NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT
|
|
- Isabel Harvey
- 8 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Djukich v. Carwell, LLC d/b/a Mercedes-Benz of South Bay Case No. CV BRO (AGRx) United States District Court, Central District of California, Western Division 312 North Spring Street Los Angeles, CA This is not a solicitation. This is not a lawsuit against you and you are not being sued. However, your legal rights are affected whether you act or do not act. To: All current and former technicians, service technicians, or mechanics who were employed by Carwell, LLC ( Carwell ) from April 29, 2009 to June 30, 2013, and who were paid on a Flat Rate Basis 1 under the Challenged Pay Plan 2 at any time during the aforementioned period. ( Class or Class Member ). The Court authorized this Notice of Proposed Class Action Settlement ( Notice ). PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY DO NOTHING CHANGE CONTACT INFORMATION EXCLUDE YOURSELF OBJECT YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS PROPOSED SETTLEMENT 3 To receive your Class Benefit (i.e., a monetary payment made by check), you do not need to do anything other than notify the Settlement Administrator, whose contact information is shown below, of any changes in your name or mailing address. Your Class Benefit check will be mailed to you, automatically, if the Court grants final approval. Update your personal information with the Settlement Administrator to ensure your Class Benefit check is mailed to the correct address. It is your responsibility to notify the Settlement Administrator of any change in your name or mailing address. You can exclude yourself if you do not want to participate in the proposed Settlement. If you exclude yourself, you will not receive a Class Benefit check. This is the only option that allows you to pursue your own claims, at your own expense, against Carwell, LLC. You can object to the proposed Settlement by preparing a written statement stating why you think the proposed Settlement is not fair. Your rights and options and the deadlines to exercise them are explained in this Notice. Carwell has agreed to the proposed Settlement and will not retaliate in any manner against any Class Member who remains in the Class and receives his Class Benefit or any Class Member who excludes himself from the Class. For the full terms, please consult the Settlement Agreement and General Release which may be viewed on the website. This notice only has a summary of the terms which may be incomplete. 1 Defined as payment to technicians, service technicians, or mechanics based on specified repairs performed on vehicles, supplemented during any particular pay period by a tool allowance if necessary to ensure compensation for such pay period at no less than double the then-applicable minimum wage of eight dollars and zero cents ($8.00). 2 Defined as the pay plan in effect as of April 29, 2009, that paid technicians, service technicians, and mechanics on a Flat Rate Basis and that is the subject of challenge in [Djukich v. Carwell, LLC]. 3 This table is a summary only. Your full rights and obligations are set forth in the Settlement Agreement and General Release which can be view on the, and more details are provided below. Page 1 of 8
2 BASIC INFORMATION 1. Why did I get this Notice? You received this notice because Carwell s records identify you as a technician, service technician, or mechanic whom it employed at some time from April 29, 2009, to June 30, 2013, and who was paid on a Flat Rate Basis 4 under the Challenged Pay Plan 5 at some time during the aforementioned period. The purpose of this Notice is to explain the Action (Pavel Djukich v. Carwell, LLC d/b/a Mercedes-Benz of South Bay, Case No. CV BRO (AGRx)), the proposed Settlement, your legal rights, what benefits are available, who is eligible, and how to get those benefits. The Court in charge of the case is the United States District Court for the Central District of California. 2. What is this Action about? The Action alleged Carwell paid Class Members pursuant to a Challenged Pay Plan, which Plaintiff claimed did not comply with California Law, and that was in effect through around May 31, Plaintiff claimed the Challenged Pay Plan deprived Class Members of minimum wages and overtime wages for all hours worked in violation of the California Labor Code, Industrial Welfare Commission Wage Order 4, and California s Unfair Competition Law. The Action seeks damages for unpaid wages, interest, attorneys fees, and costs. Carwell denies all allegations in the Action and contends that at all times it has complied with the California Labor Code, Industrial Welfare Commission Wage Order 4, and California s Unfair Competition Law. Carwell contends that the Challenged Pay Plan substantially rewarded Class Members by allowing them to earn well more than the applicable minimum wage to which they were entitled under state law. Carwell denies that it is liable for any damages whatsoever. Carwell entered the Settlement Agreement to avoid the ongoing costs and distractions of litigation. The proposed Settlement is not an admission of any wrongdoing by Carwell or an indication that it violated any law. 3. Why is this a Class Action? In a class action, a Class Representative sues on behalf of himself and other people who have similar claims. The group of people with similar claims is called a Class. Each person covered by the Class definition is a Class Member. Here, the Class Representative is Plaintiff Pavel Djukich. There are an estimated 59 Class Members. The Court will resolve the issues for all Class Members, except for those who exclude themselves from the Class. Judge Beverly Reid O Connell of the United States District Court for the Central District of California is in charge of this Action. 4. Why is there a proposed Settlement? The Court did not decide in favor of Plaintiff Djukich or Defendant Carwell. There was no trial. Instead, both sides agreed to a no-fault settlement of the Action. That way, they avoid the cost of further litigation and trial, and the people affected will get compensation from the Settlement if the Court approves it. The Class Representative and Class Counsel (the attorneys for the Class Representative) think the proposed Settlement is in best interest of the Class Members. 4 Defined as payment to technicians, service technicians, or mechanics based on specified repairs performed on vehicles, supplemented during any particular pay period by a tool allowance if necessary to ensure compensation for such pay period at no less than double the then-applicable minimum wage of eight dollars and zero cents ($8.00). 5 Defined as the pay plan in effect as of April 29, 2009, that paid technicians, service technicians, and mechanics on a Flat Rate Basis and that is the subject of challenge in [Djukich v. Carwell, LLC]. 5 Defined as the pay plan in effect as of April 29, 2009, that paid technicians, service technicians, and mechanics on a Flat Rate Basis and that is the subject of challenge in [Djukich v. Carwell, LLC]. Page 2 of 8
