In a landmark decision for companies operating in
|
|
- Clinton Edwards
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Dutch Exit Tax Rules Challenged in National Grid Indus by Tom O Shea Tom O Shea is the academic director of the Master s in Taxation program at the Institute of Advanced Legal Studies at the University of London and a lecturer in tax law at the Centre for Commercial Law Studies at Queen Mary, University of London. In a landmark decision for companies operating in the EU, National Grid Indus (C-371/10), the European Court of Justice held that Dutch exit tax rules on companies transferring their place of effective management to another EU member state were incompatible with the freedom of establishment when such rules prescribed the immediate recovery of tax on unrealized gains. Background National Grid Indus is a limited liability company incorporated in the Netherlands. Until December 15, 2000, its place of effective management was in the Netherlands. On that date it transferred its place of effective management to the United Kingdom. As a result of this transfer, National Grid Indus, under the Netherlands-U.K. income tax treaty, became a resident of the U.K. and ceased to be a resident of the Netherlands. This transfer triggered a final settlement of its tax liabilities, in particular, unrealized capital gains at the time of the transfer. National Grid Indus argued that this exit taxation amounted to a breach of its right of establishment guaranteed under article 49 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). Freedom of Establishment The first issue examined by the ECJ concerned whether the freedom of establishment was applicable to the situation at hand. Following its previous jurisprudence, the ECJ determined that the question of whether article 49 of the TFEU applied is a preliminary matter that can only be resolved by the applicable national law. The Court recalled that a member state: has the power to define both the connecting factor required of a company if it is to be regarded as incorporated under its national law and as such capable of enjoying the right of establishment, and that required if the company is to be able subsequently to maintain that status...a Member State is therefore able, in the case of a company incorporated under its law, to make the company s right to retain its legal personality under the law of that State subject to restrictions on the transfer abroad of the company s place of effective management. 1 The Court noted that in the situation at hand, the transfer of the place of effective management from the Netherlands to the U.K. did not affect its status as a Dutch company. Accordingly, the Dutch rules at issue did not concern: the determination of the conditions required by a Member State of a company incorporated under its law for that company to be able to retain its status of a company of that Member State after transferring its place of effective management to another Member State. 2 Therefore, the Court concluded that National Grid Indus could rely on article 49 of the TFEU for the purpose of challenging the lawfulness of the tax imposed on it by the Netherlands on the occasion of the transfer of the place of effective management. 1 National Grid Indus, para Id. at para. 31. TAX NOTES INTERNATIONAL JANUARY 16,
2 FEATURED PERSPECTIVES Restriction on Freedom of Establishment The Court highlighted that all measures that prohibit, impede, or render less attractive the exercise of the freedom of establishment must be regarded as restrictions on that freedom. In the situation at hand, the Court noted that a company incorporated under Dutch law that transferred its place of effective management from the Netherlands to another member state was placed at a cash flow disadvantage compared with a similar Dutch company that retained its place of effective management in the Netherlands. The transfer of the place of effective management of the Dutch company meant the immediate taxation of the unrealized capital gains relating to the assets transferred. The Court pointed out that the different treatment of the unrealized capital gains in such circumstances was liable to deter a company incorporated under Netherlands law from transferring its place of effective management to another Member State. 3 Justifications Objective Difference in Situation The Court pointed out that the situation of a company incorporated in the Netherlands that transferred its place of effective management to another member state was the same as a company also incorporated in the Netherlands that keeps its place of effective management in the Netherlands. The Court explained that both companies were in the same situation regarding the taxation of capital gains relating to the assets that were generated in the Netherlands before the transfer of the place of management. Balance in Allocation of Taxing Rights The Court highlighted that the transfer of the place of effective management of a Dutch company to another member state cannot mean that the Netherlands has to abandon its right to tax a capital gain that arose within the ambit of its powers of taxation before the transfer. The Court explained that: a Member State is entitled to charge tax on those gains at the time when the taxpayer leaves the country...such a measure is intended to prevent situations capable of jeopardising the right of the Member State of origin to exercise its powers of taxation in relation to activities carried on in its territory, and may therefore be justified on grounds connected with the preservation of the allocation of powers of taxation between the Member States. 4 The Court noted that under the Dutch legislation, when National Grid Indus transferred its place of effective management to the U.K., it was regarded as resident in the U.K. in accordance with the provisions of the Netherlands-U.K. income tax treaty. Therefore, a final settlement was drawn up regarding the capital gains relating to the company s assets in the Netherlands at the time of the transfer. Under the income tax treaty, capital gains realized after the transfer are taxed in the U.K. Therefore, the Court determined that legislation such as the Dutch rules at issue was appropriate for ensuring the preservation of the allocation of powers of taxation between the member states. Unrealized capital gains are thus taxed in the member state in which they arose. Proportionality Next, the Court investigated whether the legislation at issue went beyond what was necessary to attain its objective. The Court noted that both the establishment of the amount of the tax debt and the recovery of the tax take place at the time of the transfer of the place of effective management when the company ceased to be taxable in the Netherlands. The Court determined that in order to assess the proportionality of the legislation a distinction had to be made between: the establishment of the amount of tax; and the recovery of that tax. Establishment of Amount of Tax The Court highlighted that it was proportionate for a member state to