IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION. Chapter 11 Jointly Administered
|
|
- Gwendoline Crystal Rice
- 1 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION In re: LOUIS J. PEARLMAN, et al., Debtor. / Case No. 6:07-bk ABB Chapter 11 Jointly Administered DEFENDANTS 1 OBJECTION TO TRUSTEE S MOTION TO SET CASE MANAGEMENT PROCEDURES AND DISCOVERY PROTOCOL Defendants Howard Dorough, Paula Dorough, and Sweet D, Inc. (collectively, the Defendants ), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby files this objection (the Objection ) to the Trustee s Motion for Order Approving Case Management Procedures and Discovery Protocol [Docket No. 2566] (the Motion ) 2. In support of their Objection, the Defendants state as follows: BACKGROUND 1. The Trustee has filed adversary proceedings against each of the Defendants, along with some nearly 800 others, seeking to recover certain transfers of money utilizing the fraudulent conveyance statutes under Florida state law and the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. 2. Due to the voluminous number of adversary proceedings that the Trustee has filed, he now seeks an Order from this Court to assist him in implementing cost-effective and 1 Adversary Defendant Adversary Case Number Howard Dorough 6:09-ap ABB Paula Dorough 6:09-ap ABB Sweet D, Inc. 6:09-ap ABB 2 Defendants acknowledge that the Trustee s Motion to Establish and Implement Omnibus Procedures for Resolving and/or Settling Certain Adversary Proceedings [Docket No. 2497] is currently pending before the Court, the result of which could be a stay of all adversary proceedings pending the outcome of certain test cases. Defendants file this Objection simply to preserve their objections to the instant Motion. 1
2 efficient discovery procedures. 3. The Trustee asserts that the adversary proceedings can be lumped into some five (5) separate categories. Based on this assertion, the Trustee implies that the facts of each case within each respective category are identical, with the same legal and factual issues. Such is not the case and these cases should not be treated as the same. Each case rests on its own independent facts and should be treated independently absent the parties consent. Specific Objections and Argument 4. For the reasons and legal bases set forth below, Defendants object to the following limitations that the Trustee has proposed in his Motion, which are simply for the Trustee s benefit: a. Paragraph 45 - Trustee seeks to limit each party grouped in the EISA and TCTS Stock cases 3 to ten (10) Interrogatories and fifteen (15) Requests for Admissions; b. Paragraph 46(b) Trustee seeks to impose all costs for withdrawal and return fees charged by any off-site storage provider simply for the Defendants to have the ability to review Trustee s documents; c. Paragraph 46(e) Trustee seeks to limit the discovery of metadata of documents delivered via electronic means; d. Paragraph 51 Trustee seeks to impose a time limit on his or his professionals discovery depositions; e. Paragraph 52 Trustee requests that all deposition testimony be available for use in every other EISA Case or TCTS Stock Case without regard for confidentiality or the fact that one defendant s case has nothing to do with another defendant s 3 The Defendants cases have been identified by the Trustee as falling within the EISA case classification. 2
3 case. 5. All of these requests are solely for the benefit of the Trustee and are highly prejudicial to the Defendants ability to conduct full and complete discovery to allow each to adequately defend the claims asserted against them. 6. While there may come a point within the cases to appropriately seek protective orders or restrict discovery, it is premature at this stage of the litigation to preemptively limit the parties ability to conduct discovery. Argument I. The Discovery Limitations Proposed by Trustee are Prejudicial to the Defendants. While the Defendants acknowledge that this Court has the discretion to limit discovery pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, courts should exercise extreme caution in limiting the initial input of facts and information. See In re Sams, 123 B.R. 788, 792 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 1991). The main purpose of the court s discretion to limit discovery is to protect litigants from annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, or undue burden or expense. In re Mosher, 2009 Bankr. LEXIS 392, *6 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Feb. 11, 2009) citing to Am. Int l Specialty Lines Ins. Co. v. NWI-I, Inc., 240 F.R.D. 401, 412 (N.D. Ill. 2007). Correspondingly, courts utilize the proportionality test of Rule 26(b)(2)(C)(iii) to consider the needs of the case, the amount in controversy, the parties resources, the importance of the issues at stake, and the importance of the discovery in resolving the issues. Id. Despite the fact that the parties are in the very early stages of litigation, a cursory review of the factors in Rule 26(b)(2)(C)(iii) reveal that for most defendants in this case, discovery is absolutely crucial given the Debtor s elegant scheme. The Trustee has chosen to file nearly 800 adversary proceedings in an attempt to recover 3
