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals
RENDERED: MAY 14, 2010; 10:00 A.M. NOT TO BE PUBLISHED Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals NO. 2009-CA-000282-MR AND NO. 2009-CA-000334-MR BRIAN G. SULLIVAN APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE APPEAL AND CROSS-APPEAL
Immigration and Taxation
Immigration and Taxation Immigration, Employment and Tax Laws Why do immigrants without status pay taxes? Obligated by law Opportunity to contribute Document compliance and residency Immigration, Employment
STATE BAR COURT OF CALIFORNIA HEARING DEPARTMENT LOS ANGELES. Case Nos.: 13-O-15838-DFM ) ) ) ) ) ) )
FILED MARCH 16, 2015 STATE BAR COURT OF CALIFORNIA HEARING DEPARTMENT LOS ANGELES In the Matter of ANDREW MacLAREN STEWART, Member No. 204170, A Member of the State Bar. Case Nos.: 13-O-15838-DFM DECISION
) 1 1 > 1 FDA Docket No. 02H-0443 1 ) ) ) ) 1 1 ) 1 )
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEFORE THE FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES In the matter of LAHAYE CENTER FOR ADVANCED EYE CARE OF LAFAYETTE, D/B/A LAHAYE TOTAL EYE CARE,
SIXTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT ATTORNEY-CLIENT FEE DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROGRAM LOCAL PROGRAM RULES AND PROCEDURES
SIXTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT ATTORNEY-CLIENT FEE DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROGRAM LOCAL PROGRAM RULES AND PROCEDURES SECTION 1 - POLICY It is the policy of the Sixth Judicial District ( district ) to encourage out-of-court
Last Approval Date: May 2008. Page 1 of 12 I. PURPOSE
Page 1 of 12 I. PURPOSE The purpose of this policy is to comply with the requirements in Section 6032 of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 (the DRA ), which amends Section 1902(a) of the Social Security
invmiom crf persona1 privacy
itite&fj,**~to plvva chb-i~ z ~ w ~ ~ t e d invmiom crf persona1 privacy U.S. Department of Homeland Security 20 Mass. Ave., N.W., Rm. 3000 Washington, DC 20529 U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
WHAT YOU REALLY NEED TO KNOW ABOUT IMMIGRATION: The Facts behind the Headlines and the Hype
WHAT YOU REALLY NEED TO KNOW ABOUT IMMIGRATION: The Facts behind the Headlines and the Hype bäáçí=kçêã~å tçêâëáíé=båñçêåéãéåí=~åç== `çêéçê~íé=fããáöê~íáçå=`çãéäá~ååé=qé~ã== UMQJTUPJSQUO Éåçêã~å]ïáääá~ãëãìääÉåKÅçã
(A) There are other available remedies that the complainant can reasonably be expected to pursue;
Sec. 4-61dd. Whistle-blowing. Disclosure of information to Auditors of Public Accounts. Investigation by Attorney General. Rejection of complaint. Complaints re retaliatory personnel actions. Report to
California Health and Safety Code. Chapter 2.5 of Division 107
California Health and Safety Code Chapter 2.5 of Division 107 AB 1503 (Chapter 445, Statutes of 2010) amended Hospital Fair Pricing Policies established by AB 774 (Statutes of 2006) and added Emergency
Order No.2014-005 Docket No. BE-13-10-039 IN THE MATTER OF BEFORE THE BANKING GONZALEZ FUNERAL HOME;
Order No.2014-005 Docket No. BE-13-10-039 IN THE MATTER OF BEFORE THE BANKING GONZALEZ FUNERAL HOME; GONZALEZ FAMILY FUNERAL HOME, LLC; GONZALEZ-RIVERA FUNERAL HOME OF EDINBURG, LLC; COMMISSIONER OF TEXAS
Family Law Discovery Issues
Research Guide Last Updated: January 2013 Table of Contents How to Prepare and Serve Form Interrogatories on the Other Party (JC Form #FL-145)... 2 How to Respond to Family Law Form Interrogatories (not
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MEMORANDUM. Ludwig. J. July 9, 2010
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA KATHLEEN M. KELLY : CIVIL ACTION : v. : : No. 09-1641 NATIONAL LIABILITY & FIRE : INSURANCE COMPANY : MEMORANDUM Ludwig. J.