determine the tax due on the unrealized gains at the time when its power of taxation regarding the company in question ceases to exist (at the time of the transfer of the place of effective management to another member state). The Court recalled the N case (C-470/04), where it had pointed out that decreases in the value of assets after the emigration of the taxpayer had to be fully taken into account in order for the national rules to be regarded as proportionate, unless those decreases in value had already been taken into account in the host member state. However, the Court distinguished the circumstances of National Grid Indus from N by pointing out that since: the profits of a company which transfers its place of effective management are, after the transfer, taxed exclusively in the host Member State, in accordance with the principle of fiscal territoriality linked to a temporal component, it is also for that Member State...forreasons relating to the symmetry between the right to tax profits and the possibility of deducting losses, to take account in its tax system of fluctuations in the value of assets of that company which occur after the date on which the Member State of origin loses all fiscal connection with the company. 5 Therefore, the Court held that the member state of origin was not obliged to take account of any exchange 3 Id. at para Id. at para Id. at para JANUARY 16, 2012 TAX NOTES INTERNATIONAL
3 rate losses that may occur after the transfer of the place of effective management to the U.K. The Court noted that the tax due on the unrealized capital gains was determined at the time of the transfer of the place of effective management to the U.K. (when the member state of origin s power to tax the company ceased to exist). The Court indicated that the taking into account: by the Member State of origin either of an exchange rate gain or an exchange rate loss occurring after the transfer of the place of effective management could not only call into question the balanced allocation of powers of taxation between the Member States but also lead to double taxation or double deduction of losses. 6 The Court stressed that it was: in accordance with the principle of fiscal territoriality linked to a temporal component, namely residence for tax purposes on the national territory during the period in which the taxable gain appeared, that the capital gain generated in the Member State of origin is taxed at the time of the transfer of the place of effective management of the company. 7 The Court also commented that the host member state generally will take account of capital gains and losses realized regarding those assets after the transfer of the place of management but: a possible omission by the host Member State to take account of decreases in value does not impose any obligation on the Member State of origin to revalue, at the time of realisation of the asset concerned, a tax debt which was definitively determined at the time when the company in question...ceased to be subject to tax in the latter Member State. 8 The Court explained that the TFEU: offers no guarantee to a company...that transferring its place of effective management to another Member State will be neutral as regards taxation...such a transfer may be to the company s advantage or not, according to circumstances. 9 Immediate Recovery of Tax at Time of Transfer The Court accepted that the recovery of the tax debt at the time of actual realization in the host Member State of the asset for which a capital gain was established by the member state of origin may avoid the FEATURED PERSPECTIVES cash-flow problems which could be produced by the immediate recovery of the tax due on unrealised capital gains. 10 Administrative Burden The Court noted that there could be a significant administrative burden if the tax debt was deferred, particularly if a large number of assets were involved. In such cases, the Court highlighted that: an accurate cross-border tracing of the destiny of all the items making up the company s fixed and current assets until the realised capital gains incorporated into those assets are realised is almost impossible, and that such tracing will entail efforts representing a considerable or even excessive burden for the company in question. 11 This might represent a hindrance to the freedom of establishment just as harmful as the immediate recovery of the tax debt. On the other hand, the Court recognized that there would be occasions when the nature and extent of the company s assets would make it easy to carry out the cross-border tracing of such assets. Therefore, in coming to its determination on the issue of proportionality, the Court concluded that proportionate national rules could offer a choice to a company transferring its place of effective management to another member state between first, the immediate payment of the tax with no subsequent administrative burden but with a definite cash flow disadvantage and second, deferred payment of the tax with an administrative burden regarding the tracing of the assets. Such rules would be more proportionate that the Dutch rules at issue. In such circumstances, the Court commented that if the company considered that the administrative burden in connection with deferred recovery was excessive, it could opt for immediate payment of the tax. 12 The Court also pointed out that account should also be taken of the risk of non-recovery of the tax and held that that risk could be taken into account by the member state in designing its rules applicable to deferred payments of tax debts, indicating that measures such as the provision of a bank guarantee might be appropriate. Mutual Assistance The Court indicated that the mutual assistance directive and recovery of taxes directive were sufficient to enable the member state of origin to check the truthfulness of the tax declarations made by companies that opt for deferred payment of tax and to actually recover the tax debt in the host member state. 6 Id. at para Id. at para Id. at para Id. at para Id. at para Id. at para Id. at para. 73. TAX NOTES INTERNATIONAL JANUARY 16,