4 millions of dollars, yet he wants to impose severe and unprecedented limitations 4 on the defendants ability to conduct discovery solely to avoid unnecessarily depleting estate resources without regard to the defendants right to conduct full and complete discovery and adequately defend these claims. Put another way, the Trustee seeks to recover large sums of money from each defendant, but desires to severely limit, on the front end, each defendant s right to conduct full and complete discovery, simply for the benefit of preserving the Estate s resources. Defendants submit that the undue burden or expense portion of the test is not intended to allow courts to limit discovery simply because a plaintiff does not have the resources to properly litigate the claim. The Rules are written to protect both parties and the Plaintiff should be required to participate fully and faithfully. One example of the Trustee s attempts to gain an unreasonable advantage in this case is his effort to impose the costs of withdrawal and return fees simply for the parties requesting that the Trustee produce documents that he currently has in storage. While the Defendants would agree that certain costs such as the cost of photocopying documents is wholly reasonable, imposing a surcharge on each defendant simply to gain access to documents is another example of the Trustee s attempt to impose a one-way burden on the defendants. The Trustee filed the actions and should be required to fully participate in all discovery that is reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence and conducted in good faith in accordance with the Rules. The Trustee should not be afforded the equivalent of a golf game s handicap at the outset of discovery process. II. The Proposed Discovery Limitations are Premature. While the Trustee has unilaterally grouped each adversary proceeding into one of five (5) 4 The Trustee s Motion does not point to any case law to support his requests and Defendant s Counsel has been unable to locate any supporting case law based on the facts of this case. 4
5 self-described categories, there are assuredly certain cases within those categories that have their own facts and circumstances distinct from every other case. Because of this, some cases may require more discovery than others given a more intense fact pattern or a longer history of interaction between the parties. The Trustee seeks to limit certain portions of discovery (Requests for Admissions, Interrogatories, and electronic discovery) before such discovery requests have even been served on the Trustee. Defendants respectfully suggest that the Trustee wait until he is served with the relevant discovery requests, at which point, he will truly be able to make the assertion to this Court that such requests are burdensome. At this point, there are no discovery requests and no burdens to the Trustee or the Estate. Furthermore, for the Court to preemptively restrict discovery without first reviewing the facts of the cases and defendants requesting such discovery would result in a circumvention of the intent of the Rules. 5 Ultimately, the Trustee s motion is not only prejudicial by attempting to impose one-way limitations on the defendants ability to reasonably conduct discovery, but it is wholly premature as the Trustee is merely speculating at what the various parties may seek to discover. Any preemptive restriction will only result in perhaps numerous discovery motions being filed with this Court seeking to undo that which the Trustee currently seeks to have this Court order. WHEREFORE, Defendants Howard Dorough, Paula Dorough, and Sweet D, Inc. request that this Court enter an order denying the Trustee s Motion, and granting such other and further relief as may be deemed just and proper. 5 The Rules are clear that such limitations should not occur until after the discovery requests have been made. To wit, Rule 26 uses phrases such as the discovery sought and the proposed discovery when outlining on what bases courts should consider such limitations. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(2)(C). 5
6 Dated: July 28, 2009 Respectfully submitted, LASSITER TIDWELL DAVIS KELLER & HOGAN, PLLC By: /s/ Jason L. Turner Jason L. Turner Florida Bar No.: One Nashville Place 150 Fourth Avenue North Nashville, TN (615) (phone) (615) (fax) OF COUNSEL: /s/ Henry E. Hildebrand, III Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Esq. 150 Fourth Avenue North, Suite 1850 Nashville, TN TN BPR No.: Phone: (615) Fax: (615) Attorneys for Defendants Howard Dorough, Paula Dorough, and Sweet D, Inc. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that I served a true and correct copy of the foregoing Disclosure of Corporate Interest through the Court s ECF system if available, or by placing same in the U.S. Mail, firstclass and postage pre-paid, to the following persons or parties: Denise D. Dell-Powell, Esquire Akerman Senterfitt 420 S. Orange Ave., Suite 1200 Post Office Box 231 Orlando, FL Michael I. Goldberg, Esquire Akerman Senterfitt Las Olas Centre II, Suite East Las Olas Boulevard Ft. Lauderdale, FL
7 Soneet R. Kapila, Bankruptcy Trustee Post Office Box Fort Lauderdale, FL on this the 28 th day of July, /s/ Jason L. Turner Jason L. Turner 7
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION
Case 6:07-bk-00761-KSJ Doc 4110 Filed 07/16/13 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION In re: LOUIS J. PEARLMAN, et al. / Case No. 6:07-bk-00761-KSJ Chapter
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
Document Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION IN RE: MICHAEL TODD CHRISLEY, Chapter 7 Case No. 13-56132-MGD Debtor. JASON L. PETTIE, CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEE
Case 3:10-bk-02805-PMG Doc 1084 Filed 02/13/12 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION
Case 3:10-bk-02805-PMG Doc 1084 Filed 02/13/12 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION In re: LYDIA CLADEK, INC., Debtor. / CASE NO. 3-10-bk-02805-PMG
Rule 26. General provisions governing discovery.