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN 2012 WI 123 CASE NO.: COMPLETE TITLE: In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Thomas E. Bielinski, Attorney at Law: Office of Lawyer Regulation, Complainant, v. Thomas
U.S. Department of Labor Code of Federal Regulations Equal Employment Opportunity In Apprenticeship and Training. Title 29 - Part 30
U.S. Department of Labor Code of Federal Regulations Equal Employment Opportunity In Apprenticeship and Training Title 29 - Part 30 APPRENTICESHIP SECTION SPECIALITY COMPLIANCE SERVICES DIVISION DEPARTMENT
ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597
california legislature 2015 16 regular session ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597 Introduced by Assembly Member Cooley February 24, 2015 An act to amend Sections 36 and 877 of, and to add Chapter 6 (commencing with
IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT BANKRUPTCY ASSISTANCE SERVICES FROM AN ATTORNEY 1
IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT BANKRUPTCY ASSISTANCE SERVICES FROM AN ATTORNEY 1 If you decide to seek bankruptcy relief, you can represent yourself, you can hire an attorney to represent you, or you can
STATE OF OKLAHOMA. 2nd Session of the 53rd Legislature (2012) COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE
STATE OF OKLAHOMA nd Session of the rd Legislature () COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE FOR HOUSE BILL NO. By: Quinn COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE An Act relating to labor; amending 0 O.S., Section 00., which relates to renewal
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT KETCHIKAN DRYWALL SERVICES, INC., Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT; OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING OFFICER,
Department of Health and Human Services DEPARTMENTAL APPEALS BOARD. Civil Remedies Division
Department of Health and Human Services DEPARTMENTAL APPEALS BOARD Civil Remedies Division Scott Christie, Psy.D. (OI File No. H-12-42635-9) Petitioner, v. The Inspector General. Docket No. C-14-88 Decision
REFERENCE TITLE: accountancy board; certified public accountants HB 2218. Introduced by Representative Thorpe AN ACT
REFERENCE TITLE: accountancy board; certified public accountants State of Arizona House of Representatives Fifty-second Legislature First Regular Session HB Introduced by Representative Thorpe AN ACT AMENDING
AN ACT IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
AN ACT IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA To amend the District of Columbia Procurement Practices Act of 1985 to make the District s false claims act consistent with federal law and thereby qualify
1 L.R.O. 2001 Electronic Transactions CAP. 308B ELECTRONIC TRANSACTIONS
1 L.R.O. 2001 Electronic Transactions CAP. 308B CHAPTER 308B ELECTRONIC TRANSACTIONS ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS SECTION PART I Preliminary 1. Short title. 2. Interpretation. 3. Non-application of Parts II
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Before the COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Before the COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION In the Matter of: Coinflip, Inc., d/b/a Derivabit, and Francisco Riordan, CFTC Docket No. 15-29 Respondents. ORDER INSTITUTING PROCEEDINGS
COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF REGULATORY AGENCIES. Division of Professions and Occupations Office of Speech-Language Pathology Certification
COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF REGULATORY AGENCIES Division of Professions and Occupations Office of Speech-Language Pathology Certification 4 CODE OF COLORADO REGULATIONS (CCR) 748-1 RULES REGULATING SPEECH-LANGUAGE
[Brought into force by appointed day notice on 16 th June 2003.]
[Brought into force by appointed day notice on 16 th June 2003.] AN ACT TO PROVIDE FOR THE LEGAL RECOGNITION OF ELECTRONIC WRITING, ELECTRONIC CONTRACTS, ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES AND ORIGINAL INFORMATION
Business Associate Agreement Involving the Access to Protected Health Information
School/Unit: Rowan University School of Osteopathic Medicine Vendor: Business Associate Agreement Involving the Access to Protected Health Information This Business Associate Agreement ( BAA ) is entered
Delaware UCCJEA 13 Del. Code 1901 et seq.