4 FEATURED PERSPECTIVES Coherence of Tax System The Court accepted that the requirements of coherence of the tax system and the balanced allocation of powers of taxation coincide. 13 However, it pointed out that only the determination of the amount of tax at the time of the transfer, and not the immediate recovery of the tax, should be regarded as not going beyond what was necessary for achieving that objective. The Court explained that deferred recovery of the tax: would not call into question the link existing in the Netherlands legislation between, on the one hand, the tax advantage represented by the exemption allowed to unrealised capital gains relating to assets as long as a company obtains profits taxable in the Netherlands and, on the other, the offsetting of that advantage by a charge to tax determined at the time when that company ceases to obtain such profits. 14 Risk of Tax Avoidance Finally, the Court dismissed the argument that the Dutch rules were justified by the need to prevent tax avoidance, pointing out that: the mere fact that a company transfers its place of management to another Member State cannot set up a general presumption of tax evasion and justify a measure which compromises the exercise of a fundamental freedom. 15 The Court s Conclusion The Court concluded that article 49 of the TFEU must be interpreted as not precluding national exit tax rules that fix the amount of tax definitively, without taking into account decreases or increases in value that may occur after the date of transfer of the place of effective management. However, the Court held that article 49 of the TFEU precludes national exit tax rules that provide for the immediate recovery of tax on unrealized gains of a company at the time it transfers its place of effective management to another member state. Analysis The judgment of the Court in National Grid Indus is one of the Court s most significant judgments of 2011 and a landmark case in the Court s jurisprudence. The Court resolved a number of important issues concerning corporate emigration and corporate exit taxes, in particular, whether the Dutch company could rely on the freedom of establishment in the circumstances of 13 Id. at para Id. at para Id. at para. 84. the case and whether exit tax rules (which required immediate recovery of taxation upon emigration) were compatible with EU law. The Court provided further guidance on cash flow disadvantages caused by the rules of one member state and confirmed that the need to preserve the allocation of taxing powers between the member states is a legitimate general interest objective for national tax legislation. The Court also pointed out that both the need to ensure the coherence of the tax system and the need to prevent tax avoidance were not acceptable justifications in this case. Finally, the Court distinguished the circumstances of the National Grid Indus case from those that existed in the N case. Freedom of Establishment The ECJ has continued to develop the concept of freedom of establishment in its jurisprudence over the past 50 years. In Daily Mail (Case 81/87), the Court stated that: in the present state of Community law Articles 52 and 58 of the Treaty, properly construed, confer no right on a company incorporated under the legislation of a Member State and having its registered office there to transfer its central management and control to another Member State. Thus, in 1988, when the judgment in Daily Mail was delivered, it appeared that freedom of establishment did not apply to companies transferring their central management and control to another member state. This position was not really clarified in the Court s jurisprudence until Cartesio (C-210/06) and National Grid Indus. Cartesio In Cartesio, a Hungarian limited liability partnership transferred its registered office to Italy. Hungarian rules did not allow a company incorporated in Hungary to transfer its seat abroad while continuing to be subject to Hungarian law as its personal law. The Court held that: a Member State has the power to define both the connecting factor required of a company if it is to be regarded as incorporated under the law of that Member State and, as such, capable of enjoying the right of establishment, and that required if the company is to be able subsequently to maintain that status. That power includes the possibility for that Member State not to permit a company governed by its law to retain that status if the company intends to reorganise itself in another Member State by moving its seat to the territory of the latter, thereby breaking the connecting factor required under the national law of the Member State of incorporation Cartesio, para JANUARY 16, 2012 TAX NOTES INTERNATIONAL
5 The Court went on to highlight that: the situation where the seat of a company incorporated under the law of one Member State is transferred to another Member State with no change as regards the law which governs that company falls to be distinguished from the situation where a company governed by the law of one Member State moves to another Member State with an attendant change as regards the national law applicable, since in the latter situation the company is converted into a form of company which is governed by the law of the Member State to which it has moved. 17 National Grid Indus This reasoning was applied by the Court in its National Grid Indus judgment. The Court noted: the transfer by National Grid Indus of its place of effective management to the United Kingdom did not, however, affect its status as a company incorporated under Netherlands law, in accordance with that law, which applies the incorporation theory to companies. 18 Therefore, the Dutch company could rely on the freedom of establishment. The Court pointed out that the Dutch company, therefore: benefits, in accordance with Article 54 TFEU, from the Treaty provisions on freedom of establishment, and can thus rely on its rights under Article 49 TFEU, in particular for challenging the lawfulness of a tax imposed on it by that Member State on the occasion of the transfer of its place of effective management to another Member State. 19 Evolution of EU Law The National Grid Indus case demonstrates that EU law is constantly evolving. In Cartesio, the Court determined that conversion situations fell within the scope of freedom of establishment. In SEVIC (C-411/ 03), the Court determined that a merger situation fell within the scope of establishment. Now, in National Grid Indus, the Court has concluded that the transfer of the place of effective management of a company incorporated in an EU member state, whose national law FEATURED PERSPECTIVES allows the company to remain in existence after the transfer of the place of effective management, also falls within the scope of the freedom of establishment. The judgment is to be welcomed for adding some significant clarity to exit tax situations in the EU, but it has equally generated the puzzling question of whether the member state of arrival (the host state) must grant a step-up in value for the assets on the date of arrival. In other words, can the host member state impose capital gains tax on the acquisition cost of those assets rather than on their market value on the date of arrival in the host member state? If no step-up is granted, then clearly, double taxation is possible. Applying the reasoning of the Court in Kerckhaert-Morres (C-513/04), it may be that such double taxation must be accepted given the current state of development of EU law because, as the Court noted in Kerckhaert-Morres: the adverse consequences which might arise from the application of an income tax system such as the Belgian system at issue...result from the exercise in parallel by two Member States of their fiscal sovereignty. 20 Moreover, in National Grid Indus, the Court, recalling its previous case law, highlighted that: the Treaty offers no guarantee to a company covered by Article 54 TFEU that transferring its place of effective management to another Member State will be neutral as regards taxation. Given the relevant disparities in the tax legislation of the Member States, such a transfer may be to the company s advantage in terms of tax or not, according to circumstances. 21 Indirect Discrimination One final thought is that it may be possible to argue that the host state rules, which fail to grant the step-up in value upon the transfer of the place of effective management of the company from another member state, amount to indirect discrimination. In other words, even though they are even-handed in nature, such rules mainly affect foreigners because it will usually be foreigners who transfer their place of effective management to the host member state in the exercise of their right of establishment and are prejudiced by such rules. This line of argument can be found in O Flynn (C-237/94) and in tax judgments such as Biehl (C-175/88) and Ritter-Coulais (C-152/03). 17 Id. at para National Grid Indus, para Id. at para Kerckhaert-Morres, para National Grid Indus, para. 62. TAX NOTES INTERNATIONAL JANUARY 16,