Article 5. Depositions and Discovery. Rule 26. General provisions governing discovery. (a) Discovery methods. Parties may obtain discovery by one or more of the following methods: depositions upon oral
Case 08-01176-AJC Document 1 Filed 03/01/2008 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION
Case 08-01176-AJC Document 1 Filed 03/01/2008 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION In re: JOSE SANCHEZ Case No.: 01-42230-BKC-AJC and FANNY SANCHEZ, Chapter
Case 6:13-cv-01168-EFM-TJJ Document 157 Filed 06/26/15 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
Case 6:13-cv-01168-EFM-TJJ Document 157 Filed 06/26/15 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS CARGILL MEAT SOLUTIONS CORPORATION, v. Plaintiff, PREMIUM BEEF FEEDERS,
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION
Case 3:10-bk-02805-PMG Doc 660 Filed 04/25/11 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION In re: LYDIA CLADEK, INC., Debtor. / CASE NO. : 03:10-bk-02805-PMG
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CLERMONT COUNTY, OHIO. Plaintiffs : CASE NO. 2012 CVH 0064
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CLERMONT COUNTY, OHIO STACY MCDOWELL, et al., : Plaintiffs : CASE NO. 2012 CVH 0064 vs. : Judge McBride PATRICK SHELDON : DECISION/ENTRY Defendant : Schwartz Manes Ruby & Slovin,
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA : : : : : : : : : :
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA PLAINTIFF, Successor-in-Interest to Plaintiff, vs. DEFENDANT, Defendant. CIVIL ACTION NO. MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT'S
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA RONALD DUTTON, : : Consolidated Under Plaintiff, : MDL DOCKET NO. 875 : v. : CIVIL ACTION NO. : 09-62916 TODD SHIPYARDS CORP.,
STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS. [FILED: December 16, 2014]
STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS PROVIDENCE, SC. [FILED: December 16, 2014] SUPERIOR COURT CONSTANCE PODEDWORNY, : Executor for the ESTATE of JOSEPH : PODEDWORNY, by her agent, : THE FEDERAL-MOGUL
Case 1-08-01113-dem Doc 24 Filed 07/30/09 Entered 07/30/09 12:11:00
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------x In re: Case No: 1-08-42384-dem PHILLIP CHO, Chapter 7 Debtor. ---------------------------------------------------------x
Case 4:13-cv-00383-RAS-DDB Document 142 Filed 11/17/14 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 1584
Case 4:13-cv-00383-RAS-DDB Document 142 Filed 11/17/14 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 1584 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION,
PRACTICE GUIDELINES MEMORANDUM. RE: Sample Bankruptcy Motions and Orders for Personal Injury Practitioners and Trustees
PRACTICE GUIDELINES MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Attorneys Practicing Before Me And Other Interested Persons C. Timothy Corcoran, III United States Bankruptcy Judge DATE: January 3, 2000 1 RE: Sample Bankruptcy
Case 4:13-cv-00382-RAS-DDB Document 141 Filed 11/17/14 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 2035
Case 4:13-cv-00382-RAS-DDB Document 141 Filed 11/17/14 Page 1 of 4 PageID #: 2035 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION,
Case 12-51502 Doc 4301 Filed 07/15/13 Entered 07/15/13 13:43:53 Main Document Pg 1 of 5
Case 12-51502 Doc 4301 Filed 07/15/13 Entered 07/15/13 13:43:53 Main Document Pg 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR TH EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION In re: ) Chapter 11 )
Case 2:14-cv-02032 Document 2 Filed 09/15/14 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA MOTION
Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0 Page of 0 TAMARA W. ASHFORD Acting Assistant Attorney General KAYCEE M. SULLIVAN Trial Attorney, Tax Division U.S. Department of Justice P.O. Box, Ben Franklin Station Washington,
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA In re: ) Jointly Administered ) Case No. 00-41584 N ) Chapter 11 CROWN VANTAGE, INC., ) ) ORDER ESTABLISHING Debtor. ) CASE MANAGEMENT PROCEDURES
4:13-cv-10877-MAG-LJM Doc # 16 Filed 07/03/13 Pg 1 of 7 Pg ID 126 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
4:13-cv-10877-MAG-LJM Doc # 16 Filed 07/03/13 Pg 1 of 7 Pg ID 126 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION MICHAEL BUSSARD, v. Plaintiff, SHERMETA, ADAMS AND VON ALLMEN,
Case 11-59088 Doc 119 Filed 02/03/12 EOD 02/03/12 18:15:09 Pg 1 of 10 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA NEW ALBANY DIVISION
Case 11-59088 Doc 119 Filed 02/03/12 EOD 02/03/12 18:15:09 Pg 1 of 10 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA NEW ALBANY DIVISION : In re: : Chapter 11 : EASTERN LIVESTOCK CO., LLC,
ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597
AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY APRIL 14, 2015 california legislature 2015 16 regular session ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597 Introduced by Assembly Member Cooley February 24, 2015 An act to amend Sections 36 and 877 of, and
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DIVISION IN RE: * * [Debtor s Name] * (***-**-last four digits of SSN) * Case No. - [Joint Debtor s Name, if any * Chapter 13 (***-**-last
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION. (Substantively Consolidated Under Case No. 8:10-bk-16648-CPM)
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION In re: Chapter 7 1800HOTELS4U, LLC, HAPPY DUCK LIMITED, Debtors. Case No. 8:10-bk-16648-CPM Case No. 8:10-bk-16655-CPM (Substantively
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division
Document Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division ) In re: ) Case No. 07-11440-RGM Ronald Steven Federici, ) Chapter 7 Debtor. ) ) ) W.