3 5. Who are the Parties in this Lawsuit? Plaintiff Pavel Djukich, the Class Representative, was employed by Carwell from about November 2003 through October 2006, and then again from November 2006 through October 2010, as a service technician under the Challenged Pay Plan. Defendant Carwell, LLC does business as and operates Mercedes-Benz of South Bay, an automobile dealership. 6. Who are the attorneys for the Parties? Counsel for Plaintiff: Counsel for Defendant: Isam C. Khoury (Bar No ) Diana M. Khoury (Bar No ) Michael D. Singer (Bar No ) Kimberly D. Neilson (Bar No ) COHELAN KHOURY & SINGER Kimberly D. Neilson 605 C Street, Suite 200 San Diego, California Telephone: (619) Daniel F. Katz (pro hac vice) Luba Shur (pro hac vice) Steven M. Pyser (pro hac vice) David M. Horniak (Bar No ) Zorana Zupac (Bar No ) WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP 725 Twelfth Street, N.W. Washington, DC Telephone: (202) Kashif Haque (Bar No ) Samuel A. Wong (Bar No ) AEGIS LAW FIRM, PC 9811 Irvine Center Drive, Suite 100 Irvine, California Telephone: (949) Christopher C. Hoffman (Bar No ) FISHER & PHILLIPS LLP 4747 Executive Drive, Suite 1000 San Diego, California Telephone: (858) Lonnie D. Giamela (Bar No ) FISHER & PHILLIPS LLP 444 South Flower Street, Suite 1590 Los Angeles, California Telephone: (213) If you have questions regarding this proposed Settlement, you should contact Class Counsel or the Settlement Administrator. Do NOT contact the Court, Carwell, or Carwell s Counsel for Defendant Carwell or Carwell s managers or supervisors regarding your questions. THE TERMS OF THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT 7. What is the amount of the proposed Settlement? The proposed Settlement provides for a cash payment of $919,000 to fully and finally resolve the Action (referred to as the Gross Settlement Fund or GSF). The Class Counsel will apply to the Court for Attorneys Fees of up to 30% of the Gross Settlement Fund (no greater than $275,700), Costs incurred by Class Counsel in the Action (no greater than $36,500), a payment to the Class Representative as an Enhancement or Service Payment Award of up to $10,000), and Settlement Administration Expenses estimated to be $9,000. The exact amount of the Attorneys Fees, Costs, the Enhancement or Service Payment Award, and Settlement Administration Expenses will be determined or approved by the Court at a Final Fairness Hearing. The remaining portion of the GSF, the Net Settlement Fund or NSF, is estimated to be approximately $587,800, less the employer-sided taxes. This amount is also referred to as the Class Benefit. The NSF will be apportioned and paid automatically to all Class Members who do not request to be excluded from the Page 3 of 8
4 proposed Settlement. Any portion of the NSF that would have been attributed to Class Members who request exclusion from the Settlement will be paid to the Class Members who participate in the Settlement. No portion of the NSF will revert to Carwell. 8. How will the Class Benefit be calculated? Class Members who do not request exclusion will receive their share of the NSF based on the number of weeks worked from April 29, 2009 through June 30, 2013, as a technician, service technician, or mechanic paid on a Flat Rate Basis under the Challenged Pay Plan. The Class Benefit will be characterized as 60% wages, which amount will be reduced by applicable payroll tax withholdings and deductions and for which an IRS Form W-2 will be issued; the remaining 40% will be characterized as non-wage damages, e.g., interest, for which an IRS Form 1099 will be issued. 9. How much will my Class Benefit be? The precise amount of your Class Benefit will depend on your dates of employment, the number of weeks worked as a Class Member from April 29, 2009, to June 30, 2013, and the estimated amount you will receive minus any applicable tax withholding. The attached Employment Information Sheet includes the information upon which your share of the Class Benefit will be based, i.e., your dates of employment during the period from April 29, 2009, to June 30, 2013, and based on that information, also shows the estimated amount of your Class Benefit check should the Court grant final approval of the proposed Settlement. HOW TO GET A PAYMENT 10. How can I get my Class Benefit check? If you do nothing, you will automatically receive your Class Benefit if the Court approves the proposed Settlement at the Final Fairness Hearing. You must, however, notify the Settlement Administrator of any change in your name or mailing address. It is your responsibility to keep the Settlement Administrator informed of any change in your name or address, as your Class Benefit check will be mailed to the last known address on file. A Change of Address Form and a preprinted, return envelope have been enclosed for your convenience. It is strongly recommended that you retain a copy of the completed Change of Address Form until you receive your Class Benefit check. 11. What do I do if the number of weeks is wrong? The amount of your Class Benefit check will be based on the number of weeks worked as a Class Member at any time during the period April 29, 2009, through June 30, The number of weeks you worked during this period is shown on the attached Employment Information Sheet and is based on Carwell s records. If you believe the number of weeks worked shown on the Employment Information Sheet is not correct, you must postmark on or before October 8, 2015, a letter to the Settlement Administrator indicating what you believe the correct dates are. You should include any documents or other information which supports your belief regarding the number of weeks worked as a Class Member. The Settlement Administrator will resolve any dispute based on Carwell s records and any information which you provide. 12. When can I expect to receive my Class Benefit? If you do not exclude yourself from the proposed Settlement, your share of the Settlement will be paid if the Court grants Final Judicial Approval of the proposed Settlement approximately 30 business days after Final Judicial Approval. Class Members receiving a Class Benefit check will be responsible for correctly characterizing this compensation for tax purposes and paying any taxes due, if any. Page 4 of 8
