FAIR VALUATION OF VARIOUS PARTICIPATION SCHEMES IN LIFE INSURANCE ABSTRACT KEYWORDS. Fair value, participation scheme, asset and liability management


 Leslie Mason
 1 years ago
 Views:
Transcription
1 FAIR VALUAION OF VARIOUS PARICIPAION SCHEMES IN LIFE INSURANCE BY PIERRE DEVOLDER AND INMACULADA DOMÍNGUEZFABIÁN ABSRAC Fair valuation is becomin a maor concern for actuaries, especially in the perspective of IAS norms. One of the key aspects in this context is the simultaneous analysis of assets and liabilities in any sound actuarial valuation. he aim of this paper is to illustrate these concepts, by comparin three common ways of ivin bonus in life insurance with profit: reversionary, cash or terminal. For each participation scheme, we compute the fair value of the contract takin into account liability parameters (uaranteed interest rate and participation level) as well as asset parameters (market conditions and investment stratey). We find some equilibrium conditions between all those coefficients and compare, from an analytical and numerical point of view, the systems of bonus. Developments are made first in the classical binomial model and then extended in a Black and Scholes economy. KEYWORDS Fair value, participation scheme, asset and liability manaement. INRODUCION If for a lon time life insurance could have been considered as a sleepin beauty, thins have chaned dramatically as well from a theoretical point of view as from industrial concerns. Nowadays, the financial risks involved in life insurance products are surely amonst the most important challenes for actuaries. he need to update our actuarial backround takin into account the real financial world has been recently emphasized by Hans Bühlman in a recent editorial in ASIN BULLEIN (Bühlman ()). he classical way of handlin financial revenues in life insurance was characterized by two assumptions: stationarity of the market (no term structure of interest rate) and absence of uncertainty (deterministic approach); all this leadin to the famous actuarial paradm of the technical uaranteed rate: all the future was summarized in one maic number. Clearly thins are not so simple and life insurance is a perfect example of stochastic process (even more than non life); the two dimensions of time and ASIN BULLEIN, Vol. 35, No., 5, pp
2 76 P. DEVOLDER AND I. DOMÍNGUEZFABIÁN uncertainty are completely involved in the products: lon term aspect and financial risk (Norber ()). he purpose of this paper is to focus on the stochastic aspect of the return and to show how to calibrate technical conditions of a life insurance product, usin classical financial models. In this context fair valuation is the central topic. he comin introduction of accountin standards for insurance products will undoubtedly increase the importance of fair valuation of life continencies. Even if mortality risk can deeply influence the profitability of a life insurer (for instance in the annuity market), it seems clear that the financial risk is the heart of the matter. Pricin and valuation of life insurance products in a stochastic financial environment started first for equity linked policies with a maturity uarantee (Brennan and Schwartz (976), Delbaen (986), Aase and Persson (994), Nielsen and Sandmann (995)). he newness of these products explains probably why historically they were the first studied with stochastic financial models. But more classical products, like insurance with profit, are at least as important for the insurance industry and induce also clearly maor concerns in terms of financial risk. Different models of valuation of these contracts have been proposed based on the classical neutral approach in finance (Briys and De Varenne (997), Bacinello (, 3b)). he importance to develop, in this field, ood models and to analyse all the embedded options, will surely increase with the IAS world (Grosen and Jorensen ()). Even if for competitive or leal reasons the pricin of these products has very often limited deree of freedom, their valuation requires a complete understandin of various risks involved in each product. Amonst them, the relation between the uaranteed rate and the participation level is of first importance, in close connection with the asset side. he aim of this paper is to focus on this aspect of participation, for the one hand by introducin some links between the liability conditions and the asset stratey and, for the other hand, by comparin three classical bonus systems. wo problems are presented: first if all the parameters of the contract are fixed (actuarial valuation of an existin product), formulas of fair value are iven. Secondly, in order to desn new parameters of a product, equilibrium conditions are developed. he paper is oranised as follows. Section presents the main assumptions used in terms of assets and liabilities in a financial binomial environment and introduces three different participation systems: reversionary, cash and terminal bonus. In section 3, a first model on a sinle period is developed, showin how to compute fair values and equilibrium conditions in function of the chosen investment stratey. In this case, it appears clearly that the three participation schemes are identical. hen section 4 extends the fair valuation computation in a multiple period model; each participation system havin then different valuation. Section 5 is devoted to the equilibrium condition in the multiple period; in particular, we show that the conditions are identical for the reversionary and the cash bonus even if in eneral fair values are different as seen in section 3. his motivates to take a deeper look on the relation between fair values in these two systems. Section 6 shows that cash systems have a ber valuation when the contract is unbalanced in favour of the insurer and vice versa. Section 7 illustrates numerically the results and section 8 extends
3 FAIR VALUAION OF VARIOUS PARICIPAION SCHEMES IN LIFE INSURANCE 77 the results in a continuous time framework, usin the classical Black and Scholes economy. In this case, we show that explicit formulas for the fair values and the equilibrium value of the participation rate are still available; but implicit relations are only possible for the equilibrium value of the uaranteed rate.. NOAIONS AND DEFINIIONS We consider a life insurance contract with profit: in return for the initial payment of a premium, the policyholder obtains, at maturity, a uaranteed benefit plus a participation bonus, based on the eventual financial surplus enerated by the underlyin investments. Insurer is supposed to be risk neutral with respect to mortality. Furthermore, we assume independence between mortality and financial elements. he asset and the liability sides of the product can be characterized as follows:.. Liability side We consider a pure endowment policy with sinle premium p issued at time t and maturatin at time. he benefit is paid at maturity at time t if and only if the insured is still alive. No surrender option exists before maturity. We denote by i the uaranteed technical interest rate and by x the initial ae. he survival probability will be denoted by p x. If we assume without loss of enerality that the initial sinle premium is equal to p x, the uaranteed benefit paid at maturity (disreardin loadins and taxes) is simply iven by: G ] ] i p i p ] x We introduce then the participation liability; we denote by B the participation rate on the financial surplus ( < B ). hree different participation schemes will be compared: Reversionary bonus : a bonus is computed yearly and used as a premium in order to buy additional insurance (pure endowment insurance increasin benefit only at maturity). Cash bonus : the bonus is also computed yearly but is not interated in the contract. It can be paid back directly to the policyholder or transferred to another contract without uarantee. erminal bonus : the bonus is only computed at the end of the contract, takin into account the final surplus. We denote by B, B C and B the correspondin participation rates.
4 78 P. DEVOLDER AND I. DOMÍNGUEZFABIÁN.. Asset side We assume perfectly competitive and frictionless markets, in a discrete time framework with one risky asset and one risk less asset. he annual compounded risk free rate is supposed to be constant and will be denoted by r. he risky asset is supposed to follow a binomial evolution (CoxRossRubinstein (979)); two returns are possible at each period: a ood one denoted by u and a bad one denoted by d. In order to avoid any arbitrae opportunity, we suppose as usual: d <r < u hese values can be also expressed alternatively in terms of risk premium and volatility: where l: risk premium (l >) m: volatility (m > l) u r l m d r l m () On this market, the insurer is supposed to invest a part of the premium in the risky asset and the other part in the risk less asset. A stratey is then defined by a coefficient (with constraint < ) ivin the risky part of the investment. he return enerated by a stratey is a random variable, takin one of two possible values denoted by u and d and defined as follows: u u ( )(r) r (l m) () d d ( )(r) r (l m) (3) he case will not be taken into account. 3. A FIRS ONE PERIOD MODEL We start with the very special case. hen by definition the three ways of ivin bonus, as defined in section., are identical. A contract is characterized by its vector of technical and financial parameters: v (i,b,) (4) he other parameters (r,u,d) can be seen as constraints of the market.