News Analysis: ECJ Sorts Out Deductibility of University Fees
Volume 58, Number 11 June 14, 2010 News Analysis: ECJ Sorts Out Deductibility of University Fees by Tom O Shea Reprinted from Tax Notes Int l, June 14, 2010, p. 870 Reprinted from Tax Notes Int l, June
More informationJUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Grand Chamber) 29 November 2011 (*)
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Grand Chamber) 29 November 2011 (*) (Transfer of a company s place of effective management to a Member State other than that in which it is incorporated Freedom of establishment
More informationEU constraints on recent and expected tax changes in Belgium
EU constraints on recent and expected tax changes in Belgium D. Garabedian Madrid, 31 May 2014 Brussels London - www.liedekerke.com Overview Notional interest deduction (NID) Fairness tax Hybrid loans
More informationEXIT TAXATION. Publication of European Union Direct Taxes Centre of Excellence (EUDT CoE) NATIONAL DEVELOP- MENTS IN EUROPE EXIT TAXATION
NOVEMBER 2015 EDITION 1 WWW.BDO.NL Publication of European Union Direct Taxes Centre of Excellence (EUDT CoE) IN EUROPE PAGE 2 THE NATIONAL GRID INDUS DECISION PAGE 2 NATIONAL DEVELOP- MENTS IN EUROPE
More informationECJ Rules Dissolution of a Company Not the Same as Liquidation
Volume 69, Number 7 February 18, 2013 ECJ Rules Dissolution of a Company Not the Same as Liquidation by Tom O Shea Reprinted from Tax Notes Int l, February 18, 2013, p. 675 ECJ Rules Dissolution of a Company
More informationPortugal's Capital Gains Tax Rules in Violation of EC Treaty, ECJ Rules by Tom O'Shea
Portugal's Capital Gains Tax Rules in Violation of EC Treaty, ECJ Rules by Tom O'Shea The European Court of Justice recently issued a judgment in Erika Waltraud Ilse Hollmann v. Fazenda Pública (C-443/06),
More informationECJ Finds Finnish Withholding Tax Rules Unacceptable in Luxembourg SICAV Case
Volume 55, Number 4 July 27, 2009 ECJ Finds Finnish Withholding Tax Rules Unacceptable in Luxembourg SICAV Case by Tom O Shea Reprinted from Tax Notes Int l, July 27, 2009, p. 305 ECJ Finds Finnish Withholding
More informationEuropean Direct Tax Policy: Harmonisation versus Coordination. Dr Tom O Shea Queen Mary, University of London t.o shea@qmul.ac.uk
European Direct Tax Policy: Harmonisation versus Coordination Dr Tom O Shea Queen Mary, University of London t.o shea@qmul.ac.uk The Regulatory Framework for Tax in the EU ECHR EU Law International Law
More informationFrom Daily Mail to Cartesio a case for the
From Daily Mail to Cartesio a case for the consistency of the ECJ? By Kay Kimkana 1. INTRODUCTION On 16 December 2008, the European Court of Justice delivered its judgment in Cartesio 1 where it ruled
More informationRestriction Analysis in ECJ Tax Jurisprudence relating to the Freedom of Establishment: Is the Court reinventing the wheel?
Restriction Analysis in ECJ Tax Jurisprudence relating to the Freedom of Establishment: Is the Court reinventing the wheel? Gabrielle Pizzuto 1 1. Recent ECJ cases Two recent cases delivered by the ECJ
More informationECJ Upholds Swedish Rules on Taxation of Beer, Wine by Tom O'Shea
ECJ Upholds Swedish Rules on Taxation of Beer, Wine by Tom O'Shea The European Court of Justice on April 8 issued its judgment in European Commission v. Sweden (C-167/05), ruling that Sweden's tax treatment
More informationFreedom to Provide Services. Henriette Boecken
Freedom to Provide Services Henriette Boecken Table of Contents A. Freedom to Provide Services, Art. 56 TFEU B. Case: Bundesdruckerei vs. Stadt Dortmund C. Opinions on the Issue D. Situation in Germany
More informationBelgian Dividend Tax Treatment of Nonresidents Illegal, ECJ Says
Volume 68, Number 3 October 15, 2012 Belgian Dividend Tax Treatment of Nonresidents Illegal, ECJ Says by David Mussche Reprinted from Tax Notes Int l, October 15, 2012, p. 258 Reprinted from Tax Notes
More information15. 2. 2. 2. Is Section 10d of the Corporate Income Tax Act consistent with Article 9 of the OECD Model Tax Convention?
CHAPTER 15. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 15. 1. Introduction The main question addressed in this PhD thesis is whether the restrictions placed by Dutch law on deducting interest for corporate income tax purposes
More informationCross-Border Group Relief and ECJ case law
Cross-Border Group Relief and ECJ case law Lecture on Wednesday, 13th July 2005 Lecturer: Chair of General Business Administration and Taxation Prof. Dr. Ulrich Schreiber 1. Introduction 2. Economic Requirements
More informationSYLLABUS BASICS OF INTERNATIONAL TAXATION. ! States levy taxes by virtue of their sovereignty
SYLLABUS BASICS OF INTERNATIONAL TAXATION! States levy taxes by virtue of their sovereignty! Tax sovereignty, however, is not unlimited. There must either be a personal or an objective connection between
More informationPAPER 3.01 EU DIRECT TAX OPTION
THE ADVANCED DIPLOMA IN INTERNATIONAL TAXATION June 2015 PAPER 3.01 EU DIRECT TAX OPTION ADVANCED INTERNATIONAL TAXATION (THEMATIC) Suggested solutions Question 1 In Article 1, the following new provisions
More informationTAX DEVELOPMENTS IN POLAND UPDATE 2009
TAX DEVELOPMENTS IN POLAND UPDATE 2009 WARDYŃSKI & PARTNERS TAX PRACTICE APRIL 2010 1/8 INTRODUCTION The purpose of this report is to present key tax developments in Poland in 2009 which may be relevant
More informationInternational Tax Alert
Global Insights A Review of Key Regulatory Issues Impacting International Tax Practices European Union: German dividend withholding tax violates the principle of free movement of capital (ECJ, October
More informationEuropean Union Law and Online Gambling by Marcos Charif
With infringement proceedings, rulings by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) and the ongoing lack of online gambling regulation at EU level, it is important to understand the extent to which member states
More informationTax Relief for Gifts To European Charities. UK tax law provides a number of reliefs and exemptions connected to charities.