5 Class Benefit checks generally shall expire one hundred fifty (150) days after they are issued, and shall so indicate on their face. Thus, it is important that you cash your check before the 150-day expiration period. If a check remains uncashed after the expiration period, the funds represented by the uncashed checks will be donated to a charitable organization, the United Way of California, What am I giving up to get a Class Benefit? Unless you exclude yourself, you will remain in the Class, and that means that you cannot bring any claims or be part of any other proceedings against Carwell as described in detail in the Settlement Agreement and General Release and below. Specifically, you will be giving up or releasing the claims described below: A. Released Claims: After the Court has finally approved the proposed Settlement, the Settlement will fully release and discharge Carwell as provided in Section V of the Settlement Agreement and General Release. The discussion below captures the key release provisions, but there are more details in the Settlement Agreement and General Release that you should consult for a more detail discussion of the release. Effective upon the date of Final Judicial Approval, 6 the Plaintiff Class Releasing Parties, 7 and each of them, collectively, individually, separately, and severally, shall release and forever discharge the Defendant Released Parties 8 from the Released Claims 9 which the Plaintiff Class Releasing Parties ever had, now have, or may have arising out of or relating directly or indirectly in any manner whatsoever to the facts alleged or asserted in the Action, and all claims which were or could have been asserted based on the facts asserted in the Action, and including but in no way limited to any claims related directly or indirectly in any manner whatsoever to those 6 Final Judicial Approval means ten (10) days after the Final Judgment and Order is rendered not subject to any appeal, attempt to re-open the judgment, or request to extend the time to seek an appeal or, if an appeal had been sought, the expiration of ten (10) days after the last of (1) the final disposition of any such appeal and (2) any further proceedings in the Court or on subsequent appeal, which ultimate disposition approves the Court s Final Judgment and Order. 7 Plaintiff Class Releasing Parties means Plaintiff and each Settlement Class Member and each of his, respectively, administrators, agents, assigns, attorneys, children, heirs, executors, legatees, offspring, personal and legal representatives, current or former spouses, successors, and trustees. This definition does not apply to children and spouses insofar as they attempt to enforce any claim unrelated to any Released Claims and that is not derivative of any right of Plaintiff or any Settlement Class Member. 8 Defendant Released Parties means Carwell, AutoNation, and each of their affiliates, parents, and subsidiaries, and their respective past and present accountants, administrators, affiliates, agents, assigns, attorneys, auditors, brokers, consultants, directors, divisions, employees, executors, fiduciaries, general partners, heirs, insurers, joint venturers, law firms, licensors, limited partners, members, officers, owners, parents, partners, predecessors, principals, privies, reinsurers, representatives, shareholders, subsidiaries, successors, vendors, and all persons acting by, through, under, or in concert with them, or any of them. 9 Released Claims means and includes without limitation (1) any and all accusations, actions, agreements, allegations, arbitrations, causes of action, charges, claims, contracts, controversies, damages, demands, disputes, grievances, judgments, lawsuits, liabilities, liens, obligations, promises, and rights or proceedings of any and every kind; (2) whether based on constitutional, federal, local, municipal, or state law or executive order; (3) whether arising under common law, contract (oral or written and express or implied), equity, ordinance, order, public policy, regulation, statute, tort, or on any other theory of recovery; (4) whether asserted or unasserted, choate or inchoate, known or unknown, suspected or unsuspected, and foreseen or unforeseen; (5) whether contingent or fixed; (6) whether on an individual, class, collective, derivative, private-attorney-general, representative, or on any other basis or in any other capacity; and (7) including all forms of relief and remedies, such as all benefits, civil or statutory penalties, claims in equity and for equitable relief, costs, damages (including civil, compensatory, economic or non-economic, exemplary, general, liquidated, punitive, special, and statutory damages), debts, declarations, disbursements, expenses, fees, injunctions, interest, liabilities, losses, minimum wages, overtime wages, premium pay, tool allowance, tool reimbursement, waiting time penalties, and attorneys and other professionals costs, disbursements, expenses, and fees, and any other form of relief or remedy in law or equity, of whatever kind or nature whatsoever. By way of illustration only and by no means intending to limit the forgoing, Released Claims include claims as follows: claims for or related to unpaid minimum, overtime, double-time, and other wages or that such wages were not paid on separation; claims for or related to missed meal or rest breaks or unpaid rest breaks; claims for or related to recordkeeping violations; claims for or related to paystub violations or any purported failure to provide accurate or itemized wage statements; and claims for or related to failure to reimburse employees for equipment or tools. Page 5 of 8
6 claims raised by Plaintiff in any pleading, motion, or brief, from the beginning of the world through the execution hereof ( Plaintiff Class Release ). It is expressly intended and understood by the Parties that this Agreement is to be construed as a complete settlement, accord, and satisfaction of the Released Claims. With respect to the claims covered by Section V of the Settlement Agreement and General Release, the Class Representative and the Plaintiff Class Releasing Parties stipulate and agree that, effective upon the date of Final Judicial Approval, they shall be deemed to have, and by operation of the Final Order and Judgment shall have, expressly waived and relinquished, to the fullest extent permitted by law, the provisions, rights and benefits of Section 1542 of the California Civil Code, which provides: A GENERAL RELEASE DOES NOT EXTEND TO CLAIMS WHICH THE CREDITOR DOES NOT KNOW OR SUSPECT TO EXIST IN HIS OR HER FAVOR AT THE TIME OF EXECUTING THE RELEASE, WHICH IF KNOWN BY HIM OR HER MUST HAVE MATERIALLY AFFECTED HIS OR HER SETTLEMENT WITH THE DEBTOR. In addition, notwithstanding the choice of law provision in this Agreement, and to the fullest extent that any other law may be deemed applicable despite the choice of law provision herein, the Plaintiff Class Releasing Parties hereby agree that all federal or state laws, rights, rules, or legal principles similar, comparable, or equivalent to the provisions of Section 1542 of the Civil Code of the State of California, are hereby knowingly and voluntarily waived and relinquished. EXCLUDING YOURSELF FROM THE SETTLEMENT 14. How do I exclude myself from the proposed Settlement? If you wish to pursue your own separate claims against Carwell that the proposed Settlement releases, or if you otherwise wish not to participate in the proposed Settlement for whatever reason, you should exclude yourself ( opt out ) from this case. To do so, you must mail a request to be excluded to Class Counsel, Carwell s Counsel and the Settlement Administrator postmarked no later than thirty (30) days after mailing of the Notice Packet, on or before October 8, Untimely requests for exclusion will not be considered. The request for exclusion must be personally signed by the Class Member who seeks to opt out. A Class Member requesting to be excluded must set forth the following in writing: a) The case caption; b) The full name, address, and telephone number of the person opting out; c) The term Request for Exclusion at the top of the document; and d) A declaration stating: I request that I be excluded from the Settlement in Pavel Djukich v. Carwell, LLC, No. CV BRO (AGRx). I understand that by requesting to be excluded from the Settlement Class, I will not receive any benefits under the Settlement. The mailing addresses for Class Counsel and Carwell s Counsel are noted above. The mailing address of the Settlement Administrator is as follows: No. Djukich v. Carwell, LLC c/o CPT Group, Inc Aston Irvine, CA If I do not exclude myself, can I bring claims the proposed Settlement releases against Carwell later? Page 6 of 8