5 FAIR VALUAION OF VARIOUS PARICIPAION SCHEMES IN LIFE INSURANCE Fair valuation Usin the standard risk neutral approach in finance, the fair value of the contract can be expressed as the discounted expectation of its future cash flows, under the risk neutral measure, and takin into account the survival probability. he risk neutral probabilities, associated respectively with the ood return and the bad return, are iven by: p r d m l   u  d u  ] r p  p u  d he correspondin liabilities are respectively: m l (5) L i B[u (i)] i B[r i (l m)] (6) L i B[d (i)] i B[r i (l m)] he fair value of a contract v is then defined by: (v) p x (v) with (v) defined as the financial fair value of the benefit and iven by: v ] r! pl m l m l < i B r i l m i B r i l m r ^ B ^  BF m l m l i B r i ^l mh r i ^l mh r < < FF (7) he financial fair value consists of two parts: (v) G (v)p (v) with G (v): fair value of the uarantee r i (8) P (v): fair value of the participation correspondin to a call option and iven by: P (v) B m  l m l P P r < F (9)
6 8 P. DEVOLDER AND I. DOMÍNGUEZFABIÁN with P [r i (l m)] () P [r i (l m)] o o further, we have to make some assumptions on the values of P and P. Of course, we have P P. he followin situations can happen for a iven contract: Case : P P Case : P <P Case 3: < P < P Case : P P In this case, the technical uaranteed rate is so b that no participation can be iven. In particular, P implies: r i (l m) i r (l m)>r () he contract becomes purely deterministic, and the fair value is then: (v) r i () Case : P <P his case can be considered as the realistic assumption: If the risky asset is up, there is a surplus and participation. But if the risky asset is down, the uarantee is playin and there is no participation. he condition can be written as follows: In this situation, the fair value becomes: r (l m) i < r (l m) (3) m l (v) i B r i l m  r <  ^ ^ hhf (4) Case 3: <P < P In this case, the technical uaranteed rate is so low that even in the down situation of the market, there is a surplus: i < r (m l) (5)
7 FAIR VALUAION OF VARIOUS PARICIPAION SCHEMES IN LIFE INSURANCE 8 he fair value becomes then: v m l m l ] i B r i l m r i l m r < < ^  ^ hh ^  ^  hhff (6) i B ri r 6 he fair value of the participation is ust based on the difference between the risk free rate and the uaranteed rate. 3.. Equilibrium A vector v of parameters is said to be equilibrated if the correspondin initial fair value is equal to the sinle premium paid at time t : (v) p p x (7) that is equivalent to (v). Since relation (7) implies: (v) r i we have a first eneral equilibrium condition iven by: i r (8) So, in order to obtain equilibrium, the technical uaranteed rate must always be lower or equal to the risk free rate. We try now to look at equilibrium situations in the three cases presented in section 3.. Case : P P In this case, relation () shows that i > r, and no equilibrium is possible. Case : P <P akin into account simultaneously relation (8) and (3), we must have: r (l m) i < r (9) he relation can be written in terms of equilibrum values of each of the parameters of the contract: Guaranteed rate (function of the participation rate and the stratey coefficient): m  l i r B B ^m lh ()
8 8 P. DEVOLDER AND I. DOMÍNGUEZFABIÁN with conditions: < B and <. he condition (9) is well respected, takin into account these two conditions. Participation rate (function of the uaranteed rate and the stratey coefficient): B with conditions: < and r (m l) i < r. r i m  l <  r  i ^l mh F () Stratey coefficient (function of the uaranteed rate and the participation rate): he purpose here is to see if, for a couple of coherent values of the technical parameters i and B, there exists an asset stratey eneratin an equilibrium situation: r i B m l B   ^  h m  l () with conditions: < B he condition on i is obtained by the condition < : a) > for i < r and B < m  (i.e. for all B since l m  l >) B _ m  l i b) if i r B ^m lh Case 3: <P < P he equilibrium condition on the fair value becomes then, by (6): i B r i  r 6 or B(r i) r i Because in this case i < r, this implies B All this development shows that the real interestin situation with a nontrivial solution is the case. 4. FAIR VALUAION IN MULIPLE PERIOD MODELS We extend here the computation of fair values for a eneral maturity. he three participation schemes defined in section.. must now be studied separately. 4.. Reversionary bonus akin into account the binomial structure of the returns, the total benefit to be paid at maturity is a random variable iven by B() L L, where is
9 FAIR VALUAION OF VARIOUS PARICIPAION SCHEMES IN LIFE INSURANCE 83 the number of up cases of the risky asset amonst the years and L and L are the correspondin total returns. he fair value is then iven by: C p p L L p pl pl   ] r xb x l! b r l 6 v p p 6 ] (3) where C denotes the binomial coefficient and (v) is the financial fair value on one year (cf. (7)). 4.. Cash bonus In this case, each year, the rate of bonus is applied only to the reserve accumulated at rate i and takin into account the survival probabilities. For an initial sinle premium equal to p p x, the reserve V(t) to use at time t is iven by: V(t) p( i) t / t p x p x ( i) t / t p x he part of the liabilities to be paid at time t ( t,,...,) in case of survival as cash bonus is a random variable iven by: in up case: C (t) B c P ( p x ( i) t / t p x ) in down case: C (t) B c P ( p x ( i) t / t p x ) he fair value can be expressed as discounted expected value of all futures cash flows under the risk neutral measure and takin into account the survival probabilities: x! t t ] v p b r i p pc t p C t l b t x^ r l ] ] h p r i i B p p P p P x C x ] b l! ^ h t ] r p ] v x t t where (v) is the financial fair value and is iven by: v r i r i B p P p P C ]  ] ] b l ^ h ] r r i (4) p, p and P, P bein defined in (5) and () In the particular case P ;P >, this ives: v ] ] r ^mlh^ r i ^l mhh ] r ] > ] BC H r i (5)
10 84 P. DEVOLDER AND I. DOMÍNGUEZFABIÁN he correspondin value for the reversionary bonus is (cf. (3)): ] v ] r ^m lh^r i ^l mhh i B G (6) As expected, for these two values are indentical. A deeper comparison between (5) and (6) will be developed in section 6, after calculation of equilibrium values in section erminal bonus he bonus is only computed at the end of the contract, comparin the final technical liability ( i) with the asset value at maturity. If we denote by A () the terminal assets at time t, usin stratey, the fair value can be written as follows: ] v ] r p x px i B EQ A  i ] v 9] 7 ] ] A C where Q is the risk neutral measure and E Q denotes expectation under Q. Alternatively, we can express this fair value in terms of option price: ] ] v B C_ A; ; ] i ] r i (7) where C(A ; ;(i) ) is the price of a call option on the asset A, with maturity and strike price ( i) akin into account the binomial structure of the model, the eneral form of this price is iven by: C_ A  ; ; i  ] i! 8ud  ] C pp r he fair value is then iven explicitly by: ] ] ] B 9 B C   ] v! ud  ] C pp r r ] 8 B (8) As example, let us look at the model on two periods of time ( ). If we denote by a the minimal number of umps in order to ive participation: a inf{ N :(r (l m)) ( r (l m)) >(i) }, the followin situations can happen:
11 FAIR VALUAION OF VARIOUS PARICIPAION SCHEMES IN LIFE INSURANCE 85 First situation: a > he technical uaranteed rate is so b that no participation can be iven 8] $ u B. he fair value is ust: ] v r i : D Second situation: a he only case where bonus can be iven is the situation of two up umps of the risky asset: u d ( i) < u (9) he fair value becomes then: ] v ] r m  l > ] B d n 8u i  ] BH hird situation: a As soon as there is one up ump on the two periods, bonus is iven: d ( i) < u d (3) he fair value becomes then: ] v m l > ] B > d n u i r _  ] i ] V m  l _ ud  ] ih W ^ mh W X (3) Fourth situation: a A bonus is iven each year whatever are the returns of the asset: he fair value is simply: ] v d >(i) (3) ] ] r B <  b r i l F (33) he first and the last situations can be considered as deenerate. If we want to avoid these limit situations, we must have: d ( i) < u (34)
12 86 P. DEVOLDER AND I. DOMÍNGUEZFABIÁN We are then in situation or situation 3. Remark: It is easy to see that we will be automatically in situation 3 (a ) if: m < l l( r) (35) and i < r i. he first condition (35) is independent of the characteristics of the contract; it ust means that the volatility has not to be too important. ii. he second condition [i < r], related to the contract, seems to be quite reasonable (cf. (8) on one period). 5. EQUILIBRIUM RELAION IN MULIPLE PERIOD MODELS he aim of this section is to eneralize on periods the equilibrium relations obtained in section 3.. for one period, usin the explicit formulas of fair value obtained in section Reversionary bonus Formula (3) shows clearly that: (v) (v) Equilibrium results obtained in section 3.. are unchaned in a multiple period model with reversionary bonus. 5.. Cash bonus Formulas (5) and (6), for instance, show that the fair values are normally different usin the reversionary bonus or the cash bonus. Nevertheless, we will see that the equilibrium values of the parameters of the contract are the same. Usin (4), the contract will be equilibrated in the cash bonus scheme if: 7] r  ] A ( r) (i) B C ( p P p P ) ] r (36) Like in section 3.., we can consider different cases, dependin on the values of P and P.