Tax Relief for Gifts To European Charities Introduction UK tax law provides a number of reliefs and exemptions connected to charities. For example, the Gift Aid scheme allows donations to be deducted from
More informationEMS-Bulgaria Transport OOD v Direktor na Direktsia Obzhalvane i upravlenie na
EMS-Bulgaria Transport OOD v Direktor na Direktsia Obzhalvane i upravlenie na izpalnenieto Particulars Plovdiv Judgment of 12 July 2012 in Case C-284/11 Reference for a preliminary ruling: Supreme Administrative
More informationThe positioning of Cyprus as a leading international business centre has been
European directive helps The incorporation into local law of the EU merger directive has created the possibility of tax-neutral international mergers using, explains Sophie Stylianou of Eurofast Taxand
More informationINCOME TAX PRACTICES MAINTAINED BY BELGIUM. Report of the Panel presented to the Council of Representatives on 12 November 1976 (L/4424-23S/127)
2 November 1976 INCOME TAX PRACTICES MAINTAINED BY BELGIUM Report of the Panel presented to the Council of Representatives on 12 November 1976 (L/4424-23S/127) 1. The Panel's terms of reference were established
More informationEurope. NEW OPPORTUNITIES FOR DIVIDEND WITHHOLDING TAX REFUNDS EU / EEA Tax Exempt Entities Handbook
Europe NEW OPPORTUNITIES FOR DIVIDEND WITHHOLDING TAX REFUNDS EU / EEA Tax Exempt Entities Handbook 3rd Edition April 2012 I n t r o d u c t i o n We are pleased to present the third edition of this handbook,
More informationNondiscriminatory Taxation of Foreign Taxpayers With Special Regard to Deduction of Personal Expenses, Personal Allowances, and Tax Rates
Proceedings from the 2009 Sho Sato Conference on Tax Law, Social Policy, and the Economy Nondiscriminatory Taxation of Foreign Taxpayers With Special Regard to Deduction of Personal Expenses, Personal
More informationChanging residence involves (too) many tax problems, both for individuals and companies.
Changingresidenceinvolves(too)manytaxproblems, bothforindividualsandcompanies. Changing residence is among the most sensitive topics for international tax practitioners.residenceoftaxpayersisakeyfactorinthedeterminationofthe
More informationItalian corporate income tax for foreign investors
Italian corporate income tax for foreign investors 05 October 15 Corporate income tax Italian corporate income tax (imposta sul reddito delle società, or IRES) is due by resident companies on their worldwide
More informationOpinion of Advocate General Mengozzi, 25 May 2011 1. Case C-493/09. European Commission v Portuguese Republic. I Introduction
AG Opinion of Advocate General Mengozzi, 25 May 2011 1 Case C-493/09 European Commission v Portuguese Republic I Introduction 1. By its action brought on 1 December 2009, the European Commission seeks
More informationQuantitative restrictions on imports and all measures having equivalent effect shall be prohibited between Member States.
The Legal Helpdesk Support Schemes and Free Movement Law An overview over the latest developments Dr. Dörte Fouquet, Rechtsanwältin, Partner, BBH Jana Viktoria Nysten, LL.M., Advocaat, Attorney at law,
More informationInsurance Europe response to the EC consultation on the re-launch of the Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base (CCCTB)
Position Paper Insurance Europe response to the EC consultation on the re-launch of the Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base (CCCTB) Our reference: Referring to: ECO-TAX-15-165 Date: 6 January 2016 European
More informationTAX PLANNING INTERNATIONAL
TAX PLANNING INTERNATIONAL EUROPEAN TAX SERVICE International Information for International Business >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> VOLUME 17, NUMBER 3 >>> MARCH 2015 www.bna.com EU Financial Transaction
More informationTreatment of Outsourced Elements of Payment Transactions under EU VAT
European Union Dr R.N.F. Zuidgeest* Treatment of Outsourced Elements of Payment Transactions under EU VAT In this article, the author comments on two recent ECJ judgments, in Axa and Everything Everywhere,
More informationMain characteristics of EU Law Relations between EU Law and National Legal Systems
European Institute of Public Administration - Institut européen d administration publique Main characteristics of EU Law Relations between EU Law and National Legal Systems Tomasz KRAMER Lecturer European
More informationCross Border Tax Issues
Cross Border Tax Issues By Reinhold G. Krahn December 2000 This is a general overview of the subject matter and should not be relied upon as legal advice or opinion. For specific legal advice on the information
More informationCooperative compliance at the crossroad of different legal frameworks Cooperative compliance in the light of the EU State aid rules
Cooperative compliance at the crossroad of different legal frameworks Cooperative compliance in the light of the EU State aid rules Cooperative Compliance: Breaking the Barriers Vienna, 14-15 April 2016
More informationEU Competition Law. Article 101 and Article 102. January 2010. Contents
EU Competition Law January 2010 Contents Article 101 The requirements of Article 101(1) Exemptions under Article 101(3) Article 102 Dominant position Abuse of a dominant position Procedural issues Competition
More informationTAXATION OF CROSS BORDER PENSION PROVISION Danish National Report
TAXATION OF CROSS BORDER PENSION PROVISION Danish National Report Professor, dr. jur. Niels Winther-Sørensen Law Department, Copenhagen Business School 1. Danish Schemes for Pension Provision The Danish
More informationTAX INFORMATION EUROPEAN UNION FREEDOMS, DISCRIMINATION AND TAXATION IN PORTUGAL. PLMJ Advising with Value. June 2010
TAX INFORMATION PLMJ Advising with Value June 2010 EUROPEAN UNION FREEDOMS, DISCRIMINATION AND TAXATION IN PORTUGAL Portuguese Law Firm of the Year Chambers Europe Excellence 2009, IFLR Awards 2006 & Who
More informationRecent developments regarding Mexico s tax treaty network and relevant court precedents
Recent developments regarding Mexico s tax treaty network and relevant court precedents Mexico has a relatively short background on the negotiation and application of treaties for the avoidance of double
More informationBenefits for Collective Investment Vehicles in the EU