Case 2:12-cv-02198-JWS Document 113 Filed 05/12/14 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Case 2:12-cv-02198-JWS Document 113 Filed 05/12/14 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Mary M. Murphy, individually and as conservator for her minor children, W. M. and L. M.,
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION In re: ) Chapter 7 Liquidation ) marchfirst, INC., et al., ) CASE NO. 01 B 24742 ) (Substantively Consolidated)
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
O B 250A (Rev. 04/04) UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF WYOMING CHEYENNE DIVISION In re Granite Creek Investment Corp., Bankruptcy Case No. 08-20690 Debtor David G. Bisbee, Plaintiff Granite Creek
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION MOTION TO DEEM LATE FILED PROOFS OF CLAIM AS TIMELY FILED
Case 09-36379-PGH Doc 167 Filed 06/04/10 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION In re: CASE NO. 09-36379-BKC-PGH PALM BEACH FINANCE Chapter 11
Case 12-51502 Doc 3203 Filed 03/13/13 Entered 03/13/13 17:19:29 Main Document Pg 1 of 7
Pg 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI In Re: ) Chapter 11 ) Case No. 12-51502-659 PATRIOT COAL CORPORATION, et al., ) Jointly Administered ) Honorable Kathy Surratt-States
Friday 31st October, 2008.
Friday 31st October, 2008. It is ordered that the Rules heretofore adopted and promulgated by this Court and now in effect be and they hereby are amended to become effective January 1, 2009. Amend Rules
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MIDLAND DIVISION TRINITY HAVEN HEALTHCARE CASE NO. 07-70013-RBK CENTER, INC.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MIDLAND DIVISION IN RE: TRINITY HAVEN HEALTHCARE CASE NO. 07-70013-RBK CENTER, INC., DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION. MOTION IN AID OF APPOINTMENT AS PATIENT
NACTT ACADEMY TOOLBOX. A QUICK REFERENCE GUIDE to Selling Property While in Chapter 13 *
I. SUMMARY: NACTT ACADEMY TOOLBOX A QUICK REFERENCE GUIDE to Selling Property While in Chapter 13 * Beverly M. Burden, Chapter 13 Trustee, Lexington, KY Before a consumer debtor in chapter 13 may sell
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Franke v. Bridgepoint Education, Inc. et al Doc. 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA In re BRIDGEPOINT EDUCATION, INC., SECURITIES LITIGATION Civil No. 1cv JM (JLB)
APPENDIX A IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
APPENDIX A IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS In re: MICHELE GRAHAM, Case No.: 02-43262 (Chapter 7 Debtor. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. Adversary Proceeding
Case 14-41538 Doc 76 Filed 12/01/14 Entered 12/01/14 14:41:55 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 8
Document Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS CENTRAL DIVISION ) In re: ) ) Chapter 13 ANGELA B. MICHAUD, ) Case No. 14-41538 ) Debtor ) ) ORDER WHEREAS, Angela B. Michaud
SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL PROCEDURAL RULES COMMITTEE
SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL PROCEDURAL RULES COMMITTEE Proposed Recommendation No. 249 Proposed Amendment of Rules 4009.1, 4009.11, 4009.12, 4009.21, 4009.23, and 4011 Governing Discovery of Electronically
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, ORLANDO DIVISION
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, ORLANDO DIVISION GLENN HUNTER BROWN SR, Plaintiff, vs. REGIONS BANK, Defendant Case No. 6:08-bk-03082-KSJ Chapter 7 MOTION FOR VIOLATION
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DIVISION IN RE: [Debtor s Name] (--last four digits of SSN) Case No. - [Joint Debtor s Name, if any Chapter 13 (--last four digits of SSN)
14-13009-scc Doc 26 Filed 12/17/14 Entered 12/17/14 16:02:28 Main Document Pg 1 of 10
Pg 1 of 10 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK X In re SOVEREIGN ASSETS LTD., Debtor in Foreign Proceeding. X Chapter 15 Case No. 14-13009 ORDER GRANTING (1) RECOGNITION OF FOREIGN