13 FAIR VALUAION OF VARIOUS PARICIPAION SCHEMES IN LIFE INSURANCE 87 Case : P P No equilibrium is possible like in the reversionary scheme. Case : P <P (central assumption) Usin the values (5) and () of P and P, formula (36) becomes: ( r) (i) B m l 7] r  ] A C ( r i (l m)) ] r or r i B m  l C [r i (l m)] m  l or i r B C m  B ^ m  l h c (37) identical to relation () obtained for the reversionary bonus. Case 3: <P < P Formula (36) becomes then: ( r) (i) B C 7] r  ] A which implies like in the reversionary case: B C Conclusion: he equilibrium conditions on the parameters of the contract are the same for the reversionary bonus and for the cash bonus erminal bonus Formula (8) ives as equilibrium condition: ] ] r B ] r! ] 8ud i B C pp (38) From this relation, it is already possible to obtain an equilibrium value for the participation rate, as a function of the uaranteed rate and the stratey coefficient (to be compared with formula () for the reversionary bonus): B ] r  ]! 8 ] B   ud  C pp (39) On the other hand, if the participation rate is known, it is possible to express the equilibrium value of the uaranteed rate as follows:
14 88 P. DEVOLDER AND I. DOMÍNGUEZFABIÁN ] i   r B! u d C p p a   B! C p p a ]  m  l m l ]  d d   r B! C u d n n a  m  l m l  B! C d n d n a (4) where a is defined as usual by: a inf{k N : u k d k >(i) } Unfortunately, this relation is not explicit because the coefficient a depends on the level of i. he relation can be computed, assumin a certain value for a and then check afterwards if the condition on a is fulfilled. As example, let us see aain what happens on two periods. We first concentrate on the standard situation a ; this means that constraint (3) has to be fulfilled. Startin from (4), we will et an equilibrium candidate for i and check afterwards this constraint. For and a, we et: ] m  l m  l ] r  B > d n u u d H ^ mh m  l m  l  B > d n H ^ mh (4) with the followin condition to check: d ( i) < u d Similary, we can try to find a candidate for the situation a ; now constraint (9) has to be checked. Usin the same approach, the equilibrium value is iven by: ] m  l ] r B d n u m  l  B d n (4) with the followin condition to check: u d ( i) < u
15 FAIR VALUAION OF VARIOUS PARICIPAION SCHEMES IN LIFE INSURANCE ANALYICAL COMPARISON BEWEEN REVERSIONARY AND CASH SYSEMS Reversionary and cash systems seem not so different; the only difference is the interation of the bonus inside the contract. Moreover, we saw in section 5 that the equilibrium conditions are the same, even if the fair value formulas look quite different. From now on, and without loss of enerality, we will work without mortality effect. he aim of this section is to prove the followin relation: (reversionary) > (cash) if and only if the participation rate is reater than its equilibrium value. In order to et this relation, we have to compare the valuations in the two participation schemes usin the same parameters: For the reversionary bonus (cf. (3)): with K [p P p P ] ] v b pl i BK r l 6 b r l For the cash bonus (cf. (4)): v r i r i B K ]  ] ] b l C ] r r i Developin the reversionary formula ives:  ] v ]! C ] BK ] r ] > H he condition to have a ber fair value for the reversionary system becomes then: ] ] r ] r!  C BK i > i ] ] b l r BK ] r ] ] r r i Or: ] r  ]  ! C ] BK ] > r i Or assumin K! (i.e. P > ): ! C ] BK ]  ] BK ] BK  ] BK ] r  ] r i > (43)
16 9 P. DEVOLDER AND I. DOMÍNGUEZFABIÁN Let us consider the function: x i ]  ] G(x) x with ] r  ] For x r i, we have: G(r i) r i On the other hand, it is easy to show that for x >, the function G is strictly increasin. So when condition BK > r i is fulfilled, the fair value for the reversionary bonus is ber than the fair value for the cash bonus and vice versa. his last condition can be written as follows: B[p P p P ] > r i (44) akin into account the different cases studied in section 3., condition (44) becomes: Case : P P : not relevant here (K! ). Case : P <P : or B > m l Bp P B m [r i (l m)] > r i r i m  l <  r i ^l mh F which means that the participation rate is ber than its equilibrium value (cf. ()). Case 3: <P < P : B(p P p P )B(r i) >r i Or B > that is the equilibrium value in that case. 7. NUMERICAL ILLUSRAION In this section, we will compare the three participation schemes in terms of fair values and equilibrium values of the parameters in a two periods model and without mortality effect. In terms of financial market, we will use a central scenario based on the followin values: r riskfree rate.3 l risk premium. m volatility.6
17 FAIR VALUAION OF VARIOUS PARICIPAION SCHEMES IN LIFE INSURANCE 9 FIGURE In terms of investment stratey underlyin the product, we will mainly compare two choices:.: conservative stratey.6: aressive stratey 7.. Fair values for different uarantees and participation levels Fure shows for each chosen stratey (conservative or aressive) the relation between the uaranteed rate, the participation level and the fair value of the contract. he fair value is clearly an increasin function of the participation level, whatever is the participation scheme. 7.. Equilibrium values Like seen in section 5., the equilibrium conditions on the parameters of the contract are the same for the reversionary bonus and for the cash bonus. Fure compares, for the aressive investment stratey, the equilibrium values of the participation rate and of the uaranteed rate between reversionary and terminal bonus Fair value and equilibrium value able compares for various values of the technical parameters, chosen in relation with their equilibrium values, the fair values in the three participation schemes for the aressive investment stratey (6% in risky asset). Fures in bold and italic correspond to situations where the initial fair value is ber than the paid premium.