Volume 68, Number 6 November 5, 2012 Benefits for Collective Investment Vehicles in the EU by Petrina Smyth and Eimear Burbridge Reprinted from Tax Notes Int l, November 5, 2012, p. 581 Benefits for Collective
More informationEU State Aid and Tax Law
European Court finds that Spanish tax rules were not unlawful state aid because they did not give a selective advantage SUMMARY In two recent cases on fiscal state aid, the General Court of the European
More informationSupreme Court Judgment in Coventry and Ors v Lawrence and another [2015] UKSC 50
Alerter 24 th July 2015 Supreme Court Judgment in Coventry and Ors v Lawrence and another [2015] UKSC 50 The Supreme Court has handed down its Judgment in Coventry v Lawrence in which it considered the
More informationSpain Tax Alert. Corporate tax reform enacted. Tax rate. Tax-deductible expenses. International Tax. 2 December 2014
International Tax Spain Tax Alert 2 December 2014 Corporate tax reform enacted Contacts Brian Leonard bleonard@deloitte.es Francisco Martin Barrios fmartinbarrios@deloitte.es Elena Blanque elblanque@deloitte.es
More informationCouncil of the European Union Brussels, 12 September 2014 (OR. en)
Council of the European Union Brussels, 12 September 2014 (OR. en) Interinstitutional File: 2013/0409 (COD) 13132/14 NOTE From: To: Presidency DROIPEN 104 COPEN 218 CODEC 1799 Working Party on Substantive
More informationTax liability for non-resident enterprises engaging in service provision
Tax liability for non-resident enterprises engaging in service provision More and more European companies are facing the question of whether they actually have to pay taxes in China when providing services
More informationCorporate mobility in the EU -Freedom of establishment for national companies
Corporate mobility in the EU -Freedom of establishment for national companies Bachelor s thesis within European company law Author: Tutor: Axel Wedin Petra Inwinkl Jönköping 2010 Bachelor sthesis in European
More informationProf. Dr. Ana Paula Dourado. The Institutional Framework of the European Union and its Competence on Tax Matters
Prof. Dr. Ana Paula Dourado The Institutional Framework of the European Union and its Competence on Tax Matters 1957 1988 1994 2009/ 10 MS Eurozone Outside it EEA (1 Jan. 1994) Norway, Iceland Liechtens
More informationFrance Updates Foreign Tax Relief Rules for Residents
Volume 80, Number 3 October 19, 2015 France Updates Foreign Tax Relief Rules for Residents by Philippe Derouin Reprinted from Tax Notes Int l, October 19, 2015, p. 261 France Updates Foreign Tax Relief
More informationCCBE comments on the proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on singlemember private limited liability companies
Conseil des barreaux européens Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europe Association internationale sans but lucratif Rue Joseph II, 40 /8 1000 Bruxelles T. : +32 (0)2 234 65 10 F. : +32 (0)2 234 65
More informationConsolidation, discounts and non-discrimination in the Belgian postal market
Belgian Institute for postal services and telecommunications Consolidation, discounts and non-discrimination in the Belgian postal market WIK Conference February 11th 2015 AXEL DESMEDT MEMBER OF THE BIPT
More informationReceita Federal do Brasil (RFB) www.receita.fazenda.gov.br 1 January to 31 December Last working day of April following end of tax year
Worldwide personal tax guide 2013 2014 Brazil Local Information Tax Authority Receita Federal do Brasil (RFB) Website www.receita.fazenda.gov.br Tax Year 1 January to 31 December Tax Return due date: Last
More information3. The Chairman noted that almost all delegations could agree to the Presidency compromise.
Council of the European Union Brussels, 17 June 2016 (OR. en) Interinstitutional File: 2016/0011 (CNS) 10426/16 FISC 104 ECOFIN 628 OUTCOME OF PROCEEDINGS From: On: 17 June 2016 To: General Secretariat
More informationJUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Seventh Chamber) 12 December 2013 (*)
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Seventh Chamber) 12 December 2013 (*) (Request for a preliminary ruling Freedom to provide services Grants of public money, co-financed by the European Social Fund, for students
More informationHolding companies in Ireland
Holding companies in Irel David Lawless Paul Moloney Dillon Eustace, Dublin Irel has long been a destination of choice for holding companies because of its low corporation tax rate of 12.5 percent, participation
More informationCross-border loss relief and group taxation
Loss relief and group taxation Cross-border loss relief and group taxation Timothy Lyons QC 7 th May 2012 Loss Relief and Group Taxation (1) Participating in the internal market: The nature of the company
More information235.1. Federal Act on Data Protection (FADP) Aim, Scope and Definitions
English is not an official language of the Swiss Confederation. This translation is provided for information purposes only and has no legal force. Federal Act on Data Protection (FADP) 235.1 of 19 June
More informationBelgium: A new obligation to declare foreign private wealth structures
Belgium: A new obligation to declare foreign private wealth structures Gerd D Goyvaerts* Introduction Over the last decade Belgium has been evolving from a country with a fairly beneficial tax system for
More informationImplementation of the EU tax directives in Poland
Bartosz Bacia Implementation of the EU tax directives in Poland Since Poland joined the EU on May 1 2004, Polish tax law need to be adapted to the EU Council directives for the member states. The new legal
More informationProvinces and territories also impose income taxes on individuals in addition to federal taxes
Worldwide personal tax guide 2013 2014 Canada Local information Tax Authority Website Tax Year Tax Return due date Is joint filing possible Are tax return extensions possible Canada Revenue Agency (CRA)
More informationBelgium in international tax planning
Belgium in international tax planning Presented by Bernard Peeters and Mieke Van Zandweghe, tax division at Tiberghien Belgium has improved its tax climate considerably in recent years. This may be illustrated
More informationLimited Liability Partnership (LLP) versus Limited Company
Limited Liability Partnership (LLP) versus Limited Company December 2012 Since their introduction in 2000, LLPs have become an increasingly popular choice of entity for both trading and investment businesses.