Delaware UCCJEA 13 Del. Code 1901 et seq. 1901. Short title This chapter may be cited as the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act. 1902. Definitions As used in this chapter: (1) "Abandoned"
THE CENTRAL EXCISE ACT 1944
THE CENTRAL EXCISE ACT 1944 35B. Appeals to the Appellate Tribunal.- (1) Any person aggrieved by any of the following orders may appeal to the Appellate Tribunal against such order (a) a decision or order
State of Maryland: Frequently Asked Questions Presented and Submitted by Jeffrey Van Grack January 1, 2011
State of Maryland: Frequently Asked Questions Presented and Submitted by Jeffrey Van Grack January 1, 2011 State FAQs GENERAL 1. What general state statutes apply to Common Interest Communities in your
STATE OF OKLAHOMA. 2nd Session of the 53rd Legislature (2012) AS INTRODUCED
STATE OF OKLAHOMA nd Session of the rd Legislature () SENATE BILL AS INTRODUCED By: Jolley An Act relating to asbestos tort actions; creating the Asbestos Claims Transparency Act; providing short title;
Business Associate Agreement
This Business Associate Agreement Is Related To and a Part of the Following Underlying Agreement: Effective Date of Underlying Agreement: Vendor: Business Associate Agreement This Business Associate Agreement
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT PLAN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT PLAN 1. AUTHORITY Pursuant to the Criminal Justice Act of 1964 as amended (CJA), Section 3006A of Title 18, United
2012 WI 48 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Aaron J. Rollins, Attorney at Law:
2012 WI 48 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: COMPLETE TITLE: 2011AP778-D In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Aaron J. Rollins, Attorney at Law: Office of Lawyer Regulation, Complainant,
RULES OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION CHAPTER 0800-2-15 UNINSURED EMPLOYERS FUND
RULES OF TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF WORKERS COMPENSATION CHAPTER 0800-2-15 UNINSURED EMPLOYERS FUND TABLE OF CONTENTS 0800-2-15-.01 Definitions 0800-2-15-.10 Representation
NEW YORK CITY FALSE CLAIMS ACT Administrative Code 7-801 through 7-810 *
NEW YORK CITY FALSE CLAIMS ACT Administrative Code 7-801 through 7-810 * 7-801. Short title. This chapter shall be known as the "New York city false claims act." 7-802. Definitions. For purposes of this
ORDINANCE 1743. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Mayor and Common Council of the City of Kingman, Arizona as follows:
ORDINANCE 1743 AN ORDINANCE BY THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KINGMAN, ARIZONA, AMENDING CHAPTER 7 OF THE CITY OF KINGMAN CODE OF ORDINANCES BY MODIFYING THE ALARM ORDINANCE. WHEREAS, the
GOVERNMENT PROSECUTIONS AND QUI TAM ACTIONS
GOVERNMENT PROSECUTIONS AND QUI TAM ACTIONS DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA OFFICIAL CODE DIVISION I. GOVERNMENT OF DISTRICT. TITLE 2. GOVERNMENT ADMINISTRATION. CHAPTER 3B. OTHER PROCUREMENT MATTERS. SUBCHAPTER
Introduction (916) 653-0799 (800) 952-5665.
Introduction On January 1, 2000, California's Whistleblower Protection Act (WPA) (Government Code sections 8547 et seq.) was significantly amended. The Legislature amended this law to strengthen protections
BUSINESS ASSOCIATE AGREEMENT
BUSINESS ASSOCIATE AGREEMENT THIS BUSINESS ASSOCIATE AGREEMENT is made and entered into as of the day of, 2013 ( Effective Date ), by and between [Physician Practice] on behalf of itself and each of its
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2011 HOUSE DRH11149-TG-5 (12/01) Short Title: Tort Reform Act of 2011. (Public)
H GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION HOUSE DRH-TG- (/01) D Short Title: Tort Reform Act of. (Public) Sponsors: Referred to: Representatives Blust and Daughtry (Primary Sponsors). 1 A BILL TO BE
Company ID Number: 43420
THE E-VERIFY PROGRAM FOR EMPLOYMENT VERIFICATION MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ARTICLE I PURPOSE AND AUTHORITY This Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) sets forth the points of agreement between the Social
A Bill Regular Session, 2015 SENATE BILL 830
Stricken language would be deleted from and underlined language would be added to present law. State of Arkansas 90th General Assembly A Bill Regular Session, 2015 SENATE BILL 830 By: Senator D. Sanders
IAC 7/2/08 Parole Board[205] Ch 11, p.1. CHAPTER 11 PAROLE REVOCATION [Prior to 2/22/89, Parole, Board of[615] Ch 7]
IAC 7/2/08 Parole Board[205] Ch 11, p.1 CHAPTER 11 PAROLE REVOCATION [Prior to 2/22/89, Parole, Board of[615] Ch 7] 205 11.1(906) Voluntary termination of parole. Any voluntary termination of parole should
Whistleblower Act, 2006 Act 720
Whistleblower Act, 2006 Act 720 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS Section Information the disclosure of which is protected 1. Disclosure of impropriety 2. Person who qualifies to make disclosure of impropriety 3.