18 9 P. DEVOLDER AND I. DOMÍNGUEZFABIÁN FIGURE ABLE 6% i.5 i.5 i.6 Equilibrium values of B ERMINAL BONUS interest rate,76 %,995485,978396,96357,45 4%,6553, ,973645,4 6%,5856,99363,985763,47 8%,9958,33,99788,6 %,666,7699 REVERSIONARY BONUS,657 %,99754,97939,9654,6 4%,469,98755,97858,8 6%,933,995345,986767,54 8%,783,3498,99348,6 %,47467,6844 CASH BONUS,657 %,99759,97988,966363,6 4%,43,987777,977,8 6%,8473, ,9888,54 8%,7695,34696,9949,6 %,45357,5656 Clearly, the difference between the different bonus schemes would be much more pronounced in models on more than two periods. 8. GENERALIZAION IN CONINUOUS IME MARKE he principles of comparison between the different participation schemes can be easily adapted in a continuous time financial market. We develop here the
19 FAIR VALUAION OF VARIOUS PARICIPAION SCHEMES IN LIFE INSURANCE 93 model, usin the Black and Scholes environment. he classical assumptions on the market are supposed to be fulfilled. wo kinds of assets are supposed to exist: the risk less asset X, linked to the risk free rate: dx (t) rx (t)dt where r ln(r) is the instantaneous risk free rate. the risky fund X, modelled by a eometric Brownian motion: where w is a Wiener process. dx (t) X (t)dt sx (t)dw(t) Once aain, the risk neutral probability measure will be denoted by Q. he reference portfolio of the insurer consists of a constant proportion invested in the risky fund and a proportion ( ) invested in the risk free asset. he evolution equation of this portfolio denoted by X is then iven by: dx (t) ( ( )r)x (t)dt sx (t)dw(t) (45) 8.. he one period model We extend here the results of section 3 obtained in a binomial environment. On one period, the three kinds of participation schemes are identical. We compute the fair values for a iven contract v (i,b,) and obtain equilibrium conditions on the coefficients in order to have a fair contract. he fair value is iven now by: v p,, ] r i Bc i x b ^ hl (46) where c(i,,) represents the price of a call option on the reference portfolio X for one period and for a strike price equal to the uarantee ( i). In the Black and Scholes environment this price is iven by: where c^ i,, h r E X i Q `^ ]  ] h F d i,,,, r i F d i  ^ ^ hh ^ ^ hh d i,, ln r s / s i ^ h b b l l d ^i,, h d ^i,, h  s F is the cumulative distribution function of a standard normal variable.
20 94 P. DEVOLDER AND I. DOMÍNGUEZFABIÁN Finally the fair value can be written as follows: v p,,,, r i B F d i r i F d i x  ] b b ^ ^ hh ^ ^ hhll (47) he equilibrium condition iven by (7) can be expressed, in this model, as an explicit equilibrium value B of the participation rate, for a iven uaranteed rate i and a iven stratey coefficient (equivalent of formula () in the binomial model): B r i (48) ] rf^ d ^i,, hh  ] F^d ^i,, hh Implicit relations can only be obtained in this model if we want to solve it for the two other parameters (equilibrium value respectively for the uaranteed rate and for the stratey coefficient). 8.. Fair value in multiple period models 8... Reversionary bonus Exactly as in the discrete case and takin into account the structure of the return process, the fair value for a contract of periods usin a reversionary bonus is iven by: ] v p,,,, r i B F d i r i F d i x  b b ^ ^ hh ^ ^ hhll (49) 8... Cash Bonus he fair value is expressed as the discounted expected value of all future cash flows under the risk neutral measure Q and the survival probabilities: v p p t Q ] xb t x l! t r where CB(t) is the cash bonus paid at time t: r i E ^CB] th ] t px EQ^ CB] th Bcd ] n r c i,, p ] ^ h Finally, the fair value is iven by: r p,, xe C v ] b r i B r c i l ] ^ h ] t x ]  ] r r i o (5) erminal Bonus he fair value will have the same structure as in the one period model:
21 FAIR VALUAION OF VARIOUS PARICIPAION SCHEMES IN LIFE INSURANCE 95 ] v p,, r i B c i xd b l ^ hn (5) with: where Q a_ c^i,, h b E X  i r l ] ] i k F^d i,,,, r i F d i ^ hh  b l ^ ^ hh d i,, ln r s / s i ^ h b b l l d ^i,, h d ^i,, h  s 8.3. Equilibrium relation in multiple period models Reversionary Bonus Accordin to formula (49) and like in the binomial model, the equilibrium condition is the same as in the one period model Cash Bonus Usin formula (5), the equilibrium condition becomes for the cash bonus: r i r i B r c i,, C ]  ] b l ] ^ h ] r ] r or: B C r i r i ] rc^ i,, h ] rf^ d ^i,, hh  ] F^d ^i,, hh which is aain equal to the equilibrium value on one period (cf. (48)) erminal Bonus Usin formula (5), the equilibrium condition for the terminal bonus becomes: B ] r  ] ] r F^ d ^i,, hh  ] F^d ^i,, hh (5) 8.4. Comparison between reversionary and cash systems A same methodoloy as in section 6 can be used in order to obtain a rankin between fair values for reversionary and cash bonus when the parameters are
22 96 P. DEVOLDER AND I. DOMÍNGUEZFABIÁN not in equilibrium. Indeed usin respectively formulas (49) and (5), the fair values can be written as follows: in the reversionary case: in the cash case : ] v v p i BK* ] x ] ] r with: K* ] rc^i,, h p * r i r i B K ]  ] eb l ] r ] r i o x C which have exactly the same form as in the binomial case. So the same conclusion can be drawn. 9. CONCLUSION In this paper, we have developed various formulations in order to compare the fair value for life insurance products based on three participation schemes: reversionary, cash and terminal bonus, takin into account simultaneously the asset side and the liability side in a multiple period model. We have shown that the fair value depends on the investment stratey (and on the associated risk), on the participation level and on the uaranteed rate but also on the bonus system chosen. We have found some explicit equilibrium conditions between all these parameters. A deep comparison has been made between the three participation schemes, as well in terms of computation of the fair value as in the equilibrium conditions. Usin first a binomial model, we have obtained closed forms and iven clear interpretations on the link between the market conditions, the volatility of the assets and the parameters of the product. A same approach, leadin to similar conclusions, has been proposed in a time continuous model. he model could be also extended in order to take into account other aspects like surrender options, periodical premiums or the lonevity risk. REFERENCES AASE, K.K. and PERSSON, S.A. (994) Pricin of unitlinked life insurance policies, Scandinavian Actuarial Journal,, 65. BACINELLO, A.R. () Fair pricin of Life Insurance participatin policies with a minimum interest rate uaranteed, ASIN Bulletin, 3(), BACINELLO, A.R. (3a) Fair valuation of a uaranteed life insurance participatin contract embeddin a surrender option, Journal of Risk and Insurance, 7(3), BACINELLO, A.R. (3b) Pricin uaranteed life insurance participatin policies with annual premiums and surrender option, North American Actuarial Journal, 7(3), 7. BRIYS, E. and DE VARENNE, F. (997) On the risk of insurance liabilities: debunkin some common pitfalls, Journal of Risk an Insurance, 64(4),
Valuation of the Surrender Option Embedded in EquityLinked Life Insurance. Brennan Schwartz (1976,1979) Brennan Schwartz
Valuation of the Surrender Option Embedded in EquityLinked Life Insurance Brennan Schwartz (976,979) Brennan Schwartz 04 2005 6. Introduction Compared to traditional insurance products, one distinguishing
More informationThe Fair Valuation of Life Insurance Participating Policies: The Mortality Risk Role
The Fair Valuation of Life Insurance Participating Policies: The Mortality Risk Role Massimiliano Politano Department of Mathematics and Statistics University of Naples Federico II Via Cinthia, Monte S.Angelo