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Case 3:07-cv-00172-MJR-CJP Document 8-1 Filed 03/12/2007 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY, Plaintiff, and PEARLE PHILLIPS,
Case 08-06092-mhm Document 1 Filed 02/28/2008 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
Case 08-06092-mhm Document 1 Filed 02/28/2008 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION IN RE: JOHN WAYNE ATCHLEY and CASE NO. 05-79232-MHM ROBIN
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, ORLANDO DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Chapter 7
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, ORLANDO DIVISION GLENN HUNTER BROWN SR, Plaintiff, vs. REGIONS BANK, Defendant. Case No. :0-bk-00-KSJ Chapter MOTION FOR FINAL JUDGMENT
In re: Chapter 11. 824 SOUTH EAST BOULEVARD REALTY, INC., Case No. 11-15728 (ALG) MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER. Introduction
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x NOT FOR PUBLICATION In re: Chapter 11 824 SOUTH EAST BOULEVARD REALTY,
Augustine, FL not in Debtors' personal name. UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION In re: Case No. 3:08-bk-1882-PMG Chapter 13 RAY KEMP STANSBURY and JENNIFER L. STANSBURY, Debtors. / ORDER ON DEBTORS' OBJECTION
CAUSE NO. 02-01125-J CHARLES DURHAM IN THE 191ST DISTRICT COURT LARVAN PERAILTA DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS PLAINTIFF S MOTION TO RECOVER EXPENSES OF PROOF
CAUSE NO. 02-01125-J CHARLES DURHAM IN THE 191ST DISTRICT COURT VS. LARVAN PERAILTA DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS PLAINTIFF S MOTION TO RECOVER EXPENSES OF PROOF TO THE HONORABLE COURT: Comes Now, Charles Durham,
Case4:12-cv-03288-KAW Document2-1 Filed06/25/12 Page1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION
Case4:12-cv-03288-KAW Document2-1 Filed06/25/12 Page1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND DIVISION STANDING ORDER FOR MAGISTRATE JUDGE KANDIS A. WESTMORE (Revised
Case 1:14-cv-01323-ERK-JMA Document 1-1 Filed 02/27/14 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 6 CIVIL COVER SHEET (SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON NEXT PAGE OF THIS FORM.
Case 1:14-cv-01323-ERK-JMA Document 1-1 Filed 02/27/14 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: 6 CIVIL COVER SHEET (SEE INSTRUCTIONS ON NEXT PAGE OF THIS FORM.) I. (a) PLAINTIFFS DEFENDANTS Nemet Motors, LLC d/b/a Nemet
Jack Weinzierl Case No. 07-42155 891 Wagner Way Lantana, TX 76226 SSN / ITIN: xxx-xx-8636
Office of the United States Trustee 300 Plaza Tower 110 North College Tyler, TX 75702 (903) 590-1450 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION IN RE: Jack
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE MEMORANDUM OPINION 2
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE IN RE: Specialty Products Holdings Corp., et al. Bankruptcy No. 10-11780 Debtor(s) 1 Chapter 11 (Jointly Administered) Related to Doc.
Case 8:11-ap-00418-KRM Doc 14 Filed 05/20/11 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
Case 8:11-ap-00418-KRM Doc 14 Filed 05/20/11 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION IN RE: CHARLES F. STEINBERGER Case No. 8:10-bk-19945-KRM PAMELA J. PERRY
Case 15-01019-jal Doc 14 Filed 11/20/15 Entered 11/20/15 15:20:55 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY
Case 15-01019-jal Doc 14 Filed 11/20/15 Entered 11/20/15 15:20:55 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY IN RE: TIMOTHY SCOTT STURGEON CASE NO. 15-10309 (1(7 Debtor(s
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) )
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION In re LAWTON, DAVID, Debtor. Case No. 99-08139-6J7 AMENDED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW ON TRUSTEE S MOTION TO EXERCISE
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC02-152 KEVIN M. STEELE, Petitioner, vs. SUSAN B. KINSEY and UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondents.