FRA s Enforcement Process
FRA s Enforcement Process Prepared by: Stephen N. Gordon Trial Attorney Office of Chief Counsel Federal Railroad Administration stephen.n.gordon@dot.gov (202) 493-6001 1 Summary of Discussion Topics Organizational
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PERTAINING TO OUR DIRECTORS
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PERTAINING TO OUR DIRECTORS On April 30, 2010, the Company entered into a 2 (two) year service agreement with Mr. Ronald Yadin Lowenthal, the Company's Executive Chairman. As compensation
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act 1
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act 1 Appendix F SEC. 112. INDEPENDENT ANNUAL AUDITS OF INSURED DEPOSITORY INSTITUTIONS. (a) IN GENERAL. The Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1811
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT AT ANCHORAGE
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF ALASKA THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT AT ANCHORAGE In the Matter of a ) Uniform Pretrial Order ) ) Administrative Order 3AO-03-04 (Amended) UNIFORM PRETRIAL ORDER In order
READING SCHOOL DISTRICT
No. 831 SECTION: OPERATIONS READING SCHOOL DISTRICT TITLE: WHISTLEBLOWER ADOPTED: April 23, 2008 REVISED: 831. WHISTLEBLOWER 1. Purpose The Reading School District is committed to facilitating open and
Chapter 153. Violations and Fines 2013 EDITION. Related Laws Page 571 (2013 Edition)
Chapter 153 2013 EDITION Violations and Fines VIOLATIONS (Generally) 153.005 Definitions 153.008 Violations described 153.012 Violation categories 153.015 Unclassified and specific fine violations 153.018
General complaint form for video/cable customers
Michigan Public Service Commission Formal Video/Cable Complaint General complaint form for video/cable customers I Want to File a Formal Complaint First, you must attempt to resolve your complaint directly
SENATE BILL 1070 AN ACT
Senate Engrossed State of Arizona Senate Forty-ninth Legislature Second Regular Session SENATE BILL 0 AN ACT AMENDING TITLE, CHAPTER, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES, BY ADDING ARTICLE ; AMENDING TITLE, CHAPTER,
NEW JERSEY FAMILY COLLABORATIVE LAW ACT. An Act concerning family collaborative law and supplementing Title 2A of the New Jersey Statutes.
NEW JERSEY FAMILY COLLABORATIVE LAW ACT An Act concerning family collaborative law and supplementing Title 2A of the New Jersey Statutes. Be It Enacted by the Senate and General Assembly of the State of
HOUSE BILL 2485 AN ACT AMENDING TITLE 12, CHAPTER 13, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES, BY ADDING ARTICLE 10; RELATING TO HEALTH AND SAFETY AUDIT PRIVILEGE.
House Engrossed State of Arizona House of Representatives Fifty-first Legislature First Regular Session HOUSE BILL AN ACT AMENDING TITLE, CHAPTER, ARIZONA REVISED STATUTES, BY ADDING ARTICLE ; RELATING
Rule 82.1 Who May Appear as Counsel; Who May Appear Pro Se
Rule 82.1 Who May Appear as Counsel; Who May Appear Pro Se Only members of the bar of this Court may appear as counsel in civil cases. Only individuals who are parties in civil cases may represent themselves.