More informationFair Valuation and Hedging of Participating LifeInsurance Policies under Management Discretion
Fair Valuation and Hedging of Participating LifeInsurance Policies under Management Discretion Torsten Kleinow Department of Actuarial Mathematics and Statistics and the Maxwell Institute for Mathematical
More informationValuation of the Minimum Guaranteed Return Embedded in Life Insurance Products
Financial Institutions Center Valuation of the Minimum Guaranteed Return Embedded in Life Insurance Products by Knut K. Aase SveinArne Persson 9620 THE WHARTON FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS CENTER The Wharton
More informationINTERNATIONAL COMPARISON OF INTEREST RATE GUARANTEES IN LIFE INSURANCE
INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON OF INTEREST RATE GUARANTEES IN LIFE INSURANCE J. DAVID CUMMINS, KRISTIAN R. MILTERSEN, AND SVEINARNE PERSSON Date: This version: January 3, 4. The authors thank Thorleif Borge,
More informationINTERNATIONAL COMPARISON OF INTEREST RATE GUARANTEES IN LIFE INSURANCE
INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON OF INTEREST RATE GUARANTEES IN LIFE INSURANCE J. DAVID CUMMINS, KRISTIAN R. MILTERSEN, AND SVEINARNE PERSSON Abstract. Interest rate guarantees seem to be included in life insurance
More informationDESIGN OF LIFE INSURANCE PARTICIPATING POLICIES WITH VARIABLE GUARANTEES AND ANNUAL PREMIUMS
International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information and Control ICIC International c 2011 ISSN 13494198 Volume 7, Number 8, August 2011 pp. 4741 4753 DESIGN OF LIFE INSURANCE PARTICIPATING POLICIES
More informationFAIR VALUATION OF THE SURRENDER OPTION EMBEDDED IN A GUARANTEED LIFE INSURANCE PARTICIPATING POLICY. Anna Rita Bacinello
FAIR VALUATION OF THE SURRENDER OPTION EMBEDDED IN A GUARANTEED LIFE INSURANCE PARTICIPATING POLICY Anna Rita Bacinello Dipartimento di Matematica Applicata alle Scienze Economiche, Statistiche ed Attuariali
More informationASSESSING THE RISK POTENTIAL OF PREMIUM PAYMENT OPTIONS
ASSESSING THE RISK POTENTIAL OF PREMIUM PAYMENT OPTIONS IN PARTICIPATING LIFE INSURANCE CONTRACTS Nadine Gatzert phone: +41 71 2434012, fax: +41 71 2434040 nadine.gatzert@unisg.ch Hato Schmeiser phone:
More informationThe Effect of Management Discretion on Hedging and Fair Valuation of Participating Policies with Maturity Guarantees
The Effect of Management Discretion on Hedging and Fair Valuation of Participating Policies with Maturity Guarantees Torsten Kleinow and Mark Willder Department of Actuarial Mathematics and Statistics,
More informationValuation and Hedging of Participating LifeInsurance Policies under Management Discretion
Kleinow: Participating LifeInsurance Policies 1 Valuation and Hedging of Participating LifeInsurance Policies under Management Discretion Torsten Kleinow Department of Actuarial Mathematics and Statistics
More informationINTERNATIONAL COMPARISON OF INTEREST RATE GUARANTEES IN LIFE INSURANCE
INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON OF INTEREST RATE GUARANTEES IN LIFE INSURANCE J. DAVID CUMMINS, KRISTIAN R. MILTERSEN, AND SVEINARNE PERSSON Date: This version: August 7, 2004. The authors thank Thorleif Borge,
More informationThe Effective Dimension of AssetLiability Management Problems in Life Insurance
The Effective Dimension of AssetLiability Management Problems in Life Insurance Thomas Gerstner, Michael Griebel, Markus Holtz Institute for Numerical Simulation, University of Bonn holtz@ins.unibonn.de
More informationASSESSING THE RISK POTENTIAL OF PREMIUM PAYMENT OPTIONS IN PARTICIPATING LIFE INSURANCE CONTRACTS
ASSESSING THE RISK POTENTIAL OF PREMIUM PAYMENT OPTIONS IN PARTICIPATING LIFE INSURANCE CONTRACTS NADINE GATZERT HATO SCHMEISER WORKING PAPERS ON RISK MANAGEMENT AND INSURANCE NO. 22 EDITED BY HATO SCHMEISER
More informationOn Quantile Hedging and Its Applications to the Pricing of EquityLinked Life Insurance Contracts 1
On Quantile Hedging and Its Applications to the Pricing of EquityLinked Life Insurance Contracts 1 Alexander Melnikov Steklov Mathematical Institute of Russian Academy Sciences and Department of Mathematical
More informationANALYSIS OF PARTICIPATING LIFE INSURANCE CONTRACTS :
ANALYSIS OF PARTICIPATING LIFE INSURANCE CONTRACTS : A UNIFICATION APPROACH Nadine Gatzert Alexander Kling ABSTRACT Fair pricing of embedded options in life insurance contracts is usually conducted by
More informationPRICING AND INSOLVENCY RISK EVALUATING OF EMBEDDED OPTIONS IN UNIVERSAL INSURANCE CONSIDERING MORTALITY RATE
International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information and Control ICIC International c 2013 ISSN 13494198 Volume 9, Number 9, September 2013 pp. 3701 3714 PRICING AND INSOLVENCY RISK EVALUATING OF
More informationDEVELOPMENT AND PRICING OF A NEW PARTICIPATING CONTRACT
DEVELOPMEN AND PRICING OF A NEW PARICIPAING CONRAC Carole L. Bernard,* Olivier A. Le Courtois, and François M. QuittardPinon ABSRAC his article desins and prices a new type of participatin life insurance
More informationANALYSIS OF PARTICIPATING LIFE INSURANCE CONTRACTS :
ANALYSIS OF PARTICIPATING LIFE INSURANCE CONTRACTS : A UNIFICATION APPROACH Nadine Gatzert (corresponding author) Institute of Insurance Economics, University of St. Gallen, Switzerland; email: nadine.gatzert@unisg.ch
More informationANALYSIS OF PARTICIPATING LIFE INSURANCE CONTRACTS: A UNIFICATION APPROACH
ANALYSIS OF PARTICIPATING LIFE INSURANCE CONTRACTS: A UNIFICATION APPROACH NADINE GATZERT ALEXANDER KLING WORKING PAPERS ON RISK MANAGEMENT AND INSURANCE NO. 18 EDITED BY HATO SCHMEISER CHAIR FOR RISK
More informationPricing of Equitylinked Life Insurance Policies with an Asset Value Guarantee and Periodic Premiums
1485 Pricing of Equitylinked Life Insurance Policies with an Asset Value Guarantee and Periodic Premiums Annette Kurz Abstract In the present paper we establish a quasiexplicit formula for the periodic
More informationThe Effect of Management Discretion on Hedging and Fair Valuation of Participating Policies with Maturity Guarantees
The Effect of Management Discretion on Hedging and Fair Valuation of Participating Policies with Maturity Guarantees Torsten Kleinow HeriotWatt University, Edinburgh (joint work with Mark Willder) Marketconsistent
More informationOn the decomposition of risk in life insurance
On the decomposition of risk in life insurance Tom Fischer HeriotWatt University, Edinburgh April 7, 2005 fischer@ma.hw.ac.uk This work was partly sponsored by the German Federal Ministry of Education
More informationUNITLINKED LIFE INSURANCE CONTRACTS WITH INVESTMENT GUARANTEES A PROPOSAL FOR ROMANIAN LIFE INSURANCE MARKET
UNITLINKED LIFE INSURANCE CONTRACTS WITH INVESTMENT GUARANTEES A PROPOSAL FOR ROMANIAN LIFE INSURANCE MARKET Cristina CIUMAŞ Department of Finance, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, BabeşBolyai
More informationCREATING CUSTOMER VALUE IN PARTICIPATING LIFE INSURANCE
CREAING CUSOMER VALUE IN PARICIPAING LIFE INSURANCE ABSRAC he value of a life insurance contract may differ depending on whether it is looked at from the customer s point of view or that of the insurance
More informationRISK ASSESSMENT OF LIFE INSURANCE CONTRACTS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY IN A LÉVY FRAMEWORK
RISK ASSESSMENT OF LIFE INSURANCE CONTRACTS: A COMARATIVE STUDY IN A LÉVY FRAMEWORK Nadine Gatzert University of St. Gallen, Institute of Insurance Economics, Kirchlistrasse, 9010 St. Gallen, Switzerland,