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC02-152 KEVIN M. STEELE, Petitioner, vs. SUSAN B. KINSEY and UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondents. On Review from the Second District Court of Appeal, Case
Case 9:08-bk MGW Doc 673 Filed 06/23/11 Page 1 of 7
Case 9:08-bk-04360-MGW Doc 673 Filed 06/23/11 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION www.flsb.uscourts.gov IN RE: ) ) Case No. 9:08-bk-04360-MGW
ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597
california legislature 2015 16 regular session ASSEMBLY BILL No. 597 Introduced by Assembly Member Cooley February 24, 2015 An act to amend Sections 36 and 877 of, and to add Chapter 6 (commencing with
2:09-cv-14271-LPZ-PJK Doc # 13 Filed 06/24/10 Pg 1 of 6 Pg ID 53 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
2:09-cv-14271-LPZ-PJK Doc # 13 Filed 06/24/10 Pg 1 of 6 Pg ID 53 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION v. Plaintiff, CASE NO. 09-14271 HON.
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO ) ) ) ) ) MEMORANDUM OF OPINION 1
The court incorporates by reference in this paragraph and adopts as the findings and orders of this court the document set forth below. This document was signed electronically on January 28, 2009, which
United States Bankruptcy Court Northern District of Illinois Eastern Division. Transmittal Sheet for Opinions for Posting
United States Bankruptcy Court Northern District of Illinois Eastern Division Transmittal Sheet for Opinions for Posting Will this opinion be published? Yes Bankruptcy Caption: Carl P. Amari Bankruptcy
Case 2:11-cv-03684-ES-MAH Document 117 Filed 04/16/14 Page 1 of 8 PageID: 1757 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Case 211-cv-03684-ES-MAH Document 117 Filed 04/16/14 Page 1 of 8 PageID 1757 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V., v. Plaintiff, HUNT CONTROL
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION LISA COINER, STEPHEN COINER, and JARED COINER, a minor under the age of 18 years, who sues by his father,
Case 2:05-cv-05148-DRD-MAS Document 98 Filed 06/30/08 Page 1 of 8 PageID: 1595 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Case 205-cv-05148-DRD-MAS Document 98 Filed 06/30/08 Page 1 of 8 PageID 1595 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY STEPHEN W. LEIBHOLZ, Civil Action No. 05-5148 (DRD)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA REPUBLIC BUSINESS CREDIT, LLC VERSUS NO: 13-5535
Republic Business Credit, LLC v. Greystone & Co., Inc. et al Doc. 41 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA REPUBLIC BUSINESS CREDIT, LLC CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO: 13-5535 GREYSTONE &
Case 2:10-cv-00741-GMN-LRL Document 10 Filed 08/17/10 Page 1 of 6
Case :0-cv-00-GMN-LRL Document 0 Filed 0//0 Page of 0 Michael J. McCue (NV Bar No. 0 Nikkya G. Williams (NV Bar No. Telephone: (0-0 Facsimile: (0 - Attorneys for Defendants Jan Klerks and Stichting Wolkenkrabbers
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO In Re: JUDGE RICHARD L. SPEER Metropolitan Environmental, Inc. Debtor(s (Related Case: 01-35756 Bruce C. French, Trustee Plaintiff(s v.
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND at GREENBELT. In Re: Debtor Chapter 7. vs. Adversary No.
Entered: July 31, 2013 Case 13-00202 Doc 20 Filed 07/31/13 Page 1 of 10 Date signed July 31, 2013 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND at GREENBELT In Re: Fely Sison Tanamor
Personal injury claim" does not include a claim for compensatory benefits pursuant to worker s compensation or veterans benefits.