More informationSPECIFIC TAX REGIMES AND EUROPEAN STATE AID RULES: THE UK AGGREGATES LEVY
EU LAW SPECIFIC TAX REGIMES AND EUROPEAN STATE AID RULES: THE UK AGGREGATES LEVY Case T-210/02 British Aggregates Association v Commission judgment dated 7 March 2012 LAURA ELIZABETH JOHN JULY 2012 Whether
More informationStatement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 7. Consolidated Financial Statements
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 7 Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 7 Consolidated Financial Statements 30 November 2004 Translated by Wei-heng Lin, Associate Professor (Chung
More informationGLOBAL GUIDE TO M&A TAX
Quality tax advice, globally GLOBAL GUIDE TO M&A TAX 2013 EDITION www.taxand.com CYPRUS Cyprus From a Buyer s Perspective 1. What are the main differences among acquisitions made through a share deal versus
More informationBudget 2016 CHANGES IN DUTCH TAXATION FOR 2016. www.fi sconti.com
Budget 2016 CHANGES IN DUTCH TAXATION FOR 2016 www.fi sconti.com Table of contents Changes in Dutch payroll and income tax Tax credits and rates in 2016 ----------- 3 Emigration of substantial interest
More informationTax Update Transfer of Assets Abroad and the Impact of EC Law
Tax Update Transfer of Assets Abroad and the Impact of EC Law Amanda Hardy QC 15 Old Square Lincoln's Inn London, WC2A 3UE Tel: 02072422744 Email: taxchambers@15oldsquare.co.uk Website: www.taxchambers.co.uk
More informationHuman rights, property and the Recovery of Medical Costs for Asbestos Diseases (Wales) Bill in the Supreme Court
Human rights, property and the Recovery of Medical Costs for Asbestos Diseases (Wales) Bill in the Supreme Court Frankie McCarthy* The Recovery of Medical Costs for Asbestos Diseases (Wales) Bill was referred
More informationTHE ORDINARY AND EXTRAORDINARY POWER OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE. David Goldberg
THE ORDINARY AND EXTRAORDINARY POWER OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE David Goldberg The amount of tax collected by a state or, for that matter, by any taxing authority is a function of two things. First,
More informationState Aid, Subsidy and Tax Incentives under EU and WTO Law. Claire Micheau. 0 Wolters Kluwer Law & Business
State Aid, Subsidy and Tax Incentives under EU and WTO Law Claire Micheau 0 Wolters Kluwer Law & Business Summary of Contents About the Author Table of Contents List of Abbreviations Acknowledgements vii
More informationTackling Managed Service Companies
Tackling Managed Service Companies Response by The Chartered Institute of Taxation to the consultation document Tackling Managed Service Companies and the further draft legislation published in the document
More informationIncome in the Netherlands is categorised into boxes. The above table relates to Box 1 income.
Worldwide personal tax guide 2013 2014 The Netherlands Local information Tax Authority Website Tax Year Tax Return due date Is joint filing possible Are tax return extensions possible Belastingdienst www.belastingdienst.nl
More informationWe are responding to the consultation entitled VAT: Mini One Stop Shop Consequential amendments to the VAT Regulations 1995 (SI 1995/2518).
Ref: ITX 1 September 2014 Andy Heywood HMRC, VAT Supply Policy Team, Indirect Tax Directorate, 3rd Floor, 100 Parliament Street, London, SW1A 2BQ. via e-mail: andrew.heywood@hmrc.gsi.gov.uk Dear Mr Heywood
More informationEuropean Council Brussels, 2 February 2016 (OR. en)
European Council Brussels, 2 February 2016 (OR. en) EUCO 4/16 NOTE To: Subject: Delegations Draft Decision of the Heads of State or Government, meeting within the European Council, concerning a New Settlement
More informationA company that creates insurance contracts not being life insurance contracts.
The Netherlands International Comparison of Insurance * May 2009 The Netherlands General Insurance Definition Accounting Definition of property and casualty insurance company A company that creates insurance
More information2013 Thinking Beyond Borders
INTERNATIONAL EXECUTIVE SERVICES 2013 Thinking Beyond Borders United Kingdom kpmg.com United Kingdom Introduction An individual s liability to income tax in the United Kingdom (UK) is determined by residence
More informationEU Tax Alert. Share the Expertise
EU Tax Alert December 2012 - edition 111 The EU Tax Alert is an e-mail newsletter to inform you of recent developments in the EU that are of interest for tax professionals. It includes recent case law
More informationInvestments in Associates and Joint Ventures
IFAC Board Exposure Draft 50 October 2013 Comments due: February 28, 2014 Proposed International Public Sector Accounting Standard Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures This Exposure Draft 50, Investments
More informationNews Flash. September, 2015. Tax guide for property investment in Hungary
News Flash September, 2015 Tax guide for property investment in Hungary Tax guide for property investment in Hungary In our current newsletter we would like to inform you about the most important taxation
More informationTAXATION OF FOREIGN INCOME ISRAELI RESIDENTS
TAXATION FOREIGN INCOME FELDMAN BRODY & Associates January 2010 No part of this publication may be reproduced without permission Website: www.feldmanbrody.com While every effort has been made to ensure
More informationEU Tax Alert. Commission s package addressing cross-border inheritance tax problems IN THIS EDITION: Edition 101 January 2012
EU Tax Alert Edition 101 January 2012 Advocate General opines that legislation not allowing companies of other Member States to convert into a national company is in breach of the freedom of establishment
More informationMALTA: A JURISDICTION OF CHOICE
MALTA: A JURISDICTION OF CHOICE LONDON - September 2012 Doing business from Malta can make a huge difference for your business UHY BUSINESS ADVISORY SERVICES LIMITED Updated September, 2012 An attractive
More informationTerms of Access to Payment Systems
1 Terms of Access to Payment Systems The Different Positions of Small and Large Banks English summary of Swedish Competition Authority report 2006:1 2 Summary The Swedish banking market is dominated by
More informationVAT Treatment of Cross Border Transactions in the Single Market
RESPONSE TO GREEN PAPER COM (2010) 695 On the Future of VAT Introduction The European Council of Optometry and Optics (ECOO) would like to thank you for this opportunity to submit views. As an organisation
More information25*$1,6$7,21)25(&2120,&&223(5$7,21$1''(9(/230(17
25*$1,6$7,21)25(&2120,&&223(5$7,21$1''(9(/230(17 &URVVERUGHU,QFRPH7D[,VVXHV$ULVLQJIURP (PSOR\HH6WRFN2SWLRQ3ODQV &(175()257$;32/,&
More informationReal Estate Going Global Netherlands
www.pwc.com/goingglobal Real Estate Going Global Netherlands Tax and legal aspects of real estate investments around the globe 2012 Real Estate Going Global Netherlands 1 Contents Contents Contents...