More informationA Full Monte Carlo Approach to the Valuation of the Surrender Option Embedded in Life Insurance Contracts
A Full Monte Carlo Approach to the Valuation of the Surrender Option Embedded in Life Insurance Contracts Anna Rita Bacinello Dipartimento di Matematica Applicata alle Scienze Economiche, Statistiche ed
More informationMarket Value of Insurance Contracts with Profit Sharing 1
Market Value of Insurance Contracts with Profit Sharing 1 Pieter Bouwknegt NationaleNederlanden Actuarial Dept PO Box 796 3000 AT Rotterdam The Netherlands Tel: (31)10513 1326 Fax: (31)10513 0120 Email:
More informationUNITLINKED LIFE INSURANCE PRODUCTS VERSUS OTHER ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENTS
Dimitrie Cantemir Christian University Knowledge Horizons  Economics Volume 7, No. 3, pp. 222 227 PISSN: 20690932, EISSN: 20661061 2015 Pro Universitaria www.orizonturi.ucdc.ro UNITLINKED LIFE INSURANCE
More informationA Natural Hedge for Equity Indexed Annuities
A Natural Hedge for Equity Indexed Annuities Carole Bernard University of Waterloo c3bernar@uwaterloo.ca Phelim Boyle Wilfrid Laurier University pboyle@wlu.ca Reference number 73 Abstract Equity linked
More informationParticipating Life Insurance Contracts under Risk Based Solvency Frameworks: How to Increase Capital Efficiency by Product Design
Participating Life Insurance Contracts under Risk Based Solvency Frameworks: How to Increase Capital Efficiency by Product Design Andreas Reuß, Jochen Ruß and Jochen Wieland Abstract Traditional participating
More informationAsset Liability Management for Life Insurance: a Dynamic Approach
Risk Consulting CAPITAL MANAGEMENT ADVISORS srl Asset Liability Management for Life Insurance: a Dynamic Approach Dr Gabriele Susinno & Thierry Bochud Quantitative Strategies Capital Management Advisors
More informationThe Binomial Option Pricing Model André Farber
1 Solvay Business School Université Libre de Bruxelles The Binomial Option Pricing Model André Farber January 2002 Consider a nondividend paying stock whose price is initially S 0. Divide time into small
More informationInvestment strategies and risk management for participating life insurance contracts
Investment strategies and risk management for participating life insurance contracts Laura Ballotta and Steven Haberman Cass Business School April 16, 2009 Abstract This paper proposes an asset allocation
More information第 9 讲 : 股 票 期 权 定 价 : BS 模 型 Valuing Stock Options: The BlackScholes Model
1 第 9 讲 : 股 票 期 权 定 价 : BS 模 型 Valuing Stock Options: The BlackScholes Model Outline 有 关 股 价 的 假 设 The BS Model 隐 性 波 动 性 Implied Volatility 红 利 与 期 权 定 价 Dividends and Option Pricing 美 式 期 权 定 价 American
More informationRiskNeutral Valuation of Participating Life Insurance Contracts
RiskNeutral Valuation of Participating Life Insurance Contracts DANIEL BAUER with R. Kiesel, A. Kling, J. Russ, and K. Zaglauer ULM UNIVERSITY RTG 1100 AND INSTITUT FÜR FINANZ UND AKTUARWISSENSCHAFTEN
More informationINSTITUTE OF ACTUARIES OF INDIA
INSTITUTE OF ACTUARIES OF INDIA EXAMINATIONS 17 th November 2011 Subject CT5 General Insurance, Life and Health Contingencies Time allowed: Three Hours (10.00 13.00 Hrs) Total Marks: 100 INSTRUCTIONS TO
More informationOPTIONS and FUTURES Lecture 2: Binomial Option Pricing and Call Options
OPTIONS and FUTURES Lecture 2: Binomial Option Pricing and Call Options Philip H. Dybvig Washington University in Saint Louis binomial model replicating portfolio single period artificial (riskneutral)
More informationINSTITUTE AND FACULTY OF ACTUARIES EXAMINATION
INSTITUTE AND FACULTY OF ACTUARIES EXAMINATION 27 April 2015 (pm) Subject CT5 Contingencies Core Technical Time allowed: Three hours INSTRUCTIONS TO THE CANDIDATE 1. Enter all the candidate and examination
More informationEuropean Options Pricing Using Monte Carlo Simulation
European Options Pricing Using Monte Carlo Simulation Alexandros Kyrtsos Division of Materials Science and Engineering, Boston University akyrtsos@bu.edu European options can be priced using the analytical
More informationStocks paying discrete dividends: modelling and option pricing
Stocks paying discrete dividends: modelling and option pricing Ralf Korn 1 and L. C. G. Rogers 2 Abstract In the BlackScholes model, any dividends on stocks are paid continuously, but in reality dividends
More informationCall Price as a Function of the Stock Price
Call Price as a Function of the Stock Price Intuitively, the call price should be an increasing function of the stock price. This relationship allows one to develop a theory of option pricing, derived
More informationParticipating Life Insurance Products with Alternative Guarantees: Reconciling Policyholders and Insurers Interests
Participating Life Insurance Products with Alternative Guarantees: Reconciling Policyholders and Insurers Interests Prepared by Andreas Reuß, Jochen Ruß, Jochen Wieland Presented to the Actuaries Institute
More informationPart V: Option Pricing Basics
erivatives & Risk Management First Week: Part A: Option Fundamentals payoffs market microstructure Next 2 Weeks: Part B: Option Pricing fundamentals: intrinsic vs. time value, putcall parity introduction
More informationA liability driven approach to asset allocation
A liability driven approach to asset allocation Xinliang Chen 1, Jan Dhaene 2, Marc Goovaerts 2, Steven Vanduffel 3 Abstract. We investigate a liability driven methodology for determining optimal asset
More informationSimple formulas to option pricing and hedging in the Black Scholes model
Simple formulas to option pricing and hedging in the Black Scholes model Paolo Pianca Department of Applied Mathematics University Ca Foscari of Venice Dorsoduro 385/E, 3013 Venice, Italy pianca@unive.it
More informationunder Stochastic Interest Rates Dipartimento di Matematica Applicata alle Scienze University of Trieste Piazzale Europa 1, I34127 Trieste, Italy
Design and Pricing of EquityLinked Life Insurance under Stochastic Interest Rates Anna Rita Bacinello Dipartimento di Matematica Applicata alle Scienze Economiche, Statistiche ed Attuariali \Bruno de
More informationPricing participating policies with rate guarantees and bonuses
Pricing participating policies with rate guarantees and bonuses Chi Chiu Chu and Yue Kuen Kwok Department of Mathematics, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong, China
More informationUNITLINKED LIFE INSURANCE CONTRACTS WITH INVESTMENT GUARANTEES A PROPOSAL FOR ROMANIAN LIFE INSURANCE MARKET
UNITLINKED LIFE INSURANCE CONTRACTS WITH INVESTMENT GUARANTEES A PROPOSAL FOR ROMANIAN LIFE INSURANCE MARKET Cristina CIUMAŞ Department of Finance, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, BabeşBolyai
More informationBINOMIAL OPTIONS PRICING MODEL. Mark Ioffe. Abstract
BINOMIAL OPTIONS PRICING MODEL Mark Ioffe Abstract Binomial option pricing model is a widespread numerical method of calculating price of American options. In terms of applied mathematics this is simple
More informationChapter 2 Theoretical Considerations Regarding Embedded Options
Chapter 2 Theoretical Considerations Regarding Embedded Options In the previous chapter I have introduced the subject of embedded options and guarantees. Now I will specify the terms embedded option and
More informationThe Real Options Attached to an Investment Project
The Real Options Attached to an Investment Project MihaiCristian DINICĂ 1 ABSTRACT The real options capture the importance of the managerial team s role in creating value through investment projects.