7 16. If I exclude myself, can I get money from this proposed Settlement? No. If you exclude yourself, you will not receive a Settlement Payment. The Settlement Payment that you would have been entitled to receive will be redistributed to the remaining participating Class Members. No portion of the Gross Settlement Fund will go back to Carwell as a result of a request to be excluded. OBJECTING TO THE SETTLEMENT 17. How do I tell the Court that I do not like the proposed Settlement? If you do not think the proposed Settlement is fair or would like to object for some other reason, you can do so. Any Class Member who has not opted out of the Settlement, claims the Settlement is not adequate, fair, or reasonable, and wishes to object to the Settlement or otherwise intervene must file a written objection with the Court and serve the written objection on Class Counsel, Carwell s Counsel, and the Settlement Administrator postmarked no later than thirty (30) days after mailing of the Notice Packet on or before October 8, Class Members shall not be entitled to speak at the Final Fairness Hearing unless they have submitted a valid and timely written objection, and request to speak at the hearing pursuant to this paragraph or unless requested to speak by the Court. The written objections must set forth the following: a) The case caption; b) The full name, address, and telephone number of the person objecting; c) Evidence that the person is a Class Member; d) The word Objection at the top of the document; e) A statement of each Objection being asserted and the basis for each Objection; and f) A notice of intent to appear at the Final Fairness Hearing if there is an intention to speak at the Final Fairness Hearing. The mailing addresses for the Court, the Settlement Administrator, Class Counsel, and Carwell s Counsel are noted above. 18. What s the difference between objecting and excluding myself ( opting out )? Objecting is simply telling the Court that you don t like something about the Settlement. You can object only if you stay in the Class. Excluding yourself ( opting out ) is telling the Court that you don t want to be part of the Class. If you exclude yourself, you have no basis to object because the case no longer affects you. If you object to any of the terms of the Settlement, the Court will consider your objections when deciding whether to grant final approval to the Settlement at the final fairness hearing. THE COURT S FINAL FAIRNESS HEARING 19. When and where will the Court decide whether to approve the proposed Settlement? The Court will hold a Final Fairness Hearing in Department 14, United States District Court, For the Central District of California, Western Division, 312 North Spring Street, Los Angeles, CA on November 9, 2015, at 1:30 p.m. At this Final Fairness Hearing the Court will determine whether the proposed Settlement should be finally approved as fair, reasonable, and adequate. The Court will also be asked to approve Class Counsel s request for Attorneys Fees, Costs, the Enhancement or Service Payment Award, and the Settlement Administration Expenses. The Court may reschedule the Final Fairness Hearing without further notice to Class Members. Page 7 of 8
8 20. Do I have to come to the hearing? No. Class Counsel will answer any questions the Court may have. But you are welcome to come at your own expense. GETTING MORE INFORMATION 21. Who can I contact if I have questions about the proposed Settlement? You may contact the attorneys for the Plaintiff/Class Representative, Class Counsel, listed above if you have any questions about the proposed Settlement. You may also contact the Settlement Administrator by calling toll free 1-(888) , or you can write to Djukich vs. Carwell, LLC, c/o CPT Group, Inc., Aston, Irvine, CA Please do not contact the Clerk of the Court, the Judge, Carwell, or Carwell s Counsel. ADDITIONAL IMPORTANT INFORMATION A. Carwell will not retaliate in any manner whatsoever against any Class Member who stays in the Class and receives his Class Benefit or opts out of the Settlement. B. To receive your Class Benefit check, it is your responsibility to ensure that the Settlement Administrator has your current mailing address and telephone number on file. Again, if your address shown on the attached Employment Information Sheet is not accurate, you must return the enclosed Change of Address form to the Settlement Administrator. You may contact the Settlement Administrator at the toll-free number listed at the bottom of each page to confirm it has been received. Page 8 of 8
Superior Court of California, County of San Diego Webb v. Allstate Insurance Company Case No. 37-2013-00077708
Superior Court of California, County of San Diego Webb v. Allstate Insurance Company Case No. 37-2013-00077708 A court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation. This is not a lawsuit against
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA If you are a current or former user of PayPal in the United States who had an active PayPal account between April 19, 2006 and November
More informationUnited States District Court, District of Minnesota. Rasschaert v. Frontier Communications Corp. Case No. 11-cv-02963 DWF/JSM
United States District Court, District of Minnesota Rasschaert v. Frontier Communications Corp. Case No. 11-cv-02963 DWF/JSM NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT, AND HEARING A court
More informationYOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that a proposed class settlement (the Class Settlement ) of the above entitled purported
LEGAL NOTICE: If you worked for PLS Financial Solutions of California, Inc. (formerly Payday Loan Store of California, Inc.) or PLS Check Cashers of California, Inc. as an hourly paid or non exempt employee
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA BEHZAD MOUSAI, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, vs. Plaintiffs, CLASS/COLLECTIVE ACTION Case No. C 06-01993 SI NOTICE
More informationAs a current or former non-exempt PPG employee, you may be entitled to receive money from a class action settlement.
NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND HEARING DATE FOR COURT APPROVAL Penaloza, et al., v. PPG Industries, Inc., Case No. BC471369 As a current or former non-exempt PPG employee, you may be entitled
More informationCase 3:06-cv-00701-MJR-DGW Document 526 Filed 07/20/15 Page 1 of 8 Page ID #13631 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Case 3:06-cv-00701-MJR-DGW Document 526 Filed 07/20/15 Page 1 of 8 Page ID #13631 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ANTHONY ABBOTT, et al., ) ) No: 06-701-MJR-DGW Plaintiffs,
More informationLEGAL NOTICE BY ORDER OF THE COURT
LEGAL NOTICE BY ORDER OF THE COURT IF YOU USED A CHECK PROVIDED BY CAPITAL ONE TO TRANSFER A BALANCE ON YOUR CAPITAL ONE CREDIT CARD ACCOUNT IN APRIL OR MAY 2009, YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO BENEFITS UNDER
More informationUnited States District Court for the Southern District of California Case No. 11-md-2286 MMA (MDD)
NOTICE AND FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ( FAQ ) NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT IN RE: MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT, INC., TELEPHONE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT LITIGATION United States District Court
More informationThe two sides disagree on how much money, if any, could have been awarded if Plaintiffs, on behalf of the class, were to prevail at trial.
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES If you are a subscriber of Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc. and you, or your dependent, have been diagnosed with an autism spectrum disorder, you could receive
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA VERA WILLNER, ET AL. V. MANPOWER INC., CASE NO. 3:11-CV-02846-JST (MEJ)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA VERA WILLNER, ET AL. V. MANPOWER INC., CASE NO. 3:11-CV-02846-JST (MEJ) IMPORTANT: You are not being sued. Please read this Notice carefully.
More informationLEGAL NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT
LEGAL NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT The Records of Trina Turk reflect that you may be part of the proposed FACTA and/or Song Beverly Settlement Classes described as follows: All individuals
More informationUnited States District Court for the Northern District of California
United States District Court for the Northern District of California IF YOU RECEIVED A NON-EMERGENCY MORTGAGE OR CREDIT CARD DEFAULT SERVICING CALL OR TEXT ON YOUR CELLULAR TELEPHONE FROM BANK OF AMERICA
More informationNOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT
Patricia Buzenes v. Nuvell Financial Services LLC, et al. Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case No. BC407366 The Court ordered this Notice This is not a solicitation from a lawyer and You are not being
More informationNOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Mirkarimi v. Nevada Property 1 LLC dba The Cosmopolitan of Las Vegas S.D. Cal. Case No. 12-cv-02160-BTM (DHB)
NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Mirkarimi v. Nevada Property 1 LLC dba The Cosmopolitan of Las Vegas S.D. Cal. Case No. 12-cv-02160-BTM (DHB) PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY. THIS NOTICE CONTAINS IMPORTANT
More informationSUMMARY OF SETTLEMENT. This notice explains the lawsuit, the settlement, your rights and the potential distribution of settlement funds.
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SOLANO Lori Davis, Michelle Smith and Paul Stockman, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and on behalf of the general public,
More informationNOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES Ilya Zaydenberg v. Crocs Retail, Inc., et al. Los Angeles County Superior Court Case No. BC554214; Christopher S. DuRee, et al. v.
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES If you received a call from or on behalf of Los Angeles Times Communications LLC, you could be entitled to benefits under a class
More informationA United States District Court has authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA If you paid money to invest in certain Real Estate Partners, Inc. Investment Funds (Income Fund I, Income Fund II, Income Fund III, Unit Investment
More informationSETTLEMENT CLASS NOTICE. A class action settlement involving homeowners insurance claims may provide payments to those who qualify.
SETTLEMENT CLASS NOTICE IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF INDEPENDENCE COUNTY, ARKANSAS A class action settlement involving homeowners insurance claims may provide payments to those who qualify. There is a class
More informationSUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES If You Bought Mario Badescu Healing Cream or Control Cream At Any Time Since February 15, 2009 You Could Get One or Two $45 Certificates
More informationU.S. BANK CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT
U.S. BANK CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT If you are or were employed by U.S. BANK, N.A. as an In-Store Banker 1, In-Store Banker 2, Senior In-Store Banker 1, and/or Senior In-Store Banker 2 at In-Store
More informationNOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE OF CLAIMS
NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE OF CLAIMS If you are a current or former installation technician of Cable Communications, Inc. and worked in Oregon, please read this Notice carefully.
More informationCircuit Court of St. Louis County, Missouri YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT
Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Missouri NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND HEARING A court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. If you paid an
More informationIf you worked as a Service Technician at Source Refrigeration & HVAC, you could get a payment from this class action settlement.