More informationEUROPEAN UNION ACCOUNTING RULE 17 REVENUE FROM NON-EXCHANGE TRANSACTIONS (TAXES AND TRANSFERS)
EUROPEAN UNION ACCOUNTING RULE 17 REVENUE FROM NON-EXCHANGE TRANSACTIONS (TAXES AND TRANSFERS) Page 2 of 26 I N D E X 1. Introduction... 3 2. Objective... 3 3. Scope... 3 4. Definitions... 4 5. Non-exchange
More informationTax Brief. 1 August 2012. Messenger Press the foreign exchange gain/loss saga continues. 1 Facts and issues
Tax Brief 1 August 2012 Messenger Press the foreign exchange gain/loss saga continues At first glance, the Federal Court decision in Messenger Press Proprietary Limited v FCT looks like old news (forgive
More informationTAX ASPECTS REGARDING THE MERGER AND DIVISION
TAX ASPECTS REGARDING THE MERGER AND DIVISION Ph.D. Associate Professor BRAGĂ FILOFTEIA VIORICA Spiru Haret University, Faculty of Accounting and Finance Câmpulung, viobraga@yahoo.com Ph.D. Lecturer NĂFTĂNĂILĂ
More informationConsolidated Financial Statements and Investments in Subsidiaries
LEMBAGA PIAWAIAN PERAKAUNAN MALAYSIA MALAYSIAN ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD MASB Standard 11 Consolidated Financial Statements and Investments in Subsidiaries Any correspondence regarding this Standard should
More informationHow Canada Taxes Foreign Income
- 1 - How Canada Taxes Foreign Income (Summary) Purpose of the book The purpose of writing this book, entitled How Canada Taxes Foreign Income is particularly for the benefit of foreign tax lawyers, accountants,
More informationSpanish Tax Facts. The Expatriate Financial Guide to Spain
The Expatriate Financial Guide to Spain Spanish Tax Facts Introduction Tax Year Assessment Basis Taxation in Spain occurs at a national level and at a regional ( Autonomous Community ) or municipal level.
More informationIMPLEMENTING ENHANCED COOPERATION IN THE AREA OF FINANCIAL TRANSACTION TAX
IMPLEMENTING ENHANCED COOPERATION IN THE AREA OF FINANCIAL TRANSACTION TAX RESPONSE TO THE OPINION OF THE LEGAL SERVICE OF THE COUNCIL 1 ON THE LEGALITY OF THE COUNTERPARTY-BASED DEEMED ESTABLISHMENT OF
More informationSurvey on the Societas Europaea September 2003 Annex 6 - Germany GERMANY. International Bureau of Fiscal Documentation 1
Annex 6 - Germany GERMANY International Bureau of Fiscal Documentation 1 Abbreviations: - EStG -> Einkommensteuergesetz Income Tax Law - GewStG -> Gewerbesteuergesetz Municipal Business Tax Law - KStG
More informationCAN GENDER DIFFERENTIATED ACTUARIAL FACTORS STILL BE USED WHEN DETERMINING PREMIUMS AND BENEFITS UNDER INSURANCE CONTRACTS? THE TEST-ACHATS CASE
A&L GOODBODY BONELLI EREDE PAPPALARDO BREDIN PRAT CAN GENDER DIFFERENTIATED ACTUARIAL FACTORS STILL BE USED WHEN DETERMINING PREMIUMS AND BENEFITS UNDER INSURANCE CONTRACTS? THE TEST-ACHATS CASE DE BRAUW
More informationEXTRATERRITORIAL ENFORCEMENT OF TAX LAWS
EXTRATERRITORIAL ENFORCEMENT OF TAX LAWS Rita Correia da Cunha 1- ABSTRACT Extraterritorial enforcement of tax laws refers to the attempt of states to collect revenue beyond their territories. It is a
More informationUnited Kingdom Taxation
United Kingdom Taxation FUNDS AND FUND MANAGEMENT 2010 3.1 Taxation of funds Authorized open-ended mutual funds in the United Kingdom are organized as authorized unit trusts (AUTs) or open-ended investment
More informationGerman Tax Facts. The Expatriate Financial Guide to Germany
The Expatriate Financial Guide to Germany German Tax Facts Introduction Tax Year Assessment Basis Income Tax Taxation in Germany occurs at a national and municipal level. The Ministry of Finance controls
More informationSummary of replies to the public consultation on crossborder inheritance tax obstacles within the EU and possible solutions
EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL TAXATION AND CUSTOMS UNION ANALYSES AND TAX POLICIES Direct tax policy & co-operation Brussels, Summary of replies to the public consultation on crossborder inheritance
More informationJUDGMENT OF THE COURT 7 May 2008 *
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 7 May 2008 * (Freedom of establishment double taxation agreement calculation of maximum credit allowance for tax paid in another EEA State debt interest and group contributions) In
More information