Domestic Violence Intervention Act
Domestic Violence Intervention Act CHAPTER 29 OF THE ACTS OF 2001 as amended by 2002, c. 30, s. 2; 2015, c. 6, ss. 6-14 2016 Her Majesty the Queen in right of the Province of Nova Scotia Published by Authority
FINAL ORDER EFFECTIVE: 2-10-14
BEFORE THE COMMISSIONER OF INSURANCE OF THE STATE OF KANSAS In the Matter of ) AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE ) INSURANCE COMPANY ) Docket No. 4628-MC NAIC #92738 SUMMARY ORDER Pursuant to the authority
PUBLIC ENTITY RISK MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY MEMORANDUM OF WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS LIABILITY COVERAGE
PUBLIC ENTITY RISK MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY MEMORANDUM OF WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS LIABILITY COVERAGE FOR THE PERIOD JULY 1, 2015 TO JUNE 30, 2016 EFFECTIVE: JULY 1, 2015 PUBLIC ENTITY RISK MANAGEMENT
CHAPTER 2016-46. Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for Senate Bill No. 494
CHAPTER 2016-46 Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for Senate Bill No. 494 An act relating to digital assets; providing a directive to the Division of Law Revision and Information; creating
No. 76. An act relating to civil penalties for possession of marijuana. (H.200) It is hereby enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Vermont:
No. 76. An act relating to civil penalties for possession of marijuana. (H.200) It is hereby enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Vermont: * * * Criminal Penalties and Civil Penalties for Marijuana
BELIZE LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP ACT CHAPTER 258 REVISED EDITION 2003 SHOWING THE SUBSTANTIVE LAWS AS AT 31ST MAY, 2003
BELIZE LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP ACT CHAPTER 258 REVISED EDITION 2003 SHOWING THE SUBSTANTIVE LAWS AS AT 31ST MAY, 2003 This is a revised edition of the Substantive Laws, prepared by the Law Revision
Case 5:14-cv-00631 Document 1 Filed 07/11/14 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION
Case 5:14-cv-00631 Document 1 Filed 07/11/14 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION CAROLE RIELEY Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:14 cv 00631
CONSENT OF DEFENDANT GOLDMAN, SACHS & CO.
UNIlED STAlES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, GOLDMAN, SACHS & CO. and FABRICE TOURRE, v. Plaintiff, Defendants. 1O-CV-3229 (BSJ) CONSENT OF DEFENDANT GOLDMAN,
Rule 42. Practice of attorneys not admitted in Nevada. (1) All actions or proceedings pending before a court in this state;
Rule 42. Practice of attorneys not admitted in Nevada. 1. Application of rule. (a) This rule applies to: (1) All actions or proceedings pending before a court in this state; (2) All actions or proceedings
MANDATORY REPORTING LAWS & RULES
Janet Napolitano Governor Joey Ridenour Executive Director Arizona State Board of Nursing 4747 North 7th Street, Suite 200 Phoenix AZ 85014-3653 Phone (602) 889-5150 Fax (602) 889-5155 E-Mail: arizona@azbn.org
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Before the OFFICE OF THRIFT SUPERVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Before the OFFICE OF THRIFT SUPERVISION In the Matter of Order No.: WN-11-012 Effective Date: April 13, 2011 Pasadena, California OTS Docket No. H4585 CONSENT ORDER WHEREAS,, Pasadena,
NC General Statutes - Chapter 95 Article 23 1
Article 23. Workplace Violence Prevention. 95-260. Definitions. The following definitions apply in this Article: (1) Civil no-contact order. An order granted under this Article, which includes a remedy
NOTE - This document is provided for guidance only and does not purport to be a legal interpretation. PERSONAL INSOLVENCY ACT 2012
Background to and purpose of the Act PERSONAL INSOLVENCY ACT 2012 EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM The Act provides for the reform of personal insolvency law and will introduce the following new non-judicial debt
HAWAI`I REVISED STATUTES CHAPTER 672B DESIGN CLAIM CONCILIATION PANEL. Act 207, 2007 Session Laws of Hawai`i
HAWAI`I REVISED STATUTES CHAPTER 672B DESIGN CLAIM CONCILIATION PANEL Act 207, 2007 Session Laws of Hawai`i Section 672B-1 Definitions 672B-2 Administration of chapter 672B-3 Design claim conciliation
STATE OF NEW JERSEY. SENATE, No. 1988. 213th LEGISLATURE. Sponsored by: Senator JEFF VAN DREW District 1 (Cape May, Atlantic and Cumberland)
SENATE, No. STATE OF NEW JERSEY th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED JUNE, 00 Sponsored by: Senator JEFF VAN DREW District (Cape May, Atlantic and Cumberland) SYNOPSIS "New Jersey Fair Debt Collection Practices Act."
1 VERGERONT, J. 1 Daniel Stormer was convicted of operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated, third offense, contrary to WIS. STAT.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 31, 2001 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk, Court of Appeals of Wisconsin NOTICE This opinion is subject to further editing. If published, the official version will