United States District Court for the Northern District of California If you worked as a Service Technician at Source Refrigeration & HVAC, you could get a payment from this class action settlement. A federal
More informationQUESTIONS? CALL 1 (844) 322-8152 OR VISIT WWW.SPARKEMAILSETTLEMENT.COM 1
Notice of Settlement And Hearing Date for Court Approval Kristina Kirby, et al. v. Spark Networks, Inc., et al., Civil Case No. BC493892 Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles
More informationNOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, FAIRNESS HEARING, AND RIGHT TO APPEAR IMPORTANT NEW INFORMATION READ CAREFULLY AND DO NOT DISCARD
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, FAIRNESS HEARING, AND RIGHT TO APPEAR IMPORTANT NEW INFORMATION READ CAREFULLY AND DO
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT NOTICE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION RONALD C. BETTEN and ESTHER LAFA, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals, Case No. CV13-02885-CBM-(FFMx)
More informationUnited States District Court for the Northern District of California
United States District Court for the Northern District of California If You Purchased a Tour from Viator between October 16, 2008 and June 7, 2014 that Was Advertised as Discounted with No Text Describing
More informationNOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED PARTIAL SETTLEMENT, AND HEARING DATE FOR COURT APPROVAL
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR FLAGLER COUNTY, FLORIDA WILLIAM G. MAYFIELD, on behalf of himself and all other persons similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. CASE NO. 2009-CA-002245
More informationNotice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement of Class Action
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Clark v. LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc., Case No.: 3:13-cv-0485-JM-JMA Notice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement of Class Action A settlement
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION
WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA ELECTRICAL EMPLOYEES PENSION FUND, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, vs. DENNIS ALTER, et al., Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN
More informationCase No. CV-08-00810 R NOTICE TO CLASS OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA STEPHEN STETSON, SHANE LAVIGNE, CHRISTINE LEIGH BROWN-ROBERTS, VALENTIN YUI KARPENKO, and JAKE JEREMIAH FATHY, individually and on behalf of
More informationYour Legal Rights and Options in this Settlement:
Notice of Proposed Class Action Settlement If you subpoenaed or requested pharmacy records of another person from Rite Aid, and you were charged and paid a fixed, flat-fee $50 or $85 invoice for their
More informationReasons for Settlement: Avoids the costs and risks associated with continued litigation, including the danger of no recovery.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x : IN RE: NEVSUN RESOURCES LTD. : Civil Action No. 12 Civ. 1845 (PGG) :
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Master File No. 3:10-cv-02502-CAB-DHB CLASS ACTION
CONSTRUCTION WORKERS PENSION TRUST FUND LAKE COUNTY AND VICINITY, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, vs. GENOPTIX, INC., et al., Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT
More informationThe St. Paul Companies, Inc. Securities Litigation. c/o The Garden City Group, Inc.
Must be Postmarked No Later Than September 12, 2004 PART I: CLAIMANT IDENTIFICATION Claim Number: Control Number: The St. Paul Companies, Inc. Securities Litigation c/o The Garden City Group, Inc. Claims
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS PEORIA DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS PEORIA DIVISION JONATHAN DANIEL, ) ) Plaintiff, ) No. 14 CV 01232 ) vs. ) ) Honorable Michael M. Mihm THE CITY OF PEORIA, et al.,
More informationEmployee Settlement and Release Agreement.
Form: Description: Release: No Disparagement: References: Review by Counsel: Employee Settlement and Release Agreement. This is a sample form agreement for the settlement of any claims by an employee against
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT If you paid a practice assessment to the American Psychological Association Practice Organization, you
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. ED-CV-08-01249-GW(JCx) CLASS ACTION
MARCELO CUNHA, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, vs. Plaintiff, HANSEN NATURAL CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EASTERN
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION CASE No. 5:13-CV-04303-LHK
PAUL PERKINS, et al. Plaintiffs, v. LINKEDIN CORPORATION, Defendant. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION CASE No. 5:13-CV-04303-LHK NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION AND
More informationNotice of Class Action Lawsuit and Proposed Settlement. You May be Entitled to Receive a Settlement Payment.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA Notice of Class Action Lawsuit and Proposed Settlement. You May be Entitled to Receive a Settlement Payment. A federal court authorized this
More informationREQUEST FOR EXCLUSION FROM SETTLEMENT. JENKINS V. GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF THE GREATER EAST BAY, INC., Alameda County Superior Court Case No.