Wisconsin AB 19 (2013) (a) Personal injury claim" means any claim for damages, loss, indemnification, contribution, restitution or other relief, including punitive damages, that is related to bodily injury
Case 2:08-cv-83111-ER Document 55 Filed 01/04/10 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 2:08-cv-83111-ER Document 55 Filed 01/04/10 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA REGINALD DENT : CONSOLIDATED : MDL 875 v. : : EDPA CIVIL ACTION
case 3:12-md-02391-RLM-CAN document 2756 filed 09/18/14 page 1 of 11
case 3:12-md-02391-RLM-CAN document 2756 filed 09/18/14 page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION IN RE: BIOMET M2a MAGNUM ) CAUSE NO. 3:12-MD-2391-RLM-CAN
Case: 4:12-cv-00080-CEJ Doc. #: 309 Filed: 01/30/14 Page: 1 of 6 PageID #: 7791
Case: 4:12-cv-00080-CEJ Doc. #: 309 Filed: 01/30/14 Page: 1 of 6 PageID #: 7791 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff,
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division NOTICE OF MOTION
tr. UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division In re: PATHNET OPERATING, INC., Case No. 0-2266-SSM DEBTOR Chapter 7 GORDON P. PEYTON, CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEE FOR PATHNET
Case:14-26132-EEB Doc#:9 Filed:12/03/14 Entered:12/03/14 15:52:25 Page1 of 6 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Case:14-26132-EEB Doc#:9 Filed:12/03/14 Entered:12/03/14 15:52:25 Page1 of 6 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF COLORADO In re: CLINE MINING CORPORATION, Debtor in a Foreign Proceeding. Chapter
RULE 1. ASSIGNMENT OF CASES
LOCAL RULES FOR FOURTH CIRCUIT COURT DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI [Renumbered and codified by order of the Supreme Court effective May 18, 2006; amended effective April 23, 2009.] RULE 1. ASSIGNMENT OF CASES
Case 8:09-cv-00087-RAL-TBM Document 390 Filed 04/20/10 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
Case 8:09-cv-00087-RAL-TBM Document 390 Filed 04/20/10 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, v. Plaintiff, ARTHUR NADEL;
Case 1:11-md-02290-RGS Document 396 Filed 12/06/13 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ) ) ) ) )
Case 1:11-md-02290-RGS Document 396 Filed 12/06/13 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS IN RE JPMORGAN CHASE MORTGAGE MODIFICATION LITIGATION THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: All
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION IN RE: : : CASE NO. 99-71191 SGE MORTGAGE FUNDING : CORPORATION, : CHAPTER 11 : Debtor, : ADVERSARY PROCEEDING : NO. 00-7013
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA IN THE MATTER OF: Chapter 7 Case No. 97-03618 DJ THOUSAND ADVENTURES, INC., Debtor. ERIC W. LAM, exclusively in his capacity as Adversary
Case 8:09-bk-11551-MGW Doc 53 Filed 07/30/13 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
Case 8:09-bk-11551-MGW Doc 53 Filed 07/30/13 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION IN RE: Randy L. Jones, Case No. 8:09-bk-11551-MGW Chapter 13 Debtor. /
Case 1:07-cv-00389-MJW-BNB Document 51 Filed 08/21/2008 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Case 1:07-cv-00389-MJW-BNB Document 51 Filed 08/21/2008 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 07-cv-00389-MJW-BNB ERNA GANSER, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT
v. CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE NO.: 2006-CA-387-O HUMAN RELATIONS BOARD OF WRIT NO.: 06-05 THE CITY OF ORLANDO, FLORIDA,
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA NORTHBRIDGE APARTMENT HOMES/ CONCORD MANAGEMENT LIMITED, Petitioner, CASE NO.: 2006-CA-386-O WRIT NO.: 06-04 v. CONSOLIDATED
Case 12-30081-EPK Doc 885 Filed 09/04/14 Page 1 of 5
Case 12-30081-EPK Doc 885 Filed 09/04/14 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION www.flsb.uscourts.gov IN RE: CLSF III IV, INC., et al. Case No.:
Case 3:06-cv-00701-MJR-DGW Document 526 Filed 07/20/15 Page 1 of 8 Page ID #13631 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Case 3:06-cv-00701-MJR-DGW Document 526 Filed 07/20/15 Page 1 of 8 Page ID #13631 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ANTHONY ABBOTT, et al., ) ) No: 06-701-MJR-DGW Plaintiffs,
GOVERNMENT PROSECUTIONS AND QUI TAM ACTIONS
GOVERNMENT PROSECUTIONS AND QUI TAM ACTIONS DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA OFFICIAL CODE DIVISION I. GOVERNMENT OF DISTRICT. TITLE 2. GOVERNMENT ADMINISTRATION. CHAPTER 3B. OTHER PROCUREMENT MATTERS. SUBCHAPTER
13-22840-rdd Doc 402 Filed 10/25/13 Entered 10/25/13 16:17:31 Main Document Pg 1 of 10. (Jointly Administered)
Pg 1 of 10 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------------x In re: SOUND SHORE MEDICAL CENTER OF WESTCHESTER, et al., 1 Debtors.
Rule 26. General Provisions Governing Discovery.
Published on Arkansas Judiciary (https://courts.arkansas.gov) Rule 26. General Provisions Governing Discovery. (a) Discovery Methods. Parties may obtain discovery by one or more of the following methods:
Case 0:06-cv-03858-DSD Document 1-1 Filed 09/27/2006 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Case 0:06-cv-03858-DSD Document 1-1 Filed 09/27/2006 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA In re: Case No. 05-38890-DDO Meredith Ann Forgosh a/k/a/ Meredith Ann Chapter 7 Debtor.