More informationGN47: Stochastic Modelling of Economic Risks in Life Insurance
GN47: Stochastic Modelling of Economic Risks in Life Insurance Classification Recommended Practice MEMBERS ARE REMINDED THAT THEY MUST ALWAYS COMPLY WITH THE PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT STANDARDS (PCS) AND THAT
More informationParticipating Life Insurance Products with Alternative. Guarantees: Reconciling Policyholders and Insurers. Interests
Participating Life Insurance Products with Alternative Guarantees: Reconciling Policyholders and Insurers Interests Andreas Reuß Institut für Finanz und Aktuarwissenschaften LiseMeitnerStraße 14, 89081
More informationConsider a European call option maturing at time T
Lecture 10: Multiperiod Model Options BlackScholesMerton model Prof. Markus K. Brunnermeier 1 Binomial Option Pricing Consider a European call option maturing at time T with ihstrike K: C T =max(s T
More informationOption pricing. Vinod Kothari
Option pricing Vinod Kothari Notation we use this Chapter will be as follows: S o : Price of the share at time 0 S T : Price of the share at time T T : time to maturity of the option r : risk free rate
More informationFair Value of Life Liabilities with Embedded Options: an Application to a Portfolio of Italian Insurance Policies
Fair Value of Life Liabilities with Embedded Options: an Application to a Portfolio of Italian Insurance Policies Giulia Andreatta Stefano Corradin RAS Spa Pianificazione Redditività di Gruppo This Version:
More informationIMPLICIT OPTIONS IN LIFE INSURANCE: AN OVERVIEW
IMPLICIT OPTIONS IN LIFE INSURANCE: AN OVERVIEW NADINE GATZERT WORKING PAPERS ON RISK MANAGEMENT AND INSURANCE NO. 33 EDITED BY HATO SCHMEISER CHAIR FOR RISK MANAGEMENT AND INSURANCE JANUARY 2009 IMPLICIT
More informationBlack Scholes Merton Approach To Modelling Financial Derivatives Prices Tomas Sinkariovas 0802869. Words: 3441
Black Scholes Merton Approach To Modelling Financial Derivatives Prices Tomas Sinkariovas 0802869 Words: 3441 1 1. Introduction In this paper I present Black, Scholes (1973) and Merton (1973) (BSM) general
More informationParticipating Life Insurance Contracts under Risk Based. Solvency Frameworks: How to increase Capital Efficiency.
Participating Life Insurance Contracts under Risk Based Solvency Frameworks: How to increase Capital Efficiency by Product Design Andreas Reuß Institut für Finanz und Aktuarwissenschaften Helmholtzstraße
More informationDeciding Whether a Life Insurance Contract Should Be Reinstated
Deciding Whether a Life Insurance Contract Should Be Reinstated Hong Mao Business School Shanghai Second Polytechnic University Email: maohong@ems.sspu.cn Krzysztof M. Ostaszewski Illinois State University
More informationInstitute of Actuaries of India Subject ST2 Life Insurance
Institute of Actuaries of India Subject ST2 Life Insurance For 2015 Examinations Aim The aim of the Life Insurance Specialist Technical subject is to instil in successful candidates principles of actuarial
More informationCS 522 Computational Tools and Methods in Finance Robert Jarrow Lecture 1: Equity Options
CS 5 Computational Tools and Methods in Finance Robert Jarrow Lecture 1: Equity Options 1. Definitions Equity. The common stock of a corporation. Traded on organized exchanges (NYSE, AMEX, NASDAQ). A common
More informationVALUATION IN DERIVATIVES MARKETS
VALUATION IN DERIVATIVES MARKETS September 2005 Rawle Parris ABN AMRO Property Derivatives What is a Derivative? A contract that specifies the rights and obligations between two parties to receive or deliver
More informationAsymmetry and the Cost of Capital
Asymmetry and the Cost of Capital Javier García Sánchez, IAE Business School Lorenzo Preve, IAE Business School Virginia Sarria Allende, IAE Business School Abstract The expected cost of capital is a crucial
More informationThe Behavior of Bonds and Interest Rates. An Impossible Bond Pricing Model. 780 w Interest Rate Models
780 w Interest Rate Models The Behavior of Bonds and Interest Rates Before discussing how a bond marketmaker would deltahedge, we first need to specify how bonds behave. Suppose we try to model a zerocoupon
More informationNoarbitrage conditions for cashsettled swaptions
Noarbitrage conditions for cashsettled swaptions Fabio Mercurio Financial Engineering Banca IMI, Milan Abstract In this note, we derive noarbitrage conditions that must be satisfied by the pricing function
More informationLife Assurance (Provision of Information) Regulations, 2001
ACTUARIAL STANDARD OF PRACTICE LA8 LIFE ASSURANCE PRODUCT INFORMATION Classification Mandatory MEMBERS ARE REMINDED THAT THEY MUST ALWAYS COMPLY WITH THE CODE OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT AND THAT ACTUARIAL
More informationLife Cycle Asset Allocation A Suitable Approach for Defined Contribution Pension Plans
Life Cycle Asset Allocation A Suitable Approach for Defined Contribution Pension Plans Challenges for defined contribution plans While Eastern Europe is a prominent example of the importance of defined
More informationIMPLICIT OPTIONS IN LIFE INSURANCE CONTRACTS The case of lump sum options in deferred annuity contracts Tobias S. Dillmann Institut fur Finanz und Aktuarwissenschaften c/o Abteilung Unternehmensplanung
More informationWhen to Refinance Mortgage Loans in a Stochastic Interest Rate Environment
When to Refinance Mortgage Loans in a Stochastic Interest Rate Environment Siwei Gan, Jin Zheng, Xiaoxia Feng, and Dejun Xie Abstract Refinancing refers to the replacement of an existing debt obligation
More informationON DETERMINANTS AND SENSITIVITIES OF OPTION PRICES IN DELAYED BLACKSCHOLES MODEL
ON DETERMINANTS AND SENSITIVITIES OF OPTION PRICES IN DELAYED BLACKSCHOLES MODEL A. B. M. Shahadat Hossain, Sharif Mozumder ABSTRACT This paper investigates determinantwise effect of option prices when
More informationASSET MANAGEMENT AND SURPLUS DISTRIBUTION STRATEGIES IN LIFE INSURANCE: AN EXAMINATION WITH RESPECT TO RISK PRICING AND RISK MEASUREMENT
ASSET MANAGEMENT AND SURPLUS DISTRIBUTION STRATEGIES IN LIFE INSURANCE: AN EXAMINATION WITH RESPECT TO RISK PRICING AND RISK MEASUREMENT NADINE GATZERT WORKING PAPERS ON RISK MANAGEMENT AND INSURANCE NO.