JENKINS V GOODWILL SETTLEMENT ADMINISTRATOR C/O RUST CONSULTING, INC. - 4347 PO BOX 2396 FARIBAULT, MN 55021-9096 IMPORTANT LEGAL MATERIALS *Barcode39* -
More informationTO: ALL PERSONS AND BUSINESSES WITH A VERIZON.NET EMAIL ADDRESS
TO: ALL PERSONS AND BUSINESSES WITH A VERIZON.NET EMAIL ADDRESS This Notice Is Given To Inform You Of The Proposed Settlement Of A Class Action. If The Settlement Is Approved By The Court, Certain Benefits
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING THIS NOTICE MAY AFFECT YOUR RIGHTS PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY
SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF KING MYSPINE, PS, a Washington professional services corporation; BODY RECOVERY CLINIC LLC, a Washington Limited Liability Company; and YAROSLAV KUTSY, Plaintiffs,
More informationSETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE This Settlement Agreement and Release ( Agreement ) is made and entered into by and between Cheryl Coryea ( Coryea or Plaintiff ), and Rochester Independent School District
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT ST. CLAIR COUNTY, ILLINOIS NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION
NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION If you were injured or provided treatment for an injury and filed a claim under your Allstate Med Pay coverage, and were compensated in an amount
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION
In re CELERA CORP. SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION No. 5:10-cv-02604-EJD(HRL CLASS ACTION NOTICE
More informationNOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT
NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Hoover v. Hi Tech Pharmacal Co., Inc. Case No. EDCV 13 00097 JGB (OPx) If you purchased a product manufactured by Hi Tech Pharmacal Co., Inc., called Nasal Ease
More informationIf You Purchased StarKist Tuna, You May Benefit From A Proposed Class Action Settlement
United States District Court for the Northern District of California If You Purchased StarKist Tuna, You May Benefit From A Proposed Class Action Settlement A federal court authorized this notice. This
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT TO: All persons who are domiciled or reside in the United States or its territories and whose
More informationNotice of Proposed Class Action Settlement and Fairness Hearing
Notice of Proposed Class Action Settlement and Fairness Hearing Minor, et al. v. Congoleum Corporation United States District Court District Of New Jersey Case No.: 3:13-cv-07727-PGS-LHG This is a Notice
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND FAIRNESS HEARING
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND FAIRNESS HEARING This notice relates to the proposed settlement of a class and collective action lawsuit against First
More informationIn re CRM Holdings, Ltd. Securities Litigation c/o GCG P.O. Box 10129 Dublin, OH 43017-3129 Toll-Free: 1 (844) 322-8246
Must be Postmarked No Later Than March 18, 2015 In re CRM Holdings, Ltd Securities Litigation c/o GCG PO Box 10129 Dublin, OH 43017-3129 Toll-Free: 1 (844) 322-8246 CRH *P-CRH-POC/1* Control No: Claim
More informationSubmit a Valid Claim Form Deadline: February 12, 2016 Ask to be excluded Deadline: November 24, 2015. Object Deadline: November 24, 2015
NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT California Superior Court, County of Los Angeles IF FIRE INSURANCE EXCHANGE APPLIED DEPRECIATION WHEN CALCULATING A PAYMENT MADE TO YOU ON A PROPERTY LOSS INSURANCE CLAIM,
More informationIf You Were Sent a Text Message from The Western Union Company, You May Be Entitled to a Payment from a Class Action Settlement.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS If You Were Sent a Text Message from The Western Union Company, You May Be Entitled to a Payment from a Class Action Settlement. A federal
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE No. 09-CV-01084-JCC
THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR JUSTIN GAWRONSKI and A. BRUGUIER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT
More informationNotice of Proposed Settlement of Class Action
Notice of Proposed Settlement of Class Action TO: All persons who purchased, owned, or leased a Mercedes-Benz passenger vehicle between August 22, 2004 through May 31, 2010 in California that was the subject
More informationSample Settlement Agreement and Release for an Employment Law Claim
Sample Settlement Agreement and Release for an Employment Law Claim As submitted to the Missouri Bar Association Labor and Employment Law Committee October 2004 Drafted by a Committee working group comprised
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, KING COUNTY NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, KING COUNTY NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT If you paid money to Microsoft for an MSN account established in your name at a Best Buy store, never logged
More informationIf you received a wrong-number call related to a Verizon debt, you could get benefits and your rights may be affected by a class action settlement
If you received a wrong-number call related to a Verizon debt, you could get benefits and your rights may be affected by a class action settlement Haga clic aquí para ver este aviso en espanol There is
More informationThis Class Action Settlement May Affect Your Rights A Court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.
Garrett Kacsuta, et al., v. Lenovo (United States) Inc. Case No. 13-cv-00316-CJC (RNBx) OWNERS OF CERTAIN MODELS OF LENOVO BRAND ULTRABOOK COMPUTERS MAY CLAIM SETTLEMENT BENEFITS. This Class Action Settlement
More information1. What is this lawsuit about? 2. 4. What are the numbers from which AmeriCredit may have dialed Class Members? 2
Newman v. AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc., 11cv3041-DMS-BLM (S.D. Cal.) United States District Court Southern District of California [www.newmanamericreditsettlement.com] Frequently Asked Questions
More informationI. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA In re ACE LIMITED SECURITIES LITIGATION ) MDL No. 1675 ) CLASS ACTION PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE I. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS 1. To recover as a
More informationLEGAL NOTICE BY ORDER OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
LEGAL NOTICE BY ORDER OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE If you took out an Orange Mortgage or Easy Orange Mortgage from ING Bank from October 1, 2005 to May 31, 2009, or
More informationPicchi v. World Financial Network Bank, et al. Case No.: 11 CV 61797- Altonaga / O Sullivan
Picchi v. World Financial Network Bank, et al. Case No.: 11 CV 61797- Altonaga / O Sullivan United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida www.picchiclasssettlement.com Frequently Asked
More informationOFFICIAL COURT NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT
OFFICIAL COURT NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT KELLY MINICH AND DEBBIE MINICH, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Superior Court of California, County of San Diego v. Plaintiffs, Case No.
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA 1 1 In re LONGS DRUG STORES CORP. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. Lead Case No. C-0-0 CLASS ACTION FINAL JUDGMENT
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA GABRIEL JOHNSON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiffs, Case No. 1-09-CV-146501 CLASS ACTION Judge:
More informationFILE A CLAIM EXCLUDE YOURSELF FROM THE SETTLEMENT DO NOTHING OBJECT TO THE SETTLEMENT ATTEND THE HEARING
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA Your Personal ID # is Your Access Code is If you made a workers compensation claim in South Carolina under an AIG
More informationCOMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS SUPERIOR COURT DEPARTMENT BUSINESS LITIGATION SESSION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS SUFFOLK, ss SUPERIOR COURT DEPARTMENT BUSINESS LITIGATION SESSION JAMES MAGIDSON and CHRISTOPHER MILLSON, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs,
More informationPROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM
A. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS & INFORMATION PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE FORM 1. You are urged to read carefully the accompanying Notice of Pendency of Class Action and Proposed Settlement, Settlement Fairness
More informationA State Court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.
NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Mount v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. d/b/a America s Servicing Company Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles Case No. BC395959 A State Court authorized
More informationNOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT
NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT TO: All persons and entities which have paid the City of Ferndale (the City ) for water and sanitary sewage disposal services between January 22, 2008 and December
More informationSETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE OF ALL CLAIMS
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE OF ALL CLAIMS This Settlement Agreement And Release Of All Claims ( Agreement ) is made and entered by and between [EMPLOYEE] and the Municipality of Anchorage and [MUNICIPAL
More informationIf you purchased a Bosch or Siemens 27 front-loading washing machine, you may be entitled to a cash payment.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA If you purchased a Bosch or Siemens 27 front-loading washing machine, you may be entitled to a cash payment. Includes: Nexxt, Vision,
More informationCase3:09-md-02032-MMC Document345 Filed08/09/12 Page1 of 7
Case:0-md-00-MMC Document Filed0/0/1 Page1 of 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 In Re: Chase Bank USA, N.A. Check Loan Contract Litigation THIS DOCUMENT APPLIES TO ALL ACTIONS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT
More informationEXHIBIT A Proposed Notice UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN You have been identified as a member of a class which has been the subject of a settlement. This settlement may
More informationYour legal rights are affected whether you act or don t act. Please read this Notice carefully.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA If you are the original owner of certain MacBook or MacBook Pro computers and/or you purchased a standalone 60W or 85W MagSafe power adapter
More informationIOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR DALLAS COUNTY
IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR DALLAS COUNTY If you paid for food purchases between January 1, 2000 and August 1, 2014 at an Iowa-based prekindergarten, elementary school, middle school, or high school that,
More informationNOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT
A FEDERAL COURT ORDERED THIS NOTICE. THIS IS NOT A SOLICITATION FROM A LAWYER. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Soutter v. Equifax Information Services, LLC Civil Action No. 3:10-cv-107
More information: : : : : : : : A federal court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ----------------------------------------------------------x IN RE SAMSUNG DLP TELEVISION CLASS ACTION LITIGATION This Document Relates to ALL ACTIONS
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE. No. 2:08-md-01919-MJP. Lead Case No. C07-1874 MJP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE IN RE WASHINGTON MUTUAL, INC. SECURITIES, DERIVATIVE AND ERISA LITIGATION This Document Relates to: ERISA Action No. 2:08-md-01919-MJP
More informationNotice of Class Action and Proposed Settlement
Notice of Class Action and Proposed Settlement A court authorized this notice. It is not a solicitation from a lawyer. It relates to matters that may be of interest to disabled residents and visitors of
More information, and which are the basis for an action
SAMPLE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE FOR AN Eh4PLOYMENT LAW CLAIM This Settlement Agreement and Release ("Agreement") is made and entered into by and between (hereinafter referred to as "Claimant")
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CELESTE COONAN on behalf of all others similarly situated, Civil Action No.: 1:13-cv-00353 v. Plaintiff, NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION
More informationNOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT GRECO V. SELECTION MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INC. San Diego Superior Court Case No. 37-2014-00085074-CU-BT-CTL
NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT GRECO V. SELECTION MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INC. San Diego Superior Court Case No. 37-2014-00085074-CU-BT-CTL The Superior Court has authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 2:06-cv-02674-DLR CLASS ACTION
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 617 PENSION AND WELFARE FUNDS, on behalf of itself and all other similarly situated, Plaintiff, vs. APOLLO GROUP, INC., et al., Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
More informationLEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS LAWSUIT: The only way to potentially receive money from this Settlement.
LEGAL NOTICE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Individuals Whose Minnesota Driver s License Records Were Accessed for Illegitimate Reasons May Benefit from a Class Action Settlement.
More informationYour Legal Rights and Options in this Settlement
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF WAYNE NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT If you owned, occupied and/or resided within residential property located within the Class Addresses on June 5-6,
More informationHow To Settle A Lawsuit Against The City Of Naperville
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE THIS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE is hereby entered into as of the 3 rd day of September 2015, by and between MALIA KIM BENDIS ( PLAINTIFF ) and SERGEANT NICK LIBERIO,
More informationYOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ROME DIVISION A federal court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. A Settlement will provide $19,560.00
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Keith Moran, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, vs. Lurcat, LLC, d/b/a Café Lurcat, Plaintiff, Defendant. No.: 10-cv-03031 (JNE/FLN
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY STEPHEN TREWIN and JOSEPH FARHATT, On Behalf of Themselves And All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, vs. CHURCH & DWIGHT CO., INC., Defendant. Civ.
More informationA federal court directed this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA If You Were Sent a Text Message from Hollister Co., Abercrombie & Fitch Co., Gilly Hicks, and / or abercrombie kids, You May Be Entitled
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLORADO
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLORADO If you initiated a money transfer in the United States with Western Union between January 1, 2001 and January 3, 2013 and your money transfer was not redeemed
More informationUnited States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois IF AUTOMATED COLLECTION CALLS OR ACCOUNT INFORMATION CALLS OR TEXTS RELATING TO A CHASE CREDIT CARD OR BANK ACCOUNT WERE DIRECTED TO YOUR
More informationNOTICE OF PENDING CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT
Karen Washington v. Key Health Medical Solutions Inc. NOTICE OF PENDING CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT READ THIS NOTICE FULLY AND CAREFULLY; THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT MAY AFFECT YOUR RIGHTS! IF YOU
More informationPARTICIPANT APPLICATION & RELEASE. * For verification purposes only pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 2256 et seq.
PARTICIPANT APPLICATION & RELEASE * For verification purposes only pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 2256 et seq. Have you ever been through a major hardship/tragedy? (hurricane, tornado, fire, earthquake, major
More information