Case 4:07-bk-01568-EWH Doc 96 Filed 07/31/09 Entered 07/31/09 11:20:01 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 8
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 Michael M. Neal, Esq. LAW OFFICE OF MICHAEL M. NEAL, P.C. 1 S. Church Avenue, Suite Tucson, Arizona 01 Telephone: (0) - Facsimile: (0) - E-Mail: mmnealpc@qwestoffice.net State Bar No.
Case 3:09-cv-01222-MMH-JRK Document 33 Filed 08/10/10 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION
Case 3:09-cv-01222-MMH-JRK Document 33 Filed 08/10/10 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION PHL VARIABLE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, vs. Case No. 3:09-cv-1222-J-34JRK
Case 15-10197-BLS Doc 1393 Filed 03/20/15 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case 15-10197-BLS Doc 1393 Filed 03/20/15 Page 1 of 8 In re: RADIOSHACK CORPORATION, et al., 1 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE Debtors. Chapter 11 Case No. 15-10197-KJC
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA New Orleans Division
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA New Orleans Division NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION OF ) AMERICA, INC., et al., ) ) Plaintiffs ) ) v. ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 05-4234 C. RAY
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT NORTH CAROLINA GREENSBORO DIVISION
SO ORDERED. SIGNED this 21st day of February, 2014. UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT NORTH CAROLINA GREENSBORO DIVISION IN RE: ) ) Mary Kernodle Bolden, ) Case No. 13-11254C-7G ) Debtor.
Case 13-11482-KJC Doc 4457 Filed 08/26/15 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 13-11482-KJC Doc 4457 Filed 08/26/15 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re: ) Chapter 11 ) EXIDE TECHNOLOGIES, ) Case No. 13-11482 (KJC) ) Reorganized
Case 1:10-ap-01304 Doc 69 Filed 02/06/14 Entered 02/06/14 16:00:28 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 5
Document Page 1 of 5 SO ORDERED. SIGNED this 6th day of February, 2014 THIS ORDER HAS BEEN ENTERED ON THE DOCKET. PLEASE SEE DOCKET FOR ENTRY DATE. UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
Case 1:10-cv-22300-KMM Document 20 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/20/2011 Page 1 of 9
Case 1:10-cv-22300-KMM Document 20 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/20/2011 Page 1 of 9 NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION and FLORIDA WILDLIFE FEDERATION Plaintiffs, V. W. CRAIG FUGATE, Administrator, Federal Emergency
DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONICALLY-STORED INFORMATION IN STATE COURT: WHAT TO DO WHEN YOUR COURT S RULES DON T HELP
DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONICALLY-STORED INFORMATION IN STATE COURT: WHAT TO DO WHEN YOUR COURT S RULES DON T HELP Presented by Frank H. Gassler, Esq. Written by Jeffrey M. James, Esq. Over the last few years,
What Trustees Should Know About Florida s New Attorneys Fee Statute. By David P. Hathaway and David J. Akins. Introduction
What Trustees Should Know About Florida s New Attorneys Fee Statute By David P. Hathaway and David J. Akins Introduction More and more lawsuits are filed in Florida alleging that the trustee of a trust
R. Thomas Burgasser, PLLC R. Thomas Burgasser, Esq., of counsel 825 Payne Avenue North Tonawanda, New York 14120 Attorney for the Plaintiff
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re LEONARD P. and BRIGET M. GIRDLESTONE, 13-13398 B Debtors D YOUVILLE COLLEGE, DECISION & ORDER Plaintiff v. AP 14-1019 B BRIGET M. GIRDLESTONE,
Case 16-20012 Document 619 Filed in TXSB on 05/27/16 Page 1 of 7
Case 16-20012 Document 619 Filed in TXSB on 05/27/16 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION In re: Chapter 11 SHERWIN ALUMINA COMPANY, LLC,
Residential Mortgage Lender/Servicer Claim Abuse
Residential Mortgage Lender/Servicer Claim Abuse By Patrick M. Mosley, Esq. Law Clerk to Hon. Catherine Peek McEwen Representative Cases I. In re Stewart, 391 B.R. 327 (Bankr. E.D. La. 2008): Debtor filed
Case 10-51328 Doc 52 Filed 01/26/11 Entered 01/26/11 14:38:22 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 10
Document Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT BRIDGEPORT DIVISION In re Chapter 13 TIFFANY M. KRITHARAKIS, Case No. 10-51328 (AHWS) Debtor. UNITED STATES TRUSTEE'S MOTION
Plaintiff has developed SAS System software that enables users to access, manage,
SAS Institute Inc. v. World Programming Limited Doc. 170 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION 5:10-CV-25-FL SAS INSTITUTE INC., Plaintiff, v.