More informationCHAPTER 7: PROPERTIES OF STOCK OPTION PRICES
CHAPER 7: PROPERIES OF SOCK OPION PRICES 7.1 Factors Affecting Option Prices able 7.1 Summary of the Effect on the Price of a Stock Option of Increasing One Variable While Keeping All Other Fixed Variable
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS. Executive Summary 3. Introduction 5. Purposes of the Joint Research Project 6
TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 3 Introduction 5 Purposes of the Joint Research Project 6 Background 7 1. Contract and timeframe illustrated 7 2. Liability measurement bases 9 3. Earnings 10 Consideration
More informationParticipating Life Insurance Contracts under Risk Based Solvency Frameworks: How to increase Capital Efficiency by Product Design
Participating Life Insurance Contracts under Risk Based Solvency Frameworks: How to increase Capital Efficiency by Product Design Andreas Reuß, Jochen Ruß and Jochen Wieland Abstract Traditional participating
More informationRisk Neutral Valuation of WithProfits Life Insurance Contracts
Risk Neutral Valuation of WithProfits Life Insurance Contracts Bauer, Daniel Graduiertenkolleg 1100, University of Ulm Helmholtzstraße 22, 89081 Ulm, Germany Phone: +49 (731) 50 31088. Fax: +49 (731)
More informationHedging Illiquid FX Options: An Empirical Analysis of Alternative Hedging Strategies
Hedging Illiquid FX Options: An Empirical Analysis of Alternative Hedging Strategies Drazen Pesjak Supervised by A.A. Tsvetkov 1, D. Posthuma 2 and S.A. Borovkova 3 MSc. Thesis Finance HONOURS TRACK Quantitative
More informationGN8: Additional Guidance on valuation of longterm insurance business
GN8: Additional Guidance on valuation of longterm insurance business Classification Practice Standard MEMBERS ARE REMINDED THAT THEY MUST ALWAYS COMPLY WITH THE PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT STANDARDS (PCS) AND
More informationArticle from: Risk Management. June 2009 Issue 16
Article from: Risk Management June 2009 Issue 16 CHAIRSPERSON S Risk quantification CORNER Structural Credit Risk Modeling: Merton and Beyond By Yu Wang The past two years have seen global financial markets
More informationThe IASB Insurance Project for life insurance contracts: Impact on reserving methods and solvency requirements
Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 39 (2006) 356 375 www.elsevier.com/locate/ime The IASB Insurance Project for life insurance contracts: Impact on reserving methods and solvency requirements Laura Ballotta
More informationExam Introduction Mathematical Finance and Insurance
Exam Introduction Mathematical Finance and Insurance Date: January 8, 2013. Duration: 3 hours. This is a closedbook exam. The exam does not use scrap cards. Simple calculators are allowed. The questions
More informationA COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS BETWEEN UNITLINKED LIFE INSURANCE AND OTHER ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENTS
A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS BETWEEN UNITLINKED LIFE INSURANCE AND OTHER ALTERNATIVE INVESTMENTS CRISTINA CIUMAS PROFESSOR, PH.D., DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE, FACULTY OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, BABEŞBOLYAI
More informationFeatured article: Evaluating the Cost of Longevity in Variable Annuity Living Benefits
Featured article: Evaluating the Cost of Longevity in Variable Annuity Living Benefits By Stuart Silverman and Dan Theodore This is a followup to a previous article Considering the Cost of Longevity Volatility
More informationSome Observations on Variance and Risk
Some Observations on Variance and Risk 1 Introduction By K.K.Dharni Pradip Kumar 1.1 In most actuarial contexts some or all of the cash flows in a contract are uncertain and depend on the death or survival
More informationBlackScholesMerton approach merits and shortcomings
BlackScholesMerton approach merits and shortcomings Emilia Matei 1005056 EC372 Term Paper. Topic 3 1. Introduction The BlackScholes and Merton method of modelling derivatives prices was first introduced
More informationBlackScholes Equation for Option Pricing
BlackScholes Equation for Option Pricing By Ivan Karmazin, Jiacong Li 1. Introduction In early 1970s, Black, Scholes and Merton achieved a major breakthrough in pricing of European stock options and there
More informationResearch on Option Trading Strategies
Research on Option Trading Strategies An Interactive Qualifying Project Report: Submitted to the Faculty of the WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree
More informationA Joint Valuation of Premium Payment and Surrender Options in Participating Life Insurance Contracts
A Joint Valuation of Premium Payment and Surrender Options in Participating Life Insurance Contracts Hato Schmeiser, Joël Wagner Institute of Insurance Economics University of St. Gallen, Switzerland Singapore,
More informationFurther Topics in Actuarial Mathematics: Premium Reserves. Matthew Mikola
Further Topics in Actuarial Mathematics: Premium Reserves Matthew Mikola April 26, 2007 Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Expected Loss...................................... 2 1.2 An Overview of the Project...............................
More informationIntroduction to ArbitrageFree Pricing: Fundamental Theorems
Introduction to ArbitrageFree Pricing: Fundamental Theorems Dmitry Kramkov Carnegie Mellon University Workshop on Interdisciplinary Mathematics, Penn State, May 810, 2015 1 / 24 Outline Financial market
More informationarxiv:1108.4393v2 [qfin.pr] 25 Aug 2011
arxiv:1108.4393v2 [qfin.pr] 25 Aug 2011 Pricing Variable Annuity Contracts with HighWater Mark Feature V.M. Belyaev Allianz Investment Management, Allianz Life Minneapolis, MN, USA August 26, 2011 Abstract
More informationDynamic Hybrid Products in Life Insurance: Assessing the Policyholders Viewpoint
Dynamic Hybrid Products in Life Insurance: Assessing the Policyholders Viewpoint Samos, May 2014 Alexander Bohnert *, Patricia Born, Nadine Gatzert * * FriedrichAlexanderUniversity of ErlangenNürnberg,
More informationMULTIPLE DEFAULTS AND MERTON'S MODEL L. CATHCART, L. ELJAHEL
ISSN 17446783 MULTIPLE DEFAULTS AND MERTON'S MODEL L. CATHCART, L. ELJAHEL Tanaka Business School Discussion Papers: TBS/DP04/12 London: Tanaka Business School, 2004 Multiple Defaults and Merton s Model
More informationIntroduction. and set F = F ib(f) and G = F ib(g). If the total fiber T of the square is connected, then T >
A NEW ELLULAR VERSION OF LAKERSMASSEY WOJIEH HAHÓLSKI AND JÉRÔME SHERER Abstract. onsider a pushout diaram of spaces A, construct the homotopy pushout, and then the homotopy pullback of the diaram one
More informationPREMIUM AND BONUS. MODULE  3 Practice of Life Insurance. Notes
4 PREMIUM AND BONUS 4.0 INTRODUCTION A insurance policy needs to be bought. This comes at a price which is known as premium. Premium is the consideration for covering of the risk of the insured. The insured
More informationFundamentals of Actuarial Mathematics. 3rd Edition
Brochure More information from http://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/2866022/ Fundamentals of Actuarial Mathematics. 3rd Edition Description:  Provides a comprehensive coverage of both the deterministic
More informationHedging Guarantees in Variable Annuities. Under Both Equity and Interest Rate Risks
Hedging Guarantees in Variable Annuities Under Both Equity and Interest Rate Risks Thomas F. Coleman a,,yuyingli a, MariaCristina Patron b,1 a Department of Computer Science, Cornell University, Ithaca,
More informationOptions: Valuation and (No) Arbitrage
Prof. Alex Shapiro Lecture Notes 15 Options: Valuation and (No) Arbitrage I. Readings and Suggested Practice Problems II. Introduction: Objectives and Notation III. No Arbitrage Pricing Bound IV. The Binomial
More informationGN47: Stochastic Modelling for Life Insurance Reserving and Capital Assessment
GN47: Stochastic Modelling for Life Insurance Reserving and Capital Assessment Classification Recommended Practice MEMBERS ARE REMINDED THAT THEY MUST ALWAYS COMPLY WITH THE PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT STANDARDS
More information